XML 26 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.4
Significant Accounting Policies
Dec. 25, 2019
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Significant Accounting Policies Significant Accounting Policies:
(a)    Principles of Consolidation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and include the accounts of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions were eliminated upon consolidation. 

(b)    Use of Estimates: The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include vessel impairment, vessel valuations, residual value of vessels, the useful lives of vessels, the value of stock-based compensation, fair value of the Convertible Bond Debt (as defined below) and its equity component, estimated losses on our trade receivables, fair value of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities and the fair value of derivatives. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(c)    Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash: The Company considers highly liquid investments such as time deposits and certificates of deposit with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. The restricted cash - current balance relates to the proceeds from the sale of vessels, which were restricted pursuant to the terms under the Norwegian Bond Debt. Please see Note 6 Debt for additional information. Additionally, the Company also had restricted cash - noncurrent of $0.1 million for collateralizing a letter of credit on our office lease as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash within the Consolidated Balance Sheets that sum to the total amounts shown in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019December 31, 2018December 31, 2017
Cash and cash equivalents$69,927,594 $53,583,898 $67,209,753 $56,251,044 
Restricted cash - current18,846,177 5,471,470 — — 
Restricted cash - noncurrent75,000 74,917 10,953,885 74,917 
$88,848,771 $59,130,285 $78,163,638 $56,325,961 

(d)    Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable includes receivables from charterers for time and voyage charterers. On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses” (“ASC 326”). At each balance sheet date, the Company maintains an allowance for credit losses for expected uncollectible accounts receivable. The Company wrote off $0.8 million and $0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, related to previously reserved amounts in the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company recorded a provision of $0.7 million and $1.3 million respectively, for doubtful accounts for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

(e)    Insurance Claims: Insurance claims are recorded net of any deductible amounts for insured damages which are recognized when recovery is virtually certain under the related insurance policies and where the Company can make an estimate of the amount to be reimbursed following the insurance claim.

(f)    Inventories: Inventories, which consist of bunkers, are stated at cost which is determined on a first-in, first-out method. Lubes and spares are expensed as incurred.

(g)    Short-term Investments: The Company considers liquid investments such as certificate of deposits with an original maturity of greater than three months as investments.

(h)    Vessels and vessel improvements, at cost: Vessels are stated at cost, which consists of the contract price, and other direct costs relating to acquiring and placing the vessels in service. Major vessel improvements such as scrubbers and ballast water systems are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining useful lives of the vessels. Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the vessels based on the cost of the vessels reduced by the estimated scrap value of the vessels as discussed below.

(i)    Vessel useful economic life and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets: The Company estimates the useful life of the Company's vessels to be 25 years from the date of initial delivery from the shipyard to the original owner. The useful lives of the Company's vessels are evaluated to determine if events have occurred which would require modification to their useful lives. In addition, the Company estimates the scrap value of the vessels to be $300 per light weight ton ("lwt").

The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. When the estimate of undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest charges, expected to be generated by the use of the asset is less than its carrying amount, the Company will evaluate the asset for an impairment loss. Measurement of the impairment loss is based on the fair value of the asset as provided by third parties. The Company reviews on an annual basis all the assumptions used in the calculation of undiscounted cash flows. Based on the review, for the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company made a decision to use 15 year average of one and three year time charter rates as published by a third party (Clarksons.com) in its calculation of undiscounted cash flows. Historically, the Company utilized 25 year average of one and three year time charter rates. This is considered a change in accounting estimate. The change in accounting estimate did not
have any material impact on its consolidated financial statements. We did not recognize a vessel impairment charge for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

(j)    Accounting for Drydocking Costs: The Company follows the deferral method of accounting for drydocking costs whereby actual costs incurred are deferred and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the period through the date the next drydocking is required to become due, generally 30 months if the vessels are 15 years old or more and 60 months for the vessels younger than 15 years. Costs deferred as part of the drydocking include direct costs that are incurred as part of the drydocking to meet regulatory requirements. Certain costs are capitalized during drydocking if they are expenditures that add economic life to the vessel, increase the vessel’s earnings capacity or improve the vessel’s efficiency. Direct costs that are deferred include the shipyard costs, parts, inspection fees, steel, blasting and painting. Expenditures for normal maintenance and repairs, whether incurred as part of the drydocking or not, are expensed as incurred. Unamortized drydocking costs of vessels that are sold are written off and included in the calculation of the resulting gain or loss in the year of the vessels’ sale. Unamortized drydocking costs are written off as drydocking expense if the vessels are drydocked before the expiration of the applicable amortization period.

(k)    Deferred Financing Costs: Fees incurred for obtaining new loans or refinancing existing ones are deferred and amortized to interest expense over the life of the related debt using the effective interest method. Unamortized deferred financing costs are written off when the related debt is repaid or refinanced and such amounts are expensed in the period the repayment or refinancing is made. Such amounts are classified as a reduction of the long-term debt balance on the consolidated balance sheets. For our Super Senior Revolver Facility, as no amounts had been drawn as of December 31, 2019, deferred financing fees of $0.2 million were classified as a noncurrent asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2019. As of December 31, 2020, deferred financing fees of $0.1 million was shown as a reduction of the outstanding debt under Super Senior Facility on our Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(l)    Other fixed assets: Other fixed assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is based on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset. Other fixed assets consist principally of leasehold improvements, computers and software and are depreciated over three years. Depreciation expense for other fixed assets for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $0.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

(m)    Accounting for Revenues and Expenses: Revenues generated from time charters and/or revenues generated from profit sharing arrangements are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective time charter agreements as service is provided and the profit sharing is fixed and determinable.

Under voyage charters, voyage revenues for cargo transportation are recognized ratably over the estimated relative transit time of each voyage. Voyage revenue is deemed to commence upon the loading of the charterer’s cargo and is deemed to end upon the completion of discharge, provided an agreed non-cancellable charter between the Company and the charterer is in existence, the charter rate is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

Under voyage charters, voyage expenses include costs such as bunkers, port charges, canal tolls and cargo handling operations, whereas, under time charters, such voyage costs are the responsibility of the Company's customers. Vessel operating costs include crewing, vessel maintenance and vessel insurance. Brokerage commissions under voyage or time charters are included in voyage expenses. All voyage and vessel operating expenses are expensed as incurred on an accrual basis, except for commissions. Commissions are recognized over the related time or voyage charter period since commissions are earned as the Company's revenues are earned. Probable losses on voyages are provided for in full at the time such loss can be estimated.

We adopted Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASC 606”) as of January 1, 2018 utilizing the modified retrospective method of transition. We recorded an
adjustment of approximately $0.8 million to increase our opening accumulated deficit and increase our Unearned revenue and Other current assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet on January 1, 2018.

We adopted Accounting Standards Update 2016-02, “Leases”, (“ASC 842”) on January 1, 2019 which resulted in the recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets and related lease liabilities for operating leases of $30.5 million in Total Assets and Total Liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheet on January 1, 2019. Additionally, the Company netted $1.8 million, which was previously recorded as fair value on time charters acquired in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2018 against the Operating lease right-of-use assets upon adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019.
Operating lease right-of-use assets are assessed for any potential impairment on each balance sheet date. During the second quarter of 2020, the Company determined that there were impairment indicators present for one of our chartered-in vessel contracts and, as a result, we recorded an operating lease impairment of $0.4 million. The operating lease impairment was included as a component of operating (loss)/income in our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.

(n)    Unearned Charter Hire Revenue: Unearned charter hire revenue represents cash received from charterers prior to the time such amounts are earned. These amounts are recognized as revenue as services are provided in future periods.
(o)    Repairs and Maintenance: All repair and maintenance expenses are expensed as incurred and are recorded in vessel expenses.
(p)    Protection and Indemnity Insurance: The Company’s Protection and Indemnity Insurance is subject to additional premiums referred to as "back calls" or "supplemental calls" which are accounted for on an accrual basis and are recorded in vessel expenses.

(q)    Earnings Per Share: Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing the net income or loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the impact of stock options, warrants and restricted stock under the treasury stock method unless their impact is anti-dilutive. Convertible Bond Debt is included in diluted earnings per share based on the if-converted method.

(r)    Interest Rate Risk Management: The Company is exposed to the impact of interest rate changes for outstanding debt under the New Ultraco Debt Facility and Super Senior Facility. The Company's objective is to manage the impact of interest rate changes on its earnings and cash flows. On March 31, 2020, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement (“IRS”) to effectively convert a portion of its debt under the New Ultraco Debt Facility from a floating to a fixed-rate basis. The Company entered into two additional IRS agreements during the second quarter of 2020 to convert the remaining portion of its outstanding debt under the New Ultraco Debt Facility excluding the revolver facility. The IRS was designated and qualified as a cash flow hedge. The amount of the net payment obligation is based on the notional amount of the IRS and the prevailing market interest rates. The Company may terminate the IRS prior to their expiration dates, at which point a realized gain or loss would be recognized. The value of the Company’s commitment would increase or decrease based primarily on the extent to which interest rates move against the rate fixed for each swap.

(s)    Federal Taxes: The Company is a Republic of the Marshall Islands Corporation. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, the Company believes that its operations qualify for Internal Revenue Code Section 883 exemption and therefore are not subject to United States federal taxes on United States source shipping income.

(t)    Stock-based compensation: The Company issues stock-based compensation utilizing both stock options and stock grants. In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 718, "Stock Compensation", ("ASC 718"), stock-based compensation is measured at the fair value of the award at the date of grant and
recognized over the period of vesting on a straight-line basis using the graded vesting method. The grant-date fair value of stock options is estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Forfeitures are recognized as they occur.

Impact of Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

Leases

    On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASC 842. ASC 842 revises the accounting for leases. Under the new lease standard, lessees are required to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for substantially all leases. The new lease standard will continue to classify leases as either financing or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition. The accounting applied by a lessor under the new guidance will be substantially equivalent to current lease accounting guidance.

    The following are the type of contracts that fall under ASC 842:

Time charter out contracts
    
    Our shipping revenues are principally generated from time charters and voyage charters. In a time charter contract, the vessel is hired by the charterer for a specified period of time in exchange for consideration which is based on a daily hire rate. The charterer has the full discretion over the ports visited, shipping routes and vessel speed. The contract/charter party generally provides typical warranties regarding the speed and performance of the vessel. The charter party generally has some owner protective restrictions such that the vessel is sent only to safe ports by the charterer, subject always to compliance with applicable sanction laws, and carry only lawful or non-hazardous cargo. In a time charter contract, the Company is responsible for all the costs incurred for running the vessel such as crew costs, vessel insurance, repairs and maintenance and lubes. The charterer bears the voyage related costs such as bunker expenses, port charges and canal tolls during the hire period. The performance obligations in a time charter contract are satisfied over the term of the contract beginning when the vessel is delivered to the charterer until it is redelivered back to the Company. The charterer generally pays the charter hire in advance of the upcoming contract period. The Company determined that all time charter contracts are considered operating leases and therefore fall under the scope of ASC 842 because: (i) the vessel is an identifiable asset; (ii) the Company does not have substantive substitution rights; and (iii) the charterer has the right to control the use of the vessel during the term of the contract and derives the economic benefits from such use.

    The transition guidance associated with ASC 842 allows for certain practical expedients to the lessors. The Company elected not to separate the lease and non-lease components included in the time charter revenue because the pattern of revenue recognition for the lease and non-lease components (included in the daily hire rate) is the same. The daily hire rate represents the hire rate for a bare boat charter as well as the compensation for expenses incurred running the vessel such as crewing expense, repairs, insurance, maintenance and lubes. Both the lease and non-lease components are earned by passage of time.

    The adoption of ASC 842 did not materially impact our accounting for time charter out contracts. The revenue generated from time charter out contracts is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective time charter agreements, which are recorded as part of revenues, net in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

Time charter-in contracts

    The Company charters in vessels to supplement our own fleet and employs them both on time charters and voyage charters. The time charter-in contracts range in lease terms from 30 days to 2 years. The Company elected the practical expedient of ASC 842 that allows for time charter-in contracts with an initial lease term of less than 12 months to be excluded from the operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities recognized on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 1, 2019. The Company recognized the operating lease right-of-use assets and the corresponding lease liabilities on the Consolidated Balance sheet for time charter-in contracts greater than 12
months on the date of adoption of ASC 842. The Company will continue to recognize the lease payments for all vessel operating leases as charter hire expenses on the consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

    Under ASC 842, leases are classified as either finance or operating arrangements, with such classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in an entity's income statement. For operating leases, ASC 842 requires recognition in an entity’s income statement of a single lease expense, calculated so that the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease term, generally on a straight-line basis. Right-of-use assets represent a right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and the related lease liability represents an obligation to make lease payments pursuant to the contractual terms of the lease agreement.

    At lease commencement, a lessee must develop a discount rate to calculate the present value of the lease payments so that it can determine lease classification and measure the lease liability. When determining the discount rate to be used at lease commencement, a lessee must use the rate implicit in the lease unless that rate cannot be readily determined. When the rate implicit in the lease cannot be readily determined, the lessee should use its incremental borrowing rate. The incremental borrowing rate is the rate that reflects the interest a lessee would have to pay to borrow funds on a collateralized basis over a similar term and in a similar economic environment. The Company determined that the time charter-in contracts do not contain an implicit borrowing rate. Therefore, the Company arrived at the incremental borrowing rate by determining the Company's implied credit rating and the yield curve for debt as of January 1, 2019. The Company then interpolated the yield curve to determine the incremental borrowing rate for each lease based on the remaining lease term on the specific lease. Based on the above methodology, the Company's incremental borrowing rates ranged from 2.81% to 6.08% for the five lease contracts for which the Company recorded operating lease right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities.

    The Company has time charter-in contracts for three Ultramax vessels which are greater than 12 months as of the date of adoption of ASC 842. A brief description of each of these contracts is below:

    (i) The Company entered into an agreement effective April 28, 2017, to charter-in a 61,400 dwt, 2013 built Japanese vessel for approximately four years with options for two additional years. The hire rate for the first four years is $12,800 per day and the hire rate for the first optional year is $13,800 per day and $14,300 per day for the second optional year. The Company has determined that it will not exercise the existing options under this contract and therefore the options are not included in the calculation of the operating lease right-of-use asset. In addition, the Company’s fair value below contract value of time charters acquired of $1.8 million as of December 31, 2018, which related to the unamortized value of a prior charter with the same counterparty that had been recorded at the time of the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy, was offset against the corresponding right of use asset on this lease as of January 1, 2019.
    (ii) On May 4, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement to charter-in a 61,425 dwt 2013 built Ultramax vessel for three years with an option for an additional two years. The hire rate for the first three years is $12,700 per day and $13,750 per day for the first year option and $14,750 per day for the second year option. The Company took delivery of the vessel in the third quarter of 2018. The Company has determined that it will not exercise the existing options under this contract and therefore the options are not included in the calculation of the operating lease right-of-use asset.

    (iii) On December 9, 2018, the Company entered into an agreement to charter-in a 62,487 dwt 2016 built Ultramax vessel for two years. The hire rate for the vessel until March 2020 is $14,250 per day and $15,250 per day thereafter. The Company took delivery of the vessel in the fourth quarter of 2018. On December 25, 2019, the Company renegotiated the lease terms for another year at a hire rate of $11,600 per day. The Company accounted for this as a lease modification on December 25, 2019 and increased its lease liability and right-of-use asset on its balance sheet as of December 31, 2019 by $4.5 million. The vessel is expected to be redelivered in March 2021.

On December 22, 2020, the Company entered into an agreement to charter-in a 63,634 dwt 2021 built Ultramax vessel for a period of minimum twelve months with an option for additional three months at a hire rate of $5,900 per day plus 57% of BSI 58 average of 10 TC routes as published by the Baltic Exchange each business day.
Additionally, the Company shall share the scrubber benefit with the owners 50% calculated as the price differential between the high sulfur and low sulfur fuel oil based on actual bunker consumption during the lease period. The hire rate for the three month option would increase the fixed hire rate to $6,500 per day with no change in the rest of the terms. The vessel is expected to be delivered to the Company in the second quarter of 2021. No right-of-use asset or corresponding liability has been recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2020 since the Company did not take delivery of the vessel and as such lease term has not begun yet.

Office leases

    On October 15, 2015, the Company entered into a commercial lease agreement as a sublessee for office space in Stamford, Connecticut. The lease is effective from January 2016 through June 2023, with an average annual rent of $0.4 million. The lease is secured by a letter of credit backed by cash collateral of $0.1 million and is recorded as restricted cash - noncurrent in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019. In November 2018, the Company entered into an office lease agreement in Singapore, which expires in October 2021, with an average annual rent of $0.3 million. The Company determined the two office leases to be operating leases and recorded the lease expense as part of General and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

On July 27, 2020, the lessor on our office sublease in Stamford, Connecticut filed for Chapter 11 reorganization in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Birmingham, Alabama. On September 21, 2020, the primary landlord assumed the sublease with the existing lease terms.

Adoption of ASC 842

    The Company adopted ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, which resulted in the recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets of $28.7 million and related lease liabilities for operating leases of $30.5 million in Total Assets and Total Liabilities, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheet on January 1, 2019.

    In connection with its adoption of ASC 842, the Company elected the "package of 3" practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance, which exempts the Company from reassessing:

whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases.
any expired or existing lease classifications.
initial direct costs for any existing leases.

    Additionally, the Company elected, consistent with the practical expedient allowed under the transition guidance of ASC 842 to not separate the lease and non-lease components related to a lease contract and to account for them instead as a single lease component for the purposes of the recognition and measurement requirements of ASC 842.

    The Company elected not to use the practical expedient of hindsight in determining the lease term and in assessing the impairment of the Company's operating lease right-of-use assets.

    Prior to January 1, 2019, the Company recognized lease expense in accordance with then-existing U.S. GAAP (“prior GAAP”). Because both ASC 842 and prior GAAP generally recognize operating lease expenses on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease arrangement and the Company only has operating lease arrangements, there were no material differences between the timing and amount of lease expenses recognized under the two accounting methodologies for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

Lease Disclosures Under ASC 842

The objective of the disclosure requirements under ASC 842 is to enable users of an entity’s financial statements to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from lease arrangements. In addition to the
qualitative leasing disclosures included above, below are quantitative disclosures that are intended to meet the stated objective of ASC 842.

Operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:

DescriptionLocation in Balance Sheet
December 31, 2020 (1)
December 31, 2019 (1)
Non current assets:
Chartered-in contracts greater than 12 months (2)
Operating lease right-of-use assets$6,207,253 $18,442,965 
Office leasesOperating lease right-of-use assets1,333,618 1,967,072 
$7,540,871 $20,410,037 
Liabilities:
Chartered-in contracts greater than 12 months Current portion of operating lease liabilities$6,974,943 $12,622,524 
Office leasesCurrent portion of operating lease liabilities640,428 633,454 
Lease liabilities - current portion$7,615,371 $13,255,978 
Chartered-in contracts greater than 12 months Noncurrent portion of operating lease liabilities$— $6,974,943 
Office leasesNoncurrent portion of operating lease liabilities686,422 1,326,850 
Lease liabilities - non current portion$686,422 $8,301,793 


(1) The Operating lease right-of-use assets and Operating lease liabilities represent the present value of lease payments for the remaining term of the lease. The discount rate used ranged from 2.81% to 6.08%. The weighted average discount rate used to calculate the lease liability was 5.22%.

(2) During the second quarter of 2020, the Company determined that there were impairment indicators present for one of our chartered-in vessel contracts and, as a result, we recorded an operating lease impairment of $0.4 million. The operating lease impairment was included as component of Operating (loss)/income in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.

The table below presents the components of the Company’s lease expenses and sub-lease income on a gross basis earned from chartered-in contracts greater than 12 months for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:
DescriptionLocation in Statement of OperationsFor the Year Ended
December 31, 2020
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2019
Lease expense for chartered-in contracts less than 12 monthsCharter hire expenses$8,731,978 $28,805,970 
Lease expense for chartered-in contracts greater than 12 monthsCharter hire expenses$12,548,246 13,362,672 
Total charter hire expenses$21,280,224 42,168,642 
Lease expense for office leasesGeneral and administrative expenses$733,874 719,698 
Sub lease income from chartered-in contracts greater than 12 months *Revenues, net$8,589,156 10,259,768 

* The sub-lease income represents only time charter revenue earned on the chartered-in contracts greater than 12 months. There is additional revenue earned from voyage charters on the same chartered-in contracts which is recorded in Revenues, net in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. Additionally, there is revenue earned from time charters from chartered-in contracts less than 12 months which is included in Revenues, net in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

The cash paid for operating leases with terms greater than 12 months is $14.0 million and $14.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

The weighted average remaining lease term on our operating leases greater than 12 months is 10.4 months.

The table below provides the total amount of lease payments on an undiscounted basis on our time chartered-in contracts and office leases greater than 12 months as of December 31, 2020:

YearChartered-in contracts greater than 12 monthsOffice leasesTotal Operating leases
Discount rate upon adoption (1)
5.37 %5.80 %5.48 %
20216,982,810 700,257 7,683,067 
2022483,048 483,048 
2023244,878 244,878 
6,982,810 1,428,183 8,410,993 
Present value of lease liability6,974,943 1,326,850 8,301,793 
Lease liabilities - short term6,974,943 640,428 7,615,371 
Lease liabilities - long term— 686,422 686,422 
Total lease liabilities6,974,943 1,326,850 8,301,793 
Discount based on incremental borrowing rate$7,867 $101,333 $109,200 
(1) Discount rate upon adoption does not include the discount rate on the lease modification on December 25, 2019. The discount rate used for calculation of the right-of-use asset and the related lease liability on December 25, 2019 was 2.806%.

Revenue recognition

Voyage charters

In a voyage charter contract, the charterer hires the vessel to transport a specific agreed-upon cargo for a single voyage which may contain multiple load ports and discharge ports. The consideration in such a contract is determined on the basis of a freight rate per metric ton of cargo carried or occasionally on a lump sum basis. The charter party generally has a minimum amount of cargo. The charterer is liable for any short loading of cargo or “dead” freight. The voyage contract generally has standard payment terms of 95% freight paid within three days after completion of loading. The voyage charter party generally has a “demurrage” or “despatch” clause. As per this clause, the charterer reimburses the Company for any potential delays exceeding the allowed laytime as per the charter party clause at the ports visited which is recorded as demurrage revenue. Conversely, the charterer is given credit if the loading/discharging activities happen within the allowed laytime known as despatch resulting in a reduction in revenue. In a voyage charter contract, the performance obligations begin to be satisfied once the vessel begins loading the cargo. The Company determined that its voyage charter contracts consist of a single performance obligation of transporting the cargo within a specified time period. Therefore, the performance obligation is met evenly as the voyage progresses and the revenue is recognized on a straight line basis over the voyage days from the commencement of the loading of cargo to the completion of discharge.

The voyage contracts are considered service contracts which fall under the provisions of ASC 606 because the Company as the shipowner retains the control over the operations of the vessel such as directing the routes taken or the vessel speed. The voyage contracts generally have variable consideration in the form of demurrage or despatch. The amount of revenue earned as demurrage or despatch paid by the company for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $6.3 million and $10.7 million, respectively.
    The following table shows the revenues earned from time charters and voyage charters for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018:
        
For the Years Ended
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Time charters$105,028,131 $128,142,708 $140,006,570 
Voyage charters170,105,416 164,234,930 170,087,688 
$275,133,547 $292,377,638 $310,094,258 

Contract costs
In a voyage charter contract, the Company bears all voyage related costs such as fuel costs, port charges and canal tolls. These costs are considered contract fulfillment costs because the costs are direct costs related to the performance of the contract and are expected to be recovered. The costs incurred during the period prior to commencement of loading the cargo, primarily bunkers, are deferred as they represent setup costs and recorded as a current asset and are amortized on a straight-line basis as the related performance obligations are satisfied. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company recognized $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of deferred costs which represents bunker expenses and charter hire expenses incurred prior to commencement of loading. These costs are recorded in Other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Financial Instruments - Credit Losses

On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted ASC 326. The accounting standard amended the current financial instrument impairment model by requiring entities to use a forward-looking approach based on expected losses to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments, including trade receivables. Under the new guidance, an entity recognizes as an allowance its estimate of lifetime expected credit losses which will result in more timely recognition of such losses. The Company adopted the accounting standard using the prospective transition approach as of January 1, 2020. The cumulative effect upon adoption was not material to our consolidated financial statements.

The adoption of ASC 326 primarily impacted our trade receivables recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2020. The Company maintains an allowance for credit losses for expected uncollectible accounts receivable, which is recorded as an offset to accounts receivable and changes in such are classified as voyage expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. Upon adoption of ASC 326, the Company assessed collectability by reviewing accounts receivable on a collective basis where similar characteristics exist and on an individual basis when we identify specific customers with known disputes or collectability issues. In determining the amount of the allowance for credit losses, the Company considered historical collectability based on past due status and made judgments about the creditworthiness of customers based on ongoing credit evaluations. The Company also considered customer-specific information, current market conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts of future economic conditions to inform adjustments to historical loss data. For the year ended December 31, 2020, our assessment considered business and market disruptions caused by COVID-19 and estimates of expected emerging credit and collectability trends. The continued volatility in market conditions and evolving shifts in credit trends are difficult to predict causing variability and volatility that may have a material impact on our allowance for credit losses in future periods. The allowance for credit losses on accounts receivable was $2.4 million as of December 31, 2020 and $2.5 million as of December 31, 2019.

Accounting Standards issued but not yet adopted
The FASB has issued accounting standards that had not yet become effective as of December 31, 2020 and may impact the Company’s consolidated financial statements or related disclosures in future periods. Those standards and their potential impact are discussed below.
Accounting standards effective in 2021

In March 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2020-04, "Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting", (“ASU 2020-04”). ASU 2020-04 addresses concerns about certain accounting consequences that could result from the anticipated transition away from the use of LIBOR and other interbank offered rates to alternative reference rates. ASU 2020-04 is elective and applies “to all entities, subject to meeting certain criteria, that have contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform.” ASU 2020-04 establishes (1) a general contract modification principle that entities can apply in other areas that may be affected by reference rate reform and (2) certain elective hedge accounting expedients. ASU 2020-04 is optional and effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The Company is currently evaluating the adoption of ASU 2020-04 on its debt under the New Ultraco Debt Facility and Super Senior Facility, as both facilities bear interest on outstanding borrowings at LIBOR plus a margin rate.
    
In August 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2020-06, "Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity's Own Equity", (“ASU 2020-06”). ASU 2020-06 simplifies the accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity, including convertible instruments and contracts on an entity’s own equity. ASU 2020-06 removes from U.S. GAAP the separation models for (1) convertible debt with a cash conversion feature and (2) convertible instruments with a beneficial conversion feature. As a result, after adopting the ASU's guidance, entities will not separately present in equity an embedded conversion
feature in such debt. Instead, the entity will account for a convertible debt instrument wholly as debt, and for convertible preferred stock wholly as preferred stock (i.e., as a single unit of account), unless (1) a convertible instrument contains features that require bifurcation as a derivative under ASC 815 or (2) a convertible debt instrument was issued at a substantial premium. ASU 2020-06 is effective for all public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the adoption of ASU 2020-06 on its Convertible Bond Debt.