EX-1.01

Sonos, Inc. has included this Conflict Minerals Report as an exhibit to its Form SD as contemplated by Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Form SD (the “Conflict Minerals Rule”). The date of filing of this Conflict Minerals Report is May 30, 2023.

Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “Sonos,” “we,” “its,” “us” and “our” refer to Sonos and its consolidated subsidiaries.

As used herein and consistent with the Conflict Minerals Rule, “Conflict Minerals” or “3TG” are columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite, gold, wolframite and the derivatives tantalum, tin and tungsten, without regard to the location of origin of the minerals or derivative metals.

All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Conflict Minerals Report are forward-looking statements. In some cases, forward-looking statements may be identified by words such as "believe," "may," "will," "estimate," "continue," "anticipate," "intend," "could," "would," "expect," "objective," "plan," "potential," "seek," "grow," "target," "if," and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning the additional steps that we intend to take to mitigate the risk that our necessary 3TG benefit armed groups.

We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and these forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including (1) the continued implementation of satisfactory traceability and other compliance measures by our direct and indirect suppliers on a timely basis or at all, (2) whether smelters and refiners (“SORs”) and other market participants responsibly source 3TG and (3) political and regulatory developments, whether in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (“DRC”) or an adjoining country (collectively, the “Covered Countries”), the United States or elsewhere. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. The events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by law, we do not intend to update any of these forward-looking statements after the date of this Conflict Minerals Report or to conform these statements to actual results or revised expectations.

Sonos is one of the world’s leading sound experience brands. We are known for delivering unparalleled sound, thoughtful design aesthetic, simplicity of use, and an open platform. Our platform has attracted a broad range of more than 130 streaming content providers, such as Apple Music, Spotify, Deezer, and Pandora. We frequently introduce new services and features across our platform, providing our customers with enhanced functionality, improved sound, and an enriched user experience.

Our electronics products contain tin, tantalum, tungsten and/or gold. However, the 3TG in the products constitutes a small portion of their total materials content. For a further discussion of our products, see our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 1, 2022. The information contained in our Form 10-K is not incorporated by reference into this Conflict Minerals Report or our Form SD and should not be considered part of this Conflict Minerals Report or the Form SD.

Our products are manufactured for us by third party manufacturers. In addition, we do not directly source 3TG from SORs and believe that we are in most cases many levels removed from these market participants. However, through the efforts described in this Conflict Minerals Report, and as part of our

reasonable country of origin inquiry (“RCOI”) and due diligence processes, we seek to ensure that our suppliers source responsibly. Specifically, we endeavor in good faith to determine if any of the 3TG necessary to the functionality or production of the products that we contract to manufacture originated in a Covered Country and, if so, whether it directly or indirectly financed or benefited an armed group.

Sonos is committed to corporate social responsibility and responsible sourcing and is opposed to human rights abuses. We also take seriously our compliance obligations under the Conflict Minerals Rule. To these ends, we have adopted and communicate to our suppliers and the public a company policy (the “Conflict Minerals Policy”) regarding the use of 3TG in our products. Our Conflict Mineral Policy indicates that we require that our suppliers source 3TG only from SORs that are conformant with the Responsible Minerals Initiative's (“RMI”) Responsible Minerals Assurance Process (“RMAP”), which requires a third-party sourcing audit of such SORs. We also require all suppliers to sign a Supplier Code of Conduct based on the Responsible Business Alliance industry standard. As set forth in Supplier Code of Conduct, we expect our supplier to share our commitment to corporate social responsibility and reserve the right to request corrective action for any non-compliance, including termination of the relationship with the supplier.

As required by the Conflict Minerals Rule, for 2022, we conducted a RCOI. We designed our RCOI in good faith to determine the origin of the 3TG that are necessary to the functionality or production of products that we contracted to manufacture. For purposes of the RCOI, we treated all suppliers, except service and packaging suppliers, as potentially in scope.

Our outreach included 142 potentially in-scope suppliers (the “Suppliers”). The results of our RCOI are discussed below. For our RCOI, to the extent applicable, we utilized the same processes and procedures as for our due diligence, in particular Steps 1 and 2 of the OECD Guidance (as defined below) design framework, which are described below in this Conflict Minerals Report.

As indicated below, approximately 95% of the SORs identified to us by the Suppliers were listed as Conformant (as defined below) by the RMI.

Based on the results of our RCOI, we exercised due diligence for 2022. These due diligence efforts are discussed below.

We have designed our due diligence measures relating to 3TG to conform with, in all material respects, the criteria set forth in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas (Third Edition) (the “OECD Guidance”).

The OECD Guidance has established a five-step framework for due diligence as a basis for responsible global supply chain management of minerals from conflict-affected and high-risk areas. Selected elements of our due diligence program are discussed below. The headings below conform to the headings used in the OECD Guidance for each of the five steps.

We have a cross-functional team that is responsible for our 3TG compliance program. Leadership of the compliance program resides with senior members of our legal and sustainability teams. In addition, we utilize specialist outside counsel to advise us in connection with our Conflict Minerals Rule compliance and a service provider (the “Service Provider”) to, on our behalf, engage in supplier outreach and follow-up, validation of supplier responses and electronic storage of supplier responses. Some of the compliance activities described in this Conflict Minerals Report were performed by the Service Provider on our behalf.

We communicate our Conflict Minerals Policy internally and externally to suppliers, in each case in writing. The Conflict Minerals Policy is available on our website at https://sustainability.sonos.com/Reports/default.aspx.

We maintain business records relating to 3TG due diligence, including records of due diligence processes, findings and resulting decisions, on a computerized database. Under our business records policy, this information is to be retained for at least five years.

We have a mechanism for employees and other interested parties to anonymously report violations of our Conflict Minerals Policy or other policy violations and issues, online or by telephone, and encourage our suppliers to have such mechanism as well.

For 2022, the Service Provider sent requests to 142 Suppliers to provide us with a completed CMRT. We or the Service Provider followed up by email or phone with the Suppliers that did not provide a response within the time frame specified in the request. All of our Suppliers responded to the Service Provider’s request for information.

We and the Service Provider reviewed the responses received from the Suppliers. The Service Provider reviewed the responses received for plausibility, consistency and gaps. It followed up by email or phone with Suppliers that submitted a response that triggered any one of seven specified quality control flags.

To the extent that a completed CMRT identifies a SOR, the Service Provider reviewed the information provided against the list of Conformant SORs published in connection with the RMAP, the London Bullion Market Association (“LBMA”) Good Delivery List and the Responsible Jewellery Council’s (“RJC”) Chain-of-Custody Certification.

To the extent that a SOR identified by a Supplier was not listed as Conformant, the Service Provider attempted to contact that SOR to gain information about its sourcing practices, including origin and transfer, and to determine the source and chain of custody of the 3TG. Internet research was also performed to determine whether there are any outside sources of information regarding the SORs sourcing practices.

If a Supplier was unable to provide information concerning the processors of 3TG in its supply chain, the Service Provider requested information on the Supplier’s suppliers of products or components which may have required 3TG for their functionality or production (“Tier 2 suppliers”). The Tier 2 suppliers, and subsequent tiers of suppliers as identified to the Service Provider, were then contacted by the Service Provider.

OECD Guidance Step Four: “Carry out independent third-party audit of supply chain due diligence at identified points in the supply chain”

In connection with our due diligence, we utilized and relied on information made available by the RMI concerning independent third-party audits of SORs to assess SOR due diligence and to determine whether SORs are Conformant.

We file a Form SD and a Conflict Minerals Report with the Securities and Exchange Commission and make these filings available on our website.

Our in-scope products for 2022 consisted of speakers, components and related accessories.

In connection with our RCOI and due diligence processes, our Suppliers identified to us 226 SORs as having processed the necessary 3TG contained in our in-scope products for 2022. The table indicates each of the number of identified and conformant SORs by metal. Please see the notes that accompany the table for additional information concerning the data in the table.

Due to our position in the supply chain, we rely on our suppliers for accurate SOR information. Our due diligence measures cannot provide absolute certainty regarding the source and chain of custody of the 3TG contained in our products.

We note the following in connection with the information contained in the foregoing table:

(a) The SORs identified by our Suppliers as being part of our 2022 supply chain were provided through our Suppliers’ submission of product level CMRTs. Some of our Suppliers may have reported to us SORs that were not in our supply chain due to over-inclusiveness in the information received from their Suppliers or for other reasons. In addition, the SORs provided may not be all of the SORs in our 2022 supply chain because: (i) we have not included SOR information that our Suppliers reported to us at a “company level,” meaning that they reported to us the 3TG contained in all of their products, not just the products that they sold to us, or that our Suppliers reported to us at a “user defined” level that was broader than the products that we

purchased from the Supplier; and (ii) many of our Suppliers were unable to identify all of the SORs used to process the necessary 3TG content contained in our in-scope products.

(d) “Conformant” means that a SOR was listed as RMAP Conformant by the RMI and successfully completed an assessment against the applicable RMAP standard or an equivalent cross-recognized assessment. Included SORs were not necessarily Conformant for all or part of 2022 and may not continue to be Conformant for any future period. The RMI notes on its website that the operational impacts of COVID-19 have led to postponements of some RMAP assessments. The RMI website also notes that, due to the eligibility criteria for an RMAP assessment, SORs are sometimes removed from the Conformant list because they are no longer operational and not because they are non-conformant to the standard.

(e) SOR status reflected in the table is based solely on information made publicly available by the RMI, without independent verification by us.

The table below provides information on the SORs included in the table above that are believed to source in whole or in part from a covered country. We are unable to determine specifically the countries of origin of the 3TG in our products. Accordingly, the 3TG in our products may not have originated in a covered country or a particular covered country.

We endeavored to determine the mine or location of origin of the 3TG contained in our in-scope products by requesting that the Suppliers provide us with a completed CMRT and through the other measures described in this Conflict Minerals Report.

For 2022, none of our in-scope products were determined by us to support conflict (i.e., to contain necessary 3TG that directly or indirectly financed or benefitted an armed group in a Covered Country). However, we did not conclude that any of our in-scope products were “DRC conflict free.”

For 2023, we intend to continue to engage in the activities described above, including our efforts to engage with suppliers that provide incomplete responses or do not provide responses to our inquiries. We also intend to continue to (1) review the adequacy of our due diligence measures to assess the source and chain of custody of the 3TG in our in-scope products, (2) encourage suppliers to enhance the transparency of their supply chain and to source responsibly and (3) update our Conflict Minerals Policy as applicable.


Metal	Known SORs	Conformant SORs
Metal		Total	Total	% of Known Smelters
Gold	98	92	94%
Tantalum	33	33	100%
Tin	59	56	95%
Tungsten	36	34	94%
Total	226	215	95%


Metal	SORs Believed to Source From a Covered Country
Metal		Total SORs Sourcing from the Covered Countries	% of Known SORs	% Conformant
Gold	8	8%	88%
Tantalum	18	55%	100%
Tin	10	17%	90%
Tungsten	9	25%	100%
Total	45	20%	96%