XML 30 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2018
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
10. Fair Value Measurements

The following tables summarize the Company’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis at March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2017 by valuation hierarchy (in thousands):

 

     March 31, 2018  
            Quoted prices in      Significant other      Significant  
     Total carrying      active markets      observable inputs      unobservable inputs  
     value      (Level 1)      (Level 2)      (Level 3)  

Assets:

           

Cash equivalents

   $ 6,800      $ 6,800      $ —        $ —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 6,800      $ 6,800      $ —        $ —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Liabilities:

           

Derivative liabilities

   $ 6,957      $ —        $ —        $ 6,957  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 6,957      $ —        $ —        $ 6,957  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     June 30, 2017  
            Quoted prices in      Significant other      Significant  
     Total carrying      active markets      observable inputs      unobservable inputs  
     value      (Level 1)      (Level 2)      (Level 3)  

Assets:

           

Cash equivalents

   $ 13,521      $ 13,521      $ —        $ —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   $ 13,521      $ 13,521      $ —        $ —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk have historically consisted principally of cash and cash equivalents. At March 31, 2018 and June 30, 2017, substantially all of the Company’s interest-bearing cash equivalent balances were concentrated in one U.S. Government money market fund that has investments consisting primarily of U.S. Government Agency debt, U.S. Treasury Repurchase Agreements and U.S. Government Agency Repurchase Agreements. These deposits may be redeemed upon demand and, therefore, generally have minimal risk. The Company’s cash equivalents are classified within Level 1 on the basis of valuations using quoted market prices.

The Second Tranche Transaction was determined to be liability classified (see Note 9), which requires that the liability be measured at fair value each period with changes in fair value being recorded as component of net income (loss) in the statement of operations. This valuation was determined to be a level 3 valuation because it includes unobservable inputs. The Second Tranche Transaction liability was valued using a Monte Carlo simulation valuation model. This model incorporated several inputs, including the Company’s common stock price on the date of valuation, the historical volatility of the price of the Company’s common stock, the risk-free interest rate and management’s assessment of the probability and timing of the issuance of the units occurring. A significant fluctuation in the Company’s stock price or the Company’s estimate of the number of units to be issued could result in a material increase or decrease in the fair value of the Second Tranche liability. Significant assumptions used to value this liability are as follows:

 

     March 28, 2018
(Date of Issuance)
  March 31, 2018

Volatility

   54.20%   52.50%

Risk free interest rate

   1.70%   1.70%

Estimated date of stockholder approval

   June 2018   June 2018

Estimated number of units issuable

   26,900,000   25,300,000

Valuation date stock price

   $1.07   $1.22

The Additional Advance Warrants were determined to be liability classified (see Note 8), which requires that the liability be measured at fair value each period with changes in fair value being recorded as a component of net income (loss) in the condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss). This valuation was determined to be a level 3 valuation because it includes unobservable inputs. The Additional Advance Warrant liability was valued using a Monte Carlo simulation valuation model. This model incorporated several inputs including the Company’s common stock price on the date of valuation, the historical volatility of the price of the Company’s common stock, the risk-free interest rate and management’s assessments of the probability of the Additional Advance being drawn upon. Significant assumptions used to value this liability are as follows:

 

     March 28, 2018
(Date of Issuance)
    March 31, 2018  

Volatility

     55.20     55.20

Risk free interest rate

     1.70     1.70

Term (in years)

     7       7  

Dividend rate

     0     0

Valuation date stock price

   $ 1.07     $ 1.22  

Probability of issuance

     80     80

The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s derivative liability for which fair value is determined by Level 3 inputs (in thousands):

 

Balance at June 30, 2017

   $ —    

Initial fair value of warrant liability

     4,632  

Change in fair value

     2,325  
  

 

 

 

Balance at March 31, 2018

   $ 6,957