e10vk

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K


(Mark One)

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007
OR
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-32465

VERIFONE HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)


DELAWARE		04-3692546
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2099 Gateway Place, Suite 600 San Jose, CA (Address of Principal Executive Offices)		95110 (Zip Code)

(408) 232-7800

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of Each Class		Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $.01 par value		New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K, or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ

As of April 30, 2007, the aggregate market value of the common stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates was approximately $2.253 billion based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.

There were 84,194,231 shares of the registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding as of the close of business on July 31, 2008.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report and certain information incorporated by reference herein contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” or “continue,” the negative of such terms, or comparable terminology.

Actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating these statements, you should specifically consider various factors, including the risks outlined in Item 1A-Risk Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. These factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, events, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements.

These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and other factors include those listed under Item 1A-Risk Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and elsewhere in this report. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in expectations.

PART I


ITEM 1.	*BUSINESS*

Our system solutions consist of point of sale electronic payment devices that run our proprietary and third-party operating systems, security and encryption software, and certified payment software as well as third-party, value-added applications. Our system solutions are able to process a wide range of payment types. They include signature and PIN-based debit cards, credit cards, contactless/radio frequency identification, or RFID, cards and tokens, Near Field Communication, or NFC, enabled mobile phones, smart cards, pre-paid gift and other stored-value cards, electronic bill payment, check authorization and conversion, signature capture, and electronic benefits transfer, or EBT. Our proprietary architecture was the first to enable multiple value-added applications, such as gift card and loyalty card programs, healthcare insurance eligibility, and time and attendance tracking, to reside on the same system without requiring recertification when new applications are added to the system. We are an industry leader in multi-application payment system deployments and we believe we have the largest selection of certified value-added applications.

We design our system solutions to meet the demanding requirements of our direct and indirect customers. Our electronic payment systems are available in several modular configurations, offering our customers flexibility to support a variety of connectivity options, including wireline and wireless internet protocol, or IP, technologies. We also offer our customers support for installed systems, consulting and project management services for system deployment, and customization of integrated software solutions.

Security has become a driving factor in our business as our customers endeavor to meet ever escalating governmental statutory requirements related to the prevention of identity theft as well as operating regulation safeguards from the credit and debit card associations, including Visa International, or Visa, MasterCard Worldwide, or MasterCard, American Express, Discover Financial Services, and JCB Co., Ltd., or JCB. In 2007, these card associations established the Payment Card Industry Council, or PCI Council, to oversee and unify industry standards in the areas of credit card data security, referred to as the PCI-PED standard which consists of PIN-entry device security, or PED, and the PCI Data Security Standard, or PCI-DSS, standard. We are a leader in providing systems that meet these standards and have upgraded or launched next generation system solutions that span our product portfolio ahead of deadlines.

Our customers are primarily financial institutions, payment processors, petroleum companies, large retailers, government organizations, and healthcare companies, as well as independent sales organizations, or ISOs. The functionality of our system solutions includes transaction security, connectivity, compliance with certification standards and the flexibility to execute a variety of payment and non-payment applications on a single system solution.

Company History

VeriFone, Inc., our principal operating subsidiary, was incorporated in 1981. Shortly afterward, we introduced the first check verification and credit authorization device ever utilized by merchants in a commercial setting. In 1984, we introduced the first mass market electronic payment system intended to replace manual credit card authorization devices for small merchants. VeriFone, Inc. became a publicly traded company in 1990 and was acquired by Hewlett-Packard Company in 1997. Hewlett-Packard operated VeriFone, Inc. as a division until July 2001, when it sold VeriFone, Inc. to Gores Technology Group, LLC, a privately held acquisition and investment management firm, in a transaction led by our Chief Executive Officer, Douglas G. Bergeron. In July 2002, Mr. Bergeron and certain investment funds affiliated with GTCR Golder Rauner, LLC, or GTCR, a private equity firm, led a recapitalization in which VeriFone Holdings, Inc. was organized as a holding company for VeriFone,

Inc., and GTCR-affiliated funds became our majority stockholders. We completed our initial public offering on May 4, 2005.

On November 1, 2006, we acquired Lipman Electronic Engineering Ltd. (“Lipman”). In connection with this acquisition, we issued 13,462,474 shares of our common stock and paid $347.4 million in cash in exchange for all the outstanding ordinary shares of Lipman. All options to purchase Lipman ordinary shares were exchanged for options to purchase approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock. In addition, in accordance with the merger agreement, Lipman’s Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $1.50 per Lipman ordinary share, or an aggregate amount of $40.4 million. This special cash dividend was paid on October 23, 2006 to Lipman shareholders of record as of October 11, 2006. The aggregate purchase price for this acquisition was $799.3 million. See “Note 3 — Business Combinations” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information related to this acquisition.

Our Industry

The electronic payment solutions industry encompasses systems, software, and services that enable the acceptance and processing of electronic payments for goods and services and provide other value-added functionality at the point of sale. The electronic payment system is a critical part of the payment processing infrastructure. We believe that current industry trends, including the global shift toward electronic payment transactions and away from cash and checks, the rapid penetration of electronic payments in emerging markets as those economies modernize, the increasing proliferation of internet protocol, or IP, connectivity and wireless communication, and an increasing focus on security to combat fraud and identity theft, will continue to drive demand for electronic payment systems.

The electronic payment system serves as the interface between consumers and merchants at the point of sale and with the payment processing infrastructure. It captures critical electronic payment data, secures the data through sophisticated encryption software and algorithms, and routes the data across a range of payment networks for processing, authorization, and settlement. Payment networks include credit card networks, such as Visa, MasterCard, and American Express, that route credit card and signature-based debit transactions, as well as electronic funds transfer, or EFT, networks, such as STAR, Interlink, and NYCE, that route PIN-based debit transactions. In a typical electronic payment transaction, the electronic payment system first captures and secures consumer payment data from one of a variety of payment media, such as a credit or debit card, smart card, or contactless/RFID card. Consumer payment data is then routed from the electronic payment system to the appropriate payment processor and financial institution for authorization. Finally, the electronic payment system receives the authorization to complete the transaction between the merchant and consumer.

Industry Trends

The major trend driving growth in the global payments industry has been the move towards electronic payment transactions and away from cash and checks. This trend has been accelerated by the usage of credit and debit card based payments, especially PIN-based debit. Another key driver is the growth in single application credit card solutions, which enable merchants to provide an efficient payment solution in non-traditional settings such as the emergence of pay-at-the-table in restaurants, which is capitalizing on the development of wireless communications infrastructure. The key geographic, technological, and regulatory drivers for this trend towards electronic payments are discussed below.

Rapid Penetration of Electronic Payments in Emerging Markets

Certain regions, such as Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Asia, have lower rates of electronic payments and are experiencing rapid growth. The adoption of electronic payments in these regions is driven primarily by economic growth, infrastructure development, support from governments seeking to increase value-added tax, or VAT, sales tax collection, and the expanding presence of IP and wireless communication networks.

IP Connectivity

Broadband connectivity provides faster transmission of transaction data at a lower cost than traditional dial up telephone connections, enabling more advanced payment and other value-added applications at the point of sale. Major telecommunications carriers have expanded their communications networks and lowered fees, which allows more merchants to utilize IP based networks cost effectively. The faster processing and lower costs associated with IP connectivity have opened new markets for electronic payment systems, including many that have been primarily cash-only industries such as quick service restaurants, or QSRs. New wireless electronic payment solutions are being developed to increase transaction processing speed, throughput, and mobility at the point of sale, and offer significant security benefits by enabling consumers to avoid relinquishing their payment cards. A portable device can be presented to consumers, for example, to pay-at-the-table in full-service restaurants or to pay in other environments, such as outdoor arenas, pizza delivery, farmers’ markets, and taxi cabs.

Growth of Wireless Communications

The development and increased use of wireless communications infrastructure are increasing demand for compact, easy-to-use, and reliable wireless payment solutions. The flexibility, ease of installation, and mobility of wireless makes this technology an attractive and often more cost-effective alternative to traditional landline-based telecommunications.

The wireless communications industry has grown substantially in the United States and globally over the past twenty years. Cellular and Wireless Fidelity or Wi-Fi, communications fully support secure IP based payment transactions, which, with the increased speed of wireless communications, and ever-expanding coverage maps of standardized wireless data technologies such as General Packet Radio Service, or GPRS, and Code Division Multiple Access, or CDMA, makes wireless telecommunications an attractive alternative to traditional telecommunications.

Mobile technologies enable new applications for electronic payment transactions, including pay-at-the-table and pay-at-the-curb in restaurants, as well as electronic card payments in environments that once required cash payments or more expensive off-line card acceptance. These include delivery services, in-home services, taxi, and limousine credit and debit card acceptance. Mobile technologies also facilitate establishment of temporary payment stations such as kiosks and event ticketing and vending.

Increasing Focus on Security to Minimize Fraud and Identity Theft

Industry security standards are constantly evolving, driving recertification and replacement of electronic payment systems, particularly in Europe and the United States. In order to offer electronic payment systems that connect to payment networks, electronic payment system providers must certify their products and services with card associations, financial institutions, and payment processors and comply with government and telecommunications company regulations. This certification process may take up to twelve months to complete.

Storage and handling of credit card data by retailers represents a constant threat of fraud and identity theft, creating tremendous risk of financial and reputation losses.

The protection of cardholder data currently requires retailers to:


	•	Install only approved PIN-Entry Devices and replace any un-approved devices by 2010;

	•	Upgrade or modify processing systems to ensure ALL applications that capture, manage, transmit, or store card holder information within the enterprise meet Payment Applications Best Practices;

	•	Upgrade wired/wireless networking infrastructure to high-security routers/switches/hubs;

	•	Make wholesale changes to password and other system access policies; and

	•	Undertake costly quarterly or annual security audits by approved third-party auditors.

The current industry-wide response to this threat is to “lock down” all enterprise systems. This approach is difficult and costly due to the complexity of most retail Information Technology, or IT, environments, and is

unlikely to guarantee protection against data breaches. Furthermore, any system change, no matter how small, may be costly and time consuming to retailers as modification of any portion of the point of sale, or POS, system usually requires end-to-end re-certification.

Payment Card Industry Security Standards. The major card associations have established and participate on the policy-setting Executive Committee of the Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council, or PCI SSC. The PCI SSC has introduced PCI-DSS to address the growing demand for transaction security. Visa, MasterCard, American Express, Discover Financial Services, and JCB continue to cooperate on the development and release of more stringent PCI-DSS guidelines and test methods for the certification of electronic payment systems for secure credit and debit transactions. Recently the PCI PED program that Visa and MasterCard jointly managed has been brought under the oversight of the PCI SSC. The PCI SSC is also in the process of adopting the Visa Payment Application Best Practices, or PABP, program and making it a mandate of the PC-DSS. VeriFone was elected as a member of the PCI SSC Board of Advisors and is the only payment systems representative on the Council.

Card Association Standards. In addition to the above, an organization entitled EMVCo LLC was formed in 1999 by EuroPay International, MasterCard International, and Visa International to manage, maintain, and enhance a set of EMV integrated circuit card, or smart card, specifications and a corresponding compliance testing and certification approval process. The EMV Specifications are designed to ensure interoperability between smart cards and electronic payment systems on a worldwide basis, while increasing functionality of electronic payment systems and reduction of electronic transaction fraud. Deadlines for EMV compliance vary by card association and region, with liability shift in Europe ahead of other regions. Merchants and financial institutions that are not compliant with EMV standards may be subject to various sanctions.

Class A/B Certification. United States, or U.S., payment processors have two levels of certification, referred to as Class A and Class B. Class B certification ensures that an electronic payment system adheres to the payment processor’s basic functional and network requirements. Class A certification adds another stipulation that the payment processor will support the electronic payment system on its internal help desk systems. Obtaining these certifications, which are required by U.S. payment processors, can be time intensive and costly.

Regional Security Standards. Electronic payment systems must also comply with evolving country-specific security regulations. Countries such as Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore, Germany, Sweden, and Switzerland have particularly stringent and specific security requirements. Electronic payment systems also must comply with the recommendations of quasi-regulatory authorities and standards-setting committees, which address, among other things, fraud prevention, processing protocols, and technologies utilized. New standards are continually being adopted as a result of worldwide fraud prevention initiatives, increasing the need for system compatibility and new developments in technology. Electronic payment system providers must manage these complex requirements, which may require ongoing enhancements to existing systems or replacement with newly certified electronic payment systems.

Contactless Payments and Mobile Phone Initiated Payments based on NFC

Payments initiated via Contactless RFID technology continue to grow in popularity with trials, pilots, or rollouts taking place in all major geographies. Contactless payment credentials can be in the form of credit cards, key fobs, or other devices which use radio frequency communications between the payment credential and the point of sale system. According to the Smartcard Alliance, domestically there are approximately 18 million RFID-imbedded cards now in circulation and over fifty-one thousand retail locations now able to accept contactless payments. This contactless acceptance infrastructure is not only capable of reading card, fob, or token-based RFID payment media, but is also compatible with payments initiated via mobile phones using NFC technology.

Unattended Self-Service Kiosks and Outdoor Payment Systems

The growth in EMV transactions that require consumers to enter a secret PIN code has had a trickle down effect on all aspects of the payment acceptance infrastructure, including self-service market segments. Unattended applications such as automated ticketing machines, self-order kiosks, bill payment, product vending, telephone calling card top up, and self checkout applications that historically relied on a simple magnetic stripe reader to process credit and debit payments now require complex and secure payment systems to interact with the consumer

safely and securely. Due to the dramatic increase in complexities involved in developing compliant, secure, and certified payment solutions, most unattended and outdoor kiosk vendors have turned to traditional payment system vendors such as VeriFone to provide easy to integrate and pre-certified payment modules to enable the future of electronic payments in these environments.

Our Growth Strategy

Our objective is to enhance our position as a leading provider of technology that enables electronic payment transactions and value-added services at the point of sale. The key elements of our strategy are to:

Capitalize on High Growth Opportunities in Emerging Markets

We seek to establish a leading position in emerging, high growth electronic payment markets in Eastern Europe, Asia, and Latin America. We acquired Lipman to leverage its leadership position in emerging markets to grow further, particularly in China, India, Brazil, and Turkey, where demand for electronic payment systems is growing rapidly.

Expand Leadership Position in North America

In North America, we are increasing sales to small and medium-sized merchants by further strengthening our relationships with ISOs. The Lipman acquisition has enabled us to strengthen our ISO relationships as Lipman was the leading provider of wireless payment systems to the ISO market. Another key growth factor that we are seeking to capitalize on in North America is the terminal upgrade cycle driven primarily by the continuing migration from dial-up to IP systems, enhanced security requirements, and demand for non-payment applications such as gift, loyalty, and money transfer. We intend to continue to seek opportunities to increase our leadership position in North America by leveraging our brand, market position, scale, technology, and distribution channels.

Address Customers’ Intense Focus on Security to Meet Industry Standards

We intend to pursue market share growth globally based upon our leading portfolio of products that, in many cases meet enhanced security schedules well ahead of industry deadlines and competitive offerings. We expect to see increased market turn over opportunities as our customers review their existing installed base of terminals and look to reduce risk through replacement of older non-approved devices, and in some cases ahead of industry mandated deadlines.

We also see opportunities to assist large retailers with protecting credit and debit card data throughout their enterprise and expect to work with these retailers to help them achieve compliance with PCI-DSS, thus lowering the overall risk of data compromise.

Increase Market Share in Western Europe

We intend to pursue increased market share in Western Europe by capitalizing on industry trends, continuing to penetrate key sales channels, and expanding our product offerings. In addition, we also plan to leverage the strength received from the Lipman acquisition as a leading position in Spain and Italy, while at the same time working hard to increase our share in markets such as France and Scandinavia, where neither we nor Lipman had a strong presence.

Further Penetrate Attractive Vertical Markets

We plan to continue to increase the functionality of our system solutions to address the specific needs of various vertical markets. We currently provide system solutions that are customized for the needs of our financial services, petroleum company, multi-lane retail, government, and healthcare customers. As an example, our system solutions allow our petroleum company customers to manage fuel dispensing and control and enable “pay at the pump” functionality, cashiering, store management, inventory management, and accounting for goods and services at the point of sale. We recently announced the Secure PumpPAY solution which is a cost effective retrofit and upgrade to the insecure, uncertified pump payment systems currently deployed in over 700,000 gas pumps

domestically. The major credit card associations have mandated that starting January 1, 2009, all new self-service pumps must have PCI-approved PIN-entry devices. Further, beginning July 1, 2010, all card transactions at pumps must be protected with advanced Triple DES encryption technology.

In the multi-lane retail market, we offer system solutions that allow our customers to pursue full-motion video, a color display, digital quality sound, and highly secure payment capabilities in a single, easy-to-use system that integrates with leading point-of-sale in-lane and back office networked systems. With our technology, multi-lane retailers also have a new way to broadcast multi-media advertising and corporate messaging content directly to their customers.

In the pay-at-the-table and pay-at-the-car markets, we have established key distribution partnerships with large banks and processors with whom we have agreed to market our ON THE SPOT wireless restaurant payment system to the top 250 restaurant companies domestically. We have also integrated our solutions with the top three Restaurant Management System Vendors, allowing our systems to work seamlessly within the restaurant, and we have also launched our ON THE SPOT Managed solution targeted at the ISO channel as an easy to install turnkey solution for smaller restaurants.

Pursue Selective, Strategic Acquisitions

We may augment our organic growth by acquiring complementary businesses, product lines, or technologies. Our acquisition strategy is intended to broaden our suite of electronic payment solutions, expand our presence in selected geographies, broaden our customer base, and increase our penetration of distribution channels and vertical markets.

Our System Solutions

Our system solutions are available in several distinctive modular configurations, offering our customers flexibility to support a variety of consumer payment and connectivity options, including wireline and wireless IP technologies.

Countertop

Our countertop electronic payment systems accept magnetic, smart card, and contactless/RFID cards and support credit, debit, check, electronic benefits transfer, and a full range of pre-paid products, including gift cards and loyalty programs, among many others. Our countertop solutions are available under the Vx solutions, NURIT, and Secura brands. These electronic payment systems incorporate high performance 32-bit ARM microprocessors and have product line extensions targeted at the high-end countertop broadband and wireless solutions for financial retail, multi-lane retail, hospitality, government, and health care market segments. We design our products in a modular fashion to offer a wide range of options to our customers, including the ability to deploy new technologies at minimal cost as technology standards change. Our electronic payment systems are easily integrated with a full range of optional external devices, including secure PIN pads, check imaging equipment, barcode readers, contactless/RFID readers, and biometric devices. Our secure PIN pads support credit and debit transactions, as well as a wide range of applications that are either built into electronic payment systems or connect to electronic cash registers, or ECRs, and POS systems. In addition, we offer an array of certified software applications and application libraries that enable our countertop systems and secure PIN pads to interface with major ECR and POS systems.

Mobile/Wireless

We offer a line of wireless system solutions that support IP-based CDMA, GPRS, and Wi-Fi technologies for secure, “always on” connectivity. In addition, we have recently added a Bluetooth communications solution to our portfolio of wireless payment systems. We expect that market opportunities for wireless solutions will continue to be found in developing countries where wireless telecommunications networks are being deployed at a much faster rate than wireline networks. We have leveraged our wireless system to enter into new markets for electronic payment solutions such as the emerging pay-at-the-table market solutions for full-service restaurants and systems

for transportation and delivery segments where merchants and consumers are demanding secure payment systems to reduce fraud and identity theft.

Consumer-activated

We offer a line of products specifically designed for consumer-activated functionality at the point of sale. These products include large, easy-to-read displays, user-friendly interfaces, ECR interfaces, durable key pads, signature capture functionality, and other features that are important to serving customers in a multi-lane retail environment. For example, our signature capture devices automatically store signatures and transaction data for fast recall, and the signature image is time stamped for fraud prevention. Our consumer-activated system solutions also enable merchants to display advertising, promotional content, loyalty program information, and electronic forms in order to market products and services to consumers at the point of sale. We have extended our product portfolio to support these same features into the unattended market segments such as parking, ticketing, vending machines, gas pumps, self-checkout, and QSR markets.

Petroleum

Our family of products for petroleum companies consists of integrated electronic payment systems that combine card processing, fuel dispensing, and ECR functions, as well as secure payment systems for integration with leading petroleum pump controllers and systems. These products are designed to meet the needs of petroleum company operations, where rapid consumer turnaround, easy pump control, and accurate record keeping are imperative. These products allow our petroleum company customers to manage fuel dispensing and control and enable “pay at the pump” functionality, cashiering, store management, inventory management, and accounting for goods and services at the point of sale. They are compatible with a wide range of fuel pumps, allowing retail petroleum outlets to integrate our systems easily at most locations. We have recently expanded this suite of products to add a range of high security unattended devices and related software products targeted at integration with the petroleum pumps in domestic and international markets.

Server-based

Our server-based transaction products enable merchants to integrate advanced payment functionality into PC-based electronic systems seamlessly. These products handle all of the business logic steps related to an electronic payment transaction (credit, debit, gift, and loyalty), including collection of payment-related information from the consumer and merchant, and communication with payment processors for authorization and settlement. Our products also enable the functionality of peripherals that connect to PC-based electronic payment systems, including consumer-activated products such as secure PIN pads and signature capture devices. The PayWare software product line we acquired from Trintech Group PLC in November 2006 has augmented our server based, enterprise payment software solutions. They include PayWare Merchant, a scalable, high-performance payment solution and Card Management System, or CMS, an enterprise solution used by both acquiring and issuing entities.

Our Services

Client Services

We support our installed base by providing payment system consulting, deployment, on-site and telephone-based installation and training, 24-hour help desk support, repairs, replacement of impaired system solutions, asset tracking, and reporting. We provide a single source of comprehensive management services providing support primarily for our own system solutions in most vertical markets. Our services address many system configurations, including local area networks, leased-line, and dial-up environments. We also offer customized service programs for specific vertical markets in addition to standardized service plans.

Customized Application Development

We provide specific project management services for large turn-key application implementations. Our project management services include all phases of implementation, including customized software development, procurement, vendor coordination, site preparation, training, installation, follow-on support, and legacy system

disposal. We also offer customer education programs as well as consulting services regarding selection of product and payment methodologies and strategies such as debit implementation. We believe that our client services are distinguished by our ability to perform mass customizations for large customers quickly and efficiently.

Technology

We have developed the following core technologies that are essential to the creation, delivery, and management of our system solutions. We believe these technologies are central to our leadership position in the electronic payment solutions industry.

Platform Architecture

Our secure, multi-tasking, multi-application platform architecture consists of an ARM System-on-Chip, our Verix and NURIT operating systems, multi-application support, and file authentication technology. The combination of these technologies provides an innovative memory protection and separation scheme to ensure a robust and secure operating environment, enabling the download and execution of multiple applications on an electronic payment system without the need for recertification.

Our operating environment and modular design provide a consistent and intuitive user interface for third-party applications as well as our own. We believe our platform design enables our customers to deliver and manage multi-application payment systems in a timely, secure, and cost-effective manner. We continue to enhance and extend the capabilities of our platform to meet the growing demands of our customers for multi-application payment systems.

Our newer consumer-activated and unattended payment system solutions also incorporate a commercial Linux operating system that we have customized to include security, application resources, and data communication capabilities required in these payment systems. The Linux operating system was chosen for functionality, adaptability, and robustness as well as the readily available development tools for graphical user interface and multi-media content applications.

Libraries and Development Tools

We believe that by delivering a broad portfolio of application libraries and development tools to our large community of internal and third-party application developers, we are able to significantly reduce the time to obtain certification for our system solutions. By packaging complex programming modules such as EMV, smart card interfaces, wireless communications, IP, and secure socket layer, or SSL, into standard libraries with defined programming interfaces, we facilitate the timely and consistent implementation of our multi-application system solutions. Further, we maintain a high level of application compatibility across platforms, facilitating the migration of applications to future solutions.

We also provide developer tool kits that contain industry standard visual development environments (C/C++) along with platform-specific compilers and debuggers. We provide numerous support vehicles for our application development communities, including Developer Training, a dedicated developers’ support team, and VeriFone DevNet, an online developers’ portal that provides registered developers access to libraries, tools, programming guides, and support. Our libraries, tool kits, training, and support systems facilitate the rapid growth in deployment of third-party, value-added applications for our system solutions.

We believe that this growing portfolio of value-added applications increases the attractiveness of our solutions to global financial institutions and payment processors. In the highly competitive transaction processing market, these institutions are looking for ways to differentiate their solutions by adding additional services beyond credit and debit transaction processing. These value-added applications provide this differentiation and also provide a way to increase merchant retention and revenue for these channels.

Application Framework

Our SoftPay application framework contains a comprehensive set of pre-certified software modules enabling rapid configuration and delivery of merchant-ready applications for payment processors and financial institutions. We have configured SoftPay for use in a broad range of vertical markets including retail, restaurants, lodging, and

rental services. SoftPay supports our comprehensive range of wireline and wireless IP communications options, including Ethernet, CDMA, GPRS, and Wi-Fi.

Remote Management System

Effective remote management is essential to cost effective deployment and maintenance of electronic payment systems. Our VeriCentre and NURIT Control Center systems provide broad remote management functionality for our system solutions, including software downloads, application management, remote diagnostics, and information reporting. In addition, we have developed a solution for managing the multi-media content, signature capture/storage/retrieval, and device management of our multi-media capable, consumer activated Mx product line. Our management system licensees are responsible for the implementation, maintenance, and operation of the system. In certain markets and with certain customers, we maintain and manage the system to provide remote management services directly to customers. In addition, message management functionality allows financial institutions and payment processors to send customized text and graphics messages to any or all of their Verix NURIT, Secura, or Mx terminal based merchants, and receive pre-formatted responses.

Customers

Our customers include financial institutions, payment processors, petroleum companies, large retailers, government organizations, and healthcare companies, as well as ISOs, which re-sell our system solutions to small merchants. In North America, for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, approximately 45% of our sales were via ISOs, distributors, resellers, and system integrators, approximately 45% were direct sales to petroleum companies, retailers, and government-sponsored payment processors, and the remainder were to non-government-sponsored payment processors and financial institutions. Internationally, for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, approximately 30% of our sales were via distributors, resellers, and system integrators and the remaining 70% were direct sales to financial institutions, payment processors, and major retailers.

The percentage of net revenues from our ten largest customers, including First Data Corporation, is as follows:


	Years Ended October 31
	2007			2006			2005

Percentage of net revenues from our ten largest customers		30.8	%		36.1	%		33.1	%
Percentage of net revenues from First Data Corp. and its affiliates		*			13.0	%		12.0	%


*		Less than 10% of net revenues

No customer accounted for more than 10% of our net revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 and no customer, other than First Data Corporation and its affiliates, accounted for more than 10% of our net revenues for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2006 and 2005. Sales to First Data Corporation and its affiliates include its TASQ Technology division, which aggregates orders it receives from payment processors and ISOs.

Sales and Marketing

Our North American sales teams are focused specifically on financial institutions, payment processors, third-party distributors, and value-added resellers, and on specific vertical markets, such as petroleum, multi-lane retail, restaurants, bank branches, self-service kiosks, government, and healthcare. Our International sales teams are based in offices located in 19 countries with regional coverage responsibilities in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, or EMEA, Asia/Pacific, and Latin America. Typically, each sales team includes a general manager or managing director, account representatives, business development personnel, sales engineers, and customer service representatives with specific vertical market expertise. The sales teams are supported by client services, manufacturing, and product development teams to deliver products and services that meet the needs of our diverse customer base.

Our marketing group is responsible for product management, account management, program marketing, and corporate communications. Our product management group analyzes and identifies product and technology trends in the marketplace and works closely with our research and development group to develop new products and enhancements. Our program marketing function promotes adoption of our branded solutions through initiatives

such as our Value-Added Partner, or VAP, Program. Our corporate communications function coordinates key market messaging across regions, including public relations and go-to-market product campaigns.

As of October 31, 2007, we had 367 sales and marketing employees, representing approximately 17% of our total workforce.

Our VAP Program provides a technical, operational, and marketing environment for third-party developers to leverage our distribution channels to sell value-added applications and services. As of October 31, 2007, over 37 third-party developers, or partners, in our VAP Program have provided solutions for pre-paid cards, gift cards, and loyalty cards and age verification services, among others. Through the program, merchants obtain seamless access to value-added applications, allowing them to differentiate their offerings without a costly product development cycle.

Global Outsourcing and Manufacturing Operations

Prior to our Lipman acquisition, we outsourced 100% of our product manufacturing to providers in the Electronic Manufacturing Services, or EMS, industry. This work was outsourced to Jabil Circuit, Inc., Sanmina-SCI Corporation, and Inventec Appliances Corporation. We have enabled direct shipment capability for several product lines from our EMS providers to our customers in various countries around the world. We have enhanced our previous supply chain model by creating a hybrid global manufacturing function where we will be able to enjoy the best elements of our outsourced model combined with our Israeli in-house manufacturing facilities. We believe that this new manufacturing model will provide us with significant advantages in terms of cost, new product introductions, flexibility to meet market demand, and quality.

Competition

Our principal competitors in the market for electronic payment systems and services are Ingenico S.A. and Hypercom Corporation, the two other large providers of payment systems as well as First Data Corporation, Gemalto N.V., Gilbarco, Inc., a subsidiary of Danaher Corporation, International Business Machines Corporation, MICROS Systems, Inc., NCR Corporation, Radiant Systems, Inc., and Symbol Technologies, Inc., which is owned by Motorola, Inc. We compete primarily on the basis of the following factors: trusted brand, end-to-end system solutions, product certifications, value-added applications and advanced product features, advanced communications modularity, reliability, and low total cost of ownership.

We expect competition in our industry will be largely driven by the requirements to respond to increasingly complex technology, industry certifications, and security standards. We also see continued emphasis on consolidation among suppliers as evidenced by the recent Ingenico S.A./SAGEM Monetal merger and the acquisition by Hypercom of Thales e-Transactions, as the scale advantages related to research and development investment, volume purchasing power, and sales/technical support infrastructure continues to put pressure on smaller companies in our industry. In addition, First Data Corporation, a leading provider of payment processing services, has developed and continues to develop a series of proprietary electronic payment systems for the U.S. market.

Research and Development

We work with our customers to develop system solutions that address existing and anticipated end-user needs. Our development activities are distributed globally and managed primarily from the U.S. We utilize regional application development capabilities in locations where labor costs are lower than in the United States and where regional expertise can be leveraged for our target markets in Asia, Europe, and Latin America. Our regional development centers provide customization and adaptation to meet the needs of customers in local markets. Our modular designs enable us to customize existing systems in order to shorten development cycles and time to market.

Our research and development goals include:


	•	developing new solutions, technologies, and applications;

	•	developing enhancements to existing technologies and applications; and

	•	ensuring compatibility and interoperability between our solutions and those of third parties.

Our research and development expenses were $65.4 million, $47.4 million, and $41.8 million for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Research and development expenses as a percent of net revenues were 7.2%, 8.1%, and 8.6% for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. As of October 31, 2007, we had 774 research and development employees representing approximately 35% of our total workforce.

Industry Standards and Government Regulations

In order to offer products that connect to payment networks, electronic payment system providers must certify their products and services with card associations, financial institutions, and payment processors, as well as comply with government and telecommunications company regulations.

We have gained an in-depth knowledge of certification requirements and processes by working closely with card associations, payment processors, security organizations, and international regulatory organizations to certify our new products. We accelerate this certification process by leveraging our applications, user interface, and core technologies.

We retain a group of engineers who specialize in security design methodologies. This group is responsible for designing and integrating security measures in our system solutions and conducts early design reviews with independent security lab consultants to ensure compliance of our electronic payment system designs with worldwide security standards.

Regulatory certifications are addressed by our compliance engineering department, which is staffed by electromagnetic compatibility, or EMC, safety, telecommunications, and wireless carrier certification experts.

We actively participate in electronic payment industry working groups that help develop market standards. Our personnel are members of several working groups of the American National Standards Institute, or ANSI, a private, non-profit organization that administrates and coordinates voluntary standardization in the U.S. and the Industry Standards Organization which contains working groups responsible for international security standards. They have leadership roles on subcommittees that develop standards in such areas as financial transactions, data security, smart cards, and the petroleum industry.

We also are subject to other legal and regulatory requirements, including the European Union’s, or EU, Restriction on Hazardous Substances, or RoHS, Directive and the European Union Directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment, or WEEE, which are designed to restrict the use of certain hazardous substances in finished goods and to require active steps to promote recycling of components to limit the total quantity of waste going to final disposal.

Although the European Commission has adopted both directives, each member state is responsible for their enforcement. Each EU member state has an independent responsibility to enact national law to give effect to the WEEE Directive within its own borders, resulting in some variations in the implementation of WEEE among the different EU countries. In contrast, the RoHS directive has been universally implemented in all EU countries in a standard manner. In addition, similar legislations could be enacted in other jurisdictions, including the United States.

In March 2007, VeriFone achieved compliance with the “Administrative Measures on the Control of Pollution Caused by Electronic Information Products,” commonly referred to as China RoHS regulations, as required by China’s Ministry of Information Industry. Similar to the EU RoHS Directive, the China regulations restrict the importation into and production within China of electrical equipment containing certain hazardous materials in electronic equipment.

We believe we have taken all necessary steps to ensure all newly finished goods shipping into EU, China, and U.S. markets were fully compliant with regional or country specific environmental legislation. We are also working diligently with local business representatives and/or customers on the various local WEEE compliance strategies, including WEEE registration, collection, reporting and recycling schemes.

We are also subject to the following standards and requirements:

Security Standards

Industry and government security standards ensure the integrity of the electronic payment process and protect the privacy of consumers using electronic payment systems. New standards are continually being adopted or proposed as a result of worldwide fraud prevention initiatives, increasing the need for new security solutions and technologies. In order for us to remain compliant with the growing variety of international requirements, we have developed a security architecture that incorporates physical, electronic, operating system, encryption, and application-level security measures. This architecture has proven successful even in countries that have particularly stringent and specific security requirements, such as Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore, Sweden, and Switzerland.

Card Association Standards

Payment Card Industry Security Standards. In September 2006, PCI Security Standards Council was formed by American Express, Discover Financial Services, JCB, MasterCard, and Visa. The PCI Security Standards Council is responsible for developing and disseminating security specifications, validation testing methods and security assessor training. The five founding companies participate on the policy setting Executive Committee of the Payment Card Industry Security Standards Council.

In September 2006, the Council published an updated version of the PCI Data Security Standard, or PCI-DSS, that represents a common set of industry tools and measurements to help ensure the safe handling of sensitive electronic transaction information. The card associations continue to maintain their own security programs but they recognize the PCI-DSS as the industry standard. With significant risk to their brand name and penalties for non-compliance or a security breach, merchants have budgeted and are spending large amounts of money to achieve PCI-DSS compliance. The PCI-SSC is also in the process of adopting the PABP program and making it a mandate of the PCI-DSS. This new program will be called the Payment Application Data Security Standard, or PA-DSS, and it will force the retirement or re-architecture of insecure point of sale systems. Visa has issued a mandate that all new merchants boarded by October 2008 must use a PABP validated application. To make PCI-DSS compliance easier merchants will be forced to look for PABP validated applications.

In September 2007, the PCI Security Standards Council announced that the PCI PIN Entry Device, or PED, standard will be rolled under the PCI Security Standards Council. This PCI PED standard was previously maintained and updated by Visa, MasterCard, and JCB. The PCI PED specification and testing requirements will become a standard specification for the five card associations. All previous mandates and deadlines regarding PCI PED compliance will remain in effect under the PCI Security Standards Council. Further alignment with regional and national debit networks and certification bodies may occur, which would enable electronic payment system providers to certify payment technology more quickly and cost effectively. In practice, the PCI PED approval process represents a significant increase in level of security and technical complexity for PIN Entry Devices.

EMV Standards. EuroPay, MasterCard, and Visa, or EMV, have introduced new standards to address the growing need for transaction security and interoperability. One important example is their establishment of EMVCo LLC, a smart card standards organization that has prescribed specifications for electronic payment systems (MasterCard, Visa, and JCB) to receive certifications for smart card devices and applications. The EMV standard is designed to ensure global smart card interoperability across all electronic payment systems. To ensure adherence to this standard, specific certifications are required for all electronic payment systems and their application software. We maintain EMV certifications across our applicable product lines.

Contactless System Standards. The major card associations have each established a brand around contactless payment. The brands and specifications are PayPass^® for MasterCard, Visa payWave^® and Visa Wave^® for Visa, ExpressPay^® for American Express, and ZIP^® for Discover Financial services. Along with these brands each of the card associations has developed its own specifications governing its brands user experience, data management, the card-to-reader protocols and in at least one case the protocol between the contactless reader and the host device. Each brand of contactless payment has a complete set of specifications, certification requirements and a very

controlled testing and approval process. In order to access the specification and approval process, payment system manufacturers must become licensees of the relevant card association’s specification. Although all of the specifications are based on ISO-IEC 14443, a standard developed by the International Organization for Standardization, the application approval processes are not compatible with one another. MasterCard has recently assigned its PayPass^® contactless implementation specifications to EMVCo LLC, which may be a first step towards the creation of a common specification and certification standard for contactless payment systems. VeriFone actively participates in several standards’ bodies pursuing common standards for contactless payments, including INCITS B10, The Smart Card Alliance and the NFC Forum.

MasterCard PTS and TQM Standard. The MasterCard POS Terminal Security (PTS) Program addresses stability and security of IP communications between IP-enabled POS terminals and the acquirer host system using authentication/encryption protocols approved by MasterCard ensuring transaction data integrity. The purpose of this program is threefold:


	•	provide POS vendors with security guidelines to counter the threats presented by the use of Internet/IP technologies within the POS terminal infrastructure;

	•	specifically address network vulnerabilities within the increasingly popular IP networks; and

	•	identify potential vulnerabilities of an end-to-end solution that may occur as a result of failing to provide confidentiality, integrity, availability, authentication, non-repudiation, and replay attack prevention on the data being transmitted over the Internet.

We have successfully achieved Vx product-line and NURIT product-line compliance with the new MasterCard PTS security specification regarding security of IP-based systems. The MasterCard PTS program approval applies to several IP-enabled products including the Vx 510, Vx 570, Vx 610, and Vx 670, as well as the NURIT 8000, NURIT 8210, and NURIT 8400 payment systems. We are the first and only terminal vendor to achieve such a distinction across an entire product line.

The MasterCard Terminal Quality Management (TQM) program was created in 2003 to “help ensure the quality and reliability of EMV compliant terminals worldwide.” MasterCard’s TQM program validates the entire lifecycle of the product, from design to manufacturing and deployment. This is a hardware quality management program, on top of the EMV Level 1 certification. It mainly involves the review and audit of the vendor’s process in the different phases of implementation, manufacturing, and distribution. At the end of the process, the product is given a quality label. MasterCard has mandated the quality label to all their member banks and has made it a pre-requisite for their Terminal Integration Process (TIP) since December 2003. We maintain TQM approval across all EMV Level 1 approved products deployed with EMV applications.

Payment Processor/Financial Institution Requirements

U.S. payment processors have two types of certification levels, Class A and Class B. Class B certification ensures that an electronic payment system adheres to the payment processor’s basic functional and network requirements. Class A certification adds another stipulation that the processor actively support the electronic payment system on its internal help desk systems. Attainment of Class A certification, which may take up to twelve months, requires working with each payment processor to pass extensive functional and end-user testing and to establish the help desk related infrastructure necessary to provide Class A support. Attaining Class A certifications increases the number of payment processors that may actively sell and deploy a particular electronic payment system. We have significant experience in attaining these critical payment processor certifications and have a large portfolio of Class A certifications with major U.S. processors. In addition, several international financial institutions and payment processors have certification requirements that electronic payment systems must comply with in order to process transactions on their specific networks. We have significant direct experience and, through our international distributors, indirect experience in attaining these required certifications across the broad range of system solutions that we offer to our international customers.

Telecommunications Regulatory Authority and Carrier Requirements

Our products must comply with government regulations, including those imposed by the Federal Communications Commission and similar telecommunications authorities worldwide regarding emissions, radiation, safety, and connections with telephone lines and radio networks. Our products must also comply with recommendations of quasi-regulatory authorities and of standards-setting committees. Our electronic payment systems have been certified as compliant with a large number of national requirements, including those of the Federal Communications Commission and Underwriters Laboratory in the U.S. and similar local requirements in other countries.

In addition to national requirements for telecommunications systems, wireless network service providers mandate certain standards by which all connected devices and systems must comply with in order to operate on these networks. Many wireless network carriers have their own certification process for devices to be activated and used on their networks. Our wireless electronic payment systems have been certified by leading wireless carrier networks around the world.

Proprietary Rights

We rely primarily on copyrights, trademarks, patent filings, and trade secret laws to establish and maintain our proprietary rights in our technology and products. VeriFone maintains a patent incentive program and patent committee, which encourages and rewards employees to present inventions for patent application and filings.

We currently hold 23 patents and have 38 patent applications filed with various patent offices in several countries throughout the world, including the United Status, Canada, United Kingdom, European Union, China, Israel, India, Australia, Japan, and South Africa.

We currently hold trademark registration in approximately 28 countries for VERIFONE and in approximately 40 countries for VERIFONE including our ribbon logo. We currently hold trademark registration in the United States and a variety of other countries for product names and other marks.

We have not generally registered copyrights in our software and other written works. Instead, we have relied upon common law copyright, customer license agreements, and other forms of protection. We use non-disclosure agreements and license agreements to protect software and other written materials as copyrighted and/or trade secrets.

In the U.S. and other countries, prior to 2001, our predecessor held patents relating to a variety of POS and related inventions, which expire in accordance with the applicable law in the country where filed. In 2001, as part of the divestiture of VeriFone, Inc. from Hewlett-Packard, or HP, HP and VeriFone, Inc. entered into a technology agreement whereby HP retained ownership of most of the patents owned or applied for by VeriFone prior to the date of divestiture. The technology agreement grants VeriFone a perpetual, non-exclusive license to use any of the patented technology retained by HP at no charge. In addition, we hold a non-exclusive license to patents held by NCR Corporation related to signature capture in electronic payment systems. This license expires in 2011, along with the underlying patents.

Segment and Geographical Information

For an analysis of financial information about geographic areas as well as our segments, see “Note 13 — Segment and Geographic Information” of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.

Employees

As of October 31, 2007, we employed 2,224 persons worldwide. None of our employees are represented by a labor union agreement or collective bargaining agreement. We have not experienced any work stoppages and we believe that our employee relations are good.

Available Information

Our Internet address is http://www.verifone.com. We make available free of charge on our investor relations website under “SEC Filings” our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports

on Form 8-K, registration statements and amendments to those reports and registration statements as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such materials to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding our filings at http://www.sec.gov. A copy of any materials we file with the SEC also may be read and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.


ITEM 1A.	*RISK FACTORS*

The risks set forth below may adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results. In addition to the risks set forth below and the factors affecting specific business operations identified with the description of these operations elsewhere in this report, there may also be risks of which we are currently aware, or that we currently regard as immaterial based on the information available to us that later prove to be material.

Risks Related to Our Business

Our internal processes and controls and our disclosure controls have been inadequate; if the processes and controls we have implemented and continue to implement are inadequate, we may not be able to comply with our financial statement certification requirements under applicable SEC rules, or prevent future errors in our financial reporting.

As described under “Item 9A — Controls and Procedures” in this Annual Report, we have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and have determined that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. These weaknesses contributed to our need to restate previously reported interim financial information for each of the first three quarters of our fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, and to the delays in the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also were unable to file our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for our fiscal quarters ended January 31, 2008 and April 30, 2008 on a timely basis. We have implemented and intend to continue to implement a number of additional and enhanced processes and controls to improve our internal control over financial reporting. However, if we are unsuccessful in adequately implementing these processes and controls, we may be unable to comply with Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15, which specify the processes and controls that public companies are required to have in place, and we may be unable to provide the executive certificates required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-15, in our quarterly and annual reports. Even if we implement such controls, there can be no assurance that these controls will be sufficient to detect or prevent future errors in financial reporting. We have devoted additional resources to our financial control and reporting requirements, including hiring additional qualified employees in these areas. We expect to hire additional employees and may also engage additional consultants in these areas. Competition for qualified financial control and accounting professionals in the geographic areas in which we operate is keen and there can be no assurance that we will be able to hire and retain these individuals.

We have been named as a party to several class action and derivative action lawsuits arising from the restatements, and we may be named in additional litigation, all of which are likely to require significant management time and attention and expenses and may result in an unfavorable outcome which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In connection with the restatements of our historical interim financial statements, a number of securities class action complaints were filed against us and certain of our officers, and a number of purported derivative actions have also been filed against certain of our current and former directors and officers. See “Item 3 — Legal Proceedings” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The amount of time and resources required to resolve these lawsuits is unpredictable, and defending ourselves is likely to divert management’s attention from the day-to-day operations of our business, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, an unfavorable outcome in such litigation is likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our insurance may not be sufficient to cover our costs in these actions. In addition, we may be obligated to indemnify (and advance legal expenses to) officers, employees and directors in connection with these actions. We

currently hold insurance policies for the benefit of our directors and officers, although our insurance coverage may not be sufficient in some or all of these matters. Furthermore, our insurance carriers may seek to deny coverage in some or all of these matters, in which case we may have to fund the indemnification amounts owed to such directors and officers ourselves.

We are subject to the risk of additional litigation and regulatory proceedings or actions in connection with the restatements. We have responded to inquiries and provided information and documents related to the restatement to the SEC, the U.S. Department of Justice, the New York Stock Exchange, and the Chicago Board Options Exchange. The SEC also has expressed an interest in interviewing several current and former VeriFone officers and employees, and we are continuing to cooperate with the SEC in responding to the SEC’s requests for information. Additional regulatory inquiries may also be commenced by other U.S. federal, state or foreign regulatory agencies. In addition, we may in the future be subject to additional litigation or other proceedings or actions arising in relation to the restatement of our historical interim financial statements. Litigation and any potential regulatory proceeding or action may be time consuming, expensive and distracting from the conduct of our business. The adverse resolution of any specific lawsuit or any potential regulatory proceeding or action could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our restatement and related litigation, as well as related amendments to our credit instruments could result in substantial additional costs and expenses and adversely affect our cash flows, and may adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We have incurred substantial expenses for legal, accounting, tax and other professional services in connection with the Audit Committee investigation, our internal review of our historical financial statements, the preparation of the restated financial statements, inquiries from government agencies, the related litigation, and the amendments to our credit agreement as a result of our failure to timely file our Exchange Act reports with the SEC. We estimate that we have incurred approximately $28.4 million of expenses related to these activities through July 31, 2008, including $1.4 million of professional fees to modify our credit instruments. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses in connection with these matters. See “Secured Credit Facility” under “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources” for additional information related to the amendments to our credit agreement. For more information on the risks related to the amendments to our credit agreement, see the risk factor entitled “Our secured credit facility contains restrictive and financial covenants and, if we are unable to comply with these covenants, we will be in default” under “Risks Related to Our Capital Structure.”

Many members of our senior management team and our Board of Directors have been and will be required to devote a significant amount of time on matters relating to the restatement, our outstanding periodic reports, remedial efforts and related litigation. In addition, certain of these individuals are named defendants in the litigation related to the restatement. Defending these actions may require significant time and attention from them. If our senior management is unable to devote sufficient time in the future developing and pursuing our strategic business initiatives and running ongoing business operations, there may be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We have experienced rapid growth, and if we cannot adequately manage our growth, our results of operations will suffer.

We have experienced rapid growth in our operations, both internally and from acquisitions. Future rapid growth may place a significant strain on managerial, operational, and financial resources. We cannot be sure that we have made adequate allowances for the costs and risks associated with our expansion, or that our systems, procedures, and managerial controls will be adequate to support further expansion in our operations. Any delay in implementing, or transitioning to, new or enhanced systems, procedures, or controls may adversely affect our ability to manage our product inventory and record and report financial and management information on a timely and accurate basis. We expect that growth will require us to hire additional finance and control, engineering, technical support, sales, administrative, and operational personnel. Competition for qualified personnel can be intense in the areas where we operate and we have faced challenges in hiring qualified employees in these areas. The process of locating, training and successfully integrating qualified personnel into our operations can be lengthy and expensive. If we are unable to successfully manage expansion, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

A significant percentage of our business is executed towards the end of our fiscal quarters. This could negatively impact our business and results of operations.

Revenues recognized in our fiscal quarters tend to be back-end loaded. This means that sales orders are received, product shipped, and revenue recognized increasingly towards the end of each fiscal quarter. This back-end loading, particularly if it becomes more pronounced, could adversely affect our business and results of operations due to the following factors:


	•	the manufacturing processes at our internal manufacturing facility could become concentrated in a shorter time period. This concentration of manufacturing could increase labor and other manufacturing costs and negatively impact gross margins. The risk of inventory write offs could also increase if we were to hold higher inventory levels to counteract this;

	•	the higher concentration of orders may make it difficult to accurately forecast component requirements and, as a result, we could experience a shortage of the components needed for production, possibly delaying shipments and causing lost orders;

	•	if we are unable to fill orders at the end of a quarter, shipments may be delayed. This could cause us to fail to meet our revenue and operating profit expectations for a particular quarter and could increase the fluctuation of quarterly results if shipments are delayed from one fiscal quarter to the next or orders are cancelled by customers; and

	•	increasing manufacturing and distribution costs.

We are subject to impairment charges due to potential declines in the fair value of our assets.

As a result of our acquisitions, particularly that of Lipman, we have significant goodwill on our balance sheet. We test that goodwill for impairment on a periodic basis as required at least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The events or changes that could require us to test our goodwill for impairment include a reduction in our stock price and market capitalization and changes in our estimated future cash flows, as well as changes in rates of growth in our industry or in any of our reporting units. If we determine that goodwill is impaired in any of our reporting units, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings which would adversely affect our financial results and could also materially adversely affect our business.

The government tax benefits that our Israeli subsidiary currently receives require it to meet several conditions and may be terminated or reduced in the future, which would impact the timing of cash tax payments for previously accrued taxes.

Our principal subsidiary in Israel (formerly Lipman) has received tax benefits under Israeli law for capital investments that are designated as “Approved Enterprises.” Lipman received such tax benefits of approximately $0.1 million in 2007, zero in 2006, and $4.0 million in 2005. To maintain our eligibility for these tax benefits, we must continue to meet conditions, including making specified investments in property, plant, and equipment, and continuing to manufacture in Israel. If we do not comply with these conditions in the future, the benefits received could be cancelled or reduced and we could be required to pay increased taxes or refund the amounts of the tax benefits Lipman received in the past, together with interest and penalties. Also, an increase in our assembly of products outside of Israel may be construed as a failure to comply with these conditions. These tax benefits may not continue in the future at the current levels or at all. The termination or reduction of these tax benefits, or our inability to qualify for new programs, could adversely affect our results of operations. Our principal subsidiary in Israel has undistributed earnings of approximately $133 million, the vast majority of which are attributable to Lipman’s Approved Enterprise programs. As such these earnings were not subject to Israeli statutory corporate tax at the time they were generated. To the extent that these earnings are distributed to the United States in the future, our Israeli subsidiary would be required to pay corporate tax at the rate ordinarily applicable to such earnings (currently between 10% and 25%) along with a 15% withholding tax. As of October 31, 2007, the Company has accrued $40.5 million for taxes associated with future distributions of Israeli earnings.

We face risks related to our recent migration to a common enterprise resource planning information system to integrate all business and finance activities.

We recently migrated the majority of our business and finance activities to a new enterprise resource planning information system, which replaced our previous systems. Due to the size and complexity of our business, including the acquisition of Lipman, the conversion process will continue to be very challenging. Any disruptions and problems that occur during the system conversion could adversely impact our ability to finish the conversion in a timely and cost effective way or the quality and reliability of the information generated by the new system. Even if we do succeed, the implementation of the remaining phases, and the optimization of the already installed phases may be much more costly than we anticipated. If we are unable to successfully complete implementation of our new information system as planned, in addition to adversely impacting our financial position, results of operations and cash flows in the short and long term, it could also affect our ability to collect the information necessary to timely and accurately file our financial reports with the SEC.

We depend upon third parties to physically manufacture many of our systems and to supply the components necessary to manufacture our products.

Prior to the Lipman acquisition, VeriFone did not directly manufacture the physical systems we design which form part of our System Solutions. In addition, Lipman did not manufacture systems it sold in Brazil or a majority of the systems designed by its Dione subsidiary. We arrange for a limited number of third parties to manufacture these systems under contract and pursuant to our specifications. Components such as application specific integrated circuits, or ASICs, payment processors, wireless modules, modems, and printer mechanisms that are necessary to manufacture and assemble our systems are sourced either directly by us or on our behalf by our contract manufacturers from a variety of component suppliers selected by us. If our suppliers are unable to deliver the quantities that we require, we would be faced with a shortage of critical components. We also experience from time to time an increase in the lead time for delivery of some of our key components. We may not be able to find alternative sources in a timely manner if suppliers of our key components become unwilling or unable to provide us with adequate supplies of these key components when we need them or if they increase their prices. If we are unable to obtain sufficient key required components, or to develop alternative sources if and as required in the future, or to replace our component and factory tooling for our products in a timely manner if they are damaged or destroyed, we could experience delays or reductions in product shipments. This could harm our relationships with our customers and cause our revenues to decline. Even if we are able to secure alternative sources or replace our tooling in a timely manner, our costs could increase. For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, over half of our component spending was for components we sourced from a single supplier or a small number of suppliers.

We have significant operations in Israel and therefore our results of operations may be adversely affected by political or economic instability or military operations in or around Israel.

We have offices and a manufacturing facility in Israel and many of our suppliers are located in Israel. Therefore, political, economic, and military conditions in Israel directly affect our operations. The future of peace efforts between Israel and its Arab neighbors remains uncertain. Any armed conflicts or further political instability in the region is likely to negatively affect business conditions and adversely affect our results of operations. Furthermore, several countries continue to restrict or ban business with Israel and Israeli companies. These restrictive laws and policies may seriously limit our ability to make sales in those countries.

In addition, many employees in Israel are obligated to perform at least 30 days and up to 40 days, depending on rank and position, of military reserve duty annually and are subject to being called for active duty under emergency circumstances. If a military conflict or war arises, these individuals could be required to serve in the military for extended periods of time. Our operations in Israel could be disrupted by the absence for a significant period of one or more key employees or a significant number of other employees due to military service. Any disruption in our operations in Israel could materially adversely affect our business.

We depend on our manufacturing and warehouse facility in Israel. If operations at this facility are interrupted for any reason, there could be a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We currently assemble and test a majority of our NURIT products and some of our Dione products at our manufacturing facility located in Israel. Component and limited finished product inventories are also stored at this facility. Disruption of the manufacturing process at this facility or damage to it, whether as a result of fire, natural disaster, act of war, terrorist attack, or otherwise, could materially affect our ability to deliver products on a timely basis and could materially adversely affect our results of operations. We also assemble some of our NURIT products in Brazil. To the extent products are manufactured by third parties in additional countries, we may become more dependent on third-party manufacturers to produce and deliver products sold in these markets on a timely basis and at an acceptable cost.

We depend on a limited number of customers, including distributors and resellers, for sales of a large percentage of our System Solutions. If we do not effectively manage our relationships with them, our net revenues and operating results will suffer.

We sell a significant portion of our solutions through third parties such as independent distributors, independent sales organizations, or ISOs, value-added resellers, and payment processors. We depend on their active marketing and sales efforts. These third parties also provide after-sales support and related services to end user customers. When we introduce new applications and solutions, they also provide critical support for developing and porting the custom software applications to run on our various electronic payment systems and, internationally, in obtaining requisite certifications in the markets in which they are active. Accordingly, the pace at which we are able to introduce new solutions in markets in which these parties are active depends on the resources they dedicate to these tasks. Moreover, our arrangements with these third parties typically do not prevent them from selling products of other companies, including our competitors, and they may elect to market our competitors’ products and services in preference to our system solutions. If one or more of our major resellers terminates or otherwise adversely changes its relationship with us, we may be unsuccessful in replacing it. The loss of one of our major resellers could impair our ability to sell our solutions and result in lower revenues and income. It could also be time consuming and expensive to replicate, either directly or through other resellers, the certifications and the custom applications owned by these third parties.

A significant percentage of our net revenues is attributable to a limited number of customers, including distributors and ISOs. For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, VeriFone’s ten largest customers accounted for approximately 30.8% of VeriFone’s net revenues. No customer accounted for more than 10% of VeriFone’s net revenues in that period. If any of our large customers significantly reduces or delays purchases from us or if we are required to sell products to them at reduced prices or on other terms less favorable to us, our revenues and income could be materially adversely affected.

A majority of our net revenues is generated outside of the United States and we intend to continue to expand our operations internationally. Our results of operations could suffer if we are unable to manage our international expansion and operations effectively.

During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, 61% of our net revenues were generated outside of the United States. We expect our percentage of net revenues generated outside of the United States to continue to increase in the coming years. Part of our strategy is to expand our penetration in existing foreign markets and to enter new foreign markets. Our ability to penetrate some international markets may be limited due to different technical standards, protocols or product requirements. Expansion of our international business will require significant management attention and financial resources. Our international net revenues will depend on our continued success in the following areas:


	•	securing commercial relationships to help establish our presence in international markets;

	•	hiring and training personnel capable of marketing, installing and integrating our solutions, supporting customers, and managing operations in foreign countries;


	•	localizing our solutions to target the specific needs and preferences of foreign customers, which may differ from our traditional customer base in the United States;

	•	building our brand name and awareness of our services among foreign customers; and

	•	implementing new systems, procedures, and controls to monitor our operations in new markets.

In addition, we are subject to risks associated with operating in foreign countries, including:


	•	multiple, changing, and often inconsistent enforcement of laws and regulations;

	•	satisfying local regulatory or industry imposed security or other certification requirements;

	•	competition from existing market participants that may have a longer history in and greater familiarity with the foreign markets we enter;

	•	tariffs and trade barriers;

	•	laws and business practices that favor local competitors;

	•	fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

	•	extended payment terms and the ability to collect accounts receivable;

	•	economic and political instability in foreign countries;

	•	imposition of limitations on conversion of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars or remittance of dividends and other payments by foreign subsidiaries;

	•	changes in a specific country’s or region’s political or economic conditions; and

	•	greater difficulty in safeguarding intellectual property in areas such as China, Russia, and Latin America.

In addition, compliance with foreign and U.S. laws and regulations that are applicable to our international operations is complex and may increase our cost of doing business in international jurisdictions and our international operations could expose us to fines and penalties if we fail to comply with these regulations. These laws and regulations include import and export requirements, U.S. laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and local laws prohibiting corrupt payments to governmental officials. Although we have implemented policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these laws, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, and agents will not take actions in violation of our policies, particularly as we expand our operations through organic growth and acquisitions. Any such violations could subject us to civil or criminal penalties, including substantial fines or prohibitions on our ability to offer our products and services to one or more countries, and could also materially damage our reputation, our brand, our international expansion efforts, our business, and our operating results. In addition, if we fail to address the challenges and risks associated with international expansion and acquisition strategy, we may encounter difficulties implementing our strategy, which could impede our growth or harm our operating results.

Our quarterly operating results may fluctuate significantly as a result of factors outside of our control, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

We expect our revenues and operating results to vary from quarter to quarter. As a consequence, our operating results in any single quarter may not meet the expectations of securities analysts and investors, which could cause the price of our common stock to decline. Factors that may affect our operating results include:


	•	the type, timing, and size of orders and shipments;

	•	demand for and acceptance of our new product offerings;

	•	delays in the implementation and delivery of our products and services, which may impact the timing of our recognition of revenues;

	•	variations in product mix and cost during any period;


	•	development of new relationships and maintenance and enhancement of existing relationships with customers and strategic partners;

	•	component supplies, manufacturing, or distribution difficulties;

	•	deferral of customer contracts in anticipation of product or service enhancements;

	•	timing of commencement, implementation, or completion of major implementations projects;

	•	timing of governmental, statutory and industry association requirements;

	•	the relative mix of North America and International net revenues;

	•	fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

	•	the fixed nature of many of our expenses; and

	•	industry and economic conditions, including competitive pressures and inventory obsolescence.

In particular, differences in relative growth rates between our businesses in North America and internationally may have a significant effect on our operating results, particularly our reported gross profit percentage, in any individual quarter, with International sales carrying lower margins.

In addition, we have in the past and may continue to experience periodic variations in sales to our key vertical and international markets. These periodic variations occur throughout the year and may lead to fluctuations in our quarterly operating results depending on the impact of any given market during that quarter and could lead to volatility in our stock price.

Our North American and International operations are not equally profitable, which may promote volatility in our earnings and may adversely impact future growth in our earnings.

Our International sales of System Solutions tend to carry lower average selling prices and therefore have lower gross margins than our sales in North America. As a result, if we successfully expand our International sales, any improvement in our results of operations will likely not be as favorable as an expansion of similar magnitude in the United States and Canada. In addition, we are unable to predict for any future period our proportion of revenues that will result from International sales versus sales in North America. Variations in this proportion from period to period may lead to volatility in our results of operations which, in turn, may depress the trading price of our common stock.

Fluctuations in currency exchange rates may adversely affect our results of operations.

A substantial portion of our business consists of sales made to customers outside the United States. A portion of the net revenues we receive from such sales is denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Additionally, portions of our cost of net revenues and our other operating expenses are incurred by our International operations and denominated in local currencies. Fluctuations in the value of these net revenues, costs and expenses as measured in U.S. dollars have affected our results of operations historically, and adverse currency exchange rate fluctuations may have a material impact in the future. In addition, our balance sheet reflects non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities, primarily intercompany balances, which can be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates. We have entered into foreign currency forward contracts and other arrangements intended to hedge our exposure to adverse fluctuations in exchange rates. Nevertheless, these hedging arrangements may not always be effective, particularly in the event of imprecise forecasts of non-U.S. denominated assets and liabilities. Accordingly, if there is an adverse movement in exchange rates, we might suffer significant losses. Additionally, hedging programs expose us to risks that could adversely affect our operating results, including the following:


	•	we may be unable to hedge currency risk for some transactions because of a high level of uncertainty or the inability to reasonably estimate our foreign exchange exposures; and

	•	we may be unable to acquire foreign exchange hedging instruments in some of the geographic areas where we do business, or, where these derivatives are available, we may not be able to acquire enough of them to fully offset our exposure.

Security is vital to our customers and end users and therefore breaches in the security of our solutions could adversely affect our reputation and results of operations.

Protection against fraud is of key importance to the purchasers and end users of our solutions. We incorporate security features, such as encryption software and secure hardware, into our solutions to protect against fraud in electronic payment transactions and to ensure the privacy and integrity of consumer data. Our solutions may be vulnerable to breaches in security due to defects in the security mechanisms, the operating system and applications, or the hardware platform. Security vulnerabilities could jeopardize the security of information transmitted or stored using our solutions. In general, liability associated with security breaches of a certified electronic payment system belongs to the institution that acquires the financial transaction. However, if the security of our solutions is compromised, our reputation and marketplace acceptance of our solutions will be adversely affected, which would cause our business to suffer, and we may become subject to damage claims.

Our solutions may have defects that could result in sales delays, delays in our collection of receivables, and claims against us.

We offer complex solutions that are susceptible to undetected hardware and software errors or failures. Solutions may experience failures when first introduced, as new versions are released, or at any time during their lifecycle. Any product recalls as a result of errors or failures could result in the loss of or delay in market acceptance of our solutions and adversely affect our business and reputation. Any significant returns or warranty claims could result in significant additional costs to us and could adversely affect our results of operations. Our customers may also run third-party software applications on our electronic payment systems. Errors in third-party applications could adversely affect the performance of our solutions.

The existence of defects and delays in correcting them could result in negative consequences, including the following: harm to our brand; delays in shipping system solutions; loss of market acceptance for our system solutions; additional warranty expenses; diversion of resources from product development; and loss of credibility with distributors and customers. Correcting defects can be time consuming and in some circumstances extremely difficult. Software errors may take several months to correct, and hardware defects may take even longer to correct.

We may accumulate excess or obsolete inventory that could result in unanticipated price reductions and write-downs and adversely affect our financial condition.

In formulating our solutions, we have focused our efforts on providing to our customers solutions with higher levels of functionality, which requires us to develop and incorporate cutting edge and evolving technologies. This approach tends to increase the risk of obsolescence for products and components we hold in inventory and may compound the difficulties posed by other factors that affect our inventory levels, including the following:


	•	the need to maintain significant inventory of components that are in limited supply;

	•	buying components in bulk for the best pricing;

	•	responding to the unpredictable demand for products;

	•	cancellation of customer orders; and

	•	responding to customer requests for quick delivery schedules.

The accumulation of excess or obsolete inventory may result in price reductions and inventory write-downs, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition. We incurred an obsolescence cost of $16.6 million for obsolete inventory, scrap, and purchase commitments for excess components at contract manufacturers during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, primarily due to the implementation of PCI security standards which significantly reduced the markets in which non-PCI compliant finished goods and related accessories could be sold. In the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, we incurred an obsolescence charge of $3.5 million primarily as a result of discontinued and legacy financial and retail products and check readers, in addition to the establishment of a reserve for certain memory components that are high risk in nature as they are no longer used in manufacturing and are only being held as future repair stock.

Our proprietary technology is difficult to protect and unauthorized use of our proprietary technology by third parties may impair our ability to compete effectively.

We may not be able to protect our proprietary technology, which could enable competitors to develop services that compete with our own. We rely on copyright, trademark, and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality, licensing and other contractual arrangements to establish and protect the proprietary aspects of our solutions. We do not own any patents that protect important aspects of our current solutions. The laws of some countries in which we sell our solutions and services may not protect software and intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws in the United States. If we are unable to prevent misappropriation of our technology, competitors may be able to use and adapt our technology. Our failure to protect our technology could diminish our competitive advantage and cause us to lose customers to competitors.

Our business may suffer if we are sued for infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties, or if we are unable to obtain rights to third-party intellectual property on which we depend.

Third parties have in the past asserted and may in the future assert claims that our system solutions infringe their proprietary rights. Such infringement claims, even if meritless, may cause us to incur significant costs in defending those claims. We may be required to discontinue using and selling any infringing technology and services, to expend resources to develop non-infringing technology or to purchase licenses or pay royalties for other technology. Similarly, we depend on our ability to license intellectual property from third parties. These or other third parties may become unwilling to license to us on acceptable terms intellectual property that is necessary to our business. In either case, we may be unable to acquire licenses for other technology on reasonable commercial terms or at all. As a result, we may find that we are unable to continue to offer the solutions and services upon which our business depends.

We have received, and have currently pending, third-party claims and may receive additional notices of such claims of infringement in the future. Infringement claims may cause us to incur significant costs in defending those claims. For example, during 2005, VeriFone incurred approximately $1.2 million and Lipman incurred approximately $1.5 million in expenses in connection with the defense and settlement of proceedings brought by Verve L.L.C. More recently, in September 2007, SPA Syspatronic AG commenced an infringement action against us and others and in March 2008, Cardsoft, Inc. and Cardsoft (Assignment for the Benefit of Credits), LLC commenced an infringement action against us and others. Infringement claims are expensive and time consuming to defend, regardless of the merits or ultimate outcome. Similar claims may result in additional protracted and costly litigation. There can be no assurance that we will continue to prevail in any such actions or that any license required under any such patent or other intellectual property would be made available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. See “Item 3 — Legal Proceedings.”

We face litigation risks that could force us to incur substantial defense costs and could result in damages awards against us that would negatively impact our business.

As described in “Item 3 — Legal Proceedings,” there are a number of pending litigation and tax assessment matters each of which may be time-consuming to resolve, expensive to defend, and disruptive to normal business operations. The outcome of litigation is inherently difficult to predict. An unfavorable resolution of any specific lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may not be able to attract, integrate, manage, and retain qualified personnel.

Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continued contributions of our key senior management, engineering, sales and marketing, and manufacturing personnel, many of whom would be difficult to replace. In addition, our future success also depends on our ability to attract, integrate, manage, and retain highly skilled employees throughout our businesses. Competition for some of these personnel is intense, and in the past, we have had difficulty hiring employees in our desired time frame, particularly qualified finance and accounting professionals. We may be unsuccessful in attracting and retaining personnel. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel, the inability to attract or retain qualified personnel in the future, or delays in hiring required personnel,

particularly engineers and sales personnel, could make it difficult for us to manage our business and meet key objectives, such as timely product introductions.

In January and July 2008, we implemented work force reduction plans reducing the number of employees and contractors. These reductions have also required that we reassign certain employee duties. Workforce reductions and job reassignments could negatively affect employee morale, and make it difficult to motivate and retain the remaining employees and contractors, which would affect our ability to deliver our products in a timely fashion and otherwise negatively affect our business.

In addition, the restatement of our historical interim financial statements has adversely impacted our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel and may also affect the morale and productivity of our workforce, including as a result of the uncertainties inherent in that process as well as our inability to provide equity-based compensation or permit the exercise of outstanding stock options until we have filed all of our required reports with the SEC. Moreover, the restatement process has adversely affected the market for our shares making our equity compensation program potentially less attractive for current or prospective employees.

Shipments of electronic payment systems may be delayed by factors outside of our control, which can harm our reputation and our relationships with our customers.

The shipment of payment systems requires us or our manufacturers, distributors, or other agents to obtain customs or other government certifications and approvals, and, on occasion, to submit to physical inspection of our systems in transit. Failure to satisfy these requirements, and the very process of trying to satisfy them, can lead to lengthy delays in the delivery of our solutions to our direct or indirect customers. Delays and unreliable delivery by us may harm our reputation in the industry and our relationships with our customers.

Force majeure events, such as terrorist attacks, other acts of violence or war, political instability, and health epidemics may adversely affect us.

Terrorist attacks, war and international political instability, along with health epidemics may disrupt our ability to generate revenues. Such events may negatively affect our ability to maintain sales revenues and to develop new business relationships. Because a substantial and growing part of our revenues is derived from sales and services to customers outside of the United States and we have our electronic payment systems manufactured outside the U.S., terrorist attacks, war and international political instability anywhere may decrease international demand for our products and inhibit customer development opportunities abroad, disrupt our supply chain and impair our ability to deliver our electronic payment systems, which could materially adversely affect our net revenues or results of operations. Any of these events may also disrupt global financial markets and precipitate a decline in the price of our common stock.

While we believe we comply with environmental laws and regulations, we are still exposed to potential risks associated with environmental laws and regulations.

We are subject to other legal and regulatory requirements, including a European Union directive that places restrictions on the use of hazardous substances (RoHS) in electronic equipment, a European Union directive on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE), and the environmental regulations promulgated by China’s Ministry of Information Industry (China RoHS). RoHS sets a framework for producers’ obligations in relation to manufacturing (including the amounts of named hazardous substances contained in products sold) and WEEE sets a framework for treatment, labeling, recovery, and recycling of electronic products in the European Union which may require us to alter the manufacturing of the physical devices that include our solutions and/or require active steps to promote recycling of materials and components. Although the WEEE directive has been adopted by the European Commission, national legislation to implement the directive is still pending in the member states of the European Union. In addition, similar legislation could be enacted in other jurisdictions, including in the United States. If we do not comply with the RoHS and WEEE directives and China RoHS, we may suffer a loss of revenue, be unable to sell in certain markets or countries, be subject to penalties and enforced fees, and/or suffer a competitive disadvantage. Furthermore, the costs to comply with RoHS and WEEE and China RoHS, or with current and

future environmental and worker health and safety laws may have a material adverse effect on our results of operation, expenses and financial condition.

We may pursue complementary acquisitions and strategic investments, which will involve numerous risks. We may not be able to address these risks without substantial expense, delay or other operational or financial problems.

We may seek to acquire or make investments in related businesses, technologies, or products in the future. Acquisitions or investments involve various risks, such as:


	•	the difficulty of integrating the technologies, operations, and personnel of the acquired business, technology or product;

	•	the potential disruption of our ongoing business, including the diversion of management attention;

	•	the possible inability to obtain the desired financial and strategic benefits from the acquisition or investment;

	•	loss of customers;

	•	the risk that increasing complexity inherent in operating a larger business may impact the effectiveness of our internal controls and adversely affect our financial reporting processes;

	•	assumption of unanticipated liabilities;

	•	the loss of key employees of an acquired business; and

	•	the possibility of our entering markets in which we have limited prior experience.

Future acquisitions and investments could also result in substantial cash expenditures, potentially dilutive issuance of our equity securities, our incurring of additional debt and contingent liabilities, and amortization expenses related to other intangible assets that could adversely affect our business, operating results, and financial condition. We depend on the retention and performance of existing management and employees of acquired businesses for the day-to-day management and future operating results of these businesses.

Risks Related to Our Industry

Our markets are highly competitive and subject to price erosion.

The markets for our system solutions and services are highly competitive, and we have been subject to price pressures. Competition from manufacturers, distributors, or providers of products similar to or competitive with our system solutions or services could result in price reductions, reduced margins, and a loss of market share or could render our solutions obsolete. For example, First Data Corporation, a leading provider of payments processing services, and formerly our largest customer, has developed and continues to develop a series of proprietary electronic payment systems for the U.S. market.

We expect to continue to experience significant and increasing levels of competition in the future. We compete with suppliers of cash registers that provide built in electronic payment capabilities and producers of software that facilitates electronic payment over the internet, as well as other manufacturers or distributors of electronic payment systems. We must also compete with smaller companies that have been able to develop strong local or regional customer bases. In certain foreign countries, some competitors are more established, benefit from greater name recognition and have greater resources within those countries than we do.

If we do not continually enhance our existing solutions and develop and market new solutions and enhancements, our net revenues and income will be adversely affected.

The market for electronic payment systems is characterized by:


	•	rapid technological change;

	•	frequent product introductions and enhancements;


	•	evolving industry and government performance and security standards; and

	•	changes in customer and end-user requirements.

Because of these factors, we must continually enhance our existing solutions and develop and market new solutions.

We cannot be sure that we will successfully complete the development and introduction of new solutions or enhancements or that our new solutions will be accepted in the marketplace. We may also fail to develop and deploy new solutions and enhancements on a timely basis. In either case, we may lose market share to our competitors, and our net revenues and results of operations could suffer.

We must adhere to industry and government regulations and standards and therefore sales will suffer if we cannot comply with them.

Our system solutions must meet industry standards imposed by EMVCo LLC, Visa, MasterCard, and other credit card associations and standard setting organizations. New standards are continually being adopted or proposed as a result of worldwide anti-fraud initiatives, the increasing need for system compatibility and technology developments such as wireless and wireline IP communication. Our solutions also must comply with government regulations, including those imposed by telecommunications authorities and independent standards groups worldwide regarding emissions, radiation, and connections with telecommunications and radio networks. We cannot be sure that we will be able to design our solutions to comply with future standards or regulations on a timely basis, if at all. Compliance with these standards could increase the cost of developing or producing our solutions. New products designed to meet any new standards need to be introduced to the market and ordinarily need to be certified by the credit card associations and our customers before being purchased. The certification process is costly and time consuming and increases the amount of time it takes to sell our products. Our business and financial condition could be adversely affected if we cannot comply with new or existing industry standards, or obtain or retain necessary regulatory approval or certifications in a timely fashion, or if compliance results in increasing the cost of our products. Selling products that are non-compliant may result in fines against us or our customers, which we may be liable to pay.

Risks Related to Our Capital Structure

Our secured credit facility contains restrictive and financial covenants and, if we are unable to comply with these covenants, we will be in default. A default could result in the acceleration of our outstanding indebtedness, which would have an adverse effect on our business and stock price.

On October 31, 2006, we entered into a secured credit agreement consisting of a Term B Loan facility of $500 million and a revolving credit facility permitting borrowings of up to $40 million (the “Credit Facility”). The proceeds from the Term B loan were used to repay all outstanding amounts relating to an existing senior secured credit agreement, pay certain transaction costs, and partially fund the cash consideration in connection with the acquisition of Lipman on November 1, 2006. Through October 31, 2007, we had repaid an aggregate of $263.8 million, leaving a Term B Loan balance of $236.2 million at October 31, 2007.

Our Credit Facility contains customary covenants that require our subsidiaries to maintain certain specified financial ratios and restrict their ability to make certain distributions with respect to their capital stock, prepay other debt, encumber their assets, incur additional indebtedness, make capital expenditures above specified levels, engage in certain business combinations, or undertake various other corporate activities. Therefore, as a practical matter, these covenants restrict our ability to engage in or benefit from such activities. In addition, we have, in order to secure repayment of our Credit Facility, pledged substantially all of our assets and properties. This pledge may reduce our operating flexibility because it restricts our ability to dispose of these assets or engage in other transactions that may be beneficial to us.

In connection with our restatement process, we sought and obtained an initial amendment to our Credit Facility delaying our obligation to provide required financial reports until April 30, 2008. In connection with the initial amendment we paid to the consenting lenders an amendment fee aggregating approximately $0.7 million and we also agreed to an increase in the interest rate payable on our term loan of 0.25% per year. On April 28, 2008, we

sought and obtained a second amendment to our Credit Facility to further delay our obligation to provide required financial reports until July 31, 2008. In connection with the second amendment, we paid to the consenting lenders an additional amendment fee aggregating approximately $0.7 million. We also agreed to an increase in the interest rate payable on our term loan and any revolving commitments of 0.75% per year, an increase of 0.125% per year to the commitment fee for unused revolving commitments and an increase of 0.75% per year to the letter of credit fees. On July 31, 2008, we sought and obtained a third amendment to our Credit Facility to further delay our obligation to provide required financial reports until August 31, 2008. In connection with the third amendment, we paid to the consenting lenders an additional amendment fee aggregating approximately $0.3 million. If we are unable to comply with the covenants in our Credit Facility, we will be in default, which could result in the acceleration of our outstanding indebtedness. If acceleration occurs, we may not be able to repay our debt and it is unlikely that we would be able to borrow sufficient additional funds to refinance our debt. Even if new financing is made available to us, it may not be available on acceptable terms. If we were to default in performance under the Credit Facility we may pursue an amendment or waiver of the Credit Facility with our existing lenders, but there can be no assurance that the lenders would grant another amendment and waiver and, in light of current credit market conditions, any such amendment or waiver may be on terms, including additional fees, as well as increased interest rates and other more stringent terms and conditions that are materially disadvantageous to us.

Our indebtedness and debt service obligations will increase under our Credit Facility, which may adversely affect our cash flow, cash position, and stock price.

We intend to fulfill our debt service obligations under our Credit Facility from existing cash, investments and operations. In the future, if we are unable to generate cash or raise additional cash financings sufficient to meet these obligations and need to use more of our existing cash than planned or to liquidate investments in order to fund these obligations, we may have to delay or curtail the development and or the sales and marketing of new payment systems.

Our indebtedness could have significant additional negative consequences, including, without limitation:


	•	requiring the dedication of a significant portion of our expected cash flow to service the indebtedness, thereby reducing the amount of expected cash flow available for other purposes, including capital expenditures;

	•	increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic conditions;

	•	limiting our ability to obtain additional financing; and

	•	placing us at a possible competitive disadvantage to less leveraged competitors and competitors that have better access to capital resources.

Any modification of the accounting guidelines for convertible debt could result in higher interest expense related to our convertible debt, which could materially impact our results of operations and earnings per share.

In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement). FSP APB 14-1 requires the issuer of convertible debt instruments with cash settlement features to account separately for the liability and equity components of the instrument. The debt would be recognized at the present value of its cash flows discounted using the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of issuance. The equity component would be recognized as the difference between the proceeds from the issuance of the note and the fair value of the liability. The FSP also requires accretion of the resultant debt discount over the expected life of the debt. The FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. Entities are required to apply the FSP retrospectively for all periods presented. We are currently evaluating FSP APB 14-1 and have not yet determined the impact its adoption will have on our consolidated financial statements. However, the impact of this new accounting treatment will be significant and will result in a significant increase to non-cash interest expense beginning in fiscal year 2010 for financial statements covering past and future periods.

Some provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may delay or prevent transactions that many stockholders may favor.

Some provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may have the effect of delaying, discouraging or preventing a merger or acquisition that our stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which stockholders might receive a premium for their shares. These provisions include:


	•	authorization of the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock without the need for action by stockholders;

	•	the removal of directors or amendment of our organizational documents only by the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the shares of our capital stock entitled to vote;

	•	provision that any vacancy on the board of directors, however occurring, including a vacancy resulting from an enlargement of the board, may only be filled by vote of the directors then in office;

	•	inability of stockholders to call special meetings of stockholders, although stockholders are permitted to act by written consent; and

	•	advance notice requirements for board nominations and proposing matters to be acted on by stockholders at stockholder meetings.

Our share price has been volatile and we expect that the price of our common stock may continue to fluctuate substantially.

Our stock price has fluctuated substantially since our initial public offering and more recently since the announcement of our anticipated restatement in December 2007. In addition to fluctuations related to Company-specific factors, broad market and industry factors may adversely affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. Factors that could cause fluctuations in our stock price may include, among other things:


	•	actual or anticipated variations in quarterly operating results;

	•	changes in financial estimates by us or by any securities analysts who might cover our stock, or our failure to meet the estimates made by securities analysts;

	•	changes in the market valuations of other companies operating in our industry;

	•	announcements by us or our competitors of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships or divestitures;

	•	additions or departures of key personnel; and

	•	sales of our common stock, including sales of our common stock by our directors and officers or by our principal stockholders.

As of July 31, 2008, we have approximately 84,194,231 shares of our common stock outstanding and 11,031,138 shares reserved for issuance under our equity compensation plans. We have 100 million shares of common stock authorized under our certificate of incorporation. We are obligated under the terms of our convertible notes to seek an increase in the authorized number of shares of our common stock. We will seek such an increase in connection with our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders. If we are unsuccessful in increasing our authorized capital, we will be required to pay additional interest on our convertible notes. We will also be unable to provide additional equity compensation to our existing and new employees, which could materially adversely affect our business.


ITEM 1B.	*UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS*

None.


ITEM 2.	*PROPERTIES*

Our headquarters are located in San Jose, California. Warehouse and distribution facilities are located in the U.S., Israel, United Kingdom, Turkey, Singapore, China, and Brazil. The warehouse and distribution space is leased and totals approximately 288,000 square feet.

We also maintain research facilities and sales and administrative offices in the U.S. at approximately 11 locations in eight states or jurisdictions and outside the U.S. at approximately 35 locations in 18 countries. All of these locations are leased. We are using substantially all of our currently available productive space to develop, manufacture, market, sell and distribute our products. Our facilities are in good operating condition, suitable for their respective uses and adequate for current needs.


	Approximate
Location	Square Footage

Corporate Headquarters:
United States		17,443
Warehouse and Distribution Facilities:
United States		155,610
International		132,377

		287,987

Sales office or Research and Development:
United States		241,300
International		153,557

		394,857


ITEM 3.	*LEGAL PROCEEDINGS*

Class Action and Derivative Lawsuits

On or after December 4, 2007, several securities class action claims were filed against us and certain of our officers. The various complaints specify different class periods, with the longest proposed class period being August 31, 2006 through December 3, 2007. These lawsuits have been consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California as In re VeriFone Holdings, Inc. Securities Litigation, C 07-6140 MHP. The original actions were: Eichenholtz v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc. et al., C 07-6140 MHP; Lien v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc. et al., C 07-6195 JSW; Vaughn et al. v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc. et al., C 07-6197 VRW (Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed this complaint on March 7, 2008); Feldman et al. v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc. et al., C 07-6218 MMC; Cerini v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc. et al., C 07-6228 SC; Westend Capital Management LLC v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc. et al., C 07-6237 MMC; Hill v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc. et al., C 07-6238 MHP; Offutt v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc. et al., C 07-6241 JSW; Feitel v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc., et al., C 08-0118 CW. On March 17, 2008, the Court held a hearing on Plaintiffs’ motions for Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel and in May 2008, the Court requested additional briefing on these matters, which was submitted in June 2008. We currently expect that, following the Court’s order appointing Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel, a Consolidated Complaint will be filed. Each of the consolidated actions alleges, among other things, violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, based on allegations that we and the individual defendants made false or misleading public statements regarding our business and operations during the putative class periods and seeks unspecified monetary damages and other relief. At this time, we have not recorded any liabilities as we are unable to estimate any potential liability.

Beginning on December 13, 2007, several derivative actions were also filed against certain current and former directors and officers. These derivative lawsuits were filed in: (1) the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, as In re VeriFone Holdings, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. C 07-6347, which consolidates King v. Bergeron, et al. (Case No. 07-CV-6347), Hilborn v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc., et al. (Case No. 08-CV-1132), Patel v. Bergeron, et al. (Case No. 08-CV-1133), and Lemmond, et al. v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc.,

et al. (Case No. 08-CV-1301); and (2) California Superior Court, Santa Clara County, as In re VeriFone Holdings, Inc. Derivative Litigation, Lead Case No. 1-07-CV-100980, which consolidates Catholic Medical Mission Board v. Bergeron, et al. (Case No. 1-07-CV-100980), and Carpel v. Bergeron, et al. (Case No. 1-07-CV-101449). The complaints allege, among other things, that certain of our current and former directors and officers breached their fiduciary duties to us and violated provisions of the California Corporations Code and certain common law doctrines by engaging in alleged wrongful conduct complained of in the securities class action litigation described above. We are named solely as a nominal defendant against whom the plaintiffs seek no recovery. Amended consolidated complaints are expected to be filed in September 2008 in each set of consolidated cases.

On January 27, 2008, a class action complaint was filed against us in the Central District Court in Tel Aviv, Israel on behalf of purchasers of our stock on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. The complaint seeks compensation for damages allegedly incurred by the class of plaintiffs due to the publication of erroneous financial reports. On May 25, 2008, the Court held a hearing on our motion to dismiss or stay the proceedings, after which the Court requested that the plaintiff and we submit additional information to the Court with respect to the applicability of Israeli law to dually registered companies. This additional information was submitted to the Court in June 2008 and the parties are currently awaiting the Court’s ruling on this issue. At this time, we have not recorded any liabilities as we are unable to estimate the potential liabilities.

The foregoing cases are still in the preliminary stages, and we are not able to quantify the extent of our potential liability, if any. An unfavorable outcome in any of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, defending this litigation is likely to be costly and may divert management’s attention from the day-to-day operations of our business.

Regulatory Actions

We have responded to inquiries and provided information and documents related to the restatement of our fiscal year 2007 interim financial statements to the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Department of Justice, the New York Stock Exchange, and the Chicago Board Options Exchange. The SEC has also expressed an interest in interviewing several of our current and former officers and employees, and we are continuing to cooperate with the SEC in responding to the SEC’s requests for information. We are unable to predict what consequences, if any, any investigation by any regulatory agency may have on us. There is no assurance that other regulatory inquiries will not be commenced by other U.S. federal, state or foreign regulatory agencies.

Brazilian State Tax Assessments

One of our Brazilian subsidiaries has been notified of a tax assessment regarding Brazilian state value added tax (“VAT”), for the periods from January 2000 to December 2001 that relates to products supplied to us by a contract manufacturer. The assessment relates to an asserted deficiency of 8.3 million Brazilian reais (approximately $4.7 million) including interest and penalties. The tax assessment was based on a clerical error in which our Brazilian subsidiary omitted the required tax exemption number on its invoices. Management does not expect that we will ultimately incur a material liability in respect of this assessment, because they believe, based in part on advice of our Brazilian tax counsel, that we are likely to prevail in the proceedings relating to this assessment. On May 25, 2005, we had an administrative hearing with respect to this audit. Management expects to receive the decision of the administrative body sometime in 2008. In the event we receive an adverse ruling from the administrative body, we will decide whether or not to appeal and would reexamine the determination as to whether an accrual is necessary. It is currently uncertain what impact this state tax examination may have with respect to our use of a corresponding exemption to reduce the Brazilian federal VAT.

Two of our Brazilian subsidiaries that were acquired as a part of the Lipman acquisition have been notified of assessments regarding Brazilian customs penalties that relate to alleged infractions in the importation of goods. The assessments were issued by the Federal Revenue Department in the City of Vitória, the City of São Paulo, and the City of Itajai. The assessments relate to asserted deficiencies totaling 26.9 million Brazilian reais (approximately $15.3 million) excluding interest. The tax authorities allege that the structure used for the importation of goods was simulated with the objective of evading taxes levied on the importation by under-invoicing the imported goods; the

tax authorities allege that the simulation was created through a fraudulent interposition of parties, where the real sellers and buyers of the imported goods were hidden.

In the Vitória tax assessment, the fines were reduced from 4.7 million Brazilian reais (approximately $2.7 million) to 1.5 million Brazilian reais (approximately $0.8 million) on a first level administrative decision on January 26, 2007. The proceeding has been remitted to the Taxpayers Council to adjudicate the appeal of the first level administrative decision filed by the tax authorities. We also appealed the first level administrative decision on February 26, 2007. In this appeal, we argued that the tax authorities did not have enough evidence to determine that the import transactions were indeed fraudulent and that, even if there were some irregularities in such importations, they could not be deemed to be our responsibility since all the transactions were performed by the third-party importer of the goods. Management expects to receive the decision of the Taxpayers Council sometime in 2008. In the event we receive an adverse ruling from the Taxpayers Council, we will decide whether or not to appeal to the judicial level. Based on our current understanding of the underlying facts, we believe that it is probable that its Brazilian subsidiary will be required to pay some amount of fines. At October 31, 2007, we have accrued 4.7 million Brazilian reais (approximately $2.7 million), excluding interest, which we believe is the probable payment.

On July 12, 2007, we were notified of a first administrative level decision rendered in the São Paulo tax assessment, which maintained the total fine of 20.2 million Brazilian reais (approximately $11.5 million) imposed. On August 10, 2007, we appealed the first administrative level decision to the Taxpayers Council. A hearing was held on August 12, 2008 before the Taxpayers Council, but the Taxpayers Council did not render a decision pending its further review of the records. Management expects to receive the decision of the Taxpayers Council sometime in 2008. In the event we receive an adverse ruling from the Taxpayers Council, we will decide whether or not to appeal to the judicial level. Based on our current understanding of the underlying facts, we believe that it is probable that our Brazilian subsidiary will be required to pay some amount of fines. Accordingly, at October 31, 2007, we have accrued 20.2 million Brazilian reais (approximately $11.5 million), excluding interest.

On May 22, 2008, we were notified of a first administrative level decision rendered in the Itajai assessment, which maintained the total fine of 2.0 million Brazilian reais (approximately $1.1 million) imposed, excluding interest. On May 27, 2008, we appealed the first level administrative level decision to the Taxpayers Council. Based on our current understanding of the underlying facts, we believe that it is probable that our Brazilian subsidiary will be required to pay some amount of fines. Accordingly, at October 31, 2007, we have accrued 2.0 million Brazilian reais (approximately $1.1 million), excluding interest.

Department of Justice Investigation

On December 11, 2006, we received a civil investigative demand from the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) regarding an investigation into its acquisition of Lipman which requests certain documents and other information, principally with respect to the Company’s integration plans and communications prior to the completion of this acquisition. We produced documents and certain current and former employees provided information to a representative of the DOJ in response to this request. We are not aware of any violations in connection with the matters that are the subject of the investigation. On June 20, 2008, our counsel received written confirmation from the DOJ that it had closed this investigation.

SPA Syspatronic AG v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc., VeriFone, Inc., et al.

On September 18, 2007, SPA Syspatronic AG (“SPA”) commenced an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, against us and others, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,093,862 purportedly owned by SPA. The plaintiff is seeking a judgment of infringement, an injunction against further infringement, damages, interest, and attorneys’ fees. We filed an answer and counterclaims on November 8, 2007, and intend to vigorously defend this litigation. On January 28, 2008, we requested that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”) perform a re-examination of the patent. The PTO granted the request on April 4, 2008. We then filed a motion to stay the proceedings with the Court and on April 25, 2008, the Court agreed to stay the proceedings pending the re-examination.

Cardsoft, Inc. et al v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc., VeriFone, Inc., et al.

On March 6, 2008, Cardsoft, Inc. and Cardsoft (Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors), LLC (“Cardsoft”) commenced an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, against us and others, alleging infringement of U.S. Patents No. 6,934,945 and No. 7,302,683 purportedly owned by Cardsoft. The plaintiff is seeking a judgment of infringement, an injunction against further infringement, damages, interest, and attorneys’ fees. We intend to vigorously defend this litigation.

From time to time, we are subject to other legal proceedings related to commercial, customer, and employment matters that have arisen during the ordinary course of its business. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate disposition of these matters, our management has determined, based upon the information available at the date of these financial statements, that the expected outcome of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.


ITEM 4.	*SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS*

There were no matters submitted to a vote of our security holders during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended October 31, 2007.

PART II


ITEM 5.	*MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES*

Our common stock has been quoted on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “PAY” since April 29, 2005. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our stock.

The following table sets forth for the indicated periods, the high and low sale prices of our common stock.


	Fiscal 2007 Quarter Ended								Fiscal 2006 Quarter Ended
	Jan. 31		Apr. 30		Jul. 31		Oct. 31		Jan. 31		Apr. 30		Jul. 31		Oct. 31
	2007		2007		2007		2007		2006		2006		2006		2006

High	$	40.82	$	42.72	$	38.94	$	50.00	$	28.55	$	33.56	$	33.50	$	29.55
Low	$	29.26	$	34.84	$	31.45	$	33.03	$	21.70	$	22.85	$	25.95	$	21.21

On October 31, 2007, the closing sale price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $49.43 and as of July 31, 2008, the closing sale price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange was $14.96. As of July 31, 2008 there were approximately 33 stockholders of record. Because many shares of our common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of stockholders represented by these holders of record.

Dividend Policy

We have not declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock in our most recent three full fiscal years. We do not expect to pay any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance our operations and growth. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent on earnings, financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, any contractual restrictions, and other factors that our board of directors deems relevant. In addition, our Credit Facility contains limitations on the ability of our principal operating subsidiary, VeriFone, Inc., to declare and pay cash dividends. Because we conduct our business through our subsidiaries, as a practical matter these restrictions similarly limit our ability to pay dividends on our common stock.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Information with respect to Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation may be found in “Item 12 — Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters — Equity Compensation Plan Information,” which section is incorporated herein by reference.

Performance Graph

The following graph and table:


	•	compares the performance of an investment in our common stock over the period of April 29, 2005 through October 31, 2007, beginning with an investment at the closing market price on April 29, 2005, the end of the first day our common stock traded on the exchange following our initial public offering, and thereafter, based on the closing price of our common stock on the market, with the S&P 500 Index and a selected peer group index (the “Comparables Index”). The Comparables Index was selected on an industry basis and includes Ingenico S.A., Hypercom Corp., International Business Machines Corp., MICROS Systems, Inc., NCR Corp. and Radiant Systems, Inc.

	•	assumes $100 was invested on the start date at the price indicated and that dividends, if any, were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions. The performance shown in the graph and table represent past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance.


	4/29/2005		10/31/2005		10/31/2006		10/31/2007
VeriFone Holdings, Inc.	$	100.00	$	232.00	$	292.10	$	494.30
S&P 500 Index	$	100.00	$	104.34	$	119.11	$	133.93
Comparables Index	$	100.00	$	112.71	$	131.58	$	172.03

The information provided above under the heading “Performance Graph” shall not be considered “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


ITEM 6.	*SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA*

The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes and “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this report. The selected data in this section is not intended to replace the consolidated financial statements.


	Years Ended October 31,
	2007(3)			2006			2005			2004			2003
	(In thousands, except per share data)

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Net revenues	$	902,892		$	581,070		$	485,367		$	390,088		$	339,331
Cost of net revenues:
Cost of net revenues excluding amortization of purchased core and developed technology assets(1)		565,763			313,900			281,607			231,892			200,291
Amortization of purchased core and developed technology assets		37,897			5,625			6,935			9,745			14,148

Total cost of net revenues		603,660			319,525			288,542			241,637			214,439

Gross profit		299,232			261,545			196,825			148,451			124,892
Operating expenses:(1)
Research and development		65,430			47,353			41,830			33,703			28,193
Sales and marketing		96,295			58,607			52,231			44,002			40,024
General and administrative		80,704			42,573			29,609			25,503			25,039
Amortization of purchased intangible assets		21,571			4,703			4,967			10,200			10,200
In-process research and development		6,752			—			—			—			—

Total operating expenses		270,752			153,236			128,637			113,408			103,456

Operating income		28,480			108,309			68,188			35,043			21,436
Interest expense		(36,598	)		(13,617	)		(15,384	)		(12,597	)		(12,456	)
Interest income		6,702			3,372			598			—			—
Other income (expense), net		(7,882	)		(6,394	)		(6,673	)		(11,869	)		3,557

Income (loss) before income taxes		(9,298	)		91,670			46,729			10,577			12,537
Provision for income taxes		24,718			32,159			13,490			4,971			12,296

Net income (loss)		(34,016	)		59,511			33,239			5,606			241
Accrued dividends on preferred stock		—			—			—			4,959			6,916

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(34,016	)	$	59,511		$	33,239		$	647		$	(6,675	)

Net income (loss) per common share:
Basic	$	(0.41	)	$	0.90		$	0.57		$	0.01		$	(0.14	)

Diluted	$	(0.41	)	$	0.86		$	0.54		$	0.01		$	(0.14	)

Weighted average shares used in computing net income (loss) per common share:
Basic		82,194			66,217			58,318			50,725			48,869

Diluted		82,194			68,894			61,460			56,588			48,869

Cash dividends per common share	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	1.72		$	—

(1) Stock-based compensation included above:
Cost of net revenues — System Solutions	$	2,998		$	709		$	187		$	—		$	—
Research and development		5,937			1,194			358			—			—
Sales and marketing		8,942			2,057			663			—			—
General and administrative		11,015			2,040			479			400			81

	$	28,892		$	6,000		$	1,687		$	400		$	81


	As of October 31,
	2007(3)		2006		2005		2004			2003
	(In thousands)

Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	215,001	$	86,564	$	65,065	$	12,705		$	5,877
Total assets		1,547,309		452,945		327,352		245,619			236,967
Long-term debt and capital leases, including current portion		553,152		192,889		182,806		262,187			62,634
Class A redeemable convertible preferred stock		—		—		—		—			81,210
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		580,922		98,741		26,538		(135,387	)		(39,141	)
Other Data:
EBITDA, as adjusted(2)	$	157,252	$	130,445	$	86,423	$	57,247		$	49,854


(1)		We adopted the fair value recognition and measurement provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, effective May 1, 2005 using the modified-prospective transition method. For periods prior to May 1, 2005 we followed the intrinsic value recognition and measurement provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. For further information see Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The portion of stock-based compensation allocated to each category of expenses for each period is presented above.

(2)		We define earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or EBITDA, as adjusted, as the sum of (1) net income (loss) (excluding extraordinary items of gain or loss and any gain or loss from discontinued operations), (2) interest expense, (3) income taxes, (4) depreciation, amortization, goodwill impairment, and other non-recurring charges, (5) non-cash charges, including non-cash stock-based compensation expense and purchase accounting items, and (6) management fees to our principal stockholder. EBITDA, as adjusted, is a primary component of the financial covenants to which we are subject under our Credit Facility. If we fail to maintain required levels of EBITDA, as adjusted, we could have a default under our Credit Facility, potentially resulting in an acceleration of all of our outstanding indebtedness. Management uses EBITDA, as adjusted, only in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Management believes that the use of this non-GAAP financial measure, in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP, helps it to evaluate our performance and to compare our current results with those for prior periods as well as with the results of other companies in our industry. Our competitors may, due to differences in capital structure and investment history, have interest, tax, depreciation, amortization, and other non-cash expenses that differ significantly from ours. Management also uses this non-GAAP financial measure in our budget and planning process. Management believes that the presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure may be useful to investors for many of the same reasons that management finds these measures useful.

Our EBITDA, as adjusted, contains limitations and should be considered as a supplement to, and not as a substitute for, or superior to, disclosures made in accordance with GAAP. EBITDA, as adjusted, may be different from EBITDA or EBITDA, as adjusted, calculated by other companies and is not based on any comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles. In addition, EBITDA, as adjusted, does not reflect all amounts and costs, such as employee stock-based compensation costs, periodic costs of assets used to generate net revenues and costs to replace those assets, cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments, cash requirements for working capital needs, interest expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our debt, income taxes and the related cash requirements, restructuring and impairment charges and losses from discontinued operations, associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP. Furthermore, we expect to continue to incur expenses similar to those amounts excluded from EBITDA, as adjusted. Management compensates for these limitations by also relying on the comparable GAAP financial measure.

As noted above, management excludes the following items from EBITDA, as adjusted:


	•	Provision for income taxes. While income taxes are directly related to the amount of pre-tax income, they are also impacted by tax laws and the company’s tax structure. As the tax laws and our tax structure are not under the control of our operational managers, management believes that the provision for (benefit from) income taxes should be excluded when evaluating our operational performance.

	•	Interest expense and interest income. While working capital supports the business, management does not believe that related interest expense or interest income is directly attributable to the operating performance of our business.

	•	Depreciation of property, plant and equipment. Management excludes depreciation because while tangible assets support the business, management does not believe the related depreciation costs are directly attributable to the operating performance of our business. In addition, depreciation may not be indicative of current or future capital expenditures.

	•	Amortization of capitalized software. Management excludes amortization of capitalized software because while capitalized software supports the business, management does not believe the related amortization costs are directly attributable to the operating performance of our business. In addition, amortization of capitalized software may not be indicative of current or future expenditures to develop software.

	•	Amortization of certain acquisition related items. We incur amortization of purchased core and developed technology assets, amortization of purchased intangible assets, amortization of step-down in deferred revenue on acquisition, and amortization of step-up in inventory on acquisition in connection with acquisitions. Management excludes these items because it does not believe these expenses are reflective of ongoing operating results in the period incurred. These amounts arise from prior acquisitions and management does not believe that they have a direct correlation to the operation of our business.

	•	In-process research and development. We incur IPR&D expenses when technological feasibility for acquired technology has not been established at the date of acquisition and no future alternative use for such technology exists. These amounts arise from prior acquisitions and management does not believe they have a direct correlation to the operation of VeriFone’s business.

	•	Stock-based compensation. These expenses consist primarily of expenses for employee stock options and restricted stock units under SFAS No. 123 (R). Management excludes stock-based compensation expenses from non-GAAP financial measures primarily because they are non-cash expenses which management believes are not reflective of ongoing operating results.

	•	Acquisition related charges and restructuring costs. This represents charges incurred for consulting services and other professional fees associated with acquisition related activities. These expenses also include charges related to restructuring activities, including costs associated with severance, benefits, and excess facilities. As management does not believe that these charges directly relate to the operation of our business, management believes they should be excluded when evaluating our operating performance.

	•	Management fees to majority stockholder. Management excludes management fees paid to our majority stockholder (which were paid prior to our initial public offering) because it does not believe that these charges directly relate to the operation of our business.

	•	Refund of foreign unclaimed pension benefits. Management excludes the refund of foreign unclaimed pension benefits because it does not believe these amounts directly relate to the operation of our business.

	•	Non-cash portion of loss on debt extinguishment. This represents the non-cash portion of loss incurred on the extinguishment of our credit facility. While this credit facility supported our business, management does not believe the related loss on extinguishment is a cost directly attributable to the operating performance of our business.

A reconciliation of net income (loss), the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, to EBITDA, as adjusted, for the years ended October 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003 is as follows (in thousands):


	Years Ended October 31,
	2007			2006			2005			2004		2003

U.S. GAAP net income (loss)	$	(34,016	)	$	59,511		$	33,239		$	5,606	$	241
Provision for income taxes		24,718			32,159			13,490			4,971		12,296
Interest expense(a)		36,598			13,617			15,384			12,597		12,456
Interest income		(6,702	)		(3,372	)		(598	)		—		—
Depreciation and amortization of equipment and improvements		7,766			3,505			3,691			2,451		1,333
Amortization of capitalized software		1,220			1,231			1,173			698		108
Amortization of purchased intangible assets(b)		59,468			10,328			11,902			19,945		24,348
Amortization of step-up in deferred revenue on acquisition		3,735			986			700			519		1,561
Amortization of step-up in inventory on acquisition		13,823			121			—			—		—
In-process research and development		6,752			—			—			—		—
Stock-based compensation		28,892			6,000			1,687			400		81
Acquisition related charges and restructuring costs		10,234			—			—			—		—
Management fees to majority stockholder		—			—			125			250		250
Refund of foreign unclaimed pension benefits		—			—			—			—		(2,820	)
Extinguishment of debt issuance costs		4,764			6,359			5,630			9,810		—

EBITDA as adjusted	$	157,252		$	130,445		$	86,423		$	57,247	$	49,854


(a)		For the year ended October 31, 2007, interest expense increased due to the increase in the balance of our debt instruments.

(b)		For the year ended October 31, 2007, these expenses increased significantly due to the acquisition of Lipman and PayWare.

(3)		On November 1, 2006, we acquired Lipman. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.


ITEM 7.	*MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS*

This section and other parts of this Form 10-K contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “believes,” “plans,” “predicts,” and similar terms. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, and projections about our industry, and management’s beliefs and assumptions made by management. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in “Item 1A — Risk Factors” above. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Unless required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Restatement and Audit Committee Investigation

Background

On December 3, 2007, we announced that our management had identified errors in accounting related to the valuation of in-transit inventory and allocation of manufacturing and distribution overhead to inventory and that as a

result of these errors, we anticipated that a restatement of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements would be required for the following interim periods:


	•	the three months ended January 31, 2007;

	•	the three and six months ended April 30, 2007; and

	•	the three and nine months ended July 31, 2007.

Our management originally estimated that the restatement would result in changes to previously reported results as follows:


	As of and for the Three Months Ended
	January 31,		April 30,		July 31,
	2007		2007		2007
	(In millions)

Reduction in Inventories	$	7.7	$	16.5	$	30.2
Reduction in Income before income taxes	$	8.9	$	7.0	$	13.8

Audit Committee Investigation

On December 3, 2007, following our announcement, the Audit Committee approved the commencement of an independent investigation into the errors in accounting that led to the anticipated restatement. The Audit Committee engaged independent counsel, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP (“Simpson Thacher”), to conduct the independent investigation under the Audit Committee’s supervision. Simpson Thacher engaged Navigant Consulting, Inc. (“Navigant”) as independent forensic accountants. The scope of the investigation was proposed by Simpson Thacher in consultation with Navigant and approved by the Audit Committee. The investigation involved a program of forensic analysis designed to investigate, among other things:


	•	the circumstances surrounding the errors identified by management and described in our December 3, 2007 announcement;

	•	whether additional errors existed requiring further restatement in the interim periods of fiscal year 2007 and the adjustments required to correct and restate our interim financial statements; and

	•	whether evidence existed indicating that periods prior to fiscal year 2007 may also be required to be restated.

Simpson Thacher and Navigant assembled an investigative team that ultimately consisted of approximately 70 professionals. Information and documents were gathered from current and former employees worldwide. Using search technology, the investigative team evaluated over five million documents in physical and electronic form. Navigant also reviewed relevant accounting databases and journal entries. The investigative team also conducted more than 25 interviews of senior executives, former senior executives of Lipman and current and former finance, accounting and supply chain personnel.

We announced on April 2, 2008 that the investigation was complete and that the investigation had confirmed the existence of the errors in accounting identified in our December 3, 2007 announcement. In particular, the investigation confirmed that incorrect manual journal and elimination entries had been made primarily by our Sacramento, California supply chain accounting team with respect to several inventory-related matters.

The investigation also concluded that existing policies with respect to manual journal entries were not followed and that the review processes and controls in place were not sufficient to identify and correct the errors in a timely manner. The investigation found no evidence that any period prior to fiscal year 2007 required restatement.

Restatement

Concurrently with the Audit Committee investigation, we also conducted an internal review for the purpose of restating our fiscal year 2007 interim condensed consolidated financial statements and preparing our fiscal year 2007 annual consolidated financial statements and fiscal year 2008 interim condensed consolidated financial statements. This review included evaluations of the previously made accounting determinations and judgments. As a result, we have also corrected additional errors, including errors that had previously not been corrected because

our management believed that individually and in the aggregate such errors were not material to our consolidated financial statements. Management also made additional adjustments to reduce certain accruals which had been recorded, such as bonuses, which were accrued based upon information which, following the restatement, was no longer accurate.

The restatements of fiscal year 2007 interim results resulted in the following adjustments:


	As of and for the Three Months Ended
	January 31,		April 30,		July 31,
	2007		2007		2007
	(In millions)

Reduction in Inventories	$	13.3	$	23.9	$	40.6
Reduction in Income before income taxes	$	12.5	$	9.9	$	14.4
Reduction in Net Income	$	4.7	$	9.7	$	55.8

Among the most significant errors giving rise to the restatement were:


	•	manual journal entries made for the three months ended January 31, 2007 that erroneously added manufacturing and distribution overhead to inventory held at former Lipman subsidiaries, notwithstanding that overhead had already been allocated to that inventory. This duplication erroneously increased reported inventory and reduced reported cost of net revenues by $7.7 million in the three months ended January 31, 2007;

	•	manual journal entries made for the periods ended April 30, 2007 and July 31, 2007 that erroneously recorded in-transit inventory of an additional $12.7 million at April 30, 2007 and an additional $7.3 million at July 31, 2007 based on erroneous methodology and application of source documents; and

	•	$6.3 million in errors made in the elimination of intercompany profit in inventory for the nine months ended July 31, 2007.

In connection with the Audit Committee investigation and restatement process, we identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, as a result of which our senior management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of October 31, 2007. These material weaknesses and management’s remediation efforts are summarized under “Item 9A — Controls and Procedures” in this Annual Report.

Overview

We are a global leader in secure electronic payment solutions. We provide expertise, solutions, and services that add value to the point of sale with merchant-operated, consumer-facing, and self-service payment systems for the financial, retail, hospitality, petroleum, government, and healthcare vertical markets. We have one of the leading electronic payment solutions brands and are one of the largest providers of electronic payment systems worldwide. We believe that we benefit from a number of competitive advantages gained through our 26-year history and success in our industry. These advantages include our globally trusted brand name, large installed base, history of significant involvement in the development of industry standards, global operating scale, customizable platform, and investment in research and development. We believe that these advantages position us well to capitalize on the continuing global shift toward electronic payment transactions as well as other long-term industry trends.

Our industry’s growth continues to be driven by the long-term shift towards electronic payment transactions and away from cash and checks in addition to the need for improved security standards. Internationally, growth rates have been higher because of the relatively low penetration rates of electronic payment transactions in many countries and interest by governments in modernizing their economies and using electronic payments as a means of improving value-added tax, or VAT, and sales tax collection. Recently, additional factors have driven growth, including the shift from dial up to internet protocol, or IP, based and wireless communications personal identification number, or PIN, based debit transactions, and advances in computing technology which enable vertical solutions and non-payment applications to reside at the point of sale.

Revenues recognized in our fiscal quarters tend to be back-end loaded as we receive sales orders and deliver our system solutions increasingly towards the end of each fiscal quarter including the fourth quarter. This back-end loading may adversely affect our results of operations in a number of ways. First, if we expect to receive sales orders that do not materialize at the end of the fiscal quarter or if we do not receive them in sufficient time to deliver our systems solutions and recognize revenue in that fiscal quarter, our revenues and profitability may be adversely affected. In addition, the manufacturing processes at our internal manufacturing facility could become concentrated in a shorter time period which could increase labor and other manufacturing costs and negatively impact gross margins. If, on the other hand, we were to hold higher inventory levels to counteract this we would be subject to the risk of inventory obsolescence. The concentration of orders may also make it difficult to accurately forecast component requirements and, as a result, we could experience a shortage of the components needed for production, possibly delaying shipments and causing lost orders. This could cause us to fail to meet our revenue and operating profit expectations for a particular quarter and could increase the fluctuation of our quarterly results if shipments are delayed from one fiscal quarter to the next or orders are cancelled by customers.

Security has become a driving factor in our business as our customers endeavor to meet ever escalating governmental statutory requirements related to the prevention of identity theft as well as operating regulation safeguards from the credit and debit card associations, including Visa International, or Visa, MasterCard Worldwide, or MasterCard, American Express, Discover Financial Services, and JCB Co., Ltd., or JCB. In 2006, these card associations established the Payment Card Industry Council, or PCI Council, to oversee and unify industry standards in the areas of credit card data security, referred to as the PCI-PED standard which consists of PIN-entry device security, or PED, and the PCI Data Security Standard, or PCI-DSS, standard.

We operate in two business segments: North America and International. We define North America as the United States and Canada, and International as all other countries from which we derive revenues.

We believe that the demand for wireless, IP enabled, PIN based debit and more secure systems will continue worldwide. In addition, demand in emerging economies will continue to grow as these economies develop and seek to collect more VAT. We continue to devote research and development resources to address these market needs.

On November 1, 2006, we acquired Lipman Electronic Engineering Ltd, or Lipman, and in connection with this acquisition, we issued 13,462,474 shares of our common stock and paid $347.4 million in cash in exchange for all the outstanding ordinary shares of Lipman. All options to purchase Lipman ordinary shares were exchanged for options to purchase approximately 3.4 million shares of our common stock. In addition, in accordance with the merger agreement, Lipman’s Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $1.50 per Lipman ordinary share, or an aggregate amount of $40.4 million. The aggregate purchase price for this acquisition was $799.3 million.

Results of Operations

Net Revenues

We generate net revenues through the sale of our electronic payment systems and solutions that enable electronic transactions, which we identify as System Solutions, and to a lesser extent, warranty and support services, field deployment, installation and upgrade services, and customer specific application development, which we identify as Services.

Net revenues, which include System Solutions and Services, are summarized in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):


	Years Ended October 31,						Change in Dollars				Change in Percent
							2007 vs		2006 vs		2007 vs			2006 vs
	2007		2006		2005		2006		2005		2006			2005

Systems Solutions	$	792,289	$	517,154	$	429,741	$	275,135	$	87,413		53.2	%		20.3	%
Services		110,603		63,916		55,626		46,687		8,290		73.0	%		14.9	%

Total	$	902,892	$	581,070	$	485,367	$	321,822	$	95,703		55.4	%		19.7	%

System Solutions

System Solutions net revenues increased $275.1 million, or 53%, to $792.3 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, from $517.2 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. System Solutions net revenues comprised 88% of total net revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 compared to 89% from the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006.

International System Solutions net revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 increased $213.1 million, or 90%, to $450.5 million, from $237.5 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. The increase was largely attributable to growth across emerging economies, in particular Brazil, Turkey, China, and Israel. Factors driving the increase attributable to emerging economies were the addition of the Nurit product lines, acquired in the Lipman acquisition, and the continued desire of these countries to modernize their infrastructure and improve collection of VAT. In Western Europe, sales in the UK, Spain, and Italy, countries where Lipman had a strong presence, were the primary reason for growth. We expect that the proportion of International System Solutions net revenues, relative to North America System Solutions net revenues, will increase at a higher growth rate for at least the next year. In addition, we may experience periodic variations in sales to our International markets.

North America System Solutions net revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 increased $61.5 million, or 22%, to $341.8 million, from $280.2 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in demand for wireless products due to our customers’ interest in differentiating the service they provide to merchants, and higher sales in Canada, where customers are preparing for a transition to EMV and Interac Chip acceptance. In addition, sales were strong in multi-lane retail solutions which enable PCI security compliance. Partially offsetting this increase was a decline in sales for a legacy check processing solution.

System Solutions net revenues increased $87.4 million, or 20%, to $517.2 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, from $429.7 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005. System Solutions net revenues comprised 89% of total net revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, which was essentially unchanged from the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005.

International System Solutions net revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 increased $47.4 million, or 25%, to $237.5 million, from $190.1 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005. The increase was largely attributable to growth in emerging economies in Latin America, Gulf States, and Eastern Europe, and to a lesser degree Western Europe. Revenues in Asia Pacific declined slightly, partially due to higher sales for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005 because of a Malaysian EMV deadline, as well as competitive pressures affecting our China business for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. Factors driving the overall international increase included the desire of emerging market countries to improve collection of VAT, broadening customer acceptance of our Vx Solutions, including our second generation wireless solutions, and the need for customers to comply with EMV requirements.

North America System Solutions net revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 increased $40.0 million, or 17%, to $279.7 million, from $239.7 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to the ongoing replacement of the installed base with System Solutions that have IP communication and PIN-based debit capabilities. Other factors included greater demand for solutions which address the lower priced single application financial system market and strength in Canada. We also experienced increased sales of our legacy check processing solution, but these increases were offset by a decline in our quick service restaurant business, as a number of key corporate rollouts were largely complete by October 31, 2005.

Services

Services net revenues increased $46.7 million, or 73%, to $110.6 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 from $63.9 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. This growth occurred primarily in International and to a lesser degree in North America. International growth was due to higher maintenance revenues and deployment revenues in Europe and Brazil associated with the acquisition of Lipman. In North America, the growth of services was primarily due to a significant field upgrade project for a petroleum customer.

Services net revenues increased $8.3 million, or 15%, to $63.9 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 from $55.6 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005. This growth occurred primarily in International and to a lesser degree in North America. International growth was driven by increased demand for repair and installation services in Latin America and software application services provided to a large European petroleum customer. In North America, the growth of services provided to petroleum and multilane retail customers was partially offset by a decline in services provided to quick service restaurant customers.

Gross Profit

The following table shows the gross profit for System Solutions and Services (in thousands, except percentages):


	Amount						Gross Profit Percentage
	Years Ended October 31,						Years Ended October 31,
	2007		2006		2005		2007			2006			2005

System Solutions	$	246,294	$	230,106	$	170,330		31.1	%		44.5	%		39.6	%
Services		52,938		31,439		26,495		47.9	%		49.2	%		47.6	%

Total	$	299,232	$	261,545	$	196,825		33.1	%		45.0	%		40.6	%

System Solutions

Gross profit on System Solutions increased $16.2 million, or 7%, to $246.3 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, from $230.1 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. Gross profit on System Solutions represented 31.1% of System Solutions net revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, down from 44.5% for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. This gross profit percentage decline reflects higher corporate costs, largely attributable to the acquisition of Lipman. In addition, declines in gross profit percentage occurred in International and North America. Gross profit percentage also declined due to the higher proportion of international net revenues, which typically carry a lower margin than North American net revenues.

International gross profit percentage declined due to the higher proportion of sales, following the Lipman acquisition, in China and Brazil where price competition is significant, as well as increasing price competition in Turkey and Mexico. We also discounted non-PCI compliant solutions in order to reduce inventory levels. In addition, as a result of our acquisition of Lipman, international sales increased as a proportion of total sales. As international sales typically carry lower gross profit percentages relative to domestic gross margins, this resulted in an adverse impact on total gross margin.

North America gross profit percentage declined primarily due to the lower proportion of Petroleum system solution sales, which carry higher than average gross margins, and the growth in retail system solutions, which carry lower than average margins. Year end discounting for non-PCI compliant inventory had a slight unfavorable impact in North America. Wireless solutions, which increased year over year and carry above average margins, partially offset these declines.

Corporate costs increased to 11.5% of System Solutions net revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 compared to 2.6% of System Solutions net revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. Corporate costs increased as a percentage of System Solutions net revenues, in part due to higher non-cash acquisition related charges including an increase of $32.3 million of amortization of purchased core and developed technology assets, $13.9 million of amortization of step-up in inventory and $2.7 million of amortization of step-down in deferred revenue. In addition, stock-based compensation increased by $2.1 million. The fiscal year 2007 Corporate costs also included $15.3 million in charges related to write-offs of inventory, scrap, and accrual of liabilities to purchase excess components from contract manufacturers. The similar costs in fiscal year 2006 were approximately $4.2 million. Slightly under half of these charges in fiscal year 2007 related to non-PCI compliant inventory as the December 31, 2007 PCI deadline significantly reduced the markets in which non-PCI compliant inventory and components could be sold. Corporate costs are comprised of non-cash acquisition charges, including amortization of purchased core and developed technology assets, step-up of inventory and step-down in deferred revenue, and

other Corporate charges, including inventory obsolescence and scrap at corporate distribution centers, rework, specific warranty provisions, non-standard freight, over-and-under absorption of materials management, and supply chain engineering overhead. Since these costs are generally incurred on a company-wide basis, it is impractical to allocate them to either the North America or International segments.

Gross profit on System Solutions, including amortization of purchased core and developed technology assets, increased $59.8 million, or 35%, to $230.1 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, from $170.3 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005. Gross profit on System Solutions represented 44.5% of System Solutions net revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, up from 39.6% for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005. Amortization of purchased core and developed technology assets was 1.1% of System Solutions net revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, compared to 1.6% for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005, as several purchased core and developed technology assets became fully amortized and System Solutions revenues grew. Gross profit percentage improved due to reduction in certain Corporate costs and improved gross profit percentage in International and North America segments.

Services

Gross profit on Services increased $21.5 million, or 68%, to $52.9 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, from $31.4 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. Gross profit on Services represented 47.9% of Services net revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, as compared to 49.2% for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. This decline was due to the higher proportion of international services revenues, which carry lower margins relative to North America.

Gross profit on Services increased $4.9 million, or 19%, to $31.4 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, from $26.5 million in the same period of fiscal year 2005. Gross profit represented 49.2% of Services net revenues for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, as compared to 47.6% for the same periods in fiscal year 2005. This improvement was due to a favorable shift in mix towards helpdesk and on site maintenance service to petroleum customers and away from deployment services to QSR customers in addition to international operational improvements.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development, or R&D, expenses for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 are summarized in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):


	Years Ended October 31,									Change in Dollars						Change in Percent
										2007 vs			2006 vs			2007 vs			2006 vs
	2007			2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005

Research and development	$	65,430		$	47,353		$	41,830		$	18,077		$	5,523			38.2	%		13.2	%
Percentage of net revenues		7.2	%		8.1	%		8.6	%		5.6	%		5.8	%

R&D expenses for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 increased compared to the same period ended October 31, 2006, due to $13.6 million of expenses incurred at former Lipman entities, $4.7 million of stock-based compensation, and $2.5 million of expenses incurred at former PayWare entities, all partially offset by $4.8 million of higher software costs required to be capitalized under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 86 for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 as compared to the prior fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 due to an increase in the number of projects which have software spending.

R&D expenses for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 increased compared to the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005, primarily due to $5.4 million of increased expenses to develop Vx 670 pay-at-the-table, Vx 570 countertop, Mx870 multi-lane retail and other worldwide initiatives as well as $0.9 million of expenses from the inclusion of a full year of GO Software. GO Software was acquired on March 1, 2005. Partially offsetting this was $1.6 million of lower expenses for petroleum applications, and $0.3 million of decreased international expenses due to the non-recurrence of certification expenses to support the 2005 introduction of the Vx platform and wireless products. In addition, $0.8 million of increased expenses was due to stock-based compensation for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006.

Sales and Marketing Expenses

Sales and marketing expenses for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 are summarized in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):


	Years Ended October 31,									Change in Dollars						Change in Percent
										2007 vs			2006 vs			2007 vs			2006 vs
	2007			2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005

Sales and marketing	$	96,295		$	58,607		$	52,231		$	37,688		$	6,376			64.3	%		12.2	%
Percentage of net revenues		10.7	%		10.1	%		10.8	%		11.7	%		6.7	%

Sales and marketing expenses for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 increased compared to the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. The higher expenses, due primarily to the acquisitions of Lipman and PayWare, included $15.7 million of increased personnel costs, $6.9 million of increased stock-based compensation, $6.0 million of increased outside services, $2.5 million of increased marketing communication expenses, and $2.2 million of increased travel expenses.

Sales and marketing expenses for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 increased compared to the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005, due to $2.3 million of increased International expenses, primarily in Europe to support sales growth, a $1.6 million increase in corporate sales incentive programs and promotional expenses pertaining to the MX870 and Visual Payments launch, Vx product family and wireless initiatives and acquisition integration expenses, and $0.7 million of increased expenses from the inclusion of GO Software. An additional $1.4 million of increased expenses was due to stock-based compensation for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 are summarized in the following table (in thousands, except percentages):


	Years Ended October 31,									Change in Dollars						Change in Percent
										2007 vs			2006 vs			2007 vs			2006 vs
	2007			2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005

General and administrative	$	80,704		$	42,573		$	29,609		$	38,131		$	12,964			89.6	%		43.8	%
Percentage of net revenues		8.9	%		7.3	%		6.1	%		11.8	%		13.5	%

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 increased compared to the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, due to the acquisitions of Lipman and PayWare and included $10.2 million of integration expenses relating to the acquisition of Lipman and restructuring charges in VeriFone entities, $9.0 million of increased stock-based compensation, $8.4 million of increased personnel costs, $2.7 million of increased outside contracted services, $2.0 million of increased bad debt expense, $1.0 million of increased legal expenses, and $0.9 million of increased insurance expenses.

General and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 increased compared to the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005, due to a $4.7 million increase in expenses related to the requirements of operating as a public company, including $2.7 million associated with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a $1.6 million one-time credit for the favorable resolution of the payroll tax contingency recorded in 2005, a net $1.6 million increase in bad debt expenses primarily due to the non-recurrence of fiscal year 2005 credits associated with the collection of specifically reserved accounts receivables, a $1.5 million increase in executive bonuses, a $1.0 million increase in expenses related to planning costs in connection with the acquisition of Lipman and implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning system upgrade. In addition, $1.6 million of increased expenses was due to stock-based compensation for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006.

Amortization of Purchased Intangible Assets

For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, amortization of purchased intangible assets increased $16.9 million, to $21.6 million from $4.7 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. The increase was primarily due to additional purchased intangible assets relating to the acquisition of Lipman, which was completed on November 1, 2006.

For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, amortization of purchased intangible assets decreased $0.3 million, to $4.7 million from $5.0 million for the comparable period in fiscal year 2005. The decrease was due to several purchased intangible assets having been fully amortized during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005, offset in part by the full year amortization of intangible assets relating to the acquisition of GO Software, which was completed on March 1, 2005.

In-Process Research and Development (IPR&D)

We recognized IPR&D expense of $6.8 million during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 in connection with our Lipman acquisition. The products considered to be IPR&D were in our consumer-activated and countertop communication modules which have subsequently reached technological feasibility.

Consumer-activated systems. We had two projects involving consumer-activated systems in process. The first involved a new category of PIN pad devices with debit, credit, and smart card payment capabilities with interfaces to countertop systems and ECRs. The project was 75% complete at November 1, 2006. The estimated cost of completion at November 1, 2006 was $0.3 million and the expected completion date was December 2006. The project was completed during the three months ended January 31, 2007 for approximately the estimated cost.

The second project was a new product family of consumer-activated payment systems for multi-lane retailers. New features include a faster processor, more memory, modular design, a signature capture option, Ethernet/USB option, and smart card option. The project was in the pilot stage. The estimated cost of completion at November 1, 2006 was less than $0.1 million. The project was completed during the three months ended January 31, 2007 for approximately the estimated cost.

Countertop communication modules. This project was developing new modem, Ethernet, and ISDN communication modules for countertop system solutions, consisting of customer firmware and circuit board design intended to achieve desired functions, operating system drivers, library, and application modifications. The project was 50% complete at November 1, 2006. The estimated cost of completion at the acquisition date was $0.2 million and the expected completion date was December 2006. The project was completed during the quarter ended January 31, 2007 for approximately the estimated cost.

We prepared cash flow forecasts for the acquired projects and those forecasts were used to develop a discounted cash flow model. The discount rate assigned to in-process technologies was 19% with consideration given to the risk associated with these in-process projects.

Interest Expense

For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, interest expense increased $23.0 million to $36.6 million, from $13.6 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. The increase for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 was primarily attributable to the principal amount of debt outstanding due to the completion of our acquisition of Lipman, partially offset by the lower average interest rates paid following issuance of our convertible debt. We will pay 1.375% interest per annum on the principal amount of the convertible debt, payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on December 15, 2007. As a result of the restatement, and our inability from December 2007 to register the notes and the underlying shares with the SEC, we have been subject since December 20, 2007 to additional interest on the convertible debt of 0.25% per annum, which increased to 0.50% per annum on March 19, 2008 relating to our registration obligations relating to the notes and underlying common shares. Because we did not increase our authorized capital to permit conversion of all of the notes at the initial conversion rate, since June 21, 2008 we also have been subject to additional interest of 2.0% per annum on the principal amount of the notes, which will increase by 0.25% per annum on each anniversary thereafter if the authorized capital has not been increased. In addition, the interest rate on the notes increased an additional 0.25%

per annum on May 1, 2008 (in addition to the additional interest described above), because we failed to timely file and deliver this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In addition, on April 28, 2008, we entered into a Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “Second Amendment”) with the Lenders under our Credit Facility. In connection with the Second Amendment, we agreed to an increase in the interest rate payable on the term loan and any revolving commitments of 0.75% per annum. On July 31, 2008, we entered into a Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “Third Amendment”) with the Lenders under the Credit Facility. The Third Amendment extends the time periods for delivery of certain required financial information for the three-month periods ended January 31, April 30 and July 31, 2007, the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 and the three-month periods ended January 31 and April 30, 2008 to August 31, 2008. There are no changes to interest rates with the Third Amendment.

The fiscal year 2007 increase in interest expense also includes 3.1 million Brazilian reais (approximately $1.5 million) of interest recorded in fiscal 2007 related to interest on various assessments imposed on our Brazilian subsidiary for the items disclosed in Note 11. There was no such interest expense in fiscal 2006.

For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, interest expense decreased $1.8 million to $13.6 million, from $15.4 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005. The decrease for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 was attributable to the repayment of our Second Lien Loan in May 2005 with the proceeds that we received from our initial public offering.

In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FSP APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement). FSP APB 14-1 requires the issuer of convertible debt instruments with cash settlement features to account separately for the liability and equity components of the instrument. The debt would be recognized at the present value of its cash flows discounted using the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate at the time of issuance. The equity component would be recognized as the difference between the proceeds from the issuance of the note and the fair value of the liability. The FSP also requires accretion of the resultant debt discount over the expected life of the debt. The FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. Entities are required to apply the FSP retrospectively for all periods presented. We are currently evaluating FSP APB 14-1 and have not yet determined the impact its adoption will have on our consolidated financial statements. However, the impact of this new accounting treatment will be significant and will result in a significant increase to non-cash interest expense beginning in fiscal year 2010 for financial statements covering past and future periods.

Interest Income

Interest income of $6.7 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 increased from $3.4 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. The increase was attributable to higher cash balances for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 relative to the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006.

Interest income of $3.4 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 increased from $0.6 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005. The increase was attributable to our investment of a portion of the proceeds that we received from our secondary offering which closed in September 2005.

Other Expense, net

For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007, other expense, net was $7.9 million resulting primarily from the write-off of debt issuance costs of $4.8 million related to the accelerated pay-down of the Term B loan facility, and $2.3 million resulting from the net effects of currency conversion transactions, currency translation, and settlements of currency derivative transactions. For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, other expense, net was $6.4 million resulting primarily from a $6.4 million loss on early debt extinguishment associated with our existing Credit Facility.

Provision for Income Taxes

We recorded a provision for income taxes of $24.7 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 compared to a provision for income taxes of $32.2 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. The decrease in the

provision for income taxes is primarily attributable to a decrease in global pre-tax income and changes in the jurisdictional mix of income, partially offset by increases in valuation allowance during the year.

Our effective tax rate was (266%) for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 as compared to 35% for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. The effective tax rate was different than the expected statutory rate of 35% for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 due to the decrease in global pre-tax income and changes in the jurisdictional mix of income, partially offset by increases in the valuation allowance during the year ended October 31, 2007.

We recorded a provision for income taxes of $32.2 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, compared to $13.5 million in fiscal year 2005. The increase in the provision for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 from the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005 is primarily attributable to an increase in our pre-tax income and secondarily to an increase in our effective tax rate. For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, our effective tax rate was 35.1% as compared to 28.9% for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005. The increase in the tax rate is primarily attributable to the net effect of increases in pre-tax income, a smaller reduction in our valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, expiration of the federal research credit offset by increases in the amount of income considered permanently reinvested in foreign operations and subject to lower foreign tax rates.

As of October 31, 2007, we have recorded deferred tax assets on our consolidated balance sheet after recording a valuation allowance against foreign tax credits carryforwards, foreign taxes on basis differences and certain tax deductible intangible assets reversing beyond 2010 and various non-U.S. net operating losses. The realization of these assets is dependent on our generating sufficient U.S. and foreign taxable income. The amount of deferred tax assets considered realizable may increase or decrease in subsequent quarters when we reevaluate the underlying basis for our estimates of future domestic and certain foreign taxable income.

We are currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS, for our fiscal years 2003 and 2004. Although we believe we have correctly provided appropriate amounts for income taxes payable for the years subject to audit, the IRS may adopt different interpretations. We have not yet received any final determinations with respect to this audit.

We are currently under audit by the Israeli Tax Authority, or ITA, for our fiscal years 2004 through 2006 and the Brazil tax authority for calendar tax years 2003 through 2008. Although we believe we have correctly provided appropriate amounts for income taxes payable for the years subject to audit, the ITA may adopt different interpretations. We have not yet received any final determinations with respect to these audits.

Segment Information

Corporate net revenues and operating income (loss) reflect non-cash acquisition charges, including amortization of purchased core and developed technology assets, step-up of inventory and step-down in deferred revenue, and other Corporate charges, including inventory obsolescence and scrap at corporate distribution centers, rework, specific warrant provisions, non-standard freight, over-and-under absorption of materials management, and supply chain engineering overhead.

The following table reconciles segmented net revenues and operating income to totals for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005.


	Years Ended October 31,									Change in Dollars						Change in Percent
										2007 vs			2006 vs			2007 vs			2006 vs
	2007			2006			2005			2006			2005			2006			2005

Net revenues:
North America	$	400,433		$	333,673		$	289,720		$	66,760		$	43,953			20.0	%		15.2	%
International		506,195			248,383			196,347			257,812			52,036			103.8	%		26.5	%
Corporate		(3,736	)		(986	)		(700	)		(2,750	)		(286	)		278.9	%		40.9	%

Total net revenues	$	902,892		$	581,070		$	485,367		$	321,822		$	95,703			55.4	%		19.7	%

Operating income:
North America	$	156,562		$	129,358		$	104,867		$	27,204		$	24,491			21.0	%		23.4	%
International		110,795			60,965			37,375			49,830			23,590			81.7	%		63.1	%
Corporate		(238,877	)		(82,014	)		(74,054	)		(156,863	)		(7,960	)		191.3	%		10.7	%

Total operating income	$	28,480		$	108,309		$	68,188		$	(79,829	)	$	40,121			(73.7	)%		58.8	%

Net revenues growth in International for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 as compared to the prior year was primarily driven by an increase of approximately $213.1 million in System Solutions and $44.8 million in Services net revenues following the Lipman acquisition. See “Results of Operations — Net Revenues” for additional commentary.

Net revenues growth in North America for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 as compared to the prior year was primarily driven by an increase of approximately $61.5 million in System Solutions and $5.2 million in Services net revenues following the Lipman acquisition. See “Results of Operations — Net Revenues” for additional commentary.

The increase in International operating income for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 compared to the prior year was due to higher revenue as a result of both the acquisition of Lipman and organic growth, partially offset by a declining gross profit percentage and higher operating expenses. See “Results of Operations — Gross Profit” for additional commentary.

The increase in operating income for North America for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 was due to higher revenue, and gross profit, partially offset by a declining gross profit percentage. See “Results of Operations — Gross Profit” for additional commentary. In addition, North America research and development expenses for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 included $8.5 million for projects which have since been broadened in scope and will benefit customers outside the North America segment. As a result, the expenses for these projects for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 are charged to Corporate.

The decrease in Corporate operating income for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007 was primarily due to higher non-cash acquisition related charges including an increase of $32.3 million of amortization of purchased core and developed technology assets, $16.9 million of amortization of purchased intangible assets, $13.8 million of amortization of step-up in inventory on acquisition, $6.8 million of in-process research and development charges, and $2.7 million of amortization of step-down in deferred revenue on acquisition. In addition, stock-based compensation increased by $22.9 million. Furthermore, in fiscal year 2007, Corporate costs included $15.3 million in charges related to write-offs of inventory, scrap, and accrual of liabilities to purchase excess components from contract manufacturers, compared to $4.2 million for fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. Slightly under half of 2007 charges related to non-PCI compliant inventory as the December 31, 2007 PCI deadline significantly reduced the markets in which non-PCI compliant inventory and components could be sold. Also, product warranty cost increased $3.7 million primarily due to product situation reserve for the acquired product. In addition, approximately $8.5 million of engineering expenses for projects which previously benefited North America in the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 were broadened in scope, managed by the Corporate engineering function and charged

to Corporate in the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007. Furthermore, Corporate operating expenses increased $36.9 million primarily due to the acquisitions of Lipman and PayWare and the related integration expenses.

The increase in International operating income for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 compared to the prior year was mainly due to increased net revenues and a higher gross profit percentage as a result of the introduction of higher margin Vx wireless solutions and favorable product mix, partially offset by higher operating expenses.

The increase in operating income for North America for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 compared to the prior year was mainly due to higher net revenues and a higher gross profit percentage as a result of favorable product mix in both System Solutions and to a lesser extent Services, which was partially offset by higher operating expenses.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


	Years Ended October 31,
	2007			2006			2005
	(In thousands)

Net cash provided by (used for)
Operating activities	$	89,270		$	16,747		$	40,159
Investing activities		(311,696	)		(4,025	)		(35,004	)
Financing activities		349,920			7,834			47,319
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash		943			943			(114	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	128,437		$	21,499		$	52,360

Our primary liquidity and capital resource needs are to service our debt, finance working capital, and to make capital expenditures and investments. At October 31, 2007, our primary sources of liquidity were cash and cash equivalents of $215 million and our $40 million unused revolving credit facility.

Operating Activities

Cash flow from operations before changes in working capital amounted to $76.7 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007. A net loss of $34.0 million was offset by non-cash charges of $110.8 million, consisting primarily of acquisition-related charges of $66.2 million; stock-based compensation expense of $28.9 million; depreciation and amortization related to property, plant, and equipment, capitalized software, and debt issuance costs totaling $10.7 million; and the non-cash portion of the loss on debt extinguishment totaling $4.8 million.

Cash flow from operations due to changes in working capital netted to $12.5 million during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007. The main drivers are as follows:


	•	A reduction in inventory of $45.1 million. This reduction occurred primarily because the beginning balance of inventory for the period was unusually high because we had increased inventory for our initial stocking of inventory for new product releases. In addition, we balanced our inventory position to meet the demand changes triggered by the acquisition of Lipman;

	•	An increase in accounts payable of $28.1 million due to timing of purchases of inventory and services;

	•	An increase in deferred revenue of $14.5 million due to an increased in deferred service such as customer support and installations;

	•	An increase in tax-related balances totaling $18.1 million, which included increases in deferred tax liabilities of $38.3 million and income taxes payable of $20.4 million, partially offset by an increase in deferred tax assets of $29.1 million and the reclassification of tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $11.5 million;


	•	An increase in accounts receivable of $39.5 million due to higher sales and sales orders being received more towards the end of our fiscal year; and

	•	Increases in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $41.5 million and in other assets of $5.1 million.

Our operations provided cash of $16.7 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, which was attributable to net income of $59.5 million and depreciation, amortization and other non-cash charges of $28.7 million, offset by $71.5 million used by net operating assets and liabilities. The principal uses of net operating assets and liabilities for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006 were largely attributable to an increase in inventories of $52.0 million, an increase in accounts receivable of $28.9 million, an increase in deferred tax assets of $5.8 million, an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $4.4 million, an increase in other assets of $2.1 million, tax benefit from stock-based compensation of $3.4 million, a decrease in accrued warranty of $1.3 million, and a decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities of $2.1 million. The beginning inventory balance for the previous year, as measured by inventory turns, was at an unusually low balance due to a number of factors including higher than expected demand and transitional issues with two contract manufacturers. In addition, we increased inventory as a result of balancing our inventory position to meet the demand changes triggered by the acquisition of Lipman. The accounts receivable increase was primarily driven by higher sales in addition to a shift towards International, which typically carries a higher days sales outstanding (DSO). This was partially offset by an increase in accounts payable of $17.2 million resulting from higher inventory levels, an increase in income tax payable of $1.5 million, an increase in accrued compensation of $2.7 million, and an increase in deferred revenue, net of $7.2 million.

Investing Activities

Investing activities used cash of $311.7 million during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007. The acquisition of Lipman used cash of $263.6 million, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired. We also acquired a majority interest in VeriFone Transportation Systems (“VTS”) for cash of $4.1 million, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired. In addition, we made equity investments in two companies totaling $5.7 million. Purchases of property, plant, and equipment totaled $30.2 million, including an increase in construction in progress of $17.6 million primarily related to our migrating to a new enterprise resource planning information system, which will replace our existing system. In addition, the capitalization of software development costs was $7.7 million.

Our investing activities used $4.0 million of net cash during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006. Cash generated by the sale of marketable securities was $141.9 million, partially offset by investments in marketable securities of $125.0 million, capitalization of software development of $2.0 million, purchases of other assets of $0.9 million, purchases of property, plant, and equipment of $3.7 million, transaction costs for pending acquisitions of $3.4 million, and acquisition of PayWare, net of cash and cash of equivalent of $10.9 million.

Financing Activities

Financing activities provided cash of $350.0 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007. In November 2006, we drew $305.3 million, net of costs, on our Term B loan to fund our acquisition of Lipman. In June 2007, we issued 1.375% Senior Convertible Notes (the “Senior Notes”) for net proceeds of $307.9 million. We used $260.0 million of the proceeds from the Senior Notes to pay down our Term B loan in addition to other payments totaling $3.8 million against our Term B loan and other debt. In other transactions related to the Senior Notes, we used $80.2 million to purchase a hedge on the Senior Notes and received $31.2 million from the sale of warrants. We received additional proceeds of $37.1 million from the exercise of stock options and $11.5 million from the tax benefit derived from stock-based compensation.

Our financing provided cash of $7.8 million for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2006, primarily due to tax benefits related to exercise of stock options of $3.4 million, proceeds from long-term debt $184.0 million and proceeds from stock options exercises of $3.0 million, partially offset by principal payments of $182.6 million on the Term B loan and repayment of $0.1 million of capital leases.

Our future capital requirements may vary significantly from prior periods as well as from those currently planned. These requirements will depend on a number of factors, including operating factors such as our terms and

payment experience with customers and investment we may make in product or market development such as our current investments in expanding our International operations. Finally, our capital needs may be significantly affected by any acquisition we may make in the future. Based upon our current level of operations, we believe that we have the financial resources to meet our business requirements for the next year, including capital expenditures, working capital requirements, and future strategic investments, and to comply with our financial covenants.

Secured Credit Facility

On June 30, 2004, we entered into a secured credit facility (the “Old Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of financial institutions. The Old Credit Facility consisted of a Revolver permitting borrowings up to $30 million, a Term B Loan of $190 million, and a Second Lien Loan of $72 million.

On October 31, 2006, our principal subsidiary, VeriFone, Inc. (the “Borrower”), entered into a credit agreement consisting of a Term B Loan facility of $500 million and a revolving credit facility permitting borrowings of up to $40 million. The proceeds from the Term B loan were used to repay all outstanding amounts relating to the Old Credit Facility, pay certain transaction costs and partially fund the cash consideration in connection with the acquisition of Lipman on November 1, 2006. Through October 31, 2007, the Company had repaid an aggregate of $263.8 million, leaving a Term B Loan balance of $236.2 million at October 31, 2007.

The Credit Facility is guaranteed by VeriFone Holdings, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries and is secured by collateral including substantially all of our assets and stock of our subsidiaries. Prior to the January 25, 2008 amendment discussed below, at October 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006, the interest rates were 7.11% and 7.12% on the Term B Loan and 6.61% and 6.87% on the revolving loan, respectively. We pay a commitment fee on the unused portion of the revolving loan under the Credit Facility at a rate that varies between 0.375% and 0.300% per annum depending upon its consolidated total leverage ratio. As of October 31, 2007 and 2006, the commitment fee was 0.300% and 0.375% per annum, respectively. We pay a letter of credit fee on the unused portion of any letter of credit issued under the Credit Facility at a rate that varies between 1.50% and 1.25% per annum depending upon our consolidated total leverage ratio. At October 31, 2007 and October 31, 2006, we were subject to a letter of credit fee at a rate of 1.25% and 1.50% per annum, respectively.

As of October 31, 2007, at our option, the revolving loan bears interest at a rate of 1.25% over the three-month LIBOR, which was 5.36%, or 0.25% over the lender’s base rate, which was 7.50%. As of October 31, 2006, at our option, the revolving loan bore interest at a rate of 1.50% over the three-month LIBOR, which was 5.37%, or 0.50% over the lender’s base rate, which was 8.25%. As of October 31, 2007, the entire $40 million revolving loan was available for borrowing to meet short-term working capital requirements. At our option, at October 31, 2007 and 2006, the Term B Loan bore interest at a rate of 1.75% over the three-month LIBOR or 0.75% over the lender’s base rate.

Interest payments are generally paid quarterly but can be based on one, two, three, or six-month periods. The lender’s base rate is the greater of the Federal Funds rate plus 50 basis points or the JPMorgan prime rate. The respective maturity dates on the components of the Credit Facility are October 31, 2012 for the revolving loan and October 31, 2013 for the Term B Loan. Payments on the Term B Loan are due in equal quarterly installments of $1.2 million over the seven-year term on the last business day of each calendar quarter with the balance due on maturity.

The terms of the Credit Facility require us to comply with financial covenants, including maintaining leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios at the end of each fiscal quarter, obtaining protection against fluctuation in interest rates, and limits on annual capital expenditure levels. As of October 31, 2007, we were required to maintain a total leverage ratio of not greater than 4.0 to 1.0 and a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 2.0 to 1.0. Total leverage ratio is equal to total debt less cash as of the end of a reporting fiscal quarter divided by the consolidated EBITDA for the most recent four consecutive fiscal quarters. Some of the financial covenants become more restrictive over the term of the Credit Facility. Noncompliance with any of the financial covenants without cure or waiver would constitute an event of default under the Credit Facility. An event of default resulting from a breach of a financial covenant may result, at the option of lenders holding a majority of the loans, in an acceleration of repayment of the principal and interest outstanding and a termination of the revolving loan. The Credit Facility also contains non-financial covenants that restrict some of our activities, including our ability to dispose of assets, incur additional debt, pay

dividends, create liens, make investments, make capital expenditures, and engage in specified transactions with affiliates. The terms of the Credit Facility permit prepayments of principal and require prepayments of principal upon the occurrence of certain events including among others, the receipt of proceeds from the sale of assets, the receipt of excess cash flow as defined, and the receipt of proceeds of certain debt issues. The Credit Facility also contains customary events of default, including defaults based on events of bankruptcy and insolvency, nonpayment of principal, interest, or fees when due, subject to specified grace periods, breach of specified covenants, change in control, and material inaccuracy of representations and warranties. We were in compliance with our financial and non-financial covenants as of October 31, 2007.

On January 25, 2008, the Borrower and VeriFone Intermediate Holdings, Inc. entered into a First Amendment to the Credit Agreement and Waiver (the “First Amendment”) with the Lenders under its Credit Facility, dated October 31, 2006. The First Amendment extends the deadlines for delivery of certain required financial information for the three-month periods ended January 31, April 30, and July 31, 2007, the year ended October 31, 2007 and the three-month period ended January 31, 2008. In connection with the First Amendment, the Borrower paid to consenting Lenders a fee of $0.7 million, or 0.25% of the aggregate amount outstanding under the Term B loan and revolving credit commitment made available by the consenting Lenders, and agreed to an increase in the interest rate payable on the term loan of 0.25% per annum.

On April 28, 2008, the Borrower and VeriFone Intermediate Holdings, Inc. entered into a Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “Second Amendment”) with the Lenders under its Credit Facility. The Second Amendment extends the time periods for delivery of certain required financial information for the three-month periods ended January 31, April 30, and July 31, 2007, the year ended October 31, 2007, and the three-month periods ended January 31 and April 30, 2008 to July 31, 2008. In connection with the Second Amendment, the Borrower paid to consenting Lenders a fee of $0.7 million, or 0.25% of the aggregate amount outstanding under the term loan and revolving credit commitment made available by the consenting Lenders, agreed to an additional increase in the interest rate payable on the Term B loan and any revolving commitments of 0.75% per annum, agreed to an increase of 0.125% per annum to the commitment fee for unused revolving commitments, and agreed to an increase of 0.75% per annum to the letter of credit fees, each of which are effective from the date of the Second Amendment.

On July 31, 2008, the Borrower and VeriFone Intermediate Holdings, Inc. entered into a Third Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “Third Amendment”) with the Lenders under its Credit Facility. The Third Amendment extends the time periods for delivery of certain required financial information for the three-month periods ended January 31, April 30 and July 31, 2007, the year ended October 31, 2007 and the three-month periods ended January 31 and April 30, 2008 to August 31, 2008. In connection with the Third Amendment, the Borrower paid to consenting Lenders a fee of $0.3 million, or 0.125% of the aggregate amount outstanding under the Term B loan and the amount of the revolving credit commitment made available by the consenting Lenders. Following the Third Amendment, the Borrower pays interest on the Term B loan at a rate of 2.75% over three-month LIBOR (the Borrower may elect at the end of an interest period to have the term loan bear interest at 1.75% over the lender’s base rate) and any revolving loans would bear interest, at the Borrower’s option, at either 2.0% over LIBOR or 1.0% over the lender’s base rate, assuming the Borrower remains in the lowest rate tier based on its total consolidated leverage ratio.

In each of the Credit Agreement amendments, the Lenders agreed that no default that may have arisen under the Credit Agreement by virtue of any failure to deliver accurate financial statements or the related certifications for the fiscal quarters being restated would be a Default or an Event of Default as defined under the Credit Agreement. The Lenders also agreed that any such Default or Event of Default would for all purposes of the Credit Agreement and related loan documents be waived.

1.375% Senior Convertible Notes

On June 22, 2007, we sold $316.2 million aggregate principal amount of 1.375% Senior Convertible Notes due 2012 (the “Notes”) in an offering through Lehman Brothers Inc. and JP Morgan Securities Inc. (together, “initial purchasers”) to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Section 4(2) and Rule 144A under the Securities Act. The net proceeds from the offering, after deducting transaction costs, were approximately $307.9 million. We incurred

approximately $8.3 million of debt issuance costs. The transaction costs, consisting of the initial purchasers’ discounts and offering expenses, were primarily recorded in debt issuance costs, net and are being amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over five years. We will pay 1.375% interest per annum on the principal amount of the Notes, payable semi-annually in arrears in cash on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on December 15, 2007, subject to increase in certain circumstances as described below.

The Notes were issued under an Indenture with U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. Each $1,000 of principal of the Notes will initially be convertible into 22.719 shares of VeriFone common stock, which is equivalent to a conversion price of approximately $44.02 per share, subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of specified events. Holders of the Notes may convert their Notes prior to maturity during specified periods as follows: (1) on any date during any fiscal quarter beginning after October 31, 2007 (and only during such fiscal quarter) if the closing sale price of our common stock was more than 130% of the then current conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the period of the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the previous fiscal quarter; (2) at any time on or after March 15, 2012; (3) if we distribute, to all holders of our common stock, rights or warrants (other than pursuant to a rights plan) entitling them to purchase, for a period of 45 calendar days or less, shares of our common stock at a price less than the average closing sale price for the ten trading days preceding the declaration date for such distribution; (4) if we distribute, to all holders of our common stock, cash or other assets, debt securities, or rights to purchase our securities (other than pursuant to a rights plan), which distribution has a per share value exceeding 10% of the closing sale price of our common stock on the trading day preceding the declaration date for such distribution; (5) during a specified period if certain types of fundamental changes occur; or (6) during the five business-day period following any five consecutive trading-day period in which the trading price for the Notes was less than 98% of the average of the closing sale price of our common stock for each day during such five trading-day period multiplied by the then current conversion rate. Upon conversion, we would pay the holder the cash value of the applicable number of shares of our common stock, up to the principal amount of the note. Amounts in excess of the principal amount, if any, will be paid in stock. Unless and until we obtain stockholder approval to amend our certificate of incorporation to increase our authorized capital, the maximum number of shares available for issuance upon conversion of each $1,000 principal amount of Notes will be the pro rata portion of an aggregate of 3,250,000 shares allocable to such Note, which equates to 10.2766 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Notes. We have agreed to use our reasonable best efforts to seek such stockholder approval within one year of the issuance of the Notes. Because we did not increase our authorized capital to permit conversion of all of the Notes at the initial conversion rate by June 21, 2008, beginning on June 21, 2008 the Notes began to bear additional interest at a rate of 2.0% per annum (in addition to the additional interest described below) on the principal amount of the Notes, which will increase by 0.25% per annum on each anniversary thereafter if the authorized capital has not been increased. If stockholder approval to increase our authorized capital is received, such additional interest will cease to accrue.

As of October 31, 2007, none of the conditions allowing holders of the Notes to convert had been met. If a fundamental change, as defined in the Indenture, occurs prior to the maturity date, holders of the Notes may require us to repurchase all or a portion of their Notes for cash at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest (including additional interest, if any) to, but excluding, the repurchase date.

The Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment with all of our existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness. The Notes are effectively subordinated to any secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the related collateral and structurally subordinated to indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries including any secured indebtedness of such subsidiaries.

In connection with the sale of the Notes, we entered into a registration rights agreement, dated as of June 22, 2007, with the initial purchasers of the Notes (the “Registration Rights Agreement”). Under the Registration Rights Agreement, we agreed (1) to use reasonable best efforts to cause a shelf registration statement covering resales of the Notes and the shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Notes to be declared effective by December 19, 2007 or to cause an existing shelf registration statement to be made available within 180 days after the original issuance of the Notes and (2) to use our reasonable best efforts to keep effective the shelf registration statement until the earliest of (i) the date when the holders of transfer restricted Notes and shares of common stock issued upon conversion of the Notes are able to sell all such securities immediately without restriction under

Rule 144(k) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), (ii) the date when all transfer-restricted Notes and shares of common stock issued upon conversion of the Notes are registered under the registration statement and sold pursuant thereto and (iii) the date when all transfer-restricted Notes and shares of common stock issued upon conversion of the Notes have ceased to be outstanding. If we fail to meet these terms, we will be required to pay additional interest on the Notes at a rate of 0.25% per annum for the first 90 days and at a rate of 0.50% per annum thereafter.

Due to the delay in the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have not yet been able to register the Notes and the shares underlying the Notes. Accordingly, the interest rate on the Notes increased by 0.25% per annum on December 20, 2007 and by an additional 0.25% per annum on March 19, 2008 relating to our obligations under the Registration Rights Agreement. Once a registration statement covering the Notes and shares underlying the Notes is declared effective, such additional interest will cease to accrue. The interest penalty on convertible note derivatives was valued at $0.6 million and has been accrued as of October 31, 2007.

In addition, the interest rate on the Notes increased an additional 0.25% per annum on May 1, 2008 (in addition to the additional interest described above) because we failed to file and deliver this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Such additional 0.25% interest will cease to accrue upon the filing of this Form 10-K.

In connection with the offering of the Notes, we entered into note hedge transactions with affiliates of the initial purchasers (the “counterparties”) whereby we have the option to purchase up to 7,184,884 shares of our common stock at a price of approximately $44.02 per share. The cost to us of the note hedge transactions was approximately $80.2 million. The note hedge transactions are intended to mitigate the potential dilution upon conversion of the Notes in the event that the volume weighted average price of our common stock on each trading day of the relevant conversion period or other relevant valuation period is greater than the applicable strike price of the convertible note hedge transactions, which initially corresponds to the conversion price of the Notes and is subject, with certain exceptions, to the adjustments applicable to the conversion price of the Notes.

In addition, we sold warrants to the counterparties whereby they have the option to purchase up to approximately 7.2 million shares of our common stock at a price of $62.356 per share. We received approximately $31.2 million in cash proceeds from the sale of these warrants. If the volume weighted average price of our common stock on each trading day of the measurement period at maturity of the warrants exceeds the applicable strike price of the warrants, there would be dilution to the extent that such volume weighted average price of our common stock exceeds the applicable strike price of the warrants. Unless and until we obtain stockholder approval to amend our certificate of incorporation to increase our authorized capital, the maximum number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants will be 1,000,000 shares of our common stock. If we do not obtain stockholder approval to amend our certificate of incorporation to increase our authorized capital by the date of the second annual meeting of our stockholders after the date of the pricing of the Notes, the number of shares of our common stock underlying the warrants will increase by 10%, and the warrants will be subject to early termination by the counterparties.

The cost incurred in connection with the note hedge transactions, net of the related tax benefit and the proceeds from the sale of the warrants, is included as a net reduction in additional paid-in capital in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of October 31, 2007, in accordance with the guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock.

In accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, the Notes will have no impact on diluted earnings per share, or EPS, until the price of our common stock exceeds the conversion price of $44.02 per share because the principal amount of the Notes will be settled in cash upon conversion. Prior to conversion we will include the effect of the additional shares that may be issued if our common stock price exceeds $44.02 per share, using the treasury stock method. If the price of our common stock exceeds $62.356 per share, it will also include the effect of the additional potential shares that may be issued related to the warrants, using the treasury stock method. Prior to conversion, the note hedge transactions are not considered for purposes of the EPS calculation as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

Contractual Commitments

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of October 31, 2007 (in thousands):


			Less Than		1-3		3-5		More Than
	Total		1 Year		Years		Years		5 Years

Term B loan (including interest)	$	326,720	$	20,959	$	40,809	$	39,488	$	225,464
1.375% Senior convertible notes (including interest)		338,605		4,374		9,284		324,947		—
Capital lease obligation		64		37		26		1		—
Operating leases		47,277		10,256		15,014		10,915		11,092
Minimum purchase obligations		47,428		47,428		—		—		—

	$	760,094	$	83,054	$	65,133	$	375,351	$	236,556

Interest in the above table has been calculated using the rate in effect at October 31, 2007.

We work on a purchase order basis with third-party contract manufacturers and component suppliers with facilities in China, Singapore, Israel, and Brazil to supply our inventories. We issue a forecast to the third-party contract manufacturers and subsequently agrees to a build schedule to drive component material purchases and capacity planning. We provide each manufacturer with a purchase order to cover the manufacturing requirements, which constitutes a binding commitment by us to purchase materials produced by the manufacturer as specified in the purchase order. The total amount of purchase commitments as of October 31, 2007 was approximately $47.4 million, and are generally paid within one year. Of this amount, $4.4 million has been recorded in accrued expenses in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of October 31, 2007 because the commitment is expected not to have future value to us.

We expect that we will be able to fund our remaining obligations and commitments with cash flows from operations. To the extent we are unable to fund these obligations and commitments with cash flows from operations, we intend to fund these obligations and commitments with proceeds from our $40.0 million revolving loan under our secured credit facility or future debt or equity financings.

Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA, as adjusted)

We define earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, or EBITDA, as adjusted, as the sum of (1) net income (loss) (excluding extraordinary items of gain or loss and any gain or loss from discontinued operations), (2) interest expense, (3) income taxes, (4) depreciation, amortization, goodwill impairment, and other non-recurring charges, (5) non-cash charges, including non-cash stock-based compensation expense and purchase accounting items, and (6) management fees to our principal stockholder. EBITDA, as adjusted, is a primary component of the financial covenants to which we are subject under our Credit Facility. If we fail to maintain required levels of EBITDA, as adjusted, we could have a default under our Credit Facility, potentially resulting in an acceleration of all of our outstanding indebtedness.

Management uses EBITDA, as adjusted, only in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP. Management believes that the use of this non-GAAP financial measure, in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP, helps it to evaluate our performance and to compare our current results with those for prior periods as well as with the results of other companies in our industry. Our competitors may, due to differences in capital structure and investment history, have interest, tax, depreciation, amortization, and other non-cash expenses that differ significantly from ours. Management also uses this non-GAAP financial measure in our budget and planning process. Management believes that the presentation of this non-GAAP financial measure may be useful to investors for many of the same reasons that management finds these measures useful.

replace those assets, cash expenditures or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments, cash requirements for working capital needs, interest expense or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments on our debt, income taxes and the related cash requirements, restructuring and impairment charges and losses from discontinued operations, associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP. Furthermore, we expect to continue to incur expenses similar to those amounts excluded from EBITDA, as adjusted. Management compensates for these limitations by also relying on the comparable GAAP financial measure.

As noted above, management excludes the following items from EBITDA, as adjusted:


	•	Provision for income taxes. While income taxes are directly related to the amount of pre-tax income, they are also impacted by tax laws and the company’s tax structure. As the tax laws and our tax structure are not under the control of our operational managers, management believes that the provision for (benefit from) income taxes should be excluded when evaluating our operational performance.

	•	Interest expense and interest income. While working capital supports the business, management does not believe that related interest expense or interest income is directly attributable to the operating performance of our business.

	•	Depreciation of property, plant and equipment. Management excludes depreciation because while tangible assets support the business, management does not believe the related depreciation costs are directly attributable to the operating performance of our business. In addition, depreciation may not be indicative of current or future capital expenditures.

	•	Amortization of capitalized software. Management excludes amortization of capitalized software because while capitalized software supports the business, management does not believe the related amortization costs are directly attributable to the operating performance of our business. In addition, amortization of capitalized software may not be indicative of current or future expenditures to develop software.

	•	Amortization of certain acquisition related items. We incur amortization of purchased core and developed technology assets, amortization of purchased intangible assets, amortization of step-down in deferred revenue on acquisition and amortization of step-up in inventory on acquisition in connection with acquisitions. Management excludes these items because it does not believe these expenses are reflective of ongoing operating results in the period incurred. These amounts arise from prior acquisitions and management does not believe that they have a direct correlation to the operation of our business.

	•	In-process research and development. We incur IPR&D expenses when technological feasibility for acquired technology has not been established at the date of acquisition and no future alternative use for such technology exists. These amounts arise from prior acquisitions and management does not believe they have a direct correlation to the operation of VeriFone’s business.

	•	Stock-based compensation. These expenses consist primarily of expenses for employee stock options and restricted stock units under SFAS No. 123(R). Management excludes stock-based compensation expenses from non-GAAP financial measures primarily because they are non-cash expenses which management believes are not reflective of ongoing operating results.

	•	Acquisition related charges and restructuring costs. This represents charges incurred for consulting services and other professional fees associated with acquisition related activities. These expenses also include charges related to restructuring activities, including costs associated with severance, benefits and excess facilities. As management does not believe that these charges directly relate to the operation of our business, management believes they should be excluded when evaluating our operating performance.

	•	Management fees to majority stockholder. Management excludes management fees paid to our majority stockholder (which were paid prior to our initial public offering) because it does not believe that these charges directly relate to the operation of our business.

	•	Refund of foreign unclaimed pension benefits. Management excludes the refund of foreign unclaimed pension benefits because it does not believe these amounts directly relate to the operation of our business.


	•	Non-cash portion of loss on debt extinguishment. This represents the non-cash portion of loss incurred on the extinguishment of our credit facility. While this credit facility supported our business, management does not believe the related loss on extinguishment is a cost directly attributable to the operating performance of our business.

A reconciliation of net income (loss), the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure, to EBITDA, as adjusted, for the years ended October 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 is as follows (in thousands):


	Years Ended October 31,
	2007			2006			2005			2004		2003

U.S. GAAP net income (loss)	$	(34,016	)	$	59,511		$	33,239		$	5,606	$	241
Provision for income taxes		24,718			32,159			13,490			4,971		12,296
Interest expense(1)		36,598			13,617			15,384			12,597		12,456
Interest income		(6,702	)		(3,372	)		(598	)		—		—
Depreciation and amortization of equipment and improvements		7,766			3,505			3,691			2,451		1,333
Amortization of capitalized software		1,220			1,231			1,173			698		108
Amortization of purchased intangible assets(2)		59,468			10,328			11,902			19,945		24,348
Amortization of step-up in deferred revenue on acquisition(2)		3,735			986			700			519		1,561
Amortization of step-up in inventory on acquisition		13,823			121			—			—		—
In-process research and development		6,752			—			—			—		—
Stock-based compensation		28,892			6,000			1,687			400		81
Acquisition related charges and restructuring costs		10,234			—			—			—		—
Management fees to majority stockholder		—			—			125			250		250
Refund of foreign unclaimed pension benefits		—			—			—			—		(2,820	)
Extinguishment of debt issuance costs		4,764			6,359			5,630			9,810		—

EBITDA as adjusted	$	157,252		$	130,445		$	86,423		$	57,247	$	49,854


(1)		For the year ended October 31, 2007, interest expense increased due to the increase in the balance of our debt instruments.

(2)		For the year ended October 31, 2007, these expenses increased significantly due to the acquisition of Lipman and PayWare.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Our only off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K, consist of interest rate cap agreements and forward foreign currency exchange agreements described under “Item 7A — Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” below.

Effects of Inflation

Our monetary assets, consisting primarily of cash, cash equivalents, and receivables, are not affected by inflation because they are short-term and in the case of cash are immaterial. Our non-monetary assets, consisting primarily of inventory, intangible assets, goodwill, and prepaid expenses and other assets, are not affected significantly by inflation. We believe that replacement costs of equipment, furniture, and leasehold improvements will not materially affect our operations. However, the rate of inflation affects our cost of goods sold and expenses, such as those for employee compensation, which may not be readily recoverable in the price of system solutions and services offered by us.

Critical Accounting Estimates

General

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact our consolidated financial statements. We believe the following critical accounting policies include our more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in “Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Revenue Recognition

Net revenues from System Solutions are recognized upon shipment, delivery, or customer acceptance of the product as required pursuant to the customer arrangement. Net revenues from services such as customer support are initially deferred and then recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract. Net revenues from services such as installations, equipment repairs, refurbishment arrangements, training, and consulting are recognized as the services are rendered. For arrangements with multiple elements, we allocate net revenues to each element using the residual method based on objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered element. We defer the portion of the arrangement fee equal to the objective evidence of fair value of the undelivered elements until they are delivered.

While the majority of our sales transactions contain standard business terms and conditions, there are some transactions that contain non-standard business terms and conditions. As a result, significant contract interpretation is sometimes required to determine the appropriate accounting including: (1) whether an arrangement exists and what is included in the arrangement; (2) how the arrangement consideration should be allocated among the deliverables if there are multiple deliverables; (3) when to recognize net revenues on the deliverables; (4) whether undelivered elements are essential to the functionality of delivered elements; and (5) whether we have fair value for the undelivered elements. In addition, our revenue recognition policy requires an assessment as to whether collection is probable, which inherently requires us to evaluate the creditworthiness of our customers. Changes in judgments on these assumptions and estimates could materially impact the timing of revenue recognition.

To a limited extent, we also enter into software development contracts with our customers that we recognize as net revenues on a completed contract basis. As a result, estimates of whether the contract is going to be profitable are necessary since we are required to record a provision for such loss in the period when the loss is first identified.

Inventory Valuation

The valuation of inventories requires us to determine obsolete or excess inventory and inventory that is not of saleable quality. The determination of obsolete or excess inventories requires us to estimate the future demand for our products within specific time horizons, generally twelve months to eighteen months. If our demand forecast for specific products is greater than actual demand and we fail to reduce manufacturing output accordingly, we could be required to record additional inventories write-offs, which would have a negative impact on our gross profit percentage.

We review the adequacy of our inventories valuation on a quarterly basis. For production inventory, our methodology involves matching our on-hand and on-order inventories with our sales estimate over the next twelve and eighteen months. We then evaluate the inventory found to be in excess of the twelve-month demand estimate

and take appropriate write-downs to reflect the risk of obsolescence. For on-hand and on-order inventory in excess of eighteen month requirements we generally record a 100% reserve. This methodology is significantly affected by our sales estimates. If actual demand were to be substantially lower than estimated, additional inventories write-downs for excess or obsolete inventories may be required.

Warranty Costs

We accrue for estimated warranty obligations when revenue is recognized based on an estimate of future warranty costs for delivered product. Our warranty obligation extends from 13 months to five years from the date of shipment. We estimate such obligations based on historical experience and expectations of future costs. Our estimate and judgments is affected by actual product failure rates and actual costs to repair. These estimates and judgments are more subjective for new product introductions as these estimates and judgments are based on similar products versus actual history.

Product Returns Reserve and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Product return reserve is an estimate of future product returns related to current period net revenues based upon historical experience. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of our net revenues for any period. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to pay their invoices to us in full. We regularly review the adequacy of our accounts receivable allowance after considering the size of the accounts receivable balance, each customer’s expected ability to pay, aging of accounts receivable balances, and our collection history with each customer. We make estimates and judgments about the inability of customers to pay the amount they owe us which could change significantly if their financial condition changes or the economy in general deteriorates.

Goodwill

We review goodwill at least annually for impairment. Should certain events or indicators of impairment occur between annual impairment tests, we perform the impairment test of goodwill at that date. In testing for a potential impairment of goodwill, we: (1) allocate goodwill to our various reporting units to which the acquired goodwill relates; (2) estimate the fair value of our reporting units; and (3) determine the carrying value (book value) of those reporting units, as some of the assets and liabilities related to those reporting units are not held by those reporting units but by corporate headquarters. Furthermore, if the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value, we must estimate the fair value of all identifiable assets and liabilities of that reporting unit, in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation for an acquired business. This can require independent valuations of certain internally generated and unrecognized intangible assets such as in-process research and development and developed technology. Only after this process is completed can the amount of goodwill impairment, if any, be determined.

The process of evaluating the potential impairment of goodwill is subjective and requires significant judgment at many points during the analysis. In estimating the fair value of a reporting unit for the purposes of our annual or periodic analyses, we make estimates and judgments about the future cash flows of that reporting unit. Although our cash flow forecasts are based on assumptions that are consistent with our plans and estimates we are using to manage the underlying businesses, there is significant exercise of judgment involved in determining the cash flows attributable to a reporting unit over its estimated remaining useful life. In addition, we make certain judgments about allocating shared assets to the estimated balance sheets of our reporting units. We also consider our and our competitor’s market capitalization on the date we perform the analysis. Changes in judgment on these assumptions and estimates could result in a goodwill impairment charge.

Long-lived Assets

We review our long-lived assets including property and equipment, capitalized software development costs, and identifiable intangible assets for indicators of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable. Determining if such events or changes in circumstances have occurred is subjective and judgmental. Should we determine such events have occurred, we

then determine whether such assets are recoverable based on estimated future undiscounted net cash flows and fair value. If future undiscounted net cash flows and fair value are less than the carrying value of such asset, we write down that asset to its fair value.

We make estimates and judgments about future undiscounted cash flows and fair value. Although our cash flow forecasts are based on assumptions that are consistent with our plans, there is significant exercise of judgment involved in determining the cash flows attributable to a long-lived asset over its estimated remaining useful life. Our estimates of anticipated future cash flows could be reduced significantly in the future. As a result, the carrying amount of our long-lived assets could be reduced through impairment charges in the future. Additionally, changes in estimated future cash flows could result in a shortening of estimated useful lives for long-lived assets including intangibles.

Contingencies and Litigation

We evaluate contingent liabilities including threatened or pending litigation in accordance with SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies. We assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to a potential claim or legal proceeding, as well as potential ranges of probable losses, when the outcomes of the claims or proceedings are probable and reasonably estimable. A determination of the amount of accrued liabilities required, if any, for these contingencies is made after the analysis of each matter. Because of uncertainties related to these matters, we base our estimates on the information available at the time. As additional information becomes available, we reassess the potential liability related to pending claims and litigation and may revise our estimates. Any revisions in the estimates of potential liabilities could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position.

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective May 1, 2005, we adopted the SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which requires us to measure compensation cost for all outstanding unvested share-based awards at fair value and recognize compensation over the requisite service period for awards expected to vest. The estimation of stock awards that will ultimately vest requires judgment, and to the extent actual results differ from our estimates, such amounts will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the period estimates are revised. In valuing share-based awards, significant judgment is required in determining the expected volatility of our common stock and the expected term individuals will hold their share-based awards prior to exercising. Expected volatility of the stock is based on a blend of our peer group in the industry in which we do business and the historical volatility of our own stock. The expected term of options granted is derived from the historical actual term of option grants and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. In the future, our expected volatility and expected term may change which could substantially change the grant-date fair value of future awards of stock options and ultimately the expense we record.

Business Combinations

We are required to allocate the purchase price of acquired companies to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as well as IPR&D, based on their estimated fair values. Such valuations require management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. The significant purchased intangible assets recorded by us include customer relationship, developed and core technology and the trade name.

Critical estimates in valuing intangible assets include but are not limited to: future expected cash flows from customer contracts, customer lists, distribution agreements and acquired developed technologies and patents; expected costs to develop IPR&D into commercially viable products and estimating cash flows from projects when completed; brand awareness and market position, as well as assumptions about the period of time the brand will continue to be used in our product portfolio; and discount rates. Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates.

Restructuring

We monitor and regularly evaluate our organizational structure and associated operating expenses. Depending on events and circumstances, we may decide to take additional actions to reduce future operating costs as our business requirements evolve. In determining restructuring charges, we analyze our future operating requirements, including the required headcount by business functions and facility space requirements. Our restructuring costs, and any resulting accruals, involve significant estimates using the best information available at the time the estimates are made. These restructuring costs are accounted for under SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. In recording severance reserves, we accrue a liability when all of the following conditions have been met: management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan of termination; the plan identifies the number of employees to be terminated, their job classifications and their locations, and the expected completion date; the plan is communicated such that the terms of the benefit arrangement are explained in sufficient detail to enable employees to determine the type and amount of benefits they will receive if they are involuntarily terminated; and actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn. In recording facilities lease loss reserves, we make various assumptions, including the time period over which the facilities are expected to be vacant, expected sublease terms, expected sublease rates, anticipated future operating expenses, and expected future use of the facilities. Our estimates involve a number of risks and uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control, including future real estate market conditions and our ability to successfully enter into subleases or lease termination agreements with terms as favorable as those assumed when arriving at our estimates. We regularly evaluate a number of factors to determine the appropriateness and reasonableness of our restructuring and lease loss accruals including the various assumptions noted above. If actual results differ significantly from our estimates, we may be required to adjust our restructuring and lease loss accruals in the future.

We also incur costs from our plan to exit certain activities of companies acquired in business combinations. These costs are recognized as a liability on the date of the acquisition under EITF 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Business Combination, when both of the following conditions are met: management assesses, formulates, and approves a plan to exit the activity; and the exit plan identifies the activities to be disposed, the locations of those activities, the method of disposition, all significant actions needed to complete the plan, and the expected date of completion of the plan.

Income Taxes

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts using enacted tax rates in effect for the year the differences are expected to reverse. In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets we consider all available positive and negative evidence including our past operating results, the existence of cumulative losses in past fiscal years and our forecast of future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which we have operations.

We have recorded a valuation allowance on our foreign tax credits carryforwards, foreign taxes on basis differences, and tax deductible intangible assets reversing beyond 2010 and various non-U.S. net operating losses because realization of these tax benefits through future taxable income cannot be reasonably assured. We intend to maintain the valuation allowances until sufficient positive evidence exists to support that it is more likely than not the deferred tax assets will be realized. An increase in the valuation allowance would result in additional expense in each period the balance increases. We make estimates and judgments about our future taxable income that are based on assumptions that are consistent with our plans and estimates. Should the actual amounts differ from our estimates, the amount of our valuation allowance could be materially impacted.

We must make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of tax credits and deductions, and in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes, as well as the interest and penalties relating to these uncertain tax positions. Significant changes to these estimates may result in an increase or decrease to our tax provision in a subsequent period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS No. 160 will change the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which will be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests (“NCI”) and classified as a component of equity. In conjunction with SFAS No. 141(R), discussed below, SFAS No. 160 will significantly change the accounting for partial and/or step acquisitions. SFAS No. 160 will be effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating SFAS No. 160 and have not yet determined the impact, if any, its adoption will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) changes the accounting for business combinations including the measurement of acquirer shares issued in consideration for a business combination, the recognition of contingent consideration, the accounting for pre-acquisition gain and loss contingencies, the recognition of capitalized in-process research and development as an indefinite-lived intangible asset until approved or discontinued rather than as an immediate expense, expensing restructuring costs in connection with an acquisition rather than adding them to the cost of an acquisition, the treatment of acquisition-related transaction costs, the recognition of changes in the acquirer’s income tax valuation allowance, and accounting for partial and/or step acquisitions. SFAS No. 141(R) is effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008, with the exception of the accounting for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies under SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. Early adoption is not permitted. When SFAS No. 141(R) becomes effective (which will be in the first quarter of our fiscal year 2010), any adjustments made to valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies associated with acquisitions that closed prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 141(R) will be recorded through income tax expense, whereas currently the accounting treatment would require any adjustment to be recognized through the purchase price. We are currently evaluating SFAS No. 141(R) and have not yet determined the impact, if any, its adoption will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to elect to measure financial instruments and liabilities at fair value. The objective of the guidance is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently, without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years, provided the provisions of SFAS No. 157 are applied. We are evaluating SFAS No. 159 and have not yet determined the impact, if any, its adoption will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting

pronouncements. On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157. FSP FAS 157-2 defers the implementation of SFAS No. 157 for certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities. The remainder of SFAS No. 157 is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. The implementation of SFAS No. 157 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position. FIN 48 indicates that an enterprise shall initially recognize the financial statement effects of a tax position when it is more likely than not of being sustained on examination, based on the technical merits of the position. In addition, FIN 48 indicates that the measurement of a tax position that meets the more likely than not threshold shall consider the amounts and probabilities of the outcomes that could be realized upon ultimate settlement. This interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted FIN 48 as of November 1, 2007, as required. Upon initial adoption, the Company expects the impact on its financial position and results of operations to be an increase in tax liabilities of approximately $3.3 million. This will be reported as a $1.4 million decrease to the opening balance of retained earnings, an increase to the non-current deferred tax assets of $0.5 million, and a $1.4 million increase to goodwill. There will also be a reclassification of $17.7 million from current taxes payable to non-current taxes payable as of the date of adoption. The Company expects an increase in the effective income tax rate in future years along with greater volatility in the effective tax rate due to the adoption of FIN 48.

Selected Quarterly Results of Operations

The following selected quarterly data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes and “Item 7— Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This information has been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statements that, in our opinion, reflect all recurring adjustments necessary to fairly present

our financial information when read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes. The results of operations for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period.

Quarterly Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2007


	Year Ended October 31, 2007
	First			Second			Third			Fourth
	Quarter			Quarter			Quarter			Quarter
	(In thousands, except per share data)
	(Unaudited)

Net revenues:
System Solutions	$	188,966		$	191,469		$	205,972		$	205,882
Services		27,397			25,414			25,729			32,063

Total net revenues		216,363			216,883			231,701			237,945
Cost of net revenues:
Cost of net revenues excluding amortization of purchased core and developed technology assets(1)(2)(5)		123,682			116,365			122,990			145,061
Amortization of purchased core and developed technology assets		9,609			9,586			9,278			9,424

Total cost of System Solutions net revenues		133,291			125,951			132,268			154,485
Services		14,449			13,286			13,837			16,093

Total cost of net revenues		147,740			139,237			146,105			170,578

Gross profit		68,623			77,646			85,596			67,367
Operating expenses:(1)
Research and development		16,898			16,009			15,365			17,158
Sales and marketing		23,040			22,823			23,686			26,746
General and administrative(3)		17,376			25,565			19,364			18,399
Amortization of purchased intangible assets		5,351			5,690			5,416			5,114
In-process research and development		6,560			90			—			102

Total operating expenses		69,225			70,177			63,831			67,519

Operating income (expense)		(602	)		7,469			21,765			(152	)
Interest expense		(9,756	)		(9,507	)		(9,468	)		(7,867	)
Interest income		991			1,534			2,226			1,951
Other income (expense), net(4)		(261	)		(2	)		(4,156	)		(3,463	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(9,628	)		(506	)		10,367			(9,531	)
Provision for income taxes(6)		(3,949	)		4,312			52,753			(28,398	)

Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders	$	(5,679	)	$	(4,818	)	$	(42,386	)	$	18,867

Net income per common share — diluted	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.51	)	$	0.22


(1) Stock-based compensation included above:
Cost of net revenues — System Solutions	$	917	$	930	$	570	$	581
Research and development		1,466		1,433		1,443	$	1,595
Sales and marketing		1,829		1,683		1,974	$	3,456
General and administrative		3,584		4,253		1,872	$	1,306

	$	7,796	$	8,299	$	5,859	$	6,938


(2)		Included amortization of step-up in inventory fair value of $10.3 million and $3.4 million in the first quarter and second quarter of fiscal 2007, respectively.

(3)		In the second quarter of fiscal 2007, included $5.7 million of consulting and legal integration expenses supporting a review of the operational controls of former Lipman entities, production of documents in response


		to the U.S. Department of Justice investigation related to the Lipman acquisition and a $1.0 million charge to terminate a distributor agreement where there was a channel conflict between Lipman and VeriFone.

(4)		In the third quarter of fiscal year 2007, we incurred expenses of $4.8 million related to the write-off of debt issuance costs in connection with the extinguishment of debt.

(5)		In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, we incurred $5.3 million of excess obsolescence and scrap charges, $3.1 million of charges relating to the commitment to purchase excess components from our contract manufacturers, and $3.2 million for a product specific warranty reserve for an acquired product.

(6)		The provision for income taxes for the three months ended July 31, 2007 and the three months ended October 31, 2007, are an expense of $52.8 million and a benefit of ($28.4) million, respectively. These amounts are substantially different than tax computed at a statutory rate of 35%. The effective rates differ from the statutory rate due to two principal factors. First, under FIN 18, our quarterly tax provision is determined by applying the estimated annual effective rate to our pretax income for the quarter as adjusted for discrete items. The estimated annual rate for FIN 18 purposes was 340%. This results in a tax expense of $55.0 million and a tax benefit of ($28.7) million before discrete tax adjustments for the three months ended July 31, 2007 and the three months ended October 31, 2007, respectively. We offset these amounts with approximately ($2.2) million of discrete tax benefit and $0.3 million of discrete tax expense items to obtain the tax provision for the three month periods ended July 31, 2007 and October 31, 2007, respectively. Secondly, we recorded a significant increase in the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2007. The increase in valuation allowance resulted in a significantly larger provision for taxes which has been allocated to the quarterly results under FIN 18.

Quarterly Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2006


	Year Ended October 31, 2006
	First			Second			Third			Fourth
	Quarter			Quarter			Quarter			Quarter
	(In thousands, except per share data)
	(Unaudited)

Net revenues:
System Solutions	$	118,685		$	128,136		$	131,960		$	138,373
Services		15,945			14,054			15,657			18,260

Total net revenues		134,630			142,190			147,617			156,633
Cost of net revenues:
Cost of net revenues excluding amortization of purchased core and developed technology assets(1)		65,522			70,346			71,633			73,922
Amortization of purchased core and developed technology assets		1,593			1,419			1,071			1,542

Total cost of System Solutions net revenues		67,115			71,765			72,704			75,464
Services		7,913			7,026			8,452			9,086

Total cost of net revenues		75,028			78,791			81,156			84,550

Gross profit		59,602			63,399			66,461			72,083
Operating expenses:(1)
Research and development		11,407			12,221			11,726			11,999
Sales and marketing		14,201			14,404			14,181			15,821
General and administrative		9,698			9,993			10,936			11,946
Amortization of purchased intangible assets		1,159			1,159			1,159			1,226

Total operating expenses		36,465			37,777			38,002			40,992

Operating income		23,137			25,622			28,459			31,091
Interest expense		(3,279	)		(3,197	)		(3,438	)		(3,703	)
Interest income		687			927			938			820
Other income (expense), net(2)		201			65			(195	)		(6,465	)

Income before income taxes		20,746			23,417			25,764			21,743
Provision for income taxes		6,952			8,381			9,009			7,817

Net income attributable to common stockholders	$	13,794		$	15,036		$	16,755		$	13,926

Net income per common share — diluted	$	0.20		$	0.22		$	0.24		$	0.20


(1) Stock-based compensation included above:
Cost of net revenues — System Solutions	$	153	$	162	$	204	$	190
Research and development		180		210		326		478
Sales and marketing		331		409		569		748
General and administrative		259		408		587		786

	$	923	$	1,189	$	1,686	$	2,202


(2)		In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, we incurred expenses of $6.4 million associated with debt refinancing.


ITEM 7A.	*QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK*

We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. To mitigate some of these risks, we utilize derivative financial instruments to hedge these exposures. We do not use

derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. We do not anticipate any material changes in our primary market risk exposures in fiscal 2008.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk related to our debt, which bears interest based upon the three-month LIBOR rate. We have reduced our exposure to interest rate fluctuations through the purchase of interest rate caps covering a portion of our variable rate debt. In fiscal year 2006, we purchased two-year interest rate caps for $118,000 with an initial notional amount of $200 million declining to $150 million after one year with an effective date of November 1, 2006 under which we will receive interest payments if the three-month LIBOR rate exceeds 6.5%. Based on effective interest rates at October 31, 2007, a 50 basis point increase in interest rates on our borrowings subject to variable interest rate fluctuations would increase our interest expense by approximately $1.2 million annually.

Foreign Currency Risk

A majority of our business consists of sales made to customers outside the United States. A substantial portion of the net revenues we receive from such sales is denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Additionally, portions of our costs of net revenues and our other operating expenses are incurred by our International operations and denominated in local currencies. While fluctuations in the value of these net revenues, costs, and expenses as measured in U.S. dollars have not materially affected our results of operations historically, we cannot assure you that adverse currency exchange rate fluctuations will not have a material impact in the future. In addition, our balance sheet reflects non-U.S. dollar denominated assets and liabilities which can be adversely affected by fluctuations in currency exchange rates. In certain periods, we have not hedged our exposure to these fluctuations.

Historically, we have entered into foreign currency forward contracts and other arrangements intended to hedge our exposure to adverse fluctuations in exchange rates. As of October 31, 2007, we had no foreign currency forward contracts outstanding. On November 1, 2007, we entered into foreign currency forward contracts with aggregate notional amounts of $40.2 million to hedge exposures to non-functional currencies. If we had chosen not to enter into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge against these exposures and if the hedge currencies were to devalue 5% to 10% against the U.S. dollar, results of operations would include a foreign exchange loss of approximately $2.0 million to $4.0 million.

Hedging arrangements of this sort may not always be effective to protect our results of operations against currency exchange rate fluctuations, particularly in the event of imprecise forecasts of non-U.S. denominated assets and liabilities. Accordingly, if there were an adverse movement in exchange rates, we might suffer significant losses. For instance, for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, we suffered foreign currency contract losses of $2.3 million, $0.5 million, and $0.8 million, respectively, net of foreign currency transaction gains, despite our hedging activities.

Equity Price Risk

In June 2007, we sold $316.2 million aggregate principal amount of 1.375% Senior Convertible Notes due 2012 (the “Notes”). Holders may convert their Notes prior to maturity upon the occurrence of certain circumstances. Upon conversion, we would pay the holder the cash value of the applicable number of shares of VeriFone common stock, up to the principal amount of the Notes. Amounts in excess of the principal amount, if any may be paid in cash or in stock at our option. Concurrent with the issuance of the Notes, we entered into note hedge transactions and separately, warrant transactions, to reduce the potential dilution from the conversion of the Notes and to mitigate any negative effect such conversion may have on the price of our common stock.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

VeriFone Holdings, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of VeriFone Holdings, Inc. (and subsidiaries) as of October 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of VeriFone Holdings, Inc. (and subsidiaries) at October 31, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 2 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, under the heading Stock-Based Compensation, in fiscal 2005 VeriFone Holdings, Inc. changed its method of accounting for stock-based compensation.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), VeriFone Holdings, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated August 19, 2008 expressed an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Francisco, California

August 19, 2008

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

VeriFone Holdings, Inc.

We have audited VeriFone Holdings, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO criteria”). VeriFone Holdings, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In its assessment management has identified material weaknesses in controls over the process for preparation, review, approval and entry of manual, nonstandard journal entries; maintaining sufficient qualified accounting and finance personnel; the supervision, monitoring and monthly financial statement review processes; and, the identification, documentation and review of various income tax calculations, reconciliations and related supporting documentation. These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2007 financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated August 19, 2008 on those financial statements.

In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, VeriFone Holdings, Inc. has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of October 31, 2007, based on the COSO criteria.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

San Francisco, California

August 19, 2008

VERIFONE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	October 31,
	2007			2006
	(In thousands, except par value)

ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	215,001		$	86,564
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $4,270 and $2,364		194,146			119,839
Inventories		107,168			86,631
Deferred tax assets		23,854			13,267
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		63,413			12,943

Total current assets		603,582			319,244
Property, plant, and equipment, net		48,293			7,300
Purchased intangible assets, net		170,073			16,544
Goodwill		611,977			52,689
Deferred tax assets		67,796			21,706
Debt issuance costs, net		12,855			10,987
Transaction costs		—			12,350
Other assets		32,733			12,125

Total assets	$	1,547,309		$	452,945

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	105,215		$	66,685
Income taxes payable		19,530			5,951
Accrued compensation		21,201			16,202
Accrued warranty		11,012			4,902
Deferred revenue, net		43,049			23,567
Deferred tax liabilities		6,154			6
Accrued expenses		8,755			4,752
Accrued transaction costs		—			12,000
Other current liabilities		84,773			13,655
Current portion of long-term debt		5,386			1,985
Restructuring liabilities		1,692			2,963

Total current liabilities		306,767			152,668
Accrued warranty		655			530
Deferred revenue		11,274			7,371
Long-term debt, less current portion		547,766			190,904
Deferred tax liabilities		87,142			859
Other long-term liabilities		10,296			1,872

		963,900			354,204
Minority interest		2,487			—
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred Stock: 10,000 shares authorized as of October 31, 2007 and 2006; No shares issued and oustanding as of October 31, 2007 and 2006		—			—
Common Stock: $0.01 par value, 100,000 shares authorized at October 31, 2007 and 2006; 84,060 and 68,148 shares issued and outstanding as of October 31, 2007 and 2006		841			682
Additional paid-in-capital		635,404			140,569
Accumulated deficit		(77,484	)		(43,468	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		22,161			958

Total stockholders’ equity		580,922			98,741

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,547,309		$	452,945

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

VERIFONE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


	Years Ended October 31,
	2007			2006			2005
	(In thousands, except per share data)

Net revenues:
System Solutions	$	792,289		$	517,154		$	429,741
Services		110,603			63,916			55,626

Total net revenues		902,892			581,070			485,367
Cost of net revenues:
System Solutions		545,995			287,048			259,411
Services		57,665			32,477			29,131

Total cost of net revenues		603,660			319,525			288,542

Gross profit		299,232			261,545			196,825
Operating expenses:
Research and development		65,430			47,353			41,830
Sales and marketing		96,295			58,607			52,231
General and administrative		80,704			42,573			29,609
Amortization of purchased intangible assets		21,571			4,703			4,967
In-process research and development		6,752			—			—

Total operating expenses		270,752			153,236			128,637

Operating income		28,480			108,309			68,188
Interest expense		(36,598	)		(13,617	)		(15,384	)
Interest income		6,702			3,372			598
Other expense, net		(7,882	)		(6,394	)		(6,673	)

Income (loss) before income taxes		(9,298	)		91,670			46,729
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes		24,718			32,159			13,490

Net income (loss)	$	(34,016	)	$	59,511		$	33,239

Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.41	)	$	0.90		$	0.57

Diluted	$	(0.41	)	$	0.86		$	0.54

Weighted average number of shares used in computing net income (loss) per share:
Basic		82,194			66,217			58,318

Diluted		82,194			68,894			61,460

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

VERIFONE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME


																	Retained			Accumulated
	Common Stock										Additional			Deferred			Earnings			Other			Total
	Voting					Non Voting					Paid-in			Stock-Based			(Accumulated			Comprehensive			Stockholders’
	Shares			Amount		Shares			Amount		Capital			Compensation			Deficit)			Income			Equity
	(In thousands)

Balance as of October 31, 2004		56,430		$	564		19		$	—	$	146		$	(146	)	$	(136,218	)	$	267		$	(135,387	)
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs		11,211			112		39					125,947			—			—			—			126,059
Conversion of nonvoting to voting common stock		58			—		(58	)		—		—			—			—			—			—
Repurchase of unvested restricted common stock		(53	)		—		—			—		—			—			—			—			—
Amortization of stock-based compensation		—			—		—			—		—			52			—			—			52
Deferred stock-based compensation		—			—		—			—		442			(442	)		—			—			—
Reversal of deferred stock-based compensation upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R)		—			—		—			—		(536	)		536			—			—			—
Stock-based compensation under SFAS No. 123(R)		—			—		—			—		1,635			—			—			—			1,635
Tax benefit on stock-based compensation under SFAS No. 123(R)		—			—		—			—		441			—			—			—			441
Comprehensive Income:
Net income		—			—		—			—		—			—			33,239			—			33,239
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax		—			—		—			—		—			—			—			341			341
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax		—			—		—			—		—			—			—			(2	)		(2	)
Unrecognized gain on interest rate hedges, net of tax		—			—		—			—		—			—			—			134			134

Total comprehensive income																								33,712
Reclassification of common stock that vested		—			—		—			—		26			—			—			—			26

Balance as of October 31, 2005		67,646			676		—			—		128,101			—			(102,979	)		740			26,538
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs		502			6		—			—		3,056			—			—			—			3,062
Stock-based compensation under SFAS No. 123(R)		—			—		—			—		5,998			—			—			—			5,998
Tax benefit on stock-based compensation under SFAS No. 123(R)		—			—		—			—		3,414			—			—			—			3,414
Comprehensive Income:
Net income		—			—		—			—		—			—			59,511			—			59,511
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax		—			—		—			—		—			—			—			300			300
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of tax		—			—		—			—		—			—			—			1			1
Unrecognized loss on interest rate hedges, net of tax		—			—		—			—		—			—			—			(83	)		(83	)

Total comprehensive income																								59,729

Balance as of October 31, 2006		68,148			682		—			—		140,569			—			(43,468	)		958			98,741
Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs		2,450			24		—			—		37,744			—			—			—			37,768
Common stock issued for acquisition of Lipman		13,462			135							417,471									—			417,606
Fair value of options assumed in acquisition of Lipman		—			—		—			—		17,622												17,622
Stock-based compensation under SFAS No. 123(R)		—			—		—			—		28,892			—			—			—			28,892
Tax benefit on stock-based compensation under SFAS No. 123(R)		—			—		—			—		11,464			—			—			—			11,464
Purchase of convertible note hedge, net of tax		—			—		—			—		(49,546	)											(49,546	)
Issuance of warrants		—			—		—			—		31,188												31,188
Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Net loss		—			—		—			—		—			—			(34,016	)		—			(34,016	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax		—			—		—			—		—			—			—			21,221			21,221
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net of tax		—			—		—			—		—			—			—			(1	)		(1	)
Unrecognized loss on interest rate hedges, net of tax		—			—		—			—		—			—			—			(17	)		(17	)

Total comprehensive loss																								(12,813	)

Balance as of October 31, 2007		84,060		$	841		—		$	—	$	635,404		$	—		$	(77,484	)	$	22,161		$	580,922

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

VERIFONE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


	Years Ended October 31,
	2007			2006			2005
	(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	(34,016	)	$	59,511		$	33,239
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization of purchased intangible assets		59,468			10,328			11,902
Depreciation and amortization of property, plant, and equipment		7,766			3,505			3,691
Amortization of capitalized software		1,220			1,231			1,173
In-process research and development		6,752			—			—
Write-off of property, plant, and equipment		271			—			—
Amortization of interest rate caps		14			236			109
Amortization of debt issuance costs		1,756			1,105			1,150
Stock-based compensation		28,892			6,000			1,687
Non-cash portion of loss on debt extinguishment		4,764			6,359			2,898
Minority interest and equity in earnings of affiliates and other		(149	)		(52	)		(17	)

Net cash provided by operating activities before changes in working capital		76,738			88,223			55,832
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable, net		(39,493	)		(28,938	)		(8,817	)
Inventories		45,133			(51,983	)		(3,407	)
Deferred tax assets		(29,092	)		(5,801	)		(9,853	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(41,512	)		(4,444	)		(269	)
Other assets		(5,136	)		(2,106	)		(1,118	)
Accounts payable		28,144			17,189			3,227
Income taxes payable		20,391			1,542			2,403
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation		(11,464	)		(3,414	)		(441	)
Accrued compensation		(2,975	)		2,656			838
Accrued warranty


PART I.
	Item 1.	Business	1
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	15
	Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	28
	Item 2.	Properties	29
	Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	29
	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	32

PART II.
	Item 5.	Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	32
	Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	34
	Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	37
	Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	66
	Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	68
	Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	121
	Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	121
	Item 9B.	Other Information	123

PART III.
	Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	123
	Item 11.	Executive Compensation	130
	Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	150
	Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	153
	Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	155

PART IV.
	Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	156
EXHIBIT 21.1
EXHIBIT 23.1
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32.1


	Page

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		69
Consolidated Balance Sheets at October 31, 2007 and 2006		71
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005		72
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005		73
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005		74
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements		75