10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from             to            

Commission file number: 001-32426

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	01-0526993
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
97 Darling Avenue, South Portland, Maine	04106
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(207) 773-8171

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at April 30, 2012
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share	38,861,960 shares

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
	PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.	- 3 -
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	- 21 -
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	- 29 -
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	- 30 -
	PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	- 31 -
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	- 31 -
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	- 31 -
Item 6.	Exhibits.	- 32 -
	SIGNATURE	- 33 -

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for statements that are forward-looking and are not statements of historical facts. This Quarterly Report includes forward-looking statements. Any statements in this Quarterly Report that are not statements of historical facts may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. When used in this Quarterly Report, the words “may,” “could,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “continue,” “project,” “intend,” “estimate,” “believe,” “expect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain such words. Forward-looking statements relate to our future plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and are not historical facts and accordingly involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results or performance to be materially different from future results or performance expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report, in press releases and in oral statements made by our authorized officers: the effects of general economic conditions on fueling patterns and the commercial activity of fleets; the effects of the Company’s international business expansion and integration efforts and any failure of those efforts; the impact and range of credit losses; breaches of the Company’s technology systems and any resulting negative impact on our reputation liability, or loss of relationships with customers or merchants; the Company’s failure to successfully integrate the businesses it has acquired; fuel price volatility; the Company’s failure to maintain or renew key agreements; failure to expand the Company’s technological capabilities and service offerings as rapidly as the Company’s competitors; the actions of regulatory bodies, including banking and securities regulators, or possible changes in banking regulations impacting the Company’s industrial bank and the Company as the corporate parent; the impact of foreign currency exchange rates on the Company’s operations, revenue and income; changes in interest rates; financial loss if the Company determines it necessary to unwind its derivative instrument position prior to the expiration of a contract; the incurrence of impairment charges if our assessment of the fair value of certain of our reporting units changes; the uncertainties of litigation; as well as other risks and uncertainties identified in Item 1A of our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 28, 2012. Our forward-looking statements and these factors do not reflect the potential future impact of any alliance, merger, acquisition or disposition. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of the initial filing of this Quarterly Report and undue reliance should not be placed on these statements. We disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

- 2 -

PART I

Item 1. Financial Statements.

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	30,443		$	25,791
Accounts receivable (less reserve for credit losses of $10,724 in 2012 and $11,526 in 2011)		1,555,035			1,323,915
Income taxes receivable		714			7,755
Available-for-sale securities		16,751			17,044
Fuel price derivatives, at fair value		—			410
Property, equipment and capitalized software (net of accumulated depreciation of $113,026 in 2012 and $109,133 in 2011)		60,973			62,078
Deferred income taxes, net		141,664			143,524
Goodwill		554,771			549,504
Other intangible assets, net		105,627			109,656
Other assets		48,063			38,383
Total assets	$	2,514,041		$	2,278,060
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Accounts payable	$	553,401		$	409,226
Accrued expenses		50,721			54,738
Deposits		706,739			693,654
Borrowed federal funds		47,226			6,900
Revolving line-of-credit facilities and term loan		288,400			295,300
Amounts due under tax receivable agreement		92,763			92,763
Fuel price derivatives, at fair value		13,560			415
Other liabilities		16,287			15,749
Total liabilities		1,769,097			1,568,745
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock $0.01 par value; 175,000 shares authorized, 42,431 in 2012 and 42,252 in 2011 shares issued; 38,949 in 2012 and 38,765 in 2011 shares outstanding		424			423
Additional paid-in capital		150,628			146,282
Retained earnings		656,625			633,389
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities		184			200
Net unrealized loss on interest rate swaps		—			(60	)
Net foreign currency translation adjustment		38,450			30,448
Accumulated other comprehensive income		38,634			30,588
Less treasury stock at cost, 3,566 shares in 2012 and 2011		(101,367	)		(101,367	)
Total stockholders’ equity		744,944			709,315
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,514,041		$	2,278,060

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 3 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

	Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Revenues
Fleet payment solutions	$	109,147		$	98,534
Other payment solutions		30,975			21,556
Total revenues		140,122			120,090
Expenses
Salary and other personnel		28,715			25,694
Service fees		20,308			13,010
Provision for credit losses		5,043			5,659
Technology leasing and support		4,267			3,934
Occupancy and equipment		2,816			3,265
Depreciation and amortization		11,317			10,969
Operating interest expense		1,111			1,278
Cost of hardware and equipment sold		727			1,051
Other		7,855			9,058
Total operating expenses		82,159			73,918
Operating income		57,963			46,172
Financing interest expense		(2,285	)		(2,439	)
(Loss) gain on foreign currency transactions		(20	)		488
Net realized and unrealized losses on fuel price derivatives		(18,812	)		(25,175	)
Income before income taxes		36,846			19,046
Provision for income taxes		13,610			6,931
Net income		23,236			12,115
Other comprehensive income
Changes in available-for-sale securities, net of tax effect of $(10) in 2012 and $(7) in 2011		(16	)		(12	)
Changes in interest rate swaps, net of tax effect of $35 in 2012 and $41 in 2011		60			70
Foreign currency translation, net of tax effect of $(28) in 2012 and $37 in 2011		8,002			7,683
Total other comprehensive income	$	31,282		$	19,856
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.60		$	0.31
Diluted	$	0.59		$	0.31
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		38,820			38,516
Diluted		39,123			38,872

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 4 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	23,236		$	12,115
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used for) provided by operating activities:
Fair value change of fuel price derivatives		13,555			20,818
Stock-based compensation		3,424			2,260
Depreciation and amortization		11,667			12,203
Deferred taxes		1,908			507
Provision for credit losses		5,043			5,659
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisition:
Accounts receivable		(233,962	)		(262,024	)
Other assets		(9,864	)		(2,899	)
Accounts payable		143,296			171,689
Accrued expenses		(4,041	)		(6,424	)
Income taxes		7,205			1,744
Other liabilities		295			(176	)
Net cash used for operating activities		(38,238	)		(44,528	)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment		(4,968	)		(6,423	)
Purchases of available-for-sale securities		(80	)		(1,761	)
Maturities of available-for-sale securities		347			233
Acquisition of ReD - adjustment, net of cash acquired		—			429
Acquisition of rapid!, net of earn out		—			(8,081	)
Net cash used for investing activities		(4,701	)		(15,603	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Excess tax benefits from equity instrument share-based payment arrangements		2,244			3,008
Repurchase of share-based awards to satisfy tax withholdings		(2,608	)		(1,540	)
Proceeds from stock option exercises		1,287			2,300
Net change in deposits		13,085			128,018
Net change in borrowed federal funds		40,326			(59,484	)
Repayments on term loan		(2,500	)		—
Net change in revolving line-of-credit facility		(4,400	)		5,800
Net cash provided by financing activities		47,434			78,102
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		157			(154	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		4,652			17,817
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		25,791			18,045
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	30,443		$	35,862
Supplemental cash flow information
Interest paid	$	3,319		$	3,281
Income taxes paid	$	2,248		$	1,656
Significant non-cash transaction
Acquisition of rapid! – estimated earn out	$	—		$	10,000
Reduction to rapid! – estimated earn out	$	839			—

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

- 5 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. They do not include all information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. However, except as disclosed herein, there have been no material changes in the information disclosed in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Wright Express Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2011. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements that are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 28, 2012. When used in these notes, the term “Company” means Wright Express Corporation and all entities included in the consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (including normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three-months ended March 31, 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future quarter(s) or the year ending December 31, 2012.

In the first quarter of 2012, consolidated stockholders’ equity changed because of (i) changes in other comprehensive income reflected in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income; (ii) changes in common stock and additional paid-in capital reflected in the consolidated statements of cash flows (including stock-based compensation, proceeds from stock option exercises and tax activities around share-based awards); and (iii) net income.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other liabilities approximate their respective fair values due to the short-term nature of such instruments. The carrying values of certificates of deposit, interest-bearing money market deposits, borrowed federal funds and credit agreement borrowings, approximate their respective fair values as the interest rates on these financial instruments are variable. All other financial instruments are reflected at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet.

2. New Accounting Standards

On May 12, 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU 2011-04”). The amendments in ASU 2011-04 change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments are intended to create comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

On June 16, 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income (“ASU 2011-05”). The amendments in ASU 2011-05 require entities to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Additionally, the amendments in ASU 2011-05 require an entity to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income are presented. ASU 2011-05 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. On December 23, 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 to defer the new requirement to present components of reclassifications of other comprehensive income on the face of the financial statements. Companies are still required to adopt the other requirements contained in ASU 2011-05. The Company adopted ASU 2011-05 and has provided the required disclosures in a single statement with the Consolidated Statement of Income.

- 6 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

3. Business Acquisitions

Acquisition of rapid! Financial Services LLC.

On March 31, 2011, the Company acquired certain assets of rapid! Financial Services LLC (“rapid! PayCard”) for approximately $18,000 including an estimate of contingent consideration for future performance milestones of $10,000. rapid! PayCard is a provider of payroll prepaid cards, e-paystubs and e-W2s, and is focused on small and medium sized businesses. The Company purchased rapid! PayCard to expand its Other Payment Solutions segment. During the first quarter of 2011, the Company allocated the purchase price of the acquisition based upon a preliminary estimate of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. During the first quarter of 2012, the Company revised the intangible assets associated with the trade name. These valuations of intangible assets have been finalized. The tax basis goodwill is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

A contingent consideration agreement was entered into in connection with the purchase of rapid! PayCard. Under the terms of the agreement the former owners of rapid! PayCard will receive additional consideration based upon the achievement of certain performance criteria, measured over the twelve-month period from the date of purchase. During the first quarter of 2012, the Company revised the estimate of contingent consideration to $8,486. On April 30, 2012, the Company paid the former owners of rapid! Paycard in accordance with the contingent consideration agreement. The resulting impact of this adjustment ($839) during the first quarter of 2012 was an offset to other operating expense in our Other Payment Solutions segment and does not impact the allocation of purchase price.

The following is a summary of the allocation of the purchase price to the assets and liabilities acquired:

	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
Consideration paid (including estimated $10,000 earn out)	$	18,081		$	18,081
Less:
Accounts receivable		75			75
Accounts payable		(85	)		(85	)
Other tangible assets, net		105			105
Customer relationships (a)		4,600			4,600
Trade name (b)		1,000			1,600
Recorded goodwill	$	12,386		$	11,786

^(a) Weighted average life – 4.7 years.

^(b) Weighted average life – 5.5 years.

- 7 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

4. Reserves for Credit Losses

In general, the terms of the Company’s trade receivables provide for payment terms of 30 days or less. The Company does not extend revolving credit to its customers with respect to these receivables. The portfolio of receivables is considered to be a large group of smaller balance homogeneous amounts that are collectively evaluated for impairment.

The following table presents the Company’s aging of accounts receivable:

	Age Analysis of Past Due Financing Receivables, Gross as of March 31, 2012, and 2011
	Current and Less Than 30 Days Past Due			30-59 Days Past Due			60-89 Days Past Due			Greater Than 90 Days Past Due			Total
2012
Accounts receivable, trade	$	1,521,181		$	31,509		$	5,443		$	7,626		$	1,565,759
Percent of total		97.2	%		2.0	%		0.3	%		0.5	%
2011
Accounts receivable, trade	$	1,379,183		$	35,767		$	6,168		$	6,781		$	1,427,899
Percent of total		96.6	%		2.5	%		0.4	%		0.5	%

The following table presents changes in reserves for credit losses related to accounts receivable:

	Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Balance, beginning of period	$	11,526		$	10,237
Provision for credit losses		5,043			5,659
Charge-offs		(7,407	)		(7,667	)
Recoveries of amounts previously charged-off		1,562			1,047
Balance, end of period	$	10,724		$	9,276

- 8 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill

The changes in goodwill during the first three months of 2012 were as follows:

	Fleet Payment Solutions Segment		Other Payment Solutions Segment		Total
Balance at December 31, 2011	$	512,184	$	37,320	$	549,504
Impact of foreign currency translation		4,339		328		4,667
rapid! purchase price adjustment		—		600		600
Balance at March 31, 2012	$	516,523	$	38,248	$	554,771

Other Intangible Assets

The changes in other intangible assets during the first three months of 2012 were as follows:

	Net Carrying Amount, December 31, 2011		Acquisition adjustment			Amortization			Impact of foreign currency translation		Net Carrying Amount, March 31, 2012
Definite-lived intangible assets
Acquired software	$	19,034	$	—		$	(876	)	$	113	$	18,271
Customer relationships		75,827		—			(4,028	)		1,331		73,130
Patent		2,766		—			(146	)		89		2,709
Trade name		1,600		(600	)		(36	)		—		964
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
Trademarks and trade names		10,429		—			—			124		10,553
Total	$	109,656	$	(600	)	$	(5,086	)	$	1,657	$	105,627

The Company expects amortization expense related to the definite-lived intangible assets above to be as follows: $15,103 for April 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012; $16,817 for 2013; $13,930 for 2014; $11,469 for 2015; $9,241 for 2016 and $6,862 for 2017.

- 9 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

Other intangible assets consist of the following:

	March 31, 2012							December 31, 2011
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
Definite-lived intangible assets
Acquired software	$	29,128	$	(10,857	)	$	18,271	$	28,867	$	(9,833	)	$	19,034
Non-compete agreement		100		(100	)		—		100		(100	)		—
Customer relationships		111,410		(38,280	)		73,130		109,772		(33,945	)		75,827
Patent		3,435		(726	)		2,709		3,365		(599	)		2,766
Trade name		1,100		(136	)		964		1,700		(100	)		1,600
	$	145,173	$	(50,099	)		95,074	$	143,804	$	(44,577	)		99,227
Indefinite-lived intangible assets
Trademarks and trade names							10,553							10,429
Total						$	105,627						$	109,656

6. Earnings per Common Share

The following is a reconciliation of the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Three months ended March 31,
	2012		2011
Income available for common stockholders
Basic and Dilutive	$	23,236	$	12,115
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic		38,820		38,516
Unvested restricted stock units		160		155
Stock options		143		201
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted		39,123		38,872

- 10 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

7. Derivative Instruments

The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary risks managed by using derivative instruments are interest rate risk and commodity price risk. Interest rate swap arrangements are entered into to manage interest rate risk associated with the Company’s variable-rate borrowings. The Company also enters into put and call option contracts based on the wholesale price of gasoline and retail price of diesel fuel, which settle on a monthly basis, related to the Company’s commodity price risk. These put and call option contracts, or fuel price derivative instruments, are designed to reduce the volatility of the Company’s cash flows associated with its fuel price-related earnings exposure in North America.

Accounting guidance requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial position. The Company designates interest rate swap arrangements as cash flow hedges of the forecasted interest payments on a portion of its variable-rate credit agreement. The Company’s fuel price derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment under current guidance, and therefore, no such hedging designation has been made. Because the derivatives are either accounting or economic hedges of operational exposures, cash flows from the settlement of such contracts are included in “Cash flows from operating activities” on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Cash Flow Hedges

For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had no outstanding interest rate swap arrangements.

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments

For derivative instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss on the derivative is recognized in current earnings. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had the following put and call option contracts which settle on a monthly basis:

	Aggregate Notional Amount (gallons) (a)
Fuel price derivative instruments – unleaded fuel Option contracts settling April 2012 – September 2013		36,483
Fuel price derivative instruments – diesel Option contracts settling April 2012– September 2013		16,391
Total fuel price derivative instruments		52,874

(a) The settlement of the put and call option contracts is based upon the New York Mercantile Exchange’s New York Harbor Reformulated Gasoline Blendstock for Oxygen Blending and the U.S. Department of Energy’s weekly retail on-highway diesel fuel price for the month.

- 11 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

The following table presents information on the location and amounts of derivative fair values in the condensed consolidated balance sheets:

	Derivatives Classified as Assets						Derivatives Classified as Liabilities
	March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011			March 31, 2012			December 31, 2011
	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Interest rate contracts	Other assets	$	—	Other assets	$	—	Accrued expenses	$	—	Accrued expenses	$	95
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Commodity contracts	Fuel price derivatives, at fair value		—	Fuel price derivatives, at fair value		410	Fuel price derivatives, at fair value		13,560	Fuel price derivatives, at fair value		415
Total derivatives		$	—		$	410		$	13,560		$	510

The following table presents information on the location and amounts of derivative gains and losses in the condensed consolidated statements of income:

Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective Portion)  (a)				Location of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)	Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)						Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on  Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing) (b)	Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion and Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing)
	Three months ended March 31,					Three months ended March 31,							Three months ended March 31,
	2012		2011			2012			2011				2012		2011
Interest rate contracts	$	60	$	70	Financing interest expense	$	(109	)	$	(248	)	Financing interest expense	$	—	$	—

Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments	Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative	Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on  Derivative
		Three months ended March 31,
		2012			2011
Commodity contracts	Net realized and unrealized losses on fuel price derivatives	$	(18,812	)	$	(25,175	)

(a) The amount of gain or (loss) recognized in OCI on the Company’s interest rate swap arrangements has been recorded net of tax impacts of $35 in 2012 and $41 in 2011.

(b) No ineffectiveness was reclassified into earnings nor was any amount excluded from effectiveness testing.

- 12 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

8. Fair Value

The Company holds mortgage-backed securities, fixed income and equity securities, derivatives and certain other financial instruments which are carried at fair value. The Company determines fair value based upon quoted prices when available or through the use of alternative approaches, such as model pricing, when market quotes are not readily accessible or available. In determining the fair value of the Company’s obligations, various factors are considered, including: closing exchange or over-the-counter market price quotations; time value and volatility factors underlying options and derivatives; price activity for equivalent instruments; and the Company’s own-credit standing.

These valuation techniques may be based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:

• Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

• Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

• Level 3 – Instruments whose significant value drivers are unobservable.

- 13 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value and the related hierarchy levels:

	March 31, 2012		Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	2,948	$	—	$	2,948	$	—
Asset-backed securities		1,826		—		1,826		—
Municipal bonds		150		—		150		—
Equity securities		11,827		11,827		—		—
Total available-for-sale securities	$	16,751	$	11,827	$	4,924	$	—
Executive deferred compensation plan trust (a)	$	2,936	$	2,936	$	—	$	—
Liabilities:
Fuel price derivatives - diesel	$	3,243	$	—	$	—	$	3,243
Fuel price derivatives - unleaded fuel		10,317		—		10,317		—
Total fuel price derivatives - liabilities	$	13,560	$	—	$	10,317	$	3,243

^(a) The fair value of these instruments is recorded in other assets.

- 14 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value and the related hierarchy levels for 2011:

	December 31, 2011		Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
			Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	3,197	$	—	$	3,197	$	—
Asset-backed securities		1,930		—		1,930		—
Municipal bonds		149		—		149		—
Equity securities		11,768		11,768		—		—
Total available-for-sale securities	$	17,044	$	11,768	$	5,276	$	—
Executive deferred compensation plan trust (a)	$	2,218	$	2,218	$	—	$	—
Fuel price derivatives – unleaded fuel (c)	$	20	$	—	$	20	$	—
Liabilities:
Fuel price derivatives – diesel (c)	$	25	$	—	$	—	$	25
September 2010 interest rate swap arrangement with a base rate of 0.56% and an aggregate notional amount of $150,000(b)	$	95	$	—	$	95	$	—
Contingent consideration	$	9,325	$	—	$	—	$	9,325

^(a)  The fair value of these instruments is recorded in other assets.

^(b)  The fair value of these instruments is recorded in accrued expenses.

^(c)  The balance sheet presentation combines unleaded fuel and diesel fuel positions.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the three months ended March 31, 2012:

	Contingent Consideration			Fuel Price Derivatives – Diesel
Beginning balance	$	(9,325	)	$	(25	)
Total gains or (losses) – realized/unrealized
Included in earnings (a)		839			(3,218	)
Included in other comprehensive income		—			—
Purchases, issuances and settlements		—			—
Transfers(in)/out of Level 3		8,486			—
Ending balance	$	—		$	(3,243	)

^(a) Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2012, are reported in net realized and unrealized losses on fuel price derivatives on the condensed consolidated statements of income.

- 15 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the three months ended March 31, 2011:

	Contingent Consideration			Fuel Price Derivatives – Diesel
Beginning balance	$	—		$	(3,643	)
Total gains or (losses) – realized/unrealized
Included in earnings (a)		—			(7,042	)
Included in other comprehensive income		—			—
Purchases, issuances and settlements		(10,000	)		—
Transfers (in)/out of Level 3		—			—
Ending balance	$	(10,000	)	$	(10,685	)

^(a)  Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2011, are reported in net realized and unrealized losses on fuel price derivatives on the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Available-for-sale securities and executive deferred compensation plan trust

When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine the fair value of available-for-sale securities; such items are classified in Level 1 of the fair-value hierarchy. These securities primarily consist of exchange-traded equity securities.

For mortgage-backed and asset-backed debt securities and bonds, the Company generally uses quoted prices for recent trading activity of assets with similar characteristics to the debt security or bond being valued. The securities and bonds priced using such methods are generally classified as Level 2.

Fuel price derivatives and interest rate swap arrangements

The majority of derivatives entered into by the Company are executed over the counter and are valued using internal valuation techniques as no quoted market prices exist for such instruments. The valuation technique and inputs depend on the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying instrument. The principal technique used to value these instruments is a comparison of the spot price of the underlying instrument to its related futures curve adjusted for the Company’s assumptions of volatility and present value, where appropriate. The fair values of derivative contracts reflect the expected cash the Company will pay or receive upon settlement of the respective contracts.

The key inputs depend upon the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying instrument and include interest rate yield curves, the spot price of the underlying instrument, volatility, and correlation. The item is placed in either Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of the significant inputs to the model. Correlation and items with longer tenures are generally less observable.

- 16 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

Fuel price derivatives – diesel. The assumptions used in the valuation of the diesel fuel price derivatives use both observable and unobservable inputs. With respect to forward prices for diesel fuel, there is a lack of price transparency. Such unobservable inputs are significant to the diesel fuel derivative contact valuation methodology.

Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s diesel fuel price derivative instruments designated as Level 3 are as follows:

	Fair Value at March 31, 2012		Valuation Technique		Unobservable Input	Range $ per gallon
Fuel price derivatives – diesel	$	3,243		Option model	Future retail price of diesel fuel after March 31, 2012	$	3.72 – 3.81

Sensitivity To Changes In Significant Unobservable Inputs. As presented in the table above, the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s diesel fuel price derivative instruments are the future retail price of diesel fuel from the second quarter of 2012 through the third quarter of 2013. Significant changes in these unobservable inputs in isolation would result in a significant change in the fair value measurement.

Contingent consideration

The Company classified its liability for contingent consideration related to its acquisition of rapid! PayCard within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because the fair value was determined using significant unobservable inputs, which include the revenues of rapid! PayCard over a twelve month period ending on March 31, 2012. On March 31, 2012, the amount due was determined to be $8,486 and was paid on April 30, 2012.

- 17 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

9. Stock-Based Compensation

During the first quarter of 2012, the Company awarded restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units to employees under the 2010 Equity and Incentive Plan (the “2012 grant”). Expense associated with the performance-based restricted stock units may increase or decrease due to changes in the probability of the Company achieving pre-established performance metrics. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, total stock-based compensation cost recognized was approximately $3,400. As of March 31, 2012, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options, restricted stock units, and performance-based restricted stock units was approximately $15,400, to be recognized over the remaining vesting periods of these awards.

10. Income Taxes

Management has determined that future earnings generated by the Company’s Australia subsidiaries will be invested indefinitely outside the United States. Accordingly, no incremental domestic tax effects have been contemplated in deferred tax balances. As of March 31, 2012, the amount of unremitted earnings designated as indefinitely invested totaled $6,657.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

The Company is involved in pending litigation in the usual course of business. In the opinion of management, such litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

- 18 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

12. Segment Information

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is its Chief Executive Officer. The operating segments are reviewed separately because each operating segment represents a strategic business unit that generally offers different products and serves different markets.

The Company’s chief operating decision maker evaluates the operating results of the Company’s reportable segments based upon revenues and “adjusted net income,” which is defined by the Company as net income adjusted for fair value changes of derivative instruments, the amortization of purchased intangibles, the net impact of tax rate changes on the Company’s deferred tax asset and related changes in the tax-receivable agreement, certain non-cash asset impairment charges and the gains on the extinguishment of a portion of the tax receivable agreement. These adjustments are reflected net of the tax impact.

The Company operates in two reportable segments, Fleet Payment Solutions and Other Payment Solutions. The Fleet Payment Solutions segment provides customers with payment and transaction processing services specifically designed for the needs of vehicle fleet customers. This segment also provides information management services to these fleet customers. The Other Payment Solutions segment provides customers with a payment processing solution for their corporate purchasing and transaction monitoring needs. Revenue in this segment is derived from our corporate charge cards, single use accounts and prepaid card products. The corporate charge card products are used by businesses to facilitate purchases of products and utilize the Company’s information management capabilities. The operations from the rapid! acquisition appear in the Other Payment Solutions segment.

Financing interest expense and net realized and unrealized losses on derivative instruments are not allocated to the Other Payment Solutions segment in the computation of segment results for internal evaluation purposes. Total assets are not allocated to the segments.

The following table presents the Company’s reportable segment results for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Total Revenues		Operating Interest Expense		Depreciation and Amortization		Provision for Income Taxes		Adjusted Net Income
Three months ended March 31, 2012
Fleet payment solutions	$	109,147	$	934	$	5,821	$	16,219	$	29,463
Other payment solutions		30,975		177		410		3,701		6,104
Total	$	140,122	$	1,111	$	6,231	$	19,920	$	35,567
Three months ended March 31, 2011
Fleet payment solutions	$	98,534	$	1,020	$	5,021	$	13,627	$	24,437
Other payment solutions		21,556		258		383		2,636		4,729
Total	$	120,090	$	1,278	$	5,404	$	16,263	$	29,166

- 19 -

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)

The following table reconciles adjusted net income to net income:

	Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Adjusted net income	$	35,567		$	29,166
Unrealized losses on fuel price derivatives		(13,555	)		(20,818	)
Amortization of acquired intangible assets		(5,086	)		(5,565	)
Tax impact of the above transactions		6,310			9,332
Net income	$	23,236		$	12,115

The tax impact of the foregoing adjustments is the difference between the Company’s GAAP tax provision and a pro forma tax provision based upon the Company’s adjusted net income before taxes. The methodology utilized for calculating the Company’s adjusted net income tax provision is the same methodology utilized in calculating the Company’s GAAP tax provision.

- 20 -

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

We intend for this discussion to provide the reader with information that will assist in understanding our financial statements, the changes in key items in those financial statements from year to year, and the primary factors that accounted for those changes, as well as how certain accounting estimates affect our financial statements. The discussion also provides information about the financial results of the two segments of our business to provide a better understanding of how those segments and their results affect our financial condition and results of operations as a whole. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011, the notes accompanying those financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis as contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2012 and in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes in Item 1 of Part I of this report.

Overview

Wright Express Corporation is a leading provider of value-based, business payment processing and information management solutions. We provide products and services that meet the needs of businesses in various geographic regions including North America, Asia Pacific and Europe. The Company’s fleet and other payment solutions provide its more than 350,000 customers with security and control for complex payments across a wide spectrum of business sectors. Together with our affiliates, we market our products and services directly, as well as through more than 150 strategic relationships which include major oil companies, fuel retailers and vehicle maintenance providers.

Our Company is organized under two segments, Fleet Payment Solutions and Other Payment Solutions. The Fleet Payment Solutions segment provides customers with fleet vehicle payment processing services specifically designed for the needs of commercial and government fleets. Fleet Payment Solutions revenue, which represents a majority of our total revenue, is earned primarily from payment processing, account servicing and transaction processing, with the majority generated by payment processing.

The Other Payment Solutions segment of our business provides customers with payment processing solutions for their corporate purchasing and transaction monitoring needs through our corporate charge card, and through our prepaid and gift card products and services. Other Payment Solutions revenue is earned primarily from payment processing revenue.

Summary

Below are selected items from the first quarter of 2012:

• Average number of vehicles serviced increased 13 percent from the first quarter of 2011 to approximately 6.7 million, primarily due to the addition of fleet for BP Australia.

• Total fuel transactions processed increased 8 percent from the first quarter of 2011 to 79.3 million. Payment processing transactions increased 3 percent to 60.6 million, while transaction processing transactions increased 31 percent to 18.7 million, over the same period in the prior year. These increases are primarily due to the addition of fleet transactions in BP Australia. Domestic payment processing transaction increased 2 percent over the same period in the prior year.

• Average expenditure per payment processing transaction increased 12 percent to $74.37 from $66.42 for the same period last year. This increase was driven by higher average retail fuel prices. The average U.S. fuel price per gallon during the three months ended March 31, 2012, was $3.72 for North America, a 10 percent increase over the same period last year. The average Australian fuel price per gallon during the three months ended March 31, 2012, was $5.80, a 9 percent increase over the same period last year.

• Realized losses on our fuel price derivatives were $5.3 million compared to realized losses of $4.4 million for the first quarter of 2011.

- 21 -

• Credit loss expense in the fleet segment was $3.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, versus $5.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

• Corporate charge card purchase volume grew $754 million to $2.2 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2012, an increase of 52 percent over the same period last year.

- 22 -

Results of Operations

Fleet Payment Solutions

The following table reflects comparative operating results and key operating statistics within our Fleet Payment Solutions segment:

	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease)
(in thousands)	2012			2011			Amount			Percent
Revenues
Payment processing revenue	$	73,855		$	65,655		$	8,200			12	%
Transaction processing revenue		3,981			3,876			105			3	%
Account servicing revenue		15,454			13,809			1,645			12	%
Finance fees (a)		11,189			10,006			1,183			12	%
Other		4,668			5,188			(520	)		(10	)%
Total revenues		109,147			98,534			10,613			11	%
Total operating expenses		60,015			58,920			1,095			2	%
Operating income		49,132			39,614			9,518			24	%
Gain on foreign currency transactions		(69	)		488			(557	)		(114	)%
Financing interest expense		(2,285	)		(2,439	)		154			(6	)%
Net realized and unrealized losses on derivative instruments		(18,812	)		(25,175	)		6,363			(25	)%
Income before taxes		27,966			12,488			15,478			124	%
Provision for income taxes		10,201			4,546			5,655			124	%
Net income	$	17,765		$	7,942		$	9,823			124	%
	Three months ended March 31,						Increase (decrease)
(in thousands, except per transaction and per gallon data)	2012			2011			Amount			Percent
Key operating statistics
Payment processing revenue:
Payment processing transactions		60,557			58,913	(c)		1,644			3	%
Average expenditure per payment processing transaction	$	74.37		$	66.42	(c)	$	7.95			12	%
Average price per gallon of fuel – Domestic – ($/gal)	$	3.72		$	3.38		$	0.34			10	%
Average price per gallon of fuel – Australia – ($USD/gal)	$	5.80		$	5.32		$	0.48			9	%
Transaction processing revenue:
Transaction processing transactions		18,706			14,288			4,418			31	%
Account servicing revenue:
Average number of vehicles serviced (b)		6,678			5,900	(c)		778			13	%

^(a) Financing interest expense and net realized and unrealized gains and losses on derivative instruments are allocated solely to the Fleet Payment Solutions segment

^(b) Does not include Pacific Pride vehicle information.

^(c) Payment processing transaction and vehicle count data, as well as related calculated metrics associated with this data, for 2011 have been revised to reflect information provided from an improved business intelligence reporting process that was implemented in the second quarter of 2011. These changes do not impact our revenue or earnings. 2011 data has also been updated to remove non-fuel payment processing transactions from Wright Express Australia operations.

- 23 -

Revenues

Payment processing revenue increased $8.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to the same period last year. The increase is primarily due to the 10 percent increase in the average domestic price per gallon of fuel, representing approximately $5.0 million of the increase. Also contributing to the increase is the increase in the number of domestic payment processing transactions, which contributed approximately $2.6 million. The remaining $0.6 million increase in payment processing revenue is due to operations at Wright Express Australia for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to an 8 percent increase in transactions for the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the same period in the prior year.

Account servicing revenue increased $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to the same period last year. Approximately $0.8 million of the increase is related to an increase in the number of cards at Wright Express Australia. The remaining increase is primarily due to an increase in WEXSmart units as compared to the same period in the prior year.

Our finance fees have increased $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, over the same period in the prior year. Payments for customer receivables are due within thirty days or less. Finance fee revenue is earned when a customer’s receivable balance becomes delinquent. The finance fee is calculated using a stated late fee rate based on the outstanding balance. The absolute amount of such outstanding balances can be attributed to (i) changes in fuel prices; (ii) customer specific transaction volume; and (iii) customer specific delinquencies. Finance fee revenue can also be impacted by changes in (i) late fee rates and (ii) increases or decreases in the number of customers with overdue balances. The increase in these fees is primarily due to higher accounts receivable balances, as a result of higher fuel prices and transaction volume.

Operating Expenses

The following table compares selected expense line items within our Fleet Payment Solutions segment for the three months ended March 31:

(in thousands)	2012		2011		Increase (decrease)
Expense
Salary and other personnel	$	25,175	$	23,230		8	%
Provision for credit losses	$	3,827	$	5,549		(31	)%
Service fees	$	6,241	$	4,430		41	%
Operating interest expense	$	934	$	1,020		(8	)%

Salary and other personnel expenses increased $1.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the same period last year. The increase is primarily due to additional employees, which added approximately $1.0 million in expense over the same period in the prior year. Lower capitalized payroll during the first quarter of 2012, as compared to the first quarter in the prior year, contributed approximately $0.5 million of the increase in salary expense.

We generally measure our credit loss performance by calculating credit losses as a percentage of total fuel expenditures on payment processing transactions (“Fuel Expenditures”). This metric for credit losses was 8.5 basis points of Fuel Expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to 14.2 basis points of Fuel Expenditures for the same period last year, on a fully consolidated basis. We use a roll rate methodology to calculate the amount necessary for our ending receivable reserve balance. This methodology takes into account total receivable balances, recent charge off experience, recoveries on previously charged off accounts, and the dollars that are delinquent to calculate the total reserve. In addition, management undertakes a detailed evaluation of the receivable balances to help ensure further overall reserve adequacy. The expense we recognized in the quarter is the amount necessary to bring the reserve to its required level after net charge offs. The decrease in expense during the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the prior quarter, is primarily due to favorable aging and related rolls rates, along with increased recoveries of balances previously charged off.

Service fees increased $1.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to the same period last year. The increase is primarily due an increase in professional fees during the first quarter of 2012.

Operating interest expense decreased $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease in operating interest expense is primarily due to lower interest rates offset by higher operating debt balances. For the first quarter of 2012, the average interest rate was 0.65 percent, as compared to an average interest rate of 0.87 percent for the first quarter of 2011.

- 24 -

Fuel price derivatives

We own fuel price derivative instruments that we purchase on a periodic basis to manage the impact of volatility in North American fuel prices on our cash flows. These fuel price derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting. Accordingly, both realized and unrealized gains and losses on our fuel price derivative instruments affect our net income. Activity related to the changes in fair value and settlements of these instruments and the changes in average fuel prices in relation to the underlying strike price of the instruments is shown in the following table:

	Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Fuel price derivatives, at fair value, beginning of period	$	(5	)	$	(10,877	)
Net change in fair value		(18,812	)		(25,175	)
Cash payments (receipts) on settlement		5,257			4,357
Fuel price derivatives, at fair value, end of period	$	(13,560	)	$	(31,695	)
Collar range:
Floor	$	3.09		$	2.97
Ceiling	$	3.15		$	3.03
Domestic average fuel price, beginning of period	$	3.45		$	3.15
Domestic average fuel price, end of period	$	3.99		$	3.69

Changes in fuel price derivatives for the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the corresponding period a year ago are attributable to upward movements in fuel prices. The average price of fuel, as indicated above, is in excess of the ceiling price of our derivatives, leading to a derivative liability on our balance sheet. The losses that we actually realize on these derivatives are offset by higher payment processing revenue we receive because such revenues are dependant, in part, on the current price of fuel.

We expect that our fuel price derivatives program will continue to be important to our business model going forward, and we expect to purchase derivatives in the future. The Company currently does not plan to hedge our fuel price risk exposure for Wright Express Australia as the earnings exposure to fuel price movements is more limited than it is domestically.

Effective tax rates

Our effective tax rate was 36.9 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 36.4 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The rate fluctuated due to changes in the mix of earnings among different tax jurisdictions including our foreign subsidiaries. Our tax rate may fluctuate due to the impacts that rate mix changes have on our net deferred tax assets. Proposed changes in Australia tax consolidation laws have been announced. These proposed changes could impact the deductibility of approximately $70 million in amortization expense in Australia and hence may result in a discrete charge in our recorded tax expense in the current year.

- 25 -

Other Payment Solutions

The following table reflects comparative operating results and key operating statistics within our Other Payment Solutions segment:

	Three months ended March 31,				Increase (decrease)
(in thousands)	2012		2011		Amount		Percent
Revenues
Payment processing revenue	$	20,165	$	14,563	$	5,602		38	%
Transaction processing revenue		2,038		1,888		150		8	%
Account servicing revenue		1,044		240		804		335	%
Finance fees		172		127		45		35	%
Other		7,556		4,738		2,818		59	%
Total revenues		30,975		21,556		9,419		44	%
Total operating expenses		22,144		14,998		7,146		48	%
Operating income		8,831		6,558		2,273		35	%
Gain on foreign currency transactions		49		—		49		NM
Income before income taxes		8,880		6,558		2,322		35	%
Income taxes		3,409		2,385		1,024		43	%
Net income	$	5,471	$	4,173	$	1,298		31	%
	Three months ended March 31,				Increase (decrease)
(in thousands)	2012		2011		Amount		Percent
Key operating statistics
Payment processing revenue:
Corporate charge card purchase volume	$	2,189,578	$	1,435,965	$	753,613		52	%
NM – Not Meaningful

Revenues

Payment processing revenue increased $5.6 million, as compared to the same period in the prior year, which was primarily driven by higher corporate charge card purchase volume from our single use account product in the online travel service and insurance/warranty markets and by increased market penetration with our corporate charge card product. The corporate charge card net interchange rate for the first quarter of 2012 was down 11 basis points to 0.90 percent, which equates to approximately $2.4 million, as compared to the first quarter of last year, primarily due to contract mix, increased foreign spend, which generally has a lower interchange rate than domestic transactions, and a reduction in customer specific incentives received from MasterCard.

Other revenue has increased $2.8 million over the same period in the prior year, primarily from increased fees related to cross border charges.

- 26 -

Operating Expenses

The following table compares selected expense line items within our Other Payment Solutions segment for the three months ended March 31:

(in thousands)	2012		2011		Increase (decrease)
Expense
Salary and other personnel	$	3,540	$	2,463		44	%
Provision for credit losses	$	1,215	$	110		NM
Service fees	$	14,067	$	8,581		64	%
NM – Not Meaningful

Salary and other personnel expenses increased $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012, as compared to the same period last year. This increase was primarily due to the acquisition of rapid! Paycard, which occurred at the end of the first quarter in 2011.

Provision for credit losses increased $1.1 million during the first quarter of 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to a $0.9 million bankruptcy of a single customer during the first quarter of 2012.

Service fees increased $5.5 million during the first quarter of 2012 as compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase is primarily due to increased volume and cross border charges on our North America corporate charge card product.

- 27 -

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Cash Flows

We focus on management operating cash as a key element in achieving maximum stockholder value, and it is the primary measure we use internally to monitor cash flow performance from our core operations. Since deposits, interest-bearing money market deposits and borrowed federal funds are used to finance our accounts receivable, we believe that they are a recurring and necessary use and source of cash. As such, we consider deposits and borrowed federal funds when evaluating our operating activities. For the same reason, we believe that management operating cash may also be useful to investors as one means of evaluating our performance. However, management operating cash is a non-GAAP measure and should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, net cash provided by (used for) operating activities as presented on the consolidated statement of cash flows in accordance with GAAP.

While GAAP operating cash flows showed a use of $38.2 million in the first quarter of 2012, management operating cash moved in the opposite direction providing approximately $15.2 million inflows. Our first quarter of 2011 cash flows were use of $44.5 million in GAAP operating cash flows and $24 million in management operating cash inflows.

In addition to the $15.2 million of management operating cash we generated during the first quarter of 2012, we also decreased borrowings under our revolving credit facility by $6.9 million.

Management Operating Cash

The table below reconciles net cash provided by operating activities to change in management operating cash:

	Three months ended March 31,
	2012			2011
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities	$	(38,238	)	$	(44,528	)
Net change in deposits and interest-bearing money market deposits		13,085			128,018
Net change in borrowed federal funds		40,326			(59,484	)
Change in management operating cash	$	15,173		$	24,006

Our bank subsidiary, Wright Express Financial Services Corporation (“FSC”), utilizes certificates of deposit to finance our accounts receivable. FSC issued certificates of deposit in various maturities ranging between four weeks and two years and with fixed interest rates ranging from 0.25 percent to 1.45 percent as of March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012, we had approximately $593.1 million of deposits outstanding. Certificates of deposit are subject to regulatory capital requirements. FSC also issues interest-bearing money market deposits to finance our accounts receivable. As of March 31, 2012, we had approximately $102.6 million of interest-bearing money market deposits at a weighted average rate of 0.58 percent.

FSC also utilizes federal funds lines of credit to supplement the financing of our accounts receivable. We have approximately $93 million available on our $140 million federal funds lines of credit as of March 31, 2012.

Liquidity

We continue to have appropriate access to short-term borrowing instruments to fund our accounts receivable. Our cash balance for the period increased by approximately $4.7 million, as deposits and borrowed federal funds increased approximately $53.4 million and our accounts receivable increased approximately $230 million, primarily due to increased fuel prices.

We have approximately 4 years left on our revolving credit facility and have approximately $98.4 million in borrowings against it. As of March 31, 2012, the unutilized portion of our revolving credit facility was $599.2 million. Outstanding debt under our amortizing term loan arrangement which expires in May of 2016, totaled $190 million at March 31, 2012. As of March 31, 2012, amount outstanding under the amortizing term loan bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 150 basis points. Amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility bear interest at a rate equal to, at our option, (a) LIBOR plus 150 basis points or (b) the prime rate plus 50 basis points. We decreased our financing debt by $6.9 million during the first three months and ended the period with a balance outstanding of $288.4 million.

Our credit agreement contains various financial covenants requiring us to maintain certain financial ratios. In addition to the financial covenants, the credit agreement contains various customary restrictive covenants including restrictions in certain situations on the payment of dividends. FSC is not subject to certain of these restrictions. We have been, and expect to continue to be, in compliance with all material covenants and restrictions.

- 28 -

In prior years, we have entered into interest rate swap arrangements to convert our variable rate borrowings to fixed rate borrowings. Our last interest rate swap arrangement of $150 million expired in March 2012. We continue to review our projected borrowings under our credit facility and the current interest rate environment to determine if additional swaps should be executed. As of March 31, 2012 we do not have any interest rate swap arrangements.

Undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries of the Company amounted to $6.7 million as of March 31, 2012. If we were to distribute such earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company would be subject to both U.S. income taxes (subject to an adjustment for foreign tax credits) and withholding taxes payable to the various foreign countries.

Management believes that we can adequately fund our cash needs for at least the next 12 months.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

Letters of credit. We are required to post collateral to secure our fuel price sensitive derivative instruments where our unrealized loss exceeds any unsecured credit granted by our counter party. At March 31, 2012, we had posted as collateral letters of credit totaling $2.4 million.

Purchase of Treasury Shares

We did not repurchase any shares of common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2012.

Shelf Registration

On April 10, 2012, the Company filed a universal shelf registration with the SEC.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We have no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

See Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We have no material changes to the disclosure on this matter made in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

- 29 -

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Wright Express Corporation evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. “Disclosure controls and procedures” are controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, and is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of Wright Express Corporation concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2012.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2012, our most recently completed fiscal quarter, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

- 30 -

PART II

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

As of the date of this filing, we are not involved in any material legal proceedings. We also were not involved in any material legal proceedings that were terminated during the first quarter of 2012. However, from time to time, we are subject to other legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, none of which we believe are likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or future results.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

The following table provides information about the Company’s purchases of shares of the Company’s common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2012:

	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (a)		Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (a)
January 1 – January 31, 2012		—	$	—		—	$	48,633,132
February 1 – February 29, 2012		—	$	—		—	$	48,633,132
March 1 – March 31, 2012		—	$	—		—	$	48,633,132
Total		—	$	—		—	$	48,633,132

^(a)  On February 7, 2007, the Company announced a share repurchase program authorizing the purchase of up to $75 million of its common stock over the next 24 months. In July 2008, our board of directors approved an increase of $75 million to the share repurchase authorization. In addition, our board of directors extended the share repurchase program to July 25, 2013. We have been authorized to purchase, in total, up to $150 million of our common stock. Share repurchases will be made on the open market and may be commenced or suspended at any time. The Company’s management, based on its evaluation of market and economic conditions and other factors, will determine the timing and number of shares repurchased.

- 31 -

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit No.			Description
		3.1	Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2005, File No. 001-32426)
		3.2	Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 20, 2008, File No. 001-32426)
		4.1	Rights Agreement, dated as of February 16, 2005 by and between Wright Express Corporation and Wachovia Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2005, File No. 001-32426)
	*	10.1**	Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation Short-Term Incentive Program
	*	10.2**	2012 Corporate Annual Grant Long-Term Incentive Program
	*	10.3**	2012 International Annual Grant Long-Term Incentive Program
		10.4	Change of Control Agreement, dated April 13, 2012, between Steven A. Elder and Wright Express Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 18, 2012, File No. 001-32426)
	*	31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
	*	31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
	*	32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
	*	32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
	***	101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
	***	101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
	***	101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
	***	101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
	***	101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document

* These exhibits have been filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

** Portions of exhibits 10.1, 10.2 and 10.3 have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.

*** In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed to be “furnished” and not “filed”.

- 32 -

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION
May 3, 2012	By:	/s/ Steven A. Elder
		Steven A. Elder
		Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

- 33 -

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.			Description
		3.1	Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2005, File No. 001-32426)
		3.2	Amended and Restated By-Laws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 20, 2008, File No. 001-32426)
		4.1	Rights Agreement, dated as of February 16, 2005 by and between Wright Express Corporation and Wachovia Bank, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 4.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2005, File No. 001-32426)
	*	10.1**	Amended and Restated Wright Express Corporation Short-Term Incentive Program
	*	10.2**	2012 Corporate Annual Grant Long-Term Incentive Program
	*	10.3**	2012 International Annual Grant Long-Term Incentive Program
		10.4	Change of Control Agreement, dated April 13, 2012, between Steven A. Elder and Wright Express Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit No. 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 18, 2012, File No. 001-32426)
	*	31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
	*	31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
	*	32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
	*	32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Wright Express Corporation pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
	***	101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
	***	101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
	***	101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
	***	101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
	***	101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document

* These exhibits have been filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

** Portions of exhibits 10.1, 10.2 and 10.3 have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment.

*** In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed to be “furnished” and not “filed”.

- 34 -

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

Confidential Materials omitted and filed separately with the

Securities and Exchange Commission. Asterisks denote omissions.

AMENDED AND RESTATED

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION

SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PROGRAM

ARTICLE 1- PURPOSE OF PROGRAM

Wright Express Corporation has adopted this Short-Term Incentive Program (“STIP”) to attract and retain high-performing employees; to provide incentives for eligible employees to achieve specified company, department and/or individual performance goals; and to reward such employees for the achievement of specified goals on an annual basis. The Short-Term Incentive Program is intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

ARTICLE 2- DEFINITIONS

Wherever used in this document, the following terms have the meanings set forth below.

2.1 Appendix means an Appendix to this Program document containing targets, payment metrics, and other terms of the Program (or modifications thereof) applicable to a specific Plan Year or First Half-Year Period. The Appendices shall be considered part of the Program document.

2.2 Company means Wright Express Corporation or any legal entity that is controlled by, under common control with, or that controls Wright Express Corporation.

2.3 Eligible Earnings means total gross pay for the applicable Plan Year or First Half-Year Period (or the portion thereof during which the Participant is actively employed and eligible to participate in the STIP), including, salary or wages classified by the Company as regular; lump sum merit; paid time off (PTO), whether planned or unplanned; holiday; bereavement; jury duty; retroactive pay; overtime pay; shift differential; language differential; and excluding, salary or wages classified by the Company as disability pay, commission/incentive pay, and bonuses.

2.4 Effective Date means January 1, 2012.

2.5 MBO means management by objectives – Key Business Drivers.

2.6 Participant means an eligible employee who participates in the Program for a Plan Year or First Half-Year Period in accordance with Article 3.

2.7 Plan Year means the fiscal year of the Company; as of the Effective Date, the Plan Year is the calendar year.

2.8 First Half-Year Period means the six-month period beginning on January 1^st and ending on June 30^th of the Plan Year.

Page 1 of 11

2.9 Program means this Wright Express Corporation Short-Term Incentive Program, as amended from time to time, including the provisions of any Appendix, which are incorporated herein.

ARTICLE 3- PARTICIPATION

3.1 Eligible Employees

Each full-time regular or part-time regular employee of the Company who meets the following requirements shall be a Participant for a Plan Year:

(a) The employee is not eligible for payout under a subsidiary bonus program, a commission plan, or a high performance pay plan of the Company; and

(b) The employee is generally considered a manager, director, vice president, senior vice president, executive vice president, president or chief executive officer within the Company’s human resources information system and except as provided in Section 3.2, the employee is actively employed on the bonus payment date for the applicable year; or

(c) The employee is generally categorized as an individual contributor or a team leader within the Company’s human resources information system and received a First Half-Year Period payout or joined the company after the First-Half Year Period of the Plan Year.

Each full-time or part time regular employee of the Company who meets the following requirements shall be a Participant for a First Half-Year Period and for a Plan Year:

(a) The employee is not eligible for payout under a subsidiary bonus program, a commission plan, or a high performance pay plan of the Company; and

(b) Except as provided in Section 3.2, the employee is actively employed on the bonus payment date for the applicable half year; and

(c) The employee is generally categorized as an individual contributor or a team leader within the Company’s human resources information system;

3.2 Special Rules

(a) A Participant who dies or becomes totally disabled during a Plan Year or First Half-Year Period (as determined under the Company’s Long-Term Disability program) may receive a pro-rated bonus at target for the applicable year or half-year based on his

Page 2 of 11

\or her Eligible Earnings during the period of the Participant’s active employment. Any bonus payable to a deceased Participant shall be paid to his or her personal representative. Any bonus paid pursuant to this Section 3.2(a) shall be paid within 15 days of the Participant’s death or the determination of total disability.

(b) A Participant who is not actively employed on the bonus payment date for a Plan Year or First Half-Year Period due to an approved leave of absence may receive a bonus for the applicable year or half-year based on his or her Eligible Earnings during the period of the Participant’s active employment upon his or her return to active employment by the Company. Any bonus paid pursuant to this Section 3.2(b) shall be paid to the Participant at the same time as bonuses are paid to all Participants pursuant to Section 5.1 hereof.

(c) A Participant who shall be the subject of a Performance Improvement Plan and continues to be the subject of a Performance Improvement Plan at the time payments are made under Section 5.1 of the Program shall not be eligible to receive a payment until he or she has successfully met the requirements of the Performance Improvement Plan. Any bonus paid pursuant to this Section 3.2(c) shall be paid no later than the end of the calendar year following the Plan Year.

ARTICLE 4- INCENTIVES

The Corporate and Executive Officer MBOs for each Plan Year shall be approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, or its delegate.

An Individual Effectiveness Factor (“IEF”) shall be assigned to an employee classified as an “associate” based on criteria established by the Company. The IEF for each associate shall be initially established at 1.00. An associate’s IEF for payout may be adjusted down, but not below 0.75, or up, but not above 1.25, by action of his or her supervisor with the approval of his or her division Senior Vice President, or Executive Vice President as applicable. However, the foregoing adjustments (in the aggregate) must not increase the total amount payable under the Program for the given year or half-year. In this regard, neither the CEO nor any other executive officer is to be considered as an “associate.”

The performance measures applicable to a Plan Year or First Half-Year Period shall be set out in the Appendix.

ARTICLE 5- PAYMENTS

5.1 Time and Form

Bonuses shall be calculated and paid in a single payment for the applicable year or half-year, by no later than March 15th of the following year.

Page 3 of 11

5.2 Position Changes

“Position changes” include promotions, demotions, and transfers between positions and/or departments. All calculations shall be made based on each Participant’s applicable Eligible Earnings and the Participant’s position and STIP percentage at the end of the applicable performance period. If a position change results in a Participant moving from eligibility for Full-Year participation to eligibility for Half-Year participation after the First Half-Year has been measured and paid out, the Eligible Earnings for the entire year will be utilized in calculating the Participant’s Full-Year payout.

5.3 Taxes

All federal, state or local taxes as well as any garnishments that the Program Administrator determines are required to be withheld from any payments made under the Program shall be withheld.

ARTICLE 6- ADMINISTRATION

6.1 Program Administrator

The Program shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, which may delegate administrative responsibility in whole or in part to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and/or the Senior Vice President, Human Resources (“Administrators”), subject to any requirements for review and approval that may be established by the Compensation Committee. In all areas not specifically reserved for such review and approval, the decisions of the applicable Administrator shall be binding on the Company and each eligible employee under Article 3. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Compensation Committee may not modify MBOs or other performance criteria during a Plan Year so as to increase the payment to a Section 162(m) Participant (as defined below) or exercise its discretion to increase the amount of incentive pay that would otherwise be due a Section 162(m) Participant upon attainment of a performance goal.

6.2 Claims

Claims regarding payments under the Program shall be directed to a Participant’s direct supervisor and/or the Company’s Human Resources Department. Any claim regarding the amount of any bonus payment hereunder shall be made within 30 days of the date of such payment, or shall be forfeited.

ARTICLE 7- AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION

The Company reserves the right to terminate, amend, modify and/or restate this Program, in whole or in part, at will at any time, with or without advance notice.

Page 4 of 11

ARTICLE 8- MISCELLANEOUS

8.1 Payment Adjustments and Special Circumstances

The Compensation Committee shall have the authority to adjust payments under the Program (upward or downward) at its discretion. Subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Senior Vice President, Human Resources, acting together, shall have the power to adjust payments under the Program (upward or downward) as and to the extent appropriate to achieve the stated goals and purposes of the Program and may approve exceptions to the Program under special circumstances, to avoid undue hardship with respect to a Participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Compensation Committee, the CEO, the Senior Vice President, Human Resources, nor any other person may increase or accelerate the payment due to any Section 162(m) Participant with respect to any Plan Year. The term “Section 162(m) Participant” shall mean the CEO and each of the four highest paid officers of the Company (other than the CEO) on the last day of the taxable year, for purposes of the executive compensation disclosure rules under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

8.2 Information

The Program Administrators shall be responsible for ensuring effective communication of the Program to eligible employees. Copies of the Program shall be available to all Participants. All modifications and changes to the Program shall be appropriately documented and communicated to Participants.

8.3 No Guarantee of Payment

The Company does not guarantee payment of any bonus amounts hereunder, except to the extent that payment is required by applicable law.

8.4 Limitation of Employees’ Rights

Nothing contained in the Program shall confer upon any person a right to be employed or to continue in the employ of the Employer, or interfere in any way with the right of the Employer to terminate the employment of a Participant at any time, with or without cause.

Page 5 of 11

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Wright Express Corporation has caused this document to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 28^th day of March, 2012.

WRIGHT EXPRESS CORPORATION
By:	/s/ Robert C. Cornett
	Robert C. Cornett
Its:	Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Date:	March 28, 2012

Page 6 of 11

APPENDIX I

2012 STIP FACTORS

STIP Weightings for Plan Year Calculations and Payout

STIP weightings vary by individual but generally follow the formula shown:

	Corporate Metrics						Business Metrics						MBOs
	ANI			PPG Adjusted Revenue			EBIT			PPG Adjusted Revenue
CEO		50	%		20	%								30	%
Corporate
Executives		50	%		20	%								30	%
VPs		50	%		20	%								30	%
Directors/Managers		30	%		20	%								50	%
Team Leaders/Associates		80	%		20	%
Business Units
Presidents		20	%					30	%		20	%		30	%
Executives		20	%					30	%		20	%		30	%
VPs		10	%					30	%		20	%		40	%
Directors/Managers								30	%		20	%		50	%
Team Leaders/Associates								80	%		20	%

STIP Payout Levels

In 2012, the Company must achieve at least threshold results for Corporate Full-Year Adjusted Net Income in order to pay out any portion of the Short Term Incentive Program to any Full Year Participants and the Company must achieve at least threshold results for Corporate First Half-Year Adjusted Net Income in order to pay out any portion of the Short-Term Incentive Program to any Half-Year Participants.

Performance Results	Payout	%
Threshold	25	%
Threshold/Target	50	%
Target	100	%
Target/Max	150	%
Max or above	200	%

Note: Payouts for all Metrics and MBOs will be according to the above chart and will be interpolated between the performance result levels whenever possible. If an MBO cannot be interpolated due to the metrics used, payout level for that MBO will be at the highest performance result level fully achieved.

Page 7 of 11

2012 STIP Metrics

Corporate STIP Metrics:

Performance Goal	Threshold Performance			Target Performance			Maximum Performance
Adjusted Net Income Full-Year1	$	[**	]	$	[**	]	$	[**	]
PPG Adjusted Revenue Full-Year2	$	[**	]	$	[**	]	$	[**	]
Adjusted Net Income First Half-Year3	$	[**	]	$	[**	]		N/A
PPG Adjusted Revenue First Half-Year4	$	[**	]	$	[**	]		N/A

(1) Adjusted Net Income Full-Year means Adjusted Net Income as reported in the Corporation’s Form 10-K filing reporting the Corporation’s results for the performance period (the “10-K ANI”). Notwithstanding the foregoing,in order to determine the level of performance for purposes of this Program, the Compensation Committee may exercise discretion to reduce the 10K ANI by any or all of the following items (if any): losses from discontinued operations, the cumulative effects of changes in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, any one-time charge or dilution resulting from any acquisition or divestiture, the effect of changes to our effective federal or state tax rates, extraordinary items of loss or expense, and any other unusual or nonrecurring items of loss or expense, including restructuring charges.

(2) PPG Adjusted Revenue Full-Year is reported 2012 Revenue adjusted for the difference between reported 2012 PPG and Board-approved budgeted 2012 PPG of $[**] US and A$[**] (per liter) Australian.

(3) Adjusted Net Income First Half-Year means Adjusted Net Income as reported in the Corporation’s Form 10-Q filing reporting the Corporation’s results for the first and second quarters of 2012 (the “10-Q ANI”). Notwithstanding the foregoing, in order to determine the level of performance for purposes of this Program, the Compensation Committee may exercise discretion to reduce the 10Q ANI by any or all of the following items (if any): : losses from discontinued operations, the cumulative effects of changes in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, any one-time charge or dilution resulting from any acquisition or divestiture, the effect of changes to our effective federal or state tax rates, extraordinary items of loss or expense, and any other unusual or nonrecurring items of loss or expense, including restructuring charges.

(4) PPG Adjusted Revenue First Half-Year is reported Revenue adjusted for the difference between reported 2012 PPG and Board-approved budgeted 2012 PPG of $[**] US and A$[**] (per liter) Australian for the first and second quarters of 2012.

Americas STIP Metrics:

Performance Goal	Threshold Performance			Target Performance			Maximum Performance
EBIT Full-Year1	$	[**	]	$	[**	]	$	[**	]
PPG Adjusted Revenue Full-Year2	$	[**	]	$	[**	]	$	[**	]
EBIT First Half-Year3	$	[**	]	$	[**	]		N/A
PPG Adjusted Revenue First Half-Year4	$	[**	]	$	[**	]		N/A

(1) EBIT Full-Year means Americas Business Unit Earnings before Interest and Taxes and any Allocations of Corporate Expenses to the Business Unit and shall be calculated consistently with Corporate Adjusted Net Income as reported in the Corporation’s Form 10-K filing reporting the Corporation’s results for 2012 and may be adjusted to exclude the following items (if any): losses from discontinued

Page 8 of 11

operations, the cumulative effects of changes in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, any one-time charge or dilution resulting from any acquisition or divestiture, the effect of changes to our effective federal or state tax rates, extraordinary items of loss or expense, and any other unusual or nonrecurring items of loss or expense, including restructuring charges. Interest means interest related to the senior credit facility. This calculation does not exclude Operating Interest as reported on the income statement. The Compensation Committee may exercise discretion to include all or part of an item of loss or expense.

(2) PPG Adjusted Revenue Full-Year is reported 2012 Revenue for the Americas adjusted for the difference between reported 2012 PPG and Board-approved budgeted 2012 PPG of $[**] US.

(3) EBIT First Half-Year means Americas Business Unit Earnings before Interest and Taxes and any Allocations of Corporate Expenses to the Business Unit and shall be calculated consistently with Corporate Adjusted Net Income as reported in the Corporation’s Form 10-^Q filing reporting the Corporation’s results for the first and second quarters of 2012 and may be adjusted to exclude the following items (if any): losses from discontinued operations, the cumulative effects of changes in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, any one-time charge or dilution resulting from any acquisition or divestiture, the effect of changes to our effective federal or state tax rates, extraordinary items of loss or expense, and any other unusual or nonrecurring items of loss or expense, including restructuring charges. Interest means interest related to the senior credit facility. This calculation does not exclude Operating Interest as reported on the income statement. The Compensation Committee may exercise discretion to include all or part of an item of loss or expense.

(4) PPG Adjusted Revenue First Half-Year is reported Revenue for the Americas adjusted for the difference between reported 2012 PPG and Board-approved budgeted 2012 PPG of $[**] US for the first and second quarters of 2012.

International STIP Metrics:

Performance Goal	Threshold Performance			Target Performance			Maximum Performance
EBIT Full-Year1	$	[**	]	$	[**	]	$	[**	]
PPG Adjusted Revenue Full-Year2	$	[**	]	$	[**	]	$	[**	]
EBIT First Half-Year3	$	[**	]	$	[**	]		N/A
PPG Adjusted Revenue First Half-Year4	$	[**	]	$	[**	]		N/A

(1) EBIT Full-Year means International Business Unit Earnings before Interest and Taxes and any Allocations of Corporate Expenses to the Business Unit and shall be calculated consistently with Corporate Adjusted Net Income as reported in the Corporation’s Form 10-K filing reporting the Corporation’s results for 2012 and may be adjusted to exclude the following items (if any): losses from discontinued operations, the cumulative effects of changes in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, any one-time charge or dilution resulting from any acquisition or divestiture, the effect of changes to our effective federal or state tax rates, extraordinary items of loss or expense, and any other unusual or nonrecurring items of loss or expense, including restructuring charges. Interest means interest related to the senior credit facility. This calculation does not exclude Operating Interest as reported on the income statement. The Compensation Committee may exercise discretion to include all or part of an item of loss or expense.

(2) PPG Adjusted Revenue Full-Year is reported 2012 Revenue for the International Business Unit adjusted for the difference between reported 2012 PPG and Board-approved budgeted 2012 PPG of A$[**] (per liter) Australian.

(3) EBIT First Half-Year means International Business Unit Earnings before Interest and Taxes and any Allocations of Corporate Expenses to the Business Unit and shall be calculated consistently with Corporate Adjusted Net Income as reported in the Corporation’s Form 10-Q filing reporting the Corporation’s results for the first and second quarters of 2012 and may be adjusted to exclude the following items (if any): losses from discontinued operations, the cumulative effects of changes in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, any one-time charge or dilution resulting from any acquisition or divestiture, the effect of changes to our effective federal or state tax rates, extraordinary items of loss or expense, and any other unusual or nonrecurring items of loss or expense, including restructuring charges. Interest means interest related to the senior credit facility. This calculation does not exclude Operating Interest as reported on the income statement. The Compensation Committee may exercise discretion to include all or part of an item of loss or expense.

(4) PPG Adjusted Revenue First Half-Year is reported Revenue for the International Business Unit adjusted for the difference between reported 2012 PPG and Board-approved budgeted 2012 PPG of A$[**] Australian for the first and second quarters of 2012.

Page 9 of 11

MBOs

When establishing the MBO performance levels, Threshold goals are generally set at 90% probability of achievement, Target goals are generally set at 75% probability of achievement, and Maximum goals are generally set at 25% probability of achievement.

Executive Officer MBOs: The CEO, EVPs, and SVPs generally have 2-4 MBOs which may be shared with other executives or represent a targeted strategic or operational MBO.

Management MBOs: Each VP, Director or Manager generally has 2-4 MBOs which may be shared with other Managers or represent a targeted strategic, functional or operational MBO.

STIP Weightings for First Half-Year Period Calculations and Payout

	Net Income Measure	Revenue Measure
Corporate Associates and Team Leaders	80%	20%
	Corporate ANI	Corporate PPG Adjusted Revenue
Business Unit Associates and Team Leaders	80%	20%
	Business Unit EBIT	Business Unit PPG Adjusted Revenue

Payout Levels for First Half-Year Period

In 2012, the Company must achieve at least threshold results for the First Half-Year Period Corporate Adjusted Net Income in order to pay out any portion of the First Half-Year Period of the Short Term Incentive Program at either the Corporate or Business Unit levels.

Performance Results	Payout %
Threshold		25	%
Threshold/Target		50	%
Target		100	%
Target/Max		100	%
Max or above		100	%

Note: Payout levels of the corporate metric payout levels will be incrementalized.

Page 10 of 11

Special Provision for Payout of First Half-Year Periods where Actual Performance Exceeds Target

In the case of a First Half-Year Period where the actual performance at the Corporate or Business Unit level exceeds Target, payout will be capped at Target. The Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation may exercise discretion to modify First Half-Year Period payouts based on Company performance or other factors.

Page 11 of 11

EX-10.2

Exhibit 10.2

Confidential Materials omitted and filed separately with the

Securities and Exchange Commission. Asterisks denote omissions.

EXHIBIT B

2012 Corporate Annual Grant Long-Term Incentive Program

Award Date:

March 28, 2012

Unit Allocation Ratio:

Wright Express Job Category	PSUs	RSUs
All Levels	60%	40%
New Hire	varies	varies

PSU = Performance Based Restricted Stock Units

RSU = Restricted Stock Unit

Vesting Schedule:

The award vests at a rate of one third each year over a 3-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the award date.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Calculations:

The number of PSUs vesting under this 2012 Corporate Annual Grant Program is based on the following:

	Payout %(1)(4)			Adjusted Net Income (40%) (2)						PPG Adj  Revenue (60%)(3)
				Perf  Level(3)			$(,000)			Perf  Level(3)			$(,000)
Threshold		25	%		80.0	%	$	[**	]		85.0	%	$	[**	]
		50	%		90.0	%	$	[**	]		92.5	%	$	[**	]
Target		100	%		100.0	%	$	[**	]		100.0	%	$	[**	]
		125	%		103.5	%	$	[**	]		101.3	%	$	[**	]
Target/Max		150	%		107.0	%	$	[**	]		102.5	%	$	[**	]
		175	%		110.5	%	$	[**	]		103.8	%	$	[**	]
Max		200	%		114.0	%	$	[**	]		105.0	%	$	[**	]

(1) Threshold ANI performance must be achieved for any PSUs to vest.

(2) Adjusted Net Income means Adjusted Net Income as reported in the Corporation’s Form 10-K filing reporting the Corporation’s results for the performance period (the “10-K ANI”). Notwithstanding the foregoing,in order to determine the level of performance for purposes of this Program, the Compensation Committee may exercise discretion to reduce the 10K ANI by any or all of the following items (if any): losses from discontinued operations, the cumulative effects of changes in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, any one-time charge or dilution resulting from any acquisition or divestiture, the effect of changes to our effective federal or state tax rates, extraordinary items of loss or expense, and any other unusual or nonrecurring items of loss or expense, including restructuring charges.

(3) PPG Adjusted Revenue is reported 2012 Revenue adjusted for the difference between reported 2012 PPG and Board-approved budgeted 2012 PPG of $[**] US and A$[**] (per liter) Australian.

(4) Shares granted are ratable between payout levels.

EX-10.3

Exhibit 10.3

Confidential Materials omitted and filed separately with the

Securities and Exchange Commission. Asterisks denote omissions.

EXHIBIT C

2012 International Annual Grant Long-Term Incentive Program

Award Date:

March 28, 2012

Unit Allocation Ratio:

Wright Express Job Category	PSUs	RSUs
All Levels	60%	40%
New Hire	varies	varies

PSU = Performance Based Restricted Stock Units

RSU = Restricted Stock Unit

Vesting Schedule:

The award vests at a rate of one third each year over a 3-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the award date.

Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Calculations:

The number of PSUs vesting under this 2012 International Annual Grant Program is based on the following:

	Payout %(1)(4)			Adjusted Net Income (40%) (2)						PPG Adj  Revenue (60%)(3)
				Perf  Level(3)			$(,000)			Perf  Level(3)			$(,000)
Threshold		25	%		80.0	%	$	[**	]		85.0	%	$	[**	]
		50	%		90.0	%	$	[**	]		92.5	%	$	[**	]
Target		100	%		100.0	%	$	[**	]		100.0	%	$	[**	]
		125	%		101.5	%	$	[**	]		101.0	%	$	[**	]
Target/Max		150	%		103.0	%	$	[**	]		101.5	%	$	[**	]
		175	%		105.0	%	$	[**	]		102.5	%	$	[**	]
Max		200	%		107.0	%	$	[**	]		103.5	%	$	[**	]

(1) Threshold ANI performance must be achieved for any PSUs to vest.

(2) EBIT means International Business Unit Earnings before Interest and Taxes and any Allocations of Corporate Expenses to the Business Unit and shall be calculated consistently with Corporate Adjusted Net Income as reported in the Corporation’s Form 10-K filing reporting the Corporation’s results for 2012 and may be adjusted to exclude the following items (if any): losses from discontinued operations, the cumulative effects of changes in Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, any one-time charge or dilution resulting from any acquisition or divestiture, the effect of changes to our effective federal or state tax rates, extraordinary items of loss or expense, and any other unusual or nonrecurring items of loss or expense, including restructuring charges. Interest means interest related to the senior credit facility. This calculation does not exclude Operating Interest as reported on the income statement. The Compensation Committee may exercise discretion to include all or part of an item of loss or expense.

(3) PPG Adjusted Revenue is reported 2012 Revenue for the International Business Unit adjusted for the difference between reported 2012 PPG and Board-approved budgeted 2012 PPG of A$[**] (per liter) Australian.

(4) Shares granted are ratable between payout levels.

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael E. Dubyak, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wright Express Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 3, 2012

/s/ Michael E. Dubyak

Michael E. Dubyak

President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Steven A. Elder, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wright Express Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 3, 2012

/s/ Steven A. Elder

Steven A. Elder

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Wright Express Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report”), I, Michael E. Dubyak, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Michael E. Dubyak

Michael E. Dubyak

President and Chief Executive Officer

May 3, 2012

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Wright Express Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Steven A. Elder, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Steven A. Elder

Steven A. Elder

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

May 3, 2012