| REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 | [ ] | |
| Pre‑Effective Amendment No. ______ | [ ] | |
| Post-Effective Amendment No. 44 | [X] |
| Amendment No. 49 | [X] |
| 5701 Golden Hills Drive, Minneapolis, MN | 55416 | |||
| |
| |||
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
| Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code | (763) 765‑7500 |
| Approximate Date of Proposed Public Offering: | May 1, 2024 |
| The AZL Index Strategy Funds AZL® Balanced Index Strategy Fund AZL® MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund AZL® MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund AZL® MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund AZL® MVP Global Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
| AZL® DFA Multi-Strategy Fund AZL® MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund AZL® MVP Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund AZL® MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund |
| 3 | |
| 9 | |
| 16 | |
| 23 | |
| 30 | |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |
| 52 | |
| 59 | |
| 66 | |
| 66 | |
| 67 | |
| 67 | |
| 68 | |
| 75 | |
| 76 |
| 99 | |
| 99 | |
| 99 | |
| 100 | |
| 101 | |
| 101 | |
| 101 | |
| 101 | |
| 101 | |
| 101 | |
| 103 | |
| 103 | |
| 103 | |
| 104 | |
| 104 | |
| 105 | |
| 106 | |
| 116 |
| Management Fee |
|
| Other Expenses |
|
| Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses(1) |
|
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses |
|
| 1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| $ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
| Fund |
Target Allocation |
| AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund |
50 % |
| AZL S&P 500 Index Fund |
31 % |
| AZL International Index Fund |
14 % |
| AZL Mid Cap Index Fund |
3 % |
| AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund |
2 % |
| |
|
| |
- |
| |
One Year Ended December 31, 2023 |
Five Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
Ten Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
| AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
% |
% |
% |
| S&P 500 Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Balanced Composite Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Management Fee |
|
| Other Expenses |
|
| Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses(1) |
|
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses |
|
| 1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| $ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
| Fund |
Target Allocation |
| AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund |
47.5 % |
| AZL S&P 500 Index Fund |
28.5 % |
| AZL International Index Fund |
14 % |
| AZL Mid Cap Index Fund |
3 % |
| AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund |
2 % |
| |
|
| |
- |
| |
One Year Ended December 31, 2023 |
Five Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
Ten Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
| AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
% |
% |
% |
| S&P 500 Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Balanced Composite Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Management Fee |
|
| Other Expenses |
|
| Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses(1) |
|
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses |
|
| 1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| $ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
| Fund |
Target Allocation |
| AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund |
23.8 % |
| AZL S&P 500 Index Fund |
42.8 % |
| AZL International Index Fund |
21 % |
| AZL Mid Cap Index Fund |
4.5 % |
| AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund |
3 % |
| |
|
| |
- |
| |
One Year Ended December 31, 2023 |
Five Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
Ten Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
| AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund |
% |
% |
% |
| S&P 500 Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Growth Composite Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Management Fee |
|
| Other Expenses |
|
| Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses(1) |
|
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses |
|
| 1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| $ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
| Fund |
Target Allocation |
| AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund |
38 % |
| AZL S&P 500 Index Fund |
34.5 % |
| AZL International Index Fund |
16.5 % |
| AZL Mid Cap Index Fund |
3.5 % |
| AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund |
2.5 % |
| |
|
| |
- |
| |
One Year Ended December 31, 2023 |
Five Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
Ten Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
| AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund |
% |
% |
% |
| S&P 500 Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Moderate Composite Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Management Fee |
|
| Other Expenses |
|
| Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses(1) |
|
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses |
|
| 1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| $ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
| Fund |
Target Allocation |
| AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund |
40 % |
| AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund |
43.5 % |
| AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund |
16.5 % |
| |
|
| |
- |
| |
One Year Ended December 31, 2023 |
Five Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
Ten Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
| AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
% |
% |
% |
| S&P 500 Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Moderate Composite Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Management Fee |
|
| Other Expenses |
|
| Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses(1) |
|
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses |
|
| 1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| $ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
| Fund |
Target Allocation |
| AZL MSCI Global Equity Index Fund |
47.5 % |
| AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund |
47.5 % |
| |
|
| |
- |
| |
One Year Ended December 31, 2023 |
Five Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
Ten Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
| AZL MVP Global Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
% |
% |
% |
| MSCI World Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Global Balanced Composite Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Management Fee |
|
| Other Expenses |
|
| Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses(1) |
|
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses |
|
| Fee Waiver(2) |
- |
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses After Fee Waiver(2) |
|
| 1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| $ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
| Fund |
Target Allocation |
| AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund |
38 % |
| AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund |
40.5 % |
| AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund |
16.5 % |
| |
|
| |
- |
| |
One Year Ended December 31, 2023 |
Five Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
Since Inception ( |
| AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
% |
% |
% |
| S&P 500 Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Moderate Composite Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Management Fee |
|
| Other Expenses |
|
| Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses(1) |
|
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses |
|
| 1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| $ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
| |
|
| |
- |
| |
One Year Ended December 31, 2023 |
Five Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
Ten Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
| AZL MVP Fidelity Institutional Asset Management Multi-Strategy Index Strategy Fund |
% |
% |
% |
| S&P 500 Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Income & Growth Composite Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Management Fee |
|
| Other Expenses |
|
| Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses(1) |
|
| Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses |
|
| 1 Year |
3 Years |
5 Years |
10 Years |
| $ |
$ |
$ |
$ |
| Fund |
Target Allocation |
| AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
50 % |
| AZL S&P 500 Index Fund |
27 % |
| AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund |
18 % |
| |
|
| |
- |
| |
One Year Ended December 31, 2023 |
Five Years Ended December 31, 2023 |
Since Inception ( |
| AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund |
% |
% |
% |
| S&P 500 Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Moderate Composite Index* |
% |
% |
% |
| Fund |
Underlying Funds |
| AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund |
AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund AZL S&P 500 Index Fund AZL Mid Cap Index Fund AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund AZL International Index Fund |
| AZL MVP Global Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
AZL MSCI Global Equity Index Fund AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund |
| AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund |
| AZL MVP Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
| AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund |
AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund AZL S&P 500 Index Fund AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund |
| Allocation Risk All of the Funds |
The manner in which the Manager allocates assets may result in the Fund underperforming other funds with similar investment objectives. For those Funds where the Manager has limited discretion to allocate Fund assets among various underlying investments, the Fund’s allocation structure may cause the Fund to underperform other funds of funds with similar investment objectives. For those Funds where the Manager has discretion to allocate Fund assets among various underlying investments which represent different asset classes, each underlying investment is subject to different levels and combinations of risk, depending on the Fund’s exact asset allocation. |
| Futures Risk All of the AZL MVP Funds |
Because the Fund may utilize futures pursuant to its MVP risk management process, the Fund also is subject to derivatives risk, including risks related to futures. Investing in derivative instruments involves risks that may be different from or greater than the risks associated with investing directly in securities or other traditional investments. The value of futures contracts depend primarily upon the price of the securities, indexes, commodities, currencies or other instruments underlying them. Price movements are also influenced by, among other things, interest rates, changing supply and demand relationships, trade, fiscal, monetary, and exchange control programs and policies of governments, and national and international political and economic events and policies. The cost of futures may also be related, in part, to the degree of volatility of the underlying indices, securities, currencies, or other assets. Accordingly, futures on highly volatile indices, securities, currency, or other assets may be more expensive than futures on other investments. Changes in the value of the derivative may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate or index, and the Fund could lose more than the |
| Futures Risk (continued) |
principal amount invested. |
| Fund of Funds Risk All of the Funds |
The Fund, as a shareholder of the underlying funds, indirectly bears its proportionate share of any investment management fees and other expenses of the underlying funds. Further due to the fees and expenses paid by the Fund, as well as small variations in the Fund’s actual allocations to the underlying funds and any cash held in the Fund’s portfolio, the performance and income distributions of the Fund will not be the same as the performance and income distributions of the underlying funds allocated according to the target allocations described here. |
| Quantitative Investing Risk All of the AZL MVP Funds |
The value of securities selected using quantitative analysis can react differently to issuer, political, market, and economic developments than the market as a whole or securities selected using only fundamental analysis. The factors used in quantitative analysis and the weight placed on those factors may not be predictive of a security’s value. In addition, factors that affect a security’s value can change over time and these changes may not be reflected in the quantitative model. A quantitative model can be adversely affected by errors or imperfections in the factors or the data on which evaluations are based, or by technical issues with construction or implementation of the model, which in any case may result in a failure of the portfolio to perform as expected or a failure to identify securities that will perform well in the future. Successful operation of a quantitative model is also reliant upon the information technology systems of the Manager or Subadviser, as applicable, and its ability to ensure those systems remain operational and that appropriate disaster recovery procedures are in place. There can be no assurance that the Manager or Subadviser will be successful in maintaining effective and operational trading models and the related hardware and software systems. |
| Volatility Risk All of the AZL MVP Funds |
Although the Fund’s investment strategy seeks not to exceed a specific volatility level, certain of the Fund’s investments may appreciate or decrease significantly in value over short periods of time, which may cause the Fund’s net asset value per share to experience significant increases or declines in value over short periods of time. The Fund’s volatility strategy may not produce the desired result and there can be no guarantee that the Fund will maintain its volatility at or below its threshold volatility level. Additionally, maintenance of the volatility level will not ensure that the Fund will |
| Volatility Risk (continued) |
deliver competitive returns. The use of derivatives in connection with the Fund’s volatility strategy may expose the Fund to losses (some of which may be sudden) that it would not have otherwise been exposed to if it had only invested directly in equity and/or fixed income securities. Further, in some market conditions the Fund may either underperform or outperform as a direct result of the MVP process. The Fund may, for example, outperform in downward trending markets when volatility is high (and the equity allocation low) and underperform in upward trending markets when volatility is high (and the equity allocation low). The performance of the Fund’s futures positions may not correlate as intended with the Fund’s other investments; as a result, these futures contracts may decline in value at the same time as the Fund’s other investments decline in value. The Manager’s quantitative analysis used in the MVP process may perform differently than expected and may negatively affect performance and the ability of the Fund to maintain its volatility at or below its threshold volatility level for various reasons, including errors in using or building the models, technical issues implementing the models and various non-quantitative factors (such as market or trading system dysfunctions, and investor fear or over-reaction). |
| Bank Loan Risk • AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund A principal risk of this underlying fund: • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
The loans in which the Fund invests represent amounts borrowed by companies or other entities from banks and other lenders. In many cases, they are issued in connection with recapitalizations, acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, and refinancings, and the borrowing companies tend to have more debt than equity. Most, if not all, of the bank loans in which the fund invests will have a below investment-grade credit rating or not be rated by a major credit rating agency. The Fund may acquire bank loans directly through the lending agent, as an assignment from another lender who holds a direct interest in the loan, or as a participation interest in another lender’s portion of the loan. Transactions involving bank loans may have significantly longer settlement periods than more traditional investments (settlement can take longer than 7 days) and often involve borrowers whose financial condition is |
| Bank Loan Risk (continued) |
troubled or highly leveraged, which increases the risk that the fund may not receive its proceeds in a timely manner or that the fund may incur losses in order to pay redemption proceeds to its shareholders. In addition, loans are not registered under the federal securities laws like stocks and bonds, so investors in loans have less protection against improper practices than investors in registered securities. |
| Call Risk (also known as Prepayment Risk) • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
If interest rates fall, it is possible that issuers of callable securities held by the underlying fund will call or prepay their securities before their maturity dates. In this event, the proceeds from the called securities would most likely be reinvested by the underlying fund in securities bearing the new, lower interest rates, resulting in a possible decline in the underlying fund’s income and distributions to shareholders and termination of any conversion option on convertible securities. |
| Capitalization Risk • AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL Index Strategy Funds • AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund • AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund • AZL Mid Cap Index Fund • AZL MSCI Global Equity Index Fund • AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
To the extent the underlying fund invests significantly in small- or mid-capitalization companies, it may have capitalization risk. These companies may present additional risk because they have less predictable earnings or no earnings, more volatile share prices and less liquid securities than large- capitalization companies. These securities may fluctuate in value more than those of larger, more established companies and, as a group, may suffer more severe price declines during periods of generally declining stock prices. The shares of smaller companies tend to trade less frequently than those of larger, more established companies, which can adversely affect the price of smaller companies’ securities and the underlying fund’s ability to sell them when the portfolio manager deems it appropriate. These companies may have limited product lines, markets, or financial resources, or may depend on a limited management group. The value of some of the underlying fund’s investments will rise and fall based on investor perception rather than economic factors. |
| Collateralized Debt Obligations Risk • AZL Index Strategy Funds • AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciate Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund |
In addition to the typical risks associated with fixed-income securities and asset-backed securities, collateralized debt obligations, including CLOs, carry additional risks including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the risk that the collateral may default or decline in value or be downgraded, if rated by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization; (iii) the Fund may invest in tranches of CDOs that |
| Collateralized Debt Obligations Risk (continued) |
are subordinate to other tranches; (iv) the structure and complexity of the transaction and the legal documents could lead to disputes among investors regarding the characterization of proceeds; (v) the investment return achieved by the Fund could be significantly different than those predicted by financial models; (vi) the lack of a readily available secondary market for CDOs; (vii) the risk of forced “fire sale” liquidation due to technical defaults such as coverage test failures; and (viii) the CDO’s manager may perform poorly. |
| Convertible Securities Risk • AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
The values of the convertible securities in which the underlying fund may invest also will be affected by market interest rates, the risk that the issuer may default on interest or principal payments and the value of the underlying common stock into which these securities may be converted. Specifically, since these types of convertible securities pay fixed interest and dividends, their values may fall if market interest rates rise, and rise if market interest rates fall. Additionally, an issuer may have the right to buy back certain of the convertible securities at a time and at a price that is unfavorable to the underlying fund. |
| Credit Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
Credit risk is the chance that the issuer of a debt security will fail to repay interest and principal in a timely manner, reducing the fund’s return. Also, an issuer may suffer adverse changes in financial condition that could lower the credit quality and liquidity of a security, leading to greater volatility in the price of the security and of the fund’s shares. The underlying fund could lose money if the issuer or the guarantor of a fixed income security, or the counterparty to a derivatives contract, repurchase agreement, or a loan of portfolio securities, is unwilling or unable to make payments of principal and/or interest in a timely manner, or to otherwise honor its obligations. Securities are subject to varying degrees of credit risk, which are often reflected in their credit ratings. Those underlying funds that are permitted to invest in municipal bonds are subject to the risk that litigation, legislation, or other political events, local business or economic conditions, or the bankruptcy of the issuer could have a significant effect on an issuer’s ability to make payments of principal and/or interest. Although the underlying fund invests only in high quality obligations, if an issuer fails to pay interest or repay principal, the value of the underlying fund’s assets could decline. |
| Currency Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL International Index Fund • AZL MSCI Global Equity Index Fund |
Funds that invest in securities that trade in, and receive revenues in, foreign currencies are subject to the risk that those currencies will decline in value relative to the U.S. dollar, or, in the case of hedging positions, that the U.S. dollar will decline in value relative to the currency being hedged. Currency rates in foreign countries may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time for a number of reasons, including changes in interest rates, intervention (or failure to intervene) by the U.S. or foreign governments, central banks, or supranational authorities, such as the International Monetary Fund, or by the imposition of currency controls or other political developments in the U.S. or abroad. As a result, the underlying fund’s investments with exposure to foreign currency fluctuations may decline in value (in terms of the U.S. dollar) and reduce the returns of the underlying fund. |
| Depositary Receipt Risk • AZL MVP Global Balanced Index Strategy Fund • AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund • AZL MSCI Global Equity Index Fund |
Depositary receipts involve many of the same risks as those associated with direct investment in foreign securities. In addition, the underlying issuers of certain depositary receipts, particularly unsponsored or unregistered depositary receipts, are under no obligation to distribute shareholder communications to the holders of such receipts or to pass through to them any voting rights with respect to the deposited securities. Investing in these instruments may expose the Fund to credit risk with respect to the issuer of the depositary receipt, in addition to the risks of the underlying investment. Depositary receipts that are not sponsored by the issuer may be less liquid and there may be less readily available public information about the issuer. |
| Derivatives Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund • AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL International Index Fund • AZL Mid Cap Index Fund • AZL S&P 500 Index Fund • AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
A derivative is a financial contract whose value depends on, or is derived from, the value of an underlying asset, reference rate, or risk. Funds typically use derivatives as a substitute for taking a position in the underlying asset and/or as part of a strategy designed to reduce exposure to other risks, such as interest rate or currency risk. Funds may also use derivatives for leverage, in which case their use would involve leveraging risk. Use of derivative instruments involves risks different from, or possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in securities and other traditional investments. Derivatives are subject to a number of other risks, such as liquidity risk, interest rate risk, market risk, credit risk, counterparty risk, and selection risk. Derivatives also involve the risk of mispricing or improper valuation and the risk that changes in the value may not correlate perfectly with |
| Derivatives Risk (continued) |
the underlying asset, rate, or index. Using derivatives may result in losses, possibly in excess of the principal amount invested. Also, suitable derivative transactions may not be available in all circumstances. The counterparty to a derivatives contract could default. |
| Emerging Markets Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
The risks of foreign investments are usually much greater for emerging markets. Investments in emerging markets may be considered speculative. Emerging markets may include those in countries considered emerging or developing by the World Bank, the International Finance Corporation or the United Nations. Emerging markets are riskier than more developed markets because they tend to develop unevenly and may never fully develop. They are more likely to experience hyperinflation and currency devaluations, which adversely affect returns to U.S. investors. Companies operating in emerging markets may have greater concentration in a few industries resulting in greater vulnerability to regional and global trade conditions and also may be subject to lower trading volume and greater price fluctuations than companies in more developed markets. In addition, many emerging markets have far lower trading volumes and less liquidity than developed markets. Since these markets are often small, they may be more likely to suffer sharp and frequent price changes or long-term price depression because of adverse publicity, investor perceptions or the actions of a few large investors. In addition, traditional measures of investment value used in the United States, such as price to earnings ratios, may not apply to certain small markets. Also, there may be less publicly available information about issuers in emerging markets than would be available about issuers in more developed capital markets, and such issuers may not be subject to accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards and requirements comparable to those to which U.S. companies are subject, and, as a result, the nature and quality of such information may vary. Information about such companies may be less available and reliable and, therefore, the ability to conduct adequate due diligence in emerging markets may be limited which can impede the Fund’s ability to evaluate such companies. In addition, certain emerging market countries have material limitations on PCAOB inspection, investigation and enforcement capabilities which hinder the ability to engage in independent oversight or inspection of accounting firms located in or operating in certain emerging markets; therefore, there is no guarantee that the |
| Emerging Markets Risk (continued) |
quality of financial reporting or the audits conducted by audit firms of emerging market issuers meet PCAOB standards. Many emerging markets have histories of political instability and abrupt changes in policies. As a result, their governments are more likely to take actions that are hostile or detrimental to private enterprise or foreign investment than those of more developed countries, including expropriation of assets, confiscatory taxation, high rates of inflation or unfavorable diplomatic developments. In the past, governments of such nations have expropriated substantial amounts of private property, and most claims of the property owners have never been fully settled. There is no assurance that such expropriations will not reoccur. In such an event, it is possible that the Fund could lose the entire value of its investments in the affected market. Some countries have pervasiveness of corruption and crime that may hinder investments. Certain emerging markets may also face other significant internal or external risks, including the risk of war, and ethnic, religious and racial conflicts. In addition, governments in many emerging market countries participate to a significant degree in their economies and securities markets, which may impair investment and economic growth. National policies that may limit the Fund’s investment opportunities include restrictions on investment in issuers or industries deemed sensitive to national interests. Emerging markets may also have differing legal systems and the existence or possible imposition of exchange controls, custodial restrictions or other foreign or U.S. governmental laws or restrictions applicable to such investments. Sometimes, they may lack or be in the relatively early development of legal structures governing private and foreign investments and private property. Many emerging markets do not have income tax treaties with the United States, and as a result, investments by the Fund may be subject to higher withholding taxes in such countries. In addition, some countries with emerging markets may impose differential capital gains taxes on foreign investors. Practices in relation to settlement of securities transactions in emerging markets involve higher risks than those in developed markets, in part because the Fund will need to use brokers and counterparties that are less well capitalized, and custody and registration of assets in some countries may be unreliable. The possibility of fraud, negligence, undue influence being exerted by the issuer or refusal to recognize ownership exists in some emerging markets, and, along with other |
| Emerging Markets Risk (continued) |
factors, could result in ownership registration being completely lost. The Fund would absorb any loss resulting from such registration problems and may have no successful claim for compensation. In addition, communications between the United States and emerging market countries may be unreliable, increasing the risk of delayed settlements or losses of security certificates. Other risks of investing in emerging markets securities may include additional transaction costs, unexpected market closures, and lack of timely information. |
| Extension Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
When interest rates rise, certain bond obligations will be paid in full by the issuer more slowly than anticipated, causing the value of the securities to fall. Periods of low relative interest rates or inflationary trends may increase the risks associated with rising interest rates. |
| Financial Markets Regulatory Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
Policy changes by the U.S. government or its regulatory agencies and other governmental actions and political events within the U.S. and abroad, changes to the monetary policy by the Federal Reserve or other regulatory actions, the U.S. government’s inability at times to agree on a long-term budget and deficit reduction plan or other legislation aimed at addressing financial or economic conditions, the threat of a federal government shutdown, and threats not to increase or suspend the federal government’s debt limit, may affect investor and consumer confidence, increase volatility in the financial markets, perhaps suddenly and to a significant degree, result in higher interest rates, and even raise concerns about the U.S. government’s credit rating and ability to service its debt. Such changes and events may adversely impact the Fund, including by adversely impacting the Fund’s operations, universe of potential investment options, and return potential. |
| Financials Sector Risk • AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL MVP Global Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
Companies in the financials sector are subject to extensive governmental regulation and intervention, which may adversely affect the scope of their activities, the prices they can charge, the amount of capital they must maintain and, potentially, their size. Governmental regulation may change frequently and may have significant adverse consequences for companies in the financials sector, including effects not intended by such regulation. Legislation in the U.S. has relaxed capital requirements and other regulatory burdens on certain U.S. banks; while the |
| Financials Sector Risk (continued) |
effect of the legislation may benefit certain companies in the financials sector, increased risk taking may also result in greater overall risk in the financials sector. The impact of changes in capital requirements, or recent or future regulation in various countries, on any individual financial company or on the financials sector as a whole cannot be predicted. Certain risks may impact the value of investments in the financials sector more severely than those of investments outside this sector, including the risks associated with companies that operate with substantial financial leverage. Companies in the financials sector may also be adversely affected by increases in interest rates and loan losses, decreases in the availability of money or asset valuations, credit rating downgrades and adverse conditions in other related markets. Insurance companies, in particular, may be subject to severe price competition and/or rate regulation, which may have an adverse impact on their profitability. The financials sector is particularly sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates. Companies in the financials sector may also hold portfolios of assets concentrated in geographic markets, industries or products (such as commercial and residential real estate loans) which makes them especially vulnerable to unstable economic conditions. The financials sector is also a target for cyberattacks, and may experience technology malfunctions and disruptions. In recent years, cyberattacks and technology malfunctions and failures have become increasingly frequent in this sector and have reportedly caused losses to companies in this sector, which may negatively impact the Fund. |
| Focused Investments Risk • AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
Focusing investments in a small number of issuers, industries, or regions increases risk. Funds that invest in a relatively small number of issuers may have more risk because changes in the value of a single security or the impact of a single economic, political, or regulatory occurrence may have a greater impact on the fund’s net asset value. Some of those issuers also may present substantial credit or other risks. The fund may from time to time have greater risk if it invests a substantial portion of its assets in companies in related industries, such as technology or financial and business services that may share common characteristics and are often subject to similar business risks and regulatory burdens. The securities of companies in similar industries may react similarly to economic, market, political, or other developments. |
| Foreign Securities Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL International Index Fund • AZL MSCI Global Equity Fund • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
Because the fund invests in securities of foreign issuers, it may be subject to risks not usually associated with owning securities of U.S. issuers. These risks include, among others, adverse fluctuations in foreign currency values as well as adverse political, social and economic developments affecting a foreign country, including the risk of nationalization, expropriation or confiscatory taxation. In addition, foreign investing involves less publicly available information, and more volatile or less liquid securities markets. Investments in foreign countries could be affected by factors not present in the U.S., such as restrictions on receiving the investment proceeds from a foreign country, confiscatory foreign tax laws, and potential difficulties in enforcing contractual obligations. Transactions in foreign securities may be subject to less efficient settlement practices, including extended clearance and settlement periods. Foreign accounting may be less revealing than U.S. accounting practices. Foreign regulation may be inadequate or irregular. Owning foreign securities could cause the fund’s performance to fluctuate more than if it held only U.S. securities. |
| Risks of Investing in Japan • AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund • AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund • AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund • AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund • AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund • AZL International Index Fund |
Japan may be subject to political, economic, nuclear, and labor risks, among others. Any of these risks, individually or in the aggregate, can impact an investment made in Japan. Since 2000, Japan’s economic growth rate has generally remained low relative to other advanced economies, and it may remain low in the future. The Japanese economy faces several concerns, including a financial system with large levels of nonperforming loans, overleveraged corporate balance sheets, extensive cross-ownership by major corporations, a changing corporate governance structure, large government deficits, heavy dependence on international trade and oil and other commodity imports, an aging workforce and significant population decline, sometimes unpredictable national politics, political tensions with China, and natural disasters, such as earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, typhoons and tsunamis. Any of these concerns could negatively affect the value of Japanese investments. |
| European Investment Risk • AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund • AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund • AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund • AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund • AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL International Index Fund |
European countries that are part of the European Economic and Monetary Union (the “EMU”), which is authorized to direct monetary policies, including policies related to money supply and interest rates for the euro, may be significantly affected by tight fiscal and monetary controls that the union may seek to impose on its members, such as restrictions on inflation rates, deficits, interest rates and debt levels. Decreasing imports or exports, changes in governmental or EU regulations on trade, changes in the exchange rate of the euro, the default or threat of default by an EU member country on its sovereign debt, and/or an economic recession in an EU member country may have a significant adverse effect on the economies of EU member countries and the EU as a whole. Efforts of the EU to further unify the economic and monetary policies of its members may increase the potential interdependence of the economies of the EU members and thereby increase the risk that adverse developments in one country will adversely affect the securities of issuers located in other countries. In recent years, the European financial markets have experienced volatility and adverse trends due to concerns about rising government debt levels of several European countries. These events have adversely affected the exchange rate of the euro and may continue to significantly affect other European countries, including EU member countries that do not use the euro and non-EU member countries. Responses to the financial problems by European governments, central banks, and others, including austerity measures and reforms, may not produce the desired results, may limit future growth and economic recovery, or may result in social unrest or have other unintended consequences. Further defaults or restructurings by governments and other entities of their debt could have additional adverse effects on economies, financial markets, and asset valuations around the world. The EU faces issues involving its membership, structure, procedures and policies. On January 31, 2020, the United Kingdom withdrew from the EU (known as “Brexit”). Although its long-term effects remain uncertain, Brexit’s impact on the United Kingdom and European economies and the broader global economy could be significant and result in increased volatility, illiquidity and potentially lower economic growth in markets in the United Kingdom, Europe and globally, which may adversely affect the value of the Fund’s investments. Brexit also may spark additional member countries to contemplate departing the EU, |
| European Investment Risk (continued) |
furthering economic and political instability in the region. |
| Futures Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund • AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund • AZL International Index Fund • AZL Mid Cap Index Fund • AZL S&P 500 Index Fund • AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund |
Investing in derivative instruments involves risks that may be different from or greater than the risks associated with investing directly in securities or other traditional investments. The value of futures contracts depend primarily upon the price of the securities, indexes, commodities, currencies or other instruments underlying them. Price movements are also influenced by, among other things, interest rates, changing supply and demand relationships, trade, fiscal, monetary, and exchange control programs and policies of governments, and national and international political and economic events and policies. The cost of futures may also be related, in part, to the degree of volatility of the underlying instruments. Accordingly, futures on highly volatile instruments may be more expensive than futures on other investments. Changes in the value of the derivative may not correlate perfectly with the underlying asset, rate or index, and the fund could lose more than the principal amount invested. |
| Income Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
Income risk is the chance that falling interest rates will cause the underlying fund’s income to decline. Income risk is generally higher for short-term bonds. |
| Index Fund Risk • AZL Index Strategy Funds • AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL International Index Fund • AZL Mid Cap Index Fund • AZL MSCI Global Equity Index Fund • AZL S&P 500 Index Fund • AZL Small Cap Stock Index Fund |
The underlying fund uses an indexing strategy. It does not attempt to manage market volatility, use defensive strategies, or reduce the effects of any long-term periods of poor stock performance. The correlation between the performance of the underlying fund and the performance of the index may be affected by the underlying fund’s expenses, changes in securities markets, changes in the composition of the index, and the timing of purchases and redemptions of underlying fund shares. The correlation between the performance of the underlying fund and the performance of the index may be affected by the underlying fund’s expenses, changes in securities markets, changes in the composition of the index, and the timing of purchases and redemptions of underlying fund shares. The use of a representative sampling approach, as applicable, also may result in returns for the underlying fund that are not as well-correlated with the return of the index as would be the case if the underlying fund purchased all of the securities in |
| Index Fund Risk (continued) |
the index in the proportions represented in the index. In addition, the performance of the underlying fund and the index may vary due to asset valuation differences and differences between the underlying fund’s portfolio and the index resulting from legal restrictions, costs or liquidity constraints. The underlying fund’s investments may become concentrated in the securities of companies operating within a particular country, region, market, industry sector, or group of industries, or asset class to the same extent that the underlying fund’s index becomes concentrated. If the underlying fund’s investments are so concentrated, the underlying fund may be more adversely affected by the underperformance of those investments, may experience increased price volatility and may be more susceptible to adverse economic, market, political or regulatory occurrences affecting those securities than a fund that does not concentrate its investments. |
| Industrials Sector Risk • AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund A principal risk of this underlying fund: • AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund |
Changes in government regulation, world events and economic conditions may adversely affect companies in the industrials sector. In addition, these companies are at risk for environmental and product liability damage claims. Commodity price volatility, changes in exchange rates, imposition of import controls, increased competition, depletion of resources, technological developments and labor relations may also adversely affect the companies in this sector. |
| Interest Rate Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
Interest rate risk is the chance that the value of the bonds the Fund holds will decline due to rising interest rates. When interest rates rise, the price of most bonds goes down. The price of a bond is also affected by its maturity. Bonds with longer maturities generally have greater sensitivity to changes in interest rates. Macroeconomic factors, such as inflationary trends, can heighten interest rate risk. Recent and potential future changes in government policy may affect interest rates. Changing interest rates, including rates that below zero, may have unpredictable effects on markets, may result in heightened market volatility and may detract from Fund performance to the extent the Fund is exposed to such interest rates and/or volatility. |
| Issuer Risk • All of the Funds • A principal risk of the all of the underlying funds. |
The value of a security may decline for a number of reasons that directly relate to the issuer, such as management performance, financial leverage, and reduced demand for the issuer’s products or services. |
| Leveraging Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
Certain transactions may give rise to a form of leverage. Such transactions may include, among others, reverse repurchase agreements, loans of portfolio securities, and the use of when-issued, delayed delivery, or forward commitment transaction. The use of derivatives may also create leveraging risk. The use of leverage may cause a fund to liquidate portfolio positions when it may not be advantageous to do so to satisfy its obligations. In addition, leverage, including borrowing, may exaggerate the effect of any increase or decrease in the value of an fund’s portfolio securities. |
| Liquidity Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund |
Liquidity risk exists when particular investments are difficult to purchase or sell. Investments in illiquid securities may reduce the returns of the underlying fund because it may be unable to sell the illiquid securities at an advantageous time or price. Restricted securities may be subject to liquidity risk because they may have terms that limit their resale to other investors or may require registration under applicable securities laws before they may be sold publicly. Funds with principal investment strategies that involve restricted securities, foreign securities, derivatives, companies with small market capitalization or securities with substantial market and/or credit risk tend to have the greatest exposure to liquidity risk. Due to the lack of liquidity and, in some cases, of publicly available information, it may in some circumstances be difficult to arrive at a fair value for certain illiquid securities. Reduced liquidity in the bond markets can result from a number of events, such as limited trading activity, reductions in bond inventory, and rapid or unexpected changes in interest rates. Less liquid markets could lead to greater price volatility and limit the fund's ability to sell a holding at a suitable price. |
| Market Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of all of the underlying funds. |
The market price of securities owned by the underlying fund may go up or down, sometimes rapidly and unpredictably. Securities may decline in value due to factors affecting securities markets generally or particular industries represented in the securities markets. The value of a security may decline due to general market conditions that are not specifically related to a particular company, such as real or perceived adverse economic conditions, changes in the general outlook for corporate earnings, changes in interest or currency rates, inflation, recessions, or adverse investor sentiment, as well as military conflict, natural disasters, and outbreaks of infectious illnesses or other widespread public health issues. They may also decline due to |
| Market Risk (continued) |
factors that affect a particular industry or industries, such as labor shortages or increased production costs and competitive conditions within an industry. During a general downturn in the securities markets, multiple asset classes may decline in value simultaneously. The value of the underlying fund’s portfolio may fluctuate to a greater or lesser degree than fluctuations of the general stock market. For those underlying funds that invest in stocks of foreign companies, the value of the underlying fund’s portfolio will be affected by changes in foreign stock markets and the special economic and other factors that might primarily affect stock markets in particular foreign countries and regions. Preferred stock generally holds preference as to dividends and liquidation over an issuer's common stock but ranks junior to an issuer's debt securities. Preferred stock dividends are payable only if declared by the issuer's board, and preferred stock also may be subject to optional or mandatory redemption provisions. |
| Mortgage-Related and Other Asset-Backed Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
The fund may invest in a variety of mortgage-related and other asset-backed securities, which are subject to certain additional risks. Generally, rising interest rates tend to extend the duration of fixed rate mortgage-related securities, making them more sensitive to changes in interest rates. As a result, in a period of rising interest rates, an fund that holds mortgage-related securities may exhibit additional volatility. This is known as extension risk. In addition, adjustable and fixed rate mortgage-related securities are subject to prepayment risk. When interest rates decline, borrowers may pay off their mortgages sooner than expected. This can reduce the returns of an fund because the fund will have to reinvest that money at the lower prevailing interest rates. If an fund purchases mortgage-backed or asset-backed securities that are subordinated to other interests in the same mortgage pool, the fund may receive payments only after the pool’s obligations to other investors have been satisfied. An unexpectedly high rate of defaults on the mortgages held by a mortgage pool may limit substantially the pool’s ability to make payments of principal or interest to the fund as a holder of such subordinated securities, reducing the values of those securities or in some cases rendering them worthless unexpectedly high or low rate of prepayments on a pool’s underlying mortgages may have a similar effect on subordinated securities. A mortgage pool may issue securities subject to various levels of subordination. The risk of non-payment affects securities at each level, although the risk is greater in the case of more |
| Mortgage-Related and Other Asset-Backed Risk (continued) |
highly subordinated securities. An fund’s investments in other asset-backed securities are subject to risks similar to those associated with mortgage-related securities, as well as additional risks associated with the nature of the assets and the servicing of those assets. Asset-backed securities represent interests in “pools” of assets, including consumer loans or receivables held in trust. Asset-backed, like traditional fixed-income securities, are subject to credit, interest rate, prepayment and extension risks. The Fund’s investments in asset-backed securities are subject to additional risks associated with the nature of the assets and the servicing of those assets. These securities also are subject to the risk of default on the underlying assets, particularly during periods of economic downturn. Asset-backed securities entail certain risks not presented by mortgage-backed securities, including the risk that, in certain states, it may be difficult to perfect the liens securing the collateral backing certain asset-backed securities. In addition, certain asset-backed securities are based on loans that are unsecured, which means that there is no collateral to seize if the underlying borrower defaults. |
| Options Risk • AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
The value of the Fund’s positions in index options fluctuates in response to changes in the value of the underlying index. Writing index call options reduces the risk of owning stocks, but it limits the opportunity to profit from an increase in the market value of stocks in exchange for up-front cash at the time of selling the call option. The Fund also risks losing all or part of the cash paid for purchasing index put options. Unusual market conditions or the lack of a ready market for any particular option at a specific time may reduce the effectiveness of the Fund’s option strategies, and for these and other reasons the Fund’s option strategies may not reduce the Fund’s volatility to the extent desired. From time to time, the Fund may reduce its holdings of put options, resulting in an increased exposure to a market decline. |
| Portfolio Turnover • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
The underlying fund may actively and frequently trade its portfolio securities. High portfolio turnover (100% or more) results in higher transaction costs and can adversely affect the underlying fund’s performance. |
| Privately Placed, Rule 144A and Other Exempt Securities Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
The Fund may invest in privately placed securities, which are subject to resale restrictions, and in Rule 144A securities and other types of exempt securities, which are not registered for sale pursuant to an exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These securities typically may be resold only to qualified institutional buyers, or in a privately negotiated transaction, or to a limited number of purchasers, or in limited quantities after they have been held for a specified period of time and other conditions are met for an exemption from registration. If there are an insufficient number of qualified institutional buyers interested in purchasing such securities at a particular time, the Fund may have difficulty selling such securities at a desirable time or price. As a result, the Fund’s investment in such securities may be subject to increased liquidity risk. In addition, the issuers of Rule 144A securities may require their qualified institutional buyers (such as the Fund) to keep certain offering information confidential, which could adversely affect the ability of the Fund to sell such securities. The illiquidity of the market, as well as the lack of publicly available information regarding these securities, may also adversely affect the ability to arrive at a fair value for certain securities at certain times and could make it difficult for the Fund to sell certain securities. |
| Profitability Investment Risk • AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund • AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund |
High relative profitability stocks may perform differently from the market as a whole and following a profitability-oriented strategy may cause the Fund to, at times, underperform equity funds that use other investment strategies. |
| Quantitative Investing Risk • AZL MVP Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi- Strategy Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
The value of securities selected using quantitative analysis can react differently to issuer, political, market, and economic developments than the market as a whole or securities selected using only fundamental analysis. The factors used in quantitative analysis and the weight placed on those factors may not be predictive of a security’s value. In addition, factors that affect a security’s value can change over time and these changes may not be reflected in the quantitative model. A quantitative model can be adversely affected by errors or imperfections in the factors or the data on which evaluations are based, or by technical issues with construction or implementation of the model, which in any case may result in a failure of the portfolio to perform as expected or a failure to identify securities |
| Quantitative Investing Risk (continued) |
that will perform well in the future. Successful operation of a quantitative model is also reliant upon the information technology systems of the Manager or Subadviser, as applicable, and its ability to ensure those systems remain operational and that appropriate disaster recovery procedures are in place. There can be no assurance that the Manager or Sub-Adviser will be successful in maintaining effective and operational trading models and the related hardware and software systems. |
| Real Estate Investments Risk • AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund • AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund • AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund • AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund • AZL MVP Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi- Strategy Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL Mid Cap Index Fund |
The performance of real estate investments (REITs) depends on the strength of real estate markets, REIT management and property management which can be affected by many factors, including national and regional economic conditions. Real estate is a cyclical business, highly sensitive to general and local economic developments and characterized by intense competition and periodic overbuilding. Real estate income and values may also be greatly affected by demographic trends, such as population shifts or changing tastes and values. Government actions, such as tax increases, zoning law changes or environmental regulations, may also have a major impact on real estate. Changing interest rates and credit quality requirements will also affect the cash flow of real estate companies and their ability to meet capital needs. Investing in companies operating in the real estate industry also exposes investors to the way in which these real estate companies are organized and operated. In addition to investing directly in real estate, these companies may engage directly in real estate management or development activities. Operating these companies requires specialized management skills and the Fund indirectly bears the management expenses of these companies along with the direct expenses of the Fund. Individual real estate companies may own a limited number of properties and may concentrate in a particular region or property type. |
| Repurchase Agreements and Purchase and Sale Contracts Risks • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
If the other party to a repurchase agreement or purchase and sale contract defaults on it obligation under the agreement, the Fund may suffer delays and incur costs or lose money in exercising its rights under the agreement. If the seller fails to repurchase the security in ether situation and the market value of the security declines, the Fund may lose money. |
| Security Quality Risk (also known as “High Yield Risk” or “Junk Bond Risk”) • AZL MVP Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi- Strategy Fund • AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
The fund may invest in high yield, high risk debt securities and unrated securities of similar credit quality (commonly known as “junk bonds”) may be subject to greater levels of credit and liquidity risk than funds that do not invest in such securities. These securities are considered predominately speculative with respect to the issuer’s continuing ability to make principal and interest payments. An economic downturn or period of rising interest rates could adversely affect the market for these securities and reduce the fund’s ability to sell these securities (liquidity risk). If the issuer of a security is in default with respect to interest or principal payments, the fund may lose the value of its entire investment. |
| Selection Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund • AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi- Strategy Fund • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
The underlying fund is an actively managed investment portfolio. The portfolio manager(s) make investment decisions for the underlying fund’s assets. However, there can be no guarantee they will produce the desired results and poor security selection may cause the underlying fund to underperform its benchmark index or other funds with similar investment objectives.Additionally, the AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund is an actively managed investment portfolio. The portfolio manager(s) make investment decisions for the Fund’s assets. Although the Fund seeks to provide returns in excess of the Index, market conditions or implementation of the Fund’s investment strategy may result in losses, and the Fund may not achieve the desired correlation with and/or may not outperform the Index. There can be no guarantee that the Fund’s investment approach will produce the desired results and poor security selection may cause the Fund to underperform its benchmark index or other funds with similar investment objectives. |
| Sovereign Debt Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
Sovereign debt instruments are subject to the risk that a governmental entity may delay or refuse to pay interest or repay principal on its sovereign debt, due, for example, to cash flow problems, insufficient foreign currency reserves, political considerations, the relative size of the governmental entity’s debt position in relation to the economy or the failure to put in place economic reforms required by the International Monetary Fund or other multilateral agencies. If a governmental entity defaults, it may ask for more time in which to pay or for further loans. There is no legal process for collecting sovereign debt that a government does not pay nor are there bankruptcy proceedings through which all or part of the sovereign debt that a governmental entity has not repaid may be collected. |
| Technology Sector Risk • AZL Index Strategy Funds • AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund • AZL MSCI Global Equity Index Fund • AZL S&P 500 Index Fund |
Technology companies, including information technology companies, face intense competition, both domestically and internationally, which may have an adverse effect on a company’s profit margins. Technology companies may have limited product lines, markets, financial resources or personnel. The products of technology companies may face obsolescence due to rapid technological developments, frequent new product introduction, unpredictable changes in growth rates and competition for the services of qualified personnel. Companies in the technology sector are heavily dependent on patent and other intellectual property rights. A technology company’s loss or impairment of these rights may adversely affect the company’s profitability. |
| Treasury Obligations Risk • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
Direct obligations of the U.S. Treasury have historically involved little risk of loss of principal if held to maturity. However, due to fluctuations in interest rates, the market value of such securities may vary during the period shareholders own shares of the Fund. Because U.S. Treasury obligations trade actively outside the United States, their prices may rise and fall as changes in global economic conditions affect the demand for these securities. In addition, changes in the credit rating or financial condition of the U.S. government may cause the value of U.S. Treasury Obligations to decline. |
| U.S. Government Obligations Risks • All of the Funds A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
Obligations of U.S. Government agencies, authorities, instrumentalities and sponsored enterprises have historically involved little risk of loss of principal if held to maturity. However, not all U.S. Government securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Obligations of certain agencies, authorities, instrumentalities and sponsored enterprises of the U.S. Government are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States (e.g., the Government National Mortgage Association); other obligations are backed by the right of the issuer to borrow from the U.S. Treasury (e.g., the Federal Home Loan Banks) and others are supported by the discretionary authority of the U.S. Government to purchase an agency’s obligations. Still others are backed only by the credit of the agency, authority, instrumentality or sponsored enterprise issuing the obligation. No assurance can be given that the U.S. Government would provide financial support to any of these entities if it is not obligated to do so by law. |
| Value Stocks Risk • AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL DFA International Core Equity Fund • AZL DFA U.S. Core Equity Fund • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
The value style of investing emphasizes stocks of undervalued companies whose characteristics may lead to improved valuations. These stocks may remain undervalued because value stocks, as a category, may lose favor with investors compared to other categories of stocks or because the valuations of these stocks do not improve in response to changing market or economic conditions. Value investing has also gone in and out of favor during past market cycles and is likely to continue to do so. During periods when value investing is out of favor or when markets are unstable, the securities of value companies may underperform the securities of growth companies or the overall stock market. |
| When-Issued and Delayed Delivery Securities and Forward Commitments Risk • AZL Index Strategy Funds • AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus • AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund • AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund A principal risk of these underlying funds: • AZL Enhanced Bond Index Fund • AZL T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund |
The purchase or sale of securities on a when issued basis or on a delayed delivery basis or through a forward commitment involves the purchase or sale of securities by the Fund at an established price with payment and delivery taking place in the future. The Fund enters into these transactions to obtain what is considered an advantageous price to the fund at the time of entering into the transaction. When-issued and delayed delivery securities and forward commitments involve the risk that the security the Fund buys will lose value prior to its delivery. There also is the risk that the security will not be issued or that the other party to the transaction will not meet its obligation. |
| Name of Fund |
Percentage of Average Net Assets for the Period Ended 12/31/2023 | |
| Before Fee Waivers |
After Fee Waivers | |
| AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
0.05% |
0.05% |
| AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
0.05% |
0.05% |
| AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
0.10% |
0.10% |
| AZL MVP Global Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
0.10% |
0.10% |
| AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
0.20% |
0.10% |
| AZL MVP Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
0.10% |
0.10% |
| AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund |
0.10% |
0.10% |
| AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund |
0.10% |
0.10% |
| AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund |
0.10% |
0.10% |
| Name of Fund |
Operating Expense Limitation (through April 30, 2025) |
| AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
0.20% |
| AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
0.20% |
| AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
0.20% |
| AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
0.15% |
| AZL MVP Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
0.15% |
| AZL MVP Global Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
0.15% |
| AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund |
0.20% |
| AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund |
0.15% |
| AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund |
0.15% |
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
| |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
$13.76 |
$17.96 |
$17.48 |
$16.46 |
$14.89 |
| Investment Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income/(Loss)(a) |
0.20 |
0.21 |
0.15 |
0.33 |
0.30 |
| Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments |
1.49 |
(2.97) |
1.56 |
1.62 |
2.22 |
| Total from Investment Activities |
1.69 |
(2.76) |
1.71 |
1.95 |
2.52 |
| Distributions to Shareholders From: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income |
(0.27) |
(0.37) |
(0.34) |
(0.33) |
(0.38) |
| Net Realized Gains |
(0.90) |
(1.07) |
(0.89) |
(0.60) |
(0.57) |
| Total Dividends |
(1.17) |
(1.44) |
(1.23) |
(0.93) |
(0.95) |
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
$14.28 |
$13.76 |
$17.96 |
$17.48 |
$16.46 |
| Total Return(b) |
13.21% |
(15.10)% |
10.04% |
12.24% |
17.24% |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) |
$347,625 |
$343,081 |
$445,174 |
$417,253 |
$397,402 |
| Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
1.43% |
1.35% |
0.85% |
2.01% |
1.87% |
| Expenses Before Reductions*(c) |
0.09% |
0.09% |
0.08% |
0.09% |
0.09% |
| Expenses Net of Reductions* |
0.09% |
0.09% |
0.08% |
0.09% |
0.09% |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
5% |
8% |
13% |
19% |
5% |
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
| |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
$11.05 |
$14.38 |
$14.04 |
$13.90 |
$12.37 |
| Investment Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income/(Loss)(a) |
0.21 |
0.16 |
0.11 |
0.24 |
0.25 |
| Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments |
1.19 |
(2.34) |
1.26 |
0.54 |
1.82 |
| Total from Investment Activities |
1.40 |
(2.18) |
1.37 |
0.78 |
2.07 |
| Distributions to Shareholders From: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income |
(0.06) |
(0.28) |
(0.26) |
(0.27) |
(0.29) |
| Net Realized Gains |
(0.12) |
(0.87) |
(0.77) |
(0.37) |
(0.25) |
| Total Dividends |
(0.18) |
(1.15) |
(1.03) |
(0.64) |
(0.54) |
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
$12.27 |
$11.05 |
$14.38 |
$14.04 |
$13.90 |
| Total Return(b) |
12.85% |
(14.87)% |
10.02% |
5.98% |
16.92% |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) |
$799,366 |
$240,254 |
$324,718 |
$320,488 |
$331,516 |
| Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
1.77% |
1.30% |
0.74% |
1.82% |
1.84% |
| Expenses Before Reductions*(c) |
0.13% |
0.14% |
0.13% |
0.14% |
0.14% |
| Expenses Net of Reductions* |
0.13% |
0.14% |
0.13% |
0.14% |
0.14% |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
16% |
7% |
10% |
13% |
9% |
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
| |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
$12.50 |
$16.66 |
$15.77 |
$16.02 |
$13.99 |
| Investment Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income/(Loss)(a) |
0.20 |
0.19 |
0.14 |
0.26 |
0.26 |
| Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments |
1.84 |
(2.76) |
2.36 |
0.42 |
2.55 |
| Total from Investment Activities |
2.04 |
(2.57) |
2.50 |
0.68 |
2.81 |
| Distributions to Shareholders From: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income |
(0.27) |
(0.26) |
(0.30) |
(0.29) |
(0.35) |
| Net Realized Gains |
(0.27) |
(1.33) |
(1.31) |
(0.64) |
(0.43) |
| Total Dividends |
(0.54) |
(1.59) |
(1.61) |
(0.93) |
(0.78) |
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
$14.00 |
$12.50 |
$16.66 |
$15.77 |
$16.02 |
| Total Return(b) |
16.81% |
(15.10)% |
16.40% |
4.73% |
20.52% |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) |
$1,999,828 |
$1,982,487 |
$2,641,569 |
$2,578,042 |
$2,722,348 |
| Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
1.50% |
1.32% |
0.82% |
1.76% |
1.67% |
| Expenses Before Reductions*(c) |
0.12% |
0.12% |
0.12% |
0.12% |
0.12% |
| Expenses Net of Reductions* |
0.12% |
0.12% |
0.12% |
0.12% |
0.12% |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
4% |
10% |
6% |
12% |
5% |
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
| |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
$11.61 |
$15.50 |
$15.11 |
$14.96 |
$13.28 |
| Investment Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income/(Loss)(a) |
0.18 |
0.17 |
0.12 |
0.26 |
0.26 |
| Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments |
1.46 |
(2.60) |
1.70 |
0.64 |
2.17 |
| Total from Investment Activities |
1.64 |
(2.43) |
1.82 |
0.90 |
2.43 |
| Distributions to Shareholders From: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income |
(0.24) |
(0.28) |
(0.30) |
(0.27) |
(0.32) |
| Net Realized Gains |
(0.17) |
(1.18) |
(1.13) |
(0.48) |
(0.43) |
| Total Dividends |
(0.41) |
(1.46) |
(1.43) |
(0.75) |
(0.75) |
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
$12.84 |
$11.61 |
$15.50 |
$15.11 |
$14.96 |
| Total Return(b) |
14.59% |
(15.38)% |
12.46% |
6.44% |
18.64% |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) |
$379,315 |
$391,943 |
$523,972 |
$533,854 |
$534,298 |
| Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
1.49% |
1.31% |
0.76% |
1.83% |
1.77% |
| Expenses Before Reductions*(c) |
0.14% |
0.13% |
0.13% |
0.13% |
0.13% |
| Expenses Net of Reductions* |
0.14% |
0.13% |
0.13% |
0.13% |
0.13% |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
3% |
8% |
6% |
18% |
5% |
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
| |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
2019† |
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
$9.44 |
$12.31 |
$12.31 |
$12.99 |
$11.62 |
| Investment Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income/(Loss)(a) |
0.14 |
0.12 |
0.08 |
0.19 |
0.18 |
| Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments |
1.12 |
(2.12) |
0.89 |
0.73 |
1.68 |
| Total from Investment Activities |
1.26 |
(2.00) |
0.97 |
0.92 |
1.86 |
| Distributions to Shareholders From: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income |
(0.41) |
(0.32) |
(0.20) |
(1.22) |
(0.23) |
| Net Realized Gains |
- |
(0.55) |
(0.77) |
(0.38) |
(0.26) |
| Total Dividends |
(0.41) |
(0.87) |
(0.97) |
(1.60) |
(0.49) |
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
$10.29 |
$9.44 |
$12.31 |
$12.31 |
$12.99 |
| Total Return(b) |
13.85% |
(16.09)% |
8.05% |
7.81% |
16.20% |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) |
$506,427 |
$517,879 |
$691,209 |
$716,925 |
$763,705 |
| Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
1.44% |
1.18% |
0.61% |
1.49% |
1.40% |
| Expenses Before Reductions*(c) |
0.14% |
0.13% |
0.13% |
0.13% |
0.66% |
| Expenses Net of Reductions* |
0.14% |
0.13% |
0.13% |
0.13% |
0.66% |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
6% |
5% |
5% |
9% |
103%(d) |
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
| |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
$12.12 |
$15.44 |
$14.52 |
$14.36 |
$12.99 |
| Investment Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income/(Loss)(a) |
0.16 |
0.29 |
0.08 |
0.22 |
0.38 |
| Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments |
1.27 |
(2.10) |
1.89 |
1.20 |
1.73 |
| Total from Investment Activities |
1.43 |
(1.81) |
1.97 |
1.42 |
2.11 |
| Distributions to Shareholders From: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income |
(0.37) |
(0.16) |
(0.25) |
(0.45) |
(0.16) |
| Net Realized Gains |
(1.16) |
(1.35) |
(0.80) |
(0.81) |
(0.58) |
| Total Dividends |
(1.53) |
(1.51) |
(1.05) |
(1.26) |
(0.74) |
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
$12.02 |
$12.12 |
$15.44 |
$14.52 |
$14.36 |
| Total Return(b) |
13.22% |
(11.41)% |
13.81% |
10.64% |
16.57% |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) |
$718,515 |
$723,314 |
$937,644 |
$940,773 |
$983,277 |
| Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
1.31% |
2.14% |
0.50% |
1.60% |
2.74% |
| Expenses Before Reductions*(c) |
0.08% |
0.08% |
0.07% |
0.08% |
0.07% |
| Expenses Net of Reductions* |
0.08% |
0.08% |
0.07% |
0.08% |
0.07% |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
44% |
10% |
6% |
18% |
6% |
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
| |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
$9.82 |
$12.21 |
$11.58 |
$12.03 |
$10.65 |
| Investment Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income/(Loss)(a) |
0.14 |
0.23 |
0.05 |
0.16 |
0.31 |
| Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments |
1.21 |
(1.69) |
1.51 |
0.22 |
1.36 |
| Total from Investment Activities |
1.35 |
(1.46) |
1.56 |
0.38 |
1.67 |
| Distributions to Shareholders From: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income |
(0.02) |
(0.11) |
(0.17) |
(0.34) |
(0.11) |
| Net Realized Gains |
(0.01) |
(0.82) |
(0.76) |
(0.49) |
(0.18) |
| Total Dividends |
(0.03) |
(0.93) |
(0.93) |
(0.83) |
(0.29) |
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
$11.14 |
$9.82 |
$12.21 |
$11.58 |
$12.03 |
| Total Return(b) |
13.69% |
(11.76)% |
13.74% |
3.77% |
15.81% |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) |
$1,413,804 |
$78,423 |
$99,979 |
$90,668 |
$95,959 |
| Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
1.38% |
2.10% |
0.42% |
1.44% |
2.71% |
| Expenses Before Reductions*(c) |
0.23% |
0.30% |
0.29% |
0.30% |
0.29% |
| Expenses Net of Reductions* |
0.13% |
0.15% |
0.15% |
0.15% |
0.15% |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
18% |
11% |
13% |
18% |
10% |
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
| |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
$11.03 |
$13.55 |
$13.00 |
$12.47 |
$11.17 |
| Investment Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income/(Loss)(a) |
0.20 |
0.10 |
0.05 |
0.27 |
0.27 |
| Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments |
1.18 |
(1.98) |
1.36 |
0.61 |
1.52 |
| Total from Investment Activities |
1.38 |
(1.88) |
1.41 |
0.88 |
1.79 |
| Distributions to Shareholders From: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income |
(0.18) |
(0.09) |
(0.36) |
(0.35) |
(0.49) |
| Net Realized Gains |
- |
(0.55) |
(0.50) |
- |
- |
| Total Dividends |
(0.18) |
(0.64) |
(0.86) |
(0.35) |
(0.49) |
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
$12.23 |
$11.03 |
$13.55 |
$13.00 |
$12.47 |
| Total Return(b) |
12.63% |
(13.81)% |
11.07% |
7.16% |
16.25% |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) |
$329,932 |
$182,383 |
$243,789 |
$254,918 |
$265,363 |
| Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
1.73% |
0.81% |
0.35% |
2.19% |
2.24% |
| Expenses Before Reductions*(c) |
0.15% |
0.15% |
0.14% |
0.15% |
0.14% |
| Expenses Net of Reductions* |
0.15% |
0.15% |
0.14% |
0.15% |
0.14% |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
21% |
8% |
3% |
6% |
7% |
| |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||
| |
2023 |
2022 |
2021 |
2020 |
2019 |
| Net Asset Value, Beginning of Period |
$11.23 |
$15.13 |
$14.07 |
$13.85 |
$11.96 |
| Investment Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income/(Loss)(a) |
0.16 |
0.11 |
0.12 |
0.19 |
0.25 |
| Net Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Investments |
1.69 |
(2.21) |
2.21 |
0.87 |
2.27 |
| Total from Investment Activities |
1.85 |
(2.10) |
2.33 |
1.06 |
2.52 |
| Distributions to Shareholders From: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Investment Income |
(1.00) |
(1.02) |
(0.55) |
(0.39) |
(0.25) |
| Net Realized Gains |
- |
(0.78) |
(0.72) |
(0.45) |
(0.38) |
| Total Dividends |
(1.00) |
(1.80) |
(1.27) |
(0.84) |
(0.63) |
| Net Asset Value, End of Period |
$12.08 |
$11.23 |
$15.13 |
$14.07 |
$13.85 |
| Total Return(b) |
17.36% |
(13.71)% |
17.04% |
8.02% |
21.39% |
| Ratios to Average Net Assets/Supplemental Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net Assets, End of Period (000’s) |
$1,160,227 |
$1,152,334 |
$1,477,978 |
$1,372,669 |
$1,325,661 |
| Net Investment Income/(Loss) |
1.37% |
0.85% |
0.78% |
1.41% |
1.90% |
| Expenses Before Reductions*(c) |
0.13% |
0.12% |
0.12% |
0.12% |
0.12% |
| Expenses Net of Reductions* |
0.13% |
0.12% |
0.12% |
0.12% |
0.12% |
| Portfolio Turnover Rate |
9% |
10% |
10% |
10% |
5% |
| Shareholder Reports and the SAI |
Contact a broker or investment adviser that sells products that offer the Funds. |
Contact the Funds at: 4400 Easton Commons, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio 43219 (toll-free) 1-800-624-0197 |
Access the Allianz Life website at: www.allianzlife.com/VariableInvestments (for the SAI) www.allianzlife.com/shareholderreports (for the shareholder reports) |
| Proxy Voting Records |
Access the Allianz Life website at: www.allianzlife.com/VariableInvestments | ||
| The AZL Index Strategy Funds AZL® Balanced Index Strategy Fund AZL® MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund AZL® MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund AZL® MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund AZL® DFA Multi-Strategy Fund AZL® MVP Global Balanced Index Strategy Fund AZL® MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund AZL® MVP Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund AZL® MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 9 | |
| 9 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 13 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 21 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 23 | |
| 23 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 25 | |
| 25 |
| 25 | |
| 26 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 28 | |
| 28 | |
| 28 | |
| 29 | |
| 29 | |
| 29 | |
| 29 | |
| 30 | |
| 30 | |
| 31 | |
| 31 | |
| 31 | |
| 32 | |
| 32 | |
| 33 | |
| 33 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 34 | |
| 34 | |
| 35 | |
| 36 | |
| 37 | |
| 37 | |
| 37 | |
| 39 | |
| 39 | |
| 39 | |
| 40 | |
| 40 | |
| 40 | |
| 44 | |
| 44 | |
| 45 | |
| 47 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 48 | |
| 48 |
| 49 | |
| 50 | |
| 51 | |
| 51 | |
| 51 | |
| 51 | |
| 52 | |
| 52 | |
| 52 | |
| 52 | |
| 52 | |
| 53 | |
| 62 |
| 62 | |
| 63 | |
| 63 | |
| 63 | |
| 64 | |
| A-1 | |
| A-1 | |
| A-2 | |
| B-1 | |
| B-1 | |
| B-4 |
| Recipient (holdings) |
Frequency |
Delay before dissemination |
| Bank of New York Mellon (Fund Custodian), The |
Daily |
No delay |
| Bloomberg |
Daily |
1 Day |
| Broadridge Investor Communications Solutions, Inc. (proxy voting services) |
As necessary |
No delay |
| Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. (Fund Accountant and Administrator) |
Daily |
No delay |
| Factset |
Daily |
1 Day |
| FIS Data Systems Inc. |
Daily |
1 Day |
| MSCI, Inc. |
Daily |
Next Calendar Day |
| Refinitiv |
Quarterly |
31 Calendar days after quarter end |
| State Street Bank and Trust Company (State Street) |
Daily |
No delay |
| Name, Address, and Birth Year |
Positions Held with the Trust |
Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number of Portfolios Overseen for the AIM Complex |
Other Directorships Held Outside the AIM Complex During Past 5 Years |
| NON-INTERESTED TRUSTEES(1) | |||||
| Peggy L. Ettestad (1957) 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
Lead Independent Trustee |
Since 10/14 (Trustee since 2/07) |
Managing Director, Red Canoe Management Consulting LLC, 2008 to present |
68 |
None |
| Tamara Lynn Fagely (1958) 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
Trustee |
Since 12/17 |
Retired; previously, Chief Operations Officer, Hartford Funds, 2012 to 2013 |
68 |
Diamond Hill Funds (10 funds) |
| Richard H. Forde (1953) 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
Trustee |
Since 12/17 |
Retired; previously, Member of the Board and Chairman of the Finance and Investment Committee, Connecticut Water Service, Inc., 2013 to 2019 |
68 |
Connecticut Water Service, Inc. |
| Name, Address, and Birth Year |
Positions Held with the Trust |
Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Number of Portfolios Overseen for the AIM Complex |
Other Directorships Held Outside the AIM Complex During Past 5 Years |
| Jack Gee (1959) 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
Trustee(3) |
Since 01/22 |
Retired; previously, Managing Director, BlackRock, Inc., Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer U.S. iShares, 2004 to 2019 |
68 |
TCW ETF Trust (3 funds); Esoterica Thematic Trust (2019 to 2020) |
| Claire R. Leonardi (1955) 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
Trustee |
Since 2/04 |
Retired; previously, CEO, Health eSense Inc. (a medical device company), 2015 to 2018, and Connecticut Innovations, Inc. (a venture capital firm), 2012 to 2015 |
68 |
None |
| INTERESTED TRUSTEES(4) | |||||
| Brian Muench (1970) 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
Trustee |
Since 6/11 |
President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, 2011 to present |
68 |
None |
| Officers | |||
| Name, Address, and Birth Year |
Positions Held with Allianz VIP and VIP FOF Trust |
Term of Office(2)/ Length of Time Served |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
| Brian Muench (1970) 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
President |
Since 11/10 |
President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, 2010 to present; Vice President, Allianz Life, 2011 to present. |
| Amanda Farren (1978) 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
Secretary and Chief Legal Officer |
Since 02/24 |
Chief Legal Officer, Allianz Investment Management LLC; Senior Counsel, Allianz Life, 2024 to present; Senior Vice President and Director, The Bank of New York Mellon, 2023; Vice President and Director, The Bank of New York, 2015 to 2023 |
| Bashir C. Asad (1963) Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc. 4400 Easton Commons, Suite 200 Columbus, OH 43219 |
Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer |
Since 06/16 |
Senior Vice President, Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc., 2011 to present |
| Chris R. Pheiffer (1968) 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
Chief Compliance Officer(1) and Anti- Money Laundering Compliance Officer |
Since 02/14 |
Chief Compliance Officer of the Trust and the VIP Trust, 2014 to present, and the ETF Trust, 2020 to present |
| Mike Tanski (1970) 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
Vice President |
Since 04/09 |
Assistant Vice President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, 2013 to present |
| Laura Quade (1969) 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
Vice President |
Since 08/23 |
Vice President, Allianz Investment Management LLC, 2023 to present, previously Director at Wealth Enhancement Group, November 2019 to November 2022, Vice President, Head of Operations at Hartford Funds 2014 to 2019 |
| Name of Director |
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in each Fund |
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in All Registered Investment Companies Overseen by Trustee in the AIM Complex |
| Peggy L. Ettestad 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
None |
$50,001-$100,000 |
| Tamara Lynn Fagely 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
None |
Over $100,000 |
| Richard H. Forde 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
None |
Over $100,000 |
| Name of Director |
Dollar Range of Equity Securities in each Fund |
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities in All Registered Investment Companies Overseen by Trustee in the AIM Complex |
| Jack Gee 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
None |
Over $100,000 |
| Claire R. Leonardi 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
None |
$10,001-$50,000 |
| Brian Muench 5701 Golden Hills Drive Minneapolis, MN 55416 |
None |
Over $100,000 |
| Name of Trustee |
Aggregate Compensation from the Trust |
Pension or Retirement Benefits Accrued as Part of the Trust’s Expenses |
Estimated Annual Benefits Upon Retirement |
Total Compensation from the Trusts |
| NON-INTERESTED TRUSTEES | ||||
| Peggy L. Ettestad |
$75,061 |
$0 |
N/A |
$229,125 |
| Jack Gee |
$64,004 |
$0 |
N/A |
$195,375 |
| Claire R. Leonardi |
$62,776 |
$0 |
N/A |
$191,625 |
| Dickson W. Lewis* |
$65,233 |
$0 |
N/A |
$199,125 |
| Tamara Lynn Fagely |
$67,690 |
$0 |
N/A |
$206,625 |
| Richard H. Forde |
$64,004 |
$0 |
N/A |
$195,375 |
| Fund/Shareholder |
Percent of the Class Total Assets Held by Allianz Life Insurance Company of North America* |
Percent of the Class Total Assets Held by Allianz Life Insurance Company of New York** |
| AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
93.37% |
6.63% |
| AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
90.74% |
9.26% |
| AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
89.68% |
10.32% |
| AZL MVP Global Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
87.43% |
12.57% |
| AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
89.54% |
10.46% |
| AZL MVP Fidelity Institutional Asset Management® Multi-Strategy Fund |
88.87% |
11.13% |
| AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund |
85.76% |
14.24% |
| AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund |
86.62% |
13.38% |
| AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund |
86.04% |
13.96% |
| Name of Fund |
Gross Management Fee |
| AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
0.05% |
| AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
0.10% |
| AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund |
0.10% |
| AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund |
0.10% |
| AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
0.05% |
| AZL MVP Global Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
0.10% |
| AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
0.20% |
| AZL MVP Fidelity Institutional Asset Management Multi-Strategy Fund |
0.10% |
| AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund |
0.10% |
| Name of Fund |
Expense Limitation for Fund |
| AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
0.20% |
| AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
0.20% |
| AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund |
0.20% |
| AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund |
0.15% |
| AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
0.20% |
| AZL MVP Global Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
0.15% |
| AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
0.15% |
| AZL MVP Fidelity Institutional Asset Management Multi-Strategy Fund |
0.15% |
| AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund |
0.15% |
| |
Period Ended December 31, 2023 |
Period Ended December 31, 2022 |
Period Ended December 31, 2021 | ||||||
| Fund |
Management Fees Earned |
Recoupment |
Management Fees Waived |
Management Fees Earned |
Recoupment |
Management Fees Waived |
Management Fees Earned |
Recoupment |
Management Fees Waived |
| AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
$172,112 |
$- |
$- |
$187,233 |
$- |
$- |
$218,288 |
$- |
$- |
| AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
356,643 |
- |
- |
397,328 |
- |
- |
477,947 |
- |
- |
| AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
693,718 |
- |
- |
269,877 |
- |
- |
327,626 |
- |
- |
| AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
2,281,950 |
92,445 |
1,140,954 |
171,705 |
- |
129,135 |
194,028 |
- |
97,012 |
| AZL MVP Fidelity Institutional Asset Management Multi-Strategy Fund |
308,323 |
7,061 |
- |
203,981 |
- |
7,061 |
255,091 |
- |
- |
| AZL MVP Global Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
511,146 |
- |
- |
575,974 |
- |
- |
710,033 |
- |
- |
| AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund |
1,976,580 |
- |
- |
2,186,853 |
- |
- |
2,646,200 |
- |
- |
| |
Period Ended December 31, 2023 |
Period Ended December 31, 2022 |
Period Ended December 31, 2021 | ||||||
| Fund |
Management Fees Earned |
Recoupment |
Management Fees Waived |
Management Fees Earned |
Recoupment |
Management Fees Waived |
Management Fees Earned |
Recoupment |
Management Fees Waived |
| AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund |
$382,873 |
$- |
$- |
$435,963 |
$- |
$- |
$533,593 |
$- |
$- |
| AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund |
1,158,377 |
- |
- |
1,259,102 |
- |
- |
1,443,610 |
- |
- |
| Portfolio Manager |
Other Registered Investment Company Accounts/ Assets Under Management |
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles/ Assets Under Management |
Other Accounts/ Assets Under Management |
| Brian Muench |
2 / $2.7 billion |
n/a |
n/a |
| Brian Mong |
1 / $1.4 billion |
n/a |
n/a |
| Josiah Highmark |
26 / $1.9 billion |
n/a |
n/a |
| Fund |
Total Brokerage Commission Paid for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2023 |
Total Brokerage Commission Paid for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
Total Brokerage Commission Paid for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2021 |
| AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
$- |
$- |
$- |
| AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
- |
- |
- |
| AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
1,121 |
1,603 |
313 |
| AZL MVP Global Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
665 |
3,065 |
2,512 |
| AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
1,255 |
387 |
95 |
| AZL MVP Fidelity Institutional Asset Management Multi-Strategy Fund |
754 |
1,330 |
355 |
| AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund |
2,682 |
17,302 |
2,196 |
| AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund |
448 |
2,567 |
492 |
| AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund |
1,540 |
9,541 |
1,334 |
| Fund |
Service Fees Earned |
Service Fees Waived |
| AZL Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
$71,509 |
$- |
| AZL MVP Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
78,269 |
- |
| AZL MVP Growth Index Strategy Fund |
104,586 |
- |
| AZL MVP Moderate Index Strategy Fund |
79,605 |
- |
| AZL DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
78,569 |
- |
| AZL MVP Global Balanced Index Strategy Fund |
75,424 |
- |
| AZL MVP DFA Multi-Strategy Fund |
75,644 |
- |
| AZL MVP Fidelity Institutional Asset Management Multi-Strategy Fund |
75,546 |
- |
| AZL MVP T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Plus Fund |
92,647 |
- |
PART C
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 28. EXHIBITS
ITEM 29. PERSONS CONTROLLED BY OR UNDER COMMON CONTROL WITH REGISTRANT
The Company organizational chart is incorporated in this filing as Exhibit (r).
ITEM 30. INDEMNIFICATION
The Trust’s Agreement and Declaration of Trust provides that the Trust will indemnify its Trustees and officers against liabilities and expenses incurred in connection with litigation in which they may be involved because of their offices with the Trust, except if it is determined in the manner specified in the Agreement and Declaration of Trust that they have not acted in good faith in the reasonable belief that their actions were in or not opposed to the best interests of the Trust or that such indemnification would relieve any officer or Trustee of any liability to the Trust or its shareholders by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of his or her duties or, in a criminal proceeding, such Trustee or officers had reasonable cause to believe their conduct was unlawful. The Trust, at its expense, provides liability insurance for the benefit of its Trustees and officers.
Insofar as indemnification for liability arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed i n the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
ITEM 31. BUSINESS AND OTHER CONNECTIONS OF INVESTMENT ADVISER
Allianz Investment Management LLC (previously Allianz Life Advisers, LLC) - this information is included in Form ADV (CRD #111925) filed with the SEC by Allianz Life Investment Management LLC and is incorporated by reference herein.
ITEM 32. PRINCIPAL UNDERWRITER
| (a) | Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC (“ALFS”), whose address is 5701 Golden Hills Drive, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416, serves as the Funds’ distributor. ALFS is affiliated with the Manager. ALFS acts a principal underwriter for the following investment companies: |
Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust
Allianz Variable Insurance Products Trust
| (b) | Officers and Directors. |
| Name & Principal Business Address* | Position with Underwriter | |
| Corey Walther |
Governor and President | |
| Eric J. Thomes |
Governor, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Manager | |
| William E. Gaumond |
Governor | |
| Amy K. Borden |
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | |
| Matthew C. Dian |
Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer | |
| Kristine M. Lord-Krahn |
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary | |
| John C. Helmen |
Assistant Vice President, Distribution National Accounts | |
| Nicole D. Van Walbeek |
Assistant Secretary |
*5701 Golden Hills Drive, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
| (c) | Not applicable. |
ITEM 33. LOCATION OF ACCOUNTS AND RECORDS
All accounts, books and other documents required to be maintained by Section 31(a) of the Investment Company Act and the rules thereunder are maintained at the offices of:
Allianz Investment Management LLC, 5701 Golden Hills Drive, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
Allianz Life Financial Services, LLC, 5701 Golden Hills Drive, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
Business Data Record Services, 201 9th Ave SW, New Brighton, MN 55112
Citi Fund Services Ohio, Inc., 4400 Easton Commons, Ste 200, Columbus, Ohio 43219
FIS Investors Services LLC, 4249 Easton Way, Ste 400, Columbus, Ohio 43219
The Bank of New York Mellon, One Wall Street, New York, New York 10286
ITEM 34. MANAGEMENT SERVICES
N/A
ITEM 35. UNDERTAKINGS
N/A
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 and Investment Company Act of 1940, the Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for effectiveness of this Post-Effective Amendment to its Registration Statement pursuant to Rule 485(b) under the Securities Act of 1933 and has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed below on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Golden Valley, in the State of Minnesota on the 29th day of April, 2024.
| ALLIANZ VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS FUND OF FUNDS TRUST | ||||||
| By: | /s/ Brian Muench | |||||
|
|
||||||
| Brian Muench, President | ||||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement of Allianz Variable Insurance Products Fund of Funds Trust has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
| Signature
|
Title
|
Date
| ||||
| /s/ Brian Muench |
Trustee and President (principal executive officer) | April 29, 2024 | ||||
| Brian Muench | ||||||
| /s/ Bashir C. Asad |
Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer) | April 29, 2024 | ||||
| Bashir C. Asad | ||||||
| /s/ Peggy L. Ettestad* |
Trustee | April 29, 2024 | ||||
| Peggy L. Ettestad | ||||||
| /s/ Claire R. Leonardi* |
Trustee | April 29, 2024 | ||||
| Claire R. Leonardi | ||||||
| /s/ Tamara Lynn Fagely* |
Trustee | April 29, 2024 | ||||
| Tamara Lynn Fagely | ||||||
| /s/ Richard H. Forde* |
Trustee | April 29, 2024 | ||||
| Richard H. Forde | ||||||
| /s/ Jack Gee* |
Trustee | April 29, 2024 | ||||
| Jack Gee | ||||||
| *By: | /s/ Brian Muench | |
|
| ||
| Brian Muench | ||
| Attorney-in-Fact | ||
| (Pursuant to Powers of Attorney filed herewith) |
EXHIBITS INDEX