XML 47 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

5. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Financial instruments, including cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses are carried in the consolidated financial statements at amounts that approximate fair value at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Fair values are based on market prices and assumptions concerning the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows and assumed discount rates, reflecting varying degrees of perceived risk. Management believes that the Company’s debt obligations bear interest at rates which approximate prevailing market rates for instruments with similar characteristics and, accordingly, the carrying values for these instruments approximate fair value.

GAAP defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, the inputs used to measure fair value are prioritized based on a three-level hierarchy. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

 

  •   Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

  •   Level 2—Other inputs that are observable directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities or market corroborated inputs.

 

  •   Level 3—Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available, which requires the Company to develop its own assumptions about how market participants would value the assets or liabilities.

 

The following table details the fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (in thousands):

 

            Fair Value Measurements Using  
     Amounts
at Fair
Value
     Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
     Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 

At March 31, 2014

           

Assets—Cash Equivalents:

           

Money market funds

   $ 185,068       $ 185,068       $ —        $ —    

Certificates of deposit

     1,097         —           1,097         —     

Municipal securities

     4,791         —           4,791         —     

Assets—Short-Term Investments:

           

U.S. government agency bonds

   $ 2,101       $ —        $ 2,101       $ —    

Corporate bonds and commercial paper

     8,473         —           8,473         —     

International government bonds

     9,134         —           9,134         —     

Municipal securities

     21,951         —           21,951         —     

Certificates of deposit

     15,019         —           15,019         —     

At December 31, 2013

           

Assets—Cash Equivalents:

           

Money market funds

   $ 226,130       $ 226,130       $ —        $ —    

Certificates of deposit

     998         —           998         —     

Municipal securities

     2,000         —           2,000         —     

Assets—Short-Term Investments:

           

U.S. government agency bonds

   $ 4,501       $ —        $ 4,501       $ —    

Corporate bonds and commercial paper

     3,317         —           3,317         —     

Municipal securities

     19,703         —           19,703         —     

Certificates of deposit

     9,612         —           9,612         —     

When developing fair value estimates, the Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to measure fair value. If market prices are not available, the fair value measurement is based on models that use primarily market based parameters including yield curves, volatilities, credit ratings and currency rates. In certain cases where market rate assumptions are not available, the Company is required to make judgments about assumptions market participants would use to estimate the fair value of a financial instrument.

The valuation technique used to measure fair value for the Company’s Level 1 and Level 2 assets and liabilities is a market approach that uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company did not carry Level 3 assets or liabilities.