XML 59 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT

Note 5 - Fair Value of Financial Instruments

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2013

Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]

Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

NOTE 5 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The fair value measurement guidance clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received upon selling an asset or paid upon transferring a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under the fair value measurement guidance are described below:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 — Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

Level 3 — Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

The following table sets forth certain fair value information at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 for financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy, as well as cost or amortized cost. As required by the fair value measurement guidance, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of inputs that is significant to the fair value measurement.

						Fair Value at September 30, 2013
			Cost or Amortized Cost at September 30, 2013			Total				Level 1				Level 2				Level 3
		(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash equivalents (including restricted cash accounts)		$	67,234			$	67,234			$	67,234			$	—			$	—
Derivatives:
Put options on oil price⁽¹⁾			—				142				—				142				—
Currency forward contracts⁽²⁾			—				2,952				—				2,952				—
Swap transaction on natural gas price⁽³⁾			—				1,353				—				1,353				—
		$	67,234			$	71,681			$	67,234			$	4,447			$	—

						Fair Value at December 31, 2012
			Cost or Amortized Cost at December 31, 2012			Total				Level 1				Level 2				Level 3
		(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash equivalents (including restricted cash accounts)		$	54,298			$	54,298			$	54,298			$	—			$	—
Derivatives:
Put options on oil price⁽¹⁾			—				1,842				—				1,842				—
Currency forward contracts⁽²⁾			—				1,675				—				1,675				—
Swap transaction on natural gas price⁽³⁾			—				2,804				—				2,804				—
Swap transaction on oil price⁽⁴⁾			—				336				—				336				—
		$	54,298			$	60,955			$	54,298			$	6,657			$	—



(1)	This amount relates to derivatives which represent European put transactions on oil prices, valued primarily based on observable inputs, including forward and spot prices for related commodity indices, and are included within "prepaid expenses and other" in the condensed consolidated balance sheet with the corresponding gain or loss being recognized within "electricity revenues" in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

(2)	This amount relates to derivatives which represent currency forward contracts, valued primarily based on observable inputs, including forward and spot prices for currencies, netted against contracted rates and then multiplied against notational amounts, and are included within "prepaid expenses and other" in the condensed consolidated balance sheet with the corresponding gain or loss being recognized within "foreign currency translation and transaction gains (losses)" in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

(3)

This amount relates to derivatives which represent swap contracts on natural gas prices, valued primarily based on observable inputs, including forward and spot prices for related commodity indices, and are included within "prepaid expenses and other" in the condensed consolidated balance sheet with the corresponding gain or loss being recognized within "electricity revenues" in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

(4)

This amount relates to derivatives which represent swap contracts on oil prices, valued primarily based on observable inputs, including forward and spot prices for related commodity indices, and are included within "prepaid expenses and other" in the condensed consolidated balance sheet with the corresponding gain or loss being recognized within "electricity revenues" in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

The following table presents the amounts of gain (loss) recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) on derivative instruments not designated as hedges:

			Amount of recognized gain (loss)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments	Location of recognized gain (loss)		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
			2013				2012				2013				2012
			(Dollars in thousands)								(Dollars in thousands)
Put options on oil price	Electricity revenues		$	(824	)		$	(198	)		$	(1,256	)		$	(198	)
Swap transaction on oil price	Electricity revenues			—				(3,197	)			(294	)			1,123
Swap transactions on natural gas price	Electricity revenues			477				(421	)			81				(872	)
Currency forward contracts	Foreign currency translation and transaction gains (losses)			1,970				(137	)			4,895				(774	)

			$	1,623			$	(3,953	)		$	3,426			$	(721	)

On September 3, 2013, the Company entered into NGI swap contract for notional volume of approximately 4.4 million MMbtus with a bank for settlement effective January 1, 2014 until December 31, 2014, in order to reduce its exposure to NGI below $4.035 per MMbtu under its PPAs with Southern California Edison. The contract did not have up-front costs. Under the term of this contract, the Company will make floating rate payments to the bank and receive fixed rate payments from the bank on each settlement date. The swap contract has monthly settlement whereby the difference between the fixed price of $4.035 per MMbtu and the market price on the first commodity business day on which the relevant commodity reference price is published in the relevant calculation period (January 1, 2014 to December 1, 2014) will be settled on a cash basis. This contract will not be designated as hedge transaction and will be marked to market with the corresponding gains or losses recognized within “electricity revenues” in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

On October 17, 2013, the Company entered into NGI swap contract for notional volume of approximately 4.2 million MMbtus with a bank effective from January 1, 2014 until December 31, 2014 (see Note 15 for discussion of this contract).

On October 17, 2013, the Company entered into New York Harbor ULSD swap contract for notional volume of 275,000 barrels (“BBL”) with a bank effective from January 1, 2014 until December 31, 2014 (see Note 15 for discussion of this contract).

The Company’s financial assets measured at fair value (including restricted cash accounts) at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 include short-term bank deposits and money market funds (which are included in cash equivalents). Those assets are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in an active market.

There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt approximates its carrying amount, except for the following:

		Fair Value								Carrying Amount
		September 30, 2013				December 31, 2012				September 30, 2013				December 31, 2012
		(Dollars in millions)								(Dollars in millions)
Olkaria III loan - DEG		$	44.7			$	48.8			$	43.4			$	47.4
Olkaria III Loan - OPIC			241.4				220.0				258.8				220.0
Amatitlan loan			35.7				38.9				32.2				34.3
Senior secured notes:
Ormat Funding LLC ("OFC")			88.5				105.0				96.2				114.1
OrCal Geothermal LLC ("OrCal")			74.8				77.3				74.0				76.5
OFC 2 LLC ("OFC 2")			121.3				131.2				146.6				150.5
Senior unsecured bonds			265.8				273.2				250.7				250.9
Loans from institutional investors			22.2				27.7				21.5				27.0

The fair value of OFC Senior Secured Notes is determined using observable market prices as these securities are traded. The fair value of other long-term debt is determined by a valuation model, which is based on a conventional discounted cash flow methodology and utilizes assumptions of estimated current borrowing rates.

The carrying value of other financial instruments, such as revolving lines of credit, deposits, and other long-term debt approximates fair value.

The following table presents the fair value of financial instruments as of September 30, 2013:

		Level 1				Level 2				Level 3				Total
		(Dollars in millions)
Olkaria III loan - DEG		$	—			$	—			$	44.7			$	44.7
Olkaria III loan - OPIC			—				—				241.4				241.4
Amatitlan loan			—				—				35.7				35.7
Senior secured notes:
OFC			—				88.5				—				88.5
OrCal			—				—				74.8				74.8
OFC 2			—				—				121.3				121.3
Senior unsecured bonds			—				—				265.8				265.8
Loan from institutional investors			—				—				22.2				22.2
Other long-term debt			—				28.3				—				28.3
Revolving lines of credit			—				123.3				—				123.3
Deposits			21.0				—				—				21.0

The entire disclosure for the fair value of financial instruments (as defined), including financial assets and financial liabilities (collectively, as defined), and the measurements of those instruments as well as disclosures related to the fair value of non-financial assets and liabilities. Such disclosures about the financial instruments, assets, and liabilities would include: (1) the fair value of the required items together with their carrying amounts (as appropriate); (2) for items for which it is not practicable to estimate fair value, disclosure would include: (a) information pertinent to estimating fair value (including, carrying amount, effective interest rate, and maturity, and (b) the reasons why it is not practicable to estimate fair value; (3) significant concentrations of credit risk including: (a) information about the activity, region, or economic characteristics identifying a concentration, (b) the maximum amount of loss the entity is exposed to based on the gross fair value of the related item, (c) policy for requiring collateral or other security and information as to accessing such collateral or security, and (d) the nature and brief description of such collateral or security; (4) quantitative information about market risks and how such risks are managed; (5) for items measured on both a recurring and nonrecurring basis information regarding the inputs used to develop the fair value measurement; and (6) for items presented in the financial statement for which fair value measurement is elected: (a) information necessary to understand the reasons for the election, (b) discussion of the effect of fair value changes on earnings, (c) a description of [similar groups] items for which the election is made and the relation thereof to the balance sheet, the aggregate carrying value of items included in the balance sheet that are not eligible for the election; (7) all other required (as defined) and desired information.

+ References+ Details