XML 54 R41.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
CONTINGENCIES - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
Mar. 31, 2012
Securities Class Actions
LegalMatter
Mar. 31, 2012
Securities Class Actions First Lawsuit
Mar. 31, 2012
Securities Class Actions Second Lawsuit
Mar. 31, 2012
Securities Class Actions Third Lawsuit
Mar. 31, 2012
Stockholder Derivative Cases
LegalMatter
Mar. 31, 2012
Stockholder Derivative Cases For County Of Washoe
LegalMatter
Mar. 31, 2012
Stockholder Derivative Cases For District Of Nevada
LegalMatter
Mar. 31, 2012
Stockholder Derivative Cases For County Of Washoe First Lawsuit
Mar. 31, 2012
Stockholder Derivative Cases For County Of Washoe Second Lawsuit
Mar. 31, 2012
Stockholder Derivative Cases For District Of Nevada First Lawsuit
Mar. 31, 2012
Stockholder Derivative Cases For District Of Nevada Second Lawsuit
Jan. 04, 2012
Jurisdictional threshold
North Brawley Project
MW
Jan. 04, 2012
Jurisdictional threshold
East Brawley Project
MW
Loss Contingencies [Line Items]                            
Number of lawsuits filed   3       4 2 2            
Lawsuit filing date     2010-03-09 2010-03-18 2010-04-07       2010-03-16 2010-04-21 2010-03-29 2010-06-07    
Cash payment to be funded by the company if the proposed class action dismissed $ 3.1                          
Descriptions of derivative cases filed             The two stockholder derivative cases filed in the Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada in and for the County of Washoe were consolidated by the Court in an order dated May 27, 2010 The two stockholder derivative cases filed in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada were consolidated by the Court in an order dated August 31, 2010            
Descriptions of derivative cases filed by plaintiff             Plaintiffs filed a consolidated derivative complaint on September 7, 2010. Plaintiffs filed a consolidated derivative complaint on October 28, 2010.            
Descriptions of derivative cases filed by defendant             In accordance with a stipulation between the parties, defendants filed a motion to dismiss on November 16, 2010. The Company filed a motion to dismiss on December 13, 2010.            
Expected generating capacity                         50 50