-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, NtIuYQT4vjGfCKbCeMU6DB7DbP4oXBdrkLmZ/yce4TJLQyc2Vg1iFFpx2YPqnnI3 O74OEYtjMYuqd3CFd9PVkg== 0000950136-07-001418.txt : 20070731 0000950136-07-001418.hdr.sgml : 20070731 20070307091518 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950136-07-001418 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: CORRESP PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 1 FILED AS OF DATE: 20070307 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001296445 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: ELECTRIC SERVICES [4911] IRS NUMBER: 880326081 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: CORRESP BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 6225 NEIL ROAD, SUITE 300 CITY: RENO STATE: NV ZIP: 89511-1136 BUSINESS PHONE: 775-356-9029 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 6225 NEIL ROAD, SUITE 300 CITY: RENO STATE: NV ZIP: 89511-1136 CORRESP 1 filename1.htm


                                             [LOGO OMITTED]




January 29, 2007

Mr. William Choi, Branch Chief
Division of Corporation Finance
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street NE
Washington, D.C. 20549.
Mail Stop 3561


Dear Mr. Choi:


Re:   ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
      31, 2005 - FILE NO. 001-32347

      Ormat Technologies, Inc. (the "Company", the "Registrant" or "Ormat")
acknowledges receipt of the letter dated December 29, 2006 (the "Staff Letter")
from the Division of Corporation Finance of the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Staff"). Reference is also made to the conversation
between Mr. Joseph Tenne, the Company's Chief Financial Officer, and Ms. Yong
Kim on January 9, 2007, during which it was agreed that the Company would
respond to the Staff Letter by January 31, 2007. All references to "we" and
"our" hereinafter refer to the Company.

      In several of our responses below, we have accepted the Staff's comments
and have agreed to change or supplement the disclosure in our filings. We are
doing so in the spirit of cooperation with the Staff and not because we believe
our prior filings contain any material misstatements or omissions. Accordingly,
any changes implemented in future filings should not be taken as an admission
that prior disclosures contained any material misstatements or omissions.

      We acknowledge that the Company is responsible for the adequacy and
accuracy of the disclosure in its filing and that Staff comments or changes to
disclosures in response to Staff comments do not foreclose the Commission from
taking any action with respect to the filing. We also represent that we will not
assert Staff comments as a defense in any proceeding initiated by the Commission
or any person under the federal securities laws of the United States.

      Adopting the numbering in the Staff Letter, we respectfully respond as
follows:


ORMAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
6225 Neil Road, Suite 300 o Reno, NV  89511-1136 o  Telephone: (775) 356-9029
o Facsimile: (775) 356-9039






Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005
- -----------------------------------------------------

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of
Operations, page 62
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comparison of the Year Ended December 31, 2005 and the Year Ended December 31,
2004, page 77
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1.    SEC Comment
      -----------

      We note that revenues attributable to your Products Segment for the year
      ended December 31, 2005 did not increase or decrease significantly from
      revenues in that segment for the year ended December 31, 2004. We also
      note your statement on page 63 that revenues attributable to your Products
      Segment are far less predictable and may vary significantly. In light of
      this statement, please revise future filings to describe the significant
      components of revenues attributable to your Products Segment in order to
      increase the reader's understanding of your results of operations in
      instances when insignificant year-to-year variances are simply
      coincidental. Refer to item 303 (a)(3)(i) of regulation S-K.

      Registrant's Response
      ---------------------

      We accept the Staff's request and future filings will be revised
      accordingly.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, page 102
- -----------------------------------------------

2.    SEC Comment
      -----------

      Please tell us your basis for presenting cash flows related to marketable
      securities and change in restricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable
      securities on a net basis in your presentation of cash flows from
      investing activities rather than separately presenting cash in-flows and
      out-flows.

      Registrant's Response
      ---------------------

      As discussed in Note 1 to the Company's consolidated financial statements
      included in the 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K, marketable securities
      consist of debt securities (mainly auction rate securities and commercial
      papers). Restricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
      consist of funds that will be used to satisfy obligations due under the
      terms of certain long-term debt agreements which terms require the Company
      to maintain certain debt service reserve, cash collateral and operating
      fund accounts. Such funds are invested primarily in money market accounts,
      auction rate securities and commercial papers with a minimum investment
      grade of "AA". At December 31, 2005, the Company's investments in
      marketable securities and restricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable
      securities were classified as available-for-sale securities.

      Paragraphs 11-13 of SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows, states that
      certain items may qualify for net reporting "because their turnover is
      quick, their amounts are large, and their maturities are short." Based on
      this guidance, the Company has presented cash flows related to



                                       2


      marketable securities and restricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable
      securities on a net basis in cash flows from investing activities rather
      than separately presenting cash in-flows and out-flows.

      The following table demonstrates that turnover is quick and the amounts
      are large for these securities:





                                                                QUARTER ENDED
                                   ------------------------------------------------------------------------  BALANCE AT
                                    MARCH 31,      JUNE 30,    SEPTEMBER 30,   DECEMBER 31,   TOTAL CHANGE   DECEMBER 31,
                                       2005          2005          2005            2005       FOR THE YEAR      2005
                                   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                       (IN MILLIONS)
       Marketable securities:
            Purchases                    $74.7        $131.9          $57.6           $71.4        $335.6
            Sales                       (134.8)       (103.2)         (60.9)          (82.3)       (381.2)
                                   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Net                         ($60.1)         $28.7         ($3.3)         ($10.8)       ($45.6)          $43.6
                                   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       Restricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities:
            Purchases                    $27.8         $49.4          $40.7           $53.8        $171.7
            Sales                        (16.8)        (39.6)         (45.0)          (56.6)       (158.0)
                                   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Net                          $11.0          $9.8         ($4.3)          ($2.7)         $13.7          $36.7
                                   ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




      The maturities of the securities are longer than 90 days; however, due to
      the fact that the interest rates are reset each period, generally every 7
      to 35 days, their actual maturities are considered to be short. The
      short-term nature of these securities is further demonstrated by the
      volume of cash in-flows and cash out-flows as shown in the table above.

      For the reasons set forth above, the Company believes it is appropriate
      and consistent with the guidance in paragraphs 11-13 of SFAS No. 95,
      Statement of Cash Flows, to present cash flows related to marketable
      securities and restricted cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
      on a net basis in cash flows from investing activities rather than
      separately presenting cash in-flows and out-flows.

Note 10 - Refinancing of the Puna Project, page 130
- ---------------------------------------------------

3.    SEC Comment
      -----------

      We note that you present the prepayment on the Head Lease as a cash flow
      from operating activities within your consolidated statement of cash flows
      for the year ended December 31, 2005. We further note that you filed an
      Item 4.02 Form 8-K on December 21, 2005 to disclose that you concluded in
      error that the receipt of this cash was a financing cash flow. Please tell
      us your basis for both your initial conclusion as at the time of your
      initial filing of the Forms 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended June 30,
      2005 and September 30, 2005 and the reason for your subsequent conclusion
      at December 21, 2005. Please include all the facts and circumstances that
      would be helpful to our understanding of your conclusions. In addition,
      please tell us your basis in GAAP for recognizing the Head Lease
      prepayment as revenue over the period of the lease.



                                       3



      Registrant's Response
      ---------------------

      In May 2005, funds were received totaling $78.6 million from the lessee
      related to an operating lease transaction (Lease out, Lease in ("LOLI")
      transaction). This amount consisted of $71.0 million of prepaid rent and a
      contingent prepayment of $7.6 million which subsequently totaled
      approximately $12.0 million. The $7.6 million prepayment was not to be
      used by the Company until certain wells were drilled (subject to a new
      lease). According to the lease agreements, if the wells were not
      successful, or not drilled, or certain operating conditions were not met
      by December 2005, the amount was to be returned. Therefore, the $7.6
      million amount received was recorded as an advance and was initially
      included in the cash flow statement in operating activities as a component
      of the change in accrued liabilities since there was no assurance at the
      end of the second quarter that such amount would not need to be returned
      to the lessee (completion of the wells contingency). The $71.0 million
      prepaid rent and related $3.3 million in initial direct lease costs were
      recorded as a deferred rent liability, to be amortized over the lease
      term, and were initially included in the statement of cash flows for the
      six months ended June 30, 2005 as a financing activity because of the
      relatively long length of the lease period (31 years).

      In November 2005, while preparing the statement of cash flows for the nine
      months ended September 30, 2005, the question of the proper treatment of
      the $7.6 million prepayment in the statement of cash flows was brought to
      the attention of the Company's Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") by the
      parties responsible for the preparation and review of the cash flow
      statement. As a result of the CFO's analysis, management reached the view
      that the prepayment should be included in cash flows from financing
      activities, and not in operating activities. Therefore, the Company's
      quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
      2005 (the "Third Quarter Form 10-Q") was filed with the prepayment
      recorded as a financing activity. Management, after consultation with
      legal counsel and the audit committee, initially concluded that it would
      be prudent for the Company to amend the quarterly report on Form 10-O for
      the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Second Quarter Form 10-Q")
      to reflect the $7.6 million prepayment as a financing activity.

      Prior to amending the Second Quarter Form 10-Q, a process was undertaken
      by the Company to review all of the forgoing circumstances and applicable
      accounting literature. Paragraph 21 of SFAS No. 95 indicates that
      "Operating activities include all transactions and other events that are
      not defined as investing or financing activities in paragraphs 15-20.
      Operating activities generally involve producing and delivering goods and
      providing services. Cash flows from operating activities are generally the
      cash effect of transactions and other events that enter into the
      determination of net income." The Company, after reviewing all of the
      circumstances and based on the guidance in paragraph 21 of SFAS No. 95,
      reached the conclusion that both the $71.0 million prepaid rent and the
      $7.6 million prepayment received from the lessee should be included in the
      statements of cash flows in operating activities rather than in financing
      activities. Management, after consultation with legal counsel and the
      audit committee, concluded that it would be prudent for the Company to
      amend the Second Quarter Form 10-Q and the Third Quarter Form 10-Q to
      include the $71.0 million prepaid rent and related $3.3 million in initial



                                       4



      direct costs, and the $7.6 million prepayment, in operating activities in
      the statements of cash flows. The amendments were filed on December 22,
      2005.

      As to the recognition of the Head Lease prepayment as revenue over the
      period of the lease, since it is an operating lease, and is not dependant
      on, or subject to any conditions, the Company concluded that the rent
      revenue should be recognized ratably over the lease period on a
      straight-line basis, in accordance with paragraph 19b of SFAS No. 13,
      Accounting for Leases.


Exhibit 31.1 and 31.2
- ---------------------

4.    SEC Comment
      -----------

      Please revise your future filings so that your certifications read exactly
      as set forth in item 601 (b)(31) of Regulation S-K. Specifically, your
      reference to the "annual report" in paragraphs two, three and four is
      incorrect. Please change this paragraph to refer only to the "report."

      Registrant's Response
      ---------------------

      We accept the Staff's request and future filings will be revised
      accordingly.


Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2006
- -----------------------------------------------------------

Controls and Procedures, page 62
- --------------------------------

5.    SEC Comment
      -----------

      We note that your officers concluded that your disclosure controls and
      procedures were effective to ensure that the information required to be
      disclosed by you in your quarterly report was recorded, processed,
      summarized and reported accurately and within the time periods specified
      within the SEC's rules and instructions for Form 10-Q. In future filings,
      please revise to clarify, if true, that your officers concluded that your
      disclosure controls and procedures are also effective to ensure that
      information required to be disclosed in the reports that you file or
      submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to your
      management, including your chief executive officer and chief financial
      officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. See
      Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e).

      Registrant's Response
      ---------------------

      We accept the Staff's request and future filings will be revised
      accordingly.



                                       5





      We trust that the responses provided above address the issues raised in
the Staff Letter. If you have any questions or require further clarification,
please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at Tel: 1-775-356-9029 or
1-775-303-3406.


Sincerely,


Joseph Tenne
Chief Financial Officer
Ormat Technologies, Inc.






                                       6
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----