XML 22 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT  v2.3.0.11
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
6 Months Ended
Jun. 26, 2011
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Our financial instruments consist primarily of cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, derivative financial instruments and debt, including obligations under capital leases. The carrying values of financial instruments other than derivative financial instruments and fixed-rate debt approximated their fair values as of June 26, 2011 and December 26, 2010 due to their short-term maturities or market rates of interest. Derivative financial instruments were recorded at fair value (Note 6). As of June 26, 2011 and December 26, 2010, the fair value of our floating-rate debt, consisting of our asset-based revolving credit facility and the revolving loan under our Canadian credit facility, approximated carrying value due to our ability to borrow at comparable terms in the open market.
Our 10.5% Senior Secured Notes due 2013, issued on July 2, 2009 (Note 4), had a carrying value of $296.2 million and an estimated fair value of $314.3 million as of June 26, 2011, and a carrying value of $295.5 million and an estimated fair value of $319.5 million as of December 26, 2010. Our 8.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 (Note 4) had a carrying value of $325.0 million and an estimated fair value of $295.8 million and $295.1 million as of June 26, 2011 and December 26, 2010, respectively. The fair values of the senior secured notes and senior subordinated notes were determined based on the last trade price of the debt prior to close of trading on June 24, 2011 and December 23, 2010, the last business day of each respective fiscal period. The estimated fair values were determined using Level 1 inputs in the fair value hierarchy, as defined in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.
The fair value hierarchy consists of three levels:
•
Level 1 fair values are valuations that the entity has the ability to access and that are based on quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
•
Level 2 fair values are valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and
•
Level 3 fair values are valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
On a recurring basis prior to their expiration date, we measured our interest rate swap agreements (Note 6) at fair value using an income approach and Level 2 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. The income approach consists of a discounted cash flow model that takes into account the present value of future cash flows under the terms of the contracts incorporating observable market inputs as of the reporting date such as prevailing interest rates. Both the counterparty’s credit risk and our credit risk were considered in the fair value determination.