10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

R ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

£ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

Commission file number 333-116595

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware	20-1056194
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

110 South Poplar Street, Suite 101, Wilmington Delaware 19801

(Address of principal executive offices)

(800) 819-5556

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class	Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
None	Not applicable

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:

Limited Partner Units

Title of Class

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. £Yes R No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. £Yes R No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. R Yes £ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes R No  

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. R

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer £	Accelerated filer £	Non-accelerated filer £	Smaller Reporting Company R
	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). £Yes R No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

There is no public market for the Registrant’s securities.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

None

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P.

INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT

ON FORM 10-K

PART I			PAGE
	ITEM 1:	Business	3
	ITEM 1A:	Risk Factors	5
	ITEM 1B:	Unresolved Staff Comments	5
	ITEM 2:	Properties	5
	ITEM 3:	Legal Proceedings	5
	ITEM 4:	Mine Safety Disclosures	5
PART II
	ITEM 5:	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer of Equity Securities	6
	ITEM 6:	Selected Financial Data	7
	ITEM 7:	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	8
	ITEM 7A:	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	16
	ITEM 8:	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	17
	ITEM 9:	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	34
	ITEM 9A:	Controls and Procedures	34
	ITEM 9B:	Other Information	34
PART III
	ITEM 10:	Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant	35
	ITEM 11:	Executive Compensation	36
	ITEM 12:	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Unit Holder Matters	36
	ITEM 13:	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	37
	ITEM 14:	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	38
PART IV
	ITEM 15:	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	39
SIGNATURES			42

2

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”) includes “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expects,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “should,” “will” and “would” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.

Forward-looking statements contained in this Report are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations of our future performance, taking into account all information currently available to us. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us or are within our control. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements we make in this Report are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary from our forward-looking statements, including:

• changes in our industry, interest rates or the general economy;

• increased rates of default and/or decreased recovery rates on our investment in leases and loans;

• availability, terms and deployment of debt funding;

• general volatility of the debt markets;

• the timing of cash flows, if any, from our investments in leases and loans and payments for debt service;

• the degree and nature of our competition; and

• availability and retention of qualified personnel.

We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date of this Report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, we undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this filing or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

As used herein, the terms “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P. and subsidiary.

PART I

ITEM 1 – BUSINESS

General

We are a Delaware limited partnership formed on March 30, 2004 by our General Partner, LEAF Financial Corporation (our “General Partner”), which manages us. Our General Partner is a subsidiary of Resource America, Inc. (“RAI”). RAI is a publicly-traded company (NASDAQ: REXI) that uses industry specific expertise, to evaluate, originate, service, and manage investment opportunities through its commercial finance, real estate, and financial fund management segments. Through our offering termination date of October 13, 2006, we raised $60.0 million by selling 600,000 of our limited partner units. We commenced operations in April 2005.

We are expected to have a nine-year life, consisting of an offering period of up to two years, a five year reinvestment period and a subsequent liquidation period of two years, during which our leases and secured loans will either mature or be sold. In the event we are unable to sell our leases and secured loans during the liquidation period, to the extent that there is excess cash, we expect to continue to return capital to our partners as those leases and loans mature. Substantially all of our leases and loans will mature by the end of 2014. We entered our liquidation period beginning in October 2011. We will terminate on December 31, 2029, unless sooner dissolved or terminated as provided in our Limited Partnership Agreement.

We acquired a diversified portfolio of new, used, or reconditioned equipment that we lease to third-parties. We also acquired portfolios of equipment subject to existing leases from other equipment lessors. Our financings were typically acquired from our General Partner. In addition, we made secured loans to end users to finance their purchase of equipment. We structured our secured loans so that, in an economic sense, there was no difference to us between a secured loan and a full payout equipment lease. We financed business-essential equipment including, but not limited to, computers, copiers, office furniture, water filtration systems, machinery used in manufacturing and construction, medical equipment and telecommunications equipment. We focus on the small to mid-size business market, which generally includes businesses with:

• 500 or fewer employees;

3

• $1 billion or less in total assets; or

• $100 million or less in total annual sales.

Our principal objective is to generate regular cash distributions to our limited partners.

Our leases consist of direct financing and operating leases as defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). Under the direct financing method of accounting, interest income (the excess of the aggregate future rentals and estimated unguaranteed residuals upon expiration of the lease over the related equipment cost) is recognized over the life of the lease using the interest method. Under the operating method, the cost of the leased equipment, including acquisition fees associated with lease placements, is recorded as an asset and depreciated on a straight-line basis over its estimated useful life. Rental income on operating leases consists primarily of monthly periodic rentals due under the terms of the leases. Generally, during the lease terms of existing operating leases, we will not recover all of the cost and related expenses of rental equipment and, therefore, we are prepared to remarket the equipment in future years. We discontinue the recognition of revenue for leases and loans for which payments are more than 90 days past due. These assets are classified as non-accrual.

As discussed further in ITEM 7, the economic recession in the United States has adversely affected our operations as a result of higher delinquencies and may continue to do so as the economy recovers.

Available Information

We file annual, quarterly and current reports and other information with the SEC. The public may read and copy information we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549, on official business days during the hours of 10:00 am and 3:00 pm. The public may obtain information on the operations of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The internet address of the SEC website is http://www.sec.gov. Our General Partner’s internet address is http://www.LEAFFinancial.com. We make our SEC filings available free of charge on or through our General Partner’s internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. We are not incorporating by reference in this report any material from our General Partner’s website.

Agreements with our General Partner

We do not directly employ any persons to manage or operate our business. These functions are provided by our General Partner and employees of our General Partner and/or its affiliates. We reimburse our General Partner and/or its affiliates for all direct and indirect costs of services provided, including the cost of employees and benefits properly allocable to us and all other expenses necessary or appropriate for the conduct of our business.

Competition

The equipment leasing business is highly fragmented and competitive. We acquire equipment from our General Partner and its affiliates. Our General Partner and its affiliates compete with:

• a large number of national, regional and local banks, savings banks, leasing companies and other financial institutions;

• captive finance and leasing companies affiliated with major equipment manufacturers; and

• other sources of equipment lease financing, including other publicly-offered partnerships.

Many of our competitors are substantially larger and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we have. Competition with these entities may reduce the creditworthiness of potential lessees or borrowers to whom we have access or decrease our yields. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. A lower cost of funds could enable a competitor to offer leases or loans at rates which are less than ours, potentially forcing us to lower our rates or lose origination volume.

Employees

As is commonly the case with limited partnerships, we do not directly employ any of the persons responsible for our management or operations. Rather, the personnel of our General Partner and/or its affiliates manage and operate our business. Officers of our General Partner may spend a substantial amount of time managing the business and affairs of our General Partner and its affiliates and may face a conflict regarding the allocation of their time between our business and affairs and their other business interests. The officers of our General Partner who provide services to us are not required to work full time on our affairs. These officers may devote significant time to the affairs of our General Partner’s affiliates and be compensated by these affiliates for the services rendered to them. There may be significant conflicts between us and affiliates of our General Partner regarding the availability of these officers to manage us.

4

ITEM 1A – RISK FACTORS

Risk factors have been omitted as permitted under rules applicable to smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None

ITEM 2 – PROPERTIES

We do not own or lease any real property.

ITEM 3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not subject to any pending material legal proceedings.

ITEM 4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

5

PART II

ITEM 5 – MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our limited partner units are not publicly traded. There is no market for our limited partner units and it is unlikely that any will develop. The following table shows the number of equity security holders, including our General Partner with respect to limited partner units it purchased.

Title of Class
	Number of Partners as of December 31, 2011
Limited Partners	1,405
General Partner	1

Total distributions paid to limited partners for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 were $1.2 million, $2.5 million and $2.8 million, respectively. These distributions were paid on a monthly basis to our limited partners at rate of approximately 2% in 2011, 4% in 2010, and 5 % in 2009, of their original capital contribution to us.

6

ITEM 6 – SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected financial data should be read together with our consolidated financial statements, the notes to our consolidated financial statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, each contained in Item 7 in this report. We derived the selected consolidated financial data below from our consolidated financial statements (in thousands, except units and per unit data):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
Revenues	$	6,366		$	13,411		$	21,629		$	34,780		$	34,864
Interest expense		3,443			7,713			12,862			17,872			18,545
Provision for credit losses		4,313			8,656			17,941			11,128			5,847
Other expenses		3,284			4,810			10,240			13,180			12,360
Total expenses		11,040			21,179			41,043			42,180			36,752
Net loss	$	(4,674	)	$	(7,768	)	$	(19,414	)	$	(7,400	)	$	(1,888	)
Net loss allocated to limited partners	$	(4,627	)	$	(7,690	)	$	(19,220	)	$	(7,326	)	$	(1,869	)
Distributions to partners	$	1,198		$	2,471		$	2,784		$	4,826		$	4,843
Weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding during the year		592,809			592,809			593,013			595,623			599,095
Net loss per weighted average limited partner unit	$	(7.81	)	$	(12.97	)	$	(32.41	)	$	(12.30	)	$	(3.12	)

	December 31,
	2011			2010			2009			2008			2007
Investment in leases and loans, net	$	39,451		$	86,922		$	159,015		$	265,993		$	338,172
Total assets		53,962			105,598			182,598			299,039			372,245
Debt and note payable		45,726			90,625			151,981			254,744			324,170
Partners’ (deficit) capital:
General partner		(605	)		(546	)		(443	)		(221	)		(99	)
Limited partners		(8,631	)		(2,818	)		7,318			29,371			41,855
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,256	)		(2,063	)		(4,421	)		(10,098	)		(4,614	)
Total partners’ (deficit) capital	$	(10,492	)	$	(5,427	)	$	2,454		$	19,052		$	37,142

7

ITEM 7 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion provides an analysis of our operating results, an overview of our liquidity and capital resources and other items related to us.  This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Item 1 and the consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

As used herein, the terms “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P. and subsidiary.

Fund Summary

As discussed in more detail in Item 1, we acquire a diversified portfolio of new, used or reconditioned equipment that we lease to third parties. We also acquire portfolios of equipment subject to existing leases from other equipment lessors. Our financings are typically acquired from our General Partner. In addition, we may make secured loans to end users to finance their purchase of equipment.

When we commenced operations in 2005, the United States economy was experiencing strong growth, an abundance of liquidity in the debt markets and historically low credit losses.  However, it is widely believed that the United States economy over the past few years has suffered through the worst economic recession in over 75 years.  The recession has been severe and its consequences broadly felt.  Many well-known major financial institutions failed and others had to be bailed out.   Unemployment soared to generational highs and has remained at such levels.  Bank lending was severely reduced and became more expensive.   In recent years, banks became much more reluctant to lend, and when they did it became more expensive to borrow.  If existing loans came up for renewal and were extended, they were written for reduced amounts and at higher interest rates. Also, lenders insisted on ever-tighter covenants around delinquencies and write-offs that made it more difficult to remain in compliance. As our primary debt facilities matured and we had to extend, renew, or refinance them, our costs increased.  Most significantly, we had to reduce our debt on the leases previously financed.  The money to pay down the debt had to come from lease payments and those amounts were no longer available to re-invest in new leases.  The lenders’ higher fees and costs also had to be paid from funds that were then unavailable to re-invest in new leases.    All of this happened while losses increased.  The small businesses that represent our typical leasing customer have suffered through the recession.  The increase in write-offs also created an additional burden on the cash available to re-invest.

Our losses, while greater than projected, were still modest considering the magnitude of the economic storm.  In fact, the General Partner changed its underwriting standards early in 2008, and the portfolio of leases written since then have performed as well as originally modeled.  We proactively negotiated with lenders to prevent them from foreclosing on any collateral, or requiring a liquidation of leases that would have badly impaired capital.  Our General Partner has deferred our payment of fees and reimbursement of expenses totaling approximately $17.2 million from inception through December 31, 2011, in order to preserve cash for us.  Additionally, in 2010 the General Partner waived all future management fees, including those retroactive to December 1, 2009, in order to preserve cash.  We entered our liquidation phase in October 2011, and accordingly we are prohibited under the partnership agreement from acquiring new leases.

To date, limited partners have received total distributions ranging from approximately 28% to 40% of their original amount invested, depending upon when the investment was made.   Management is working to maximize the amount that can be distributed to limited partners in the future. However, we could not continue to support 8% distributions, and beginning in August 2010, distributions were lowered to 2.0%.

General Economic Overview

Uncertainty and caution continue to reign in the various forecasts for the U.S. economy. However, during the fourth quarter of 2011 there was, on balance, more favorable economic news than unfavorable economic news.  During the fourth quarter of 2011 there was improvement in the employment rate, reduction in jobless claims, and increases in equipment sales and business borrowing, both of which tend to be precursors to sustained economic growth.  At the same time continued uncertainty and a lack of confidence in the small business community, a key driver in long term job creation, continue to be major impediments to steady and sustained economic growth.  Significant economic statistics reported on fourth quarter activity are presented below.

· The National Federation of Independent Business survey showed that small business concerns over business conditions and the political climate continue to be key reasons preventing business expansion.  Small businesses comprise the majority of the borrowers and lessees in the LEAF Fund’s portfolio and consequently the health of the small business community is critical to the LEAF Fund’s portfolio performance.

8

· The National Association of Realtors reported that existing home sales in December 2011 increased for the third month in a row and remained above prior year levels significantly reducing the housing inventory. At the same time the S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index showed decreases in home prices. So while there is more sales activity (a positive), the price declines negatively impact personal wealth (a negative).

· The Federal Reserve’s Beige Book released in the fourth quarter of 2011 showed increases in consumer spending and manufacturing activity and economic activity was described as slow to moderate.

· During the fourth quarter of 2011 the unemployment rate fell to 8.5%, and the Institute of Supply Management reported an accelerating pace in U.S. manufacturing which supported employment gains.

· The Equipment Lease and Finance Foundation’s Monthly Confidence Index in December 2011 was 57.2 signifying steadying optimism about business activity among surveyed executives in the equipment lease and finance industry.  Similarly the December 2011 Credit Manager’s Index published by the National Association of Credit Managers increased to 54.4 (positive territory) driven largely by gains in the service industry.

As stated previously the overall economic trends in the fourth quarter of 2011 tended to be more positive than negative.  Those trends are in line with recent stability shown in the LEAF Fund’s portfolio performance.  However, while uncertainty in the economic outlook persists, and while the economy remains unsettled, our portfolio performance may be affected.

Finance Receivables and Asset Quality

Information about our portfolio of leases and loans is as follows (dollars in thousands):

	December 31,
	2011			2010
Investment in leases and loans, net	$	39,451		$	86,922
Number of contracts		8,800			13,600
Number of individual end users (a)		7,700			12,000
Average original equipment cost	$	24.2		$	24.8
Average initial lease term (in months)		66			62
Average remaining lease term (in months)		21			22
States accounting for more than 10% of lease and loan portfolio:
California		13	%		13	%
Types of equipment accounting for more than 10% of lease and loan portfolio:
Industrial Equipment		27	%		28	%
Medical Equipment		18	%		18	%
Water Purification		13	%		10	%
Office Equipment		9	%		10	%
Types of businesses accounting for more than 10% of lease and loan portfolio:
Services		45	%		45	%
Manufacturing		14	%		12	%
Retail Trade		13	%		13	%

(a) Located in the 50 states as well as the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. No individual end user or single piece of equipment accounted for more than 1% of our portfolio based on original cost of the equipment.

We utilized debt facilities in addition to our equity to fund the acquisitions of lease portfolios. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, our outstanding bank debt was $37.9 million and $82.6 million, respectively.

9

Portfolio Performance

The table below provides information about our finance receivables including non-performing assets, which are those assets that are not accruing income due to non-performance or impairment (dollars in thousands):

	As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
							Change
	2011			2010			$			%
Investment in leases and loans before allowance for credit losses	$	40,211		$	92,242		$	(52,031	)	(56	)%
Less: allowance for credit losses		760			5,320			(4,560	)	(86	)%
Investment in leases and loans, net	$	39,451		$	86,922		$	(47,471	)	(55	)%
Weighted average investment in direct financing leases and loans before allowance for credit losses	$	63,131		$	127,662		$	(64,531	)	(51	)%
Non-performing assets	$	974		$	6,394		$	(5,420	)	(85	)%
Charge-offs, net of recoveries	$	8,873		$	14,716		$	(5,843	)	(40	)%
As a percentage of finance receivables:
Allowance for credit losses		1.89	%		5.77	%
Non-performing assets		2.42	%		6.93	%
As a percentage of weighted average finance receivables:
Charge-offs, net of recoveries		14.05	%		11.53	%

We managed our credit risk by adhering to strict credit policies and procedures, and closely monitoring our receivables. Our General Partner, the servicer of our leases and loans, responded to the recent economic recession in part, by implementing early intervention techniques in collection procedures.

Our allowance for credit losses is our estimate of losses inherent in our commercial finance receivables. The allowance is based on factors which include our historical loss experience on equipment finance portfolios we manage, an analysis of contractual delinquencies, current economic conditions and trends and equipment finance portfolio characteristics, adjusted for recoveries. In evaluating historic performance, we perform a migration analysis, which estimates the likelihood that an account progresses through delinquency stages to ultimate charge-off. Our policy is to charge off to the allowance those financings which are in default and for which management has determined the probability of collection to be remote. Substantially all of our assets are collateral for our debt and, therefore, significantly greater delinquencies than anticipated will have an adverse impact on our cash flow and distributions to our partners.

We focus on financing equipment used by small to mid-sized businesses. The recent economic recession in the US has made it more difficult for some of our customers to make payments on their financings with us on a timely basis, which has adversely affected our operations in the form of higher delinquencies. However, in 2011 our non-performing assets as a percentage of finance receivables declined to 2.4% at December 31, 2011 compared to 6.9% at December 31, 2010 due to an improved aging of our portfolio.  Our investments in leases and loans that were current as a percentage of our portfolio increased to 93.7% as of December 31, 2011 compared to 88.6% at December 31, 2010.  We are cautiously optimistic that this trend will continue as the economy continues to recover.

10

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenues and cost and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including the allowance for credit losses, the estimated unguaranteed residual values of leased equipment, impairment of long-lived assets and the fair value and effectiveness of interest rate swaps. We base our estimates on historical experience, current economic conditions and on various other assumptions that we believe reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We have identified the following policies as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations.

Investments in Leases and Loans

Our investments in leases and loans consist of direct financing leases, operating leases and loans.

Direct Financing Leases.  Certain of our lease transactions are accounted for as direct financing leases (as distinguished from operating leases). Such leases transfer substantially all benefits and risks of equipment ownership to the customer. Our investment in direct financing leases consists of the sum of the total future minimum lease payments receivable plus the estimated unguaranteed residual value of leased equipment, less unearned finance income. Unearned finance income, which is recognized as revenue over the term of the financing by the effective interest method, represents the excess of the total future minimum lease payments plus the estimated unguaranteed residual value over the cost of the related equipment.

Unguaranteed residual value represents the estimated amount to be received at lease termination from lease extensions or ultimate disposition of the leased equipment. The estimates of residual values are based upon the General Partner’s history with regard to the realization of residuals, available industry data and our General Partner’s senior management’s experience with respect to comparable equipment. The estimated residual values are recorded as a component of investments in leases. Residual values are reviewed periodically to determine if the current estimate of the equipment’s fair market value appears to be below its recorded estimate. If required, residual values are adjusted downward to reflect adjusted estimates of fair market values. Upward adjustments to residual values are not permitted.

Operating Leases. Leases not meeting the criteria to be classified as direct financing leases are deemed to be operating leases. Under the accounting for operating leases, the cost of the leased equipment, including acquisition fees associated with lease placements, is recorded as an asset and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the equipment’s estimated useful life, generally up to seven years. Rental income consists primarily of monthly periodic rental payments due under the terms of the leases. We recognize rental income on a straight line basis. Generally, during the lease terms of existing operating leases, we will not recover all of the cost and related expenses of its rental equipment and, therefore, it is prepared to remarket the equipment in future years. Our policy is to review, on a quarterly basis, the expected economic life of its rental equipment in order to determine the recoverability of its undepreciated cost. We write down its rental equipment to its estimated net realizable value when it is probable that its carrying amount exceeds such value and the excess can be reasonably estimated; gains are only recognized upon actual sale of the rental equipment. There were no write-downs of equipment during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

Loans. For term loans, the investment in loans consists of the sum of the total future minimum loan payments receivable less unearned finance income. Unearned finance income, which is recognized as revenue over the term of the financing by the effective interest method, represents the excess of the total future minimum contracted loan payments over the cost of the related equipment. For all other loans, interest income is recorded at the stated rate on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected.

Allowance for credit losses. We evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses (including investments in leases and loans) based upon, among other factors, management’s historical experience on the portfolios it manages, an analysis of contractual delinquencies, economic conditions and trends, and equipment finance portfolio characteristics, adjusted for expected recoveries. In evaluating historic performance, we perform a migration analysis, which estimates the likelihood that an account progresses through delinquency stages to ultimate charge-off. After an account becomes 180 or more days past due, any remaining balance is fully-reserved less an estimated recovery amount.  Generally, the account is then charged-off and referred to our internal recovery group consisting of a team of credit specialists and collectors. The group utilizes several resources in an attempt to maximize recoveries on charged-off accounts including: 1) initiating litigation against the end user customer and any personal guarantor, 2) referring the account to an outside law firm or collection agency and/or 3) repossessing and remarketing the equipment through third parties. Our policy is to charge off to the allowance those financings which are in default and for which management has determined the probability of collection to be remote. We discontinue the recognition of revenue for leases and loans for which payments are more than 90 days past due. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Fund had $974,000 and $6.4 million, respectively, of leases and loans on non-accrual status. Fees from delinquent payments are recognized when received and are included in other income.

11

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2010

The following summarizes our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (dollars in thousands):

							Increase (Decrease)
	2011			2010			$			%
Revenues:
Interest on equipment financings	$	5,123		$	10,397			(5,274	)		(51	)%
Rental income		759			1,798			(1,039	)		(58	)%
Losses on sales of equipment and lease dispositions, net		(297	)		(585	)		288			(49	)%
Other income		781			1,801			(1,020	)		(57	)%
		6,366			13,411			(7,045	)		(53	)%
Expenses:
Interest expense		3,443			7,713			(4,270	)		(55	)%
Interest expense - related party		873			771			102			13	%
Depreciation on operating leases		541			1,242			(701	)		(56	)%
Provision for credit losses		4,313			8,656			(4,343	)		(50	)%
General and administrative expenses		986			1,430			(444	)		(31	)%
Administrative expenses reimbursed to affiliate		646			1,621			(975	)		(60	)%
Management fees to affiliate		-			(215	)		215			(100	)%
Mark to market changes on derivative liabilities		238			(39	)		277			(710	)%
		11,040			21,179			(10,139	)		(48	)%
Net loss	$	(4,674	)	$	(7,768	)		3,094
Net loss allocated to limited partners	$	(4,627	)	$	(7,690	)		3,063

As discussed in more specific detail below, the overall reductions in both revenues and expenses were caused by the significant decrease in the size of the leases and loans portfolio as well as the significant reduction in debt during the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010.

The decrease in total revenues was primarily attributable to the following:

• a decrease in interest on equipment financings. Our weighted average net investment in financing assets decreased to $63.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to $127.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, a decrease of $64.5 million (51%).

• a decrease in rental income which was principally the result of a decrease in our investment in operating leases in the 2011 period compared to the 2010 period.

• a decrease in other income primarily due to a decrease in late fee income of $460,000 and a decrease in collection administrative fees of $445,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010.  These decreases reflect the decrease in size of our lease and loan portfolio.

The decrease in total expenses was primarily attributable to the following:

• a decrease in interest expense primarily due to a decrease in average debt outstanding. Weighted average borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2011 were $58.4 million as compared to $117.9 million as of December 31, 2010.

• Market to market changes on derivatives decreased consistent with the debt decrease and is due to interest rate fluctuations in the market.

• a decrease in depreciation on operating leases directly related to a decrease in our investment in operating leases.

• a significant decrease in provision for credit losses. We provide for credit losses when losses are likely to occur based on a migration analysis of past due payments and economic conditions. This decrease is consistent with the decline in the portfolio of equipment financed assets and improvement in aging of the portfolio.

• a decrease in general and administrative expenses and administrative expenses reimbursed to affiliates due to the decrease in the size of our portfolio, partially offset by increased legal costs associated with collection efforts.

12

The net loss per limited partner unit, after the net loss allocated to our General Partner, for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $7.81 and $12.97, respectively, based on a weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding of 592,809 each period.

In 2010, the General Partner waived asset management fees, including those accrued in 2009.  The General Partner continued to waive asset management fees in 2011 and waived all future management fees. Approximately $1.1 million of management fees were waived for the year ended December 31, 2011 and approximately $3.4 million in management fees have been waived through December 31, 2011 on a cumulative basis.

Year Ended December 31, 2010 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2009

The following summarizes our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 (dollars in thousands):

							Increase (Decrease)
	2010			2009			$			%
Revenues:
Interest on equipment financings	$	10,397		$	17,829			(7,432	)		(42	)%
Rental income		1,798			2,750			(952	)		(35	)%
Losses on sales of equipment and lease dispositions, net		(585	)		(626	)		41			(7	)%
Other income		1,801			1,676			125			7	%
		13,411			21,629			(8,218	)		(38	)%
Expenses:
Interest expense		7,713			12,862			(5,149	)		(40	)%
Interest expense to related party		771			-			771			100	%
Depreciation on operating leases		1,242			2,193			(951	)		(43	)%
Provision for credit losses		8,656			17,941			(9,285	)		(52	)%
General and administrative expenses		1,430			2,635			(1,205	)		(46	)%
Administrative expenses reimbursed to affiliate		1,621			2,491			(870	)		(35	)%
Management fees to affiliate		(215	)		2,921			(3,136	)		(107	)%
Mark to market changes on derivative liabilities		(39			-			(39	)		(100	)%
		21,179			41,043			(19,864	)		(48	)%
Net loss	$	(7,768	)	$	(19,414	)		11,646
Net loss allocated to limited partners	$	(7,690	)	$	(19,220	)		11,530

As discussed in more specific detail below, the overall reductions in both revenues and expenses were caused by the significant decrease in the size of the leases and loans portfolio as well as the significant reduction in debt in during the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2009.

The decrease in total revenues was primarily attributable to the following:

• a decrease in interest on equipment financings. Our weighted average net investment in financing assets decreased to $127.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to $218.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, a decrease of $91.3 million (42%).

• a decrease in rental income which was principally the result of a decrease in our investment in operating leases in the 2010 period compared to the 2009 period.

The decrease in total expenses was primarily attributable to the following:

• a decrease in interest expense primarily due to a decrease in average debt outstanding. Weighted average borrowings for year ended December 31, 2010 were $117.9 million as compared to $217.2 million as of December 31, 2009.

• a decrease in depreciation on operating leases directly related to a decrease in our investment in operating leases.

• a significant decrease in provision for credit losses. We provide for credit losses when losses are likely to occur based on a migration analysis of past due payments and economic conditions. This decrease is consistent with the decline in the portfolio of equipment financed assets.

• a decrease in management fees to affiliate attributable to the decrease in our portfolio of equipment financing assets, since management fees are paid based on lease payments received. In 2010, the General Partner waived asset management fees including those accrued for in December 2009. Approximately $2.0 million of management fees were waived for the year ended December 31, 2010.

13

• a decrease in general and administrative expenses and administrative expenses reimbursed to affiliates due to the decrease in the size of our portfolio, partially offset by increased legal costs associated with collection efforts.

The net loss per limited partner unit, after the net loss allocated to our General Partner, for the year ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 was $12.97 and $32.41, respectively, based on a weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding of 592,809 and 593,013, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Our major source of liquidity is obtained by the collection of lease and loan payments after payments of debt principal and interest on debt. Our other cash requirements, in addition to debt service, are for normal operating expenses and distributions to partners. We plan to fund our other cash requirements for operating expenses and distributions to partners from cash remaining after payments for debt service. As noted previously, we entered the liquidation phase in October 2011.  Accordingly, we are not permitted to purchase any new leases or loans.

We believe that our future net cash inflows can be estimated as the total scheduled future payments to be received from leases and loans less our debt service payments. At December 31, 2011, the total future minimum lease payments scheduled to be received was $43.4 million which excludes the $760,000 allowance for credit losses. The outstanding principal balance owed on our debt facility was $37.9 million. We believe at this time that future net cash inflows will be sufficient to either finance operations or meet debt service payments. The following table sets forth our sources and uses of cash for the periods indicated (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
Net cash (provided by) used in operating activities	$	825		$	(907	)	$	11,367
Net cash provided by investing activities		42,320			61,610			86,218
Net cash used in financing activities		(43,363	)		(60,474	)		(97,724	)
Decrease (increase) in cash	$	(218	)	$	229		$	(139	)

During the year ended December 31, 2011, cash decreased by $218,000 which was primarily due to debt repayments of $44.7 million and distributions to our partners of $1.2 million, partially offset by proceeds from leases and loans of $42.5 million.

For the period August 2009 through February 2010, we suspended monthly distributions to our partners in order to increase liquidity to enable us to renew our WestLB debt agreement. In March 2010 we resumed the payment of monthly distributions to our partners at a rate of 8% per annum through July 2010.  Ongoing distributions since August 2010 have been made at 2% and are dependent on us having sufficient cash and liquidity to make such distributions.

Partners’ distributions paid for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 were $1.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively.  Prior to August 1, 2009, distributions to limited partners were paid at a rate of 8% per annum of invested capital. Cumulative partner distributions paid from our inception to December 31, 2010 were approximately $19.1 million.

In 2010, the General Partner waived asset management fees including those accrued for in December 2009.  Approximately $1.1 million of management fees were waived for the year ended December 31, 2011 and approximately $3.4 million have been waived on a cumulative basis.   The General Partner has waived all future management fees.

Future cash distributions are dependent on our performance and are impacted by a number of factors which include: our ability to obtain and maintain debt financing on acceptable terms to build and maintain our equipment finance portfolio; lease and loan defaults by our customers; and prevailing economic conditions. If the current economic recovery falters, we could continue to see a scarcity of available debt on terms beneficial to the partnership and higher than expected lease and loan defaults resulting in poorer fund performance than projected.

14

Borrowings

Our borrowing relationships each require the pledging of eligible leases and loans to secure amounts advanced. Borrowings outstanding under our credit facilities are as follows as of December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

	Type	Facility Amount		Amount Outstanding		Amount Available			Amount of Collateral (1)
WestLB (2)	Term	$	125,000	$	24,962		(3	)	$	29,196
Series 2007-Term Securitization (4)	Term		12,944		12,944		N/A			22,975
		$	137,944	$	37,906	$	-		$	52,171

____________________________

 (1) Recourse under these facilities is limited to the amount of collateral pledged. The WestLB revolving line of credit is collateralized by specific lease receivables and related equipment, with a 1% credit reserve of the outstanding line of credit.

 (2) We have no availability under this credit facility.  Availability is subject to having eligible leases or loans to pledge as collateral, compliance with covenants, and the borrowing base formula.

 (3) Interest on the borrowings prior to March 2009 were calculated at LIBOR plus 1.20% per annum. Borrowings under this facility after March 2009 were at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.50% per annum. To mitigate fluctuations in interest rates, we entered into interest rate swap agreements, which terminate on various dates ranging from July 2013 to August 2015. As of December 31, 2011, the interest rate swap agreements fixed the interest rate on this facility at 5.6%. Interest and principal are due as payments are received under the financings. This credit facility expired on June 30, 2010 and as discussed below, no additional borrowings are currently permitted under this facility.

(4) The original amount borrowed at June 2007 was $276.8 million. A term note securitization is a one-time funding that pays down over time without any ability for us to draw down additional amounts.  At December 31, 2011, only the Class B tranche on the 2007-Term Securitization had a remaining unpaid balance, on which interest is charged a fixed rate of 6.65% per annum.

In addition to the borrowings discussed above, we owe $7.8 million to Resource Capital Corporation (“RCC”) as of December 31, 2011, which is a related entity of ours through common management with RAI.  On June 3, 2011, we paid a 1% fee to extend the note maturity date from March 4, 2011 to February 15, 2012 and to reduce the interest rate from 12% to 10% per annum.  Monthly payments are made at approximately 0.3% of the outstanding principal and interest is payable quarterly.  On February 15, 2012, the Fund paid an additional 1% fee, or $77,000, to RCC to extend the maturity date of the note payable to related party from February 15, 2012 to February 15, 2013.

We are subject to certain financial covenants related to our debt facilities. These covenants are related to such things as minimum tangible net worth, maximum leverage ratios and portfolio delinquency. The minimum tangible net worth covenants measure our equity adjusted for intangibles and amounts due to our General Partner. The maximum leverage covenants restrict the amount that we can borrow based on a ratio of our total debt compared to our net worth. The portfolio performance covenants generally provide that we would be in default if a specified percentage of our portfolio of leases and loans was delinquent in payment beyond acceptable grace periods.

In addition, our debt facilities include financial covenants covering affiliated entities responsible for servicing our portfolio. These covenants exist to provide the lenders with information about the financial viability of the entities that service our portfolio. These entities include us, our General Partner and certain other affiliates involved in the sourcing and servicing of our portfolio. These covenants are similar in nature to our covenants and are related to such things as the entity’s minimum tangible net worth, maximum leverage ratios, managed portfolio delinquency and compliance of the debt terms of all of our General Partner’s managed entities.

On April 7, 2011 we were notified by WestLB that we were in default on ours loan agreement due to various ongoing covenant breaches.  These breaches relate to the percentage of defaulted leases in our portfolio, the percentage of defaulted leases in the overall lease portfolio serviced by our General Partner, and a required minimum credit support amount, among others.  As a result, the lender has advised us that it has reserved, and continues to reserve, all of its rights and remedies provided for in the loan agreement including the right to (i) commence legal action to collect the obligations we owe it; (ii) declare all amounts immediately due and payable; (iii) repossess the collateral we have pledged to it under the loan agreement; and (iv) increase the interest rate on outstanding borrowings.  If the lender chooses to repossess and sell our collateral, such a sale of a portfolio could be at prices lower than its carrying value, which could result in losses and reduce our income and distributions to our partners. As of December 31, 2011, we were still in breach of several covenants under this facility.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, we are not, nor have we been, delinquent on any monthly payments of principle and interest owed to the lender.  Moreover, while the lender has reserved its rights, it has not initiated exercise of any of the forgoing remedies.

15

Liquidity Summary

Historically, we issued debt to acquire leases and loans. Repayment of our debt is based on the payments we receive from our customers. If a lease or loan becomes delinquent we must repay our lender, even though our customer has not paid us. Higher-than-expected lease and loan defaults will reduce our liquidity.

Our liquidity has been and could be further adversely affected by higher than expected equipment lease defaults, which results in a loss of revenues. These losses may adversely affect our ability to make distributions to our partners and, if the level of defaults is sufficiently large, may result in our inability to fully recover our investment in the underlying equipment. In evaluating our allowance for losses on uncollectible leases, we consider our contractual delinquencies, economic conditions and trends, lease portfolio characteristics and our General Partner’s management’s prior experience with similar lease assets. At December 31, 2011, our credit evaluation indicated a need for an allowance for credit losses of $760,000. As our lease portfolio ages, and if the recovery in the United States economy falters for a substantial period of time, we may need to increase our allowance for credit losses.

The tightening of credit markets has and may continue to adversely affect our liquidity, particularly our ability to obtain or renew debt financing needed to execute our investment strategies. Specifically, we rely on both revolving and term debt facilities to fund our acquisitions of equipment financings. A term debt facility is a loan that is contractually repaid over a period of time. If we are unable to obtain new debt or renew existing facilities that will allow us to invest the repayments of existing leases and loans into new investments, the volume of our leases and loans will be reduced.

We continue to seek additional sources of financing, including expanded bank financing that will enable us to originate investments and generate income while preserving capital. We expect that future financings may be at higher interest rates with lower leverage. As a result, our profitability may be negatively impacted if we are unable to increase our lease and loan rates to offset increases in borrowing rates.

Legal Proceedings

We are a party to various routine legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. Our General Partner believes that none of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of certain new accounting pronouncements that will or may affect our consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk have been omitted as permitted under rules applicable to smaller reporting companies.

16

ITEM 8 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Partners

Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (a Delaware Limited Partnership) and subsidiaries (the “Fund”), as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners’ capital (deficit) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Fund is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Fund’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 28, 2012

17

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands)

	December 31,
	2011			2010
ASSETS
Cash	$	21		$	239
Restricted cash		13,056			15,870
Accounts receivable		4			65
Investment in leases and loans, net		39,451			86,922
Deferred financing costs, net		1,302			2,230
Other assets		128			272
Total assets	$	53,962		$	105,598
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ DEFICIT
Liabilities:
Debt	$	37,906		$	82,637
Note payable to related party		7,820			7,988
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		438			317
Other liabilities		368			535
Derivative liabilities, at fair value		773			2,318
Due to affiliates		17,149			17,230
Total liabilities		64,454			111,025
Commitments and contingencies  (Note 11)
Partners’ Deficit:
General partner		(605	)		(546	)
Limited partners		(8,631	)		(2,818	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,256	)		(2,063	)
Total partners’ deficit		(10,492	)		(5,427	)
Total liabilities and partners' deficit	$	53,962		$	105,598

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

18

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 (In thousands, except unit and per unit data)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
Revenues:
Interest on equipment financings	$	5,123		$	10,397		$	17,829
Rental income		759			1,798			2,750
Losses on sales of equipment and lease dispositions, net		(297	)		(585	)		(626	)
Other income		781			1,801			1,676
		6,366			13,411			21,629
Expenses:
Interest expense		3,443			7,713			12,862
Interest expense to related party		873			771			-
Depreciation on operating leases		541			1,242			2,193
Provision for credit losses		4,313			8,656			17,941
General and administrative expenses		986			1,430			2,635
Administrative expenses reimbursed to affiliate		646			1,621			2,491
Management fees to affiliate		-			(215	)		2,921
Mark to market changes on derivative liabilities		238			(39	)		-
		11,040			21,179			41,043
Net loss	$	(4,674	)	$	(7,768	)	$	(19,414	)
Net loss allocated to limited partners	$	(4,627	)	$	(7,690	)	$	(19,220	)
Weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding during the period		592,809			592,809			593,013
Net loss per weighted average limited partner unit	$	(7.81	)	$	(12.97	)	$	(32.41	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

19

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital (Deficit)

(In thousands, except unit data)

										Accumulated
	General									Other			Total
	Partner			Limited Partners						Comprehensive			Partners’			Comprehensive
	Amount			Units			Amount			(Loss) Income			Deficit			(Loss) Income
Balance, January 1, 2009	$	(221	)		593,694		$	29,371		$	(10,098	)	$	19,052		$	-
Cash distributions		(28	)		-			(2,756	)		-			(2,784	)
Redemption of limited partner units		-			(885	)		(77	)		-			(77	)
Net loss		(194	)		-			(19,220	)		-			(19,414	)	$	(19,414	)
Net change in cash flow hedges		-			-			-			5,677			5,677			5,677
Balance, December 31, 2009		(443	)		592,809			7,318			(4,421	)		2,454		$	(13,737	)
Cash distributions		(25	)		-			(2,446	)		-			(2,471	)
Net loss		(78	)		-			(7,690	)		-			(7,768	)	$	(7,768	)
Net change in cash flow hedges		-			-			-			2,740			2,740			2,740
Amortization of net loss on financial derivative		-			-			-			(382	)		(382	)
Balance, December 31, 2010		(546	)		592,809			(2,818	)		(2,063	)		(5,427	)	$	(5,028	)
Cash distributions		(12	)		-			(1,186	)		-			(1,198	)
Net loss		(47	)		-			(4,627	)		-			(4,674	)	$	(4,674	)
Amortization of net loss on financial derivative		-			-			-			807			807
Balance, December 31, 2011	$	(605	)		592,809		$	(8,631	)	$	(1,256	)	$	(10,492	)	$	(4,674	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

20

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(4,674	)	$	(7,768	)	$	(19,414	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) by operating activities:
Losses on sales of equipment and lease dispositions, net		297			585			626
Depreciation on operating leases		541			1,242			2,193
Provision for credit losses		4,313			8,656			17,941
Amortization of deferred financing costs		1,008			1,442			1,395
Amortization of net gain on financial derivative		(738	)		(382	)		(382	)
Unrealized gains on derivative hedging activities		-			(596	)		-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		61			12			56
Other assets		144			602			(321	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities		(46	)		(466	)		(208	)
Due to affiliates		(81	)		(4,234	)		9,481
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		825			(907	)		11,367
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of leases and loans		-			(7,777	)		(7,696	)
Proceeds from leases and loans		42,502			69,930			93,613
Security deposits (returned) collected		(182	)		(543	)		301
Net cash provided by investing activities		42,320			61,610			86,218
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings of debt		-			6,735			6,656
Repayment of debt		(44,731	)		(76,079	)		(109,419	)
Borrowings - note payable - related party		-			8,000			-
Repayments - note payable - related party		(168	)		(12	)		-
Decrease in restricted cash		2,814			4,508			8,856
Increase in deferred financing costs		(80	)		(1,155	)		(956	)
Redemption of limited partner units		-			-			(77	)
Cash distributions to partners		(1,198	)		(2,471	)		(2,784	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(43,363	)		(60,474	)		(97,724	)
(Decrease) increase  in cash		(218	)		229			(139	)
Cash, beginning of period		239			10			149
Cash, end of period	$	21		$	239		$	10

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

21

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2011

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS

Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (the “Fund”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed on March 30, 2004 by its General Partner, LEAF Financial Corporation (the “General Partner”). The General Partner manages the Fund. The General Partner is a subsidiary of Resource America, Inc. (“RAI”). RAI is a publicly-traded company (NASDAQ: REXI) that uses industry specific expertise to evaluate, originate, service and manage investment opportunities through its commercial finance, real estate and financial fund management segments. Through its offering termination date of October 13, 2006, the Fund raised $60.0 million by selling 600,000 of its limited partner units. It commenced operations in April 2005.

The Fund is expected to have a nine-year life, consisting of an offering period of up to two years, a five-year reinvestment period and a subsequent liquidation period of two years, during which the Fund’s leases and secured loans will either mature or be sold. In the event the Fund is unable to sell its leases and secured loans during the liquidation period, the Fund is expected to continue to return capital to its partners as those leases and loans mature. Substantially all of the Fund’s leases and loans mature by the end of 2014. The Fund entered its liquidation period in October 2011. The Fund will terminate on December 31, 2029, unless sooner dissolved or terminated as provided in the Limited Partnership Agreement.

The Fund acquired diversified portfolios of equipment to finance to end users throughout the United States as well as the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. The Fund also acquired existing portfolios of equipment subject to existing financings from other equipment finance companies, primarily an affiliate of its General Partner. The primary objective of the Fund is to generate regular cash distributions to its partners from its equipment finance portfolio over the life of the Fund.

As of December 31, 2011, in addition to its 1% general partnership interest, the General Partner also had invested $1.0 million for a 2.0% limited partnership interest in the Fund.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Fund and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, LEAF Fund II, LLC and LEAF II Receivables Funding, LLC.  All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to 2010 and 2009 reported amounts to conform to the current year presentation.  In the statement of operations, renewal income of approximately $123,000 and $217,000 were reclassified to ‘Interest on equipment financings’ and ‘Rental income,’ respectively, from ‘Other Income’ for the year ended December 31, 2010.  Also, renewal income of approximately $260,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 that was previously included in ’Other income’ has been reclassified to ‘Interest on equipment financings’ on the statement of operations.  Additionally, amortization of other comprehensive income on the Fund’s interest rate swaps of approximately $159,000 for the year ended December 2010 was reclassified from “Loss on derivative activities” to “Interest expense.”

Use of Estimates

Preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include the allowance for credit losses, the estimated unguaranteed residual values of leased equipment, and the fair value and effectiveness of interest rate swaps. The Fund bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includes cash being held in reserve by the Fund’s lenders. Restricted cash also includes approximately $723,000 of customer payments deposited into a lockbox shared with the General Partner and other entities serviced by the Fund’s General Partner. The lockbox is in the name of U.S. Bank NA as trustee under an inter-creditor agreement amongst the Fund’s General Partner, the other entities and their respective lenders. These amounts, which are recorded as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheets, represent customer payments received by the lockbox, applied to the respective customer’s accounts, but not transferred to the Fund’s bank account.

22

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

December 31, 2011

Concentration of Credit Risk

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, 13% of the Fund’s portfolio was concentrated in California.  No other state accounted for more than 9% of the Fund’s portfolio balance as of December 31, 2011.

Investments in Leases and Loans

The Fund’s investments in leases and loans consist of direct financing leases, operating leases and loans.

Direct Financing Leases. Certain of the Fund’s lease transactions are accounted for as direct financing leases (as distinguished from operating leases). Such leases transfer substantially all benefits and risks of equipment ownership to the customer. The Fund’s investment in direct financing leases consists of the sum of the total future minimum lease payments receivable plus the estimated unguaranteed residual value of leased equipment, less unearned finance income. Unearned finance income, which is recognized as revenue over the term of the financing by the effective interest method, represents the excess of the total future minimum lease payments plus the estimated unguaranteed residual value over the cost of the related equipment.

Unguaranteed residual value represents the estimated amount to be received at lease termination from lease extensions or ultimate disposition of the leased equipment. The estimates of residual values are based upon the General Partner’s history with regard to the realization of residuals, available industry data and the General Partner’s senior management’s experience with respect to comparable equipment. The estimated residual values are recorded as a component of investments in leases. Residual values are reviewed periodically to determine if the current estimate of the equipment’s fair market value appears to be below its recorded estimate. If required, residual values are adjusted downward to reflect adjusted estimates of fair market values. Upward adjustments to residual values are not permitted.

Operating Leases. Leases not meeting the criteria to be classified as direct financing leases are deemed to be operating leases. Under the accounting for operating leases, the cost of the leased equipment, including acquisition fees associated with lease placements, is recorded as an asset and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the equipment’s estimated useful life, generally up to seven years. Rental income consists primarily of monthly periodic rental payments due under the terms of the leases. The Fund recognizes rental income on a straight line basis. Generally, during the lease terms of existing operating leases, the Fund will not recover all of the cost and related expenses of its rental equipment and, therefore, it is prepared to remarket the equipment in future years. The Fund’s policy is to review, on a quarterly basis, the expected economic life of its rental equipment in order to determine the recoverability of its undepreciated cost. The Fund writes down its rental equipment to its estimated net realizable value when it is probable that its carrying amount exceeds such value and the excess can be reasonably estimated; gains are only recognized upon actual sale of the rental equipment. There were no write-downs of equipment during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

Loans. For term loans, the investment in loans consists of the sum of the total future minimum loan payments receivable less unearned finance income. Unearned finance income, which is recognized as revenue over the term of the financing by the effective interest method, represents the excess of the total future minimum contracted loan payments over the cost of the related equipment. For all other loans, interest income is recorded at the stated rate on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected.

Allowance for credit losses. The Fund evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses (including investments in leases and loans) based upon, among other factors, management’s historical experience on the portfolios it manages, an analysis of contractual delinquencies, economic conditions and trends, and equipment finance portfolio characteristics, adjusted for expected recoveries. In evaluating historic performance, the Fund performs a migration analysis, which estimates the likelihood that an account progresses through delinquency stages to ultimate charge-off. After an account becomes 180 or more days past due, any remaining balance is fully-reserved less an estimated recovery amount.  Generally, the account is then charged-off and referred to the Fund internal recovery group consisting of a team of credit specialists and collectors. The group utilizes several resources in an attempt to maximize recoveries on charged-off accounts including:  1) initiating litigation against the end user customer and any personal guarantor, 2) referring the account to an outside law firm or collection agency and/or 3) repossessing and remarketing the equipment through third parties. The Fund’s policy is to charge off to the allowance those financings which are in default and for which management has determined the probability of collection to be remote. The Fund discontinues the recognition of revenue for leases and loans for which payments are more than 90 days past due. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Fund had $974,000 and $6.4 million, respectively, of leases and loans on non-accrual status. Payments received while leases and loans are on non-accrual status are recorded as a reduction of principal. Income recognition resumes when a lease or loan becomes less than 90 days delinquent. Fees from delinquent payments are recognized when received and are included in other income.

23

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

December 31, 2011

Transfers of Financial Assets

In connection with establishing its credit facilities with its banks, the Fund formed bankruptcy remote special purpose entities through which the financings are arranged. The Fund’s transfers of assets to the special purpose entities do not qualify for sales accounting treatment due to certain call provisions that the Fund maintains. Accordingly, assets and related debt of the special purpose entities are included in the Fund’s consolidated balance sheets. The Fund’s leases and restricted cash are assigned as collateral for these borrowings and there is no further recourse to the general credit of the Fund. Collateral in excess of these borrowings represents the Fund’s maximum loss exposure.

The Fund may sell leases to third parties. Leases are accounted for as sold when control of the lease is surrendered. Control over the leases are deemed surrendered when (1) the leases have been isolated from the Fund, (2) the buyer has the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the leases and (3) the Fund does not maintain effective control over the leases through either (a) an agreement that entitles and obligates the Fund to repurchase or redeem the leases before maturity, or (b) the ability to unilaterally cause the buyer to return specific leases. In connection with these sales, the Fund’s General Partner, the servicer of the leases prior to the sale, may continue to service the leases for the third party in exchange for “adequate compensation” as defined under U.S. GAAP. The Fund accrues liabilities for obligations associated with leases and loans sold which the Fund may be required to repurchase due to breaches of representations and warranties and early payment defaults. The Fund periodically evaluates the estimates used in calculating expected losses and adjustments are reported in earnings. To obtain fair values, the Fund generally estimates fair value based on the present value of future cash flows estimated using management’s best estimates of key assumptions, including credit losses and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. As these estimates are influenced by factors outside the Fund’s control and as uncertainty is inherent in these estimates, actual amounts charged off could differ from amounts recorded. The provision for repurchases is recorded as a component of gain on sales of leases and loans.

Derivative Instruments

The Fund recognizes all derivatives at fair value as either assets or liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The accounting for subsequent changes in the fair value of these derivatives depends on whether the derivative has been designated and qualified for hedge accounting treatment pursuant to U.S. GAAP.

Prior to October 1, 2010, the Fund entered into derivative contracts, including interest rate swaps, substantially all of which were accounted for as cash flow hedges.  Under hedge accounting, the effective portion of the gain or loss on a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge was reported in accumulated other comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and was then reclassified into earnings as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the related borrowing.

Effective October 1, 2010, the Fund discontinued the use of hedge accounting. Therefore, any subsequent changes in the fair value of derivative instruments, including those that had previously been accounted for under hedge accounting, is recognized immediately in the consolidated statement of operations. While the Fund will continue to use derivative financial instruments to reduce exposure to changing interest rates, this accounting change may create volatility in Fund’s results of operations, as the fair value of Fund’s derivative financial instruments change.

For the forecasted transactions that are probable of occurring, the derivative gain or loss remaining in accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2011 is being reclassified into earnings as an adjustment to interest expense over the terms of the related forecasted borrowings, consistent with hedge accounting treatment. In the event that the related forecasted borrowing is no longer probable of occurring, the related gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income will be recognized in earnings immediately.

Income Taxes

Federal and state income tax laws provide that the income or losses of the Fund are reportable by the Partners on their individual income tax returns. Accordingly, no provision for such taxes has been made in the accompanying financial statements.

24

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

December 31, 2011

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and all other changes in the equity of a business during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. These changes, other than net income, are referred to as “other comprehensive income (loss)” and for the Fund only include changes as a result of hedging activities.

Allocation of Partnership Income, Loss and Cash Distributions

Cash distributions, if any, are made monthly as follows: 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the General Partner until the limited partners have received an amount equal to their unpaid cumulative return (8%) of their adjusted capital contribution.

Net income for any fiscal period during the reinvestment period (the period commencing October 13, 2006 and ending October 13, 2011) is allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the General Partner. Income during the liquidation period, as defined in the Partnership Agreements, will be allocated first to the Partners in proportion to and to the extent of the deficit balances, if any, in their respective capital accounts. Thereafter, net income will be allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the General Partner.

Net Income (Loss) per Limited Partner Unit

Net income (loss) per limited partner unit is computed by dividing net loss allocated to the Fund’s Limited Partners by the weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding during the period is computed based on the number of limited partner units issued during the period weighted for the days outstanding during the period.

Recent Accounting Standards

Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Effective

The FASB has issued the following guidance that is not yet effective for the Fund as of December 31, 2011:

Comprehensive Income - In June 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to eliminate the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity.  The amendment requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. This guidance will become effective for the Fund beginning January 1, 2012.

Fair Value Measurements - In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to revise the wording used to describe the requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. For many of the requirements, the FASB does not intend for the amendments to result in a change in the application of the current requirements. Some of the amendments clarify the FASB’s intent about the application of existing fair value measurement requirements, such as specifying that the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise in a fair value measurement are relevant only when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets. Other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements such as specifying that, in the absence of a Level 1 input, a reporting entity should apply premiums or discounts when market participants would do so when pricing the asset or liability. This guidance will become effective for the Fund beginning January 1, 2012.  The Fund does not expect that adoption of this amendment will significantly impact its consolidated financial statements.

25

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

December 31, 2011

NOTE 3 – SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information is as follows (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	3,484	$	6,935	$	12,314

NOTE 4 – INVESTMENT IN LEASES AND LOANS

The Fund’s investment in leases and loans, net, consists of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2011			2010
Direct financing leases (a)	$	25,779		$	63,493
Loans (b)		14,154			26,775
Operating leases		278			1,974
		40,211			92,242
Allowance for credit losses		(760	)		(5,320	)
	$	39,451		$	86,922

(a) The Fund’s direct financing leases are for initial lease terms generally ranging from 24 to 120 months.

(b) The interest rates on loans generally range from 6% to 14%.

The components of direct financing leases and loans are as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2011						2010
	Leases			Loans			Leases			Loans
Total future minimum lease payments	$	27,286		$	16,030		$	68,308		$	31,010
Unearned income		(2,674	)		(1,765	)		(7,139	)		(4,106	)
Residuals, net of unearned residual income (a)		1,767			-			3,080			-
Security deposits		(600	)		(111	)		(756	)		(129	)
	$	25,779		$	14,154		$	63,493		$	26,775

(a) Unguaranteed residuals for direct financing leases represent the estimated amounts recoverable at lease termination from lease extensions or disposition of the equipment.

The Fund’s investment in operating leases, net, consists of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2011			2010
Equipment	$	1,426		$	6,714
Accumulated depreciation		(1,149	)		(4,760	)
Security deposits		1			20
	$	278		$	1,974

26

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

December 31, 2011

At December 31, 2011, the future minimum lease and loan payments and related rental payments scheduled to be received on non-cancelable direct financing leases, loans and operating leases for each of the five succeeding annual periods ending December 31 and thereafter, are as follows (in thousands):

	Direct Financing Leases		Loans		Operating Leases (a)		Total
2012	$	16,922	$	7,458	$	57	$	24,437
2013		6,877		5,083		17		11,977
2014		1,402		2,130		9		3,541
2015		715		629		-		1,344
2016		685		458		-		1,143
2017 and thereafter		685		272		-		957
	$	27,286	$	16,030	$	83	$	43,399

(a) Operating lease amounts as shown are net of the residual value, if any, at the end of the lease term.

NOTE 5 – ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES AND CREDIT QUALITY

The disclosures in this footnote follow new guidance issued by the FASB that requires companies to provide more information about the credit quality of their financing receivables including, but not limited to, significant purchases and sales of financing receivables, aging information and credit quality indicators.

The following table is an age analysis of the Fund’s receivables from leases and loans (presented gross of allowance for credit losses of $760,000 and $5.3 million for December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively) as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

Age of receivable	Investment in leases and loans		%			Investment in leases and loans		%
Current	$	37,692		93.7	%	$	81,739		88.6	%
Delinquent:
31 to 91 days past due		1,545		3.9	%		4,109		4.5	%
Greater than 91 days (a)		974		2.4	%		6,394		6.9	%
	$	40,211		100.0	%	$	92,242		100.0	%

(a) Balances in this age category are collectivelly evaluated for impairment.

The Fund had $974,000 and $6.4 million of leases and loans on nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  The credit quality of the Fund’s investment in leases and loans as of December 31, 2011 is as follows (in thousands):

27

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

December 31, 2011

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010
Performing	$	39,237	$	85,848
Nonperforming		974		6,394
	$	40,211	$	92,242

The following table summarizes the annual activity in the allowance for credit losses (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
Allowance for credit losses, beginning of year	$	5,320		$	11,380		$	5,770
Provision for credit losses		4,313			8,656			17,941
Charge-offs		(10,662	)		(15,868	)		(13,230	)
Recoveries		1,789			1,152			899
Allowance for credit losses, end of year (a)	$	760		$	5,320		$	11,380

(a) End of year balances were collectively evaluated for impairment.

NOTE 6 – DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, deferred financing costs include $1.3 million and $2.2 million, respectively, of unamortized costs which are being amortized over the terms of the estimated useful life of the related debt. Accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $4.7 million and $3.8 million, respectively.

NOTE 7 – DEBT AND NOTE PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTY

The Fund’s debt consists of the following (in thousands):

					December 31, 2011
	Type	Maturity Date			Facility Amount		Amount Outstanding		Amount Available			Interest rate per annum per agreement			Interest rate per annum adjusted for Swap (2)			December 31, 2010 Outstanding Balance
WestLB, AG	Term		(3	)	$	125,000	$	24,962		(1	)		(3	)		5.6	%	$	53,174
2007-01- Term Securitization - Class A-3 (4)	Term	July 2012				-		-		N/A		One month LIBOR + 0.20%				5.6	%		14,934
2007-01 Term Securitization - Class B	Term	March 2015				12,944		12,944		N/A			6.7	%		6.7	%		14,529
					$	137,944	$	37,906	$	-								$	82,637

(1) The Fund has no availability under this credit facility. Availability is subject to having eligible leases or loans (as defined in the respective agreement) to pledge as collateral, compliance with covenants and the borrowing base formula.

(2) To mitigate fluctuations in interest rates, the Fund entered into interest rate swap agreements. The interest rate swap agreements terminate on various dates and fix the interest rate.

(3) This revolving line of credit is collateralized by specific lease receivables and related equipment, with a 1% credit reserve of the outstanding line of credit. Interest on borrowings prior to March 2009 were calculated at London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.20% per annum. Borrowings under this facility after March 2009 are a rate of LIBOR plus 2.50% per annum. To mitigate fluctuations in interest rates, the Fund entered into interest rate swap agreements, which terminate on various dates ranging from July 2013 to August 2015. As of December 31, 2011, the interest rate swap agreements fixed the interest rate on this facility at 5.6%. This credit facility expired on June 30, 2010 and as discussed below, no additional borrowings are currently permitted under this facility.  Recourse under this facility is limited to the amount of collateral pledged. As of December 31, 2011, $26.2 million of leases and loans and $2.9 million of restricted cash were pledged as collateral under this facility.

(4) As of December 31, 2011, $13.6 million of leases and loans and $9.4 million of restricted cash were pledged as collateral under this securitization.

28

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

December 31, 2011

The Fund is subject to certain financial covenants related to its debt facilities. These covenants are related to such things as minimum tangible net worth, maximum leverage ratios and portfolio delinquency. The minimum tangible net worth covenants measure the Fund’s equity adjusted for intangibles and amounts due to its General Partner. The maximum leverage covenants restrict the amount that the Fund can borrow based on a ratio of its total debt compared to its net worth. The portfolio performance covenants generally provide that the Fund would be in default if a specified percentage of its portfolio of leases and loans was delinquent in payment beyond acceptable grace periods.

In addition, the Fund’s debt facilities include financial covenants covering affiliated entities responsible for servicing its portfolio. These covenants exist to provide the lenders with information about the financial viability of the entities that service the Fund’s portfolio. These entities include the Fund, its General Partner and certain other affiliates involved in the sourcing and servicing of the portfolio. These covenants are similar in nature to the Fund’s covenants and are related to such things as the entity’s minimum tangible net worth, maximum leverage ratios, managed portfolio delinquency and compliance of the debt terms of all of the General Partner’s managed entities.

On April 7, 2011 the Fund was notified by WestLB that it was in default on its loan agreement due to various ongoing covenant breaches.  These breaches relate to the percentage of defaulted leases in its portfolio, the percentage of defaulted leases in the overall lease portfolio serviced by the General Partner, and a required minimum credit support amount, among others.  As a result, the lender has advised the Fund that it has reserved, and continues to reserve, all of its rights and remedies provided for in the loan agreement including the right to (i) commence legal action to collect the obligations the Fund owes it; (ii) declare all amounts immediately due and payable; (iii) repossess the collateral the Fund has pledged to it under the loan agreement; and (iv) increase the interest rate on outstanding borrowings.  If the lender chooses to repossess and sell the Fund’s collateral, such a sale of a portfolio could be at prices lower than its carrying value, which could result in losses and reduce its income and distributions to its partners. As of December 31, 2011, the Fund was still in breach of several covenants under this facility.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Fund is not, nor has it been, delinquent on any monthly payments of principle and interest owed to the lender.  Moreover, while the lender has reserved its rights, it has not initiated exercise of any of the forgoing remedies.

Weighted average borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2011 were $58.4 million as compared to $117.9 million as of December 31, 2010, at effective interest rates of 8.41% and 7.66%, respectively.

Note payable to related party:  In addition to the borrowings discussed above, the Fund owes $7.8 million to Resource Capital Corporation (“RCC”) as of December 31, 2011, which is a related entity of the Fund through common management with RAI.  On June 3, 2011, the Fund paid a 1% fee to extend the note maturity date from March 4, 2011 to February 15, 2012 and to reduce the interest rate from 12% to 10% per year.  Monthly payments are made at approximately 0.3% of the outstanding principal and interest is payable quarterly.

As discussed in Note 12, on February 15, 2012 the Fund paid RCC a 1% fee, or $77,000, to extend the maturity of the note payable to related party to February 15, 2013.

Repayments: Estimated annual principal payments on the Fund’s aggregate borrowings (assuming that WestLB waives the aforementioned covenant breaches) over the next four years ended December 31, are as follows (in thousands):

December 31, 2012	$	28,498
December 31, 2013		11,162
December 31, 2014		3,400
December 31, 2015		2,666
	$	45,726

NOTE 8 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

Since the Fund’s assets are structured on a fixed-rate basis, and funds borrowed through bank debt are obtained on a floating-rate basis, the Fund is exposed to interest rate risk if rates rise because it will increase the Fund’s borrowing costs. In addition, when the Fund acquires assets, it bases its pricing in part on the spread it expects to achieve between the interest rate it charges its customers and the effective interest cost the Fund will pay when it funds those loans. Increases in interest rates that increase the Fund’s permanent funding costs between the time the assets are originated and the time they are funded could narrow, eliminate or even reverse this spread.

29

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

December 31, 2011

To manage interest rate risk, the Fund employs a hedging strategy using derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps.  As discussed previously, effective October 1, 2010, the Fund has elected not to use hedge accounting.  The Fund does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Fund manages the credit risk of possible counterparty default in these derivative transactions by dealing primarily with counterparties with investment grade ratings. The Fund has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if the Fund defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Fund could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. The Fund has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that incorporate the loan covenant provisions of the Fund’s indebtedness with a lender affiliate of the derivative counterparty. Failure to comply with the loan covenant provisions would result in the Fund being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by the agreement. As of December 31, 2011, the Fund has not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If the Fund had breached any of these provisions at December 31, 2011, it could be required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $821,000.

At December 31, 2011, the Fund has 20 interest rate swaps which terminate on various dates ranging from July 2013 to August 2015 which generally coincide with the maturity period of its portfolio of lease and loans.  These contracts, which fix the Fund’s interest rates on a portion of its variable rate debt, are based on 1 month LIBOR.  The following table indicates the notional amounts outstanding and the ranges of fixed and variable rates associated with these contracts as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

	2011			2010
Fixed swaps (notional amount)	$	24,657		$	167,118
Range of receive rate		0.45% - 0.56	%		0.26% - 1.05	%
Range of pay rate		3.03% - 5.55	%		3.03% - 5.55	%

The following table indicates the fair value of the derivative contracts as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

	Balance Sheet Location	Derivative Assets		Derivative Liabilities
2011	Derivatives liabilities, at fair value	$	-	$	(773	)
2010	Derivatives liabilities, at fair value	$	284	$	(2,602	)

30

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

December 31, 2011

The following table summarizes the effect of the interest rate swaps on the 2010 consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income prior to being de-designated on October 1, 2010 (in thousands):

	Amount of loss recognized in OCI (effective portion)			Location of loss reclassified from OCI to the statement of operations (effective portion)	Amount of loss reclassified from OCI to the statement of operations (effective portion)			Location of loss recognized in the statement of operations (ineffective portion)	Amount of loss recognized in the statement of operations (ineffective portion)
2010	$	(1,155	)	Interest expense	$	(3,639	)	Interest expense	$	-

The following table summarizes the effect of the interest rate swaps on the 2011 and 2010 consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income subsequent to being de-designated on October 1, 2010 (in thousands):

	Location of loss reclassified from OCI to the statement of operations	Amount of net (loss)/ gain reclassified from OCI to the statement of operations			Location of loss recognized in the statement of operations	Amount of net (loss)/gain recognized in the statement of operations
2011	Interest expense	$	(807	)	Various (1)	$	(238	)
2010	Interest expense	$	126		Various (1)	$	39

(1) All changes in fair value of derivatives subsequent to dedesignation as cash flow hedges were realized in Mark to market changes on derivative liabilities on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Assuming market rates remain constant with those at December 31, 2011, $511,000 of accumulated other comprehensive loss is expected to be charged to earnings over the next 12 months.

NOTE 9 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

For cash, receivables and payables, the carrying amounts approximate fair values because of the short term maturity of these instruments. The carrying value of debt approximates fair market value since interest rates approximate current market rates.

31

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

December 31, 2011

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability at the measurement date (exit price). U.S. GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3). The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the measurement in its entirety.

• Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

• Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.

• Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that reflect the entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and are consequently not based on market activity, but rather through particular valuation techniques.

The Fund employs a hedging strategy to manage exposure to the effects of changes in market interest rates. All derivatives are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at their fair value as either assets or liabilities. Because the Fund’s derivatives are not listed on an exchange, these instruments are valued by a third-party pricing agent using an income approach and utilizing models that use as their primary basis readily observable market parameters. This valuation process considers factors including interest rate yield curves, time value, credit factors and volatility factors. Although the Fund has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties.  However, the Fund has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Fund has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Assets (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis included the following (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements Using							Assets (Liabilities)
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		At Fair  Value
Interest rate swap liabilities at December 31, 2011	$	-	$	(773	)	$	-	$	(773	)
Interest rate swap liabilities at December 31, 2010	$	-	$	(2,602	)	$	-	$	(2,602	)
Interest rate swap assets at December 31, 2010	$	-	$	284		$	-	$	284

NOTE 10 – CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

The Fund relies on the General Partner and its affiliates to manage the Fund’s operations and pays the General Partner or its affiliates fees to manage the Fund. The following is a summary of fees and costs of services and materials charged by the General Partner or its affiliates (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010			2009
Acquisition fees	$	-	$	153		$	123
Management (credit) fees		-		(215	)		2,921
Administrative expenses		646		1,621			2,491

Acquisition Fees: The General Partner is paid a fee for assisting the Fund in acquiring equipment subject to existing equipment leases equal to 2% of the purchase price the Fund pays for the equipment or portfolio of equipment subject to existing equipment financing.

Management Fees: The General Partner was paid a subordinated annual asset management fee equal to 4% of gross rental payments for operating leases or 2 % for full payout leases, or a competitive fee, whichever is less. During the Fund’s five-year investment period, the management fees were subordinated to the payment to the Fund’s limited partners of a cumulative annual distribution of 8.0% of their capital contributions, as adjusted by distributions deemed to be a return of capital.  In 2010, the General Partner waived asset management fees including those accrued for in December 2009.  Approximately $1.1 million of management fees were waived for the year ended December 31, 2011 and approximately $3.4 million have been waived on a cumulative basis.  The General Partner has waived all future management fees.

32

LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements – (Continued)

December 31, 2011

Administrative Expenses: The General Partner and its affiliates are reimbursed by the Fund for administrative services reasonably necessary to operate which don’t exceed the General Partner’s cost of those fees or services.

Due to Affiliates:  Due to affiliates includes amounts due to the General Partner related to acquiring and managing portfolios of equipment from its General Partner, management fees and reimbursed expenses.

Distributions:  The General Partner owns a 1% general partner interest and a 2.0% limited partner interest in the Fund. The General Partner was paid cash distributions of $12,000 and $19,000, respectively, for its general partner and limited partner interests in the Fund in 2011.

NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In connection with a sale of leases and loans to a third-party in July of 2008, the Fund contractually agreed to repurchase delinquent leases up to a maximum of $2.3 million calculated as 7.5% of total proceeds received from the sale (“Repurchase Commitment”).  As of December 31, 2011, the Fund has a $12,000 remaining Repurchase Commitment of which $0 was recorded as a liability.

The Fund is party to various legal proceeding arising out of the ordinary course of its business. Management believes that none of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Fund’s financial condition or results of operations.

NOTE 12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On February 15, 2012, the Fund extended the maturity date of the note payable to related party from February 15, 2012 to February 15, 2013 by paying a 1% fee, or $77,000, to RCC..

33

ITEM 9 – CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision of our General Partner’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our General Partner’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our General Partner’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our General Partner’s management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO, in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based upon this assessment, our General Partner’s management concluded that, as of December 31, 2011, our internal control over financial reporting is effective.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B – OTHER INFORMATION

On June 8, 2011 we commenced a solicitation of our limited partners seeking their consent to amend the Limited Partnership Agreement to extend our reinvestment period for an additional two years and to allow for reinvestment of Distributable Cash in new leases and loans prior to full settlement of the Unpaid Cumulative Return to our partners.  The Limited Partnership Agreement defines “Distributable Cash” generally as our gross revenue without deduction for depreciation, but after deducting cash funds used to pay all expenses, debt service, capital improvements and replacements, and less amounts allocated to reserves by our General Partner and plus amounts released from reserves by our General Partner.  The Limited Partnership Agreement defines “Unpaid Cumulative Return” as the amount of the limited partner’s Cumulative Return, reduced by aggregate distributions made to such limited partner, and defines “Cumulative Return” as an amount equal to an 8.0% annual cumulative return on the limited partner’s Adjusted Capital Contribution. A limited partner’s “Adjusted Capital Contribution” is the aggregate initial purchase price paid for a limited partner’s units of limited partnership interest, reduced by all distributions theretofore made to a limited partner in excess of the Cumulative Return. Voting on the amendments closed in December 2011.   A majority of the limited partner units outstanding were required to vote in favor of the proposed amendments to enact the proposed changes.  However, we did not receive the required number of votes necessary to (1) extend the reinvestment period for an additional two years or (2) to allow for reinvestment of Distributable Cash prior to full settlement of the Unpaid Cumulative Return.  Accordingly, the Fund entered the liquidation phase in October 2011 and all Distributable Cash will continue to be used to settle the Unpaid Cumulative Return.

34

PART III

ITEM 10 – DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Our General Partner manages our activities. Although our limited partners have limited voting rights under our partnership agreement, they do not directly or indirectly participate in our management or operations or have actual or apparent authority to enter into contracts on our behalf or to otherwise bind us. Our General Partner will be liable, as General Partner, for all of our debts to the extent not paid, except to the extent that indebtedness or other obligations incurred by it are specifically with recourse only to our assets. Whenever possible, our General Partner intends to make any of our indebtedness or other obligations with recourse only to our assets.

As is commonly the case with limited partnerships, we do not directly employ any of the persons responsible for our management or operation. Rather, our General Partner’s personnel manage and operate our business. Officers of our General Partner may spend a substantial amount of time managing the business and affairs of our General Partner and its affiliates and may face a conflict regarding the allocation of their time between our business and affairs and their other business interests.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the directors and executive officers of our General Partner.

Name	Age	Position
Crit S. DeMent	59	Chief Executive Officer
Jonathan Z. Cohen	41	Director
Jeffrey F. Brotman	48	Director
Robert K. Moskovitz	55	Chief Financial Officer

Crit S. DeMent was Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of LEAF Financial since November 2001 until December 14, 2011. Mr. DeMent also serves as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of LEAF Asset Management since it was formed in August 2006, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of LEAF Funding since March 2003, a Senior Vice President of Resource America since 2005 and Senior Vice President – Equipment Leasing of Resource Capital Corp. since March 2005. Beginning January 1, 2011, Mr. DeMent serves as the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of LEAF Commercial Capital, Inc.  Before that, he was President of Fidelity Leasing, Inc. and its successor, the Technology Finance Group of Citi-Capital Vendor Finance from 1998 to 2001. Mr. DeMent was Vice President of Marketing for Tokai Financial Services from 1987 through 1996. Mr. DeMent serves as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Equipment Leasing and Finance Association.

Jonathan Z. Cohen has been a Director of LEAF Financial Corporation since January 2002, and a Director of LEAF Asset Management since it was formed in August 2006. Mr. Cohen also serves, or has served, in the following positions with Resource America: a Director since 2002, President since 2003, Chief Executive Officer since 2004, Chief Operating Officer from 2002 to 2004, Executive Vice President from 2001 to 2003, and Senior Vice President from 1999 to 2001. In addition, Mr. Cohen serves as Chief Executive Officer, President and a Director of Resource Capital Corp. (a publicly-traded real estate investment trust) since its formation in 2005. Mr. Cohen also serves as Vice Chairman of the Managing Board of Atlas Pipeline Partners GP, LLC (the general partner of Atlas Pipeline Partners, L.P., a publicly-traded oil and gas pipeline limited partnership) since its formation in 1999, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Atlas Energy GP, LLC (the general partner of Atlas Energy, L.P. (f/k/a Atlas Pipeline Holdings, L.P.), a publicly-traded oil and gas limited partnership) and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Atlas Resource Partners GP, LLC (the general partner of Atlas Resource Partners, L.P., a publicly-traded oil and gas E&P limited partnership) since February 2012.  Mr. Cohen was also Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Atlas Energy, Inc. ((f/k/a Atlas America, Inc.) a publicly-traded oil and gas company) from September 2000 until February 2011 and Vice Chairman of Atlas Energy Resources, LLC from June 2006 until February 2011.

Jeffrey F. Brotman has been a Director of LEAF Financial since April 2008. Mr. Brotman has also been Executive Vice President of Resource America since June 2007. Mr. Brotman was a co-founder of Ledgewood, P.C. (a Philadelphia-based law firm) and was affiliated with the firm from 1992 until June 2007, serving as its managing partner from 1995 until March 2006. Mr. Brotman is also a non-active Certified Public Accountant and an Adjunct Professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. Mr. Brotman was Chairman of the Board of Directors of TRM Corporation (a publicly-traded consumer services company) from September 2006 until September 2008 and was its President and Chief Executive Officer from March 2006 through June 2007.

The board of directors of our General Partner has not adopted specific minimum qualifications for service on the board, but rather seeks a mixture of skills that are relevant to our business. The following presents a brief summary of the attributes of each director that led to the conclusion that such person should serve as a director:

Mr. DeMent has lengthy and extensive experience in the equipment leasing and finance industry.

35

Mr. Cohen has extensive financial and operational experience, including as the chief executive officer of our general partner’s publicly traded parent company.

Mr. Brotman has significant experience in finance, as an attorney, and as the chief executive officer of a public company.

Robert K. Moskovitz has been Chief Financial Officer of LEAF Financial since February 2004, Treasurer of LEAF Financial from September 2004 until April 2009, and Assistant Secretary of LEAF Financial since June 2007. Mr. Moskovitz also serves as Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary of LEAF Asset Management since it was formed in August 2006, and Chief Financial Officer and a Director of LEAF Funding since May 2004.  Beginning January 1, 2011, Mr. Moskovitz serves as the Chief Financial Officer of LEAF Commercial Capital, Inc.  He has over twenty years of experience as the Chief Financial Officer of both publicly and privately owned companies. From 2002 to 2004, Mr. Moskovitz was an independent consultant on performance management initiatives, primarily to the financial services industry. From 2001 to 2002 he was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ImpactRx, Inc., which provides advanced sales and marketing intelligence to pharmaceutical companies. From 1983 to 2001 Mr. Moskovitz held senior executive level financial positions with several high growth public and privately held companies. He began his professional career with Deloitte & Touché (formerly Touché Ross & Co). Mr. Moskovitz holds a B.S. degree in Business Administration from Drexel University.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Because we do not directly employ any persons, we rely on a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics adopted by Resource America, Inc. that applies to the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of our General Partner, as well as to persons performing services for us generally. You may obtain a copy of this code of ethics by a request to our General Partner at LEAF Financial Corporation, One Commerce Square, 2005 Market Street, 14th Floor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which we refer to as the Exchange Act, requires the directors and executive officers of our General Partner, our General Partners, and holders greater than 10% of our limited partnership interests to file reports with the SEC. SEC regulations require us to identify anyone who filed a required report late during the most recent fiscal year.  Based on our review of these reports, we believe that the filing requirements for all of these reporting persons were complied with during 2011.

ITEM 11 – EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We do not have, and do not expect to have, any employees as discussed in Item 10 – “Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.” Instead, our management and day-to-day activities are provided by the employees of our General Partner and its affiliates. No officer or director of our General Partner will receive any direct remuneration from us. Those persons will receive compensation solely from our General Partner or its affiliates other than us.

ITEM 12 – SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED UNIT HOLDER MATTERS

(a) We had 1,405 limited partners as of December 31, 2011.

(b) In 2004, our General Partner contributed $1,000 to our capital as our General Partner and received its General Partner interest in us. As of December 31, 2011 our General Partner owned 11,986 of our limited partner units. These purchases of limited partner units by our General Partner and its affiliates were at a price discounted by the 7% sales commission which was paid by most of our other limited partners.

(c) We know of no arrangements that would, at any date subsequent to the date of this report, result in a change in control of us.

(d) Our General Partner’s name and address is LEAF Financial Corporation, One Commerce Square, 2005 Market Street, 14th Floor, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.

36

ITEM 13 – CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

We do not directly employ any persons to manage or operate our business. These functions are provided by our General Partner and employees of our General Partner and/or its affiliates. We reimburse our General Partner and/or its affiliates for all direct and indirect costs of services provided, including the cost of employees and benefits properly allocable to us and all other expenses necessary or appropriate for the conduct of our business. The following is a summary of fees and costs of services charged by our General Partner or its affiliates (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010			2009
Acquisition fees	$	-	$	153		$	123
Management (credit) fees		-		(215	)		2,921
Administrative expenses		646		1,621			2,491

Acquisition Fees: Our General Partner was paid a fee for assisting us in acquiring equipment subject to existing equipment leases equal to 2% of the purchase price we paid for the equipment or portfolio of equipment subject to existing equipment financing.

Management Fees: Our General Partner was paid a subordinated annual asset management fee equal to 4% of gross rental payments for operating leases or 2 % for full payout leases, or a competitive fee, whichever is less. During our five-year investment period, the management fees were subordinated to the payment to our limited partners of a cumulative annual distribution of 8.0% of their capital contributions, as adjusted by distributions deemed to be a return of capital.  In 2010, our General Partner waived asset management fees including those accrued for in December 2009.  Approximately $1.1 million of management fees were waived for the year ended December 31, 2011 and approximately $3.4 million have been waived on a cumulative basis.  Our General Partner has waived all future management fees.

Administrative Expenses: Our General Partner and its affiliates are reimbursed by us for administrative services reasonably necessary to operate which don’t exceed our General Partner’s cost of those fees or services.

Due to Affiliates:  Due to affiliates includes amounts due to our General Partner related to acquiring and managing portfolios of equipment from our General Partner, management fees and reimbursed expenses.

Note Payable to related party:   We owe $7.8 million to Resource Capital Corporation (“RCC”) as of December 31, 2011, which is a related entity of ours through common management with RAI.  On June 3, 2011, we paid a 1% fee to extend the note maturity date from March 4, 2011 to February 15, 2012 and to reduce the interest rate from 12% to 10% per year.  On February 15, 2012, we extended the maturity date of the note payable to related party from February 15, 2012 to February 15, 2013 by paying a 1% fee, or $77,000, to RCC.  Monthly payments are made at approximately 0.3% of the outstanding principal and interest is payable quarterly.

Distributions. Our General Partner owns a 1% general partner interest and a 2.0% limited partner interest in us. Our General Partner was paid cash distributions of $12,000 and $19,000 respectively, for its general partner and limited partner interests in us in 2011.

Additionally, our General Partner is entitled to the following fees (if applicable):

• a subordinated commission equal to one-half of a competitive commission, up to a maximum of 3% of the contract sales price, for arranging the sale of our equipment after the expiration of a lease. During the reinvestment period, these commissions are subordinated to the payment of distributions to our limited partners of a cumulative annual return of 8%, compounded daily, on their capital contributions, as adjusted by distributions deemed to be a return of capital. No commissions were paid in the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010; and

• a commission equal to the lesser of a competitive rate or 2% of gross rental payments derived from any re-lease of equipment, payable as we receive rental payments from re-lease. We will not, however, pay a re-lease commission if the re-lease is with the original lessee or its affiliates. No re-lease commissions were paid in the years ended December 31, 2011 or 2010.

Because we are not listed on any national securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system, we have elected to use the Nasdaq National Stock Market’s definition of “independent director” in evaluating whether any of our General Partner’s directors are independent. Under this definition, the board of directors of our General Partner has determined that Linda Richardson is an independent Director of our General Partner.

37

ITEM 14 – PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed by our independent auditors, Grant Thornton, LLP were $157,000 and $158,000 in the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Audit-Related Fees. We did not incur fees in 2011 for other services not included above.

Tax Fees. We did not incur fees in 2011 for other services not included above.

All Other Fees. We did not incur fees in 2011 for other services not included above.

Procedures for Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditor.

Our General Partner’s Board of Directors reviews and approves in advance any audit and any permissible non-audit engagement or relationship between us and our independent auditors.

38

PART IV

ITEM 15 – EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

1. Financial Statements

The financial statements required by this Item are set forth in Item 8 – “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

2. Financial Statement Schedules

No schedules are required to be presented in this report under Regulation S-X promulgated by the SEC.

3. Exhibits

39

Exhibit No.	Description
3.1	Certificate of Limited Partnership for Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (1)
3.2	Amended Certificate of Limited Partnership for Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P.(2)
3.3	Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership for Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (4)
4.1	Forms of letters sent to limited partners confirming their investment (1)
10.1	Origination & Servicing Agreement among LEAF Financial Corporation, Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P. and LEAF Funding, Inc. dated April 15, 2005 (3)
10.2	Secured Loan Agreement dated as of June 1, 2005 with LEAF Fund II, LLC as Borrower, LEAF Funding, Inc. as Originator, Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P. as Seller, LEAF Financial Corporation as Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Collateral Agent and Securities Intermediary and WestLB AG, New York Branch as Lender (3)
10.3	First Amendment to WestLB AG, New York Branch, Secured Loan Agreement (5)
10.4	Second Amendment to WestLB AG, New York Branch, Secured Loan Agreement (6)
10.5	Third Amendment to WestLB AG, New York Branch, Secured Loan Agreement (7)
10.6	Fifth Amendment to WestLB AG, New York Branch, Secured Loan Agreement (8)
10.7	Sixth Amendment to WestLB AG, New York Branch, Secured Loan Agreement (9)
10.8	Indenture among LEAF II Receivables Funding, LLC as issuer, and U.S. Bank National Association as trustee and custodian (9)
10.9	Seventh Amendment to WestLB AG, New York Branch, Secured Loan Agreement (10)
10.10	Eighth Amendment to WestLB AG, New York Branch, Secured Loan Agreement (10)
10.11	Ninth Amendment to WestLB AG, New York Branch, Secured Loan Agreement (11)
10.12	Tenth Amendment to WestLB AG, New York Branch, Secured Loan Agreement (11)
10.13	Eleventh Amendment to WestLB AG, New York Branch, Secured Loan Agreement (11)
10.14	Twelfth Amendment to WestLB AG, New York Branch, Secured Loan Agreement (12)
10.15	Thirteenth Amendment to WestLB AG, New York Branch, Secured Loan Agreement (12)
10.16	Fourteenth Amendment to West LB AG, New York Branch, Secured Loan Agreement (12)
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 1350 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101	Interactive data file containing the following financial statements formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners’ (Deficit) Capital for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009; and, (iv) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text.

(1) Filed previously on June 17, 2004 as an exhibit to our Registration Statement and by this reference incorporated herein.

(2) Filed previously on September 7, 2004 in Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 as an exhibit to our Registration Statement and by this reference incorporated herein.

(3) Filed previously as an exhibit to our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and by this reference incorporated herein.

(4) Filed previously on December 27, 2005 as Appendix A Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to our Registration Statement and by this reference incorporated herein.

40

(5) Filed previously as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and by this reference incorporated herein.

(6) Filed previously as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 and by this reference incorporated herein.

(7) Filed previously as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and by this reference incorporated herein.

(8) Filed previously as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and by this reference incorporated herein.

(9) Filed previously as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and by this reference incorporated herein.

(10) Filed previously as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and by this reference incorporated herein.

(11) Filed previously as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 and by this reference incorporated herein.

(12) Filed previously as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and by this reference incorporated herein.

41

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	LEASE EQUITY APPRECIATION FUND II, L.P.
	Delaware Limited Partnership
	By:	LEAF Financial Corporation,  the General Partner
March 28, 2012	By:	/s/ CRIT S. DEMENT
		CRIT S. DEMENT
		Chief Executive Officer
March 28, 2012	By:	/s/ ROBERT K. MOSKOVITZ
		ROBERT K. MOSKOVITZ
		Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ Crit S. DeMent	Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner	March 28, 2012
CRIT S. DEMENT	(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Robert K. Moskovitz	Chief Financial Officer	March 28, 2012
ROBERT K. MOSKOVITZ	(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
/s/ Jonathan Z. Cohen	Director of the General Partner	March 28, 2012
JONATHAN Z. COHEN
/s/ Jeffrey F. Brotman	Director of the General Partner	March 28, 2012
JEFFREY F. BROTMAN

42

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Crit S. DeMent, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 28, 2012	/s/ Crit S. DeMent
	Name: Crit S. DeMent
	Title: Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Robert K. Moskovitz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011  of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under such supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 28, 2012	/s/ Robert K. Moskovitz
	Name: Robert K. Moskovitz
	Title: Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Crit S. DeMent, Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  March 28, 2012	/s/ Crit S. DeMent
	Name: Crit S. DeMent
	Title: Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner

EX-32.2

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert K. Moskovitz, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  March 28, 2012	/s/ Robert K. Moskovitz
	Name: Robert K. Moskovitz
	Title: Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner

XML

INVESTMENT IN LEASES AND LOANS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

INVESTMENT IN LEASES AND LOANS [Abstract]

INVESTMENT IN LEASES AND LOANS

NOTE 4 – INVESTMENT IN LEASES AND LOANS

The Fund's investment in leases and loans, net, consists of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2011			2010
Direct financing leases (a)	$	25,779		$	63,493
Loans (b)		14,154			26,775
Operating leases		278			1,974
		40,211			92,242
Allowance for credit losses		(760	)		(5,320	)
	$	39,451		$	86,922

(a) The Fund's direct financing leases are for initial lease terms generally ranging from 24 to 120 months.

(b) The interest rates on loans generally range from 6% to 14%.

The components of direct financing leases and loans are as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2011						2010
	Leases			Loans			Leases			Loans
Total future minimum lease payments	$	27,286		$	16,030		$	68,308		$	31,010
Unearned income		(2,674	)		(1,765	)		(7,139	)		(4,106	)
Residuals, net of unearned residual income (a)		1,767			-			3,080			-
Security deposits		(600	)		(111	)		(756	)		(129	)
	$	25,779		$	14,154		$	63,493		$	26,775

(a) Unguaranteed residuals for direct financing leases represent the estimated amounts recoverable at lease termination from lease extensions or disposition of the equipment.

The Fund's investment in operating leases, net, consists of the following (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2011			2010
Equipment	$	1,426		$	6,714
Accumulated depreciation		(1,149	)		(4,760	)
Security deposits		1			20
	$	278		$	1,974

At December 31, 2011, the future minimum lease and loan payments and related rental payments scheduled to be received on non-cancelable direct financing leases, loans and operating leases for each of the five succeeding annual periods ending December 31 and thereafter, are as follows (in thousands):

	Direct Financing Leases		Loans		Operating Leases (a)		Total
2012	$	16,922	$	7,458	$	57	$	24,437
2013		6,877		5,083		17		11,977
2014		1,402		2,130		9		3,541
2015		715		629		-		1,344
2016		685		458		-		1,143
2017 and thereafter		685		272		-		957
	$	27,286	$	16,030	$	83	$	43,399

(a) Operating lease amounts as shown are net of the residual value, if any, at the end of the lease term.

XML

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION [Abstract]

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

NOTE 3 – SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information is as follows (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	3,484	$	6,935	$	12,314

XML

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
ASSETS
Cash	$ 21	$ 239
Restricted cash	13,056	15,870
Accounts receivable	4	65
Investment in leases and loans, net	39,451	86,922
Deferred financing costs, net	1,302	2,230
Other assets	128	272
Total assets	53,962	105,598
Liabilities:
Debt	37,906	82,637
Note payable to related party	7,820	7,988
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	438	317
Other liabilities	368	535
Derivative liabilities, at fair value	773	2,318
Due to affiliates	17,149	17,230
Total liabilities	64,454	111,025
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Partners' Deficit:
General partner	(605)	(546)
Limited partners	(8,631)	(2,818)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(1,256)	(2,063)
Total partners' deficit	(10,492)	(5,427)
Total liabilities and partners' deficit	$ 53,962	$ 105,598

XML

ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS [Abstract]

ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS

Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P. (the “Fund”) is a Delaware limited partnership formed on March 30, 2004 by its General Partner, LEAF Financial Corporation (the “General Partner”). The General Partner manages the Fund. The General Partner is a subsidiary of Resource America, Inc. (“RAI”). RAI is a publicly-traded company (NASDAQ: REXI) that uses industry specific expertise to evaluate, originate, service and manage investment opportunities through its commercial finance, real estate and financial fund management segments. Through its offering termination date of October 13, 2006, the Fund raised $60.0 million by selling 600,000 of its limited partner units. It commenced operations in April 2005.

The Fund is expected to have a nine-year life, consisting of an offering period of up to two years, a five-year reinvestment period and a subsequent liquidation period of two years, during which the Fund's leases and secured loans will either mature or be sold. In the event the Fund is unable to sell its leases and secured loans during the liquidation period, the Fund is expected to continue to return capital to its partners as those leases and loans mature. Substantially all of the Fund's leases and loans mature by the end of 2014. The Fund entered its liquidation period in October 2011. The Fund will terminate on December 31, 2029, unless sooner dissolved or terminated as provided in the Limited Partnership Agreement.

The Fund acquired diversified portfolios of equipment to finance to end users throughout the United States as well as the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. The Fund also acquired existing portfolios of equipment subject to existing financings from other equipment finance companies, primarily an affiliate of its General Partner. The primary objective of the Fund is to generate regular cash distributions to its partners from its equipment finance portfolio over the life of the Fund.

As of December 31, 2011, in addition to its 1% general partnership interest, the General Partner also had invested $1.0 million for a 2.0% limited partnership interest in the Fund.

XML

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES [Abstract]

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Fund and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, LEAF Fund II, LLC and LEAF II Receivables Funding, LLC.  All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassification

Certain reclassifications have been made to 2010 and 2009 reported amounts to conform to the current year presentation.  In the statement of operations, renewal income of approximately $123,000 and $217,000 were reclassified to ‘Interest on equipment financings' and ‘Rental income,' respectively, from ‘Other Income' for the year ended December 31, 2010.  Also, renewal income of approximately $260,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009 that was previously included in 'Other income' has been reclassified to ‘Interest on equipment financings' on the statement of operations.  Additionally, amortization of other comprehensive income on the Fund's interest rate swaps of approximately $159,000 for the year ended December 2010 was reclassified from “Loss on derivative activities” to “Interest expense.”

Use of Estimates

Preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates include the allowance for credit losses, the estimated unguaranteed residual values of leased equipment, and the fair value and effectiveness of interest rate swaps. The Fund bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includes cash being held in reserve by the Fund's lenders. Restricted cash also includes approximately $723,000 of customer payments deposited into a lockbox shared with the General Partner and other entities serviced by the Fund's General Partner. The lockbox is in the name of U.S. Bank NA as trustee under an inter-creditor agreement amongst the Fund's General Partner, the other entities and their respective lenders. These amounts, which are recorded as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheets, represent customer payments received by the lockbox, applied to the respective customer's accounts, but not transferred to the Fund's bank account.

Concentration of Credit Risk

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, 13% of the Fund's portfolio was concentrated in California.  No other state accounted for more than 9% of the Fund's portfolio balance as of December 31, 2011.

Investments in Leases and Loans

The Fund's investments in leases and loans consist of direct financing leases, operating leases and loans.

Direct Financing Leases. Certain of the Fund's lease transactions are accounted for as direct financing leases (as distinguished from operating leases). Such leases transfer substantially all benefits and risks of equipment ownership to the customer. The Fund's investment in direct financing leases consists of the sum of the total future minimum lease payments receivable plus the estimated unguaranteed residual value of leased equipment, less unearned finance income. Unearned finance income, which is recognized as revenue over the term of the financing by the effective interest method, represents the excess of the total future minimum lease payments plus the estimated unguaranteed residual value over the cost of the related equipment.

Unguaranteed residual value represents the estimated amount to be received at lease termination from lease extensions or ultimate disposition of the leased equipment. The estimates of residual values are based upon the General Partner's history with regard to the realization of residuals, available industry data and the General Partner's senior management's experience with respect to comparable equipment. The estimated residual values are recorded as a component of investments in leases. Residual values are reviewed periodically to determine if the current estimate of the equipment's fair market value appears to be below its recorded estimate. If required, residual values are adjusted downward to reflect adjusted estimates of fair market values. Upward adjustments to residual values are not permitted.

Operating Leases. Leases not meeting the criteria to be classified as direct financing leases are deemed to be operating leases. Under the accounting for operating leases, the cost of the leased equipment, including acquisition fees associated with lease placements, is recorded as an asset and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the equipment's estimated useful life, generally up to seven years. Rental income consists primarily of monthly periodic rental payments due under the terms of the leases. The Fund recognizes rental income on a straight line basis. Generally, during the lease terms of existing operating leases, the Fund will not recover all of the cost and related expenses of its rental equipment and, therefore, it is prepared to remarket the equipment in future years. The Fund's policy is to review, on a quarterly basis, the expected economic life of its rental equipment in order to determine the recoverability of its undepreciated cost. The Fund writes down its rental equipment to its estimated net realizable value when it is probable that its carrying amount exceeds such value and the excess can be reasonably estimated; gains are only recognized upon actual sale of the rental equipment. There were no write-downs of equipment during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

Loans. For term loans, the investment in loans consists of the sum of the total future minimum loan payments receivable less unearned finance income. Unearned finance income, which is recognized as revenue over the term of the financing by the effective interest method, represents the excess of the total future minimum contracted loan payments over the cost of the related equipment. For all other loans, interest income is recorded at the stated rate on the accrual basis to the extent that such amounts are expected to be collected.

Allowance for credit losses. The Fund evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses (including investments in leases and loans) based upon, among other factors, management's historical experience on the portfolios it manages, an analysis of contractual delinquencies, economic conditions and trends, and equipment finance portfolio characteristics, adjusted for expected recoveries. In evaluating historic performance, the Fund performs a migration analysis, which estimates the likelihood that an account progresses through delinquency stages to ultimate charge-off. After an account becomes 180 or more days past due, any remaining balance is fully-reserved less an estimated recovery amount.  Generally, the account is then charged-off and referred to the Fund internal recovery group consisting of a team of credit specialists and collectors. The group utilizes several resources in an attempt to maximize recoveries on charged-off accounts including:  1) initiating litigation against the end user customer and any personal guarantor, 2) referring the account to an outside law firm or collection agency and/or 3) repossessing and remarketing the equipment through third parties. The Fund's policy is to charge off to the allowance those financings which are in default and for which management has determined the probability of collection to be remote. The Fund discontinues the recognition of revenue for leases and loans for which payments are more than 90 days past due. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Fund had $974,000 and $6.4 million, respectively, of leases and loans on non-accrual status. Payments received while leases and loans are on non-accrual status are recorded as a reduction of principal. Income recognition resumes when a lease or loan becomes less than 90 days delinquent. Fees from delinquent payments are recognized when received and are included in other income.

Transfers of Financial Assets

In connection with establishing its credit facilities with its banks, the Fund formed bankruptcy remote special purpose entities through which the financings are arranged. The Fund's transfers of assets to the special purpose entities do not qualify for sales accounting treatment due to certain call provisions that the Fund maintains. Accordingly, assets and related debt of the special purpose entities are included in the Fund's consolidated balance sheets. The Fund's leases and restricted cash are assigned as collateral for these borrowings and there is no further recourse to the general credit of the Fund. Collateral in excess of these borrowings represents the Fund's maximum loss exposure.

The Fund may sell leases to third parties. Leases are accounted for as sold when control of the lease is surrendered. Control over the leases are deemed surrendered when (1) the leases have been isolated from the Fund, (2) the buyer has the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the leases and (3) the Fund does not maintain effective control over the leases through either (a) an agreement that entitles and obligates the Fund to repurchase or redeem the leases before maturity, or (b) the ability to unilaterally cause the buyer to return specific leases. In connection with these sales, the Fund's General Partner, the servicer of the leases prior to the sale, may continue to service the leases for the third party in exchange for “adequate compensation” as defined under U.S. GAAP. The Fund accrues liabilities for obligations associated with leases and loans sold which the Fund may be required to repurchase due to breaches of representations and warranties and early payment defaults. The Fund periodically evaluates the estimates used in calculating expected losses and adjustments are reported in earnings. To obtain fair values, the Fund generally estimates fair value based on the present value of future cash flows estimated using management's best estimates of key assumptions, including credit losses and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. As these estimates are influenced by factors outside the Fund's control and as uncertainty is inherent in these estimates, actual amounts charged off could differ from amounts recorded. The provision for repurchases is recorded as a component of gain on sales of leases and loans.

Derivative Instruments

The Fund recognizes all derivatives at fair value as either assets or liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The accounting for subsequent changes in the fair value of these derivatives depends on whether the derivative has been designated and qualified for hedge accounting treatment pursuant to U.S. GAAP.

Prior to October 1, 2010, the Fund entered into derivative contracts, including interest rate swaps, substantially all of which were accounted for as cash flow hedges.  Under hedge accounting, the effective portion of the gain or loss on a derivative designated as a cash flow hedge was reported in accumulated other comprehensive income on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and was then reclassified into earnings as an adjustment to interest expense over the term of the related borrowing.

Effective October 1, 2010, the Fund discontinued the use of hedge accounting. Therefore, any subsequent changes in the fair value of derivative instruments, including those that had previously been accounted for under hedge accounting, is recognized immediately in the consolidated statement of operations. While the Fund will continue to use derivative financial instruments to reduce exposure to changing interest rates, this accounting change may create volatility in Fund's results of operations, as the fair value of Fund's derivative financial instruments change.

For the forecasted transactions that are probable of occurring, the derivative gain or loss remaining in accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2011 is being reclassified into earnings as an adjustment to interest expense over the terms of the related forecasted borrowings, consistent with hedge accounting treatment. In the event that the related forecasted borrowing is no longer probable of occurring, the related gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income will be recognized in earnings immediately.

Income Taxes

Federal and state income tax laws provide that the income or losses of the Fund are reportable by the Partners on their individual income tax returns. Accordingly, no provision for such taxes has been made in the accompanying financial statements.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and all other changes in the equity of a business during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. These changes, other than net income, are referred to as “other comprehensive income (loss)” and for the Fund only include changes as a result of hedging activities.

Allocation of Partnership Income, Loss and Cash Distributions

Cash distributions, if any, are made monthly as follows: 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the General Partner until the limited partners have received an amount equal to their unpaid cumulative return (8%) of their adjusted capital contribution.

Net income for any fiscal period during the reinvestment period (the period commencing October 13, 2006 and ending October 13, 2011) is allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the General Partner. Income during the liquidation period, as defined in the Partnership Agreements, will be allocated first to the Partners in proportion to and to the extent of the deficit balances, if any, in their respective capital accounts. Thereafter, net income will be allocated 99% to the limited partners and 1% to the General Partner.

Net Income (Loss) per Limited Partner Unit

Net income (loss) per limited partner unit is computed by dividing net loss allocated to the Fund's Limited Partners by the weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding during the period is computed based on the number of limited partner units issued during the period weighted for the days outstanding during the period.

Recent Accounting Standards

Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Effective

The FASB has issued the following guidance that is not yet effective for the Fund as of December 31, 2011:

Comprehensive Income - In June 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to eliminate the option to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity.  The amendment requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders' equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. This guidance will become effective for the Fund beginning January 1, 2012.

Fair Value Measurements - In May 2011, the FASB issued an amendment to revise the wording used to describe the requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. For many of the requirements, the FASB does not intend for the amendments to result in a change in the application of the current requirements. Some of the amendments clarify the FASB's intent about the application of existing fair value measurement requirements, such as specifying that the concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise in a fair value measurement are relevant only when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets. Other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements such as specifying that, in the absence of a Level 1 input, a reporting entity should apply premiums or discounts when market participants would do so when pricing the asset or liability. This guidance will become effective for the Fund beginning January 1, 2012.  The Fund does not expect that adoption of this amendment will significantly impact its consolidated financial statements.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 31, 2009
Revenues:
Interest on equipment financings	$ 5,123	$ 10,397	$ 17,829
Rental income	759	1,798	2,750
Losses on sales of equipment and lease dispositions, net	(297)	(585)	(626)
Other income	781	1,801	1,676
Revenues	6,366	13,411	21,629
Expenses:
Interest expense	3,443	7,713	12,862
Interest expense to related party	873	771	0
Depreciation on operating leases	541	1,242	2,193
Provision for credit losses	4,313	8,656	17,941
Mark to market changes on derivative liabilities	238	(39)	0
General and administrative expenses	986	1,430	2,635
Administrative expenses reimbursed to affiliate	646	1,621	2,491
Management fees to affiliate	0	(215)	2,921
Expenses	11,040	21,179	41,043
Net loss	(4,674)	(7,768)	(19,414)
Net loss allocated to limited partners	$ (4,627)	$ (7,690)	$ (19,220)
Weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding during the period (in units)	592,809	592,809	593,013
Net loss per weighted average limited partner unit (in dollars per share)	$ (7.81)	$ (12.97)	$ (32.41)

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS [Abstract]

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

NOTE 12 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On February 15, 2012, the Fund extended the maturity date of the note payable to related party from February 15, 2012 to February 15, 2013 by paying a 1% fee, or $77,000, to RCC.

XML

Document And Entity Information	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2011
Entity Registrant Name	Lease Equity Appreciation Fund II, L.P.
Entity Central Index Key	0001294154
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Document Type	10-K
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Dec. 31, 2011

XML

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital (Deficit) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data, unless otherwise specified	General Partner [Member]	Limited Partner [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Member]	Total	Comprehensive (Loss) Income [Member]
Balance at Dec. 31, 2008	$ (221)	$ 29,371	$ (10,098)	$ 19,052	$ 0
Balance (in units) at Dec. 31, 2008		593,694
Increase (Decrease) in Partners' Capital [Roll Forward]
Cash distributions paid	(28)	(2,756)	0	(2,784)
Redemption of limited partner units	0	(77)	0	(77)
Redemption of limited partner units (in units)		(885)
Net loss	(194)	(19,220)	0	(19,414)	(19,414)
Net change in cash flow hedges	0	0	5,677	5,677	5,677
Balance at Dec. 31, 2009	(443)	7,318	(4,421)	2,454	(13,737)
Balance (in units) at Dec. 31, 2009		592,809
Increase (Decrease) in Partners' Capital [Roll Forward]
Cash distributions paid	(25)	(2,446)	0	(2,471)
Net loss	(78)	(7,690)	0	(7,768)	(7,768)
Net change in cash flow hedges	0	0	2,740	2,740	2,740
Amortization of net loss on financial derivative	0	0	(382)	(382)
Balance at Dec. 31, 2010	(546)	(2,818)	(2,063)	(5,427)	(5,028)
Balance (in units) at Dec. 31, 2010		592,809
Increase (Decrease) in Partners' Capital [Roll Forward]
Cash distributions paid	(12)	(1,186)	0	(1,198)
Net loss	(47)	(4,627)	0	(4,674)	(4,674)
Amortization of net loss on financial derivative	0	0	807	807
Balance at Dec. 31, 2011	$ (605)	$ (8,631)	$ (1,256)	$ (10,492)	$ (4,674)
Balance (in units) at Dec. 31, 2011		592,809

XML

DEBT AND NOTE PAYABLE RELATED PARTY

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

DEBT AND NOTE PAYABLE RELATED PARTY [Abstract]

DEBT AND NOTE PAYABLE RELATED PARTY

NOTE 7 – DEBT AND NOTE PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTY

The Fund's debt consists of the following (in thousands):

					December 31, 2011
	Type	Maturity Date			Facility Amount		Amount Outstanding		Amount Available			Interest rate per annum per agreement			Interest rate per annum adjusted for Swap (2)			December 31, 2010 Outstanding Balance
WestLB, AG	Term		(3	)	$	125,000	$	24,962		(1	)		(3	)		5.6	%	$	53,174
2007-01- Term Securitization - Class A-3 (4)	Term	July 2012				-		-		N/A		One month LIBOR + 0.20%				5.6	%		14,934
2007-01 Term Securitization - Class B	Term	March 2015				12,944		12,944		N/A			6.7	%		6.7	%		14,529
					$	137,944	$	37,906	$	-								$	82,637

(1) The Fund has no availability under this credit facility. Availability is subject to having eligible leases or loans (as defined in the respective agreement) to pledge as collateral, compliance with covenants and the borrowing base formula.

(2) To mitigate fluctuations in interest rates, the Fund entered into interest rate swap agreements. The interest rate swap agreements terminate on various dates and fix the interest rate.

(3) This revolving line of credit is collateralized by specific lease receivables and related equipment, with a 1% credit reserve of the outstanding line of credit. Interest on borrowings prior to March 2009 were calculated at London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.20% per annum. Borrowings under this facility after March 2009 are a rate of LIBOR plus 2.50% per annum. To mitigate fluctuations in interest rates, the Fund entered into interest rate swap agreements, which terminate on various dates ranging from July 2013 to August 2015. As of December 31, 2011, the interest rate swap agreements fixed the interest rate on this facility at 5.6%. This credit facility expired on June 30, 2010 and as discussed below, no additional borrowings are currently permitted under this facility.  Recourse under this facility is limited to the amount of collateral pledged. As of December 31, 2011, $26.2 million of leases and loans and $2.9 million of restricted cash were pledged as collateral under this facility.

(4) As of December 31, 2011, $13.6 million of leases and loans and $9.4 million of restricted cash were pledged as collateral under this securitization.

The Fund is subject to certain financial covenants related to its debt facilities. These covenants are related to such things as minimum tangible net worth, maximum leverage ratios and portfolio delinquency. The minimum tangible net worth covenants measure the Fund's equity adjusted for intangibles and amounts due to its General Partner. The maximum leverage covenants restrict the amount that the Fund can borrow based on a ratio of its total debt compared to its net worth. The portfolio performance covenants generally provide that the Fund would be in default if a specified percentage of its portfolio of leases and loans was delinquent in payment beyond acceptable grace periods.

In addition, the Fund's debt facilities include financial covenants covering affiliated entities responsible for servicing its portfolio. These covenants exist to provide the lenders with information about the financial viability of the entities that service the Fund's portfolio. These entities include the Fund, its General Partner and certain other affiliates involved in the sourcing and servicing of the portfolio. These covenants are similar in nature to the Fund's covenants and are related to such things as the entity's minimum tangible net worth, maximum leverage ratios, managed portfolio delinquency and compliance of the debt terms of all of the General Partner's managed entities.

On April 7, 2011 the Fund was notified by WestLB that it was in default on its loan agreement due to various ongoing covenant breaches.  These breaches relate to the percentage of defaulted leases in its portfolio, the percentage of defaulted leases in the overall lease portfolio serviced by the General Partner, and a required minimum credit support amount, among others.  As a result, the lender has advised the Fund that it has reserved, and continues to reserve, all of its rights and remedies provided for in the loan agreement including the right to (i) commence legal action to collect the obligations the Fund owes it; (ii) declare all amounts immediately due and payable; (iii) repossess the collateral the Fund has pledged to it under the loan agreement; and (iv) increase the interest rate on outstanding borrowings.  If the lender chooses to repossess and sell the Fund's collateral, such a sale of a portfolio could be at prices lower than its carrying value, which could result in losses and reduce its income and distributions to its partners. As of December 31, 2011, the Fund was still in breach of several covenants under this facility.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Fund is not, nor has it been, delinquent on any monthly payments of principle and interest owed to the lender.  Moreover, while the lender has reserved its rights, it has not initiated exercise of any of the forgoing remedies.

Weighted average borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2011 were $58.4 million as compared to $117.9 million as of December 31, 2010, at effective interest rates of 8.41% and 7.66%, respectively.

Note payable to related party:  In addition to the borrowings discussed above, the Fund owes $7.8 million to Resource Capital Corporation (“RCC”) as of December 31, 2011, which is a related entity of the Fund through common management with RAI.  On June 3, 2011, the Fund paid a 1% fee to extend the note maturity date from March 4, 2011 to February 15, 2012 and to reduce the interest rate from 12% to 10% per year.  Monthly payments are made at approximately 0.3% of the outstanding principal and interest is payable quarterly.

As discussed in Note 12, on February 15, 2012 the Fund paid RCC a 1% fee, or $77,000, to extend the maturity of the note payable to related party to February 15, 2013.

Repayments: Estimated annual principal payments on the Fund's aggregate borrowings (assuming that WestLB waives the aforementioned covenant breaches) over the next four years ended December 31, are as follows (in thousands):

December 31, 2012	$	28,498
December 31, 2013		11,162
December 31, 2014		3,400
December 31, 2015		2,666
	$	45,726

XML

DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS [Abstract]

DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS

NOTE 6 – DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, deferred financing costs include $1.3 million and $2.2 million, respectively, of unamortized costs which are being amortized over the terms of the estimated useful life of the related debt. Accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 was $4.7 million and $3.8 million, respectively.

XML

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES [Abstract]

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

NOTE 10 – CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES

The Fund relies on the General Partner and its affiliates to manage the Fund's operations and pays the General Partner or its affiliates fees to manage the Fund. The following is a summary of fees and costs of services and materials charged by the General Partner or its affiliates (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010			2009
Acquisition fees	$	-	$	153		$	123
Management (credit) fees		-		(215	)		2,921
Administrative expenses		646		1,621			2,491

Acquisition Fees: The General Partner is paid a fee for assisting the Fund in acquiring equipment subject to existing equipment leases equal to 2% of the purchase price the Fund pays for the equipment or portfolio of equipment subject to existing equipment financing.

Management Fees: The General Partner was paid a subordinated annual asset management fee equal to 4% of gross rental payments for operating leases or 2 % for full payout leases, or a competitive fee, whichever is less. During the Fund's five-year investment period, the management fees were subordinated to the payment to the Fund's limited partners of a cumulative annual distribution of 8.0% of their capital contributions, as adjusted by distributions deemed to be a return of capital.  In 2010, the General Partner waived asset management fees including those accrued for in December 2009.  Approximately $1.1 million of management fees were waived for the year ended December 31, 2011 and approximately $3.4 million have been waived on a cumulative basis.  The General Partner has waived all future management fees.

Administrative Expenses: The General Partner and its affiliates are reimbursed by the Fund for administrative services reasonably necessary to operate which don't exceed the General Partner's cost of those fees or services.

Due to Affiliates:  Due to affiliates includes amounts due to the General Partner related to acquiring and managing portfolios of equipment from its General Partner, management fees and reimbursed expenses.

Distributions:  The General Partner owns a 1% general partner interest and a 2.0% limited partner interest in the Fund. The General Partner was paid cash distributions of $12,000 and $19,000, respectively, for its general partner and limited partner interests in the Fund in 2011.

XML

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS [Abstract]

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

NOTE 8 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

Since the Fund's assets are structured on a fixed-rate basis, and funds borrowed through bank debt are obtained on a floating-rate basis, the Fund is exposed to interest rate risk if rates rise because it will increase the Fund's borrowing costs. In addition, when the Fund acquires assets, it bases its pricing in part on the spread it expects to achieve between the interest rate it charges its customers and the effective interest cost the Fund will pay when it funds those loans. Increases in interest rates that increase the Fund's permanent funding costs between the time the assets are originated and the time they are funded could narrow, eliminate or even reverse this spread.

To manage interest rate risk, the Fund employs a hedging strategy using derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps.  As discussed previously, effective October 1, 2010, the Fund has elected not to use hedge accounting.  The Fund does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Fund manages the credit risk of possible counterparty default in these derivative transactions by dealing primarily with counterparties with investment grade ratings. The Fund has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision where if the Fund defaults on any of its indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Fund could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. The Fund has agreements with certain of its derivative counterparties that incorporate the loan covenant provisions of the Fund's indebtedness with a lender affiliate of the derivative counterparty. Failure to comply with the loan covenant provisions would result in the Fund being in default on any derivative instrument obligations covered by the agreement. As of December 31, 2011, the Fund has not posted any collateral related to these agreements. If the Fund had breached any of these provisions at December 31, 2011, it could be required to settle its obligations under the agreements at their termination value of $821,000.

At December 31, 2011, the Fund has 20 interest rate swaps which terminate on various dates ranging from July 2013 to August 2015 which generally coincide with the maturity period of its portfolio of lease and loans.  These contracts, which fix the Fund's interest rates on a portion of its variable rate debt, are based on 1 month LIBOR.  The following table indicates the notional amounts outstanding and the ranges of fixed and variable rates associated with these contracts as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

	2011			2010
Fixed swaps (notional amount)	$	24,657		$	167,118
Range of receive rate		0.45% - 0.56	%		0.26% - 1.05	%
Range of pay rate		3.03% - 5.55	%		3.03% - 5.55	%

The following table indicates the fair value of the derivative contracts as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

	Balance Sheet Location	Derivative Assets		Derivative Liabilities
2011	Derivatives liabilities, at fair value	$	-	$	(773	)
2010	Derivatives liabilities, at fair value	$	284	$	(2,602	)

The following table summarizes the effect of the interest rate swaps on the 2010 consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income prior to being de-designated on October 1, 2010 (in thousands):

	Amount of loss recognized in OCI (effective portion)			Location of loss reclassified from OCI to the statement of operations (effective portion)	Amount of loss reclassified from OCI to the statement of operations (effective portion)			Location of loss recognized in the statement of operations (ineffective portion)	Amount of loss recognized in the statement of operations (ineffective portion)
2010	$	(1,155	)	Interest expense	$	(3,639	)	Interest expense	$	-

The following table summarizes the effect of the interest rate swaps on the 2011 and 2010 consolidated statements of operations and other comprehensive income subsequent to being de-designated on October 1, 2010 (in thousands):

	Location of loss reclassified from OCI to the statement of operations	Amount of net (loss)/ gain reclassified from OCI to the statement of operations			Location of loss recognized in the statement of operations	Amount of net (loss)/gain recognized in the statement of operations
2011	Interest expense	$	(807	)	Various (1)	$	(238	)
2010	Interest expense	$	126		Various (1)	$	39

(1) All changes in fair value of derivatives subsequent to dedesignation as cash flow hedges were realized in Mark to market changes on derivative liabilities on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Assuming market rates remain constant with those at December 31, 2011, $511,000 of accumulated other comprehensive loss is expected to be charged to earnings over the next 12 months.

XML

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT [Abstract]

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

NOTE 9 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

For cash, receivables and payables, the carrying amounts approximate fair values because of the short term maturity of these instruments. The carrying value of debt approximates fair market value since interest rates approximate current market rates.

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability at the measurement date (exit price). U.S. GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3). The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the measurement in its entirety.

• Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

• Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.

• Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that reflect the entity's own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and are consequently not based on market activity, but rather through particular valuation techniques.

The Fund employs a hedging strategy to manage exposure to the effects of changes in market interest rates. All derivatives are recorded on the consolidated balance sheets at their fair value as either assets or liabilities. Because the Fund's derivatives are not listed on an exchange, these instruments are valued by a third-party pricing agent using an income approach and utilizing models that use as their primary basis readily observable market parameters. This valuation process considers factors including interest rate yield curves, time value, credit factors and volatility factors. Although the Fund has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties.  However, the Fund has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Fund has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Assets (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis included the following (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurements Using							Assets (Liabilities)
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		At Fair  Value
Interest rate swap liabilities at December 31, 2011	$	-	$	(773	)	$	-	$	(773	)
Interest rate swap liabilities at December 31, 2010	$	-	$	(2,602	)	$	-	$	(2,602	)
Interest rate swap assets at December 31, 2010	$	-	$	284		$	-	$	284

XML

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES [Abstract]

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

NOTE 11 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In connection with a sale of leases and loans to a third-party in July of 2008, the Fund contractually agreed to repurchase delinquent leases up to a maximum of $2.3 million calculated as 7.5% of total proceeds received from the sale (“Repurchase Commitment”).  As of December 31, 2011, the Fund has a $12,000 remaining Repurchase Commitment of which $0 was recorded as a liability.

The Fund is party to various legal proceeding arising out of the ordinary course of its business. Management believes that none of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Fund's financial condition or results of operations.

XML

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010	Dec. 31, 2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$ (4,674)	$ (7,768)	$ (19,414)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) by operating activities:
Losses on sales of equipment and lease dispositions, net	297	585	626
Depreciation on operating leases	541	1,242	2,193
Provision for credit losses	4,313	8,656	17,941
Amortization of deferred financing costs	1,008	1,442	1,395
Amortization of net gain on financial derivative	(738)	(382)	(382)
Unrealized gains on derivative hedging activities	0	(596)	0
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	61	12	56
Other assets	144	602	(321)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses and other liabilities	(46)	(466)	(208)
Due to affiliates	(81)	(4,234)	9,481
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	825	(907)	11,367
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of leases and loans	0	(7,777)	(7,696)
Proceeds from leases and loans	42,502	69,930	93,613
Security deposits (returned) collected	(182)	(543)	301
Net cash provided by investing activities	42,320	61,610	86,218
Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings of debt	0	6,735	6,656
Repayment of debt	(44,731)	(76,079)	(109,419)
Borrowings - note payable - related party	0	8,000	0
Repayments - note payable - related party	(168)	(12)	0
Decrease in restricted cash	2,814	4,508	8,856
Increase in deferred financing costs	(80)	(1,155)	(956)
Redemption of limited partner units	0	0	(77)
Cash distributions to partners	(1,198)	(2,471)	(2,784)
Net cash used in financing activities	(43,363)	(60,474)	(97,724)
(Decrease) increase in cash	(218)	229	(139)
Cash, beginning of period	239	10	149
Cash, end of period	$ 21	$ 239	$ 10

XML

ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES AND CREDIT QUALITY

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2011

ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES AND CREDIT QUALITY [Abstract]

ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES AND CREDIT QUALITY

NOTE 5 – ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES AND CREDIT QUALITY

The disclosures in this footnote follow new guidance issued by the FASB that requires companies to provide more information about the credit quality of their financing receivables including, but not limited to, significant purchases and sales of financing receivables, aging information and credit quality indicators.

The following table is an age analysis of the Fund's receivables from leases and loans (presented gross of allowance for credit losses of $760,000 and $5.3 million for December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively) as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):

Age of receivable	Investment in leases and loans		%			Investment in leases and loans		%
Current	$	37,692		93.7	%	$	81,739		88.6	%
Delinquent:
31 to 91 days past due		1,545		3.9	%		4,109		4.5	%
Greater than 91 days (a)		974		2.4	%		6,394		6.9	%
	$	40,211		100.0	%	$	92,242		100.0	%

(a) Balances in this age category are collectivelly evaluated for impairment.

The Fund had $974,000 and $6.4 million of leases and loans on nonaccrual status as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.  The credit quality of the Fund's investment in leases and loans as of December 31, 2011 is as follows (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010
Performing	$	39,237	$	85,848
Nonperforming		974		6,394
	$	40,211	$	92,242

The following table summarizes the annual activity in the allowance for credit losses (in thousands):

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011			2010			2009
Allowance for credit losses, beginning of year	$	5,320		$	11,380		$	5,770
Provision for credit losses		4,313			8,656			17,941
Charge-offs		(10,662	)		(15,868	)		(13,230	)
Recoveries		1,789			1,152			899
Allowance for credit losses, end of year (a)	$	760		$	5,320		$	11,380

(a) End of year balances were collectively evaluated for impairment.