XML 18 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Recent and Pending Accounting Standards
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections [Abstract]  
Recent and Pending Accounting Standards
RECENT AND PENDING ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Revenue
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Since this ASU was issued, the FASB has issued several updates including ASU No. 2015-14 in July 2015 which delayed the effective date, ASU No. 2016-08 in March 2016 which updated guidance related to principal versus agent considerations, ASU No. 2016-10 in April 2016 which updated guidance related to the identification of performance obligations, ASU No. 2016-12 in May 2016 which updated guidance related to scope improvements and practical expedients and ASU No. 2016-20 which provided technical corrections and improvements but did not update guidance issued in prior updates. The effective date is January 1, 2018, and while early adoption to the original effective date of January 1, 2017 is permitted, we have elected not to early adopt.
ASU No. 2014-09 creates a five-step model that requires companies to exercise judgment when considering all relevant facts and circumstances in the determination of when and how revenue is recognized. The two permitted transition methods under the new standard are the full retrospective method, in which case the standard would be applied to each prior reporting period presented, or the modified retrospective method, in which case the cumulative effect of applying the standard would be recognized at the date of initial application. We have completed our review of the acceptable transition methods and have selected the modified retrospective approach. We currently estimate the modified retrospective approach may have a material impact on either deferred revenue or retained earnings in our 2018 consolidated financial statements as the potential impact is dependent upon the mix of products and services for contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2017.
We currently believe the standard will materially impact our revenue recognition on a going-forward basis once adopted. While we continue to assess the potential impacts of this standard, we currently believe that the most significant impact relates to our accounting for software license revenue. We expect software license revenue to generally be recognized when made available rather than over a combined service period or term period. Due to the nuances of certain contracts, the actual revenue recognition treatment required under the standard will be dependent on contract-specific terms and may vary in some instances from recognition at the time that software is made available to the customer.
Leases
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. The new standard establishes a right of use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than twelve months. Leases will be classified as either financing or operating with the classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement.
ASU No. 2016-02 will be effective for fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2019, including the related interim periods and early adoption of the standard is permitted. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. While we are still evaluating the impact of the potential new standard on our consolidated financial statements, we expect that upon adoption we will recognize ROU assets and lease liabilities and that the amounts could be material.
Goodwill
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The new standard simplifies how an entity tests for goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 measured a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit's goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. By eliminating Step 2 an entity must now record an impairment to goodwill based on an analysis of the fair value of a reporting unit as compared to its carrying amount. An impairment charge is recognized for the amount that the carrying value exceeds the reporting unit's fair value.
ASU No. 2017-04 will be effective for fiscal years beginning on January 1, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and early adoption as of January 1, 2017 is permitted. All changes are to be accounted for on a prospective basis upon adoption. We do not believe adoption of ASU No. 2017-04 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. We have not yet determined whether we will early adopt ASU No. 2017-04.