XML 28 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2016
Fair Value Measurements [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements

11. Fair Value Measurements 



The Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis, including cash equivalents and warrants. General accounting principles for fair value measurement established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (“Level 1”) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (“Level 3”). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1: Values are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.



Level 2: Values are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, or other model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.



Level 3: Values are generated from model-based techniques that use significant assumptions not observable in the market.



The following table sets forth the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the fair value hierarchy.  As required by the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of the Accounting Standards Codification, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Fair Value Measurement Using



Total

 

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Instruments
(Level 1)

 

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

 

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

Assets at March 31, 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          Cash equivalents

$

347,821 

 

347,821 

 

—  

 

—  

Total assets at fair value

$

347,821 

 

347,821 

 

—  

 

—  

Liabilities at March 31, 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          Warrants issued May 2012

$

237,650 

 

—  

 

—  

 

237,650 

          Warrants issued August 2013

$

525,186 

 

—  

 

—  

 

525,186 

Total liabilities at fair value:

$

762,836 

 

—  

 

—  

 

762,836 

Assets at December 31, 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          Cash equivalents

$

524,083 

 

524,083 

 

—  

 

—  

Total assets at fair value

$

524,083 

 

524,083 

 

—  

 

—  

Liabilities at December 31, 2015:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          Warrants issued May 2012

$

143,681 

 

—  

 

—  

 

143,681 

          Warrants issued August 2013

$

650,449 

 

—  

 

—  

 

650,449 

Total liabilities at fair value:

$

794,130 

 

—  

 

—  

 

794,130 



Level 1

The Company’s financial assets consist of cash equivalents invested in money market funds in the amount of $347,821 and $524,083 at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. These assets are classified as Level 1 as described above and total interest income recorded for these investments was insignificant during both the three month periods ended March  31, 2016, and March 31, 2015. There were no transfers in or out of Level 1 during the period ended March 31, 2016.

Level 2

The Company does not have any financial assets or liabilities classified as Level 2.

Level 3 

In conjunction with the Company’s May 2012 and August 2013 financing transactions, the Company issued warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. Due to the provisions included in the warrant agreements, the warrants did not meet the exemptions for equity classification and as such, the Company accounts for these warrants as derivative instruments. The calculated fair value of the warrants is classified as a liability and is periodically re-measured with any changes in value recognized in “Other expense” in the Statements of Operations.

The remaining warrants from the May 2012 transaction expire in May 2018 and were revalued as of March 31, 2016 using the following assumptions: 1) volatility of 113.14%; 2) risk-free interest rate of 0.73%; and 3) a closing stock price of $1.10.

The remaining warrants from the August 2013 expire in November 2018 and were revalued as of March 31, 2016 using the following assumptions: 1) volatility of 110.74%; 2) risk-free interest rate of 0.87%; and 3) a closing stock price of $1.10.

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s warrants is volatility.  Significant increases (decreases) in the volatility in isolation would result in significantly higher (lower) liability fair value measurements.



The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities for the three month period ended March  31, 2016:









 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

 

Warrants issued May 2012

 

Warrants issued August 2013

 

Total Liabilities

Balance at beginning of period

 

 

$              143,681

 

$          650,449

 

$        794,130

     Issues

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

     Settlements

 

 

-

 

-

 

-

     Revaluation

 

 

93,969 

 

(125,263)

 

(31,294)

Balance at end of period

 

 

$              237,650

 

$          525,186

 

$        762,836



The Company currently does not have derivative instruments to manage its exposure to currency fluctuations or other business risks. The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. All derivative financial instruments are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value.