10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended January 2, 2011

¨ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 001-32253

EnerSys

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	23-3058564
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

2366 Bernville Road
Reading, Pennsylvania	19605
(Address of principal executive offices)	(zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code 610-208-1991

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  YES    ¨  NO.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Large accelerated filer	x	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).    ¨  YES    x  NO.

Common Stock outstanding at February 4, 2011: 49,990,470 shares

ENERSYS

INDEX – FORM 10-Q

		Page
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets (Unaudited) January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010		3
	Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income (Unaudited) For the Quarters Ended January 2, 2011, and December 27, 2009		4
	Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income (Unaudited) For the Nine Months Ended January 2, 2011, and December 27, 2009		5
	Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) For the Nine Months Ended January 2, 2011, and December 27, 2009		6
	Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) For the Quarters and Nine Months Ended January 2, 2011, and December 27, 2009		7
	Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)		8
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		23
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		39
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		41
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		42
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		42
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		42
Item 6.	Exhibits		43
SIGNATURES			44

2

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ENERSYS

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

	January 2, 2011			March 31, 2010
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	205,794		$	201,042
Accounts receivable, net		420,200			383,641
Inventories, net		305,821			254,371
Deferred taxes		16,697			16,378
Prepaid and other current assets		54,589			39,849
Total current assets		1,003,101			895,281
Property, plant, and equipment, net		323,235			315,141
Goodwill		320,143			317,265
Other intangible assets, net		90,763			90,136
Other assets		33,197			34,187
Total assets	$	1,770,439		$	1,652,010
Liabilities and equity
Current liabilities:
Short-term debt	$	695		$	43
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations		20,438			26,695
Accounts payable		214,563			198,345
Accrued expenses		192,339			194,430
Total current liabilities		428,035			419,513
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations		310,549			323,748
Deferred taxes		69,543			70,023
Other liabilities		54,470			54,502
Total liabilities		862,597			867,786
Equity:
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, 135,000,000 shares authorized; 51,764,707 shares issued and 49,964,707 outstanding at January 2, 2011; 50,381,832 shares issued and 48,581,832 outstanding at March 31, 2010		517			504
Additional paid-in capital		459,426			428,579
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,800,000 shares held as of January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010		(19,800	)		(19,800	)
Retained earnings		386,745			303,410
Accumulated other comprehensive income		76,397			67,204
Total EnerSys stockholders’ equity		903,285			779,897
Non-controlling interest		4,557			4,327
Total equity		907,842			784,224
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,770,439		$	1,652,010

See accompanying notes.

3

ENERSYS

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income (Unaudited)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

	Quarter ended
	January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009
Net sales	$	508,596		$	421,258
Cost of goods sold		390,696			322,929
Gross profit		117,900			98,329
Operating expenses		67,826			61,608
Bargain purchase gain		—			(2,919	)
Restructuring charges		1,754			1,063
Operating earnings		48,320			38,577
Interest expense		5,610			5,667
Other (income) expense, net		(341	)		1,452
Earnings before income taxes		43,051			31,458
Income tax expense		9,292			8,299
Net earnings	$	33,759		$	23,159
Net earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.68		$	0.48
Diluted	$	0.67		$	0.47
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding:
Basic		49,564,495			48,179,030
Diluted		50,331,554			48,841,856

See accompanying notes.

4

ENERSYS

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income (Unaudited)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

	Nine Months Ended
	January 2, 2011		December 27, 2009
Net sales	$	1,416,408	$	1,128,848
Cost of goods sold		1,091,173		864,441
Gross profit		325,235		264,407
Operating expenses		189,712		176,301
Bargain purchase gain		—		(2,919	)
Restructuring charges		5,227		7,765
Operating earnings		130,296		83,260
Interest expense		17,677		16,667
Other expense, net		631		4,158
Earnings before income taxes		111,988		62,435
Income tax expense		28,653		17,960
Net earnings	$	83,335	$	44,475
Net earnings per common share:
Basic	$	1.69	$	0.93
Diluted	$	1.67	$	0.91
Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding:
Basic		49,168,320		48,048,812
Diluted		49,840,357		48,711,570

See accompanying notes.

5

ENERSYS

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

(In Thousands)

	Nine Months Ended
	January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009
Cash flows from operating activities
Net earnings	$	83,335		$	44,475
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		33,221			33,349
Provision for doubtful accounts		1,864			2,569
Change in deferred income taxes		(430	)		589
Stock-based compensation		6,694			5,374
Non-cash interest expense		5,850			5,329
Loss (Gain) on disposal of fixed assets		407			(689	)
Bargain purchase gain		—			(2,919	)
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable		(35,700	)		5,552
Inventory		(50,638	)		(17,621	)
Prepaid and other current assets		(6,231	)		(4,678	)
Other assets		(2,403	)		1,300
Accounts payable		15,464			46,873
Accrued expenses		(9,528	)		(10,124	)
Other liabilities		3,007			774
Net cash provided by operating activities		44,912			110,153
Cash flows from investing activities
Capital expenditures		(41,202	)		(30,665	)
Purchases of businesses, net of cash acquired		(1,397	)		(22,716	)
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant, and equipment		360			1,132
Net cash used in investing activities		(42,239	)		(52,249	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt		644			(7,425	)
Payments of long-term debt		(23,801	)		(12,317	)
Capital lease obligations and other		(38	)		(310	)
Net effect from exercising of stock options and vesting of equity awards		16,900			1,856
Tax benefits from exercises of stock options and vesting of equity awards		7,265			1,295
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		970			(16,901	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		1,109			6,807
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		4,752			47,810
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		201,042			163,161
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	205,794		$	210,971

See accompanying notes.

6

ENERSYS

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)

(In Thousands)

	Quarter ended						Nine months ended
	January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009			January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009
Net earnings	$	33,759		$	23,159		$	83,335		$	44,475
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net unrealized gain on derivative instruments, net of tax		1,792			3,794			3,623			4,000
Pension funded status adjustment, net of tax		76			181			(38	)		(26	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(10,802	)		(4,361	)		5,608			53,081
Total comprehensive income	$	24,825		$	22,773		$	92,528		$	101,530

See accompanying notes.

7

ENERSYS

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Data)

NOTE 1: Basis Of Presentation

The accompanying interim unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements of EnerSys (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and notes required for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals considered necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K (SEC File No. 001-32253), which was filed on June 1, 2010.

The Company reports interim financial information for 13-week periods, except for the first quarter, which always begins on April 1, and the fourth quarter, which always ends on March 31. The four quarters in fiscal 2011 end on July 4, 2010, October 3, 2010, January 2, 2011, and March 31, 2011, respectively. The four quarters in fiscal 2010 ended on June 28, 2009, September 27, 2009, December 27, 2009, and March 31, 2010, respectively.

NOTE 2: Recently Issued Accounting Standards

No new accounting standards became applicable to the Company during fiscal 2011.

NOTE 3: Inventories

Inventories, net consist of:

	January 2, 2011		March 31, 2010
Raw materials	$	81,645	$	66,288
Work-in-process		89,839		80,397
Finished goods		134,337		107,686
Total	$	305,821	$	254,371

Inventory reserves for obsolescence and other estimated losses were $17,461 and $11,678 at January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively, and have been included in the net amounts shown above.

8

NOTE 4: Fair Value Of Financial Instruments

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This guidance includes a fair value hierarchy that is intended to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures. The fair value hierarchy is based on inputs to valuation techniques that are used to measure fair value that are either observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity’s pricing based upon their own market assumptions. The Company uses the following valuation techniques to measure fair value for its financial assets and financial liabilities:

Level 1	Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2	Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable and market-corroborated inputs which are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3	Inputs are derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or value drivers are unobservable.

The following tables represent the financial assets and (liabilities), measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010 and the basis for that measurement:

	Total Fair Value Measurement January 2, 2011			Quoted Price in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Interest rate swap agreements	$	(6,898	)	$	—	$	(6,898	)	$	—
Lead forward contracts		4,654			—		4,654			—
Foreign currency forward contracts		82			—		82			—
Total derivatives	$	(2,162	)	$	—	$	(2,162	)	$	—
	Total Fair Value Measurement March 31, 2010			Quoted Price in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Interest rate swap agreements	$	(9,710	)	$	—	$	(9,710	)	$	—
Lead forward contracts		62			—		62			—
Foreign currency forward contracts		1,911			—		1,911			—
Total derivatives	$	(7,737	)	$	—	$	(7,737	)	$	—

The fair value of interest rate swap agreements are based on observable prices as quoted for receiving the variable three month London Interbank Offered Rates (“LIBOR”) and paying fixed interest rates and, therefore, were classified as Level 2.

The fair value of lead forward contracts are calculated using observable prices for lead as quoted on the London Metal Exchange (“LME”) and, therefore, were classified as Level 2.

The fair value for foreign currency forward contracts are based upon current quoted market prices and are classified as Level 2 based on the nature of the underlying market in which these derivatives are traded.

9

Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, debt and derivatives. Because of short maturities, the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents and short-term debt approximates fair value.

The fair value of the Company’s senior secured credit facility approximates its carrying value, as it is variable rate debt. The senior unsecured 3.375% Convertible Notes due 2038 (the “Convertible Notes”), with a face value of $172,500, were issued when the Company’s stock price was trading at $30.19 per share. On the last trading day (December 31, 2010) of the quarter, the Company’s stock price closed at $32.12 per share. The Convertible Notes have a conversion option at $40.60 per share, and due to current conditions in the financial markets, the Company’s Convertible Notes were trading at 113% of face value on the last trading day (December 31, 2010) of the quarter and 94% of face value on March 31, 2010. As of January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010, the unamortized discount on the Convertible Notes was $32,189 and $36,580, respectively, and included in the equity component of the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets in accordance with the accounting guidance (see Note 10 regarding Debt).

The Company uses lead hedge contracts to manage its lead cost risk. The Company uses foreign currency forward and option contracts to manage risk on the purchase and conversion of U.S. dollar based lead costs into local currencies in Europe, as well as currency exposures from intercompany and third party trade transactions. The Company uses interest rate swap agreements to manage risk on a portion of its floating-rate debt.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010 are as follows:

	January 2, 2011						March 31, 2010
	Carrying Amount			Fair Value			Carrying Amount			Fair Value
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	205,794		$	205,794		$	201,042		$	201,042
Derivatives (3)		4,736			4,736			1,973			1,973
Financial liabilities:
Long-Term Debt
Term A Loan	$	188,438		$	188,438		$	201,094		$	201,094
Convertible Notes		140,311	(1)		194,925	(2)		135,920	(1)		161,978	(2)
Euro Term Loan		—			—			11,158			11,158
Other		40			40			41			41
Capital lease obligations		2,198			2,198			2,230			2,230
Derivatives (3)		6,898			6,898			9,710			9,710

⁽¹⁾ The carrying amounts of the Convertible Notes at January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010 represent the $172,500 principal value, less the unamortized debt discount (see Note 10).

⁽²⁾ The fair value amounts of the Convertible Notes represent the trading values of the Convertible Notes with a principal value of $172,500 at January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010.

⁽³⁾ Represents interest rate swap agreements, lead and foreign currency hedges (see Note 5 for asset and liability positions of the interest rate swap agreements, lead and foreign currency hedges at January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010).

10

NOTE 5: Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company accounts for derivative instruments and hedging activities in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance. The guidance establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities, and requires that all derivatives be recognized as either assets or liabilities at fair value. The Company does not enter into derivative contracts for speculative trading purposes. Derivatives are used to hedge the volatility arising from movements in a portion of the cost of lead purchases, as well as to hedge certain interest rates and foreign exchange rate risks. The changes in the fair value of these contracts are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income until the related purchased lead, incurred interest rates or foreign currency exposures are charged to earnings. At that time, the portion recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income is recognized in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income. The amount of accumulated other comprehensive income related to interest rates, lead and foreign exchange contracts at January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010, net of tax, was an unrecognized loss of $1,412 and $5,034, respectively.

During the third quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded losses of ($1,816) and ($1,821), respectively, on interest rate swaps, which were recorded as increases in interest expense. During the third quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded gains of $6,375 and $2,921, respectively, on the settlement of lead hedge contracts and losses of ($1,422) and ($1,302), respectively, on foreign currency hedges, which were recorded as increases or decreases to cost of goods sold.

During the nine months of fiscal 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded losses of ($5,637) and ($4,921), respectively, on interest rate swaps, which were recorded as increases in interest expense. During the nine months of fiscal 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded gains of $2,533 and $11,354, respectively, on the settlement of lead hedge contracts and gains (losses) of $915 and ($129), respectively, on foreign currency hedges, which were recorded as increases or decreases to cost of goods sold.

In the coming twelve months, the Company anticipates that $3,456 of the current pretax loss will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income as part of interest expense. In the coming twelve months, the Company anticipates that $4,139 of the current pretax gain will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income as part of cost of goods sold. This amount represents the current unrealized impact of hedging lead and foreign exchange rates, which will change as market rates change in the future, and will ultimately be realized in the income statement as an offset to the corresponding actual changes in lead cost to be realized in connection with the variable lead cost and foreign exchange being hedged.

11

Presented below in tabular form is information on the location and amounts of derivative fair values in the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets and derivative gains and losses in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income:

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments Designated as Hedging Instruments

In the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets

January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010

		Asset Derivatives					Liability Derivatives
Description	Balance Sheet Location	January 2, 2011		March 31, 2010		Balance Sheet Location	January 2, 2011		March 31, 2010
Interest rate swap agreements	Other assets	$	—	$	—	Other liabilities	$	6,898	$	9,710
Lead hedge forward contracts	Prepaid and other current assets		4,654		62	Accrued expenses		—		—
Foreign currency forward contracts	Prepaid and other current assets		82		1,911	Accrued expenses		—		—
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		$	4,736	$	1,973		$	6,898	$	9,710

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income

For the quarters ended January 2, 2011 and December 27, 2009

Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Amount of Pretax Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated OCI (1) on Derivatives (Effective Portion)					Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI (1) into Income (Effective Portion)		Amount of Pretax  Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI (1) (Effective Portion)
	January 2, 2011		December 27, 2009					January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009
Interest rate swap agreements	$	291	$	(324	)		Interest expense	$	(1,816	)	$	(1,821	)
Lead hedge forward contracts		5,251		5,389			Cost of goods sold		6,375			2,921
Foreign currency forward contracts		352		572			Cost of goods sold		(1,422	)		(1,302	)
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments	$	5,894	$	5,637				$	3,137		$	(202	)

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income

For the nine months ended January 2, 2011 and December 27, 2009

Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Amount of Pretax Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated OCI  (1) on Derivatives (Effective Portion)						Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI (1) into Income (Effective Portion)	Amount of Pretax Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI (1) (Effective Portion)
	January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009				January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009
Interest rate swap agreements	$	(2,825	)	$	(1,091	)	Interest expense	$	(5,637	)	$	(4,921	)
Lead hedge forward contracts		7,125			12,806		Cost of goods sold		2,533			11,354
Foreign currency forward contracts		(914	)		736		Cost of goods sold		915			(129	)
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments	$	3,386		$	12,451			$	(2,189	)	$	6,304

(1) OCI = Other comprehensive income

12

NOTE 6: Income Taxes

The Company’s income tax provisions for all periods consist of federal, state and foreign income taxes. The tax provisions for the third quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010 were based on the estimated effective tax rates applicable for the full years ending March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively, after giving effect to items specifically related to the interim periods.

The effective income tax rates for the third quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010 were 21.6% and 26.4%, respectively. The effective income tax rates for the nine months of 2011 and 2010 were 25.6% and 28.8%, respectively. The rate decreases in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2011 as compared to the comparable prior year periods are primarily due to a change in the mix of earnings among tax jurisdictions and the favorable settlement of a foreign tax audit during the third quarter of fiscal 2011, resulting in the release of associated tax liabilities of $2,500 under FASB guidance.

NOTE 7: Warranties

The Company provides for estimated product warranty expenses when the related products are sold, with related liabilities included within accrued expenses. Warranty estimates are forecasts that are based on the best available information, primarily historical claims experience, and claims costs may differ from amounts provided. An analysis of changes in the liability for product warranties is as follows:

	Quarter ended						Nine months ended
	January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009			January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009
Balance at beginning of period	$	33,220		$	30,339		$	31,739		$	30,914
Current period provisions		3,684			4,290			12,615			8,277
Costs incurred		(4,550	)		(1,983	)		(12,587	)		(8,335	)
Foreign exchange and other		(113	)		(222	)		474			1,568
Balance at end of period	$	32,241		$	32,424		$	32,241		$	32,424

13

NOTE 8: Commitments, Contingencies And Litigation

Litigation and Other Legal Matters

The Company is involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of its business, the results of which, in the opinion of management, are not likely to be material to the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows (see Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K).

Environmental Issues

As a result of its operations, the Company is subject to various federal, state, and local, as well as international environmental laws and regulations and is exposed to the costs and risks of handling, processing, storing, transporting, and disposing of hazardous substances, especially lead and acid. The Company’s operations are also subject to federal, state, local and international occupational safety and health regulations, including laws and regulations relating to exposure to lead in the workplace.

As more fully described in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company has potential environmental liabilities at its Sumter, South Carolina facility and has reserves of $3,292 at January 2, 2011, and $3,682 at March 31, 2010. Based on information available at this time, management believes that the Company’s reserves are sufficient to satisfy its environmental liabilities.

Lead Contracts

To stabilize its costs, the Company has entered into contracts with financial institutions to fix the price of lead. The vast majority of such contracts are for a period not extending beyond one year. Under these contracts, at January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010, the Company has hedged the price to purchase 34,898 and 63,335 pounds of lead, respectively, for a total purchase price of $35,518 and $60,724, respectively.

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

The Company quantifies and monitors its global foreign currency exposures. On a selective basis, the Company will enter into foreign currency forward and option contracts to reduce the volatility from currency movements that affect the Company. The maturity period of these contracts is less than one year. The Company’s largest exposure is from the purchase and conversion of U.S. dollar based lead costs into local currencies in Europe. Additionally, the Company has currency exposures from intercompany and third party trade transactions. To hedge these exposures, the Company has entered into a total of $75,734 and $64,234, respectively, of foreign currency forward contracts with financial institutions as of January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010.

Interest Rate Swap Agreements

The Company is exposed to changes in variable U.S. interest rates on borrowings under its credit agreements. On a selective basis, from time to time, the Company enters into interest rate swap agreements to reduce the negative impact that increases in interest rates could have on its outstanding variable rate debt. At January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010, such agreements effectively convert $125,000 and $170,000, respectively, of the Company’s variable-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis, utilizing the three-month LIBOR, as a floating rate reference. Fluctuations in LIBOR and fixed rates affect both the Company’s net financial investment position and the amount of cash to be paid or received under these agreements.

14

NOTE 9: Restructuring Plans

The Company has acquisition related restructuring plans and non-acquisition related restructuring plans and bases its restructuring accounting and disclosures on applicable accounting guidance. As a result, charges to net earnings were made in the periods in which restructuring plan liabilities were incurred.

Acquisition related restructuring plans charged to earnings

In fiscal 2010, the Company acquired the stock of OEB Traction Batteries and certain operating assets and liabilities of the reserve power battery business of Accu Holding AG and its Swedish sales subsidiary (all collectively referred to as “Oerlikon”). The Company completed the process of closing the two manufacturing facilities of Oerlikon during the third quarter of fiscal 2011 which resulted in the reduction of 105 employees. For the first nine months of fiscal 2011, the Company recorded $1,658 in charges related to this plan and incurred $2,520 against the accrual. As of January 2, 2011, the reserve balance associated with these actions is $348. The Company expects to be committed to an additional $800 of restructuring charges in fiscal 2011, primarily in Europe.

A roll-forward of the acquisition related restructuring reserve for the nine months of fiscal 2011 is as follows:

	Employee Severance			Other			Total
Balance at March 31, 2010	$	1,292		$	—		$	1,292
Accrued		90			1,568			1,658
Costs incurred		(988	)		(1,532	)		(2,520	)
Foreign currency impact and other		(69	)		(13	)		(82	)
Balance at January 2, 2011	$	325		$	23		$	348

Non-acquisition related restructuring plans

In February and May 2009, the Company announced a plan to restructure certain of its European and American operations, which will result in a reduction of approximately 515 employees upon completion across its operations. These actions are primarily in Europe, the most significant of which was the closure of its leased Italian manufacturing facility and the opening of a new Italian distribution center. The Company estimates that the total charges for these actions will amount to approximately $33,000, which includes cash expenses of approximately $24,000, primarily for employee severance-related payments, and a non-cash charge of approximately $9,000, primarily for impairment of fixed assets.

In addition, during the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company announced a further restructuring of its European operations, which will result in the reduction of approximately 55 employees upon completion across its operations. The Company estimates that the total charges for these actions will amount to approximately $3,900, primarily from cash expenses for employee severance-related payments.

Based on commitments incurred to date, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $31,457 in fiscal 2009 and 2010 with $3,569 of additional charges during the nine months of fiscal 2011. The Company incurred $5,593 of costs against the accrual during the nine months of fiscal 2011. As of January 2, 2011, the reserve balance associated with these actions is $5,334. The Company expects to be committed to an additional $1,800 of restructuring charges in fiscal 2011, primarily in Europe.

15

A roll-forward of the non-acquisition related restructuring reserve for the nine months of fiscal 2011 is as follows:

	Employee Severance			Total
Balance at March 31, 2010	$	7,482		$	7,482
Accrued		3,569			3,569
Costs incurred		(5,593	)		(5,593	)
Foreign currency impact and other		(124	)		(124	)
Balance at January 2, 2011	$	5,334		$	5,334

NOTE 10: Debt

The following summarizes the Company’s long-term debt and capital lease obligations:

	January 2, 2011		March 31, 2010
Term A Loan: Payable in quarterly installments of 1.25% in year 1, 1.88% in years 2-3, 2.50% in year 4, 3.13% in year 5 and 14.39% in year 6, with the remaining balance due on June 27, 2014, bearing interest at 1.54% at January 2, 2011	$	188,438	$	201,094
Convertible Notes bearing interest at 3.375% (net of unamortized discount of $32,189 and $36,580, respectively)		140,311		135,920
Euro Term Loan: Payable in quarterly installments between €1,000 and €1,750 beginning March 31, 2008 through June 30, 2011, bearing interest at 1.90% at September 30, 2010. Euro Term Loan was paid in full on September 30, 2010.		—		11,158
Other debt		40		41
Capital lease obligations		2,198		2,230
Sub total		330,987		350,443
Less current portion		20,438		26,695
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations	$	310,549	$	323,748

Senior Unsecured 3.375% Convertible Notes

The Convertible Notes are general senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with the Company’s existing and future senior unsecured obligations and are junior to any of the Company’s existing or future secured obligations to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such obligations. The Convertible Notes are not guaranteed by, and are structurally subordinate in right of payment to, all of the (i) existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities of the Company’s subsidiaries and (ii) preferred stock of the Company’s subsidiaries to the extent of their respective liquidation preferences.

16

The Convertible Notes require the semi-annual payment of interest in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year beginning December 1, 2008, at 3.375% per annum on the principal amount outstanding. The Convertible Notes will accrete principal beginning on June 1, 2015 and will bear contingent interest, if any, beginning with the nine-month interest period commencing on June 1, 2015 under certain circumstances. The Convertible Notes will mature on June 1, 2038, unless earlier converted, redeemed or repurchased. Prior to maturity the holders may convert their Convertible Notes into shares of the Company’s common stock under certain circumstances. When issued, the initial conversion rate was 24.6305 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, which was equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $40.60 per share.

At any time after June 6, 2015, the Company may at its option redeem the Convertible Notes, in whole or in part, for cash, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the accreted principal amount of Convertible Notes to be redeemed, plus any accrued and unpaid interest. A holder of Convertible Notes may require the Company to repurchase some or all of the holder’s Convertible Notes for cash upon the occurrence of a fundamental change as defined in the indenture and on each of June 1, 2015, 2018, 2023, 2028 and 2033 at a price equal to 100% of the accreted principal amount of the Convertible Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, in each case. It is the Company’s current intent to settle the principal amount of any conversions in cash, and any additional conversion consideration in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination of cash and shares.

If applicable, the Company will pay a make-whole premium on Convertible Notes converted in connection with certain fundamental changes that occur prior to June 6, 2015. The amount of the make-whole premium, if any, will be based on the Company’s common stock price and the effective date of the fundamental change. The indenture contains a detailed description of how the make-whole premium will be determined and a table showing the make-whole premium that would apply at various stock prices. No make-whole premium would be paid if the price of the Company’s common stock on the effective date of the fundamental change is less than $29.00 per share. Any make-whole premium will be payable in shares of the Company’s common stock (or the consideration into which the Company’s common stock has been exchanged in the fundamental change) on the conversion date for the Convertible Notes converted in connection with the fundamental change.

At January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010, there was $172,500 aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes outstanding.

The following represents the principal amount of the liability component, the unamortized discount, and the net carrying amount of our Convertible Notes as of January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively:

	January 2, 2011			March 31, 2010
Principal	$	172,500		$	172,500
Unamortized discount		(32,189	)		(36,580	)
Net carrying amount	$	140,311		$	135,920

As of January 2, 2011, the remaining discount will be amortized over a period of 53 months. The conversion price of the $172,500 in aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes is approximately $40.60 per share and the number of shares on which the aggregate consideration to be delivered upon conversion is 4,248,761.

The effective interest rate on the liability component of the Convertible Notes is 8.50%. The amount of interest cost recognized for the amortization of the discount on the liability component of the Convertible Notes was $1,495 and $1,374, respectively, during the quarters ended January 2, 2011 and December 27, 2009 and $4,391 and $4,036, respectively, during the nine months ended January 2, 2011 and December 27, 2009.

17

Senior Secured Credit Facility

In June 2008, the Company entered into a $350,000 senior secured credit facility consisted of a $225,000 Term A Loan and an undrawn $125,000 revolving credit facility.

The $225,000 senior secured Term A Loan is subject to a quarterly principal amortization of 1.25% in Year 1, 1.88% in Years 2-3, 2.50% in Year 4, 3.13% in Year 5 and 14.39% in Year 6 and matures on June 27, 2014. The $125,000 revolving credit facility matures on June 27, 2013. Borrowings under the credit agreements bear interest at a floating rate based, at the Company’s option, upon (i) a LIBOR rate plus an applicable percentage (currently 1.25%), or (ii) the greater of the federal funds rate plus 0.5% or the prime rate, plus an applicable percentage (currently 0.25%). There are no prepayment penalties on loans under the $350,000 senior secured credit facility.

At January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010, there was $188,438 and $201,094, respectively, outstanding under the Term A Loan and there were no borrowings under the revolving credit facility.

Obligations under the senior secured credit facility are secured by substantially all of the Company’s existing and hereafter acquired assets located in the United States, including substantially all of the capital stock of the Company’s United States subsidiaries that are guarantors under the credit facility, and 65% of the capital stock of certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries that are owned by the Company’s United States companies. The Company’s credit agreements contain various covenants that, absent prepayment in full of the indebtedness and other obligations, or the receipt of waivers, would limit the Company’s ability to conduct certain specified business transactions including incurring debt, mergers, consolidations or similar transactions, buying or selling assets out of the ordinary course of business, engaging in sale and leaseback transactions, repurchasing the Company’s common stock, paying dividends and certain other actions. At January 2, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.

Other debt excluding capital lease obligations

At January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010, there were $40 and $11,199, respectively, of borrowings outstanding outside the United States. Borrowings outside the United States at January 2, 2011 were considerably lower due to the Euro Term Loan, which was due to mature on June 30, 2011, being repaid in full on September 30, 2010.

18

NOTE 11: Retirement Plans

The following table presents the interim disclosure requirements of components of the Company’s net periodic benefit cost related to its defined benefit pension plans:

	United States Plans						International Plans
	Quarter ended						Quarter ended
	January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009			January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009
Service cost	$	60		$	45		$	144		$	165
Interest cost		161			159			625			650
Expected return on plan assets		(156	)		(123	)		(407	)		(320	)
Amortization and deferral		68			86			4			4
Net periodic benefit cost	$	133		$	167		$	366		$	499
	United States Plans						International Plans
	Nine months ended						Nine months ended
	January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009			January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009
Service cost	$	190		$	178		$	420		$	475
Interest cost		484			477			1,834			1,908
Expected return on plan assets		(468	)		(369	)		(1,201	)		(947	)
Amortization and deferral		181			249			12			11
Net periodic benefit cost	$	387		$	535		$	1,065		$	1,447

Significant assumptions used in the accounting for the pension benefit plans are as follows:

	United States Plans						International Plans
	Nine months ended						Nine months ended
	January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009			January 2, 2011	December 27, 2009
Discount rate		6.5	%		6.0	%	3.8 - 6.0%	4.3 - 6.0%
Expected return on plan assets		8.0	%		8.0	%	5.5 - 7.0%	5.5 - 7.5%
Rate of compensation increase		N/A			N/A		2.0 - 3.5%	2.0 - 3.5%

The Company presently anticipates contributing approximately $1,800 to its defined benefit pension plans in fiscal 2011, based on current actuarial information.

The Company has defined contribution plans covering all U.S. based employees who are not covered by a collective bargaining agreement and substantially all UK employees, both direct and salaried.

19

NOTE 12: Stock-Based Compensation

As of January 2, 2011, the Company maintains an Equity Incentive Plan for the grant of various types of equity awards including nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, market share units and other forms of equity-based compensation. As of January 2, 2011, the Company had 3,161,043 shares available for future grants.

The Company recognized equity-based compensation expense associated with its equity incentive plans of $2,367, with a related tax benefit of $511, for the third quarter of fiscal 2011, and $1,633, with a related tax benefit of $490, for the third quarter of fiscal 2010. The Company recognized equity-based compensation expense associated with its equity incentive plans of $6,694, with a related tax benefit of $1,726, for the nine months of fiscal 2011, and $5,374, with a related tax benefit of $1,612, for the nine months of fiscal 2010.

Common stock activity for the nine months of fiscal 2011 included the exercise of 1,332,198 options for $16,900 and the vesting of 176,149 of restricted stock and restricted stock units. Common stock activity for the nine months of fiscal 2010 included the exercise of 280,859 options for $1,856 and the vesting of 96,717 of restricted stock and restricted stock units.

Stock Incentive Plans

Non-qualified stock options have been granted to employees under the equity incentive plans at prices not less than the fair market value of the shares on the dates the options were granted. Stock options issued prior to fiscal 2009 vest and become exercisable 25% per year over a four-year period from the date of grant. Stock options issued in fiscal 2009 and 2010 generally vest and become exercisable 33.3% per year over a three-year period from the date of grant. Stock options generally expire 10 years from the date of grant. No stock options were granted during the first nine months of fiscal 2011.

Restricted Stock

The Company approved grants of restricted stock at the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and vests 25% per year over a four-year period from the date of grant. No restricted stock was granted during the nine months of fiscal 2011.

Restricted Stock Units

In August 2010, the Company granted to non-employee directors 21,248 restricted stock units at the market price of $22.59 per restricted stock unit at the date of grant. These restricted stock units vest thirteen-months following the date of grant. In May 2010, the Company granted to management and other key employees 287,212 restricted stock units at fair market value and 124,093 market share units. Restricted stock units are granted at the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and vest and are settled in common stock 25% per year over a four-year period from the date of grant.

Market share units are granted at fair value on the date of grant and vest and are settled in common stock on the third anniversary of the date of grant. Market share units are converted into between zero and two shares of common stock for each unit granted at the end of a three-year performance cycle. The conversion ratio is calculated by dividing the average closing share price of the Company’s common stock during the ninety calendar days immediately preceding the vesting date by the average closing share price of the Company’s common stock during the ninety calendar days immediately preceding the grant date, with the resulting quotient capped at two. This quotient is then multiplied by the number of market share units granted to yield the number of shares of common stock to be delivered on the vesting date.

The compensation cost to be recorded is based on the fair value at the grant date. The fair value of the restricted stock units granted in fiscal 2011 was based on the market price of $25.67 per share at the date of grant. The fair value of the market share units granted in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 was estimated at the date of grant at $34.45 per share using a binominal matrix-pricing model with the following assumptions: a risk-free interest rate of 1.30%, dividend yield of zero, time to maturity of 3 years and expected volatility of 43.0%.

As of January 2, 2011, 742,685 restricted stock units and 124,093 market share units were outstanding. At March 31, 2010, 608,630 restricted stock units were outstanding.

20

NOTE 13: Earnings Per Share

Net earnings per share—basic is based on the weighted average number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding. Net earnings per share—diluted gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares that were outstanding during the period. As of January 2, 2011 and December 27, 2009, the Company had outstanding stock options, restricted stock, market share units and restricted stock units that could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future. Weighted average common shares—basic and common shares—diluted were as follows:

	Quarter ended				Nine months ended
	January 2, 2011		December 27, 2009		January 2, 2011		December 27, 2009
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding—basic		49,564,495		48,179,030		49,168,320		48,048,812
Assumed exercise and lapse of equity awards, net of shares assumed reacquired		767,059		662,826		672,037		662,758
Weighted average common shares—diluted		50,331,554		48,841,856		49,840,357		48,711,570
Anti-dilutive equity awards not included in weighted average common shares—diluted		250,559		871,242		390,669		1,479,926

The aggregate number of common shares that the Company could be obligated to issue upon conversion of its Convertible Notes that the Company sold in May 2008, is 4,248,761. It is the Company’s current intent to settle the principal amount of any conversions in cash, and any additional conversion consideration in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination of cash and shares. No contingent shares were included in diluted shares outstanding during the third quarters and nine months of fiscal 2011 and 2010, as the specified conversion price exceeded the average market price of the Company’s common stock, and the inclusion of contingent shares would have been anti-dilutive.

21

NOTE 14: Business Segments

The Company has three reportable business segments based on geographic regions, defined as follows:

• Americas, which includes North and South America, with segment headquarters in Reading, Pennsylvania, USA

• Europe, which includes Europe, the Middle East and Africa, with segment headquarters in Zurich, Switzerland

• Asia, which includes Asia, Australia and Oceania, with segment headquarters in Singapore

The following table provides selected financial data for the Company’s reportable business segments:

	Quarter ended						Nine months ended
	January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009			January 2, 2011			December 27, 2009
Net sales by segment
Europe	$	236,403		$	209,590		$	632,263		$	533,748
Americas		224,602			179,115			651,442			493,904
Asia		47,591			32,553			132,703			101,196
Total net sales	$	508,596		$	421,258		$	1,416,408		$	1,128,848
Operating earnings by segment
Europe	$	15,927		$	7,910		$	35,122		$	9,947
Americas		31,008			23,907			91,086			61,872
Asia		3,139			4,904			9,315			16,287
Restructuring charges (Europe)		(1,754	)		(1,063	)		(5,227	)		(7,048	)
Restructuring charges (Americas)		—			—			—			(717	)
Bargain purchase gain (Europe)		—			2,919			—			2,919
Total operating earnings	$	48,320		$	38,577		$	130,296		$	83,260

NOTE 15: Subsequent Events

The Company evaluated all subsequent events through the date that the consolidated financial statements were issued. No material subsequent events have occurred since January 2, 2011 that required recognition or disclosure in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

22

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Reform Act”) provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of EnerSys. EnerSys and its representatives may, from time to time, make written or verbal forward-looking statements, including statements contained in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and its reports to stockholders. Generally, the inclusion of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “will,” and similar expressions identify statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that are intended to come within the safe harbor protection provided by those sections. All statements addressing operating performance, events, or developments that EnerSys expects or anticipates will occur in the future, including statements relating to sales growth, earnings or earnings per share growth, and market share, as well as statements expressing optimism or pessimism about future operating results, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Reform Act. The forward-looking statements are and will be based on management’s then-current views and assumptions regarding future events and operating performance, and are applicable only as of the dates of such statements.

Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although we do not make forward-looking statements unless we believe we have a reasonable basis for doing so, we cannot guarantee their accuracy. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements due to a number of uncertainties and risks, including the risks described in the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K and other unforeseen risks. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, even if subsequently made available on our website or otherwise, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise these statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Our actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements for a number of reasons, including the following factors:

• general cyclical patterns of the industries in which our customers operate;

• the extent to which we cannot control our fixed and variable costs;

• the raw material in our products may experience significant fluctuations in market price and availability;

• certain raw materials constitute hazardous materials that may give rise to costly environmental and safety claims;

• legislation regarding the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in our products;

• risks involved in foreign operations such as disruption of markets, changes in import and export laws, currency restrictions and currency exchange rate fluctuations;

• our ability to raise our selling prices to our customers when our product costs increase;

• the extent to which we are able to efficiently utilize our global manufacturing facilities and optimize our capacity;

• general economic conditions in the markets in which we operate;

• competitiveness of the battery markets throughout the world;

• our timely development of competitive new products and product enhancements in a changing environment and the acceptance of such products and product enhancements by customers;

• our ability to adequately protect our proprietary intellectual property, technology and brand names;

• unanticipated litigation and regulatory proceedings to which we might be subject;

• changes in our market share in the geographic business segments where we operate;

• our ability to implement our cost reduction initiatives successfully and improve our profitability;

• unanticipated quality problems associated with our products;

• our ability to implement business strategies, including our acquisition strategy, and restructuring plans;

23

• our acquisition strategy may not be successful in locating advantageous targets;

• our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems and management personnel we acquire into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames;

• our debt and debt service requirements which may restrict our operational and financial flexibility, as well as imposing unfavorable interest and financing costs;

• our ability to maintain our existing credit facilities or obtain satisfactory new credit facilities;

• adverse changes in our short- and long-term debt levels under our credit facilities;

• our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates on our variable-rate debt;

• our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;

• our ability to maintain good relations with labor unions;

• credit risk associated with our customers, including risk of insolvency and bankruptcy;

• our ability to successfully recover in the event of a disaster affecting our infrastructure; and

• terrorist acts or acts of war, whether in the United States or abroad, could cause damage or disruption to our operations, our suppliers, channels to market or customers, or could cause costs to increase, or create political or economic instability.

This list of factors that may affect future performance is illustrative, but by no means exhaustive. Accordingly, all forward-looking statements should be evaluated with the understanding of their inherent uncertainty.

In the following discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition, certain financial measures may be considered “non-GAAP financial measures” under Securities and Exchange Commission rules. These rules require supplemental explanation and reconciliation, which is provided in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. EnerSys’ management uses the non-GAAP measures “primary working capital”, “primary working capital percentage” (see definitions in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below) and capital expenditures in its evaluation of business segment cash flow and financial position performance. These disclosures have limitations as an analytical tool, should not be viewed as a substitute for cash flow determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of the Company’s results as reported under GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies. Management believes that this non-GAAP supplemental information is helpful in understanding the Company’s ongoing operating results.

24

Overview

We are the global leader in stored energy solutions for industrial applications. We manufacture, market and distribute related products such as chargers, power equipment and battery accessories, and we provide related after-market and customer-support services for industrial batteries. We market and sell our products globally to over 10,000 customers in more than 100 countries through a network of distributors, independent representatives and our internal sales force.

We operate and manage our business in three geographic regions of the world — Americas, Europe and Asia, as described below. Our business is highly decentralized with manufacturing locations throughout the world. More than half of our manufacturing capacity is located outside of the United States, and approximately 60% of our net sales are generated outside of the United States. Under the criteria of the FASB guidance, the Company has three reportable business segments based on geographic regions, defined as follows:

• Americas, which includes North and South America, with our segment headquarters in Reading, Pennsylvania, USA

• Europe, which includes Europe, the Middle East and Africa, with our segment headquarters in Zurich, Switzerland

• Asia, which includes Asia, Australia and Oceania, with our segment headquarters in Singapore

We evaluate business segment performance based primarily upon operating earnings, exclusive of highlighted items. Highlighted items are those that the Company deems are not indicative of ongoing operating results, including those charges that the Company incurs as a result of restructuring activities and those charges and credits that are not directly related to ongoing business segment performance. All corporate and centrally incurred costs are allocated to the business segments based principally on net sales. We evaluate business segment cash flow and financial position performance based primarily upon capital expenditures and primary working capital levels (see definition of primary working capital in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below). Although we monitor the three elements of primary working capital (receivables, inventory and payables), our primary focus is on the total amount, due to the significant impact it has on our cash flow.

25

Our management structure, financial reporting systems, and associated internal controls and procedures, are all consistent with our three geographic business segments. We report on a March 31 fiscal year-end. Our financial results are largely driven by the following factors:

• general cyclical patterns of the industries in which our customers operate;

• changes in our market share in the geographic business segments where we operate;

• changes in our selling prices and, in periods when our product costs increase, our ability to raise our selling prices to pass such cost increases through to our customers;

• the extent to which we are able to efficiently utilize our global manufacturing facilities and optimize our capacity;

• the extent to which we can control our fixed and variable costs, including those for our raw materials, manufacturing, distribution and operating activities;

• changes in our level of debt and changes in the variable interest rates under our credit facilities; and

• the size and number of acquisitions and our ability to achieve their intended benefits.

We have two primary industrial battery product lines: reserve power products and motive power products. Net sales classifications by product line are as follows:

• Reserve power products are used for backup power for the continuous operation of critical applications in telecommunications systems, UPS, applications for computer and computer-controlled systems, and other specialty power applications, including security systems, for premium starting, lighting and ignition applications, in switchgear and electrical control systems used in electric utilities and energy pipelines, and in commercial aircraft and military aircraft, submarines, ships and tactical vehicles.

• Motive power products are used to provide power for manufacturing, warehousing and other material handling equipment, primarily electric industrial forklift trucks, mining equipment, and for diesel locomotive starting, rail car lighting and rail signaling equipment.

26

Economic Climate

The global economic recovery that we have experienced since the summer of 2009 is reflected in the increases in our global revenue. Our revenue reached a low point in the first quarter of fiscal 2010; revenue in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 was 50% higher than the low point last year. We are also encouraged by the continued positive trends in our incoming order rate.

Volatility of Commodities and Foreign Currencies

Our most significant commodity and foreign currency exposures are related to lead and the euro. Volatility of commodity costs and foreign currency exchange rates have caused large swings in our production costs. As the global economic climate changes, we anticipate that our commodity costs may continue to fluctuate significantly as they have in the past several years. The increase in our cost of lead due to increases in average lead prices was approximately $107 million in the nine months of fiscal 2011 compared to the nine months of fiscal 2010.

Customer Pricing

Our selling prices fluctuated during the last several years to offset the volatile cost of commodities. Beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2009, as a result of reductions in the cost of lead, our average selling prices began to decline on a sequential quarterly basis. As the cycle of lead costs turned upward in the early part of fiscal 2010, we began to increase average selling prices to help offset the higher costs. During the nine months of fiscal 2011, our selling prices increased to reflect the rising commodity prices. Selling price increases offset approximately $57 million of the increased lead cost of $107 million in the nine months of fiscal 2011. Approximately 35% to 40% of our revenue is currently subject to agreements that adjust pricing to a market-based index for lead.

27

Cost Savings Initiatives-Restructuring

To help improve our level of profitability, we continue to take actions to rationalize and automate our production facilities and move capacity to lower cost facilities.

Cost savings programs remain a continuous element of our business strategy and are directed primarily at further reductions in plant manufacturing and raw materials costs and our operating expenses, primarily selling, general and administrative. We accelerated the consolidation of certain operations and additional restructuring of our business during the economic decline in 2008 and 2009.

In fiscal 2011, even as revenue and earnings are improving, we began a further restructuring of our European operations. The benefits of this action are expected to occur in future periods.

We believe that the restructuring actions taken over the last 4 years will have a favorable pre-tax earnings impact of approximately $40 million, or $0.58 per share, on an annualized basis when fully implemented by the end of fiscal 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our capital structure and liquidity remain strong. As of January 2, 2011, we had approximately $206 million of cash and cash equivalents, approximately $131 million of undrawn, committed credit lines, and over $92 million of uncommitted credit lines. We believe that we have the financial resources and the capital available to fund the foreseeable organic growth in our business and to remain active in pursuing further acquisition opportunities.

28

Results of Operations

Net Sales

	Quarter ended January 2, 2011					Quarter ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
Current quarter by segment	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage
Europe	$	236.4		46.5	%	$	209.7		49.8	%	$	26.7		12.8	%
Americas		224.6		44.2			179.0		42.5			45.6		25.4
Asia		47.6		9.3			32.6		7.7			15.0		46.2
Total net sales	$	508.6		100.0	%	$	421.3		100.0	%	$	87.3		20.7	%

	Nine months ended January 2, 2011					Nine months ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
Year to date by segment	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage
Europe	$	632.3		44.6	%	$	533.7		47.3	%	$	98.6		18.5	%
Americas		651.4		46.0			493.9		43.7			157.5		31.9
Asia		132.7		9.4			101.2		9.0			31.5		31.1
Total net sales	$	1,416.4		100.0	%	$	1,128.8		100.0	%	$	287.6		25.5	%

Net sales increased $87.3 million or 20.7% in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and increased $287.6 million or 25.5% in the nine months of fiscal 2011 from the comparable periods in fiscal 2010. This increase for the quarter was the result of an 18% increase in organic volume, a 3% increase from acquisitions and a 3% increase due to pricing, partially offset by a 3% decrease from weaker foreign currencies, primarily the euro and British pound. The increase for the nine months of fiscal 2011 from the comparable period in fiscal 2010 was the result of a 19% increase in organic volume, a 5% increase from acquisitions and a 5% increase due to pricing, partially offset by a 3% decrease from weaker foreign currencies.

Segment sales

The improving economic and market conditions have had a significant impact on our unit sales volume. All of our segments experienced organic volume improvements in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, compared to the comparable period of 2010.

Our Europe segment’s net sales increased $26.7 million or 12.8% in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010, primarily due to an increase in organic volume of 14%. Price increases and acquisitions contributed approximately 5% and 2%, respectively, to the improvement, which was partially offset by an 8% decrease due to weaker foreign currencies. Our Europe segment’s revenue increased $98.6 million or 18.5% in the nine months of fiscal 2011, as compared to the nine months of fiscal 2010, primarily due to an increase in organic volume which contributed approximately a 16% increase, complemented by increases of approximately 7% and 4% due to price and acquisitions, respectively, partially offset by an 8% decrease from weaker foreign currencies.

Our Americas segment’s revenue increased $45.6 million or 25.4% in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010, primarily due to higher organic volume, which contributed approximately an 18% increase. Pricing, acquisitions and foreign currency changes contributed approximately 1%, 5% and 1%, respectively, to the improvement. Our Americas segment’s revenue increased $157.5 million or 31.9% in the nine months of fiscal 2011, as compared to the nine months of fiscal 2010, primarily due to higher organic volume which contributed approximately a 21% increase and pricing, acquisitions and foreign currency changes contributed approximately 4%, 6% and 1%, respectively.

Our Asia segment’s revenue increased $15.0 million or 46.2% in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010, primarily due to higher organic volume of 42% and 7% due to foreign currency changes, partially offset by lower pricing of 3%. Our Asia segment’s revenue increased $31.5 million or 31.1% in the nine months of fiscal 2011, as compared to the nine months of fiscal 2010, primarily due to higher organic volume which contributed approximately a 27% increase and 5% due to foreign currency changes, partially offset by lower pricing of 1%. The pricing environment in Asia continues to be challenging.

29

Product line sales

	Quarter ended January 2, 2011					Quarter ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage
Reserve Power	$	252.9		49.7	%	$	213.3		50.6	%	$	39.6		18.6	%
Motive Power		255.7		50.3			208.0		49.4			47.7		22.9
Total net sales	$	508.6		100.0	%	$	421.3		100.0	%	$	87.3		20.7	%

	Nine months ended January 2, 2011					Nine months ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage
Reserve Power	$	707.8		50.0	%	$	594.1		52.6	%	$	113.7		19.1	%
Motive Power		708.6		50.0			534.7		47.4			173.9		32.5
Total net sales	$	1,416.4		100.0	%	$	1,128.8		100.0	%	$	287.6		25.5	%

Sales of our reserve power products in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2011 increased $39.6 million or 18.6% and $113.7 million or 19.1%, respectively, compared to the comparable periods of fiscal 2010. In the third quarter of fiscal 2011, organic volume growth contributed 18% of the increase, pricing and acquisitions contributed approximately 2% and 1%, respectively, to the improvement, which was partially offset by a 2% decrease due to foreign currency changes. In the nine months of fiscal 2011, higher organic volume was approximately 17%, pricing and acquisitions contributed approximately 3% and 2%, respectively, to the improvement, which was partially offset by a 3% decrease due to foreign currency changes.

Sales of our motive power products in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2011 increased $47.7 million or 22.9% and $173.9 million or 32.5%, respectively, compared to the comparable periods of fiscal 2010. The third quarter increase was primarily due to higher organic volume, which contributed approximately an 18% increase. Pricing and acquisitions contributed 3% and 6%, respectively, to the improvement which was partially offset by a 4% decrease due to foreign currency changes. In the nine months of fiscal 2011, organic volume increase was approximately 21% with pricing and acquisitions each contributing 8%, partially offset by a 4% decrease due to foreign currency changes.

30

Gross Profit

	Quarter ended January 2, 2011					Quarter ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage
Gross Profit	$	117.9		23.2	%	$	98.3		23.3	%	$	19.6		19.9	%
	Nine months ended January 2, 2011					Nine months ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage
Gross Profit	$	325.2		23.0	%	$	264.4		23.4	%	$	60.8		23.0	%

Gross profit increased 19.9% or $19.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011, and increased 23.0% or $60.8 million in the nine months of fiscal 2011 when compared to the comparable periods of fiscal 2010.

Gross profit, as a percentage of net sales decreased 10 basis points in the third quarter and 40 basis points in the nine month period of fiscal 2011, when compared to the comparable periods of fiscal 2010. This decrease is primarily attributed to higher commodity costs offset by on-going cost reduction programs and higher selling prices, as discussed below. In addition, significantly higher volumes in the fiscal 2011 periods were a benefit to the gross profit margin.

We estimate that the cost of lead alone, our most significant raw material, increased our cost of sales by approximately $18.0 million and $107.0 million, respectively, in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2011, compared to the comparable periods in fiscal 2010. Selling price increases offset approximately $11 million and $57 million, respectively, of the increased lead cost in the third quarter and in the nine months of fiscal 2011.

Our sales initiatives will continue to emphasize pricing activities to improve gross profit and continue to focus on improving product mix to higher margin products.

Additionally, we remain highly focused on our long-standing and on-going cost reduction programs, which we believe continue to be highly effective in reducing our costs.

Operating Items

	Quarter ended January 2, 2011					Quarter ended December 27, 2009						Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions			Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage
Operating expenses	$	67.8		13.3	%	$	61.6			14.6	%	$	6.2		10.1	%
Bargain purchase gain	$	—		—		$	(2.9	)		(0.7	)%	$	2.9		NM
Restructuring charges	$	1.8		0.4	%	$	1.1			0.3	%	$	0.7		65.0	%

	Nine months ended January 2, 2011					Nine months ended December 27, 2009						Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions			Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions			Percentage
Operating expenses	$	189.7		13.4	%	$	176.3			15.6	%	$	13.4			7.6	%
Bargain purchase gain	$	—		—		$	(2.9	)		(0.3	)%	$	2.9			NM
Restructuring charges	$	5.2		0.4	%	$	7.8			0.7	%	$	(2.6	)		(32.7	)%

31

Operating expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased 130 basis points and 220 basis points respectively, in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2011 in comparison to the comparable periods of fiscal 2010. This decrease in the percentage is largely the result of leveraging our operating expenses with higher revenue. Operating expenses, excluding the effect of foreign currency translation, increased 11.7% or $7.1 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and increased 9.3% or $16.2 million in the nine months of fiscal 2011 when compared to the comparable periods of fiscal 2010, due primarily to higher sales volume. Selling expenses, our main component of operating expenses, were 58.6% and 59.2% of total operating expenses in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2011 compared to 57.2% and 58.1% of total operating expenses in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2010.

Restructuring charges

Included in our third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2011 operating results are $1.8 million and $5.2 million, respectively, of restructuring charges primarily for staff reductions made in Europe. Included in our operating earnings for the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2010 were restructuring charges of $1.1 million and $7.8 million, respectively. These were primarily for staff reductions made in Europe and the Americas.

32

Operating Earnings

	Quarter ended January 2, 2011						Quarter ended December 27, 2009						Increase (Decrease)
Current quarter by segment	In Millions			Percentage of Total Net Sales (1)			In Millions			Percentage of Total Net Sales (1)			In Millions			Percentage
Europe	$	15.9			6.7	%	$	7.9			3.8	%	$	8.0			NM	%
Americas		31.0			13.8			24.0			13.3			7.0			29.7
Asia		3.2			6.6			4.9			15.1			(1.7	)		(36.0	)
Subtotal		50.1			9.8			36.8			8.7			13.3			36.4
Restructuring charges-Europe		(1.8	)		(0.7	)		(1.1	)		(0.5	)		(0.7	)		(65.0	)
Bargain purchase gain-Europe		—			—			2.9			1.4			(2.9	)		NM
Total operating earnings	$	48.3			9.5	%	$	38.6			9.2	%	$	9.7			25.3	%
	Nine months ended January 2, 2011						Nine months ended December 27, 2009						Increase (Decrease)
Year to date by segment	In Millions			Percentage of Total Net Sales (1)			In Millions			Percentage of Total Net Sales (1)			In Millions			Percentage
Europe	$	35.1			5.6	%	$	10.0			1.9	%	$	25.1			NM	%
Americas		91.1			14.0			61.9			12.5			29.2			47.2
Asia		9.3			7.0			16.3			16.1			(7.0	)		(42.8	)
Subtotal		135.5			9.6			88.2			7.8			47.3			53.8
Restructuring charges-Europe		(5.2	)		(0.8	)		(7.1	)		(1.3	)		1.9			25.8
Restructuring charges-Americas		—			—			(0.7	)		(0.1	)		0.7			NM
Bargain purchase gain-Europe		—			—			2.9			0.4			(2.9	)		NM
Total operating earnings	$	130.3			9.2	%	$	83.3			7.4	%	$	47.0			56.5	%

⁽¹⁾ The percentages shown for the segments are computed as a percentage of the applicable segment’s net sales.

NM = not meaningful

Operating earnings increased 25.3% or $9.7 million in the third quarter and increased 56.5% or $47.0 million in the nine months of fiscal 2011 in comparison to the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2010. Operating earnings as a percentage of net sales, as shown in the table above, increased 30 basis points in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and increased 180 basis points in the nine months of fiscal 2011 when compared to the comparable periods in fiscal 2010. The improvements in the percentage were due primarily to the growth of revenue at a significantly higher rate than the increase in operating expenses since a large portion of operating expenses are relatively fixed. Operating earnings improved primarily due to higher sales volume, price realization and cost reduction initiatives, partially offset by higher commodity costs. There were additional offsets from restructuring charges in Europe in fiscal 2011 and in Europe and Americas in fiscal 2010. Operating earnings for the third quarter and the nine months of fiscal 2010 were favorably affected by a bargain purchase gain of $2.9 million on the acquisition of Oerlikon.

We experienced a substantial increase in operating earnings in our Europe segment in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 in comparison to the comparable quarter in the prior year, with the operating margin increasing 290 basis points to 6.7%. This improvement in our Europe segment earnings is primarily attributable to an improvement in organic volume and pricing, and benefits of the restructuring programs on both production and operating expenses, partially offset by higher commodity costs.

Our Americas segment had an increase in operating earnings in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 in comparison to the comparable quarter in the prior year, with the operating margin increasing 50 basis points to 13.8%. The margin improvement was primarily from higher sales volume and price realization combined, partially offset by higher commodity costs.

Operating earnings decreased in our Asia segment in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 in comparison to the comparable quarter in the prior year, with the operating margin decreasing to 6.6% from 15.1%. Higher manufacturing costs, freight costs and expenses related to business development in the Asian region, coupled with the impact of lower pricing, contributed to the lower operating margins, partially offset by higher sales volume in Asia compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010. The higher manufacturing costs were partially the result of expenses associated with the transition of our Shenzhen, China operations from a manufacturing and sales and distribution center, to a light assembly and sales and distribution center. Business development expenses relate to initial start up costs as part of our efforts to establish a presence in India, as well as expansion in China with the construction of our new Chongqing manufacturing facility.

33

Operating earnings almost tripled in our Europe segment in the nine months of fiscal 2011 in comparison to the comparable period in the prior year, with the operating margin increasing 370 basis points to 5.6%. This major improvement in Europe earnings is primarily attributable to an increase of 16% in organic volume and 7% of pricing as European macro-economic conditions improved and the benefits of the restructuring programs on both production and operating expenses.

Operating earnings in our Americas segment increased 47.2% in the nine months of fiscal 2011 in comparison to the comparable period in the prior year, while the operating margin increased 150 basis points to 14.0%. Earnings improved in our Americas segment due primarily to 21% increase in organic volumes from improved macro-economic conditions and 4% pricing.

Operating earnings in our Asia segment decreased 42.8% in the nine months of fiscal 2011 in comparison to the comparable period in the prior year, with the operating margin as a percentage of sales decreasing from 16.1% to 7.0%. This reduction in our Asia segment earnings was primarily due to higher commodity and freights costs, higher manufacturing costs, and expenses related to business development in the Asian region, along with lower pricing, partially offset by higher sales volume. In addition, the nine month period of fiscal 2010 benefited from a $1.1 million gain from the sale of assets. The higher manufacturing costs and business development expenses for the nine month period were as described earlier for the recent quarter.

Interest Expense

	Quarter ended January 2, 2011					Quarter ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions			Percentage
Interest expense	$	5.6		1.1	%	$	5.7		1.4	%	$	(0.1	)		(1.0	)%
	Nine months ended January 2, 2011					Nine months ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions			Percentage
Interest expense	$	17.7		1.3	%	$	16.7		1.5	%	$	1.0			6.1	%

Interest expense of $5.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 (net of interest income of $0.2 million) was $0.1 million lower than the interest expense of $5.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 (net of interest income of $0.5 million). Interest expense of $17.7 million in the nine months of fiscal 2011 (net of interest income of $0.8 million) was $1.0 million higher than the $16.7 million (net of interest income of $1.4 million) in the nine months of fiscal 2010.

The decrease in interest expense in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to the third quarter of 2010 is attributable primarily to lower borrowing levels partially offset by higher non-cash accretion on our Convertible Notes and higher effective interest rates on our interest rate swaps.

The increase in interest expense in the nine months of fiscal 2011 compared to the nine months of 2010 is attributable primarily to more days in the nine month period of fiscal 2011 versus fiscal 2010, higher non-cash accretion on our Convertible Notes, the write off of non-cash deferred financing fees due to the early payment of the Euro Term Loan, and higher effective interest rates on our interest rate swaps, partially offset by lower borrowing levels.

Our average debt outstanding (reflecting the reduction of the Convertible Notes discount) was $334.2 million and $344.7 million in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2011, respectively, compared to $362.2 million and $367.3 million, respectively, in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2010. The average Convertible Notes discount excluded from our average debt outstanding was $33.0 million and $34.4 million, respectively in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2011 and $38.7 million and $40.1 million, respectively, in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2010.

Included in interest expense is non-cash, accreted interest on the Convertible Notes of $1.5 million and $4.4 million, respectively, in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2011 and $1.4 million and $4.0 million, respectively, in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2010.

34

Also included in interest expense are non-cash charges for deferred financing fees of $0.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively, in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2011, compared to $0.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively, in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2010.

Other (Income) Expense, Net

	Quarter ended January 2, 2011						Quarter ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions			Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions			Percentage
Other (income) expense, net	$	(0.4	)		0.0	%	$	1.5		0.4	%	$	(1.9	)		NM
	Nine months ended January 2, 2011						Nine months ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions			Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions			Percentage
Other expense, net	$	0.6			0.0	%	$	4.2		0.4	%	$	(3.6	)		(84.8	)%

Other (income) expense, net was ($0.4) million for the third quarter of fiscal 2011 compared to $1.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. This favorable impact is mainly attributable to net foreign currency transaction gains.

Other expense, net was $0.6 million in the nine months of fiscal 2011 compared to $4.2 million in the comparable period of fiscal 2010. This $3.6 million favorable change is primarily attributed to $2.9 million lower foreign currency transaction losses in the current fiscal period.

Earnings Before Income Taxes

	Quarter ended January 2, 2011					Quarter ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage
Earnings before income taxes	$	43.1		8.4	%	$	31.5		7.5	%	$	11.6		36.9	%
	Nine months ended January 2, 2011					Nine months ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage
Earnings before income taxes	$	112.0		7.9	%	$	62.4		5.5	%	$	49.6		79.4	%

As a result of the above, earnings before income taxes in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 increased $11.6 million compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2010 and earnings before income taxes in the nine months of fiscal 2011 increased $49.6 million compared to nine months of fiscal 2010. Earnings before income taxes as a percentage of sales were 8.4% and 7.9% respectively, in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2011 in comparison to 7.5% and 5.5%, respectively, in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2010.

35

Income Tax Expense

	Quarter ended January 2, 2011					Quarter ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage
Income tax expense	$	9.4		1.8	%	$	8.3		2.0	%	$	1.1		12.0	%
Effective tax rate		21.6%					26.4%					(4.8)%
	Nine months ended January 2, 2011					Nine months ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage
Income tax expense	$	28.7		2.0	%	$	18.0		1.6	%	$	10.7		59.5	%
Effective tax rate		25.6%					28.8%					(3.2)%

The Company’s income tax provisions for all periods consist of federal, state and foreign income taxes. The tax provisions for the third quarters of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 were based on the estimated effective tax rates applicable for the full years ending March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively, after giving effect to items specifically related to the interim periods.

The effective income tax rates for the third quarters of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 were 21.6% and 26.4%, respectively. The effective income tax rates for the nine months of fiscal 2011 and fiscal 2010 were 25.6% and 28.8%, respectively. The rate decreases in the third quarter and nine months of fiscal 2011 as compared to the comparable prior year periods are primarily due to a change in the mix of earnings among tax jurisdictions and the favorable settlement of a foreign tax audit of $2.5 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2011, resulting in the release of associated tax liabilities under FASB guidance.

Net Earnings

	Quarter ended January 2, 2011					Quarter ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage
Net earnings	$	33.7		6.6	%	$	23.2		5.5	%	$	10.5		45.8	%

	Nine months ended January 2, 2011					Nine months ended December 27, 2009					Increase (Decrease)
	In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage of Total Net Sales			In Millions		Percentage
Net earnings	$	83.3		5.9	%	$	44.5		3.9	%	$	38.8		87.4	%

As a result of the above, net earnings in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 were $33.7 million or 6.6% of net sales, compared to net earnings in the third quarter of fiscal 2010 of $23.2 million or 5.5% of net sales. Net earnings in the nine months of fiscal 2011 were $83.3 million or 5.9% of net sales, compared to net earnings in the nine months of fiscal 2010 of $44.5 million or 3.9% of net sales.

Net earnings per common share in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 were $0.68 per basic share and $0.67 per diluted share, compared to $0.48 per basic share and $0.47 per diluted share in the third quarter of fiscal 2010. Net earnings per common share in the nine months of fiscal 2011 were $1.69 per basic share and $1.67 per diluted share, compared to $0.93 per basic share and $0.91 per diluted share in the nine months of fiscal 2010.

36

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies from those discussed under the caption “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During the nine months of fiscal 2011, cash from operating activities of $44.9 million was provided primarily from net earnings of $83.3 million and depreciation and amortization of $33.2 million, substantially offset by cash used for the increase in primary working capital of $70.9 million in a period of rising sales. In the nine months of fiscal 2010, cash from operating activities of $110.2 million was provided primarily from net earnings of $44.5 million, depreciation and amortization of $33.3 million, augmented by positive cash flow from reduced primary working capital of $34.8 million, as we improved primary working capital percentage from 27.8% at March 31, 2009 to 26.2% at December 27, 2009.

Primary working capital for this purpose is trade accounts receivable, plus inventories, minus trade accounts payable. The resulting net amount is divided by the trailing three month net sales (annualized) to derive a primary working capital percentage. Primary working capital was $511.5 million (yielding a primary working capital percentage of 25.1%) at January 2, 2011, $441.8 million (yielding a primary working capital percentage of 26.2%) at December 27, 2009, and $439.7 million (yielding a primary working capital percentage of 24.4%) at March 31, 2010. The primary working capital percentage of 25.1% at January 2, 2011 is 0.7 percentage points above that for March 31, 2010, and 1.1 percentage points below that for the prior year quarter.

Primary working capital increased during the nine months of fiscal 2011 due to an increase in accounts receivable and inventory, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable. Trade receivables increased as a result of the increase in revenue. We experienced a planned increase in inventory, partly in preparation for anticipated new business. Relative to recent quarterly sales, the inventory level is now below that of the first quarter of this fiscal year since most of the increase in inventory, excluding the impact of foreign currency translation, took place in the first quarter. Accounts payable in the nine months of fiscal 2011 increased modestly with the relative increase in sales.

Primary working capital and primary working capital percentages at January 2, 2011, March 31, 2010 and December 27, 2009 are computed as follows:

(In Millions)
Balance At	Trade Receivables		Inventory		Accounts Payable			Total		Quarter Revenue Annualized		Primary Working Capital %
January 2, 2011	$	420.2	$	305.8	$	(214.5	)	$	511.5	$	2,034.4		25.1	%
March 31, 2010		383.6		254.4		(198.3	)		439.7		1,802.1		24.4	%
December 27, 2009		374.1		251.6		(183.9	)		441.8		1,685.0		26.2	%

37

Investing activities used cash of $42.2 million in the nine months of fiscal 2011, compared to cash used of $52.2 million in the comparable period in fiscal 2010. This decrease was primarily due to limited acquisition activity of $1.4 million in the nine months compared to $22.7 million for the comparable period of fiscal 2010. Partially offsetting this decrease was an increase in capital expenditures to $41.2 million in the nine months of fiscal 2011 compared to $30.7 million for the comparable period of fiscal 2010. Capital spending in fiscal 2011 includes the construction of our new manufacturing facility currently being built in Chongqing, China.

Financing activities provided cash of $1.0 million in the nine months of fiscal 2011, primarily reflecting repayment of long-term debt of $23.8 million, offset by the exercise of stock options and the related tax benefits that contributed $24.2 million. Financing activities used cash of $16.9 million in the nine months of fiscal 2010, primarily reflecting the scheduled payments of long-term debt and repayments of short-term debt totaling $19.7 million, partially offset by the exercise of stock options and the related tax benefits totaling $3.2 million.

As a result of the above, total cash and cash equivalents increased by $4.8 million to $205.8 million in the nine months of fiscal 2011 compared to an increase of $47.8 million to $211.0 million in the comparable period of fiscal 2010.

All obligations under our U.S. credit agreement are secured by, among other things, substantially all of our U.S. assets. Our U.S. credit agreements contain various covenants which, absent prepayment in full of the indebtedness and other obligations, or the receipt of waivers, limit our ability to conduct certain specified business transactions, buy or sell assets out of the ordinary course of business, engage in sale and leaseback transactions, pay dividends and take certain other actions. There are no prepayment penalties on loans under the $350 million senior secured credit facility.

We are in compliance with all covenants and conditions under our credit agreements. Since we believe that we will continue to comply with these covenants and conditions, we believe that we have the financial resources and the capital available to fund the foreseeable organic growth in our business and to remain active in pursuing further acquisition opportunities. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a detailed description of debt.

38

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risks

Our cash flows and earnings are subject to fluctuations resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and raw material costs. We manage our exposure to these market risks through internally established policies and procedures and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. Our policy does not allow speculation in derivative instruments for profit or execution of derivative instrument contracts for which there are no underlying exposures. We do not use financial instruments for trading purposes and are not a party to any leveraged derivatives. We monitor our underlying market risk exposures on an ongoing basis and believe that we can modify or adapt our hedging strategies as needed.

Interest Rate Risks

We are exposed to changes in variable U.S. interest rates on borrowings under our credit agreements. On a selective basis, from time to time, we enter into interest rate swap agreements to reduce the negative impact that increases in interest rates could have on our outstanding variable rate debt. At January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010, such agreements effectively convert $125.0 million and $170.0 million, respectively, of our variable-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis, utilizing the three-month LIBOR, as a floating rate reference. Fluctuations in LIBOR and fixed rates affect both our net financial investment position and the amount of cash to be paid or received by us under these agreements. The following commentary provides details for the outstanding interest rate swap agreements:

In October 2005, we entered into interest rate swap agreements to fix interest rates on $75.0 million of floating rate debt through December 22, 2010. The fixed rates per year plus an applicable credit spread began December 22, 2005, and were 4.25% during the first year, 4.525% the second year, 4.80% the third year, 5.075% the fourth year, and 5.47% in the fifth year. In connection with the issuance of $172.5 million aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes and the repayment of a portion of the senior secured Term Loan B in May 2008, we terminated $30.0 million of these interest rate swap agreements at a loss of $1.2 million. The remaining $45.0 million matured on December 22, 2010.

In August 2007, we entered into interest rate swap agreements, which became effective in February 2008, to fix interest rates on $40.0 million of floating rate debt through February 22, 2011, at 4.85% per year.

In November 2007, we entered into interest rate swap agreements which became effective in May 2008, to fix interest rates on $40.0 million of floating rate debt through May 7, 2013, at 4.435% per year.

In December 2007, we entered into $45.0 million of interest rate swap agreements, which became effective in February and May 2008, to fix the interest rates on $20.0 million of floating rate debt through February 22, 2013, at 4.134% per year, and to fix the interest rates on $25.0 million of floating rate debt through May 7, 2013, at 4.138% per year.

A 100 basis point increase in interest rates would increase interest expense by approximately $0.7 million on the non-hedged variable rate portions of our debt.

39

Commodity Cost Risks - Lead Contracts

We have a significant risk in our exposure to certain raw materials. Our largest single raw material cost is for lead, for which the cost remains volatile. In order to hedge against increases in our lead cost, we have entered into contracts with financial institutions to fix the price of lead. A vast majority of such contracts are for a period not extending beyond one year. We had the following contracts outstanding at the dates shown below:

Date	$’s Under Contract (in millions)		# Pounds Purchased (in millions)		Average Cost/Pound		Approximate % of Lead Requirements (1)
January 2, 2011	$	35.5		34.9	$	1.02		8	%
March 31, 2010	$	60.7		63.4	$	0.96		17	%
December 27, 2009	$	32.3		33.8	$	0.95		10	%

⁽¹⁾ Based on approximate annual lead requirements for the periods then ended.

For the remaining quarter of this fiscal year, we believe approximately 93% of the cost of our lead requirement is known. This takes into account the hedge contracts in place at January 2, 2011, lead purchased by January 2, 2011 that will be reflected in future costs under our FIFO accounting treatment, and the benefit from our lead tolling program.

We estimate that a 10% increase in our cost of lead would increase our cost of goods sold by approximately $12 million or 2% of net sales based on revenue and costs in the third quarter of fiscal 2011.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risks

We manufacture and assemble our products primarily in Bulgaria, China, the Czech Republic, France, Germany, Mexico, Poland, the United Kingdom and the United States. Approximately 60% of our sales and expenses are transacted in foreign currencies. Our sales revenue, production costs, profit margins and competitive position are affected by the strength of the currencies in countries where we manufacture or purchase goods relative to the strength of the currencies in countries where our products are sold. Additionally, as we report our financial statements in U.S. dollars, our financial results are affected by the strength of the currencies in countries where we have operations relative to the strength of the U.S. dollar. The principal foreign currencies in which we conduct business are the euro, Swiss franc, British pound, Polish zloty, Chinese renminbi and Mexican peso.

We quantify and monitor our global foreign currency exposures on a regular basis. Periodically, we will enter into foreign currency forward contracts and option contracts to reduce our impact from the volatility of currency movements. Based primarily on statistical currency correlations on our estimated exposures in fiscal 2011, we are confident that the pretax effect on annual earnings of changes in the principal currencies in which we conduct our business would not be in excess of approximately $10 million in more than one year out of twenty years.

40

Our largest exposure is from the purchase and conversion of U.S. dollar-based lead costs into local currencies in Europe. Additionally, we have currency exposures from intercompany and third party trade transactions. To hedge these exposures, we have entered into forward contracts with financial institutions to fix the value at which we will buy or sell certain currencies. Each contract is for a period not extending beyond one year. As of January 2, 2011 and March 31, 2010, we had contracts outstanding of $75.7 million and $64.2 million, respectively, as follows:

	January 2, 2011							March 31, 2010
Transactions Hedged	$US Equivalent (in millions)		Average Rate Hedged		Approximate % of Annual Requirements (1)			$US Equivalent (in millions)		Average Rate Hedged		Approximate % of Annual Requirements (1)
Sell euros for U.S. dollars	$	15.4	$/€	1.35		8	%	$	25.6	$/€	1.37		18	%
Sell euros for Polish zloty		36.3	PLN/€	4.02		47	%		30.5	PLN/€	4.11		52	%
Sell euros for British pounds		19.3	€/£	0.85		53	%		8.1	€/£	0.89		46	%
Sell U.S. dollars for Chinese renminbi		3.4	¥/$	6.56		23	%		—		—		—
Other		1.3							—
Total	$	75.7						$	64.2

⁽¹⁾ Based on the fiscal year currency requirements.

Foreign exchange translation adjustments are recorded in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Based on changes in the timing and amount of interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate movements and our actual exposures and hedges, actual gains and losses in the future may differ from our historical results.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

41

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are involved in litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. We do not expect that any of this litigation, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flow.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The following table summarizes the number of common shares we purchased from participants in our equity incentive plans. As provided by such plans, vested options outstanding may be exercised through surrender to the Company of option shares or vested options outstanding under the Plan to satisfy the applicable aggregate exercise price (and any withholding tax) required to be paid upon such exercise.

Purchases of Equity Securities

Period	(a) Total number of shares (or units) purchased		(b) Average price paid per share (or unit)		(c) Total number  of shares (or units) purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs		(d) Maximum  number (or approximate dollar value) of shares (or units) that may be purchased under the plans or programs
October 4 – October 31, 2010		—	$	—		—		—
November 1 – November 28, 2010		2,839		25.96		—		—
November 29 – January 2, 2011		937		31.57		—		—
Total		3,776	$	27.35		—		—

42

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit
3.1	Fifth Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 3 to EnerSys’ Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-115553) filed on July 13, 2004).
3.2	Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibits 3.2 to Amendment No. 3 to EnerSys’ Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-115553) filed on July 13, 2004).
4.1	2004 Securityholder Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Amendment No. 4 to EnerSys’ Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-115553) filed on July 26, 2004).
4.2	Consent to Waiver dated as of November 1, 2007, between EnerSys, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Capital Partners IV, L.P. and MSDW IV 892 Investors, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to EnerSys Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-32253) filed on June 11, 2008).
4.3	Consent to Waiver dated as of February 2, 2008, by and between Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Capital Partners IV, L.P., MSDW IV 892 Investors, L.P. and EnerSys. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to EnerSys Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-32253) filed on June 11, 2008).
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith).
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith).
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

43

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

ENERSYS (Registrant)
By	/s/    MICHAEL J. SCHMIDTLEIN
	Michael J. Schmidtlein Senior Vice President Finance & Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 9, 2011

44

EnerSys

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit
3.1	Fifth Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 3 to EnerSys’ Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-115553) filed on July 13, 2004).
3.2	Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibits 3.2 to Amendment No. 3 to EnerSys’ Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-115553) filed on July 13, 2004).
4.1	2004 Securityholder Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Amendment No. 4 to EnerSys’ Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-115553) filed on July 26, 2004).
4.2	Consent to Waiver dated as of November 1, 2007, between EnerSys, Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Capital Partners IV, L.P. and MSDW IV 892 Investors, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to EnerSys Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-32253) filed on June 11, 2008).
4.3	Consent to Waiver dated as of February 2, 2008, by and between Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Capital Partners IV, L.P., MSDW IV 892 Investors, L.P. and EnerSys. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to EnerSys Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-32253) filed on June 11, 2008).
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith).
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (filed herewith).
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

45

EX-31.1

EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant To Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Under the Securities Exchange Act Of 1934

I, John D. Craig, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EnerSys;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

ENERSYS
By	/s/ John D. Craig
	John D. Craig
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: February 9, 2011

EX-31.2

EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant To Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Under the Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 

I, Michael J. Schmidtlein, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EnerSys;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

ENERSYS
By	/s/ Michael J. Schmidtlein
	Michael J. Schmidtlein
	Senior Vice President Finance & Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 9, 2011

EX-32.1

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of EnerSys on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended January 2, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of EnerSys.

ENERSYS
By	/s/ John D. Craig
	John D. Craig
	Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
By	/s/ Michael J. Schmidtlein
	Michael J. Schmidtlein
	Senior Vice President Finance & Chief Financial Officer

Date: February 9, 2011