-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, PSVeIU9nxCvUQ/qquf+zj7P1fhMxClpzT3zi8/mcph0TAvXXGxQD/1pW22rX89To U6LqOy/azSgNskXcLqD86A== 0001125282-05-004658.txt : 20050902 0001125282-05-004658.hdr.sgml : 20050902 20050902164002 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0001125282-05-004658 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 8-K PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 4 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20050830 ITEM INFORMATION: Other Events ITEM INFORMATION: Financial Statements and Exhibits FILED AS OF DATE: 20050902 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20050902 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: River Rock Entertainment Authority CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0001288924 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-AMUSEMENT & RECREATION SERVICES [7900] IRS NUMBER: 680490898 STATE OF INCORPORATION: XX FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 8-K SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 333-115186 FILM NUMBER: 051068345 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3250 HIGHWAY 128 EAST CITY: GEYSERVILLE STATE: CA ZIP: 95441 BUSINESS PHONE: (707) 857-2777 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 3250 HIGHWAY 128 EAST CITY: GEYSERVILLE STATE: CA ZIP: 95441 8-K 1 b408624_8k.htm CURRENT REPORT Prepared and filed by St Ives Financial

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 30, 2005

River Rock Entertainment Authority
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Not Applicable     333-115186     68-0490898  
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)     (Commission File Number)     (IRS Employer Identification No.)  


3250 Highway 128 East
Geyserville, California
    95441  
(Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip Code)  

(707) 857-2777
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report.)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

   Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

   Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

   Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

   Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 


Back to Contents

Item 8.01. Other Events.

     On August 25, 2005, the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (“ABC”) reversed its earlier determination that an alcohol license could not be issued to River Rock Casino (the “Casino”). The denial was based solely on its finding that a technical building code violation would occur if alcohol were served on the premises. A lawful certificate of occupancy for the Casino had been issued that deemed the premises suitable for serving alcohol, but the ABC disregarded the certificate. Instead, it chose to rely on a report by the State Fire Marshall in which he opined that the building official had mistakenly interpreted the building code in issuing the occupancy certificate. The Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians (the “Tribe”) challenged that report in an administrative proceeding.

     Following a two-day hearing in May, 2005, the administrative law judge found that the building official had not misapplied the code, that the certificate of occupancy had been properly issued, and that the certificate of occupancy should not have been disregarded by the ABC. The judge recommended that the ABC reverse itself and grant the alcohol license, subject to the outcome of any protests that had been filed by local residents. A hearing on those protests had been delayed pending the outcome of the hearing on the building code issue. The ABC had earlier rejected the objections of the protestors, but they have a right to a hearing on their protests.

     The ABC has agreed to adopt the judge's decision and to issue an alcohol license for the Casino, subject to a favorable disposition of the protests. Unless appealed, the decision of the ABC to issue the license will become effective on October 11, 2005, but the license will not transfer until the protests have been heard by an administrative law judge and a decision favorable to the Tribe on the protests has been issued.

     The dates for hearing the protests have not yet been set. As a result of the evidence and arguments presented by the protestors, the ABC could determine that an alcohol license should not be issued to the Casino, or could limit the scope of any license that it determines should be issued.

     The Authority has furnished the press release announcing this determination and the Department's August 25, 2005 order as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2, respectively, to this Form 8-K. The information in this report and Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

     (c) Exhibits.

  EXHIBIT    DESCRIPTION
  99.1   Press Release of River Rock Entertainment Authority dated September 2, 2005.
       
  99.2   Decision of the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control dated August 25, 2005.


SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Date: September 2, 2005

River Rock Entertainment Authority
     
By: /s/ Douglas Searle                     
Douglas Searle
Chief Executive Officer

 


GRAPHIC 2 emptybox.gif GRAPHIC begin 644 emptybox.gif M1TE&.#EA#``,`/?^``````$!`0("`@,#`P0$!`4%!08&!@<'!P@("`D)"0H* M"@L+"PP,#`T-#0X.#@\/#Q`0$!$1$1(2$A,3$Q04%!45%186%A<7%Q@8&!D9 M&1H:&AL;&QP<'!T='1X>'A\?'R`@("$A(2(B(B,C(R0D)"4E)28F)B7IZ>GM[>WQ\?'U]?7Y^?G]_?X"`@(&!@8*" M@H.#@X2$A(6%A8:&AH>'AXB(B(F)B8J*BHN+BXR,C(V-C8Z.CH^/CY"0D)&1 MD9*2DI.3DY24E)65E9:6EI>7EYB8F)F9F9J:FIN;FYRGI^?GZ"@ MH*&AH:*BHJ.CHZ2DI*6EI::FIJ>GIZBHJ*FIJ:JJJJNKJZRLK*VMK:ZNKJ^O MK["PL+&QL;*RLK.SL[2TM+6UM;:VMK>WM[BXN+FYN;JZNKN[N[R\O+V]O;Z^ MOK^_O\#`P,'!P<+"PL/#P\3$Q,7%Q<;&QL?'Q\C(R,G)RWM_?W^#@X.'AX>+BXN/CX^3DY.7EY>;FYN?GY^CHZ.GIZ>KJZNOK MZ^SL[.WM[>[N[N_O[_#P\/'Q\?+R\O/S\_3T]/7U]?;V]O?W]_CX^/GY^?KZ M^OO[^_S\_/W]_?[^_O___R'Y!`$``/X`+``````,``P`!P@Z`/\)'$APX)L? M"!,J_/<#F;B'$!\:8"BNX,`#%"T*Q/BCHD:.'BV"U/AOY,>,)SN2Y&C@@,N7 &+@$$!``[ ` end EX-99.1 3 b408624_ex99-1.txt PRESS RELEASE EXHIBIT 99.1 RIVER ROCK ENTERTAINMENT AUTHORITY ANNOUNCES DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL DECISION Geyserville, CA. September 2, 2005 - The River Rock Entertainment Authority (the "Authority"), the operator of the River Rock Casino in Sonoma County, California, today announced that on August 25, 2005, the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control ("ABC") reversed its earlier determination that an alcohol license could not be issued to the River Rock Casino (the "Casino"). The denial was based solely on its finding that a technical building code violation would occur if alcohol were served on the premises. A lawful certificate of occupancy for the Casino had been issued that deemed the premises suitable for serving alcohol, but the ABC disregarded the certificate. Instead, it chose to rely on a report by the State Fire Marshall in which he opined that the building official had mistakenly interpreted the building code in issuing the occupancy certificate. The Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians (the "Tribe") challenged that report in an administrative proceeding. Following a two-day hearing in May, 2005, the administrative law judge found that the building official had not misapplied the code, that the certificate of occupancy had been properly issued, and that the certificate of occupancy should not have been disregarded by the ABC. The judge recommended that the ABC reverse itself and grant the alcohol license, subject to the outcome of any protests that had been filed by local residents. A hearing on those protests had been delayed pending the outcome of the hearing on the building code issue. The ABC had earlier rejected the objections of the protestors, but they have a right to a hearing on their protests. The ABC has agreed to adopt the judge's decision and to issue an alcohol license for the Casino, subject to a favorable disposition of the protests. Unless appealed, the decision of the ABC to issue the license will become effective on October 11, 2005, but the license will not transfer until the protests have been heard by an administrative law judge and a decision favorable to the Tribe on the protests has been issued. The dates for hearing the protests have not yet been set. As a result of the evidence and arguments presented by the protestors, the ABC could determine that an alcohol license should not be issued to the Casino, or could limit the scope of any license that it determines should be issued. RIVER ROCK ENTERTAINMENT AUTHORITY We are a Tribal governmental instrumentality of the Dry Creek Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians (the "Tribe"), a federally recognized self-governing Indian tribe. The Tribe has 768 enrolled members and approximately 75-acre reservation in Sonoma County, California. We own and operate the River Rock Casino, a 68,000 square foot facility which is on the reservation and overlooks the scenic Alexander Valley, 75 miles north of San Francisco. River Rock Casino features 35,500 square feet of gaming space containing 1,600 slot and video poker machines, as well as two full-service restaurants. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This release contains certain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Unites States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Whenever you read a statement that is not simply a statement of historical fact (such as when we describe what we "believe," "expect" or "anticipate will occur and other similar statements), you must remember that our expectations may not be correct, even though we believe they are reasonable. We do not guarantee that the transactions and events described in this press release will happen as described (or that they will happen at all). You should read this press release completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We will not update these forward-looking statements, even though our situation will change in the future. Whether actual results will conform to our expectations and predictions is subject to a number or risks and uncertainties, including: o Our financial performance o Our dependence on a single gaming site o Our levels of leverage and ability to meet our debt service and other obligations o General local, domestic and global economic conditions o Changes in federal or state tax laws or regulations, including the Compact o Maintenance of licenses required under gaming laws and regulations and construction permits and approvals required under applicable laws and regulations; and o Development of new competitive gaming properties. Contact: Douglas Searle, Chief Executive Officer River Rock Entertainment Authority (707) 857-2702 EX-99.2 4 b408624_ex99-2.txt CERTIFICATE OF DECISION EXHIBIT 99.2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL CERTIFICATE OF DECISION FILE : 47 - 396835 REG. : 04058060. It is hereby certified that the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, having reviewed the findings of fact, determination of issues and recommendation in the attached proposed decision submitted by an Administrative Law Judge of the Administrative Hearing Office, adopted said proposed decision as its decision in the case therein described on August 25, 2005. THIS DECISION SHALL BECOME OPERATIVE OCTOBER 11, 2005. Sacramento, California Dated: August 25, 2005 Rheba Chastain ---------------------------------- Supervisor, Hearing and Legal Unit Any appeal of this decision must be made in accordance with Chapter 1.5, Articles 3, 4 and 5, Division 9 of the Business and Professions Code. For further information, call the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board at (916) 445-4005, or mail your written appeal to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 300 Capital Mall, Suite 1245, Sacramento, CA 95814. RECEIVED AUG 05 2005 Hearing and Legal Unit Dept. of Alcoholic Beverage Control SACRAMENTO BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION(1) OF: } FILE: 47-396835 } Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo Indians } REG: 04058060 dba River Rock Casino } 3250 Highway 128 East } LICENSE TYPE: 47 Geyserville, CA 95441 } } PAGES: 419 For the Person-to-Person and } Premises-to-Premises Transfer } REPORTERS: of an On-sale Bona Fide Public } Eating-place License } } Cindy Lambert (2/1/05) } Malinda Hentz (5/18/05) } Vicki Walker (5/19/05) } Atkinson-Baker } Under the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. } PROPOSED DECISION Administrative Law Judge John P. McCarthy [ALJ], Administrative Hearing Office, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, heard this matter on February 1, May 18, and May 19, 2005, at Geyserville, California. Thomas M. Allen, Staff Counsel, represented the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control [Department]. Petitioner Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo Indians [variously Petitioner, Applicant, Dry Creek Rancheria, Tribe] was represented by Jerome L. Levine, Rory E. Dilweg and Richard H. Lee, Attorneys-at-Law. Oral and documentary evidence on the record was received at the hearing and the matter was argued and submitted for decision as of June 22, 2005.(2) - ---------------- (1) There are also some 68 or 69 verified protests against transfer to Petitioner of the subject license. On motion of Petitioner in January 2005, the petition and protest matters were bifurcated, since the protest matters become of interest if, and only if, Petitioner succeeds in the within bifurcated petition matter. (2) Submission was delayed until June 22, 2005, to permit the parties to submit written closing argument. Petitioner's Post-Hearing Brief was received on schedule and has been marked as Exhibit S. Department's Post-Hearing Brief was received on schedule and has been marked as Exhibit 11. Petitioner's Post-Hearing Reply Brief was received on schedule and has been marked as Exhibit T. Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo Indians 47-396835 05058060 Page 2 ISSUES ------ 1. Will transfer of the applied-for license to Petitioner at the existing River Rock Casino cause the proposed premises to be in violation of fire safety/building code standards of the applicable Uniform Building Code? (Exhibit 1.) 2. Will transfer of the applied-for on-sale license put the public at risk by allowing consumption of alcoholic beverages at a premises that does not meet applicable fire safety standards? (Id.) 3. Will transfer of the license as requested be contrary to public welfare or morals? FINDINGS OF FACT ---------------- THE APPLICATION 1. The pending application was filed with the Department on or about February 4, 2003, and is for the transfer, both person-to-person and premises-to-premises, of an existing On-sale General Bona Fide Public Eating-place License (type 47) to Applicant, doing business as River Rock Casino, for premises located at 3250 Highway 128 East in Geyserville (Alexander Valley), California [Proposed Premises]. (Exhibit A.) 2. A type 47 license authorizes the sale, service and consumption of beer, wine and distilled spirits on licensed premises operated as a bona fide public eating-place.(3) 3. During the Department's investigation into the within application the Proposed Premises opened for business as the River Rock Casino without selling or serving alcoholic beverages to the public. The Proposed Premises had been recently constructed and has not been licensed by the Department in the past. 4. The Department concluded its investigation into Petitioner's application to transfer the license sometime in August 2004. Shortly thereafter a Notice of Denial issued giving notice to Petitioner of the Department's intention to deny its application. The Notice of Denial is not in the record, but the Statement of Issues it contained is part of both Exhibits 1 and A. Despite the existence of 68 or 69 verified citizen and public official protests alleging at least 18 reasons for denying - --------------- (3) See California Business and Professions Code Section 23038. Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo Indians 47-396835 05058060 Page 3 transfer of the license (see Exhibit A), the matters noted above under "Issues" set forth the only grounds on which the Department based its determination to deny the application. (Id.) They are the only issues to be addressed herein. CALIFORNIA - DRY CREEK RANCBERIA COMPACT 5. In September 1999, the State of California and the Dry Creek Rancheria entered into what is called the Tribal-State Compact between The State of California and the Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo Indians [Compact]. (Exhibit 1.) It includes 40 pages, Addendums A (5 pages) and B (1 page) and evidence of compliance with Addendum B (12 pages), relating to the Model Tribal Labor Relations Ordinance. (Id.) The Compact governs most of the formal relations between the State and the Tribe and an agreement of that sort is required by federal law for the Tribe to offer Class III gaming at a facility on its tribal land. California Government Code Section 12012.25(a)(16) evidences ratification of the Compact by the State of California. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 6. The Proposed Premises is located on Federal Tribal Land off a rural highway in Geyserville, Sonoma County, Alexander Valley, California. The casino's type of construction is "a semi-permanent sprung structure." The entire casino measures approximately 350 feet by 211 feet, all-inclusive. It appears to consist of two attached oblong structures and at least one exterior patio area containing an undetermined total square footage, estimated to be a bit over 63,000 square feet. (Exhibits 3 and 4.) Included in the larger of the two attached oblong structures are a reception area, 4 fixed bars, a restaurant with patio, a separate pizza preparation/serving area, an area identified for "wine tasting," a large open space for table games/slot machines/events, money-counting offices, storage facilities and other office areas. (Exhibit 3.) Exhibit 3 clearly identifies by name each of the above-described areas. In the smaller of the two structures are restrooms for men, women and employees, open space designated for slot machines, and a complete kitchen, food storage and scullery area. (Id.) The space connecting the two structures includes storage and closet facilities, passageways between the two structures, and a room designated for surveillance. (Id.) Permitted occupancy for the entire casino is estimated to just exceed 3,000 persons.(4) - ------------------- (4) The estimate is that of assigned Department Investigator Scott Warnock. Exhibit B, the Certificate of Occupancy for the Proposed Premises indicates the occupancy load to be 3,919. Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo Indians 47-396835 05058060 Page 4 THE DEPARTMENT'S INVESTIGATION AND DENIAL 7. Because one of the protesters raised an issue as to whether the Proposed Premises is in compliance with applicable fire safety standards, the assigned Department Investigator, now Supervising Investigator Scott Warnock [Warnock] undertook to investigate that issue. He first contacted representatives of Petitioner to see if he would be permitted to bring the Sonoma County Fire Chief onto tribal land to inspect the Proposed Premises. Warnock was told that permission would be denied due to a pending court action. Petitioner's representative suggested to Warnock that an inspection by the California State Fire Marshal would be acceptable. Such a request was made of the State Fire Marshal and an inspection was arranged. That inspection took place, according to a report of the State Fire Marshal dated June 10, 2004, on May 27, 2004. (Exhibit 9.) 8. Investigator Warnock apparently made no effort during his investigation into fire safety/building code compliance to determine if Petitioner, in building the Proposed Premises structure(s), satisfied the various requirements outlined in Sections 6.4.2(b) and 6.4.2(c) of the Compact. He testified he "wasn't trying to determine if they had followed anything." 9. Warnock was provided by representatives of Petitioner with a draft letter purportedly prepared by Leon B. Manuel, Jr., [Manuel] the Dry Creek Rancheria's Building Officer, that provided a brief summary of Manuel's experience, testified to the fire safety aspects and Uniform Building Code-1997 [UBC] compliance of the Proposed Premises and indicated that a Certificate of Occupancy had been issued for the casino. (Exhibit A, pages numbered 23-25 at top right of exhibit.) Interestingly, as indicated, the letter is clearly marked "draft." It is not signed and makes reference to an "Attachment A" that is not present, at least with the draft letter attached to Exhibit A. Warnock did not give the letter much, if any, credence because Manuel was believed by Warnock to be a tribal insider. Warnock testified that Petitioner's representatives indicated their willingness to provide the letter to him in final form, but he advised he was not interested in the letter in final form. 10. As a result of investigation and inspection of the Proposed Premises by representatives of the California State Fire Marshal, the Proposed Premises as of May 27, 2004, was found to be in compliance with fire safety elements of the UBC, as to its size, occupancy and use. (Exhibit 9.) Relying on Sections 508 and 904.2.3.1 of the UBC, the Report of the State Fire Marshal concluded that addition of alcoholic beverages consumption at the Proposed Premises would place the Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo Indians 47-396835 05058060 Page 5 Proposed Premises out of compliance with the fire safety provisions of the UBC.(5) (Id.) It was on the basis of that Exhibit 9 conclusion of the State Fire Marshal that Investigator Warnock recommended and the Department determined to deny Petitioner's application. CASINO CONSTRUCTION-CODE COMPLIANCE 11. Pursuant to the Compact, Petitioner established the Dry Creek Gaming Commission prior to construction of the River Rock Casino gaming facility. Chairperson of the Dry Creek Gaming Commission is Vicki Wattles. 12. Prior to construction of the River Rock Casino, and pursuant to the Compact, Petitioner adopted the Dry Creek Gaming Facility Building and Safety Ordinance. (Exhibit F.) The Dry Creek Gaming Facility Building and Safety Ordinance adopts the UBC as the standard for construction of the Tribe's River Rock Casino gaming facility. 13. Petitioner intended to comply with the Dry Creek Gaming Facility Building and Safety Ordinance in construction of its gaming facility, the River Rock Casino. 14. The River Rock Casino gaming facility was designed by FFKR Architects and Planners, J. David Giles, Project Architect. (See Exhibit H.) Stantec Consulting, Inc, [Stantec] provided Leon B. Manuel, Jr., [Manuel] to the gaming facility project. (See Exhibits Q and R.) Manuel served the Dry Creek Gaming Commission as its Building Official, building inspector and fire code official.(6) The General Contractor for the gaming facility was Swinerton Builders, Terry M. McKellips, Senior Project Manager. (See Exhibit G.) 15. Construction on the River Rock Casino gaming facility commenced in early 2002. Manuel remained as Tribal Building Official, building inspector and fire code official during the entire duration of the construction and through the within hearing. He reviewed all architectural drawings and plans, issued all building permits, performed all inspections and, in conjunction with the responsible - ------------ (5) Representatives of the State Fire Marshal had been inspecting and reporting upon River Rock Casino's compliance with UBC/California Building Code on a number of occasions prior to their being contacted by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control in connection with the within application. Those inspections had been at the request of the California Attorney General, presumably pursuant to the "meet and confer" requirement of Section 6.4.2(d) of the Compact. Earlier reports had been generated in that process. (See Exhibits 6, 7 and 8.) (6) Manuel is also the Tribe's fire chief. Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo Indians 47-396835 05058060 Page 6 architectural/construction persons, performed the final, as built, Code Analysis shown on Exhibit D. The Code Analysis considered in detail the building's total square footage, type of construction, various occupant loads and classifications, exit widths, occupancy separations, and fire protection systems. (Exhibit D.) 16. Construction on the River Rock Casino gaming facility was completed and, pursuant to Section 6.4.2(c) of the Compact, a Certificate of Occupancy issued from the Dry Creek Gaming Commission on October 28, 2003. (Exhibit B.) The Certificate of Occupancy, by its terms, finds the building to be in compliance with the Dry Creek Rancheria Building Code (UBC) for uses and occupancies that include use as a restaurant and bar. (Id.) 17. In certifying the River Rock Casino to be in full compliance with the fire and life safety elements of the UBC, Manuel employed a provision of the UBC entitled, "Alternate materials, alternate design and methods of construction," section 104.2.8. (Exhibit C, page 1-2, stapled out of order in the exhibit.) That section serves as a substitute for the traditional code analysis by permitting one to look at "equivalencies." Manuel explained his basis for using that section in some level of detail in Exhibit J. He listed in the document 22 of the most important characteristics of the building's construction and six statements of equivalency to justify the conclusion he reached. (Exhibit J.) Manuel's analysis included consideration that alcoholic beverages would be consumed inside. (Exhibit J, first paragraph under "Discussion," page 1 in 2/28/03 letter; see also Exhibit 3, areas on diagram described as bar, bar-seating, wine bar, wine tasting and two service bars, and Exhibit D, bar and wine tasting shown under Occupant Load.) The building does have an automatic sprinkler system as required by Section 904.2.3.1. 18. Having used the Section 104.2.8 analysis, Manuel did not use the existence of automatic sprinklers to obtain an allowable area increase or as a substitute for fire resistive construction as permitted alternately by sections 505.3, and/or 508. INDEPENDENT CODE ANALYSIS 19. An independent analysis of code compliance for the River Rock Casino structure was prepared by Rolf Jensen & Associates [RJA] on or about May 27, 2003, prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. According to RJA official Donald Moeller, the engagement of RJA to perform an independent code analysis was the result of some issues between the State Fire Marshal/State Attorney General and the Tribe. RJA was selected from a list, provided the Tribe by the State Fire Marshal, of possible independent firms to provide such an analysis. The RJA analysis and report was made with full knowledge that alcoholic beverages Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo Indians 47-396835 05058060 Page 7 would be served inside. (Exhibits 3 and L, page 1.) While the RJA report, Exhibit L, is a bit equivocal, the principal conclusion was that the analysis and justification of Leon Manuel, the Building Official for the project, was a reasonable one and "that the features provided in this building, ... , could be judged to provide protection equivalent to that of a ... building complying with the 1997 Uniform Building Code." (Exhibit L, page 10.) 20. Later, in early 2005, RJA was apparently asked to respond to the report the State Fire Marshal prepared for the Department, Exhibit 9, specifically on the issue of adding consumption of alcoholic beverages to the uses at the River Rock Casino. RJA came to a conclusion different from the State Fire Marshal in Exhibit 9. (Exhibit M.) SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS 21. Hugh Council, the Department's principal code expert witness and the senior representative of the State Fire Marshal who testified at the hearing, testified that the UBC permits an alternative methods analysis under Section 104.2.8. Council testified that competent experts in the field would not always agree about application of the UBC and fire safety matters. He also testified that he recognized that Leon Manuel held various positions in connection with the River Rock Casino project that made him the responsible person for rendering the judgments in question about compliance with the UBC and fire and life safety matters. 22. Except as set forth in this Decision, all other allegations in the Statement of Issues and all other contentions of the parties lack merit or constitute surplusage. LEGAL CONCLUSIONS 1. Article XX, Section 22 of the California Constitution delegates to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control the exclusive power to license the sale of alcoholic beverages in this State. Section 10.5 of the Compact requires Petitioner to follow "applicable law" concerning standards for serving alcoholic beverages and to "[a]dopt and comply with standards that are no less stringent than state laws, if any, prohibiting a gaming enterprise from providing, allowing, contracting to provide, or arranging to provide alcoholic beverages ... [free of charge] as an incentive or enticement." (Compact, ss.10.2(i).) Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo Indians 47-396835 05058060 Page 8 2. California Business and Professions Code Section 23958 requires the Department to conduct a thorough investigation to determine if, among other things, "the premises for which a license is applied qualify for a license, ... the provisions of [the ABC Act] have been complied with, ... [or if there are] any matters connected therewith which may affect the public welfare and morals." It provides, in part, that "[t]he department shall deny an application ... for a transfer of a license if... the premises ... do[es] not qualify for a license under the [Act]." 3. In a petition matter the burden of establishing entitlement to the Department action sought is upon the Petitioner. 4. Compact Section 6.4.2(b) requires that all gaming facilities of the tribe built after agreement on the Compact (September 1999) shall meet the building and safety codes of the Tribe. Those building and safety codes were to have been modified so that they meet the standards of the county within which the facility sits or the Uniform Building Codes, including the fire code, then in effect. The subsection includes the following language, "... provided that nothing herein shall be deemed to confer jurisdiction upon any County or the State with respect to any reference to such building and safety codes. " (Emphasis added.) 5. Compact Section 6.4.2(c) requires that a certificate of occupancy be issued by the Tribal Gaming Agency prior to occupancy of the building if the building had not been used for any gaming activities prior to the effective date of the Compact. It requires inspections by qualified building and safety experts under the direction of the Tribal Gaming Agency as the basis for issuing the certificate. "The Tribal Gaming Agency shall determine and certify that, ... the Facility meets the Tribe's building and safety code. ..." 6. A preponderance of the evidence presented at the hearing established that Petitioner substantially complied with each and every Compact requirement concerning building codes and public safety as set forth above in Legal Conclusions, paragraphs 4 and 5. No issue was raised as to the qualifications of Leon Manuel, Jr., to serve as the building official and in the building scheme contemplated by the Compact it is Manuel who was responsible, in this project, for making all the inspections and determinations. 7. Compact Section 6.4.2(d) requires the State to designate an agent or agents to be noticed concerning any such inspections by the Tribal Gaming Agency's experts and gives permission for the State's agent(s) to accompany any such inspection. "The Tribe agrees to correct any Gaming Facility condition noted in Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo Indians 47-396835 05058060 Page 9 an inspection that does not meet the standards set forth in subdivisions (b) and (c)." The section provides for exchange of reports of inspections and upon final certification by the Tribal Gaming Agency provides a time limit for forwarding the certification to the State. "If the State's agent objects to that certification, the Tribe shall make a good faith effort to address the State's concerns, but if the State does not withdraw its objection, the matter will be resolved in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions of Section 9.0. " (Emphasis added.) 8. Very little evidence was presented as to full compliance with Compact Section 6.4.2(d). It may be that the final Tribal certifications for the River Rock Casino were not forwarded to the State's experts as required. However, no claim was made that the Tribe failed in that regard. No evidence was presented that the State representative(s) objected to the Certificate of Occupancy in a timely fashion pursuant to the Compact and invoked the dispute resolution provision of Section 9.0 of the Compact. The evidence suggests (see Exhibit 9's conclusion on June 10, 2004, that the casino structure is in full compliance with all building and safety codes, albeit without service of alcoholic beverages) the State found no issue with the safety of the building until well after the October 28, 2003, issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. The Certificate of Occupancy (Exhibit B) and the final, as built, Code Analysis (Exhibit D) both clearly contemplate service of alcoholic beverages, as did the only complete building diagram received in evidence (Exhibit 3). 9. Giving tribal sovereignty its due and recognizing the Compact as the principal vehicle for adjusting grievances between Petitioner and the State, it is not necessary to determine which interpretation of the UBC is correct, that of Hugh Council and the State Fire Marshal or that of Leon Manuel, the Tribal Gaming Agency and RJA. One could, and the parties have, argued legitimately in favor of each. The point is that Manuel and the Tribal Agency were charged in the Compact with making the determinations. Even Council agrees with that. Their certification should be given full effect, absent evidence suggesting invocation of the dispute resolution machinery provided by the Compact.(7) To conclude differently would permit the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control to analyze building code/fire safety compliance in the abstract, from scratch, and to thereby permit it to second-guess the persons rightfully charged with making the determinations in the first instance. The Department has broad discretion in its Constitutional mandate to protect the public welfare and morals, but its discretion is not unlimited. In many years of Department service, the court has never before seen a Notice of Denial hinge solely on the opinion of an outside "expert" that a - ----------- (7) In any event, it is unclear and most unlikely that this would be the appropriate forum for such a claim. Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo Indians 47-396835 05058060 Page 10 certificate of occupancy, duly issued by the responsible authority, should be discounted. In this case, where the relationship between the State and Petitioner is so meticulously defined by the Compact, to extend the Department's discretion into building and safety code compliance, areas specifically covered by the Compact, goes too far. 10. A preponderance of the evidence established that transfer of the applied-for license to Petitioner at the existing River Rock Casino would not result in licensure of a premises that is in violation of fire safety/building code standards of the applicable Uniform Building Code. 11. Transfer of the applied-for license to Petitioner at the existing River Rock Casino will not put the public at risk by allowing consumption of alcoholic beverages at a premises that does not meet applicable fire safety standards. 12. Transfer of the applied-for license to Petitioner at the existing River Rock Casino will not be inimical to public welfare or morals. ORDER ----- The petition of Applicant Dry Creek Rancheria of Pomo Indians is granted and the license shall transfer subject to disposition favorable to Petitioner of all the protest issues that were separated from this petition portion of the matter. Dated: July 26, 2005 /s/ John P. McCarthy --------------------------- John P. McCarthy Administrative Law Judge STATE OF CALIFORNIA -- BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, GOVERNOR ================================================================================ DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL [seal] Administrative Hearing Office 2277 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Suite 415 Sacramento, Calfomia 95825 (916) 263-7963 January 24, 2005 VIA FAX TO ADDRESSEES AND FIRST CLASS MAIL TO ALL Alex R. Baghdassarian, Esq. Brook Dooley, Esq. John R. Peirce Holland & Knight, LLP Keker & Van Nest, LLP Chief Counsel 633 W. 5th Street, 21st Floor 710 Sansome Street Department of Alcoholic Los Angeles, CA 90071 San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Beverage Control 3927 Lennane Dr., # 100 Sacramento, CA 95834
Re: Request of Petitioner Dry Creek Rancheria to bifurcate the petition matter from the protest matter in the hearing now set to commence February 1, 2004; File 47-396835, Reg. No. 04058060 Counsel: Petitioner Dry Creek Rancheria's Motion to bifurcate the Petition matter from the Protest matters is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, the Petition of Dry Creek Rancheria for approval of its application for an On-sale General Bona Fide Public Eating-place license will be heard as presently set, commencing Tuesday morning, February l, 2004, at 9:30 a.m. The place of the hearing will remain the same as was noticed in the original Notice of Hearing on Protest Against and Petition for Issuance of License dated December 1, 2004. The hearings as to the various protests against issuance of the license sought are hereby taken off calendar, to be reset, if necessary, only upon reaching a final resolution in the Petition matter. -------------------------------- John P. McCarthy Administrative Law Judge ------------------- cc: See attached service list STATE'S EXHIBIT 1 ------------------- BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF: | | Bill Cogbill, Sheriff, et al | 2796 Ventura Avenue | Santa Rosa, CA 95403 | | FOR THE PERSON TO PERSON AND PREMISES TO | FILE : 47 - 396835 PREMISES TRANSFER OF AN ON-SALE GENERAL | PUBLIC EATING PLACE LICENSE TO: | REG. : 04058060 | Dry Creek Rancheria Of Pomo Indians | DECLARATION OF River Rock Casino | SERVICE BY MAIL 3250 Highway 128 East | Geyserville, CA 95441 | AND IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR SAID LICENSE under the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act. The undersigned declares: I am over eighteen years of age, and not a party to the within cause; my business address is 3927 Lennane Drive, Suite 100, Sacramento, California 95834. I served by CERTIFIED mail a copy of the following documents: CERTIFICATE OF DECISION on each of the following, by placing same in an envelope(s) addressed as follows: Dry Creek Rancheria Of Pomo Indians Rory E. Dilweg, Attorney at Law River Rock Casino 633 W. 5th Street, 21st Floor 3250 Highway 128 East Los Angeles, CA 90071 Geyserville, CA 95441 Richard H. Lee, Attorney at Law David W. Meyers 633 W. 5th Street, 21st Floor Attorney at Law Los Angeles, CA 90071 809 Coombs Street Napa, CA 94559-2977 Jerome L. Levine, Attorney at Law 633 W. 5th Street, 21st Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Goldstein, Woodside & Dion SEE ATTACHED LIST Deputy County Counsels 575 Administration Drive, Room 105A Each said envelope was then, on August 25, 2005 sealed and deposited in the United States Mail at Sacramento, California, the county in which I am employed, with the postage thereon fully prepaid. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 25, 2005 at Sacramento, California. /s/ Rheba Chastain -------------------------- Declarant X Santa Rosa District Office(interoffice mail) - --- Division Office(interoffice mail) - --- ABC-116 (9/04) | ATTACHMENT TO DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL | DRY CREEK RANCHERIA OF POMO INDIANS | File: 396835 - Reg. No.: 04058060 | | | | | | - Page 1 - - ------------------------------------------------------ Alex R. Baghdassarian, Esq. Alvin R. Cadd Attorney at Law 3845 Highway 128 Holland & Knight, LLP Geyserville, CA 95441 633 West 5th Street, 21st Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Alyce Cadd 3845 Highway 128 Edward Beddow Geyserville, CA 95441 5584 Maacama Ridge Road Healdsburg, CA 95448 Candace Cadd 3650 Highway 128 Sandra K. Beddow Geyserville, CA 95441 5584 Maacama Ridge Road Healdsburg, CA 95448 Larry Cadd 3650 Highway 128 April Bennett-Lance Geyserville, CA 95441 1656 West Dry Creek Road Healdsburg, CA 95448 Kathryn D. Catron 450 Colony Road Elizabeth Bermudes Geyserville, CA 95441 1128 Alexander Valley Road Healdsburg, CA 95448 Bobbi Chamberlain P. O. Box 376 Harry Black Geyserville, CA 95441 4849 Highway 128 Geyserville, CA 95441 Bill Cogbill Sheriff-Coroner Lea Black Sonoma County Sheriff's Department 4849 Highway 128 2796 Ventura Avenue Geyserville, CA 95441 Santa Rosa, CA 95403 Glenn I. Brizee Charlotte Colby 4991 East Soda Rock Lane 4520 Old Barn Road Healdsburg, CA 95448 Healdsburg, CA 95448 Jeanette Y. Brizee John N. Dayton 4991 Soda Rock Lane P. O. Box 447 Healdsburg, CA 95448 Geyserville, CA 95441 Wes Brabacher P. O. Box 376 Geyserville, CA 95441 | ATTACHMENT TO DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL | DRY CREEK RANCHERIA OF POMO INDIANS | File: 396835 - Reg. No.: 04058060 | | | | | | - Page 2 - - ------------------------------------------------------ Brook Dooley, Esq. Mary H. Hafner Attorney at Law 4290 Pine Flat Road Keker & Van Nest, LLP Healdsburg, CA 95448 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Richard P. Hafner 4290 Pine Flat Road Linda Esselstein Healdsburg, CA 95448 10300 Highway 128 Healdsburg, CA 95448 Elizabeth L. Helmholz 4530 Old Barn Road William D. Esselstein Healdsburg, CA 95448 10300 Highway 128 Healdsburg, CA 95448 George Helmholz 74550 Dobie Lane David Fanucchi Covelo, CA 95428 5155 Highway 128 Geyserville, CA 95441 Peter J. Holewinski 4505 Pine Flat Road Joyce Fanucchi Healdsburg, CA 95448 5155 Highway 128 Geyserville, CA 95441 Rosemarie S. Holewinski 4505 Pine Flat Road Theresa Fanucchi Healdsburg, CA 95448 5120 Highway 128 Geyserville, CA 95441 Paul L. Kelley Board of Supervisors Carol Farrell County of Sonoma 9800 Highway 128 575 Administration Drive. Rm. 100A Healdsburg, CA 95448 Santa Rosa, CA 95403 Michael J. Farrell Joel Kiff 9800 Highway 128 4015 Alexander Valley Lane Healdsburg, CA 95448 Healdsburg, CA 95448 Marion E. Garrett Vernon A. Losh, II P. O. Box 696 Chief Department Director Geyserville, CA 95441 County of Sonoma Dept. of Emergency Services 2300 County Drive, Suite 221A Arthur C. Guy Santa Rosa, CA 95403 10650 Highway 128 Healdsburg, CA 95448 | ATTACHMENT TO DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL | DRY CREEK RANCHERIA OF POMO INDIANS | File: 396835 - Reg. No.: 04058060 | | | | | | - Page 3 - - ------------------------------------------------------ Bennett McMicking Ronald Pourroy 12250 Brooks Road 8303 Highway 128 Windsor, CA 95492 Healdsburg, CA 95448 Clifton L. Miller Kay R. Reed 5255 Pine Flat Road 1410 Alexander Valley Road Healdsburg, CA 95448 Healdsburg, CA 95448 Billy D. Munselle Tony Roehrick 3660 Highway 128 Superintendent Geyserville, CA 95441 Alexander Valley School District 8511 Highway 128 Cynthia Myers Healdsburg, CA 95448 P. O. Box 1302 Mendocino, CA 95460 Susan M. Rose 6800 Highway 128 Jack L. Neureuter Healdsburg, CA 95448 1410 Geysers Road Geyersville, CA 95441 Robert V. Scavullo 130 El Camino Del Mar Karen Neureuter San Francisco, CA 94121 1410 Geysers Road Geyserville, CA 95441 Janice Sceales 5376 Highway 128 Seaver Page Geyserville, CA 95441 5577 Maacama Ridge Road Healdsburg, CA 95448 Ralph A. Sceales 5376 Highway 128 Karen Passalacqua Geyserville, CA 95441 5904 Highway 128 Geyserville, CA 95441 Mary Ellen Smith P. O. Box 1559 Martha Pogue Healdsburg, CA 95448 23220 Woodrigde Court Geyserville, CA 95441 Richard A. Smith 17500 Tera Holland Lane Cheryl Pourroy Healdsburg, CA 95448 8303 Highway 128 Healdsburg, CA 95448 Marcia Teuschler 3301 Feliz Creek Road Hopland, CA 95449 | ATTACHMENT TO DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL | DRY CREEK RANCHERIA OF POMO INDIANS | File: 396835 - Reg. No.: 04058060 | | | | | | - Page 4 - - ------------------------------------------------------ Barbara Toschi 15201 Chalk Hill Road Healdsburg, CA 95448 Jennifer Tucker 5692 Highway 128 Geyserville, CA 95441 Donna M. Vincent 4633 East Soda Rock Lane Healdsburg, CA 95448 Fred R. Wasson 3674 Highway 128 Geyserville, CA 95441 Ruby M. Wasson 3674 Highway 128 Geyserville, CA 95441 Daniel Weinberg 4504 Pine Flat Road Healdsburg, CA 95448 Jane H. Weller 14821 Chalk Hill Road Healdsburg, CA 95448 Nelson S. Weller 14821 Chalk Hill Road Healdsburg, CA 95448 Edith Wilson 4660 Thomas Road Healdsburg, CA 95448
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----