20-F

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 20-F

(Mark One)

[   ] REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

OR

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

[   ] SHELL COMPANY PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report __________________

Commission file number: 333-183376

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

not applicable
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

British Virgin Islands
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Suite 824, Harbour Bay, P.O Box CR-56766, Nassau, Bahamas
(Address of principal executive offices)

James Longshore, 416-628-2881 (telephone), 416-981-3055 (facsimile), 357 Suite 824, Harbour Bay, P.O Box CR-56766,
Nassau, Bahamas
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
None	Not applicable

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
None
(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
Common shares
(Title of Class)

- 1 -

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

Title of each class	Outstanding at December 31, 2016
Common shares	48,174,417

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

[   ] Yes     [X] No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

[   ] Yes     [X] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

[X] Yes     [   ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

[X] Yes     [   ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer: See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [   ] Accelerated filer [   ] Non-accelerated filer [X]

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP [X]	International Financial Reporting as issued by the [   ]	Other [   ]
	International Accounting Standards Board

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

[   ] Item 17     [   ] Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

[   ] Yes     [X] No

- 2 -

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

		Page
General Matters		5
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements		5
ITEM 1	IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS	7
ITEM 2	OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE	7
ITEM 3	KEY INFORMATION	7
A.	Selected Financial Data	7
B.	Capitalization and Indebtedness	7
C.	Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds	8
D.	Risk Factors	8
ITEM 4	INFORMATION ON XTRA-GOLD	16
A.	History and Development of Xtra-Gold	16
B.	Business Overview	16
C.	Organizational Structure	19
D.	Property, Plants and Equipment	19
ITEM 4A	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	39
ITEM 5	OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS	39
A.	Operating Results	39
B.	Liquidity and Capital Resources	41
C.	Research and Development, Patents and Licenses	43
D.	Trend Information	43
E.	Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements	43
F.	Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations	43
G.	Safe Harbor	44
ITEM 6	DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES	45
A.	Directors and Senior Management	45
B.	Compensation	48
C.	Board Practices	50
D.	Employees	53
E.	Share Ownership	53
ITEM 7	MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS	55
A.	Major Shareholders	55
B.	Related Party Transactions	56
C.	Interests of Experts and Counsel	56
ITEM 8	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	57
A.	Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information	57
B.	Significant Changes	57
ITEM 9	THE OFFERING AND LISTING	57
A.	Offer and Listing Details	57
B.	Plan of Distribution	58
C.	Markets	58
D.	Dilution	58
E.	Expenses of the Issue	58
ITEM 10	ADDITIONAL INFORMATION	58
A.	Share Capital	58
B.	Memorandum and Articles of Association	58
C.	Material Contracts	59
D.	Exchange Controls	59
E.	Taxation	59
F.	Dividends and Paying Agents	65
G.	Statement by Experts	65
H.	Documents on Display	65
I.	Subsidiary Information	65

- 3 -

ITEM 11	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	65
ITEM 12	DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES	65
PART II
ITEM 13	DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES	65
ITEM 14	MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDER S AND USE OF PROCEEDS	66
ITEM 15	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	66
A.	Disclosure Controls and Procedures	66
B.	Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting	66
C.	Attestation Report on of the Registered Public Accounting Firm	66
D.	Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting	66
ITEM 16	[RESERVED]	67
A.	Audit Committee Financial Expert	67
B.	Code of Ethics	67
C.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	67
D.	Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees	68
E.	Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers	68
F.	Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant	69
G.	Corporate Governance	69
H.	Mine Safety Disclosure	71
PART III
ITEM 17	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	107
ITEM 18	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	107
ITEM 19	EXHIBITS	107
SIGNATURES		108

- 4 -

GENERAL MATTERS

Use of Names

In this annual report filed on Form 20-F, the terms “Xtra-Gold”, “company”, “we”, and “our” refers to Xtra-Gold Resources Corp., a British Virgin Islands company, and our wholly-owned subsidiaries, Xtra-Gold Exploration Limited and Xtra Oil & Gas (Ghana) Limited and our 90% owned subsidiary, Xtra-Gold Mining Limited.

Currency

Unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts in this annual report are expressed in United States dollars.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report, including all exhibits hereto, contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information. Forward-looking statements are with reference to our financial condition, results of operations, business prospects, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, capital expenditure, and exploration and development efforts. Words such as “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “forecasts”, “projects”, “budgets”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, “could”, “might”, “should”, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot be certain that these plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. Actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These statements include comments regarding the establishment and estimates of mineral reserves and mineral resources, production, production commencement dates, productions costs, cash operating costs per ounce, total cash costs per ounce, grade, processing capacity, potential mine life, feasibility studies, development costs, capital and operating expenditures, exploration, the closing of certain transactions including acquisitions and offerings. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this annual report, our other filings with the SEC and Canadian securities commissions and in news releases and public statements made by our officers, directors or representatives of our company, that address activities, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements and forward-looking information.

The following, in addition to the factors described elsewhere in this annual report under “Risk Factors”, are among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements:

• our ability to continue as a going concern

• unexpected changes in business and economic conditions;

• significant increases or decreases in gold prices;

• changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates;

• unanticipated grade changes;

• changes in metallurgy;

• access and availability of materials, equipment, supplies, labor and supervision, power and water;

• determination of mineral resources and mineral reserves;

• availability of drill rigs; changes in project parameters;

• costs and timing of development of new mineral reserves; results of current and future exploration activities;

• results of pending and future feasibility studies; joint venture relationships;

• political or economic instability, either globally or in the countries in which we operate;

• local and community impacts and issues;

• timing of receipt of government approvals; accidents and labor disputes; environmental costs and risks; and

• competitive factors, including competition for property acquisitions; and availability of capital at reasonable rates or at all.

- 5 -

With respect to any forward-looking statement that includes a statement of its underlying assumptions or bases, we believe such assumptions or bases to be reasonable and have formed them in good faith, assumed facts or bases almost always vary from actual results, and the differences between assumed facts or bases and actual results can be material depending on the circumstances. When, in any forward-looking statement, we express an expectation or belief as to future results, that expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and is believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the stated expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or anyone acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements. Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the Federal securities laws, we do not undertake any obligations to publicly release any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this annual report or to reflect unanticipated events that may occur. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this annual report and you should not rely on these statements without also considering the risks and uncertainties associated with these statements and our business.

- 6 -

PART I

Item 1 Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

Item 2 Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

Item 3 Key Information

A. Selected Financial Data

The following financial information has been extracted from our consolidated financial statements for the years indicated and is expressed in United States dollars. Our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”). The historical data included below and elsewhere in this annual report is not necessarily indicative of our future performance. The financial information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this annual report and “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – A. Operating Results and B. Liquidity and Capital Resources” of this annual report.

In this annual report, all currency refers to United States Dollars (US$) unless indicated otherwise.

The following table summarizes information relating to the operations of Xtra-Gold for the last five fiscal years ended December 31.

For the Year Ended December 31

	2016	2015	2014	2013	2012
	$	$	$	$	$
Operating revenues	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Consolidated loss and comprehensive loss for the period	(467,711)	(391,723)	(687,057)	(750,942)	(7,631,636)
Net loss (gain) and comprehensive loss (gain) attributable to non-controlling interest	(13,173)	(35,642)	(6,842)	8,849	466,378
Net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to Xtra-Gold Resources Corp.	(480,884)	(427,365)	(693,899)	(742,093)	(7,165,258)
Basic and diluted loss attributable to common shareholders per common share	(0.01)	(0.01)	(0.02)	(0.02)	(0.16)
Total current assets	1,593,038	1,049,334	1,124,733	1,717,195	2,692,522
Total assets	2,895,984	2,491,603	2,713,212	3,616,752	4,836,377
Total current liabilities	486,613	391,750	327,193	311,904	404,507
Total liabilities	486,613	391,750	327,193	515,299	931,491
Working capital	1,106,425	657,584	797,540	1,405,291	1,948,426
Capital stock	48,174	45,622	45,811	46,264	46,540
Total equity	2,409,371	2,099,853	2,386,019	3,101,453	3,904,866
Total Xtra-Gold Resources Corp. stockholders’ equity	3,335,472	3,039,127	3,360,935	4,083,211	4,877,795
Dividends declared per share	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding	47,256,630	45,721,507	45,996,481	46,481,748	44,698,113

- 7 -

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

D. Risk Factors

The securities of our company are considered speculative due to the nature of our business and the present stage of our development. Only those persons who can bear the risk of the entire loss of their investment should participate. An investor should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission and with Canadian securities regulators before investing in our common shares. The risks described below are not the only ones faced. Additional risks that we are either unaware of, or we are aware of but we currently believe are immaterial, may become important factors that affect our business. If any of the following risks occur, or if others occur, our business, operating results and financial condition could be seriously harmed and the investor may lose all of their investment.

Risks Associated with our Company and our Operations

Our company is currently in the exploration stage with respect to all our projects. The chance of ever reaching the production stage at our projects is uncertain. Our company cannot predict whether we will successfully effectuate our company’s current business plan.

If our company does not obtain new financings, commencing from 2017, the amount of funds available to our company to pursue any further exploration activities at our projects will be reduced and our company’s plan of operations may be adversely affected.

Our company has relied on private placement financings and an initial public offering completed in Canada in November 2010 to fund our exploration programs, including our drilling programs at our Kibi project. Commencing from 2017, our company will continue to require additional financing to complete our plan of operations to carry out any further exploration activities on our projects. Any impairment in our company’s ability to raise additional funds through financings would reduce the available funds for such exploration activities, with the result that our company’s plan of operations may be adversely affected.

Substantial additional capital may be required commencing from 2017 to continue exploration activities at all of our projects. If our company cannot raise additional capital as needed, our ability to execute our business plan and fund our ongoing operations will be in jeopardy.

Commencing from 2017, our company may need to explore various financing alternatives to meet our projected costs and expenses. Our company cannot assure our stockholders that we will be able to obtain the necessary financing for our projects on favorable terms or at all. Additionally, if the actual costs to execute our company’s business plan are significantly higher than expected, our company may not have sufficient funds to cover these costs and we may not be able to obtain other sources of financing. The failure to obtain all necessary financing would prevent our company from executing our business plan and would impede our company’s ability to sustain operations or become profitable, and our company could be forced to cease our operations.

To date, we have not generated revenues from operations and our company will continue to incur operating losses and there is no guarantee that we will achieve operating profits.

Our company has incurred operating losses on an annual basis for a number of years, primarily arising out of the costs related to continued exploration and development of mineral resource properties, including costs written off on properties no longer being pursued by our company. As of December 31, 2016, our company had an accumulated deficit of $28,583,385. It is anticipated that our company will continue to experience operating losses for fiscal 2017 and until our company discovers economically mineable mineralized material and successfully develops a mine. There can be no assurance that our company will ever achieve significant revenues or profitable operations.

Our auditors have raised substantial doubts as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern. Since inception we have experienced recurring losses from operations, which losses have caused an accumulated deficit of approximately $28,583,385 as of December 31, 2016. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. We anticipate that we may continue to incur losses in future periods until we are successful in generating revenues which are significant enough to pay our expenses and fund our exploration efforts. There are no assurances that we will be able to raise our revenues to a level which supports profitable operations and provides sufficient funds to pay our obligations as they are incurred. If we are unable to meet those obligations, we could be forced to substantially curtail our operations and planned exploration efforts, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and operations in future periods.

- 8 -

Our company’s projects are in the exploration stage and may not result in the discovery of commercial bodies of mineralization which would result in our company discontinuing that project. Substantial expenditures are required to determine if a project has economically mineable mineralized material.

Our company’s projects are all in the exploration stage. Mineral exploration involves a high degree of risk and few properties which are explored are developed into producing mines. The exploration efforts of our company on our projects may not result in the discovery of commercial bodies of mineralization which would require our company to discontinue that project. Substantial expenditures are required to determine if a project has economically mineable mineralized material. It could take several years to establish proven and probable mineral resources or reserves. Due to these uncertainties, there can be no assurance that current and future exploration programs will result in the discovery of mineral resources or reserves.

Our company currently depends significantly on a limited number of projects.

Our company’s activities are currently focused on our Kibi project. Our company will as a consequence be exposed to some heightened degree of risk due to the lack of property diversification. Adverse changes or developments affecting our Kibi project would have a material and adverse effect on our company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our company is subject to factors beyond our control which may impact our company’s title in our projects.

Although our company has obtained title opinions with respect to all of our projects and has taken other reasonable measures to ensure proper title to these projects, there is no guarantee that title to any of our projects will not be challenged or impugned. Third parties may have valid claims underlying portions of our company’s interests. Our projects may be subject to prior unregistered liens, agreements, transfers or claims and title may be affected by, among other things, undetected defects. In addition, our company may be unable to operate our projects as permitted or to enforce its rights with respect to our projects.

Our company’s activities are and will be subject to complex laws, significant government regulations and accounting standards that may delay or prevent operations at our projects and can adversely affect our company’s operating costs, the timing of the our company’s operations, ability to operate and financial results.

Business, exploration activities and any future development activities and mining operations are and will be subject to extensive Ghanaian, United States, Canadian, British Virgin Islands and other foreign, federal, state, territorial and local laws and regulations and also exploration, development, production, exports, taxes, labor standards, waste disposal, protection of the environment, reclamation, historic and cultural resource preservation, mine safety and occupational health, reporting and other matters, as well as accounting standards. Compliance with these laws, regulations and standards or the imposition of new such requirements could adversely affect our company’s operating and future development costs, the timing of our company’s operations, ability to operate and financial results. These laws and regulations governing various matters include:

• environmental protection;

• management of natural resources;

• exploration, development of mines, production and post-closure reclamation;

• export and import controls and restrictions;

• price controls;

• taxation;

• labor standards and occupational health and safety, including mine safety;

• historic and cultural preservation; and

• generally accepted accounting principles.

- 9 -

The costs associated with compliance with these laws and regulations may be substantial and possible future laws and regulations, or more stringent enforcement of current laws and regulations by governmental authorities, could cause additional expense, capital expenditures, restrictions on or suspensions of our company’s operations and delays in the development of our projects. These laws and regulations may allow governmental authorities and private parties to bring lawsuits based upon damages to property and injury to persons resulting from the environmental, health and safety impacts of our company’s past and current operations, and could lead to the imposition of substantial fines, penalties or other civil or criminal sanctions. In addition, our company’s failure to comply strictly with applicable laws, regulations and local practices relating to permitting applications or reporting requirements could result in loss, reduction or expropriation of entitlements, or the imposition of additional local or foreign parties as joint venture partners. Any such loss, reduction, expropriation or imposition of partners could have a materially adverse effect on our company’s operations or business.

Our company may not be able to obtain, renew or continue to comply with all of the permits necessary to develop each of our projects which would force our company to discontinue development, if any, on that project.

Pursuant to Ghanaian law, if our company discovers economically mineable mineralized material, we must obtain various approvals, licenses or permits pertaining to environmental protection and use of water resources in connection with the development, if any, of our projects. In addition to requiring permits for the development of our mineral concessions where our projects are located, our company may need to obtain other permits and approvals during the life of our projects. Obtaining, renewing and continuing to comply with the necessary governmental permits and approvals can be a complex and time-consuming process. The failure to obtain or renew the necessary permits or licenses or continue to meet their requirements could delay future development and could increase the costs related to such activities.

The development of all of our company’s projects may be delayed due to delays in receiving regulatory permits and approvals, which could impede our company’s ability to develop our projects which, absent raising additional capital, could cause it to curtail or discontinue development, if any.

If our company discovers economically mineable mineralized material, our company may experience delays in developing our projects. The timing of development at our projects depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:

• taxation;

• the timely issuance of permits; and

• the acquisition of surface land and easement rights required to develop and operate our projects, (in particular, our company is required to acquire surface land through expropriation in connection with our mineral concessions).

These delays could increase development costs of our projects, affect our company’s economic viability, or prevent our company from completing the development of our projects.

Our company’s activities are subject to environmental laws and regulations that may increase our company’s costs of doing business and may restrict our operations.

All of our company’s exploration activities in Ghana are subject to regulation by governmental agencies under various environmental laws. To the extent our company conducts exploration activities or undertakes new exploration or future mining activities in other foreign countries, our company will also be subject to environmental laws and regulations in those jurisdictions. These laws address emissions into the air, discharges into water, management of waste, management of hazardous substances, protection of natural resources, antiquities and endangered species, and reclamation of lands disturbed by mining operations. Environmental legislation in many countries is evolving and the trend has been towards stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and increasing responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations may require significant capital outlays and may cause material changes or delays in our company’s intended activities. Our company cannot assure our stockholders that future changes in environmental regulations will not adversely affect our company’s business, and it is possible that future changes in these laws or regulations could have a significant adverse impact on some portion of our company’s business, causing our company to reevaluate those activities at that time.

In addition, our company may be exposed to potential environmental impacts during any full scale mining operation. At such time of commencement of full scale mining, if ever, our company plans to negotiate posting of a reclamation bond to quantify the reclamation costs. Our company anticipates that the dollar amount of reserves established for exposure to environmental liabilities will be $220,000, as to $150,000 for our Kwabeng project and $70,000 for our Pameng project, as estimated by the Environmental Protection Agency of Ghana, however, our company is currently unable to predict the ultimate cost of compliance or the extent of liability risks.

- 10 -

During the year ended December 31, 2014, our company received revised environmental permits for our Banso and Muoso projects. Currently, the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") has made no formal requests for any additional increase in our environmental bonds for reclamation.

Our company is unable to predict the remediation costs for potential environmental liabilities.

The costs of remediation may exceed the provision that our company has made for such remediation by a material amount. Whenever a previously unrecognized remediation liability becomes known, or a previously estimated cost is increased, the amount of that liability or additional cost could adversely affect our company’s exploration activities and our financial condition. At December 31, 2016, the company had accrued $216,000 for repair of environmental damage during alluvial operations. These costs are supported by the environmental bond of $221,322 posted as required by the Ghanaian government.

There may be instances where certain events occur that our company is not insured against.

Our company maintains insurance policies to protect itself against certain risks related to its operations. This insurance is maintained in amounts that our company believes to be reasonable depending upon the circumstances surrounding each identified risk. However, our company may elect not to have insurance for certain risks because of the high premiums associated with insuring those risks or for various other reasons; in other cases, insurance may not be available for certain risks. Some concern always exists with respect to investments in parts of the world where civil unrest, war, nationalist movements, political violence or economic crisis are possible. These countries may also pose heightened risks of expropriation of assets, business interruption, increased taxation and a unilateral modification of concessions and contracts. Our company does not maintain insurance policies against political risk. Occurrence of events for which our company is not insured could adversely affect our company’s exploration activities and its financial condition.

Our company is subject to the potential of legal claims and the associated costs of defense and settlement.

Our company is subject to litigation risks. All industries, including the mining industry, are subject to legal claims, with and without merit. Defense and settlement costs of legal claims can be substantial, even with respect to claims that have no merit. Due to the inherent uncertainty of the litigation process, the resolution of any particular legal proceeding to which our company is or may become subject could have a material effect on its financial position, results of operations or our company’s project development operations.

Our company is subject to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which could materially adversely affect our financial position.

Our company’s primary currency for operations is the United States dollar and, to a lesser extent, the “Cedi”, the Ghanaian currency and the Canadian dollar. Our company maintains most of its working capital in Canadian dollars. Our company converts its Canadian funds to foreign currencies as certain payment obligations become due. Accordingly, our company is subject to fluctuations in the rates of currency exchange between the United States dollar and these foreign currencies and these fluctuations, which are beyond our control, could materially affect our company’s financial position and results of operations. A significant portion of the operating costs of our projects are in Cedi. Our company obtains services and materials and supplies from providers in West Africa. The costs of goods and services could increase or decrease due to changes in the value of the United States dollar or the Cedi or other currencies. Consequently, exploration and development of our projects could be more costly than anticipated.

Our company’s business is impacted by any instability and fluctuations in global financial systems.

Any credit crisis and related instability in the global financial system, has had, and may continue to have, an impact on our company’s business and our company’s financial condition. Our company may face significant challenges if conditions in the financial markets do not continue to improve. Our company’s ability to access the capital markets may be severely restricted at a time when our company wishes or needs to access such markets, which could have a materially adverse impact on our company’s flexibility to react to changing economic and business conditions or carry on our operations.

Our company is subject to the effects that historically high inflation rate may have on its results.

Our company’s mineral properties are located in Ghana, which has historically experienced relatively high rates of inflation. High inflation rates in Ghana could cause the prices of materials obtained within Ghana to be slightly higher. As our company maintains our funds in U.S. and/or Canadian currency, the effect due to Ghanaian currency fluctuations is minimal.

The Government of Ghana has the right to increase its current ownership interest of 10% in our company’s subsidiary, Xtra-Gold Mining Limited (“XG Mining”), through which our company holds, among other things, its interest in our Kibi project and our other projects, for a consideration agreed upon by the parties or by arbitration and has a right of pre-emption to purchase all minerals produced by XG Mining. If the Government of Ghana were to exercise any of its rights, our company’s results of operations in future periods could be adversely impacted.

- 11 -

The Government of Ghana is granted a 10% free carried interest in all mining operations and has no obligation to contribute to development or operating expenses. The Government of Ghana currently has a 10% free carried interest in XG Mining, one of our Ghanaian subsidiaries that holds all of the mining leases securing our interest in all of the concessions where our projects are located. The Government of Ghana also has:

• the right to acquire an additional interest in XG Mining for a price to be determined by agreement or arbitration;

• the right to acquire a special share (as defined in the Minerals and Mining Act, 2006 (Act 703), as amended by the Minerals and Mining Act, 2010 (Act 794) (the “Mining Act (Ghana)”) in XG Mining at any time for such consideration as the Government of Ghana and XG Mining might agree; and

• a right of pre-emption to purchase all minerals raised, won or obtained in Ghana.

While our company is not aware of the Government of Ghana having ever exercised such right of pre-emption, our company cannot assure our stockholders that the Government of Ghana would not seek to exercise one or more of these rights which, if exercised, could have an adverse affect on our company’s results of operations in future periods. If the Government of Ghana should exercise its right to either acquire the additional interest in XG Mining or its right to acquire the special share, any profit that might otherwise be reported from XG Mining’s operations would be proportionally reduced in the same percentage as the minority interest attributable to the Government of Ghana in that subsidiary would be increased. If the Government of Ghana should exercise its right to purchase all gold and other minerals produced by XG Mining, the price it would pay may be lower than the price our company could sell the gold or other minerals for in transactions with third parties and it could result in a reduction in any revenues our company might otherwise report from XG Mining’s operations.

Our company currently relies on the continued services of key executives, including the directors of our company and a small number of highly skilled and experienced executives and personnel. The loss of their services may delay our company’s exploration activities or adversely affect our business and future operations.

Due to the relatively small size of our company, the loss of these persons or our company's inability to attract and retain additional highly skilled employees may lead to our company having to delay our exploration activities or adversely affect our business and future operations.

Our company may experience difficulty in engaging the services of qualified personnel in connection with our technical operations at our projects.

If the loss of any of our company’s key technical personnel occurs at any of our projects, our company may have difficulty finding qualified replacements. Our company’s inability to hire and retain the services of qualified persons for these positions in a timely manner could impede our company’s exploration activities at any of our projects which would have a material adverse effect on our company’s ability to conduct business.

Our company is subject to changes in political stability in West Africa.

Our company conducts exploration and development activities in Ghana, West Africa. Our company’s projects in Ghana may be subject to the effects of political changes, war and civil conflict, changes in government policy, lack of law enforcement and labor unrest and the creation of new laws. These changes (which may include new or modified taxes or other government levies as well as other legislation) may impact the profitability and viability of our properties. The effect of unrest and instability on political, social or economic conditions in Ghana could result in the impairment of exploration, development and mining operations. Any such changes are beyond the control of our company and may adversely affect our business.

In addition, local tribal authorities in West Africa exercise significant influence with respect to local land use, land labor and local security. From time to time, the Government of Ghana has intervened in the export of mineral concentrates in response to concerns about the validity of export rights and payment of duties. No assurances can be given that the co-operation of such authorities, if sought by our company, will be obtained, and if obtained, maintained.

The Government of Ghana also announced that it will be engaging companies to address the issue of dividend payment, exemptions and the mining sector fiscal regime, generally. As a result of these discussions, the Government of Ghana could amend the Mining Act (Ghana) or other regulations resulting in a material adverse impact on our company including increases in operating costs, capital expenditures or abandonment or delays in development of mining properties.

- 12 -

The mining industry is a competitive industry and our company may compete with larger, more established competitors for gold acquisition opportunities.

Significant and increasing competition exists for the limited number of gold acquisition opportunities available. As a result of this competition, some of which is with large established mining companies with substantial capabilities and greater financial and technical resources than our company, our company may be unable to acquire additional attractive mining properties on terms we consider acceptable.

The marketability of our company’s minerals may be influenced by various industry conditions.

The marketability of minerals, if any, which may be acquired or discovered by our company, will be affected by numerous factors beyond the control of our company. These factors include market fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of mineral markets and processing equipment and government regulations, including regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure and environmental protection. The exact effect of these factors cannot be accurately predicted, but the combination of these factors may result in our company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital. The probability of our company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital will be, to a significant extent, dependent upon the market price for gold. Gold prices fluctuate dramatically and are affected by numerous industry factors, such as interest rates, exchange rates, inflation or deflation, fluctuation in the value of the United States dollar and foreign currencies, global and regional supply and demand for precious metals, forward selling by producers, central bank sales and purchases of gold, production and cost levels in major gold producing regions and the political and economic conditions of major gold, copper or other mineral-producing countries throughout the world. Moreover, gold prices are also affected by macro-economic factors such as expectations for inflation, interest rates, currency exchange rates and global or regional political and economic situations. The current demand for, and supply of, gold affects gold prices, but not necessarily in the same manner as current demand and supply affect the prices of other commodities. The potential supply of gold consists of new gold mine production plus existing stocks of bullion and fabricated gold held by governments, financial institutions, industrial organizations and individuals. Since mine production in any single year constitutes a very small portion of the total potential supply of gold, normal variations in current production do not necessarily have a significant effect on the supply of gold or its price.

It may be difficult for our shareholders to enforce any judgment obtained in the United States against us or our officers or directors, which may limit the remedies otherwise available to our shareholders.

The majority of our directors and officers are residents of countries other than the United States and all or a substantial portion of such persons’ assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for our shareholders to:

• effect service of process on our directors or officers, or

• enforce any United States judgment they receive against us or our officers or directors in a foreign court, or including judgments predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof. In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether foreign courts would be competent to hear original actions brought in such foreign court against us or such persons predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state thereof. Consequently, you may be effectively prevented from pursuing remedies under U.S. federal securities laws against us or our officers and directors. The foregoing risks also apply to those experts identified in this Annual Report that are not residents of the United States.

Risks Relating to our Common Shares

Broker-dealers may be discouraged from effecting transactions in our common shares because they are considered a penny stock and are subject to the penny stock rules.

Rules 15g-1 through 15g-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act impose sales practice and disclosure requirements on certain brokers-dealers who engage in certain transactions involving a “penny stock”. Subject to certain exceptions, a penny stock generally includes any equity security not listed on a stock exchange that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share. Our common shares have traded below $5.00 per share throughout its trading history.

A broker-dealer selling penny stock to anyone other than an established customer or “accredited investor”, generally, an individual with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or an annual income exceeding $200,000, or $300,000 together with his or her spouse, must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser and must receive the purchaser‘s written consent to the transaction prior to sale, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt. In addition, the penny stock regulations require the broker-dealer to deliver, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the penny stock market, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt. A broker-dealer is also required to disclose commissions payable to the broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the securities. Finally, a broker-dealer is required to send monthly statements disclosing recent price information with respect to the penny stock held in a customer‘s account and information with respect to the limited market in penny stocks. The additional sales practice and disclosure requirements imposed upon broker-dealers may discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our common shares, which could severely limit the market liquidity of our common shares and impede the sale of our common shares in the secondary market.

- 13 -

The price of our common shares is likely to be highly volatile and possibly illiquid, which could cause the value of investments to decline.

The market price of our common shares may be highly volatile and possibly illiquid. Our shareholders may not be able to resell their common shares following periods of volatility because of the market’s adverse reaction to volatility. Factors that could cause such volatility may include, among other things:

• actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly operating results;

• large purchases or sales of our common shares;

• additions or departures of key personnel;

• investor perception of our company’s business prospects;

• conditions or trends in other industry related companies;

• changes in the market valuations of publicly traded companies in general and other industry-related companies; and

• world-wide political, economic and financial conditions.

The markets for our common shares is limited.

There is currently only a limited trading market for our common shares. Our common shares trade on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “XTGRF” which is a limited market in comparison to the NASDAQ Global Market, the NYSE MKT LLC and other national securities exchanges. Our securities are also listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the trading symbol “XTG”. The market for our securities on the TSX only commenced in November 2010 and, to date, trading has been limited. There is no assurance that the market for our common shares on the OTC Bulletin Board or TSX will develop into active trading markets.

In connection with future stock offerings, the value of our company’s common shares may become diluted as more of our common shares are issued and outstanding.

Our company may undertake in the future additional offerings of our common shares or of securities convertible into our common shares. The increase in the number of our common shares issued and outstanding and the possibility of sales of such common shares may depress the price of our common shares. In addition, as a result of such additional common shares, the voting power of our company’s existing shareholders will be diluted.

We are authorized to issue up to 250,000,000 of shares without prior shareholder consent which will be dilutive to our shareholders.

Xtra-Gold is authorized to issue up to 250,000,000 of no par value common shares of a single class which may be issued by our Board of Directors without further action or approval of our shareholders. While our Board of Directors is required to fulfill its fiduciary obligation in connection with the issuance of such shares, the shares may be issued in transaction with which not all shareholders agree, and the issuance of such shares will cause dilution to the ownership interest of our company’s shareholders.

We have never paid cash dividends on our common shares.

We have never paid dividends on our common shares and do not presently intend to pay cash dividends on our common shares. Any future decisions as to the payment of dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors, subject to applicable law.

Risks Related to our Company Post Continuation

In November 2012, as a result of the adoption by our shareholders of certain resolutions, at a special meeting of shareholders held on November 16, 2012 and a plan of conversion (the “Plan of Conversion”) under Chapter 92A of the Nevada Revised Statutes filed with the Nevada Secretary of State and the subsequent filing of a memorandum of association and articles of association (the “Memorandum and Articles”) with the Registrar of Corporate Affairs in the British Virgin Islands (the “BVI”), both of which were filed on November 30, 2012, we changed the jurisdiction of incorporation of our company from Nevada to the BVI (the “Continuation”).

- 14 -

We will still be treated as a U.S. corporation and taxed on our worldwide income after the Continuation.

The Continuation of our company from Nevada to the BVI was for corporate purposes a migration from Nevada to the BVI. Transactions whereby a U.S. corporation migrates to a foreign jurisdiction are considered by the United States Congress to be a potential abuse of the U.S. tax rules because after the migration the foreign entity is not subject to U.S. tax on its worldwide income. As a result, Section 7874(b) of the Code was enacted in 2004 to address this potential abuse. Section 7874(b) of the Code provides generally that a corporation that migrates from the United States will still remain subject to U.S. tax on its worldwide income unless the migrating entity has substantial business activities in the foreign country in which it is migrating when compared to its total business activities.

Section 7874(b) of the Code applies to the migration of our company from Nevada to the BVI, causing our company to be subject to United States federal income taxation on our worldwide income because our company does not have substantial business activities in the BVI when compared to its total business activities. Our administrative functions and our business operations are primarily located outside of the BVI. Substantially, all of our shareholders reside outside of the BVI and historically most of our funds have been raised outside of the BVI. Accordingly, we believe that our company will continue to be treated as a U.S. domestic corporation under Section 7874 of the Code after the Continuation.

Moreover, while we believe we have addressed the material U.S. federal income tax considerations as to the exchange of the shares of common stock of our company, as a Nevada company for shares of our company, as a BVI company pursuant to the Continuation, we cannot assure Holders that we have addressed the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to persons who may be subject to special provisions of the U.S. federal income tax law based on their individual circumstances. Holders should review the discussion under “Material United Federal Tax Consequences” in its entirety, including the definitions of “U.S. Holder” and “Non-U.S. Holder” described therein.

Under the BVI Business Companies Act, 2004 (the “BVI Act”), the number of shareholder votes required to approve certain fundamental matters, including amendments to our articles and business combination transactions, may be less than under Nevada law with the result that these transactions may more easily be approved under the BVI Act than under Nevada law.

Under the BVI Act, shareholder approval by resolution, being a majority approval, is required to approve certain fundamental changes, including amendments to our articles and mergers, which are the equivalent of mergers under Nevada law. Under the BVI Act, the majority approval is determined based upon those shareholders present at the meeting and entitled to vote on the fundamental change. While majority approval is required, the number of shares required may be significantly less than 50% of the outstanding share capital, which is the requirement under Nevada law, due to the fact that the quorum requirement for shareholders meetings is only two individuals present in person, each of whom is a stockholder or a proxyholder entitled to vote at a meeting.

Pursuant to the Memorandum and Articles of our company, our shareholders will have greater rights of dissent, with the result that dissenting shareholders may impede our ability to make fundamental corporate changes or increase the cost to us of making these changes.

Pursuant to our Memorandum and Articles, our shareholders will have the right to dissent when we amend our articles to change any provisions restricting or constraining the issue, transfer or ownership of shares of that class. Our shareholders will also have dissenters’ rights when we propose to amend our articles to add, change or remove any restrictions on our business or businesses that we may carry on, merge (other than a vertical short-form merger with a wholly-owned subsidiary), continue to another jurisdiction, sell, lease or exchange all or substantially all of our property, or carry out a going private or squeeze-out transaction. The exercise by shareholders of their dissent and appraisal rights when we attempt to complete any of these fundamental changes could impede our ability to make fundamental corporate changes or increase the cost to us of making these changes.

The stock price of our common shares may be volatile. In addition, demand in the United States for our common shares may be decreased by the change in domicile.

The market price of our common shares may be subject to significant fluctuations in response to variations in results of operations and other factors. Developments affecting the mining industry generally, including general economic conditions and government regulation, could also have a significant impact on the market price for our common shares. In addition, the stock market has experienced a high level of price and volume volatility. Market prices for the stock of many similar companies have experienced wide fluctuations which have not necessarily been related to the operating performance of such companies. These broad market fluctuations, which are beyond our control, could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common shares. We cannot predict what effect, if any, the Continuation will have on the market price prevailing from time to time or the liquidity of our common shares. The change in domicile may decrease the demand for our common shares in the United States. The decrease may not be offset by increased demand for our common shares in the BVI.

- 15 -

As a reporting issuer under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, we file more limited reports with the SEC than do companies who are registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. As we have elected “foreign private issuer” status following our Continuation into the BVI, our reporting obligations under U.S. securities laws is more limited than if we had remained a domestic issuer. This lack of transparency may make it more difficult for investors in our securities to make informed investment decisions.

While we are subject to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, we do not have a class of securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. Consequently, we file more limited reports with the SEC than do companies whose shares are registered under Section 12(g). For example, as a company reporting under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, we are not subject to the SEC’s proxy rules and our officers, directors and principal shareholders are not required to file reports under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, and such persons are not subject to the short-swing profit rules of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act.

Following our Continuation into the BVI, we have qualified as a foreign private issuer under U.S. securities laws and we have elected foreign private issuer status. While we will remain subject to limited reporting obligations under U.S. federal securities law, as a foreign private issuer:

• we are not required to file quarterly reports on Form 10-Q with the SEC; although since our securities are listed on the TSX we are a reporting issuer in Canada and subject to the rules of the Canadian securities administrators (the “CSA”) which includes the applicable provincial securities commissions in the provinces of British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario, we will file quarterly reports containing unaudited interim financial statements and MD&A with the CSA via SEDAR (System for Electronic Delivery of Analysis and Retrieval) and, in accordance with SEC rules, post copies of such reports on our website;

• we are not be required to file current reports on Form 8-K; although we are required to file current reports on Form 6-K but for less mandatory items than are required under Form 8-K, and since our securities are listed on the TSX and subject to the rules of the CSA, we will file material change reports with the CSA via SEDAR and, under SEC rules, post copies of such reports on our website;

• our officers, directors and principal shareholders are not subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act, which otherwise requires them to file ownership reports with the SEC and subjects them to “short-swing” profit liability;

• we are not subject to the SEC’s proxy rules; and

• we are not subject to the provisions of Regulation FD which is designed to prevent selective disclosure of material information.

While we believe that the disclosure requirements of the TSX and the CSA, and SEC regulations applicable to foreign private issuers, will collectively provide transparency to the investment community and allow informed investment decisions to be made by investors in our securities, there is no assurance that the reduced transparency afforded to foreign private issuers will not also reduce the information available to investors and make investment decisions in our securities more difficult.

Item 4 Information on Xtra-Gold

A. History and Development of Xtra-Gold

On November 30, 2012, we completed the Continuation to the BVI which resulted in the change of the jurisdiction of incorporation of our company from Nevada to the BVI.

B. Business Overview

We are engaged in the exploration of gold properties exclusively in Ghana, West Africa in the search for mineral deposits, mineral resources and/or mineral reserves which could be economically and legally extracted or produced. Our exploration activities include the review of existing data, grid establishment, geological mapping, geophysical surveying, trenching and pitting to test the areas of anomalous soil samples and reverse circulation (RC) and/or diamond drilling to test targets followed by infill drilling, if successful, to define a mineral resource and, perhaps ultimately, a mineral reserve.

Our mining portfolio currently consists of 225.87 square kilometers comprised of 33.65 square kilometers for our Kibi project, 51.67 square kilometers for our Banso project, 55.28 square kilometers for our Muoso project, 44.76 square kilometers for our Kwabeng project, and 40.51 square kilometers for our Pameng project, or 55,873 acres, pursuant to the leased areas set forth in our mining leases.

- 16 -

Our interests in our projects are held by our Ghanaian subsidiary, XG Mining, through mining leases granted by the Government of Ghana and registered to XG Mining for leased areas located within and upon concessions in Ghana. A concession is a grant of a tract of land made by a government or other controlling authority in exchange for an agreement that the land will be used for a specific purpose. The mining lease areas for our projects total approximately 226 square kilometers and are located at the northern extremity of the Kibi Gold Belt which is a greenstone belt, as defined in all the geological publications in Ghana, and is one of the four main greenstone belts located in Ghana.

Development of our Business During 2016

As at the date of this annual report, we have the following five projects all of which are in the exploration stage.

•	Kibi Project. Our Kibi project is located on the Apapam concession and is our only material project. This project encompasses the Zone 2 – Zone 3 – Zone 4 gold system consisting of an over 5.5 kilometer long mineralized trend delineated from gold-in-soil anomalies, geophysical interpretations, trenching and drilling along the northwest margin of the Apapam concession and the recently discovered Zone 5 auriferous shear system spatially associated with a 1.8 kilometer long gold-in- soil anomaly lying at the northeast extremity of the concession.
	Exploration activities on this project from January 1 to December 31, 2016, being the fiscal year for which this annual report is being filed, exploration activities focused on the implementation of the Phase I drill program on the Cobra Creek Gold Corridor prospect; an approximately 550 metre (“m”) wide, NE-trending, quartz-feldspar porphyry (“QFP”) hosted, multi- structure braided shear zone system traced to date over an approximately 850 m strike length. A total of 43 diamond core boreholes totaling 2,639 m were completed over a 2.75 month period extending from June 7 to August 31, 2016.
	The results of the Cobra Creek Gold Corridor Phase I drill program were reported by the Company on October 19, 2016; with 26 of the 43 boreholes yielding exploration significant auriferous drill intercepts, including the following highlights:

- 4.5 m grading 10.9 grams per tonne (“g/t”) gold, including 16.28 g/t gold over 2.9 m, and including 57.08 g/t gold over 0.6 m, from 7.1 m down-hole in #CCDD16020; 0.7 m grading 58.73 g/t gold from vertical depth of 27.6 m in #CCDD16024; and 5.5 m grading 6.57 g/t gold, including 11.7 g/t gold over 2 m, from surface in #CCDD16013 (High Grade Shoot); and

- 5.2 m grading 9.51 g/t gold, including 37.95 g/t gold over 1.1 m, and including 51.35 g/t gold over 0.6 m, from vertical depth of 1 m in #CCDD16015; and 1.5 m grading 48.1 g/t gold and 0.7 m grading 10.5 g/t gold from vertical depths of 1.5 m and 12 m respectively in #CCDD16022 (High Grade Shoot – NW Branch).

A surface sampling program was also completed on the Cobra Creek target in the March 2016 quarter; with the exploration work designed to further define the auriferous structural corridor in preparation for the Phase I drill program. The work program included the mechanical stripping of approximately 800 square metres of bedrock exposure and 178 metres of trenching to follow up on new auriferous occurrences discovered by prospecting efforts, and to further delineate the strike-extensions of the known gold-bearing shear zones; with a total of 128 saw-cut channel samples (101 m) and 157 trench channel samples collected. The results of the surface sampling program implemented from mid-October 2015 to early April 2016 on the Cobra Creek Gold Corridor prospect were reported by the Company on June 16, 2016.

Kibi project exploration work also included scout pitting (16) to test gold-in-soil anomalies and approximately 5.3 line-kilometres (245 samples) of infill soil geochemical sampling to further delineate the Akwadum South (“Zone 7”) and Hillcrest Shear (“Zone 6”) grassroots gold targets located on the Apapam Mining Lease and the adjoining Akim Apapam Reconnaissance Licence application, respectively. We did not conduct any exploration activities on our Kwabeng, Pameng, Banso and Muoso projects during the year.

See “Kibi Project – Prior Exploration by Xtra-Gold” for exploration activities conducted by our company during the two years preceding the fiscal year.

As at the date of this annual report, during 2017, we plan to conduct:

• additional Cobra Creek Gold Corridor outcrop stripping / trenching followed by detailed geological mapping and channel sampling to further investigate the auriferous occurrences discovered by prospecting efforts and to further define the strike-extensions of the known gold-bearing shear zones to guide follow up drilling efforts;

• prospecting, reconnaissance geology, and scout trenching / pitting of additional prospective IP/Resistivity targets present along the 2.2 km long Cobra Creek grid and of untested, high priority gold-in-soil anomalies across the extent of the Apapam concession is also planned; and

• a drill program of approximately 2000 to 3000 meters, at an estimated cost of $500,000.

- 17 -

Kwabeng Project. Our Kwabeng project is located on the Kwabeng concession. During the fiscal year for which this annual report is being filed, our company conducted geological compilation, prospecting, reconnaissance geology, soil geochemical sampling, and scout hand trenching to identify and/or further advance grassroots targets on this project. During the fiscal year, we collected 30 rock composite chip samplesand implemented a scout soil geochemistry grid of 67 samples to follow up on an anomalous gold occurrence discovered by the ongoing grassroots target generation program of the Kwabeng concession.

As at the date of this annual report, during 2017, we plan to conduct:

• ongoing geological compilation, prospecting, soil geochemical sampling, and scout trenching to identify and/or further advance grassroots targets; and

• the continuation of placer gold recovery operations at this project (commenced in March 2013).

Pameng Project. Our Pameng project is located on the Pameng concession. During the fiscal year, we did not conduct any exploration activities on this project. In connection with the two years preceding the fiscal year, we did not conduct any exploration activities at this project.

As of the date of this annual report, during 2017, we plan to conduct an exploration program consisting of:

• ongoing geological compilation, prospecting, soil geochemical sampling, and scout trenching to identify and/or further advance grassroots targets.

Banso Project. Our Banso project is located on the Banso concession. During the fiscal year, we did not conduct any exploration activities on this project. No exploration work was undertaken on this property in 2016 or in 2015. See “Banso Project – Exploration Activities by Buccaneer Gold Corp. in 2014” for exploration activities conducted on this project during that year.

Muoso Project. Our Muoso project is located on the Muoso concession. During the fiscal year, we did not conduct any exploration activities on this project in 2016 or in 2015. See “Muoso Project - Exploration Activities by Buccaneer Gold Corp. in 2014” for exploration activities conducted on this project during thst year.

The litigation initiated by Buccaneer in 2015 was settled in November 2016. We received cash of $20,000. We returned 1 million Buccaneer shares. All other claims were dropped. Buccaneer is not longer pursuing an earn-in on the properties. As of the date of this annual report, during 2017, we plan to conduct an exploration program consisting of:

• ongoing geological compilation, prospecting, soil geochemical sampling, and scout trenching to identify and/or further advance grassroots targets; and

• the continuation of placer gold recovery operations at these projects (commenced in 2015);

As at the date of this annual report, we have estimated $200,000 for the cost for soil sampling and trenching at our Kibi, Kwabeng, Pameng, Banso and Muoso projects.

Gold Recovery Operations. We continued with placer gold recovery operations at our Kwabeng Banso and Muoso projects during the fiscal year . We recovered 2,549 ounces of raw placer gold (Kwabeng – 1,474 ounces, Banso – 727 ounces, and Muoso – 348 ounces) and sold 2,142 ounces of fine gold for net proceeds of $828,559. As at the date of this annual report, during 2017, we plan to continue placer gold recovery operations at these projects.

Net proceeds from gold recoveries to the end of 2016, from all properties, amounted to $12,432,506.

As of the date of this annual report, we have:

• have achieved losses since inception;

• have minimal operations, and

• relied upon the sale of our securities and the proceeds derived from our recovery of placer gold operations to fund our operations.

Principal Capital Expenditures/Divestitures over the last Three Fiscal Years

Our company has not had any principal capital expenditures or divestitures over the last three fiscal years. We intend to purchase an exploration drill in 2017 and have made an initial deposit toward this purchase in 2016.

- 18 -

C. Organizational Structure

The following organization chart sets forth our significant subsidiaries.

D. Property, Plants and Equipment

National Instrument 43-101 Compliance

The hardrock, lode gold exploration technical information relating to our mineral properties contained in this annual report on Form 20-F is based upon information prepared by or the preparation of which was supervised by Yves Clement, P.Geo., our Vice-President, Exploration.

Location of Operations

Except for the land upon which our field camp is located in Kwabeng, Ghana, we do not own any real property. We own the mineral rights on our projects located in the Kibi Gold Belt where all of our exploration activities are currently conducted. Mining leases granted by the Government of Ghana and registered to our Ghanaian subsidiary, XG Mining, grant us the right to operate at our Kibi, Kwabeng, Pameng, Banso and Muoso projects and are described elsewhere in this annual report.

We currently conduct limited administrative activities from our corporate office located at Suite 902, 357 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5H 2T7, Canada, where we have leased 881 square feet for a five year term commencing on November 1, 2012 and expiring on October 31, 2017, at approximately $2,731 (CAD$3,667) per month.

As of the date of this annual report, our technical and administrative activities are conducted at our field camp. We do not pay any rent as we own our field camp.

- 19 -

Map of Projects and Operations

The map below shows the locations of our Kibi, Kwabeng, Pameng, Banso and Muoso projects all of which are described in further detail in this annual report.

Xtra-Gold Mining Concessions Located in the Kibi Gold Belt

- 20 -

Xtra-Gold Mining Leases Located in the Kibi Gold Belt

- 21 -

Overview of Projects

All of our mineral exploration projects are currently at an early stage of evaluation.

As at the date of this annual report, no mineralized material or mineral resource or mineral reserve estimates have been made at any of our projects.

We have the following exploration activities planned for 2017:

at our Kibi project:

• additional Cobra Creek Gold Corridor outcrop stripping / trenching followed by detailed geological mapping and channel sampling to further investigate the auriferous occurrences discovered by prospecting efforts and to further define the strike- extensions of the known gold-bearing shear zones to guide follow up drilling efforts;;

• prospecting, reconnaissance geology, and scout trenching / pitting of additional prospective IP/Resistivity targets present along the 2.2 km long Cobra Creek grid and of untested, high priority gold-in-soil anomalies across the extent of the Apapam concession is also planned; and

• a drill program of approximately 2,000 to 3,000 meters at an estimated cost of $500,000;

at our Kwabeng project:

• ongoing geological compilation, prospecting, soil geochemical sampling, and scout trenching to identify and/or further advance grassroots targets; and

• the continuation of placer gold recovery operations at this project (commenced in March 2013);

at our Pameng project:

• ongoing geological compilation, prospecting, soil geochemical sampling, and scout trenching to identify and/or further advance grassroots targets; and

at our Banso and Muoso projects:

• ongoing geological compilation, prospecting, soil geochemical sampling, and scout trenching to identify and/or further advance grassroots targets; and

• the continuation of placer gold recovery operations at these projects (commenced in 2015).

Title to Properties

We hold 30-year mining leases expiring on July 26, 2019 on our Kwabeng and Pameng concessions. We have renewed our Apapam concession, which expired on December 17, 2015, for a 15 year extension. We hold a 14-year mining lease on our Banso concession expiring on January 5, 2025 and a 13-year mining lease on our Muoso concession expiring on January 5, 2024.

Recovery of Placer Gold

In July 2010, we entered into agreements with independent Ghanaian contract miners to recover placer gold and produce the mineralized material from our Kibi and Pameng projects and an agreement with Ravenclaw Mining Limited, a Swiss company (see footnote 8 following the compensation table under “Compensation – Directors and Senior Management Compensation Table”), to assist in overseeing the contract miners to limit our involvement in the placer gold recovery operations from July 2010 through December 2011 and enable our company to focus on lode gold exploration activities (see “Business Overview – Gold Recovery Operations” for further details).

During 2010 through 2012, we did not conduct any placer gold recovery operations at our Kwabeng project. During 2013, 2014 and 2015, we conducted placer gold recovery operations at our Kwabeng project, while adding placer gold recovery operations at Banso and Muoso in 2015.

- 22 -

VTEM Survey

In 2011, an airborne Versatile Time-domain Electromagnetic (“VTEM”), Magnetic and Radiometric survey (the “VTEM survey”) was completed by our company on our projects which are all located in the Kibi Gold Belt and encompassed approximately 4,000 line-kilometers at 200 meter line spacing, with approximately 490 line-kilometers of detail 100 meter line spacing coverage over our core Kibi project mining lease area. The VTEM system is renowned for its superior penetration depth of greater than 400 meters, low base frequency for enhanced penetration in conductive ground cover and high spatial resolution which permits the spotting of drill targets directly off the airborne anomalies. The primary purpose of the VTEM survey was to delineate auriferous graphitic or sulphidic shears but resistivity-depth data may also help further define and/or identify the granitoid bodies hosting the Kibi project mineralization In addition to helping map lithological contacts, including the gold prospective granitoid bodies, the aeromagnetic survey will permit the detection of low-magnetic domains possibly reflecting demagnetization resulting from intense gold-related hydrothermal alteration. The radiometric survey may also help further define and/or identify the gold-hosting granitoid bodies.

The VTEM data was incorporated into the geological compilation following our receipt of the final survey interpretation data from Geotech Airborne Limited (see “Technical Reports - Interpretation Report of VTEM Survey” below for further details). This integrated survey, in combination with previous soil geochemistry and reconnaissance geology surveys will help further delineate known gold occurrences outside Zone 2 of the Kibi project, and evaluate the remainder of the Apapam mining lease area for the hosting of granitoid-hosted and Ashanti style shear zone gold mineralization. Similarly, the VTEM survey will help further define the extent and regional controls of the gold-bearing structures discovered to date by scout trenching on the Ankaase Gold Trend, located on the Muoso concession, and Banso Area No. 3 gold-in-soil anomalies; with the objective of guiding follow-up trenching designed to outline high priority, cost effective drill targets.

Technical Reports

Interpretation Report of VTEM Survey

In August 2011, Geotech Airborne Limited provided our company with a report setting forth its interpretation of approximately 4,027 line kilometers of electromagnetic, magnetic and radiometric data for gold exploration in our Kibi project area.

The airborne geophysical datasets display a complex signal largely dominated by NE-SW to NNE-SSW structures that are interpreted as shear zones and graphitic sediments. Metasediments, metavolcanics and granitoids units have been delineated from their geophysical (magnetic, electromagnetic and radiometric) characteristics. The electromagnetic anomaly picks show elongated patterns of conductors located in NE-SW to NNE-SSW trending areas interpreted as graphitic layers within the interpreted shear zone and graphitic sediments.

The available geological and geophysical data was interpreted in terms of gold potential within the area of interest. The geophysical interpretation used the genetic model for stockworks/silicification gold emplacement and the genetic model of granitoid gold emplacement. A total of 38 targets were delineated and ranked according to a priority level for ground follow-up. Geotech Airborne Limited suggested that these targets should be further investigated in the field using geology and geochemistry before planning a drilling program.

Modified Gold Deportment Study

In October 2011, SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd. provided our company with a mineralogical report relating to mineralogical test work consisting of a modified gold deportment study to characterize the gold, in two samples, to recommend a process route to maximize gold recoveries. Approximately 10 kilograms of sample G478923 sulphide material (drill core) and 10 kilograms of composite oxide (saprolite) material were utilized for the test work. The composite oxide sample was created by SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd. from trench samples that were crushed and combined. The mineralogical test work included metallurgical and mineralogical tests and was done in conjunction with gravity test work conducted by the Metallurgical Section of SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd. This report outlined the methodology as to how the different tests were conducted, the results of the test work, conclusions and recommendations. The objective of the modified gold deportment study was to gain an understanding of the nature and mode of occurrence of the gold in each sample. The modified gold deportment study included the following:

• test work to determine the amenability of the ore to gravity recovery;

• gold distribution across size fractions (grading analysis);

• heavy liquid separation to determine the amount of free gold or gold in heavy particles such as sulphides;

- 23 -

• exposure and mineral association analysis of the particulate gold grains in the gravity concentrate;

• chemical composition of the ore and metallurgical test products;

•   general mineralogical characterization of the ore;

•   identification and quantification of gold minerals including native gold, gold-tellurides, etc. in the gravity concentrates;

•   grain size distribution of the gold grains in the gravity concentrate;

•   test work to determine the gold recovery by direct cyanidation; and

•   diagnostic leach analysis of the gravity tailings to determine the gold deportment in the gravity tails.

SGS South Africa (Pty) Ltd. made the following preliminary gold recovery conclusions in their report:

• The gold in the G478923 gold ore samples (3.49 g/t Au) is highly amenable to cyanidation leaching with ~97% recoverable by means of direct cyanidation. This ore is also amenable to gravity upgrading, with ~67% of the gold recovered at a mass pull of ~3%. In the gravity concentrate (97.5 g/t Au), a total of 143 particulate gold grains were observed in the gravity concentrate of this sample.

• The grading analysis on the G478923 gold ore sample indicated a very high upgrading of gold in the +106µm size fraction (~69%). This indicates that the gold is either large gold grains or locked in large gold-bearing particles. From the liberation and mineral association characteristics determined by QEMSCAN, on the gravity concentrate, the gold was found to be ~63% liberated and ~25% was associated with pyrite. This indicates that the gold is either large, liberated gold grains or locked in large gold-bearing pyrite particles.

• The direct cyanidation and diagnostic leach indicates that the sample is highly amenable to cyanide leaching, with ~97% of the gold recovered from the head sample at a grind of 80%-75µm by direct cyanidation and ~96% for the gravity tailings at a grind of~50%-75µm. This is corroborated by the exposure and the mineral association characteristics as determined by QEMSCAN analysis of the gravity concentrate. Approximately 90% of the particulate gold grains are ≥10% exposed and should be leachable.

• The gold in the composite gold ore sample (7.28 g/t Au) is also highly amenable to cyanidation, with ~97% of the gold recoverable by means of direct cyanidation. The ore is also amenable to gravity upgrading, to some degree, with only ~56% of the gold recovered at a mass pull of ~3%. In the gravity concentrate (134.83 g/t Au) a total of 125 particulate gold grains were observed by QEMSCAN.

• The grading analysis on the composite gold ore sample indicated a very high upgrading of gold in the +106µm size fraction (~74%). This indicates that the gold is either large gold grains or locked in large gold-bearing particles. From the liberation and mineral association characteristics determined by QEMSCAN analysis of the gravity tailings, it was found that the gold grains were moderately liberated (~76%) and that ~10% was occurring in silicates and ~14% in oxides. This indicates that the gold is either large, liberated gold grains or locked in large gold-bearing silicate/oxide particles.

• The direct cyanidation and diagnostic leach tests indicated that the sample is highly amenable to cyanide leaching, with ~98% of the gold recovered from the head sample at a grind of 80%-75µm and ~99% of the gold in the gravity tailings at a grind of 50%-75µm. This is corroborated by the exposure and mineral association characteristics of particulate gold in the gravity concentrate, as determined by QEMSCAN analysis. Approximately ~96% of the gold grains are ≥10% exposed and should be leachable.

• The most simplistic processing option would be to mill the ore to ~80%-75µm followed by carbon-in-leach cyanidation. Another option, which may result in somewhat lower operational cost is to mill the ore relatively coarsely (say 80%-106µm) followed by gravity concentration and intensive cyanidation of the gravity concentrate. The gravity tailings could then be milled finer to ~80%-75 µm, followed by carbon-in- leach cyanidation. Taking out the coarse gold and some of the sulphides by gravity, will allow shorter retention times in the leach tanks and possibly even lower cyanide consumption.

Report on Structural Geological Investigations of Zone 2, Kibi Project

In November 2011, SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. provided our company with a report of their structural geological investigations of Zone 2 (Big Bend zone, South zone and other zones including the Mushroom zone) on our Kibi project.

- 24 -

Objectives and Overview

•  to review geological mapping to date and to provide on ground structural geological guidance; and

•  to conduct structural geological investigations of key exposures and drill core at Zone 2 with a focus on understanding:

• the 3D geometry of diorite dykes;

• structural controls on the distribution of gold mineralization (including ore plunge); and

• kinematics of shear/fault zones and their influence on the distribution of gold mineralization.

SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. Conclusions

• The distribution of gold mineralization in the Big Bend zone is controlled by two NNE-trending shear zones that bound the auriferous zone in a quartz diorite.

• Auriferous quartz veins in the Big Bend zone comprise:

• shear and extensional veins related to the development of NNE-trending shear zones; and

• stockwork veins in a particular portion of the quartz diorite.

• Vein geometry, rare kinematic indicators and steeply plunging mineral lineation imply that deformation associated with gold mineralization in the Big Bend zone resulted from a protracted episode of reverse SE over NW movement.

• The controls on gold mineralization at the South zone and other zones are not well understood and require further oriented core drilling followed by structural geology investigations.

SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. Recommendations

Big Bend Zone

• complete infill drilling at the Big Bend zone to confirm gold grade continuity in preparation for resource estimation;

• conduct detailed petrography studies to identify compositional variations in the quartz diorite and verify their potential control on the distribution of gold mineralization;

• include structural contours of auriferous diorite contacts on geological maps to investigate the relationship between the geometry of the auriferous portion of the diorite body and the distribution of gold mineralization; and

• define the continuation of (auriferous) shear zones to the north and south of the Big Bend diorite.

South Zone and Other Zones (including the Mashroom Zone)

• undertake further oriented core drilling to verify the extent and potential presence of shear zones at the South zone (drill orientations to SW and SE); and

• determine the shear zone kinematics and controls on gold distribution.

Regional Structural Geology Interpretation of the Aeromagnetic Data from the VTEM Survey

In December 2011, SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. provided our company with a report of their structural geological interpretation of aeromagnetic data covering our Kibi Gold Belt mining concessions to assist in understanding the structural setting of gold mineralization in the area and to provide a practical structural framework for future exploration targeting. The defined area of interest is ~705 square kilometers in area and is located at the northern extremity of the Kibi Gold Belt. The area of interest was based on the extent of the VTEM Survey conducted by Geotech Airborne Limited. The SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. report documents the methodology, results, conclusion and recommendations from the structural geological interpretation.

The scope of work included a desktop structural interpretation of the airborne geophysical data we acquired over the area of interest. Based on the available airborne geophysical data, SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. constructed form lines outlining the internal geometry of stratigraphy within our area of interest. In general, form lines within our area of interest display a strong southwest-northeast trend, parallel to the tectonic grain in the known greenstone belts of Ghana. Variations from this trend occur in a north-west-southeast-trending belt along the lower portion of our area of interest.

- 25 -

SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. Conclusions

• A fault network was interpreted and subdivided in terms of age. The fault network comprises dominant southwest- northeast- trending faults, subparallel to the dominant trend observed in the form lines that include early reactivated D_E extensional faults. These faults are interpreted to have developed (or reactivated) during the Eburnean Orogeny (D₂ -D₅ ) and are believed to be closely linked to gold mineralization.

• Two types of intrusions (belt and basin type granitoids) were identified in our area of interest, both of which were emplaced before the culmination of the Eburnean Orogeny (D₅ ) and therefore are overprinted by D₅ deformation.

• A late (D₆ ) fault set is represented by east-west-rending faults that are linked by minor northwest-southeast- trending faults. These are characterized by narrow, linear breaks in the magnetic data often with little to no visible offset in the magnetic stratigraphy. These late faults are interpreted to have resulted from northeast-southwest compression that may have occurred at the final stages of the Eburnean Orogeny or post-dated the Eburnean Orogeny.

• Several areas of structural complexity were identified within our area of interest, including left and right- hand steps along the major fault corridors, intersections between D₂ -D₅ faults and intersections between D₂ -D₅ and D₅ faults, particularly in the vicinity of intrusions.

SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc. Recommendations

• Regional ground-truthing of the regional structural interpretation should be conducted. This should aim to not only identify whether a given fault is present, but also characterize each fault in terms of:

• fault products (including the brittle/brittle-ductile/ductile nature of the fault);

• orientation of associated foliations and lineations if present;

• kinematics; and

• alteration or gold mineralization present.

• A confidence rating should be compiled for each interpreted fault identified as part of this interpretation. This may include using existing geological mapping, satellite imagery, other geophysical datasets, or ground-truthing to produce a confidence rating based on the number of datasets, a given fault is identified in, or based on the resolution of datasets a given interpreted fault is based on.

• Regional ground-truthing of the regional lithological interpretation should be conducted. This should focus on the location of the boundary between the basin and belt assemblages, as well as better defining the internal variation within both these assemblages, including their known relationships with gold mineralization.

• Conduct a regional geochemical survey to verify the validity of identified target areas and conduct close- spaced soil geochemical sampling to guide exploration drilling in areas of positive results.

Note:

• 1 ppm = 1 gram per tonne (g/t) = 1,000 part per billion (ppb)

• All gold results for our exploration programs are reported in parts per million gold (Au).

Our Prior Exploration Activities

Please refer to our annual reports on Form 20-F and Form 10-K previously filed with the SEC for any exploration activities conducted by us before the three years required by this annual report.

- 26 -

Kibi Project

Overview

Our Kibi project is also referred to in this annual report as the Apapam concession and is comprised of a 33.65 square kilometer land position.

Our Kibi project land position also encompasses the following two land staking applications:

• the Akim Apapam concession is a reconnaissance license contiguous to the southwest extremity of our Kibi project covering an area of 7.0 square kilometers (700 hectares); and

• the Apapam concession extension is a ground extension along the northwest boundary of our Kibi project covering an area of 1.42 square kilometers (142 hectares).

The Akim Apapam concession application was made to provide a buffer area. The Akim Apapam concession was covered by a first pass (200 meters x 25 meters) soil geochemistry survey in 2011; with 2012 exploration efforts including a single trench (157 meters) and 27 hand auger holes (147 meters) targeting a gold-in-soil anomaly. The Apapam concession extension application was made to cover certain trench and drill gold intercepts. The applications for the Akim Apapam concession and the Apapam concession extension were submitted by our company to the Minerals Commission of Ghana on January 15, 2008 and November 19, 2009, and as at the date of this annual report, approval of these applications is still pending and there is no assurance that either of them will be granted.

The Apapam concession contains two small scale mining licenses, comprising approximately 0.1012 square kilometers (10.12 hectares) located within the northwest portion of the concession which were granted to third parties before our company’s application for the Apapam concession. None of the in situ, lode gold mineralization occurrences, described in the October 31, 2012 independent National Instrument 43-101 technical report prepared by SEMS Exploration Services Ltd. are located within and/or proximal to these third party small scale mining licenses, and there is no current knowledge of any lode gold occurrences being present on these parcels. No information is available on past and/or current alluvial gold mining activity on these small scale mining licenses.

Location and Access

Our Kibi project lies within the Kibi-Winneba greenstone belt in the Eastern Region of Ghana and is located on the eastern flank of the Atewa Range along the headwaters of the Birim River in the immediate vicinity of the district capital of Kibi, approximately 75 kilometers NNW of the nation’s capital city of Accra. Access to our Kibi project is by driving northwest from Accra on the paved Accra-Kumasi Trunk Road, the main national highway, for approximately 90 kilometers until the town of Kibi, marked by a road sign, is reached. One would make a left hand turn at the Kibi sign and drive southwest for approximately 5 kilometers to arrive at our Apapam concession. A tarred road emanating from the Accra-Kumasi Trunk Road, approximately 15 kilometers northeast of Kibi, dissects the north-central and south-eastern portions of our concession, while the tarred road servicing the town of Apapam provides access to the concession’s south-western extremity. Our Kibi project is located approximately 15 kilometers south-southeast from our field camp.

The Kibi-Winneba greenstone belt is characterized by a narrow sequence of Birimian metavolcanics underlying most of the Atewa Range, which is covered by an extensive laterite/bauxite capping, and surrounded by a thick package of Birimian metasediments dominating the flanks and the lower lying areas. Our Kibi project covers the Birimian volcanic-sediment contact which we believe represents a highly favorable environment for the hosting of lode gold deposits throughout Ghana.

Historic Work

Before the exploration work conducted by our company, very little systematic exploration work for bedrock gold deposits has been conducted in the Kibi area since the 1930s.

Prior Exploration by Xtra-Gold

2014 Exploration Program

Exploration activities on this project from January 1 to December 31, 2014, being the fiscal year for which this annual report is being filed, was limited to Zone 5 reconnaissance geology / prospecting with 144 rock composite chip samples collected, and geological - geophysical modelling geared towards drill target selection.

- 27 -

2015 Exploration Program

Exploration work on the Cobra Creek target during the 2015 year concentrated on outcrop stripping and detailed geological mapping / channel sampling to follow up on auriferous occurrences discovered by 2014 prospecting efforts, and to further define the strike-extensions of the known auriferous structures hosted by the Cobra Creek gold corridor. A total of 506 saw-cut channel samples totaling approximately 387 linear-meters were collected from approximately 5,510 square meters of stripped / power washed bedrock exposure, including approximately 1,860 square meters of manual stripping and approximately 3,650 square meters of mechanical stripping. Compilation of the geological and assay result data is in progress and the 2015 Cobra Creek sampling results will be reported upon the completion of the ongoing outcrop stripping / detailed geological mapping / channel sampling program. Cobra Creek gold zone work also included the collection of 54 rock composite chip prospecting samples and approximately 7 line-kilometers (245 samples) of infill soil geochemical sampling (completed January 2016) to further ground proof high priority IP/Resistivity geophysical targets along the approximately 1.8 kilometer long Cobra Creek anomalous gold-in-soil trend.

Additional exploration efforts on our Kibi project for the 2015 fiscal year included the collection of 62 rock composite chip samples as part of an ongoing, concession-wide prospecting program targeting gold-in-soil anomalies and lode gold prospective, geophysically inferred, litho-structural geology settings.

2016 Exploration Program

During 2016, in connection with our Kibi project, exploration activities focused on the implementation of the Phase I drill program on the Cobra Creek Gold Corridor prospect; an approximately 550 metre (“m”) wide, NE-trending, quartz-feldspar porphyry (“QFP”) hosted, multi-structure braided shear zone system traced to date over an approximately 850 m strike length. A total of 43 diamond core boreholes totaling 2,639 m were completed over a 2.75 month period extending from June 7 to August 31, 2016.

The first pass drill program included: 12 initial exploratory boreholes ranging from 56 m to 220 m in length (1,576 m) designed to test 10 priority auriferous shear targets identified by extensive outcrop stripping / channel sampling efforts, Induced Polarization (“IP”) / Resistivity anomalies spatially associated with auriferous shears, and to gain a better understanding of the litho-structural setting of the gold mineralization; and 31 short, predominantly vertical (-90^o) boreholes ranging from 16 m to 63 m in length (1,063 m) designed to better target / dissect relatively flat-lying, gold-bearing extensional veining systems. Twenty of the short holes (775 m) tested the near-surface distribution of auriferous extensional veining arrays within the High Grade Shoot and Tourmaline Zone area at the northeastern extremity of the Main Shear structure.

The results of the Cobra Creek Gold Corridor Phase I drill program were reported by the Company on October 19, 2016; with 26 of the 43 boreholes yielding exploration significant auriferous drill intercepts, including the following highlights:

- 4.5 m grading 10.9 grams per tonne (“g/t”) gold, including 16.28 g/t gold over 2.9 m, and including 57.08 g/t gold over 0.6 m, from 7.1 m down-hole in #CCDD16020; 0.7 m grading 58.73 g/t gold from vertical depth of 27.6 m in #CCDD16024; and 5.5 m grading 6.57 g/t gold, including 11.7 g/t gold over 2 m, from surface in #CCDD16013 (High Grade Shoot); and

- 5.2 m grading 9.51 g/t gold, including 37.95 g/t gold over 1.1 m, and including 51.35 g/t gold over 0.6 m, from vertical depth of 1 m in #CCDD16015; and 1.5 m grading 48.1 g/t gold and 0.7 m grading 10.5 g/t gold from vertical depths of 1.5 m and 12 m respectively in #CCDD16022 (High Grade Shoot – NW Branch).

A surface sampling program was also completed on the Cobra Creek target in the March 2016 quarter; with the exploration work designed to further define the auriferous structural corridor in preparation for the Phase I drill program. The work program included the mechanical stripping of approximately 800 square metres of bedrock exposure and 178 metres of trenching to follow up on new auriferous occurrences discovered by prospecting efforts, and to further delineate the strike-extensions of the known gold-bearing shear zones; with a total of 128 saw-cut channel samples (101 m) and 157 trench channel samples collected. The results of the surface sampling program implemented from mid-October 2015 to early April 2016 on the Cobra Creek Gold Corridor prospect were reported by the Company on June 16, 2016.

Kibi project exploration work also included scout pitting (16) to test gold-in-soil anomalies and approximately 5.3 line-kilometres (245 samples) of infill soil geochemical sampling to further delineate the Akwadum South (“Zone 7”) and Hillcrest Shear (“Zone 6”) grassroots gold targets located on the Apapam Mining Lease and the adjoining Akim Apapam Reconnaissance Licence application, respectively. We did not conduct any exploration activities on our Kwabeng, Pameng, Banso and Muoso projects during the year.

- 28 -

Future Exploration Plans

2017 Proposed Exploration Program

During 2017, we plan to conduct:

• additional Cobra Creek Gold Corridor outcrop stripping / trenching followed by detailed geological mapping and channel sampling to further investigate the auriferous occurrences discovered by prospecting efforts and to further define the strike-extensions of the known gold-bearing shear zones to guide follow up drilling efforts;

• prospecting, reconnaissance geology, and scout trenching / pitting of additional prospective IP/Resistivity targets present along the 2.2 km long Cobra Creek grid and of untested, high priority gold-in-soil anomalies across the extent of the Apapam concession is also planned; and

• a drill program of approximately 2000 to 3000 meters, at an estimated cost of $500,000.

Gold Intercept Reporting Criteria

Unless otherwise indicated, “Reported Intercepts” represent core-lengths; true width of mineralization is unknown at this time. Individual sample results were length weighted to yield average composite interval grades as reported. Unless otherwise indicated “Significant Intercepts” satisfy following criteria: greater than (>) 5.0 gram gold x meter product and > 0.5 g/t gold. “Anomalous” signifies at least one intercept > 2.0 gram gold x meter product and > 0.25 g/t gold. Unless otherwise indicated, intercepts are constrained with a 0.25 g/t gold minimum cut-off grade at the top and bottom of the intercept, with no upper cut-off grade applied, and a maximum of five consecutive meters of internal dilution (less than 0.25 g/t gold). All internal intervals yielding above 15 g/t gold are indicated within the intersection.

Quality-Control Program

We have implemented a quality-control program to ensure best practice in the sampling and analysis of the diamond drill core, reverse circulation (RC) chip samples, saprolite trench and saw-cut channel samples, and soil samples. Drill core is HQ diameter (63.5 millimeters) in upper oxidized material (regolith) and NQ diameter (47.6 millimeters) in the lower fresh rock portion of the hole. Drill core is saw cut and half the core is sampled in standard intervals. The remaining half of core is stored in a secure location. Reverse circulation (RC) chip samples are taken at one meter intervals under dry drilling conditions by experienced geologists, with all samples weighed on site. Saprolite trench samples consist of continuous, horizontal channels collected from a canal excavated along the bottom sidewall of the trench (~ 0.10 meters above floor). All samples are transported in security-sealed bags to ALS Ghana Limited, an ISO 9001:2000 certified laboratory. As of the date of this annual report, a 1,000 gram split of the sample is pulverized to better than 85% passing 75 microns, and analyzed by industry standard 50 gram fire assay fusion with atomic absorption spectroscopy finish. Samples with observed visible gold and/or exhibiting typical Kibi-type granitoid hosted mineralization characterized by liberated, particulate gold grains are pulverized in their entirety to better than 85% passing 75 microns, and analyzed four times by industry standard 50 gram fire assay fusion with atomic absorption spectroscopy finish; with the arithmetic average of the four assays reported. Our company inserts a certified reference standard (low to high grade), analytical blank, and field duplicate sample in every batch of 20 drill core / reverse circulation (RC) chip / trench channel / saw cut channel samples. Validation parameters are established in the database to ensure quality control.

Recovery and Sale of Placer Gold

There was no placer gold recovery operations carried out at this project during 2014 through to the end of our fiscal year.

Resources and Reserves

No mineral reserves have been identified on our Kibi project.

Apapam Mining Lease

XG Mining’s interest in our Kibi project was previously held by a prospecting license granted by the Government of Ghana on March 29, 2004 covering a licensed area of 33.65 square kilometers. In May 2008, XG Mining applied to the Government of Ghana to convert the Kibi prospecting license to a mining lease. When our application received parliamentary approval, the Government of Ghana granted and registered the Apapam mining lease to XG Mining on the following terms and conditions.

The Apapam mining lease is dated December 18, 2008 and is owned and controlled by our company, as to a 90% interest; and is registered to our subsidiary, XG Mining, while the remaining 10% free carried interest in XG Mining is held by the Government of Ghana. The Apapam mining lease covers a lease area of 33.65 square kilometers and is located in the East Akim District of the Eastern Region of Ghana. The Apapam mining lease has a seven year term which expired on December 17, 2015. We have applied for a renewed for a further 30 year term in accordance with the Mining Act (Ghana). We have been granted surface and mining rights by the Government of Ghana to work, develop and produce gold in the Apapam lease area (including the processing, storing and transportation of ore and materials).

- 29 -

With respect to the Apapam mining lease, we are:

• required to pay applicable taxes and annual rental fees to the Government of Ghana in the amount of approximately $19 (GH¢32.80); and

• committed to pay a royalty in each quarter to the Government of Ghana, through the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, based on the production for that quarter within 30 days from the quarter end as well as a royalty on all timber felled in accordance with existing legislation;

• required to:

• commence commercial production of gold within two years from the date of the mining lease;

• conduct our operations with due diligence, efficiency, safety and economy, in accordance with good commercial mining practices and in a proper and workmanlike manner, observing sound technical and engineering principles using appropriate modern and effective equipment, machinery, materials and methods and paying particular regard to the conservation of resources, reclamation of land and environmental protection generally; and

• mine and extract ore in accordance with preceding paragraph, utilizing methods which include dredging, quarrying, pitting, trenching, stoping and shaft sinking in the Apapam lease area.

We are further required to furnish to the government authorities of Ghana, comprised of the Minister of Lands, Forestry and Mines, the Head of the Inspectorate Division of the Minerals Commission, the Chief Executive of the Minerals Commission and the Director of Ghana Geological Survey (the “government authorities”), with technical records which include:

• a report in each quarter not later than 30 days after the quarter end to the government authorities in connection with quantities of gold won in that quarter, quantities sold, revenue received and royalties payable;

• a report half-yearly not later than 40 days after the half year end to the government authorities summarizing the results of operations during the half year and technical records, which report shall also contain a description of any geological or geophysical work carried out by our company in that half year and a plan upon a scale approved by the Head of the Inspectorate Division of the Minerals Commission showing dredging areas and mine workings;

• a report in each financial year not later than 60 days after the end of the financial year summarizing the results of our operations in the lease area during that financial year and the technical records, which report shall further contain a description of the proposed operations for the following year with an estimate of the production and revenue to be obtained;

• a report not later than three months after the expiration or termination of the Apapam mining lease, to the government authorities giving an account of the geology of the lease area including the stratigraphic and structural conditions and a geological map on scale prescribed in the Mining Regulations;

• a report not less than 21 days in advance of the proposed alteration, issuance or borrowing to the government authorities (except for the Head of the Inspectorate Division of the Minerals Commission and the Director of Ghana Geological Survey) of any proposed alteration to our regulations,

• a report not less than 21 days in advance of the proposed alteration, issuance or borrowing to the government authorities (except for Head of the Inspectorate Division of the Minerals Commission and the Director of Ghana Geological Survey) on the particulars of any fresh share issuance or borrowings in excess of an amount equal to the stated capital of XG Mining;

• a copy of XG Mining’s annual financial reports to the government authorities (except for the Head of the Inspectorate Division of the Minerals Commission and the Director of Ghana Geological Survey) including a balance sheet, profit and loss account and notes thereto certified by a qualified accountant, who is a member of the Ghana Institute of Chartered Accountants, not later than 180 days after the financial year end; and

- 30 -

• such other reports and information in connection with our operations to the government authorities as they may reasonably require.

We are entitled to:

• surrender all of our rights in respect of any part of the lease area not larger in aggregate than 20% of the lease area by providing not less than two months’ notice to the Government of Ghana;

• surrender a larger part of the lease area by providing not less than 12 months’ notice; and

• terminate our interest in the Apapam mining lease if the mine can no longer be economically worked, by giving not less than nine months’ notice to the government authorities, without prejudice to any obligation or liability incurred before such termination.

The Government of Ghana has the right to terminate our interest in the Apapam mining lease if we:

• fail to make payments when due;

• contravene or fail to comply with terms and conditions of the mining lease (however, we have 120 days to remedy from the notice of such event);

• become insolvent or commit an act of bankruptcy; or

• submit false statements to the government authorities.

The Apapam mining lease further provides that XG Mining shall report forthwith to the government authorities if it discovers any other mineral deposits apart from gold and silver in the lease area, who in turn will provide XG Mining with the first option to prospect further and to work the said minerals subject to satisfactory arrangements made between XG Mining and the government authorities.

Kwabeng Project

Our Kwabeng Project is also referred to in this annual report as the Kwabeng concession and is comprised of 44.76 square kilometers.

Location and Access

The Kwabeng concession is located in the East Akim District of the Eastern Region of Ghana, along the western, lower flank and base of the Atewa Range, approximately 10 kilometers north-northwest of our Kibi project which is located on the Apapam concession. The eastern boundary of the Kwabeng concession is demarcated by the Atewa Forest Reserve.

Access to our Kwabeng project can be gained by driving northwest from Accra on the Accra-Kumasi Trunk Road, for approximately 110 kilometers until arrival at Anyinam, making a left hand turn at the road sign that reads “Kwabeng” in the middle of the Town of Anyinam and driving in a southwesterly direction approximately 10 kilometers until arriving at a sign reading “Xtra-Gold Mining” before reaching the town of Kwabeng.

Historical Work

There has been very little exploration for lode source gold deposits at our Kwabeng and Pameng projects; however, there has been detailed exploration for placer gold deposits. Prior to the recovery of placer gold from our Kwabeng project during 2007 and 2008 and our Kibi and Pameng projects during 2010 and 2011, these projects contained approximately 12,583,000 bank cubic meters of auriferous gravels. As at the date of this annual report, historical work indicates that there are approximately 4,068,520bank cubic meters of mineralized material remaining on our Kibi, Kwabeng and Pameng projects at an average grade of 0.568 grams of gold/bank cubic meters. In addition to the mineralized material, there is potential to define reserves with further exploration.

The placer gold deposit currently located at our Kwabeng concession was mined by the former owner in the early 1990’s for 15 months and produced approximately 16,800 ounces of gold before operations were ceased due to mining difficulties as noted hereunder. The placer gold is contained in a gravel deposit distributed across the floor of the river valleys west of the Atewa Range which can easily be excavated.

- 31 -

Prior Exploration by Xtra-Gold

2014 Exploration Program

In May 2014, we announced prospecting and soil geochemistry results for our recently discovered Bomaa Gold Target on our Kwabeng Concession. Highlights of prospecting and sampling results for the Bomaa prospect reported today include:

• additional prospecting indicates that the 4 individual mineralized rock float and/or subcrop clusters originally identified form part of a continuous train traceable in a meandering pattern over an approximately 2.8 kilometer distance; with the mineralized rock float / subcrop train appearing to mimic the trace of a variably folded, auriferous argillite metasedimentary rock unit;

• 208 (65%) out of the 317 composite chip samples from the Bomaa mineralized argillite rock float and/or subcrop train yielded gold values above 0.1 grams per tonne (“g/t”); with 79 (25%) returning values above 1 g/t gold, including maximum gold values of 20.7 g/t, 26.8 g/t, and 35.4 g/t;

• stronger mineralized rock float / subcrop concentrations, along with stronger quartz stockwork / silicification intensities and higher gold grades, centered on tighter fold closures along the apparent argillite host rock unit;

• Bomaa North mineralized rock float and/or subcrop cluster extends over an approximately 325 meter distance along an inferred open fold structure developed along the apparent auriferous argillite rock unit; with 24 (34%) out of 71 composite chip samples from mineralized argillite floats / subcrops returning values above 1 g/t gold, including high gold values of 7.24 g/t, 11.55 g/t, 26.8 g/t, and 35.4 g/t;

• strong gold-in-soil anomaly closely mimics the Bomaa North inferred fold structure developed along the apparent auriferous argillite rock unit; with highly elevated gold-in-soil values of 606 parts per billion (“ppb), 1,150 ppb, and 2,230 ppb spatially associated with high-grade floats / subcrops.

The Kwabeng concession prospecting results announced on May 6, 2014 encompass a compilation of 317 rock float and/or subcrop composite chip samples, including: 208 new samples corresponding to a Bomaa prospect follow up prospecting program conducted from late November 2013 to mid-March 2014 to further delineate the 4 previously identified mineralized rock float / subcrop trains (clusters) and to ground check gold-in-soil anomalies yielded by the recently completed 10.5 line-kilometer Bomaa soil geochemistry survey and 109 previously reported samples from earlier Bomaa prospecting efforts. The present soil geochemistry results encompass 482 samples, including 63 previously reported scout soil samples testing the Bomaa North and Bomaa South targets. Refer to our November 21, 2013 news release for details regarding these previously reported composite chip and soil samples.

Additional prospecting and sampling efforts indicate that the 4 individual mineralized rock float and/or subcrop clusters originally identified appear to form part of a continuous train traceable in a meandering pattern over an approximately 2.8 kilometer distance; with the mineralized rock float / subcrop train appearing to mimic the trace of a NEtrending, variably folded, auriferous argillite metasedimentary rock unit. The fact that the auriferous float train tends to exhibit relatively tight / linear boundaries, cross-cuts topographical relief, essentially consists of a single rock type, and exhibits a close spatial relationship with gold-in-soil anomalies appears to further indicate the relatively in situ or weakly dispersed nature of the mineralized floats. The apparent mineralized argillite rock unit remains open along strike with gold-bearing rock floats extending beyond the northeast and southwest extremities of the Bomaa control grid. Rock float / subcrop sampling and soil geochemistry compilation maps depicting the trace of the apparent auriferous argillite rock unit have been posted on our website.

Of the 317 composite chip samples collected in the delineation of the Bomaa mineralized float and/or subcrop train: 46 (15%) yielded less than 0.01 g/t gold; 63 (20%) returned gold values from 0.01 g/t to 0.1 g/t; 129 (40%) between 0.1 g/t and 1.0 g/t gold; 38 (12%) between 1 g/t and 2 g/t gold; 31 (10%) between 2 g/t and 5 g/t gold; and 10 samples (3%) returned values over 5 g/t gold, including maximum gold values of 20.7 g/t, 26.8 g/t, and 35.4 g/t. The mineralized floats / subcrops are typically sub-angular to angular slab-shaped blocks capable of attaining dimensions of up to 3.5 meters by 1.5 meters by 1 meter and dominantly consist of strongly silicified argillite metasedimentary rock exhibiting quartz stockworks and disseminated pyrite and/or hematite pseudomorphs after magnetite.

The mineralized rock float and/or subcrop train attains maximum widths of 50 meters to 115 meters in association with the tighter fold closures developed along the apparent auriferous argillite host rock unit while the float train corresponding to the gently folded / undulating segments of the mineralized argillite rock unit tends to average 20 meters to 30 meters in width. Similarly stronger mineralized rock float / subcrop concentrations, along with stronger quartz stockwork / silicification intensities and higher gold grades, tend to occur in association with the tighter fold closures along the apparent argillite host rock unit; with the stronger float / subcrop concentrations appearing to reflect the more resistive nature of the strongly silicified argillite material. Over its approximately 2.8 kilometer trace, the apparent mineralized unit is highly variable in terms of soil geochemical signature; ranging from little or no soil geochemical expression to a very strong gold-in-soil anomaly exhibiting a close spatial association with the priority Bomaa North fold target.

- 32 -

Bomaa North / Bomaa South Priority Targets

Clusters of higher grade rock floats and/or subcrops in the 1 g/t to 5 g/t gold range occur along most of the approximately2.8 kilometer trace of the apparent auriferous argillite rock unit but the Bomaa North and Bomaa South clusters stand out in terms of float / subcrop concentration, areal extent, stockwork / alteration intensity, and higher gold grades with their prominence appearing to reflect their settings along apparent fold structures.

The Bomaa North mineralized rock float and/or subcrop cluster extends over an approximately 325 meter distance along an inferred open fold structure developed along the apparent auriferous argillite rock unit; with the float / subcrop train averaging 30 meters to 50 meters in width but swelling to approximately 115 meters along the inferred fold axis. The northern limb of the apparent fold is characterized by an approximately 130 meter by 30 meter to 50 meter zone of stronger mineralized rock float and/or subcrop concentrations with composite chip sampling of floats / subcrops within the southern half of the zone consistently yielding elevated gold grades, including high gold values of 7.24 g/t, 11.55 g/t, 26.8 g/t, and 35.4 g/t.

Of the 71 composite chip samples collected from the Bomaa North mineralized float and/or subcrop cluster: 21 (29%) yielded less than 0.1 g/t gold; 26 (37%) returned gold values from 0.1 g/t to 1.0 g/t; 6 (8.5%) between 1.0 g/t and 2.0 g/t gold; 12 (17%) between 2 g/t and 5 g/t gold; and 6 samples (8.5%) returned values over 5 g/t gold, including maximum gold values of 26.8 g/t and 35.4 g/t. A strong gold-in-soil anomaly closely mimics the apparent fold structure developed along the inferred auriferous argillite rock unit; with highly elevated gold-in-soil values of 606 ppb, 1,150 ppb, and 2,230 ppb spatially associated with high-grade floats / subcrops within the southern portion of the aforementioned stronger float / subcrop zone.

The approximately 350 meters long by 20 meters to 50 meters wide Bomaa South mineralized rock float and/or subcrop cluster appears to be structurally controlled by an inferred, south trending isoclinal fold developed along the apparent auriferous argillite rock unit; with the fold structure opening up at its midway point with a west trending divergent limb. A zone of stronger mineralized float / subcrop concentrations appears to extend out from the fold opening over approximately 125 meter distances along the structure’s northern and western limbs. This inferred structural zone returned high gold values of 4.62 g/t, 5.83 g/t, and 6.53 g/t from rock float / subcrop composite chip sampling; and a single strongly anomalous gold-in-soil value of 260 ppb.

The remaining extent of the Bomaa South target is geochemically characterized by a lower amplitude gold-in-soil signature in the 20 ppb to 67 ppb gold range exhibiting a close spatial relationship with the inferred trace of the auriferous argillite rock unit. Prospecting failed to yield any rock floats along the approximately 200 meter long, NW-trending, weak to strong gold-in-soil anomaly lying along the northwest flank of the Bomaa South target area but this soil anomaly may reflect a yet to be delineated fold structure along the inferred argillite host rock unit.

2015 Exploration Program

A total of 30 rock composite chip samples were collected during the 2015 year as part of a prospecting program focusing on the ground proofing of geophysical and structural geology targets. A scout soil geochemistry grid (67 samples) was also implemented on the Kwabeng concession to follow up on an anomalous gold occurrence discovered by the ongoing grassroots target generation program.

2016 Exploration Program

During 2016, in connection with our Kibi project, exploration activities focused on the implementation of the Phase I drill program on the Cobra Creek Gold Corridor prospect; an approximately 550 metre (“m”) wide, NE-trending, quartz-feldspar porphyry (“QFP”) hosted, multi-structure braided shear zone system traced to date over an approximately 850 m strike length. A total of 43 diamond core boreholes totaling 2,639 m were completed over a 2.75 month period extending from June 7 to August 31, 2016.

The first pass drill program included: 12 initial exploratory boreholes ranging from 56 m to 220 m in length (1,576 m) designed to test 10 priority auriferous shear targets identified by extensive outcrop stripping / channel sampling efforts, Induced Polarization (“IP”) / Resistivity anomalies spatially associated with auriferous shears, and to gain a better understanding of the litho-structural setting of the gold mineralization; and 31 short, predominantly vertical (-90^o) boreholes ranging from 16 m to 63 m in length (1,063 m) designed to better target / dissect relatively flat-lying, gold-bearing extensional veining systems. Twenty of the short holes (775 m) tested the near-surface distribution of auriferous extensional veining arrays within the High Grade Shoot and Tourmaline Zone area at the northeastern extremity of the Main Shear structure.

- 33 -

The results of the Cobra Creek Gold Corridor Phase I drill program were reported by the Company on October 19, 2016; with 26 of the 43 boreholes yielding exploration significant auriferous drill intercepts, including the following highlights:

- 4.5 m grading 10.9 grams per tonne (“g/t”) gold, including 16.28 g/t gold over 2.9 m, and including 57.08 g/t gold over 0.6 m, from 7.1 m down-hole in #CCDD16020; 0.7 m grading 58.73 g/t gold from vertical depth of 27.6 m in #CCDD16024; and 5.5 m grading 6.57 g/t gold, including 11.7 g/t gold over 2 m, from surface in #CCDD16013 (High Grade Shoot); and

- 5.2 m grading 9.51 g/t gold, including 37.95 g/t gold over 1.1 m, and including 51.35 g/t gold over 0.6 m, from vertical depth of 1 m in #CCDD16015; and 1.5 m grading 48.1 g/t gold and 0.7 m grading 10.5 g/t gold from vertical depths of 1.5 m and 12 m respectively in #CCDD16022 (High Grade Shoot – NW Branch).

A surface sampling program was also completed on the Cobra Creek target in the March 2016 quarter; with the exploration work designed to further define the auriferous structural corridor in preparation for the Phase I drill program. The work program included the mechanical stripping of approximately 800 square metres of bedrock exposure and 178 metres of trenching to follow up on new auriferous occurrences discovered by prospecting efforts, and to further delineate the strike-extensions of the known gold-bearing shear zones; with a total of 128 saw-cut channel samples (101 m) and 157 trench channel samples collected. The results of the surface sampling program implemented from mid-October 2015 to early April 2016 on the Cobra Creek Gold Corridor prospect were reported by the Company on June 16, 2016.

Kibi project exploration work also included scout pitting (16) to test gold-in-soil anomalies and approximately 5.3 line-kilometres (245 samples) of infill soil geochemical sampling to further delineate the Akwadum South (“Zone 7”) and Hillcrest Shear (“Zone 6”) grassroots gold targets located on the Apapam Mining Lease and the adjoining Akim Apapam Reconnaissance Licence application, respectively. We did not conduct any exploration activities on our Kwabeng, Pameng, Banso and Muoso projects during the year.

2017 Proposed Exploration Program

We intend to progress with ongoing geological compilation, prospecting, soil geochemical sampling, and scout trenching to identify and/or further advance grassroots targets.

Recovery and Sale of Placer Gold

As at December 31, 2016, we have sold an aggregate of 13,861 fine ounces of gold from placer gold recovered from the mineralized material at our Kwabeng project during 2007, 2008, 2013, 2014, 2015 and the fiscal year. We did not have an exclusive agreement with any company or entity to buy the placer gold that was recovered. No placer gold recovery operations were conducted at this project during 2010 through 2012.

The gold price (approximately $1,246 per ounce as at March 22, 2017) is significantly greater compared to the gold price during the previous mining effort by the former operator of this project (approximately $300 per ounce). On the basis of an annual recovery of placer gold of approximately 700,000 bank cubic meters, we anticipate that recovery of placer gold operations at this project could be sustained for 6 years, however, this will depend upon numerous factors including the grade and commercial recoverability of the mineralized material and the selling gold price at the relevant time.

Resumption of Placer Gold Recovery Operations at our Kwabeng Project

Placer gold recovery operations at our Kwabeng project resumed in 2013. As stated elsewhere in this annual report, we plan to focus our efforts and our financial resources primarily on planned exploration activities on our Kibi project (see “Kibi Project – 2017 Exploration Program”).

Former Ownership

In the early 1990’s, the former mining lessee invested approximately $24,000,000 to open and operate a mine at the Kwabeng concession. The mining operation lasted for 15 months and 16,800 ounces of gold was produced before the mine was shut down due to a poor gold price, mining methodology and a lack of funds to continue mining operations.

Resources and Reserves

No mineral resources or mineral reserves have been identified on our Kwabeng project.

- 34 -

Kwabeng Mining Lease

The Kwabeng mining lease is dated July 26, 1989 and is owned and controlled by our company, as to a 90% interest; and is registered to our subsidiary, XG Mining, while the remaining 10% free carried interest in XG Mining is held by the Government of Ghana. The Kwabeng mining lease covers a lease area of 44.76 square kilometers and has a 30 year term expiring on July 26, 2019. We have been granted surface and mining rights by the Government of Ghana to work, develop and produce gold in the lease area (including processing, storing and transportation of ore and materials). See “Kibi Project – Apapam Mining Lease” for identical mining lease terms for the Kwabeng mining lease, except for the name of the mining lease, the lease registration particulars, the lease area and annual rental fees payable in the amount of approximately $19 (GH¢32.80) .

The Kwabeng mining lease further provides that XG Mining shall report forthwith to the government authorities if we discover any other minerals in the Kwabeng lease area and will provide XG Mining with the first option to prospect further and to work the said minerals subject to satisfactory arrangements made between XG Mining and the government authorities.

Ancillary Operations

Field Camp at Kwabeng Project

Our company possesses our fully operational and well maintained field camp comprised of an administrative office, living quarters and workshop facilities located on our Kwabeng concession which is accessible by paved road located approximately two hours drive from the capital city of Accra. Our field camp is the base of operations for the majority of our administrative activities and all of our exploration activities. All of our senior Ghanaian staff is accommodated in the field camp with our junior staff located in the surrounding towns and villages. XG Mining has rehabilitated the field camp which included installation of a communication system for Internet access, electronic mail, telephone and facsimile service and minor construction repairs. Our field camp is within cell phone coverage and is supplied with electricity from the national power grid, which lines run along the road accessing our field camp.

Fuel and Spare Parts Supply

We deliver fuel from Accra by tanker and discharge the fuel into and store the fuel in the fuel tank facility located within our field camp. We purchase spare parts for all of our equipment either locally or from suppliers overseas and store such parts in the secure spare parts warehouse located at our field camp.

Workspace

There is adequate office space at our field camp to accommodate our administrative, geology, surveying, equipment maintenance and other departments, as well as their technical support and our laborers.

Equipment Maintenance

Any maintenance of our excavators or other equipment which we may own will be carried out in the workshops located within our field camp.

Capital Expenditures

We do not anticipate any significant capital expenditures in the next 12 months in connection with placer gold recovery operations.

Pameng Project

Our Pameng project is also referred to in this annual report as the Pameng concession and is comprised of 40.51 square kilometers. The Pameng concession is located in the East Akim District of the Eastern Region of Ghana, along the western, lower flank and base of the Atewa Range, approximately 2 kilometers west-northwest of our Kibi project which is located on the Apapam concession. Access to our Pameng project can be gained by driving northwest from Accra on the Accra-Kumasi Trunk Road for approximately 125 kilometers until arrival at the village of Pameng where there is a road sign reading “Pameng”. Make a left hand turn at the Pameng sign and drive southwest approximately 2 kilometers to reach our Pameng concession. Our Pameng concession is located approximately 12.5 kilometers south-southwest from our field camp.

Historical Work

To the best of our knowledge, the Pameng concession has never been subjected to modern, systematic exploration for lode gold mineralization.

- 35 -

Prior Exploration by Xtra-Gold

2014 Exploration Programs

In May 2014, we announced that in mid-March 2014, an approximately 5.6 kilometer long by 1 to 3 kilometer wide control grid (i.e. “Pameng Grid”) encompassing approximately 47 kilometers of cross-lines was initiated for the systematic soil geochemical sampling and prospecting of an approximately 10 square kilometer area covering the eastern portion of the Pameng concession along the western flank of the Atewa Range; with the grid subsequently expanded by 21 line-kilometers to cover additional prospective geophysical and structural geology targets. The final grid design covering an approximately 13.5 square kilometer area was completed in late July 2014 with a total of approximately 68 line-kilometers of cross-lines established at 200 meter spacing and 2,324 soil samples collected at 25 meter station spacing. A total of 202 rock composite chip samples were also collected on the Pameng grid as part of a prospecting program focussing on the ground proofing of geophysical and structural geology targets.

A second soil geochemical sampling grid (i.e. “Akropong Grid”) extending over an approximately 2.3 square kilometer area covering a prospective geophysical / structural geology target was also implemented on the Pameng concession during the 2014 reporting year. A total of approximately 12.5 line-kilometers of cross-lines were established at 200 meter spacing and 529 soil samples collected at 25 meter station spacing on the Akropong grid from mid-September to late November 2014. With a view to conserving our company’s working capital, management decided to postpone the laboratory analyses of the soil and rock samples from the Pameng and Akropong grids for the fiscal year.

2015 Exploration Programs

No significant lode gold exploration work was conducted in 2015 on this project.

2016 Exploration Programs

No significant lode gold exploration work was conducted in 2016 on this project.

Future Exploration Plans for 2017

As at the date of this annual report, during 2017, we have planned the following exploration activities at this project:

• ongoing geological compilation, prospecting, soil geochemical sampling, and scout trenching to identify and/or further advance grassroots targets.

Recovery and Sale of Placer Gold

During 2010 and 2011, we negotiated with independent Ghanaian contract miners and operators in connection with their placer gold recovery operations at our Pameng project on fixed payment terms to our company. During 2010, 4,719.76 ounces of gold was recovered and produced by the contract miners from our Pameng project for which we received and sold 896.76 ounces of gold for gross proceeds of $1,128,451.34. During 2011, 5,621.16 ounces of gold was recovered and produced by the contract miners at this project for which we received and sold 1,068.02 ounces of gold for $1,489,058.18. During 2012, we sold 52.81 ounces of gold for gross proceeds of $87,997.30 which was the remaining payment we had received from the contract miners during their 2010 and 2011 placer gold recovery operations at this project. No placer gold recovery operations were conducted at this project during 2012 through the end of our fiscal year.

Mineral Reserves

No mineral reserves have been identified on our Pameng project.

Pameng Mining Lease

The Pameng mining lease is dated July 26, 1989 and is owned and controlled by our company, as to a 90% interest; and is registered to our subsidiary, XG Mining, while the remaining 10% free carried interest in XG Mining is held by the Government of Ghana. The Pameng mining lease covers a lease area of 40.51 square kilometers and has a 30 year term expiring on July 26, 2019. We have been granted surface and mining rights by the Government of Ghana to work, develop and produce gold in the lease area (including processing, storing and transportation of ore and materials). See “Kibi Project – Apapam Mining Lease” for identical mining lease terms for the Pameng mining lease, except for the name of the mining lease, the lease registration particulars, the lease area and annual rental fees payable in the amount of approximately $19 (GH¢32.80) .

- 36 -

The Pameng mining lease further provides that XG Mining shall report forthwith to the government authorities if we discover any other minerals in the Pameng lease area, and will provide XG Mining with the first option to prospect further and to work the said minerals subject to satisfactory arrangements made between XG Mining and the government authorities.

Banso Project

Our Banso project is also referred to in this annual report as the Banso concession and is comprised of 55.28 square kilometers.

Location and Access

The Banso concession is located in the East Akim District of the Eastern Region of Ghana, approximately 7 kilometers south-southwest from our field camp.

Both of the Banso concession and the Muoso concession lie in the Kibi-Winneba Gold Belt on the western flanks of the prominent Atewa Range, which is underlain by Birimian greenstone, phyllites, meta-tuffs, epi-diorite, meta-greywacke and chert. The valleys, over which this concession is located, are underlain by thick sequences of Birimian metasediments. The north-western end of the Atewa Range is the type-locality for the Birimian metasediments and metavolcanics. The area where both of our Banso and Muoso projects are located is one of the oldest placer gold mining areas of Ghana, dating back many centuries.

Access to the Banso concession is gained by driving northwest approximately 136 kilometers from Accra on the paved Accra-Kumasi Trunk Road.

Historic Work

Historical exploration and mining has mainly focused on placer gold. Before the acquisition of our interest in the Banso concession, to the best of our knowledge and based on mining records in Ghana, there has never been a detailed documented bedrock exploration program conducted on this concession.

Prior Exploration by Xtra-Gold

2014 to 2016 Exploration Programs

No significant lode gold exploration work was conducted by our company on our Banso project during 2013 through to the end of our fiscal year.

Prior Exploration by Buccaneer Gold Corp.

2014 Exploration

There was no exploration activity conducted on this project by our company or by Buccaneer Gold Corp. in 2014.

2015 Exploration

There was no exploration activity conducted on this project by our company or by Buccaneer Gold Corp. in 2015.

2016 Exploration

There was no exploration activity conducted on this project by our company or by Buccaneer Gold Corp. in 2016. This project was the subject of litigation between Buccaneer and the company which commenced in 2015 and settled in November 2016. The company retained its 100% interest in the project.

Future Exploration Plans for 2017

As at the date of this annual report, during 2017, we have planned the following exploration activities at this project:

• ongoing geological compilation, prospecting, soil geochemical sampling, and scout trenching to identify and/or further advance grassroots targets; and

• the continuation of placer gold recovery operations at these projects (commenced in 2015).

- 37 -

Mineral Reserves

No mineral reserves have been identified on our Banso project.

Banso Mining Lease

The Banso mining lease is dated January 6, 2011 and is owned and controlled by our company, as to a 90% interest; and is registered to XG Mining, while the remaining 10% free carried interest in XG Mining is held by the Government of Ghana. The Banso mining lease covers a lease area of 51.67 square kilometers and has a 14 year term expiring on January 5, 2025. We have been granted surface and mining rights by the Government of Ghana to work, develop and produce gold in the lease area (including processing, storing and transportation of ore and materials). See “Kibi Project – Apapam Mining Lease” for identical mining lease terms for the Banso mining lease, except for the name of the mining lease, the lease registration particulars, the lease area and annual rental fees payable in the amount of approximately $148 (GH¢260.00) .

The Banso mining lease further provides that XG Mining shall report forthwith to the government authorities if we discover any other minerals in the Banso lease area, and will provide XG Mining with the first option to prospect further and to work the said minerals subject to satisfactory arrangements made between XG Mining and the government authorities.

Muoso Project

Our Muoso project is also referred to in this annual report as the Muoso concession and is comprised of 55.28 square kilometers.

Location and Access

The Muoso concession is located in the East Akim District of the Eastern Region of Ghana, approximately 1 kilometer north from our field camp.

Access to our Muoso project is gained by driving northwest approximately 80 kilometers from Accra on the paved Accra-Kumasi Trunk Road. This highway passes through the easternmost portion of the Muoso concession and shares a common boundary with the Kwabeng concession. From the town of Osino, one would drive northwest approximately 5 kilometers to the town of Anyinam, from which an all weather direct road heads south through the centre of the Muoso concession and onto the Banso concession, approximately 15 kilometers south of the Accra-Kumasi Trunk Road. The town of Muoso is approximately 10 kilometers from Anyinam. A number of dirt roads, trails and footpaths offer additional access to this concession.

Historic Work

Historical exploration and mining has mainly focused on placer gold. Before the acquisition of our interest in the Muoso concession, to the best of our knowledge and based on mining records in Ghana, there has never been a detailed documented bedrock exploration program conducted on this concession.

Prior Exploration by Xtra-Gold

No significant lode gold exploration work was conducted by our company on our Muoso project during 2014 through to the end of our fiscal year.

Prior Exploration by Buccaneer Gold Corp.

2014 Exploration

There was no exploration activity conducted on this project by Buccaneer Gold Corp. in 2014.

2015 Exploration

There was no exploration activity conducted on this project by Buccaneer Gold Corp. in 2015.

- 38 -

2016 Exploration

There was no exploration activity conducted on this project by our company or by Buccaneer Gold Corp. in 2016. This project was the subject of litigation between Buccaneer and the company which commenced in 2015 and settled in November 2016. The company retained its 100% interest in the project.

Future Exploration Plans for 2017

As at the date of this annual report, during 2017, we have planned the following exploration activities at this project:

• ongoing geological compilation, prospecting, soil geochemical sampling, and scout trenching to identify and/or further advance grassroots targets; and

• the continuation of placer gold recovery operations at these projects (commenced in 2015).

Resources and Reserves

No mineral resources or mineral reserves have been identified on our Muoso project.

Muoso Mining Lease

The Muoso mining lease is dated January 6, 2011 and is owned and controlled by our company, as to a 90% interest; and is registered to XG Mining, while the remaining 10% free carried interest is held by the Government of Ghana. The Muoso mining lease covers an area of 55.28 square kilometers and has a 13 year term expiring on January 5, 2024. We have been granted surface and mining rights by the Government of Ghana to work, develop and produce gold in the Muoso lease area (including processing, storing and transportation of ore and materials). See “Kibi Project – Apapam Mining Lease” for identical terms for the Muoso mining lease, except for the name of the mining lease, the lease registration particulars, the lease area and annual rental fees payable in the amount of approximately $159 (GH¢280.00) .

The Muoso mining lease further provides that XG Mining shall report forthwith to the government authorities if we discover any other minerals in the Muoso lease area, and will provide XG Mining with the first option to prospect further and to work the said minerals subject to satisfactory arrangements made between XG Mining and the government authorities.

Assignment of Interest

Item 4A Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

A. Operating Results

Our company’s loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $467,711 (December 31, 2015 - $391,723, December 31, 2014 - $687,057). Our company’s basic and diluted loss per share for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $0.01 (December 31, 2015 - $0.01, December 31, 2014 - $0.02) . The exploration program was scaled back in each of 2015 and 2014 to conserve cash. Gains from gold recovery increased in 2016 and 2015 because of volume sold as compared to 2014 as Banso and Muoso operations commenced. However, these gains were partly offset as costs related to the gold program in 2016 increased compared to 2015 and 2014.

The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 47,256,630 (December 31, 2015- 45,721,507, December 31, 2014- 45,996,481). Average shares outstanding in 2016 increased with the placement of 2,500,000 units and conversion of 408,000 stock options to shares, while 396,000 shares were repurchased and cancelled. Average shares outstanding were reduced in 2015 and 2014 due to share repurchases.

We incurred expenses of $1,302,245 in the year ended December 31, 2016 (December 31, 2015 - $909,555, December 31, 2014 - $1,055,203). Exploration increased in 2016 as the 2,639 metre drill program was completed and has decreased in 2015 and 2014 due to reduced funds and uncertainty about the recovery of gold equity markets. We expense all exploration costs. Amortization decreased each year as no new equipment was purchased. General and administrative expense was mostly consistent over the three year period. Non-cash stock based compensation expense was reasonably stable over the three year period. Efforts to lower legal, audit and regulatory fees in 2014 and 2015 resulted in a reduced cash G&A costs in 2015 and 2014.

- 39 -

During 2016, in connection with our Kibi project, exploration activities focused on the implementation of the Phase I drill program on the Cobra Creek Gold Corridor prospect; an approximately 550 metre (“m”) wide, NE-trending, quartz-feldspar porphyry (“QFP”) hosted, multi-structure braided shear zone system traced to date over an approximately 850 m strike length. A total of 43 diamond core boreholes totaling 2,639 m were completed over a 2.75 month period extending from June 7 to August 31, 2016.

The first pass drill program included: 12 initial exploratory boreholes ranging from 56 m to 220 m in length (1,576 m) designed to test 10 priority auriferous shear targets identified by extensive outcrop stripping / channel sampling efforts, Induced Polarization (“IP”) / Resistivity anomalies spatially associated with auriferous shears, and to gain a better understanding of the litho-structural setting of the gold mineralization; and 31 short, predominantly vertical (-90^o) boreholes ranging from 16 m to 63 m in length (1,063 m) designed to better target / dissect relatively flat-lying, gold-bearing extensional veining systems. Twenty of the short holes (775 m) tested the near-surface distribution of auriferous extensional veining arrays within the High Grade Shoot and Tourmaline Zone area at the northeastern extremity of the Main Shear structure.

The results of the Cobra Creek Gold Corridor Phase I drill program were reported by the Company on October 19, 2016; with 26 of the 43 boreholes yielding exploration significant auriferous drill intercepts, including the following highlights:

- 4.5 m grading 10.9 grams per tonne (“g/t”) gold, including 16.28 g/t gold over 2.9 m, and including 57.08 g/t gold over 0.6 m, from 7.1 m down-hole in #CCDD16020; 0.7 m grading 58.73 g/t gold from vertical depth of 27.6 m in #CCDD16024; and 5.5 m grading 6.57 g/t gold, including 11.7 g/t gold over 2 m, from surface in #CCDD16013 (High Grade Shoot); and

- 5.2 m grading 9.51 g/t gold, including 37.95 g/t gold over 1.1 m, and including 51.35 g/t gold over 0.6 m, from vertical depth of 1 m in #CCDD16015; and 1.5 m grading 48.1 g/t gold and 0.7 m grading 10.5 g/t gold from vertical depths of 1.5 m and 12 m respectively in #CCDD16022 (High Grade Shoot – NW Branch).

A surface sampling program was also completed on the Cobra Creek target in the March 2016 quarter; with the exploration work designed to further define the auriferous structural corridor in preparation for the Phase I drill program. The work program included the mechanical stripping of approximately 800 square metres of bedrock exposure and 178 metres of trenching to follow up on new auriferous occurrences discovered by prospecting efforts, and to further delineate the strike-extensions of the known gold-bearing shear zones; with a total of 128 saw-cut channel samples (101 m) and 157 trench channel samples collected. The results of the surface sampling program implemented from mid-October 2015 to early April 2016 on the Cobra Creek Gold Corridor prospect were reported by the Company on June 16, 2016.

Kibi project exploration work also included scout pitting (16) to test gold-in-soil anomalies and approximately 5.3 line-kilometres (245 samples) of infill soil geochemical sampling to further delineate the Akwadum South (“Zone 7”) and Hillcrest Shear (“Zone 6”) grassroots gold targets located on the Apapam Mining Lease and the adjoining Akim Apapam Reconnaissance Licence application, respectively. We did not conduct any exploration activities on our Kwabeng, Pameng, Banso and Muoso projects during the year.

Exploration work on the Cobra Creek target during the 2015 year concentrated on outcrop stripping and detailed geological mapping / channel sampling to follow up on auriferous occurrences discovered by 2014 prospecting efforts, and to further define the strike-extensions of the known auriferous structures hosted by the Cobra Creek gold corridor. A total of 506 saw-cut channel samples totaling approximately 387 linear-meters were collected from approximately 5,510 square meters of stripped / power washed bedrock exposure, including approximately 1,860 square meters of manual stripping and approximately 3,650 square meters of mechanical strippingCobra Creek gold zone work also included the collection of 54 rock composite chip prospecting samples and approximately 7 line-kilometers (245 samples) of infill soil geochemical sampling (completed January 2016) to further ground proof high priority IP/Resistivity geophysical targets along the approximately 1.8 kilometer long Cobra Creek anomalous gold-in-soil trend.

Additional exploration efforts on our Kibi project for the 2015 fiscal year included the collection of 62 rock composite chip samples as part of an ongoing, concession-wide prospecting program targeting gold-in-soil anomalies and lode gold prospective, geophysically inferred, litho-structural geology settings.

In connection with our Kwabeng project, a total of 30 rock composite chip samples were collected during the 2015 year as part of a prospecting program focusing on the ground proofing of geophysical and structural geology targets. A scout soil geochemistry grid (67 samples) was also implemented on the Kwabeng concession to follow up on an anomalous gold occurrence discovered by the ongoing grassroots target generation program. We did not conduct any exploration activities on our Pameng project during the 2015 fiscal year.

Exploration efforts for the 2014 fiscal year focused on geological compilation and surface work designed to identify and/or further advance grassroots targets on our Kwabeng and Pameng projects; with soil geochemical sampling and reconnaissance geology / prospecting activities yielding totals of 80.5 line-kilometers of grid lines, 2,853 soil geochemical samples, and 449 rock composite chip samples.

- 40 -

Exploration work on our Kibi project during the 2014 year was limited to Cobra Creek gold corridor reconnaissance geology / prospecting totalling 144 rock composite chip samples and geological – geophysical modelling geared towards trenching / outcrop stripping target selection.

We recognized gains related to other items of $834,534 in 2016 (2015 - $517,832, 2014 - $368,146). The gains can mostly be attributed to the recovery of gold. During the year ended December 31, 2016, we sold 2,142 ounces of gold at an average price of $1,189 for net proceeds of $828,559 (2015 – 1,754 ounces of gold for net proceeds of $745,538, 2014 - 1,159 ounces of gold for net proceeds of $411,152). Lower gold prices and reduced ounces of gold sale negatively affected revenue from gold recoveries in 2014. Gold sales relating to our share of gold is not recognized until the risks and rewards of ownership passed to the buyer. These placer gold recovery operations were contracted to local Ghanaian groups. We pay a 5% government royalty on our gold sales. Using local contractors promotes the local economy while avoiding illegal workings on our projects.

We realised a mark-to-market expense of $1,000 in 2016 related to embedded derivatives for the Canadian dollar warrant issued as a part of the May 2016 financing. A warrant recovery of $992 was recognized in 2014 related to a different group of warrants. Canadian dollar denominated warrants were issued with financings. These warrants were deemed to be embedded derivatives since our company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar. The warrants are marked to market in each period with the change in value recognized in other items of the Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

A provision for doubtful debts of $97,493 was recorded in 2015, related to a balance receivable from a company which was engaged in litigation with us. This balance was written off in 2016 upon settlement of the litigation.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, our company had a foreign exchange loss of $19,086 (2015 – loss of $110,873, 2014 – loss of $19,592) due to strength in the U.S. dollar and comparative weakness in the Ghana cedi and Canadian dollar.

Our company’s portfolio of marketable securities had an unrealized gain of $308,685 (2015 - loss of $27,248, 2014 - loss of $35,268). Our company recognized a $277,073 realized loss on sale of securities in the year ended December 31, 2016 (2015 - gain of $11,885, 2014 – gain of $9,051). The most significant influence on realized and unrealized investment gains in 2016 related to Buccaneer shares. These shares were originally recorded at $400,000 and were returned to Buccaneer for $nil. The shares were valued at about $20,000 before they were returned. The 2015 and 2014 losses resulted from decreased prices related to equity investments. Unrealized gains and losses reflect mark-to-market changes in the investment portfolio during a period. A realized gain is recognized when securities are sold from the investment portfolio, being the difference between the selling price and the purchase price of the security sold. At the time of the sale, any mark-to-market gain or loss which was related to the security sold, previously recognized in unrealized gains and losses, is reversed.

Other income of $8,989 (2015 - $6,239, 2014 - $9,980) mostly relates to dividends on investment portfolio assets.

B. Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our activities, principally the exploration and acquisition of properties for gold and other metals, may be financed through joint ventures or through the completion of equity transactions such as equity offerings and the exercise of stock options and warrants. During the year ended December 31, 2016, our company issued 2,500,000 equity units for net proceeds of $693,728 and issued 408,000 shares on conversion of stock options for cash proceeds of $48,756.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, our company repurchased 396,000 of our shares at a cost of $69,774 (2015 – 149,000 shares for $18,901, 2014 – 452,500 of our shares at a cost of $136,679).

At December 31, 2016, accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased to $269,613 (December 31, 2013 - $246,721, December 31, 2014 - $230,798), due to an increase in costs related to recovery of gold and associated reclamation. Our cash and cash equivalents as at December 31, 2016 were sufficient to pay these liabilities. We believe that our company has sufficient working capital to achieve our 2017 operating plan.

At December 31, 2016, we had total cash and cash equivalents of $913,562 (December 31, 2015 - $862,552, December 31, 2014 - $850,736). Working capital as of December 31, 2016 was $1,106,425 (December 31, 2015 - $657,584, December 31, 2014 - $797,540). The increase in working capital mostly reflects the equity units issued for cash in 2016. During the year ended December 31, 2016, our company sold $150,193 in tradable securities and purchased $253,554 in tradable securities.

- 41 -

We are an exploration company focused on gold and associated commodities and do not have operating revenues; and therefore, we must utilize our current cash reserves, income from placer gold sales, income from investments, funds obtained from the exercise of stock options and warrants and other financing transactions to maintain our capacity to meet the planned exploration programs, or to fund any further development activities. There is no certainty that future financing will be available to us in the amounts or at the times desired on terms acceptable to us, if at all.

Our shares of common stock, warrants and stock options outstanding as at March 28, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 31, 2014 were as follows:

	March 28, 2017	December 31, 2016	December 31, 2015	December 31, 2014
Common Shares	48,079,417	48,174,417	45,662,417	45,811,417
Warrants	1,397,000	1,397,000	-	-
Stock Options	1,650,000	1,920,000	2, 235,000	2,426,000
Fully diluted	51,126,417	51,491,417	47,897,417	48,237,417

As of the date of this report, the exercise of all outstanding warrants and options would raise approximately $1.0 million, however such exercise is not anticipated until the market value of our shares of common stock increases in value.

We remain debt free and our credit and interest rate risk is limited to interest-bearing assets of cash and bank or government guaranteed investment vehicles. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are short-term and non-interest bearing.

Our liquidity risk with financial instruments is minimal as excess cash is invested with a Canadian financial institution in government-backed securities or bank-backed guaranteed investment certificates.

Our fiscal 2017 budget to carry out our plan of operations is approximately $1,000,000 as disclosed in our Plan of Operations section above and in our 20-F annual report under Item 4.B – Information on Xtra-Gold – Business Overview”. These expenditures are subject to change if management decides to scale back or accelerate operations.

We believe that we are adequately capitalized to achieve our operating plan for fiscal 2017. As is typical for junior exploration companies, we will require additional funds from equity sources to maintain the current momentum on our projects. At December 31, 2016, there were no borrowings made by our company. We have committed to purchase an exploration drill and at December 31, 2016 we have prepaid for 50% of the cost.

Recent Capital Raising Transactions

During May 2016, the Company issued 2,500,000 units at CAD$0.40 per unit for cash proceeds of $693,728 net of costs. Each unit was comprised of one common share and one half of one common share purchase warrant. Each full purchase warrant is convertible into one common share of the Company at a price of CAD$0.65 for a period of 15 months from closing. The Company also issued 147,000 finders warrants with this financing. Each finders warrant is convertible into one common share of the Company at a price of CAD$0.65 for a period of 15 months from closing.

During the second quarter of 2016, the Company issued 408,000 shares at CAD$0.15 per share for cash proceeds of $48,756 on the exercise of stock options.

There were no capital raising transactions in 2015 or 2014.

Going Concern

We have incurred net losses of $28,583,385 since inception through December 31, 2016. The report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 contains an explanatory paragraph regarding our ability to continue as a going concern based upon an ongoing history of financial losses and because our company is dependent on our ability to raise additional capital, which may not be available when required, to implement our business plan. These conditions are typical for junior exploration companies. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. There are no assurances we will be successful in our efforts to increase our revenues and report profitable operations or to continue as a going concern.

- 42 -

Corporate and Management Changes

At our Annual General Meeting on June 22, 2015, the following individuals did not stand for re-election; Paul Zyla, Richard Grayston, and Dr. Guy Della Valle. The following individuals were newly elected as Directors; Denis Laviolette and Hans Morsches. Paul Zyla did not continue as CEO and was replaced by Peter Minuk. John Ross did not continue as CFO and was replaced by Victor Nkansa. In August 2015, James Longshore succeeded Peter Minuk as CEO.

In October 2015, Davidson and Company LLP were succeeded by RBSM LLP as our auditor.

C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses

As Xtra-Gold is a mineral exploration company with no producing properties, the information required by this item is inapplicable.

D. Trend Information

Although gold prices closed 2016 at $1,146 per ounce, below the 2016 average of $1,248 per ounce, there were several positive indicators for gold price improvements into 2017.

The World Gold Council delivered Shari’ah-compliant guidance on gold as an investment, opening the market for potential Islamic investors and institutions. This change should open new markets for gold and create demand for the metal.

Gold does well in times of inflation and uncertainty. Concerns of the stability of banks in the Euro zone in 2017 will create uncertainty. Should the Trump presidency stumble economically, or be unable to deliver on its promises, gold could react positively. Concerns exist about China's ability to continue on its rapid economic growth in an era of increased trade protection.

Gold prices per ounce over the previous three years are as follows:

	2016	2015	2014
High	1,366	1,295	1,385
Low	1,077	1,049	1,142
Average	1,248	1,160	1,266

The tone for the precious metals market in the near future will depend on the U.S. dollar strength. The US Federal Reserve has indicated that it will increase rates three times in 2017. These increases assume that economic slack exists in the system and that the US economy will continue to expand. Any wobble in the US economy could interfere with the rate increases and create uncertainty about the US economy, which would be good for gold prices. If rate increases are sustainable, that could signal inflation, which would be good for gold.

Overall, a lower U.S. dollar should lead to higher costs in U.S. dollar terms to identify and explore for gold but could be more than offset by higher gold prices, resulting in greater interest in gold exploration companies. Conversely, if the U.S. dollar strengthens further, interest in the gold exploration sector could be reduced.

E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Our company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

Our company’s material contractual obligations as of December 31, 2016 are set out in the following table.

		Payments due by period as of December 31, 2016
				less than	1-3	3-5	more than 5
Contractual Obligations		Total		1 year	years	years	years
Long-Term Debt Obligations		-		-	-	-	-
Capital (Finance) Lease Obligations		-		-	-	-	-
Operating Lease Obligations	$	27,310	$	27,310	-	-	-
Purchase Obligations		-		-	-	-	-
Other Long-Term Liabilities		-		-	-	-	-
Total	$	27,310	$	27,310	-	-	-

- 43 -

G. Safe Harbor

This annual report, including all exhibits hereto, contains forward-looking statements and forward-looking information. Forward-looking statements are with reference to our financial condition, results of operations, business prospects, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, capital expenditure, and exploration and development efforts. Words such as “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends”, “plans”, “forecasts”, “projects”, “budgets”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, “could”, “might”, “should”, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot be certain that these plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. Actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These statements include comments regarding the establishment and estimates of mineral reserves and mineral resources, production, production commencement dates, productions costs, cash operating costs per ounce, total cash costs per ounce, grade, processing capacity, potential mine life, feasibility studies, development costs, capital and operating expenditures, exploration, the closing of certain transactions including acquisitions and offerings. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this annual report, our other filings with the SEC and Canadian securities commissions and in news releases and public statements made by our officers, directors or representatives of our company, that address activities, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements and forward-looking information.

The following, in addition to the factors described elsewhere in this annual report under “Risk Factors”, are among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements:

• unexpected changes in business and economic conditions;

• significant increases or decreases in gold prices;

• changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates;

• unanticipated grade changes;

• changes in metallurgy;

• access and availability of materials, equipment, supplies, labor and supervision, power and water;

• determination of mineral resources and mineral reserves;

• availability of drill rigs; changes in project parameters;

• costs and timing of development of new mineral reserves; results of current and future exploration activities;

• results of pending and future feasibility studies; joint venture relationships;

• political or economic instability, either globally or in the countries in which we operate;

• local and community impacts and issues;

• timing of receipt of government approvals; accidents and labor disputes; environmental costs and risks; and

• competitive factors, including competition for property acquisitions; and availability of capital at reasonable rates or at all.

With respect to any forward-looking statement that includes a statement of its underlying assumptions or bases, we believe such assumptions or bases to be reasonable and have formed them in good faith, assumed facts or bases almost always vary from actual results, and the differences between assumed facts or bases and actual results can be material depending on the circumstances. When, in any forward-looking statement, we express an expectation or belief as to future results, that expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and is believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the stated expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or anyone acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements. Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the Federal securities laws, we do not undertake any obligations to publicly release any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this annual report or to reflect unanticipated events that may occur. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this annual report and you should not rely on these statements without also considering the risks and uncertainties associated with these statements and our business.

- 44 -

Item 6 Directors, Senior Management and Employees

A. Directors and Senior Management

The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2016, the names of the directors and senior management of Xtra-Gold. Each of our directors has served in his capacity since his election and/or appointment and will serve until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders.

Name, Municipality of Residence and Position Held with the Company	Age	Principal Occupation	Date of Appointment or Election	Other Principal Directorships
James Longshore (5)(6) Rose Island, Bahamas General Manager, Ghana Operations	50	President and CEO, General Manager, Ghana Operations of Xtra-Gold Resources Corp.	January 3, 2009	none

Name, Municipality of Residence and Position Held with the Company	Age	Principal Occupation	Date of Appointment or Election	Other Principal Directorships
Denis Laviolette(1)(2)(3) Toronto, Ontario Director	32	Vice President Palisade Global Investments	June 22, 2015	none
Peter Minuk (5)(6) Toronto, Ontario Secretary and Treasurer and Director	512	Self-employed business consultant	March 5, 2007	none
James Harold Schweitzer (1)(2)(3)(5)(6) Scarborough, Ontario Director	79	Retired businessman	June 11, 2011	none
Yves P. Clement (5)(6) Vancouver, British Columbia Vice-President, Exploration	52	Geologist and Vice-President, Exploration of Xtra-Gold Resources Corp.	May 1, 2006	none
Victor Nkansa (5)(6) Accra, Ghana Vice-President, Ghana Operations	59	Chief Financial Officer and Vice- President, Ghana Operations of Xtra-Gold Resources Corp.	December 22, 2009	none
Hans Julian Morsches(1)(2)(3) Kansas City, Missouri Director	59	Senior Market Manager, Unum	June 22, 2015	none

(1)	Member of Audit Committee. All members of the Audit Committee are financially literate and all members are independent. “Financially literate” and “independent” have the meaning ascribed to those terms in National Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees and in the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ (National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations).
(2)	Member of the Compensation Committee.
(3)	Member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
(4)	There is no family relationship between any of the persons named above.
(5)	There is no arrangement or understanding with major shareholders, customers, suppliers or others, pursuant to which any person referred to above was selected as a director or member of senior management.

- 45 -

⁽⁶⁾ A brief description of the business experience, functions and areas of experience in our company, as well as the principal business activities of the directors and senior management of Xtra-Gold are set forth below.

James Longshore
President and CEO, General Manager, Ghana Operations
Mr. Longshore was elected as a director of our company in June 2014. He is a co-founder of Xtra-Gold and formerly served as our company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer from March 4, 2007 to June 1, 2010 and a director from September 1, 2006 to June 1, 2010. Effective September 23, 2015, Mr. Longshore became Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. Mr. Longshore has been overseeing our operations in Ghana as the General Manager of our subsidiaries, XG Mining and XGEL since 2009. Mr. Longshore has more than 20 years of business investment experience in resource companies.

During the prior five years, Mr. Longshore has not been an officer and/or director of any other public companies.

As of the date of this annual report, Mr. Longshore devotes a majority of his time in consulting services to our company on a month-to-month basis (see “Termination of Employment, Change in Responsibilities and Employment Contracts - Consulting Arrangements with General Manager, Ghana Operations”). Mr. Longshore oversees the administrative and exploration activities relating to our projects. Mr. Longshore has not entered into a non-competition and non-disclosure agreement with our company.

Denis Laviolette, B.Sc, Earth Science (Geology)
Mr. Laviolette is an intermediate level mining and exploration professional with approximately 10 years of experience in exploration, advanced mine operations, start-up mine management, QA/QC, grass roots exploration, financing and acquisitions, working in Northern Ontario (Timmins, Kirkland Lake and Red Lake), Norway and Ghana. He is also experienced with respect to GIS, 3D-modeling, resource delineation/estimation and large scale regional target delineation and production work, with a focus in Archean meso-thermal gold terranes and structural geology. He is currently applying for APGO (Association of Professional Geoscientists of Ontario) membership. Mr. Laviolette received his B.Sc, Earth Science (Geology) from Brock University, in St. Catharines, Ontario.

Mr. Laviolette is currently employed as Vice President for Palisade Global Investments. His responsibilities include market/portfolio analysis, appraising and vetting assets on a technical basis, providing valuation estimates, and reviewing corporate financial statements. In addition Denis serves as President of Palisade Resources Corp and CEO of Goldspot Discoveries Inc.Mr. Laviolette was employed as a mining analyst with Pinetree Capital Ltd. (“Pinetree”) in Toronto since February 2014 to September 2015. His responsibilities at Pinetree include market/portfolio analysis, reviewing and vetting assets from a technical perspective and providing valuation estimates, analyzing and summarizing technical reports on resources, feasibility and corporate financial statements.

Mr. Laviolette has been and is currently chief geologist/partner/operator of M.A. Resources Ltd., a privately held alluvial mining and exploration company in Ghana since February 2013 to the present time. From February 2012 to February 2013, he was the senior geologist for Buccaneer Gold Corp. in Ghana. From February 2011 to February 2012, he was the senior project geologist for Xtra-Gold in connection with its Kibi Gold Belt, located in the Apapam Concession in Ghana. From March 2010 to February 2011, Mr. Laviolette was a Production Geologist for Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. at its Macassa Gold Mine in Kirkland Lake, Ontario. From November 2009 to March 2010, he was a Production Geologist for Lakeshore Gold Corp. at its Timmins West Mine, in Timmins, Ontario.

Peter Minuk
Secretary and Treasurer and Director

Mr. Minuk was appointed as Vice-President, Finance and a director of our company in March 2007. He resigned as Vice-President, Finance effective January 31, 2009 and was subsequently appointed Secretary and Treasurer on August 11, 2009 following the resignation of Kiomi Mori from this office. Mr. Minuk served as interim Chief Executive Officer of the company from June 22, 2015 to September 23, 2015. Mr. Minuk has more than 25 years of experience in finance and investment as well as experience in project management, training and developing staff and client relationships. From February 1, 2009 to May 31, 2009, he provided limited consulting services to our company. From April 2, 2011 to the date of this annual report, Mr. Minuk has been providing freelance management and consulting services to unrelated companies. From June 1, 2009 to April 1, 2011, Mr. Minuk was a business analyst consultant for Industry Canada where he was responsible for reviewing proposals relating to regional development of public infrastructure projects and providing oversight over 40 projects assigned to him by the Fed Dev Ontario which is responsible for administering a variety of government stimulus programs, resources and initiatives for the southern Ontario region. Before joining our company, from 1990 to 2006, Mr. Minuk was employed by BMO InvestorLine in connection with implementing project management protocols. Mr. Minuk received a Masters Certificate in Project Management from the Schulich School of Business, York University in 2005. He obtained his Fellow of the Canadian Securities Institute in 1989 and completed the Business Administration program from Southern Alberta Institute of Technology in 1985.

- 46 -

During the prior five years, Mr. Minuk has been an officer and/or director of the following public companies.

Name of Company	Position(s) Held	Term of Office
Buccaneer Gold Corp.(1)	Corporate Secretary	April 2011 to August 2015

⁽¹⁾ Buccaneer Gold Corp. is a mineral exploration TSXV listed issuer.

As at the date of this annual report, Mr. Minuk devotes approximately 25% of his time in consulting services to our company. He provides 75% of his time to unrelated companies. There is no management consulting agreement in force at this time nor has Mr. Minuk entered into a non-competition and non-disclosure agreement with our company.

James Harold Schweitzer
Director

Mr. Schweitzer was appointed as a director of our company in June 2011. Mr. Schweitzer was employed in the securities sector of the investment industry in Canada in various capacities for 55 years and retired in June 2011. He was employed as a registered representative with Haywood Securities Inc. from February 2003 to June 2011, when he resigned from Haywood. His former employment as a registered representative of Haywood Securities Inc. was approved by the Investment Dealers Association of Canada. As a registered representative, Mr. Schweitzer acted as an account executive and investment advisor for clients and was licensed to provide advice to clients as to which securities (primary resource stocks) a client can buy and sell. Prior to that, Mr. Schweitzer became a director and shareholder in the brokerage firm of Wills Bickle and Co. Ltd. in 1975. In 1979, he joined McDermid Miller and McDermid as a registered representative and was appointed as a trading officer for Ontario and was in charge of its Toronto branch office until its merger with St. Lawrence Securities in 1984. Mr. Schweitzer remained with McDermid Miller and McDermid through two mergers with other brokerage firms until 2000 when Raymond James Financial Inc. acquired the then named firm of Goepel McDermid Inc. He resigned as registered representative of Raymond James Financial Inc. in February 2003.

During the prior five years, Mr. Schweitzer has been an officer and/or director of the following public companies:

Name of Company	Position(s) Held	Term of Office
Ranger Canyon Energy Inc.(1)	Director	May 2008 to September 2011

⁽¹⁾ Ranger Canyon Energy Inc. was an Alberta, Canada oil and gas company and a former reporting issuer that was dissolved on May 2, 2012.

Yves Pierre Clement, P. Geo.
Vice-President, Exploration

Mr. Clement was appointed Vice-President, Exploration of our company in May 2006. Mr. Clement has over 25 years experience in the generation, evaluation and development of a wide variety of mineral resources hosted by a broad spectrum of geological environments in Canada and South America. Before joining our company, Mr. Clement was senior project geologist for Lake Shore Gold Corp. in the Timmins lode gold camp from August 2005 to April 2006 and was formerly exploration manager for Aurora Platinum Corp.’s Sudbury operations from August 2000 to July 2005. Before joining Aurora, Mr. Clement was senior project geologist/exploration manager for Southwestern Resources Corp. where he was responsible for the generation of precious and base metal exploration opportunities in Peru and Chile. Mr. Clement’s experience will allow us to further maximize the value of our existing portfolio of projects, as well as allowing us to expand our strategy of growth through strategic acquisitions.

As of the date of this annual report, Mr. Clement devotes approximately 70% of his time in consulting services to our company pursuant to a management consulting agreement (see “Management Consulting Agreements - Management Consulting Agreement with Vice-President, Exploration”). He provides 30% of his time to unrelated companies. Mr. Clement has not entered into a non-competition and non-disclosure agreement with our company.

Victor Nkansa, CA, BA, Economics, MBA, Finance
Vice-President, Ghana Operations

Mr. Nkansa was appointed as Vice-President, Ghana Operations of our company in December 2009 and Chief Financial Officer on June 22, 2015. His responsibilities include overseeing our operations in Ghana under the supervision of our President and CEO, and General Manager of our Ghanaian subsidiaries, James Longshore. Mr. Nkansa is also the Secretary and a director of our Ghanaian subsidiaries. Mr. Nkansa is familiar and experienced with respect to obtaining mining leases, prospecting and reconnaissance licenses and the government regulations relating thereto and is knowledgeable in connection with environmental and forestry issues, immigration and customs affairs. His experience and background will assist us with respect to acquiring approvals, prospecting licenses, mining leases and related permits and renewals from the relevant government authorities to advance our operations in Ghana and acting as our primary government liaison in connection therewith. Mr. Nkansa has more than 28 years of business experience, the last 14 years of which have been in the mining industry. Since 2004, he has been the Controller of our Ghanaian subsidiaries where his responsibilities include the provision of accounting services and assisting with the facilitation of license renewals with respect to our property interests.

- 47 -

During the prior five years, Mr. Nkansa has not been an officer and/or director of any other public companies.

As at the date of this annual report, Mr. Nkansa devotes a variable amount of his time in consulting services to our company on a month to month “as needed” basis (see “Termination of Employment, Change in Responsibilities and Employment Contracts - Consulting Arrangements with Vice-President, Ghana Operations”). Mr. Nkansa has not entered into a non-competition and non-disclosure agreement with our company.

Hans Julian Morsches. B.A., M.A.

Mr. Morsches is the Senior Market Manager of Unum at its Kansas City and St. Louis regional offices in Missouri and is a 30 year insurance industry veteran. He has been in his current role since May 1999 and has overall responsibility for the Unum brand in Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, Nebraska and southern Illinois. Prior to moving to Kansas City, he was National Vice President for Sales for Unum Canada located in Toronto from September 1989 to May 1999. Unum is a Fortune 270 insurance company and has been an employee benefits market leader for 35 years generating US$10.5 billion annual revenue.

Mr. Morsches received his B.A., Liberal Arts from Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee in 1980 and his Masters of International Management from the American Graduate School of International Management in 1983.

B. Compensation

The following tables and accompanying notes set forth all compensation paid by our company to our directors and senior management for the positions held during 2016.

No part of this compensation was paid pursuant to a profit sharing plan. There were no amounts set aside for a pension, retirement or similar benefits plans for any director or officer.

Directors and Senior Management Compensation Table

Name	Position	Year	Compensation (US$)	Option-based awards (US$)	Non-equity incentive plan compensation Annual incentive plans	Total compensation (US$)
James Longshore	Director President and CEO General Manager, Ghana Operations	2016 2016 2016	- -  (2) 241,348 (3)(8)	- - -	- - -	- - 241,348
Denis Laviolette	Director	2016	-	-	-	-
Peter Minuk	Director Secretary and Treasurer	2016 2016	2,267 (1) 4,533 (1)	- -	- -	2,267 4,533
James H. Schweitzer	Director	2016	-	-	-	-
Yves P. Clement	Vice-President, Exploration	2016	89,643 (1)(2)	98,973  (4)	-	188,616
Victor Nkansa	Vice-President, Ghana Operations Chief Financial Officer	2016 2016	64,838 (2)(3) -	- -	- -	64,838 -
Hans Julian Morsches	Director	2016	-	-	-	-

⁽¹⁾ The compensation noted above under “Total Compensation” was paid in Canadian dollars and was translated at the average exchange rate of C$1.00 = US$0.7555.

- 48 -

(2)	See “Termination of Employment, Change in Responsibilities and Employment Contracts” below for consulting arrangements and/or consulting contracts with our company.
(3)	The compensation noted above under “Total Compensation” was paid in Ghanaian c e d i and was translated at the average exchange rate of C$1.00 = US$0.2331.
(4)	The fair value of these options has been calculated in accordance with ASC718 under US GAAP. The grant date fair value does not materially differ from that calculated under the CICA Handbook or International Financial Reporting Standards. The methodology used to calculate the grant date fair value was the Black-Scholes method, with a volatility assumption of 61%, an expected life of 7.5 years and an interest free rate of 1.75%.

Stock Options Granted in 2016

During our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, one grant of 400,000 stock options was issued to the Vice President Exploration. There was one other stock option grant of 125,000 options to a consultant who was neither senior management nor a director during the year.

Name	Date of Grant	Options Granted	Exercise Price	Expiry Date
Yves P. Clement	May 5, 2016	400,000	$0.40	May 5, 2026

Termination of Employment, Change in Responsibilities and Employment Contracts

Determination of Compensation Paid in 2016

The terms of the following management consulting agreements were determined by our Compensation Committee and subsequently approved by our Board of Directors. As at the date of this annual report, our Compensation Committee has complete authority to determine the amount of compensation to be paid and the other terms of management compensation. At the time of entering into the agreements, our Compensation Committee did not consult with any consultants or other third parties in determining the amount of compensation to be paid under the management consulting agreements.

During the fiscal year, our Compensation Committee considered and determined the compensation be paid to James Longshore as noted under “Consulting Arrangements with President and Chief Executive Officer”. In determining the compensation to be paid to Mr. Longshore, our Compensation Committee considered a number of factors including the scope of his duties and responsibilities to our company, the time he devotes to our business, his length of services to our company and industry standards for compensation paid for similar positions in other comparable reporting companies. Our Compensation Committee did not consult with any experts or other third parties in fixing the amount of Mr. Longshore’s compensation.

During the fiscal year, Mr. Longshore received a compensation package, through Brokton International Ltd., for providing his consulting services as general manager to XG Mining and XGEL as noted under “Consulting Arrangements with General Manager, Ghana Operations”. Mr. Longshore was reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred on behalf of our company in connection with carrying out his duties and responsibilities. The terms of any future compensation to be paid to Mr. Longshore will be determined by our Compensation Committee. At such time, our Compensation Committee will consider a number of factors in determining Mr. Longshore’s compensation including the scope of his duties and responsibilities to our company and our subsidiaries, the time he devotes to our business, his length of service to our company and industry standards for compensation paid for similar positions in other comparable reporting companies and whether to consult with any experts or third parties in fixing such compensation.

During the fiscal year, our Compensation Committee considered and determined compensation be paid to Mr. Clement as noted under “Management Consulting Agreement with Vice-President, Exploration”. In determining the compensation to be paid to Mr. Clement, our Compensation Committee considered a number of factors including the scope of his duties and responsibilities to our company and our subsidiaries, the time he devotes to our business, his length of service to our company and industry standards for compensation paid for similar positions in other comparable reporting companies. Our Compensation Committee did not consult with any experts or other third parties in fixing the amount of Mr. Clement’s compensation.

- 49 -

Consulting Arrangements with President, Chief Executive Officer, and General Manager, Ghana Operations

Our Chief Executive Officer, James Longshore, provides the stewardship of our company, oversees day-to-day managerial functions of our business, reviews all business opportunities, reports to our Board of Directors and performs the duties and responsibilities generally associated with being the most senior executive of a reporting company. As of the date of this annual report, Mr. Longshore provides his services to our company on a month-to-month basis and is paid as a part of his General Manager Ghana Operations fees. He is reimbursed for certain expenses incurred in performing his duties to our company. There is no provision for a payment to be made to our Chief Executive Officer if his services are terminated without cause or for payment of additional compensation in the event of a change in responsibilities.

The consulting services of James Longshore, as our General Manager, Ghana Operations is provided by Brokton International Ltd. through which he oversees administrative and exploration activities relating to our projects. As of the date of this annual report, Brokton International Ltd. provides Mr. Longshore’s services to our company on a month-to-month basis and is paid $9,500 per month to provide the foregoing services. Brokton International Ltd. is reimbursed for certain expenses incurred by Mr. Longshore in performing his duties to our Ghanaian subsidiaries. There is no provision for a payment to be made to Brokton International Ltd. if Mr. Longshore’s services are terminated without cause or for additional compensation in the event of a change in responsibilities.

Management Consulting Agreement with Chief Financial Officer and Vice-President, Ghana Operations

Our Chief Financial Officer and Vice-President, Ghana Operations, Victor Nkansa, oversees our operations in Ghana under the supervision of our President and CEO, James Longshore, who is the President and General Manager of our Ghanaian subsidiaries. Mr. Nkansa is also the Secretary and a director of our Ghanaian subsidiaries.

His primary responsibilities are the provision of accounting services and assisting with the facilitation of obtaining mining leases, operating permits and prospecting license or renewals with respect to our property interests and acting as our primary liaison with the Government of Ghana. He also provides certain accounting services to our company including financial and general management duties, accounting, financial and reporting control and regulatory reporting duties. As of the date of this annual report, our Vice-President, Ghana Operations is paid 10,700 Cedis (US$2,845) per month by XG Mining to provide his consulting services on a month to month “as needed” basis. There is no provision for a payment to be made to our Vice-President, Ghana Operations if he is terminated without cause or for payment of additional compensation in the event of a change in responsibilities.

Management Consulting Agreement with Vice-President, Exploration

Our Vice-President, Exploration, Yves Clement, makes project or property site attendances as may be required from time to time, prepares progress reports with respect to our mineral exploration projects, conducts due diligence as may be required from time to time in connection with potential mineral properties; reviews geological data and liaises with principal owners of mineral properties in which our company may wish to acquire an interest, meets with government authorities and retains technical experts, makes recommendations to our Board of Directors and its relevant committees with respect to the acquisition and/or abandonment of mineral exploration properties and prepares and implements, subject to our Board of Directors’ approval, plans for the operation of our company including plans for exploration programs, costs of operations and other expenditures in connection with our mineral projects. As of the date of this annual report, Mr. Clement is paid CAD$11,250 (USD$8,128) per month to provide the foregoing services. He is reimbursed for certain expenses incurred in performing his duties to our company. There is no provision for a payment to be made to our Vice-President, Exploration if this agreement is terminated without cause or for payment of additional compensation in the event of a change in responsibilities.

C. Board Practices

Election of Directors

The directors of Xtra-Gold are elected annually and hold office until the earlier occurrence of the next annual general meeting of our shareholders is held, their successors in office are duly elected or appointed or a director resigns. We have not entered into service contracts with any directors of our company or any of our subsidiaries providing for benefits upon termination of employment.

Board Committees

Our Board of Directors has established three committees, an audit committee (the “Audit Committee”), a compensation committee (the “Compensation Committee”) and a nominating and corporate governance committee (the “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee”). The members of these committees do not have any fixed terms for holding their positions, are appointed and replaced from time to time by resolution of the Board of Directors and do not receive any cash remuneration for acting as members of the committees, however committee members may be awarded additional stock options for each committee served on.

- 50 -

There are no director service contracts between Xtra-Gold and its directors providing for benefits upon termination of employment. The members of these committees are comprised entirely of independent non-related directors.

Our Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee as summarized below.

Audit Committee

While we are not currently subject to any law, rule or regulation in the United States requiring that we establish or maintain an audit committee, as a reporting issuer in Canada, we are required to comply with National Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees (“NI 52-110”), adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators, which states in part that every issuer must have an audit committee that complies with the requirements of the instrument. Prior to our company becoming a reporting issuer in Canada in November 2010, our Board of Directors determined it advisable and in the best interests of our shareholders to establish an audit committee (the “Audit Committee”) in November 2009.

Our Audit Committee assists our Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to:

• the integrity of our financial statements;

• our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; and

• the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accountants.

Our Audit Committee has adopted a written charter pursuant to which the Audit Committee provides:

• an independent review and oversight of our company's financial reporting processes, internal controls and independent auditors;

• a forum separate from our management in which auditors and other interested parties can candidly discuss concerns. By effectively carrying out its functions and responsibilities, our Audit Committee helps to ensure that:

• our management properly develops and adheres to a sound system of internal controls;

• procedures are in place to objectively assess our management's practices and internal controls; and

• the outside auditors, through their own review, objectively assess our company's financial reporting practices.

Our Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of any registered public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for our company.

Our Audit Committee is composed of three directors; namely James Schweitzer, who is also Chair of our Audit Committee, Denis Laviolette and, Hans Julian Morsches all of whom have been determined by our Board of Directors to be “independent,” as defined in the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ and within the meaning of NI 52-110.

Board of Directors Independence

Our Board of Directors consists of five members; namely, James Longshore (Chair), Peter Minuk, James Schweitzer, Denis Laviolette and, Hans Julian Morsches. Our Board of Directors has determined that James Schweitzer, Denis Laviolette and, Hans Julian Morsches are independent within the within the meaning of National Instrument 58-101 – Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices (“NI 58-101”) and the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ and as is required by the applicable policies of the TSX. James Longshore and Peter Minuk are not independent within the meaning of NI 58-101 as they are officers of our company and thereby have a “material relationship” with our company.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

We established our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in November 2009. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has adopted a written charter pursuant to which the committee:

• recommends the slate of director nominees for election to our Board of Directors;

• identifies and recommends candidates to fill vacancies on our Board of Directors;

- 51 -

• reviews the composition of our Board of Directors’ committees; and

• monitors compliance with, reviews and recommends changes to our various corporate governance policies and guidelines.

This committee also prepares and supervises our Board of Directors’ annual review of director independence and our Board of Directors’ annual self-evaluation. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is composed of three directors; namely James Schweitzer, Denis Laviolette and, Hans Julian Morsches, all of whom have been determined by our Board of Directors to be “independent,” as defined in the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ and within the meaning of NI 52-110.

A majority of the persons serving on our Board of Directors must be “independent”. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has considered transactions and relationships between each director or any member of his immediate family and us or our affiliates, including those reported under “Related Party Transactions” below and also reviewed transactions and relationships between directors or their affiliates and members of our senior management or their affiliates. As a result of this review, the committee affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Schweitzer, Laviolette and, Morsches are independent.

Nomination of Directors

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers all qualified candidates for our Board of Directors identified by members of the committee, by other members of our Board of Directors, by senior management and by our stockholders. The committee reviews each candidate including each candidate’s independence, skills and expertise based on a variety of factors, including the person’s experience or background in management, finance, regulatory matters and corporate governance. When identifying nominees to serve as director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to create a Board of Directors that is strong in its collective knowledge and has a diversity of skills and experience with respect to accounting and finance, management and leadership, vision and strategy, business operations, business judgment, industry knowledge and corporate governance. In addition, before nominating an existing director for re-election to our Board of Directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers and reviews an existing director’s Board of Directors’ and committee meeting attendance and performance, length of Board of Directors’ service, experience, skills and contributions that the existing director brings to our Board of Directors, equity ownership in our company and independence.

The committee follows the same process and uses the same criteria for evaluating candidates proposed by members of our Board of Directors, members of senior management and stockholders. Based on its assessment of each candidate, the committee recommends candidates to our Board of Directors. However, there is no assurance that there will be any vacancy on our Board of Directors at the time of any submission or that the committee will recommend any candidate for our Board of Directors.

In addition to the each of the individual skills and background described above, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Board of Directors also concluded that each of these individuals will continue to provide knowledgeable advice to our other directors and to senior management on numerous issues facing our company and on the development and execution of our strategy.

Diversity Policy

Policies Regarding the Representation of Women on the Board

The members of our company’s Board have diverse backgrounds and expertise and were selected on the belief that the company and its stakeholders would benefit from such a broad range of talent and experiences. The Board considers merit as the key requirement for board appointments. Our company has not adopted a written diversity policy and has sought to attract and maintain diversity at the Board level informally through the recruitment efforts of management in discussion with directors prior to proposing nominees to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and to the Board as a whole for consideration.

Consideration of the Representation of Women on the Board and in Executive Officer Appointments

In identifying suitable Board nominees or in selecting and assessing candidates for executive positions, candidates will be considered on merit against objective criteria regarding business experience, skill sets, competencies, technical expertise, sector specific knowledge and with due regard for the benefit of diversity including the level of representation of women in these capacities. As the need for new directors or executive officers arises, the Corporate Governance Committee assesses candidates on the basis of industry experience and business acumen with specific knowledge of mineral exploration and development or other areas (such as finance, West African market experience) as desired at that particular time by the company, the Board and its committees. Board candidates are also evaluated against the area of expertise of existing members so new appointments may contribute to expanding the Board’s breadth of experience.

- 52 -

Company’s Targets for Women on the Board and in Executive Officer Positions

Presently, none of the company’s directors and none of the executive officers of the company and of its major subsidiaries are women. Diversity including gender, age, nationality, cultural and educational background, business knowledge and other experience, are among the factors that the Corporate Governance Committee considers in identifying and selecting candidates for the Board and executive positions. For example, with the majority of the company’s operations being located in West Africa, one of the executive officers is Ghanaian. Taken together, these diverse skills and backgrounds help to create a business environment that encourages a range of perspectives in which all employees and directors are treated with fairness and respect, and have equal access to opportunities for advancement based on skills and aptitude. As a result, the Corporation has not adopted targets based on any specific area of diversity and does not set targets for women on the Board or in executive officer positions.

Compensation Committee

We established a Compensation Committee in November 2009. The Compensation Committee has adopted a written charter pursuant to which the committee is responsible for overseeing our compensation programs and practices, including our executive compensation plans and incentive compensation plans. Our Chief Executive Officer provides input to the Compensation Committee with respect to the individual performance and compensation recommendations for the other executive officers. Although the committee’s charter authorizes the committee to retain an independent consultant, no third party compensation consultant was engaged for 2016. The Compensation Committee is composed of three directors; namely James Schweitzer, who is also Chair of our Compensation Committee, Denis Laviolette and, Hans Julian Morsches, all of whom have been determined by our Board of Directors to be “independent,” as defined in the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ and within the meaning of NI 52-110.

Risk Management

We do not separate the role of our Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of our Board of Directors. However, our management has approval limits which it must not exceed without approval from our Board of Directors. These approval limits span hiring, asset purchases and the issuance of shares. Our Board of Directors administers its oversight function through three sub-committees which report to our full Board of Directors, being our Audit Committee, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Compensation Committee. We are a very small company at this time and consider five members for our Board of Directors to be adequate for the purpose of directing its activities. Our Board of Directors self-assesses on an ongoing basis and has the scope to increase its size if the need is determined.

D. Employees

As at the date of this annual report, our company has no salaried employees. Our President, Chief Executive Officer, and General Manager of our Ghanaian subsidiaries provides our company with his consulting services and devotes approximately 80% of his time to our company. Our Chief Financial Officer and Vice-President, Ghana Operations provides our company with his consulting services and devotes approximately 80% of his time to our company. Our Vice-President, Exploration provides our company with his consulting services and devotes approximately 70% of his time in consulting services to our company. We also engage the consulting services of our Secretary and Treasurer with respect to corporate and administrative services who devotes a variable percentage of his time to our company on an “as needed” basis.

E. Share Ownership

The following table sets forth, as of the date of this annual report, the number of common shares of our company beneficially owned by the directors and members of senior management of Xtra-Gold, individually, and as a group, and the percentage of ownership of the outstanding common shares represented by such shares.

The shareholders listed below possess sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares.

Directors and Senior Management Share Ownership

NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER	TITLE OF CLASS OF SHARES	NUMBER OF SECURITIES OF CLASS	PERCENTAGE OF CLASS (1)	PERCENTAGE OF CLASS (2)
James Longshore (3)	common	3,475,855	7.9%	7.9%
Denis Laviolette (4)	common	0	0.3%	0.3%
Peter Minuk (5)	common	20,000	0.0%	0.0%
James H. Schweitzer (6)	common	250,000	0.7%	0.7%
Yves P. Clement (7)	common	0	1.0%	1.0%
Victor Nkansa (8)	common	0	0.1%	0.1%
Hans Julian Morsches (9)	common	125,000	0.5%	0.5%
Directors and Officers as a Group		3,870,855	9.4%	9.4%

- 53 -

(1)	Based on 49,538,917 common shares outstanding as at March 22, 2017 and as if all of the options held by directors and officers (1,372,000 as a group) were exercised converted to common shares.
(2)	Based on 49,538,917 common shares outstanding as at March 22, 2017 and as if only the vested options (1,372,000 as a group) and were exercised converted to common shares.
(3)	James Longshore owns 3,028,355 common shares of which 120,000 common shares are owned directly, 2,000,000 common shares are owned indirectly through Brokton International Ltd., a Turks & Caicos Islands corporation, whose sole beneficial owner is James Longshore and 908,355 common shares are owned indirectly through Sausilito Ltd., a Turks & Caicos Islands corporation, whose sole beneficial owner is James Longshore. Mr. Longshore exercises sole investment, voting and disposition powers over the common shares included in the above table. Mr. Longshore holds a total of 607,000 stock options with exercise prices and expiry dates as set out in the table below.
(4)	Denis Laviolette holds a total of a total of 125,000 stock options with exercise prices and expiry dates as set out in the table below.
(5)	Peter Minuk owns 20,000 common shares and holds a total of 150,000 stock options with exercise prices and expiry dates as set out in the table below.
(6)	James H. Schweitzer owns 200,000 common shares and holds 108,000 stock options with an exercise price and expiry date as set out in the table below.
(7)	Yves P. Clement holds a total of 424,000 stock options with exercise prices and expiry dates as set out in the table below.
(8)	Victor Nkansa holds 27,000 holds stock options with exercise prices and expiry dates as set out in the table below.
(9)	Hans Julian Morsches owns 125,000 common shares and holds a total of a total of 125,000 stock options with exercise prices and expiry dates as set out in the table below.

Options to Purchase Securities

10% Rolling Stock Option Plan

On May 12, 2011, our Board of Directors considered and believed that it was advisable and in the best interests of our company to terminate our fixed 2005 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan and authorized, approved and adopted our 10% rolling stock option plan (the “Option Plan”). Our Option Plan was approved by our shareholders at our annual and special shareholders’ meeting held on June 10, 2011 and we received final acceptance of our Option Plan from the TSX on July 13, 2011. In accordance with TSX policy, all unallocated options or other entitlements to a compensation arrangement which does not have a fixed number of securities reserved for issuance must be approved every three years by our Board of Directors and our shareholders. On March 26, 2014, our Board of Directors approved our Option Plan for a further three year period (the “2014 Plan”). The 2014 Plan was approved by our shareholders at our annual and special meeting of shareholders held on June 19, 2014 and we received final acceptance of our 2014 Plan from the TSX on June 26 2014.

Pursuant to our Option Plan, our company may issue no more than 10% of our issued and outstanding common shares in the aggregate from time to time, and a maximum of 5% of the common shares may be issued to any one director, officer, key employee or other eligible person, except consultants, in any 12 month period, unless disinterested stockholder approval is obtained. The maximum number of common shares that may be issued to a consultant under our Option Plan in a 12 month period shall not exceed 2% of the common shares outstanding. The number of securities issuable to our company’s insiders (as defined in National Instrument 55-104 – Insider Reporting Requirements), at any time, under all security-based compensation arrangements, shall not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding securities and the number of securities issued to insiders, within any one-year period, under all security-based compensation arrangements, shall not exceed 10% of the issued and outstanding securities. Common shares used for stock grants and our Option Plan options may be authorized and unissued common shares or common shares reacquired by our company. Common shares covered by our Option Plan options which terminate unexercised or common shares subject to stock awards which are forfeited or cancelled will again become available for grant as additional options or stock awards, without decreasing the maximum number of common shares issuable under our Option Plan.

Upon adoption of our Option Plan, the 1,989,000 outstanding options granted under our former 2005 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan were converted into options under our Option Plan, and the former plan was terminated. As at the date of this annual report, 4,816,692 common shares have been reserved for issuance under our Option Plan. As at the date of this annual report, there are 1,650,000 options outstanding to purchase an aggregate of 1,650,000 common shares, representing 3.4% of the 48,166,917 common shares currently outstanding. Options to purchase 3,166,692 common shares are currently available for grant under our Option Plan, being 10% of the 48,166,917 common shares currently outstanding less the 1,650,000 shares reserved for the 1,650,000 options currently outstanding.

- 54 -

The period during which options may be exercised shall be determined by our Board of Directors in its discretion, to a maximum of 10 years from the date that the option is granted and the options shall vest on the date of the grant, except that options issued to persons employed in investor relations activities must vest in stages over not less than 12 months with no more than one-quarter of the options vesting in any three month period.

Stock Options Outstanding

The names and titles of the directors and executive officers of our company to whom outstanding stock options have been granted and the number of common shares subject to such stock options is set forth in the following table as of December 31, 2016, as well as the number of options granted to directors and all consultants as a group. The exercise prices of the stock options are stated in Canadian dollars as that is the currency unit in which the options were issued.

Name	Title	Number of Stock Options Granted to Purchase Common Shares	Exercise Price	Expiration Date
James Longshore	President , CEO and Director General Manager, Ghana Operations	162,000 63,000 382,000	CAD$0.15 CAD$0.15 CAD$0.15	May 1, 2017 June 1, 2020 December 31, 2022
Denis Laviolette	Director	125,000	CAD$0.20	October 8, 2025
Peter Minuk	Secretary and Treasurer and Director	108,000 42,000	CAD$0.50 CAD$0.50	May 1, 2017 June 1, 2020
James H. Schweitzer	Director	108,000	CAD$0.15	June 10, 2021
Yves P. Clement	Vice-President, Exploration	100,000 400,000	CAD$0.225 CAD$0.40	March 1, 2021 May 5, 2026
Victor Nkansa	Vice-President, Ghana Operations	12,000 15,000	CAD$0.50 CAD$0.50	June 1, 2020 March 1, 2021
Hans Julian Morsches	Director	125,000	CAD$0.20	October 8, 2025

As a group, seven officers and directors hold 1,642,000 stock options as at December 31, 2016.

Item 7 Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

A. Major Shareholders

Our company is a publicly owned BVI company and our common shares are owned by residents of the United States, Canada and other foreign residents. To the extent known to our company, our company is not directly owned or controlled by another corporation, by any foreign government or by any other natural or legal person severally or jointly. To the extent known to our company, there are no arrangements, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of our company.

Our company’s registered shareholders’ list for our common shares, dated March 22, 2017, showed 146 registered shareholders and 48,166,917shares outstanding of which 16 of these registered shareholders were U.S. residents including one that is a U.S. depository holding 34,086,252 common shares representing 74.82% of the issued and outstanding shares of Xtra-Gold.

The following table lists the only persons or companies, known by our company, to beneficially own more than 5% of our voting securities. There has been no significant change in the percentage ownership held by any major shareholders during the past three years. Our company’s major shareholders do not have different voting rights.

- 55 -

NAME OF BENEFICIAL OWNER	TITLE OF CLASS OF SHARES	NUMBER OF SECURITIES OF CLASS	PERCENTAGE OF CLASS
James Longshore (1)(2)	common	3,028,355	7.9% (2)

(1)

James Longshore owns 3,028,355 common shares of which 120,000 common shares are owned directly, 2,000,000 common shares are owned indirectly through Brokton International Ltd., a Turks & Caicos Islands corporation, whose sole beneficial owner is James Longshore and 908,355 common shares are owned indirectly through Sausilito Ltd. is a Turks & Caicos Islands corporation, whose sole beneficial owner is James Longshore. Mr. Longshore exercises sole investment, voting and disposition powers over the common shares included in the above table. Mr. Longshore holds a total of 607,000 stock options with exercise prices and expiry dates as set out in the table under “Stock Options Outstanding”.

(2)

Based on 48,166,917common shares outstanding as at March 22, 2017 and as if all of the stock options were exercised and the common share purchase warrants held were converted into common shares.

B. Related Party Transactions

During the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company entered into the following transactions with related parties:

		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
		2016		2015		2014
Consulting fees paid or accrued to officers or their companies	$	539,706	$	495,683	$	472,649
Directors’ fees		2,267		4,692		18,845
Stock option grants to officers and directors		400,000		250,000		108,000
Stock option grant price range	$	0.31	$	0.15	$	0.43

Of the total consulting fees noted above, $256,319 (December 31, 2015 - $201,097, December 31, 2014 - $144,394) was incurred by the Company to a private company of which a related party is a 50% shareholder and director. The related party was entitled to receive $127,348 (December 31, 2015 - $100,548, December 31, 2014 - $72,197) of this amount. As at December 31, 2016, $47,792 (December 31, 2015, $51,096, December 31, 2014 - $28,974) remains payable to this related company and $5,000 (December 31, 2015 - $10,000, December 31, 2014 - $nil) remains payable to the related party for expenses earned for work on behalf of the Company.

As at December 31, 2016, $nil (December 31, 2015 - $97,493, December 31, 2014 - $97,493) was due from Buccaneer for services performed by the Company during the periods. These balances were forgiven when Buccaneer announced they were not pursuing their interest in the Concessions. Company had fully provided against this balance in 2015.

In 2016, a total of 400,000 stock options were issued to an officer of the Company at a strike price of $0.31 per share. A total of $89,643 was included in consulting fees related to these options. In 2015, a total of 250,000 stock options were issued to directors of the Company at a strike price of $0.15 per share. A total of $18,175 was included in consulting fees related to these options. In 2014, a total of 108,000 stock options were issued to a director of the Company at a strike price of $0.43 per share. A total of $22,489 was included in consulting fees related to these options.

A total of 1,231,000 stock options previously granted to related parties were amended in 2015 by re-pricing these options to CAD$0.15 per share and a total of 424,000 stock options previously granted to related parties were amended in 2015 by repricing these options to CAD$0.225 per share. A total of $106,283 was included in consulting fees related to these options. A total of 2,147,000 stock options previously granted to related parties were amended in 2014 by re-pricing these options to CAD$0.50 per share. A total of $54,581 was included in consulting fees related to these options.

C Interests of Experts and Counsel

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Act of 1934 and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this sub-item.

- 56 -

Item 8 Financial Information

A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

Financial Statements

The financial statements required as part of this annual report are filed under Item 18 of this annual report.

Legal and Arbitration Proceedings

During the year ended December 31, 2016, all pending or threatened litigation was settled. On November 22, 2016, the Company announced that Buccaneer had abandoned its rights in respect of the Concessions in settlement of litigation commenced in 2015.

Dividends

Our company has not declared any dividends for the last five years and does not anticipate that we will do so in the foreseeable future. Our company does not presently have any intention of paying dividends. Our future dividend policy will be determined by our Board of Directors of the basis of earnings, financial requirements and other relevant factors.

B. Significant Changes

No significant changes have occurred since the date of our most recent audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, other than property update activities as reported in Note 6 to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 which are disclosed in this annual report.

Item 9. The Offering and Listing

Our common shares have traded on the TSX under the trading symbol “XTG” since November 23, 2010, following the completion of our initial public offering in Canada. Our common shares are quoted from broker dealers on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “XTGRF”. There is currently only a limited trading market for shares of our common shares. There is no assurance that the market for our common shares on the OTC Bulletin Board or TSX will develop into active trading markets.

The following table lists the annual high and low market prices on the TSX and the OTCQB for the five most recent financial years.

		TSX				OTC BULLETIN BOARD
FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED		HIGH		LOW		HIGH		LOW
		CAD$		CAD$		US$		US$
December 31, 2016	$	0.55	$	0.20	$	0.42	$	0.14
December 31, 2015	$	0.295	$	0.175	$	0.22	$	0.123
December 31, 2014	$	0.43	$	0.10	$	0.38	$	0.08
December 31, 2013	$	0.87	$	0.34	$	0.84	$	0.32
December 31, 2012	$	1.50	$	0.62	$	1.49	$	0.66

The following table lists the high and low market prices on the TSX and OTC Bulletin Board for Xtra-Gold’s common shares for the full financial quarters for the two most recent full financial years.

		TSX				OTC BULLETIN BOARD
FOR THE FINANCIAL QUARTER ENDED		HIGH		LOW		HIGH		LOW
		CAD$		CAD$		US$		US$
December 31, 2016	$	0.34	$	0.20	$	0.27	$	0.14
September 30, 2016	$	0.54	$	0.34	$	0.41	$	0.27
June 30, 2016	$	0.55	$	0.40	$	0.42	$	0.30
March 31, 2016	$	0.46	$	0.21	$	0.35	$	0.15
December 31, 2015	$	0.265	$	0.205	$	0.179	$	0.145
September 30, 2015	$	0.22	$	0.175	$	0.162	$	0.123
June 30, 2015	$	0.255	$	0.225	$	0.206	$	0.182
March 31, 2015	$	0.295	$	0.205	$	0.22	$	0.17

The following table lists the high and low market prices on the TSX and OTC Bulletin Board for Xtra-Gold’s common shares for the most recent six months.

- 57 -

		TSX				OTC BULLETIN BOARD
FOR THE MONTH ENDED		HIGH		LOW		HIGH		LOW
		CAD$		CAD$		US$		US$
February 28, 2017	$	0.35	$	0.25	$	0.27	$	0.18
January 31, 2017	$	0.27	$	0.23	$	0.20	$	0.17
December 31, 2016	$	0.24	$	0.20	$	0.17	$	0.14
November 30, 2016	$	0.26	$	0.21	$	0.20	$	0.14
October 31, 2016	$	0.34	$	0.26	$	0.27	$	0.19
September 30, 2016	$	0.43	$	0.34	$	0.33	$	0.27

Share Price Volatility and Price Fluctuations

Securities markets in Canada have experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, in recent years, and the market price of many resources companies that are considered to be speculative exploration companies, have experienced wide fluctuations in their share price which have not necessarily been related to operating performance or underlying asset values on the prospects of such companies. Our common shares fluctuated during 2016 from a low of $0.20 to a high of $0.55 and during the most recent six months our common shares fluctuated from a low of $0.14 to a high of $0.33. Mineral exploration is considered high risk and highly speculative and the trading market for mineral exploration companies is characteristically volatile, with wide fluctuation of price and volume which, only in part, relates to progress of exploration. There can be no assurance that continued fluctuation in our common share price and volume will not occur.

B. Plan of Distribution

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

C. Markets

Xtra-Gold shares trade on the following stock exchange and other regulated markets:

Stock Exchange of Other Regulated Market	Company Symbol
Toronto Stock Exchange	XTG
OTC Bulletin Board	XTGRF

D. Dilution

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

E. Expenses of the Issue

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

Item 10 Additional Information

A. Share Capital

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

B. Memorandum and Articles of Association

Our company was incorporated in Nevada on September 1, 1998 (see “Corporate History” under Item 4. Information on our Company for further details).

- 58 -

On November 30, 2012, we changed the jurisdiction of incorporation of our company to the BVI.

Information regarding the Memorandum and Articles of Xtra-Gold and the various matters regarding the objects and purposes of our company, the powers of our directors, our authorized capital and the rights of our shareholders is incorporated by reference in a registration statement on Form S-4, SEC File No. 183376, as amended.

C. Material Contracts

Our company has not entered into any material contracts outside of the ordinary course of business for the two years immediately preceding publication of this annual report.

D. Exchange Controls

Our company is a corporation incorporated pursuant to the laws of the Territory of the BVI.

BVI has no system of exchange controls. There are no BVI restrictions on the repatriation of capital or earnings of a BVI public company to non-resident investors. There are no laws in BVI or exchange restrictions affecting the remittance of dividends, profits, interest, royalties and other payments to non-resident holders of the issuer’s securities.

There are no limitations under the laws of BVI or in the organizing documents of our company on the right of foreigners to hold or vote securities of our company.

E Taxation

Scope of Discussion

This discussion addresses the material United States federal income tax considerations, under current U.S. law, generally applicable to U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders (as defined below) of the ownership and disposition of our common shares. This discussion does not address all potentially relevant U.S. federal income tax matters including the U.S. federal income tax consequences of a U.S. Holder or Non-U.S. Holder of our common shares such as the consequences to persons subject to special provisions of U.S. federal income tax law, such as those described below as excluded from the definitions of a U.S. Holder and Non-U.S. Holder. United States alternative minimum tax considerations are not addressed in this discussion. In addition, this discussion does not cover any state, local or foreign tax consequences, nor any U.S. federal gift, estate or generation-skipping transfer tax consequences (except for such considerations addressed briefly herein for Non-U.S. Holders).

The following discussion is based upon the Code, Treasury Regulations, published IRS rulings, published administrative positions of the IRS, and court decisions that are currently applicable, any of which could be materially and adversely changed, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time (including, without limitation, United States rates of taxation). This discussion does not consider the potential effects, both adverse and beneficial, of any recently proposed legislation which, if enacted, could be applied, possibly on a retroactive basis, at any time. There is no assurance that the IRS will not successfully challenge the conclusions reached herein.

U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders

As used herein, a “U.S. Holder” means a holder of our common shares who is: a citizen, or an individual resident (as defined under United States tax laws), of the United States; a corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or of any political subdivision thereof; an estate the income of which is taxable in the United States irrespective of source; or a trust if:

• a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all of its substantial decisions; or

• the trust was in existence on August 20, 1996 and has properly elected to continue to be treated as a United States person.

This discussion is limited to U.S. Holders who hold our common shares directly (e.g., not through an intermediary entity such as a corporation, partnership, limited liability company, or trust).

As used herein, a “Non-U.S. Holder” means a holder of our common shares that is not a U.S. Holder and who holds our common shares directly (e.g., not through an intermediary entity such as a corporation, partnership, limited liability company, or trust).

This discussion does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences applicable to U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including, but not limited to, the following:

- 59 -

• tax exempt organizations, qualified retirement plans, individual retirement accounts, or other tax-deferred accounts;

• financial institutions, insurance companies, real estate investment trusts, or regulated investment companies;

• dealers in securities or currencies or traders in securities that elect to apply a mark-to-market accounting method;

• U.S. Holders that have a "functional currency" other than the U.S. dollar;

• U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders that own our common shares as part of a straddle, hedging transaction, conversion transaction, constructive sale, or other arrangement involving more than one position;

• U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders that acquired our common shares in connection with the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for services;

• U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders that hold our common shares other than as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Code; or

• U.S. tax expatriates or former long-term residents of the U.S.

U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders that are subject to special provisions under the Code, including U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders described immediately above, should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences arising from and relating to the Continuation and the ownership and disposition of our common shares following the Continuation.

Treatment of our Company as a U.S. Corporation for Tax Purposes Following the Continuation

The Continuation of our company from Nevada to the BVI resulted in the application of the U.S. “corporate inversion” rules. United States federal income tax law with respect to corporate inversions provides in certain cases that a non-U.S. corporation may be treated as a U.S. corporation for all purposes of the Code. An inversion can occur in certain transactions in which a non-U.S. corporation acquires substantially all of the assets of or equity interests in a U.S. corporation, if, after the transaction, former equity owners of the U.S. corporation own 80% or more of the stock, by vote or by value, in the non-U.S. corporation. Our company believes that these conditions have been met as a result of the Continuation.

Thus, even though following the Continuation our company is organized under the laws of the BVI and treated as a BVI company for corporate law and BVI tax purposes, we treat our company also as a U.S. domestic corporation under United States federal tax law, fully subject to United States federal income tax on our worldwide income under Section 7874(b) of the Code, and the remainder of this discussion assumes such treatment.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Continuation

The Continuation was treated as a tax-free reorganization pursuant to Section 368(a)(1)(F) of the Code, and was therefore not taxable to our company. Moreover, U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders will not recognize gain or loss on our common shares as a result of the Continuation. Accordingly, such Holders’ tax bases in and holding periods for our common shares after the Continuation will be the same as their tax bases in and holding periods for our common shares before the Continuation. Our company and our shareholders may be required to report certain information to the IRS in connection with the Continuation. Accordingly, U.S. Holders and Non-U.S. Holders should consult with their own tax advisors regarding any statements or information reporting to the IRS in connection with the Continuation.

Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations of Owning Shares after the Continuation

U.S. Holders

Distributions on Shares

For United States federal income tax purposes, the gross amount of any distribution (including non-cash property) paid by our company (including BVI taxes withheld therefrom, if any) with respect to shares generally will be included in the gross income of a U.S. Holder as a dividend to the extent such distribution is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under United States federal income tax principles. To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds our company’s current and accumulated earnings and profits for a taxable year, the distribution first will be treated as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares and to the extent that such distribution exceeds the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares, will be taxed as a capital gain (see “Capital Gains and Losses” below). Dividends received by non-corporate U.S.

- 60 -

Holders will be subject to United States federal income tax at lower rates (generally 15%) than other types of ordinary income in taxable years beginning on or before December 31, 2012 if certain conditions are met. These conditions include the U.S. Holder’s satisfaction of a holding period requirement, and the U.S. Holder not treating the distribution as “investment income” for purposes of the investment interest deduction rules. Unless the reduced rate provision is extended by subsequent legislation, dividends received on or after January 1, 2013 will be taxed at ordinary income rates.

Except as described immediately below, dividend distributions to U.S. Holders that are corporations will qualify for the 70% dividends received deduction, which is generally available to corporations that own less than 20% of the voting power or value of the outstanding stock of the distributing U.S. corporation. A corporate U.S. Holder may not be entitled to take the 70% dividends received deduction in all circumstances. In addition to other applicable rules, U.S. Holders that are corporations should consider the effect of:

•   Section 246A of the Code, which reduces the dividends received deduction allowed to a corporate U.S. Holder that has incurred indebtedness that is “directly attributable” to an investment in portfolio stock;

•   Section 246(c) of the Code, which, among other things, disallows the dividends received deduction in respect of any dividend on a share of stock that is held for less than the minimum holding period; and

•   Section 1059 of the Code, which, under certain circumstances, reduces the basis of stock for purposes of calculating gain or loss in a subsequent disposition by the portion of any “extraordinary dividend” (as defined in the Code) that is eligible for the dividends received deduction.

Dispositions of Shares

Gain or loss, if any, realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale or other disposition of shares generally will be subject to United States federal income taxation as a capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares and the amount realized on the disposition (see “Capital Gains and Losses” below). Any such gain or loss that a U.S. Holder recognizes will generally be treated as U.S.-source income or loss.

Capital Gains and Losses

A capital gain or loss may be realized with respect to a disposition of shares, as described above. The amount of the capital gain or loss will be equal to the difference between the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the shares and the amount realized on the transaction. Net capital gains (i.e. capital gains in excess of capital losses) recognized by a non-corporate U.S. Holder (including an individual) on capital assets that have been held for more than one year will generally be subject to a maximum United States federal income tax rate of 15% (which is scheduled to increase to a maximum rate of 20% on January 1, 2013 unless the reduced rate is extended by subsequent legislation). Deductions for capital losses are subject to certain limitations.

Foreign Tax Credit

Generally, a U.S. Holder who pays (or has withheld from distributions) non-U.S. income tax with respect to stock he or she owns is entitled to either a deduction or a tax credit for such foreign tax paid or withheld. Generally, it is more advantageous to claim a credit because a credit reduces United States federal income tax on a dollar-for-dollar basis, while a deduction merely reduces the taxpayer’s income subject to tax. This election is made on a year-by-year basis and generally applies to all foreign taxes paid by (or withheld from) the U.S. Holder during that year.

In addition, this limitation is calculated separately with respect to specific “baskets” of income. Foreign taxes assigned to a particular class of income generally cannot offset United States tax on income assigned to another class. Unused foreign tax credits can generally be carried back one year and carried forward ten years.

In this situation, however, it is unclear whether BVI tax paid or withheld on distributions on our shares (if any) will be creditable for U.S. federal income tax purposes because following the Continuation, we will be treated as a U.S. domestic corporation for U.S. tax purposes. The IRS may take the position that distributions on our shares are U.S.-source income and thus BVI income tax withheld on distributions is not creditable against a U.S. Holder’s United States federal income tax liability. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning their ability to utilize foreign tax credits in this context.

Currency Fluctuations

For United States federal income tax purposes, the amount received by a U.S. Holder as payment with respect to a distribution on, or disposition of, shares, if paid in non-U.S. currency, will be the U.S. dollar value of the payment at the date of the payment, regardless of whether the payment is later converted into U.S. dollars. In such case, the U.S. Holder may recognize ordinary income or loss as a result of currency fluctuations between the date on which the payment is made and the date the payment is converted into U.S. dollars.

- 61 -

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Tax

Payments made within the U.S. or by a U.S. payor or U.S. middleman, of dividends on, and proceeds arising from the sale or other taxable disposition of, shares will generally be subject to information reporting and backup withholding tax, at the rate of 28% (under current law), if a U.S. Holder:

• fails to furnish such U.S. Holder’s correct U.S. taxpayer identification number (generally on Form W-9);

• is notified by the IRS that such U.S. Holder has previously failed to properly report interest and dividend income; or

• fails to certify, under penalty of perjury, that such U.S. Holder has furnished its correct U.S. taxpayer identification number that the IRS has not notified such U.S. Holder that it is subject to backup withholding tax, and that such U.S. Holder is a U.S. person.

However, certain exempt persons generally are excluded from these information reporting and backup withholding rules. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the U.S. backup withholding tax rules will be allowed as a credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, or will be refunded, if such U.S. Holder furnishes required information to the IRS in a timely manner. Each U.S. Holder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the information reporting and backup withholding rules.

New Tax on Net Investment Income

For tax years beginning after December 31, 2012, certain U.S. Holders that are individuals, estates or trusts whose income exceeds certain thresholds will be required to pay an additional 3.8% tax on “net investment income”, which includes, among other things, dividends and net gain from the sale or other disposition of property (other than property held in a trade or business). U.S. Holders are urged to consult with their own tax advisors regarding the effect, if any, of this tax on net investment income on their ownership and disposition of our shares.

Non-U.S. Holders

Distributions on Shares

The gross amount of any distribution by our company to a Non-U.S. Holder with respect to shares is treated first as dividend income to the extent such distribution is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under United States federal income tax principles. To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds our company’s current and accumulated earnings and profits for a taxable year, the distribution is treated as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of the Non-U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in shares. Then, to the extent that such distribution exceeds the Non-U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in shares, it is taxed as gain from the sale or exchange of the Non-U.S. Holder’s shares (see “Dispositions of Shares”, below).

Any such distribution that constitutes a dividend is treated as U.S.-source gross income for Non-U.S. Holders of shares, and is subject to withholding under Section 1441 of the Code (unless it is treated as “effectively connected” income as described below). The withholding rate under the Code on dividends is generally 30%, but may be reduced pursuant to a treaty. Any dividend income that is “effectively connected” with a Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a U.S. trade or business (and, where a tax treaty applies, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder) will not be subject to the withholding tax described in this paragraph but instead will be taxed as described in the second bullet point and the remaining discussion under the heading “Dispositions of Shares” below. Non-U.S. Holders will be required to provide specific documentation to claim a treaty exemption or reduced rate of withholding with respect to the distribution. Non-U.S. Holders should also review the discussion of the new FATCA rules, below.

Dispositions of Shares

A Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect to gain recognized upon the disposition of shares unless:

• such Non-U.S. Holder is an individual who is present in the United States for a period or periods aggregating 183 days or more during the taxable year of disposition and certain other conditions are met;

- 62 -

• such gain is effectively connected with such Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a U.S. trade or business (and, where a tax treaty applies, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment maintained by the Non-U.S. Holder); or

• the common shares constitute a U.S. real property interest by reason of the company’s status as a “United States real property holding corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

A Non-U.S. Holder described in the first bullet above is required to pay a flat 30% tax on the gain derived from the sale, which tax may be offset by U.S.-source capital losses. A Non-U.S. Holder described in the second bullet above or, if the third bullet applies, is required to pay tax on the net gain derived from the sale under regular graduated U.S. federal income tax rates, and corporate Non-U.S. Holders described in the second bullet above may also be subject to branch profits tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty. Non-U.S. Holders should consult any applicable income tax treaties that may provide for different results. It is assumed that our company is not a United States real property holding corporation within the meaning of Section 897 of the Code for purposes of the third bullet point above. Non-U.S. Holders should also review the discussion of the new FATCA rules, below.

U.S. Estate and Gift Tax Consequences of Owning Shares

The U.S. gift, estate, and generation-skipping transfer tax rules generally apply to a Non-U.S. Holder of our shares. In general, our shares are considered a U.S.-situs asset for U.S. estate tax purposes and could be subject to U.S. estate tax at the death of a Non-U.S. Holder depending on the particular facts and circumstances of the Non-U.S. Holder. Non-U.S. Holders of our shares should consult an independent tax advisor with respect to U.S. gift, estate, and generation-skipping transfer tax consequences applicable to the ownership of our shares.

Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

Generally, our company must report annually to the IRS and to Non-U.S. Holders the amount of dividends paid and the amount of tax, if any, withheld with respect to those payments. These information reporting requirements apply even if withholding is not required. Pursuant to tax treaties or other agreements, the IRS may make such information available to tax authorities in the Non-U.S. Holder’s country of residence. The payment of proceeds from the sale of our shares by a broker to a Non-U.S. Holder is generally not subject to information reporting if:

• the Non-U.S. Holder certifies his, her or its non-U.S. status under penalties of perjury by providing a properly executed IRS Form W-8BEN, or otherwise establish an exemption; or

• the sale of our common shares is effected outside the U.S. by a foreign office of a broker, unless the broker is:

• a U.S. person;

• a foreign person that derives 50% or more of its gross income for certain periods from activities that are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the U.S.;

• a “controlled foreign corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes; or

• a foreign partnership more than 50% of the capital or profits interest of which is owned by one or more U.S. persons or which engages in a U.S. trade or business.

A backup withholding tax may apply to amounts paid to a Non-U.S. Holder if the Non-U.S. Holder fails to properly establish its foreign status on the applicable IRS Form W-8 or if certain other conditions are met. Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be refunded or credited against the Non-U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, assuming the required information is timely provided to the IRS.

FATCA

New U.S. legislation signed into law on March 18, 2010 (the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”)) substantially changes the withholding and reporting rules applicable to Non-U.S. Holders who are not individuals that receive certain U.S.-source income, generally effective for payments made after December 31, 2013 (with respect to dividends) and after December 31, 2014 (with respect to gross proceeds from a sale or other disposition). Certain changes made by FATCA may result in different U.S. federal income tax consequences for Non-U.S. Holders that are not individuals than those described above, including with respect to withholding and information reporting, and distributions on and dispositions of shares.

- 63 -

FATCA imposes a 30% U.S. withholding tax (which may be reduced pursuant to a treaty) on dividends on, or gross proceeds from the sale or other disposition of, shares paid to a Non-U.S. Holder that is a foreign financial institution or certain foreign non-financial entities, unless:

• the foreign financial institution undertakes certain diligence and reporting obligations; or

• the foreign non-financial entity either certifies it does not have any substantial United States owners or furnishes identifying information regarding each substantial United States owner.

If the Non-U.S. Holder is a foreign financial institution, it must enter into an agreement with the United States Treasury requiring, among other things, that it undertake to identify accounts held by certain United States persons or United States-owned foreign entities, annually report certain information about such accounts, and withhold 30% on payments to account holders whose actions prevent it from complying with these reporting and other requirements. Non-U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the application of FATCA to their particular circumstances.

Material BVI Income Tax Consequences

BVI companies, provided that they do not operate or hold real property in the BVI or employ persons resident in the BVI, and all amounts paid by them to non-residents, are generally exempt from all local taxes and stamp duty.

Certain Canadian Income Tax Consequences

This summary is based on the provisions of the Income Tax Act (Canada) and the regulations thereunder in force as of the date hereof and the current administrative policies and practices of the Canada Revenue Agency published in writing by the Canada Revenue Agency before such date. This summary takes into account all specific proposals to amend the Income Tax Act (Canada) and the regulations thereunder which have been publicly announced by or on behalf of the Minister of Finance (Canada) before the date of this proxy statement/prospectus and assumes that all such proposed Canadian amendments will be enacted in their present form. No assurance can be given that the proposed Canadian amendments will be enacted in the form proposed, if at all. This summary does not otherwise take into account or anticipate any changes in law, whether by judicial, governmental or legislative decision or action, or changes in the administrative policies and practices of the Canada Revenue Agency.

This summary does not apply to a Holder:

• that is a “financial institution” for purposes of the “mark-to-market property” rules;

• to which the “functional currency” reporting rules in subsection 261(5) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) apply;

• an interest in which is a “tax shelter investment”; or

• with respect to whom our company is a “foreign affiliate”, all within the meaning of the Income Tax Act (Canada).

Such Holders should consult their own tax advisors.

The following summary of the Canadian tax consequences has been provided for general information purposes only and is not intended to be, and should not under any circumstances be assumed or relied on by any shareholder to be, a complete analysis or discussion of all potential tax consequences relevant to shareholders in any jurisdiction. The following discussion is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal advice to any particular person who holds our common shares.

Shareholders are strongly urged to consult, and must rely on the advice of, their own independent tax and other advisors to determine the tax consequences of the Continuation to them because of their own particular circumstances and the jurisdiction in which they reside or in which they may be subject to tax consequences by the virtue of their ownership of our common shares.

This summary does not take into account, provincial, territorial or foreign income tax legislation or considerations, which may differ materially from those described herein. Holders should consult their own legal advisors with respect to the tax consequences to them based on their particular circumstances.

Continuation of our company to the BVI

No disposition of our common shares should be considered to have occurred for Canadian federal income tax purposes solely as result of the Continuation. Consequently, the Continuation should not result in the realization of any capital gain (or capital loss) by a Holder.

- 64 -

Qualified Investments

Provided our common shares remain listed on a “designated stock exchange” (within the meaning of the Income Tax Act (Canada) and which currently includes the TSX) at all relevant times, such common shares will be a “qualified investment” under the Income Tax Act (Canada) for trusts governed by registered retirement savings plans, registered retirement income funds, deferred profit sharing plans, registered education savings plans, registered disability savings plans and tax-free savings accounts.

Notwithstanding that our common shares may be a qualified investment for a trust governed by a tax-free savings account, a registered retirement savings plan or a registered retirement income fund, the holder of a tax-free savings account or the annuitant under a registered retirement savings plan or a registered retirement income fund will be subject to a penalty tax on our common shares held in the tax-free savings account, registered retirement savings plans or registered retirement income funds (as the case may be) if such shares are a “prohibited investment” for the purpose of section 207.01 of the Income Tax Act (Canada). Our common shares will generally be a “prohibited investment” if the holder of a tax-free savings account or the annuitant of a registered retirement savings plan or a registered retirement income fund does not deal at arm’s length with our company for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada) or the holder of a tax-free savings account or the annuitant of a registered retirement savings plan or a registered retirement income fund has a “significant interest” (as defined in the Income Tax Act (Canada)) in our company or a corporation, partnership or trust with which our company does not deal at arm’s length for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada). Such holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors.

The foregoing summaries of United States, BVI and Canadian tax consequences have been provided for general information purposes only and should not be assumed or relied on by any shareholder to be, a complete analysis or discussion of all potential tax consequences relevant to shareholders in any jurisdiction. The foregoing discussion is not a legal advice to any particular person who holds our common shares.

F. Dividends and Paying Agents

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

G. Statements by Experts

This Form 20-F is being filed as an annual report under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and, as such, there is no requirement to provide any information under this item.

H. Documents on Display

Any of the documents referred to in this Form 20-F can be viewed at the office of Xtra-Gold, located at Suite 824, Harbour Bay, TP.O Box CR-56766, Nassau, Bahamas during normal business hours. All of the above documents referred to above are in English.

Xtra-Gold is required to file financial statements and other information with the Ontario Securities Commission, the British Columbia Securities Commission and the Alberta Securities Commission electronically through SEDAR which can be viewed at www.sedar.com.

I. Subsidiary Information

This annual report includes consolidated information relating to our company and our subsidiaries.

Item 11 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Xtra-Gold is a smaller reporting company and, as such, does not need to provide the information required by this Item 11.

Item 12 Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 13 Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

Not applicable.

- 65 -

Item 14 Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders

Not applicable.

Item 15 Controls and Procedures

A. Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

Based on that evaluation, our management has concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this annual report our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information required to be disclosed in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms; and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected.

B. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

•   pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

•   provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

•   provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of our internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of these controls. Based on this assessment, our management has concluded that as of December 31, 2016, our internal control over financial reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

C. Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

This annual report does not include an attestation report of RBSM LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm that audited our company’s annual financial statements included in this annual report, in connection with internal control over financial report. Management’s report is not subject to attestation by our company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the SEC that permit our company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

- 66 -

D. Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation that occurred during our most recently completed fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 16	[reserved]
Item 16A	Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our Board of Directors has determined that each of James Schweitzer, Denis Laviolette and, Hans Julian Morsches is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 16.A of Form 20-F. In general, an “audit committee financial expert” is an individual member of the audit committee who:

•   understands generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements;

•   is able to assess the general application of such principles in connection with accounting for estimates and accruals;

•   has experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the company’s financial statements;

•   understands internal controls over financial reporting;

•   understands audit committee functions; and

•   is an independent director.

Item 16B Code of Ethics

In December 2009, we adopted a new and expanded code of ethics applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial and accounting officers and persons performing similar functions. Our code of ethics is a written standard designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote:

• honest and ethical conduct;

• full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in regulatory filings and public statements;

• compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations;

• the prompt reporting of a violation of our code of ethics; and

• accountability for adherence to our code of ethics.

A copy of our code of ethics was previously filed as an exhibit to our annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We will provide a copy of our code of ethics, without charge, to any person who makes a written request to us at our principal offices.

Item 16C Principal Accountant Fees and Services

During the financial years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, RBSM LLP served as the company auditor. During the year 2014, Davidson & Company LLP, Chartered Accountants, served as Xtra-Gold’s external auditor.

Audit Fees

Audit fees are the aggregate fees billed by RBSM LLP in 2015 and Davidson & Company in 2014 and 2013 for the audit of Xtra-Gold’s consolidated annual financial statements that are provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. The aggregate audit fees billed by our company’s external auditors for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $40,000, for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $40,000 and $60,000 for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Audit-related Fees

Audit-related fees consist of assurance and related services by our company’s external auditors that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our company’s quarterly financial statements and are not reported above under “Audit Fees.” Our company paid RBSM LLP $15,000 for audit-related fees in the year ended December 31, 2016, and $10,000 for audit-related fees for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our company paid Davidson & Company $nil for audit-related fees for the year ended December 31, 2014.

- 67 -

Tax Fees

Tax fees consist of professional services rendered by our company’s external auditors for tax compliance and tax advice. Our company paid RBSM LLP $nil for tax fees for the year ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Our company paid Davidson & Company $1,530 for tax fees for the year ended December 31, 2014.

All Other Fees

All other fees consist of fees for other miscellaneous items. There were no other fees in connection services provided or billed by our company’s external auditors in the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Audit Committee’s Pre-approval Policies and Procedures

Our Audit Committee has adopted a procedure for pre-approval of all fees charged by our company’s external auditors. Under the procedure, our Audit Committee approves the engagement letter with respect to audit, tax and review services. Other fees are subject to pre-approval by our Audit Committee.

Item 16D Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

Not applicable.

Item 16E Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

Our company commenced a normal course issuer bid on February 9, 2012 (the “2012 Bid”), with the acceptance of the TSX. Pursuant to the 2012 Bid, our company could purchase 4,045,353 common shares which, at that time, represented approximately 10% of our company’s public float. The 2012 Bid expired on February 8, 2013. Our company purchased an aggregate of 68,300 common shares under the 2012 Bid which were cancelled.

The 2012 Bid and any subsequent normal course issuer bid, as detailed hereunder, are conducted in accordance with Part VI, Sections 628 and 629 of the TSX Company Manual. All common shares purchased by our company are cancelled.

Our company renewed the 2012 Bid for a further one year period commencing on February 15, 2013 (the “2013 Bid”), with the acceptance of the TSX. Pursuant to the 2013 Bid, our company could purchase 3,957,802 common shares which, at that time, represented approximately 10% of our company’s public float. The 2013 Bid expired on February 14, 2014. Our company purchased an aggregate of 280,000 common shares under the 2013 Bid which were cancelled.

Our company renewed the 2013 Bid for a further one year period commencing on February 17, 2014 (the “2014 Bid”), with the acceptance of the TSX. Pursuant to the 2014 Bid, our company could purchase 4,119,002 common shares which, at that time, represented approximately 10% of our company’s public float. The 2014 Bid expired on February 16, 2015. Our company purchased an aggregate of 533,500 common shares under the 2014 Bid which were cancelled.

Our company renewed the 2014 Bid for a further one year period commencing on October 30, 2015 (the “2015 Bid”), with the acceptance of the TSX. Pursuant to the 2015 Bid, our company could purchase 4,000,000 common shares which, at that time, represented approximately 9.4% of our company’s public float. The 2015 Bid expired on November 5, 2016. Our company purchased an aggregate of 372,500 common shares under the 2015 Bid which were cancelled.

The Company announced in a news release disseminated on December 6, 2016, that, following expiration of the 2015 Bid, it would be renewing the 2016 bid for a further one year to purchase up to 4,000,000 Common Shares of the Company (the “2016 Bid”), representing approximately 8.3% of the public float of the Company. The maximum number of Common Shares that may be purchased on a daily basis is 5,327 Common Shares representing 25% of the average daily trading volume for the last six calendar months, except where purchases are made in accordance with "block purchases" exemptions under applicable TSX policies. The Common Shares purchased by the Company will be cancelled.

As of March 28, 2017, the Company had repurchased 327,000 Common Shares at an average price of C$0.18 per share under the 2016 Bid, of which 257,000 have been cancelled.

Further details relating to the 2016 Bid are noted in the table directly below and in the footnotes following the table, which sets forth information as at the date of this annual report.

- 68 -

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid per Share	(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Month 1 (December 6 to 31, 2016)	87,500	0.15	87,500	3,912,500
Month 2 (January 1 to 31, 2017)	-	-	-	3,912,500
Month 3 (February 1 to 28, 2017)	169,500	0.19	169,500	3,743,000
Month 4 (March 1 to 30, 2017)	70,000	0.18	70,000	3,673,000
Total Shares Repurchased	327,000	0.18	169,500	3,673,000

Footnotes

• The average price paid per share in the above table is in US dollars.

• The details of the 2014 Bid, referred to above, were announced in a news release on February 13, 2014 (as reported by our company on Form 6-K filed on February 18, 2014).

• The results of the 2014 Bid and the details of the 2015 Bid, referred to above, were announced in a news release on October 30, 2015.

• The results of the 2015 Bid and the details of the 2016 Bid, referred to above, were announced in a news release on December 6, 2016.

Item 16F Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

Effective October 2, 2015, the company changed auditors as RBSM LLP replaced Davidson & Company.

Item 16G Corporate Governance

Audit Committee

While we are not currently subject to any law, rule or regulation in the United States requiring that we establish or maintain an audit committee, as a reporting issuer in Canada, we are required to comply with National Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees (“NI 52-110”), adopted by the Canadian Securities Administrators, which states in part that every issuer must have an audit committee that complies with the requirements of the Instrument. Prior to our company becoming a reporting issuer in Canada in November 2010, our Board of Directors determined it advisable and in the best interests of our stockholders to establish an audit committee (the “Audit Committee”) in November 2009.

Our Audit Committee assists our Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibility relating to:

• the integrity of our financial statements;

• our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; and

• the qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accountants.

Our Audit Committee has adopted a written charter pursuant to which the Audit Committee provides:

• an independent review and oversight of our company's financial reporting processes, internal controls and independent auditors;

- 69 -

• a forum separate from our management in which auditors and other interested parties can candidly discuss concerns. By effectively carrying out its functions and responsibilities, our Audit Committee helps to ensure that:

• our management properly develops and adheres to a sound system of internal controls;

• procedures are in place to objectively assess our management's practices and internal controls; and

• the outside auditors, through their own review, objectively assess our company's financial reporting practices.

Our Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of any registered public accounting firm engaged for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for our company.

Our Audit Committee is composed of three directors; namely James Schweitzer, who is also Chair of our Audit Committee, Denis Laviolette and, Hans Julian Morsches, all of whom have been determined by our Board of Directors to be “independent,” as defined in the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ and within the meaning of NI 52-110.

Board of Directors Independence

Our Board of Directors consists of five members; namely James Longshore, Peter Minuk, James Schweitzer, Denis Laviolette and Hans Julian Morsches. Our Board of Directors has determined that James Schweitzer, Denis Laviolette and Hans Julian Morsches are independent within the meaning of National Instrument 58-101 – Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices (“NI 58-101”) and the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ and as is required by the applicable policies of the TSX. Paul Zyla and Peter Minuk are not independent within the meaning of NI 58-101 as they are officers of our company and thereby have a “material relationship” with our company.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

We established our Nominating and Corporate Governance committee in November 2009. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has adopted a written charter pursuant to which the committee:

• recommends the slate of director nominees for election to our Board of Directors;

• identifies and recommends candidates to fill vacancies on our Board of Directors;

• reviews the composition of our Board of Directors’ committees; and

• monitors compliance with, reviews and recommends changes to our various corporate governance policies and guidelines.

This committee also prepares and supervises our Board of Directors’ annual review of director independence and our Board of Directors’ annual self-evaluation. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is composed of three directors; namely Schweitzer, Laviolette and Morsches, all of whom have been determined by our Board of Directors to be “independent,” as defined in the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ and within the meaning of NI 52-110.

A majority of the persons serving on our Board of Directors must be “independent”. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has considered transactions and relationships between each director or any member of his immediate family and us or our affiliates, including those reported under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” below and also reviewed transactions and relationships between directors or their affiliates and members of our senior management or their affiliates. As a result of this review, the committee affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Schweitzer, Laviolette and Morsches are independent.

Nomination of Directors

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers all qualified candidates for our Board of Directors identified by members of the committee, by other members of our Board of Directors, by senior management and by our stockholders. The committee reviews each candidate including each candidate’s independence, skills and expertise based on a variety of factors, including the person’s experience or background in management, finance, regulatory matters and corporate governance. When identifying nominees to serve as director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks to create a Board of Directors that is strong in its collective knowledge and has a diversity of skills and experience with respect to accounting and finance, management and leadership, vision and strategy, business operations, business judgment, industry knowledge and corporate governance. In addition, before nominating an existing director for re-election to our Board of Directors, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers and reviews an existing director’s Board of Directors’ and committee meeting attendance and performance, length of Board of Directors’ service, experience, skills and contributions that the existing director brings to our Board of Directors, equity ownership in our company and independence.

- 70 -

The committee follows the same process and uses the same criteria for evaluating candidates proposed by members of our Board of Directors, members of senior management and stockholders. Based on its assessment of each candidate, the committee recommends candidates to our Board of Directors. However, there is no assurance that there will be any vacancy on our Board of Directors at the time of any submission or that the committee will recommend any candidate for our Board of Directors.

Compensation Committee

We established a Compensation Committee in November 2009. The Compensation Committee has adopted a written charter pursuant to which the committee is responsible for overseeing our compensation programs and practices, including our executive compensation plans and incentive compensation plans. Our Chief Executive Officer provides input to the Compensation Committee with respect to the individual performance and compensation recommendations for the other executive officers. Although the committee’s charter authorizes the committee to retain an independent consultant, no third party compensation consultant was engaged for 2010. The Compensation Committee is composed of three directors; namely James Schweitzer, Denis Laviolette and Hans Julian Morsches, all of whom have been determined by our Board of Directors to be “independent,” as defined in the Marketplace Rules of the NASDAQ and within the meaning of NI 52-110.

Risk Management

We separate the role of our Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman of our Board of Directors. Our management has approval limits which it must not exceed without approval from our Board of Directors. These approval limits span hiring, asset purchases and the issuance of shares. Our Board of Directors administers its oversight function through three sub-committees which report to our full Board of Directors, being our Audit Committee, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and our Compensation Committee. We are a very small company at this time and consider five members for our Board of Directors to be adequate for the purpose of directing its activities. Our Board of Directors self-assesses on an ongoing basis and has the scope to increase its size if the need is determined.

Not applicable.

Item 16H Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

PART III

Item 17 Financial Statements

Our company has provided our financial statements pursuant to Item 18.

Item 18 Financial Statements

Our company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

This annual report on Form 20-F includes the following financial statements of Xtra-Gold:

• Audited Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014

• Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated March 28, 2017

• Consolidated Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

• Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

• Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014

• Consolidated Statement of Equity

• Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Item 19 Exhibits

The following exhibits are included in this annual report on Form 20-F:

- 71 -

Exhibit Number	Description
1.3	Memorandum and Articles of Association (1)
1.4	Code of Ethics (1)
12.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act, Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
12.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)
13.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (2)
13.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (2)

(1)	Previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Form 20-F filed April 3, 2013.
(2)	Filed as an exhibit to this annual report on Form 20-F.

- 72 -

SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

	XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
		/s/ James Longshore
	By
		James Longshore
		President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 28, 2017

- 73 -

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2016

(expressed in U.S. Dollars, except where noted)

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	Page
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014	1
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014	2
Consolidated Statements of Equity for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014	3
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014	4
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	5-19

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Xtra-Gold Resources Corp.

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Xtra-Gold Resources Corp. and subsidiaries (“The Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2016. Xtra-Gold Resources Corp.’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Xtra-Gold Resources Corp. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered losses from operations, which raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

RBSM, LLP

Henderson, Nevada
March 28, 2017

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)

AS AT		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
		2016			2015			2014
ASSETS
Current
Cash and cash equivalents	$	913,562		$	862,552		$	850,736
Investment in trading securities, at fair value cost of $511,672 (December 31,         2015 - $651,580, December 31, 2014 - $710,297) (Note 4)		248,592			101,214			81,012
Receivables and other assets		190,227			31,636			103,047
Inventory		240,657			53,932			89,938
Total current assets		1,593,038			1,049,334			1,124,733
Restricted cash (Note 7)		221,322			221,322			221,322
Equipment (Note 5)		347,202			486,525			632,735
Mineral properties (Note 6)		734,422			734,422			734,422
TOTAL ASSETS	$	2,895,984		$	2,491,603		$	2,713,212
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	269,613		$	246,721		$	230,798
Warrant liability (Note 8)		1,000			—			—
Asset retirement obligation (Note 7)		216,000			145,029			96,395
Total current liabilities		486,613			391,750			327,193
Total liabilities		486,613			391,750			327,193
Equity
Capital stock (Note 8)        Authorized - 250,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001       Issued and outstanding       48,174,417 common shares (December 31, 2015 – 45,662,417 common shares,              December 31, 2014 – 45,811,417 common shares)		48,174			45,662			45,811
Additional paid in capital		31,870,683			31,095,966			30,990,260
Deficit accumulated		(28,583,385	)		(28,102,501	)		(27,675,136	)
Total Xtra-Gold Resources Corp. stockholders’ equity		3,335,472			3,039,127			3,360,935
Non-controlling interest		(926,101	)		(939,274	)		(974,916	)
Total equity		2,409,371			2,099,853			2,386,019
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	$	2,895, 984		$	2,491,603		$	2,713,212

History and organization of the Company (Note 1)	APPROVED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
Continuance of operations (Note 2)
Contingency and commitments (Note 13)
	“James Longshore”	“James Schweitzer”
	Director	Director

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)

		Year			Year			Year
		Ended			Ended			Ended
		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
		2016			2015			2014
EXPENSES
Amortization	$	139,323		$	146,210		$	188,078
Exploration		738,123			327,694			428,619
General and administrative		424,799			435,651			438,506
LOSS BEFORE OTHER ITEMS		(1,302,245	)		(909,555	)		(1,055,203	)
OTHER ITEMS
Foreign exchange loss		(19,086	)		(110,873	)		(19,592	)
Interest expense		(14,540	)		(10,216	)		(8,169	)
Net (loss) gain on sales of trading securities		31,612			(15,363	)		(26,217	)
Other income		8,989			6,239			9,980
Recovery of gold		828,559			745,538			411,152
Loss contingency (Note 13)		—			—			—
Warrant (expense) gain (Note 8)		(1,000	)		—			992
Provision for doubtful debts		—			(97,493	)		—
		834,534			517,832			368,146
Consolidated loss for the year		(467,711	)		(391,723	)		(687,057	)
Net gain attributable to non-controlling interest		(13,173	)		(35,642	)		(6,842	)
Net loss attributable to Xtra-Gold Resources Corp.	$	(480,884	)	$	(427,365	)	$	(693,899	)
Basic and diluted loss attributable to common shareholders per common share	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding		47,256,630			45,721,507			45,996,481

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)

	Common Stock
							Additional						Non-
	Number						Paid in						Controlling
	of Shares			Amount			Capital			Deficit			Interest			Total
Balance, December 31, 2013	46,263,917		$	46,264		$	31,018,184		$	(26,981,237	)	$	(981,758	)	$	3,101,453
Stock-based compensation	—			—			108,302			—			—			108,302
Repurchase of shares	(452,500	)		(453	)		(136,226	)		—			—			(136,679	)
Loss for the year	—			—			—			(693,899	)		6,842			(687,057	)
Balance, December 31, 2014	45,811,417			45,811			30,990,260			(27,675,136	)		(974,916	)		2,386,019
Stock-based compensation	—			—			124,458			—			—			124,458
Repurchase of shares	(149,000	)		(149	)		(18,752	)		—			—			(18,901	)
Loss for the year	—			—			—			(427,365	)		35,642			(391,723	)
Balance, December 31, 2015	45,662,417			45,662			31,095,966			(28,102,501	)		(939,274	)		2,099,853
Private placement	2,500,000			2,500			691,228			—			—			693,728
Stock-based compensation	—			—			104,519			—			—			104,519
Repurchase of shares	(396,000	)		(396	)		(69,378	)		—			—			(69,774	)
Stock option exercises	408,000			408			48,348			—			—			48,756
Loss for the period	—			—			—			(480,884	)		13,173			(467,711	)
Balance, December 31, 2016	48,174,417		$	48,174		$	31,870,683		$	(28,583,385	)	$	(926,101	)	$	2,409,371

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)

		Year			Year			Year
		Ended			Ended			Ended
		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
		2016			2015			2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Loss for the year	$	(467,711	)	$	(391,723	)	$	(687,057	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Amortization		139,323			146,210			188,078
Change in asset retirement obligation		70,971			48,634			16,000
Stock-based compensation		104,519			124,458			108,302
Warrant expense (gain)		1,000			—			(992	)
Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain)		(12,405	)		11,848			11,969
Purchase of trading securities		(253,554	)		(62,742	)		(118,289	)
Proceeds on sale of trading securities		150,193			15,329			140,121
Net (loss) gain on sales of trading securities		(31,612	)		15,363			26,217
Provision for doubtful debts		—			97,493			—
Changes in non-cash working capital items:
(Increase) decrease in receivables and other assets		(158,591	)		(26,082	)		167,837
(Increase) decrease in inventory		(186,725	)		36,006			(89,938	)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		22,892			15,923			(80,114	)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(621,700	)		30,717			(317,866	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Restricted cash		—			—			—
Net cash used in investing activities		—			—			—
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuances of capital stock, net of financing costs		693,728			—			—
Proceeds from exercise of options		48,756			—			—
Repurchase of capital stock		(69,774	)		(18,901	)		(136,679	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		672,710			(18,901	)		(136,679	)
Change in cash and cash equivalents during the year		51,010			11,816			(454,545	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year		862,552			850,736			1,305,281
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year	$	913,562		$	862,552		$	850,736

Supplemental disclosure with respect to cash flows (Note 10)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

1. HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE COMPANY

Silverwing Systems Corporation (the “Company”), a Nevada corporation, was incorporated on September 1, 1998. On June 23, 1999, the Company completed the acquisition of Advertain On-Line Canada Inc. (“Advertain Canada”), a Canadian company operating in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. The Company changed its name to Advertain On-Line Inc. (“Advertain”) on August 19, 1999. Advertain Canada’s business was the operation of a web site, “Advertain.com”, whose primary purpose was to distribute entertainment advertising on the Internet.

In May 2001, the Company, being unable to continue its funding of Advertain Canada’s operations, decided to abandon its interest in Advertain Canada. On June 15, 2001, the Company sold its investment in Advertain Canada back to Advertain Canada’s original shareholder. On June 18, 2001, the Company changed its name from Advertain to RetinaPharma International, Inc. (“RetinaPharma”) and became inactive.

In 2003, the Company became a resource exploration company. On October 31, 2003, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Xtra-Gold Resources, Inc. (“XGRI”). XGRI was incorporated in Florida on October 24, 2003. On December 19, 2003, the Company changed its name from RetinaPharma to Xtra-Gold Resources Corp.

In 2004, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Canadiana Gold Resources Limited (“Canadiana”) and 90% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Goldenrae Mining Company Limited (“Goldenrae”). Both companies are incorporated in Ghana and the remaining 10% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Goldenrae is held by the Government of Ghana.

On October 20, 2005, XGRI changed its name to Xtra Energy Corp. (“Xtra Energy”).

On October 20, 2005, the Company incorporated Xtra Oil & Gas Ltd. (“XOG”) in Alberta, Canada. This subsidiary was struck from the records in 2014.

On December 21, 2005, Canadiana changed its name to Xtra-Gold Exploration Limited (“XG Exploration”).

On January 13, 2006, Goldenrae changed its name to Xtra-Gold Mining Limited (“XG Mining”).

On March 2, 2006, the Company incorporated Xtra Oil & Gas (Ghana) Limited (“XOGG”) in Ghana.

On November 30, 2012, the Company changed its residency address from the USA to the British Virgin Islands.

2. CONTINUANCE OF OPERATIONS

The Company is in the early stages of development and as is common with any exploration company, it raises financing for its exploration and acquisition activities. The Company has incurred a loss of $480,884 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and has accumulated a deficit of $28,583,385. Results for the year ended December 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of future results. However, these losses raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and implement its business plan, which is typical for junior exploration companies. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Management of the Company (“Management”) is of the opinion that sufficient financing will be obtained from external financing and further share issuances to meet the Company’s obligations. At year ended December 31, 2016, the Company has working capital of $1,106,425, which would not be sufficient to fund the required exploration programs for a period greater than 12 months. The Company’s discretionary exploration activities do have considerable scope for flexibility in terms of the amount and timing of exploration expenditure, and expenditures may be adjusted accordingly if required.

5

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Generally accepted accounting principles

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America (“US GAAP”).

Principles of consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries, Xtra Energy (from October 31, 2003), XG Exploration (from February 16, 2004), XOG (from October 20, 2005) and XOGG (from March 2, 2006) and its 90% owned subsidiary, XG Mining (from December 22, 2004). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

Use of estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant areas requiring the use of estimates include the carrying value and recoverability of mineral properties, inputs used in the calculation of stock-based compensation and warrants, inputs used in the calculation of the asset retirement obligation, and the valuation allowance applied to deferred income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and would impact future results of operations and cash flows.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash held at financial institutions.

Receivables

Management has evaluated all receivables and has provided allowances for accounts where it deems collection doubtful. As of December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, the Company recorded allowance for doubtful accounts of $0, $97,493, and $0, respectively.

Inventory

Inventories are initially recognized at cost and subsequently stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The Company’s inventory consists of raw gold. Costs are determined using the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method and includes expenditures incurred in extracting the raw gold, other costs incurred in bringing them to their existing location and condition, and the cost of reclaiming the disturbed land to a natural state.

Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs necessary to make the sale. Inventories are written down to net realizable value when the cost of inventories is not estimated to be recoverable due to declining selling prices, or other issues related to the sale of gold.

Recovery of gold

Recovery of gold and other income is recognized when title and the risks and rewards of ownership to delivered bullion and commodities pass to the buyer and collection is reasonably assured.

6

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

Trading securities

The Company’s trading securities are reported at fair value, with realized and unrealized gains and losses included in earnings.

Non-Controlling Interest

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of XG Mining (from December 22, 2004). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. The Company records a non-controlling interest which reflects the 10% portion of the earnings (loss) of XG Mining allocable to the holders of the minority interest.

Equipment

Equipment is recorded at cost and is being amortized over its estimated useful lives using the declining balance method at the following annual rates:

Furniture and equipment	20%
Computer equipment	30%
Vehicles	30%
Mining and exploration equipment	20%

Mineral properties and exploration and development costs

The costs of acquiring mineral rights are capitalized at the date of acquisition. After acquisition, various factors can affect the recoverability of the capitalized costs. If, after review, management concludes that the carrying amount of a mineral property is impaired, it will be written down to estimated fair value. Exploration costs incurred on mineral properties are expensed as incurred. Development costs incurred on proven and probable reserves will be capitalized. Upon commencement of production, capitalized costs will be amortized using the unit-of-production method over the estimated life of the ore body based on proven and probable reserves (which exclude non-recoverable reserves and anticipated processing losses). When the Company receives an option payment related to a property, the proceeds of the payment are applied to reduce the carrying value of the exploration asset.

Long-lived assets

Long-lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For purposes of evaluating the recoverability of long-lived assets, the recoverability test is performed using undiscounted net cash flows related to the long-lived assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

Asset retirement obligations

The Company records the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development, and/or normal use of the long-lived assets. The Company also records a corresponding asset which is amortized over the life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial measurement of the asset retirement obligation, the obligation is adjusted at the end of each period to reflect the passage of time (accretion expense) and changes in the estimated future cash flows underlying the obligation (asset retirement cost).

7

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

Stock-based compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”. Under the fair value recognition provisions, stock-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date for all stock-based awards to employees and directors and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. The Black-Scholes option valuation model is used to calculate fair value.

The Company accounts for stock compensation arrangements with non-employees in accordance with ASC 505 which requires that such equity instruments are recorded at their fair value on the measurement date. The measurement of stock-based compensation is subject to periodic adjustment as the underlying equity instruments vest. Non-employee stock-based compensation charges are amortized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. For stock options granted to non-employees, the fair value of the stock options is estimated using a Black-Scholes valuation model.

Warrants

The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value using the appropriate valuation methodology and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements of operations. The warrants are presented as a liability because they do not meet the criteria of Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) topic 480 for equity classification. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the warrants are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under the asset and liability method the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be recognized.

Loss per share

Basic loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. To calculate diluted loss per share, the Company uses the treasury stock method and the if converted method. As of December 31, 2016, there were 1,397,000 warrants (December 31, 2015 – nil, December 31, 2014 – nil) and 1,920,000 stock options (December 31, 2015 – 2,235,000, December 31, 2014 – 2,426,000) outstanding which have not been included in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding as these were anti-dilutive.

Foreign exchange

The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Any monetary assets and liabilities that are in a currency other than the U.S. dollar are translated at the rate prevailing at year end. Revenue and expenses in a foreign currency are translated at rates that approximate those in effect at the time of translation. Gains and losses from translation of foreign currency transactions into U.S. dollars are included in current results of operations.

Financial instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, trading securities, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from its financial instruments. The fair values of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values unless otherwise noted. Cash in Canada is primarily held in financial institutions. Balances on hand may exceed insured maximums. Cash in Ghana is held in banks with a strong international presence. Ghana does not insure bank balances.

8

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

Fair value of financial assets and liabilities

The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on US GAAP guidance which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements.

The Company classifies financial assets and liabilities as held-for-trading, available-for-sale, held-to-maturity, loans and receivables or other financial liabilities depending on their nature. Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognized at fair value on their initial recognition, except for those arising from certain related party transactions which are accounted for at the transferor’s carrying amount or exchange amount.

Financial assets and liabilities classified as held-for-trading are measured at fair value, with gains and losses recognized in net income. Financial assets classified as held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, and financial liabilities other than those classified as held-for-trading are measured at amortized cost, using the effective interest method of amortization. Financial assets classified as available-for-sale are measured at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses being recognized as other comprehensive income until realized, or if an unrealized loss is considered other than temporary, the unrealized loss is recorded in income.

Financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are carried at cost, which management believes approximates fair value due to the short term nature of these instruments. Investments in trading securities are classified as held for trading, with unrealized gains and losses being recognized in income.

The following table presents information about the assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques the Company utilized to determine such fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points that are observable such as quoted prices, interest rates and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are unobservable data points for the asset or liability, and included situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset.

						Significant
				Quoted Prices		Other		Significant
				in Active		Observable		Unobservable
		December 31,		Markets		Inputs		Inputs
		2016		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	913,562	$	913,562	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash		221,322		221,322		—		—
Marketable securities		248,592		248,592		—		—
Warrant liability		1,000		—		—		1,000
Total	$	1,384,476	$	1,383,476	$	—	$	1,000

						Significant
				Quoted Prices		Other		Significant
				in Active		Observable		Unobservable
		December 31,		Markets		Inputs		Inputs
		2015		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	862,552	$	862,552	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash		221,322		221,322		—		—
Investment in trading securities		101,214		101,214		—		—
Warrant liability		—		—		—		—
Total	$	1,185,088	$	1,185,088	$	—	$	—

9

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

						Significant
				Quoted Prices		Other		Significant
				in Active		Observable		Unobservable
		December 31,		Markets		Inputs		Inputs
		2014		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	850,736	$	850,736	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash		221,322		221,322		—		—
Investment in trading securities		81,012		81,012		—		—
Warrant liability		—		—		—		—
Total	$	1,153,070	$	1,153,070	$	—	$	—

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities are determined through market, observable and corroborated sources. The fair value of the warrant liability is determined through the Black Scholes valuation model.

Concentration of credit risk

The financial instrument which potentially subjects the Company to concentration of credit risk is cash. The Company maintains cash in bank accounts that, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. As of December 31, 2016, the Company held $694,941 (December 31, 2015- $468,750, December 31, 2014- $635,550) in low risk money market funds which are not federally insured. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant risks on its cash in bank accounts. The company has contracted to sell all its recovered gold through a licensed exporter in Ghana.

Recent accounting pronouncements

On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, requiring an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date, which deferred the effective date of the new revenue standard for periods beginning after December 15, 2016 to December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted but not earlier than the original effective date. Accordingly, the updated standard is effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and we do not plan to early adopt. We have not yet selected a transition method and we are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern, which requires management of an entity to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued or available to be issued. This update is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement Period Adjustments. ASU 2015-16 requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The amendments in this Update require that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. Any current period adjustments to provisional amounts that would have impacted a prior period’s earnings had they been recognized at the acquisition date are required to be presented separately on the face of the income statement or disclosed in the notes. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments in this Update should be applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occur after the effective date of this Update with earlier application permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. Therefore the amendments in ASU 2015-16 will become effective for us as of the beginning of our 2017 fiscal year. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact upon our financial condition or results of operations.

10

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740), which requires that all deferred income tax assets and liabilities be presented as noncurrent in the balance sheet. The pronouncement is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early application permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU 2016-01 requires that equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) are to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. Furthermore, equity investments without readily determinable fair values are to be assessed for impairment using a quantitative approach. The amendments in ASU 2016-01 should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption, with other amendments related specifically to equity securities without readily determinable fair values applied prospectively. The amendments in ASU 2016-01 will become effective for us as of the beginning of our 2019 fiscal year. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact upon our financial condition or results of operations.

On February 24, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, requiring lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with the exception of short-term leases. For lessees, leases will continue to be classified as either operating or finance leases in the income statement. Lessor accounting is similar to the current model but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model. Lessors will continue to classify leases as operating, direct financing or sales-type leases. The effective date of the new standard for public companies is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition and requires application of the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. The updated standard is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. We are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

On March 30, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies various aspects related to the accounting and presentation of share-based payments. The amendments require entities to record all tax effects related to share-based payments at settlement or expiration through the income statement and the windfall tax benefit to be recorded when it arises, subject to normal valuation allowance considerations. All tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments are required to be reported as operating activities in the statement of cash flows. The updates relating to the income tax effects of the share-based payments including the cash flow presentation must be adopted either prospectively or retrospectively. Further, the amendments allow the entities to make an accounting policy election to either estimate forfeitures or recognize forfeitures as they occur. If an election is made, the change to recognize forfeitures as they occur must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach with a cumulative effect adjustment recorded to opening retained earnings. The effective date of the new standard for public companies is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, in an effort to reduce the diversity of how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments of this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact this ASU will have on the financial statements and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, in an effort to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments of this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

11

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

4. INVESTMENTS IN TRADING SECURITIES

At December 31, 2016, the Company held investments classified as trading securities, which consisted of various equity securities. All trading securities are carried at fair value. As of December 31, 2016, the fair value of trading securities was $248,592. (December 31, 2015 – $101,214, December 31, 2014 – $81,012).

		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
		2016			2015			2014
Investments in trading securities at cost	$	511,672		$	651,580		$	710,297
Unrealized gains (losses)		(263,080	)		(550,366	)		(629,285	)
Investments in trading securities at fair market value	$	248,592		$	101,214		$	81,012

5. EQUIPMENT

				December 31, 2016
				Accumulated		Net Book
		Cost		Amortization		Value
Furniture and equipment	$	8,358	$	8,358	$	—
Computer equipment		20,274		20,274		—
Exploration equipment		1,464,478		1,144,382		320,096
Vehicles		333,989		306,883		27,106
	$	1,827,099	$	1,479,897	$	347,202

The company expensed $139,323 for amortization in 2016.

				December 31, 2015
				Accumulated		Net Book
		Cost		Amortization		Value
Furniture and equipment	$	8,358	$	8,358	$	—
Computer equipment		20,274		20,274		—
Exploration equipment		1,464,478		1,047,418		417,060
Vehicles		333,989		264,524		69,465
	$	1,827,099	$	1,340,574	$	486,525

The company expensed $146,210 for amortization in 2015.

				December 31, 2014
				Accumulated		Net Book
		Cost		Amortization		Value
Furniture and equipment	$	8,358	$	8,358	$	—
Computer equipment		20,274		20,274		—
Exploration equipment		1,464,478		930,979		533,499
Vehicles		333,989		234,753		99,236
	$	1,827,099	$	1,194,364	$	632,735

12

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

The company expensed $188,078 for amortization in 2014.

6. MINERAL PROPERTIES

		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
		2016			2015			2014
Acquisition costs	$	1,607,729		$	1,607,729		$	1,607,729
Asset retirement obligation (Note 7)		8,133			8,133			8,133
Option payments received		(881,440	)		(881,440	)		(881,440	)
Total	$	734,422		$	734,422		$	734,422

Kibi, Kwabeng and Pameng Projects

The Company holds an individual mining lease over the lease area of each of the Kibi Project, the Kwabeng Project and the Pameng Project, all of which are located in Ghana. The mining leases for the Kwabeng and Pameng Projects grant the Company mining rights to produce gold in the respective lease areas until July 26, 2019. We have renewed the lease for a 15 year extension of our Kibi Project (formerly known as the Apapam Project) which expired December 17, 2015. The extension is in accordance with the terms of application and payment of fees to the Minerals Commission of Ghana (“Mincom”). All gold production will be subject to a production royalty of the net smelter returns (“NSR”) payable to the Government of Ghana.

Banso and Muoso Projects

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company made an application to Mincom to convert a single prospecting license (“PL”) securing its interest in the Banso and Muoso Projects located in Ghana to a mining lease covering the lease area of each of these Projects. This application was approved by Mincom who subsequently made recommendation to the Minister of Lands, Forestry and Mines to grant an individual mining lease for each Project. Subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2010, the Government of Ghana granted two mining leases for these Projects dated January 6, 2011. These mining leases grant the Company mining rights to produce gold in the respective lease areas until January 5, 2025 with respect to the Banso Project and until January 5, 2024 with respect to the Muoso Project. These mining leases supersede the PL previously granted to the Company. Among other things, both mining leases require that the Company (i) pay the Government of Ghana a fee of $30,000 in consideration of granting of each lease (paid in the March 2011 quarter); (ii) pay annual ground rent of GH¢260.00 (USD$167) for the Banso Project and GH¢280.00 (USD$180) for the Muoso Project; (iii) commence commercial production of gold within two years from the date of the mining leases; and (iv) pay a production royalty to the Government of Ghana. The Company has filed for the necessary permits to commence work on the project. The permits were approved and work has commenced on the properties.

The Company executed a letter of intent (“LOI”) with Buccaneer Gold Corp. (“Buccaneer”), formerly Verbina Resources Inc., a company related by two directors in common, on July 21, 2010 whereby Buccaneer could acquire an undivided 55% interest in the Company’s interest in the mineral rights of the Company’s Banso and Muoso concessions (“Concessions”). On January 21, 2011, the terms of the agreement were amended.

On November 22, 2016, the Company announced that Buccaneer had abandoned its rights in respect of the Concessions.

Mining lease and prospecting license commitments

The Company is committed to expend, from time to time fees payable (a) to the Minerals Commission for: (i) an extension of an expiry date of a prospecting license (currently $15,000 for each occurrence); (ii) a grant of a mining lease (currently $100,000); (iii) an extension of a mining lease (currently $100,000); (iv) annual operating permits; and (v) the conversion of a reconnaissance license to a prospecting license (currently $20,000); (b) to the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) (of Ghana) for: (i) processing and certificate fees with respect to EPA permits; (ii) the issuance of permits before the commencement of any work at a particular concession; or (iii) the posting of a bond in connection with any mining operations undertaken by the Company; (c) for a legal obligation associated with our mineral properties for clean up costs when work programs are completed; and (d) an aggregate of less than $500 in connection with annual ground rent and mining permits to enter upon and gain access to the areas covered by the Company’s mining leases and future reconnaissance and prospecting licenses and such other financial commitments arising out of any approved exploration programs in connection therewith.

13

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

7. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION

		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
		2016		2015		2014
Balance, beginning of year	$	145,029	$	96,395	$	203,395
Change in obligation		70,971		48,634		(123,000	)
Accretion expense		—		—		16,000
Balance, end of year	$	216,000	$	145,029	$	96,395

The Company has a legal obligation associated with its mineral properties for clean up costs when work programs are completed.

The undiscounted amount of cash flows, required over the estimated reserve life of the underlying assets, to settle the obligation, adjusted for inflation, is estimated at $216,000 (2015 - $145,029, 2014 - $96,395). During 2016, 2015 and 2014, the obligation was estimated based on actual reclamation cost experience on an average per acre basis and the remaining acres to be reclaimed. It is expected that this obligation will be funded from general Company resources at the time the costs are incurred. The Company has been required by the Ghanaian government to post a bond of US$221,322 which has been recorded in restricted cash.

8. CAPITAL STOCK

Issuances of shares

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 2,500,000 units at CAD$0.40 per unit for proceeds of $693,728 net of costs. Each unit was comprised of one common share and one half of one common share purchase warrant. Each full purchase warrant is convertible into one common share of the Company at a price of CAD$0.65 for a period of 15 months from closing. The Company also issued 147,000 finders warrants with this financing. Each finders warrant is convertible into one common share of the Company at a price of CAD$0.65 for a period of 15 months from closing.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 408,000 shares at CAD$0.15 per share for proceeds of $48,756 on exercise of stock options.

Cancellation of shares

During the year ended December 31, 2016, a total of 396,000 common shares were re-purchased for $69,774 and cancelled.

Stock options

At June 30, 2011, the Company adopted a new 10% rolling stock option plan (the “2011 Plan”) and cancelled the 2005 equity compensation plan. Pursuant to the 2011 Plan, the Company is entitled to grant options and reserve for issuance up to 10% of the shares issued and outstanding at the time of grant. The terms and conditions of any options granted, including the number and type of options, the exercise period, the exercise price and vesting provisions, are determined by the Compensation Committee which makes recommendations to the board of directors for their approval. The maximum term of options granted cannot exceed 10 years.

14

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

The TSX’s rules relating to security-based compensation arrangements require that every three years after the institution of a security-based compensation arrangement which does not have a fixed maximum aggregate of securities issuable, all unallocated options must be approved by a majority of the Company’s directors and by the Company’s shareholders. The Board approved all unallocated options under the Option Plan on March 26, 2014 which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at the annual and special meeting held on June 19, 2014.

At December 31, 2016, the following stock options were outstanding:

Number of	Exercise	Expiry Date
Options	Price
108,000	CDN$0.50	March 5, 2017
162,000	CDN$0.15	March 12, 2017
54,000	CAD$0.50	June 1, 2020
63,000	CDN$0.15	June 1, 2020
48,000	CDN$0.225	June 1, 2020
90,000	CDN$0.50	July 1, 2020
30,000	CDN$0.50	March 1, 2021
100,000	CDN$0.225	March 1, 2021
108,000	CDN$0.15	June 10, 2021
382,000	CDN$0.15	December 31, 2022
250,000	CDN$0.20	October 8, 2025
400,000	CDN$0.40	May 5, 2026
125,000	CDN$0.65	July 25, 2021

Stock option transactions and the number of stock options outstanding are summarized as follows:

	December 31, 2016				December 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
				Weighted				Weighted				Weighted
	Number			Average	Number			Average	Number			Average
	of			Exercise	of			Exercise	of			Exercise
	Options			Price	Options			Price	Options			Price
Outstanding, beginning of year	2,235,000		$	0.16	2,426,000		$	0.43	2,489,000		$	1.03
Granted	525,000		$	0.36	250,000		$	0.15	108,000		$	0.43
Exercised	(408,000	)	$	0.12	—			—	—			—
Cancelled/Expired	(432,000	)	$	0.16	(441,000	)	$	0.36	(171,000	)	$	1.90
Outstanding, end of year	1,920,000		$	0.23	2,235,000		$	0.16	2,426,000		$	0.43
Exercisable, end of year	1,920,000		$	0.23	2,235,000		$	0.16	2,426,000		$	0.43

The aggregate intrinsic value for options vested and for total options as of December 31, 2016 is approximately $57,059 (December 31, 2015 - $nil, December 31, 2014 - $nil). The weighted average contractual term of stock options outstanding and exercisable as at December 31, 2016 is 5.60 years (December 31, 2015 – 3.67 years, December 31, 2014 – 5.05 years).

The fair value of stock options granted, vested, and modified during the year ended December 31, 2016 was $104,519 (year ended December 31, 2015 - $124,458, December 31, 2014 - $108,302) which has been included in general and administrative expense.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company re-priced 424,000 options previously granted to insiders of the Company and 48,000 options previously granted to non-insiders of the Company. The options were re-priced to $0.18 (CAD$0.225), resulting in a charge of $20,202 during the year.

15

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company re-priced 1,231,000 options previously granted to insiders of the Company to $0.12 (CAD$0.15), resulting in a charge of $86,081 during the year.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, 2,147,000 options previously granted to insiders of the Company and 171,000 options previously granted to non-insiders of the Company were re-priced to $0.43 (CAD$0.50), resulting in a charge of $59,304 during the year.

The following assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes valuation of stock options amended during the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	2016	2015	2014
Risk-free interest rate	N/A	0.26% - 1.64%	1.25%
Expected life	N/A	0.8 to 5 years	5.0 years
Annualized volatility	N/A	58% - 74%	45%
Dividend rate	N/A	—	—

There were 400,000 option grants during 2016 to an insider of the Company at $0.31 (CAD$0.40) . A further 125,000 options were granted during 2016 to a consultant of the company at $0.50 (CAD$0.65) . During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company granted 250,000 options to insiders of the Company at $0.15 (CAD$0.20) . During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company granted 108,000 options to an insider of the Company at $0.43 (CAD$0.50) . The following assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes valuation of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014:

	2016	2015	2014
Risk-free interest rate	1.75%	1.75%	1.75%
Expected life	4 to 7.5 years	7.5 years	7.5 years
Annualized volatility	61% - 65%	68%	95%
Dividend rate	—	—	—

The weighted average fair value of options granted in 2016 was $104,519 (2015 - $124,458. 2014 - $108,302).

Warrants

At December 31, 2016, the following warrants were outstanding:

Number of Warrants	Exercise Price	Expiry Date
1,397,000	CAD$0.65	August 25, 2017

Warrant transactions and the number of warrants outstanding are summarized as follows:

	2016		2015	2014
Balance, beginning of period	—		—	964.500		CAD$1.00
Issued	1,397,000	CAD$0.65	—	—
Exercised	—		—	—
Expired	—		—	(964,500	)
Balance, end of period	1,397,000	CAD$ 0.65	—	—

Under US GAAP when the strike price of the warrants is denominated in a currency other than an entity's functional currency, the warrants would not be considered indexed to the entity’s own stock, and would consequently be considered to be a derivative liability. The common share purchase warrants described above are denominated in CAD dollars and the Company’s functional currency is the US dollar. As a result, the Company determined that these warrants are not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock and characterized the fair value of these warrants as derivative liabilities upon issuance. The derivative will be subsequently marked to market through income.

16

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

The Company determined that the fair value of the warrant liability using the Black-Scholes Options Pricing Model at May 25, 2016 to be $70,712. The fair value of the warrants has been estimated at December 31, 2016 using the Black-Scholes Options Pricing Model was $1,000.

The Company recorded the full value of the derivative as a liability at issuance and recognized the amount as financing expense in the consolidated statement of operations. At December 31, 2016, the fair value adjustment was recognized in the consolidated statement of operations.

9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company entered into the following transactions with related parties:

		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
		2016		2015		2014
Consulting fees paid or accrued to officers or their companies	$	539,706	$	495,683	$	472,649
Directors’ fees		2,267		4,692		18,845
Stock option grants to officers and directors		400,000		250,000		108,000
Stock option grant price range	$	0.31	$	$0.15	$	0.43

Of the total consulting fees noted above, $256,319 (December 31, 2015 - $201,097, December 31, 2014 - $144,394) was incurred by the Company to a private company of which a related party is a 50% shareholder and director. The related party was entitled to receive $127,348 (December 31, 2015 - $100,548, December 31, 2014 - $72,197) of this amount. As at December 31, 2016, $47,792 (December 31, 2015, $51,096, December 31, 2014 - $28,974) remains payable to this related company and $5,000 (December 31, 2015 - $10,000, December 31, 2014 - $nil) remains payable to the related party for expenses earned for work on behalf of the Company.

As at December 31, 2016, $nil (December 31, 2015 - $97,493, December 31, 2014 - $97,493) was due from Buccaneer for services performed by the Company during the periods. These balances were forgiven when Buccaneer announced they were not pursuing their interest in the Concessions. The Company had fully provided against this balance in 2015.

In 2016, a total of 400,000 stock options were issued to an officer of the Company at a strike price of $0.31 per share. A total of $89,643 was included in consulting fees related to these options. In 2015, a total of 250,000 stock options were issued to directors of the Company at a strike price of $0.15 per share. A total of $18,175 was included in consulting fees related to these options. In 2014, a total of 108,000 stock options were issued to a director of the Company at a strike price of $0.43 per share. A total of $22,489 was included in consulting fees related to these options.

A total of 1,231,000 stock options previously granted to related parties were amended in 2015 by re-pricing these options to CAD$0.15 per share and a total of 424,000 stock options previously granted to related parties were amended in 2015 by repricing these options to CAD$0.225 per share. A total of $106,283 was included in consulting fees related to these options.

A total of 2,147,000 stock options previously granted to related parties were amended in 2014 by re-pricing these options to CAD$0.50 per share. A total of $54,581 was included in consulting fees related to these options.

17

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

10. SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE WITH RESPECT TO CASH FLOWS

		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
		2016		2015		2014
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	14,540	$	10,216	$	8,169
Income taxes	$	—	$	—	$	—

There were no significant non-cash transactions during the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, or December 31, 2014.

11. DEFERRED INCOME TAXES

Income tax benefits attributable to losses from United States of America operations was $Nil for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and 2014, and differed from the amounts computed by applying the United States of America federal income tax rate of 34% to pretax losses from operations as a result of the following:

		2016			2015			2014
Loss for the year	$	(467,711	)	$	(391,723	)	$	(687,057	)
Computed “expected” tax (benefit) expense		(159,000	)	$	(133,000	)	$	(234,000	)
Non deductible (taxable) items		(10,000	)		(73,000	)		(10,000	)
Change in statutory, foreign tax, foreign exchange and other		(30,000	)		121,000			106,000
Valuation allowance		199,000			85,000			138,000
Net expected tax (benefit) expense	$	—		$	—		$	—

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are presented below:

		2016			2015		2014
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Trading securities	$	137,000		$	96,000		125,000
Equipment		373,000			384,000		168,000
Net operating loss carryforwards - US		3,322,000			3,050,000		2,799,000
Net operating loss carryforwards - Ghana		87,000			159,000		2,494,000
Valuation allowance		(3,919,000	)		(3,689,000	)	(5,586,000	)
Total deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—		—

The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2016 was $(3,919,000) and (December 31, 2015 – $(3,689,000), December 31, 2014 – $(5,586,000)) respectively. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company has not provided for deferred income taxes on the difference between the carrying value of substantially all of its foreign subsidiaries and their corresponding tax basis as the earnings of those subsidiaries are intended to be permanently reinvested in their operations. As such, the investments are not anticipated to give rise to income taxes in the foreseeable future.

18

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets. In order to fully realize the deferred tax asset attributable to net operating loss carryforwards, the Company will need to generate future taxable income of approximately $10,120,000 prior to the expiration of the net operating loss carryforwards. Of the $10,120,000 of operating loss carryforwards, $9,772,000 is attributable to the US, and expires between 2017 and 2036, and the balance of $348,000 is attributable to Ghana and expires between 2017 and 2021.

12. SEGMENTED INFORMATION

The Company has one reportable segment, being the exploration and development of resource properties.

Geographic information is as follows:

		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
		2016			2015			2014
Cash and restricted cash:
Canada	$	772,535		$	564,633		$	704,972
Ghana		362,349			519,241			367,086
Total cash and restricted cash		1,134,884			1,083,874			1,072,058
Capital assets
Canada		—			—			—
Ghana		1,081,624			1,220,947			1,367,157
Total capital assets		1,081,624			1,220,947			1,367,157
Total	$	2,216,508		$	2,304,821		$	2,439,215
Net (loss) profit:
Canada	$	(599,442	)	$	(748,145	)	$	(755,479	)
Ghana		118,558			320,780			61,580
Total	$	(480,884	)	$	(427,365	)	$	(693,899	)

13. CONTINGENCY AND COMMITMENTS

a)	The Company leases 881 square feet for its corporate office located at Suite 902, 357 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario. The lease has a 60 month term commencing November 1, 2012, at approximately CAD$3,667 (US$2,731) per month. Payments in the next twelve months are $27,310 and $nil thereafter.
b)	In late 2009, the Government of Ghana announced an increase in the gross overriding royalty (“GOR”) required payable by all mining companies in the country from 3% to 5%. The industry standard remained at 3% due to stability agreements which were in place with a number of companies. From the commencement of gold recovery in July 2010 to September 2010, the Company paid the GOR at 5% and as of October 2010, the Company began to pay the GOR at 3% until July 1, 2011 when the Company again paid the royalty at 5%. As a result of this decision, there is a potential unrecorded liability of $84,300 related to 2010 activities and a recorded liability of $120,000 related to 2011 activities. Although the Company believes it is unlikely that these amounts will become payable a provision has been recorded due to the uncertainty of the timing of the increase.
c)	The Government of Ghana initially required an environmental bond of $385,000 for the Banso permit and $327,000 for the Muoso permit. The Company has submitted a request for a reduction of these fees to the government and is awaiting a response.

19

XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
December 31, 2016

14. SUBSEQUENT EVENT NOTE

Subsequent to December 31, 2016, an aggregate of 327,000 common shares were re-purchased for $44,511 (CAD$58,475) and 257,000 common shares were cancelled at March 28, 2017. Subsequent to December 31, 2016, 162,000 options were exercised for common shares and cash proceeds of $17,500 (CAD$24,300) were raised. Also, 108,000 stock options expired.

20

EX-12.1

Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE 15D-14(A)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, JAMES LONGSHORE, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Xtra-Gold Resources Corp.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s control over financial reporting.

Date: March 28, 2017

       JAMES LONGSHORE

James Longshore

President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-12.2

Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OR RULE 15D-14(A)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, VICTOR NKANSA, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Xtra-Gold Resources Corp.;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b.	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d.	Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b.	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s control over financial reporting.

Date: March 28, 2017

           VICTOR NKANSA

Victor Nkansa

Chief Financial Officer

EX-13.1

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Xtra-Gold Resources Corp. (the “company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James Longshore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(a)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(b)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

Date: March 28, 2017

          JAMES LONGSHORE

James Longshore

President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

EX-13.2

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Xtra-Gold Resources Corp. (the “company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Victor Nkansa, Chief Financial Officer of the company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

(a)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(b)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.

Date: March 28, 2017

         VICTOR NKANSA

Victor Nkansa

Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML

Document and Entity Information	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 shares
Document Type	20-F
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Dec. 31, 2016
Trading Symbol	xtgr
Entity Registrant Name	XTRA-GOLD RESOURCES CORP
Entity Central Index Key	0001288770
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	48,174,417
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Well Known Seasoned Issuer	No
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2016
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Current
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 913,562	$ 862,552	$ 850,736
Investment in trading securities, at fair value cost of $511,672 (December 31, 2015 - $651,580, December 31, 2014 - $710,297)	248,592	101,214	81,012
Receivables and other assets	190,227	31,636	103,047
Inventory	240,657	53,932	89,938
Total current assets	1,593,038	1,049,334	1,124,733
Restricted cash	221,322	221,322	221,322
Equipment	347,202	486,525	632,735
Mineral properties	734,422	734,422	734,422
TOTAL ASSETS	2,895,984	2,491,603	2,713,212
Current
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	269,613	246,721	230,798
Warrant liability	1,000	0	0
Asset retirement obligation	216,000	145,029	96,395
Total current liabilities	486,613	391,750	327,193
Total liabilities	486,613	391,750	327,193
Equity
Capital stock Authorized - 250,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 Issued and outstanding 48,174,417 common shares (December 31, 2015 - 45,662,417 common shares, December 31, 2014 - 45,811,417 common shares)	48,174	45,662	45,811
Additional paid in capital	31,870,683	31,095,966	30,990,260
Deficit accumulated	(28,583,385)	(28,102,501)	(27,675,136)
Total Xtra-Gold Resources Corp. stockholders' equity	3,335,472	3,039,127	3,360,935
Non-controlling interest	(926,101)	(939,274)	(974,916)
Total equity	2,409,371	2,099,853	2,386,019
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	$ 2,895,984	$ 2,491,603	$ 2,713,212

XML

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) - USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Trading Securities, Cost	$ 511,672	$ 651,580	$ 710,297
Common Stock, Shares Authorized	250,000,000	250,000,000	250,000,000
Common Stock, Par Value Per Share	$ 0.001	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common Stock, Shares, Issued	48,174,417	45,662,417	45,811,417
Common Stock, Shares, Outstanding	48,174,417	45,662,417	45,811,417

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
EXPENSES
Amortization	$ 139,323	$ 146,210	$ 188,078
Exploration	738,123	327,694	428,619
General and administrative	424,799	435,651	438,506
LOSS BEFORE OTHER ITEMS	(1,302,245)	(909,555)	(1,055,203)
OTHER ITEMS
Foreign exchange loss	(19,086)	(110,873)	(19,592)
Interest expense	(14,540)	(10,216)	(8,169)
Net (loss) gain on sales of trading securities	31,612	(15,363)	(26,217)
Other income	8,989	6,239	9,980
Recovery of gold	828,559	745,538	411,152
Loss contingency	0	0	0
Warrant (expense) gain	(1,000)	0	992
Provision for doubtful debts	0	(97,493)	0
Total Other Items	834,534	517,832	368,146
Consolidated loss for the year	(467,711)	(391,723)	(687,057)
Net gain attributable to non-controlling interest	(13,173)	(35,642)	(6,842)
Net loss attributable to Xtra-Gold Resources Corp.	$ (480,884)	$ (427,365)	$ (693,899)
Basic and diluted loss attributable to common shareholders per common share	$ (0.01)	$ (0.01)	$ (0.02)
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding	47,256,630	45,721,507	45,996,481

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY - USD ($)	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid in Capital [Member]	Deficit [Member]	Non-Controlling Interest [Member]	Total
Beginning Balance at Dec. 31, 2013	$ 46,264	$ 31,018,184	$ (26,981,237)	$ (981,758)	$ 3,101,453
Beginning Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2013	46,263,917
Stock-based compensation		108,302			108,302
Repurchase of shares	$ (453)	(136,226)			(136,679)
Repurchase of shares (Shares)	(452,500)
Loss for the year			(693,899)	6,842	(687,057)
Ending Balance at Dec. 31, 2014	$ 45,811	30,990,260	(27,675,136)	(974,916)	2,386,019
Ending Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2014	45,811,417
Stock-based compensation		124,458			124,458
Repurchase of shares	$ (149)	(18,752)			(18,901)
Repurchase of shares (Shares)	(149,000)
Loss for the year			(427,365)	35,642	(391,723)
Ending Balance at Dec. 31, 2015	$ 45,662	31,095,966	(28,102,501)	(939,274)	2,099,853
Ending Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2015	45,662,417
Private placement	$ 2,500	691,228			693,728
Private placement (Shares)	2,500,000
Stock-based compensation		104,519			104,519
Repurchase of shares	$ (396)	(69,378)			(69,774)
Repurchase of shares (Shares)	(396,000)
Stock option exercises	$ 408	48,348			48,756
Stock option exercises (Shares)	408,000
Loss for the year			(480,884)	13,173	(467,711)
Ending Balance at Dec. 31, 2016	$ 48,174	$ 31,870,683	$ (28,583,385)	$ (926,101)	$ 2,409,371
Ending Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2016	48,174,417

XML

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Loss for the year	$ (467,711)	$ (391,723)	$ (687,057)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Amortization	139,323	146,210	188,078
Change in asset retirement obligation	70,971	48,634	16,000
Stock-based compensation	104,519	124,458	108,302
Warrant expense (gain)	1,000	0	(992)
Unrealized foreign exchange loss (gain)	(12,405)	11,848	11,969
Purchase of trading securities	(253,554)	(62,742)	(118,289)
Proceeds on sale of trading securities	150,193	15,329	140,121
Net (loss) gain on sales of trading securities	(31,612)	15,363	26,217
Provision for doubtful debts	0	97,493	0
Changes in non-cash working capital items:
(Increase) decrease in receivables and other assets	(158,591)	(26,082)	167,837
(Increase) decrease in inventory	(186,725)	36,006	(89,938)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities	22,892	15,923	(80,114)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	(621,700)	30,717	(317,866)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Restricted cash	0	0	0
Net cash used in investing activities	0	0	0
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuances of capital stock, net of financing costs	693,728	0	0
Proceeds from exercise of options	48,756	0	0
Repurchase of capital stock	(69,774)	(18,901)	(136,679)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	672,710	(18,901)	(136,679)
Change in cash and cash equivalents during the year	51,010	11,816	(454,545)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year	862,552	850,736	1,305,281
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the year	$ 913,562	$ 862,552	$ 850,736

XML

HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE COMPANY

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE COMPANY [Text Block]

1. HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE COMPANY

Silverwing Systems Corporation (the “Company”), a Nevada corporation, was incorporated on September 1, 1998. On June 23, 1999, the Company completed the acquisition of Advertain On-Line Canada Inc. (“Advertain Canada”), a Canadian company operating in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. The Company changed its name to Advertain On-Line Inc. (“Advertain”) on August 19, 1999. Advertain Canada’s business was the operation of a web site, “Advertain.com”, whose primary purpose was to distribute entertainment advertising on the Internet.

In May 2001, the Company, being unable to continue its funding of Advertain Canada’s operations, decided to abandon its interest in Advertain Canada. On June 15, 2001, the Company sold its investment in Advertain Canada back to Advertain Canada’s original shareholder. On June 18, 2001, the Company changed its name from Advertain to RetinaPharma International, Inc. (“RetinaPharma”) and became inactive.

In 2003, the Company became a resource exploration company. On October 31, 2003, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding common stock of Xtra-Gold Resources, Inc. (“XGRI”). XGRI was incorporated in Florida on October 24, 2003. On December 19, 2003, the Company changed its name from RetinaPharma to Xtra-Gold Resources Corp.

In 2004, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Canadiana Gold Resources Limited (“Canadiana”) and 90% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Goldenrae Mining Company Limited (“Goldenrae”). Both companies are incorporated in Ghana and the remaining 10% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Goldenrae is held by the Government of Ghana.

On October 20, 2005, XGRI changed its name to Xtra Energy Corp. (“Xtra Energy”).

On October 20, 2005, the Company incorporated Xtra Oil & Gas Ltd. (“XOG”) in Alberta, Canada. This subsidiary was struck from the records in 2014.

On December 21, 2005, Canadiana changed its name to Xtra-Gold Exploration Limited (“XG Exploration”).

On January 13, 2006, Goldenrae changed its name to Xtra-Gold Mining Limited (“XG Mining”).

On March 2, 2006, the Company incorporated Xtra Oil & Gas (Ghana) Limited (“XOGG”) in Ghana.

On November 30, 2012, the Company changed its residency address from the USA to the British Virgin Islands.

XML

CONTINUANCE OF OPERATIONS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

CONTINUANCE OF OPERATIONS [Text Block]

2. CONTINUANCE OF OPERATIONS

The Company is in the early stages of development and as is common with any exploration company, it raises financing for its exploration and acquisition activities. The Company has incurred a loss of $480,884 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and has accumulated a deficit of $28,583,385. Results for the year ended December 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of future results. However, these losses raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and implement its business plan, which is typical for junior exploration companies. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Management of the Company (“Management”) is of the opinion that sufficient financing will be obtained from external financing and further share issuances to meet the Company’s obligations. At year ended December 31, 2016, the Company has working capital of $1,106,425, which would not be sufficient to fund the required exploration programs for a period greater than 12 months. The Company’s discretionary exploration activities do have considerable scope for flexibility in terms of the amount and timing of exploration expenditure, and expenditures may be adjusted accordingly if required.

XML

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES [Text Block]

3. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Generally accepted accounting principles

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America (“US GAAP”).

Principles of consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries, Xtra Energy (from October 31, 2003), XG Exploration (from February 16, 2004), XOG (from October 20, 2005) and XOGG (from March 2, 2006) and its 90% owned subsidiary, XG Mining (from December 22, 2004). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

Use of estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant areas requiring the use of estimates include the carrying value and recoverability of mineral properties, inputs used in the calculation of stock-based compensation and warrants, inputs used in the calculation of the asset retirement obligation, and the valuation allowance applied to deferred income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and would impact future results of operations and cash flows.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash held at financial institutions.

Receivables

Management has evaluated all receivables and has provided allowances for accounts where it deems collection doubtful. As of December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, the Company recorded allowance for doubtful accounts of $0, $97,493, and $0, respectively.

Inventory

Inventories are initially recognized at cost and subsequently stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The Company’s inventory consists of raw gold. Costs are determined using the first-in, first-out (“ FIFO ”) method and includes expenditures incurred in extracting the raw gold, other costs incurred in bringing them to their existing location and condition, and the cost of reclaiming the disturbed land to a natural state.

Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs necessary to make the sale. Inventories are written down to net realizable value when the cost of inventories is not estimated to be recoverable due to declining selling prices, or other issues related to the sale of gold.

Recovery of gold

Recovery of gold and other income is recognized when title and the risks and rewards of ownership to delivered bullion and commodities pass to the buyer and collection is reasonably assured.

Trading securities

The Company’s trading securities are reported at fair value, with realized and unrealized gains and losses included in earnings.

Non-Controlling Interest

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of XG Mining (from December 22, 2004). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. The Company records a non-controlling interest which reflects the 10% portion of the earnings (loss) of XG Mining allocable to the holders of the minority interest.

Equipment

Equipment is recorded at cost and is being amortized over its estimated useful lives using the declining balance method at the following annual rates:

Furniture and equipment	20%
Computer equipment	30%
Vehicles	30%
Mining and exploration equipment	20%

Mineral properties and exploration and development costs

The costs of acquiring mineral rights are capitalized at the date of acquisition. After acquisition, various factors can affect the recoverability of the capitalized costs. If, after review, management concludes that the carrying amount of a mineral property is impaired, it will be written down to estimated fair value. Exploration costs incurred on mineral properties are expensed as incurred. Development costs incurred on proven and probable reserves will be capitalized. Upon commencement of production, capitalized costs will be amortized using the unit-of-production method over the estimated life of the ore body based on proven and probable reserves (which exclude non-recoverable reserves and anticipated processing losses). When the Company receives an option payment related to a property, the proceeds of the payment are applied to reduce the carrying value of the exploration asset.

Long-lived assets

Long-lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For purposes of evaluating the recoverability of long-lived assets, the recoverability test is performed using undiscounted net cash flows related to the long-lived assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

Asset retirement obligations

The Company records the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development, and/or normal use of the long-lived assets. The Company also records a corresponding asset which is amortized over the life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial measurement of the asset retirement obligation, the obligation is adjusted at the end of each period to reflect the passage of time (accretion expense) and changes in the estimated future cash flows underlying the obligation (asset retirement cost).

Stock-based compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”. Under the fair value recognition provisions, stock-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date for all stock-based awards to employees and directors and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. The Black-Scholes option valuation model is used to calculate fair value.

The Company accounts for stock compensation arrangements with non-employees in accordance with ASC 505 which requires that such equity instruments are recorded at their fair value on the measurement date. The measurement of stock-based compensation is subject to periodic adjustment as the underlying equity instruments vest. Non-employee stock-based compensation charges are amortized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. For stock options granted to non-employees, the fair value of the stock options is estimated using a Black-Scholes valuation model.

Warrants

The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value using the appropriate valuation methodology and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements of operations. The warrants are presented as a liability because they do not meet the criteria of Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) topic 480 for equity classification. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the warrants are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under the asset and liability method the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be recognized.

Loss per share

Basic loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. To calculate diluted loss per share, the Company uses the treasury stock method and the if converted method. As of December 31, 2016, there were 1,397,000 warrants (December 31, 2015 – nil, December 31, 2014 – nil) and 1,920,000 stock options (December 31, 2015 – 2,235,000, December 31, 2014 – 2,426,000) outstanding which have not been included in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding as these were anti-dilutive.

Foreign exchange

The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Any monetary assets and liabilities that are in a currency other than the U.S. dollar are translated at the rate prevailing at year end. Revenue and expenses in a foreign currency are translated at rates that approximate those in effect at the time of translation. Gains and losses from translation of foreign currency transactions into U.S. dollars are included in current results of operations.

Financial instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, trading securities, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from its financial instruments. The fair values of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values unless otherwise noted. Cash in Canada is primarily held in financial institutions. Balances on hand may exceed insured maximums. Cash in Ghana is held in banks with a strong international presence. Ghana does not insure bank balances.

Fair value of financial assets and liabilities

The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on US GAAP guidance which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements.

The Company classifies financial assets and liabilities as held-for-trading, available-for-sale, held-to-maturity, loans and receivables or other financial liabilities depending on their nature. Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognized at fair value on their initial recognition, except for those arising from certain related party transactions which are accounted for at the transferor’s carrying amount or exchange amount.

Financial assets and liabilities classified as held-for-trading are measured at fair value, with gains and losses recognized in net income. Financial assets classified as held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, and financial liabilities other than those classified as held-for-trading are measured at amortized cost, using the effective interest method of amortization. Financial assets classified as available-for-sale are measured at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses being recognized as other comprehensive income until realized, or if an unrealized loss is considered other than temporary, the unrealized loss is recorded in income.

Financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are carried at cost, which management believes approximates fair value due to the short term nature of these instruments. Investments in trading securities are classified as held for trading, with unrealized gains and losses being recognized in income.

The following table presents information about the assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques the Company utilized to determine such fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points that are observable such as quoted prices, interest rates and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are unobservable data points for the asset or liability, and included situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset.

						Significant
				Quoted Prices		Other		Significant
				in Active		Observable		Unobservable
		December 31,		Markets		Inputs		Inputs
		2016		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	913,562	$	913,562	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash		221,322		221,322		—		—
Marketable securities		248,592		248,592		—		—
Warrant liability		1,000		—		—		1,000
Total	$	1,384,476	$	1,383,476	$	—	$	1,000

						Significant
				Quoted Prices		Other		Significant
				in Active		Observable		Unobservable
		December 31,		Markets		Inputs		Inputs
		2015		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	862,552	$	862,552	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash		221,322		221,322		—		—
Investment in trading securities		101,214		101,214		—		—
Warrant liability		—		—		—		—
Total	$	1,185,088	$	1,185,088	$	—	$	—

						Significant
				Quoted Prices		Other		Significant
				in Active		Observable		Unobservable
		December 31,		Markets		Inputs		Inputs
		2014		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	850,736	$	850,736	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash		221,322		221,322		—		—
Investment in trading securities		81,012		81,012		—		—
Warrant liability		—		—		—		—
Total	$	1,153,070	$	1,153,070	$	—	$	—

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities are determined through market, observable and corroborated sources. The fair value of the warrant liability is determined through the Black Scholes valuation model.

Concentration of credit risk

The financial instrument which potentially subjects the Company to concentration of credit risk is cash. The Company maintains cash in bank accounts that, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. As of December 31, 2016, the Company held $694,941 (December 31, 2015 - $468,750, December 31, 2014 - $635,550) in low risk money market funds which are not federally insured. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant risks on its cash in bank accounts. The company has contracted to sell all its recovered gold through a licensed exporter in Ghana.

Recent accounting pronouncements

On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, requiring an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date, which deferred the effective date of the new revenue standard for periods beginning after December 15, 2016 to December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted but not earlier than the original effective date. Accordingly, the updated standard is effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and we do not plan to early adopt. We have not yet selected a transition method and we are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern , which requires management of an entity to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued or available to be issued. This update is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement Period Adjustments . ASU 2015-16 requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The amendments in this Update require that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. Any current period adjustments to provisional amounts that would have impacted a prior period’s earnings had they been recognized at the acquisition date are required to be presented separately on the face of the income statement or disclosed in the notes. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments in this Update should be applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occur after the effective date of this Update with earlier application permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. Therefore the amendments in ASU 2015-16 will become effective for us as of the beginning of our 2017 fiscal year. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact upon our financial condition or results of operations.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740), which requires that all deferred income tax assets and liabilities be presented as noncurrent in the balance sheet. The pronouncement is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early application permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities . ASU 2016-01 requires that equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) are to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. Furthermore, equity investments without readily determinable fair values are to be assessed for impairment using a quantitative approach. The amendments in ASU 2016-01 should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption, with other amendments related specifically to equity securities without readily determinable fair values applied prospectively. The amendments in ASU 2016-01 will become effective for us as of the beginning of our 2019 fiscal year. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact upon our financial condition or results of operations.

On February 24, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases , requiring lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with the exception of short-term leases. For lessees, leases will continue to be classified as either operating or finance leases in the income statement. Lessor accounting is similar to the current model but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model. Lessors will continue to classify leases as operating, direct financing or sales-type leases. The effective date of the new standard for public companies is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition and requires application of the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. The updated standard is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. We are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

On March 30, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies various aspects related to the accounting and presentation of share-based payments. The amendments require entities to record all tax effects related to share-based payments at settlement or expiration through the income statement and the windfall tax benefit to be recorded when it arises, subject to normal valuation allowance considerations. All tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments are required to be reported as operating activities in the statement of cash flows. The updates relating to the income tax effects of the share-based payments including the cash flow presentation must be adopted either prospectively or retrospectively. Further, the amendments allow the entities to make an accounting policy election to either estimate forfeitures or recognize forfeitures as they occur. If an election is made, the change to recognize forfeitures as they occur must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach with a cumulative effect adjustment recorded to opening retained earnings. The effective date of the new standard for public companies is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments , in an effort to reduce the diversity of how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments of this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact this ASU will have on the financial statements and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business , in an effort to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments of this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

XML

INVESTMENTS IN TRADING SECURITIES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

INVESTMENTS IN TRADING SECURITIES [Text Block]

4. INVESTMENTS IN TRADING SECURITIES

At December 31, 2016, the Company held investments classified as trading securities, which consisted of various equity securities. All trading securities are carried at fair value. As of December 31, 2016, the fair value of trading securities was $248,592. (December 31, 2015 – $101,214, December 31, 2014 – $81,012).

		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
		2016			2015			2014
Investments in trading securities at cost	$	511,672		$	651,580		$	710,297
Unrealized gains (losses)		(263,080	)		(550,366	)		(629,285	)
Investments in trading securities at fair market value	$	248,592		$	101,214		$	81,012

XML

EQUIPMENT

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

EQUIPMENT [Text Block]

5. EQUIPMENT

				December 31, 2016
				Accumulated		Net Book
		Cost		Amortization		Value
Furniture and equipment	$	8,358	$	8,358	$	—
Computer equipment		20,274		20,274		—
Exploration equipment		1,464,478		1,144,382		320,096
Vehicles		333,989		306,883		27,106
	$	1,827,099	$	1,479,897	$	347,202

The company expensed $139,323 for amortization in 2016.

				December 31, 2015
				Accumulated		Net Book
		Cost		Amortization		Value
Furniture and equipment	$	8,358	$	8,358	$	—
Computer equipment		20,274		20,274		—
Exploration equipment		1,464,478		1,047,418		417,060
Vehicles		333,989		264,524		69,465
	$	1,827,099	$	1,340,574	$	486,525

The company expensed $146,210 for amortization in 2015.

				December 31, 2014
				Accumulated		Net Book
		Cost		Amortization		Value
Furniture and equipment	$	8,358	$	8,358	$	—
Computer equipment		20,274		20,274		—
Exploration equipment		1,464,478		930,979		533,499
Vehicles		333,989		234,753		99,236
	$	1,827,099	$	1,194,364	$	632,735

The company expensed $188,078 for amortization in 2014.

XML

MINERAL PROPERTIES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

MINERAL PROPERTIES [Text Block]

6. MINERAL PROPERTIES

		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
		2016			2015			2014
Acquisition costs	$	1,607,729		$	1,607,729		$	1,607,729
Asset retirement obligation (Note 7)		8,133			8,133			8,133
Option payments received		(881,440	)		(881,440	)		(881,440	)
Total	$	734,422		$	734,422		$	734,422

Kibi, Kwabeng and Pameng Projects

The Company holds an individual mining lease over the lease area of each of the Kibi Project, the Kwabeng Project and the Pameng Project, all of which are located in Ghana. The mining leases for the Kwabeng and Pameng Projects grant the Company mining rights to produce gold in the respective lease areas until July 26, 2019. We have renewed the lease for a 15 year extension of our Kibi Project (formerly known as the Apapam Project) which expired December 17, 2015. The extension is in accordance with the terms of application and payment of fees to the Minerals Commission of Ghana (“Mincom”). All gold production will be subject to a production royalty of the net smelter returns (“NSR”) payable to the Government of Ghana.

Banso and Muoso Projects

During the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company made an application to Mincom to convert a single prospecting license (“PL”) securing its interest in the Banso and Muoso Projects located in Ghana to a mining lease covering the lease area of each of these Projects. This application was approved by Mincom who subsequently made recommendation to the Minister of Lands, Forestry and Mines to grant an individual mining lease for each Project. Subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2010, the Government of Ghana granted two mining leases for these Projects dated January 6, 2011. These mining leases grant the Company mining rights to produce gold in the respective lease areas until January 5, 2025 with respect to the Banso Project and until January 5, 2024 with respect to the Muoso Project. These mining leases supersede the PL previously granted to the Company. Among other things, both mining leases require that the Company (i) pay the Government of Ghana a fee of $30,000 in consideration of granting of each lease (paid in the March 2011 quarter); (ii) pay annual ground rent of GH¢260.00 (USD$167) for the Banso Project and GH¢280.00 (USD$180) for the Muoso Project; (iii) commence commercial production of gold within two years from the date of the mining leases; and (iv) pay a production royalty to the Government of Ghana. The Company has filed for the necessary permits to commence work on the project. The permits were approved and work has commenced on the properties.

The Company executed a letter of intent (“LOI”) with Buccaneer Gold Corp. (“Buccaneer”), formerly Verbina Resources Inc., a company related by two directors in common, on July 21, 2010 whereby Buccaneer could acquire an undivided 55% interest in the Company’s interest in the mineral rights of the Company’s Banso and Muoso concessions (“Concessions”). On January 21, 2011, the terms of the agreement were amended.

On November 22, 2016, the Company announced that Buccaneer had abandoned its rights in respect of the Concessions.

Mining lease and prospecting license commitments

The Company is committed to expend, from time to time fees payable (a) to the Minerals Commission for: (i) an extension of an expiry date of a prospecting license (currently $15,000 for each occurrence); (ii) a grant of a mining lease (currently $100,000); (iii) an extension of a mining lease (currently $100,000); (iv) annual operating permits; and (v) the conversion of a reconnaissance license to a prospecting license (currently $20,000); (b) to the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) (of Ghana) for: (i) processing and certificate fees with respect to EPA permits; (ii) the issuance of permits before the commencement of any work at a particular concession; or (iii) the posting of a bond in connection with any mining operations undertaken by the Company; (c) for a legal obligation associated with our mineral properties for clean up costs when work programs are completed; and (d) an aggregate of less than $500 in connection with annual ground rent and mining permits to enter upon and gain access to the areas covered by the Company’s mining leases and future reconnaissance and prospecting licenses and such other financial commitments arising out of any approved exploration programs in connection therewith.

XML

ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION [Text Block]

7. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION

		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
		2016		2015		2014
Balance, beginning of year	$	145,029	$	96,395	$	203,395
Change in obligation		70,971		48,634		(123,000	)
Accretion expense		—		—		16,000
Balance, end of year	$	216,000	$	145,029	$	96,395

The Company has a legal obligation associated with its mineral properties for clean up costs when work programs are completed.

The undiscounted amount of cash flows, required over the estimated reserve life of the underlying assets, to settle the obligation, adjusted for inflation, is estimated at $216,000 (2015 - $145,029, 2014 - $96,395). During 2016, 2015 and 2014, the obligation was estimated based on actual reclamation cost experience on an average per acre basis and the remaining acres to be reclaimed. It is expected that this obligation will be funded from general Company resources at the time the costs are incurred. The Company has been required by the Ghanaian government to post a bond of US$221,322 which has been recorded in restricted cash.

XML

CAPITAL STOCK

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

CAPITAL STOCK [Text Block]

8. CAPITAL STOCK

Issuances of shares

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 2,500,000 units at CAD$0.40 per unit for proceeds of $693,728 net of costs. Each unit was comprised of one common share and one half of one common share purchase warrant. Each full purchase warrant is convertible into one common share of the Company at a price of CAD$0.65 for a period of 15 months from closing. The Company also issued 147,000 finders warrants with this financing. Each finders warrant is convertible into one common share of the Company at a price of CAD$0.65 for a period of 15 months from closing.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 408,000 shares at CAD$0.15 per share for proceeds of $48,756 on exercise of stock options.

Cancellation of shares

During the year ended December 31, 2016, a total of 396,000 common shares were re-purchased for $69,774 and cancelled.

Stock options

At June 30, 2011, the Company adopted a new 10% rolling stock option plan (the “2011 Plan”) and cancelled the 2005 equity compensation plan. Pursuant to the 2011 Plan, the Company is entitled to grant options and reserve for issuance up to 10% of the shares issued and outstanding at the time of grant. The terms and conditions of any options granted, including the number and type of options, the exercise period, the exercise price and vesting provisions, are determined by the Compensation Committee which makes recommendations to the board of directors for their approval. The maximum term of options granted cannot exceed 10 years.

The TSX’s rules relating to security-based compensation arrangements require that every three years after the institution of a security-based compensation arrangement which does not have a fixed maximum aggregate of securities issuable, all unallocated options must be approved by a majority of the Company’s directors and by the Company’s shareholders. The Board approved all unallocated options under the Option Plan on March 26, 2014 which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at the annual and special meeting held on June 19, 2014.

At December 31, 2016, the following stock options were outstanding:

Number of	Exercise	Expiry Date
Options	Price
108,000	CDN$0.50	March 5, 2017
162,000	CDN$0.15	March 12, 2017
54,000	CAD$0.50	June 1, 2020
63,000	CDN$0.15	June 1, 2020
48,000	CDN$0.225	June 1, 2020
90,000	CDN$0.50	July 1, 2020
30,000	CDN$0.50	March 1, 2021
100,000	CDN$0.225	March 1, 2021
108,000	CDN$0.15	June 10, 2021
382,000	CDN$0.15	December 31, 2022
250,000	CDN$0.20	October 8, 2025
400,000	CDN$0.40	May 5, 2026
125,000	CDN$0.65	July 25, 2021

Stock option transactions and the number of stock options outstanding are summarized as follows:

	December 31, 2016				December 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
				Weighted				Weighted				Weighted
	Number			Average	Number			Average	Number			Average
	of			Exercise	of			Exercise	of			Exercise
	Options			Price	Options			Price	Options			Price
Outstanding, beginning of year	2,235,000		$	0.16	2,426,000		$	0.43	2,489,000		$	1.03
Granted	525,000		$	0.36	250,000		$	0.15	108,000		$	0.43
Exercised	(408,000	)	$	0.12	—			—	—			—
Cancelled/Expired	(432,000	)	$	0.16	(441,000	)	$	0.36	(171,000	)	$	1.90
Outstanding, end of year	1,920,000		$	0.23	2,235,000		$	0.16	2,426,000		$	0.43
Exercisable, end of year	1,920,000		$	0.23	2,235,000		$	0.16	2,426,000		$	0.43

The aggregate intrinsic value for options vested and for total options as of December 31, 2016 is approximately $57,059 (December 31, 2015 - $nil, December 31, 2014 - $nil). The weighted average contractual term of stock options outstanding and exercisable as at December 31, 2016 is 5.60 years (December 31, 2015 – 3.67 years, December 31, 2014 – 5.05 years).

The fair value of stock options granted, vested, and modified during the year ended December 31, 2016 was $104,519 (year ended December 31, 2015 - $124,458, December 31, 2014 - $108,302) which has been included in general and administrative expense.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company re-priced 424,000 options previously granted to insiders of the Company and 48,000 options previously granted to non-insiders of the Company. The options were re-priced to $0.18 (CAD$0.225), resulting in a charge of $20,202 during the year.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company re-priced 1,231,000 options previously granted to insiders of the Company to $0.12 (CAD$0.15), resulting in a charge of $86,081 during the year.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, 2,147,000 options previously granted to insiders of the Company and 171,000 options previously granted to non-insiders of the Company were re-priced to $0.43 (CAD$0.50), resulting in a charge of $59,304 during the year.

The following assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes valuation of stock options amended during the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	2016	2015	2014
Risk-free interest rate	N/A	0.26% - 1.64%	1.25%
Expected life	N/A	0.8 to 5 years	5.0 years
Annualized volatility	N/A	58% - 74%	45%
Dividend rate	N/A	—	—

There were 400,000 option grants during 2016 to an insider of the Company at $0.31 (CAD$0.40) . A further 125,000 options were granted during 2016 to a consultant of the company at $0.50 (CAD$0.65) . During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company granted 250,000 options to insiders of the Company at $0.15 (CAD$0.20) . During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company granted 108,000 options to an insider of the Company at $0.43 (CAD$0.50) . The following assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes valuation of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014:

	2016	2015	2014
Risk-free interest rate	1.75%	1.75%	1.75%
Expected life	4 to 7.5 years	7.5 years	7.5 years
Annualized volatility	61% - 65%	68%	95%
Dividend rate	—	—	—

The weighted average fair value of options granted in 2016 was $104,519 (2015 - $124,458. 2014 - $108,302).

Warrants

At December 31, 2016, the following warrants were outstanding:

Number of Warrants	Exercise Price	Expiry Date
1,397,000	CAD$0.65	August 25, 2017

Warrant transactions and the number of warrants outstanding are summarized as follows:

	2016		2015	2014
Balance, beginning of period	—		—	964.500		CAD$1.00
Issued	1,397,000	CAD$0.65	—	—
Exercised	—		—	—
Expired	—		—	(964,500	)
Balance, end of period	1,397,000	CAD$0.65	—	—

Under US GAAP when the strike price of the warrants is denominated in a currency other than an entity's functional currency, the warrants would not be considered indexed to the entity’s own stock, and would consequently be considered to be a derivative liability. The common share purchase warrants described above are denominated in CAD dollars and the Company’s functional currency is the US dollar. As a result, the Company determined that these warrants are not considered indexed to the Company’s own stock and characterized the fair value of these warrants as derivative liabilities upon issuance. The derivative will be subsequently marked to market through income.

The Company determined that the fair value of the warrant liability using the Black-Scholes Options Pricing Model at May 25, 2016 to be $70,712. The fair value of the warrants has been estimated at December 31, 2016 using the Black-Scholes Options Pricing Model was $1,000.

The Company recorded the full value of the derivative as a liability at issuance and recognized the amount as financing expense in the consolidated statement of operations. At December 31, 2016, the fair value adjustment was recognized in the consolidated statement of operations.

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS [Text Block]

9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company entered into the following transactions with related parties:

		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
		2016		2015		2014
Consulting fees paid or accrued to officers or their companies	$	539,706	$	495,683	$	472,649
Directors’ fees		2,267		4,692		18,845
Stock option grants to officers and directors		400,000		250,000		108,000
Stock option grant price range	$	0.31	$	$0.15	$	0.43

Of the total consulting fees noted above, $256,319 (December 31, 2015 - $201,097, December 31, 2014 - $144,394) was incurred by the Company to a private company of which a related party is a 50% shareholder and director. The related party was entitled to receive $127,348 (December 31, 2015 - $100,548, December 31, 2014 - $72,197) of this amount. As at December 31, 2016, $47,792 (December 31, 2015, $51,096, December 31, 2014 - $28,974) remains payable to this related company and $5,000 (December 31, 2015 - $10,000, December 31, 2014 - $nil) remains payable to the related party for expenses earned for work on behalf of the Company.

As at December 31, 2016, $nil (December 31, 2015 - $97,493, December 31, 2014 - $97,493) was due from Buccaneer for services performed by the Company during the periods. These balances were forgiven when Buccaneer announced they were not pursuing their interest in the Concessions. The Company had fully provided against this balance in 2015.

In 2016, a total of 400,000 stock options were issued to an officer of the Company at a strike price of $0.31 per share. A total of $89,643 was included in consulting fees related to these options. In 2015, a total of 250,000 stock options were issued to directors of the Company at a strike price of $0.15 per share. A total of $18,175 was included in consulting fees related to these options. In 2014, a total of 108,000 stock options were issued to a director of the Company at a strike price of $0.43 per share. A total of $22,489 was included in consulting fees related to these options.

A total of 1,231,000 stock options previously granted to related parties were amended in 2015 by re-pricing these options to CAD$0.15 per share and a total of 424,000 stock options previously granted to related parties were amended in 2015 by repricing these options to CAD$0.225 per share. A total of $106,283 was included in consulting fees related to these options.

A total of 2,147,000 stock options previously granted to related parties were amended in 2014 by re-pricing these options to CAD$0.50 per share. A total of $54,581 was included in consulting fees related to these options.

XML

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE WITH RESPECT TO CASH FLOWS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE WITH RESPECT TO CASH FLOWS [Text Block]

10. SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE WITH RESPECT TO CASH FLOWS

		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
		2016		2015		2014
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	14,540	$	10,216	$	8,169
Income taxes	$	—	$	—	$	—

There were no significant non-cash transactions during the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, or December 31, 2014.

XML

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES [Text Block]

11. DEFERRED INCOME TAXES

Income tax benefits attributable to losses from United States of America operations was $Nil for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and 2014, and differed from the amounts computed by applying the United States of America federal income tax rate of 34% to pretax losses from operations as a result of the following:

		2016			2015			2014
Loss for the year	$	(467,711	)	$	(391,723	)	$	(687,057	)
Computed “expected” tax (benefit) expense		(159,000	)	$	(133,000	)	$	(234,000	)
Non deductible (taxable) items		(10,000	)		(73,000	)		(10,000	)
Change in statutory, foreign tax, foreign exchange and other		(30,000	)		121,000			106,000
Valuation allowance		199,000			85,000			138,000
Net expected tax (benefit) expense	$	—		$	—		$	—

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are presented below:

		2016			2015		2014
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Trading securities	$	137,000		$	96,000		125,000
Equipment		373,000			384,000		168,000
Net operating loss carryforwards - US		3,322,000			3,050,000		2,799,000
Net operating loss carryforwards - Ghana		87,000			159,000		2,494,000
Valuation allowance		(3,919,000	)		(3,689,000	)	(5,586,000	)
Total deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—		—

The valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2016 was $(3,919,000) and (December 31, 2015 – $(3,689,000), December 31, 2014 – $(5,586,000)) respectively. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. The Company has not provided for deferred income taxes on the difference between the carrying value of substantially all of its foreign subsidiaries and their corresponding tax basis as the earnings of those subsidiaries are intended to be permanently reinvested in their operations. As such, the investments are not anticipated to give rise to income taxes in the foreseeable future.

Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets. In order to fully realize the deferred tax asset attributable to net operating loss carryforwards, the Company will need to generate future taxable income of approximately $10,120,000 prior to the expiration of the net operating loss carryforwards. Of the $10,120,000 of operating loss carryforwards, $9,772,000 is attributable to the US, and expires between 2017 and 2036, and the balance of $348,000 is attributable to Ghana and expires between 2017 and 2021.

XML

SEGMENTED INFORMATION

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

SEGMENTED INFORMATION [Text Block]

12. SEGMENTED INFORMATION

The Company has one reportable segment, being the exploration and development of resource properties.

Geographic information is as follows:

		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
		2016			2015			2014
Cash and restricted cash:
Canada	$	772,535		$	564,633		$	704,972
Ghana		362,349			519,241			367,086
Total cash and restricted cash		1,134,884			1,083,874			1,072,058
Capital assets
Canada		—			—			—
Ghana		1,081,624			1,220,947			1,367,157
Total capital assets		1,081,624			1,220,947			1,367,157
Total	$	2,216,508		$	2,304,821		$	2,439,215
Net (loss) profit:
Canada	$	(599,442	)	$	(748,145	)	$	(755,479	)
Ghana		118,558			320,780			61,580
Total	$	(480,884	)	$	(427,365	)	$	(693,899	)

XML

CONTINGENCY AND COMMITMENTS

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

CONTINGENCY AND COMMITMENTS [Text Block]

13. CONTINGENCY AND COMMITMENTS

a)	The Company leases 881 square feet for its corporate office located at Suite 902, 357 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario. The lease has a 60 month term commencing November 1, 2012, at approximately CAD$3,667 (US$2,731) per month. Payments in the next twelve months are $27,310 and $nil thereafter.
b)	In late 2009, the Government of Ghana announced an increase in the gross overriding royalty (“GOR”) required payable by all mining companies in the country from 3% to 5%. The industry standard remained at 3% due to stability agreements which were in place with a number of companies. From the commencement of gold recovery in July 2010 to September 2010, the Company paid the GOR at 5% and as of October 2010, the Company began to pay the GOR at 3% until July 1, 2011 when the Company again paid the royalty at 5%. As a result of this decision, there is a potential unrecorded liability of $84,300 related to 2010 activities and a recorded liability of $120,000 related to 2011 activities. Although the Company believes it is unlikely that these amounts will become payable a provision has been recorded due to the uncertainty of the timing of the increase.
c)	The Government of Ghana initially required an environmental bond of $385,000 for the Banso permit and $327,000 for the Muoso permit. The Company has submitted a request for a reduction of these fees to the government and is awaiting a response.

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENT NOTE

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

SUBSEQUENT EVENT NOTE [Text Block]

14. SUBSEQUENT EVENT NOTE

Subsequent to December 31, 2016, an aggregate of 327,000 common shares were re-purchased for $44,511 (CAD$58,475) and 257,000 common shares were cancelled at March 28, 2017. Subsequent to December 31, 2016, 162,000 options were exercised for common shares and cash proceeds of $17,500 (CAD$24,300) were raised. Also, 108,000 stock options expired.

XML

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Generally accepted accounting principles [Policy Text Block]

Generally accepted accounting principles

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States of America (“US GAAP”).

Principles of consolidation [Policy Text Block]

Principles of consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries, Xtra Energy (from October 31, 2003), XG Exploration (from February 16, 2004), XOG (from October 20, 2005) and XOGG (from March 2, 2006) and its 90% owned subsidiary, XG Mining (from December 22, 2004). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

Use of estimates [Policy Text Block]

Use of estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant areas requiring the use of estimates include the carrying value and recoverability of mineral properties, inputs used in the calculation of stock-based compensation and warrants, inputs used in the calculation of the asset retirement obligation, and the valuation allowance applied to deferred income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and would impact future results of operations and cash flows.

Cash and cash equivalents [Policy Text Block]

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash held at financial institutions.

Receivables [Policy Text Block]

Receivables

Management has evaluated all receivables and has provided allowances for accounts where it deems collection doubtful. As of December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, the Company recorded allowance for doubtful accounts of $0, $97,493, and $0, respectively.

Inventory [Policy Text Block]

Inventory

Inventories are initially recognized at cost and subsequently stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The Company’s inventory consists of raw gold. Costs are determined using the first-in, first-out (“ FIFO ”) method and includes expenditures incurred in extracting the raw gold, other costs incurred in bringing them to their existing location and condition, and the cost of reclaiming the disturbed land to a natural state.

Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs necessary to make the sale. Inventories are written down to net realizable value when the cost of inventories is not estimated to be recoverable due to declining selling prices, or other issues related to the sale of gold.

Recovery of gold [Policy Text Block]

Recovery of gold

Recovery of gold and other income is recognized when title and the risks and rewards of ownership to delivered bullion and commodities pass to the buyer and collection is reasonably assured.

Trading securities [Policy Text Block]

Trading securities

The Company’s trading securities are reported at fair value, with realized and unrealized gains and losses included in earnings.

Non-Controlling Interest [Policy Text Block]

Non-Controlling Interest

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of XG Mining (from December 22, 2004). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation. The Company records a non-controlling interest which reflects the 10% portion of the earnings (loss) of XG Mining allocable to the holders of the minority interest.

Equipment [Policy Text Block]

Equipment

Equipment is recorded at cost and is being amortized over its estimated useful lives using the declining balance method at the following annual rates:

Furniture and equipment	20%
Computer equipment	30%
Vehicles	30%
Mining and exploration equipment	20%

Mineral properties and exploration and development costs [Policy Text Block]

Mineral properties and exploration and development costs

The costs of acquiring mineral rights are capitalized at the date of acquisition. After acquisition, various factors can affect the recoverability of the capitalized costs. If, after review, management concludes that the carrying amount of a mineral property is impaired, it will be written down to estimated fair value. Exploration costs incurred on mineral properties are expensed as incurred. Development costs incurred on proven and probable reserves will be capitalized. Upon commencement of production, capitalized costs will be amortized using the unit-of-production method over the estimated life of the ore body based on proven and probable reserves (which exclude non-recoverable reserves and anticipated processing losses). When the Company receives an option payment related to a property, the proceeds of the payment are applied to reduce the carrying value of the exploration asset.

Long-lived assets [Policy Text Block]

Long-lived assets

Long-lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For purposes of evaluating the recoverability of long-lived assets, the recoverability test is performed using undiscounted net cash flows related to the long-lived assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

Asset retirement obligations [Policy Text Block]

Asset retirement obligations

The Company records the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development, and/or normal use of the long-lived assets. The Company also records a corresponding asset which is amortized over the life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial measurement of the asset retirement obligation, the obligation is adjusted at the end of each period to reflect the passage of time (accretion expense) and changes in the estimated future cash flows underlying the obligation (asset retirement cost).

Stock-based compensation [Policy Text Block]

Stock-based compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the provisions of ASC 718, “Compensation-Stock Compensation”. Under the fair value recognition provisions, stock-based compensation expense is measured at the grant date for all stock-based awards to employees and directors and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. The Black-Scholes option valuation model is used to calculate fair value.

The Company accounts for stock compensation arrangements with non-employees in accordance with ASC 505 which requires that such equity instruments are recorded at their fair value on the measurement date. The measurement of stock-based compensation is subject to periodic adjustment as the underlying equity instruments vest. Non-employee stock-based compensation charges are amortized over the vesting period on a straight-line basis. For stock options granted to non-employees, the fair value of the stock options is estimated using a Black-Scholes valuation model.

Warrants [Policy Text Block]

Warrants

The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value using the appropriate valuation methodology and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the consolidated statements of operations. The warrants are presented as a liability because they do not meet the criteria of Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) topic 480 for equity classification. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the warrants are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations.

Income taxes [Policy Text Block]

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under the asset and liability method the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be recognized.

Loss per share [Policy Text Block]

Loss per share

Basic loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. To calculate diluted loss per share, the Company uses the treasury stock method and the if converted method. As of December 31, 2016, there were 1,397,000 warrants (December 31, 2015 – nil, December 31, 2014 – nil) and 1,920,000 stock options (December 31, 2015 – 2,235,000, December 31, 2014 – 2,426,000) outstanding which have not been included in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding as these were anti-dilutive.

Foreign exchange [Policy Text Block]

Foreign exchange

The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Any monetary assets and liabilities that are in a currency other than the U.S. dollar are translated at the rate prevailing at year end. Revenue and expenses in a foreign currency are translated at rates that approximate those in effect at the time of translation. Gains and losses from translation of foreign currency transactions into U.S. dollars are included in current results of operations.

Financial instruments [Policy Text Block]

Financial instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, trading securities, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from its financial instruments. The fair values of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values unless otherwise noted. Cash in Canada is primarily held in financial institutions. Balances on hand may exceed insured maximums. Cash in Ghana is held in banks with a strong international presence. Ghana does not insure bank balances.

Fair value of financial assets and liabilities [Policy Text Block]

Fair value of financial assets and liabilities

The Company measures the fair value of financial assets and liabilities based on US GAAP guidance which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about fair value measurements.

The Company classifies financial assets and liabilities as held-for-trading, available-for-sale, held-to-maturity, loans and receivables or other financial liabilities depending on their nature. Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognized at fair value on their initial recognition, except for those arising from certain related party transactions which are accounted for at the transferor’s carrying amount or exchange amount.

Financial assets and liabilities classified as held-for-trading are measured at fair value, with gains and losses recognized in net income. Financial assets classified as held-to-maturity, loans and receivables, and financial liabilities other than those classified as held-for-trading are measured at amortized cost, using the effective interest method of amortization. Financial assets classified as available-for-sale are measured at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses being recognized as other comprehensive income until realized, or if an unrealized loss is considered other than temporary, the unrealized loss is recorded in income.

Financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are carried at cost, which management believes approximates fair value due to the short term nature of these instruments. Investments in trading securities are classified as held for trading, with unrealized gains and losses being recognized in income.

The following table presents information about the assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2016, and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques the Company utilized to determine such fair value. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs utilize data points that are observable such as quoted prices, interest rates and yield curves. Fair values determined by Level 3 inputs are unobservable data points for the asset or liability, and included situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset.

						Significant
				Quoted Prices		Other		Significant
				in Active		Observable		Unobservable
		December 31,		Markets		Inputs		Inputs
		2016		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	913,562	$	913,562	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash		221,322		221,322		—		—
Marketable securities		248,592		248,592		—		—
Warrant liability		1,000		—		—		1,000
Total	$	1,384,476	$	1,383,476	$	—	$	1,000

						Significant
				Quoted Prices		Other		Significant
				in Active		Observable		Unobservable
		December 31,		Markets		Inputs		Inputs
		2015		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	862,552	$	862,552	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash		221,322		221,322		—		—
Investment in trading securities		101,214		101,214		—		—
Warrant liability		—		—		—		—
Total	$	1,185,088	$	1,185,088	$	—	$	—

						Significant
				Quoted Prices		Other		Significant
				in Active		Observable		Unobservable
		December 31,		Markets		Inputs		Inputs
		2014		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	850,736	$	850,736	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash		221,322		221,322		—		—
Investment in trading securities		81,012		81,012		—		—
Warrant liability		—		—		—		—
Total	$	1,153,070	$	1,153,070	$	—	$	—

The fair values of cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities are determined through market, observable and corroborated sources. The fair value of the warrant liability is determined through the Black Scholes valuation model.

Concentration of credit risk [Policy Text Block]

Concentration of credit risk

The financial instrument which potentially subjects the Company to concentration of credit risk is cash. The Company maintains cash in bank accounts that, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. As of December 31, 2016, the Company held $694,941 (December 31, 2015 - $468,750, December 31, 2014 - $635,550) in low risk money market funds which are not federally insured. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any significant risks on its cash in bank accounts. The company has contracted to sell all its recovered gold through a licensed exporter in Ghana.

Recent accounting pronouncements [Policy Text Block]

Recent accounting pronouncements

On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, requiring an entity to recognize the amount of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date, which deferred the effective date of the new revenue standard for periods beginning after December 15, 2016 to December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted but not earlier than the original effective date. Accordingly, the updated standard is effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 and we do not plan to early adopt. We have not yet selected a transition method and we are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern , which requires management of an entity to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued or available to be issued. This update is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In July 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement Period Adjustments . ASU 2015-16 requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. The amendments in this Update require that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. Any current period adjustments to provisional amounts that would have impacted a prior period’s earnings had they been recognized at the acquisition date are required to be presented separately on the face of the income statement or disclosed in the notes. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments in this Update should be applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occur after the effective date of this Update with earlier application permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. Therefore the amendments in ASU 2015-16 will become effective for us as of the beginning of our 2017 fiscal year. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact upon our financial condition or results of operations.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740), which requires that all deferred income tax assets and liabilities be presented as noncurrent in the balance sheet. The pronouncement is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early application permitted. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities . ASU 2016-01 requires that equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) are to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer. Furthermore, equity investments without readily determinable fair values are to be assessed for impairment using a quantitative approach. The amendments in ASU 2016-01 should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption, with other amendments related specifically to equity securities without readily determinable fair values applied prospectively. The amendments in ASU 2016-01 will become effective for us as of the beginning of our 2019 fiscal year. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact upon our financial condition or results of operations.

On February 24, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases , requiring lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with the exception of short-term leases. For lessees, leases will continue to be classified as either operating or finance leases in the income statement. Lessor accounting is similar to the current model but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model. Lessors will continue to classify leases as operating, direct financing or sales-type leases. The effective date of the new standard for public companies is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition and requires application of the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. The updated standard is effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2020. We are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

On March 30, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies various aspects related to the accounting and presentation of share-based payments. The amendments require entities to record all tax effects related to share-based payments at settlement or expiration through the income statement and the windfall tax benefit to be recorded when it arises, subject to normal valuation allowance considerations. All tax-related cash flows resulting from share-based payments are required to be reported as operating activities in the statement of cash flows. The updates relating to the income tax effects of the share-based payments including the cash flow presentation must be adopted either prospectively or retrospectively. Further, the amendments allow the entities to make an accounting policy election to either estimate forfeitures or recognize forfeitures as they occur. If an election is made, the change to recognize forfeitures as they occur must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach with a cumulative effect adjustment recorded to opening retained earnings. The effective date of the new standard for public companies is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments , in an effort to reduce the diversity of how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments of this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact this ASU will have on the financial statements and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business , in an effort to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments of this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.

XML

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Dec. 31, 2015

Dec. 31, 2014

Schedule of Equipment, Declining Method Annual Rates [Table Text Block]

Furniture and equipment	20%
Computer equipment	30%
Vehicles	30%
Mining and exploration equipment	20%

Schedule of Fair Value of Financial Assets And Liabilities [Table Text Block]

						Significant
				Quoted Prices		Other		Significant
				in Active		Observable		Unobservable
		December 31,		Markets		Inputs		Inputs
		2016		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	913,562	$	913,562	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash		221,322		221,322		—		—
Marketable securities		248,592		248,592		—		—
Warrant liability		1,000		—		—		1,000
Total	$	1,384,476	$	1,383,476	$	—	$	1,000

						Significant
				Quoted Prices		Other		Significant
				in Active		Observable		Unobservable
		December 31,		Markets		Inputs		Inputs
		2015		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	862,552	$	862,552	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash		221,322		221,322		—		—
Investment in trading securities		101,214		101,214		—		—
Warrant liability		—		—		—		—
Total	$	1,185,088	$	1,185,088	$	—	$	—

						Significant
				Quoted Prices		Other		Significant
				in Active		Observable		Unobservable
		December 31,		Markets		Inputs		Inputs
		2014		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	850,736	$	850,736	$	—	$	—
Restricted cash		221,322		221,322		—		—
Investment in trading securities		81,012		81,012		—		—
Warrant liability		—		—		—		—
Total	$	1,153,070	$	1,153,070	$	—	$	—

XML

INVESTMENTS IN TRADING SECURITIES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Schedule of Investments [Table Text Block]

		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
		2016			2015			2014
Investments in trading securities at cost	$	511,672		$	651,580		$	710,297
Unrealized gains (losses)		(263,080	)		(550,366	)		(629,285	)
Investments in trading securities at fair market value	$	248,592		$	101,214		$	81,012

XML

EQUIPMENT (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Dec. 31, 2015

Dec. 31, 2014

Schedule of Equipment [Table Text Block]

				December 31, 2016
				Accumulated		Net Book
		Cost		Amortization		Value
Furniture and equipment	$	8,358	$	8,358	$	—
Computer equipment		20,274		20,274		—
Exploration equipment		1,464,478		1,144,382		320,096
Vehicles		333,989		306,883		27,106
	$	1,827,099	$	1,479,897	$	347,202

				December 31, 2015
				Accumulated		Net Book
		Cost		Amortization		Value
Furniture and equipment	$	8,358	$	8,358	$	—
Computer equipment		20,274		20,274		—
Exploration equipment		1,464,478		1,047,418		417,060
Vehicles		333,989		264,524		69,465
	$	1,827,099	$	1,340,574	$	486,525

				December 31, 2014
				Accumulated		Net Book
		Cost		Amortization		Value
Furniture and equipment	$	8,358	$	8,358	$	—
Computer equipment		20,274		20,274		—
Exploration equipment		1,464,478		930,979		533,499
Vehicles		333,989		234,753		99,236
	$	1,827,099	$	1,194,364	$	632,735

XML

MINERAL PROPERTIES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Schedule of Mineral Properties Acquired [Table Text Block]

		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
		2016			2015			2014
Acquisition costs	$	1,607,729		$	1,607,729		$	1,607,729
Asset retirement obligation (Note 7)		8,133			8,133			8,133
Option payments received		(881,440	)		(881,440	)		(881,440	)
Total	$	734,422		$	734,422		$	734,422

XML

ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Schedule of Asset Retirement Obligations [Table Text Block]

		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
		2016		2015		2014
Balance, beginning of year	$	145,029	$	96,395	$	203,395
Change in obligation		70,971		48,634		(123,000	)
Accretion expense		—		—		16,000
Balance, end of year	$	216,000	$	145,029	$	96,395

XML

CAPITAL STOCK (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Schedule of Stock Options Oustanding [Table Text Block]

Number of	Exercise	Expiry Date
Options	Price
108,000	CDN$0.50	March 5, 2017
162,000	CDN$0.15	March 12, 2017
54,000	CAD$0.50	June 1, 2020
63,000	CDN$0.15	June 1, 2020
48,000	CDN$0.225	June 1, 2020
90,000	CDN$0.50	July 1, 2020
30,000	CDN$0.50	March 1, 2021
100,000	CDN$0.225	March 1, 2021
108,000	CDN$0.15	June 10, 2021
382,000	CDN$0.15	December 31, 2022
250,000	CDN$0.20	October 8, 2025
400,000	CDN$0.40	May 5, 2026
125,000	CDN$0.65	July 25, 2021

Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity [Table Text Block]

	December 31, 2016				December 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
				Weighted				Weighted				Weighted
	Number			Average	Number			Average	Number			Average
	of			Exercise	of			Exercise	of			Exercise
	Options			Price	Options			Price	Options			Price
Outstanding, beginning of year	2,235,000		$	0.16	2,426,000		$	0.43	2,489,000		$	1.03
Granted	525,000		$	0.36	250,000		$	0.15	108,000		$	0.43
Exercised	(408,000	)	$	0.12	—			—	—			—
Cancelled/Expired	(432,000	)	$	0.16	(441,000	)	$	0.36	(171,000	)	$	1.90
Outstanding, end of year	1,920,000		$	0.23	2,235,000		$	0.16	2,426,000		$	0.43
Exercisable, end of year	1,920,000		$	0.23	2,235,000		$	0.16	2,426,000		$	0.43

Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-Scholes Valuation Assumptions [Table Text Block]

	2016	2015	2014
Risk-free interest rate	1.75%	1.75%	1.75%
Expected life	4 to 7.5 years	7.5 years	7.5 years
Annualized volatility	61% - 65%	68%	95%
Dividend rate	—	—	—

Schedule of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants or Rights [Table Text Block]

Number of Warrants	Exercise Price	Expiry Date
1,397,000	CAD$0.65	August 25, 2017

Schedule of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants or Rights, Activity [Table Text Block]

	2016		2015	2014
Balance, beginning of period	—		—	964.500		CAD$1.00
Issued	1,397,000	CAD$0.65	—	—
Exercised	—		—	—
Expired	—		—	(964,500	)
Balance, end of period	1,397,000	CAD$0.65	—	—

Amended Stock Options [Member]

Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-Scholes Valuation Assumptions [Table Text Block]

	2016	2015	2014
Risk-free interest rate	N/A	0.26% - 1.64%	1.25%
Expected life	N/A	0.8 to 5 years	5.0 years
Annualized volatility	N/A	58% - 74%	45%
Dividend rate	N/A	—	—

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Schedule of Related Party Transactions [Table Text Block]

		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
		2016		2015		2014
Consulting fees paid or accrued to officers or their companies	$	539,706	$	495,683	$	472,649
Directors’ fees		2,267		4,692		18,845
Stock option grants to officers and directors		400,000		250,000		108,000
Stock option grant price range	$	0.31	$	$0.15	$	0.43

XML

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE WITH RESPECT TO CASH FLOWS (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Schedule of Cash Flow, Supplemental Disclosures [Table Text Block]

		December 31,		December 31,		December 31,
		2016		2015		2014
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	14,540	$	10,216	$	8,169
Income taxes	$	—	$	—	$	—

XML

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Schedule of Income Tax Expense (Benefit) [Table Text Block]

		2016			2015			2014
Loss for the year	$	(467,711	)	$	(391,723	)	$	(687,057	)
Computed “expected” tax (benefit) expense		(159,000	)	$	(133,000	)	$	(234,000	)
Non deductible (taxable) items		(10,000	)		(73,000	)		(10,000	)
Change in statutory, foreign tax, foreign exchange and other		(30,000	)		121,000			106,000
Valuation allowance		199,000			85,000			138,000
Net expected tax (benefit) expense	$	—		$	—		$	—

Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities [Table Text Block]

		2016			2015		2014
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Trading securities	$	137,000		$	96,000		125,000
Equipment		373,000			384,000		168,000
Net operating loss carryforwards - US		3,322,000			3,050,000		2,799,000
Net operating loss carryforwards - Ghana		87,000			159,000		2,494,000
Valuation allowance		(3,919,000	)		(3,689,000	)	(5,586,000	)
Total deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—		—

XML

SEGMENTED INFORMATION (Tables)

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2016

Schedule of Segmented Information [Table Text Block]

		December 31,			December 31,			December 31,
		2016			2015			2014
Cash and restricted cash:
Canada	$	772,535		$	564,633		$	704,972
Ghana		362,349			519,241			367,086
Total cash and restricted cash		1,134,884			1,083,874			1,072,058
Capital assets
Canada		—			—			—
Ghana		1,081,624			1,220,947			1,367,157
Total capital assets		1,081,624			1,220,947			1,367,157
Total	$	2,216,508		$	2,304,821		$	2,439,215
Net (loss) profit:
Canada	$	(599,442	)	$	(748,145	)	$	(755,479	)
Ghana		118,558			320,780			61,580
Total	$	(480,884	)	$	(427,365	)	$	(693,899	)

XML

HISTORY AND ORGANIZATION OF THE COMPANY (Narrative) (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016
History And Organization Of The Company 1	100.00%
History And Organization Of The Company 2	100.00%
History And Organization Of The Company 3	90.00%
History And Organization Of The Company 4	10.00%

XML

CONTINUANCE OF OPERATIONS (Narrative) (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($) mo
Continuance Of Operations 1	$ 480,884
Continuance Of Operations 2	28,583,385
Continuance Of Operations 3	$ 1,106,425
Continuance Of Operations 4 | mo	12

XML

SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Narrative) (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($) shares
Significant Accounting Policies 1	90.00%
Significant Accounting Policies 2	$ 0
Significant Accounting Policies 3	97,493
Significant Accounting Policies 4	$ 0
Significant Accounting Policies 5	10.00%
Significant Accounting Policies 6 | shares	1,397,000
Significant Accounting Policies 7	0
Significant Accounting Policies 8	0
Significant Accounting Policies 9 | shares	1,920,000
Significant Accounting Policies 10	2,235,000
Significant Accounting Policies 11	2,426,000
Significant Accounting Policies 12	$ 694,941
Significant Accounting Policies 13	2,015
Significant Accounting Policies 14	$ 468,750
Significant Accounting Policies 15	2,014
Significant Accounting Policies 16	$ 635,550

XML

INVESTMENTS IN TRADING SECURITIES (Narrative) (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Investments In Trading Securities 1	$ 248,592
Investments In Trading Securities 2	101,214
Investments In Trading Securities 3	$ 81,012

XML

EQUIPMENT (Narrative) (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Equipment 1	$ 139,323
Equipment 2	146,210
Equipment 3	$ 188,078

XML

MINERAL PROPERTIES (Narrative) (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($) yr
Mineral Properties 1 | yr	15
Mineral Properties 2	$ 30,000
Mineral Properties 3	167
Mineral Properties 4	$ 180
Mineral Properties 5	55.00%
Mineral Properties 6	$ 15,000
Mineral Properties 7	100,000
Mineral Properties 8	100,000
Mineral Properties 9	20,000
Mineral Properties 10	$ 500

XML

ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION (Narrative) (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Asset Retirement Obligation 1	$ 216,000
Asset Retirement Obligation 2	145,029
Asset Retirement Obligation 3	96,395
Asset Retirement Obligation 4	$ 221,322

XML

CAPITAL STOCK (Narrative) (Details) - 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2016	USD ($) mo yr shares	CAD mo yr CAD / shares shares
Capital Stock 1 | shares	2,500,000	2,500,000
Capital Stock 2 | CAD / shares		CAD 0.40
Capital Stock 3	$ 693,728
Capital Stock 4 | CAD		CAD 0.65
Capital Stock 5 | mo	15	15
Capital Stock 6 | shares	147,000	147,000
Capital Stock 7 | CAD		CAD 0.65
Capital Stock 8 | mo	15	15
Capital Stock 9 | shares	408,000	408,000
Capital Stock 10 | CAD / shares		CAD 0.15
Capital Stock 11	$ 48,756
Capital Stock 12 | shares	396,000	396,000
Capital Stock 13	$ 69,774
Capital Stock 14	10.00%	10.00%
Capital Stock 15	10.00%	10.00%
Capital Stock 16 | yr	10	10
Capital Stock 17	$ 57,059
Capital Stock 18	0
Capital Stock 19	$ 0
Capital Stock 20 | yr	5.6	5.6
Capital Stock 21 | yr	3.67	3.67
Capital Stock 22 | yr	5.05	5.05
Capital Stock 23	$ 104,519
Capital Stock 24	124,458
Capital Stock 25	$ 108,302
Capital Stock 26 | shares	424,000	424,000
Capital Stock 27 | shares	48,000	48,000
Capital Stock 28	$ 0.18
Capital Stock 29 | CAD		CAD 0.225
Capital Stock 30	$ 20,202
Capital Stock 31 | shares	1,231,000	1,231,000
Capital Stock 32	$ 0.12
Capital Stock 33 | CAD		CAD 0.15
Capital Stock 34	$ 86,081
Capital Stock 35 | shares	2,147,000	2,147,000
Capital Stock 36 | shares	171,000	171,000
Capital Stock 37	$ 0.43
Capital Stock 38 | CAD		CAD 0.50
Capital Stock 39	$ 59,304
Capital Stock 40	400,000	400,000
Capital Stock 41	$ 0.31
Capital Stock 42 | CAD		CAD 0.40
Capital Stock 43 | shares	125,000	125,000
Capital Stock 44	$ 0.50
Capital Stock 45 | CAD		CAD 0.65
Capital Stock 46 | shares	250,000	250,000
Capital Stock 47	$ 0.15
Capital Stock 48 | CAD		CAD 0.20
Capital Stock 49 | shares	108,000	108,000
Capital Stock 50	$ 0.43
Capital Stock 51 | CAD		CAD 0.50
Capital Stock 52	104,519
Capital Stock 53	124,458
Capital Stock 54	108,302
Capital Stock 55	70,712
Capital Stock 56	$ 1,000

XML

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Narrative) (Details) - 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2016	USD ($) $ / shares shares	CAD / shares
Related Party Transactions 1	$ 256,319
Related Party Transactions 2	201,097
Related Party Transactions 3	$ 144,394
Related Party Transactions 4	50.00%
Related Party Transactions 5	$ 127,348
Related Party Transactions 6	100,548
Related Party Transactions 7	72,197
Related Party Transactions 8	47,792
Related Party Transactions 9	51,096
Related Party Transactions 10	28,974
Related Party Transactions 11	5,000
Related Party Transactions 12	10,000
Related Party Transactions 13	0
Related Party Transactions 14	0
Related Party Transactions 15	97,493
Related Party Transactions 16	$ 97,493
Related Party Transactions 17 | shares	400,000
Related Party Transactions 18 | $ / shares	$ 0.31
Related Party Transactions 19	$ 89,643
Related Party Transactions 20 | shares	250,000
Related Party Transactions 21 | $ / shares	$ 0.15
Related Party Transactions 22	$ 18,175
Related Party Transactions 23 | shares	108,000
Related Party Transactions 24 | $ / shares	$ 0.43
Related Party Transactions 25	$ 22,489
Related Party Transactions 26 | shares	1,231,000
Related Party Transactions 27 | CAD / shares		CAD 0.15
Related Party Transactions 28 | shares	424,000
Related Party Transactions 29 | CAD / shares		0.225
Related Party Transactions 30	$ 106,283
Related Party Transactions 31 | shares	2,147,000
Related Party Transactions 32 | CAD / shares		CAD 0.50
Related Party Transactions 33	$ 54,581

XML

DEFERRED INCOME TAXES (Narrative) (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Deferred Income Taxes 1	$ 0
Deferred Income Taxes 2	34.00%
Deferred Income Taxes 3	$ (3,919,000)
Deferred Income Taxes 4	(3,689,000)
Deferred Income Taxes 5	(5,586,000)
Deferred Income Taxes 6	10,120,000
Deferred Income Taxes 7	10,120,000
Deferred Income Taxes 8	9,772,000
Deferred Income Taxes 9	$ 348,000

XML

CONTINGENCY AND COMMITMENTS (Narrative) (Details) - 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2016	USD ($) mo $ / mo	CAD mo $ / mo
Contingency And Commitments 1	881	881
Contingency And Commitments 2 | mo	60	60
Contingency And Commitments 3 | CAD		CAD 3,667
Contingency And Commitments 4 | $ / mo	2,731	2,731
Contingency And Commitments 5	$ 27,310
Contingency And Commitments 6	$ 0
Contingency And Commitments 7	3.00%	3.00%
Contingency And Commitments 8	5.00%	5.00%
Contingency And Commitments 9	3.00%	3.00%
Contingency And Commitments 10	5.00%	5.00%
Contingency And Commitments 11	3.00%	3.00%
Contingency And Commitments 12	5.00%	5.00%
Contingency And Commitments 13	$ 84,300
Contingency And Commitments 14	120,000
Contingency And Commitments 15	385,000
Contingency And Commitments 16	$ 327,000

XML

SUBSEQUENT EVENT NOTE (Narrative) (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($) shares	Dec. 31, 2016 CAD shares
Subsequent Event Note 1	327,000	327,000
Subsequent Event Note 2 | $	$ 44,511
Subsequent Event Note 3 | CAD		CAD 58,475
Subsequent Event Note 4	257,000	257,000
Subsequent Event Note 5	162,000	162,000
Subsequent Event Note 6 | $	$ 17,500
Subsequent Event Note 7 | CAD		CAD 24,300
Subsequent Event Note 8	108,000	108,000

XML

Schedule of Equipment, Declining Method Annual Rates (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Equipment, Declining Method Annual Rates 1	20.00%
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Equipment, Declining Method Annual Rates 2	30.00%
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Equipment, Declining Method Annual Rates 3	30.00%
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Equipment, Declining Method Annual Rates 4	20.00%

XML

Schedule of Fair Value of Financial Assets And Liabilities (Details) - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 1	$ 913,562
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 2	913,562
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 3	0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 4	0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 5	221,322
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 6	221,322
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 7	0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 8	0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 9	248,592
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 10	248,592
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 11	0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 12	0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 13	1,000
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 14	0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 15	0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 16	1,000
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 17	1,384,476
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 18	1,383,476
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 19	0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 20	$ 1,000
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 1		$ 862,552
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 2		862,552
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 3		0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 4		0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 5		221,322
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 6		221,322
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 7		0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 8		0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 9		101,214
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 10		101,214
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 11		0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 12		0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 13		0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 14		0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 15		0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 16		0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 17		1,185,088
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 18		1,185,088
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 19		0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 20		$ 0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 1			$ 850,736
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 2			850,736
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 3			0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 4			0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 5			221,322
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 6			221,322
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 7			0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 8			0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 9			81,012
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 10			81,012
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 11			0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 12			0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 13			0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 14			0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 15			0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 16			0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 17			1,153,070
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 18			1,153,070
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 19			0
Significant Accounting Policies Schedule Of Fair Value Of Financial Assets And Liabilities 20			$ 0

XML

Schedule of Investments (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Investments In Trading Securities Schedule Of Investments 1	$ 511,672
Investments In Trading Securities Schedule Of Investments 2	651,580
Investments In Trading Securities Schedule Of Investments 3	710,297
Investments In Trading Securities Schedule Of Investments 4	(263,080)
Investments In Trading Securities Schedule Of Investments 5	(550,366)
Investments In Trading Securities Schedule Of Investments 6	(629,285)
Investments In Trading Securities Schedule Of Investments 7	248,592
Investments In Trading Securities Schedule Of Investments 8	101,214
Investments In Trading Securities Schedule Of Investments 9	$ 81,012

XML

Schedule of Equipment (Details) - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 1	$ 8,358
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 2	8,358
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 3	0
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 4	20,274
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 5	20,274
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 6	0
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 7	1,464,478
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 8	1,144,382
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 9	320,096
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 10	333,989
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 11	306,883
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 12	27,106
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 13	1,827,099
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 14	1,479,897
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 15	$ 347,202
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 1		$ 8,358
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 2		8,358
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 3		0
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 4		20,274
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 5		20,274
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 6		0
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 7		1,464,478
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 8		1,047,418
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 9		417,060
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 10		333,989
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 11		264,524
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 12		69,465
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 13		1,827,099
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 14		1,340,574
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 15		$ 486,525
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 1			$ 8,358
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 2			8,358
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 3			0
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 4			20,274
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 5			20,274
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 6			0
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 7			1,464,478
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 8			930,979
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 9			533,499
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 10			333,989
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 11			234,753
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 12			99,236
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 13			1,827,099
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 14			1,194,364
Equipment Schedule Of Equipment 15			$ 632,735

XML

Schedule of Mineral Properties Acquired (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Mineral Properties Schedule Of Mineral Properties Acquired 1	$ 1,607,729
Mineral Properties Schedule Of Mineral Properties Acquired 2	1,607,729
Mineral Properties Schedule Of Mineral Properties Acquired 3	1,607,729
Mineral Properties Schedule Of Mineral Properties Acquired 4	8,133
Mineral Properties Schedule Of Mineral Properties Acquired 5	8,133
Mineral Properties Schedule Of Mineral Properties Acquired 6	8,133
Mineral Properties Schedule Of Mineral Properties Acquired 7	(881,440)
Mineral Properties Schedule Of Mineral Properties Acquired 8	(881,440)
Mineral Properties Schedule Of Mineral Properties Acquired 9	(881,440)
Mineral Properties Schedule Of Mineral Properties Acquired 10	734,422
Mineral Properties Schedule Of Mineral Properties Acquired 11	734,422
Mineral Properties Schedule Of Mineral Properties Acquired 12	$ 734,422

XML

Schedule of Asset Retirement Obligations (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Asset Retirement Obligation Schedule Of Asset Retirement Obligations 1	$ 145,029
Asset Retirement Obligation Schedule Of Asset Retirement Obligations 2	96,395
Asset Retirement Obligation Schedule Of Asset Retirement Obligations 3	203,395
Asset Retirement Obligation Schedule Of Asset Retirement Obligations 4	70,971
Asset Retirement Obligation Schedule Of Asset Retirement Obligations 5	48,634
Asset Retirement Obligation Schedule Of Asset Retirement Obligations 6	(123,000)
Asset Retirement Obligation Schedule Of Asset Retirement Obligations 7	0
Asset Retirement Obligation Schedule Of Asset Retirement Obligations 8	0
Asset Retirement Obligation Schedule Of Asset Retirement Obligations 9	16,000
Asset Retirement Obligation Schedule Of Asset Retirement Obligations 10	216,000
Asset Retirement Obligation Schedule Of Asset Retirement Obligations 11	145,029
Asset Retirement Obligation Schedule Of Asset Retirement Obligations 12	$ 96,395

XML

Schedule of Stock Options Oustanding (Details) - 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2016	USD ($)	CAD
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 1 | $	$ 108,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 2 | CAD		CAD 0.50
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 3 | $	162,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 4 | CAD		0.15
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 5 | $	54,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 6 | CAD		0.50
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 7 | $	63,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 8 | CAD		0.15
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 9 | $	48,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 10 | CAD		0.225
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 11 | $	90,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 12 | CAD		0.50
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 13 | $	30,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 14 | CAD		0.50
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 15 | $	100,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 16 | CAD		0.225
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 17 | $	108,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 18 | CAD		0.15
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 19 | $	382,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 20 | CAD		0.15
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 21 | $	250,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 22 | CAD		0.20
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 23 | $	400,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 24 | CAD		0.40
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 25 | $	$ 125,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stock Options Oustanding 26 | CAD		CAD 0.65

XML

Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 1	$ 2,235,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 2	0.16
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 3	$ 2,426,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 4	0.43
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 5	$ 2,489,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 6	1.03
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 7	$ 525,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 8	0.36
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 9	$ 250,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 10	0.15
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 11	$ 108,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 12	0.43
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 13	$ (408,000)
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 14	0.12
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 15	$ 0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 16	0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 17	0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 18	0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 19	$ (432,000)
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 20	0.16
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 21	$ (441,000)
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 22	0.36
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 23	$ (171,000)
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 24	1.90
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 25	$ 1,920,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 26	0.23
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 27	$ 2,235,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 28	0.16
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 29	$ 2,426,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 30	0.43
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 31	$ 1,920,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 32	0.23
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 33	$ 2,235,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 34	0.16
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 35	$ 2,426,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity 36	0.43

XML

Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-Scholes Valuation Assumptions (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($) yr
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 1	1.75%
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 2	1.75%
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 3	1.75%
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 4	$ 4
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 5 | yr	7.5
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 6 | yr	7.5
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 7 | yr	7.5
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 8	61.00%
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 9	65.00%
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 10	68.00%
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 11	95.00%
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 12	$ 0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 13	0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 14	$ 0
Amended Stock Options [Member]
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 1	0.26%
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 2	1.64%
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 3	1.25%
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 4	0.8
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 5 | yr	5
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 6 | yr	5
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 7	58.00%
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 8	74.00%
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 9	45.00%
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 10	$ 0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options Black-scholes Valuation Assumptions 11	$ 0

XML

Schedule of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants or Rights (Details) - 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2016	USD ($)	CAD
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights 1 | $	$ 1,397,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights 2 | CAD		CAD 0.65

XML

Schedule of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants or Rights, Activity (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2016 CAD
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 1	$ 0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 2	$ 0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 3	964.500	964.500
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 4 | CAD		CAD 1.00
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 5	$ 1,397,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 6 | CAD		0.65
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 7	0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 8	0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 9	0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 10	0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 11	0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 12	0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 13	0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 14	(964,500)
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 15	1,397,000
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 16 | CAD		CAD 0.65
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 17	0
Capital Stock Schedule Of Stockholders' Equity Note, Warrants Or Rights, Activity 18	$ 0

XML

Schedule of Related Party Transactions (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Related Party Transactions Schedule Of Related Party Transactions 1	$ 539,706
Related Party Transactions Schedule Of Related Party Transactions 2	495,683
Related Party Transactions Schedule Of Related Party Transactions 3	472,649
Related Party Transactions Schedule Of Related Party Transactions 4	2,267
Related Party Transactions Schedule Of Related Party Transactions 5	4,692
Related Party Transactions Schedule Of Related Party Transactions 6	18,845
Related Party Transactions Schedule Of Related Party Transactions 7	400,000
Related Party Transactions Schedule Of Related Party Transactions 8	250,000
Related Party Transactions Schedule Of Related Party Transactions 9	$ 108,000
Related Party Transactions Schedule Of Related Party Transactions 10	0.31
Related Party Transactions Schedule Of Related Party Transactions 11	$ 0.15
Related Party Transactions Schedule Of Related Party Transactions 12	0.43

XML

Schedule of Cash Flow, Supplemental Disclosures (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Supplemental Disclosure With Respect To Cash Flows Schedule Of Cash Flow, Supplemental Disclosures 1	$ 14,540
Supplemental Disclosure With Respect To Cash Flows Schedule Of Cash Flow, Supplemental Disclosures 2	10,216
Supplemental Disclosure With Respect To Cash Flows Schedule Of Cash Flow, Supplemental Disclosures 3	8,169
Supplemental Disclosure With Respect To Cash Flows Schedule Of Cash Flow, Supplemental Disclosures 4	0
Supplemental Disclosure With Respect To Cash Flows Schedule Of Cash Flow, Supplemental Disclosures 5	0
Supplemental Disclosure With Respect To Cash Flows Schedule Of Cash Flow, Supplemental Disclosures 6	$ 0

XML

Schedule of Income Tax Expense (Benefit) (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 1	$ (467,711)
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 2	(391,723)
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 3	(687,057)
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 4	(159,000)
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 5	(133,000)
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 6	(234,000)
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 7	(10,000)
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 8	(73,000)
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 9	(10,000)
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 10	(30,000)
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 11	121,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 12	106,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 13	199,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 14	85,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 15	138,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 16	0
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 17	0
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Income Tax Expense (benefit) 18	$ 0

XML

Schedule of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 1	$ 137,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 2	96,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 3	125,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 4	373,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 5	384,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 6	168,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 7	3,322,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 8	3,050,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 9	2,799,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 10	87,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 11	159,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 12	2,494,000
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 13	(3,919,000)
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 14	(3,689,000)
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 15	(5,586,000)
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 16	0
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 17	0
Deferred Income Taxes Schedule Of Deferred Tax Assets And Liabilities 18	$ 0

XML

Schedule of Segmented Information (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2016 USD ($)
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 1	$ 772,535
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 2	564,633
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 3	704,972
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 4	362,349
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 5	519,241
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 6	367,086
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 7	1,134,884
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 8	1,083,874
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 9	1,072,058
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 10	0
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 11	0
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 12	0
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 13	1,081,624
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 14	1,220,947
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 15	1,367,157
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 16	1,081,624
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 17	1,220,947
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 18	1,367,157
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 19	2,216,508
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 20	2,304,821
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 21	2,439,215
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 22	(599,442)
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 23	(748,145)
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 24	(755,479)
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 25	118,558
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 26	320,780
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 27	61,580
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 28	(480,884)
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 29	(427,365)
Segmented Information Schedule Of Segmented Information 30	$ (693,899)