XML 28 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.2
LEASES
9 Months Ended
Jul. 31, 2020
LEASES  
LEASES

8.LEASES

 

Adoption of ASC 842

 

As discussed in Note 1, on November 1, 2019, the Company adopted the provisions of ASC 842 using the modified retrospective approach, which applies the provisions of ASC 842 upon adoption, with no change to prior periods. This adoption resulted in the Company recognizing initial right of use assets and lease liabilities of approximately $10.9 million at November 1, 2019. The adoption did not have a significant impact on the Company’s statement of operations.

 

 

Upon the initial adoption of ASC 842, the Company elected the following practical expedients allowable under the guidance: not to reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases; not to reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases; not to reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases. Additionally, the Company elected the short-term lease exemption policy, applying the requirements of ASC 842 to only long-term (greater than one year) leases.

 

 

The Company leases rail cars for its facility to transport ethanol and dried distillers’ grains to its end customers. Operating lease right of use assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The Company uses its estimated incremental borrowing rate, unless an implicit rate is readily determinable, as the discount rate for each lease in determining the present value of lease payments. For the nine months ended July 31, 2020, the Company’s weighted average discount rate was 4.87%.  Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

 

The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease or contains a lease at inception. The Company’s leases have remaining terms of approximately one to seven years. For the nine months ended July 31, 2020, the weighted average remaining lease term was four years.

 

The Company elected to use a portfolio approach for lease classification, which allows for an entity to group together leases with similar characteristics provided that its application does not create a material difference when compared to accounting for the leases at a contract level. For railcar leases, the Company elected to combine the railcars within each rider and account for each rider as an individual lease.

 

The following table summarizes the remaining maturities of the Company’s operating lease liabilities as of July 31, 2020:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Twelve Months Ended July 31,

 

 

 

 

2021

 

$

1,767,000

 

2022

 

 

1,767,000

 

2023

 

 

1,767,000

 

2024

 

 

1,698,750

 

2025

 

 

1,650,000

 

Thereafter

 

 

2,575,000

 

Totals

 

 

11,224,750

 

Less: Amount representing interest

 

 

1,607,521

 

Lease liabilities

 

$

9,617,229

 

 

For the three months ended July 31, 2020, the Company recorded operating lease costs of approximately $591,000 in cost of goods sold in the Company’s statement of operations, which approximates the cash paid for the period. For the nine months ended July 31, 2020, the Company recorded operating lease costs of approximately $1,731,000 in cost of goods sold in the Company’s statement of operations, which approximates the cash paid for the period.