XML 43 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Note 6 - Derivative Instruments, Hedging Activities and Other Comprehensive Income
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2014
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Text Block]

Note 6. Derivative Instruments, Hedging Activities and Other Comprehensive Income


The Company is exposed to capital market risk, including changes in interest rates. In order to manage volatility relating to variable interest rate risk, the Company enters into interest rate hedging transactions from time to time. The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes nor does the Company have any derivatives that are not designated as cash flow hedges. The Company has an agreement with each of its derivative counterparties that contain a provision that if the Company defaults on any of its indebtedness, including a default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the lender, then the Company could also be declared in default on its derivative obligations. As of March 31, 2014, the Company was party to various cash flow hedge agreements with notional amounts totaling $326.7 million, which effectively fixes the interest rate index underlying certain variable rate debt over various terms through 2020. Utilizing a weighted average spread over LIBOR on all variable rate debt resulted in fixing the weighted average interest rate at 3.28%.


These interest rate hedge agreements are the only assets or liabilities that the Company records at fair value on a recurring basis. The valuation of these assets and liabilities is determined using widely accepted techniques including discounted cash flow analyses, which consider the contractual terms of the derivatives (including the period to maturity) and use observable market-based inputs such as interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The Company also incorporates credit valuation adjustments to reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements.


As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs for identical instruments that are classified within Level 1 and observable inputs for similar instruments that are classified within Level 2) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3). In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.


Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation of its derivatives. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.


As of March 31, 2014 the fair value of the Company’s interest rate hedge assets, net, was $0.4 million, including accrued interest of $0.3 million. As of March 31, 2014, $2.1 million is recorded in prepaid and other assets and $1.7 million is recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet. At December 31, 2013 the fair value of the Company’s interest rate hedge assets was $1.1 million, including accrued interest of $0.3 million. As of December 31, 2013, $2.8 million is recorded in prepaid and other assets and $1.7 million is recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.


The Company currently expects the impact to interest expense over the next 12 months as the hedged forecasted interest payments occur to be $3.7 million. Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income related to derivatives will be reclassified to earnings over time as the hedged items are recognized in earnings. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, $0.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively, were reclassified as a reduction to earnings.


The Company’s share of net unrealized gains and losses on its interest rate hedge agreements are the only components of the change in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The following sets forth comprehensive (loss) income allocable to the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:


   

Three months ended

March 31,

 
   

2014

   

2013

 

Net income (loss) attributable to Kite Realty Group Trust common shareholders

  $ 2,218     $ (82 )

Other comprehensive (loss) income allocable to Kite Realty Group Trust1

    (667 )     602  

Comprehensive income attributable to Kite Realty Group Trust common shareholders

  $ 1,551     $ 520  

____________________

1

Reflects the Company’s share of the net change in the fair value of derivative instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges.