XML 44 R33.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2014
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
25. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

Measured on recurring basis

 

The Company measured its financial assets and liabilities including time deposits, available-for-sale securities and game license payment liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013 and 2014.

 

Cash equivalents included time deposits that can been withdrawn at any time and are stated at fair value. Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value. The Company classified such financial assets as investments within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued based on the quoted market price in an active market.

 

The Company did not have Level 2 investments as of December 31, 2013 and 2014.

 

Game license payment liabilities arising from the acquisition of intangible assets relating to a game license obtained in 2012 are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because the Company recorded the present value of the installment payment liabilities using discounted cash flow ("DCF") method. The significant unobservable input used in the DCF model was the discount rate of 3.25% which approximated to the Company's expected borrowing rate from banks in the United States. Significant increase (decrease) in the discount rate would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value.

 

The following table shows the fair value of the Company's financial assets and liabilities measured at recurring basis as of December 31, 2013 and 2014:

 

As of December 31, 2013 As of December 31, 2014
Fair Value Measurements at the Reporting Date Using Fair Value Measurements at the Reporting Date Using
Quoted prices in Significant           Quoted prices in     Significant              
active markets other Significant           active markets     other     Significant        
    for identical     observable     unobservable           for identical     observable     unobservable        
    instruments     inputs     inputs     Total     instruments     inputs     inputs     Total  
    (level 1)     (level 2)     (level 3)     balance     (level 1)     (level 2)     (level 3)     balance  
                                                 
Time deposits   $ 72,520,957     $ -     $ -     $ 72,520,957     $ 40,777,831     $ -     $ -     $ 40,777,831  
Available-for-sale securities     -       -       -       -       20,013,487       -       -       20,013,487  
Game license payment liabilities     -       -       39,260,000       39,260,000       -       -       19,860,000       19,860,000  
                                                                 
Total   $ 72,520,957     $ -     $ 39,260,000     $ 111,780,957     $ 60,791,318     $ -     $ 19,860,000     $ 80,651,318  

  

Fair Value measurement
Using Significant
Unobservable is inputs (level 3)
Game license payment liabilities
       
Opening balance   $ 39,260,000  
Transfer into Level 3     -  
Transfer out of Level 3     -  
Total gains or losses for the period        
Included in earning (or changes in net assets)     600,000  
Settlements     (20,000,000 )
         
Closing balance   $ 19,860,000  

 

Measured on nonrecurring basis

 

The Company measured the fair value of the purchased intangible using the "cost," "income approach-excess earnings" or "with & without" valuation methods. In addition, the Company measured the fair value of intangible assets using income approach method based on which to recognize the impairment loss in 2013 and 2014. These intangible assets are considered Level 3 assets because the Company used unobservable inputs, such as forecast financial performance of the acquired businesses or assets and discount rates to determine the fair value of these purchased assets.

 

Goodwill and cost method investments are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis when impairment is recognized.

 

The Company measured the fair value of cost method investment in U4iA and Meteor using income approach method based on which to recognize the impairment loss in 2013 and 2014, respectively. The cost method investment in Meteor is considered as Level 3 assets because the Company used unobservable inputs, such as forecast financial performance and future cash flow to determine the fair value of the cost method investment.

 

Warrants and intangible assets purchased with issued warrants as consideration are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis on the transaction date (see Note 22).