XML 27 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.4
Note 4 - Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2020
Notes to Financial Statements  
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]

4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

The following table details the fair value of the financial assets measured on a recurring basis (in thousands):

 

  

December 31, 2020

 
  

Total

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

 

Money market funds

 $34,335  $34,335  $-  $- 

Corporate debt securities

  249,671   -   249,671   - 

Commercial paper

  2,999   -   2,999   - 

U.S. treasuries and government agency bonds

  7,499   -   7,499   - 

Auction-rate securities backed by student-loan notes

  2,861   -   -   2,861 

Mutual funds and money market funds under deferred compensation plan

  26,924   26,924   -   - 

Total

 $324,289  $61,259  $260,169  $2,861 

 

  

December 31, 2019

 
  

Total

  

Level 1

  

Level 2

  

Level 3

 

Money market funds

 $28,100  $28,100  $-  $- 

Corporate debt securities

  260,950   -   260,950   - 

Commercial paper

  1,994   -   1,994   - 

U.S. treasuries and government agency bonds

  19,493   -   19,493   - 

Auction-rate securities backed by student-loan notes

  3,138   -   -   3,138 

Mutual funds and money market funds under deferred compensation plan

  21,975   21,975   -   - 

Total

 $335,650  $50,075  $282,437  $3,138 

 


Level 1 includes instruments with quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

Level 2 includes instruments for which the valuations are based upon quoted market prices in active markets involving similar assets or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets. The market inputs used to value these instruments generally consist of market yields, recently executed transactions, broker/dealer quotes or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Pricing sources may include industry standard data providers, security master files from large financial institutions, and other third-party sources used to determine a daily market value.

Level 3 includes instruments for which the valuations are based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

 

The Company’s level 3 assets consist of government-backed student loan auction-rate securities. The following table provides a rollforward of the fair value of the auction-rate securities (in thousands): 

 

Balance at January 1, 2019

 $3,241 

Change in unrealized gain included in other comprehensive income

  147 

Sale and settlement at par

  (250)

Balance at December 31, 2019

  3,138 

Change in unrealized gain included in other comprehensive income

  23 

Sale and settlement at par

  (300)

Balance at December 31, 2020

 $2,861 

 

The Company determined the fair value of the auction-rate securities using a discounted cash flow model with the following assumptions:

 

 

December 31,

 
 

2020 (1)

  

2019

 

Time-to-liquidity (in years)

2

-3(2.5)  

2

-3 

Discount rate

3.5%

-7.9%(5.6%)  

4.0%

-8.3% 

 


(1)

The parenthetical value represents the weighted average assumption, which was calculated based on the relative fair value of the securities.

 

The fair value measurement involves the analysis of valuation techniques and evaluation of unobservable inputs commonly used by market participants to price similar instruments. Outputs from the valuation process are assessed against various market sources when they are available, including marketplace quotes, recent trades of similar illiquid securities and independent pricing services. The valuation of the auction-rate securities is subject to significant management judgment regarding projected future cash flows, which will depend on many factors, including the quality of the underlying collateral, estimated time to liquidity including potential to be called or restructured, underlying final maturity, and market conditions, among others. Changes in any of the unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of auction-rate securities in isolation would result in a lower or higher fair value measurement. For example, an increase in the time-to-liquidity assumption or estimated discount rate would result in a lower fair value measurement.