XML 35 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.6.0.2
Note 14 - Litigation
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2016
Notes to Financial Statements  
Legal Matters and Contingencies [Text Block]
1
4
.  LITIGATION
 
The Company is a party to actions and proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including potential litigation regarding its shareholders and its intellectual property, challenges to the enforceability or validity of its intellectual property, claims that the Company’s products infringe on the intellectual property rights of others, and employment matters. These proceedings often involve complex questions of fact and law and
may
require the expenditure of significant funds and the diversion of other resources to prosecute and defend. The Company defends itself vigorously against any such potential claims.
 
Silergy
 
In
December
2016,
the Company settled a patent infringement lawsuit with Silergy Corp. and was awarded a total of
$3.0
million pursuant to a settlement and license agreement. Under the agreement, the parties agreed to a mutual release of past claims and covenant not to sue provisions, and grant of certain patent licenses for future use. Based on their relative fair values, the Company allocated approximately
$0.6
million to the settlement which was recorded as a credit to litigation expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended
December
31,
2016.
The remaining
$2.4
million was allocated to the grant of the patent licenses for future use and will be recognized ratably over
five
years.
 
O2
Micro
 
In
May
2012,
 the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (the “District Court”) issued an order finding
O2
Micro International, Ltd.
(“O2
Micro”) liable for approximately
$9.1
million in attorneys’ fees and non-taxable costs, plus interest, in connection with the patent litigation that the Company won in
2010.
  This award was in addition to the approximately
$0.3
million in taxable costs that the District Court had earlier ordered
O2
Micro to pay to the Company in connection with the same lawsuit.  In
October
2012,
O2
Micro appealed the District Court’s judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the “Federal Circuit”). In
August
2013,
the Federal Circuit affirmed
O2
Micro’s liability for the full amount of the award.  In
September
2013,
O2
Micro filed a petition for rehearing of that ruling, but the Federal Circuit denied
O2
Micro’s petition for rehearing in
October
2013.
 
 
In
November
2013,
the Company received a cash payment of
$9.5
million from
O2
Micro. In
January
2014,
O2
Micro filed an appeal with the United States Supreme Court. Had
O2
Micro been successful in obtaining a favorable ruling against the Company, the Company could have been liable to return a portion or all of the
$9.5
million to
O2
Micro. Accordingly, the Company recorded the
$9.5
million as a current liability as of
December
31,
2013.
  
In
March
2014,
the United States Supreme Court declined to hear the case. As
O2
Micro had no further legal avenues to appeal, the Company released the current liability of
$9.5
million and recorded the award as a credit to litigation expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the
first
quarter of
2014.
In addition, the Company incurred additional legal fees of
$0.5
million in connection with the final resolution of the lawsuit.