XML 37 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Note 2 - Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]
2.  Fair Value Measurements

The following is a schedule of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term investments as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):

   
Estimated Fair Market Value as of
December 31,
 
   
2012
   
2011
 
Cash, cash equivalents and investments
           
Cash in banks
  $ 59,145     $ 43,305  
Money market funds
    15,959       51,066  
Government agencies/ treasuries
    85,521       79,827  
Auction-rate securities backed by student-loan notes
    11,755       13,675  
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments
  $ 172,380     $ 187,873  

   
December 31,
 
Reported as:
 
2012
   
2011
 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 75,104     $ 96,371  
Short-term investments
    85,521       77,827  
Long-term investments
    11,755       13,675  
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments
  $ 172,380     $ 187,873  

The contractual maturities of the Company’s investments classified as available-for-sale as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 is as follows (in thousands):

   
December 31,
 
   
2012
   
2011
 
Due in less than 1 year
  $ 52,880     $ 45,133  
Due in 1 - 5 years
    32,641       32,694  
Due in greater than 5 years
    11,755       13,675  
    $ 97,276     $ 91,502  

The following table details the fair value measurements as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 within the fair value hierarchy of the financial assets that are required to be recorded at fair value (in thousands):

   
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using
 
         
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
   
Significant Other Observable Inputs
   
Significant Unobservable Inputs
 
   
Total
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
 
Money market funds
  $ 15,959     $ 15,959     $ -     $ -  
US treasuries and US government agency bonds
    85,521       -       85,521       -  
Long-term available-for-sale auction-rate securities
    11,755       -       -       11,755  
    $ 113,235     $ 15,959     $ 85,521     $ 11,755  

   
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2011 Using
 
         
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
   
Significant Other Observable Inputs
   
Significant Unobservable Inputs
 
   
Total
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
 
Money market funds
  $ 51,066     $ 51,066     $ -     $ -  
US treasuries and US government agency bonds
    79,827       -       79,827       -  
Long-term available-for-sale auction-rate securities
    13,675       -       -       13,675  
    $ 144,568     $ 51,066     $ 79,827     $ 13,675  

The following tables summarize unrealized gains and losses related to our investments in marketable securities designated as available-for-sale (in thousands):

   
As of December 31, 2012
 
   
Adjusted Cost
   
Unrealized
Gains
   
Unrealized
Losses
   
Total Fair Value
   
Fair Value of Investments in Unrealized Loss Position
 
                               
Money market funds
  $ 15,959     $ -     $ -     $ 15,959     $ -  
US treasuries and US government agency bonds
    85,483       45       (7 )     85,521       14,121  
Auction-rate securities backed by student-loan notes
    12,245       -       (490 )     11,755       11,755  
    $ 113,687     $ 45     $ (497 )   $ 113,235     $ 25,876  

   
As of December 31, 2011
 
   
Adjusted Cost
   
Unrealized
Gains
   
Unrealized
Losses
   
Total Fair Value
   
Fair Value of Investments in Unrealized Loss Position
 
                               
Money market funds
  $ 51,066     $ -     $ -     $ 51,066     $ -  
US treasuries and US government agency bonds
    79,830       14       (17 )     79,827       25,281  
Auction-rate securities backed by student-loan notes
    14,305       -       (630 )     13,675       13,675  
    $ 145,201     $ 14     $ (647 )   $ 144,568     $ 38,956  

At December 31, 2012, fixed income available-for-sale securities included $85.5 million securities issued by government agencies and treasuries which are classified as short-term investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company also had $16.0 million invested in money market funds. At December 31, 2012, there was $7,000 in unrealized losses from these investments. The impact of gross unrealized gains and losses was not material.  At December 31, 2012, the Company also had $11.8 million of auction-rate securities, all of which are classified as long-term available-for-sale investments.

At December 31, 2011, fixed income available-for-sale securities included securities issued by government agencies and treasuries, $77.8 million of which are classified as short-term investments and $2.0 million which are classified as cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company also had $51.1 million invested in money market funds.  At December 31, 2011, there was $17,000 in unrealized losses from these investments. The impact of gross unrealized gains and losses was not material. At December 31, 2011, the Company also had $13.7 million of auction-rate securities, all of which are classified as long-term available-for-sale investments.

Temporary impairment charges are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within stockholders’ equity and have no impact on net income. Other-than-temporary impairment exists when the Company either has the intent to sell the security, it will more likely than not be required to sell the security before anticipated recovery or it does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. Other-than-temporary impairment charges are recorded in interest income and other, net in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

The Company's level 2 assets consist of U.S. treasuries and U.S. government agency bonds. These securities generally have market prices available from multiple sources, which are used as inputs into a distribution-curve based algorithm to determine fair value.

The Company’s level 3 assets consist of government-backed student loan auction-rate securities, with interest rates that reset through a Dutch auction every 7 to 35 days and which became illiquid in 2008.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the assets measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (in thousands):

   
Auction-Rate Securities
 
Beginning balance at January 1, 2011
  $ 19,180  
Sales and settlement at par
    (5,775 )
Unrealized gain
    270  
         
Ending balance at December 31, 2011
    13,675  
Sales and settlement at par
    (2,100 )
Total realized and unrealized gains:
       
Included in interest income and other, net
    40  
Included in other comprehensive income
    140  
         
Ending balance at December 31, 2012
  $ 11,755  

During the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company sold $2.1 million and $5.8 million, respectively, in auction-rate securities at par, all of which were classified as long-term investments.

The Company’s investment portfolio as of December 31, 2012 included $11.8 million in government-backed student loan auction-rate securities, net of impairment charges of $0.52 million; of which, $0.49 million was temporary and $0.03 million was recorded as other-than-temporary. This compares to an investment balance for auction-rate securities as of December 31, 2011 of $13.7 million, net of impairment charges of $0.7 million; of which, $0.6 million was temporary and $0.1 million was recorded as other-than-temporary.    

The underlying maturities of these auction-rate securities are up to 35 years. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the portion of the impairment classified as temporary was based on the following analysis:

 
1.
The decline in the fair value of these securities is not largely attributable to adverse conditions specifically related to these securities or to specific conditions in an industry or in a geographic area;

 
2.
Management possesses both the intent and ability to hold these securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value;

 
3.
Management believes that it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell these securities before recovery of its cost basis;

 
4.
Except for the credit loss of $70,000 recognized in the year ended December 31, 2009 for the Company’s holdings in auction rate securities described below, the Company does not believe that there is any additional credit loss associated with other auction-rate securities because the Company expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis;

 
5.
$6.3 million of auction-rate securities were downgraded by Moody’s to A3-Baa3 during the year ended December 31, 2009. There have been no further downgrades since;

 
6.
All scheduled interest payments have been made pursuant to the reset terms and conditions; and

 
7.
All redemptions of auction-rate securities representing 68% of the original portfolio purchased by the Company in February 2008 have been at par.

Based on the guidance of ASC 320-10-35 and ASC 320-10-50, the Company evaluated the potential credit loss of each of the auction-rate securities that are currently held by the Company. Based on such analysis, the Company determined that those securities that are not 100% FFELPS guaranteed are potentially subject to credit risks based on the extent to which the underlying debt is collateralized and the security-specific student-loan default rates. The Company’s portfolio includes two such securities. The senior parity ratio for the two securities is approximately 106%. If, therefore, the student-loan default rate and borrowing rate increases for these issuers, the remaining balance in these trusts may not be sufficient to cover the senior debt. The Company therefore concluded that there is potential credit risk for these two securities and as such, used the discounted cash flow model to determine the amount of credit loss to be recorded. In valuing the potential credit loss, the following parameters were used: 2.0 year expected term, cash flows based on the 90-day t-bill rates for 2.0 year forwards and a risk premium of 5.9%, the amount of interest that the Company was receiving on these securities when the market was last active. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company was able to redeem a security at face value for which an OTTI of $40,000 had previously been recorded for and therefore, recognized a gain of $40,000 in interest income and other, net, in our Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Unless a rights offering or other similar offer is made to redeem at par and accepted by the Company, the Company intends to hold the balance of these investments through successful auctions at par, which the Company believes could take approximately 2.0 years.

Determining the fair value of the auction-rate securities requires significant management judgment regarding projected future cash flows which will depend on many factors, including the quality of the underlying collateral, estimated time for liquidity including potential to be called or restructured, underlying final maturity, insurance guaranty and market conditions, among others. To determine the fair value of the auction-rate securities at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company used a discounted cash flow model, for which there are four unobservable inputs: estimated time-to-liquidity, discount rate, credit quality of the issuer and expected interest receipts. A significant increase in the time-to liquidity or the discount rate inputs or a significant decrease in the credit quality of the issuer or the expected interest receipts inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower fair value measurement.

The following are the values used in the discounted cash flow model:

 
December 31, 2012
December 31, 2011
Time-to-Liquidity
24 months
24 months
Expected Return (Based on the requisite treasury rate, plus a contractual penalty rate)
1.8%
1.8%
Discount Rate (Based on the requisite LIBOR, the cost of debt and a liquidity risk premium)
2.5% - 7.3%, depending on the credit-rating of the security
3.1% - 7.9% depending on the credit-rating of the security

If the auctions continue to fail, the liquidity of the Company’s investment portfolio may be negatively impacted and the value of its investment portfolio could decline.