XML 59 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2014
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, available-for-sale securities, prepaid expenses, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and other short-term assets and liabilities approximate their respective fair values due to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities.

Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Fair value is determined based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect readily obtainable data from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect certain market assumptions. As a basis for considering such assumptions, GAAP establishes a three-tier value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used to develop the assumptions and for measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; (Level 2) inputs other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which requires the Company to develop its own assumptions. This hierarchy requires the Company to use observable market data, when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining fair value.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The following tables show assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and the input categories associated with those assets and liabilities:

 

(in thousands)                     

As of September 30, 2014

   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

Assets:

        

Cash equivalents – money market funds

   $ 90,334       $ —         $ —     

Cash equivalents – commercial paper

     —           3,200         —     

Investments – commercial paper

     —           3,000         —     

Investments – corporate debt securities

     —           50,356         —     

As of December 31, 2013

   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3  

Assets:

        

Cash equivalents – money market funds

   $ 47,740       $ —         $ —     

Cash equivalents – corporate debt securities

     —           13,998         —     

Investments – commercial paper

     —           49,680         —     

Investments – corporate debt securities

     —           40,436         —     

 

The Company’s investment portfolio consists of investments classified as cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities. All highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents are invested in U.S. treasury and various corporate debt securities that approximate their face value. All marketable securities with an original maturity when purchased of greater than three months are classified as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses reported in other comprehensive income (loss). The amortized cost of securities in this category is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity.

Other Fair Value Measurements

The estimated fair value of the $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes was $193.1 million as of September 30, 2014. The Company estimated the fair value of the Notes by using a quoted market rate in an inactive market, which is classified as a Level 2 input. The carrying value of the Notes is $78.6 million due to the bifurcation of the conversion feature of the Notes as described more fully in Note 7, “Borrowings.”

The estimated fair value and carrying value of the loans payable under the Loan Agreement with Hercules was $40.6 million and $40.5 million, respectively, as of September 30, 2014. The Company estimated the fair value of the loans payable by using publically available information related to Hercules’ portfolio of debt investments based on unobservable inputs, which is classified as a Level 3 input.

The immaterial fair value of a derivative liability as of September 30, 2014 was determined using a probability-weighted valuation based upon the likelihood of Silver Creek achieving a qualified financing, which is classified as a Level 3 input, as described in Note 7, “Borrowings.”