XML 78 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Income Taxes
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]  
Income Taxes
Income Taxes

Provision for Income Taxes
 
AGL and its Bermuda Subsidiaries, which include AG Re, Assured Guaranty Re Overseas Ltd. (“AGRO”), Assured Guaranty (Bermuda) Ltd. and Cedar Personnel Ltd., are not subject to any income, withholding or capital gains taxes under current Bermuda law. The Company has received an assurance from the Minister of Finance in Bermuda that, in the event of any taxes being imposed, AGL and its Bermuda Subsidiaries will be exempt from taxation in Bermuda until March 31, 2035. The Company’s U.S. and United Kingdom (“U.K.”) subsidiaries are subject to income taxes imposed by U.S. and U.K. authorities, respectively, and file applicable tax returns. In addition, AGRO, a Bermuda domiciled company and Assured Guaranty (Europe) Ltd., a U.K. domiciled company, have elected under Section 953(d) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code to be taxed as a U.S. domestic corporation.
 
In conjunction with the acquisition of AGMH on July 1, 2009 ("AGMH Acquisition"), AGMH has joined the consolidated federal tax group of AGUS, AGC, and AG Financial Products Inc. (“AGFP”). For the periods beginning on July 1, 2009 and forward, AGMH files a consolidated federal income tax return with AGUS, AGC, AGFP and AG Analytics Inc. (“AGUS consolidated tax group”). In addition, a new tax sharing agreement was entered into effective July 1, 2009 whereby each company in the AGUS consolidated tax group will pay or receive its proportionate share of taxable expense or benefit as if it filed on a separate return basis with current period credit for net losses to the extent used in consolidation. Assured Guaranty Overseas US Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries AGRO, Assured Guaranty Mortgage Insurance Company and AG Intermediary Inc., have historically filed their own consolidated federal income tax return. Each company, as a member of its respective consolidated tax return group, pays its proportionate share of the consolidated federal tax burden for its group as if each company filed on a separate return basis with current period credit for net losses to the extent used in consolidation.
 
The Company's provision for income taxes for interim financial periods is not based on an estimated annual effective rate due to the variability in fair value of its credit derivatives, which prevents the Company from projecting a reliable estimated annual effective tax rate and pretax income for the full year 2012. A discrete calculation of the provision is calculated for each interim period.
 
The effective tax rates reflect the proportion of income recognized by each of the Company’s operating subsidiaries, with U.S. subsidiaries taxed at the U.S. marginal corporate income tax rate of 35%, U.K. subsidiaries taxed at the U.K. blended marginal corporate tax rate of 24.5% unless subject to U.S. tax by election or as a U.S. controlled foreign corporation, and no taxes for the Company’s Bermuda holding company and Bermuda subsidiaries unless subject to U.S. tax by election or as a U.S. controlled foreign corporation. For periods subsequent to April 1, 2012, the U.K. corporation tax rate has been reduced to 24%,  for the period April 1, 2011 to April 1, 2012 the U.K. corporation tax rate was 26% resulting in a blended tax rate of 24.5% in 2012 and prior to April 1, 2011, the U.K. corporation tax rate was 28% resulting in a blended tax rate of 26.5% in 2011. The Company’s overall corporate effective tax rate fluctuates based on the distribution of taxable income across jurisdictions.
 
A reconciliation of the difference between the provision for income taxes and the expected tax provision at statutory rates in taxable jurisdictions is presented below.

Effective Tax Rate Reconciliation
 
 
Second Quarter
 
Six Months
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
 
(in millions)
Expected tax provision (benefit) at statutory rates in taxable jurisdictions
$
191.2

 
$
(33.6
)
 
$
(7.6
)
 
$
54.1

Tax-exempt interest
(15.5
)
 
(16.2
)
 
(30.9
)
 
(31.5
)
Change in liability for uncertain tax positions
0.5

 
0.6

 
1.1

 
1.2

Other
0.9

 
1.0

 
1.9

 
1.9

Total provision (benefit) for income taxes
$
177.1

 
$
(48.2
)
 
$
(35.5
)
 
$
25.7

Effective tax rate
32.0
%
 
52.8
%
 
25.0
%
 
21.1
%

 
The expected tax provision at statutory rates in taxable jurisdictions is calculated as the sum of pretax income in each jurisdiction multiplied by the statutory tax rate of the jurisdiction by which it will be taxed. Pretax income of the Company’s subsidiaries which are not U.S. domiciled but are subject to U.S. tax by election or as controlled foreign corporations is included at the U.S. statutory tax rate. Where there is a pretax loss in one jurisdiction and pretax income in another, the total combined expected tax rate may be higher or lower than any of the individual statutory rates.
 
The following table presents pretax income and revenue by jurisdiction.
 
Pretax Income (Loss) by Tax Jurisdiction(1)
 
 
Second Quarter
 
Six Months
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
 
(in millions)
United States
$
546.3

 
$
(95.7
)
 
$
(21.9
)
 
$
155.0

Bermuda
7.2

 
4.3

 
(120.4
)
 
(33.3
)
UK
0.1

 
0.1

 
0.3

 
0.2

Total
$
553.6

 
$
(91.3
)
 
$
(142.0
)
 
$
121.9


 
Revenue by Tax Jurisdiction(1)
 
 
Second Quarter
 
Six Months
 
2012
 
2011
 
2012
 
2011
 
(in millions)
United States
$
680.1

 
$
75.7

 
$
399.7

 
$
369.4

Bermuda
79.4

 
40.6

 
2.4

 
25.8

UK
0.0

 
0.0

 
0.0

 
0.1

Total
$
759.5

 
$
116.3

 
$
402.1

 
$
395.3

 ____________________
(1)
In the above tables, pretax income and revenues of the Company’s subsidiaries which are not U.S. domiciled but are subject to U.S. tax by election or as controlled foreign corporations are included in the U.S. amounts.
 
Pretax income by jurisdiction may be disproportionate to revenue by jurisdiction to the extent that insurance losses incurred are disproportionate.
 
Valuation Allowance
 
The Company came to the conclusion that it is more likely than not that its net deferred tax asset will be fully realized after weighing all positive and negative evidence available as required under GAAP. The positive evidence that was considered included the cumulative operating income the Company has earned over the last three years, and the significant unearned premium income to be included in taxable income. The positive evidence outweighs any negative evidence that exists. As such, the Company believes that no valuation allowance is necessary in connection with this deferred tax asset. The Company will continue to analyze the need for a valuation allowance on a quarterly basis.

Uncertain Tax Positions
It is reasonably possible that a change in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next twelve months due to the closing of IRS audits or the lapse of statute of limitations.  Based on the information currently available, the Company does not expect any changes to be material to the consolidated financial condition or results of operations.