XML 58 R7.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements  
Note 1 - Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Description of Business

 

We are a provider of Cyber Security, Energy, and Business Advisory Solutions delivering integration and consulting services. We help clients in diverse industries improve performance, comply with complex regulations, reduce costs, leverage and integrate technology, and stimulate growth. We team with our clients to deliver sustainable and measurable results. Our primary focus is using our expertise on issues related to three key areas for customers; (i) cyber security, (ii) energy usage and strategy, and (iii) performance, risk and compliance initiatives.  We work with our customers to assess, design, and provide customized advice and solutions that are tailored to address each client’s particular needs. We provide solutions and services to a wide variety of organizations including Fortune 500 companies, medium-sized businesses and governmental entities.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned.  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, requires management to make estimates and assumptions.  These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from these estimates.

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments having an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.  Amounts invested may exceed federally insured limits at any given time.  As a result of the Company’s cash management system, checks issued but not presented to the banks for payment may create negative book cash balances. Such negative balances are included in trade accounts payable and totaled $0 and $184,889 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents.  The Company places its cash and cash equivalents on deposit with financial institutions in the United States.  The Company from time to time may have amounts on deposit in excess of the insured limits (FDIC limits are $250,000).  The Company periodically assesses the financial condition of the institutions and believes that the risk of loss is remote.

 

Notes receivable

 

Notes receivable are recorded at the amounts advanced under the respective note and security agreements.  The Company analyzes each note for impairment of possible credit losses at each reporting period.  Any allowances for credit losses are recorded in the statement of operations in the period such losses become determinable.

 

Accounts receivable

 

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. The Company determines the allowance based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.  At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $252,864 and $83,325, respectively.

 

Marketable securities

 

Marketable equity securities are accounted for as trading securities and are stated at market value with unrealized gains and losses accounted for in other income (expense).

 

Property and equipment

 

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from three to seven years.  Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred.  Gains or losses on dispositions are reflected in income.  Property and equipment includes equipment under capital leases of $35,469 at both December 31, 2013 and 2012.  Amounts included on the balance sheet at December 31, 2013 and 2012 under capital leases are net of accumulated depreciation of $22,464 and $15,370, respectively.

 

Valuation of goodwill and intangible assets

 

Our intangible assets include goodwill, trademarks, non-compete agreements, patents and purchased customer relationships, all of which are accounted for based on Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 350 Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. As described below, goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are not amortized but are tested at least annually for impairment or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Intangible assets with limited useful lives are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated period of benefit, ranging from two to eight years. Such valuations require critical estimates and assumptions which include, but are not limited to i) information included in our business plan, ii) estimated cash flows, and iii) discount rates.

 

Impairment testing

 

Our goodwill impairment testing is calculated at the reporting or segment unit level. Our annual impairment test has two steps. The first identifies potential impairments by comparing the fair value of the reporting or segment unit with its carrying value.  If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill is not impaired and the second step is not necessary. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, the second step calculates the possible impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying amount. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying amount, a write-down is recorded.

 

The impairment test for the other intangible assets is performed by comparing the carrying amount of the intangible assets to the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows whenever events or circumstances indicate that an impairment may have occurred. If the sum of the future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the intangible asset or to its related group of assets, an impairment charge is recorded to the extent that the carrying amount of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value.

 

We predominately use a discounted cash flow model derived from internal budgets in assessing fair values for our impairment testing.  Factors that could change the result of our impairment test include, but are not limited to, different assumptions used to forecast future net sales, expenses, capital expenditures, and working capital requirements used in our cash flow models. In addition, selection of a risk-adjusted discount rate on the estimated undiscounted cash flows is susceptible to future changes in market conditions, and when unfavorable, can adversely affect our original estimates of fair values. In the event that our management determines that the value of intangible assets have become impaired using this approach, we will record and accounting charge for the amount of the impairment.  The Company also engages an independent valuation expert to assist it in performing the valuation and analysis of fair values of goodwill and intangibles.

 

The Company completed an annual goodwill impairment evaluation for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.  Our  annual goodwill impairment testing date is October 1 of each year. In determining impairment charges, the Company uses various valuation techniques using both the income approach and market approach at each reporting unit in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ASC 350. During 2013, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment write-down of $4,472,089 related to its Energy and Sustainability Solutions business segment / reporting unit which is reflected in the Statement of Operations.  During 2012, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment write-down of $4,378,182 related to its Energy and Sustainability Solutions business segment / reporting unit which is reflected in the Statement of Operations.  The balance recorded as goodwill as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 is $10,715,807 (inclusive of the goodwill of $2,034,398 related to the Root9B acquisition) and $13,153,497, respectively, net of accumulated impairment of $10,606,032 and $6,133,943, respectively.

 

Intangible assets, other than goodwill, consist of customer relationships, non-competition agreements and trademarks/trade names.  The fair market value of the customer relationships were determined by discounting the expected future cash flows from the acquired customers.  The value of the non-competition agreements were estimated from the percentage of discounted cash flows expected to be lost if the agreement was not in place.  At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company performed an analysis of the net carrying value of these intangible assets to their fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 350. Based on that analysis, it was determined that an impairment was required for the intangible asset related to the customer list set up at the time of the acquisition of Ecological.  The retention rates of the customers form Ecological remain very high and in line with planned levels, however, the revenue amounts for those customers has not been at planned levels.  As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $238,803 to the ES segment at December 31, 2013.  No impairment was deemed to exist at December 31, 2012.  Customer relationships acquired are being amortized over the estimated useful life of four or five years. Non-competition agreements are being amortized over the life of the agreement. Acquired trademarks/trade names are being amortized over seven years.  Total intangibles balances, prior to accumulated amortization, were $1,561,404 and $1,618,400 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. At

 

December 31, 2013 and 2012, accumulated amortization of intangible assets totaled $757,911 and $462,451, respectively.  Amortization expense on these intangible assets of $295,459 and $173,714 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, is included as depreciation and amortization on the Statement of Operations.

 

Amortization expense related to intangible assets for the next five years is expected to be as follows for the years ended:

 

December 31, 2014   $ 255,654  
December 31, 2015     199,512  
December 31, 2016     161,407  
December 31, 2017     143,983  
December 31, 2018     35,795  
    $ 796,351  

 

  

Revenue recognition

 

The Company follows the guidance of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 for revenue recognition.  In general, the Company records revenue when persuasive evidence of any agreement exists, services have been rendered, and collectability is reasonably assured, therefore, revenue is recognized when the Company invoices customers for completed services at contracted rates and terms. Therefore, revenue recognition may differ from the timing of cash receipts.

 

 

Income taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ASC Topic 740 “Income Taxes”.  Under FASB ASC Topic 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be removed or settled (see Note 13). The Company regularly assesses the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be realized from recoverable income taxes or recovered from future taxable income.  To the extent that the Company believes any amounts are not more likely than not to be realized through the reversal of the deferred tax liabilities and future income, the Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets.  In the event the Company determines that all or part of the net deferred tax assets are not realizable in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would be charged to earnings in the period such determination is made. Similarly, if the Company subsequently realizes deferred tax assets that were previously determined to be unrealizable, the respective valuation allowance would be reversed, resulting in an adjustment to earnings in the period such determination is made.

 

FASB ASC Topic 740-10 clarifies the accounting for income taxes, by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the balance sheet. It also provides guidance on de-recognition, measurement and classification of amounts related to uncertain tax positions, accounting for and disclosure of interest and penalties, accounting in interim period disclosures and transition relating to the adoption of new accounting standards. Under FASB ASC Topic 740-10, the recognition for uncertain tax positions should be based on a more-likely-than-not threshold that the tax position will be sustained upon audit. The tax position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that has a greater than fifty percent probability of being realized upon settlement.

 

Derivative Warrant Liability

 

The Company evaluates warrants issued in connection with debt and preferred stock issuances to determine if those contracts, or any potential embedded components of those contracts, qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for.  This accounting treatment requires that the carrying amount of any embedded derivatives be marked-to-market at each balance sheet date and carried at fair value.  In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, as is the case with the Company, as our only derivatives are related to common stock warrants issued in direct connection with debt and preferred stock issuances, the change in the fair value during the period is recorded in the Statement of Operations as either income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise, the derivative liability is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then the related fair value is reclassified to equity.  The fair value at each balance sheet date and the change in value for each class of warrant derivative is disclosed in detail in Note 11 to the Financial Statements.

 

Share-based compensation

 

The Company accounts for stock based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC 718 – Compensation-Stock Compensation. For employee stock options issued under the Company’s stock-based compensation plans, the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model, and an estimated forfeiture rate is used when calculating stock-based compensation expense for the period. For employee restricted stock awards and units issued under the Company’s stock-based compensation plans, the fair value of each grant is calculated based on the Company’s stock price on the date of the grant and an estimated forfeiture rate when calculating stock-based compensation expense for the period. The Company recognizes the compensation cost of stock-based awards according to the vesting schedule of the award.

 

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation awards to non-employees in accordance with FASB ASC 505-50 Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees (“ASC 505-50”). Under ASC 505-50, the Company determines the fair value of the warrants or stock-based compensation awards granted as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. Any stock options issued to non-employees are recorded in expense and additional paid-in capital in stockholders’ equity (deficit) over the applicable service periods.

 

 

Recent accounting pronouncements

 

Since January 1, 2012, there have been several new accounting pronouncements and updates to the Accounting Standards Codification.  Each of these updates has been reviewed by Management who does not believe their adoption has had or will have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or operating results.