XML 35 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Regulatory Matters
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Regulatory Matters  
Regulatory Matters

15. Regulatory Matters

 

Banking and Hilltop

 

PlainsCapital and Hilltop are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory — and possibly additional discretionary — actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct, material effect on the consolidated financial statements. The regulations require PlainsCapital and Hilltop to meet specific capital adequacy guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company performs reviews of the classification and calculation of risk-weighted assets to ensure accuracy and compliance with the Basel III regulatory capital requirements. The capital classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the companies to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to total average assets (as defined), and minimum ratios of common equity Tier 1, Tier 1 and total capital (as defined) to risk-weighted assets (as defined).

 

In order to avoid limitations on capital distributions, including dividend payments, stock repurchases and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers, Basel III also implemented a capital conservation buffer, which requires a banking organization to hold a buffer above its minimum risk-based capital requirements. This buffer will help to ensure that banking organizations conserve capital when it is most needed, allowing them to better weather periods of economic stress. The buffer is measured relative to risk-weighted assets. The phase-in of the capital conservation buffer requirements began on January 1, 2016 for Hilltop and the Bank. Based on the actual ratios as shown in the table below, Hilltop and the Bank exceed each of the capital conservation buffer requirements in effect as of September 30, 2017, as well as the fully phased-in requirements through 2019.

 

The following table shows PlainsCapital’s and Hilltop’s actual capital amounts and ratios in accordance with Basel III compared to the regulatory minimum capital requirements including conservation buffer in effect at the end of the period and on a fully phased-in basis as if such requirements were currently in effect as measured at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively (dollars in thousands). Based on actual capital amounts and ratios shown in the following table, PlainsCapital’s ratios place it in the “well capitalized” (as defined) capital category under regulatory requirements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum Capital Requirements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Including Conservation Buffer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In Effect at

 

Fully

 

To Be Well

 

 

 

Actual

 

End of Period

 

Phased In

 

Capitalized

 

 

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Ratio

    

Ratio

    

Ratio

 

September 30, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 capital (to average assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PlainsCapital

 

$

1,150,229

 

12.18

%  

4.0

%  

4.0

%  

5.0

%

Hilltop

 

 

1,682,910

 

12.87

%  

4.0

%  

4.0

%  

N/A

 

Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PlainsCapital

 

 

1,150,229

 

14.44

%  

5.75

%  

7.0

%  

6.5

%

Hilltop

 

 

1,633,561

 

17.66

%  

5.75

%  

7.0

%  

N/A

 

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PlainsCapital

 

 

1,150,229

 

14.44

%  

7.25

%  

8.5

%  

8.0

%

Hilltop

 

 

1,682,910

 

18.20

%  

7.25

%  

8.5

%  

N/A

 

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PlainsCapital

 

 

1,213,069

 

15.23

%  

9.25

%  

10.5

%  

10.0

%

Hilltop

 

 

1,730,164

 

18.71

%  

9.25

%  

10.5

%  

N/A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum Capital Requirements

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Including Conservation Buffer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In Effect at

 

Fully

 

To Be Well

 

 

 

Actual

 

End of Period

 

Phased In

 

Capitalized

 

 

    

Amount

    

Ratio

    

Ratio

    

Ratio

    

Ratio

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tier 1 capital (to average assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PlainsCapital

 

$

1,108,484

 

12.35

%  

4.0

%  

4.0

%  

5.0

%

Hilltop

 

 

1,652,101

 

13.51

%  

4.0

%  

4.0

%  

N/A

 

Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PlainsCapital

 

 

1,108,484

 

14.64

%  

5.125

%  

7.0

%  

6.5

%

Hilltop

 

 

1,602,400

 

18.30

%  

5.125

%  

7.0

%  

N/A

 

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PlainsCapital

 

 

1,108,484

 

14.64

%  

6.625

%  

8.5

%  

8.0

%

Hilltop

 

 

1,652,101

 

18.87

%  

6.625

%  

8.5

%  

N/A

 

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PlainsCapital

 

 

1,164,767

 

15.38

%  

8.625

%  

10.5

%  

10.0

%

Hilltop

 

 

1,693,240

 

19.34

%  

8.625

%  

10.5

%  

N/A

 

 

Broker-Dealer

 

Pursuant to the net capital requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), Hilltop Securities has elected to determine its net capital requirements using the alternative method. Accordingly, Hilltop Securities is required to maintain minimum net capital, as defined in Rule 15c3-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act, equal to the greater of $250,000 and $1,000,000, respectively, or 2% of aggregate debit balances, as defined in Rule 15c3-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Additionally, the net capital rule of the NYSE provides that equity capital may not be withdrawn or cash dividends paid if resulting net capital would be less than 5% of the aggregate debit items. HTS Independent Network follows the primary (aggregate indebtedness) method, as defined in Rule 15c3-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act, which requires the maintenance of the larger of minimum net capital of $250,000 or 1/15 of aggregate indebtedness.

 

At September 30, 2017, the net capital position of each of the Hilltop Broker-Dealers was as follows (in thousands). 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HTS

 

 

 

Hilltop

 

Independent

 

 

    

Securities

    

Network

 

Net capital

 

$

181,288

 

$

3,353

 

Less: required net capital

 

 

9,679

 

 

250

 

Excess net capital

 

$

171,609

 

$

3,103

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net capital as a percentage of aggregate debit items

 

 

37.5

%

 

 

 

Net capital in excess of 5% aggregate debit items

 

$

157,089

 

 

 

 

 

Under certain conditions, Hilltop Securities may be required to segregate cash and securities in a special reserve account for the benefit of customers under Rule 15c3-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Assets segregated under the provisions of the Exchange Act are not available for general corporate purposes. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Hilltop Securities held cash of $207.3 million and $181.0 million, respectively, segregated in special reserve bank accounts for the benefit of customers. Hilltop Securities was not required to segregate cash and securities in special reserve accounts for the benefit of proprietary accounts of introducing broker-dealers at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The fair values of any segregated assets included in special reserve accounts were determined using Level 1 inputs.

 

Mortgage Origination

 

As a mortgage originator, PrimeLending and its subsidiaries are subject to minimum net worth and liquidity requirements established by the HUD and the GNMA, as applicable. On an annual basis, PrimeLending and its subsidiaries submit audited financial statements to HUD and GNMA, as applicable, documenting their respective compliance with its minimum net worth and liquidity requirements. As of September 30, 2017, PrimeLending and its subsidiaries’ net worth and liquidity exceeded the amounts required by both HUD and GNMA, as applicable.

 

Insurance

 

The statutory financial statements of the Company's insurance subsidiaries, which are domiciled in the State of Texas, are presented on the basis of accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the Texas Department of Insurance. Texas has adopted the statutory accounting practices of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”) as the basis of its statutory accounting practices with certain differences that are not significant to the insurance company subsidiaries’ statutory equity.

 

A summary of statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income (loss) of each insurance subsidiary is as follows (in thousands).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

Capital and surplus:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

National Lloyds Insurance Company

 

$

86,879

 

$

131,328

 

American Summit Insurance Company

 

 

21,831

 

 

30,462

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended September 30,

 

Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2017

    

2016

    

Statutory net income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

National Lloyds Insurance Company

 

$

(4,147)

 

$

8,146

 

$

(10,663)

 

$

4,507

 

American Summit Insurance Company

 

 

(1,216)

 

 

(357)

 

 

(693)

 

 

729

 

 

Regulations of the Texas Department of Insurance require insurance companies to maintain minimum levels of statutory surplus to ensure their ability to meet their obligations to policyholders. At September 30, 2017, the Company's insurance subsidiaries had statutory surplus in excess of the minimum required.

 

The NAIC has adopted a risk based capital (“RBC”) formula for insurance companies that establishes minimum capital requirements indicating various levels of available regulatory action on an annual basis relating to insurance risk, asset credit risk, interest rate risk and business risk. The RBC formula is used by the NAIC and certain state insurance regulators as an early warning tool to identify companies that require additional scrutiny or regulatory action. At September 30, 2017, the Company's insurance subsidiaries' RBC ratio exceeded the level at which regulatory action would be required.