XML 21 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.2
Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2019
Fair Value Measurements  
Fair Value Measurements

3. Fair Value Measurements

 

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, describes the fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value.

 

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value are reported using a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

 

·

Level 1 — Quotes prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. The Company’s Level 1 assets consist of cash and cash equivalents. The Company has no Level 1 liabilities.

 

·

Level 2 — Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted market prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets and liabilities. The Company has no Level 2 assets or liabilities.

 

·

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market data and which require internal development of assumptions about how market participants price the fair value of the assets or liabilities. The Company has no Level 3 assets. The Company’s Level 3 liabilities consist of the warrant liability.

 

The Company is required to mark the value of its warrant liability to market and recognize the change in valuation in its statements of operations each reporting period.

 

The following table sets forth the Company’s financial instruments measured at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

June 30, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents 

 

$

10,512

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Total assets at fair value 

 

$

10,512

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

December 31, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents 

 

$

7,776

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Total assets at fair value 

 

$

7,776

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock warrants 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Total liabilities at fair value 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

As indicated in Note 2, on January 1, 2019, the Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-11 to account for the down round feature of its warrants issued in connection with its initial public offering in May 2014.  As a result of the adoption of ASU 2017-11, effective January 1, 2019, the Company no longer measures these warrants at fair value.

 

The significant assumptions used in preparing the option pricing model for valuing the Company’s warrants as of December 31, 2018 include (i) volatility (70.0%), (ii) risk free interest rate of 2.57% (estimated using treasury bonds with a 1-year life), (iii) strike price ($6.00) for the common stock warrants, (iv) fair value of common stock ($0.58) and (v) expected life (1 year).

 

The following is a rollforward of the fair value of Level 3 warrants:

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance at December 31, 2016

    

$

172

Change in fair value

 

 

(143)

Ending balance at December 31, 2017

 

 

29

Change in fair value

 

 

(29)

Ending balance at December 31, 2018

 

$

 —

 

There were no transfers between Level 1,  2 or 3 during 2019 or 2018. If the Company’s estimates regarding the fair value of its warrants are inaccurate, a future adjustment to these estimated fair values may be required. Additionally, these estimated fair values could change significantly.