20-F 1 l25326ae20vf.htm TELVENT GIT, S.A. 20-F Telvent GIT, S.A. 20-F
Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2007
 
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
(Mark One)
     
o   REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
     
þ   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
     
o   SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                    
Commission file number: 000-50991
 
TELVENT GIT, S.A.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
N/A
(Translation of registrant’s name into English)
 
KINGDOM OF SPAIN
(Jurisdiction of incorporation of organization)
 
Valgrande, 6
28108, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
 
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
     
Title of each class   Name of each exchange on which registered
     
Ordinary shares, €3.00505 par value per share   Nasdaq Global Market
 
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
 
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:
     Ordinary shares, € 3.00505 par value per share: 29,247,100 (as of December 31, 2006)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a Non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.(Check One):
Large accelerated o      Accelerated filer þ      Non-accelerated filer o
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. Item 17 o Item 18 þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
 
 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
         
    Page
       
       
    3  
    3  
    3  
    14  
    33  
    34  
    62  
    70  
    72  
    74  
    75  
    91  
    93  
       
    93  
    93  
    94  
    94  
    95  
    96  
    96  
    97  
    97  
       
    98  
    98  
    98  
       
 EX-4.32
 EX-8.1
 EX-12.1
 EX-12.2
 EX-12.3
 EX-13.1
 EX-13.2
 EX-13.3

 


Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION
Presentation
     We have prepared the audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report (the “Consolidated Financial Statements”) in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which we refer to as U.S. GAAP.
References
     Unless otherwise indicated, (1) the terms “we”, “us”, “our company”, “our” and “Telvent” refer to Telvent GIT, S.A. and includes Telvent GIT, S.A. and its subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires; (2) “Abengoa” refers to Abengoa, S.A. and its subsidiaries (including Telvent Corporation, S.L., Telvent Investments, S.L. and Siema AG) except for Telvent GIT, S.A. and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires; (3) “the Abengoa Group” refers to Abengoa, S.A. and its subsidiaries, including Telvent GIT, S.A. and its subsidiaries; (4) “shares” and “ordinary shares” refer to our ordinary shares; (5) all references to “U.S. Dollars”, “dollars”, “$” and “U.S. $” are to the legal currency of the United States and all references to “Euros” and “€” are to the legal currency of the European Union; (6) all references to the “NMS Division of Metso” refer to Metso Automation SCADA Solutions Ltd. and Metso Automation SCADA Solutions Inc., which we acquired on January 31, 2003 and were renamed Telvent Canada Ltd. (“Telvent Canada”) and Telvent USA Inc. (“Telvent USA”) respectively; (7) all references to “WBU-Xwave” refer to the western business unit of Xwave Solutions Inc., which we acquired on July 31, 2004; (8) all references to “Miner & Miner” refer to Miner and Miner, Consulting Engineers, Inc., in which we acquired a 70% interest on December, 10, 2004 and the remaining 30% on February 22, 2006; (9) all references to “ICX” refer to ICX Sistemas S.A., which we acquired on May 21, 2004, (10) all references to “Almos” refer to Almos Systems, Pty Ltd. (Australia) and Almos Systems B.V. (Netherlands), which we acquired on July 5, 2005; (11) all references to “ Beijing Blue Shield” or “Telvent Blueshield” refer to Beijing Blue Shield High & New Tech. Co, Ltd., which we acquired on April 26, 2006; (12) all references to “ Farradyne” refer to PB Farradyne Inc., which we acquired on July 1, 2006; (13) all references to Telvent China refer to our subsidiary Telvent Control System (Beijing) Co., Ltd., (14) all references to “ Maexbic” refer to Maexbic, S.A., which we acquired on November 13, 2006 and (15) all references to “Latin America” include Mexico and all references to “North America” refer to the United States and Canada.
Initial Public Offering
     We undertook an initial public offering of our shares pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form F-1 dated October 21, 2004 (our “Registration Statement” and our “initial public offering” or “IPO”). Our ordinary shares are quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “TLVT”; they are not listed on any other exchange or otherwise quoted for trading in Spain.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
     Many statements in this Form 20-F contain forward-looking statements that reflect our current expectations and views of future events. These forward-looking statements can be identified by words or phrases such as “may”, “will”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “aim”, “estimate”, “intend”, “plan”, “believe”, “is/are likely to” or other similar expressions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. These forward-looking statements include, among other things:
    our anticipated growth strategies in each of the sectors in which we operate;
 
    the levels of growth we anticipate in our targeted geographic areas;
 
    our future business development, results of operations and financial condition;
 
    the success of our research and development activities;
 
    our ability to continue to control costs and maintain the quality of our services and solutions;
 
    our ability to develop technologically advanced solutions and to execute successfully our real-time process outsourcing programs;

 


Table of Contents

    risks associated with the financing of “Build-Operate-Transfer” programs;
 
    our ability to provide integrated IT solutions;
 
    our ability to sell additional products to our existing customer base;
 
    our expectations regarding information technology expenditures by our customers;
 
    our ability to identify, acquire and integrate complementary businesses;
 
    the trend of our customers to outsource more of their mission-critical activities;
 
    our expectations regarding the payment of dividends and our future effective tax rate;
 
    our ability to grow based upon our relationship with our parent company Abengoa, S.A.;
 
    Abengoa’s future activities with respect to us;
 
    our ability to retain senior management and other highly-skilled personnel;
 
    our anticipated use of proceeds from our initial public offering;
 
    our ability to increase revenues and operating margins by shifting our product mix; and
 
    the importance of our alliances, joint ventures and investments.
     We cannot assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
PART I
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
     Not applicable.
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
     Not applicable.
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
A. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected consolidated statement of operations data for fiscal years 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, these consolidated financial statements and related notes. These consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. You should read the selected consolidated financial data set forth below in conjunction with the “Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” section included elsewhere in this annual report.

3


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006 (1) (2)     2006(2)     2005(2)     2004(2)     2003(2)     2002  
                    (In thousands, except per share data)                  
Consolidated Statement of Operations:
                                               
Revenues (3)
  $ 664,923     503,844     402,369     312,571     257,732     219,435  
Cost of revenues (3)
    518,931       393,219       319,712       245,578       202,149       180,752  
 
                                   
Gross profit
    145,992       110,625       82,657       66,993       55,583       38,683  
 
                                   
General and administrative
    52,590       39,850       25,286       21,446       18,807       18,536  
Sales and marketing
    18,119       13,730       12,023       10,118       9,091       3,705  
Research and development
    21,729       16,465       14,980       11,060       11,278       5,772  
Depreciation and amortization
    12,619       9,562       8,225       7,904       5,943       3,116  
Impairment charges (4)
                            1,589       2,290  
 
                                   
Total operating expenses
    105,057       79,607       61,514       50,528       46,708       33,419  
 
                                   
Income from operations
    40,935       31,018       21,143       16,465       8,875       5,264  
Financial income (expense), net
    (8,767 )     (6,643 )     (3,432 )     (2,313 )     (4,381 )     (1,463 )
Other income (expense), net
    (511 )     (387 )           88       (665 )     34  
 
                                   
Total other income (expense)
    (9,278 )     (7,030 )     (3,432 )     (2,225 )     (5,046 )     (1,429 )
 
                                   
Income before income taxes
    31,657       23,988       17,711       14,240       3,829       3,835  
Income tax expense (benefit)
    2,745       2,080       2,972       4,749       (809 )     (1,210 )
 
                                   
Net income before minority interest
    28,912       21,908       14,739       9,491       4,638       5,045  
Net loss (profit) attributable to minority interest
    (92 )     (70 )     (373 )     654       (124 )     (374 )
 
                                   
Net income
  $ 28,820     21,838     14,366     10,145     4,514     4,671  
 
                                   
Dividends per share (5)
  $                 0.31     0.42  
Basic and diluted net income per share (6)
  $ 0.99     0.75     0.49     0.47     0.23     0.23  
Weighted average number of shares outstanding (6)
    29,247       29,247       29,247       21,776       20,000       20,000  
                                                 
    As of December 31,
    2006 (1)   2006   2005   2004   2003   2002
    (In thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
                                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 91,365     69,232     80,010     80,515     27,735     32,731  
Restricted cash (7)
    10,617       8,045       3,183       8,028             49,681  
Total assets
    733,266       555,631       435,342       368,460       316,504       335,708  
Net related party credit line receivable (payable) balance (8)
    24,252       18,377       22,711       20,792       (6,740 )     (52,743 )
Short-term debt
    42,620       32,295       23,958       18,748       24,186       18,264  
Long-term debt (9)
    22,042       16,702       23,825       26,083       34,617       19,378  
Shareholders’ equity
    233,219       176,721       157,997       135,971       60,333       61,193  
 
(1)   Data presented in U.S. Dollars was translated from Euros to U.S. Dollars at the December 31, 2006 noon buying rate of U.S. $1.3197 to € 1.00.
 
(2)   Financial results for the year ended December 31, 2003 include eleven months of results of operations of Telvent Canada and Telvent USA. Financial results for the year ended December 31, 2004 include approximately seven, five and one months of results of operations of ICX, WBU – Xwave and Miner & Miner, respectively. Financial results for the year ended December 31, 2005 include six months of results of operations of Almos. Financial results for the year ended December 31, 2006 include approximately eight, six and two months of results of operations of Beijing Blue Shield, Farradyne and Maexbic, respectively.
 
(3)   During 2003, we implemented the requirements of FIN 46-R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” for those variable interest entities that had been created after January 31, 2003. As a result of this implementation, we recorded additional revenues and cost of revenues relating to other venture partners of € 3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. As of January 1, 2004, we extended the implementation of FIN 46-R to those variable interest entities that had been created prior to February 1, 2003 and to those remaining joint ventures created after January 1, 2004. The effect of this implementation was to consolidate certain entities managed under joint venture agreements for 2006, 2005 and 2004. The effect of this consolidation for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, resulted in additional revenues of € 40.9 million, € 31.7 million and € 30.8 million respectively, relating to other venture partners and additional cost of revenues of € 40.8, € 31.5 and € 30.7 million respectively, relating to other venture partners. The financial statements of prior periods were not restated and the effect of consolidating these entities did not result in a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle as of January 1, 2004.

4


Table of Contents

(4)   Impairment charges in 2003 and 2002 relate to some of our minority investments. We sold these investments in August 2004.
 
(5)   Prior to our IPO, as a subsidiary of Abengoa we distributed our net income, calculated in accordance with Spanish GAAP, to our shareholders to the extent permitted by Spanish law. See “Item 8 — Other Financial Information – Dividends”.
 
(6)   Assumes that our 200 to 1 stock split occurred as of the beginning of each period presented. For purposes of the earnings per share (EPS) calculation, we used 20,000,000 weighted average number of shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, 21,775,752 for the year ended December 31, 2004, and 29,247,100 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. The increase in the weighted average number of shares outstanding in 2004 and 2005 was due to the capital increase from our IPO and from the underwriter’s partial exercise of their overallotment option.
 
(7)   Restricted cash at December 31, 2002 consisted of the cash collateral account we maintained to provide credit support in connection with a guarantee relating to a minority investment. The collateral account was no longer required as of July 2003. At December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, there were deposits amounting to € 8,045, € 3,183 and € 8,028 respectively, which constituted a counter-guarantee of certain obligations we assumed during the normal course of business. These deposits are restricted for use until the cash is received by the third party which thereby releases the Company’s obligation.
 
(8)   Net related party credit line receivable (payable) balance consists of the net amount of our loans to Abengoa (€ 44.3 million as of December 31, 2002, € 50.2 million as of December 31, 2003, € 23.0 million as of December 31, 2004, € 28.0 million as of December 31, 2005 and € 23.4 million as of December 31, 2006) and our borrowings from Abengoa (€ 97.0 million as of December 31, 2002, € 57.0 million as of December 31, 2003, € 2.2 million as of December 31, 2004, €5.3 million as of December 31, 2005 and € 5.1 million as of December 31, 2006). See Item 7.B. “Related Party Transactions” and Note 22 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
(9)   Long-term debt consists of long-term debt plus the current portion of long-term debt as presented in the consolidated balance sheet.
Exchange Rate Information
     We report our results of operations in Euros. The following table provides, for the periods and dates indicated, information concerning the noon buying rate for the Euro in New York City for cable transfers as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Average figures reflect the average of the noon buying rates on the last day of each month during the relevant period.
                                 
    U.S. Dollars per Euro   Euros per U.S. Dollar
    Rate at           Rate at    
Year Ended December 31,   Period End   Average   Period End   Average
2002
    1.0485       0.9454       0.9537       1.0578  
2003
    1.2597       1.1321       0.7938       0.8833  
2004
    1.3538       1.2438       0.7387       0.7459  
2005
    1.1842       1.2448       0.8445       0.8033  
2006
    1.3197       1.2563       0.7577       0.7960  
     For the six full months preceding the date of this annual report, the high and low exchange rates were as follows:
                                 
    U.S. Dollars per Euro   Euros per U.S. Dollar
Month   High   Low   High   Low
September 2006
    1.2833       1.2648       0.7792       0.7906  
October 2006
    1.2773       1.2502       0.7829       0.7999  
November 2006
    1.3261       1.2705       0.7541       0.7871  
December 2006
    1.3327       1.1702       0.7504       0.8546  
January 2007
    1.3286       1.2904       0.7527       0.7750  
February 2007
    1.3246       1.2933       0.7549       0.7732  
     On March 23, 2007, the most recent practicable date for this purpose, the exchange rate for the conversion of U.S. Dollars into Euros was 1.3302, and the exchange rate for the conversion of Euros into U.S. Dollars was 0.7518.

5


Table of Contents

     Unless otherwise noted or the context otherwise requires, all convenience translations from Euros to U.S. Dollars and from U.S. Dollars to Euros in this annual report were made at a rate of U.S. $1.3197 to € 1.00 and U.S. $1.00 to € 0.7577, respectively, both calculated using the noon buying rate in effect as of December 31, 2006. We make no representation that any Euro or U.S. Dollar amounts could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. Dollars or Euros, as the case may be, at any particular rate, the rates stated above, or at all.
B. CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS
     Not applicable.
C. REASONS FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS
     Not applicable.
D. RISK FACTORS
     Many factors could affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. We are subject to various risks resulting from changing economic, political, social, industry, business and financial conditions. The principal risks are described below.
Risks Relating To Our Business
Our business is exposed to the risk that adverse economic conditions, in our key geographical areas, will reduce the demand for information technology services and solutions.
     Demand for information technology services is dependent on customers’ operations, budgets and overall financial condition. Therefore, demand for our services is highly sensitive to changes in general economic conditions and consolidation among our target customers in our core sectors. In particular, we are sensitive to economic conditions in our Energy and Traffic segments, which constituted 74.2% of our 2006 revenues. Generalized or localized downturns or inflationary pressures in our key geographical areas could also have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition. This is particularly true in Europe, where 58.4% of our revenues were generated during 2006 and in North America where 15.6% of our revenues were generated. As much of our business activity is highly concentrated in Spain, our business and financial condition is largely dependent upon economic conditions in Spain. In addition, if worldwide adverse economic conditions continue or worsen, our expected growth will be adversely affected.
We are particularly sensitive to risks relating to the uncertainties inherent in government and state-owned company contracts, especially in Europe.
     A substantial percentage of our revenue derives from services we provide as a contractor or subcontractor on various projects with governmental entities, including state-owned companies. In 2006, 43.9% of our revenues were derived from services we provided to governmental entities. Although a number of government projects for which we serve as a contractor or subcontractor are planned as multi-year projects, governments normally reconsider the funding of these projects on an annual (or more frequent) basis, particularly in the United States. Generally, these governmental entities may change the scope of, terminate or delay these projects at their convenience. In particular, 23.2% of our 2006 revenues came from contracts or subcontracts with European governmental entities. The termination of, or a major reduction in the scope of, a major government project could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, adverse economic changes or slowdowns or political instability in any of the countries in which we operate, particularly in Latin America, Asia-Pacific, the Middle-East and Africa, can impact government expenditures on infrastructure projects and, accordingly, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve growth in those geographic areas.
We may not be able to manage effectively our expanding operations or integrate our acquired businesses successfully, which may impede our growth or negatively impact our performance.
     We grew significantly in 2005 and 2006, and we intend to use a significant portion of the proceeds from our initial public offering to fund further acquisitions. Such growth has placed and will place a significant strain on our managerial and operational resources. To accommodate our growth and future acquisitions, and fulfill our obligations as a U.S. reporting company, we must implement new or upgraded operating and financial systems, procedures and controls throughout many different locations, including processes to address internal controls, trade barriers and receivables collection. The success of any acquisitions we make will also depend on our ability to integrate personnel and acquired assets. These efforts may not be successful. This risk is heightened because we envision making

6


Table of Contents

acquisitions outside of Spain, even though much of our management and central operations are based in Spain. Our failure to expand and integrate these systems and procedures efficiently could cause our expenses to grow and our revenues to decline or grow more slowly than expected. Our inability to successfully integrate any businesses we acquired would cause us not to realize the degree or timing of benefits we expected and would impair our ability to achieve our growth strategy.
We may incur financial risk in connection with “Build-Operate-Transfer” programs.
     “Build-Operate-Transfer” projects represent one method of financing a real-time process outsourcing program. A typical component of these “B-O-T” programs is a requirement to fund a portion of the equity investment required to construct the project in exchange for the right to operate a portion of the project (such as a toll system) for a fee over the life of the project. This exposes us to the risks inherent in an equity investment in a technological project, including the risks of integration delays and cost overruns, and could require us to incur indebtedness or obtain financing in order for us to be able to fund our required equity investment, which could increase our leverage and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We have not yet made an equity investment in a “B-O-T” project. We anticipate that we will invest some of the proceeds that we received from our IPO in “B-O-T” projects.
We may not be able to successfully extend sales of our solutions into other geographic areas, which may impede our growth.
     Part of our growth strategy is predicated on extending sales in our core sectors to all of the geographic areas in which we currently operate. There are unique challenges in each geographic location in which we operate, and extending the geographical reach of our sectors may be more difficult than we anticipate. In addition, in certain of our segments (particularly Traffic and Transport), customers are local in nature and so to extend our sectors into new geographic areas we will need to develop relationships with new customers. To the extent that we are unable to do so, we may not be able to implement our growth strategy.
We may need additional capital, which, if we can obtain it, could cause us to take steps that could dilute the value of our shareholders’ investments, increase our indebtedness, or both.
     Our credit arrangement with Abengoa is one of our primary sources of borrowed capital for our working capital or other needs and permits us to request to borrow up to € 45.0 million for a period not to exceed one year. Abengoa may, at its option, elect not to lend us funds under this arrangement. In addition, Abengoa currently provides us with credit support in connection with some of our performance bonds and some of our lending arrangements and also periodically guarantees our lines of credit and our trade letters of credit with respect to some of our projects. Any refusal or inability of Abengoa to provide us with funding under the credit arrangement or to provide us with guarantees or credit support, because of financial constraints on Abengoa or otherwise, could significantly curtail our ability to access short-term capital and could have a material adverse effect on us. We may require additional cash resources due to changed business conditions or other future developments, including any joint ventures investments or acquisitions we may decide to pursue. If the resources available to us are insufficient to satisfy our cash requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain additional credit arrangements. The sale of additional equity securities could result in additional dilution to our shareholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased debt service obligations and could result in operating and financing covenants that would restrict our operations. In addition, we cannot be certain that any additional financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.
We may not be able to implement appropriate hedging strategies to protect against future movements in currency rates between the Euro and the U.S. Dollar, which may adversely affect our results of operations.
     We are exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency exposures. In 2006, approximately 58% of our revenues were recorded in Euros, approximately 21% of our revenues were recorded in U.S. Dollars and the remainder was recorded in other currencies. If we fail to adequately hedge any of our foreign currency risk, we could be exposed to adverse foreign exchange rate changes, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our relationships with our alliance partners may not be successful, which could adversely affect our business and the implementation of our growth strategy.
     In certain market sectors, we depend on alliances and value-added reseller relationships to generate sales and manage existing projects. In Europe we have an agreement with Echelon for the Automatic Meter Reading (AMR) market and with DMS Group for Energy Distribution Management Systems which is an important product in the electricity distribution part of our Energy segment. We also have an agreement with Larson & Tubro in India among others. In the U.S. and Canada, we have alliances with Environmental Systems Research Institute, or ESRI, for geographic information systems, OSISoft for data warehousing solutions and Symantec for

7


Table of Contents

security related solutions. These agreements are for renewable one-year terms and are terminable upon notice. If these relationships are not successful or the agreements are not renewed under favorable terms, our business and growth in those countries could be negatively affected.
Problems with third-party technology suppliers could create delays in our delivery of products and systems to our customers.
     Some of our software products and systems use sub-products supplied by other technology companies such as operating systems databases, protocols, interfaces, middleware and graphics engines. In these cases we have long-term agreements, usually under a royalty scheme, to embed these third-party products and functionalities in our products and systems. If we are not successful in maintaining these agreements, we could encounter delays in our ability to deliver promised functionality to our customers while we investigate and install substitute technologies in our products. These delays could adversely affect our business.
The failure of our mission-critical information technology solutions or our customers’ systems could expose us to liability.
     We provide real-time information management products and service solutions for our customers’ applications that monitor and control mission-critical operational and management functions. In some cases, these systems protect product inventories from problems such as theft, leakage or spills and protect the environment and public safety. Some of our solutions also minimize outage and waste issues. If a customer system experienced a critical failure or outage as a direct result of a defect in our products, whether those products are our own or those portions of the product supplied through integrated technology partners, we may be subject to claims for injuries or other damages. Our insurance may not be sufficient or may not apply to any exposure we have resulting from this type of product failure and we may not have adequate recourse against our technology partners.
Our operations depend on facilities throughout the world and are subject to risks that could disrupt the services that we provide.
     In providing our services, we operate out of numerous facilities worldwide. Our facilities and operations could be damaged or disrupted by a natural disaster, war, political unrest, terrorist activity, computer viruses or public health concerns. A major catastrophe, such as an earthquake or other natural disaster at any of our sites, or significant political unrest, war or terrorist activities in any of the areas where we conduct operations, could result in a prolonged interruption of or disruption to the services we provide to our customers. We may not be able to provide our services in the manner required by our customers if any of the foregoing occur, which would damage our reputation, business and financial condition.
A slow-down of the Chinese economy, adverse changes in political and economic policies of the Chinese government, or changes in the willingness of third parties to fund projects in China may reduce our growth and profitability.
     Our revenues in the Asia-Pacific region during 2006 were € 19.1 million and the majority of this revenue was derived from our Chinese operations. As part of our growth strategy in this region, we expect our Chinese operations to grow over the next several years. However, growth estimates in China are particularly unpredictable and our sales in China are subject to significant volatility. Since the late 1970s, the Chinese government has been reforming the economic system in China. However, any Chinese government economic reform policies or measures may from time to time be modified or revised. Although the Chinese economy has grown significantly in the past decade, we cannot be certain that it will continue to grow at historical rates, if at all. In addition, China’s regulatory policies create additional administrative and operational burdens for us and increase our costs of doing business, and also make it more difficult for foreign companies to repatriate income from China. Any adverse changes in economic conditions in China, or changes in policies of the Chinese government or Chinese laws and regulations, could have a material adverse effect on the overall economic growth of China and investment in infrastructure and information technology. In addition, the funding for most of our projects in China has come from third parties, such as the World Bank and the Spanish government. Changes in the willingness of such parties to provide funds for infrastructure projects, including for information technology services and solutions, would materially impact our ability to maintain or increase our current level of activity in China. These developments could adversely affect our businesses, lead to reduction in demand for our services, adversely affect our competitive position and limit our future growth.
We depend substantially on a limited number of key personnel who would be difficult to replace. If we lose the services of these individuals, our business will be adversely affected.
     Our continued growth and success depend in large part on the managerial and technical skills of the members of our senior management, particularly Manuel Sánchez, José Ignacio del Barrio, Ana Plaza, Francisco Cáceres, Bárbara Zubiría, David Jardine, Larry Stack, Dai Yue, Luis Rancé, Marcio Leonardo, José Montoya, Ignacio González, Javier Garoz, Adolfo Borrero, José María Flores, Raúl Agüera, Carmen Rodríguez, Enrique Rodríguez and Lidia García, and the success of our expansion efforts

8


Table of Contents

depends on significant management attention to integration and coordination. Any loss of services of any of those individuals would negatively affect our business. In addition, during periods in which demand for technically-skilled employees is great, we may experience significant employee turnover. These individuals are in high demand and we may not be able to attract or retain the staff we need, which could adversely affect our businesses.
We may not be able to compete effectively, which would harm our business.
     There are many companies that provide competing solutions in the sectors and in the geographic areas in which we operate. In particular, we compete on our ability to provide innovative solutions to our customers. If we are unable to continue to develop innovative solutions for our customers at competitive prices, we will not be able to compete successfully. The competition we face is intense and we expect it to increase in the future.
     Increased competition could result in:
    price reductions and lower revenues;
 
    loss of customers;
 
    lower than anticipated growth; and/or
 
    loss of market share.
     In addition, our competitors may develop products and services solutions that are better than ours, that are more appealing to customers or that achieve greater market acceptance. We compete with large engineering and industrial firms and small sector-driven specialized firms on a geographic and customer basis, including General Electric, Honeywell, Affiliated Computer Services Inc., Indra Sistemas, S.A., Sice (Sociedad Ibérica de Construcciones Eléctricas, S.A.), and Transcore Inc. (a subsidiary of Roper Industries). Many of our competitors are larger than we are and have greater financial and marketing resources than we do. Many of our competitors have longer operating histories and greater name recognition than we do. Also, some of our competitors have established offshore operations in countries like India and China in order to reduce the costs of research and development and engineering services for projects. These advantages may allow our competitors to respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies, changes in customer requirements or acquisition opportunities than we can and to reduce their costs. It is also possible that new competitors may emerge and acquire significant market share. In addition, we often face significant competition from construction companies that also provide solutions similar to ours. To the extent these construction companies build an infrastructure project, they have an advantage relative to us in competing for the value-added information technology products and services solutions accompanying the infrastructure project.
Our acquisitions and joint venture strategy involve risks and uncertainties that may harm our business or cause it not to perform as expected.
     As part of our business strategy, we continually review potential acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic alliances that we expect will complement our existing business. In particular, we plan to continue to rely on potential acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic alliances to help us fuel our growth by enhancing the value-added products and services solutions that we can offer to our installed customer base. However, we do not know for certain that we will be able to identify suitable joint ventures, acquisitions or alliances at particular times, or that we will be able to successfully close these transactions.
     In addition, any acquisitions and joint ventures we pursue may result in numerous risks and uncertainties, including:
    the risks associated with entering geographic or business markets in which we have no or only limited prior experience;
 
    the diversion of management attention from our other business concerns;
 
    the risk that an acquired business, joint venture or investment will not perform as expected or that it will expose us to unforeseen liabilities; and
 
    the risk that we may not be able to implement our internal controls and procedures over financial reporting in the time frame allowed by the Sarbanes-Oxley requirements.

9


Table of Contents

     To the extent we recognize goodwill in any acquisition and we later deem that goodwill to be impaired, we will recognize losses that will adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
If we make minority investments in other companies, we will be exposed to the risk that we will not control those businesses or may need to invest additional capital in them.
     We may, directly or indirectly, make minority investments in other companies. If we obtain any such minority investments, we will not control any such companies and the business decisions of such companies may not be in our best interests. Some of these investments may require ongoing expenditures if we are required to meet capital calls in order to maintain our level of equity investment. If we do not make these additional investments when we are obligated to do so, our ownership interest may be diluted. In addition, if the value of these strategic investments declines, we may be subject to losses that will adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Changes in technology could adversely affect our business and hurt our competitive position.
     The markets for our products and services change rapidly because of changes in customer requirements, technological innovations, new product introductions, prices, industry standards and domestic and international economic factors. New products and technology may render existing information technology products and services or technology infrastructure obsolete, excessively costly or otherwise unmarketable. If we are unable to introduce and integrate new technologies into our services in a timely and cost-effective manner, our competitive position will suffer and our prospects for growth will be impaired. In addition, our strategy to increase our gross margins through increased sales of higher value added, advanced applications would be impaired.
Our proprietary technology is difficult to protect and unauthorized use of our proprietary technology by third parties may reduce the value of our products, services and brand and impair our ability to compete effectively.
     Our success and ability to compete depend in large part upon our ability to protect our proprietary technology. While we currently hold or have pending a large number of registered trademarks and product names, which we believe reduce the risk of third-party infringement, we currently hold no material patents or registered copyrights, and we rely primarily on a combination of trade secret, copyright and other intellectual property laws, nondisclosure and other contractual agreements and technical measures to protect our rights in our proprietary technology. These measures may not be sufficient to protect our proprietary technology from third-party infringement and could subject us to increased competition or cause us to lose market share. In addition, these measures may not protect us from the claims of employees and other third parties. We also face risks to the protection of our proprietary technology because our products are sold in markets such as the Asia-Pacific region and Latin America that provide less protection for intellectual property than is provided under U.S. or Spanish laws. Unauthorized use of our intellectual property could weaken our competitive position, reduce the value of our products, services and brand, and harm our operating results.
Labor and employment laws in Spain and other geographic areas in which we operate may make it difficult for us to reduce our workforce if we deem it advisable.
     Approximately 53% of our workforce is located in Spain. Spanish law places significant limitations on, and imposes a number of procedural requirements for, a company’s ability to reduce its workforce through layoffs or otherwise. These provisions of Spanish law could make it more difficult, expensive and time-consuming for us to reduce our workforce at a time when we consider it in our best interest to do so. In addition, approximately 15% of our workforce is located in Latin America and approximately 12% in Canada, where there are more restrictive labor and employment laws regarding workforce reductions than are typical in the United States.
Our business may suffer if we are sued for infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties.
     We are subject to the risk of adverse claims and litigation alleging infringement by us of the intellectual property rights of others. In the future, third parties may assert infringement claims alleging infringement by our current or future products or applications. These claims may result in protracted and costly litigation, subject us to liability if we are found to have infringed third parties’ intellectual property rights, and, regardless of the merits or ultimate outcome, may divert management’s attention from the operation of our business.

10


Table of Contents

We may adopt an equity-based compensation plan that may adversely affect our ordinary shares.
     In 2004 and prior years, under a plan established by Abengoa, certain of our employees, including members of our management team, entered into stock purchase agreements with Abengoa for ordinary shares of Telvent. In addition, in 2006, members of our senior management participated in a stock purchase plan on Abengoa’s shares. In the future, we may adopt an equity-based compensation plan which may adversely affect our ordinary shares. Although we have no current concrete plans to implement an equity-based compensation plan with respect to our ordinary shares for employees and senior management, we expect in the future to consider adopting some form of an equity-based incentive plan.
We bear increased costs as a result of becoming a publicly-traded company in the United States.
     As a result of becoming a publicly-traded company in the United States in October 2004, our general and administrative costs have increased by a significant amount. This increase is the result of higher expenses associated with director and officer liability insurance, auditing, management oversight, regulatory requirements (including the need to make regulatory filings as well as establish and maintain internal controls and procedures), investor relations, and the establishment and maintenance of heightened corporate governance measures. In addition, we now incur additional legal and accounting costs as a result of being a U.S. public company and reporting in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The increased costs and the time demands on management may have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
We have broad discretion in how to use the remaining net proceeds we received from our IPO and we may not apply such proceeds to uses with which all our shareholders agree.
     We have no specific allocation for the remaining net proceeds, and our management retains the right to utilize the net proceeds as it determines. We cannot assure you that management will be able to use the remaining proceeds to effectively continue the growth of our business or that management will use these proceeds in a manner with which all our shareholders will agree.
Risks Relating to Being Part of the Abengoa Group
Abengoa, our majority shareholder, is in a position to control matters requiring a shareholder vote, and this ownership concentration may adversely affect the market price of our shares as well as the ability of our other shareholders to influence matters subject to shareholder vote.
     Abengoa owns, indirectly, 62.2% of our outstanding ordinary shares. This concentration gives Abengoa the ability to control all matters submitted for shareholder vote, as well as the ability to call an extraordinary meeting of shareholders (which, under Spanish law, a holder of 5% or more of issued shares can do). At any such meeting, or at our ordinary general meeting of shareholders, Abengoa can, as a result of its majority ownership of our ordinary shares:
    elect at least a majority of our directors;
 
    effect certain amendments to our bylaws and other organizational documents;
 
    control our decisions regarding debt incurrence, stock issuance and the declaration and payments of dividends;
 
    control our management; and
 
    approve or reject any merger, consolidation or sale of substantially all of our assets.
     The concentration of ownership of our ordinary shares could delay or prevent mergers, tender offers or other purchases of our ordinary shares. Therefore, this concentration of ownership may adversely affect our share price or the liquidity of our ordinary shares. Abengoa may choose to vote in a manner that is not consistent with the desires of the other owners of our ordinary shares or in a manner that the other owners of our ordinary shares do not consider to be in their best interest. In addition, as of December 31, 2006, approximately 56% of the shares of Abengoa were owned by its majority shareholder, Inversión Corporativa. Any significant change in Abengoa’s ownership structure could have a material effect on the manner in which Abengoa exercises its voting power. Because we are a “controlled company” as defined by the rules of the Nasdaq Global Market, Abengoa may choose to elect more directors to our board and may choose to appoint directors who are not independent of Abengoa or us to our board or committees of our board.

11


Table of Contents

Our ability to implement our business strategy may be negatively affected by Abengoa’s financial condition, its other business opportunities and its agreements with its lenders.
     Although we are not directly responsible for the repayment of any loans made by third parties to Abengoa, Abengoa’s current credit facility contains, and its credit facilities in the future may contain, covenants between the Abengoa Group and its lenders which take into account our financial performance and financial condition as a consolidated entity. Some kinds of transactions which we may wish to undertake might require the consent or approval of Abengoa’s lenders in order for Abengoa to avoid a default under its agreement with those lenders because of the indirect restrictions imposed on us by the terms of Abengoa’s credit facility. These indirect restrictions arise out of covenants made by Abengoa in its credit facility that require Abengoa to ensure that none of its subsidiaries, including us, grant security interests in or dispose of their assets, make loans or otherwise extend credit, or enter into merger or combination transactions, other than in the ordinary course of their respective businesses. The covenants have the indirect effect of restricting our ability to take any of these actions or engage in any of these transactions, even if we consider them to be in our interest, because Abengoa has agreed with its lenders to ensure that we do not do so. In addition, Abengoa’s credit facility limits Abengoa’s ability to incur debt as calculated on a consolidated basis to include Abengoa and its subsidiaries, including us. These restrictions on Abengoa could have the indirect effect of limiting our ability to incur additional indebtedness when it might otherwise be in our interest to do so. Our ability to implement our business strategy could be adversely affected by Abengoa’s compliance with its obligations under its credit facilities.
As our contracts with Abengoa were negotiated between parties under common control, it is possible we may have been able to obtain better terms from third parties or may not be able to replace them with equally-favorable arrangements.
     Our contracts with Abengoa were negotiated between parties under common control. It is possible that we may have been able to obtain better terms from third parties, and that the terms we received under the contracts with Abengoa may increase our expenses and reduce our net income compared to the terms of contracts we might have obtained from third parties. The most important of these contracts are our credit arrangement and service agreements with Abengoa. Our credit arrangement with Abengoa is one of our primary sources of borrowings. In addition, we recognized revenues in 2006 of € 29.2 million from services that we and our subsidiaries provided to Abengoa, primarily for the provision of communications, IT and related services; and we recognized expenses of € 17.6 million related to services, supplies and leased facilities provided by Abengoa to us. We have not attempted to negotiate similar arrangements with unaffiliated parties and do not know whether third parties would enter into such arrangements with us on more or less favorable terms, if at all. Consequently, if these existing agreements were terminated for any reason, we cannot be certain that we would be able to enter into equally-favorable arrangements with third parties, if at all. Our inability to replace these arrangements on equally-favorable terms could reduce our net income, limit our available borrowings and adversely affect our ability to achieve our growth objectives.
Abengoa is not required to provide any security for funds we lend to it under our credit arrangement and any such loans will be treated as subordinated debt under Spanish law, which may limit our ability to be repaid and impair our financial condition in the event of Abengoa’s insolvency or bankruptcy.
     Under our credit arrangement with Abengoa, we may lend up to € 45.0 million at any one time to Abengoa for a period not to exceed one year. This arrangement is unsecured and may provide Abengoa with funds on a more favorable basis than otherwise available to it from third parties. We may not be repaid or receive the interest we have earned on those funds. Abengoa has significant other indebtedness currently outstanding, some or all of which may be secured or otherwise senior to us upon Abengoa’s insolvency or bankruptcy, which would also make it more difficult for us to be repaid upon any insolvency or bankruptcy. According to Spanish insolvency law, any loan between an insolvent or bankrupt company that forms part of a group and any of its affiliated companies will be considered to be a subordinated loan for the purposes of the bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings. As a result of that subordination, payment of that affiliate loan shall be subject to the prior payment by the insolvent or bankrupt company of its other indebtedness and trade payables that are not expressly subordinated by law. Accordingly, under Spanish law, any money we loan to Abengoa may be considered to be subordinated debt of Abengoa in the event of Abengoa’s insolvency or bankruptcy.

12


Table of Contents

Risks Relating To The Public Market For Our Shares
There was no public market for our ordinary shares prior to our IPO, the market price of our ordinary shares is volatile, and our liquidity may be affected by our major shareholder.
     Prior to our IPO, there was no public market for our ordinary shares. We cannot be certain that an active trading market for our shares will continue, or that the market price of our shares will not fall below the initial public offering price. Between our IPO and March 23, 2007, the high and low prices for our shares were $18.24 and $6.50, respectively.
     Given that Abengoa, our executive officers and others own, approximately 68.0% of our ordinary shares, a significant portion of our shares may not trade. In addition, the stock market has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have affected the market prices of the securities of information technology companies, and which may be unrelated to our operating performance or prospects. Furthermore, our operating results and prospects from time to time may be below the expectations of market analysts and investors. Any of these events could result in a material decline in the prevailing market prices of our ordinary shares, and could prevent shareholders from recouping their investment in the ordinary shares or selling their ordinary shares at a profit.
Future sales by our pre-IPO shareholders of a substantial number of our shares in the public market could adversely affect the price of our shares.
     If our pre-IPO shareholders sell substantial amounts of our ordinary shares, the market price of our ordinary shares could fall. These sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate. The ordinary shares that we sold in our IPO are eligible for immediate resale in the public market without restrictions, and the ordinary shares our pre-IPO shareholders hold may also be sold in the public market in the future, subject to the restrictions contained in Rule 144 under the United States Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and applicable lock-up agreements and provided that the circumstances in which they are offered or sold in Spain do not constitute an offer of securities under Spanish law. Abengoa currently holds, indirectly, 62.2% of our ordinary shares. In the event that Abengoa sells some or all of its shares to another party, our other shareholders will not generally be eligible to participate in the sale.
Risks Relating To Our Organization Under Spanish Law
We are a Spanish corporation and it may be difficult to enforce judgments against us in U.S. domestic courts.
     We are a corporation organized under the laws of the Kingdom of Spain. At this time, only one of our directors or executive officers is a resident of the United States. As a result, even though we have appointed CT Corporation System as our agent for service of process, investors may not be able to effect service of process within the United States upon us or our directors or officers regarding matters arising under the U.S. securities laws, or to enforce judgments of U.S. courts based upon these laws.
     Our counsel has advised us that there is doubt that a lawsuit based upon U.S. securities laws could be brought in an original action in Spain, and that there is doubt that a foreign judgment based on the U.S. securities laws could be enforced in Spain. Our counsel has also advised us that the courts of Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain have exclusive jurisdiction for challenging corporate resolutions, while the general rules of jurisdiction and international treaties will apply to any other claims by shareholders against us.
Abengoa can effectively control the timing and amount of any dividends that we pay in the future.
     Our bylaws and Spanish law require shareholder approval in order for us to declare dividends. If we declare dividends in the future, we may not be able to pay them more frequently than annually due to certain provisions of Spanish law. Although we will declare any dividends in Euros as required under Spanish law, we intend to pay dividends in U.S. Dollars. Any holders of our ordinary shares outside of the United States may incur costs associated with receiving dividends in U.S. Dollars. Our ability to pay any dividends and the effect of any such dividends on our financial position will be affected by changes in exchange rates. The amount of the dividends we may pay will be based on a calculation of our net income in Euros in accordance with Spanish GAAP. Also, Abengoa, our indirect majority shareholder, is, subject to the requirements of Spanish corporate law, effectively in a position to control whether and when we declare any dividends.

13


Table of Contents

The rights and responsibilities of our shareholders are governed by Spanish law and differ in some respects from the rights and responsibilities of shareholders under U.S. law. In particular, our shareholders do not have appraisal rights in the case of a merger or consolidation.
     The rights and responsibilities of holders of our ordinary shares are governed by our bylaws and by Spanish law. These rights and responsibilities differ in some respects from the typical rights and responsibilities of shareholders in U.S. corporations. For example, under Spanish law, we are required to set aside 10% of our net income as a legal reserve until the balance of the reserve is equivalent to at least 20% of our issued share capital. In addition, Spanish law makes it more difficult for us to pay dividends more frequently than annually and Spanish law does not grant appraisal rights to a corporation’s shareholders who wish to challenge the consideration to be paid upon a merger or consolidation of the corporation.
     At our ordinary general meeting, shareholders are asked to approve the actions of our management, the financial statements of our previous fiscal year and the allocation of our net income and loss (and any other issues presented by the Board). If our shareholders do not approve our Spanish GAAP financial statements, we cannot file our annual accounts with the Mercantile Registry of Madrid. In certain circumstances, if the annual accounts are not registered within one year from the end of the relevant fiscal year, we would be precluded from registering any other resolutions with the Mercantile Registry until we have filed our annual accounts.
     Additionally, pursuant to the Spanish Corporation Law and our bylaws, shareholders have preemptive rights to subscribe for any new shares issued by us, including the ordinary shares. These preemptive rights may be voluntarily waived by our shareholders or may be abolished in certain circumstances if our shareholders pass a resolution at a shareholders’ meeting in accordance with Article 159 of the Spanish Corporation Law. Our ability to raise funds through the sale of ordinary shares in the future, our ability to use our ordinary shares to make acquisitions, and our ability to provide management with equity-based compensation, could be adversely affected by these preemptive rights.
Provisions of Spanish law and of our bylaws may delay, prevent or make difficult an acquisition of us, which could prevent a change of control and therefore prevent payment of any expected acquisition premium on the price of our shares.
     Provisions of Spanish corporation and tax law may have the effect of delaying, preventing or making it more difficult for another entity to merge with or acquire us. Further, as is the case in civil law jurisdictions generally, a merger or takeover in Spain is subject to substantially more administrative process than would be the case in a typical U.S. jurisdiction. This additional administrative process could protract or make more expensive the process of effecting such a transaction. Under Spanish law, directors of a corporation may be elected to serve for terms of up to six years and we have adopted five-year terms for our directors, although actions taken at the general shareholders’ meeting may result in the directors being removed at any time. As a result of these five-year terms, not all of our directors will be elected each year. This may have the result of delaying or making more expensive an attempt to effect a change of control of our company. Third parties who are otherwise willing to pay a premium over prevailing market prices to gain control of us may be unable or unwilling to do so because of these provisions of Spanish law. This could cause our ordinary shares to trade at prices below the price for which third parties might be willing to pay to gain control of us.
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
A. HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY
Introduction
     We were incorporated in the Kingdom of Spain as Telvent Desarrollos, S.A. on April 4, 2000, pursuant to the Spanish Corporation Law of 1989, as amended. At a general shareholders’ meeting held on January 19, 2001, we changed our name to Telvent Sistemas y Redes, S.A. and at a general shareholders’ meeting held on January 23, 2003, we changed our name to Telvent GIT, S.A., which remains our legal and commercial name. Our registered office is located at Valgrande, 6, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain and we can be contacted at (34) 902-33-55-99 or (34) 917-14-70-02. Our agent in the United States is CT Corporation System, 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10011.
     We were formed to serve as the holding company for the information technology business of the Abengoa Group, which is comprised of a set of diversified industrial and technology companies applying innovative solutions for sustainable development in the infrastructures, environment and energy sectors. The Abengoa Group provides these solutions through the following business units:

14


Table of Contents

    Solar;
 
    Bioenergy;
 
    Environmental services;
 
    Industrial engineering and construction; and
 
    Information technologies.
     Our holding company structure was completed on January 1, 2001, upon Abengoa’s contribution of the shares of Telvent Energía y Medio Ambiente S.A., formerly known as Sociedad Anónima de Instalaciones de Control (“Sainco”) and its subsidiaries to us. We now operate our business principally through fourteen significant subsidiaries, including Telvent Energía y Medio Ambiente S.A. (See a list of our significant subsidiaries under “Item 4.C–Organizational Structure.”)
     The principal events in our history have been:
    1963: Incorporation of Sainco.
 
    1974: Entry into Traffic sector.
 
    1978: Entry into Environment sector.
 
    1986: Entry into Transport sector.
 
    1988: Start of our international expansion to Latin America with completion of Energy projects in Mexico.
 
    1990: Award of first Traffic sector projects in China.
 
    1996: Start of our operations in Brazil.
 
    2001: Initial sale by Abengoa of our ordinary shares to management.
 
    2001: Disposition to Abengoa of Abentel Telecomunicaciones, S.A.
 
    2002: Acquisition from Abengoa of Telvent Factory Holding AG, Telvent Housing, S.A. and Telvent Portugal S.A.
 
    2003: Acquisitions of Telvent Canada and Telvent USA from Metso Corporation.
 
    2003: Adoption of the Telvent brand name throughout our business operations.
 
    2004: Acquisitions of ICX, WBU-Xwave and a majority (70%) interest in Miner & Miner.
 
    2004: IPO and listing of our ordinary shares on the Nasdaq National Market.
 
    2005: Acquisition of Almos. Start of our operations in Australia and the Netherlands.
 
    2006: Acquisition of the remaining 30% of the shares of Miner & Miner not acquired by Telvent in 2004.
 
    2006: Acquisition of a majority (80%) interest in Beijing Blue Shield in China.
 
    2006: Acquisition of the Farradyne traffic business in North America.
 
    2006: Acquisition of Maexbic, a supplier of public transportation ticketing technology in Spain.
     Our ordinary shares trade under the symbol “TLVT.” Following our IPO and the underwriters’ partial exercise of their over allotment option, Abengoa owned, indirectly, 62.2% of our outstanding ordinary shares.

15


Table of Contents

Capital Expenditures/Divestitures
     Euro amounts disclosed below for acquisitions of foreign entities have been translated using the historical exchange rate at the date of purchase.
     On May 21, 2004, we purchased 100% of the shares of ICX for € 1.8 million. ICX, which is now merged with Telvent Interactiva, is engaged in the development of applications for the public administration and healthcare sector. (See “Item 5 — Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Acquisitions” for more details about this acquisition).
     In June and August 2004, because of the inherent volatility associated with investments in early-stage technology companies, we sold all of our minority investments, including our investments in Xfera Móviles S.A. (“Xfera”), Telvent Factory Holding AG, and ViryaNet to Telvent Investments S.L., an indirect subsidiary of Abengoa, for a net amount of € 35.4 million. Telvent Investments also assumed all of our obligations under Xfera-related guarantees. We continue to have the opportunity to benefit from the synergies presented by these investments.
     On July 31, 2004, we purchased WBU-Xwave for € 1.7 million. Formerly a part of Halifax-based Aliant Company, WBU-Xwave is now an IT services division of Telvent Canada and specializes in information technology services and outsourcing system integration services. (See “Item 5 — Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Acquisitions” for more details about this acquisition).
     On December 10, 2004, we acquired a 70% equity stake in Miner & Miner, a company based in Fort Collins, Colorado, engaged in the development and implementation of geographical information systems software for utilities for a total purchase price of U.S. $8.2 million (€ 6.2 million). (See “Item 5 — Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Acquisitions” for more details about this acquisition). Effective January 1, 2006, we acquired the remaining 30% of the shares of Miner & Miner not previously acquired by Telvent on December 10, 2004 for a total purchase price of U.S. $6.8 million (€ 5.7 million) which was paid on February 22, 2006. (See “Item 5 — Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Acquisitions” for more details about this acquisition).
     On July 6, 2005, we acquired 100% of the shares of Almos Systems Pty Ltd. (Australia) and Almos Systems B.V. (Netherlands) for a total purchase price of € 5.8 million, and a deferred, contingent and variable payment based on Almos meeting certain income targets over a period ending June 30, 2006. On April 12, 2006, we made an additional payment of € 0.4 million as part of a cash adjustment payment stipulated in the purchase agreement. On December 4, 2006, in accordance with the terms of the Share Purchase Agreements made with the sellers of the shares of Almos, we paid the contingent and variable “earn out” portion of the purchase price in the total amount of € 0.5 million. This payment was based on Almos meeting certain income targets over a period ending June 30, 2006. (See “Item 5 — Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Acquisitions” for more details about this acquisition).
     On April 26, 2006, Telvent China acquired 80% of the issued and outstanding shares of Beijing Blue Shield, a Beijing-based leading provider of IT services and solutions for traffic management and consulting and airport/seaport security. The purchase price of this acquisition was Rmb 32 million (€3.2 million). As of December 31, 2006, we had paid 80% of the total amount or Rmb 25.6 million (€ 2.3 million), in cash. A final payment in the amount of Rmb 6.4 million (€ 0.6 million) will be due on May 20, 2007. (See “Item 5 — Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Acquisitions” for more details about this acquisition).
     On July 1, 2006, we completed the acquisition of 100% of Farradyne together with the assets of the sellers used in Farradyne’s business, a leading provider of traffic information technology consulting and integration services in the United States. The total purchase price for the Farradyne business was U.S. $39.4 million (€ 31.0 million). A portion of the purchase price was paid into escrow and will serve as security for the sellers’ obligations to Telvent under the purchase agreement. This acquisition was financed in part through a mix of use of proceeds from our IPO and a loan in the amount of U.S. $20 million (€ 15.2 million), under a credit agreement with LaSalle Bank National Association. (See “Item 5 — Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Acquisitions” for more details about this acquisition).
     On November 13, 2006, we completed the acquisition of 100% of the shares of Maexbic, a supplier of public transportation ticketing technology in Spain, for a total purchase price consisting of a fixed cash payment on closing of € 1.9 million and a deferred, contingent and variable payment, up to a maximum of € 0.6 million, based on Maexbic meeting certain income targets over a period from the closing to December 31, 2007. (See “Item 5 — Operating and Financial Review and Prospects-Acquisitions” for more details about this acquisition).

16


Table of Contents

     We are also devoting substantial resources to our research and development efforts, through which we have developed proprietary products and solutions for our targeted industrial sectors and infrastructure IT systems which apply across product lines including the following:
    vertical solutions for oil and gas pipelines such as the Smart Client program (XOS.net for OASyS® Infrastructure) (an EU Integrated Solution, that Includes SAP PM-PCS certified interface, and integrates metering, RTU, SAS, SCADA, DMS, OSISoft, PI, OMS, MWFM, SAP i/f);
 
    the Cross Domain Platform Data Acquisition Subsystems that applies to electric, oil, gas, environment, traffic and transport;
 
    the next Generation Liquids Suite, an integrated oil and gas solution (gasCAT, floCAT, SCADA, Liquids Suite, Simulation & Modeling, Enterprise GIS, Pipeline integrity application integration, emergency measures and mobile crew dispatch);
 
    urban / interurban traffic / toll systems developments such as LPR technology for highways, highway free-flow gantry prototype for demo and testing; and
 
    in Transport, cashless ATVM, for subways, Regula (Railway Control Traffic Centers), the GENIO speech interface for ATVM, and the “Payment by Tag” parking.
     We made investments of € 16.5 million, € 15.0 million and € 11.1 million in research and development in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Similarly, we incurred a total of € 2.3 million, € 3.9 million and € 4.9 million of capital expenditures related to the building of our facilities and data centers in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
B. BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Overview
     We are an information technology company that specializes in high value-added products and services solutions in four industry segments (Energy, Traffic, Transport and Environment). In addition, we provide similar products and services solutions in the areas of healthcare, public administration and managed services that we include in our “Other” segment. Our technology allows high performing companies to make real-time business decisions using data acquisition, control and advanced operational applications, providing secure actionable information delivered to the enterprise. These products and services solutions include systems integration, consulting services, design and engineering services, maintenance and outsourcing services and software that enable our customers to more efficiently manage their operations, business processes and customer services.
     Our business is organized in three primary ways: across segments, across information technology solutions and across geographic areas.
Segments: In our targeted industrial segments, we have developed distinctive skills that share the following characteristics:
    Mission-critical: Our solutions are specifically designed to address mission-critical functions in segments that require real-time data gathering, interpretation and immediate response and decision making.
 
    Extensive networks: From 5,000-mile pipelines to river basins to electricity transmission and distribution grids to interstate highways, our solutions monitor extensive networks where comprehensive data gathering and control is required to better control those networks, ensure their reliability and integrate the data on a secure basis back to the enterprise.
 
    Flow-based: Whether related to fluids, energy or traffic, we have broad experience in information applications that facilitate the organization and management of continuous flow along defined paths.

17


Table of Contents

     The following chart provides a summary of the allocation of our revenues among our segments for the last three fiscal years.
                         
    2006   2005   2004
Energy
    43.1 %     44.1 %     39.6 %
Traffic
    31.1       31.0       36.6  
Transport
    8.7       7.2       6.4  
Environment
    8.6       9.0       8.9  
Other
    8.5       8.7       8.5  
 
                       
Total
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
 
                       
     Real-time IT Solutions: Our mission-critical real-time products and services solutions collect raw data at the field level, transform that data into operational information, and convert the operational information into business intelligence.
     As an example, for a typical project in the Energy segment, we would provide a complete solution for the operation of an oil and gas pipeline network through:
    remote terminal units (RTUs) that measure and process flow data and transmit this data in a digital format through a telecommunication system;
 
    OASyS®, our supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system, which monitors pipeline flow based on the data transmitted by the RTUs and assembles the data into operational information, such as volumetric data, pressure, temperature and warnings;
 
    operational applications that use operating, safety and cost data to notify a customer’s enterprise system of inventory, trend and cost-cutting information; and
 
    business applications, such as POLARIS that prepare data in a form that can interface with enterprise resource planning or accounting systems for invoicing, banking and real-time business decision making.
     Our services and solutions can then be classified into four different complementary categories representing the four stages of converting field data into decision-making mission-critical information. We refer to these four categories collectively as the “hourglass”. This is illustrated in the diagram below.
TELVENT’S PORTFOLIO OF SOLUTIONS FOR THE
MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION “UP THE HOURGLASS”
(DIAGRAM)

18


Table of Contents

     We believe that the “hourglass” shape depicts the market for the provision of our solutions in our targeted industry segments because we believe fewer companies provide solutions for control systems and advanced operational applications in these segments than provide solutions to capture field data or for business applications.
Specific Geographies: We currently focus on the following geographic regions: Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, the Middle-East and Africa. We started operations in Spain over 40 years ago. While we continue to solidify and grow our presence in Spain, we have also developed a strong presence and expect to continue to grow in North America and Latin America. We also expect to increase our presence in the Asia-Pacific region, the Middle-East and Africa and in the rest of Europe.
    Europe: Traffic represents our largest segment in the Spanish market, where we have provided intelligent traffic systems to numerous cities, including Madrid. We also have significant sales in our Transport segment in Spain and in the Electricity unit of our Energy segment in Europe.
 
    North America: We are a leader in the Oil & Gas unit of our Energy segment and a leading provider of intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) and consulting services.
 
    Latin America: We have a strong presence in Mexico and Brazil, and a leadership position by the Oil & Gas unit of our Energy segment. We are also experiencing strong growth in our Transport business in Venezuela, Brazil and Mexico.
 
    Asia-Pacific: Our Energy, Traffic and Transport segments, and more recently our Environment segment have been able to build a position in the Asia Pacific region that we believe will constitute a platform for future growth.
 
    Middle-East and Africa: Our Oil & Gas unit of our Energy segment, and our Traffic and Environment segments are starting to build a position in this region.
     The following chart illustrates an approximate breakdown of our revenues by region for each of the last three fiscal years:
                         
    2006   2005   2004
Europe
    58.4 %     53.8 %     58.5 %
North America
    17.8       14.6       12.7  
Latin America
    15.6       17.1       19.3  
Asia-Pacific
    3.8       7.9       5.7  
Middle-East and Africa
    4.5       6.6       3.8  
 
                       
Total
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
 
                       
Energy Segment
Our Energy segment reported revenues of € 217.2 million in 2006, representing 43.1% of our revenues. Europe represented 41.3% of this revenue, North America represented 23.6%, with Latin America, Asia-Pacific and the Middle-East and Africa representing the remainder.
Oil & Gas
For our Energy — Oil and Gas customers, we provide complete solutions for gathering, pipeline and distribution operators that manage the capture of field data, provide validation and operational control, advanced operational applications and real time business applications. The comptenecy center for this sector is based in our Calgary center, and currently conducts business globally.
Oil & Gas transmission and distribution traditionally has been a core market for us. After establishing a strong presence in Spain, we expanded our Oil & Gas activities through first our alliance with, and late in January 2003, the acquisition of, the NMS Division of Metso.
Strengths. Our product offerings in the Oil & Gas unit reflect the following competitive strengths:
    Market leadership: We believe we are a market leader in pipeline transport and distribution solutions in North America and Latin America based upon transmission pipeline mileage, where we compete directly with global players like ABB, Invensys, Honeywell International Inc. and Emerson Electric Co.

19


Table of Contents

    Distinctive customer base: Our solutions are used by our customers to control approximately 60% of the oil and gas transmission pipeline capacity in North America. We maintain long-standing relationships with many of these customers and have developed or implemented new solutions to address customer’s operational, public and environmental needs.
 
    Integrated complete solution: We offer integrated products, solutions and services for the Oil & Gas sector, including the OASyS® Oil & Gas management suites, SimSuite for pipeline leak detection and location, and POLARIS for revenue accounting. We believe the recent introduction of new RTUs will enhance our product offering in this sector and that growing security, safety and environmental concerns should enhance demand for our applications and enterprise integration in this sector. We believe our applications have comparatively strong security, field-proven status and enterprise compatibility features that differentiate us in the market.
Products. Our main products include:
    Liquids Management Suite (LMS) is a real-time operations software suite for liquid pipelines that includes a number of flexible, high-performance modules that meet a variety of real-time operational needs. These modules include metering and ticketing, tank management, volumetric data, leak detection, pump statistics and data validation in a highly integrated, loosely coupled configuration customizable for specific, crude and products pipelines.
 
    SimSuite Pipeline. SimSuite is a technologically-advanced transient pipeline modeling and simulation system for gas and liquids pipelines that can be used in concert with our liquids and gas suites to add a variety of high performance on-line real-time and off-line simulation applications. On-line real-time applications include batch trackings and leak detection and location and other hydraulic modeling functions which optimize and ensure safe operations of crude, products and gas pipeline networks. Off-line applications include engineering and design analysis, operational planning and control center operator training and certification.
 
    POLARIS. Polaris Liquids and Polaris Gas provide a comprehensive commercial accounting platform solution, which integrates ticketing, production volume accounting, revenue accounting, billing and customer or shipper reporting. This solution allows our customers to increase their business efficiency, in part by allowing them to conduct business in a web-based secure real-time environment, thus minimizing manual entry and manual processes and those inherent delays. POLARIS runs on both UNIX and Windows platforms and uses Oracle®, Microsoft SQL Server® or Sybase® as its data repository.
 
    Real Time Gas (RTG). Our RTG monitoring suite complements our OASyS® SCADA system with tools to operate a gas transmission or distribution pipeline network safely and efficiently through real-time calculation and monitoring of line pack, storage and compressor performance.
 
    Gas Day Operations (GDO). Our GDO application enables operations and planning personnel to generate, monitor, and revise current and predicted load for gas pipeline distribution.
 
    Gas Measurement and Accounting Applications (GMAS). The GMAS modules of our Gas Suite provide a comprehensive gas measurement, data collection, aggregation, validation and processing solution and can integrate seamlessly with enterprise based invoicing processes.
 
    OASyS® Dynamic Network of Applications (OASyS® DNA). OASyS® DNA is the industry leading supervisory control and real-time information system (SCADA) platform that is the underpinning of our solutions suites allowing the deployment of multiple applications that are linked through standard interfaces, such as those identified above. OASyS® on UNIX or Windows platforms offers a highly secure, enterprise friendly, mission critical infrastructure with certified ERP integration, historical information archive, retrieval, and analysis subsystems simplifying regulatory and Sarbanes-Oxley compliance and reporting requirements.
 
      Growth strategy. We have two primary Oil & Gas priorities:
 
    Maintain our current leadership position in North America and Latin America. We plan to maintain this position by leveraging our large installed customer base to introduce newly-developed enterprise infrastructure products such as OASyS® DNA, GMAS, POLARIS and SimSuite Pipeline. We have already been successful in progressively introducing our full range of products to several of our long-standing customers including Duke Energy, ChevronTexaco and Edison Gas.
 
    Significantly increase our share of the Asia-Pacific market. The most attractive opportunities for us in this region are in China and Australia in both the transport and distribution sectors of the market. In China, approximately 5,600 miles of the transport pipeline network are planned to be built through 2010, and approximately 100 million more residential customers are projected to be

20


Table of Contents

      served by 2010. To expand our presence in China, we will leverage our existing local resources. Due to our recent acquisition of Almos, located in Australia, we are also looking at opportunities in the gas distribution business in that country.
 
    Capture the market opportunity for higher value-added complete solutions and real-time process outsourcing and professional services. We intend to continue to enhance our solutions and services offerings in Oil & Gas by adding advanced applications and a secure infrastructure framework that leverages the integration of real-time data with corporate IT systems. We will focus on developing and implementing value-added applications and services that enable real-time decision making, workflow and workforce management, geographical information and asset management, and customer information systems integration. To achieve this, we will rely on internal research and development programs, customer funded development programs, and the development of strategic partnerships, including our alliances with OSIsoft, Viryanet, Symantec, SAP and other industry technology leaders.
 
  Electricity
 
 
For our Energy — Electricity customers, we provide complete solutions, including field data acquisition, supervisory control systems and advanced operational and business applications. This technology is based in our Seville, Spain competency center and our Houston, Texas delivery unit from which we currently conduct business globally.
 
 
Our Electricity business was built around a technologically-advanced product portfolio and the development of long-standing relationships with key utilities in Spain, Mexico and Brazil. The acquisition of the NMS Division of Metso provided us with a significant installed customer base in the U.S. and sales and distribution capabilities in the North American market. In addition, we are establishing a presence in the Chinese market. In this sector, our competitors include Indra, Siemens, ABB and General Electric. The acquisition of Miner & Miner provided us with a significant complementary, enterprise Geographic Information System (GIS) based, suite of asset, work and operations management products called ArcFM Solutions Suite.
 
      Strengths. Our product offerings in our Electricity unit reflect the following competitive strengths:
 
    Customer platforms in Europe, Latin America and North America. We have strong relationships with many of the largest electric utilities of Europe and Latin America, and we have a significant installed customer base in North America.
 
    Strong portfolio solutions provide a platform for developing business applications. Our Electricity unit’s offering of products and services solutions is especially strong in the areas of field data capture, control systems and operational applications for transmission and distribution. We believe further potential for expanding our offering of solutions exists in the area of business applications, substation automation and distribution automation RTU subsystems.
 
      Products. Our main products include:
 
    Distribution Management Systems. Our Electric Suite is a complete product and solutions portfolio can serve most of the requirements of an electric utility. Most of these solutions are completely developed in our Product Centers and are based in the following solutions:
 
      For Asset Management:
    ArcFM: ArcGIS extension for electric network information management.
 
    Network Adapter: Integration tools for third party network analysis.
 
    Conduit Manager: Major underground cable/conduit management.
For Work Management:
    Designer Network planning and design and Work Management System integration framework.
 
    Service Hub: Mobile workforce management and automated crew dispatch.
For Operations Management:
    OASyS®: Core SCADA and Advanced application functions.
 
    Responder: Integrated outage prediction and management.
 
    DMS: Advance distribution system management functionality.

21


Table of Contents

      Our Electric Suite consists of completely integrated solutions that allow customers to choose the most appropriate applications and modules to create the final configuration that meets their needs. We are a value-added reseller of DMS software under an agreement with DMS Group.
 
    Data Acquisition Subsystems. We provide electric utility customers with master control station communication technologies, Remote Terminal Units (RTU) and Substation Automation Systems (SAS) to enable remote control of network facilities for every aspect of the Electricity business:
    Distribution: Substation and feeder networks.
 
    Transmission: Substations.
 
    Generation: All types of power plants: including hydraulic, thermal and the new renewable technologies.
 
    Retailing: Telvent’s Metering Systems (TMS), a solution with all the functionality available for Automatic Meter Reading (AMR) requirements, Management Meter Reading (MMR) and Smart Metering (SM) to electric utilities.
 
      Growth strategy. Our primary Electricity priorities are to:
 
    Continue growth in Europe and Latin America. We expect continued growth in Europe and Latin America as a result of our customers’ continued investments in renovation and replacement of existing equipment and expected investments in new infrastructure development.
 
    Increase our presence in North America. We expect continued investment in renovation and replacement of equipment, increases in existing security levels and upgrades of current systems to address new product and service demand. We anticipate increasing our presence by introducing our North American customers to new products tested in Spain and Latin America.
 
    Strengthen our position in the Asia-Pacific. We have completed several distribution projects in China. We plan to extend our coverage of distribution systems in China through our commercial network of agents already in place for our Energy — Oil & Gas unit and Traffic segment. We also plan to leverage our current presence in Perth, Australia, for the development of our business strategy in Australia.
 
    Capture the market opportunity for higher value-added complete solutions and real-time process outsourcing. We intend to complete our product offerings in Electricity by adding applications that establish a link with corporate IT systems. We will focus on developing or implementing the following applications, for example: enterprise integration platform, workflow and workforce management, geographical information systems, asset management, customer information systems and smart metering. To achieve this, we will rely on internal research and development capability and the development of strategic partnerships, including our alliance with Environment Systems Research Institute, Inc. (“ESRI”). Additionally, we expect to target acquisitions of specialized players with complementary product portfolios. We will also evaluate options to enter the segment-specific managed services business, focusing on low capital-intensive data management processes, such as automatic meter reading, a DMS operation management and asset, work and outage management with ArcFM Solutions and Responder.
Traffic Segment
     Our Traffic solutions are focused on minimizing urban congestion and maximizing highway road capacity through our ITS (Intelligent Transportation Systems), ATMS (Advanced Traffic Management Systems) and ATIS (Automatic Traffic Information Systems). We also deploy automated toll solutions for highways. Our products and services solutions cover traffic management systems, highway management systems, tunnel management systems, enforcement management systems and toll management systems. Our Traffic segment is based in our Madrid, Spain competency center, and its business has historically been focused in Spain, Latin America, China and the United States. In this segment, our competitors include Transcore, Inc. (a subsidiary of Roper Industries), Affiliated Computer Services Inc., Indra, Siemens, Peek, Sagem and Kapsch.
     Our Traffic segment reported revenues of € 156.5 million in 2006, representing 31.1% of our revenues. Europe represented 72.0% of this revenue, with North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and the Middle-East and Africa representing the remainder.
     Strengths. Our product solutions in our Traffic segment reflect the following strengths:

22


Table of Contents

    Ability to transfer expertise to new geographies. We believe we are a leader in the Traffic industry in Spain and the United States. In Latin America, we have undertaken traffic management projects in Sao Paolo, Brazil; Rosario, Argentina, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic and Guadalajara, Mexico. In China, we have undertaken urban and interurban traffic projects, including large projects in Beijing and Shandong province. In Beirut, Lebanon, included in our Middle-East and Africa region, we are developing an ATMS for the traffic of the city. In July 2006, we expanded our Traffic business to North America with the acquisition of Farradyne.
 
    Strong portfolio of integrated product solutions. We provide an integrated, complete solution to our Traffic customers, with applications ranging from RMY controllers to capture field data, to ITACA and OPAC (intelligent systems for urban traffic control) to provide an advanced operational application control system and geographical information systems, and an enforcement processing system at the advanced applications level. We also provide Open Road Toll toll systems and road weather information systems.
       Products. Our main products include:
    Traffic Management Systems;
    ITACA: intelligent system for urban traffic control;
 
    OPAC: intelligent system for the United States market of urban traffic control;
 
    RMY/CMY: controller to capture and process traffic data;
 
    Odyssey: intelligent traffic control, highway and city access management system; and
 
    Sicotie: tunnel management and control system.
 
    MIST: Farradyne’s Management Information System for Traffic that manages and controls field devices such as traffic signals, dynamic message signs and traffic detectors.
 
    SMARTNET: Farradyne's software product that provides regional sharing of information about road construction, conditions and traffic accidents/incidents among public transportation, law enforcement and emergency response agencies.
    Highway fare collection and back office. Our proprietary toll system products include dynamic lanes toll systems, free flow systems, antennae and tags for highway tolls:
    SmartTOLL: an intelligent system for toll management and control for concession motorways, tunnels and bridges.
 
    Enforcement Management Systems, including field equipment and back office and Data Processing Center both for cities and highways, red light enforcement and speed enforcement.
 
    Red Eye: Red light detection systems.
       Growth strategy. We have three primary Traffic priorities:
    Continue growth in Europe and Latin America. We believe continued growth will require us to leverage our current position to develop the urban and interurban traffic management business in Mexico and Brazil and to capture incremental growth in the Spanish traffic market.
 
    Execute growth strategy in North America. Our recent acquisition of Farradyne has established us in the Traffic business in the United States. We believe that the North American market represents a key opportunity for the growth of our Traffic business.
 
    Extend presence in Asia-Pacific. In order to execute our growth strategy in China, we will rely on our Beijing office, which has recently expanded to 110 employees after the acquisition of Beijing Blue Shield. We plan to leverage Beijing Blue Shield’s existing relationship with the Chinese government and will continue to pursue projects funded by international

23


Table of Contents

      agencies such as the World Bank. In China, the National Highway System is projected to comprise a total of 22,000 miles of toll highways by 2015, compared to 6,000 miles in 2000. We expect Chinese authorities to adopt latest-generation technologies, which we address with a complete range of electronic toll systems.
Transport Segment
     Our Transport solutions include fare collection systems, remote control systems and passenger information systems for railways and public transportation systems, and access control and payment systems for parking. The unit is based in our Bilbao, Spain product center. In this segment, our competitors include Indra, Logica CMG, ERG, ACS, Thales, Cubic Corporation and GFI Genfare.
     Our Transport segment reported revenues of € 43.9 million in 2006, representing 8.7% of our revenues. Activity in Europe represented 65.2% of these revenues, with Latin America representing the remainder.
     Our growth in recent years has been fueled by our development of new fare collection systems for public transportation services, with significant new projects in Madrid, Spain for the Madrid metro and the Spanish national railway authority; in Bilbao, Spain for the Bilbao metro; in Caracas, Venezuela, for IAFE; in Valencia, Spain, for the Valencia metro; in Tianjin, China, for the Tianjin metro; and in Monterrey, Mexico, for the Metrorey.
Strengths. Our product solutions in our Transport segment reflect the following strengths:
    Strong presence in the Spanish market. We have assisted several customers in Spain in implementing their recent advanced infrastructure projects.
 
    Comprehensive product range. We offer an innovative portfolio of solutions, including unified fare collection solutions, and we are developing other solutions that we will be able to introduce in the future.
     Products. Within our Transport segment, we offer advanced solutions and services for railway, buses and subway traffic controls and fare collection systems. Our solutions are focused on information and control management and automated fare collection. Our proprietary ticketing products include unified ticketing and vending machines. Our proprietary parking solution include automatic vending machines, access barriers and tags for parking systems.
    Information and Control Management Solutions:
    TR3000 Regular/CTC: Regulation and Traffic Management.
 
    TR3000 SMS/STR: Facilities Management & Users Information.
 
    SIRail & SIBus: Location & Dispatch (AVL/D).
    Automatic Fare Collection Systems:
    MobiFast: Railway and Subway fare collection.
 
    ValTick: Fare Collection Management and Control Systems for buses and tramways.
 
    Web.Park: Congress and Parkings Control Systems.
 
    Maexbic 3000: On-board fare collection equipment.
       Growth strategy. Our primary Transport priorities are to:
    Maintain growth in Europe. We expect that the Spanish market growth will be driven by new concessions from the Spanish railway infrastructure regulatory authority, construction of new light railway lines in Mallorca, Alicante, Málaga, Sevilla and Vitoria, and extension of subway networks in Barcelona, Bilbao, Madrid and Valencia. We expect to capture this growth in part through the continued deployment of our MobiFast and ValTick proprietary products. We hope to capture additional railway and subway projects by leveraging our proven track record in Spain.

24


Table of Contents

    Capture opportunities in Latin America. In fare collection systems, we expect the build-up of subway and light railway networks in some Latin American cities to provide an opportunity to leverage our geographic presence and our existing traffic and toll projects. We are currently taking part in subway contests and have obtained our first fare collection system contracts in Venezuela, Mexico and Brazil.
 
    Enter the North American transport market. We intend to leverage our technology, the expertise we have developed in Spain and our existing commercial platform in the U.S. to develop our North American transport business. In addition, we will explore acquisitions or alliances to enhance our distribution capabilities, ensure compliance with local standards and to complete our services maintenance capacity.
 
    Capture real-time process outsourcing opportunities. We intend to pursue real-time process outsourcing opportunities. Some of these may involve our facilitating a portion of the financing of specific projects and charging a fee for our services in exchange for operating certain elements of a project such as toll and ticketing systems over a period of time in connection with “Build-Operate-Transfer” projects.
Environment Segment
     Our Environment segment includes all our activities related to environmental protection (air quality and continuous emissions monitoring), meteorology and hydrology, water and wastewater management. This unit is based in Spain, the Netherlands, the United States, Canada, Australia, Mexico, Brazil and China. The business is managed globally from our office in Seville, Spain.
     The Environment segment reported € 43.5 million of revenues in 2006, representing 8.6% of our revenues. Activity in Europe represented 48.0% of this revenue. Activity in North America and Latin America represented 27.9% of this revenue and the remainder relates to projects in other regions including the Middle East.
     Our Environment business was developed around our proprietary technical expertise in meteorology and the extension of our existing products to the water and wastewater market. We achieved critical mass through a long-standing relationship with Spain’s Ministry of the Environment, National Meteorology Institute, and Airport Authority, and we have more recently expanded this segment through initial projects in Latin America, the development of our water business in North America and the Almos acquisition. In this segment, our competitors include Vaisala Oyj, AWI, Sutron, Transdyn, ABB, Siemens and Yokogawa.
     Our acquisition of Almos provided us with a significant complementary suite of meteorological applications for the aeronautical activity and a strong platform to grow our business in other countries in Europe and Australia.
Strengths. Our product solutions in our Environment segment reflect the following strengths:
    Leadership in the Spanish, Swiss and Dutch markets: We believe we are a market leader in Spain, Switzerland and the Netherlands, as we provide solutions to most of the major airports and have a strong customer base of government entities.
 
    Leadership in the Australian market: We believe we are a leader in the Australian market for meteorological systems as a result of our acquisition of Almos, which has been the exclusive supplier to the Australian Bureau of Meteorology.
 
    Strong and growing position in North America and Latin America: We continue to expand our customer base of local water utilities and airports in North America and Latin America.
 
    Strong and growing position in the Middle-East and Africa. We continue to expand our customer base of local water utilities and airports in these regions.
 
    Comprehensive product solutions. We offer comprehensive products and services solutions for water systems and strong offerings in meteorology control and monitoring systems.
Products. Within this segment, we offer complete IT solutions and services for weather observation, the integral cycle of water and environment protection, providing reliable and effective information that support customers on making optimal decisions for their environment business.

25


Table of Contents

Weather
     We provide a complete suite of leading-edge meteorological systems and value-added solutions for national meteorological centers, civil aviation authorities and defense organizations worldwide.
Aviation Weather Suite, a solution for aeronautical weather observing requirements, thus enhancing the safety and efficiency of air traffic operations. Their components are the following:
    AMS400 Automated Weather Observation Systems (AWOS).
 
    AMS700 Automated Terminal Information Service (ATIS) / VOLMET.
 
    AMS500 Low Level Windshear Alert System (LLWAS).
 
    METAPPS Pilot Biefing Workstation.
 
    METIS Forecast Workstation.
 
    METCOM Message Switch.
 
    REVOLVER RVR Sensor.
Nation Wide Weather Networks, a fully networked system that integrates any weather observation network, comprised of AMS220 automatic weather stations and MetConsole meteorological workstation as its basic components.
TERWIS Road Weather Information Systems, to monitor and forecast atmospheric and road conditions, enabling rapid and effective decision-making by traffic authorities on road clearing, de-icing and warnings to road users.
Weather Radars for remote sensing. We provide customized turn-key solutions in weather radars, a key meteorological system for precipitation monitoring and detection and tracking of severe weather.
Early Warning System. A complete technological solution for early detection and warning of severe weather conditions and mitigation of their effects.
Water
     We provide a suite of solutions for water utilities and hydrological authorities for better resource management.
Real Time Watershed Management and Flood Warning System. An OASyS® SCADA based system that is able to integrate hydrological data, weather radar data, satellite imaging and hydrological simulation modeling over a GIS, to provide water resources planning, flood simulation and automatic early warnings.
Water Distribution & Water Treatment Plants Automation System. A complete suite of water management applications, based on OASyS® SCADA and fully integrated with ArcGIS, that meets the requirements of water utilities for specific real time business operations. The water management suite includes applications such as:
    Hydraulic Simulation Software.
 
    Leakage Detection: Segmentization and flow balance calculations.
 
    Water demand forecast model.
 
    Operators Training Simulator.
 
    Asset & Maintenance Management Systems.
 
  Environment Protection

26


Table of Contents

     We provide a suite of solutions for environmental agencies and industries to make efficient decisions on preserving the environment.
    Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting Systems. Fully automated air pollution monitoring fixed cabinets or mobile units, based on an OASyS® SCADA system to collect and process real-time information and integrate statistical and numerical pollutants dispersion models and weather forecasting models, thus generating automatic early warnings on air pollutions episodes and risks maps.
 
    Spill Prevention & Management System. A tool for civil protection and environmental authorities to make decisions on prevention of water pollution on sea and coast, to develop contingency plans for accidental sea pollution and to locate and size rings and barriers to collect the spills.
Growth strategy. Our primary Environment priorities are to:
    Maintain growth in Spain and increase presence in Europe. We will pursue opportunities to upgrade the existing systems of our customers and increase our offering of higher value-added applications such as workforce management systems and geographical information systems. We will leverage our leadership position in certain European countries in which Almos, our recently acquired business, has a good presence.
 
    Increase presence in North America. We will seek to expand our presence with our current customer base and focus our expansion in the sunbelt states and in the East Coast of North America.
 
    Increase presence in the Asia-Pacific region. We will leverage our recently acquired Almos business in Australia to increase our presence in the region.
Other Segment
     Our “Other” segment includes opportunities in the public administration, healthcare and managed services areas. In addition, we generate other revenues from opportunities we pursue in the management of mission-critical infrastructures and applications and outsourcing of systems and applications through our data center capabilities in Madrid, Barcelona, Seville (Spain) and Lisbon (Portugal). We derived revenues of € 42.8 million from these operations in 2006, which represented 8.5% of our 2006 revenues.
Healthcare
Within our “Other” segment, we provide complete solutions for our healthcare customers to provide patients, professionals and Public and Private NHS healthcare delivery at points of care. This unit is based in our Seville Center, and currently conducts business globally.
Based upon our historical activities in Spain, we intend to expand our healthcare activities into North America, particularly Canada, and Latin America.
Strengths.
     Our product offerings in the Healthcare unit reflect the following competitive strengths:
    Spanish market leadership: More than 15 years of experience and a complete suite of products installed in hospitals.
 
    Distinctive customer base: Over 150 public and private healthcare institutions are using our Health Solutions. Over 40,000 healthcare professionals use our software on a daily basis.
 
    Integrated complete solution: We offer integrated products and services solutions in Healthcare, including a complete suite TiCares, based on years of experience (including a portfolio of high-value-added solutions), new technological foundations and innovating model.

27


Table of Contents

Products.
Our main suite of products, TiCares, is a global solution for the full healthcare process cycle. Although its components are capable of functioning independently, each can be integrated into a multi-component solution. The suite is structured into three levels: TiCares-PAS, TiCares-CIS, and TiCares-DIS.
    TiCares-PAS is a Patient Administration System for basic management of patient services provided by healthcare professionals. It enables control of all administrative activities and functional processes and provides knowledge management through the incorporation of diverse solutions.
 
    TiCares-CIS is Telvent’s Clinical Information System for the management of clinical procedures provided to patients. It encompasses the full medical practice and is based on diagnosis and patient care. The solutions comprising the system include the Clinical Work Station, for the provision of patient care by medical professionals (physicians and nursing staff), and the Nursing Services Management solution, for management of the information used by the hospital’s nursing staff to care for patients.
 
    TiCares-DIS represents the third grouping of TiCares information systems. It was designed especially for departmental information systems, with special emphasis on digital medical imaging (RIS-PACS), intensive care units, diagnosis departments and integration systems and middleware for interoperability among specialized systems.
Growth strategy.
We have two primary Healthcare sector priorities:
    Consolidate and maintain a leadership position in Spain. We plan to position our solutions in other regions and leverage our current installed customer base by introducing new products.
 
    Positioning our brand in the Latin America and North America markets. The most attractive opportunity for us in these regions are in Mexico and Dominican Republic, where we are growing our presence in public and private hospital networks, and also in Canada, due to our Calgary presence and the similarity between the Spanish and Canadian government supported health services.
Public Administration
For our Public Administration customers, our focus is to provide a complete solution for the citizens and the administration using our Electronic Government model based on our digital global platform TiWorks.
Strengths.
Our product offerings in the Public Administration unit reflect the following competitive strengths:
    Spanish Market leadership: We have delivered horizontal systems installed in the Spanish Administration.
 
    Integrated complete solution: We offer integrated products and services solutions in e-Government, including a complete suite TiWorks, based on years of experience (including a portfolio of high-value-added solutions), new technological foundations and innovating model.
Products.
Based on an extensive and comprehensive range of products and services, Telvent facilitates the structured transformation of traditional procedures into a comprehensive digital government management model. Utilizing this model, Telvent has developed a global solution suites that cater to the specific needs of local authorities and government, including health, security and defense agencies.
Our main products include:
Our Electronic Government platform, TiWorks, is a complete product suite covering the full administrative process management cycle. Although each component is capable of functioning independently, the full power of the solution is leveraged by integrating

28


Table of Contents

multiple components within the product suite. Consequently, the solution can be tailored to meet each administration’s specific needs, regardless of its size or state of technological development.
TiWorks is based on a comprehensive suite of components, which includes the following:
    Document Manager, a basic tool for simple, efficient management of organizational paperwork.
 
    Knowledge Manager, which allows organizations and public institutions to innovate, foster and share knowledge among all of their stakeholders.
 
    E-Signature and Certificate Authentication Platform, which provides advanced authentication and e-signature functions. Moreover, we believe that it is currently the only platform able to authenticate the electronic version of the Spanish identification document.
 
    Process Engine and Systems and Messaging Integrator, which enables the development of a wide range of global solutions customized to individual clients needs.
Growth strategy.
     Our strategy has three objectives:
  1.   Identifying new business targets. In 2003, we began to focus on the Government of Andalusia to generate sales of data center and e-Business products and services and in 2004 and 2005, we created a business unit of Government and Municipalities.
 
  2.   Identifying new geographical areas. We started in 2003 working only in Andalusia. In 2004, we started to expand into other regions of Spain such as Madrid and Catalonia, and during 2005 and 2006 we expanded into Latin America.
 
  3.   Developing products. The first two objectives are connected with the development of new products and require a large investment in Research and Development (R&D).
Managed Services
     Telvent offers IT Outsourcing business services and solutions based on real time management of customers’ information systems and technological platforms. These services enable customers to outsource technology activities to Telvent, allowing customers to adapt themselves to today’s fast technological changes, in an efficient, scalable way, concentrating their resources on their core business.
     The goal is to be a leader in IT Outsourcing and communications Services, based on expertise, innovation, scalability and 24x7x365 availability. Our services cover the complete service life cycle from consultancy, integration, operation and maintenance.
Strengths
    Experience: 20 years of experience in this technological business area.
 
    Data Centers: Five data centers in the Iberian Peninsula with approximately 40,672 square meters of technical space: Madrid (2), Barcelona, Seville and Lisbon.
 
    Communications: Telvent hosts in its data centers almost all of the existing telecommunication carriers in the Iberian Peninsula, which allows full access to any communications network.
 
    Managed Services: Telvent covers the complete IT service life-cycle from consultancy and integration, to operation and maintenance.
 
    Leadership: Telvent is a market leader in data center services in Spain.
Products and Services
     We provide outsourcing and consultancy services grouped by specialized families of services:
    Management of Assets and Resources: managing specialized human resources and technological assets for customers, assisting them to avoid erroneous and/or obsolete technology investments and converting fixed costs to variable costs. These include hosting (hardware and/or software), equipment leasing, desktop and micro-IT management or body shopping.

29


Table of Contents

    Data Center Management: housing services for technological platforms in redundant infrastructure in all of the utility requirements (electricity, temperature, humidity, fire detection and suppression, etc.). These services include housing of technical offices or IT system housing on racks, in cages or rooms in our five data centers in the Iberian Peninsula.
 
    Communication Management: managing the following services: Networks (LAN, MAN, WAN), Internet access, interconnection between operators, unified messaging and other corporate voice and data services (voice over IP, E-mail, etc.)
 
    Security and Contingency Management: security services for our customers’ information systems and the capability of implementing customers’ business continuity services. Our security services include: firewall management, intrusion prevention, antivirus, antispam and security monitoring 24x7 via a Security Operation Center. Our contingency and business continuity services for the market include: managed backup solutions, synchronic or asynchronic data replication solutions and the preparation and implementation of contingency plans.
 
    System Management: corresponds to daily operating services of the customers’ technology systems. This includes various service levels. First tier services are performed from 24x7 operations and support centers, where service incidents are received and solved. The system is monitored proactively to prevent future incidents. In addition, we provide shared services, such as low demand storage or virtual systems. Second tier services include specialized technical teams dedicated to management of customer’s problem reports, systems and technical problems mainly organized by the following technologies:
    Operating Systems: IBM Mainframe (OS40, OS390 and ZOS), Microsoft Windows, Linux and UNIX (HP-UX, AIX, Solaris, etc.)
 
    Application Servers (middleware solutions): Microsoft .Net, Jboss, IBM Web sphere, Oracle AS, Bea Web logic, etc.
 
    Databases: Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle, IBM DB2, My SQL, Sybase, Informix, etc.
 
    Application Management: based on design, implementation and management of our customers’ corporate applications, which range from corporate or ERP applications, customer relationship management (CRM) applications, SCM, business vision management, management of engineering applications or Engineering, Knowledge Management (KM), etc.; to management of technologies associated with these business applications such as SAP, Oracle and Microsoft.
Growth strategy
    Identifying new business targets
 
    Identifying new geographical areas, such as data center solutions in the North America region and in the rest of Telvent’s core geographies
 
    Identifying new services, such as the business consulting and applications functional development
 
    Acquiring branding and expertise in IT consulting by internal training, alliances or acquisitions
 
    Integrating IT Infrastructure Library methodology as the operational model
Seasonality
     We do not believe there is inherent seasonality in our revenues as reported under U.S. GAAP. We historically have experienced fluctuations in the cash we receive throughout the year as we tend to receive greater payments in the fourth quarter due to the budgetary cycles of some of our customers.
Research and Development
     Constant Investment. Our research and development planning process helps to ensure that our research and development investments are aligned with our long-term strategic and business objectives and responds to our customers’ needs and helps to create a sustained competitive advantage.
     Product and Competency Centers. Product Centers provide infrastructure technologies that underpin our portfolio of solutions. These technologies are used by our Competency Centers to develop high value-added advanced applications, specific to each Telvent segment. Our research and development activity, geographically distributed, is based in Calgary (SCADA and Oil & Gas applications), Madrid (Traffic applications), Seville (Environment, RTU and Electricity applications), Bilbao (Transportation

30


Table of Contents

systems), Rockville, Maryland (Intelligent Transportation Systems — MIST, OPAC, SmartNET applications), Fort Collins, Colorado (GIS based applications) and Perth, Australia (LLWAS and AWOS).
     Successful Track Record. Our research and development function has developed products including the OASyS® DNA, our multi industry data acquisition and IT infrastructure product, RTUs for electric distribution and, most recently, the MobiFast advanced payment system for the Transport segment.
Sales and Marketing
     Our sales and marketing work force is located globally and is responsible for product management, account management, sales administration and corporate marketing communication. By working closely with our account management team, our product management team analyzes and identifies product and technology trends in our target markets and works closely with our research and development group to develop new products, product enhancements and product capabilities as demanded by our customers.
     Our services are predominantly sold by our direct sales force. Our sales support group works closely with our direct sales force to provide it with sales tools, technical training and on-going logistical support to facilitate its sales and support efforts. Our corporate marketing communication group is responsible for our marketing programs, including corporate and product branding, trade shows, press releases and interviews, speaker engagements, training and technology seminars, print advertising and sales and marketing materials.
Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights
     We rely on trademark and copyright law, trade secret protection and confidentiality and/or license agreements with our employees, customers, partners and others to protect our intellectual property rights. We generally pursue the registration of our trademarks in all of our geographic areas, where practicable, and we seek to protect our marks against similar and confusing marks of third parties. We do not possess any material patents or registered copyrights, but we do have registered marks and applications pending for registered marks in various jurisdictions in which we operate. “Telvent” is a registered community mark in the European Union. It is also registered in Mexico, Canada, the United States and Brazil.
C. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
Our Parent Company
     The Abengoa Group is comprised of a set of diversified industrial and technology companies applying innovative solutions for sustainable development in the infrastructures, environment and energy sectors. The Abengoa Group provides these solutions through the followings business units:
    Solar;
 
    Bioenergy;
 
    Environmental services;
 
    Industrial engineering and construction; and
 
    Information technology.
     We and Abengoa’s subsidiary Telvent Investments, S.L. (“Telvent Investments”) comprise Abengoa’s information technology business unit. Abengoa indirectly owns 62.2% of our ordinary shares. We do not have an ownership interest in Telvent Investments. Since our inception, our results of operations have been fully consolidated by Abengoa. Abengoa is a public company headquartered in Seville, Spain, and its shares are listed on the Madrid Stock Exchange.
     We generally operate our business independently from Abengoa’s other businesses. For instance, we maintain our own sales force and lease our own premises and offices in all of our core geographic areas.

31


Table of Contents

Our Subsidiaries
     The following chart shows the name and country of organization of, and our percentage ownership in, each of our significant subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006.
                 
    Country of   Percentage
Name of Subsidiary   Organization   Ownership
Telvent Energía y Medio Ambiente, S.A.
  Spain     100 %
Telvent Tráfico y Transporte, S.A.
  Spain     100 %
Telvent Brasil S.A.
  Brazil     100 %
Telvent México S.A. de C.V.
  Mexico     100 %
Telvent Canada Ltd.
  Canada     100 %
Telvent U.S.A. Inc.
    U.S.A.       100 %
Telvent Interactiva, S.A.
  Spain     100 %
Telvent Outsourcing, S.A.
  Spain     100 %
Telvent Housing, S.A.
  Spain     100 %
Miner & Miner, Consulting Engineers, Inc.
    U.S.A.       100 %
Telvent Australia Pty. Ltd. (formerly Almos Systems Pty Ltd.)
  Australia     100 %
Telvent Netherlands B.V (formerly Almos Systems B.V.).
  Netherlands     100 %
Telvent Control System (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
  China     100 %
Telvent Farradyne Inc. (formerly P.B. Farradyne, Inc.)
    U.S.A.       100 %
D.   PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
     Facilities
     Our principal executive offices are located in Madrid, under a lease that expires in 2020. We categorize our other facilities as Delivery Units, Competency Centers, Product Centers and Data Centers.
     Delivery Units. Our Delivery Units are customer centric and geographically oriented offices responsible for the sales, service and project execution of the work under our customer contracts and are located in Houston, Texas, United States; Fort Collins, Colorado, United States; Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Madrid, Spain; Barcelona, Spain; Seville, Spain; Mexico City, Mexico; Beijing, China; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Perth, Australia; Culemborg, the Netherlands and Rockville, Maryland, United States.
     Competency Centers. Our Competency Centers are industry-vertical centers of excellence responsible for developing and enhancing industry-specific advanced applications and solutions for our targeted sectors. These Competency Centers deliver solutions embedding product, advanced applications, business-specific knowledge, integrated third-party product (if necessary) and deployment support to the Delivery Units around the world. They are located in Seville, Spain (Energy — Electricity, and Environment); Calgary, Canada (Energy — Oil & Gas); Madrid, Spain (Traffic); and Bilbao, Spain (Transport).
     Product Centers. Our Product Centers are technology focused and develop, support and distribute specific infrastructure and other products. These products are used in our Competency Center solutions and / or our specific project implementations of the Delivery Units in meeting customer requirements of our projects. They are located in Calgary, Canada (IT Infrastructure –OASyS®); Baltimore, Maryland, United States (SimSuite Pipeline); Fort Collins, Colorado, United States (ArcFM Solutions Suite); Seville, Spain (Data Acquisition Subsystems – RTUs); Bilbao, Spain (Toll & Fare Collection Systems –Mobismart, Valtick, SATToll, WEBPark); Perth, Australia (AWOS and LLWAS); Rockville, Maryland, United States (Traffic Management – MIST, SMARTNET); and Barcelona, Spain (Maexbic Transport Products).
     Data Centers. Our data centers are buildings that we lease as a bare shell in which we install electrical facilities (including uninterruptible power supplies (UPS) and generators for power back up), air conditioning, fire protection and extinguisher systems, security (including 24x7 complete security control system and magnetic strip card controlled access, closed circuit TV’s and motion detectors), and a management system with 24x7 equipment monitoring and maintenance System (SCADA) as well as building out the interior. The data centers are used for the hosting and housing of our customers’ IT systems.
     With the exception of a 1,303 square meter facility and 1,267 square meter facility in Beijing, China that we have purchased, all of our facilities are leased. As of December 31, 2006, we had leased facilities in more than 35 locations in Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, the Middle-East and Africa. As detailed in the table below, our leases of material leased facilities cover approximately 113,365 square meters (1,220,142 square feet) of office space.

32


Table of Contents

Table of Facilities
                 
    Square Meters   Square Feet
Location   (approx.)   (approx.)
Europe
    79,492       855,542  
North America
    25,216       271,418  
Latin America
    4,108       44,217  
Asia-Pacific
    4,109       44,229  
Middle-East and Africa
    440       4,736  
 
               
Totals
    113,365       1,220,142  
 
               
Table of Material Leased Facilities
                                 
    Square   Square           Lease
    Meters   Feet.           Termination
Location   (approx.)   (approx.)   Type(1)   Date
Madrid, Spain
    32,341       348,119     DU, CC, DC   Oct. 2020
Seville, Spain
    6,127       65,947     DU, CC, PC   Dec. 2010
Seville, Spain
    7,820       84,178     DU, CC, PC   July 2013
Seville, Spain
    877       9,435     DC   Dec. 2010
Barcelona, Spain
    2,511       27,028     DC   Jan. 2009
Lisbon, Portugal
    5,355       57,641     DU, DC   June 2007
Houston, Texas, USA
    4,476       48,177     DU   Nov. 2009
Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
    2,646       28,842     DU, PC   May 2012
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
    12,338       132,800     DU, CC, PC   July 2008
Río Janeiro, Brazil
    491       5,285     DU   May 2007
Mexico City, Mexico
    959       10,319     DU   Dec. 2007
Perth, Australia
    1,239       13,336     PC,DU   June 2011
Rockville, Maryland, USA
    2,731       29,391     PC,DU   April 2009
                         
Total
    77,180       831,107                  
                         
 
    Notes:
 
(1)   DU means Delivery Units; CC means Competency Centers; PC means Product Centers; DC means Data Centers.
Material Tangible Fixed Assets
     Our material tangible fixed assets consist primarily of the property and plants in our Data Centers in Madrid, Barcelona, Seville and Lisbon, Portugal.
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
     Not applicable.

33


Table of Contents

ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
A. OPERATING RESULTS
     The following discussion contains information about our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity and capital resources that we have prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. It also includes information about our revenues and gross profit by sectors and geographies.
Overview
     We are an information technology company that specializes in high value-added products and services solutions in four industry sectors (Energy, Traffic, Transport and Environment). In addition, we provide similar products and services solutions in the areas of healthcare, public administration and managed services, that we include in our “Other” sector. Our technology allows companies to make real-time business decisions using data acquisition, control and advanced operational applications, providing secure actionable information delivery to the enterprise. Our mission-critical real-time solutions and applications collect raw data at the field level, transform that data into operational information and convert the operational information into business intelligence. We are capable of providing solutions to link this business intelligence to our customers’ enterprise information technology systems.
     Our customers include some of the largest energy companies in the United States, Canada, Europe, Mexico, Brazil and China, some of the largest European, North American and Latin American utilities, the traffic or transport authorities of some of the largest cities in Spain, North America, Latin America, China and the Middle-East and a number of government environmental entities in Europe, North America, Latin America, Australia and the Middle-East.
     Our Energy and Traffic sectors accounted for 43.1% and 31.1% for our revenues during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, 44.1% and 31.0% of our revenues during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and 39.6% and 36.6% during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. Our three largest geographic regions are Europe, Latin America and North America, which accounted for 58.4%, 15.6% and 17.8% respectively, of our 2006 revenues, 53.8%, 17.1% and 14.6%, respectively, of our 2005 revenues and 58.5%, 19.3% and 12.7%, respectively, of our 2004 revenues.
Background
     Since the incorporation in 1963 of our predecessor Sainco, we and our predecessors have been able to establish long-standing relationships with our customers in our Energy and Traffic segments and progressively introduce new ranges of products and services solutions to the market. We and our predecessors also have developed new related segments, such as Environment and Transport, and we and our predecessors have successfully entered new geographies, such as our entry into Mexico, Brazil and China in the 1990’s, and Canada, the United States, Australia and the Netherlands since the year 2000.
     Since Telvent was incorporated in 2000 as the holding company for the information technology business of the Abengoa Group, there have been occasional strategic realignments of the ownership of some businesses within the Abengoa Group. In 2001, we sold Abentel Telecomunicaciones, S.A. to Abengoa, and in 2002, we acquired Telvent Housing, S.A., Telvent Factory Holding AG and Telvent Portugal S.A. from Abengoa.
     In June 2004, Abengoa restructured its ownership interest in Telvent by forming Telvent Corporation. Abengoa owns its entire interest in Telvent through Telvent Corporation and Siema AG, another of Abengoa’s wholly-owned subsidiaries. Telvent Corporation also owns 99.99% of the capital stock of Telvent Investments, the entity to which we sold Telvent Factory Holding AG and all of our remaining minority investments, including our investment in Xfera, for a net amount of € 35.4 million in June and August 2004.

34


Table of Contents

     The following table sets forth certain of our statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004.
                                                                 
    Year             Year             Year                    
    ended     Percentage     ended     Percentage     ended     Percentage     Percentage     Percentage  
    December     of 2006     December     of 2005     December     of 2004     Change     Change  
    31, 2006     Revenues     31, 2005     Revenues     31, 2004     Revenues     2005-2006     2004-2005  
                    (Euros in thousands, except percentages and per share data)                          
Revenues(1)
  503,844       100 %   402,369       100.0 %   312,571       100.0 %     25.2 %     28.7 %
Cost of revenues(1)
    393,219       78.0       319,712       79.5       245,578       78.6       23.0 %     30.2 %
 
                                                     
Gross profit
    110,625       22.0       82,657       20.5       66,993       21.4       33.8 %     23.4 %
General and administrative
    39,850       7.9       25,286       6.3       21,446       6.9                  
Sales and marketing
    13,730       2.7       13,023       3.2       10,118       3.2                  
Research and development
    16,465       3.3       14,980       3.7       11,060       3.5                  
Depreciation and amortization
    9,562       1.9       8,225       2.0       7,904       2.5                  
Impairment charges
                                                       
 
                                                       
Total operating expenses
  79,607       15.8     61,514       15.3     50,528       16.2                  
Income from operations
  31,018       6.2     21,143       5.3     16,465       5.3       46.7 %     28.4 %
Financial expense, net
    (6,643 )     (1.3 )     (3,432 )     (0.9 )     (2,313 )     (0.7 )                
Other income (expense), net
    (387 )     (0.1 )                   88       0.0                  
 
                                                       
Total other income (expense)
    (7,030 )     (1.4 )     (3,432 )     (0.9 )     (2,225 )     (0.7 )                
 
                                                       
Income before income taxes
  23,988       4.8     17,711       4.4     14,240       4.6                  
Income tax expense (benefit)
    2,080       (0.4 )     2,972       0.7       4,749       1.5                  
 
                                                       
Net income before minority interest
    21,908       4.3       14,739       3.7       9,491       3.0                  
Loss/(profit) attributable to minority interests
    (70 )             (373 )     (0.1 )     654       0.2                  
 
                                                         
Net income
  21,838       4.3     14,366       3.6     10,145       3.2       52.0 %     41.6 %
 
                                                   
Earnings per share Basic and diluted net income per share
  0.75             0.49             0.47                          
 
                                                         
Weighted average number of shares outstanding Basic and diluted
    29,247,100               29,247,100               21,775,752                          
 
(1)   In 2004, we applied FIN 46-R to all remaining joint ventures created after January 1, 2004. As such, all joint ventures in which Telvent is the primary beneficiary are consolidated. Total revenue recognized with respect to these consolidated joint ventures was € 48,577, including € 40,947 of revenues of other ventures in these arrangements, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. During the corresponding period in 2005, revenue recognized with respect to these consolidated joint ventures was € 42,403 including € 31,684 of revenues of other ventures in these arrangements. During the corresponding period in 2004, revenue recognized with respect to these consolidated joint ventures was € 40,125, including € 30,820 of revenues of other ventures partners in these arrangements. Corresponding costs due to other joint ventures of € 40,761, € 31,528 and € 30,727 are recognized in cost of revenues as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The financial statements of prior periods were not restated and the effect of consolidating these entities did not result in a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle as of January 1, 2004.

35


Table of Contents

Bookings and Backlog
     New contract bookings represent new signed contracts for the year, regardless of performance. New contract bookings in 2006 were € 552.8 million, an increase of € 72.4 million, or 15.1%, from new bookings of € 480.4 million in 2005. We provide information regarding our bookings because we believe doing so provides useful trend information regarding changes in the volume of our new business over time.
     Backlog as of December 31, 2006 was € 445.2 million, an increase of € 56.3 million, or 14.4% from a backlog of € 388.9 million as of December 31, 2005. Our backlog represents the portion of our signed contracts for which performance is pending. Backlog excludes our pipeline of projects that we are pursuing but as to which we have not yet signed binding agreements.
Acquisitions
     In 2004, 2005 and 2006, acquisitions had an impact on our results of operations.
Acquisition of ICX
     On May 21, 2004, we purchased 100% of the shares of ICX, a company engaged in the development of applications and services for the public administration and healthcare sectors in order to take advantage of potential synergies with our current healthcare solutions in public health management systems.
     The results of operations of ICX are reflected in our results of operations for the full years 2006 and 2005, and for seven months in 2004.
Acquisition of WBU-Xwave
     On July 31, 2004, we purchased WBU-Xwave, formerly part of Xwave Solutions Inc. (part of Halifax-based Aliant Inc.), which specializes in customized IT solutions and IT outsourcing for a variety of sectors, including oil and gas, primarily focused in Alberta, Canada.
     We believe that with this acquisition we also acquired a strong IT services and IT outsourcing business which complements our “up the hourglass” strategy, and that has provided us with established customer relationships and a talented group of IT experts, with strong industry experience and proven results. With this expertise, we believe we are better able to move beyond the traditional operations space and reach into the enterprise layer of the corporation, making it possible to provide new solutions to existing and new clients.
     The results of operations of WBU-Xwave are reflected in our results of operations for the full years 2006 and 2005, and for five months in 2004.
Acquisition of Miner & Miner
     On December 10, 2004, we acquired 70% of the issued and outstanding shares of Miner & Miner. Effective January 1, 2006, Telvent acquired the remaining 30% of its shares. The results of operations of Miner & Miner are reflected in our results of operations for the full years 2006 and 2005.
     Based in Fort Collins, Colorado, Miner & Miner is the developer of ArcFM, a GIS software solution for utilities that has been implemented at more than 180 utilities in North America and abroad. Since 1987, Miner & Miner has been a strategic business partner of ESRI, the market leader for GIS. Miner & Miner is also the developer of Responder, an Outage Management System, and Designer, which provides an integrated environment, on a desktop or mobile device, for work flow management, network analysis, automated layouts and job cost estimates. This acquisition is part of our strategy of offering seamless enterprise integrated real-time data to increase the efficiency, security and profitability of our customers in the Energy, Traffic, Transport and Environment sectors worldwide.

36


Table of Contents

Acquisition of Almos
     On July 6, 2005, we acquired 100% of the shares of Almos Systems Pty Ltd. (Australia) and Almos Systems B.V. (Netherlands). With its head office in Perth, Australia, Almos is a market-leading supplier of meteorological solutions. The results of operations of Almos are reflected in our results of operations for the full year 2006 and for six months in 2005.
     We have been providing real-time IT meteorology solutions for more than 25 years, mainly in Spain and Latin America. With the addition of Almos, we gained access to a distinctive and complete suite of leading-edge meteorological systems and value-added solutions. In addition, the strategic location of Almos headquarters in Perth, Australia, should be ideal for developing further business opportunities in the Asia-Pacific region, one of the highest growth areas in the world.
     Almos adds market leading solutions to our portfolio of meteorology solutions that we will be able to offer to our Environment sector clients and also has the potential to open a new geography for the rest of our business. We expect that our customers in this market sector will benefit from the technological, market, and business synergies that we anticipate will result from this transaction.
Acquisition of Beijing Blue Shield
     On April 26, 2006, the Company acquired 80% of the issued and outstanding shares of Beijing Blue Shield, a Beijing-based leading provider of IT services and solutions for traffic management and consulting and airport/seaport security. The results of operations of Beijing Blue Shield are reflected in our results of operations for eight months in 2006.
     As investment in traffic infrastructure across China increases, this acquisition provides us with an opportunity to increase our traffic business in China. Beijing Blue Shield has designed and supplied traffic systems for more than 300 projects in over 100 cities across China. Beijing Blue Shield’s core BBS-ATMS 4.0 traffic control system incorporates traffic engineering, monitoring, control and signal control. Beijing Blue Shield has also developed airport safety check information management systems. Beijing Blue Shield’s founding shareholders, China Motor-Vehicle Safety Appraisal Center and Shenzen Airport Co. Ltd., will continue to hold the remaining 20% shares of Beijing Blue Shield and we will work with them to develop future business opportunities.
Acquisition of Farradyne
     On July 1, 2006, we completed the acquisition from Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. and PB Energy Storage Services, Inc., of 100% of their Farradyne traffic business, a leading provider of traffic information technology (IT) products and consulting and integration services in the United States and 100% of the shares Ltd., PB Farradyne Inc, which is now called Telvent Farradyne Inc. The acquisition of Farradyne, based in Rockville, Maryland, with 15 offices in 10 states in the United States, solidifies Telvent’s position in the Traffic sector in the United States and globally. Farradyne, with more than 275 professionals, has a wide range of skills and experience in areas that include planning, deploying, integrating, operating, marketing and designing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), 511 traveler information systems, traffic signal systems, regional information systems, freeway management systems and operations and maintenance.
     The results of operations of Farradyne are reflected in our results of operations for six months in 2006.
Acquisition of Maexbic
     On November 13, 2006, we completed the acquisition of 100% of the shares of Maexbic, S.A., a supplier of public transportation ticketing technology in Spain. The results of operations of Maexbic are reflected in our results of operations for two months in 2006. Maexbic is headquartered in Barcelona and has more than 25 years experience in the development and implementation of public transportation ticket issuing, cancellation and control systems in the Spanish market. This acquisition strengthens our position in the Spanish transportation ticketing market. The combination of Telvent’s technology for rail transportation ticketing systems, together with Maexbic’s solutions and products, enables Telvent to offer a complete and scalable solution to integrate bus and rail fares which enable passengers to use a single ticket to access all of a city’s transport systems.
Segments and Geographic Information
     We have five reportable operating segments. The segments are grouped with reference to the types of services that we provide and the types of clients that use those services. We assess each segment’s performance based on revenues and gross profit or gross margin. The five reportable operating segments are Energy, Traffic, Transport, Environment and Other.

37


Table of Contents

    Energy comprises three main areas focusing on oil, gas and electricity markets. It offers flow systems and services such as flow measurement applications, applications for leak detection systems and revenue accounting programs.
 
    Traffic provides products and services such as urban and interurban (ITS) traffic management systems, including incident detection, intersection control, city access management systems, security information and enforcement systems and electronic toll collection systems.
 
    Transport focuses on fare collection systems for railways and public transportation systems, and access control and payment systems for parking, and CTC’s, travel information and communication systems for railways.
 
    Environment provides solutions for environment protection, meteorology, water and wastewater management.
 
    Other includes opportunities in the public administration, healthcare and managed services areas.
                                                 
    Year Ended December 31, 2006
                    (Euros in thousands, except percentages)        
    Energy   Traffic   Transport   Environment   Other   Total
Revenues
  €  217,167    €  156,478    €  43,942    €  43,473    €  42,784    €  503,844 
Gross Profit
  €  50,891    €  27,998    €  9,228    €  9,432    €  13,075    €  110,625 
Gross Margin
    23.4 %     17.9 %     21.0 %     21.7 %     30.6 %     22.0 %
                                                 
    Year Ended December 31, 2005
    (Euros in thousands, except percentages)
    Energy   Traffic   Transport   Environment   Other   Total
Revenues
  €  177,620    €  124,574    €  29,169    €  36,021    €  34,985    €  402,369 
Gross Profit
  €  36,006    €  20,288    €  6,050    €  8,405    €  11,908    €  82,657 
Gross Margin
    20.3 %     16.3 %     20.7 %     23.3 %     34.0 %     20.5 %
                                                 
    Year Ended December 31, 2004
    (Euros in thousands, except percentages)
    Energy   Traffic   Transport   Environment   Other   Total
Revenues
  €  123,469    €  114,468    €  20,053    €  27,933    €  26,648    €  312,571 
Gross Profit
  €  26,297    €  19,817    €  4,137    €  6,856    €  9,886    €  66,993 
Gross Margin
    21.3 %     17.3 %     20.6 %     24.5 %     37.1 %     21.4 %
Energy
                         
    Year Ended December 31,
    (Euros in thousands, except percentages)
    2006   2005   2004
Revenues
  €  217,167    €  177,620    €  123,469 
Gross Profit
  €  50,891    €  36,006    €  26,297
Gross Margin
    23.4 %     20.3 %     21.3 %
Revenue growth rate over prior period
    22.3 %     43.9 %     8.8 %
     Our Energy segment revenues increased 22.3% from € 177.6 million in 2005 to € 217.2 million in 2006. The main reasons for this increase are the general good business performance, including our oil and gas business in Mexico, the execution of the first part of the Vattenfall AMR project, the good performance of the electric business in Spain and the high percentage completion of contracts. Gross margin has shown an improvement from 20.3% in 2005 to 23.4% in 2006.
     During 2006, we strengthened our leadership position in this segment in Spain, North America and Latin America. The growth rate of recent years was maintained, and we were able to include new areas of business over our traditional SCADA systems. This includes a new professional services business unit, the Automatic Meter Reading (AMR) business and the area of control systems for renewable energies such as bio-ethanol plants and solar power plants.
Electricity
     Our revenues for the electric utility business for the year 2006 rose significantly, by 34.1% from € 108.8 million in 2005 to € 146.0 million in 2006, mainly due to the contribution of the AMR project for Vattenfall that brought us more than € 35 million in revenues. In addition, during 2006 we strengthened our position in North America, Spain and Latin America in real-time IT solutions for electric utilities. Gross margin increased from 21.6% in 2005 to 24.4% in 2006. This resulted from a number of projects in Spain and North America with a higher gross profit percentage.

38


Table of Contents

     In Europe, we experienced significant growth of 119.9% from € 38.0 million in 2005 to € 83.6 million in 2006. This was mainly as a result of revenues from the Vattenfall project in Sweden and general good business performance coming from organic growth in our electric business in Spain. Revenues in Spain over the period grew 38.1%, because of the good performance of the recurring business with Adif, Red Electrica de España and Endesa. The contribution of our business to renewable energy plants also has been very important, supplying important references for bioethanol plants in Lacq (France) and Salamanca (Spain) and the solar power plants owned by Abengoa. In Sweden, the roll-out of the AMR project for Vattenfall continues according to the schedules and technical requirements contained in the contract. For 2007, a large amount of backlog remains which will be significant in achieving the goals defined for this year.
     In North America, electric utility business revenues increased by 22.9% from € 21.5 million in 2005 to € 26.5 million in 2006. This increase is mainly due to sales of our automation products (SAGE RTUs) to large utilities and the growth of our Enterprise GIS business. Capital budgets for IT-related spending are down in the electric utility industry, which impacts our traditional SCADA business. We expect, however, that SCADA-related bookings will improve during the first and second quarters of 2007, due to a very strong pipeline. In the meantime, we continue to focus on distribution utilities that are expanding their networks due to population growth and outdated field assets. This focus explains our significant revenue growth related to automation products.
     Enterprise GIS revenues worldwide increased significantly from 2005 to 2006, with 78% of the revenue coming from the U.S. market. However, the number of software licenses grew rapidly in the international market, with 80% of the total new user base being added outside the U.S.
     Revenues in 2006 in our Latin American region stayed at the same level as in 2005 totalling € 27.7 million. Gross profit in this area was slightly affected by some issues we have experienced in some important projects in Mexico.
     In our Middle East and Africa region, our revenues fell from € 17.3 million in 2005 to € 7.6 million in 2006. The Tunisia project continues to have problems which are impeding acceptance of the project. This is due mainly to delays in the administrative approvals required from the client. Our goal is to reach agreement for the final acceptance of the project in the second quarter of 2007. The delays in this project had an impact on the project margins for 2006.
Oil & Gas
     Our revenues for the Oil & Gas business for the year 2006 have grown 3.5%, from € 68.8 million in 2005 to € 71.2 million in 2006. Bookings in North America and China’s Oil & Gas markets were generally delayed until later in the year than originally expected. However the expected projects began to materialize after the second quarter.
     In North America, we experienced a decline in revenues of 7.4% from € 26.8 million in 2005 to € 24.8 million in 2006. This was somewhat anticipated as we entered 2006 with a lower than normal backlog. The staffing challenges in the Calgary operations market due to the booming oil sands activity and the abnormally late arrival of bookings in the liquids pipeline part of our Oil & Gas business in the year 2006 also contributed to the decline. However, our gas business revenues have increased significantly during 2006. This increase is mainly due to the co-engineered sales of our SCADA and advanced applications solutions to transmission pipeline companies. We expect liquids related revenues to show a strong start in 2007 as a result of the 2006 situation described and as we enter the year with a good backlog, strong sales prospects and earlier order prospects.
     Of significance in 2006, Telvent was able to renew its multi-year IT services and outsourcing contract with Talisman of Calgary, Canada for a total value of approximately € 17 million over 42 months. In addition, during 2006, with the goal of strengthening our leadership position in North America, we introduced a professional services business unit and began adapting our advanced applications to address the specific needs of the production and gathering (up - stream) sector of the oil & gas market that has not traditionally been the target of our advanced applications. This sector offers opportunities for our traditional oil & gas advanced applications used today in managing pipeline assets (mid - stream) through additional embedded business logic that can be applied to the measurement and control requirements of production assets such as producing wells, fields and gathering pipelines.
     Oil & Gas revenues increased in Latin America and Europe in 2006 to € 40.0 million, an increase of 21.6% over 2005.
     The Asia-Pacific and the Middle East and Africa regions produced revenue contributions of € 6.4 million compared with € 9.1 million in 2005. For Oil & Gas, we conduct business in these regions opportunistically, so we expect revenues to fluctuate from year to year based on projects available in the period.
     Our Energy backlog in 2006 increased by 4.1%, to € 145.0 million at the end of 2006.

39


Table of Contents

Traffic
                         
    Year Ended December 31,
    2006   2005   2004
    (Euros in thousands, except percentages)
Revenues
  €  156,478     €  124,574     €  114,468  
Gross Profit
  €  27,998     €  20,288     €  19,817  
Gross Margin
    17.9 %     16.3 %     17.3 %
Revenue growth rate over prior period
    25.6 %     8.8 %     45.2 %
     Our Traffic segment revenues for the year 2006 increased by 25.6% when compared to 2005, due primarily to the acquisition of Farradyne and the increase of business in Spain and Latin America.
     As most of our temporary joint venture consortiums are in our Traffic segment, the majority of the impact of their consolidation is reflected in the revenues in this segment for both the year ended December 31, 2006 and the same period in 2005. In 2006 and 2005, we consolidated additional Traffic revenues of 36.0 million and 26.9 million, respectively, relating to other joint ventures. Excluding the effect of the consolidation of these joint ventures, the growth between periods amounted to 23.3%.
     Our gross margin in this segment, excluding the effect of the consolidation of our temporary joint ventures, was 23.1% for the year 2006; and including the effect of their consolidation, our gross margin was 17.9% for the same period.
     We have continued to strengthen travel information as a leader in integrated Intelligent Traffic Systems for traffic management, incident detection, intersection monitoring, automatic toll systems, city access management systems and enforcement, with a wide range of products and service that help minimize city traffic congestion and maximize inter-city traffic capacity.
     Of particular note in 2006, we increased our presence in the strategic geographies of China and the U.S., through the acquisition of leading companies in the traffic market:
    We acquired Beijing Blue Shield in China in April 2006, whose personnel have significant knowledge of the Chinese traffic market, as well as expertise in traffic consulting and security. Beijing Blue Shield has contributed 1.2 million in revenues, representing 0.8%, of the total Traffic revenues.
 
    We acquired the Farradyne business in the U.S. in July 2006, whose personnel have strong expertise in consultancy and systems development. Farradyne contributed 17.2 million in revenues in 2006, representing 11.0% of the total Traffic revenues. Farradyne will help to develop the Telvent brand in the traffic market in North America, providing additional opportunities for both existing and new solutions.
     Excluding the impact of the acquisitions and the impact of foreign exchange, organic growth in the Traffic segment was approximately 11%.
     In the Traffic segment, 2006 was a year with a high volume of new contracts. We have established a presence in North America and strengthened our presence in Europe (Spain). We have also won projects in Latin America and in the Asia-Pacific region (China and south-east Asia) to upgrade and maintain ITS and urban traffic control systems.
     In Europe, we achieved overall growth of 9.2% with gross margins of 14.7%, mostly coming from projects in Spain. Gross margin was slightly impacted by the decrease in gross margin in two projects finished in this period: the monitoring and control system of Tabasa tunnels and the signalling and ITS systems in Ocaña-La Roda highway, both in Spain. There has been an increase in demand for enforcement-related projects in the region, like the PRIDE project for the Guardia Civil de Tráfico. Outside of Spain, the two most relevant projects have been the upgrade of our historical Oresund Link Project, linking Denmark with Sweden, and the M4 – M6 toll system for Eurolink, in Ireland.
     In North America, we have established a presence in the Traffic industry through the acquisition of Farradyne, contributing revenues of  17.2 million and a gross margin of 31.7%, which provides a good business outlook in the region. We have been awarded contracts for regional traveler information services, operation of traffic management centers and traffic management systems in the United States.

40


Table of Contents

     In Latin America, we experienced a decrease in revenues of 17.1%, mainly due to the delay in the start of two important contracts in Brazil (the maintenance of the control system in Belo Horizonte and the control center of Sao Paulo) and also due to the successful conclusion of two important projects, the traffic control system for Belo Horizonte, Brazil, and the upgrade of the traffic control center of Guadalajara, Mexico, both of which have ceased to contribute revenues.
     In the Asia-Pacific region, we are benefiting from the local presence of Beijing Blue Shield, which, being a Chinese company, gives us better visibility in the market. We continue to grow in this region due to the continuous performance of projects. During 2006, we experienced growth of 53.1% and gross margin growth of 8.3%, mainly due to the Beijing Supercenter Project and several Urban Traffic Control projects in China. We believe our advanced products and increased number of local references put us in a strong position to achieve additional growth in the region in 2007.
     In the Middle-East and Africa region, we have almost doubled our business mainly due to the Beirut Urban Traffic systems project. We had to temporarily suspend performance of this project during the second quarter of 2006, due to the political situation in Lebanon, but recommenced the work during the fourth quarter.
     Backlog in this segment, measured as of December 31, 2006, increased by 48.8% to 146.0 million.
Transport
                         
    Year Ended December 31,
    2006   2005   2004
    (Euros in thousands, except percentages)
Revenues
  €  43,942     €  29,169     €  20,053  
Gross Profit
  €  9,228     €  6,050     €  4,137  
Gross Margin
    21.0 %     20.7 %     20.6 %
Revenue growth rate over prior period
    50.6 %     45.5 %     (17.7 )%
     Revenues in 2006 in our Transport segment increased by 50.6% in comparison with 2005, due primarily to the growth of business with existing customers in Europe, and the penetration of new markets in Latin America.
     Our gross margin in this segment increased from 20.7% to 21.0% from 2005 to 2006, in line with gross margin in previous years.
     In public transport and ticketing systems, 2006 saw the expansion, in sales, of our solutions, applications and equipment in the global marketplace. Also, the successful inaugurations of ticketing systems for the Tianjin Metro in China and the new railway from Caracas to Cua, in Venezuela, position Telvent as a leader in contact-less technology. This technology results in increased dependability and improved access for users of the railway system.
     In our railway activity, the development of a new applications line for the automatic regulation of trains continues in collaboration with specific strategic customers. This is in addition to, and complements, the current line of products for Railway Command & Control Centers integrating Centralized Traffic Control Systems, Station Facilities Control Systems, Passenger Information Systems and Telecommunications.
     In Europe, which represents 65.2% of our total Transport business, we achieved overall growth of 76.9%, with a gross margin of 22.4%, which represents an increase of 1.9% year-over-year. This growth came mostly from increased revenues with recurring customers in Spain, such as Metro de Madrid, Metro de Bilbao, Mintra, FEVE, Adif and Cintra, through increased use of our products and solutions for station and railway signaling control systems, access control systems, automatic fare collection machines, and parking lot control systems.
     In Latin America, we successfully launched our Transport business in 2006 and produced revenues of 14.0 million, with a gross margin of 19.5%. The main projects we have started are the contact-less ticketing system and passenger information system for the Caracas-Valle del Tuy railway line and the telecontrol system for Metro de Valencia, both in Venezuela, the ticketing solution for Metro de Monterrey, in Mexico, and the access control system installed for Metro de Belo Horizonte, in Brazil.
     In the Asia-Pacific region, the successful completion of our Metro de Tianjin ticketing project has impacted our revenues in the area, which have decreased from 12.3 million in 2005 to 0.3 million in 2006.
     We acquired Maexbic, in Spain, in November 2006, providing us with significant expertise in equipment and solutions for bus ticketing management systems, along with important references in the Spanish market. This acquisition strengthens and complements

41


Table of Contents

our products and services for on-board ticketing for buses and light-trains, allowing for the development of a complete product line for fare integration in multimodal transit, which has become a requirement for this marketplace.
     Backlog in this segment, measured as of December 31, 2006, decreased by 16.8% to 27.7 million.
Environment
                         
    Year Ended December 31,
    2006   2005   2004
    (Euros in thousands, except percentages)
Revenues
  €  43,473     €  36,021     €  27,933  
Gross Profit
  €  9,432     €  8,405     €  6,856  
Gross Margin
    21.7 %     23.3 %     24.5 %
Revenue growth rate over prior period
    20.7 %     29.0 %     47.0 %
     Revenues generated in our Environment segment increased from 36.0 million in 2006 to 43.5 million in 2005, or 20.7%. Excluding the  6.1 million revenues coming from our acquisition of Almos and the impact of foreign exchange, organic growth was 3.8%.
     Expansion of our Environment business continued in 2006. This has been the first full year of contribution of Almos to our Environment segment. Its offices in Australia and the Netherlands have been integrated with the Telvent family, and renamed to Telvent Australia and Telvent Netherlands, respectively. With the acquisition of Almos, we gained access to a full set of value-added meteorological solutions, as well as the establishment of strategic operation bases in new geographical areas of large growth potential, such as Asia-Pacific and Europe.
     2006 was a successful year for Telvent in aeronautical meteorology. In addition to maintaining business with recurrent customers, we have entered new markets, such as United Kingdom, India, Argentina, Venezuela and Saudi Arabia. Our optical technology for visibility measurements at airports was consolidated in 2006, and we have received a significant number of orders for Revolver Transmissometers. During this year, we have entered the weather radar market, our booking contracts for the modernization of the national weather radar networks in Spain and Morocco. In our Water business, in addition to our ongoing contracts in the Middle East, we entered into the market in Turkey.
     In Europe, our revenues remained stable in volume and profitability, because of the good performance of the hydrology and air quality business with recurring customers in Spain, Netherlands, Belgium and Switzerland. In percentage terms, contribution of the region to the total revenues of the Environment segment has dropped below 50%, to 41%. The most significant contracts were awarded by the National Institute of Meteorology and by the Environment Ministry.
     In North America, our revenues decreased by 21.0%, mainly due to the year-over-year variability caused by the relatively small turnover of projects. The Alberta Road Weather Information System (“RWIS”) project contributed to our decrease in revenues due to the lower seasonal contribution of this long-term contract. This project has entered into a new phase that is more services-oriented and with a decrease in revenues over the previous phase, and with a higher percentage of systems integration work. The RWIS project, along with Water SCADA projects for utilities, is the main revenue stream in this region.
     In Latin America, the delay we experienced in 2005 in signing some contracts resulted in new contracts in 2006 that have contributed to the increase in revenues from 1.6 million in 2005 to 3.9 million in 2006, an increase of over 150% year-over-year. Latin America now represents 9% of the total revenues in our Environment segment.
     In the Asia-Pacific region in 2006, for the first time revenues reached a significant volume of 1.6 million, coming from the recurring business in Australia and the new aviation weather contracts booked in India in the second half of 2006.
     In the Middle-East and Africa, our revenues grew 67.5% in 2006 over the previous year. Revenues amounted to 8.9 million, which represents 20% of the total revenues of the segment. The increase in revenues is mainly due to the contribution of the ongoing Water SCADA projects in Jordan and Qatar, the two large meteorological projects in progress for the Directorate General of Civil Aviation of Kuwait, as well as in the new meteorological contracts in Saudi Arabia and Morocco booked in the second half of 2006.
     Our gross margin declined from 23.3% in 2005 to 21.7% in 2006, as a result of the larger contribution in 2006 of big turn-key projects with a high volume of revenues but lower gross margins, such as the hydrological projects within the water industry in Spain.

42


Table of Contents

     Backlog in this segment as of December 31, 2006 was 46.4 million, a 4.5% decrease over the prior period.
Other
                         
    Year Ended December 31,
    2006   2005   2004
    (Euros in thousands, except percentages)
Revenues
  €  42,784     €  34,985     €  26,648  
Gross Profit
  €  13,075     €  11,908     €  9,886  
Gross Margin
    30.6 %     34.0 %     37.1 %
Revenue growth rate over prior period
    22.3 %     31.3 %     20.6 %
     Our 22.3% increase in our “Other” segment revenues during 2006 represents steady growth due to further market development and the continuing evolution of our Public Administration activity. This increase also reflects the organic growth in both our Healthcare business and the managed services projects we provide. Our gross margin has slightly declined due to our revenue mix, with a higher contribution of turn-key contracts with lower margins.
     The 228.8% increase in our revenues from our Public Administration activity during 2006 is due to the development of our presence in the Central Government of Spain with the electronic signature project in the Public Administrations Ministry, which provides our digital signature platform for various public entities and regional governments, the Identification Verification System for the Homeland Security Ministry, which checks the authenticity of the documentation carried by travelers at every Spanish border control office, and others such as the Statistical System. Gross margins in this activity declined from 31.0% in 2005 to 24.1% in 2006, due to the higher contribution of larger turn-key projects with lower margins.
     In our Healthcare IT activity, we have experienced 18.7% growth with important contracts like the Corporate Radiology Information System and Central Archive for Digital Medical Imaging for the Andalusian Health Service. We are leveraging our success in Andalusia to extend our business to the rest of Spain and abroad. In Latin America, we have started local activities in the Dominican Republic, with a contract to provide a hospital information system for the new Santiago Metropolitan Hospital. Our gross margin in Healthcare is 16.8%, a decrease of 1.4% as compared to 2005.
     In our managed services activity, our revenues increased by 26.9% during 2006, although our gross margin decreased slightly from 47.2% in 2005 to 41.8% in 2006. This decrease reflects the change in the revenue mix in our activity, by the incorporation of larger contracts with integration of different IT solutions. However, these figures demonstrate that managed services is becoming a consolidated business, with a mix of consulting, outsourcing and systems integration services, leveraging our data center capabilities and our large installed base of more than 380 customers. Most of the revenues are recurrent. Thus we expect margins to be stable in this range, since most of the contracts are multi-year contracts (three to five years in average), with fixed monthly installments.
     Backlog in this segment measured as of December 31, 2006 increased by 20.5% to a figure of 55.7 million.
Geographic Information
     The following table identifies our revenues by region during 2006, 2005 and 2004, and the percentage change per selected region for the periods presented.
                                         
                            Percentage     Percentage  
    Year Ended December 31,     Change     Change  
    2006     2005     2004     2005 - 2006     2004-2005  
            (Euros in thousands, except percentages)          
Europe
  €  294,229     €  216,653     €  182,760       35.8 %     18.5 %
Latin America
    89,757       68,583       60,461       30.9 %     13.4 %
North America
    78,360       58,843       39,767       33.2 %     48.0 %
Asia- Pacific
    19,065       31,905       17,805       (40.2 )%     79.0 %
Middle-East and Africa
    22,433       26,385       11,778       (15.0 )%     124.0 %
 
                             
Total
  €  503,844     €  402,369     €  312,571                  
 
                                 

43


Table of Contents

Results of Operations
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2006 to Year Ended December 31, 2005
Revenues
                 
Year Ended   Year Ended    
December 31,   December 31,   Percentage Change
2006   2005   2005-2006
(Euros in thousands, except percentages)
€ 503,844
    402,369       25.2 %
     The increase in our 2006 revenues was due primarily to double-digit organic growth in all of our segments and the effect of the revenues from the companies we acquired in 2005 and 2006. Almos, Beijing Blue Shield and Farradyne contributed 6.1 million, 1.2 million and 17.2 million, respectively, in revenues for the year 2006. In addition, we consolidated additional revenues of 40.9 million and  31.7 million, respectively, relating to other joint venture partners. Revenue growth also includes 1.1 million (or 0.2% of revenues) from the translation of our non-Euro-denominated revenues due to the depreciation of the Euro against other currencies in which we generated revenues.
Cost of Revenues
                                 
Year Ended   Percentage of   Year Ended   Percentage of   Percentage
December 31,   2006   December 31,   2005   change
2006   Revenues   2005   Revenues   2005-2006
(Euros in thousands, except percentages)
€ 393,219
    78.0 %   €  319,712       79.5 %     23.0 %
     Our 2006 cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues decreased slightly year-over-year mainly due to our continuous efforts to generate more revenues from higher value-added applications with higher gross margins and the contributions of our managed services, public administration and healthcare IT businesses in our “Other” segment. Additionally, cost of revenues for 2006 and 2005 included 40.8 million and 31.5 million, respectively, due to the effect of the consolidation of our temporary joint venture consortiums, which represents the cost of revenues attributable to other joint venture partners. Excluding the effect of the consolidation of our temporary joint venture consortiums, our 2006 and 2005 gross margins would have been 23.9% and 22.3%, respectively, representing an increase of 1.6 percentage points year-over-year.
General and Administrative
                                 
Year Ended   Percentage of   Year Ended   Percentage of   Percentage
December 31,   2006   December 31,   2005   change
2006   Revenues   2005   Revenues   2005-2006
(Euros in thousands, except percentages)
€ 39,850
    7.9 %   €  25,286       6.3 %     57.6 %
     Our general and administrative expenses increased significantly from 2005 to 2006, mainly as a result of the additional legal, accounting, internal control and investor relations costs that we continue to incur as a result of being a publicly-traded company in the United States. We have incurred significant internal and external costs during 2006, including audit fees, as a result of the work perfomed throughout the year for the implementation of our system of internal control over financial reporting, which is required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act. In addition, we are consolidating general and administrative costs in 2006 from our Farradyne acquisition, including certain temporary integration costs. We expect that such costs will be reduced in the future as we continue to integrate the Farradyne business and implement our own information systems, administration services, etc.
     Furthermore, our stock compensation plans increased our general and administrative expenses in both periods; the impact of these charges was 1.9 million and 1.4 million for 2006 and 2005, respectively. The reason for the increase year-over-year is the application, starting January 2006, of SFAS 123R, which requires fair value accounting for stock-based plans, and the fact that we have recorded compensation expense related to our parent company’s new stock based compensation plan under which shares of our parent company were granted to our senior management in January 2006.
     Although our continuing reorganization and integration efforts produced some cost savings during 2006, such cost savings are partially offset by the expenses described above. We expect that our internal reorganization will continue to contribute cost savings in

44


Table of Contents

the near future, but we also expect to continue to incur additional internal control, accounting and legal costs, new acquisition integration costs and other similar expenses in 2007 and thereafter.
Sales and Marketing
                                 
Year Ended   Percentage of   Year Ended   Percentage of   Percentage
December 31,   2006   December 31,   2005   change
2006   Revenues   2005   Revenues   2005-2006
(Euros in thousands, except percentages)
€ 13,730
    2.7 %   €  13,023       3.2 %     5.4 %
     The increase in our sales and marketing expense from 2005 to 2006, was primarily due to the result of higher selling expenses and sales personnel costs incurred with increased business activity across segments and geographies, especially in connection with our efforts to develop our Traffic segment business in North America and the consolidation of our presence in new regions such as the Middle-East and Africa. However, we have been able to reduce sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of revenues.
Research and Development
                                 
Year Ended   Percentage of   Year Ended   Percentage of   Percentage
December 31,   2006   December 31,   2005   change
2006   Revenues   2005   Revenues   2005-2006
(Euros in thousands, except percentages)
€ 16,465
    3.3 %   €  14,980       3.7 %     9.9 %
     Our research and development expenses increased in 2006, but decreased slightly as a percentage of revenues. We intend to reach and maintain an approximate level of investment in research and development of 4% as a percentage of revenues (not including the effect of the consolidation of our temporary joint ventures). We also expect to continue to optimize our research and development expenses after the reorganization of our research and development department across our global operations and with the realization of synergies from the integration of the businesses that we acquired in 2005 and 2006. The number of our research and development projects related to the development of higher value-added applications are expected to increase in line with our strategy.
Depreciation and Amortization
                                 
Year Ended   Percentage of   Year Ended   Percentage of   Percentage
December 31,   2006   December 31,   2005   change
2006   Revenues   2005   Revenues   2005-2006
(Euros in thousands, except percentages)
€ 9,562
    1.9 %   €  8,225       2.0 %     16.2 %
     The increase in depreciation and amortization from 2005 to 2006 was primarily due to the impact of the non-cash amortization expense resulting from the intangible assets recognized in our purchase price allocations, such as backlog (customer contracts), software and purchased technology, and customer relationships, and an increase in depreciation expense coming from our capital leases. The intangibles mentioned above arise from the NMS Division of Metso, WBU-Xwave, Miner & Miner, Almos, Beijing Blue Shield and Farradyne acquisitions. The amortization expense related to intangibles arising from the purchase price allocation of these businesses was 3.4 million in 2006 and  2.8 million in 2005.
Financial Expense, Net
                                 
Year Ended   Percentage of   Year Ended   Percentage of   Percentage
December 31,   2006   December 31,   2005   change
2006   Revenues   2005   Revenues   2005-2006
(Euros in thousands, except percentages)
€ (6,643)
    (1.3 )%   €  (3,432 )     (0.9 )%     93.5 %
     Net financial expense increased significantly year-over-year primarily due to the increase in our indebtedness under our credit arrangement with Abengoa, from the outstanding credit facilities that our subsidiary, Telvent Brasil, had with various financial institutions to finance its negative operating cash flow during 2006, and for the interest generated under the new credit agreement (see Note 14 to our Consolidated Financial Statements) with LaSalle Bank to finance our Farradyne acquisition. In addition, financial

45


Table of Contents

income decreased as a result of having a lower balance of proceeds from our initial public offering generating interest for us during the 2006 periods. Interest income earned on the proceeds from our initial public offering amounted to 0.9 million and 1.1 million during 2006 and 2005, respectively.
     Finally, the impact of the mark-to-market of our derivatives amounted to (0.5) million in 2006 and (1.1) million, in 2005.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
     Income tax expense decreased in the year ended December 31, 2006 over the same period in 2005 mainly due to the increase in the research and development tax credits that we received under applicable tax laws in Spain and North America, and from the reduction of the corporate income tax rate in Spain as of December 31, 2006, from 35% to 32.2% for 2007 and 30.0 % for year 2008 onwards. Such reduction has impacted our deferred tax asset and liabilities balances at December 31, 2006, resulting in a net effect on income tax expense of (0.7) million in 2006. See Note 19 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2005 to Year Ended December 31, 2004
Revenues
                 
Year Ended   Year Ended   Percentage
December 31,   December 31,   change
2005   2004   2004-2005
(Euros in thousands, except percentages)
€ 402,369
  €  312,571       28.7 %
     The increase in our 2005 revenues was primarily due to organic growth in our business and the contribution of the acquired businesses in 2005 and 2004. The most significant contribution to our revenue growth in the year 2005 comes from our Energy sector. In 2005 and 2004, we consolidated additional revenues of 31.7 million and 30.8 million, respectively, relating to other joint venture partners. In addition, our WBU-Xwave, ICX, Miner & Miner and Almos acquisitions contributed 7.0 million, 2.9 million, 13.1 million and 7.2 million, respectively, in revenues in 2005 and 2.6 million, 2.1 million, 0.6 million, and nil, respectively, in revenues in 2004. Revenue growth includes 3.6 million (or 0.9% of revenues) from the translation of our non-Euro-denominated revenues due to the depreciation of the Euro against other currencies in which we generated revenues.
Cost of Revenues
                                 
Year Ended   Percentage of   Year Ended   Percentage of   Percentage
December 31,   2005   December 31,   2004   change
2005   Revenues   2004   Revenues   2004-2005
(Euros in thousands, except percentages)
€ 319,712
    79.5 %   €  245,578       78.6 %     30.2 %
     Our 2005 cost of revenues increased 30.2% year-over-year and the cost of revenues as a percentage of revenues also increased slightly year-over-year. Cost of revenues for 2005 and 2004 included 31.5 million and 30.7 million, respectively, due to the effect of the consolidation of our temporary joint venture consortiums, which represents the cost of revenues attributable to other joint venture partners. Excluding the effect of the consolidation of our temporary joint venture consortiums, our 2005 and 2004 gross margins would have been 22.3% and 23.7%, respectively, representing a decrease of 1.4 percentage points year-over-year. This was mainly due to the higher contribution of revenues from turnkey contracts with lower margins.
General and Administrative
                                 
Year Ended   Percentage of   Year Ended   Percentage of   Percentage
December 31,   2005   December 31,   2004   change
2005   Revenues   2004   Revenues   2004-2005
(Euros in thousands, except percentages)
€ 25,286
    6.3 %   €  21,446       6.9 %     17.9 %
     Our general and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased from 2004 to 2005. This was mainly due to the cost savings that we achieved from our continuing reorganization efforts, although we incurred additional legal and accounting costs that partially offset such cost savings. The impact of our stock compensation plan on our general and administrative expenses was 1.4 million and 2.3 million for 2005 and 2004, respectively.

46


Table of Contents

Sales and Marketing
                                 
Year Ended   Percentage of   Year Ended   Percentage of   Percentage
December 31,   2005   December 31,   2004   change
2005   Revenues   2004   Revenues   2004-2005
(Euros in thousands, except percentages)
 13,023
    3.2 %     10,118       3.2 %     28.7 %
     Our sales and marketing expense increased by 2.9 million in 2005, primarily as a result of higher advertising expenses and sales personnel costs incurred with increased business activity across sectors and regions, especially in connection with our efforts to develop our Traffic sector in North America, and the consolidation of our presence in new regions such as the Middle-East and Africa. However, sales and marketing expenses as a percentage of revenues, remained constant from 2004 to 2005.
Research and Development
                                 
Year Ended   Percentage of   Year Ended   Percentage of   Percentage
December 31,   2005   December 31,   2004   change
2005   Revenues   2004   Revenues   2004-2005
(Euros in thousands, except percentages)
 14,980
    3.7 %     11,060       3.5 %     35.4 %
     Our research and development expenses increased in 2005, both in absolute terms and as a percentage of revenues. We intend to maintain an approximate level of investment in research and development close to 4% as a percentage of revenues, excluding the effect of the consolidation of our temporary consortiums. The number of our research and development projects related to the development of higher value-added applications will increase in line with our “up the hourglass” strategy.
Depreciation and Amortization
                                 
Year Ended   Percentage of   Year Ended   Percentage of   Percentage
December 31,   2005   December 31,   2004   change
2005   Revenues   2004   Revenues   2004-2005
(Euros in thousands, except percentages)
 8,225
    2.0 %     7,904       2.5 %     4.1 %
     The increase in depreciation and amortization from 2004 to 2005 was primarily due to the impact of the non-cash amortization expense resulting from the purchase price allocation (which consisted primarily of an adjustment in the value of intangible assets such as backlog (customer contracts), software technology and customer relationships) in the acquisition of the NMS Division of Metso, WBU-Xwave, Miner & Miner and Almos. The amortization expense related to intangibles arising from the purchase price allocation of these businesses was  2.8 million in 2005 and  2.3 million in 2004.
Financial Expense, Net
                                 
Year Ended   Percentage of   Year Ended   Percentage of   Percentage
December 31,   2005   December 31,   2004   change
2005   Revenues   2004   Revenues   2004-2005
(Euros in thousands, except percentages)
 (3,432)
    (0.9 )%     (2,313 )     (0.7 )%     48.4 %
     Financial expense increased in the year ended December 31, 2005 over the same period in 2004 mainly due to the impact of the mark-to-market of our derivatives, which amounted to (1.1) million in 2005 and 1.9 million in 2004, representing an decrease of 3 million year-over-year. Financial expense also increased by 0.6 million, due to the new short-term credit facilities obtained in 2005 in Brazil. See Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements.
     On the other hand, the interest we earned on the proceeds from our initial public offering was 1.1 million and 0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

47


Table of Contents

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
     Income tax expense decreased in the year ended December 31, 2005 over the same period in 2004 mainly due to the reversal of part of the valuation allowances recognized in 2004 and the increase in our research and development tax credits that we received under applicable tax laws in Spain and North America. See Note 19 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Impact of Inflation
     We have not historically been affected materially by inflation in our core geographies.
Seasonality
     We do not believe there is inherent seasonality in our revenues as reported under U.S. GAAP. We historically have experienced fluctuations in the cash we receive throughout the year as we tend to receive greater payments in the fourth quarter due to the budgetary cycles of some of our customers.
B. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity
     Management believes that our available cash and cash equivalents (including the net proceeds that we received from our IPO) and cash flow from our ongoing operations will be sufficient to finance our working capital for the foreseeable future. If we have a need in the future for additional liquidity, we will seek to obtain additional or increased lines of credit from Abengoa or third-party lenders.
Operating Activities
                                         
                            Percentage   Percentage
    Year Ended December 31,   Change   Change
    2006   2005   2004   2005 - 2006   2004 - 2005
    (Euros in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities
  €  36,719     €  4,464     €  24,694       722.6 %     (81.9 )%
     For the year ended December 31, 2006, net cash provided by operating activities was 36.7 million, compared with net cash provided by operating activities of 4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. We had 9.0 million of non-cash adjustments to net income for the year ended December 31, 2006, including depreciation and amortization charges of 10.0 million, compared with 15.0 million of non-cash adjustments to net income, including 10.6 million of depreciation and amortization charges, for the year ended December 31, 2005. We also included a non-cash adjustment of  0.9 million related to net foreign currency exchange gains, due to the impact of the depreciation of the Euro against other currencies on our monetary assets and liabilities, compared with 0.9 million of foreign currency exchange losses for year ended December 31, 2005. Additionally, we added back to net income 1.9 million in 2006 and 1.4 million in 2005, resulting from the stock compensation plans expense, and adjusted (2.8) million and 1.6 million, in 2006 and 2005, respectively, related to deferred income taxes. Working capital and temporary joint ventures provided 5.9 million to our operating cash for the year ended December 31, 2006, compared with 25.2 million used in the year ended December 31, 2005. The increase in operating cash for the year ended December 31, 2006 was mainly due to the increase in our accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities and related parties trade payable of 87.4 million and the increase in our billings in excess of cost and estimated earnings of 8.2 million. These changes were partially offset by the increase in our accounts and other long-term receivables of  44.3 million, the increase in unbilled revenues of 26.7 million, our increase in inventory of  8.1 million, related parties receivable and other assets of 8.5 million, and the incorporation of the temporary consortiums’ working capital of  2.1 million.
     For the year ended December 31, 2005, net cash provided by operating activities was 4.5 million, compared with net cash provided by operating activities of 25.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. We had 15.0 million of non-cash adjustments to net income for the year ended December 31, 2005, including depreciation and amortization charges of 10.6 million, compared with 6.0 million of non-cash adjustments to net income, including 9.0 million of depreciation and amortization charges, for the year ended December 31, 2004. We also included a non-cash adjustment of 0.8 million related to net foreign currency exchange losses reflected in our consolidated statement of operations due to the impact of the appreciation of the Euro against other currencies on our monetary assets and liabilities, compared with 0.9 million for year ended December 31, 2004. Additionally, we

48


Table of Contents

included 1.4 million in 2005 and 2.3 million in 2004, due to the charge related to the stock compensation plan involving our ordinary shares and 1.6 million and (6.4) million, in 2005 and 2004, respectively, related to deferred income taxes. Working capital and temporary joint ventures used 25.2 million of our operating cash for the year ended December 31, 2005 compared with 9.6 million provided during for the year ended December 31, 2004. The decrease in operating cash for the year ended December 31, 2005 was mainly due to the increase in our accounts receivable of 16.0 million, in our increase in unbilled revenues of 37.0 million, in our increase in inventory of 1.1 million, related parties receivable and other assets of 5.6 million, and the incorporation of the temporary consortiums’ working capital of 11.5 million. These changes were partially offset by an increase in our billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts of 4.0 million, and in our accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities and related parties payable of 42.0 million.
     Net cash provided by operating activities in 2004 was 25.1 million. For the year ended December 31, 2004, we had 6.0 million of non-cash adjustments to net income including depreciation and amortization charges of 9.0 million. We also recorded a non-cash adjustment of 0.9 million related to net foreign currency exchange losses reflected in our consolidated statement of operations due to the impact of the appreciation of the Euro against other currencies on our monetary assets and liabilities. Working capital and temporary joint ventures provided 9.6 million of our operating cash. The increase in operating cash for the year ended December 31, 2004 was mainly due to the decrease in our accounts receivable of 1.7 million, to our decrease in inventory of 2.6 million, to our increase in related parties receivable and other assets of 1.7 million, to our increase in billing in excess of cost and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts of 2.0 million and the incorporation of the temporary consortiums’ working capital change of 8.4 million. These charges were partially offset by an increase in our unbilled revenues of 10.8 million and the increase in our account payable and other liabilities and related parties payable of 7.0 million.
Investing Activities
                                         
                            Percentage   Percentage
    Year Ended December 31,   Change   Change
    2006   2005   2004   2005 - 2006   2004 - 2005
    (Euros in thousands)              
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
  (45,984 )   (8,235 )   14,143       458.4 %     (158.2 )%
     Net cash used in investing activities in 2006 was 46 million. We used 30.7 million to make the payment on our Farradyne acquisition in July 2006, 5.8 million to make the payment for the remaining 30% of Miner and Miner in February 2006, 2.4 million to make the deferred and earn-out payments on the Almos adquisition, 2.3 million to make a first payment on our Beijing Blue Shield acquisition in April 2006 and 1.7 million to make the payment on our Maexbic acquisition in November 2006. In 2006, we also incurred in 2.3 million of capital expenditures that were mainly related to the build-out of our facilities and data centers and the establisment of our new headquarters in China. These cash payments were partially offset because we were paid 4.6 million from related parties under our reciprocal credit agreement.
     Net cash used in investing activities in 2005 was 8.2 million. We used 3.1 million to make the deferred payment on the Miner & Miner acquisition in April 2005 and we also used 1.8 million to make a first payment on our Almos acquisition in July 2005. In 2005, we incurred 3.9 million of capital expenditures that were mainly related to the build-out of our facilities and data centers and the establishment of our new headquarters in China. Additionally, we repaid 5.0 million to related parties under our reciprocal credit agreement.
Net cash provided by investing activities in 2004 was 14.1 million. This amount was mainly driven by the 33.9 million we received upon the sale of certain investments (substantially all of which related to the sale of our Xfera investment for 25.6 million and to the sale of Telvent Factory Holding AG to another Abengoa subsidiary for 7.9 million). This investing cash inflow was partially offset by our acquisition of ICX, WBU-Xwave and Miner & Miner, as well as the deferred payment on our acquisition of the NMS Division of Metso, for a total cash outlay of 10 million. In addition, we incurred 4.9 million of capital expenditures that were primarily related to the build–out of our facilities and data centers and we were paid 3.2 million from related parties under our reciprocal credit agreement.
Financing Activities
                                         
                            Percentage   Percentage
    Year Ended December 31,   Change   Change
    2006   2005   2004   2005 - 2006   2004-2005
    (Euros in thousands)            
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
  (373 )   2,377     12,227       (115.7 )%     (80.6 )%

49


Table of Contents

     Net cash used in financing activities in 2006 totaled (0.4) million. During 2006, we had net proceeds of 1.1 million from long-term debt, which includes 0.5 million borrowed under the Caja de Ahorros de Ronda, Cádiz, Almería, Málaga y Antequera (Unicaja) credit agreement and 0.6 million borrowed under an 8-year mortgage for the purchase of a new office in Beijing to establish our China headquarters. Additionally, we had short-term debt proceeds of 16.1 million mainly to partially finance the Farradyne acquisition, borrowed from La Salle Bank. We repaid 11.6 million of long-term debt mainly in connection with a repayment of long-term debt related to the credit facility with La Salle Bank, Fortis Bank, ING and Liscat loans, and 5.8 of short-term debt mainly related to repayments on the credit facility with Fibra Bank, BSCH, Citibank and Safra Bank. Additionally, we repaid 0.2 million from our credit arrangement with Abengoa.
     Net cash provided by financing activities in 2005 totaled 2.4 million. During 2005, we had net proceeds of 9.2 million from long-term debt, which includes 8.6 million borrowed under the Caja de Ahorros de Ronda, Cádiz, Almería, Málaga y Antequera (Unicaja) credit agreement and 0.6 million borrowed under an 8-year mortgage for the purchase of a new office in Beijing to establish our China headquarters. Additionally, we had short-term debt proceeds of 5.2 million mainly related to finance the working capital requirements of our operations in Brazil. We repaid 15.1 million of long-term debt mainly in connection with a repayment of long-term debt related to the credit facility with La Salle Bank, Fortis Bank, ING and Liscat loans. Additionally, we borrowed 3.1 million from our credit arrangement with Abengoa.
     Cash provided by financing activities in 2004 totaled 12.2 million. During 2004, we repaid 33.5 million of debt owed to Abengoa that was mainly incurred in connection with the acquisition of Xfera and we repaid 24.5 million of short-term and long-term debt that was mainly incurred in connection with the acquisition of the NMS Division of Metso, and we had short-term and long-term debt proceeds of 9.6 million. Additionally, during 2004, we received 60.5 million of net proceeds from our IPO.
     Our cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2006, December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 were 69.2 million, 80.0 million and 80.5 million, respectively. We consider all highly liquid investments, including deposits, money market funds, and commercial paper with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
     At December 31, 2006 we had 8.0 million in restricted cash, which serves as collateral securing certain guarantee obligations that we assumed during the normal course of business. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we also received 3.2 million due to the deposits that were restricted for use as of December 31, 2005, until the cash was received by the third party, which thereby released our obligation.
     As a corporate policy, we try to optimize working capital so that our projects are cash-flow positive over their life cycles. We achieve this result by factoring our receivables under agreements that we have with various financial institutions. We do not factor any of our North American receivables at this time, in part due to the pledge of receivables under the Telvent Canada and Telvent USA financing arrangements. With respect to those receivables we do factor, we have entered into several accounts receivable factoring arrangements under which we recorded the accelerated receipt of 108.8 million of cash for the year ended December 31, 2006, 75.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 65.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. We sell, on a revolving and non-recourse basis, some of these trade account receivables. We account for these transactions as sales because we relinquish control of the pooled receivables. Accordingly, pooled receivables sold under these facilities are excluded from receivables on our balance sheet. We do not retain any beneficial interest in the sold pooled receivables. See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Credit Arrangements and Loan Facilities
     The following discussion is a summary of the credit arrangements and the material loan facilities that we or our subsidiaries entered into during 2006, and the total level of borrowings at December 31, 2006. A complete description of any material credit arrangements is provided in Item 10.C. “ Material Contracts”.
     On April 6, 2005, our subsidiaries Telvent Interactiva S.A. and Telvent Tráfico y Transporte S.A., entered into a definitive Current Account Credit Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Madrid (Caja Madrid), pursuant to which the Bank made available to us a line of credit for operating purposes with a maximum borrowing limit of  9.8 million. Interest was payable quarterly in arrears on daily balances due under the line of credit at the annual nominal rate of 2.69% during the first quarter. The term of the Agreement was one year, but was terminated on November 10, 2005 when we replaced it with a loan from Monte de Piedad y Caja de Ahorros de Ronda, Cádiz, Almería, Málaga y Antequera (Unicaja), as described below. On November 10, 2005 we signed a new Credit Agreement with Unicaja, the purpose of which was to replace the above-mentioned loan with Caja Madrid. The total amount available to us under this new facility is  12.6 million. This Agreement was obtained in connection with El Toyo Digital

50


Table of Contents

City Project, and will be established on a non-recourse basis when the customer accepts delivery in the turn-key phase of the project. The term of the new credit agreement is 22 years, and the interest rate is 3.22% plus 1% for the first twelve months and EURIBOR plus 1% on a monthly basis thereafter. The amount outstanding under this agreement at December 31, 2006 was 9.4 million.
     On May 25, 2005, we obtained an 8-year mortgage loan with the Bank of Communications bearing interest at 5.58%, for Rmb 5.6 million ( 0.6 million) in connection with the purchase of a new office in Beijing to establish our headquarters in China. On May 23, 2006, Telvent China signed a purchase contract with Beijing Development Area Co., Ltd. to purchase a new office in Beijing adjacent to Telvent China’s current headquarters. The new office will be used by Beijing Blue Shield, a company recently acquired by Telvent China. Forty percent of the total purchase price of Rmb 9,208,780 ( 896) was paid on closing and the balance was financed by an 8-year mortgage, which we entered into on July 14th, 2006 with the Bank of Communications. The amounts outstanding under these agreements at December 31, 2006 was  1.2 million.
     In November 2005, we entered into a line of credit in the amount of 2 million with Banco de Andalucía. The credit line was guaranteed 50% by Telvent. This credit line was cancelled in November 2006.
     The net amount receivable under the credit arrangement with Abengoa as of December 31, 2006 was 18.4 million. Under such agreement, we may borrow funds from, or lend funds to Abengoa, up to a maximum of 45 million. We incur no costs and receive no payments under this arrangement unless and until we borrow or loan funds there under.
     As of December 31, 2006, the aggregate amount outstanding under Telvent Canada’s two separate credit facilities with LaSalle Bank was 1.7 million.
     On May 31, 2006, our subsidiary, Telvent Traffic North America Inc. (“Telvent Traffic”), entered into a credit agreement with LaSalle Bank National Association under which it may borrow up to U.S. $20 million. The obligations of Telvent Traffic under the credit agreement are guaranteed by Telvent. The credit facility is available for partial financing of acquisitions permitted under the agreement. The credit facility matures on May 1, 2007. Loans under the credit agreement bear interest on the outstanding principal amount at a rate per annum equal to either (depending on the election made by Telvent Traffic): (i) the prime rate in effect as publicly announced by LaSalle Bank National Association or (ii) the London Interbank Offering Rate for United States dollar deposits in the London Interbank Eurodollar market (LIBOR), plus an applicable margin which is based on the leverage ratio of Telvent GIT, S.A. The leverage ratio is the ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated EBITDA (net income plus the sum of expenses for interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). The minimum margin is 0.75 % and the maximum applicable margin is 1.25%. For prime rate loans, interest is payable quarterly in arrears. For LIBOR loans, interest is payable in arrears on the last day of each interest period, which can be one, two, three or six months, as selected by Telvent Traffic. This credit facility is not a revolving facility. The amount outstanding under this facility at December 31, 2006 was U.S. $ 20 million ( 15.3 million).
     As of December 31, 2006, 3.3 million was outstanding under the financings obtained by our subsidiary, Telvent Housing S.A., from ING and Liscat for the equipment and fixtures installed in our two Madrid facilities and our Barcelona facility. In September 2006, the Fortis Bank loan was cancelled. In addition, the amount outstanding under our Caja Madrid loan obtained by our subsidiary Telvent Energía y Medio Ambiente in 2001 was 1.5 million at December 31, 2006.
     As of December 31, 2006, 0.8 million was also outstanding in connection with the credit facilities that our subsidiary, Telvent Brasil S.A., obtained from various financial institutions. There are no outstanding borrowings under this credit facility as of January 2007.
     In the ordinary course of business, we arrange for performance guarantees in the form of performance bonds to our customers. The bonds are for a fixed monetary amount and match the duration of the contract. We mitigate to some degree our risk by requiring our sub-contractors to provide similar bonds. In connection with some of our obligations, we currently depend on lines of credit established by Abengoa with third-party lenders. As of December 31, 2006, we had 170.3 million of these obligations outstanding.
     For a description of our exposure to market risk, see “Item 11 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk”.
Capital Resources
     We expect that our principal uses of funds for the next several years will include acquisitions, joint ventures, new product development, interest and principal payments on our indebtedness, net working capital increases and capital expenditures. We intend to finance our growth objectives through cash generated by our business activities and the proceeds we received from our IPO. Management believes available resources are sufficient to fund our business for the foreseeable future.

51


Table of Contents

     In the future, we may become involved in “Build-Operate-Transfer” projects if the trend toward outsourcing certain activities by our potential customers continues to evolve. In these transactions, we would be required to fund an equity investment in projects. These equity investments would increase our need for capital.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
     Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements for fiscal years 2004, 2005 and 2006, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
     An understanding of our accounting policies for these items is critically important to understanding our consolidated financial statements. The following discussion provides more information regarding the estimates and assumptions used for these items in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should be read in conjunction with the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
     We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
    revenue recognition;
 
    factoring of trade receivables and allowance for doubtful accounts;
 
    consolidation of variable interest entities;
 
    derivative instruments;
 
    stock-based compensation; and
 
    goodwill and intangible assets.
Revenue Recognition
     We provide services to our customers under contracts that contain various pricing mechanisms and other terms. These contracts generally fall into one of the following categories:
    products and services solutions — which are typically long-term contracts (in excess of a year) and maintenance contracts in the Energy, Traffic, Transport and Environment sectors; and
 
    managed services — which includes leasing arrangements, maintenance, monthly fixed-rate contracts, fixed-rate hourly contracts and research and development activities funded by government agencies and other third parties.
We recognize revenue when the following four basic criteria are met:
    there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists;
 
    delivery has occurred or services have been rendered;
 
    the fee is fixed or determinable; and
 
    collectibility is probable.
     For products and services solutions contracts, revenue is recognized in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Position (“SOP”) No. 81-1, “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts”. In general, SOP 81-1 requires the use of the percentage-of-completion method to recognize revenue and profit as our work progresses. We use the cost-to-cost method to measure our progress towards completion. This method relies on estimates of total expected costs or total expected

52


Table of Contents

hours to complete the construction service, which are compared to costs or hours incurred to date, to arrive at an estimate of how much revenue and profit has been earned to date.
     Additionally, since the acquisition of Miner & Miner, part of our products and services solutions revenue is derived from the sale of software, support contracts and services. Such revenue is recognized in accordance with SOP No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition” and SOP 81-1. For software sales with no significant post-shipment obligations and no uncertainty about customer acceptance, revenue is recognized on delivery of software to the customer. Revenues on software sales with significant post-shipment obligations, including the production, modification, or customization of software are recognized by the percentage-of-completion method, with progress to completion measured on the basis of completion of milestones, labor costs incurred currently versus the total estimated labor cost of performing the contract over its term or other factors appropriate to the individual contract of sale.
     Because these estimates may require significant judgment, depending on the complexity and length of the services, the amount of revenues and profits that have been recognized to date are subject to revisions. We regularly review our progress on these contracts and revise the estimated costs of fulfilling our obligations. If we do not accurately estimate the amount of costs or hours required or the scope of work to be performed, do not complete our projects within the planned periods of time or do not satisfy our obligations under the contracts, then revenues and profits may be significantly and negatively affected and losses may need to be recognized. Revisions to revenue and profit estimates are reflected in income in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known.
     For our managed services contracts, we recognize revenue earned on the leasing, maintenance and monthly fixed-rate contracts on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract. For contract arrangements under which there is a fixed-rate per hour charge, we record income based on time incurred to date.
     We include amounts received for research and development activities in unearned income and amortize such amounts into income in the period during which the related services are performed and the revenue is earned.
     In contracts for both products and services solutions and managed services, we may bill the customer prior to performing the service, which would require us to record a liability as “billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings”. In other contracts, we may perform the service prior to billing the customer, which would require us to record unbilled revenue.
Factoring of trade receivables and allowance for doubtful accounts
     We have entered into several accounts receivable factoring arrangements that provide for the accelerated receipt of cash on available trade accounts receivable. Under the factoring agreements, we sell on a revolving and non-recourse basis, certain of our trade accounts receivable (the “Pooled Receivables”) to various financial institutions. These transactions are accounted for as sales because we have relinquished control of the Pooled Receivables and we do not maintain any continuing involvement with the sold assets. Accordingly, the Pooled Receivables sold under these facilities are excluded from receivables in the accompanying balance sheet.
     In addition, for those trade receivables that remain on the balance sheet, we record an allowance for doubtful accounts when we consider there are probable but unconfirmed losses in the collection of such accounts receivable balances. A specific receivable is reviewed for impairment when, based on current information and events, it is deemed probable that contractual amounts will not be fully collected. Factors considered in assessing uncollectability include a customer’s extended delinquency and filing for bankruptcy. An impairment allowance is recorded based on the difference between the carrying value of the receivable and the expected amount of collection.
Consolidation of variable interest entities
     Following the issuance of FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”, as revised in December 2003 by FIN 46-R, we consolidate certain joint venture arrangements or Union Temporal de Empresas (“UTEs”) as described in Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. These joint ventures are deemed to be variable interest entities as they have no equity and are operated through a management committee, comprised of equal representation from each of the venture partners, which makes decisions about the joint venture’s activities that have a significant effect on its success. Transfer restrictions in the agreements establish a de facto agency relationship between all venture partners. In accordance with FIN 46-R, we consolidate those joint ventures where we are the partner most closely associated with the joint venture.
     Determination of whether a de facto agency relationship exists between us and the other venture partners because of transfer restrictions is based upon the facts and circumstances of each agreement and requires judgment to assess the substance of the

53


Table of Contents

restriction, and in particular whether or not the “restricted party” has the ability to realize or manage its economic interest in the UTE and the reasons and economic rationale behind the restrictions placed on that party. A different interpretation or assessment of the restriction may lead to a conclusion that a de facto agency relationship does not exist and may mean that certain UTEs would not need to be consolidated under FIN 46-R.
     Once we have determined that a de facto agency relationship does exists, further judgment is required to identify which party is the primary beneficiary. Under FIN 46-R, as the venture partners in a UTE are exposed to a majority of the UTE’s expected losses and expected residual returns, one of the venture partners must be deemed to be the primary beneficiary and the party in the group that is most closely associated with the UTE is considered to be that beneficiary. This is based on an analysis of all relevant facts and circumstances, including the nature of the relationships between, and activities of, the parties involved. A different interpretation of these facts and circumstances or different assessment of who is most closely associated with the UTE could result in a conclusion that a different venture partner is the primary beneficiary and in that case we would not consolidate that UTE.
     Under the current accounting treatment, the increase in total assets from these consolidated entities amounted to 54,073 and 39,868 as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 respectively. Total revenue recognized with respect to these consolidated joint ventures was 48,577, including 40,947 of revenues of other venture partners in these arrangements, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. During the corresponding period in 2005, revenue recognized with respect to these consolidated joint ventures was 42,403, including 31,684 of revenues of other venture partners in these arrangements. Corresponding costs due to other joint venturers of 40,761 and 31,528, are recognized in cost of revenues as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These revenues and equivalent cost of revenues were recognized based on the billings of the other ventures to the UTE.
Derivative Instruments
     All derivative instruments are recognized in the financial statements and are measured at fair value regardless of the purpose or intent for holding them. We, as part of our foreign currency risk management program, have entered into numerous forward exchange contracts to protect against fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on long-term projects and anticipated future transactions. In addition, we have entered into interest rate caps in order to manage interest rate risk on certain long-term variable rate financing arrangements.
     Although the forward exchange contracts and interest rate caps are used solely as economic hedges, these transactions are currently recorded at fair value within the balance sheet with related gains and losses recorded in earnings, as we have not yet applied hedge accounting for these transactions, as permitted under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”.
     We also enter into certain long-term binding contracts that are denominated in a currency that is neither the functional or local currency of either party. This feature of the contracts is analogous to an embedded derivative that is bifurcated from the underlying host contract at inception of the contract and similar to freestanding derivatives, is recorded at fair value within the balance sheet with related gains and losses recorded in earnings.
     The valuation of derivative assets and liabilities, and the identification and valuation of embedded derivatives requires the use of considerable professional judgment. These determinations were based on available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Stock-Based Compensation
     Under a plan established by Abengoa, certain of our employees, including members of our management team, entered into agreements with Abengoa to buy ordinary shares of Telvent from Abengoa. The shares sold under the stock purchase plan contained certain performance and vesting features. The performance feature within the arrangement contained a clause whereby Abengoa can call portions of the shares sold if the performance criteria are not met. The performance criteria are tied to the achievement of cumulative and individual annual budgets in the first three years of the plan. Furthermore, in the absence of a public listing of our shares, the plan participants could sell the shares back to Abengoa based on a formula value. Such repurchase feature expired at the time of our IPO.
     Furthermore, in March 2004, various employees, including our managers, were granted additional shares under the stock compensation plan. The shares were accounted for as a formula value stock plan in accordance with paragraphs 97 to 98 of EITF 00-23 until the date of our IPO.

54


Table of Contents

     We have applied Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB 25’’), and related interpretations in accounting for the formula based stock purchase plans described above until December 31, 2005. We recognized compensation expense in earnings at the balance sheet date based on a formula, with the exception of shares granted after January 1, 2003, where compensation expense has been recognized based on the excess, if any, of the fair-value of our stock at the grant date of the award over the amount an employee is required to pay to acquire the stock. For ordinary shares sold to employees after January 1, 2003, we estimated the fair value of our stock at the date of sale on the basis of the midpoint of the expected price range for a public share offering less a 15% discount. The allocation of a discount was due to the non-marketability of the shares as a result of the absence of a public market in 2003.
     After our IPO, the variable nature of the stock-based compensation plans reverted to a fixed plan, apart from where performance conditions still had to be met by the employees, in which case the related plans continued to be variable after the date of the IPO. For plans considered “fixed plans” after the date of our IPO, the remaining deferred compensation was expensed over the remainder of the vesting period. For plans which continue to be variable, the deferred compensation cost and resulting compensation expense will be adjusted to the market value of the shares as of each balance sheet date.
     Upon adoption of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123R”), on January 1, 2006, the Company has designated its formula based stock purchase plan as an equity award plan and we have started to record as an expense the fair value of the shares purchased by employees under the plan. As the shares sold under the incentive plan consist of unvested stock, the fair value applied was the estimated market value on the grant date, as previously calculated for the pro-forma disclosures required by SFAS 123. We have chosen the modified prospective application transition method allowed by SFAS 123R.
     In addition, the Company has applied SFAS 123R to account for the share acquisition plan established by Abengoa on Abengoa’s shares. The plan is for members of the senior management of Abengoa and its subsidiaries, including senior management of Telvent and its subsidiaries. This plan has been accounted for as an equity award plan under SFAS 123R, and is being treated similar to a stock option plan. A valuation of the plan has been performed at the grant date, which was January 23, 2006, and the corresponding compensation cost is being recognized over the requisite service period of five years and six months (cliff vesting).
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
     Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually at a reporting unit level and written down when impaired. We test goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value. Fair value is generally determined using discounted cash flows, market multiples and market capitalization. Significant estimates used in the fair value methodologies include estimates of future cash flows, future short-term and long-term growth rates, weighted average cost of capital and estimates of market multiples of the reportable unit. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for our goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite life. See Notes 10-12 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
     We recorded goodwill in relation to our acquisitions of the NMS Division of Metso, WBU-Xwave, Miner & Miner, Farradyne and Maexbic. We have selected December 31 as the date as of which we will perform our annual goodwill impairment tests. No impairments were recognized for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 or 2004.
     We have also recorded intangible assets with finite lives in relation to our acquisitions of the NMS Division of Metso, WBU-Xwave, Miner & Miner, Almos, Beijing Blue Shield and Farradyne. These comprise customer contract (backlog) and relationships, purchased software technology and in-process research and development. We based the value of these intangible assets on an independent valuation report. We are amortizing the intangible assets over their estimated useful lives which are two to ten years for customer contracts and relationships and four to ten years for purchased software technology. In-process research and development is amortized fully after acquisition. If our estimates of useful lives were to change, we could be required to accelerate the amortization charge recognized in earnings. We review the carrying value of our finite life intangibles for impairment loss whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. The recoverability assessment involves considerable estimates of future cash flows in association with recorded finite life intangibles. If these estimates or related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for our finite life intangible assets. Finally, we recorded an indefinite-life intangible asset , or brand-name, in the purchase of Miner & Miner. This “brand name” intangible is not amortized but is instead tested annually for impairment. See Note 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

55


Table of Contents

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments”. This standard amends the guidance in SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, and No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”. SFAS No. 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. The provisions of SFAS No. 155 nullify or amend certain Derivatives Implementation Group (DIG) Issues. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have any material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
     In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets — An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140”. This standard amends the guidance in SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”. Among other requirements, SFAS No. 156 requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in any of the following situations:
      A transfer of the servicer’s financial assets that meets the requirements for sale accounting;
 
      A transfer of the servicer’s financial assets to a qualifying special-purpose entity in a guaranteed mortgage securitization in which the transferor retains all of the resulting securities and classifies them as either available-for-sale securities or trading securities in accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”; or
 
      An acquisition or assumption of an obligation to service a financial asset that does not relate to financial assets of the servicer or its consolidated affiliates.
     SFAS No. 156 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this Statement to have any material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
     In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). This clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We have not yet assessed what effect, if any, the adoption of this Interpretation will have on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
     In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, that defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We do not expect the adoption of this Statement to have any material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
     In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R). This Statement requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. It also requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position, with limited exceptions. An employer with publicly traded equity securities, such as Telvent, is required to initially recognize the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006; such requirement did not affect our reported disclosures. Guidance related to the measurement date of the plans is effective for years ending after December 31, 2008. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have any material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
     During October 2006, the FASB issued three final FASB Staff Positions (FSPs) related to Statements 126 and 123(R). FSP FAS 126-1 amends certain accounting standards to clarify the definition of a “public entity.” FSP FAS 123(R)-5 addresses whether a

56


Table of Contents

modification of an instrument in connection with an equity restructuring should be considered a modification for purposes of applying FSP FAS 123(R)-1. FSP FAS 123(R)-6 addresses certain technical corrections of Statement 123(R). FSP FAS 126-1 should be applied prospectively in fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2006. The latter two should be applied in the first reporting period beginning after October 10 and October 20, 2006, respectively. We do not expect the adoption of any of these FSPs to have any material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
     On February 15, 2007, the FASB issued Statement 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, which permits an entity to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Statement 159 offers an irrevocable option to carry the vast majority of financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in earnings (the fair value option, or FVO). Under Statement 159, entities that elect the FVO will report unrealized gains and losses in earnings. Statement 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted. We have not assessed what effect, if any, the adoption of this Statement will have on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
C. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES, ETC
     We have made investments of 16.5 million, 15.0 million and 11.1 million in research and development in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. We invest in technology rationalization, integration and innovation and in new research programs to support our strategic position as a Global Real-Time IT Company in multiple industry verticals. To accommodate a geographically distributed R&D environment, in 2004 we deployed our universe model. In this model, product and competency centers work collaboratively and systematically to support technology deployment in strategically geographically positioned delivery units. Product centers provide infrastructure technologies and system architectures that underpin all of our solutions, while competency centers develop high-value-added, industry specific, advanced real-time and business process applications. The competency center applications can be deployed on a stand-alone basis or in concert with product center infrastructure products. As in past years, our product and competency centers continued to allocate a substantial investment in pure research that typically utilizes a public funding component and collaborative research with universities, research centers and corporations.
D. TREND INFORMATION
Energy
     The backlog corresponding to our Energy Business guarantees a large portion of the 2007 revenues planned and we expect an important additional contribution from new orders in Electricity projects such as Cadafe in Venezuela and the Vattenfall project in Sweden, as well as projects with Colonial Pipeline, Koch Pipeline and Keyspan Energy in Oil & Gas.
     In Europe, we anticipate that the electric utilities in Spain will continue with significant investments in order to strengthen the capacity of their distribution and transmission networks. We will try to take advantage of our excellent position in this market and get an important portion of these orders. However the Electrical market in Spain remains unstable. Large corporations like ACS, Unión Fenosa and Acciona are increasing their presence in this market and competing for business from customers such as Iberdrola and Endesa and other competitors may appear.
     In North America, in our Oil & Gas sector, the eighteen months of increasing oil and gas prices, which had companies focused on exploration and production (E&P), has now brought companies to focus on pipelines infrastructure to get high priced production to refineries and markets. The North American oil and gas pipeline market seems to be rebounding after a couple of years of diverted investments into E&P.
     In Electricity, although capital budgets for IT-related spending are down in the sector, which impacts our traditional SCADA business, we expect that SCADA-related bookings will improve significantly during the first and second quarters of 2007, due to a very strong pipeline. Two drivers should bring us opportunities in North America and Europe in the following years. The first driver is the growth anticipated in the renewable energy market, in which we are achieving a presence with important references. The second driver is the changes in electric regulations and energy efficiency that should bring more opportunities for our AMR/AMM solutions. Market indicators in North America project steady spending for the Enterprise GIS sector in 2007, in line with the 5% to 6% increase of 2006.
     Our pipeline in Latin America shows a lot of potential projects in the region. We are pursuing projects in Brazil, Bolivia, Chile, Equator and Panama where we are taking advantage of our local presence in this area. We have recently established a local company in Venezuela, in order to improve our local presence and to obtain a share of this market.

57


Table of Contents

     In our Enterprise GIS business, future revenue streams, including software maintenance and implementation services, are likely to grow faster in the international markets, especially in Latin America and the Asia-Pacific region.
     In the Asia-Pacific region, our success in developing the China oil and gas markets is expected to have both a direct and indirect effect in our continuing development of this business area, particularly as we widen our product and solutions for the upstream market.
     In China, official statistics show that by the year 2020, China will need an electricity installed capacity of 1 billion kilowatts, a 100% increase from the current 500 million kilowatts. In order to help alleviate the situation, State Grid Corp of China (SGCC), China’s largest power grid builder, and the operator of more than half the power-starved economy’s electricity distribution, has planned an investment of 107 billion yuan (US $12.9 billion) to construct and repair its grids. China Southern Power Grid Corp (CSG), the second-largest electricity distributor, will spend 30.5 billion yuan (US $3.7 billion) improving its power transmission capacity in the five provinces it serves — Guangdong, Guangxi, Guizhou, Yunnan and Hainan. Based on these planned expenditures, we foresee an expansion of our client base in China in the next several years.
Traffic
     In Europe, our Spanish traffic activity is maintaining a consolidated position, with a market share of approximately 30%, and maintenance service contracts with recurring income. Traffic safety is a priority for the government and enforcement activities are receiving big investments from national and municipal funds, mainly in speed radar networks, red-light infringements and violations processing. We expect to have a strong future position in this sector based on the past projects awarded by the Road Traffic Authority (DGT). Local traffic authorities continue to update urban traffic control centers as existing systems built during the 1990’s are being decommissioned. Also, there is some strong activity in the area of ITS systems and Tunnel Management. Also, shadow-toll systems are emerging, which also should provide a good opportunity in the near future.
     Elsewhere in Europe, new opportunities should emerge in Central and Eastern Europe countries due to the boost of investments in infrastructures provided by their entry in the European Union. Specifically, toll systems are already in high demand and we are continuing our sales and marketing efforts to position Telvent, as a technology provider for ITS systems, taking advantage of the successful completion of the Bucharest-Cernavoda freeway project and our entrance in Ireland through the Eurolink Toll System. Also, conventional toll systems continue to be demanded by toll highway concessionaires and new opportunities should arise for freeflow systems.
     In North America, the acquisition of Farradyne in July of 2006, positions Telvent as a key player in ITS systems, within the specific U.S. rules and way-of-work, enabling a platform for provision of new solutions for tunnels and conventional and free flow toll systems, and continuing with consulting activities.
     In Latin America, Brazil is already facing an update of urban control systems in Sao-Paolo and Rio de Janeiro, and also continuing its implementation of ITS systems in the main highways. Argentina is providing opportunities for enforcement activities, from the successful operation of the system in Rosario, Argentina. However, no representative growth is expected in this area for traffic activities.
     In Mexico, the update of urban traffic systems in Guadalajara and Leon, during 2006 is providing some opportunities for the implementation of new systems based on wireless communications, together with some ITS opportunities as ITS concepts are merging in the country.
     In the Asia-Pacific region, the projects awarded in China during 2006 should provide good references and position Beijing Blue Shield as a key player in high-end urban traffic systems, complementing its activities in smaller cities and traffic engineering, and allowing strong competition with local companies. We are expecting to enter the Indian market with our own technology and in Thailand the enforcement project awarded by the Thai Police positions us well for the future.
     In the Middle East and Africa, the projects for enforcement, UTC and traffic and enforcement control in Saudi Arabia are expected to start actively in the last six months of 2007, providing good expectations for an increase of revenues.

58


Table of Contents

Transport
     In Europe, the acquisition of Maexbic, a Spanish company with expertise in bus ticketing solutions, is expected to help position Telvent as a key player for intermodal public transport and tariff integration for 2007 and following years. The extension of existing subway lines and the creation of new ones should create opportunities for new bookings for automatic fare collection systems. We expect to see continued growth in the Transport segment in 2007, although it may be at a lower rate than 2006.
     In the rest of Europe, Telvent has been preselected in Glasgow and Manchester subways, as a first step for the presentation of offers. We will start focusing in Eastern European countries in 2007 in order to capture opportunities in the area of public transport.
     In Latin America, we foresee important growth in our Transport business due to existing opportunities, mainly in Venezuela and Mexico, with important investments in the railway sector. Also, we believe we have good opportunities to obtain new projects in Peru, Colombia and Argentina.
     In the Asia-Pacific region, some new railway projects are expected for tender, mainly in China. We believe we have considerable opportunities to win new projects in Tianjin, leveraging the success of the Tianjin Line1 project and in other Chinese cities such as Beijing, Shanghai and Nanjin. We are giving particular attention to Beijing, with new subways lines under construction in preparation for the 2008 Olympic Games.
     In the Middle-East and Africa, marketing efforts in Morocco and Egypt are in progress but we have not yet identified any specific opportunities. Arabic countries may provide opportunities for specific actions and offers in the near future.
Environment
     In Europe, the business with the Spanish Administration is expected to continue growing, mainly as a result of the opportunities in meteorological systems and automatic hydrological information system (Saih) for the Duero, Guadalquivir and Catalonian basins contracts, that should result in significant revenues in 2007 and following years. Weather radar is also an emerging business in Spain and a sector in which we have a solid position. Therefore, we expect large opportunities and significant revenues in this segment in 2007. From the Netherlands, we will manage the commercial expansion to other European countries like Switzerland, Sweden, UK, Germany, Belgium and Eastern European countries. We anticipate that UK, Switzerland, Belgium and Sweden will start generating revenues in 2007.
     In our North America region, after obtaining our first RWIS contract in Alberta, Canada, we have established a position in this sector. New RWIS opportunities, both in Canada and U.S. with an outsourcing/concessions scheme are expected in 2007, so we anticipate to grow in this strategic sector. Growth is expected in the water industry during 2007.
     In Latin America, we expect that significant opportunities for environmental early warning systems and hydro meteorological projects will materialize in 2007 in this region.
     In the Asia-Pacific region, we foresee an opportunity in meteorological applications for Chinese airports. This is being boosted by the enormous investment plans in airport infrastructures throughout the country. We also expect good business opportunities from the water sector where it is projected that they will maintain an annual growth of 15% until 2010. Our efforts will be in positioning our products and solutions in a region where we do not yet have any historic references.
     The Middle-East and Africa region is expected to continue to grow in 2007. Our current strong presence in meteorology and water will be leveraged to get upcoming opportunities and increase our market position in this region. Large contracts are expected for 2007 in water in the Middle East.
Other
     In Europe, our healthcare business in Spain has doubled in bookings in 2006, consolidating the growth in this business area. With a strong presence traditionally coming from Andalucia, we have been able to expand our presence to other regions in Spain. Our long-term R&D is focused on starting new areas of activities such as legal, medicine and biosensor which will be developed during 2007.
     Our Public Administration business in Spain has an important presence in the Central Administration using our suite TiWorks as a platform for e-Government. From this, we are leading projects related to interoperability among Spanish Central Administration, regions and municipalities which are expected to help us develop this business in the future. Also, we entered into the homeland security market with the contract we signed with the Spanish Police for Border Control, which includes artificial vision and image

59


Table of Contents

recognition techniques for biometric authentication of counterfeit ID cards and passports. In 2007 and 2008, we expect to win new projects in this market. We foresee opportunities in the areas of census, banking and airline security.
     Our managed services activity is achieving good growth both in revenues and in our installed base in Spain. With more than 400 customers, the possibilities of cross and up-selling are greater and thus we are increasing our up-the-value-chain offering from infrastructure and systems outsourcing, to applications and business processes outsourcing. We are also expecting our consulting capabilities to create a good base and driver for the selling of larger projects. Also, we are investing internal resources in the development of partnerships to reinforce the managed security concepts in the market. We believe that security is a key concern among most corporations. We are preparing for this market demand with a strong team and dedicated infrastructure in our data center network. The largest sectors where we are seeing the biggest investment in outsourcing services are healthcare, finance and insurance, and are our key growing target markets.
     In Latin America, we signed our first healthcare contract in the Dominican Republic and have established a commercial base in the country, which gives us an excellent position to become a player in this geography.
     We expect to expand our homeland security projects to other countries in which we already have presence, such as Dominican Republic, Panama, Argentina and Brazil. We also expect to win projects in statistical systems in Dominican Republic and Venezuela during 2007.
     Although currently developed mostly in Spain, we plan to expand our managed services activity to the rest of our core geographies. We have plans to market our managed services business to our existing customers in all of our core segments and geographies.
E. OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Guarantees
Performance Guarantees
     In the normal course of business we provide performance guarantees in the form of performance bonds to customers that obligate us to fulfill the terms of the underlying contract. These bonds are for a fixed monetary amount and match the duration of the underlying contract that is generally between 18 and 36 months. We request similar bonds from sub-contractors to mitigate this risk. The guarantees are generally not drawn upon as us will usually successfully complete the contract or renegotiate contract terms.
Financial Guarantees
     As of December 31, 2006, we maintained the following guarantees:
                         
            Estimated        
    Maximum     Proceeds from     Carrying  
    Potential     Collateral/     Amount of  
    Payments     Recourse     Liabilities  
    (Euros in thousands)  
Performance guarantees
    170,336     14,557      
Financial guarantees
    3,218              
 
                 
 
     173,554     14,557      
 
                 
     The maximum potential payments represent a “worse-case scenario”, and do not necessarily reflect expected results. Estimated proceeds from collateral and recourse represent the anticipated value of assets that could be liquidated or received from other parties to offset we our payments under guarantees.
Product Warranties
     We provide warranties in connection with all of our sales contracts except for housing, hosting and maintenance contracts. Warranties typically range from one to two years depending on the contract and cover factors such as non-conformance to specifications and defects in materials and workmanship. Based on historical experience, we have not incurred any material unexpected costs associated with servicing our warranties.

60


Table of Contents

Commitments
     As stipulated in the share purchase agreement, a payment of Rmb 6.4 million ( 637 thousand) is due from us on May 20, 2007, related to the purchase of Beijing Blue Shield. However, such payment has been deferred to November 30, 2007 pending resolution of certain items related to the carrying value of the net assets purchased, which are currently under discussion with the sellers of BBS: Shenzhen Airport Co. Ltd. and China Motor-Vehicle Safety Appraisal and Inspection Center. In March 2007, we have agreed with the sellers to extend the date for the final payment to November 30, 2007.
     Regarding the Maexbic acquisition, there is a contingent and variable earn-out outstanding payment, up to a maximum of 625,000, based on Maexbic meeting certain financial targets over the period ended December 31, 2007. In addition, there has been a guarantee deposit payment of 100,000 that the company has made on March 29, 2007.
F. TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
     As of December 31, 2006, we had the contractual obligations set forth in the following table:
                                         
    Payments Due by Period  
            Less than                     More than  
    Total     1 year     1-3 years     3-5 years     5 years  
    (Euros in thousands)  
Contractual Obligations
                                       
Long-term debt
  16,702     1,514     4,980     2,057     8,151  
Short-term debt
    32,295       32,295                    
Deferred and contingent payment on acquisitions
    1,362       1,362                    
Capital lease obligations
    4,396       2,562       1,809       25        
Operating lease obligations
    36,519       11,713       20,952       3,520       334  
Other long-term liabilities
    7,187       1,471       4,807       663       246  
Purchase obligations
    108,894       108,894                    
 
                             
Total contractual obligations
    207,355       159,811       32,548     6,265     8,731  
 
                             
     We have contractual obligations to make future payments on debt and lease agreements. Additionally, in the normal course of business, we enter into contractual arrangements where we commit to future purchases of services from unaffiliated and related parties, and request deposits from our customers.
     Long-term and short-term debt include the total amount outstanding under long-term and short-term financing arrangements and is more fully discussed in Notes 14 and 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
     Deferred and contingent payment on acquisitions includes the Rmb 6.4 million ( 0.7) deferred payment on the Beijing Blue Shield acquisition, as well as the 0.6 million earn-out payment, and guarantee deposit of 0.1 million, on the Maexbic acquisition.
     Capital lease obligations include the amounts owed to third parties in connection with facilities, equipment and machinery acquired under capital lease arrangements. Operating lease obligations include the amounts owed on leases for corporate buildings. Operating and capital lease obligations are more fully discussed in Note 18 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
     Other long-term liabilities include the total amount outstanding under government loans, customer deposits and other payments due to suppliers, and are more fully discussed in Note 16 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
     Purchase obligations include any agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding on us and that specifies all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction.

61


Table of Contents

ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
A. DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT
     On March 23, 2007, our directors and senior management were:
             
            Expiration of
Name   Age   Position   Director Term
Manuel Sánchez
  43   Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer   2010
HRH Carlos de Borbón
  69   Director   2010
Miguel Cuenca
  58   Director   2010
Eduard Punset
  70   Director   2010
Javier Salas
  59   Director   2010
José B. Terceiro
  63   Director   2010
Cándido Velázquez-Gaztelu
  71   Director   2010
Bernardo Villazán
  36   Director   2010
Emilio Cassinello
  69   Director   2010
José I. del Barrio
  44   Executive Vice President Outsourcing    
Ana Plaza
  39   Chief Financial Officer & Head of Investor Relations    
Francisco Cáceres
  45   Chief Technical Officer    
Raúl Agüera
  37   Chief Accounting Officer    
Bárbara Zubiría
  31   Chief Reporting Officer    
Carmen Rodríguez
  36   Chief Audit Officer    
Larry Stack
  54   President -Energy    
José Montoya
  60   President - Transport    
Dave Jardine
  64   Chairman - North America    
José María Flores
  45   Executive Vice President Transport    
Ignacio González
  39   Executive Vice President Energy    
Javier Garoz
  37   Executive Vice President Environment    
Dai Yue
  43   Chairman- China    
Luis Rancé
  64   Chairman- Mexico    
Marcio Leonardo
  55   Chairman- Brazil    
Adolfo Borrero
  45   Executive Vice President Public Administration and Healthcare    
Enrique Rodríguez
  39   Chief Operating Officer    
Lidia García
  33   Legal Counsel    
     Manuel Sánchez — Director since January 2002, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Sánchez joined Telvent in 1989 as a software engineer. In 1995, he became Telvent Mexico’s General Manager. In 2000, he was promoted to the position of General Manager of Telvent Energía y Medio Ambiente, a subsidiary of Telvent. In 2001, Mr. Sánchez was named our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Sánchez is also Chairman of GIRH, Abengoa’s human resources outsourcing subsidiary, since 2002. Mr. Sánchez was appointed as our Chairman in March 2004. He is also one of two joint directors of each of Telvent Investments, which is the Abengoa entity to which we transferred our ownership interest in our minority investments during 2004, and Telvent Corporation, which is our majority shareholder. He holds a degree in Industrial Engineering from ICAI Madrid and a degree in business administration (IPADE, Mexico). He also serves as a director of ViryaNet and Wisdom Lux.
     His Royal Highness Carlos de BorbónDos Sicilias y Borbón Parma — Director since January 2003. His Royal Highness has served as a board member of several companies, including CEPSA (a Spanish energy company), Iberpistas (the Spanish tollway operator), URBIS, Petresa and Thyssen Group. He also sponsors and presides over various foundations, including Banesto, San Benito de Alcántara (the Spanish Nature Conservation Foundation) and the Foundation for the Protection of the Environment. At present, he is the President of the Patronage of the Navy Museum and President of the Spanish Nobleman Association. HRH Carlos de Borbón earned a law degree from Complutense University (Madrid, Spain).
     Miguel Cuenca — Director since November 2000 and a Member of the Nominating and Compensation Committee. Mr. Cuenca was Secretary of the National Industry Institute (INI) from 1985 until 1992 and Vice-President from 1992-1996. INI is the Spanish state-owned holding company that holds all of the shares in governmental entities and state-owned companies in Spain. He also has

62


Table of Contents

been a Member of the Economic and Social Council of the European Union (1990-1992) and Vice-President of Iberia Airlines of Spain (1993-1995). Currently, he is President of the Innovation and Technology Wood Managing Commission Foundation, the Economic and Social Council of Cordoba (since 2004), and is a contributor to several newspapers and TV programs. Mr. Cuenca has a law degree from Complutense University (Madrid, Spain) and an MBA from IESE Business School of the University of Navarra (IESE) in Barcelona, Spain.
     Eduard Punset — Director since November 2000; Member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Punset has written several books and co-authored others about the impact of technology on business growth. At present, he is a professor for several institutions and manages REDES, a television program about the public understanding of science. He is Chairman of Smart Planet (a multimedia science production company) and Board Member of Sol Meliá S.A. From 1969 to 1974 he was a senior member of The International Monetary Fund in Washington and his representative in the Caribbean. He was also the Deputy Director of Economic and Financial Studies for the Banco Hispano Americano and from 1980 to 1981 he was Spain’s Minister for Relations with the European Union. Mr. Punset has an Economics degree from the University of Madrid and received degrees in Monetary Economy at l’Ecole de Hautes Etudes of the Sorbonne and a Master in Science and Economy from the University of London. He is currently Professor of Science, Technology and Society at the Chemical Institute of Ramón Llull University (Barcelona).
     Javier Salas — Director since November 2000 and Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Salas was General Manager of Corporate Management at the National Industry Institute (INI) from 1988 until 1990 and was later promoted to President. He was Chairman of Iberia Airlines of Spain from 1993-1995. At present, he is Chairman of the Board of UNISECO, S.A. and the Board of I & F Ingeniería y Fachadas Holding Group, S.L and a board member of several companies including Red Eléctrica de España, S.A. (electricity transmission and operation), GED Iberian Private Equity SGERC (private equity), GED Capital Development, S.A. (venture capital), and PROINTEC. He is also a member of the Advisory Committee of the Banco Privado Portugues (banking and financial services) and Axioma, Inc (software solutions). He serves as the President of “Fundación Entorno” (Environment) and is a director partner of Saga Servicios Financieros, S.A. (financial services). Mr. Salas has been President of ASPEL (Cleanliness Company Professional Association) since 2001. Mr. Salas has an Economics degree from University of Málaga, Spain.
     José B. Terceiro — Director since November 2000. Mr. Terceiro is a Professor of Applied Economics the University Complutense of Madrid. Mr. Terceiro is Chairman of the Board of Advisers of Abengoa, S.A. and Bioetonal Galicia, S.A. and is a Board Member of the Prisa Group, Abengoa, Unión Fenosa and Iberia Airlines of Spain. He previously held several Spanish government offices, including Undersecretary of the Cabinet Office, General Director for Libraries and Books, the National Education Advisor and Vice-President of the Center for Constitutional Studies. He was a member of the Economic and Social Council of Spain. In addition, Mr. Terceiro has also been a Professor at several other universities in Spain and abroad, including the Universidad de La Havana and he developed the program of the North-American Universities for the University of Madrid. From 1983 until 1999, Mr. Terceiro was the advisor of the Academic Board of the Royal College Complutense at Harvard. Mr. Terceiro holds a PHD in Economy from the University Complutense of Madrid.
     Cándido Velázquez-Gaztelu — Director since November 2000 and Chairman of the Nominating and Compensation Committee. Mr. Velázquez-Gaztelu was Chairman of Tabacalera S.A. from 1973 to 1988 and was Chairman of Telefónica, S.A. (the main Spanish telephone company) from 1989 to 1996. Currently, he is an advisory board member of Abengoa and Accenture (management and technology consulting) and Wisdom Lux (an entertainment company), Zenith Media (media planning and buying agency) and Worldbest Cigars. He is also president of the Spanish Autism Confederation. Mr. Velázquez-Gaztelu graduated from Granada University in Law and Social Studies and holds an MBA from IESE (Barcelona, Spain).
     Bernardo Villazán — Director since May 2005 and a Member of the Nominating and Compensation Committee. Mr. Villazán is Director and Chairman of Lucent Technology Spain and Portugal. He has worked for more than 20 years in the Information Technology and Telecommunications sectors, as much in Spain as in the United States, for companies such as Sainco, Data General and Sun Microsystems. Mr. Villazán is a member of the Advisory Administrators Institute and is also a member of the Board of Directors and Treasurer of AETIC (Association of Electronics, Information Technologies and Telecommunications companies of Spain). Mr. Villazán holds a Senior Management Program (PADE) degree from the IESE Business School.
     Emilio Cassinello — Director since May 2005 and a Member of the Audit Committee. Emilio Cassinello Aubán, career diplomat, Ambassador of Spain, is at present the Director General of the Toledo International Center for Peace and a member of the Board of Directors of Parques Reunidas. In the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, he has served as Assistant Director General for Africa, Director General of Organizations and International Conferences, Director General of Latin America Political Affairs, and Director of the Foreign Policy Planning Staff. He has acted as Commercial Counselor and Chargé d’ Affaires in the Embassies of Addis Ababa and Dar es Salaam, Cultural Counselor in Mexico, and Spain’s Ambassador in Angola (1978-79) and Mexico (1982-85). He was President and Chairman of the State Corporation for the Universal

63


Table of Contents

Exposition of Seville 1992 (1986-1991), and Commissioner General (1991-1993). He was also General Consul of Spain in New York (1998-2003) and Ambassador at large for North American Affaires (2003-2004).
A Law Graduate from Madrid and Mexico Law Schools, Emilio Cassinello holds a LLM from Harvard Law School. He was the founding Secretary General of the Spain/United States Council and is Vice-President of the Euroamerican Foundation. He is also a member of the Scientific Council of Real Elcano Institute of International and Strategic Studies and of the Casa Árabe (Madrid); Honorary Fellow of the Foreign Policy Association of New York, and a member of the Advisory Council of the Dukes of Soria Foundation. He is also a member of the Board of both the Museum Picasso-Málaga and El Museo del Barrio (New York).
     José Ignacio del Barrio — Executive Vice President Outsourcing and Executive Vice President Business Development. Mr. del Barrio has worked for Abengoa and Telvent since July 1988. Mr. del Barrio started his career in Telvent as a Project Manager for large-scale strategic projects in Africa and Latin America in the Communications Division and was later promoted to Director of the International Department. In 1993, he was named Telvent Mexico’s General Manager. After three years in Mexico, he took the position of Sales and Marketing Director of Telvent Energía y Medio Ambiente S.A. and in 1998 he was named Managing Director of the Communications Division. In 2001, he was named Telvent’s General Manager, where he founded and held executive positions in Telvent Housing, Telvent Datahouse and Telvent Interactiva. Currently, Mr. del Barrio is the Executive Vice President of Telvent Housing and Telvent Outsourcing. Mr. del Barrio is also one of two joint directors of each of Telvent Investments, which is the Abengoa entity to which we transferred our ownership interest in our minority investments during 2004, and Telvent Corporation, which is our majority shareholder. Mr. del Barrio graduated with a degree in Telecommunications Engineering from UPM (Madrid, Spain), and holds a degree from the Business Administration Program from IESE (Barcelona, Spain).
     Ana Plaza — Chief Financial Officer and Head of Investor Relations. Ms. Plaza joined Telvent in 1999 as its Financial Controller and Internal Audit Manager and became CFO in 2001. From September 2003 to April 2004, she held the position of Audit and Consolidation Director in Abengoa. Prior to joining Telvent, Ms. Plaza spent four years at the Audit and Consolidation Corporate Department of Abengoa. She also worked for PricewaterhouseCoopers from 1991 to 1995. Ms. Plaza holds an MA in Economics from Cordoba University and an Executive MBA from IESE (Madrid, Spain). In January 2007 she was appointed as Head of Investor Relations of the company in addition to her other position. Ms. Plaza has been selected by the World Economic Forum as a Young Global Leader in 2007.
     Francisco Cáceres — Chief Technical Officer. Mr. Cáceres is responsible for global coordination of product research, technology development and product management. He joined Telvent in 1987 as a Software Engineer participating in electrical control systems projects. From 1993 to 2003, he held various R&D management positions related to embedded systems and SCADA systems. In 2003, he was promoted to the position of Director of the Product Center located in Seville, until January 2006 when he was designated Chief Technology Officer of Telvent. Mr. Cáceres holds a degree in Software Engineering from Seville University, a six sigma Champion and a degree in business administration (AD-1) from San Telmo’s Institute (Seville).
     Raúl Agüera— Chief Accounting Officer. Before joining the Company in 2005 as Director of Administration, Mr. Agüera worked as Financial Controller and Chief Financial Officer for Pridesa and Ondagua, Spanish companies of RWE Group, a multi-utility German company working in electricity, gas, water and service areas. Previously he was Administration and Financial Director in SERNAUTO, Spanish Autoparts Association, and has had two years experience in private banking. Mr.Agüera graduated with a degree in Economics from ETEA (Cordoba, Spain).
     Bárbara Zubiría — Chief Reporting Officer since October 2006. From April 2005 to October 2006, Ms. Zubiria served as our Chief Audit Officer. Before joining Telvent in 2005, Ms. Zubiría Furest worked as a manager in the Global Offering Services (GOS) group of Deloitte & Touche in Madrid, Spain, focusing on U.S. and international reporting and SEC compliance. She also worked as a financial auditor for 3 years, both for Arthur Andersen in Miami, Florida and then in Madrid, and for KPMG in Miami. Ms. Zubiría earned a Bachelor of Business Administration, cum laude, with a specialty in accounting, and a Master of Science (Accounting and Auditing) from Florida International University of Miami, Florida. She is licensed as a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) by the State of Florida.
     Carmen Rodríguez— Chief Audit Officer. On October 17, 2006, Ms. Carmen Rodríguez was appointed by the Audit Committee as the new Chief Audit Officer. Ms Rodríguez has been in charge of internal auditing for the Company since 2003. Ms Rodríguez joined Telvent in January 2002 as an Internal Auditor. In September 2003, she was promoted to the position of Internal Audit Manager and has been working in the implementation of Telvent’s system of internal control over financial reporting for the last two years. Prior to joining Telvent, Ms. Rodríguez worked three years in the tax practice of PricewaterhouseCoopers in Madrid, Spain. Before that, from 1996 to 1999, Ms. Rodríguez worked in the Financial Department of Visa. Ms. Rodríguez holds a bachelors degree

64


Table of Contents

in Business Administration and Economics from the CEU University of Madrid. In addition, she has a Masters Degree in Taxation from the Instituto de Empresa (Madrid, Spain).
     Larry Stack —President —Energy. Since January 2007. Mr. Stack is responsible for the operations of our North American businesses, as well as for the strategic marketing activities of Telvent North America. Beginning in 1986 at Valmet (later known as Metso Automation), a leading international automation company, Mr. Stack held various project, research and development management and executive positions. Mr. Stack held the position of Chief Technology Officer of Telvent from January 2003 to January 2006, when he was promoted to his current position. Mr. Stack graduated in Electronics Engineering Technology (with Honors) from the Southern Alberta Institute of Technology.
     José Montoya— President — Traffic and Transport. Mr. Montoya held since 1989 the position of Vice President Traffic and Transport. Currently, he is a member of the board of directors of several of our subsidiaries. He is also the Vice-Chairman of the Spanish Traffic Organization (PEMTRA); Vice-President of the Spanish Road Association and a member of the Road Safety National Council, to which he was appointed by the Department of the Interior of Spain. Mr. Montoya graduated in engineering from the Universidad Politécnica de Linares and also holds an MBA from IESE (Madrid, Spain).
     David Jardine —Chairman North America. Mr. Jardine has led the Calgary, Canada based-unit (Telvent Canada), which we acquired in 2003, since 1987. Previously, he was Vice President of Westronic Inc., which manufactured automation products for the electric utility market and was subsequently sold to GE Power Systems. Mr. Jardine received a degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Manitoba and holds an MBA from the Haskayne Business School of the University of Calgary.
     José María Flores— Executive Vice President, Transportation. Mr. Flores joined Telvent in 1987 as project engineer and became project manager in 1990. He managed several key projects in the Electric business and in 1993 was promoted to Manager of the new Distribution Automation department. In 1997 was promoted to Director, Electric Utilities department and in 1999 to Vice President, Energy Division. He moved to North America at the end of 2002 and served as Executive Vice President of Telvent North America until June 2006. In June 2004, he returned to Spain to serve in his current position. Mr. Flores is an Electrical Engineer from University of Seville and MBA from Instituto San Telmo (Seville).
     Ignacio González — Executive Vice President — Energy. Mr. González joined us in 1990 as a Project Engineer participating in key control systems projects. From 1995 to 1998, he worked as an engineer and Project Manager for the Electrical Sector. In 1998, he was promoted to the position of International Proposals Department Manager, which he held until 1999, when he was named Telvent Mexico’s General Manager. In 2002, he was named General Manager of Telvent Energía y Medio Ambiente. In 2006 he was appointed as Executive Vice President Electricity & Environment. In January 2007, he was appointed Executive Vice President — Energy. Mr. González holds an honors degree in Industrial Engineering, with a specialization in electricity, from Seville University and an MBA from Institute San Telmo (Seville).
     Javier Garoz — Executive Vice President —Environment. From 2002 until December 2003 assumed the position of Manager of the Environmental Division in Seville. He joined Telvent in 2001 holding several positions in sales and management. He had worked for 16 years in several international and national businesses occupying the post of General Director, European Comercial Director, Director of International Marketing, Regional Director and Sales manager. Javier Garoz has a bachelor’s degree in marketing and comercial management through ESIC. He has completed the Program of Director Development through IESE.
     Dai Yue —Chairman China. Mr. Dai joined Telvent in July 2002. Previously, he spent thirteen years as Chief Representative in China and Director of Projects for MQM, S.A. and two years with IBG Group as General Manager, where he specialized in industrial projects in China, including petrochemical, machine tools, defense, energy, water and waste treatment. Mr. Dai holds Masters degrees in communications and in Spanish culture from Beijing Foreign Study University of China.
     Luis Rancé —Chairman Mexico. Mr. Rancé joined Telvent in 1990 at the time of incorporation of our Mexican subsidiary. Prior to joining us, he spent five years running his own energy management systems business. Before that, he spent 24 years with the main power utilities in Mexico: Luz y Fuerza del Centro (LYF) and Comisión Federal de Electricidad (CFE), both government utilities, where he held various executive operations positions. Mr. Rancé has a B.S. degree in electrical and mechanical engineering from Universidad Autónoma de Mexico (UNAM) and a Master’s degree in Power Systems from Pennsylvania State University.
     Marcio Leonardo —Chairman Brazil. Mr. Leonardo has held his current position since 2001. Prior to joining us, he spent 17 years managing his own engineering company, which was a supplier to the industrial automation market in Brazil. Mr. Leonardo was also previously a Professor in the Electrical Department of the Catholic University of Minas Gerais and has held different board positions at the Brazilian Electrical and Electronic Industry Association. He holds a B.S. degree in electrical and electronic engineering from the Federal University of Minas Gerais and a specialization degree in industrial electronics from the Catholic University of Minas Gerais.

65


Table of Contents

     Adolfo Borrero — Executive Vice President — Public Administration and Healthcare. Since May 2005, Mr. Borrero has been CEO of Telvent Interactiva, whose main activity is the development of the Healthcare and Government IT business of Telvent. Mr. Borrero has been involved as General Manager for Telvent Interactiva from August 2000, when the company was incorporated as an spin-off of Telvent Energía y MedioAmbiente. Previously, Mr. Borrero held the position of Division Manager of e-Business development during 2000; Division Manager of Information Systems in 1999; Division Manager of Electrical Distribution in 1998. Previously, Mr. Borrero worked in Sainsel. Mr. Borrero has a degree in electrical engineering from Escuela Superior de Ingenieros Industriales de Sevilla (1986) and an MBA from Instituto Internacional San Telmo (1995). He is also President of Asociación Española de Tecnologías de la Información y de Conocimiento (AETIC), Andalusian branch, and VP of Centro Andaluz de Innovación de la Tecnología de la Información y las Comunicaciones (CITIC), two IT leading organizations in Spain.
     Enrique Rodríguez — Chief Operating Officer . Mr. Rodríguez joined us in 1994 as a Project Manager participating in turnkey control system projects in Oil & Gas until 1997. In 1997 he was promoted to different management positions in several technical areas in Telvent México until 2002 when he returned to Spain as Director of Oil & Gas. In 2003, he was appointed as our Chief Operating Officer, and in 2005 he was promoted to General Manager of Telvent Servicios Compartidos. Mr. Rodríguez holds a degree in Aerospace Engineering from Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, and a degree in business administration from IPADE, in Mexico.
     Lidia García — Legal Counsel. Ms. García joined Telvent in 2000 as Legal Counsel for Telvent Tráfico y Transporte, S.A. She held this position until 2005, when she was appointed Risk Manager for Telvent, a position that she held until 2006, when she was appointed Legal Counsel of Telvent. She has held the position of Secretary of the Board of several companies within Telvent, including her current position as Secretary of the Board of Telvent GIT, S.A. since June 2006. Prior to joining Telvent, Ms García worked in the Committee on External Economic Relations of the European Parliament, in Brussels. Ms García graduated with a degree in Law from the University of Complutense of Madrid (CEU). She also holds a Diploma in European Union Law from the “College des Haute études Européens” from the Pantheon Sorbonne University in Paris. She is member of the Madrid Bar Association since 1998.
B. COMPENSATION
Senior Management and Director Compensation
     For the year ended December 31, 2006, we paid aggregate directors’ fees plus meeting allowances and consulting fees of approximately  393,682 to our directors and we paid aggregate compensation (including salary and bonus) of  3,332,008 to the fifteen members of our senior management listed above. These figures include accruals for contingent or deferred compensation.
Certain Transactions and Relations
     During 2006, H.R.H. Mr. Carlos de Borbón received 40.484,45 (+16% VAT) in consulting fees from Telvent Corporation, S.L.
Formula Based Stock Compensation Plan
     Under a plan established by Abengoa, certain of our employees, including members of our management team, entered into agreements with Abengoa, before our IPO, to buy our ordinary shares from Abengoa. Such purchases were financed by bank loans guaranteed by Abengoa, and the ordinary shares purchased by the participating employees are pledged as collateral to the lenders. In addition, the participating employees and Abengoa entered into call option agreements that provide that Abengoa, in certain circumstances (including certain events of non-continuation of employment), is entitled to buy back the employee’s shares at a price equal to the amount paid by the employee plus the interest on the loan guaranteed by Abengoa in favor of the employee.
     The ordinary shares sold under the stock purchase plan contained certain performance and vesting features. There are two different vesting schedules. Under one schedule, 15% of the shares vest on the earlier of the third anniversary of their acquisition or an initial

66


Table of Contents

public offering of our shares, and 85% vest on the fifth anniversary. Under the other schedule, 15% of the shares vest on the earlier of the third anniversary of their acquisition or an initial public offering of our shares, 35% vest on the fifth anniversary of the purchase and 50% vest on the seventh anniversary of the purchase. Under these vesting features, 15.0% of the ordinary shares sold vested in 2004, 17.0% of the ordinary shares sold vested in 2006, and 68.0% of the ordinary shares sold will vest in 2008.
     Also, each participating employee was required to enter into a non-competition agreement with us for a period of five years from the date of his or her purchase agreement. Mr. Sánchez purchased 370,000 shares under this plan and the rest of our senior management team purchased an additional 766,800 shares. In connection with our IPO, Mr. Sánchez and certain other senior managers sold some of these shares to the underwriters through the underwriters’ partial exercise of their overallotment option. As noted above, Abengoa guaranteed the bank loans used by our senior management team to purchase our shares from Abengoa, but we did not arrange either the loan or the guarantee.
     We do not believe that Abengoa will enter into any further such agreements regarding our ordinary shares.
Abengoa Stock Purchase Plan
     On February 2, 2006, Abengoa implemented a Share Acquisition Plan, which was approved by the Board of Directors of Abengoa on January 23, 2006. The plan is for members of the senior management of Abengoa and its subsidiaries, including us and our subsidiaries, (collectively, the “Abengoa Group”), under which the participants in the plan will be entitled to purchase shares of Abengoa. Our Nomination and Compensation Committee and Board of Directors approved participation in the plan by members of our senior management on January 19, 2006.
     The material terms of the plan are as follows: Members of the senior management of the Abengoa Group from all its subsidiaries and business areas, current or future, including 15 of Telvent’s current senior management, are eligible to participate in the plan. These 15 members have purchased 516,100 shares of Abengoa, which represents less than 1% of the equity of Abengoa all together.
     Each participant involved in the plan has utilized the proceeds of an individual bank loan secured or guaranteed by Abengoa and excluding the personal responsibility of the participants pursuant to article 81.2 of the Companies Act (Spain) to acquire shares of Abengoa that are already issued, at the the current market price, during the first and second quarter of 2006, in accordance with the Stock Exchange Act (Spain). The bank credit has been obtained for a total amount of 10.9 million (including expenses, commissions and interests) and is to be paid over a period of five years and six months. Each participant has pledged the Abengoa shares acquired under the plan to the bank, without recourse to the participant. The shares have been purchased by the bank for the participants, and the acquisition cost for all participants have been the average acquisition price plus associated costs for all of the shares purchased under the plan for all participants.
     The duration of the plan is five complete financial years (2006 — 2010) plus six months (until June 30, 2011). The plan is based on the annual accomplishment by the participant of annual management objectives set for the participant by the management of the company with which the participant is employed. If the annual objectives are not met by the participant, the bank may sell a percentage of the shares as follows: 2006 (30%), 2007 (30%), 2008 (15%), 2009 (15%) and 2010 (10%). A participant may not transfer, sell, borrow against or otherwise dispose of the shares before July 1, 2011. At the end of the five years and six months term of the plan, if the amount realized on a sale of the shares does not entirely cover the amount of the loan and costs and taxes on capital gains, Abengoa will compensate the participant with the necessary amount to meet the total amount required. In addition, the plan permits Abengoa to repurchase the shares from a participant on the occurrence of certain events, such as death, disability, or retirement of the participant or termination of the employment of the participant.
2007 Extraordinary Variable Compensation Plan
     On March 22, 2007, the Nomination and Compensation Committee of the Telvent Board of Directors and the Telvent Board of Directors approved a variable compensation plan (“the Plan”) for members of the senior management of Telvent and its subsidiaries. The participants in the Plan include currently 30 members of the senior management of Telvent and various subsidiaries, including business unit managers, senior project managers, technical and research and development managers and corporate services officers and managers (the “ Participants”). The Plan is based on the accomplishment of objectives based on the 2006 Strategic Plan of Telvent. The duration of the Plan is five complete fiscal years (2007 — 2011) commencing January 1, 2007 and ending December 31, 2011. The calculation and the payment of the benefits under the Plan must occur not later than June 30, 2012 after the verification of the fulfillment of the objectives based on the annual audit reports.

67


Table of Contents

     The Plan provides for extraordinary, variable compensation to the Participants based on fulfillment of the annual objectives during the term of the Plan and is in addition to any other variable compensation and/or bonuses earned or which may be earned by each Participant. The total amount available for distribution under the Plan is 10,280. The compensation only vests and becomes payable after the end of the fifth year of the Plan.
     The following conditions must be fulfilled in order for a Participant to earn compensation under the Plan:
  (a)   The Participant must remain in the employment of Telvent or one of our subsidiaries throughout the term of the Plan.
 
  (b)   For each fiscal year of the Plan, the Participant must be entitled to receive an annual bonus under the bonus plan of the company with which the Participant is employed for that year, based on the achievement of least 90% of the objectives other than bookings or quality specified in that company’s bonus plan. Failure to earn a bonus under that company’s bonus plan in one year does not disqualify a Participant from being eligible to earn compensation under the Plan in another year.
 
  (c)   Fulfillment of the consolidated five-year budget of Telvent corresponding to the fiscal years 2007-2011 according to the Internal Strategic Plan of June, 2006.
 
  (d)   The price of the ordinary shares of Telvent listed on the NASDAQ Global Market on December 31, 2011 must be not less than $17 per share. If the list price is less than $17 due to circumstances of volatility of the share prices and/or the stock market, then the price of the Telvent shares will calculated using the average price during a reference period of three months before and three months after December 31, 2011 and this will be submitted for the consideration of our Nomination and Compensation Committee of Telvent.
     In case of termination of the employment of a Participant (whether voluntary or by dismissal) before the end of the term of the Plan, the Plan will terminate with respect to that Participant, and the Participant will not be entitled to receive any payment under the Plan. In the case of death of a Participant, the Plan will terminate with respect to that Participant and, at the end of the term of the Plan, the heirs of the Participant will be entitled to receive the compensation earned under the Plan by the Participant for the fiscal years completed prior to the death of the Participant. In the case of either retirement of a Participant on reaching 65 years of age or total disability (that prevents the Participant from being able to do any other type of work) before the end of the term of the Plan, the Plan will terminate with respect to that Participant and the Participant will be entitled to receive the compensation earned under this Plan for fiscal years completed to the date of his retirement. In addition, the Participant will be entitled to receive compensation for the fiscal year in which the Participant retired if the objectives for that fiscal year are fulfilled.
C. BOARD PRACTICES
Responsibilities and Terms
     Under Spanish law, the board of directors of a Spanish corporation is responsible for management, administration and representation in all matters concerning our business, subject to the provisions of the bylaws and resolutions adopted at general shareholders’ meetings by a majority vote of the shareholders. Although we are not required to have a majority of our board consist of independent members under applicable Nasdaq listing standards because we are a “controlled company” pursuant to those standards, we endeavor to appoint a majority of the members of the board of directors from outside of our company. Five of our nine current directors (Messrs. Cuenca, Punset , Salas, Villazán and Cassinello) are independent under applicable Nasdaq listing standards.
     Directors are elected by our shareholders to serve five-year terms. A director may be re-elected to serve for an unlimited number of terms. If a director does not serve out his or her entire term, the board of directors may fill the vacancy by appointing a shareholder as a replacement director to serve until the next general shareholders’ meeting, when the appointment may be ratified or a new director to fill the vacancy is elected or replaced. A director may resign or be removed (with or without cause) from office by a majority vote of the shareholders at a general shareholders’ meeting. As a result of these five-year terms, not all of our directors will be elected each year, and in some years none of our directors will stand for election. Information about how long each of our current directors has served as a director, and when his term expires, is set forth in Section 6.A. above.
     Under Spanish law, the board of directors may delegate its powers to an executive committee or other delegated committee or to one or more executive officers, unless the shareholders, through a meeting, have specifically delegated certain powers to the board and have not approved the board’s delegation to others. We have not established an executive committee, but may do so in the future. Spanish corporate law provides that resolutions appointing an executive committee or any executive officer or authorizing the permanent delegation of all, or part of, the board’s power require a two-thirds majority of the members of the board of directors. Certain powers provided in Spanish corporate law may not be delegated, including the drafting of the financial statements and the

68


Table of Contents

proposal for its approval by the shareholders at their annual meeting, disapproval of which would prohibit the filing of the company’s annual accounts in the Mercantile Registry of Madrid.
None of our directors have any contracts with us, including our subsidiaries, providing for benefits upon termination of their services as directors.
Audit Committee
     Our Audit Committee, which we established in January 2003, reports to the board regarding the appointment of our independent public accountants, the scope and results of our annual audits, compliance with our accounting and financial policies and management’s procedures and policies relative to the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. At this time, our Audit Committee is responsible for the oversight of our relationship with Abengoa, including the approval of the terms and conditions of transactions between Abengoa and us. The members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Salas, Punset and Cassinello, all of whom are independent in accordance with Nasdaq’s listing standards and the independence requirements of the SEC. The chairman and financial expert on the Audit Committee is Mr. Salas. Under Spanish law, shareholders have the authority to approve the engagement of the auditors for an initial period of at least three years up to a maximum of nine years. Our external auditors are appointed by our shareholders at each annual shareholders’ meeting.
     Our Board of Directors has adopted an Audit Committee Charter for the Audit Committee. A copy of such charter, as amended, is available on our website at www.telvent.com. In March 2005, our Board of Directors approved a set of amendments to our Audit Committee Charter to clarify and expand it.
Nominating and Compensation Committee
     The Nominating and Compensation Committee was established in September 2005. The Nominating Committee is responsible for reporting to the Board of Directors on matters relating to the appointment, reelection, retirement, removal and compensation of the members of the Board of Directors on general policy relating to Compensation and incentives for the aforesaid members and executive officers. The committee is responsible for preparing the proposals that the Board of Directors puts to the General Meeting of shareholders for the appointment or removal of Directors, including those appointed by the Board of Directors to fill casual vacancies by co-option.
     The members of the Nominating and Compensation Committee are Messrs. Velázquez-Gaztelu, Villazán and Cuenca. Messrs. Villazán and Cuenca are independent in accordance with Nasdaq’s listing standards and the independence requirements of the SEC.
D. EMPLOYEES
     We had the following number of employees as of the dates and in the functional areas specified in the following table:
                         
    As of December 31,
    2006   2005   2004
Sales and marketing
    269       218       198  
Research, development and innovation
    330       302       256  
Management and administration
    589       411       374  
Engineering and integration
    2,314       1,725       1,584  
 
                       
Total employees
    3,502       2,656       2,412  
 
                       
     Our employees were located in the following geographic areas as of the dates specified in the following table:
                         
    As of December 31,
    2006   2005   2004
Europe
    1,881       1,647       1,518  
North America
    946       606       601  
Latin America
    504       313       259  
Asia-Pacific
    171       90       34  
 
                       
Total employees
    3,502       2,656       2,142  
 
                       

69


Table of Contents

E. SHARE OWNERSHIP
     The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares by each of our executive officers and each of our directors as of March 23, 2007.
                 
            Percentage of
Name of Beneficial   Total Shares   Ordinary
Owner(1)   Beneficially Owned   Shares(2)
Directors and Executive Officers
               
Manuel Sánchez
    333,000       1.14 %
HRH Carlos de Borbón
           
Miguel Cuenca
           
Eduard Punset
           
Javier Salas
           
José B. Terceiro
           
Cándido Velázquez-Gaztelu
           
Bernardo Villazán
    600       *  
Emilio Cassinello
           
José I. del Barrio
    122,500       *  
Ana Plaza
    34,000       *  
Francisco Cáceres
           
Raúl Agüera
           
Bárbara Zubiría
           
Carmen Rodríguez
           
Larry Stack
    72,000       *  
José Montoya
    136,620       *  
Dave Jardine
    108,000       *  
José María Flores
    80,000       *  
Ignacio González
    120,000       *  
Javier Garoz
           
Dai Yue
           
Luis Rancé
           
Marcio Leonardo
           
Adolfo Borrero
    80,000       *  
Enrique Rodríguez
           
Lidia García
           
All directors and executive officers as a group (28 persons)
    1,086,720       3.72 %
 
(1)   Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC, and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities.
 
(2)   * represents beneficial ownership of less than one percent of our ordinary shares.
     Each of the directors and executive officers listed above acquired his or her shares through the stock compensation plan described in “Item 6.B-Compensation”.
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
A. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
     To the best of our knowledge, we only have three major shareholders (a shareholder that beneficially owns 5.0% or more of our outstanding ordinary shares), Abengoa, FMR Corp. and Waddell & Reid Investment Management.
     As of March 23, 2007, Abengoa owned 18,201,000, or 62.2%, of our outstanding ordinary shares, through its two wholly-owned subsidiaries Telvent Corporation, S.L. and Siema AG. As of December 31, 2006, we believe that Inversión Corporativa owned approximately 56.0% of the shares of Abengoa. Inversión Corporativa is a private corporation, which we believe has approximately 300 shareholders, none of whom we believe has a controlling interest. Prior to our IPO, Abengoa owned 91% of our ordinary shares.

70


Table of Contents

Following the IPO and the partial exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment option, Abengoa’s percentage ownership of our ordinary shares decreased to its current level.
     According to a Schedule 13G that FMR Corp. filed on February 14, 2007, at December 31, 2006 it owned 4,377,000 shares or 14.96% of our outstanding ordinary shares. FMR Corp. is the parent company of the Fidelity Investments mutual fund complex.
     According to a Form 13-F filed by Waddell & Reed Financial Inc with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 9, 2007, Waddell & Reed Financial Inc., through certain of its subsidiaries, owned 1,461,900 or 5% of our outstanding ordinary shares as at December 31, 2006.
     None of Abengoa, FMR Corp. or Waddell & Reed have voting rights that differ from the voting rights of our other shareholders.
B. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Services and Supplies Provided by Abengoa to Us
     During the years 2006, 2005 and 2004, certain of our subsidiaries entered into, or renewed, a number of service agreements with Abengoa for the provision of professional services to assist, improve and support us with the expansion of our activities. These transactions were completed at market rates. These services include:
    cash pooling arrangements;
 
    financial management;
 
    institutional support with international multilateral financing organizations;
 
    institutional commercial assistance;
 
    tax and legal advisory services;
 
    centralized asset management;
 
    support in providing official global credit rating;
 
    assistance with auditing and consolidation services under Spanish GAAP;
 
    provision of guarantees and endorsements;
 
    negotiation and optimization of global corporate insurance policies;
 
    internal publicity and corporate image;
 
    human resources services; and
 
    other support services.
     Each agreement has a one-year term and is extended annually unless terminated by either party within 30 days prior to its expiration. Our subsidiaries may reduce the level of services they request under these agreements. Each agreement provides that either party may terminate the agreement if the other party does not fulfill its obligations. None of the agreements may be assigned without the prior written consent of the other party. The total amounts of the services provided by Abengoa under the services agreements were 4.1 million, 3.4 million and 3.7 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
     We also have entered into a service agreement with Gestion Integral de Recursos Humanos, S.A., or GIRH, a subsidiary of Abengoa. This agreement provides us with services for personnel management, recruiting and hiring personnel, human resources development, employment relationships and occupational safety. This agreement was entered into in 2004, with one-year renewable terms. We recorded expenses under this agreement of 1.2 million, 1.3 million and 1.2 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Our chairman and chief executive officer, Manuel Sánchez, is also the chairman of GIRH.
     In addition to the services agreements, we purchase a variety of supplies from Abengoa and its subsidiaries, which primarily consist of production, assembly and engineering of electronic and control boards and mechanical installation services. Our purchases of supplies from Abengoa and its subsidiaries totaled 9.8 million, 10.2 million and 7.4 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004,

71


Table of Contents

respectively. We believe these purchases were on at least as favorable terms and conditions as we could have obtained from third-party suppliers. We also lease our Seville facilities from a member of the Abengoa Group. Our lease expenses in 2006, 2005 and 2004 totaled 0.6 million, 0.1 million and  0.1 million. Finally, we also lease part of our Madrid facility space from a member of the Abengoa Group. Lease expenses related to the portion of our Madrid facility leased from a member of the Abengoa Group was  0.8 million during 2006.
Services Provided by Us to Abengoa
     We, and our subsidiaries, have an agreement to provide services to Abengoa primarily for the provision of communications, IT and related services. The largest of these agreements involve our subsidiary, Telvent Outsourcing, which has agreements with Abengoa that generally provide for one-year terms and are renewable annually. In 2006, 2005 and 2004, the revenues from these agreements amounted to 11.8 million, 9.4 million and 7.9 million, respectively.
Minority Investments
     In June and August 2004, we sold all of our remaining minority investments including our investments in Xfera and ViryaNet, to our affiliate Telvent Investments, an indirect subsidiary of Abengoa for a net amount of  35.4 million. Telvent Investments also assumed all of our obligations under Xfera relating to guarantees. We sold these investments because of the inherent volatility associated with companies in early stage technologies, although we continue to have the opportunity to benefit from the synergies presented by these investments. We are not a shareholder of Telvent Investments.
Credit Arrangements with Abengoa
     On April 20, 2004, we established a new bilateral credit arrangement with Abengoa that replaced the prior credit arrangements that we and our subsidiaries had with Abengoa. Under this new arrangement, we and Abengoa have agreed that we may borrow funds from or lend funds to each other, from time to time upon not less than one day’s notice, up to a maximum of 45.0 million (or the equivalent amount in any other currency quoted in the Spanish currency market). Borrowings under this credit arrangement bear interest at EURIBOR, or LIBOR for borrowings other than in Euro, in either case plus 0.75% per year for a period not to exceed one year, with interest added to the outstanding balance. Each borrowing matures on the last date of the fiscal year in which such borrowing was made, without requiring any earlier payment of principal. This credit arrangement is optional and either we or Abengoa may elect not to make loans to the other. This arrangement had an initial term that ended on December 31, 2004, and renews for annual one-year terms until terminated by either party. The largest amount of our indebtedness under this arrangement in 2006 was 43.0 million, and our net payable as of March 23, 2007 was 15.9 million. We incur no costs and receive no payments under this arrangement unless and until we borrow or loan funds thereunder.
Abengoa Loan Facility
     On July 20, 2005, Abengoa entered into a syndicated financing facility in the amount of 600.0 million, guaranteed by members of the Abengoa Group. The facility, which expires in 2012 is used to finance projects and investments in the businesses and activities of the Abengoa Group. Neither Telvent GIT, S.A. nor any of its subsidiaries are guarantors of this facility. However, our financial condition and results of operations affect Abengoa’s compliance with its covenants under this loan.
C. INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL
    Not applicable.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
A. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Consolidated Financial Statements
     Please see “Item 18– Financial Statements” and pages F-2 through F-35 of this annual report.
Other Financial Information
Export Sales
     Not applicable.
Legal Proceedings
     We are subject to lawsuits from time to time, including lawsuits that we have relating to our acquisitions. There are no material legal proceedings pending or, to our knowledge, threatened, against us.

72


Table of Contents

Xfera Matter
     As described in our Form 6-K filed on March 19, 2007, on March 16, 2007, we were informed by Mr. Sánchez that he received an order from the Audiencia Nacional dismissing the appeal filed by the prosecutor in the Xfera case as described by our Form 6-K filed on February 13, 2007. This order is not appealable and therefore the order made by the Court described in our Form 6-K filed on January 29, 2007, declaring the proceedings null and void and dismissing the charges against Mr. Sánchez and the executives of Abengoa S.A. is now final and binding.
Sintel
     A member of our Board of Directors, Mr. Cándido Velázquez Gaztelu, was the President of the Board of Directors of Telefónica S.A. in April 1996 when the sale of its subsidiary “Sintel” was approved. The Audiencia Nacional is investigating the reasons for Sintel’s insolvency. In connection with that investigation, the Audiencia Nacional called Mr. Cándido Velázquez Gaztelu, among others, to give testimony about Telefonica’s sale of Sintel.
     If the Judge conducting the Audiencia Nacional investigation were to conclude that there is substance to the criminal charges raised by the prosecutor in the criminal investigation against Mr. Velázquez Gaztelu, the prosecutor would have the opportunity to formally charge Mr. Velázquez Gaztelu.
Toyo
     On June 13, 2006, a court in Spain issued a judgment stating that the award of the concession contract for the Advanced Digital Services Center for the City of Almería (the “El Toyo Project”) to Telvent was void on the grounds that the procurement procedures followed by the government of the City of Almería in awarding the contract were inadequate. The City filed an appeal against the judgment. On July 6, 2006, Telvent, as an interested party, also filed an appeal. The filing of the appeals renders the judgment ineffective until all of the appeals have been resolved. As of December 31, 2006, the development and installation work for the El Toyo project was substantially complete.
Dividends
     Under Spanish law, a corporation may declare and pay dividends only out of profits remaining after transfer to legal reserves, or out of distributable reserves, and only if the net worth of the corporation is not, before or as a result of the dividend distribution, lower than its issued share capital. The calculations of these profits will be based on our unconsolidated net income in accordance with Spanish GAAP rather than U.S. GAAP.
     Spanish law requires us to allocate at least 10% of our net income each year to a legal reserve, until the balance of such reserve is equivalent to at least 20% of our issued share capital. A corporation’s legal reserve is not available for distribution to shareholders except upon liquidation. Our legal reserve, as of December 31, 2006, was below the required level of 20% of our issued share capital as of such date. We are required to add 10% of our net income, measured on an unconsolidated basis in accordance with Spanish GAAP, to our legal reserve each year until we have reached the required legal reserve of 20% of Telvent GIT’s issued share capital. In 2006, 10% of our net income, measured on an unconsolidated basis in accordance with Spanish GAAP, was 0.8 million. We may also make payment of dividends from our distributable reserves. As of December 31, 2006, we had distributable reserves of 7.4 million. In addition, Spanish law makes it more difficult for us to pay dividends more frequently than annually, although our board of directors or shareholders under certain circumstances may declare a distribution of interim dividends based on the fiscal year’s results out of our distributable reserves and/or the profits since the beginning of the fiscal year if we have the minimum balance in our legal reserves and other reserves established by our bylaws.
     Prior to our IPO, as a 91.0% subsidiary of Abengoa, we distributed our net income to our shareholders to the extent permitted by Spanish law. We will consider paying cash dividends in the future subject to approval at our Shareholders’ meeting. We anticipate that any dividends that we do pay will be declared in Euros, as required by Spanish law, but paid in U.S. Dollars at the exchange rate as of the time of declaration of such dividends. We may pay shareholders resident in Europe in Euros. Our bylaws require majority shareholder approval for the declaration of dividends. As Abengoa owns a majority of our ordinary shares, it effectively is able to control our dividend policy.
     The timing and amount of future dividend payments, if any, that we make will depend on a variety of factors, including our earnings, prospects and financial condition, capital investment required to implement our strategy for growth and expansion, other capital expenditure requirements, payment of financial obligations, our generation of cash from operations and general business conditions, legal restrictions and such other factors as our board of directors considers relevant. Under their financing agreements, our

73


Table of Contents

North American subsidiaries, through which we conduct our business in North America, are prohibited from paying dividends until their outstanding obligations under their financing agreements are paid in full.
     Dividends may be subject to withholding tax in Spain. Dividends payable by us to non-residents of Spain are subject to withholding tax at the rate of 18%, subject to reductions pursuant to applicable tax treaties. See “Item 10.E—Taxation.”
     Although laws vary from state to state within the United States, uncollected dividends and shares may be considered abandoned property under the laws of a shareholder of record’s state of residence after a period of time, ranging from three years to seven years, has passed since that shareholder’s last contact with our transfer agent. If a shareholder of record does not claim dividends from our transfer agent within the applicable time period, our transfer agent, in accordance with applicable state law, will transfer the amount of the unclaimed dividend and the related shares to the treasury of that shareholder’s state of residence as reflected in the transfer agent’s records, which may not be that shareholder’s actual state of residence. Amounts paid to a state treasury in this manner will not be repaid to us, and whether or not that shareholder is subsequently permitted to recover the property from the state treasury will depend on that state’s laws.
B. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
     There have been no significant changes since the date of the financial statements included in this annual report.
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
A. OFFER AND LISTING DETAILS
     The trading history of our ordinary shares began with their listing on the Nasdaq National Market beginning on October 26, 2004 in connection with our IPO. The following table sets forth the price history of our ordinary shares since our IPO:
                 
    High Market Price   Low Market Price
    ($ Per Share)   ($ Per Share)
Annual highs and lows
               
2004
    12.72       9.00  
2005
    12.55       7.13  
2006
    16.30       10.76  
Quarterly highs and lows
               
2004
               
(Oct. 26 – Dec. 31)
    12.72       9.00  
2005
               
First Quarter
    12.55       9.70  
Second Quarter
    10.40       7.13  
Third Quarter
    11.89       10.01  
Fourth Quarter
    11.24       9.60  
2006
               
First Quarter
    15.19       10.76  
Second Quarter
    16.30       10.95  
Third Quarter
    14.88       12.61  
Fourth Quarter
    14.87       12.40  
 
               
Monthly highs and lows
               
2006
               
September
    13.70       13.07  
October
    13.50       12.40  
November
    13.90       12.91  
December
    14.87       13.06  
2007
               
January
    15.50       14.50  
February
    18.11       15.31  

74


Table of Contents

B. PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION
     Not applicable.
C. MARKETS
     Our ordinary shares are traded only on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol TLVT.
D. SELLING SHAREHOLDERS
     Not applicable.
E. DILUTION
     Not applicable.
F. EXPENSES OF THE ISSUE
     Not applicable.
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A. SHARE CAPITAL
     Not applicable.
B. MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
     The following discussion addresses some provisions of our bylaws and also compares some aspects of Spanish corporation law, which applies to us, to Delaware corporation law, the state law under which many corporations in the United States are incorporated, or, where relevant, to U.S. federal laws. This comparative information is only a summary, and it is subject to the complete text of our Articles of Association, which are incorporated by reference in the exhibits to this report and to the complete texts of the referenced laws, including the Spanish Corporation Law of 1989, as amended, and the Delaware law, including the Delaware General Corporation Law, and U.S. federal laws, as amended. Our charter documents are our Deed of Incorporation and our bylaws. Our bylaws set forth our purposes, our authorized share capital and the terms of our shares, and other important aspects of our corporate governance. The English translation of our bylaws is titled “Articles of Association,” after their Spanish title Estatutos Sociales.
Objects and Purposes
     We registered with the Madrid Mercantile Registry at Volume 15,370, Book 0 of the Companies Book, Section 8 (a), Sheet 164, Page M-257,879, 1st entry. Our corporate purposes, set forth at Article 4 of our bylaws, are as follows:
    To provide engineering and information services in the Internet and telecommunications markets.
 
    To manufacture, develop, market, maintain, repair and install all kinds of information, control, protection, monitoring and security devices and systems.
 
    To improve buildings that are specifically designed to house computer systems and equipment, and/or to house communications network operating systems and equipment owned by third parties.
 
    To develop, construct, assemble, operate, repair, maintain, import, export, sell and lease all kinds of (i) machines, devices, installations, units, sub-units, individual parts and materials for all computer, electronic, electromechanical and electrical applications, and (ii) scientific devices for control, measurement and installation, repair and maintenance.
 
    To obtain, purchase, sell, transfer and operate concessions, rights and patents.

75


Table of Contents

    To acquire, promote, dispose of, use and encumber all types of movable assets and real estate and intangible rights without restriction of any kind and any other commercial activities directly or indirectly related to the above-mentioned corporate purposes.
Directors
General
     Spanish Law. The board of directors bears the ultimate responsibility for managing the business and affairs of a corporation. In discharging this function, directors of a Spanish corporation owe specific fiduciary duties of care, loyalty and confidentiality to the corporation. In general terms, Spanish corporation law requires directors to perform their duties with the diligence of a responsible businessperson and a loyal representative complying with the duties set forth in the law and the bylaws of the corporation. In addition, directors are required to keep themselves informed of the corporation’s business. In addition, Spanish corporation law was modified in 2003 to provide for specific duties of directors in connection with loyalty, conflicts of interest, information and confidentiality, as detailed below.
     Delaware Law. The board of directors bears the ultimate responsibility for managing the business and affairs of a corporation. In discharging this function, directors of a Delaware corporation owe fiduciary duties of care and loyalty to the corporation and to its stockholders. Delaware courts have decided that the directors of a Delaware corporation are required to exercise an informed business judgment in the performance of their duties. An informed business judgment means that the directors have informed themselves of all material information reasonably available to them. Delaware courts have imposed a heightened standard of conduct upon directors of a Delaware corporation who take any action designed to defeat a threatened change in control of the corporation. In addition, under Delaware law, when the board of directors of a Delaware corporation approves the sale or break-up of the corporation, the board of directors may, in certain circumstances, have a duty to obtain the highest value reasonably available to the stockholders.
Director’s Power to Vote on a Contract in which He or She is Materially Interested
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. While our bylaws do not explicitly address our directors’ power to vote on contracts in which they have a material interest, their duty of loyalty under Spanish law would prevent them from voting on such contracts. Under Spanish law, directors’ duty of loyalty requires that they comply with the duties imposed by the law and the bylaws with loyalty to the corporation’s interests, and that they put the interests of the corporation before their own. This duty of loyalty requires that a director of a corporation:
    not use the corporation’s name or involve his or her status as director to carry out transactions for his or her personal benefit;
 
    refrain from taking advantage of business opportunities of the corporation, unless the corporation has determined, independently of the interested director, not to pursue the business opportunity;
 
    obtain shareholder approval prior to competing with the corporation;
 
    notify the corporation of any potential conflicts of interest, including the holding of any interest in competitors;
 
    refrain from disclosing confidential information obtained while serving as a member of the board; and
 
    not take advantage of any information that he or she may possess as a consequence of being a member of the board;
     Therefore, it is our policy that any director who has a personal interest in any proposal before the board, or in the re-election or resignation of a director, may not deliberate or vote on these matters, and that such votes will be conducted by secret ballot.
     Delaware Law. Transactions involving a Delaware corporation and an interested director of that corporation are generally permitted if:
    the material facts as to the interested director’s relationship or interest are disclosed and either a majority of disinterested directors or the stockholders approve the transaction; or
 
    the transaction is fair to the corporation at the time it is authorized by the board of directors, a committee of the board of directors or the stockholders.

76


Table of Contents

Power to Vote on Compensation for One or More Directors without an Independent Quorum
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. Our directors do not have the authority to vote on director compensation; Article 24 of our bylaws provides that directors’ compensation shall be determined yearly by the shareholders at the general meeting of shareholders. Please see the discussion under “Shareholder Meetings,” below, for information on quorum requirements.
     Delaware Law. Delaware law gives the board of directors the authority to fix the compensation of directors unless otherwise restricted by the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation. In voting on such compensation, the vote of a majority of the directors present at a meeting at which a quorum is present, or such greater number as required by the certificate of incorporation or bylaws, will be determinative. The number of directors needed for a quorum is set in either the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws, and generally may not be less than one-third of the total number of directors.
Number of Shares a Director is Required to Hold
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. Under Spanish law, directors are not required to own any shares of capital stock of the companies on whose boards of directors they serve. However, Spanish law and our bylaws provide that a director appointed to fill a mid-term vacancy must hold at least one share of capital stock.
     Delaware Law. Under Delaware law, directors are not required to own any stock of the companies on whose boards of directors they serve.
Shareholder Rights
Dividend Rights
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. Our bylaws require majority shareholder approval for the declaration of dividends. Under Spanish law, a corporation may declare and pay dividends only out of profits remaining after required transfers to legal reserves, or out of distributable reserves, and only if the net worth of the corporation is not, before or as a result of the dividend distribution, lower than its issued share capital. A person is entitled to dividends if it was a shareholder when the shareholders’ resolution to declare those dividends was adopted; its entitlement to those dividends lapses on the fifth anniversary of the adoption of the resolution. However, our transfer agent would dispose of unclaimed dividends in accordance with the abandoned-property laws of our shareholders’ jurisdictions of residence (as shown on the transfer agent’s records). Please see “Dividends” under “Item 8.A—Financial Information—Consolidated Financial Statements and Other Financial Information” for a discussion of our dividend policy, our legal reserves, and how our transfer agent would treat unclaimed dividends.
     Delaware Law. Delaware law provides for the declaration and payment of dividends by a corporation’s board of directors in the exercise of the board’s business judgment, subject to the availability of net profits in excess of the amount of capital represented by the issued and outstanding stock of all classes, if any, having a preference upon the distribution of assets. Stockholders generally have no right to compel the directors to declare and pay dividends.
Voting Rights
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. Our ordinary shares are all of the same class and series and, in accordance with Article 9 of our bylaws, each share confers on its holder the right to attend general shareholders’ meetings, to vote, to challenge company resolutions, and to participate in the distribution of company earnings and in any surplus assets resulting from liquidation, as well as other rights inherent in the holder’s status as shareholder. Each ordinary share entitles its holder to one vote.
     Our directors serve five-year terms. The maximum term allowed by Spanish law is six years, which permits terms to be renewed without limit. While our directors’ terms begin in different years, our board is not staggered into separate classes. Under Spanish law, one or more shareholders can nominate, and vote their shares in favor of, one or more directors in proportion to the percentage of the total capital stock represented by the shares thus cast. Shares voted in the exercise of this special voting right cannot be voted for the election of additional directors.
     Delaware Law. Stockholders of Delaware corporations generally have such voting rights as are set forth in the certificate of incorporation. If not otherwise provided therein, each share of capital stock entitles its holder to one vote.

77


Table of Contents

     The Delaware General Corporation Law generally provides for a one-year term for directors. The certificate of incorporation or bylaws may provide for the board to be “staggered” into two or three classes with terms of up to three years, with the term of each class expiring in a different year. There is no limit on the number of terms a director may serve. Delaware law permits cumulative voting if provided in a corporation’s certificate of incorporation.
Rights to Share in the Company’s Profits
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. Under Spanish corporation law, a stockholder has no interest in the profits of a corporation until a dividend has been declared out of such profits. Our bylaws do not vary or expand upon this provision of Spanish law.
     Delaware Law. The provisions of Delaware law are not significantly different from those of Spanish law.
Rights to Share in Surplus During Liquidation
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. Spanish corporation law requires that valid corporate debts be paid before a liquidating distribution is made to shareholders. Upon the payment of such debts, distributions to shareholders will generally be made in the manner set forth in the corporation’s bylaws, and holders of ordinary shares will be entitled only to what may be left after satisfaction of the priorities of any preferred stock. Our bylaws provide that our shareholders will, at a general meeting of shareholders, determine the payment of our surplus assets during liquidation. Our bylaws do not currently authorize any preferred shares.
     Delaware Law. The provisions of Delaware law are not significantly different from those of Spanish law.
Redemption of Shares
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. Under Spanish law, subject to certain exceptions, a corporation may purchase its own shares if:
    the purchase has been authorized by the shareholders at a general shareholders’ meeting by means of a resolution establishing the terms of the purchase, including the maximum number of shares to be purchased, the minimum and maximum purchase price and the duration of the authorization, which shall not exceed 18 months;
 
    the aggregate nominal value of the shares purchased, together with the aggregate nominal value of those shares already held by the corporation and its affiliates, does not exceed 10% of the share capital of the corporation;
 
    the purchase enables the corporation to create a special reserve equal to the purchase price of its own shares without decreasing its share capital and reserves; and
 
    the shares to be purchased are fully paid.
     Generally, shares that are not purchased in accordance with these rules must either be disposed of within one year from the date of the first purchase or be redeemed, or the purchase can be declared void. Our bylaws do not vary or expand upon these provisions of Spanish law.
     Delaware Law. A corporation may purchase or redeem shares of its own stock unless the capital of the corporation is impaired or the purchase or redemption would cause an impairment of the capital of the corporation. A Delaware corporation may, however, purchase or redeem out of capital any of its preferred stock or, if no preferred stock is outstanding, any shares of its own shares if such shares will be retired upon acquisition and the capital of the corporation will be reduced in accordance with specified limitations.
Shareholder Proposals
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. Shareholders representing 5% of the share capital are permitted to request the call of a general shareholders’ meeting and to propose the matters for vote. Our bylaws do not vary or expand upon this provision of Spanish law.
     Delaware Law. Delaware law does not specifically grant stockholders the right to bring business before an annual or special meeting. If a Delaware corporation is subject to the SEC’s proxy rules, a stockholder who owns at least $2,000 in market value, or 1% of the corporation’s securities entitled to vote, may propose a matter for a vote at an annual or special meeting in accordance with those rules.

78


Table of Contents

Appraisal Rights
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. Shareholders of a Spanish corporation do not have the right to demand payment in cash of the judicially-determined fair value of their shares in connection with a merger or consolidation involving the corporation. Our bylaws do not vary or expand upon this provision of Spanish law.
     Delaware Law. The Delaware General Corporation Law affords stockholders in certain cases the right to demand payment in cash of the judicially-determined fair value of their shares in connection with a merger or consolidation involving their corporation, subject to certain exceptions.
Preemptive Rights
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. Pursuant to Spanish law and our bylaws, shareholders have preemptive rights to subscribe for any new shares issued by us, including our ordinary shares. These preemptive rights may be voluntarily waived by the shareholders or may be abolished in certain circumstances if our shareholders pass a resolution at a shareholders’ meeting in accordance with Spanish corporation law.
     Delaware Law. Under Delaware law, stockholders have preemptive rights only to the extent, if at all, set forth in the corporation’s certificate of incorporation.
Changes in Shareholder Rights
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. A resolution passed at a shareholders’ meeting with the favorable vote of the majority of all the shares and of the affected shares is required to change the rights of a class of shares.
     Delaware Law. The provisions of Delaware law are not significantly different from those of Spanish law.
Shareholder Meetings
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. Pursuant to our bylaws and Spanish law, general meetings of shareholders may be either ordinary or extraordinary. One ordinary general meeting must be convened within the first six months of each fiscal year on a date fixed by the board of directors. As a general rule, extraordinary general meetings may be called from time to time by our board of directors at its discretion or at the request of shareholders representing at least 5% of our share capital.
     At ordinary general meetings, shareholders are asked to approve the actions of our management, the financial statements for our previous fiscal year, the allocation of our profit or loss and any other item included on the agenda. All other matters may be addressed at extraordinary general meetings called for such purposes. After our shareholders approve our financial statements, we must file them with the Mercantile Registry of Madrid. If our shareholders do not approve our financial statements, we cannot file our annual accounts with the Mercantile Registry. If we do not file our annual accounts within one year of the end of the relevant fiscal year, we are precluded from registering any other resolution with the Mercantile Registry until we have filed the annual accounts.
     Notice of every shareholders’ meeting (except a meeting attended by all shareholders) must be published in the Mercantile Registry Official Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Registro Mercantil) and in a local newspaper within the province of Madrid at least thirty days prior to the date fixed for the meeting, and must include the agenda for the meeting. In addition, we have agreed with the underwriters of our IPO to furnish English-language notices of our regular annual meetings to holders of our ordinary shares.
     Spanish law provides that shareholders of record five days before any shareholders’ meeting must be allowed to vote at such shareholders’ meeting.
     Any share may be voted by written proxy, and proxies may be given to any individual. Proxies are valid only for a single meeting. Neither our bylaws nor Spanish law require us to solicit proxies from shareholders. We plan to make a form of proxy available to shareholders through our website in advance of shareholders’ meetings.
     Our bylaws provide that, on the first call of a general shareholders’ meeting, a duly constituted general meeting of shareholders requires a quorum of at least 25% of our subscribed share capital. On the second call, the meeting is validly convened regardless of the share capital attending. However, certain major corporate actions (such as issuing additional ordinary shares, increasing or decreasing share capital, issuing debt securities, amending the bylaws or mergers) that require shareholder approval can only be approved at a

79


Table of Contents

meeting at which 50% of the subscribed share capital is present or represented on the first call and 25% of the subscribed share capital is present or represented on the second call. When the shareholders attending a meeting represent less than 50% of the subscribed share capital, resolutions on any of these major corporate actions must be adopted by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the share capital present or represented at such meeting. A shareholders’ meeting at which 100% of the capital stock is present or represented is validly constituted even if no notice of such meeting was given, and, upon unanimous agreement, shareholders may consider any matter at such meeting.
     A resolution passed in a general meeting of shareholders by a majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy is binding on all shareholders, subject to Spanish law. In certain circumstances, such as substitution of corporate purpose or change of corporate form, Spanish law allows shareholders holding non-voting stock and dissenting or absent shareholders to withdraw from the company. In the case of resolutions contrary to law, the bylaws or public policy, the right to contest is extended to all shareholders; however, in the case of resolutions contrary to the bylaws or to public policy, those shareholders who were present at the meeting and did not oppose such resolutions may not contest them.
     Spanish corporation law does not permit shareholder action without calling a meeting.
     Delaware Law/ Nasdaq Listing Standards/U.S. Federal Securities Laws. A Delaware corporation is required to hold an annual meeting of stockholders to elect directors, unless directors are elected by written consent in lieu of an annual meeting as described below. However, the failure to hold an annual meeting at the designated time or to elect a sufficient number of directors to conduct the business of the corporation does not affect otherwise valid corporate acts or cause any kind of forfeiture or dissolution of the corporation. Instead, the board of directors will be required to hold a meeting as soon as is convenient. Annual meetings of stockholders may be held at any place as may be designated by or in the manner provided in the certificate of incorporation or bylaws. In addition to the election of directors, the corporation may transact any other proper business of the corporation at an annual meeting of stockholders.
     Delaware law also permits a corporation to hold special meetings of stockholders, which may be called by the board of directors or anyone authorized in the certificate of incorporation or bylaws.
     Written notice of any meeting of stockholders of a Delaware corporation must be provided at least ten and not more than sixty days prior to the meeting. A notice for a special meeting must specify the purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called.
     The board of directors of a Delaware corporation may set a record date to determine the stockholders entitled to receive notice of or to vote at any meeting of stockholders. Such record date must be between sixty and ten days before the meeting date, and not earlier than the date on which the directors acted to fix it. If the directors do not set one, the record date is the close of business on the day before the day on which notice of the meeting is given.
     At least 33-1/3% of the shares entitled to vote at a meeting must be present to constitute a quorum for the conduct of business at any meeting of the stockholders of a Delaware corporation, although a corporation’s certificate of incorporation or bylaws can require a higher percentage. Nasdaq’s listing standards also require a quorum of 33-1/3% of outstanding shares for the conduct of business at a meeting of the stockholders of a Nasdaq-listed company. Nasdaq has exempted us from this requirement; we comply with the quorum requirements of Spanish law outlined above.
     Under Delaware law, unless the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws of a Delaware corporation provides otherwise, the affirmative vote of a majority of stockholders present and entitled to vote at a stockholders’ meeting constitutes the act of the stockholders in most matters. The election of directors requires a plurality of the votes, and certain matters require the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding capital stock, such as approval of changes to the certificate of incorporation or of a merger involving the corporation.
     Stockholders of Delaware corporations can authorize another person or persons to act for them by proxy. Such proxies can be valid for the period specified therein, which can extend for multiple years. In addition, Nasdaq-listed companies must comply with a Nasdaq requirement that they solicit proxies and provide proxy statements for all meetings of shareholders. Nasdaq has granted us an exemption from these requirements. We are also, as a foreign private issuer, generally exempt from the SEC’s rules governing the solicitation of shareholder proxies by publicly-traded companies. As noted above, we plan to make a form of proxy available to our shareholders through our website in advance of shareholders’ meetings.
     Unless otherwise provided in the certificate of incorporation, any action required or permitted to be taken at any annual or special meeting of stockholders of a Delaware corporation may be taken without a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a

80


Table of Contents

written consent, setting forth the action to be so taken, is signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted.
Limitations on Rights to Own Our Securities
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. Pursuant to Spanish Law 18/1992 on Foreign Investments (Ley 18/1992, de 1 de julio) and Royal Decree 664/199 (Real Decreto 664/1999, de 23 de abril), foreign investors may invest freely in shares of Spanish companies except for companies operating in certain strategic industries, including air transportation, radio and television broadcasting, gaming, munitions and mining, unless the Spanish government has issued an exemption. While these provisions of Spanish law do not restrict the rights of foreign persons to own our ordinary shares, or to exercise full voting rights, these provisions of Spanish law could prevent us from investing in the restricted industries. We must report to the Spanish Registry of Foreign Investments our ordinary shares held by foreign investors. Our bylaws do not vary or expand upon these provisions of Spanish law.
     Delaware Law/U.S. Federal Law. The Delaware General Corporation Law does not restrict the rights of foreign persons to own shares of Delaware corporations, or to exercise full voting rights with respect to those shares. However, U.S. federal laws impose some restrictions on the ownership of interests in certain regulated industries, including the airline and broadcast industries.
Anti-Takeover Provisions
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. Our bylaws do not contain any provisions that would have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company. Although Section 60 of Spanish Law 24/1988, dated as of July 28, and Royal Decree 1197/1991, dated as of July 26, regulate takeover bids by regulating mechanisms and instituting procedures for acquiring a control position within a corporation for reorganizing a corporation’s structure, these laws apply only to companies listed on a Spanish stock exchange and therefore do not apply to us.
     Delaware Law. In addition to other aspects of Delaware law governing fiduciary duties of directors during a potential takeover, the Delaware General Corporation Law also contains a business combination statute that protects Delaware companies from hostile takeovers and from actions following the takeover by prohibiting some transactions once an acquirer has gained a significant holding in the corporation.
     Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law prohibits “business combinations,” including mergers, sales and leases of assets, issuances of securities and similar transactions by a corporation or a subsidiary with an interested stockholder that beneficially owns 15% or more of a corporation’s voting stock, within three years after the person becomes an interested stockholder, unless:
    the transaction that will cause the person to become an interested stockholder is approved by the board of directors of the target prior to the transactions;
 
    after the completion of the transaction in which the person becomes an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder holds at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation not including shares owned by persons who are directors and also officers of interested stockholders and shares owned by specified employee benefit plans; or
 
    after the person becomes an interested stockholder, the business combination is approved by the board of directors of the corporation and holders of at least 66.67% of the outstanding voting stock, excluding shares held by the interested stockholder.
     A Delaware corporation may elect not to be governed by Section 203 by a provision contained in the original certificate of incorporation of the corporation or an amendment to the original certificate of incorporation or to the bylaws of the corporation, which amendment must be approved by a majority of the shares entitled to vote and may not be further amended by the board of directors of the corporation. Such an amendment is not effective until twelve months following its adoption.
Threshold for Required Disclosure of Ownership
     Our Bylaws and Spanish Law. Under Spanish Law, a company that acquires more than 10% of the capital of another company must notify the issuer of its acquisition and of any subsequent acquisition of an additional 5% or more of the issuer’s capital. The rights corresponding to the shares are suspended pending such notification. Such notification must be included in the notes to both companies’ financial statements.

81


Table of Contents

     Delaware Law/U.S. Federal Securities Laws. While Delaware law does not provide for special disclosure of any particular level of share ownership, United States federal securities laws do contain certain disclosure requirements of this nature. For example, any person acquiring more than 5% of the beneficial ownership of a class of a company’s equity securities registered under Section 12 of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Securities Exchange Act”) must file with the SEC a schedule disclosing certain information about itself, including the background of such person, the source of the funds used in the purchase of such securities, the person’s plans concerning the management of the acquired corporation if the purpose of the stock purchase is to acquire control over the issuing corporation, the number of such shares beneficially owned by such person and the number of shares such person and each of its associates have a right to acquire, and information as to any contracts, arrangements or understandings with any person with respect to any securities of the issuing corporation.
     In addition, beneficial owners of more than 10% of a class of such registered securities must file with the SEC a statement of ownership regarding those securities and report any subsequent changes in their ownership within two business days. However, because we are a foreign private issuer, beneficial owners of more than 10% of our securities are exempt from the latter such requirements.
C. MATERIAL CONTRACTS
The following information summarizes certain significant terms of our material contracts.
Reciprocal loan agreement with Abengoa
     On April 20, 2004, we entered into a bilateral credit arrangement with Abengoa that replaced a prior credit agreement that we and our subsidiaries had with Abengoa. Under the current agreement, we and Abengoa may borrow funds from or lend funds to each other, from time to time upon not less than one day’s notice, up to a maximum of 45.0 million (or the equivalent amount in any other currency quoted in the Spanish currency market). Borrowings under this credit arrangement bear interest at EURIBOR, or LIBOR for borrowings denominated in currencies other Euros, in either case plus 0.75% per year for a period not to exceed one year, with interest added to the outstanding balance. Each borrowing matures on the last date of the fiscal year in which such borrowing was made, without requiring any earlier payment of principal. This credit arrangement is optional and either we or Abengoa may elect not to make loans to the other. This agreement had an initial term ending December 31, 2004; it renews for annual one-year terms until terminated by either party. Our net amount receivable under this arrangement as of December 31, 2006 was 18.4 million. We incur no costs and receive no payments under this arrangement unless and until we borrow or loan funds thereunder.
Telvent Canada credit agreement with LaSalle Business Credit
     Under a credit agreement dated May 2, 2003, Telvent Canada Ltd. has three separate credit facilities with LaSalle Business Credit, a division of ABN Amro Bank N.V., Canada Branch. The first facility (“Facility A”) is a secured revolving credit line for working capital purposes in a maximum amount which was originally up to U.S. $8 million ( 5.9 million) but was reduced by an amendment dated April 13, 2006 to a maximum of up to U.S. $6 million ( 4.5 million). Availability of funds under Facility A is based on a borrowing base which is calculated monthly determined as a percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventory of Telvent Canada Ltd. Amounts drawn under Facility A cannot exceed U.S. $6 million. Facility A bears interest at a rate equal to LIBOR or a base rate index plus an applicable margin, at Telvent Canada’s option.
     The second facility (“Facility B”) is a delayed draw, non-revolving, term loan facility in the amount of up to U.S. $5.5 million ( 4.2 million). Facility B was repaid in April, 2006, and no further amounts may be borrowed under this facility.
     The third facility was added by an amending agreement dated April 13, 2006, under which the credit agreement was amended to reduce the amount of the credit available under Facility A from U.S. $8 million to U.S. $6 million and to add an additional secured revolving credit facility (“Facility C”) in a maximum aggregate principal amount of U.S. $12 million solely for the purposes of issuing standby letters of credit in connection with projects in which Telvent Canada or Telvent USA is required to provide bid, advance payment or performance securities. Under Facility C, the fees for letters of credit are calculated on the basis of a rate per annum equal to 0.75% of the face amount of each letter of credit at the time of issuance by LaSalle Business Credit.
     All facilities mature in March 2008. LaSalle Business Credit has a first security interest in all assets and equity of Telvent Canada Ltd. and Telvent USA Inc. As part of the credit agreement, Telvent Canada is restricted from paying dividends to us and we will be unable to factor any receivables of Telvent Canada or Telvent USA without prior written consent of LaSalle Business Credit. By an amending agreement dated July 14, 2005, the credit agreement was amended to permit Telvent Canada to borrow amounts up to U.S. $4 million from time to time for working capital purposes from Telvent affiliates.

82


Table of Contents

Telvent Traffic North America credit agreement with LaSalle Business Credit
     On May 31, 2006, our subsidiary, Telvent Traffic North America Inc. (“Telvent Traffic”), entered into a credit agreement with LaSalle Bank National Association under which it may borrow up to U.S. $20 million. The obligations of Telvent Traffic under the credit agreement are guaranteed by Telvent GIT, S.A. The credit facility is available for partial financing of acquisitions permitted under the agreement. The credit facility matures on May 1, 2007. Loans under the credit agreement bear interest on the outstanding principal amount at a rate per annum equal to either (depending on the election made by Telvent Traffic): (i) the prime rate in effect as publicly announced by LaSalle Bank National Association or (ii) the London Interbank Offering Rate for United States dollar deposits in the London Interbank Eurodollar market (LIBOR), plus an applicable margin which is based on the leverage ratio of Telvent GIT, S.A. The leverage ratio is the ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated EBITDA (net income plus the sum of expenses for interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). The minimum margin is 0.75 % and the maximum applicable margin is 1.25%. For prime rate loans, interest is payable quarterly in arrears. For LIBOR loans, interest is payable in arrears on the last day of each interest period, which can be one, two, three or six months, as selected by Telvent Traffic. This credit facility is not a revolving facility. By an amendment effective June 16, 2006, the agreement was amended to reflect that the shares of Telvent Traffic were transferred from Telvent to our subsidiary Telvent Tráfico y Transporte, S.A. on that date.
Services Agreements with Abengoa
     We and certain of our subsidiaries have entered into separate agreements with Abengoa for the provision of professional services to assist and support us with the expansion of our activities. These services include cash pooling arrangements, financial management, institutional support with international multilateral financing organizations, institutional commercial assistance, tax and legal advisory services, centralized asset management, support in global credit ratings, negotiation and optimization of global corporate insurance policies, the provision of guarantees and endorsements, internal publicity and corporate image services and human resources services. Each of these agreements has a one-year term that is extended annually unless terminated by either party within 30 days of its expiration and can be terminated by either party upon breach by the other. We and our consolidated subsidiaries paid a total of 4.1 million to Abengoa for services under these agreements in 2006.
Services agreement with Gestión Integral de Recursos Humanos, S.A.
     On January 1, 2004, Abengoa subsidiary GIRH agreed to provide human resources (including personnel recruitment and management) and occupational safety services to a group of our subsidiaries for an annual aggregate fee in 2006 of approximately 1.2 million. This agreement has a one-year term that is automatically renewed unless the agreement is terminated by either party within 60 days of its expiration.
Underwriting agreement with the underwriters of our IPO
     On October 21, 2004, we and certain of our existing shareholders entered into an underwriting agreement with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Lehman Brothers Inc. and SG Cowen & Co., LLC as representatives of the several underwriters, in which (i) the underwriters agreed to purchase from us, and we agreed to sell to them, all of the ordinary shares that we issued in our IPO, and (ii) the underwriters agreed to purchase from the selling shareholders, and the selling shareholders agreed to sell to them, certain of our ordinary held by the selling shareholders prior to our IPO, for a per-share price of $9.00 per share. We sold a total of 9,247,100 newly-issued ordinary shares, and the selling shareholders sold a total of 107,900 existing ordinary shares, to the underwriters under this agreement, including those sold to the underwriters pursuant to their partial exercise of their overallotment option. We did not receive any of the proceeds of the sale of shares by the selling shareholders to the underwriters. In the underwriting agreement, we agreed that we would make certain reports and information available to our shareholders, we and the selling shareholders agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities and we and the selling shareholders agreed to execute ancillary agreements pursuant to which we would not sell or transfer any of our ordinary shares for 180 days after the date of the underwriting agreement.
Agreements to sell our shares of Xfera Móviles
     On June 18, 2004, we agreed to sell 17,437,937 shares of Xfera Móviles, S.A. to Abengoa subsidiary Telvent Investments, S.L. for a sale price of approximately 24.3 million, equal to the net book value of the shares. At the time of the sale the shares were 100% paid-in and encumbered by a pledge in favor of Nortel Networks International Finance and Holding B.V. (“Nortel”) and Ericsson Credit A.B. (“Ericsson”).
     On June 23, 2004, we agreed to sell 1,467,270 shares of Xfera Móviles, S.A. to Telvent Investments for a sale price of approximately  1.3 million, equal to the net book value of the shares. At the time of the sale the shares were 50% paid-in and

83


Table of Contents

encumbered by a pledge in favor of Nortel and Ericsson. Under this agreement, Telvent Investments agreed to pay Xfera Móviles the full amount of a capital call, issued by Xfera prior to the date of the agreement, corresponding to the certain of the transferred shares, and to indemnify us for any damages, losses and liabilities related to that capital call.
Lease for Principal Executive office in Madrid, Spain
     We lease our principal executive offices in Madrid, Spain under a lease dated November 15, 2000 with Valgrande 6 S.A. In January 2005, we and the landlord agreed in writing to reduce the size of the leased premises by 10,557 square meters (113,634 square feet) and the premises are now 34,096.65 square meters (367,013 square feet). By an amendment dated July 1, 2006, both parties agreed to reduce the size of the leased premises by 1,755.29 square meters and now the premises are 32,341.36 square meters. In that amendment, Telvent Servicios Compartidos, S.A. was novated into the agreement in place of Telvent Housing, S.A. The rent is adjusted annually in accordance with a consumer price index. In 2006, our rent under this lease was 4,403,789.64 (VAT included). We also pay our proportionate share of operating costs and property taxes. The initial term of the lease expires on October 1, 2020. The lease will be renewed for a further 3 years if neither party gives notice at least one year before the end of the term that the lease will not be renewed.
Lease for office in Seville, Spain
     Telvent Servicios Compartidos S.A. leases offices at Ronda del Tamarguillo, 29 Plantas 1a y 2a, Seville, Spain under a lease dated February 25, 2004 with Prevision Espanola, S.A. and SUR, S.A. de Seguros y Reaseguros (now Helvetia Previsión, S.A.). For the first 2 years of the term, the annual base rent was 404,363. We also pay our proportionate share of operating costs and property taxes. After the second year of the term, the rent will be adjusted annually in accordance with a Spanish consumer price index. This facility is 6,126.71 square meters (65,947 square feet). The term of the lease is 6 years, commencing January 1, 2005 and expiring on December 31, 2010. We may extend the lease for additional one year periods by giving written notice at least 6 months prior to the expiry of the lease for a maximum of two years.
     Telvent Servicios Compartidos S.A. also leases offices on the third and fourth floors in the same building (Ronda del Tamarguillo, 29 Plantas 3a y 4a, Seville, Spain) under a lease dated July 30, 2003 with Altius Partners, S.L. (now leased from Romero Álvarez, S.A., who purchased the floors managed by Altius Partners, S.L. ).The obligations under the lease are guaranteed by Telvent. The rent for the first year of the term is 60,933 per month. We also pay our proportionate share of operating costs and property taxes. After the first year of the term, the rent is adjusted annually in accordance with a Spanish consumer price index. This facility is 7,820 square meters (84,178 square feet). The initial term of the lease is for 10 years expiring on August 1, 2013. The lease will be extended for successive periods of 2 years each, unless we give notice in writing to the landlord 6 months before the end of the term or renewal term as the case may be.
     In 2006, our combined total rent under these leases was 1,330 (VAT included).
Lease for Data Center office in Seville, Spain
     Telvent Housing leases offices at Avda. Montesierra 36 in Seville, Spain under a lease dated July 1, 2004 with Decesaris, S.A. The rent is adjusted annually in accordance with a Spanish consumer price index. In 2006, our rent under this lease was 118,536 for the year. This facility is 877 square meters (9,435 square feet). The initial term of the lease expires on December 31, 2010. The lease will be extended for a maximum of 4 successive periods of 5 years each, unless we give notice in writing to the landlord 30 days before the end of the term or renewal term as the case may be. We are responsible for paying the operating costs related to the facility. All the taxes related with the facility are the owner’s responsibility.
Lease for Data Center office in Barcelona, Spain
     Telvent Housing leases offices at Acero 30-32, Barcelona, Spain under a lease dated June 27, 2001 with Sertram S.A. The rent is adjusted annually in accordance with a Spanish consumer price index. In 2006, our rent under this lease was 330,951. We are responsible for paying the operating costs and property taxes related to the facility. This facility is 2,511 square meters (27,028 square feet). The initial term of the lease expires on January 1, 2009. The lease will be extended for a maximum of 20 successive periods of one year each, unless we give notice in writing to the landlord six months before the end of the term or any renewal term as the case may.

84


Table of Contents

Lease for Data Center office in Lisbon, Portugal
     Telvent Housing leases offices at Severiano Falcao 14, Lisbon, Portugal under a lease dated June 21, 2000 with Imovest Sociedade Gestora de Fundos de Investimientos Imobiliarios, S.A. The rent is adjusted annually in accordance with a Portuguese index of leasing contracts. In 2006, our rent under this lease was 514,824. This facility is 5,355 square meters (57,641 square feet). The initial term of the lease expires on June 20, 2007. The lease will be extended for successive periods of one year each, unless we give notice in writing to the landlord ninety days before the end of the term or any renewal term as the case may be.
Lease for office in Calgary, Canada
     Telvent Canada leases offices at 10333 Southport Road SW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada under a lease dated August 7, 2002 with Pension Fund Realty Limited. This facility is 12,337 square meters (132,800 square feet). The rent under this lease is CAD $1,759,600 per year. We also pay our proportionate share of operating costs and property taxes. The lease expires on July 31, 2008. We have the option to enter into a new lease for two further terms of five years each by giving written notice at least 6 months prior to the expiry of the lease. The rent for each renewal lease term will be the market rate for space of similar size, use and location. Telvent Canada Ltd. sub-leases 2,927 square meters (31,509 square feet) of the space in the Calgary facilities.
Lease for office in Houston, USA
     Telvent USA leases offices at 7000A Hollister Road, Houston, Texas, USA 77040 under a lease dated October 16, 2003 with Baker Hughes Incorporated. This facility is 4,476 square meters (48,177 square feet). In 2006, our annual rent under this lease was U.S. $578,124. We also pay our proportionate share of excess operating costs other than the costs of utilities for normal business hours and property taxes which are included in the rent. The initial term of the lease expires on November 30, 2009. Negotiations are underway to extend the existing lease under the same annual rent and terms until November 30, 2012, with an option to renew for a further three years at a rate to be determined.
Offices in Beijing, China
     Under a purchase contract dated March 17, 2005 with Beijing Development Area Co., Ltd., our subsidiary Telvent Control System (Beijing) Co. Ltd. (“Telvent China”) purchased a new three-floor, 1,303 square meter (14,025 square feet) office in Beijing to establish our China headquarters. The total purchase price was 9,383,821 Rmb: 8,219,177 for the building and 1,164,644 for improvements. The purchase price was paid 40% on closing, and the balance was financed by an 8 year mortgage (5.58% interest rate). According to China Laws, the amortization period will be 30 years.
     Under a purchase contract dated May 23, 2006 with Beijing Development Area Co., Ltd., Telvent China purchased a new three-floor, 1,267 square meters (13,640 square feet) steel bar and concrete frame office building at No. 18-1, BDA International Enterprise Avenue, No.63 lot, Economic and Technology Development Zone, 100176 Beijing, PRC. The total purchase price was Rmb 9,208.78 thousand. The initial payment in the amount of Rmb 3,688 thousand was paid on April 11, 2006, and the balance (Rmb 5.52 million) was financed by an 8 year mortgage (July 22, 2006 to June 22, 2014) at an interest rate 5.325% and with monthly payments of RMB 73,593. According to Chinese Laws, the amortization period will be 30 years.
Lease for office in Rio Janeiro, Brazil
     Telvent Brazil S.A. leases offices in Rio Janeiro, Brazil under a lease dated January 1, 2003 with Bargoa S.A. (an Abengoa company). This facility is 491 square meters (5,285 square feet). In 2006, our rent under this lease was 70,000 Brazilian Reals per year. This lease may be renewed annually on May 10.
Lease for office in Mexico City, Mexico
     Telvent México S.A. de C.V. leases offices in Mexico D.F., Mexico under a lease dated January 1, 2003 with Abengoa Mexico, S.A. De C.V., as amended by Addendum dated January 3, 2005 and January 1, 2006. This facility is 958 square meters (10,319 square feet). In 2006, our rent under this lease was monthly 136,806 Mexican Pesos. The amount of the rent is reviewed every 12 months based on the Mexican inflation index multiplied by 1.20. The term of the lease expires on January 2, 2011. The term of this lease will be extended automatically from year to year if at the date of the expiration of the lease neither party has given notice to the other party that the lease will not be renewed.
Lease for office in Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
     On March 1, 2007, Miner and Miner Consulting Engineers, Inc., (“Miner and Miner”) a wholly-owned subsidiary of Telvent GIT, S.A., entered into a lease with Meyers 4701, LLC (“Landlord”) for office space located at 4701 Royal Vista Circle, Windsor, Colorado. The leased facility is currently 1,949 square meters (20,982 square feet) but will be expanded by Landlord by approximately 7,500 square feet (the “Addition”). The Addition is scheduled to be complete in early summer 2007, at which time Miner and Miner will occupy the Addition. The rent under this lease is U.S. $26,221 per month until the Addition is occupied and upon completion of the Addition the monthly rent shall change to the product of the actual size of the leased facility in square feet times U.S. $18.50 per square foot, divided by 12 months. Monthly rental payments shall be subject to a bi-annual increase of not more than 6%. Miner and Miner will also pay its proportionate share of the operating costs and property taxes. The lease expires six years after the date on which Miner and Miner occupies the Addition. Miner and Miner has options to renew the lease for three additional terms of six years each by giving notice at least 180 days and no more than a year prior to the expiration of the then existing lease term. The rent for each renewal term will be the market rate for space of similar size, use and location.

85


Table of Contents

Lease for office in Perth, Australia
     Telvent Australia Pty. Ltd. leases offices at Units 3 and 4, 41 King Edward Road, Osborne Park, Western Australia, under two leases both dated July 1, 2005 with Savterne Pty Ltd. This facility is 1,239 square meters (13,336 square feet).The rent under these leases was AUD $101,440 for 2006. The rent is adjusted annually in accordance with the Australian consumer price index. We also pay our proportionate share of operating costs and property taxes. The lease expires on July 1, 2008. We have the option to renew the leases for a further term of three years by giving written notice at least 6 months prior to the expiry of the lease. The rent for each renewal lease term will be the market rate for space of similar size, use and location.
Lease for office in Culemborg, Netherlands
     Telvent Netherlands B.V. leases offices at Landzichtweg, 70, 4105 DP Culemborg, Netherlands, under a lease dated March 11, 1993 with Kroezen Vastgoed Exploitatie B.V. This facility is 633 square meters (6,813 square feet). The rent under this lease was  77,384 for 2006. We also pay our proportionate share of operating costs and property taxes. The lease expires on September 30, 2008.
Lease for office in Rockville, Maryland
Telvent Farradyne Inc. leases offices at 3206 Tower Oaks Boulevard, Rockville, Maryland 20852, under a lease dated November 27, 2002 with GLB Montrose Office Park LLC. This facility is 29,391 square feet. The rent under this lease is U.S. $745,223 per year from April 15, 2005 to April 14, 2006; U.S. $767,580 per year from April 15, 2006 to April 14, 2007; U.S. $790,607 per year from April 15, 2007 to April 14, 2008; and U.S. $814,326 from April 15, 2008 to April 30, 2009. We also pay our proportionate share of operating costs and property taxes. The lease expires on April 30, 2009. We have the option to enter into a new lease for one further term of five years by giving written notice at least 270 days prior to the expiry of the lease. The rent for each renewal lease term will be equal to 95% of the fair market rent for space of similar size, use and location. The foregoing fair market rent will take into account a tenant improvement allowance of U.S. $5 per rentable square foot.
Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement for the Acquisition of Farradyne
     May 18, 2006, Telvent and our subsidiary, Telvent Traffic North America Inc. (“Telvent Traffic”) entered into a Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. (“PBQD”), its subsidiary, Farradyne, and PB Energy Storage Services, Inc. (“PB Energy”) under which Telvent Traffic acquired the intelligent transportation systems business of these selling parties (the “Farradyne Business”). Telvent guaranteed the performance by Telvent Traffic of its obligations under the Agreement.
     The acquisition of the Farradyne Business occurred in two steps: Telvent Traffic purchased all of the issued and outstanding shares of Farradyne; and Farradyne then purchased certain assets of the Farradyne division of PBQD and certain assets of the Alltech division of PB Energy. Telvent Traffic assumed certain, but not all, of the liabilities of the Farradyne Business, including normal trade and employment liabilities, and obligations related to certain contracts.
     The total purchase price for the Farradyne Business was U.S. $38 million, and is subject to certain post-closing adjustments. A portion of the purchase price in the amount of U.S. $4,999,999 was paid into escrow and serves as security for PBQD’s and PB Energy’s obligations to Telvent Traffic under the Agreement to indemnify Telvent Traffic for any breaches of their representations, warranties and covenants.
     The Agreement contains certain covenants, representations and warranties of PBQD, Farradyne and PB Energy. PBQD and PB Energy agreed to indemnify Telvent Traffic against losses and damages resulting from a breach of any of these covenants, representations and warranties up to certain limits. In the case of breaches of certain representations and warranties, such as those pertaining to taxes and title to Farradyne shares, and breaches of PBQD’s and PB Energy’s agreement not to compete with the Farradyne Business for a period of time following closing, there is no monetary limitation on PBQD’s and PB Energy’s indemnification obligations. For breaches of the representations and warranties pertaining to existing litigation and existing intellectual property infringement claims, the limit is U.S. $22,756,810, plus an amount equal to fifty percent of the legal costs that the Company or Telvent Traffic may incur in connection therewith. For breaches of the remaining covenants, representations and warranties, PBQD’s and PB Energy’s indemnification obligation is limited to the escrowed purchase price amount of U.S. $4,999,999.
     Telvent Traffic completed the acquisition of the Farradyne Business from on July 3, 2006 (effective as of July 1, 2006). On the closing, an amendment to the Agreement was entered into effective July 1, 2006 to make various amendments including updating schedules to the Agreement listing contracts to be assigned to Telvent Traffic and obligations to be assumed by Telvent Traffic. To provide for an orderly transition of the operations of the Farradyne Business, PBQD and Farradyne entered into a Transition Agreement on the closing pursuant to which PBQD has provided to Farradyne certain support services, such as accounting, invoicing and information technology services, for a transition period. PBQD, PB Energy and Telvent Traffic also entered into a Cooperation Agreement to establish a strategic relationship between the parties to pursue mutually beneficial project opportunities.
D. EXCHANGE CONTROLS
     In 1991, Spain adopted the European Union standards for free movement of capital and services. As a result, exchange controls, as well as restrictions on foreign investments, have generally been abolished. There are no exchange controls in existence in Spain that would affect our import and export of capital. As described under “Item 10.B-Memorandum and Articles of Association-Limitations on rights to own our securities”, foreign investors may invest freely in shares of Spanish companies (except for companies operating in certain strategic industries, unless the Spanish government has issued an exemption), and we must report to the Spanish Registry of Foreign Investments our ordinary shares held by foreign investors, but there are no material limitations on the amount of cash payments that we may remit to residents of foreign countries. Please see also “Item 8.A-Consolidated statements and other financial information-Dividends”.
Formula Based Stock Compensation Plan
     See Item 6B “Compensation” for a description of this Plan.
Abengoa Stock Purchase Plan
     See Item 6B “Compensation” for a description of this Plan.
2007 Extraordinary Variable Compensation Plan
     See Item 6B “Compensation” for a description of this Plan.

86


Table of Contents

E. TAXATION
     The following is a summary of the material Spanish and United States federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares. This summary is not a complete analysis or listing of all the possible tax consequences of such transactions and does not address all tax considerations that may be relevant to all categories of shareholders, some of whom may be subject to special rules. Accordingly, our shareholders should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of their purchase, ownership and disposition of ordinary shares, including the effect of tax laws of any other jurisdiction, based on their particular circumstances. The statements regarding Spanish and United States federal tax laws set out below are based on laws and relevant interpretations thereof in effect as of the date of this prospectus, all of which are subject to change, and any such change may have retroactive effect.
Spanish Taxation
     The following discussion, subject to the limitations and qualifications therein, applies to the material Spanish tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares. This discussion applies only to shareholders that are “nonresident holders,” as defined below.
     As used herein, the term “nonresident holder” means a beneficial owner of our ordinary shares:
    that is an individual or corporation not resident in Spain for Spanish tax purposes;
 
    whose ownership of our ordinary shares is not for Spanish tax purposes effectively connected with either a permanent establishment in Spain through which such owner carries on or has carried on business or a fixed base in Spain from which such owner performs or has performed independent personal services; and
 
    that is not treated as owning or having owned at any time, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of our ordinary shares.
     This discussion is based on Spanish tax laws currently in effect, which laws are subject to change at any time, perhaps with retroactive effect. This discussion does not consider all aspects of Spanish taxation that may be relevant to particular nonresident holders, some of whom may be subject to special rules. In particular, this discussion does not address the Spanish tax consequences applicable to partnerships or other “look-through” entities or investors who hold ordinary shares through partnerships or such entities. Each nonresident holder should consult with its own tax advisor as to the particular tax consequences to it of the purchase, ownership or disposition of our ordinary shares.
     Income Taxes — Taxation of Dividends. If we pay dividends on our ordinary shares, under Spanish law, the dividends are subject to Spanish Non-Residents Income Tax, withheld at source on the gross amount of the dividends, currently at a 18% tax rate, unless the shareholder is entitled to an exemption or a reduced rate under a Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation (“CADT”) between Spain and its country of residence. Nonresident holders should consult their tax advisors with respect to the applicability and the procedures under Spanish law for obtaining the benefit of an exemption or a reduced rate under a CADT.
     Income Taxes — Rights. Distributions to shareholders of preemptive rights to subscribe for new shares made with respect to our ordinary shares are not treated as income under Spanish law and, therefore, are not subject to Spanish Non-Residents Income Tax. The exercise of such preemptive rights subscribing for new shares is not considered a taxable event under Spanish law and thus is not subject to Spanish Non-Residents Income Tax. The tax treatment of disposals of preemptive rights depends on whether the underlying shares to which such rights relate are listed on a stock exchange of a European Union member. If our ordinary shares are listed on a stock exchange of a European Union member, the amount that a shareholder receives from the disposal of preemptive rights will reduce the acquisition value of the underlying shares and will be taxable to such shareholder, as a capital gain, only to the extent that the amount such shareholder receives exceeds the acquisition value of the underlying shares. If our ordinary shares are not listed on a stock exchange of a European Union member, the amount that a shareholder receives from the disposal of preemptive rights will be considered as taxable capital gain. See “— Spanish Taxation – Income Taxes – Taxation of Capital Gains” below. Our ordinary shares are not currently listed on a European Union member stock exchange and we do not anticipate that they will be listed on any of these exchanges in the future.
     Income Taxes — Taxation of Capital Gains. Under Spanish Non-Residents Income Tax Law, any capital gains derived from the sale or exchange of our ordinary shares are considered to be Spanish source income and, therefore, are taxable in Spain. Spanish Non-Residents Income Tax is currently levied at a 18% tax rate on capital gains obtained by nonresident holders who are not entitled to the benefit of an exemption or a reduced rate under an applicable CADT.

87


Table of Contents

     However, capital gains realized by a shareholder on the sale or exchange of our ordinary shares will be exempt from Spanish Non-Residents Income Tax in the following cases:
    If such shareholder is a resident of another European Union Member State, it will be exempt from Spanish Non-Residents Income Tax on capital gains, provided that (i) our assets do not mainly consist of, directly or indirectly, Spanish real estate, and (ii) the gain is not obtained through a country or territory statutorily defined as a tax haven. In respect of requirement (i), above, our assets currently do not, and we do not expect them in the foreseeable future to consist, directly or indirectly, mainly of Spanish real estate.
 
    If such shareholder is entitled to the benefit of an applicable CADT, capital gains realized by it will, in the majority of cases, be exempt from Spanish Non-Residents Income Tax (since most CADTs provide for taxation only in the nonresident holder’s country of residence).
     As a general rule, in the event that capital gain derived by one of our shareholders from the disposition of our ordinary shares is exempt from Spanish Non-Residents Income Tax, in accordance with the Order of December 23, 2003, such shareholder will be obliged to file with the Spanish tax authorities the corresponding tax Form 210 evidencing its entitlement to the exemption and provide the Spanish tax authorities with a certificate of tax residence issued by the tax authorities of the country of residence, within the meaning of a CADT, if applicable.
     Spanish Wealth Tax. Unless an applicable CADT provides otherwise, individual nonresident holders who hold ordinary shares located in Spain are subject to the Spanish Wealth Tax (Spanish Law 19/1991), which imposes a tax on property located in Spain on the last day of any year. Therefore, if a shareholder is an individual and such shareholder holds ordinary shares on the last day of any year, he or she will be subject to the Spanish Wealth Tax for such year at marginal rates varying between 0.2% and 2.5% of the average market value of such ordinary shares during the last quarter of such year. Nonresident holders should consult their tax advisors with respect to the applicability of the Spanish Wealth Tax.
     Spanish Inheritance and Gift Taxes. Unless an applicable CADT provides otherwise, transfers of ordinary shares on death or by gift to individuals are subject to Spanish Inheritance and Gift Taxes, respectively (Spanish Law 29/1987), if the transferee is a resident of Spain for Spanish tax purposes, or if the ordinary shares are located in Spain, regardless of the residence of the transferee. Spanish tax authorities will consider our ordinary shares to be located in Spain for Spanish tax purposes. The applicable tax rate, after applying all relevant factors, ranges between 7.65% and 81.6%. Gifts granted to corporate nonresident holders will be generally subject to Spanish Non-Residents Income Tax. Nonresident holders should consult their tax advisors with respect to the applicability of the Spanish Inheritance and Gift Taxes.
     Spanish Transfer Tax. A transfer by a nonresident holder of our ordinary shares will be exempt from any Spanish Transfer Tax (Impuesto sobre Transmisiones Patrimoniales) and Value Added Tax if, at the time of such transfer, real estate in Spain does not amount to more than 50% of our assets. Real estate located in Spain currently does not, and we do not expect that Spanish real estate will in the foreseeable future, amount to more than 50% of our assets. Additionally, no Stamp Duty will be levied on a transfer by a nonresident holder of our ordinary shares.
During the forth quarter of 2006, a tax reform was carried out in Spain by virtue of laws 35/2006 (introducing a new Personal Income Tax) and 36/2006 (introducing measures to avoid tax fraud). The tax reform has mainly focused on the following topics:
    Corporate Income Tax (CIT) rates — Law 35/2006 has reduced the 35% general CIT rate available until December 31, 2006 to 32.5% for year 2007 and 30% for year 2008 onwards.
 
    Tax credits in Corporate Tax — Corporate income tax credits (i.e. reinvestment, export activities, research and development (R&D), technological innovation, cultural investment tax credits) available up to December 31, 2006 has been progressively reduced according to certain rates. The main tax credits applied by Telvent are the R&D and technological Innovation tax credits. Up to December 31, 2006, companies could deduct 30% (50% in certain cases) of the R&D expenses incurred in the tax period. In 2007, companies will only be able to deduct 27% (46% in certain cases) of the R&D expenses incurred in the tax period. From 2008 to 2011, the R&D tax credit will amount to 25% (42% in certain cases) of the expenses incurred. With regards to the technological innovation (IT) tax credit, up to December 31, 2006, companies could deduct 10% (15% in certain cases) of the IT expenses incurred in the tax period. In 2007, companies will only be able to deduct 9% (13% in certain cases) of the IT expenses incurred in the tax period. From 2008 to 2011, the IT tax credit will amount to 8% (12% in certain cases) of the expenses incurred.

88


Table of Contents

    Withholding tax rates for non-residents:
    Dividends: from 15% to 18%
 
    Interests: from 15% to 18%
 
    Royalties: From 25% to 24%
 
    Capital Gains: From 35% to 18%
    Transfer Price Regime — From 2007 onwards, a taxpayer is obliged to apply fair market value for intra-group transactions. There is an increase in the burden of proof: the tax payer must keep transfer pricing documentation at the disposal of the tax administration. The specific content of the Transfer pricing documentation will be stated in outstanding regulations.
United States Taxation
     The following discussion, subject to the limitations and qualifications therein, applies to the material United States federal tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares. The following discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its legislative history, existing and proposed regulations, published rulings and court decisions, all as currently in effect and all subject to change at any time, perhaps with retroactive effect. This discussion applies only to shareholders that are U.S. holders, as defined below.
     As used herein, “U.S. holder” means a beneficial owner of our ordinary shares that is, for United States federal income tax purposes:
    an individual citizen or resident of the United States;
 
    a corporation (or other entity classified as a corporation for such purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state or political subdivision thereof;
 
    an estate, the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
 
    a trust, if (1) a United States court can exercise primary supervision over the trust’s administration and one or more United States persons (within the meaning of the United States Internal Revenue Code) are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (2) the trust has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a United States person.
     The discussion does not consider all aspects of United States federal income taxation that may be relevant to particular U.S. holders by reason of their particular circumstances, including potential application of the alternative minimum tax, or any aspect of state, local or non-United States federal tax laws. In addition, this summary is directed only to U.S. holders that hold our ordinary shares as capital assets and does not address the considerations that may be applicable to certain classes of U.S. holders, including banks, financial institutions, securities dealers or traders, insurance companies, broker-dealers, tax-exempt organizations, investors liable for the alternative minimum tax, U.S. holders that have an office or fixed place of business or “tax home” outside the Untied States, U.S. holders of our ordinary shares as part of a “straddle,” “hedge” or “conversion transaction,” U.S. holders, directly, or indirectly or through attribution, of 10% or more of our outstanding ordinary shares, persons who own our ordinary shares through a partnership or other pass-through entity, persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and persons who acquired our ordinary shares pursuant to the exercise of an employee stock option or otherwise as compensation. Each U.S. holder should consult with its own tax advisor as to the particular tax consequences to it of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares, including the effects of applicable state, local, foreign or other tax laws and possible changes in tax laws.
     If a partnership (or other entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is the beneficial owner of our ordinary shares, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A shareholder that is a partnership holding our ordinary shares, or a partner in such a partnership, should consult its tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares.
     Taxation of Dividends in General. Subject to the discussion below under “Passive Foreign Investment Company”, the gross amount of any distribution paid on our ordinary shares out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for United States federal income tax purposes, before reduction for any Spanish income tax withheld by us, will be included in a U.S. holder’s gross income as a dividend when actually or constructively received. Accordingly, the amount of dividend income that will be included in a U.S. holder’s gross income may be greater than the amount actually received or receivable by such shareholder. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated first as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of the shareholder’s tax basis in the ordinary shares and then as capital gain. If a shareholder is not able to determine whether

89


Table of Contents

any portion of a distribution is not treated as a dividend for United States federal income tax purposes, such shareholder may be required to treat the full amount of such distribution as a dividend. We have not yet determined whether we will maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under United States federal income tax principles and, therefore, whether we will provide information to U.S. holders necessary to make such determinations with respect to distributions on our ordinary shares. Corporate U.S. holders generally will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed United States corporations in respect of dividends received from United States corporations. Non-corporate U.S. holders that meet certain eligibility requirements will qualify for United States federal income taxation on dividends paid in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2009, at a reduced rate of 15% or lower if we are a “qualified foreign corporation.” Generally, we will be a “qualified foreign corporation” if either (i) we are eligible for benefits under the Convention between the United States and the Kingdom of Spain for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion With Respect to Taxes on Income, together with its related Protocol (the “U.S.-Spain Treaty”) or (ii) our ordinary shares are listed on an established securities market in the United States. As we are eligible for benefits under the U.S.-Spain Treaty and as our ordinary shares trade on the Nasdaq National Market, we presently are a “qualified foreign corporation,” and we generally expect to be a “qualified foreign corporation” during all taxable years before 2009, but no assurance can be given that a change in circumstances will not affect our treatment as a “qualified foreign corporation” in any of such taxable years. Non-corporate U.S. holders nevertheless will not be eligible for the reduced rate (a) if they have not held our ordinary shares for at least 61 days of the 121-day period beginning on the date which is 60 days before the ex-dividend date, (b) to the extent they are under an obligation to make related payments on substantially similar or related property or (c) with respect to any portion of a dividend that is taken into account by them as investment income under Section 163(d)(4)(B) of the United States Internal Revenue Code. Any days during which a shareholder has diminished its risk of loss with respect to our ordinary shares (for example, by holding an option to sell our ordinary shares) are not counted towards meeting the 61-day holding period. Non-corporate U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning whether dividends received by them qualify for the reduced rate.
     We anticipate that any dividends that we pay will be declared in Euros as required by Spanish law but will be paid in U.S. Dollars. However, if we pay any dividends in Euros, the dividends will be included in our shareholders’ gross income in a U.S. Dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date the dividends are actually or constructively received by our shareholders, regardless of whether the dividend payments are actually converted into U.S. Dollars. Shareholders will have a tax basis in any Euros distributed by us equal to the U.S. Dollar value of the Euros on the date they are actually or constructively received by such shareholders. Generally, any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange fluctuations during the period from the date on which a shareholder includes the dividend payment in income to the date on which such shareholder converts the payment into U.S. Dollars will be treated as ordinary income or loss and will be United States source income or loss for United States foreign tax credit purposes.
     Dividends paid by us generally will be foreign source passive income for United States foreign tax credit purposes or, if for financial services entities, foreign source financial services income for such purposes. However, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (H.R. 4520) generally treats income that constitutes financial services income as general category income, along with other income that is not passive income, for United States foreign tax credit purposes for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006. Subject to certain limitations, shareholders may elect to claim as a foreign tax credit against their United States federal income tax liability the Spanish income tax withheld from dividends received on our ordinary shares. Shareholders that do not elect to claim a foreign tax credit may instead claim a deduction for Spanish income tax withheld. In addition, special rules apply in determining the foreign tax credit limitation with respect to dividends received by non-corporate U.S. holders that are subject to United States federal income taxation at the reduced rate (discussed above). The calculation of foreign tax credits and, in the case of a U.S. holder that elects to deduct foreign taxes, the availability of deductions, involves the application of complex rules that depend on a U.S. holder’s particular circumstances. Shareholders should consult their own tax advisors to determine whether and to what extent they would be entitled to this credit or deduction.
     Sale or Exchange of Ordinary Shares. Upon a taxable sale or exchange of ordinary shares, shareholders will recognize a capital gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes equal to the difference, if any, between the U.S. Dollar value of the amount realized on the sale or exchange and their adjusted tax basis determined in U.S. Dollars in the ordinary shares. This gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if their holding period in the ordinary shares exceeds one year at the time of the sale or exchange. Any gain or loss will generally be United States source gain or loss for United States foreign tax credit purposes. Shareholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the United States federal income tax treatment of capital gains, which may be taxed at lower rates than ordinary income for individuals and certain other non-corporate U.S. holders, and capital losses, the deductibility of which is subject to limitations. See “– Spanish Taxation – Income Taxes – Taxation of Capital Gains” above for a description of how shareholders may be able to obtain an exemption from Spanish capital gains tax upon a sale or other disposition of ordinary shares. Shareholders should also consult their own tax advisors regarding the source of such gain or loss, which in certain instances may be foreign source.

90


Table of Contents

     If a shareholder receives Euros upon the sale of our ordinary shares, it will realize an amount equal to the U.S. Dollar value of the Euros on the date of the sale (or, if our ordinary shares are traded on an established securities market and it is a cash basis taxpayer or an electing accrual basis taxpayer, the settlement date). It will have a tax basis in the Euros received equal to the U.S. Dollar amount realized. Generally, any gain or loss it realizes upon a subsequent disposition of the Euros (including upon an exchange for U.S. Dollars) will be ordinary income or loss and will be United States source income or loss for United States foreign tax credit purposes.
     Passive Foreign Investment Company. We believe that we are not a “passive foreign investment company” (“PFIC”) for United States federal income tax purposes for the current taxable year. We intend to conduct our business and investment activities in a manner that avoids classification as a PFIC in future taxable years and, based on our current projections and forecasts, we do not expect to become a PFIC in the foreseeable future. However, because our PFIC status must be determined on an annual basis based on the composition of our assets and income during a taxable year, there can be no assurance that we will not be considered a PFIC for the current taxable year or any future taxable year. If we were considered a PFIC for any taxable year, certain adverse consequences could apply to U.S. holders. The PFIC rules are complex, and shareholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding our status as a PFIC for the current taxable year and any subsequent taxable years and the eligibility, manner and advisability of making a “mark to market” election or certain other elections if we are treated as a PFIC for any of these taxable years.
     Backup Withholding and Information Reporting. Any dividend paid on our ordinary shares to shareholders may be subject to United States federal tax information reporting requirements and to United States backup withholding (the backup withholding rate currently is 28%). In addition, the proceeds of a shareholder’s sale of ordinary shares may be subject to United States federal tax information reporting and to United States backup withholding. Backup withholding will not apply if a shareholder (i) is a corporation or other exempt recipient or (ii) provides a United States taxpayer identification number, certifies both that it is a United States person and as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding, and otherwise complies with any applicable backup withholding requirements. Any amounts withheld under the United States backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or a credit against such shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax, provided the required information is furnished to the United States Internal Revenue Service. Shareholders should consult their own tax advisors as to their qualification for exemption from backup withholding and the procedure for obtaining such an exemption.
F. DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS
     Not applicable.
G. STATEMENT BY EXPERTS
     Not applicable.
H. DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY
     You may read and copy our Registration Statement and its exhibits and other reports and information that we file with or furnish to the SEC, including this annual report, at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains an Internet Web site at www.sec.gov.
I. SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION
     Not applicable.
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
     Market risk is the risk of unexpected losses in earnings relating to our assets and liabilities from unfavorable changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. The primary market risk to which we are exposed is exchange rate risk associated with contracts denominated in currencies other than the Euro. We are also exposed, to a lesser extent, to interest rate risk from our interest-bearing assets and liabilities.
Exchange Rate Risk
     The majority of our assets, liabilities, sales and costs are denominated in Euros. Our Spanish business enters into contracts in which revenues and costs are denominated in other currencies, principally the U.S. Dollar. Our foreign subsidiaries also enter into

91


Table of Contents

contracts principally denominated in local currencies, the U.S. Dollar or the Euro that are managed against their functional currency or the Euro. At present, we generally hedge our currency risk on a project-specific basis only where our revenues and/or costs are denominated in currencies that differ from the functional currency of our contracting entity. We currently do not engage in currency translation hedging with respect to the Euro.
     We manage our foreign exchange exposures in accordance with our internal policies and guidelines. We manage our foreign currency exposure on an individual contract basis using foreign exchange contracts that generally have maturities of three months to 12 months and that mature when the forecasted revenues or expenses are anticipated to occur. The counterparties to these contracts are highly-rated financial institutions.
     Although these are used solely as economic hedges, these transactions are currently recorded at fair value on our balance sheets, with related gains and losses recorded as earnings on our consolidated statements of operations, as we have not yet sought to apply hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP (SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities) for these transactions.
     The following tables provide quantitative information about our foreign exchange contracts by principal currency as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.
                                 
    As of December 31, 2006  
    Positive     Notional     Negative     Notional  
    Fair Value     Amount     Fair Value     Amount  
Forward exchange contracts:
                               
Euro/ U.S. Dollar versus:
                               
U.S. Dollars
  1,227     17,196     2,570     29,970  
Morocco Dirhams
                1       30  
Brazilian Reais
    79       6,941       107       8,833  
Canadian Dollars
    767       28,372       499       18,554  
Jordan Dinars
                9       764  
Qatari Riyals
    51       1,768       2       1.072  
Japanese Yen
    180       2,359              
Thai Bahts
    103       2,879       81       2.862  
 
                       
 
    2,406       59,515       3,269       62,085  
 
                               
Interest rate contracts:
                               
Interest rate caps
    408       19,032              
 
                       
 
                               
Total
  2,814     78,547     3,269     62,085  
 
                       
                                 
    As of December 31, 2005  
    Positive     Notional     Negative     Notional  
    Fair Value     Amount     Fair Value     Amount  
Forward exchange contracts:
                               
Euro/ U.S. Dollar versus:
                               
U.S. Dollars
  435     7,336     312     6,150  
Morocco Dirhams
                7       614  
Brazilian Reais
                521       3,243  
Mexican Peso
    158       10,929              
Canadian Dollars
    601       17,010       406       23,458  
Jordan Dinars
                47       1,127  
Qatari Riyals
                147       3,622  
 
                       
 
    1,194       35,275       1,440       38,214  
 
                               
Interest rate contracts:
                               
Interest rate caps
          23,480              
 
                       
 
                               
Total
  1,194     58,755     1,440     38,214  
 
                       
     The tables above include embedded derivatives that we bifurcate from certain long-term binding Contracts denominated in a different currency to the functional or reporting currency of either party. Similar to freestanding derivatives, these are recorded at fair value within the balance sheet with related gains and losses recorded in earnings.

92


Table of Contents

     As a result of the increase in our sales abroad, starting in 2003, we have been subject to greater exposure to fluctuations between foreign currencies and the Euro. As our non-Euro-denominated revenues continue to increase as a percentage of our total revenues, we expect this trend to continue.
Interest Rate Risk
     We are also exposed to interest rate risk from our interest-bearing debt obligations. The interest rate on these instruments is based on a rate of three-month or one-year EURIBOR, plus the applicable margins. We manage certain specific exposures from some of our long-term debt obligations using interest rate caps to limit the impact of interest rate increases. These contracts mature between 2008 and 2022. Our exposure is limited to the premiums paid to purchase the caps. Total premiums paid were 397 during the year ended December 31, 2006.
     Details of the terms of our short-term and long-term debt are reflected in Notes 14 and 15, respectively, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages F- 25 to F-27.
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
     Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
     None.
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
     On October 21, 2004, the SEC declared effective our Registration Statement (File No. 333-119508) to register 10,005,000 ordinary shares at an initial public offering price of $9.00 per share (for an aggregate price of $90,045,000), and the offering of our ordinary shares pursuant to such Registration Statement commenced. On that date, we agreed to sell 8,700,000 ordinary shares to the underwriters (whose representatives were Merrill Lynch & Co., Lehman Brothers, and SG Cowen & Co.) at $9.00 per share (for an aggregate price of $78,300,000). In November 2004, the underwriters exercised in part their one-time option to purchase 655,000 of the 1,305,000 ordinary shares registered to cover the overallotment option; we sold 547,100 such ordinary shares to the underwriters at $9.00 per share (for an aggregate price of $4,923,900), and certain selling shareholders sold the remaining 107,900 of such shares at $9.00 per share (for an aggregate price of $971,100).
     Our expenses of the offering were $5,825,673 for underwriting discounts and commissions and 5,292,146 for other expenses (including costs for professional fees relating to accounting advice and legal costs during the year ended December 31, 2004). As disclosed in the Registration Statement, our expenses are subject to reimbursement. Our net proceeds from the offering were $77.4 million. No offering expenses were paid directly or indirectly to our directors, our affiliates, or any person owning 10% or more of any class of our equity securities. The offering has terminated.
     On November 25, 2004, we used 0.8 million of the net proceeds of the offering to pay the deferred payment for the acquisition of ICX. On December 10, 2004, we used $3.8 million of the net proceeds to make the initial payment of the total $7.9 million purchase price for our acquisition of 70% of the issued and outstanding shares of Miner & Miner. On April 5, 2005, we used $4.1 million of the net proceeds to make the second payment for our acquisition of those shares.
     On July 5, 2005, we used 3.8 million and $0.4 million of the net proceeds to make the first payment for the acquisition of Almos.
     On February 23, 2006, we used $6.8 million of the net proceeds to make the payment for the acquisition of the remaining 30% of the shares of Miner & Miner.
     On April 12, 2006, we made an additional payment of 0.4 million as part of a cash adjustment payment stipulated in the Almos purchase agreement.

93


Table of Contents

     On April 26, 2006, we signed a share purchase agreement to acquire 80% of Beijing Blue Shield for a total purchase price of 32 million (Rmb) ( 3.2 million).
     On June 30, 2006, we used 1.5 million of the net proceeds to make the deferred payment on Almos acquisition.
     On July 2, 2006, we used U.S. $ 18 million of the net proceeds to make part of the payment on the Farradyne acquisition. The remaining purchase price was paid through a financing arrangement of U.S. $ 20 million obtained from LaSalle Bank National Association.
     On November 10, 2006, we used 1.8 million of the net proceeds to make the first payment on the Maexbic acquisition.
     On December 6, 2006, we used 0.5 million of the net proceeds to make the earn-out payment on the Almos acquisition.
     On March 29, 2007, we used 0.1 million to make a guarantee deposit payment we owed under the Maexbic acquisition.
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Not applicable
ITEM 15T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Reporting Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of December 31, 2006, we, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Reporting Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. As described below under the section “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”, we identified the following material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting: we have not maintained effective internal controls over the financial statement closing and reporting process in some of our foreign subsidiaries, in particular in the areas of tax and derivative accounting. Solely as a result of this material weakness, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Reporting Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2006.
(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
     The following Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting is furnished as part of this Form 20-F.
     Telvent’s management, under the supervision of its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Reporting Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that: (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
     Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect all misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
     Under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Reporting Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer, our management assessed the design and effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006.

94


Table of Contents

Management excluded from the scope of its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Telvent Farradyne, Inc. which was acquired on July 1, 2006, Beijing Blue Shield High & New Tech. Co., Ltd., which was acquired on April 26, 2006, and Maexbic, S.A., which was acquired in November 2006. The effect of the consolidation of these newly acquired businesses on our consolidated financial statements represent 1.15% of net assets, 4.86% of total assets, 4.07% of revenues, and 3.94% of net income as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. In making its assessment, management used the criteria set forth in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this assessment, our management has determined that we have not maintained effective internal controls over the financial statement closing and reporting process in some of our foreign subsidiaries, in particular in the areas of tax and derivative accounting. The Company has been growing significantly over the last three years, and part of its growth comes from foreign and newly acquired businesses. Although we are making significant efforts to implement our systems of internal controls, both operational and financial reporting related, and to closely monitor these subsidiaries from corporate office, we have been unable to complete this implementation by the required reporting date. Solely as a result of such material weakness, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2006.
     Management plans to continue to implement its system of internal controls over financial reporting in newly acquired and foreign subsidiaries, and in particular, is implementing enhancements to the financial closing process in order to remediate this material weakness. In October 2006, in order to remediate this weakness, we formed a separate department of Reporting and Consolidation at the corporate level, reporting directly to our Chief Executive Officer. We appointed a person experienced with U.S. GAAP to head this department. Other enhancements to the financial closing process, which management is currently undertaking or is planning to carry out in the near future, include the following:
    Analyzing the application of accounting principles throughout our subsidiaries and their reporting to the corporate office, and ensuring that all principles are homogeneous and in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP);
 
    Developing a formal accounting manual and training accounting personnel on the use of such manual to assist in the application of homogeneous accounting principles throughout the Company and its subsidiaries;
 
    Performing consistent and timely review of documentation reported from newly acquired subsidiaries by the corporate department in the financial closing process; and
 
    Appointing experienced accounting staff for the corporate finance and accounting functions at each foreign location.
     The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte, S.L., has audited management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. Deloitte, S.L.’s report on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 is furnished in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.
(c) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on internal Controls
     The Report of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Controls is furnished in Item 18 of this form 20-F.
(d) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
     In preparation for our compliance with the SEC’s requirement that management evaluate and report on internal controls over financial reporting, with which we, as a foreign private issuer, first needed to comply for the year ended on December 31, 2006, we have been making, throughout the year, various significant changes to our system of internal control over financial reporting. The results of such changes and management’s conclusions with respect thereto are presented in the section “Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” above.
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
     Our board of directors has determined that we have at least one audit committee financial expert, Mr. Javier Salas, who is the Chairman of our Audit Committee. Mr. Salas has acquired such expertise through his experience actively supervising persons performing principal financial and accounting officer functions, experience overseeing the performance of companies with respect to the preparation and evaluation of their financial statements, and other relevant experience outlined in “Item 6.A-Directors and Senior Management”. Mr. Salas is independent as defined under Rule 4200(a)(15) of the National Association of Securities Dealers’ listing standards, which are applicable to us as a company listed on the Nasdaq Global Market.

95


Table of Contents

ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS
     Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Conduct for our employees, officers and directors to govern their relations with current and potential customers, fellow employees, competitors, government and self-regulatory agencies, the media, and anyone else with whom we have contact. On February 25, 2005, our board of directors approved a set of amendments to clarify and expand our Code of Conduct as follows:
    we added a new section that describes our corporate culture, in which professionalism, superb quality and our Common Management Systems are central;
 
    we redirected from senior management to the Secretary of the Board of Directors any questions about potential conflicts of interest or about the Code of Conduct, any reports of information that might be necessary to ensure that financial reports and disclosures are full, fair and accurate, and any reports of unethical or illegal behavior or a violation or a suspected violation of the Code of Conduct;
 
    we redirected from senior management to the Board of Directors or its Chairman the responsibility for pre-clearance of all public and media communications involving us (which is required);
 
    we redirected from senior management to the Board of Directors the responsibility for the administration of the Code of Conduct, and clarified that only the Board of Directors can grant any waiver of the application of the Code of Conduct;
 
    we expanded the language that describes our prohibition of insider trading; and
 
    we added a section that obligates any employee to contact our Legal Department before taking any action if there is a question as to the legality of that action.
A copy of our Code of Conduct, as amended, is available on our website at www.telvent.com.
     In addition, in July of 2005, the Audit Committee adopted, in accordance with Section 301 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act, a whistleblower policy to establish procedures for: (a) the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by Telvent regarding accounting, internal controls or auditing matters; and (b) the submission by employees of Telvent, on a confidential and anonymous basis, of good faith concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
     The following table provides information on the aggregate fees billed by our principal accountants, Deloitte, S.L. (our auditors for the year 2006) and PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores, S.L. (our auditors for the year 2005) or by other member firms of Deloitte and PricewaterhouseCoopers to the Telvent group, classified by type of service rendered for the periods indicated:
                 
    Year Ended December 31
    2006   2005
    (Deloitte)   (PwC)
    (Euros in thousands)
Audit Fees
    1,504       762  
Audit-Related Fees
          14  
Tax Fees
          45  
All Other Fees
           
 
               
Total
    1,504       821  
 
               
     Audit Fees are the aggregate fees billed for professional services in connection with the audit of our consolidated annual financial statements, quarterly review of our interim financial statements and statutory audits of our subsidiaries’ financial statements under the rules of Spain and the countries in which our subsidiaries are organized. Also included are services that can only be provided by our auditor, such as auditing of non-recurring transactions, consents, comfort letters, attestation services and any audit services required for U.S. SEC or other regulatory filings.
     Audit-Related Fees are fees charged for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, and are not restricted to those that can only be provided by the auditor signing the audit report.

96


Table of Contents

This category comprises fees billed for consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards, as well as advisory services associated with our financial reporting process. Also included are fees billed for audits of expenses like software development costs related to government grants for research and development purposes.
     Tax Fees are fees billed for tax compliance, tax review and tax advice on actual or contemplated transactions.
     Audit Committee’s Policy on Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of the Independent Auditor
     Subject to shareholder approval of the independent auditor in accordance with Spanish law, the Audit Committee has the sole authority to appoint, retain or replace the independent auditor. The Audit Committee is also directly responsible for the compensation and oversight of the work of the independent auditor. These policies generally provide that we will not engage our independent auditors to render audit or non-audit services unless the service is specifically approved in advance by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee’s pre-approval policy, which covers audit and non-audit services provided to us or to any of our subsidiaries for periods subsequent to our IPO, is as follows:
    The Audit Committee shall review and approve in advance the annual plan and scope of work of the independent auditor, including staffing of the audit, and shall (i) review with the independent auditor any audit-related concerns and management’s response and (ii) confirm that any examination is performed in accordance with the relevant accounting standards.
 
    The Audit Committee shall pre-approve all audit services and all permitted non-audit services (including the fees and terms thereof) to be performed for the Company by the independent auditors, to the extent required by law. The Committee may delegate to one or more Committee members the authority to grant pre-approvals for audit and permitted non-audit services to be performed for the Company by the independent auditor, provided that decisions of such members to grant pre-approvals shall be presented to the full Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.
 
    For those audit services performed by the independent auditor that may be considered as permitted audit services, the pre-approval of such fees by the Audit Committee will not be compulsory provided that all such fees are less than 3,000.
     In accordance with the above pre-approval policy, all audit and permitted non-audit services performed for us by our principal accountants, or any of its affiliates, were approved by the Audit Committee of our board of directors, who concluded that the provision of such services by the independent accountants was compatible with the maintenance of that firm’s independence in the conduct of its auditing functions: an auditor may not function in the role of management; an auditor may not audit his or her own work; and an auditor may not serve in an advocacy role for his or her client.
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
     The Nasdaq listing standards mandated by Rule 10A-3(b) of the Securities Exchange Act (which require, among other things, that each member of the audit committee of a listed company be independent) became operative with respect to foreign private issuers, including us, after July 31, 2005. Between July 31, 2005 and the first anniversary of our IPO on October 21, 2005, an exemption from compliance with the independence requirements was available to us. Effective September 2005, all three members of our audit committee are independent as required by Nasdaq listing standards and SEC requirements.
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
     In fiscal year 2006 neither we nor any person acting on our behalf made any purchase of Telvent equity securities.

97


Table of Contents

PART III
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
We have provided our financial statements under Item 18.
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our financial statements are at pages F-1 to F-39.
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
     The following exhibits are filed as part of this annual report.
     
Exhibit    
Number   Description
 
   
1.1
  Deed of Incorporation as filed with the Mercantile Registry of Madrid (English translation). (1)
 
   
1.2
  Articles of Association of the Spanish Corporation Telvent GIT, S.A. (“Telvent”) (English translation). (2)
 
   
2.1
  Form of Stock Certificate of Telvent. (1)
 
   
4.1
  Reciprocal Loan Agreement between Abengoa, S.A. (“Abengoa”) and Telvent dated April 20, 2004 (English translation). (1)
 
   
4.2
  Credit Agreement between Telvent Canada Ltd. (“Telvent Canada”) and LaSalle Business Credit, a division of ABN Amro Bank N.V., Canada Branch (“LaSalle”), dated May 2, 2003. (1)
 
   
4.3
  Credit Agreement Amendment (Availability and Covenant Amendments) between Telvent Canada and LaSalle, dated June 29, 2004. (4)
 
   
4.4
  Form of Services Agreement (English translation). (1)
 
   
4.5
  Telvent-GIRH Contract for Services between Telvent and Gestión Integral de Recursos Humanos, S.A., dated January 1, 2004 (English translation). (1)
 
   
4.6
  Form of Underwriting Agreement. (3)
 
   
4.7
  Share Purchase Agreement by and among Metso Automation Holding B.V, Neles-Jamesbury Inc., Telvent Sistemas y Redes, S.A., Metso Automation SCADA Solutions Ltd., and Metso Automation SCADA Solutions Inc., dated January 31, 2003. (1)
 
   
4.8
  Sale of Shares of the Company Xfera Móviles, S.A. and Adherence to Pledge and Subordination Agreements between Telvent Investments, S.L. (“Telvent Investments”) and Telvent, dated June 18, 2004 (English translation). (1)
 
   
4.9
  Contract of Sale of Shares of the Company Xfera Móviles, S.A. between Telvent Investments and Telvent, dated June 23, 2004 (English translation). (1)
 
   
4.10
  Lease contract between Carrierhouse, S.A. (now known as Telvent Housing) and Valgrande 6, S.A., dated November 15, 2000 for the facilities at Valgrande 6, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain, (English translation). (4)
 
   
4.11
  Commercial Lease Agreement between Telvent Servicios Compartidos S.A. and Prevision Espanola, S.A. and SUR, S.A. de Seguros y Reaseguros, dated February 25, 2004 for the facilities at Ronda del Tamarguillo, 29 Plantas 1a y 2a, Seville, Spain (English translation). (4)
 
   
4.12
  Lease Contract between Telvent Edificio Valgrarde, S.L. (now known as Servicios Compartidos S.A.) and Altius Partners S.L., dated July 30, 2003 at Ronda del Tamarguillo, 29 Plantas 1a y 2a, Seville, Spain (English translation). (4)
 
   
4.13
  Commercial Lease Agreement between Telvent Housing and Decesaris, S.A., dated July 1, 2004 for the facilities at Avda. Montesierra 36, Seville, Spain (English translation). (4)
 
   
4.14
  Lease Agreement for Premises for Uses Other Than as a Dwelling between Carrierhouse, S.A. (now known as Telvent

98


Table of Contents

     
Exhibit    
Number   Description
 
   
 
  Housing) and Sertram, S.A., dated June 27, 2001 for the facilities at Acero 30-32, Barcelona, Spain (English translation). (4)
 
   
4.15
  Lease of Office Space-Southland Park between Metso Automation SCADA Solutions Ltd. (now known as Telvent Canada) and Pensionfund Realty Limited, dated August 7, 2002 for the facilities at 10333 Southport Road S.W., Calgary, AB, Canada. (4)
 
   
4.16
  Lease Agreement between Telvent USA Inc. and Baker Hughes Incorporated, dated October 16, 2003 for the facilities at 7000A Hollister Road, Houston, Texas. (4)
 
   
4.17
  Leasehold Contract between Telvent Control System (Beijing) Co., Ltd. and Beijing Development Area Co., Ltd., dated November 15, 2001 (English translation). (4)
 
   
4.18
  Purchase contract between Telvent Control System (Beijing) Co., and Beijing Development Area Co., Ltd., dated March 17, 2005. (4)
 
   
4.19
  Leasing Agreement between Sainco Brasil S/A (now known as Telvent Brasil S.A.) and Bargoa S.A., dated January 1, 2003, together with a letter memorializing a discussion held on May 24, 2004 concerning amendments to the terms of the lease (English translation). (4)
 
   
4.20
  Lease between Telvent Mêxico, S.A. de C.V. and Abengoa Mexico, S.A. De C.V., dated January 1, 2003, as amended by an Addendum dated January 3, 2005 (English translation). (4)
 
   
4.21
  Lease between Carrierhouse S.A. (now known as Telvent Housing) and MC –Imovest, Sociedade Gestora de Fundos de Investimentos Imobiliarios, S.A. dated June 21, 2000 for the facilities at Severiano Falcao 14, Lisbon, Portugal. (4)
 
   
4.22
  Lease dated June 1, 2004 between Miner and Miner, Consulting Engineers, Inc. and Meyers 4701, LLC with respect to the facilities at 4701 Royal Vista Circle, Windsor, Colorado (5)
 
   
4.23
  Two leases both dated July 1, 2005, between Almos Systems Pty. Ltd. and Savterne Pty Ltd. with respect to the facilities at Units 3 and 4, 41 King Edward Road, Osborne Park, Western Australia (5)
 
   
4.24
  Lease dated March 11, 1993 between ACT Sigmex B.V. (Almos Systems) and Kroezen Vastgoed Exploitatie B.V. with respect to the facilities at Landzichtweg, 70, 4105 DP Culemborg, Netherlands (5)
 
   
4.25
  Credit Agreement Amendment (Facility B Letter of Credit) between Telvent Canada Ltd. and LaSalle Business Credit, a division of ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Canada Branch, dated May 12, 2003 (5)
 
   
4.26
  Credit Facility Amendment (Affiliate Borrowing Amendments) between Telvent Canada Ltd. and LaSalle Business Credit, a division of ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Canada Branch, dated July 14, 2005 (5)
 
   
4.27
  Credit Facility Amendment (Availability Amendments) between Telvent Canada Ltd. and LaSalle Business Credit, a division of ABN AMRO Bank N.V., Canada Branch, dated April 13, 2006 (5)
 
   
4.28
  Credit Agreement, dated May 31, 2006, among Telvent Traffic North America Inc. and LaSalle Bank National Association. (6)
 
   
4.29
  Amendment to Credit Agreement effective June 16, 2006 between Telvent Traffic North America Inc. and LaSalle Bank National Association (6)
 
   
4.30
  Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement, dated May 18, 2006, between Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., PB Farradyne, Inc., PB Energy Storage Services, Inc. and Telvent Traffic North America Inc. (6)
 
   
4.31
  Amendment to Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement, dated July 1, 2006, between Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc., PB Farradyne, Inc., PB Energy Storage Services, Inc. and Telvent Traffic North America Inc. (6)
 
   
4.32
  Lease dated November 27, 2002 between Telvent Farradyne Inc. and GLB Montrose Office Park LLC with respect to the facilities at 3206 Tower Oaks Boulevard, Rockville, Maryland 20852
 
   
4.33
  Lease dated March 1, 2007 between Miner and Miner, Consulting Engineers, Inc. and Meyers 4701, LLC with respect to the facilities at 4701 Royal Vista Circle, Windsor, Colorado (7)

99


Table of Contents

     
Exhibit    
Number   Description
 
   
4.34
  Abengoa Share Plan adopted by the Telvent Board of Directors January 23, 2006 (8)
 
   
4.35
  2007 Variable Compensation Plan adopted by the Telvent Board of Directors January 23, 2006 (9)
 
   
8.1
  Significant Subsidiaries of Telvent
 
   
12.1
  Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act.
 
   
12.2
  Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act.
 
   
12.3
  Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act.
 
   
13.1
  Certification furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act (such certificate is not deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act and is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act).
 
   
13.2
  Certification furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act (such certificate is not deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act and is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act).
 
   
13.3
  Certification furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act (such certificate is not deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act and is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act).

100


Table of Contents

 
(1)   incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed on October 4, 2004.
 
(2)   incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Form 6-K filed on November 23, 2004.
 
(3)   incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Registration Statement on Form F-1/A filed on October 18, 2004.
 
(4)   incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on May 13, 2005.
 
(5)   incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed May 3, 2006.
 
(6)   incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Report on Form 6-K filed on August 30, 2006.
 
(7)   incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Report on Form 6-K filed on March 7, 2007.
 
(8)   incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Report on Form 6-K filed on February 8, 2006.
 
(9)   incorporated by reference to the registrant’s Report on Form 6-K filed on March 26, 2007.
SIGNATURES
     The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
         
  TELVENT GIT, S.A. (Registrant)
 
 
  By:   /s/ Manuel Sánchez    
    Manuel Sánchez   
    Chief Executive Officer   
 
Date: March 30, 2007

101


Table of Contents

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN ANNUAL REPORT 20-F:

F-1


Table of Contents

         
  Plaza Pablo Ruiz Picasso, 1
Torre Picasso
28020 Madrid
 
  España
 
 
  Tel.:   +34 915 14 50 00
 
  Fax:   +34 915 14 51 80
 
      +34 915 56 74 30
    www.deloitte.es
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Telvent GIT, S.A.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Telvent GIT, S.A. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and shareholders’ equity for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The consolidated financial statements of the Company for the two years ended December 31, 2005, were audited by other auditors whose report, dated April 3, 2006, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such 2006 consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Telvent GIT, S.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 30, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
S\ Deloitte, S.L.
Madrid, Spain
March 30, 2007

 

 

 

     
Deloitte, S.L. Inscrita en el Registro Mercantil de Madrid, Tomo 13.650, folio 188, sectión 8, hoja M-54414.
 

Member of

inscriptisectiónn 96, C.I.F.: B-79104469. Domicilio Social: Plaza Pablo Ruiz Picasso, 1, Torre Picasso - 28020 Madrid
  Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

F-2


Table of Contents

         
  Plaza Pablo Ruiz Picasso, 1
Torre Picasso
28020 Madrid
 
  España
 
 
  Tel.:   +34 915 14 50 00
 
  Fax:   +34 915 14 51 80
 
      +34 915 56 74 30
    www.deloitte.es
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Telvent GIT, S.A.:
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Telvent GIT, S.A. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Telvent Farradyne, Inc., which was acquired on July 1, 2006, Beijing Blue Shield High & New Tech. Co., Ltd., which was acquired on April 26, 2006, and Maexbic, S.A., which was acquired in November 2006, whose financial statements constitute 1.15% of net assets, 4.86% of total assets, 4.07% of revenues, and 3.94% of net income as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting at the mentioned companies. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

F-3


Table of Contents

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management’s assessment:
The Company has been growing significantly over the last three years, and part of its growth comes from foreign and newly acquired businesses. The Company is implementing its systems of internal controls, both operational and financial reporting related, to these foreign subsidiaries in addition to monitor them from corporate office. However, the Company has been unable to complete this implementation by the required reporting date. This matter has caused some misstatements to the consolidated financial statements, in particular in the areas of tax and derivative accounting. As such, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2006.
This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, of the Company and this report does not affect our report on such consolidated financial statements.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2006, of the Company and our report dated March 30, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion.
S\ Deloitte, S.L.
Madrid, Spain
March 30, 2007

 

 

 

     
Deloitte, S.L. Inscrita en el Registro Mercantil de Madrid, Tomo 13.650, folio 188, sectión 8, hoja M-54414.
 

Member of

inscriptisectiónn 96, C.I.F.: B-79104469. Domicilio Social: Plaza Pablo Ruiz Picasso, 1, Torre Picasso - 28020 Madrid
  Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

F-4


Table of Contents

[PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LOGO]
     
 
  Paseo de la Castellana, 43
 
  28046 Madrid
 
  España
 
  Tel. +34 915 684 400
 
  Fax +34 913 083 566
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the board of directors and shareholders of Telvent GIT, S.A:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Telvent GIT, S.A. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Telvent GIT, S.A. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
PricewaterhouseCoopers
April 3, 2006
Madrid, Spain
PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores, S.L. — R.M. Madrid, hoja 87.250-1, folio 75, tomo 9.267, libro 8.054, sección 3(a) Inscrita en el R.O.A.C. con el número SO242 – CIF: B-79031290

F-5


Table of Contents

Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands of Euros, except share amounts)
                 
    As of     As of  
    December 31,     December 31,  
    2006     2005  
Assets:
               
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  69,232     80,010  
Restricted cash
    8,045       3,183  
Other short-term investments
    386       709  
Derivative contracts
    2,814       1,194  
Accounts receivable (net of allowances of 2,719 in 2006 and 2,650 in 2005)
    144,763       92,494  
Unbilled revenues
    101,317       77,069  
Due from related parties
    47,958       45,449  
Inventory
    19,274       10,669  
Other taxes receivable
    13,258       8,434  
Deferred tax assets
    3,692       6,043  
Other current assets
    7,016       2,485  
 
           
Total current assets
  417,755     327,739  
Deposits and other investments
    1,795       1,870  
Property, plant and equipment, net
    51,215       52,965  
Long-term receivables and other assets
    11,236       11,317  
Deferred tax assets
    14,954       14,446  
Other intangible assets, net
    21,260       10,143  
Goodwill
    37,416       16,862  
 
           
Total assets
  555,631     435,342  
 
           
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
               
Accounts payable
  216,614     150,246  
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings
    26,568       20,417  
Accrued and other liabilities
    10,389       9,418  
Income and other taxes payable
    26,901       17,835  
Deferred tax liabilities
    5,347       3,082  
Due to related parties
    23,512       11,146  
Current portion of long-term debt
    1,514       8,515  
Short-term debt
    32,295       23,958  
Short-term leasing obligations
    2,562       1,948  
Derivative contracts
    3,269       1,440  
 
           
Total current liabilities
  348,971     248,005  
Long-term debt less current portion
    15,188       15,310  
Long-term leasing obligations
    1,834       4,035  
Other long term liabilities
    5,716       7,507  
Deferred tax liabilities
    6,276       673  
Unearned income
    131       211  
 
           
Total liabilities
  378,116     275,741  
 
           
Minority interest
    794       1,604  

F-6


Table of Contents

Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands of Euros, except share amounts)
                 
    As of     As of  
    December 31,     December 31,  
    2006     2005  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)
               
Shareholders’ equity:
               
Common stock, 3.005 par value, 29,247,100 shares authorized, issued and outstanding, same class and series
    87,889       87,889  
Additional paid-in capital
    40,338       40,471  
Deferred compensation
          (2,044 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
    (2,142 )     2,883  
Retained earnings
    50,636       28,798  
 
           
Total shareholders’ equity
  176,721     157,997  
 
           
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  555,631     435,342  
 
           
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-7


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands of Euros, except share and per share amounts)
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
Revenues
  503,844     402,369     312,571  
Cost of revenues
    393,219       319,712       245,578  
 
                 
Gross profit
  110,625     82,657     66,993  
 
                 
General and administrative
    39,850       25,286       21,446  
Sales and marketing
    13,730       13,023       10,118  
Research and development
    16,465       14,980       11,060  
Depreciation and amortization
    9,562       8,225       7,904  
 
                 
Total operating expenses
  79,607     61,514     50,528  
 
                 
Income from operations
  31,018     21,143     16,465  
Financial income
    3,471       3,355       4,009  
Financial expense
    (10,114 )     (6,787 )     (6,322 )
Other income (expense), net
    (387 )           88  
 
                 
Total other income (expense)
  (7,030 )   (3,432 )   (2,225 )
 
                 
Income before income taxes
  23,988     17,711     14,240  
Income tax expense (benefit)
    2,080       2,972       4,749  
 
                 
Net income before minority interest
  21,908     14,739     9,491  
Loss/(profit) attributable to minority interests
    (70 )     (373 )     654  
 
                 
Net income
  21,838     14,366     10,145  
 
                 
Earnings per share
                       
Basic and diluted net income per share
  0.75     0.49     0.47  
 
                 
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
                       
Basic and diluted
    29,247,100       29,247,100       21,775,752  
 
                 
The consolidated statements of operations include the following income and (expense) items from transactions with related parties. See Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements:
                         
    Year Ended December 31,
    2006   2005   2004
Revenues
  29,226     22,635     16,223  
Cost of revenues
    (10,636 )     (10,236 )     (7,410 )
General and administrative
    (5,646 )     (4,254 )     (1,323 )
Financial (expense), net
    (1,409 )     (321 )     (135 )
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-8


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands of Euros)
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
Cash flows from operating activities:
                       
Net income
  21,838     14,366     10,145  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
                       
Depreciation and amortization
    9,986       10,625       9,015  
Net foreign exchange (gains) losses
    (903 )     849       882  
Allowance for doubtful accounts
    278       485       307  
Deferred income taxes
    (2,769 )     1,602       (6,369 )
Minority interests
    70       373       (654 )
Compensation related to stock compensation plans
    1,910       1,413       2,258  
Loss (gains) on sale of investments
    387             (88 )
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of amounts acquired:
                       
Accounts and other long-term receivable
    (44,333 )     (16,019 )     1,747  
Inventory
    (8,149 )     (1,136 )     2,563  
Unbilled revenues
    (26,743 )     (36,917 )     (10,830 )
Related parties trade receivables and other assets
    (8,484 )     (5,614 )     (1,684 )
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings
    8,248       3,951       1,965  
Accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities, related parties trade payable
    87,443       42,001       6,992  
Due to temporary joint ventures
    (2,060 )     (11,515 )     8,445  
 
                 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
  36,719     4,464     24,694  
 
                 
Cash flows from investing activities:
                       
Restricted cash — guaranteed deposit of long term investments and commercial transactions
    (4,862 )     4,845       (8,028 )
Due from related parties
    4,552       (5,018 )     3,233  
Purchase of property, plant & equipment
    (2,313 )     (3,894 )     (4,931 )
Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired
    (43,208 )     (4,957 )     (10,043 )
(Acquisition) disposals of investments
    (153 )     789       33,912  
 
                 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
  (45,984 )   (8,235 )   14,143  
 
                 
Cash flows from financing activities:
                       
Proceeds from long-term debt
    1,084       9,196       1,982  
Repayment of long-term debt
    (11,576 )     (15,128 )     (11,371 )
Proceeds of short-term debt
    16,095       7,157       7,662  
Repayment of short-term debt
    (5,758 )     (1,947 )     (13,100 )
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net
                60,518  
Due to related parties
    (218 )     3,099       (33,464 )
 
                 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
  (373 )   2,377     12,227  
 
                 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-9


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (cont.)
(In thousands of Euros)
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
  (9,638 )   (1,394 )   51,064  
Net effect of foreign exchange in cash and cash equivalents
    (1,140 )     889       (1,534 )
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period
    67,796       69,582       27,735  
Joint venture cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period
    12,214       10,933       3,250  
 
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period
  69,232     80,010     80,515  
 
                 
Supplemental disclosure of cash information:
                       
Cash paid for the period:
                       
Income taxes
  2,507     1,153     439  
Interest
  8,275     5,802     6,419  
 
                 
Non-cash transactions:
                       
Capital leases (Note 18)
  1,796     2,622     5,168  
Bilateral credit agreement between related parties (Note 22)
          24,537  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-10


Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
(In thousands of Euros, except share amounts)
                                                         
                                            Accumulated        
                    Additional             Deferred     Other     Total  
    Ordinary Shares     Paid-in     Retained     Stock     Comprehensive     Shareholders’  
    Shares     Amount     capital     Earnings     Compensation     Income / (Loss)     Equity  
Balance, December 31, 2003
    20,000,000     60,101         663         (431 )   60,333  
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
Net Income
                      10,145                   10,145  
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of taxes of 575
                                  (1,068 )     (1,068 )
Effect of the sale of securities and affiliates to related parties
                      3,624             704       4,328  
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                  (2,569 )     (2,569 )
 
                                                     
Total comprehensive income
                                                    10,836  
Issuance of common stock
    8,700,000       26,144       35,284                         61,428  
Issuance of common stock due to exercise of green shoe option
    547,100       1,644       1,872                         3,516  
Expenses related to share offering
                    (7,059 )                       (7,059 )
Share offering expenses paid by Abengoa
                3,784                         3,784  
Reclass of stock compensation, net to shareholders’ equity
                6,438             (3,942 )           2,496  
Amortization of stock compensation
                            637             637  
 
                                         
Balance, December 31, 2004
    29,247,100     87,889     40,319     14,432     (3,305 )   (3,364 )   135,971  
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
Net Income
                      14,366                   14,366  
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                  6,247       6,247  
 
                                                     
Total comprehensive income
                                                    20,613  
Reclass of stock compensation, net to shareholders’ equity
                152                         152  
Amortization of stock compensation
                            1,261             1,261  
 
                                         
Balance, December 31, 2005
    29,247,100     87,889     40,471     28,798     (2,044 )   2,883     157,997  
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
Net Income
                      21,838                   21,838  
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                  (5,025 )     (5,025 )
 
                                                     
Total comprehensive income
                                                    16,813  
Elimination of deferred compensation balance
                (2,044 )           2,044              
Amortization of formula based stock compensation plan
                1,640                         1,640  
Parent Company stock purchase plan expense
                271                         271  
 
                                         
Balance, December 31, 2006
    29,247,100     87,889     40,338     50,636         (2,142 )   176,721  
 
                                         
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-11


Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands of Euros, except share and per share amounts)
1. Description of Business
Telvent Sistemas y Redes, S.A. was incorporated on April 4, 2000 and is registered in the Madrid Registry of Companies, Volume 15,370, Folio 164, Sheet No. M-257879, 1st entry, C.I.F. No. A-82631623. Its corporate headquarters are located in Madrid, Spain. At the general shareholders’ meeting held on January 23, 2003, Telvent Sistemas y Redes, S.A. changed its name to Telvent GIT, S.A. (“Telvent” or “the Company”). Telvent is a majority owned subsidiary of Abengoa, S.A. (“Abengoa Group”).
Telvent is an information technology company that provides value-added real-time products and services solutions to customers in targeted industrial segments (Energy, Environment, Traffic, Transport) primarily in Europe, North America, Latin America (including Mexico), the Asia-Pacific region, and the Middle-East and Africa. These products and services solutions include systems integration, consulting services, outsourcing services, design and engineering services, maintenance services and software that enable our customers to more efficiently manage their core operations, business processes, and customer services.
Telvent’s mission-critical real-time products and services solutions collect raw data at the field level, transform that data into operational information, and convert the operational information into business intelligence. Telvent is capable of providing solutions that link this business intelligence to its customers’ enterprise information technology systems.
Within these financial statements, “Abengoa” refers to Abengoa, S.A. and its subsidiaries, but excluding Telvent and its subsidiaries. The “Abengoa Group” refers to Abengoa, S.A. and its subsidiaries, including Telvent and its subsidiaries.
2. Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements of Telvent, together with its subsidiaries, include the accounts of all majority-owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries and variable interest entities that are required to be consolidated. All intercompany profits, transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation. Investments in joint ventures and other entities over which the Company does not have control, but does have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies, are carried under the equity method. There were no such investments at December 31, 2006 and 2005. Non-marketable equity investments in which the Company does not exercise control or have significant influence over the operating and financial policies are accounted for using the cost method subject to other-than-temporary impairment.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
The Company considers all highly liquid investments, including deposits, money market funds, and commercial paper with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
At December 31, 2005, there were deposits amounting to 3,183, which constituted a counter-guarantee of certain obligations assumed by the Company during the normal course of business. These deposits were restricted for use until the cash was received by the third party, which released the Company’s obligation. The cash was received from third parties during the first quarter of 2006, and we have thus been released from the restriction.
At December 31, 2006, there are deposits amounting to 8,045, which also constitute a counter-guarantee of certain obligations assumed by the Company during the normal course of business. These deposits are restricted for use until the cash is received by the third party, which will thereby release the Company’s obligation.

F-12


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2006, the Company had the following cash equivalents:
                     
            Maturity    
Financial fund   Name   Currency   Date   Amount
ABN Funds
  Interest Growth Fund   Euro   Daily     6,332  
 
  Global Liquidity Fund   Euro   Daily     4,501  
Deutsche Bank Funds
  DWS Institutional Money Plus   Euro   Daily     12,443  
 
                   
 
          Total     23,276  
 
                   
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The allowance for doubtful accounts is used to provide for impairment of receivables on the balance sheet. The balance represents an estimate of probable but unconfirmed losses in the collection of accounts receivable balances. A specific receivable is reviewed for impairment when, based on current information and events, it is deemed probable that contractual amounts will not be fully collected. Factors considered in assessing recoverability include a customer’s extended delinquency and filing for bankruptcy. An impairment allowance is recorded based on the difference between the carrying value of the receivable and the expected amount of collection.
Financial Instruments
Derivatives
All derivative instruments are recognized in the financial statements and are measured at fair value regardless of the purpose or intent for holding them. The Company, as part of its foreign currency risk management program, has entered into numerous forward exchange contracts to protect against fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates on long-term projects and anticipated future transactions. In addition, the Company has entered into interest rate caps in order to manage interest rate risk on certain long-term variable rate financing arrangements.
Although the forward exchange contracts and interest rate caps are used solely as economic hedges, these transactions are currently recorded at fair value within the balance sheet with related gains and losses recorded in earnings, as the Company has not yet started to apply hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities for these transactions.
The Company enters into certain long-term binding contracts that are denominated in a currency that is neither the functional or local currency of either party. This feature of the contracts is analogous to an embedded derivative that is bifurcated from the underlying host contract at inception of the contract and similar to freestanding derivatives, is recorded at fair value within the balance sheet with related gains and losses recorded in earnings.
Factoring of Trade Receivables
The Company has entered into several accounts receivable factoring arrangements that provide for the accelerated receipt of approximately 108,810 of cash for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 75,667 for the year ended December 31, 2005 on available trade accounts receivable. Under the factoring agreements, the Company sells on a revolving and non-recourse basis, certain of its trade accounts receivable (“Pooled Receivables”) to various financial institutions. These transactions are accounted for as sales because the Company has relinquished control of the Pooled Receivables and the Company does not maintain any continuing involvement with the sold assets. Accordingly, Pooled Receivables sold under these facilities are excluded from receivables in the accompanying balance sheet. The Company incurs commissions of approximately 0.15% to 0.30% of the Pooled Receivable balance. The commission and interest expense are recorded as a charge to earnings in the period in which they are incurred as the commission and interest expense is in effect a loss on the sale of the asset. The total amount of commission expense included in financial expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was 2,338, 1,446 and 1,202, respectively.
Inventory
Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value and is determined using the average cost method. Inventory consists of raw materials and work-in-progress, which includes the cost of direct labor, materials and overhead costs related to projects.

F-13


Table of Contents

Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at historical cost and depreciated using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
     
Buildings and surface rights
  20 years
Integral equipment
  3 - 20 years
Furniture and fixtures
  7 - 10 years
Computer equipment
  3 - 4 years
Vehicles
  5 - 12 years
Other
  3 - 7 years
Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred, while improvements, which increase the economic life of the asset, are capitalized and amortized accordingly. Gains or losses upon sale or retirement of property, plant and equipment are included in the consolidated statement of operations and the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the consolidated balance sheet.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of identifiable tangible and intangible net assets over the fair value of these net assets as of the date of acquisition. Other intangible assets represent the fair value of intangible assets identified on acquisition. The Company applies the provisions of SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which require that goodwill, and certain other intangible assets deemed to have an indefinite useful life, not be amortized, but instead be assessed annually for impairment using fair value measurement techniques.
Other intangible assets represent identifiable intangibles with a finite life and are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition and are amortized using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
     
Software licenses
  4 years
Purchased software technology
  5 - 10 years
Customer contracts and relationships
  2 - 10 years
In process research and development
  Immediately
Other intangible assets also include brand names, arising from the purchase of Miner & Miner, which are not amortized, as it is deemed to have an indefinite useful life.
The Company has recorded intangibles for acquired customer relationships due to the fact that the Company has historically experienced a high incidence of repeat business for system sales and ongoing service support. The Company identified both contractual and non-contractual customer relationships (as distinct from contractual backlog) in its oil, gas and water, transit, electric utilities, remote terminal units (RTU) parts, repair businesses and traffic and transport. The customer contracts intangible is being amortized over the period of the related contracts, ranging normally from 2 to 10 years. The customer relationship intangible is being amortized generally over a ten-year period depending on the related acquisition, as the cash flows show strong and consistent net inflows over a ten-year period. Straight-line amortization was chosen for customer relationships because of relatively consistent expected cash flows over the ten-year useful life. In-process research and development acquired in a business combination is fully amortized immediately after acquisition.
Maintenance costs related to software technology are expensed in the period in which they are incurred.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets
The Company reviews the carrying value of its long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment, and finite life intangibles whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. To the extent the estimated undiscounted future cash inflows attributable to the asset, less estimated undiscounted future cash outflows, are less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the difference between the carrying value of such assets and fair value. Assets for which there is a committed disposition plan, whether through sale or abandonment, are reported at the lower of carrying value or fair value less costs to sell.

F-14


Table of Contents

Revenues
Revenues consist primarily of two types of revenues streams, products and services solutions and managed services.
Products and Services Solutions (Projects)
The Company provides products and services solutions generally under short and long-term fixed-price contracts. The contracts periods range from 3 months to approximately 3 years in length. Income for these contracts is recognized following the percentage-of-completion method, measured by the cost-to-cost method in accordance with the SOP 81-1, Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts. The revenue earned in a period is based on total actual costs incurred plus estimated costs to completion.
Billings in excess of recognized revenues are recorded in “Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings”. When billings are less than recognized revenues, the differences are recorded in “Unbilled revenues”.
Contract costs include all direct material and labor costs and those indirect costs related to contract performance, such as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs, and depreciation costs. Selling costs directly attributable to a specific project are capitalized if it is expected that such costs will be recovered. General and administrative costs are charged to expense as incurred. In the event that a loss is anticipated on a contract, it is immediately recognized in income. Changes in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability, and changes to the job scope may result in revisions to costs and income and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are determined.
Additionally, since the acquisition of Miner & Miner, part of our products and services solutions revenue is derived from the sale of software, support contracts and services. Such revenue is recognized in accordance with SOP No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition” and SOP 81-1. For software sales with no significant post-shipment obligations and no uncertainty about customer acceptance, revenue is recognized on delivery of software to the customer. Revenues on software sales with significant post-shipment obligations, including the production, modification, or customization of software, are recognized by the percentage-of-completion method, with progress to completion measured on the basis of completion of milestones, labor costs incurred currently versus the total estimated labor cost of performing the contract over its term, or other factors appropriate to the individual contract of sale.
Managed Services
Managed services contracts include leasing arrangements, maintenance, monthly fixed-rate, and fixed-rate hourly contracts. The Company recognizes revenue earned on the leasing, maintenance, and monthly fixed-rate contracts on a straight-line basis over the term of the contract. For contract arrangements where there is a fixed-rate per hour charge, the income is recorded based on time incurred to date.
The Company receives funds under capital grants from government agencies and other third parties, primarily for the purposes of research and development projects. Amounts received from such parties have been included in unearned income in the balance sheet and are amortized into income during the period in which the services are performed and the cost is incurred.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues includes distribution costs, direct labor, materials and the applicable share of overhead expense directly related to the execution of services and delivery of projects.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses include compensation, employee benefits, office expenses, travel and other expenses for executive, finance, legal, business development and other corporate and support-functions personnel. General and administrative expenses also include fees for professional services, occupancy costs and recruiting of personnel.
Advertising
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense amounted to approximately 2,274, 1,797, and 1,250 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

F-15


Table of Contents

Research and Development
Expenditures on research and development are expensed as incurred. The types of cost included in research and development expense include salaries, software, contractor fees, supplies and administrative expenses related to research and development activities.
Earnings Per Share
A basic earnings per share measure is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. There were no instruments outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 that would have a dilutive impact on the earnings per share calculation and accordingly, a separate fully diluted earnings per share measure is not presented.
Effective April 15, 2004, the shareholders approved a 200 for 1 split of ordinary shares, resulting in an increase in the number of shares from 100,000 to 20,000,000. The par value of the shares decreased accordingly from 601.01 to 3.005. Related disclosures within these consolidated financial statements retrospectively reflect the impact of this change.
The weighted average number of shares outstanding is calculated using the average number of days for each year.
Foreign Currency Translation
The functional currency of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries is the local currency in which they operate; accordingly, their financial statements are translated into the Euro using the exchange rate at each balance sheet date for assets and liabilities and a weighted average exchange rate for revenues, expenses, gains and losses within the statement of operations. Shareholders’ equity accounts are translated at historical exchange rates. Translation adjustments related to the balance sheet are included in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of shareholders’ equity.
Foreign currency transactions undertaken by the Company and its domestic subsidiaries are accounted for at the exchange rates prevailing on the related transaction dates. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to Euros using period-end exchange rates, and income and expense items are translated using a weighted average rate for the relevant period. Gains and losses resulting from the settlement of foreign currency transactions and from the translation of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations.
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Other comprehensive income (loss), which is reported in the accompanying statement of shareholders’ equity, consists of net income (loss) and other gains and losses affecting equity that are excluded from net income. For the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company’s other comprehensive income consisted of the cumulative currency translation adjustment. For the year ended December 31, 2004, other comprehensive income also included unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, and
adjustments related to the sale of certain subsidiaries to an entity under common control, which was recorded as a capital contribution directly to retained earnings because under Spanish law, the Company is not allowed to affect additional paid-in capital unless the transaction relates to an issuance of capital.
Segments
Segments are identified by reference to the Company’s internal organization structure and the factors that management uses to make operating decisions and assess performance. The Company had, for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, five reportable segments consisting of Energy, Traffic, Transport, Environment and Other.
Start-Up Activities
The Company expenses the costs of start-up activities, including organization costs, as incurred.
Stock Compensation Plan
Until December 31, 2005, the Company applied Accounting Principles Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB 25”), and related interpretations in accounting for its formula based stock purchase plan. Compensation expense was

F-16


Table of Contents

recognized in earnings at the balance sheet date based on a formula, with the exception of shares granted after January 1, 2003, where compensation expense was recognized based on the excess, if any, of the fair-value of the Company’s stock at the grant date of the award over the amount an employee is required to pay to acquire the stock. For ordinary shares sold to employees after January 1, 2003, we estimated the fair value of our stock at the date of sale on the basis of the midpoint of the expected price range for a public share offering less a 15% discount. The allocation of a discount was due to the non-marketability of the shares as a result of the absence of a public market in 2003.
As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123R”), on January 1, 2006, the Company has designated its formula-based stock purchase plan as an equity award plan and has started to record as an expense the fair value of the shares purchased by the Company’s employees under the plan. As the shares sold under the incentive plan consist of unvested stock, the fair value applied was the estimated market value on the grant date, as previously calculated for the pro-forma disclosures required by SFAS 123. The Company has chosen the modified prospective application transition method allowed by SFAS 123R. Amounts previously classified under the “deferred stock compensation” caption of the consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity were reclassified to “additional paid-in capital”.
In addition, the Company has applied SFAS 123R to account for the share acquisition plan established by Abengoa on Abengoa’s shares. The plan is for members of the senior management of Abengoa and its subsidiaries, including senior management of Telvent and its subsidiaries. This plan has been accounted for as an equity award plan under SFAS 123R, and is being treated similar to a stock option plan. A valuation of the plan has been performed at the grant date, which was January 23, 2006, and the corresponding compensation cost is being recognized over the requisite service period of five years and six months (cliff vesting).
The applicable disclosure requirements of SFAS 123R have been provided below for the period ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:
                         
    Year Ended December 31,
    2006   2005   2004
Net income as reported
   21,838     14,366     10,145  
Add share-based compensation cost included in net income as reported
  1,910     1,413     2,258  
Less share-based employee compensation cost that would have been included in the determination of net income if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards
  (1,910 )   (2,523 )   (2,710 )
Pro forma net income if the fair value based method had been applied to all awards
  21,838     13,256     9,693  
Basic and diluted earnings per share as reported in Euros
  0.75     0.49     0.47  
Pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share in Euros
  0.75     0.45     0.45  
As the shares sold under the incentive plan consist of unvested stock, the fair value applied to arrive at the pro forma earnings and per share data was the estimated market value on the grant date.
Income Taxes
Up to January 1, 2004, the Company filed its income tax as part of the consolidated tax group of our majority shareholder Abengoa, S.A. using the separate return basis. Following our initial public offering (our ¨IPO¨) in October of 2004, and the consequent dilution of Abengoa’s ownership interest in Telvent, the Company and some of its subsidiaries were excluded from the Abengoa consolidated tax group. Thus, for the year ended December 31, 2004, all Telvent companies filed taxes on a stand-alone basis. Since January 1, 2005, the Company and some of its subsidiaries have formed a new tax group. Following the rules for tax consolidation in Spain, subsidiaries in which more than a 75% interest is owned can be consolidated for tax purposes. The remaining companies will file taxes on a stand-alone basis.
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset/liability method. At each balance sheet date, a current tax asset or liability is recorded, representing income taxes currently refundable or payable. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial statement and income tax purposes, as determined under enacted tax laws and rates. The income tax provision is the result of the change in these current and deferred tax accounts from period to period, plus or minus tax payments made or refunds received during the year.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured in each jurisdiction at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted by the balance sheet date. The effect is included in income from continuing operations in the period of enactment. The Company adjusts its deferred tax assets and liabilities to reflect changes in tax laws or rates. As described in Note 19, during the fourth quarter of 2006, a tax reform was carried out in Spain by virtue of laws 35/2006 (introducing a new Personal Income Tax) and 36/2006 (introducing measures in order to avoid

F-17


Table of Contents

tax fraud). With respect to corporate income tax rates, Law 35/2006 has reduced the 35% general corporate income tax rate available until December 31, 2006, to 32.5% for the year 2007, and 30% for year 2008 onwards. Therefore, the effect of this change has been reflected in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006.
The Company records tax loss carry-forwards as deferred tax assets to the extent that they are more likely than not to be recovered in future periods. The Company’s temporary differences include allowances for research and development activities, employee training and export activities.
Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation.
3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments”. This standard amends the guidance in SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, and No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”. SFAS No. 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole (eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host) if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. The provisions of SFAS No. 155 nullify or amend certain Derivatives Implementation Group (DIG) Issues. SFAS No. 155 is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006. The Company does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have any material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets — An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 140”. This standard amends the guidance in SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities”. Among other requirements, SFAS No. 156 requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or servicing liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a servicing contract in any of the following situations:
  (a)   A transfer of the servicer’s financial assets that meets the requirements for sale accounting;
 
  (b)   A transfer of the servicer’s financial assets to a qualifying special-purpose entity in a guaranteed mortgage securitization in which the transferor retains all of the resulting securities and classifies them as either available-for-sale securities or trading securities in accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”; or
 
  (c)   An acquisition or assumption of an obligation to service a financial asset that does not relate to financial assets of the servicer or its consolidated affiliates.
SFAS No. 156 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006, with earlier adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have any material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (FIN 48). This clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This Interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company has not yet assessed what effect, if any, the adoption of this Interpretation will have on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, that defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have any material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

F-18


Table of Contents

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R). This Statement requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan (other than a multiemployer plan) as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. It also requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position, with limited exceptions. An employer with publicly traded equity securities, such as the Company, is required to initially recognize the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan and to provide the required disclosures as of the end of the fiscal year ending after December 15, 2006; such requirement did not affect the Company’s reported disclosures. Guidance related to the measurement date of the plans is effective for years ending after December 31, 2008: The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have any material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
During October 2006, the FASB issued three final FASB Staff Positions (FSPs) related to Statements 126 and 123(R). FSP FAS 126-1 amends certain accounting standards to clarify the definition of a “public entity.” FSP FAS 123(R)-5 addresses whether a modification of an instrument in connection with an equity restructuring should be considered a modification for purposes of applying FSP FAS 123(R)-1. FSP FAS 123(R)-6 addresses certain technical corrections of Statement 123(R). FSP FAS 126-1 should be applied prospectively in fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2006. The latter two should be applied in the first reporting period beginning after October 10 and October 20, 2006, respectively. The Company does not expect the adoption of any of these FSPs to have any material effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
On February 15, 2007, the FASB issued Statement 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, which permits an entity to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value. Statement 159 offers an irrevocable option to carry the vast majority of financial assets and liabilities at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in earnings (the fair value option, or FVO). Under Statement 159, entities that elect the FVO will report unrealized gains and losses in earnings. Statement 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has not assessed what effect, if any, the adoption of this Statement will have on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
4. Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consist of:
                 
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005  
Trade accounts receivable
  145,798     93,455  
Payroll advances
    1,684       1,689  
Allowances for doubtful accounts
    (2,719 )     (2,650 )
 
           
 
  144,763     92,494  
 
           
The following analysis details the changes in the Company’s allowances for doubtful accounts during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
Balance at beginning of the year
  2,650     2,165     2,145  
Increase in allowances during the year
    278       485       307  
Write-offs during the year
    (209 )           (287 )
 
                 
Balance at the end of the year
  2,719     2,650     2,165  
 
                 
5. Other Short-Term Investments
The following is a summary of the Company’s other short-term investments as of December 31, 2006 and 2005:
                 
    Year Ended December, 31  
    2006     2005  
Investment funds and other investments
  11     510  
Short-term guarantee deposits
    375       199  
 
           
 
  386     709  
 
           

F-19


Table of Contents

6. Deposits and Other Investments
Deposits and other investments consist of the following:
                 
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005  
Deposits for rentals and customers
  1,795     1,761  
Other investments
          109  
 
           
 
  1,795     1,870  
 
           
Joint Ventures
The Company participates in joint venture arrangements or Union Temporal de Empresas (“UTEs”) in connection with its share of certain long-term service contracts.
These joint ventures are considered to be variable interest entities as they have no equity, and are operated through a management committee comprised of equal representation from each of the ventures, which makes decisions about the joint venture’s activities that have a significant effect on its success. Transfer restrictions in the agreements establish a de facto agency relationship between all ventures. In accordance with FIN 46-R, the Company consolidates those joint ventures where it is the partner most closely associated with the joint venture.
In accordance with its transition provisions, as of January 1, 2004, the Company applied FIN 46-R to all variable interest entities created prior to January 31, 2003. Since these entities were previously equity accounted for, the impact of consolidation of certain of these variable interest entities where the Company is the primary beneficiary did not result in a cumulative effect of an accounting change.
The company has applied FIN 46-R to all remaining joint ventures created after January 1, 2004. As such, all joint ventures in which the Company is the primary beneficiary are consolidated. The increase in total assets from these consolidated entities amounted to 54,073 and  39,868 as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Total revenue recognized with respect to these consolidated joint ventures was  48,577, including 40,947 of revenues of other venture partners in these arrangements, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2006. During the corresponding period in 2005, revenue recognized with respect to these consolidated joint ventures was 42,403 including 31,684 of revenues of other venture partners in these arrangements. During the corresponding period in 2004, revenue recognized with respect to these consolidated joint ventures was 40,125, including 30,820 of revenues of other venture partners in these arrangements. Corresponding costs due to other joint ventures of 40,761, 31,528 and 30,727 are recognized in cost of revenues as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These revenues and equivalent cost of revenues were recognized based on the billings of the other venturers to the UTE. There are no consolidated assets that are collateral for the UTEs’ obligations. The effect in operating cash flow was a decrease of 2,279 and 10,560 (including 2,060 and 11,515 of changes in operating assets and liabilities) for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively and an increase of 8,371 (including 8,445 of changes in operating assets and liabilities) for the year ended December 31, 2004. The enterprise’s maximum exposure to loss related to performance guarantees given by Telvent as a result of its involvement with the UTEs that are not consolidated is 2,547.
7. Long-term Receivables and Other Assets
Long-term receivables and other assets consist of the following:
                 
    As of     As of  
    December 31,     December 31,  
    2006     2005  
Long-term receivables
  10,862     11,127  
Other assets
    374       190  
 
           
 
  11,236     11,317  
 
           
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005 long-term receivables consisted mainly of a trade note receivable to be collected monthly over a period of twenty years in relation to the execution of our El Toyo digital city project. In connection with this receivable, on November 10, 2005 we also signed a Credit Agreement with Unicaja (Note 15), that will be established on a non-recourse basis when the customer accepts delivery of the above mentioned project in its turn-key phase.

F-20


Table of Contents

8. Inventory
Inventory consists of the following:
                 
    Year Ended  
    December 31,  
    2006     2005  
Raw Materials
  3,221     2,233  
Work-in-progress
    16,053       8,436  
 
           
 
  19,274     10,669  
 
           
9. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
                                                 
    Year Ended December, 31  
    2006     2005  
            Accumulated     Net             Accumulated     Net  
    Cost     Depreciation     Value     Cost     Depreciation     Value  
Land and buildings
  6,128     (3,740 )   2,388     5,292     (3,597 )   1,695  
Integral equipment
    57,677       (15,445 )     42,232       54,327       (11,455 )     42,872  
Furniture and fixtures
    5,687       (4,597 )     1,090       5,876       (4,496 )     1,380  
Computer equipment
    10,405       (9,424 )     981       11,914       (10,469 )     1,445  
Vehicles
    702       (465 )     237       527       (443 )     84  
Capital leases
    16,989       (12,818 )     4,171       15,083       (9,763 )     5,320  
Other
    333       (217 )     116       314       (145 )     169  
 
                                   
 
  97,921     (46,706 )   51,215     93,333     (40,368 )   52,965  
 
                                   
Total depreciation expense for property, plant and equipment other than leases for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was 3,264, 3,220, and 4,017, respectively. Additionally, there are 295, 665 and 1,111 of depreciation included in “Cost of revenues” for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Total depreciation expense for capitalized leases for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was 2,081, 917 and 541, respectively. Additionally there are 1,001, 1,735 and 875 of depreciation included in “General and Administrative” for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 respectively.
10. Other Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of the following:
                                                 
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005  
            Accumulated     Net             Accumulated     Net  
    Cost     Amortization     Value     Cost     Amortization     Value  
Intangible assets, subject to amortization:
                                               
Software licenses
  3,221     (2,243 )   978     2,315     (2,075 )   240  
Customer contracts and relationships
    17,331       (6,732 )     10,599       9,420       (3,872 )     5,548  
Purchased software technology
    14,507       (5,367 )     9,140       7,785       (3,845 )     3,940  
In- process research and development
    566       (566 )           368       (368 )      
 
                                   
Total intangible assets subject to amortization
  35,625     (14,908 )   20,717     19,888     (10,160 )   9,728  
Intangible assets, not subject to amortization:
                                               
Brand names
  543         543     415         415  
 
                                   
Total
  36,168     (14,908 )   21,260     20,303     (10,160 )    10,143  
 
                                   

F-21


Table of Contents

Total amortization expense for other intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was 4,217, 4,088 and 3,582, respectively. Based on the amount of intangible assets subject to amortization at the end of 2006, the expected amortization for each of the next five years and thereafter is as follows:
         
    (Unaudited)  
    Year ended  
    December 31,  
2007
    4,123  
2008
    3,810  
2009
    3,536  
2010
    3,002  
2011
    1,975  
Thereafter
    4,271  
 
     
 
  20,717  
 
     
11. Acquisitions
Acquisition of Miner & Miner
As part of the original share purchase agreement for the purchase of 70% of the shares of Miner & Miner, if Miner & Miner’s financial performance for the period December 1, 2004 through December 31, 2005 met a minimum target level, Telvent would be obligated to purchase the remaining 30% of the shares for a purchase price determined by a financial performance formula. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company acquired the remaining 30% of the shares of Miner & Miner for a total purchase price of 5,735, which was paid on February 22, 2006. This purchase price has been allocated to the tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, based on an updated valuation of Miner & Miner performed as of the purchase date. As a result, the following is a summary of the allocation of the total purchase price for 30% of Miner & Miner:
         
    As of  
    February 22,  
    2006  
Adjusted working capital
  376  
Property, plant and equipment
    97  
Intangible assets:
       
Customer contracts and relationships
    1,620  
Software technology
    429  
Brand names
    184  
Goodwill
    3,811  
Deferred tax liability
    (782 )
 
     
Total purchase price
  5,735  
 
     
The results of operations of Miner & Miner, net of minority interest, have been included in the Company’s Energy segment from the date of purchase of the original 70%, in December 2004.
Acquisition of Beijing Blue Shield
On April 26, 2006, the Company acquired 80% of the issued and outstanding shares of Beijing Blue Shield High & New Tech. Co., Ltd. (“BBS”), a Beijing-based leading provider of IT services and solutions for traffic management and consulting, and airport/seaport security. The purchase price of this acquisition was Rmb 32 million ( 3,184). As of December 31, 2006, the Company has paid 80% of the total amount, or Rmb 25.6 million ( 2,309), in cash. A final payment of Rmb 6.4 million ( 637) will be due on May 20, 2007, pending resolution of certain items which are currently under discussion with the sellers.
The Company has performed an initial purchase price allocation that indicates that the net fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is greater than the purchase price. Therefore, the Company has reduced, on a pro-rata basis, the intangible assets identified, resulting in the following purchase price allocation:

F-22


Table of Contents

         
    As of  
    April 26,  
    2006  
Cash and cash equivalents
  159  
Currents assets
    3,514  
Tangible assets
    123  
Liabilities assumed
    (1,827 )
Intangible assets:
       
Software technology
    1,869  
Goodwill
     
Deferred tax liability
    (654 )
 
     
Total purchase price
  3,184  
 
     
The above allocation may be modified within the allocation period allowed by SFAS 141, as a result of a change in the carrying value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed which is currently under review by Telvent and the sellers of BBS.
The results of operations of Beijing Blue Shield net of minority interest, have been included in the Company’s Traffic segment from the date of its acquisition.
Pro forma revenues, income from operations, net income and earnings per share (EPS) would have been as follows if this acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively:
                 
    Year ended December 31,
    2006   2005
    (Unaudited)
Revenues
  504,459     404,467  
Income from operations
  30,995     21,216  
Net income
    21,827       14,551  
EPS
    0.75       0.50  
Acquisition of Telvent Farradyne
On July 1, 2006, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of the business and related assets of PB Farradyne, Inc. (Farradyne), a leading provider of traffic information technology consulting and integration services in the United States. The acquired business operates as Telvent Farradyne, Inc. The total purchase price for the Farradyne business was U.S. $ 39,405 ( 30,995). A portion of the purchase price was paid into escrow and will serve as security for the sellers’ obligations to Telvent under the purchase agreement. This acquisition has been financed through a mix of use of proceeds from the Company’s initial public offering (IPO) and a loan under a credit agreement with LaSalle Bank National Association (see Note 14).
The Company has performed a preliminary purchase price allocation to the tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed (the ¨net assets¨). The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired has been allocated to goodwill. The following is a summary of the preliminary purchase price allocation at the date of acquisition in Euros:
         
    As of  
    July 1,  
    2006  
Current assets
  14,056  
Tangible assets
    573  
Liabilities assumed
    (3,090 )
Intangible assets:
       
Customer contracts and relationships
    4,864  
Software technology
    4,864  
Goodwill
    13,133  
Deferred tax liability
    (3,405 )
 
     
Total purchase price
  30,995  
 
     
The above allocation may be modified within the allocation period allowed by SFAS 141, as the Company is currently finalizing the determination of the realizable value of certain of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

F-23


Table of Contents

The results of operations of Farradyne have been included in the Company’s Traffic segment from the date of its acquisition.
Pro forma revenues, income from operations, net income and EPS would have been as follows if this acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively:
                 
    Year ended December 31,
    2006   2005
    (Unaudited)
Revenues
   524,421      441,889  
Income from operations
  30,533     21,839  
Net income
    21,522       14,817  
EPS
    0.74       0.51  
Acquisition of Maexbic
On November 2006, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of Maexbic, S.A., a leading provider of public transportation ticketing technology in Spain. The total purchase price for this acquisition was 1,850, and a contingent and variable earn-out will be payable, up to a maximum of 625, based on Maexbic meeting certain financial targets over the period ending December 31, 2007.
The Company is currently determining the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in order to perform the purchase price allocation required by SFAS 141, Business Combinations. As of December 31, 2006, the excess purchase price over the carrying value of net assets acquired, amounting to 1,511, has been temporarily allocated entirely to goodwill.
The results of operations of Maexbic have been included in the Company’s Traffic segment from the date of its acquisition.
Pro forma revenues, income from operations, net income and EPS would have been as follows if this acquisition had occurred as of the beginning of the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively:
                 
    Year ended December 31,
    2006   2005
    (Unaudited)
Revenues
   504,628      404,072  
Income from operations
  30,708     21,330  
Net Income
    21,448       14,476  
EPS
    0.73       0.49  
12. Goodwill
As discussed in Note 2, the Company applies SFAS 142, which requires that goodwill and certain intangible assets with an indefinite useful life not to be amortized, and should instead be reviewed for impairment annually.
During the fourth quarter of every year, the Company performs its annual impairment review for goodwill and other indefinite-life intangible assets. Based on the results of the impairment review, no charge for impairment has been required.
The following analysis details the changes in the Company’s goodwill during 2006 and 2005 by segment:
                         
    Energy     Traffic     Total  
Balance, December 31, 2004
  13,689         13,689  
Acquisitions
    614             614  
Currency translation adjustment
    2,559             2,559  
 
                 
Balance, December 31, 2005
    16,862             16,862  
Acquisitions
    8,323       14,644       22,967  
Currency translation adjustment
    (1,957 )     (456 )     (2,413 )
 
                 
Balance, December 31, 2006
  23,228     14,188     37,416  
 
                 

F-24


Table of Contents

13. Accrued and Other Liabilities
Accrued and other liabilities consist of the following:
                 
    As of December 31,  
    2006     2005  
Payroll, accrued vacation and other employee benefits
  4,357     2,548  
Notes Payable
    652       1,500  
Current portion of government loans
    1,471       1,654  
Contingent consideration on Almos acquisition
          1,750  
Other short term liabilities
    3,909       1,966  
 
           
 
  10,389     9,418  
 
           
As of December 31, 2006, notes payable included the deferred payment on the Beijing Blue Shield acquisition in the amount of 652. As of December 31, 2005, notes payable included the deferred payment on the Almos Systems acquisition in the amount of 1,500, whereas contingent consideration on Almos acquisition included the maximum amount of such consideration on that date. A total of 480 was paid in June 2006, based on Almos’ actual financial results for the target period ended June 30, 2006.
14. Short-Term Debt
Short-term debt at December 31, 2006 and 2005 consists of the following:
                 
    As of December 31,  
    2006     2005  
Due under short-term credit facilities
  814     4,204  
Banco de Andalucia
          1,540  
LaSalle Bank
    15,336        
Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Madrid
          690  
Advance payments
    12,431       12,953  
Other short-term debt
    3,714       4,571  
 
           
 
  32,295     23,958  
 
           
Short-term debt consists of amounts drawn down under credit facilities that the Company has with various financial institutions.
In 2005, in order to finance the working capital requirements of our operations in Brazil, Telvent Brasil obtained credit facilities with several banks (Safia Bank, Citibank, Bank of Boston, Banco Santander, Central Hispano and Banco Fibra). These credit facilities allow to borrow up to Brazilian Real 27.8 million ( 9.8 million) and are secured by Abengoa. This limit can be used for letters of credit, guarantees and bank overdrafts. As of December 31, 2006, 814 was outstanding under the Bank of Boston credit facilities.
As of December 31, 2005 short-term debt included 1,540 under a line of credit established by the Company with Banco de Andalucía (this line of credit allowed the Company to borrow up to 2.0 million) and 690 under a line of credit established by the Company with Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Madrid. As of December 31, 2006, this debt has been cancelled.
On May 31, 2006, our subsidiary, Telvent Traffic North America Inc. (“TTNA”), entered into a credit agreement with LaSalle Bank National Association under which it may borrow up to U.S. $20 million ( 15,336). The obligations of TTNA under the credit agreement are guaranteed by Telvent GIT, S.A. The credit facility was available for partial financing of acquisitions permitted under the agreement. The credit facility matures on May 1, 2007. Loans under the credit agreement bear interest on the outstanding principal amount at a rate per annum equal to either (depending on the election made by TTNA): (i) the prime rate in effect as publicly announced by LaSalle Bank National Association or (ii) the London Interbank Offering Rate for United States dollar deposits in the London Interbank Eurodollar market (LIBOR), plus an applicable margin which is based on the leverage ratio of Telvent GIT, S.A. The amount outstanding under this facility as of December 30, 2006 was U.S. $20 million ( 15,336).
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, advance payments consisted primarily of inter-company receivables in connection with commercial transactions in the normal course of business, where the group has received advanced payments from the financial institutions.
Furthermore, as of December 2006 and 2005 “Other short-term debt” consisted primarily of amounts outstanding under corporate Diners and American Express cards.

F-25


Table of Contents

15. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
                 
    As of December 31,  
    2006     2005  
Total long-term debt
  16,702     23,825  
Current portion of long-term debt
    (1,514 )     (8,515 )
 
           
Long-term debt less current portion
  15,188     15,310  
 
           
The Company has entered into borrowing arrangements outstanding as of December 31, 2006 for working capital requirements, general corporate purposes and for financing certain hosting activities in Spain.
The total principal amount outstanding with each counter party, less the corresponding current portion at December 31, 2006 and 2005 is as follows:
                         
    Year Ended December 31, 2006  
    Total Long-Term     Current Portion of     Long-Term Debt Less  
    Debt     Long-Term Debt     Current Portion  
LaSalle Bank
  1,660         1,660  
Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Madrid
    1,134       560       574  
ING and Liscat
    3,304       781       2,523  
Bank of Communications
    1,201       173       1,028  
Unicaja
    9,403             9,403  
 
                 
 
  16,702     1,514     15,188  
 
                 
                         
    Year Ended December 31, 2005  
    Total Long-Term     Current Portion of     Long-Term Debt Less  
    Debt     Long-Term Debt     Current Portion  
Fortis Bank
  3,159     3,159      
LaSalle Bank
    2,684       1,063       1,621  
Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Madrid
    1,516       393       1,123  
ING and Liscat
    6,847       3,546       3,301  
Bank of Communications
    702       101       601  
Unicaja
    8,917       253       8,664  
 
                 
 
  23,825     8,515     15,310  
 
                 
Telvent Housing obtained a secured loan of 10,000 from Fortis Bank in March 2003, which bore interest at twelve-month EURIBOR plus 1.25% and was repaid in September 2006.
Telvent Canada Ltd. had three separate credit facilities with LaSalle Bank under a credit agreement dated May 2, 2003. The first facility (“Facility A”) was a secured revolving credit line for working capital purposes up to U.S. $8,000 ( 5,874). Availability of funds under Facility A is based on a monthly borrowings base formula determined as a percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventory of Telvent Canada Ltd. Amounts withdrawn under Facility A cannot exceed U.S. $8,000.
The second facility (“Facility B”) is a delayed draw, non-revolving, term loan facility in the amount up to U.S. $5,500 ( 4,176), which was created in part for the purpose of financing the acquisition of the NMS division of Metso. Facility B was repaid in April 2006, and no further amounts may be borrowed under this facility.
By an amending agreement dated April 13, 2006, the credit agreement was amended to reduce the amount of the credit available under Facility A from U.S. $8,000 to U.S. $6,000 (4,556), and to add an additional secured revolving credit facility (“Facility C”) in a maximum aggregate principal amount of U.S. $12,000 solely for the purposes of issuing standby letters of credit in connection with projects in which Telvent Canada Ltd. or Telvent USA Inc. are required to provide bid, advance payment or performance securities.
Facility A bears interest at a rate of LIBOR or a base rate index plus an applicable margin. Under Facility C, the fees for letters of credit are calculated on the basis of a rate per annum equal to 0.75% of the face amount of each letter of credit at the time of issuance by the bank.
All outstanding facilities with LaSalle Bank mature in March 2008. LaSalle Bank has a first security interest in all assets and equity of Telvent Canada Ltd. and Telvent USA Inc. As part of the credit facilities agreement, Telvent Canada Ltd. is restricted from paying

F-26


Table of Contents

dividends to the Company without prior written consent of the bank. As of December 31, 2006, the Company was in compliance with all covenant requirements.
Telvent Energia y Medio Ambiente S.A. borrowed 3,642 from Caja de Ahorros y Monte de Piedad de Madrid in October 2001. The loan bears interest at a rate of three-month EURIBOR plus 0.60% and matures in October 2008. Any future issuances of debt from Telvent Energia y Medio Ambiente S.A. will be subordinated debt to that agreement until its repayment.
Telvent Housing has entered into three financing arrangements, one with ING and two with Liscat. The first financing arrangement with Liscat of 6,702 was established in December 2002 and originally matured in May 2006. In 2005, the Company renewed the maturity of this loan from May 2006 to April 2010. Interest is payable monthly at a rate of twelve-month EURIBOR plus 1.10%. Abengoa guarantees this facility. The second financing arrangement with Liscat of 3,296 was established in November 2003 and originally matured in April 2007. In 2005 the Company renewed the maturity of this loan, from April 2007 to April 2010. Interest is payable on a monthly basis at twelve-month EURIBOR plus 1.10%. Abengoa guarantees this facility.
The financing arrangement with ING of 10,854 was established in December 2002 and matured in June 2006.
On March 17, 2005, the Company signed a purchase contract with Beijing Development Area Co., Ltd. to purchase a new office in Beijing to establish the China headquarters for Telvent. Forty percent of the total purchase price of Rmb 9,384 ( 913) was paid on closing and the balance was financed by an 8-year mortgage, which the Company entered into on May 25, 2005 with the Bank of Communications. Additionally, on May 23, 2006, the Company signed a purchase contract with Beijing Development Area Co., Ltd. to purchase a new office in Beijing adjacent to Telvent China’s current headquarters. The new office will be used by Telvent Blue Shield, the company acquired by Telvent China in April 2006. Forty percent of the total purchase price of Rmb 9.209 ( 896) was paid on closing and the balance was financed by an 8-year mortgage, which the Company entered into on July 14, 2006 with the Bank of Communications.
On November 10, 2005 the Company signed a Credit Agreement with Caja de Ahorros de Ronda, Cádiz, Almería, Málaga y Antequera (Unicaja). The total amount available under this facility is 12,600. This Credit Agreement has been obtained in connection with El Toyo Digital City Project, and has been established on a non-recourse basis until the customer accepts delivery in the turn-key phase of the project, which is expected to occur in 2007. The term of the new credit agreement is 22 years, and the interest rate is Euribor + 1%, on a monthly basis. The amount outstanding under this agreement at December 31, 2006 was 9,403.
16. Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other long-term liabilities consist of the following:
                 
    As of December 31,  
    2006     2005  
Government loans excluding current portion
  2,746     3,841  
Long-term customer deposits
    2,388       1,726  
Other long-term obligations
    582       1,940  
 
           
 
  5,716     7,507  
 
           
The Company receives interest-free five-year loans from the Spanish Science and Technology Ministry for research and development purposes. These loans also provide a two-year grace period before repayments of principal must begin. The current portion of government loans of 1,471 and 1,654, as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, is included within “Accrued and other liabilities” (Note 13).
Long-term customer deposits represent security deposits from customers primarily in relation to long-term hosting contracts.

F-27


Table of Contents

Maturity of Debt and Similar Obligations
The aggregate principal repayment of short-term debt, long-term debt and government loans, including amounts shown under current liabilities, required in each of the next five fiscal years and thereafter are as follows:
                                         
    Year Ending December 31,  
    Current                            
    Portion of             Long-Term              
    Long-Term     Short-Term     Debt Less              
    Debt     Debt     Current Portion     Government Loans     Total  
2007
  1,514     32,295         1,471       35,280  
2008
                3,583       1,085       4,668  
2009
                1,397       752       2,149  
2010
                1,458       431       1,889  
2011
                599       232       831  
Thereafter
                8,151       246       8,397  
 
                             
 
  1,514     32,295     15,188     4,217     53,214  
 
                             
17. Financial Instruments
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist of cash, accounts receivable (including unbilled revenue) and long-term receivables. The Company generally does not require collateral from its customers. During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, no customer comprised greater than 10% of the accounts receivable balance or more than 10% of revenues.
Derivatives
The majority of the Company’s assets, liabilities, sales and costs are denominated in Euros. The Company enters into contracts where revenues and costs are denominated in other currencies, principally the U.S. dollar. The Company’s foreign subsidiaries also enter into contracts principally denominated in local currencies, the U.S. dollar or the Euro that are managed against the relevant functional currency or the Euro.
The Company manages foreign exchange exposures in accordance with internal policies and guidelines. This is performed on an individual contract basis using foreign exchange contracts that generally have maturities of three months to 12 months and which mature when the forecasted revenues or expenses are anticipated to occur. The counterparties to these contracts are highly rated financial institutions.
Although the forward exchange contracts are used solely as economic hedges, hedge accounting has not been applied for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, and thus the contracts have been recorded at fair value within the balance sheet with related gains and losses recorded in earnings.
The following table provides quantitative information about the Company’s outstanding foreign exchange contracts by principal currency.

F-28


Table of Contents

                                 
    As of December 31, 2006  
    Positive     Notional     Negative     Notional  
    Fair Value     Amount     Fair Value     Amount  
Forward exchange contracts:
                               
Euro/ U.S. Dollar versus:
                               
U.S. Dollars
  1,227       17,196     2,570       29,970  
Morocco Dirhams
                1       30  
Brazilian Reais
    79       6,941       107       8,833  
Canadian Dollars
    767       28,372       499       18,554  
Jordan Dinars
                9       764  
Qatari Riyals
    51       1,768       2       1.072  
Japanese Yen
    180       2,359              
Thai Bahts
    102       2,879       81       2.862  
 
                       
 
    2,406       59,515       3,269       62,085  
 
                               
Interest rate contracts:
                               
Interest rate caps
    408       19,032              
 
                       
Total
  2,814     78,547     3,269     62,085  
 
                       
                                 
    As of December 31, 2005  
    Positive     Notional     Negative     Notional  
    Fair Value     Amount     Fair Value     Amount  
Forward exchange contracts:
                               
Euro/ U.S. Dollar versus:
                               
U.S. Dollars
  435     7,336     312     6,150  
Morocco Dirhams
                7       614  
Brazilian Reais
                521       3,243  
Mexican Pesos
    158       10,929              
Canadian Dollars
    601       17,010       406       23,458  
Jordan Dinars
                47       1,127  
Qatari Riyals
                147       3,622  
 
                       
 
    1,194       35,275       1,440       38,214  
 
                               
Interest rate contracts:
                               
Interest rate caps
          23,480              
 
                       
Total
  1,194       58,755     1,440       38,214  
 
                       
The above table includes embedded derivatives that the Company bifurcates from certain long-term binding contracts denominated in a different currency to the functional or reporting currency of either party. Similar to freestanding derivatives, these are recorded at fair value within the balance sheet with related gains and losses recorded in earnings.
The Company is also exposed to interest rate risk from its interest-bearing debt obligations. The interest rate on these instruments is based on a rate of three-month or one-year EURIBOR, plus the applicable margins. The Company manages certain specific exposures using interest rate caps to limit the impact of interest rate increases. These contracts mature between 2008 and 2022. The exposure of the Company is limited to the premiums paid to purchase the caps. Total premiums paid were 397 during the year ended December 31, 2006. Outstanding notional values were 19,032 and 23,480 as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The fair value of the caps was 408 and 0.1 as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In 2005, such amount was recorded within “other assets”.
The Company does not use any other derivatives. For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company recognized net (losses) and gains of (499), (1,090) and 1,945, respectively, in financial expense from the mark to market of the derivatives described above.

F-29


Table of Contents

Fair Values of Financial Instruments
Fair value is defined as the amount that a financial instrument could be bought or sold in an arm’s length transaction, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. The Company uses the following methods and assumptions in order to estimate the fair values of its financial instruments.
These determinations were based on available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates and therefore, they may not necessarily be indicative of the amount the Company could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.
Cash, Short-Term Investments, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable
The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair values due to the short maturity of these instruments, unless otherwise indicated.
Short-Term and Long-Term Debt
Debt is primarily based on variable rates with fair value approximating carrying value.
Other long-term liabilities
The fair value of interest free loans received from the Spanish Science and Technology Ministry is estimated based on quoted market prices or current rates offered to the Company for debt of similar maturities. Other long-term liabilities include payments due to suppliers. Interest is payable based on variable rates, therefore, fair value approximates carrying value.
Derivatives
The fair value derived from market information and appropriate valuation methodologies reflects the estimated amounts the Company would receive or pay to terminate the transaction at the reporting date.
The Company recognizes all forward exchange contracts and interest rate caps as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet and measures those instruments at fair value.
The carrying value and estimated fair value of financial instruments are presented below:
                                 
    As of December 31,
    2006   2005
    Carrying   Fair   Carrying   Fair
    Amount   Value   Amount   Value
Assets:
                               
Cash (including restricted cash)
  77,277     77,277       83,193       83,193  
Other short-term investments
    386       386       709       709  
Accounts receivable
    144,763       144,763       92,494       92,494  
Derivatives
    2,814       2,814       1,194       1,194  
Liabilities:
                               
Short-term debt
    32,295       32,295       23,958       23,958  
Long-term debt including current portion
    16,702       16,702       23,825       23,825  
Other long-term liabilities
    5,716       5,495       7,507       7,286  
Derivatives
    3,269       3,269       1,440       1,440  

F-30


Table of Contents

18. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
A payment of Rmb 6.4 million (637) is due on May 20, 2007 related to the purchase of Beijing Blue Shield High & New Tech. Co., Ltd. (“BBS”). Such payment will be made pending resolution of certain items related to the carrying value of net assets purchased, which are currently under discussion with the sellers of BBS.
Regarding the Maexbic acquisition, there is a contingent and variable earn-out outstanding payment, up to a maximum of 625, based on Maexbic meeting certain financial targets over the period ended December 31, 2007. In addition, there has been a guarantee deposit payment of 100 that the Company has made on March 29, 2007.
Leases
The Company leases corporate buildings that it classifies as operating leases. Computer equipment and machinery used in the normal course of business and that meet the relevant criteria are classified as capital leases. The capital leases generally require interest payments based on EURIBOR plus 1.1%.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating and capital leases are as follows:
                 
Year Ending December 31,   Operating     Capital  
2007
  11,713     2,720  
2008
    11,242       1,292  
2009
    9,710       488  
2010
    2,551       25  
2011
    969        
Thereafter
    334        
 
           
 
  36,519       4,525  
 
             
Less: amounts representing interest
            (129 )
 
             
Present value of future lease payments
            4,396  
Less: current portion
            (2,562 )
 
             
 
          1,834  
 
             
During 2006, the Company entered into various new capital lease agreements for an aggregate amount of 1,796. The majority of leases were for computer equipment, and the remaining were for furniture and fixtures. The terms of the new leases expire between January 2008 and August 2010. Similar to previous lease agreements the new leases require interest payments based on EURIBOR plus 1.1%.
Total rent expense under operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was 11,119, 10,115 and 10,066, respectively. Total payment under capital leases for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was 3,549, 3,095 and 1,247, respectively. Total rent expense under related party leases was 276, 97 and 83 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Contingencies
From time to time, the Company has been party to various litigation and administrative proceedings relating to claims arising from its operations in the normal course of business.
On June 13, 2006, a court in Spain issued a judgment stating that the award of the concession contract for the Advanced Digital Services Center for the City of Almería (the “El Toyo Project”) to Telvent was void on the grounds that the procurement procedures followed by the government of the City of Almería in awarding the contract were inadequate. The City filed an appeal against the judgment. On July 6, 2006, Telvent, as an interested party, also filed an appeal. The filing of the appeals renders the judgment ineffective until all of the appeals have been resolved. As of December 31, 2006, the development and installation work for the El Toyo project is substantially complete.
Based on the information presently available, including discussion with counsel, management believes that resolution of these matters,

F-31


Table of Contents

including the proceedings related to the El Toyo Project, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, consolidated results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows.
Guarantees
Performance Guarantees
In the normal course of business the Company provides performance guarantees in the form of performance bonds to customers that obligate the Company to fulfill the terms of the underlying contract. These bonds are for a fixed monetary amount and match the duration of the underlying contract that is generally between 18 and 36 months. The Company requests similar bonds from sub-contractors to mitigate this risk. The guarantees are generally not drawn upon as the Company will usually successfully complete the contract or renegotiate contract terms.
Financial Guarantees
As of December 31, 2006, the Company maintains the following guarantees:
                         
            Estimated        
    Maximum   Proceeds from   Carrying
    Potential   Collateral/   Amount of
    Payments   Recourse   Liabilities
Performance guarantees
    170,336     14,557      
Financial guarantees
    3,218              
 
                       
 
  173,554     14,557      
 
                       
The maximum potential payments represent a “worse-case scenario”, and do not necessarily reflect expected results. Estimated proceeds from collateral and recourse represent the anticipated value of assets that could be liquidated or received from other parties to offset the Company’s payments under guarantees.
Product Warranties
The Company provides warranties in connection with all of its sales contracts except for housing, hosting and maintenance contracts. Warranties typically range from one to two years depending on the contract and cover factors such as non-conformance to specifications and defects in materials and workmanship. Based on historical experience, the Company has not incurred any material unexpected costs associated with servicing its warranties.
19. Income Taxes
The taxable results of the Company are included in the various domestic and foreign consolidated tax returns of Telvent or its subsidiaries. Also, in certain states, local and foreign jurisdictions, the Company files on a stand-alone basis.
The income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
Domestic
                       
Current
  (775 )   (1,673 )   (878 )
Deferred
    4,313       3,445       3,528  
 
                 
 
    3,538       1,772       2,650  
 
                 
 
                       
Foreign
                       
Current
    (2,589 )     (551 )     (27 )
Deferred
    1,131       1,751       2,126  
 
                 
 
    (1,458 )     1,200       2,099  
 
                 
Total income tax expense (benefit)
  2,080     2,972     4,749  
 
                 

F-32


Table of Contents

The following is a reconciliation of the effective tax rate:
                         
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
Income before taxes
  23,988      17,711     14,240  
 
                 
Domestic federal statutory tax rate
    35 %     35 %     35 %
 
  8,396     6,198     4,984  
Stock compensation plans
    669       495       790  
Dividends received from subsidiaries
    3,078             403  
Changes in valuation allowances
          (564 )     1,788  
R&D tax credit
    (4,909 )     (2,562 )     (1,994 )
Business combinations
    (3,046 )     (1,303 )     (841 )
Reduction of the domestic federal statutory tax rate
    (657 )            
Tax deductions and effect on different tax rates on foreign subsidiaries
    (1,451 )     708       (381 )
 
                 
Tax Expense/ (Benefit)
  2,080     2,972     4,749  
 
                 
During the fourth quarter of 2006, a tax reform was carried out in Spain by virtue of laws 35/2006 (introducing a new Personal Income Tax) and 36/2006 (introducing measures in order to avoid tax fraud). With respect to corporate income tax rates, Law 35/2006 has reduced the 35% general corporate income tax rate available until December 31, 2006, to 32.5% for the year 2007, and 30% for year 2008 onwards. The effect of this change has been reflected in the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006, as deferred tax assets and liabilities should be measured in each jurisdiction at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates and tax laws that have been enacted by the balance sheet date.
Detail of income and other taxes payable as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
                 
    As of December, 31  
    2006     2005  
Income tax payable
  2,665     4,994  
Other taxes payable
    24,236       12,841  
 
           
 
  26,901     17,835  
 
           
Other taxes payable include mainly value-added tax (VAT), payroll withholdings on account and social security. Additionally, “Other taxes receivable” include mainly value-added tax (VAT).
At December 31, 2004, the Company recognized a valuation allowance against some of its deferred tax assets from tax loss carry-forwards and research and development tax credits related to some of its subsidiaries, mainly Sainsel, because it considered, based on the evidence available on such date, that it was more likely than not that such assets would not be realized. At December 31, 2005, the Company reassessed the recoverability of such assets and considered that it was more likely than not that a portion of them will be recoverable, based on existing contracts and future business plans of its subsidies. As such, part of the valuation allowance was reversed during the year ended December 31, 2005. At December 31, 2006, a valuation allowance was no longer applicable as the subsidiary giving rise to the deferred tax asset was sold.
Up to December 31, 2006, the domestic federal statutory tax rate was 35.0%. This rate has been reduced to 32.5% for the year 2007 and 30.0% for the year 2008 and thereafter. At December 31, 2006, the Company adjusted its deferred taxes to the new rates.
Significant components of the Company’s net deferred tax assets/(liabilities) are as follows:
                                                 
    As of December 31,  
    2006     2005  
    Short Term     Long-Term     Total     Short-Term     Long-Term     Total  
Deferred tax assets:
                                               
Capitalized research and development
  2,770     12,401       15,171     4,355     8,937     13,292  
Net operating tax loss carry-forwards
    407       1,140       1,547       1,095       2,068       3,163  
Derivative contracts and other assets
    515       1,413       1,928       593       4,665       5,258  
Deferred tax allowances
                            (1,224 )     (1,224 )
 
                                   
 
  3,692     14,954     18,646     6,043     14,446       20,489  
 
                                   

F-33


Table of Contents

                                                 
    2006     2005  
    Short Term     Long-Term     Total     Short-Term     Long-Term     Total  
Deferred tax liabilities:
                                               
Revenue recognition percentage of completion
  4,629         4,629     3,119         3,119  
Derivatives
    660             660       201       53       254  
Intangible assets
          6,198       6,198                    
Other liabilities
    58       78       136       (238 )     620       382  
 
                                   
 
  5,347     6,276     11,623     3,082     673     3,755  
 
                                   
Net deferred tax recognized
  (1,655 )   8,678     7,023     2,961     13,773     16,734  
 
                                   
Gross Spanish and foreign tax attribute carry-forwards as of December 31, 2006 amount approximately to 4,839. If the net operating losses are not utilized, carry-forwards will expire 15 years after their effective generation date.
Expiry dates of future tax loss carry-forwards are as follows:
         
    Year Ending  
    December 31,  
2015
  311  
2016
    2,238  
2017
    1,913  
2018
     
2019
    377  
2020
     
 
     
 
  4,839  
 
     
20. Share Capital
The following table shows increases in share capital of the Company since incorporation. Share capital amounts are shown in actual amounts rather than thousands of Euros:
                         
        Number   Cumulative   Cumulative
Event   Date   of shares   Balance   Share Capital
    (In actual amount)
 
  December 31, 2003             100,000      60,101,000.00
Split (200 for 1)
  April 15, 2004           20,000,000      60,101,000.00
Increase in capital
  October 21, 2004     8,700,000       28,700,000      86,244,935.00
Increase in capital
  November 19, 2004     547,100       29,247,100      87,888,997.86
 
  Balance as of December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006             29,247,100      87,888,997.86
 
                       
In each transaction involving an increase in share capital, the new shares have the same rights and obligations as those previously in circulation.
Effective April 15, 2004, the shareholders approved a 200 for 1 split of ordinary shares, resulting in an increase in the number of shares from 100,000 to 20,000,000. The nominal value of the shares decreased accordingly from  601.01 to 3.005.
On October 21, 2004 the number of shares were increased by 8,700,000, with an offering price of U.S. $9, in relation to the Company’s initial public offering. On November 19, 2004, there was an additional increase in the number of shares of 547,100, with the same offering price of U.S. $9, due to the underwriters’ partial exercise of the over-allotment option.
The proceeds from the above described increases of capital amounted to 60,518, net of related expenses.
21. Stock Compensation Plan
Formula-based stock compensation plan
Under a plan established by Abengoa, certain of the Company’s employees, including members of its management team, entered into agreements with the Company’s principal shareholders to buy ordinary shares in the Company. The shares purchased were already issued and outstanding on the date of sale. All shares were sold at a pre-split price of 601.01 ( 3.005 post-split), which is also the weighted-average purchase price of the shares. This par value represented a discount to fair value. The shares sold under the stock

F-34


Table of Contents

purchase plan contained certain performance and vesting features. The vesting period is 15% of the shares after three years, or upon completion of an initial public offering whichever occurred first, and the remaining 85% after five years for certain employees. For other employees, a portion of the shares sold have a vesting period of 15% after three years, or upon completion of an initial public offering whichever occurred first, 35% after five years, and the remaining 50% after seven years. The performance feature within the arrangement contains a clause whereby the seller can call portions of the shares sold if the performance criteria are not met. The performance criteria are tied to the achievement of cumulative and individual annual budgets in the first three years of the plan. In the absence of a listing of Telvent, the plan participants could sell the shares back to the seller based on a formula value, which was based on the unconsolidated results of operations of Telvent. The formula was subsequently changed to a fixed amount plus an interest return. When Telvent listed, the above repurchase feature expired.
In March 2004, various employees, including managers of the Company, were granted additional shares under the stock compensation plan. All shares were sold at a post-split price of 3.005 per share ( 601.01 pre-split). The estimated fair value on the date of grant was the midpoint of the estimated offering price range of 12.37 ( 2,475 pre-split). The midpoint of the estimated offering price range of 12.37 was deemed to be the fair value of the shares at March 2004. The total number of shares acquired by these employees was 140,000, which increases the total share capital ownership of employees to 9.236%.
The employees and management team have financed the purchase of the shares with a bank loan. The shares are pledged as collateral on the loan. Abengoa must bid for the shares if the share collateral is enforced.
The total number of shares purchased during the year ended December 31, 2004 is below. No additional shares have been purchased during the years ended December 31,2005 and 2006. The Company does not plan to sell any further shares under this plan. No shares were forfeited during any of the years.
                 
    Before Share Split     After Share Split  
    (number of shares)  
Shares outstanding at December 31, 2003
    7,495       1,499,000  
Purchased
    700       140,000  
 
           
Shares outstanding at December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006
    8,195       1,639,000  
 
           
The shares were accounted for as a formula value stock plan in accordance with paragraphs 97 and 98 of EITF 00-23, with compensation expense being calculated as the difference between the purchase value (which was par value) and the formula value. Compensation expense for shares that were purchased after January 1, 2003, was calculated based on the midpoint of the expected IPO price range less a discount of 15%.
As of October 2004, the Company successfully listed its shares on the NASDAQ, as such, the put feature within the stock plan expired. The variable nature of the plans reverted to a fixed plan, apart from where performance conditions still had to be met by the employees, for which these plans continued to be variable after the date of the IPO. For the plans which are fixed plans after the date of the IPO the remaining deferred compensation was expensed over the vesting period. For plans which continue to be variable, the deferred compensation cost and resulting compensation expense has been adjusted to the market value of the shares as of December 31, 2005 and 2004. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123R”), on January 1, 2006, the Company designated its formula-based stock purchase plan as an equity award plan and has started to record as an expense the fair value of the shares purchased by employees under the plan. As the shares sold under the incentive plan consist of unvested stock, the fair value applied was the estimated market value on the grant date, as previously calculated for the pro-forma disclosures required by SFAS 123. The Company has chosen the modified prospective application transition method allowed by SFAS 123R.
Total compensation cost recorded under this plan was 1,640, 1,413 and 2,258 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Parent Company Stock Purchase Plan
On February 2, 2006, Abengoa implemented a Share Acquisition Plan (the “Plan”) on Abengoa S.A.’s shares for members of the senior management of Abengoa subsidiaries, including 15 members of Telvent and its subsidiaries. The implementation of the Plan was approved by the Board of Directors of Abengoa on January 23, 2006. The duration of the Plan is five complete financial years (2006 — 2010) plus six months (until June 30, 2011). The Plan is based on the annual accomplishment by the participant of annual management objectives set for the participant by the management of the company with which the participant is employed. If the annual objectives are not met by the participant, the bank may sell a percentage of the Shares as follows:

F-35


Table of Contents

2006 — 30%
2007 — 30%
2008 — 15%
2009 — 15%
2010 — 10%
Under the Plan, Abengoa has a repurchase option under which Abengoa can purchase the Shares from the participant on the occurrence of certain events, such as death, disability or retirement of the participant or termination of the employment of the participant with the Abengoa Group Company.
The Company has applied SFAS 123R to account for this share acquisition plan. This plan has been accounted for as an equity award plan under SFAS 123R, and is being treated similar to a stock option plan. A valuation of the plan has been performed at the grant date, which was January 23, 2006, and the corresponding compensation cost is being recognized over the requisite service period of five years and six months (cliff vesting). The acquisition cost for all participants was the average acquisition price plus associated costs for all of the shares purchased under the Plan for all participants. The fair value of the 516,100 shares granted, amounting to 1,621 ( 2.87 per share), less estimated forfeitures of 12,600 shares, is measured at the grant date and remains fixed unless and until the award is modified. The assumptions used in the valuation of the shares granted, performed as a theoretical valuation of an European call option on Abengoa ordinary shares as of January 23, 2006, were as follows: Abengoa spot price — 14.15;strike price — 26.1; Maturity — July 1, 2011; Volatility — 40%. Compensation cost recorded on this plan for the period ended December 31, 2006 amounted to 271.
22. Related Party Transactions
During the normal course of business, the Company has conducted operations with related parties, through the execution of projects, loan contracts and advisory services. The transactions were completed at market rates.
Services Agreement
The Company and certain subsidiaries have entered into a contractual arrangement with Abengoa from which the Company receives certain administrative services. Such services include finance management, centralized asset management, legal advice, institutional support with international multilateral financing organizations, institutional commercial assistance, support in providing official global ratings, auditing and consolidation, tax advisory services, negotiation and optimization of global corporate insurance policies, provision of guarantees and endorsements, services including internal communication, corporate image and institutional relations, human resource services and other specific support services upon request. Total amounts paid to Abengoa under the services agreement were 4,107, 3,358, and 3,740 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The allocation of such expenses is based on anticipated annual sales. The allocation method is considered reasonable and properly reflects Telvent’s cost of doing business, as corporate expenses incurred are allocated based upon Telvent’s projected sales as a proportion of Abengoa’s total projected sales.
Bilateral Credit Arrangement
On April 20, 2004, the Company established a bilateral credit arrangement with Abengoa which replaced any prior credit arrangements. Under this new arrangement, the Company and Abengoa may borrow funds from or lend funds to each other, from time to time upon not less than twenty-four hours’ notice, up to a maximum of 45.0 million (or the equivalent amount in any other currency quoted in the Spanish currency market). Borrowings under this credit arrangement bear interest at EURIBOR, or LIBOR for borrowings other than in Euro, in either case plus 0.75% per year for a period not to exceed one year, with interest added to the outstanding balance. Each borrowing matures on the last date of the fiscal year in which such borrowing was made, without requiring any earlier payment of principal. This credit arrangement is optional and either the Company or Abengoa may elect not to make loans to the other. This arrangement had an initial term ending December 31, 2004, and renews for annual one-year terms until terminated by either party.
The average monthly balance of amounts (due to) or due from Abengoa affiliates was (19,497) and (4,260) in 2006 and 2005, respectively. At each year-end, the creditor has the right to demand, or to give notice of its intention to demand repayment.
Details of transactions with group companies and related parties for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 is provided on the face of the consolidated statements of operations.

F-36


Table of Contents

Details of balances with group companies and related parties as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows:
                 
    As of December 31,  
Due from related parties   2006     2005  
Trade receivables
  24,511     17,450  
Credit line receivable
    23,447       27,999  
 
           
 
  47,958     45,449  
 
           
                 
    As of December 31,  
Due to related parties   2006     2005  
Trade payables
  18,442     5,858  
Credit line payable
    5,070       5,288  
 
           
 
  23,512     11,146  
 
           
23. Segments and Geographic Information
The Company has five reportable operating segments. The segments are grouped with reference to the types of services provided and the types of clients that use those services. The Company assesses each segment’s performance based on net revenues and gross profit or contribution margin. The five reportable operating segments are Energy, Traffic, Transport, Environment and Other.
    Energy comprises three primary areas focusing on oil, gas and electricity markets. It offers flow systems and services such as flow measurement applications, applications for leak detection systems, and revenue accounting programs.
 
    Traffic provides services such as urban and inter-urban (ITS) traffic management systems, including incident detection, intersection control, city access management systems, security and enforcement systems, and electronic toll collection systems.
 
    Transport focuses on fare collection and centralized traffic control systems for railways and other public transportation systems, such as light trains, buses and trams systems, telecontrol systems for railway infrastructures, and access control and payment systems for parking.
 
    Environment provides water and wastewater management applications, as well as meteorological information system services and solutions.
 
    Other includes healthcare, public administration and managed services.
                                                 
    Year Ended December 31, 2006  
    Energy     Traffic     Transport     Environment     Other     Total  
Revenues
  217,167     156,478     43,942     43,473     42,784     503,844  
Cost of revenues
    (166,276 )     (128,480 )     (34,714 )     (34,041 )     (29,708 )     (393,219 )
 
                                   
Gross profit
  50,891     27,998     9,228     9,432     13,076     110,625  
 
                                     
Operating expenses
                                            (79,607 )
Other expenses, net
                                            (7,030 )
 
                                             
Income before income taxes
                                          23,988  
 
                                             
                                                 
    Year Ended December 31, 2005  
    Energy     Traffic     Transport     Environment     Other     Total  
Revenues
  177,620     124,574     29,169     36,021     34,985     402,369  
Cost of revenues
    (141,614 )     (104,286 )     (23,119 )     (27,616 )     (23,077 )     (319,712 )
 
                                   
Gross profit
  36,006     20,288     6,050     8,405     11,908     82,657  
 
                                     
Operating Expenses
                                            (61,514 )
Other Expenses, net
                                            (3,432 )
 
                                             
Income before Income taxes
                                          17,711  
 
                                             
                                                 
    Year Ended December 31, 2004  
    Energy     Traffic     Transport     Environment     Other     Total  
Revenues
    123,469       114,468     20,053     27,933     26,648     312,571  
Cost of revenues
    (97,172 )     (94,651 )     (15,916 )     (21,077 )     (16,762 )     (245,578 )
 
                                   
Gross profit
  26,297     19,817     4,137     6,856     9,886     66,993  
 
                                     
Operating Expenses
                                            (50,528 )
Other Expenses, net
                                            (2,225 )
 
                                             
Income before Income taxes
                                          14,240  
 
                                             

F-37


Table of Contents

The majority of the joint ventures’ net revenues (83%) that the Company consolidates due to FIN 46-R are included in the Company’s Traffic segment.
Assets by segment
The Company evaluates its assets by segment to generate information needed for internal control, resource allocation and performance assessment. This information also helps management to establish a basis for asset realization, determine insurance coverage, assess risk exposure, and meet requirements for external financial reporting.
Segment assets of the Company are as follows:
                                                 
    As of December 31, 2006  
    Energy     Traffic     Transport     Environment     Other     Total  
Segment assets
    187,018       127,866       28,928       26,955       72,585       443,352  
Unallocated assets
                                            112,279  
 
                                             
Total assets
                                          555,631  
 
                                             
                                                 
    As of December 31, 2005  
    Energy     Traffic     Transport     Environment     Other     Total  
Segment assets
    129,042       62,060       14,531       28,380       62,957       296,970  
Unallocated assets
                                            138,372  
 
                                             
Total assets
                                          435,342  
 
                                             
Unallocated assets include certain financial investments and other assets held for the benefit of the entire Company.
Geographic Information
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, sales outside of Spain comprised 52%, 52% and 55% of the Company’s revenues, respectively. Revenues consisted of sales to customers in the following areas:
                         
    As of December 31,  
    2006     2005     2004  
Europe
    294,229       216,653       182,760  
Latin America
    89,757       68,583       60,461  
North America
    78,360       58,843       39,767  
Asia-Pacific
    19,065       31,905       17,805  
Middle-East and Africa
    22,433       26,385       11,778  
 
                 
 
  503,844     402,369     312,571  
 
                 
The most significant investments included in property, plant and equipment, net of depreciation, outside of Spain, are located in:
                 
    As of December 31,  
    2006     2005  
Portugal
  4,867     5,194  
North America
    1,009       1,482  
Latin America
    431       336  
China
    2,043       1,155  
Other
    171       173  
 
           
 
  8,521     8,340  
 
           
24. Subsequent Events
On March 22, 2007, the Nomination and Compensation Committee of the Telvent Board of Directors and the Telvent Board of Directors approved a variable compensation plan (“the Plan”) for members of the senior management of Telvent and its subsidiaries. The participants in the Plan include currently 30 members of the senior management of Telvent and various subsidiaries, including business unit managers, senior project managers, technical and research and development managers and corporate services officers and managers (the “ Participants”). The Plan is based on the accomplishment of objectives based on the Strategic Plan of Telvent in effect as of December 31, 2006. The duration of the Plan is five complete fiscal years (2007 - 2011) commencing January 1, 2007

F-38


Table of Contents

and ending December 31, 2011. The calculation and the payment of the benefits under the Plan must occur not later than June 30, 2012 after the verification of the fulfillment of the objectives.
The Plan provides for extraordinary, variable compensation to the Participants based on fulfillment of the annual objectives during the term of the Plan and is in addition to any other variable compensation and/or bonuses earned or which may be earned by each Participant. The total amount available for distribution under this Plan is 10,280. The compensation only vests and becomes payable after the end of the 5th year of the Plan.

F-39