XML 70 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.20.1
Accounting Policies, by Policy (Policies)
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation


The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of GI Dynamics, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.


The functional currency of GID Europe Holding B.V., GID Europe B.V., GID Germany GmbH and GI Dynamics Australia Pty Ltd is the U.S. dollar. Consolidated balance sheet accounts of the Company’s subsidiaries are remeasured into U.S. dollars using the exchange rate in effect at the consolidated balance sheet date while expenses are remeasured using the average exchange rate in effect during the period. Gains and losses arising from remeasurement of the wholly owned subsidiaries’ financial statements are included in the determination of net loss.

Segment Reporting

Segment Reporting


The Company has one reportable segment which designs, develops, manufactures and markets medical devices for non-surgical approaches to treating type 2 diabetes.


GI Dynamics does not report geographic segments as there were no product sales in 2019 or 2018 and at December 31, 2019 and 2018, all long-lived assets comprised of property and equipment were held in the U.S.

Use of Estimates

Use of Estimates


The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. requires the Company’s management to make estimates and judgments that may affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, inventory valuation including reserves for excess and obsolete inventory, impairment of long-lived assets, income taxes including the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, research and development, contingencies, valuation of warrant and other derivative liabilities, estimates used to assess its ability to continue as a going concern and stock-based compensation. GI Dynamics bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Changes in estimates are reflected in reported results in the period in which they become known.

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash


GI Dynamics considers all highly liquid investment instruments with an original maturity when purchased of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Investments qualifying as cash equivalents primarily consist of money market funds and have a carrying amount that approximates fair value. The amount of cash equivalents included in cash and cash equivalents was approximately $0 and $1.1 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.


At December 31, 2019 and 2018, GI Dynamics had approximately $2 and $0.01 million, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents denominated in Australian dollars or Euros that is subject to foreign currency gain and loss.  


GI Dynamics has $30 thousand in restricted cash used to secure a corporate credit card account.

Property and Equipment

Property and Equipment


Property and equipment, are recorded at cost and are depreciated when placed in service using the straight-line method based on their estimated useful lives as follows:


Asset Description 

Estimated Useful Life

(In Years)

Laboratory and manufacturing equipment  5
Computer equipment and software  3
Office furniture and equipment  5

Included in property and equipment are certain costs of software obtained for internal use. Costs incurred during the preliminary project stage are expensed as incurred, while costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the software. GI Dynamics also capitalizes costs related to specific upgrades and enhancements when it is probable the expenditures will result in additional functionality. Maintenance and training costs related to software obtained for internal use are expensed as incurred.


Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the remaining lease term. Costs for capital assets not yet placed into service have been capitalized as construction in progress and will be depreciated in accordance with the above guidelines once placed into service. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred.

Derivative Liabilities

Derivative Liabilities


GI Dynamics examines all financial instruments to determine if the financial instrument or any component feature is a derivative under ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”) and therefore requires liability classification. Certain warrants to purchase common stock did not meet the requirements for equity classification and are considered derivative instruments due to their cash settlement features. The derivative warrants are initially recorded at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value recorded in other income (expense) in the statements of operations. The Company estimates fair value using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. See Note 5 for inputs and assumptions used in the determination of the fair value. If the derivative instruments subsequently meet the requirements for classification as equity, the Company reclassifies the then fair value of the instrument to equity. If multiple outcomes are probable, management assigns probability adjustments to determine the most likely probability adjusted fair value.

Research and Development Costs

Research and Development Costs


Research and development costs are expensed when incurred. Research and development costs include costs of all basic research activities as well as other research, engineering, and technical effort required to develop a new product or service or make significant improvement to an existing product or manufacturing process. Research and development costs also include preapproval regulatory and clinical trial expenses.

Patent Costs

Patent Costs


GI Dynamics expenses as incurred all costs, including legal expenses, associated with obtaining patents until the patented technology becomes feasible. All costs incurred after the patented technology is feasible will be capitalized as an intangible asset. As of December 31, 2019, no such costs had been capitalized since inception of the Company. GI Dynamics has expensed approximately $200 thousand of patent costs within general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations for each of the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation


GI Dynamics accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718, Stock Compensation, or ASC 718, which requires that stock-based compensation be measured and recognized as an expense in the financial statements and that such expense be measured at the grant date fair value.


For awards that vest based on service conditions, GI Dynamics uses the straight-line method to allocate compensation expense to reporting periods. The grant date fair value of options granted is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which requires the use of subjective assumptions including volatility, expected term and the fair value of the underlying common stock, among others.


The assumptions used in determining the fair value of stock-based awards represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change, and management uses different assumptions, the Company’s stock-based compensation could be materially different in the future. The risk-free interest rate used for each grant is based on a zero-coupon U.S. Treasury instrument with a remaining term similar to the expected term of the stock-based award. Because GI Dynamics does not have a sufficient stable history to estimate the expected term, it uses the simplified method for estimating the expected term. The simplified method is based on the average of the vesting tranches and the contractual life of each grant. Because there was no public market for GI Dynamics common stock prior to its IPO, GI Dynamics lacked company-specific historical and implied volatility information. The Company does have approximately 6 years of historical price volatility since its IPO in September 2011. Therefore, management estimates the expected stock volatility based on the to-date historical price volatility. GI Dynamics has not paid and does not anticipate paying cash dividends on its shares of common stock; therefore, the expected dividend yield is assumed to be zero.


GI Dynamics recognizes the impact of share-based award forfeitures only as they occur rather than by applying an estimated forfeiture rate.


GI Dynamics periodically issues performance-based awards. For these awards, vesting will occur upon the achievement of certain milestones. When achievement of the milestone is deemed probable, the Company records as compensation expense, the value of the respective stock award over the implicit remaining service period.


Stock awards to non-employees were accounted for in accordance with ASC 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees (“ASC 505-50”). The measurement date for non-employee awards was generally the date performance of services required from the non-employee was complete. For non-employee awards that vest based on service conditions, the Company expensed the value of the awards over the related service period, provided the service condition was expected to be met. The Company recorded the expense of services rendered by non- employees based on the estimated fair value of the stock option using the Black-Scholes option pricing model over the contractual term of the non-employee award. At each reporting period, the fair value of unvested non-employee awards was remeasured and expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting term of the underlying award. In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718: Improvements to nonemployee share-based payment accounting), or ASU 2018-07, which provides measurement provisions and clarifications for the accounting for Non-employee Share-Based Payments (“NESBP”). As a result, most of the guidance within ASC 718 associated with employee share-based payments, including most of its requirements related to classification and measurement, applies to NESBP. The Company elects to use the contractual term of each award as the expected term for NESBP awards. The Company adopted ASU 2018-07 as of January 1, 2019 and there was no impact to retained earnings or equity as no uncompleted NESBPs were outstanding when adopted. At December 31, 2019, the Company had options to purchase 120,000 shares of common stock granted to non-employees.

New Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements


In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), or ASU 2016-02. ASU 2016-02 requires that most operating leases be recorded on the balance sheet unless the practical expedient is elected for short-term operating leases. The lessee will record a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis, and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset representing the lessee’s right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. Lessees must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. The Company elected to apply the practical expedient as it relates to short-term leases. The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019. There was no impact to retained earnings upon adoption as there were no long-term leases in effect at adoption (see Note 10 of the Consolidated Financial Statements for a more complete description of the lease accounting and impacts of adoption).


In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718: Improvements to nonemployee share-based payment accounting), or ASU 2018-07, which provides measurement provisions and clarifications for the accounting for Non-employee Share-Based Payments (“NESBP”). As a result, most of the guidance within ASC 718 associated with employee share-based payments, including most of its requirements related to classification and measurement, applies to NESBP. ASU 2018-07 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted but not in advance of adoption of Topic 606. Upon transition, the entity is required to measure and record these nonemployee awards at fair value as of the adoption date without subsequent remeasurement. The Company adopted ASU 2018-07 as of January 1, 2019 and there was no impact to retained earnings or equity as no uncompleted NESBPs were outstanding when adopted. At December 31, 2019, the Company had options to purchase 120,000 shares of common stock granted to non-employees. 


Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements


In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, or ASU 2018-13, which provides guidance focused on the disclosure requirements for disclosing fair value estimates, assumptions, and methodology. Requirements removed include the requirement to disclose details around amount and reasoning for level 1 to level 2 transfers, timing policies for transfer between levels and the valuation processes for level 3 fair value measurements. Modified requirements include details regarding net asset redemption restrictions and timing related to uncertainty disclosures. Requirements added include disclosures of changes in unrealized gains and losses for recurring level 3 measurements held as of the reporting date and disclosures around the range and weighted average of significant inputs used to develop level 3 fair value measurements. These amendments are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The amendments on changes in unrealized gains and losses, the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements and the narrative description of measurement uncertainty should be applied prospectively for only the most recent interim or annual period presented in the initial fiscal year of adoption. All other amendments should be applied retrospectively to all periods presented upon their effective date. Early adoption is permitted upon issuance of this update, however the Company has declined early adoption. The Company will adopt this ASU in 2020 and expects no impact to its consolidated financial statements on adoption.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets


GI Dynamics regularly reviews the carrying amount of its long-lived assets to determine whether indicators of impairment may exist that merit adjustments to carrying values or estimated useful lives. If indications of impairment exist, projected future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset are compared to the carrying amount to determine whether the asset’s value is recoverable. If the carrying value of the asset exceeds such projected undiscounted cash flows, the asset will be written down to its estimated fair value. No such impairments were recorded in 2019 or 2018.

Loss Contingencies

Loss Contingencies


In accordance with ASC 450, Contingencies, GI Dynamics accrues anticipated costs of settlement, damages, and losses for loss contingencies based on historical experience or to the extent specific losses are probable and estimable. Otherwise, the Company expenses these costs as incurred. If the estimate of a probable loss is a range, and no amount within the range is more likely, GI Dynamics accrues the minimum amount of the range. No loss contingencies were recorded on the balance sheet as of December 31, 2019 or 2018.

Fraudulent Diversion of Funds and Related Insurance Proceeds

Fraudulent Diversion of Funds and Related Insurance Proceeds


In July 2018, after a third-party investigation isolated the activity, an insurance claim was filed for $271 thousand for fraudulent diversion of cash from the Company’s account into a personal account that occurred during the years 2016 through 2018.  Income in the year ended December 31, 2018 represents net insurance proceeds on the claim less $22 thousand of research and development expense. GI Dynamics has since implemented internal controls to correct the identified control deficiencies associated with the fraud and the employee responsible for the diverted funds is no longer with the Company.

Income Taxes

Income Taxes


GI Dynamics uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. The Company records deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between its financial reporting and the tax bases of assets and liabilities measured using the enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company regularly assesses the need for a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets. Future realization of the Company’s deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income within the available carryback or carryforward periods. Sources of taxable income include taxable income in prior carryback years, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, tax planning strategies, and future taxable income. The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to an amount it believes is more-likely-than-not to be realized. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to reflect the uncertainty associated with their ultimate realization.


The Company assesses its income tax positions and records tax benefits based upon management’s evaluation of the facts, circumstances, and information available at the reporting date. For those tax positions where it is more-likely-than-not that a tax benefit will be sustained, the Company records the largest amount of tax benefit with a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. For those income tax positions where it is not more-likely-than-not that a tax benefit will be sustained, no tax benefit is recognized in the financial statements. The Company classifies interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions as income tax expense.

Guarantees

Guarantees


GI Dynamics has identified the guarantees described below as disclosable, in accordance with ASC 460, Guarantees.


As permitted under Delaware law, GI Dynamics indemnifies its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was, serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make is unlimited; however, the Company maintains directors’ and officers’ insurance coverage that should limit its exposure and enable it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid.


GI Dynamics is a party to a number of agreements entered into in the ordinary course of business that contain typical provisions that obligate it to indemnify the other parties to such agreements upon the occurrence of certain events. Such indemnification obligations are usually in effect from the date of execution of the applicable agreement for a period equal to the applicable statute of limitations. The aggregate maximum potential future liability of the Company under such indemnification provisions is uncertain.


As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, GI Dynamics had not experienced any material losses related to these indemnification obligations, and no material claims with respect thereto were outstanding. The Company does not expect significant claims related to these indemnification obligations and, consequently, concluded that the fair value of these obligations is negligible. As a result, no related reserves have been established.