20-F 1 20.F.htm 20-F UNITED STATES







Washington, D.C. 20549







For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011





Commission file number 333-146371



(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)


Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)


19, Avenue de la Liberté, L-2930 Luxembourg,

Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Address of Registrant’s principal executive offices)


Henk Scheffer, Company Secretary, 19, Avenue de la Liberté, L-2930 Luxembourg,

Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Fax: +352 4792 89 3937

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)


Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:




Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Shares

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:


Securities for which there is reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:



Indicate the number of outstanding shares of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:

Common Shares


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes  x    No  ¨ 

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes  ¨    No  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  x    No  ¨ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.





Large accelerated filer  

Accelerated filer  ¨ 

Non-accelerated filer  ¨ 

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP  ¨  International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards

Board  x    Other  ¨ 

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17  ¨    Item 18  ¨ 

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).




Yes      No 








PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND CERTAIN OTHER INFORMATION.............................................................................................. 1

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS................................................................................ 4

PART I........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 5

ITEM  1.          IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS........................................................ 5

ITEM 2.           OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE.......................................................................................... 5

ITEM  3.          KEY INFORMATION.................................................................................................................................................. 5

A.                 Selected Financial Data............................................................................................................................................... 5

B.                 Capitalization and Indebtedness............................................................................................................................... 7

C.                 Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds............................................................................................................ 7

D                  Risk Factors.................................................................................................................................................................. 7

ITEM 4.           INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY................................................................................................................... 20

A.                 History and Development of the Company........................................................................................................... 20

B.                 Business Overview.................................................................................................................................................... 26

C.                 Organizational Structure........................................................................................................................................... 60

D.                 Property, Plant and Equipment................................................................................................................................ 62

ITEM 4A.        UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS..................................................................................................................... 95

ITEM 5.           OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS.......................................................................... 95

A.                 Operating Results.................................................................................................................................................... 107

B.                 Liquidity and Capital Resources........................................................................................................................... 120

C.                 Research and Development, Patents and Licenses............................................................................................ 126

D.                 Trend Information.................................................................................................................................................... 126

E.                  Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.......................................................................................................................... 126

F.                  Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations.................................................................................................. 127

G.                 Safe Harbor............................................................................................................................................................... 127

ITEM  6.          DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES.......................................................................... 128

A.                 Directors and Senior Management....................................................................................................................... 128

B.                 Compensation.......................................................................................................................................................... 136

C.                 Board Practices/Corporate Governance............................................................................................................... 148

D.                 Employees................................................................................................................................................................. 157

E.                  Share Ownership...................................................................................................................................................... 159

ITEM  7.          MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS...................................................... 161

A.                 Major Shareholders................................................................................................................................................. 161

B.                 Related Party Transactions.................................................................................................................................... 163

C.                 Interest of Experts and Counsel............................................................................................................................ 165

ITEM  8.          FINANCIAL INFORMATION............................................................................................................................... 165

A.                 Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information.............................................................................. 165

B.                 Significant Changes................................................................................................................................................ 179

ITEM  9.          THE OFFER AND LISTING.................................................................................................................................... 179

A.                 Offer and Listing Details......................................................................................................................................... 179

B.                 Plan of Distribution................................................................................................................................................. 180

C.                 Markets..................................................................................................................................................................... 180

D.                 Selling Shareholders................................................................................................................................................ 181

E.                  Dilution...................................................................................................................................................................... 181

F.                  Expenses of the Issue............................................................................................................................................. 181

ITEM  10.        ADDITIONAL INFORMATION........................................................................................................................... 181

A                  Share Capital............................................................................................................................................................. 181

B.                 Memorandum and Articles of Association......................................................................................................... 181




C.                 Material Contracts................................................................................................................................................... 191

D.                 Exchange Controls................................................................................................................................................... 192

E.                  Taxation..................................................................................................................................................................... 192

F.                  Dividends and Paying Agents.............................................................................................................................. 198

G.                 Statements by Experts............................................................................................................................................. 198

H.                 Documents on Display........................................................................................................................................... 198

I.                   Subsidiary Information........................................................................................................................................... 198

ITEM 11.         QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.................................... 198

ITEM  12.        DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES........................................................ 201

A.                 Debt Securities......................................................................................................................................................... 201

B.                 Warrants and Rights............................................................................................................................................... 201

C.                 Other Securities........................................................................................................................................................ 201

D.                 American Depositary Shares................................................................................................................................. 202

PART II................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 202

ITEM 13.         DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES................................................................. 202


ITEM 15.         CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES......................................................................................................................... 202

ITEM 16A.      AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT..................................................................................................... 205

ITEM 16B.      CODE OF ETHICS.................................................................................................................................................... 205

ITEM 16C.      PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES........................................................................................ 205

ITEM 16D.      EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES..................................... 206


ITEM  16F.      CORPORATE GOVERNANCE............................................................................................................................... 206

ITEM  16G.     MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE............................................................................................................................... 206

PART III................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 206

ITEM  17.        FINANCIAL STATEMENTS................................................................................................................................. 206

ITEM  18.        FINANCIAL STATEMENTS................................................................................................................................. 206

ITEM 19.         EXHIBITS.................................................................................................................................................................. 206



Definitions and Terminology

Unless indicated otherwise, or the context otherwise requires, references herein to “ArcelorMittal”, “we”, “us”, “our” and the “Company” or similar terms are to ArcelorMittal, formerly known as Mittal Steel Company N.V. (“Mittal Steel”), having its registered office at 19, avenue de la Liberté, L-2930 Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, and, where the context requires, its consolidated subsidiaries. References to the “ArcelorMittal group” and the “Group” are to ArcelorMittal and its consolidated subsidiaries.  ArcelorMittal’s principal subsidiaries, categorized by reporting segment and location, are listed below.

All references herein to “Arcelor” refer to Arcelor, a société anonyme incorporated under Luxembourg law, which was acquired by Mittal Steel on August 1, 2006. For the purposes of this annual report, the names of the following ArcelorMittal subsidiaries as abbreviated below will be used where applicable.

Name of Subsidiary






Flat Carbon Americas



ArcelorMittal Dofasco Inc.

ArcelorMittal Dofasco


ArcelorMittal Lázaro Cárdenas S.A. de C.V.

ArcelorMittal Lázaro Cárdenas


ArcelorMittal USA LLC

ArcelorMittal USA


ArcelorMittal Brasil S.A.

ArcelorMittal Brasil





Flat Carbon Europe



ArcelorMittal Atlantique et Lorraine S.A.S.

ArcelorMittal Atlantique et Lorraine


ArcelorMittal Belgium N.V.

ArcelorMittal Belgium


ArcelorMittal España S.A.

ArcelorMittal España


ArcelorMittal Flat Carbon Europe S.A.



ArcelorMittal Galati S.A.

ArcelorMittal Galati


ArcelorMittal Poland S.A.

ArcelorMittal Poland


Industeel Belgium S.A.

Industeel Belgium


Industeel France S.A.

Industeel France


ArcelorMittal Eisenhüttenstadt GmbH

ArcelorMittal Eisenhüttenstadt


ArcelorMittal Bremen GmbH

ArcelorMittal Bremen


ArcelorMittal Méditerranée S.A.S.

ArcelorMittal Méditerranée





Long Carbon Americas and Europe



Acindar Industria Argentina de Aceros S.A.



ArcelorMittal Belval & Differdange S.A.

ArcelorMittal Belval & Differdange


ArcelorMittal Brasil S.A.

ArcelorMittal Brasil


ArcelorMittal Hamburg GmbH

ArcelorMittal Hamburg


ArcelorMittal Las Truchas, S.A. de C.V.

ArcelorMittal Las Truchas


ArcelorMittal Montreal Inc.

ArcelorMittal Montreal


ArcelorMittal Gipúzkoa S.L.

ArcelorMittal Gipuzkoa


ArcelorMittal Ostrava a.s.

ArcelorMittal Ostrava

Czech Republic

ArcelorMittal Point Lisas Ltd.

ArcelorMittal Point Lisas

Trinidad and Tobago

Société Nationale de Sidérurgie S.A.



ArcelorMittal Duisburg GmbH

ArcelorMittal Duisburg


ArcelorMittal Warszawa S.p.z.o.o.

ArcelorMittal Warszawa








ArcelorMittal South Africa Ltd.

ArcelorMittal South Africa

South Africa

JSC ArcelorMittal Temirtau

ArcelorMittal Temirtau


OJSC ArcelorMittal Kryviy Rih

ArcelorMittal Kryviy Rih








ArcelorMittal Mines Canada Inc.

ArcelorMittal Mines Canada





Distribution Solutions



ArcelorMittal International Luxembourg S.A.

ArcelorMittal International Luxembourg






In addition, unless we have indicated otherwise, or the context otherwise requires, references in this annual report to:

·         “production capacity” are to the annual production capacity of plant and equipment based on existing technical parameters as estimated by management;

·         “steel products” are to finished and semi-finished steel products, and exclude raw materials (including those described under “upstream” below), direct reduced iron (“DRI”), hot metal, coke, etc.;

·         “sales” include shipping and handling fees and costs billed to a customer in a sales transaction;

·         “tons”, “net tons” or “ST” are to short tons and are used in measurements involving steel products (a short ton is equal to 907.2 kilograms or 2,000 pounds);

·         “tonnes” or “MT” are to metric tonnes and are used in measurements involving steel products, as well as crude steel, iron ore, iron ore pellets, DRI, hot metal, coke, coal, pig iron and scrap (a metric tonne is equal to 1,000 kilograms or 2,204.62 pounds);

·         “Articles of Association” are to the amended and restated articles of association of ArcelorMittal, dated January 25, 2011;

·         “crude steel” are to the first solid steel product upon solidification of liquid steel, including ingots from conventional mills and semis (e.g., slab, billet and blooms) from continuous casters;

·         measures of distance are stated in kilometers, each of which equals approximately 0.62 miles, or in meters, each of which equals approximately 3.28 feet;

·         “DMTU” or “dmtu” stand for dry metric tonne unit;

·         “real”, “reais” or “R$” are to Brazilian reais, the official currency of Brazil;

·         “US$”, “$”, “dollars”, “USD” or “U.S. dollars” are to United States dollars, the official currency of the United States;

·         “AUD$” or “AUD” are to Australian dollars, the official currency of Australia;




·         “C$” or “CAD” are to Canadian dollars, the official currency of Canada;

·         “HK$” are to Hong Kong dollars, the official currency of Hong Kong;

·         “CNY” are to Chinese yuan, the official currency of China;

·         “KZT” are to the Kazak tenge, the official currency of Kazakhstan;

·         “UAH” are to the Ukrainian Hryvnia, the official currency of Ukraine;

·         “euro”, “euros”, “EUR” or “€“ are to the currency of the European Union member states participating in the European Monetary Union;

·         “ZAR” are to South African rand, the official currency of the Republic of South Africa;

·         “Ps.” or “MXN” are to the Mexican peso, the official currency of the United Mexican States;

·         “downstream” are to finishing operations, for example in the case of flat products, the process after the production of hot-rolled coil/plates, and in case of long products, the process after the production of blooms/billets (including production of bars, wire rods, SBQ, etc.);

·         “upstream” are to operations that precede downstream steel-making, such as mining products (iron ore pellets and iron ore fines), coking coal, coke, sinter, DRI, blast furnace, basic oxygen furnace (“BOF”), electric arc furnace (“EAF”), casters & hot rolling/plate mill;

·         “number of employees” are to employees on the payroll of the Company;

·         “Significant shareholder” are to a trust (HSBC Trust (C.I.) Limited, as trustee), of which Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal, Mrs. Usha Mittal and their children are the beneficiaries, or (where the context requires) prior owners of the Significant shareholder’s stake in ArcelorMittal;

·         “brownfield project” are to the expansion of an existing operation;

·         “greenfield project” are to the development of a new project;

·         “coking coal” are to coal that, by virtue of its coking properties, is used in the manufacture of coke, which is used in the steelmaking process;

·         “direct reduced iron” or “DRI” are to metallic iron formed by removing oxygen from iron ore without the formation of, or passage through, a smelting phase. DRI can be used as feedstock for steel production;

·         “iron ore fines” are to ultra-fine iron ore generated by mining and grinding processes, that are aggregated into iron ore pellets through an agglomeration process or used as sinter feed;

·         “iron pellets” are to agglomerated ultra-fine iron ore particles of a size and quality suitable for use in steel-making processes;

·         “sinter” are to a metallic input used in the blast furnace steel-making process, which aggregates fines, binder and other materials into a coherent mass by heating without melting;

·         “special bar quality” (“SBQ”) are to special bar quality steel, a high-quality long product;

·         “energy coal” are to coal used as a fuel source in electrical power generation, cement manufacture and various industrial applications. Energy coal may also be referred to as steam or thermal coal;

·         “metallurgical coal” are to a broader term than coking coal that includes all coals used in steelmaking, such as coal used for the pulverized coal injection process;

·         “run of mine” or “ROM” ore mined to be fed to a preparation and/or concentration process;

·         “wet recoverable” are to a quantity of iron ore or coal recovered after the material from the mine has gone through a preparation and/or concentration process excluding drying;

·         “BRICET” are to the countries of Brazil, Russia, India, China, Eastern Europe and Turkey;




·         “CIS” are to the countries of the Commonwealth of Independent States; and

·         the “Spanish Stock Exchanges” are to the stock exchanges of Madrid, Barcelona, Bilbao and Valencia.

Financial Information

This annual report contains the audited consolidated financial statements of ArcelorMittal and its consolidated subsidiaries, including the consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2010 and 2011, and the consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2010 and 2011. ArcelorMittal’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).

The financial information and certain other information presented in a number of tables in this annual report have been rounded to the nearest whole number or the nearest decimal. Therefore, the sum of the numbers in a column may not conform exactly to the total figure given for that column. In addition, certain percentages presented in the tables in this annual report reflect calculations based upon the underlying information prior to rounding and, accordingly, may not conform exactly to the percentages that would be derived if the relevant calculations were based upon the rounded numbers.

Market Information

This annual report includes industry data and projections about our markets obtained from industry surveys, market research, publicly available information and industry publications. Statements on ArcelorMittal’s competitive position contained in this annual report are based primarily on public sources including, but not limited to, publications of the World Steel Association. Industry publications generally state that the information they contain has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but that the accuracy and completeness of such information is not guaranteed and that the projections they contain are based on a number of significant assumptions. We have not independently verified this data or determined the reasonableness of such assumptions. In addition, in many cases we have made statements in this annual report regarding our industry and our position in the industry based on internal surveys, industry forecasts and market research, as well as our own experience. While these statements are believed to be reliable, they have not been independently verified.


This annual report and the documents incorporated by reference in this annual report contain forward-looking statements based on estimates and assumptions. This annual report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements concerning the business, future financial condition, results of operations and prospects of ArcelorMittal, including its subsidiaries. These statements usually contain the words “believes”, “plans”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “estimates” or other similar expressions. For each of these statements, you should be aware that forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Although it is believed that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, there is no assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated will be realized or, even if realized, that they will have the expected effects on the business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects of ArcelorMittal.

These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which the statements were made, and no obligation has been undertaken to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made in this annual report or elsewhere as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable laws and regulations. In addition to other factors and matters contained or incorporated by reference in this annual report, it is believed that the following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements:

·         a prolonged period of weak economic growth, either globally or in ArcelorMittal’s key markets;

·         the risk that excessive capacity in the steel industry globally and particularly in China may hamper the steel industry’s recovery and weigh on the profitability of steel producers;

·         the risk of protracted weakness in steel prices or of price volatility;

·         any volatility in the supply or prices of raw materials, energy or transportation, or mismatches of raw material and steel price trends;

·         increased competition in the steel industry;

·         the risk that unfair practices in steel trade could negatively affect steel prices and reduce ArcelorMittal’s profitability, or that national trade restrictions could hamper ArcelorMittal’s access to key export markets;




·         increased competition from other materials, which could significantly reduce market prices and demand for steel products;

·         legislative or regulatory changes, including those relating to protection of the environment and health and safety;

·         laws and regulations restricting greenhouse gas emissions;

·         the risk that ArcelorMittal’s high level of indebtedness could make it difficult or expensive to refinance its maturing debt, incur new debt and/or flexibly manage its business;

·         risks relating to greenfield and brownfield projects;

·         risks relating to ArcelorMittal’s mining operations;

·         the fact that ArcelorMittal’s reserve estimates could materially differ from mineral quantities that it may be able to actually recover, that its mine life estimates may prove inaccurate and the fact that market fluctuations may render certain ore reserves uneconomical to mine

·         drilling and production risks in relation to mining;

·         rising extraction costs in relation to mining;

·         failure to manage continued growth through acquisitions;

·         a Mittal family trust’s ability to exercise significant influence over the outcome of shareholder voting;

·         any loss or diminution in the services of Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal, ArcelorMittal’s Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer;

·         the risk that the earnings and cash flows of ArcelorMittal’s operating subsidiaries may not be sufficient to meet future funding needs at the holding company level;

·         the risk that changes in assumptions underlying the carrying value of certain assets, including as a result of adverse market conditions, could result in impairment of tangible and intangible assets, including goodwill;

·         the risk that significant capital expenditure and other commitments ArcelorMittal has made in connection with acquisitions may limit its operational flexibility and add to its financing requirements;

·         ArcelorMittal’s ability to fund under-funded pension liabilities;

·         the risk of labor disputes;

·         economic policy, political, social and legal risks and uncertainties in certain countries in which ArcelorMittal operates or proposes to operate;

·         fluctuations in currency exchange rates, particularly the euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate, and the risk of impositions of exchange controls in countries where ArcelorMittal operates;

·         the risk of disruptions to ArcelorMittal’s manufacturing operations;

·         the risk of damage to ArcelorMittal’s production facilities due to natural disasters;

·         the risk that ArcelorMittal’s insurance policies may provide inadequate coverage;

·         the risk of product liability claims;

·         the risk of potential liabilities from investigations, litigation and fines regarding antitrust matters;

·         the risk that ArcelorMittal’s governance and compliance processes may fail to prevent regulatory penalties or reputational harm, both at operating subsidiaries and joint ventures;

·         the risk of unfavorable changes to, or interpretations of, the tax laws and regulations in the countries in which ArcelorMittal operates;

·         the risk that ArcelorMittal may not be able fully to utilize its deferred tax assets; and




·         the risk that ArcelorMittal’s reputation and business could be materially harmed as a result of data breaches, data theft, unauthorized access or successful hacking.

These factors are discussed in more detail in this annual report, including under “Item 3D—Key Information—Risk Factors”.



Not applicable.


Not applicable.

ITEM 3.              KEY INFORMATION

A.    Selected Financial Data

The following tables present selected consolidated financial information of ArcelorMittal as of and for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, prepared in accordance with IFRS. This selected consolidated financial information should be read in conjunction with ArcelorMittal’s consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included elsewhere herein.

In accordance with IFRS 5, Statements of Operations have been adjusted retrospectively for all periods presented due to the completion of the spin-off of stainless steel operations in a separately focused company, Aperam, on January 25, 2011. Stainless steel operations are therefore presented as discontinued operations.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Amounts in $ millions except per share data and percentages)


Year ended December 31,








$     96,293

$    116,942

$   61,021

$   78,025

$   93,973

Cost of sales (including depreciation and






Selling, general and administrative expenses






Operating income/(loss)






Operating income as percentage of sales






Income from investments in associates
and joint ventures






Financing costs—net






Income/(loss) before taxes






Net income from continuing operations
(including non-controlling interest)






Discontinued operations






Net income attributable to equity holders of
the parent






Net income (including non-controlling interest)






Earnings per common share—continuing operations
(in U.S. dollars)






Basic earnings per common share(4)






Diluted earnings per common share(4)






Earnings per common share—
discontinued operations (in U.S. dollars)






Basic earnings per common share(4)






Diluted earnings per common share(4)






Earnings per common share (in U.S. dollars)






Basic earnings per common share(4)






Diluted earnings per common share(4)






Dividends declared per share










Consolidated Statements of Financial Position(6)

(Amounts in $ millions except share, production and shipment data)


As of December 31,













Cash and cash equivalents including
restricted cash(7)

$            8,105

$            7,587

$          6,009

$           6,289

$           3,905

Property, plant and equipment






Total assets






Short-term debt and current portion of
long-term debt






Long-term debt, net of current portion






Net assets






Share capital






Basic weighted average common shares
outstanding (millions)






Diluted weighted average common shares
outstanding (millions)


















Other Data






Net cash provided by operating activities

$          16,532

$          14,652

$          7,278

$           4,015

$           1,777

Net cash (used in) investing activities






Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities






Total production of crude steel
(thousands of tonnes)






Total shipments of steel products
(thousands of tonnes)(5)







(1)    Including $4,767 million, $6,405 million, $3,169 million, $4,873 million and $5,875 million of sales to related parties for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively (see Note 14 to ArcelorMittal’s consolidated financial statements).

(2)    Including $2,408 million, $2,373 million, $1,942 million, $2,448 million and $2,897 million of purchases from related parties for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively.

(3)    Including depreciation and impairment of $4,566 million, $5,759 million, $5,126 million, $4,920 million and $5,000 million for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively.

(4)    Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income attributable to equity holders of ArcelorMittal by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted earnings per common share include assumed shares from stock options, shares from restricted stock units and convertible debt (if dilutive) in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented.

(5)    Shipment volumes of steel products for the operations of the Company include certain inter-segment shipments.

(6)    Stainless steel assets and liabilities are reclassified to assets and liabilities held for distribution only as of December 31, 2010 and not as at the other year-ends in this table.

(7)    Including restricted cash of $245 million, $11 million, $90 million, $82 million and $84 million at December 31, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively.

B.    Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

C.    Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D.    Risk Factors

Our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects could be materially adversely affected by any of the risks and uncertainties described below.

Risks Related to the Global Economy and the Steel Industry

ArcelorMittal’s activities and results are substantially affected by regional and global macroeconomic conditions.   Recessions or prolonged periods of weak growth in the global economy or the economies of ArcelorMittal’s key selling markets have in the past had and in the future would be likely to have a material adverse effect on the steel industry and ArcelorMittal.

The steel industry has historically been highly cyclical.  This is due largely to the cyclical nature of the business sectors that are the principal consumers of steel, namely the automotive, construction, appliance, machinery, equipment, infrastructure and transportation industries.  The demand for steel products thus generally correlates to macroeconomic fluctuations in the global economy.  This correlation and the adverse effect of macroeconomic downturns on steel producers were evidenced in the 2008/2009




financial and subsequent economic crisis.  The results of steel producers were substantially affected, with many (including ArcelorMittal) recording sharply reduced revenues and operating losses.  The recovery from this severe economic downturn has been slow and uncertain, and was negatively affected by several factors in 2011 including the Euro-zone sovereign debt crisis and a cooling of emerging market economies.  See “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Overview—Economic Environment”.  A new global recession, a recession in the developed regions (Europe and North America) that are ArcelorMittal’s primary selling markets, and/or a slowdown in emerging economies that are substantial consumers of steel (such as China, Brazil, Russia and India, as well as emerging Asian markets, the Middle East and the Commonwealth of Independent States (“CIS”) regions) would likely result in reduced demand for (and hence price of) steel and have a material adverse effect on the steel industry in general and on ArcelorMittal’s results of operations and financial condition in particular.

Excess capacity and oversupply in the steel industry globally and particularly in China may hamper the steel industry’s recovery and weigh on the profitability of steel producers including ArcelorMittal.

In addition to economic conditions, the steel industry is affected by global production capacity and fluctuations in steel imports/exports and tariffs. The steel industry has historically suffered from structural over-capacity. The industry is currently characterized by a substantial increase in production capacity in the developing world, particularly in China, and also in India and other emerging markets. China is now the largest global steel producer by a large margin, and the balance between its domestic production and consumption has been an important factor in global steel prices in recent years. Chinese steel exports, or conditions favorable to them (excess steel capacity in China, an undervalued Chinese currency and/or higher market prices for steel in markets outside of China) can have a significant impact on steel prices in other markets, including the U.S. and Europe.  While growth in Chinese steel production slowed in 2011, ArcelorMittal remains exposed to the risk of steel production increases in China and other markets outstripping increases in real demand, in particular given indications of a slowdown in worldwide demand, including Chinese demand, which may weigh on price recovery and therefore exacerbate the “margin squeeze” in the steel industry created by high-cost raw materials.

Protracted low steel prices would have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s results, as could price volatility.

The prices of steel products are influenced by many factors, including demand, worldwide production capacity, capacity-utilization rates, raw material prices and contract arrangements, steel inventory levels and exchange rates.  Steel prices are volatile, reflecting the inherent volatility of these variables as well as more generally the highly cyclical nature of the global steel industry.  Following an extended period of rising prices, global steel prices fell sharply during the financial and economic crisis of 2008/2009.  This resulted from the sharp drop in demand and was exacerbated by massive industry destocking (i.e., customer reductions of steel inventories).  This had a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal and other steel producers, who experienced lower revenues, margins and, as discussed further below, write-downs of finished steel products and raw material inventories.  Steel prices gradually recovered in late 2009 and into 2010 while remaining below their pre-financial crisis peaks.  Steel prices remained volatile throughout 2011 rising in the first quarter on stronger demand and higher raw material prices but softening in the second half. The softening accelerated in the fourth quarter as iron ore prices dropped sharply in October, and customers then started to destock in an uncertain economic environment.  See “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Overview—Key Factors Affecting Results of Operations—Steel Prices”.  While there has been some increase in price levels to date in 2012, any sustained price recovery will likely require a broad economic recovery in order to underpin an increase in real demand for steel products by end users. Conversely, a protracted downturn in steel prices would materially and adversely affect ArcelorMittal’s revenues and profitability.

Volatility in the supply and prices of raw materials, energy and transportation, and mismatches with steel price trends, could adversely affect ArcelorMittal’s results of operations.

Steel production consumes substantial amounts of raw materials including iron ore, coking coal and coke. Because the production of direct reduced iron, the production of steel in electric arc furnaces and the re-heating of steel involve the use of significant amounts of energy, steel companies are also sensitive to natural gas and electricity prices and dependent on having access to reliable supplies of energy. Any prolonged interruption in the supply of raw materials or energy would adversely affect ArcelorMittal’s results of operation and financial condition.

The prices of iron ore, coking coal and coke are highly volatile and may be affected by, among other factors: industry structural factors (including the oligopolistic nature of the iron ore industry and the fragmented nature of the steel industry); demand trends in the steel industry itself and particularly from Chinese steel producers (as the largest group of producers); new laws or regulations; suppliers’ allocations to other purchasers; business continuity of suppliers; expansion projects of suppliers; interruptions in production by suppliers; accidents or other similar events at suppliers’ premises or along the supply chain; wars, natural disasters, political disruption and other similar events; fluctuations in exchange rates; the bargaining power of raw material suppliers; and the availability and cost of transportation. Although ArcelorMittal has substantial sources of iron ore and coal from its own mines and is expanding output at such mines and also has new mines under development, it remains exposed to volatility in the supply and price of iron ore, coking coal and coke as it obtains a significant portion of such raw materials under a portfolio of different term supply contracts (for example, from the Brazilian mining company Vale) to mitigate variations between supply of these input materials and demand from steel mills.




Historically, energy prices have varied significantly, and this trend is expected to continue due to market conditions and other factors beyond the control of steel companies.

Steel and raw material prices have historically been highly correlated. A drop in raw material prices therefore typically triggers a decrease in steel prices. During the 2008/2009 crisis, both steel and raw materials prices dropped sharply. Another risk is embedded in the timing of the production cycle: rapidly falling steel prices can trigger write-downs of raw material inventory purchased when steel prices were higher, as well as of unsold finished steel products. ArcelorMittal recorded substantial write-downs in 2008/2009 as a result of this. Furthermore, a lack of correlation or a time lag in correlation between raw material and steel prices may also occur and result in a “margin squeeze” in the steel industry.  ArcelorMittal experienced such a squeeze in late 2011, for example, when iron ore prices fell over 30% in three weeks in October 2011 and resulted in a significant fall in steel prices while lower raw material prices had yet to feed into the Company’s operating costs.  Because ArcelorMittal sources a substantial portion of its raw materials through long term contracts with quarterly (or more frequent) formula-based or negotiated price adjustments and sells a substantial part of its steel products at spot prices, it faces the risk of adverse differentials between its own production costs, which are affected by global raw materials prices, and trends for steel prices in regional markets. Exposure to this risk may change as raw material suppliers move increasingly toward sales on shorter term basis. In 2010, iron ore suppliers moved away from the long-prevailing industry practice of setting prices annually, which had provided a measure of short-term price stability, in favor of a system where prices are set on a quarterly basis.  For additional details on ArcelorMittal’s raw materials supply and self-sufficiency, see “Item 4B—Business Overview—Raw Materials and Energy”.

Developments in the competitive environment in the steel industry could have an adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s competitive position and hence its business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

The markets in which steel companies operate are highly competitive.  Competition—in the form of established producers expanding in new markets, smaller producers increasing production in anticipation of demand increases, amid an incipient recovery, or exporters selling excess capacity from markets such as China—could cause ArcelorMittal to lose market share, increase expenditures or reduce pricing.  Any of these developments could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

Unfair trade practices in ArcelorMittal’s home markets could negatively affect steel prices and reduce ArcelorMittal’s profitability, while trade restrictions could limit ArcelorMittal’s access to key export markets.

ArcelorMittal is exposed to the effects of “dumping” and other unfair trade and pricing practices by competitors. Moreover, government subsidization of the steel industry remains widespread in certain countries, particularly those with centrally-controlled economies such as China.  As a consequence of the recent global economic crisis, there is an increased risk of unfairly-traded steel exports from such countries into various markets including North America and Europe, in which ArcelorMittal produces and sells its products. Such imports could have the effect of reducing prices and demand for ArcelorMittal products.

In addition, ArcelorMittal has significant exposure to the effects of trade actions and barriers due the global nature of its operations. Various countries have in the past instituted, or are currently contemplating the implementation of, trade actions and barriers, which could materially and adversely affect ArcelorMittal’s business by limiting the Company’s access to steel markets.

See “Item 4B—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Government Regulations”.

Competition from other materials could reduce market prices and demand for steel products and thereby reduce ArcelorMittal’s cash flow and profitability.

In many applications, steel competes with other materials that may be used as substitutes, such as aluminum (particularly in the automobile industry), cement, composites, glass, plastic and wood. Government regulatory initiatives mandating the use of such materials in lieu of steel, whether for environmental or other reasons, as well as the development of other new substitutes for steel products, could significantly reduce market prices and demand for steel products and thereby reduce ArcelorMittal’s cash flow and profitability.

ArcelorMittal is subject to strict environmental laws and regulations that could give rise to a significant increase in costs and liabilities.

ArcelorMittal is subject to a broad range of environmental laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. These laws and regulations impose increasingly stringent environmental protection standards regarding, among others, air emissions, wastewater storage, treatment and discharges, the use and handling of hazardous or toxic materials, waste disposal practices, and the remediation of environmental contamination. The costs of complying with, and the imposition of liabilities pursuant to, environmental laws and regulations can be significant, and compliance with new and more stringent obligations may require additional capital expenditures or modifications in operating practices. Failure to comply can result in civil and or criminal penalties being imposed, the suspension of permits, requirements to curtail or suspend operations, and lawsuits by third parties. Despite ArcelorMittal’s efforts to




comply with environmental laws and regulations, environmental incidents or accidents may occur that negatively affect the Company’s reputation or the operations of key facilities.

ArcelorMittal also incurs costs and liabilities associated with the assessment and remediation of contaminated sites. In addition to the impact on current facilities and operations, environmental remediation obligations can give rise to substantial liabilities in respect of divested assets and past activities. This may also be the case for acquisitions when liabilities for past acts or omissions are not adequately reflected in the terms and price of the acquisition. ArcelorMittal could become subject to further remediation obligations in the future, as additional contamination is discovered or cleanup standards become more stringent.

Costs and liabilities associated with mining activities include those resulting from tailings and sludge disposal, effluent management, and rehabilitation of land disturbed during mining processes. ArcelorMittal could become subject to unidentified liabilities in the future, such as those relating to uncontrolled tailings breaches or other future events or to underestimated emissions of polluting substances.

ArcelorMittal’s operations may be located in areas where individuals or communities may regard its activities as having a detrimental effect on their natural environment and conditions of life. Any actions taken by such individuals or communities in response to such concerns could compromise ArcelorMittal’s profitability or, in extreme cases, the viability of an operation or the development of new activities in the relevant region or country.

See “Item 4B—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Government Regulations—Environmental Laws and Regulations” and “Item 8A—Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings”.

Laws and regulations restricting emissions of greenhouse gases could force ArcelorMittal to incur increased capital and operating costs and could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Compliance with new and more stringent environmental obligations relating to greenhouse gas emissions may require additional capital expenditures or modifications in operating practices, as well as additional reporting obligations. The integrated steel process involves carbon and creates carbon dioxide (CO2), which distinguishes integrated steel producers from mini-mills and many other industries where CO2 generation is primarily linked to energy use. The European Union has established greenhouse gas regulations that may require us to incur additional costs to acquire emissions allowances. The United States required reporting of greenhouse gas emissions from certain large sources beginning in 2011 and has begun adopting and implementing regulations to restrict emissions of greenhouse gases under existing provisions of the Clean Air Act. Further measures, in the European Union, the United States, and many other countries, may be enacted in the future. In particular, a recently adopted international agreement, the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action, calls for a second phase of the Kyoto Protocol’s greenhouse gas emissions restrictions to be effective through 2020 and for a new international treaty to come into effect and be implemented from 2020.  Such obligations, whether in the form of a national or international cap-and-trade emissions permit system, a carbon tax, emissions controls, reporting requirements, or other regulatory initiatives, could have a negative effect on ArcelorMittal’s production levels, income and cash flows. Such regulations could also have a negative effect on the Company’s suppliers and customers, which could result in higher costs and lower sales.

Moreover, many developing nations, such as China, India and certain others, have not yet instituted significant greenhouse gas regulations. It is possible that a future international agreement to regulate emissions may provide exemptions and lesser standards for developing nations. In such case, ArcelorMittal may be at a competitive disadvantage relative to steelmakers having more or all of their production in such countries.

In addition, some scientists have concluded that increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the Earth’s atmosphere may produce climate changes that have significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, droughts, floods and other climatic events. If any such events were to occur, they could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

See “Item 4B—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Government Regulations—Environmental Laws and Regulations” and “Item 8A—Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Environmental Liabilities”.

ArcelorMittal is subject to stringent health and safety laws and regulations that give rise to significant costs and liabilities.

ArcelorMittal is subject to a broad range of health and safety laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. These laws and regulations, as interpreted by relevant agencies and the courts, impose increasingly stringent health and safety protection standards. The costs of complying with, and the imposition of liabilities pursuant to, health and safety laws and regulations could be significant, and failure to comply could result in the assessment of civil and criminal penalties, the suspension of permits or operations, and lawsuits by third parties.

Despite ArcelorMittal’s efforts to monitor and reduce accidents at its facilities (see “Item 4B—Business Overview—Government Regulations”), health and safety incidents do occur, some of which may result in costs and liabilities and negatively impact




ArcelorMittal’s reputation or the operations of the affected facility. Such accidents could include explosions or gas leaks, fires or collapses in underground mining operations, vehicular accidents, other accidents involving mobile equipment, or exposure to radioactive or other potentially hazardous materials. Some of ArcelorMittal’s industrial activities involve the use, storage and transport of dangerous chemicals and toxic substances, and ArcelorMittal is therefore subject to the risk of industrial accidents which could have significant adverse consequences for the Company’s workers and facilities, as well as the environment. Such accidents could lead to production stoppages, loss of key personnel, the loss of key assets, or put at risk employees (and those of sub-contractors and suppliers) or persons living near affected sites.

ArcelorMittal may continue to be exposed to increased operational costs due to the costs and lost time associated with the HIV/AIDS and malaria infection rates within our workforce in Africa and other regions. ArcelorMittal may also be affected by potential outbreaks of flu or other viruses or infectious diseases in any of the regions in which it operates.

Under certain circumstances, authorities could require ArcelorMittal facilities to curtail or suspend operations based on health and safety concerns.

See “Item 4B—Information on the Company—Business Overview—Government Regulations—Environmental Laws and Regulations” and “Item 8A—Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings”.

Risks Related to ArcelorMittal

ArcelorMittal has a substantial amount of indebtedness, which could make it more difficult or expensive to refinance its maturing debt, incur new debt and/or flexibly manage its business.

As of December 31, 2011, ArcelorMittal had total debt outstanding of $26.4 billion, consisting of $2.8 billion of short-term indebtedness (including payables to banks and the current portion of long-term debt) and $23.6 billion of long-term indebtedness. As of December 31, 2011, ArcelorMittal had $3.9 billion of cash and cash equivalents ($3.8 billion) including restricted cash ($0.1 billion), and $8.6 billion available to be drawn under existing credit facilities. Substantial amounts of indebtedness mature in 2012 ($2.8 billion), 2013 ($4.0 billion), 2014 ($3.7 billion) and 2015 ($2.0 billion). See “Item 5B—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

Although the global financial crisis eased during the second half of 2009 and in 2010, conditions in global capital and credit markets have remained volatile and highly uncertain.  Conditions worsened in the second half of 2011, due in particular to the Euro-zone sovereign debt crisis and its collateral effects.  The markets are particularly volatile and uncertain for companies with high leverage or in sectors that have been adversely affected by the global economic downturn, including steel and other basic material producers.

Financial markets could conceivably deteriorate sharply, including in response to significant political or financial news, such as a default or heightened risk of default by a sovereign country in Europe or elsewhere, large credit losses at a systemically important financial institution or the bankruptcy of a large company.  As a result, the Company may experience difficulties in accessing the financial markets on acceptable terms.

In addition, credit rating agencies could downgrade ArcelorMittal’s ratings (which are currently just above so-called “investment grade” levels, with two credit rating agencies having placed ArcelorMittal’s current credit rating on negative outlook) either due to factors specific to ArcelorMittal, a prolonged cyclical downturn in the steel industry, or macroeconomic trends (such as global or regional recessions) and trends in credit and capital markets more generally. The margin under ArcelorMittal’s principal credit facilities and certain of its bond issuances is subject to adjustment in the event of a change in its long-term credit ratings. Any decline in ArcelorMittal’s credit ratings, including a loss of investment grade status, would result in an increase to its cost of borrowing and could significantly harm its financial condition and results of operations as well as hinder its ability to refinance its existing indebtedness on acceptable terms. Moreover, ArcelorMittal could, in order to increase financial flexibility during a period of reduced availability of credit, implement capital raising measures such as equity offerings or asset disposals, which could in turn create a risk of diluting existing shareholders, the Company receiving relatively low proceeds for the divested assets and/or causing substantial accounting losses (particularly if the divestments are done in difficult market conditions).

ArcelorMittal’s principal credit facilities contain restrictive covenants.  These covenants limit, inter alia, encumbrances on the assets of ArcelorMittal and its subsidiaries, the ability of ArcelorMittal’s subsidiaries to incur debt and the ability of ArcelorMittal and its subsidiaries to dispose of assets in certain circumstances. ArcelorMittal’s principal credit facilities also include the following financial covenant: ArcelorMittal must ensure that the “Leverage Ratio”, being the ratio of “Consolidated Total Net Borrowings” (consolidated total borrowings less consolidated cash and cash equivalents) to “Consolidated EBITDA” (the consolidated net pre-taxation profits of the ArcelorMittal group for a Measurement Period, subject to certain adjustments as defined in the facilities), at the end of each “Measurement Period” (each period of 12 months ending on the last day of a financial half-year or a financial year of ArcelorMittal), is not greater than a ratio of 3.5 to one. As of December 31, 2011, the Leverage Ratio stood at approximately 2.2 to one.




The restrictive and financial covenants could limit ArcelorMittal’s operating and financial flexibility. Failure to comply with any covenant would enable the lenders to accelerate ArcelorMittal’s repayment obligations. Moreover, ArcelorMittal’s debt facilities have provisions whereby certain events relating to other borrowers within the ArcelorMittal group could, under certain circumstances, lead to acceleration of debt repayment under such credit facilities. Any invocation of these cross-acceleration clauses could cause some or all of the other debt to accelerate, creating liquidity pressures.

Furthermore, some of ArcelorMittal’s debt is subject to floating rates of interest and thereby exposes ArcelorMittal to interest rate risk (i.e., if interest rates rise, ArcelorMittal’s debt service obligations on its floating rate indebtedness would increase). Depending on market conditions, ArcelorMittal from time to time uses interest-rate swaps or other financial instruments to hedge a portion of its interest rate exposure either from fixed to floating or floating to fixed. After taking into account interest-rate derivative financial instruments, ArcelorMittal had exposure to 79% of its debt at fixed interest rates and 21% at floating rates as of December 31, 2011.

See “Item 5B—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

ArcelorMittal’s growth strategy includes greenfield and brownfield projects that are inherently subject to completion and financing risks.

As a part of its future growth strategy, the Company plans to expand its steel-making capacity and raw materials production through a combination of brownfield growth, new greenfield projects and acquisition opportunities, mainly in emerging markets. See “Item 4B—Business Overview—Business Strategy”.  To the extent that these plans proceed, these projects would require substantial capital expenditures and their timely completion and successful operation may be affected by factors beyond the control of ArcelorMittal. These factors include receiving financing on reasonable terms, obtaining or renewing required regulatory approvals and licenses, securing and maintaining adequate property rights to land and mineral resources (especially in connection with mining projects in certain developing countries in which security of title with respect to mining concessions and property rights remains weak), local opposition to land acquisition or project development (as experienced, for example, in connection with the Company’s projects in India), demand for the Company’s products and general economic conditions. Any of these factors may cause the Company to delay, modify or forego some or all aspects of its expansion plans. Greenfield projects can also, in addition to general factors, have project-specific factors that increase the level of risk. For example, the Company has acquired (along with a partner) Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation in view of developing the Mary River iron ore deposit in the Arctic Circle. The scale of this project and the location of the deposit raise unique challenges, including extremely harsh weather conditions, lack of transportation infrastructure and environmental concerns. The Company cannot guarantee that it will be able to execute this project or other projects, and to the extent that they proceed, that it will be able to complete them on schedule, within budget, or achieve an adequate return on its investment.

ArcelorMittal’s mining operations are subject to risks associated with mining activities.

ArcelorMittal operates mines and has substantially increased the scope of its mining activities in recent years. Mining operations are subject to hazards and risks usually associated with the exploration, development and production of natural resources, any of which could result in production shortfalls or damage to persons or property. In particular, hazards associated with open-pit mining operations include, among others:

·         flooding of the open pit;

·         collapse of the open-pit wall;

·         accidents associated with the operation of large open-pit mining and rock transportation equipment;

·         accidents associated with the preparation and ignition of large-scale open-pit blasting operations;

·         production disruptions due to weather; and

·         hazards associated with the disposal of mineralized waste water, such as groundwater and waterway contamination;

Hazards associated with underground mining operations, of which ArcelorMittal has several, include, among others:

·         underground fires and explosions, including those caused by flammable gas;

·         gas and coal outbursts;

·         cave-ins or falls of ground;

·         discharges of gases and toxic chemicals;

·         flooding; 




·         sinkhole formation and ground subsidence;

·         other accidents and conditions resulting from drilling;

·         difficulties associated with mining in extreme weather conditions, such as the Arctic; and

·         blasting, removing, and processing material from an underground mine.

ArcelorMittal is exposed to all of these hazards. For example, in the past two years, there have been methane gas explosions at the Kuzembaev Mine in Kazakhstan, in development roadways of unpredictable geology, resulting in four fatalities and an extended disruption of operations.  The reoccurrence of any of these events, or the occurrence of any of those listed above, could delay production, increase production costs and result in death or injury to persons, damage to property and liability for ArcelorMittal, some or all of which may not be covered by insurance, as well as substantially harm ArcelorMittal’s reputation as a company focused on ensuring the health and safety of its employees.

ArcelorMittal’s reserve estimates may materially differ from mineral quantities that it may be able to actually recover; ArcelorMittal’s estimates of mine life may prove inaccurate; and market price fluctuations and changes in operating and capital costs may render certain ore reserves uneconomical to mine.

ArcelorMittal’s reported reserves are estimated quantities of ore and metallurgical coal that it has determined can be economically mined and processed under present and anticipated conditions to extract their mineral content. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves and in projecting potential future rates of mineral production, including factors beyond ArcelorMittal’s control. Reserve engineering involves estimating deposits of minerals that cannot be measured in an exact manner, and the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. As a result, no assurance can be given that the indicated amount of ore or coal will be recovered or that it will be recovered at the anticipated rates. Estimates may vary, and results of mining and production subsequent to the date of an estimate may lead to revisions of estimates. Reserve estimates and estimates of mine life may require revisions based on actual production experience and other factors. For example, fluctuations in the market prices of minerals and metals, reduced recovery rates or increased operating and capital costs due to inflation, exchange rates, mining duties or other factors may render proven and probable reserves uneconomic to exploit and may ultimately result in a restatement of reserves.

Drilling and production risks could adversely affect the mining process.

Substantial time and expenditures are required to:

·         establish mineral reserves through drilling;

·         determine appropriate mining and metallurgical processes for optimizing the recovery of metal contained in ore and coal;

·         obtain environmental and other licenses;

·         construct mining, processing facilities and infrastructure required for greenfield properties; and

·         obtain the ore or coal or extract the minerals from the ore or coal.

If a project proves not to be economically feasible by the time ArcelorMittal is able to exploit it, ArcelorMittal may incur substantial losses and be obliged to recognize impairments. In addition, potential changes or complications involving metallurgical and other technological processes arising during the life of a project may result in delays and cost overruns that may render the project not economically feasible.

ArcelorMittal faces rising extraction costs over time as reserves deplete.

Reserves are gradually depleted in the ordinary course of a given mining operation. As mining progresses, distances to the primary crusher and to waste deposits become longer, pits become steeper and underground operations become deeper. As a result, over time, ArcelorMittal usually experiences rising unit extraction costs with respect to each mine.

ArcelorMittal has grown through acquisitions and will likely continue to do so. Failure to manage external growth and difficulties integrating acquired companies and subsequently implementing steel and mining development projects could harm ArcelorMittal’s future results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

ArcelorMittal results from Mittal Steel Company N.V.’s 2006 acquisition of, and 2007 merger with, Arcelor, a company of approximately equivalent size. Arcelor itself resulted from the combination of three steel companies, and Mittal Steel had previously grown through numerous acquisitions over many years. ArcelorMittal made numerous acquisitions in 2007 and 2008.  While the




Company’s large-scale M&A activity has been less extensive since the 2008 financial crisis, it could make substantial acquisitions at any time.

The Company’s past growth through acquisitions has entailed significant investment and increased operating costs, as well as requiring greater allocation of management resources away from daily operations. Managing growth has required the continued development of ArcelorMittal’s financial and management information control systems, the integration of acquired assets with existing operations, the adoption of manufacturing best practices, attracting and retaining qualified management and personnel (particularly to work at more remote sites where there is a shortage of skilled personnel) as well as the continued training and supervision of such personnel, and the ability to manage the risks and liabilities associated with the acquired businesses. Failure to continue to manage such growth could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects. In particular, if integration of acquisitions is not successful, ArcelorMittal could lose key personnel and key customers, and may not be able to retain or expand its market position.

A Mittal family trust has the ability to exercise significant influence over the outcome of shareholder votes.

As of December 31, 2011, a trust (HSBC Trust (C.I.) Limited, as trustee), of which Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal, Mrs. Usha Mittal and their children are the beneficiaries, beneficially owned (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) 637,338,263 of ArcelorMittal’s outstanding common shares, representing approximately 41.15% of ArcelorMittal’s outstanding voting shares. The trust has the ability to significantly influence the decisions adopted at the ArcelorMittal general meetings of shareholders, including matters involving mergers or other business combinations, the acquisition or disposition of assets, issuances of equity and the incurrence of indebtedness. The trust also has the ability to significantly influence a change of control of ArcelorMittal.

The loss or diminution of the services of the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of ArcelorMittal could have an adverse effect on its business and prospects.

The Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of ArcelorMittal, Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal, has for over a quarter of a century contributed significantly to shaping and implementing the business strategy of Mittal Steel and subsequently ArcelorMittal. His strategic vision was instrumental in the creation of the world’s largest and most global steel group. The loss or any diminution of the services of the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer could have an adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business and prospects. ArcelorMittal does not maintain key person life insurance on its Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer.

ArcelorMittal is a holding company that depends on the earnings and cash flows of its operating subsidiaries, which may not be sufficient to meet future operational needs or for shareholder distributions.

Because ArcelorMittal is a holding company, it is dependent on the earnings and cash flows of, and dividends and distributions from, its operating subsidiaries to pay expenses, meet its debt service obligations, pay any cash dividends or distributions on its common shares or conduct share buy-backs.  Significant cash or cash equivalent balances may be held from time to time at the Company’s international operating subsidiaries, including in particular those in France, where the Company maintains a cash management system under which most of its cash and cash equivalents are centralized, and in Algeria, Argentina, Brazil, China, Kazakhstan, Morocco, South Africa, Ukraine and Venezuela.  Some of these operating subsidiaries have debt outstanding or are subject to acquisition agreements that impose restrictions on such operating subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends, but such restrictions are not significant in the context of ArcelorMittal’s overall liquidity.  Repatriation of funds from operating subsidiaries may also be affected by tax and foreign exchange policies in place from time to time in the various countries where the Company operates, though none of these policies are currently significant in the context of ArcelorMittal’s overall liquidity.  Under the laws of Luxembourg, ArcelorMittal will be able to pay dividends or distributions only to the extent that it is entitled to receive cash dividend distributions from its subsidiaries, recognize gains from the sale of its assets or record share premium from the issuance of shares.

If earnings and cash flows of its operating subsidiaries are substantially reduced, ArcelorMittal may not be in a position to meet its operational needs or to make shareholder distributions in line with announced proposals.

Changes in assumptions underlying the carrying value of certain assets, including as a result of adverse market conditions, could result in impairment of such assets, including intangible assets such as goodwill.

At each reporting date, ArcelorMittal reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible and intangible assets (excluding goodwill, which is reviewed annually or whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable) to determine whether there is any indication that the carrying amount of those assets may not be recoverable through continuing use. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset (or cash generating unit) is reviewed in order to determine the amount of the impairment, if any. The recoverable amount is the higher of its net selling price (fair value reduced by selling costs) and its value in use.




In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset (or cash generating unit). If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized. An impairment loss is recognized as an expense immediately as part of operating income in the consolidated statements of operations.

Goodwill represents the excess of the amounts ArcelorMittal paid to acquire subsidiaries and other businesses over the fair value of their net assets at the date of acquisition. Goodwill has been allocated at the level of the Company’s eight operating segments; the lowest level at which goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually at the levels of the groups of cash generating units which correspond to the operating segments as of November 30, or when changes in the circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The recoverable amounts of the groups of cash generating units are determined from the higher of its net selling price (fair value reduced by selling costs) or its value in use calculations, which depend on certain key assumptions. These include assumptions regarding the discount rates, growth rates and expected changes to selling prices and direct costs during the period. Management estimates discount rates using pre-tax rates that reflect current market rates for investments of similar risk. The growth rates are based on the Company’s growth forecasts, which are in line with industry trends. Changes in selling prices and direct costs are based on historical experience and expectations of future changes in the market. See Notes 2 and 9 to ArcelorMittal’s consolidated financial statements.

If management’s estimates change, the estimate of the recoverable amount of goodwill or the asset could fall significantly and result in impairment. While impairment does not affect reported cash flows, the decrease of the estimated recoverable amount and the related non-cash charge in the consolidated statements of operations could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s results of operations or financial position. Based on its impairment review in connection with the preparation of its 2011 financial statements, the Company did not record any impairment of goodwill at December 31, 2011. Management believes, however, that reasonably possible changes in key assumptions used in assessing value in use would cause an impairment loss to be recognized with respect to the Company’s Flat Carbon Europe and Distribution Solutions segments, which account for approximately $2.9 billion and $1.0 billion of goodwill, respectively. At December 31, 2011, the Company had $12.5 billion of goodwill and $1.6 billion of other intangibles, compared to $12.6 billion of goodwill and $1.8 billion of other intangibles at December 31, 2010. See Note 9 to ArcelorMittal’s consolidated financial statements.  For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company recorded a net impairment loss related to its property, plant and equipment amounting to $331 million.

No assurance can be given as to the absence of significant further impairment losses in future periods, particularly if market conditions deteriorate again as they did in 2008-2009.

Capital expenditure commitments and other undertakings arising from acquisitions and investments may limit ArcelorMittal’s operational flexibility, add to its financing requirements and adversely affect its results of operations and prospects.

In connection with the acquisition of certain operating subsidiaries and other investments, ArcelorMittal has committed itself to significant capital expenditures and other undertakings. See “Item 5F—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations” and Note 22 to ArcelorMittal’s consolidated financial statements. ArcelorMittal expects to fund these commitments primarily through internal sources, which may be limited depending on the Company’s results of operations, financing capacity and other uses of cash, such as dividends and maintenance expenditure. As a result, the Company is unable to guarantee that these projects will be completed on time or at all. Failure to comply with commitments in connection with past growth projects may result in forfeiture of a part of ArcelorMittal’s investment, the loss of tax and regulatory benefits, and/or contractual disputes that could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s financial condition or results of operations.

See “Item 4A—History and Development of the Company—Updates on Previously Announced Investment Projects”.

Underfunding of pension and other post-retirement benefit plans at some of ArcelorMittal’s operating subsidiaries could require the Company to make substantial cash contributions to pension plans or to pay for employee healthcare, which may reduce the cash available for ArcelorMittal’s business.

ArcelorMittal’s principal operating subsidiaries in Brazil, Canada, Europe, South Africa and the United States provide defined benefit pension plans to their employees. Some of these plans are currently underfunded. At December 31, 2011, the value of ArcelorMittal USA’s pension plan assets was $2.2 billion, while the projected benefit obligation was $3.8 billion, resulting in a deficit of $1.6 billion. At December 31, 2011, the value of the pension plan assets of ArcelorMittal’s Canadian subsidiaries was $2.9 billion, while the projected benefit obligation was $3.5 billion, resulting in a deficit of $0.6 billion. At December 31, 2011, the value of the pension plan assets of ArcelorMittal’s European subsidiaries was $0.6 billion, while the projected benefit obligation was $2.1 billion, resulting in a deficit of $1.5 billion. ArcelorMittal USA, ArcelorMittal’s Canadian subsidiaries, and ArcelorMittal’s European subsidiaries also had partially underfunded post-employment benefit obligations relating to life insurance and medical benefits as of December 31, 2011. The consolidated obligations totaled $6.6 billion as of December 31, 2011, while underlying plan assets were only $0.5 billion, resulting in a deficit of $6.1 billion. See Note 23 to ArcelorMittal’s consolidated financial statements.




ArcelorMittal’s funding obligations depend upon future asset performance, which is tied to equity markets to a substantial extent, the level of interest rates used to discount future liabilities, actuarial assumptions and experience, benefit plan changes and government regulation. Because of the large number of variables that determine pension funding requirements, which are difficult to predict, as well as any legislative action, future cash funding requirements for ArcelorMittal’s pension plans and other post-employment benefit plans could be significantly higher than current estimates. In these circumstances funding requirements could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

ArcelorMittal could experience labor disputes that may disrupt its operations and its relationships with its customers.

A majority of the employees of ArcelorMittal and of its contractors are represented by labor unions and are covered by collective bargaining or similar agreements, which are subject to periodic renegotiation (see “Item 6D—Employees”). Strikes or work stoppages could occur prior to, or during, the negotiations preceding new collective bargaining agreements, during wage and benefits negotiations or during other periods for other reasons. ArcelorMittal periodically experiences strikes and work stoppages at various facilities.  Prolonged strikes or work stoppages, which may increase in their severity and frequency, may have an adverse effect on the operations and financial results of ArcelorMittal.

ArcelorMittal is subject to economic policy risks and political, social and legal uncertainties in certain of the emerging markets in which it operates or proposes to operate, and these uncertainties may have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

ArcelorMittal operates, or proposes to operate, in a large number of emerging markets. In recent years, many of these countries have implemented measures aimed at improving the business environment and providing a stable platform for economic development. ArcelorMittal’s business strategy has been developed partly on the assumption that this modernization, restructuring and upgrading of the business climate and physical infrastructure will continue, but this cannot be guaranteed. Any slowdown in the development of these economies could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects, as could insufficient investment by government agencies or the private sector in physical infrastructure. For example, the failure of a country to develop reliable electricity and natural gas supplies and networks, and any resulting shortages or rationing, could lead to disruptions in ArcelorMittal’s production.

Moreover, some of the countries in which ArcelorMittal operates have been undergoing substantial political transformations from centrally-controlled command economies to market-oriented systems or from authoritarian regimes to democratically-elected governments and vice-versa. Political, economic and legal reforms necessary to complete such transformation may not progress sufficiently. On occasion, ethnic, religious, historical and other divisions have given rise to tensions and, in certain cases, wide-scale civil disturbances and military conflict. The political systems in these countries are vulnerable to their populations’ dissatisfaction with their government, reforms or the lack thereof, social and ethnic unrest and changes in governmental policies, any of which could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects and its ability to continue to do business in these countries.

In addition, the legal systems in some of the countries in which ArcelorMittal operates remain less than fully developed, particularly with respect to property rights, the protection of foreign investment and bankruptcy proceedings, generally resulting in a lower level of legal certainty or security for foreign investment than in more developed countries. ArcelorMittal may encounter difficulties in enforcing court judgments or arbitral awards in some countries in which it operates among other reasons because those countries may not be parties to treaties that recognize the mutual enforcement of court judgments. Assets in certain countries where ArcelorMittal operates could also be at risk of expropriation or nationalization, and compensation for such assets may be below fair value. For example, the Venezuelan government has implemented a number of selective nationalizations of companies operating in the country to date. Although ArcelorMittal believes that the long-term growth potential in emerging markets is strong, and intends them to be the focus of the majority of its near-term growth capital expenditures, legal obstacles could have a material adverse effect on the implementation of ArcelorMittal’s growth plans and its operations in such countries.

ArcelorMittal’s results of operations could be affected by fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, particularly the euro to U.S. dollar exchange rate, as well as by exchange controls imposed by governmental authorities in the countries where it operates.

ArcelorMittal operates and sells products globally, and, as a result, its business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects could be adversely affected by fluctuations in exchange rates. A substantial portion of ArcelorMittal’s assets, liabilities, operating costs, sales and earnings are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar (ArcelorMittal’s reporting currency). Accordingly, fluctuations in exchange rates to the U.S. dollar, could have an adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

ArcelorMittal operates in several countries whose currencies are, or have in the past been, subject to limitations imposed by those countries’ central banks, or which have experienced sudden and significant devaluations. Currency devaluations, the imposition of new exchange controls or other similar restrictions on currency convertibility, or the tightening of existing controls, in the countries in which ArcelorMittal operates could adversely affect its business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects. See “Item 4B—Business Overview—Government Regulations—Foreign Exchange”.




Disruptions to ArcelorMittal’s manufacturing processes could adversely affect its operations, customer service levels and financial results.

Steel manufacturing processes are dependent on critical steel-making equipment, such as furnaces, continuous casters, rolling mills and electrical equipment (such as transformers), and such equipment may incur downtime as a result of unanticipated failures or other events, such as fires or furnace breakdowns. ArcelorMittal’s manufacturing plants have experienced, and may in the future experience, plant shutdowns or periods of reduced production as a result of such equipment failures or other events. To the extent that lost production as a result of such a disruption could not be compensated for by unaffected facilities, such disruptions could have an adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s operations, customer service levels and financial results.

Natural disasters could damage ArcelorMittal’s production facilities.

Natural disasters could significantly damage ArcelorMittal’s production facilities and general infrastructure. For example, ArcelorMittal Lázaro Cárdenas’s production facilities located in Lázaro Cárdenas, Michoacán, Mexico and ArcelorMittal Galati’s production facilities located in the Botasani region of Romania are located in regions prone to earthquakes of varying magnitudes. The Lázaro Cárdenas area has, in addition, been subject to a number of tsunamis in the past. ArcelorMittal Point Lisas is located in Trinidad & Tobago, an area vulnerable to both hurricanes and earthquakes. The ArcelorMittal wire drawing operations in the United States are located in an area subject to tornados. Although risk mitigation efforts have been incorporated in plant design and operations, extensive damage in the event of a tornado cannot be excluded. Extensive damage to the foregoing facilities or any of our other major production complexes and potential resulting staff casualties, whether as a result of floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, tsunamis or other natural disasters, could, to the extent that lost production could not be compensated for by unaffected facilities, severely affect ArcelorMittal’s ability to conduct its business operations and, as a result, reduce its future operating results.

ArcelorMittal’s insurance policies provide limited coverage, potentially leaving it uninsured against some business risks.

The occurrence of an event that is uninsurable or not fully insured could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects. ArcelorMittal maintains insurance on property and equipment and product liability insurance in amounts believed to be consistent with industry practices but it is not fully insured against all such risks. ArcelorMittal’s insurance policies cover physical loss or damage to its property and equipment on a reinstatement basis arising from a number of specified risks and certain consequential losses, including business interruption arising from the occurrence of an insured event under the policies. Under ArcelorMittal’s property and equipment policies, damages and losses caused by certain natural disasters, such as earthquakes, floods and windstorms, are also covered. ArcelorMittal also maintains various other types of insurance, such as directors and officers’ liability insurance, workmen’s compensation insurance and marine insurance.

In addition, ArcelorMittal maintains trade credit insurance on receivables from selected customers, subject to limits that it believes are consistent with those in the industry, in order to protect it against the risk of non-payment due to customers’ insolvency or other causes. Not all of ArcelorMittal’s customers are or can be insured, and even when insurance is available, it may not fully cover the exposure.

Notwithstanding the insurance coverage that ArcelorMittal and its subsidiaries carry, the occurrence of an event that causes losses in excess of limits specified under the relevant policy, or losses arising from events not covered by insurance policies, could materially harm ArcelorMittal’s financial condition and future operating results.

Product liability claims could have a significant adverse financial impact on ArcelorMittal.

ArcelorMittal sells products to major manufacturers engaged in manufacturing and selling a wide range of end products. ArcelorMittal also from time to time offers advice to these manufacturers. Furthermore, ArcelorMittal’s products are also sold to, and used in, certain safety-critical applications, such as, for example, pipes used in gas or oil pipelines and in automotive applications. There could be significant consequential damages resulting from the use of or defects in such products. ArcelorMittal has a limited amount of product liability insurance coverage, and a major claim for damages related to ArcelorMittal products sold and, as the case may be, advice given in connection with such products could leave ArcelorMittal uninsured against a portion or the entirety of the award and, as a result, materially harm its financial condition and future operating results.

ArcelorMittal is subject to regulatory risk, and may incur liabilities arising from investigations by governmental authorities, litigation and fines, among others, regarding its pricing and marketing practices or other antitrust matters.

ArcelorMittal is the largest steel producer in the world. As a result of this position, ArcelorMittal may be subject to exacting scrutiny from regulatory authorities and private parties, particularly regarding its trade practices and dealings with customers and counterparties. As a result of its position in the steel markets and its historically acquisitive growth strategy, ArcelorMittal could be the target of governmental investigations and lawsuits based on antitrust laws in particular. These could require significant expenditures and result in liabilities or governmental orders that could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s business, operating results, financial condition and prospects. ArcelorMittal and certain of its subsidiaries are currently under investigation by governmental entities in several countries, and are named as defendants in a number of lawsuits relating to various antitrust matters.




For example, in September 2008, Standard Iron Works filed a class action complaint in U.S. federal court against ArcelorMittal, ArcelorMittal USA LLC and other steel manufacturers, alleging that the defendants had conspired since 2005 to restrict the output of steel products in order to affect steel prices. Since the filing of the Standard Iron Works lawsuit, other similar direct purchaser lawsuits have been filed in the same court and consolidated with the Standard Iron Works law suit.  In addition, class actions on behalf of indirect purchasers have been filed.  A motion by ArcelorMittal and the other defendants to dismiss the direct purchaser claims was denied in June 2009, and the litigation is now in the discovery stage.  Antitrust proceedings and investigations involving ArcelorMittal subsidiaries are also currently pending in Brazil and South Africa. See “Item 8A—Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Legal Claims—Competition/Antitrust Claims”.

Because of the fact-intensive nature of the issues involved and the inherent uncertainty of such litigation and investigations, negative outcomes are possible. An adverse ruling in the proceedings described above or in other similar proceedings in the future could subject ArcelorMittal to substantial administrative penalties and/or civil damages. In cases relating to other companies, civil damages have ranged as high as hundreds of millions of U.S. dollars in major civil antitrust proceedings during the last decade. With respect to the pending U.S. federal court litigation, ArcelorMittal could be subject to treble damages. Unfavorable outcomes in current and potential future litigation and investigations could reduce ArcelorMittal’s liquidity and negatively affect its financial performance and its financial condition.

ArcelorMittal’s governance and compliance processes may fail to prevent regulatory penalties and reputational harm, both at operating subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates.

ArcelorMittal operates in a global environment, and its activities straddle multiple jurisdictions and complex regulatory frameworks, at a time of increased enforcement activity and enforcement initiatives worldwide. ArcelorMittal’s governance and compliance processes, which include the review of internal controls over financial reporting, may not prevent breaches of law, accounting or governance standards at the Company or its subsidiaries. Risks of violations are also present at the Company’s joint ventures and associates where ArcelorMittal has only a non-controlling stake and does not control governance practices or accounting and reporting procedures. In addition, ArcelorMittal may be subject to breaches of its Code of Business Conduct, other rules and protocols for the conduct of business, as well as instances of fraudulent behavior and dishonesty by its employees, contractors or other agents. The Company’s failure to comply with applicable laws and other standards could subject it to fines, litigation, loss of operating licenses and reputational harm.

The income tax liability of ArcelorMittal may substantially increase if the tax laws and regulations in countries in which it operates change or become subject to adverse interpretations or inconsistent enforcement.

Taxes payable by companies in many of the countries in which ArcelorMittal operates are substantial and include value-added tax, excise duties, profit taxes, payroll-related taxes, property taxes and other taxes. Tax laws and regulations in some of these countries may be subject to frequent change, varying interpretation and inconsistent enforcement. Ineffective tax collection systems and national or local government budget requirements may increase the likelihood of the imposition of arbitrary or onerous taxes and penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition to the usual tax burden imposed on taxpayers, these conditions create uncertainty as to the tax implications of various business decisions. This uncertainty could expose ArcelorMittal to significant fines and penalties and to enforcement measures despite its best efforts at compliance, and could result in a greater than expected tax burden. See Note 19 to ArcelorMittal’s consolidated financial statements.

In addition, many of the jurisdictions in which ArcelorMittal operates have adopted transfer pricing legislation. If tax authorities impose significant additional tax liabilities as a result of transfer pricing adjustments, it could have a material adverse effect on ArcelorMittal’s financial condition and results of operations.

It is possible that tax authorities in the countries in which ArcelorMittal operates will introduce additional revenue raising measures. The introduction of any such provisions may affect the overall tax efficiency of ArcelorMittal and may result in significant additional taxes becoming payable. Any such additional tax exposure could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations.

ArcelorMittal may face a significant increase in its income taxes if tax rates increase or the tax laws or regulations in the jurisdictions in which it operates, or treaties between those jurisdictions, are modified in an adverse manner. This may adversely affect ArcelorMittal’s cash flows, liquidity and ability to pay dividends.

If ArcelorMittal were unable to utilize fully its deferred tax assets, its profitability could be reduced.

At December 31, 2011, ArcelorMittal had $6.1 billion recorded as deferred tax assets on its consolidated statements of financial position. These assets can be utilized only if, and only to the extent that, ArcelorMittal’s operating subsidiaries generate adequate levels of taxable income in future periods to offset the tax loss carry forwards and reverse the temporary differences prior to expiration.




At December 31, 2011, the amount of future income required to recover ArcelorMittal’s deferred tax assets of $6.1 billion was at least $21 billion at certain operating subsidiaries.

ArcelorMittal’s ability to generate taxable income is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond its control.  If ArcelorMittal generates lower taxable income than the amount it has assumed in determining its deferred tax assets, then the value of deferred tax assets will be reduced. In addition, changes in tax law may result in a reduction in the value of deferred tax assets, as occurred in 2011.

ArcelorMittal’s reputation and business could be materially harmed as a result of data breaches, data theft, unauthorized access or successful hacking.

ArcelorMittal’s operations depend on the secure and reliable performance of its information technology systems. An increasing number of companies, including ArcelorMittal, have recently experienced intrusion attempts or even breaches of their information technology security, some of which have involved sophisticated and highly targeted attacks on their computer networks. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service or sabotage systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, the Company may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement in a timely manner effective and efficient countermeasures.

If unauthorized parties force access to ArcelorMittal’s information technology systems, they may be able to misappropriate confidential information, cause interruptions in the Company’s operations, damage its computers or otherwise damage its reputation and business. In such circumstances, the Company could be held liable or be subject to regulatory or other actions for breaching confidentiality and personal data protection rules. Any compromise of the Company’s security could result in a loss of confidence in its security measures and subject it to litigation, civil or criminal penalties, and adverse publicity that could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.

U.S. investors may have difficulty enforcing civil liabilities against ArcelorMittal and its directors and senior management.

ArcelorMittal is incorporated under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg with its principal executive offices and corporate headquarters in Luxembourg. The majority of ArcelorMittal’s directors and senior management are residents of jurisdictions outside of the United States. The majority of ArcelorMittal’s assets and the assets of these persons are located outside the United States. As a result, U.S. investors may find it difficult to effect service of process within the United States upon ArcelorMittal or these persons or to enforce outside the United States judgments obtained against ArcelorMittal or these persons in U.S. courts, including actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Likewise, it may also be difficult for an investor to enforce in U.S. courts judgments obtained against ArcelorMittal or these persons in courts in jurisdictions outside the United States, including actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. It may also be difficult for a U.S. investor to bring an original action in a Luxembourg court predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws against ArcelorMittal’s directors and senior management and non-U.S. experts named in this annual report.


A.    History and Development of the Company

ArcelorMittal is the world’s leading integrated steel and mining company. It results from the combination in 2006 of Mittal Steel and Arcelor, which were at the time the world’s largest and second largest steel companies by production volume respectively.

ArcelorMittal had sales of approximately $94.0 billion, steel shipments of approximately 85.8 million tonnes, crude steel production of approximately 91.9 million tonnes, iron ore production of 65.2 million tonnes and coal production of 8.9 million tonnes for the year ended December 31, 2011, as compared to sales of approximately $78.0 billion, steel shipments of approximately 85.0 million tonnes, crude steel production of approximately 90.6 million tonnes, iron ore production of 68.6 million tonnes and coal production of 7.4 million tonnes for the year ended December 31, 2010.

ArcelorMittal’s net income attributable to equity holders of the parent for the year ended December 31, 2011, was $2.3 billion, or $1.46 per share, as compared with net income attributable to equity holders of the parent of $2.9 billion, or $1.93 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2010.

As of December 31, 2011, ArcelorMittal had equity of $60.5 billion, total debt of $26.4 billion and cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, of $3.9 billion as compared to equity of $66.1 billion, total debt of $26.0 billion and cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash, of $6.3 billion as of December 31, 2010.

ArcelorMittal has been built on a management strategy that emphasizes size and scale, vertical integration, product diversity and quality, continuous growth in higher value products, and a strong focus on employee well-being and customer service. The Company’s three-dimensional strategy, described under “Item 4B—Business Overview—Business Strategy”, is its key to sustainability and growth. ArcelorMittal has unique geographical and product diversification coupled with upstream and downstream integration designed to minimize risk caused by economic cycles.




Geography: ArcelorMittal is the largest steel producer in the Americas, Africa and Europe, and is the fourth largest producer in the CIS region, with a growing presence in Asia, particularly China. ArcelorMittal has steel-making operations in 20 countries on four continents, including 60 integrated, mini-mill and integrated mini-mill steel-making facilities. As of December 31, 2011, ArcelorMittal had approximately 261,000 employees.

ArcelorMittal reports its business in six reportable segments corresponding to continuing operations: Flat Carbon Americas; Flat Carbon Europe; Long Carbon Americas and Europe; Asia, Africa and CIS; Distribution Solutions; and Mining. In January 2011, ArcelorMittal completed the spin-off of its stainless steel division to a separately-focused company, Aperam, and these operations are therefore reported as discontinued operations (see “—Key Transactions and Events in 2011”).  Beginning in the first quarter of 2011, ArcelorMittal began reporting Mining as a separate reportable segment in order to reflect changes in the Company’s approach to managing its mining operations.

ArcelorMittal’s steel-making operations have a high degree of geographic diversification. Approximately 38% of its steel is produced in the Americas, approximately 46% is produced in Europe and approximately 16% is produced in other countries, such as Kazakhstan, South Africa and Ukraine. In addition, ArcelorMittal’s sales of steel products are spread over both developed and developing markets, which have different consumption characteristics. ArcelorMittal’s mining operations, present in North and South America, Africa, Europe and the CIS region, are integrated with its global steel-making facilities and are important producers of iron ore and coal in their own right.

Products: ArcelorMittal produces a broad range of high-quality steel finished and semi-finished products. Specifically, ArcelorMittal produces flat steel products, including sheet and plate, long steel products, including bars, rods and structural shapes. ArcelorMittal also produces pipes and tubes for various applications. ArcelorMittal sells its steel products primarily in local markets and through its centralized marketing organization to a diverse range of customers in approximately 174 countries including the automotive, appliance, engineering, construction and machinery industries. The Company also produces various types of mining products including iron ore lump, fines, concentrate and sinter feed, as well as coking, PCI and thermal coal.

As a global steel producer, the Company is able to meet the needs of different markets. Steel consumption and product requirements clearly differ between developed markets and developing markets. Steel consumption in developed economies is weighted towards flat products and a higher value-added mix, while developing markets utilize a higher proportion of long products and commodity grades. To meet these diverse needs, the Company maintains a high degree of product diversification and seeks opportunities to increase the proportion of its product mix consisting of higher value-added products.

Mining Value Chain: ArcelorMittal has a significant and growing portfolio of raw material and mining assets, as well as certain strategic long-term contracts with external suppliers. In 2011 (assuming full production of iron ore at ArcelorMittal Mines Canada, Serra Azul and full share of production at Peña Colorada for its own use), approximately 57% of ArcelorMittal’s iron-ore requirements and approximately 19% of its coal requirements were supplied from its own mines or from strategic contracts at many of its operating units. The Company currently has iron ore mining activities in Algeria, Brazil, Bosnia, Canada, Kazakhstan, Liberia (since September 2011), Mexico, Ukraine and the United States and has projects under development or prospective development in Liberia, Canada, Mauritania and India. The Company currently has coal mining activities in Kazakhstan, Russia and the United States. It has coal mining projects under prospective development in India. ArcelorMittal also has made strategic investments in order to secure access to other raw materials including manganese and ferro alloys.

In addition, ArcelorMittal produces substantial amounts of direct reduced iron, or DRI, which is a scrap substitute used in its mini-mill facilities to supplement external metallics purchases. ArcelorMittal is also a significant producer of coke, a critical raw material for steel-making produced from metallurgical coal, and it satisfies over 91% of its coke needs through its own production facilities. ArcelorMittal’s facilities have good access to shipping facilities, including through ArcelorMittal’s own 14 deep-water port facilities and linked railway sidings.

ArcelorMittal has its own downstream steel distribution business, primarily run through its Distribution Solutions segment. It also provides value-added and customized steel solutions through further processing to meet specific customer requirements.


ArcelorMittal is a successor to Mittal Steel, a business founded in 1989 by Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of ArcelorMittal. It has experienced rapid and steady growth since then largely through the consistent and disciplined execution of a successful consolidation-based strategy. Mittal Steel made its first acquisition in 1989, leasing the Iron & Steel Company of Trinidad & Tobago. Some of its principal acquisitions since then include Sibalsa (Mexico) in 1992, Sidbec Dosco (Canada) in 1994, Hamberger Stahlwerk (Germany) and Karmet (Kazakhstan) in 1995, Thyssen Duisburg (Germany) in 1997, Inland Steel (USA) in 1998, Unimetal (France) in 1999, Sidex (Romania) and Annaba (Algeria) in 2001, Nova Hut (Czech Republic) in 2003, BH Steel (Bosnia), Balkan Steel (Macedonia), PHS (Poland) and Iscor (South Africa) in 2004, ISG (USA) and Kryvorizhstal (Ukraine) in 2005, three Stelco Inc. subsidiaries (Canada) and Arcelor in 2006.




Arcelor was created in February 2002 by the combination of three steel-making companies: Aceralia Corporación Siderúrgica (“Aceralia”), Arbed and Usinor. At the time of its acquisition by Mittal Steel in 2006, Arcelor was the second largest steel producer in the world in terms of production, with 2005 production of 46.7 million tonnes of steel and 2005 revenues of €32.6 billion. It operated in all key end markets: the automotive industry, construction, household appliances, packaging and general industry. Arcelor enjoyed leading positions in Western Europe and South America, in particular due to its Brazilian operations. The process of integrating Arcelor and Mittal Steel, including the realization of the targeted $1.6 billion in synergies from the merger, was completed on schedule by the end of 2008.

In 2007 and through the first half of 2008, ArcelorMittal continued to pursue a disciplined growth strategy, with transactions announced in Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Costa Rica, China, Estonia, France, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Poland, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, Sweden, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Uruguay, United Arab Emirates, the United States and Venezuela, a large part of which were successfully completed. ArcelorMittal also completed buy-out offers for non-controlling interests in certain of its subsidiaries in Argentina, Brazil and Poland. In addition, the Company announced and, in some cases, initiated development plans for greenfield steelmaking and mining projects in numerous countries.

During the latter part of 2008 and all of 2009, ArcelorMittal largely suspended mergers and acquisitions activity in light of the deteriorating economic and market environment, and sharply curtailed its investment activities. The Company re-examined its investment projects involving significant capital expenditure (including those announced in prior years), reducing capital expenditures for 2009 to $2.7 billion, of which $2.1 billion was for maintenance. In 2010, capital expenditure remained modest at $3.3 billion for the year, of which $2.7 billion was for maintenance. In 2011, capital expenditure increased to $4.8 billion, $3.5 billion of which was related to steelmaking facilities (including health and safety investments) and $1.3 billion dedicated to mining projects. In 2012, capital expenditure is expected to amount to approximately $4.0 to $4.5 billion, $3.0 billion of which is expected to be maintenance-related (including health and safety investments) and $1.5 billion of which is expected to be dedicated to growth projects, mainly for mining (as the Company has announced its intention to further increase its iron ore capacity by 10% in 2012). Merger and acquisition activity remained limited in 2010 but increased somewhat in 2011 with the acquisition (along with a partner) of Baffinland.

The steel-making and other assets acquired as described above (including the acquisitions of raw material producers or production sites) now constitute ArcelorMittal’s major operating subsidiaries.

Updates on Previously Announced Investment Projects

India Greenfield Projects. In 2005 and 2006, ArcelorMittal announced plans to build large-scale integrated steel plants in the Indian States of Jharkhand and Orissa at a cost estimated at the time as in excess of $10 billion. Implementation of these projects has been delayed for various reasons, including because of challenges relating to securing necessary mining rights, land and construction permits and regulatory approvals, and the fact that, in the meantime, the Company has explored alternative investment opportunities. In June 2010, the Company entered into a memorandum of understanding with authorities in the state of Karnataka in South India for construction of a six-million tonne steel plant with a captive 750 megawatt power plant, representing a potential aggregate investment of $6.5 billion. The Company has completed all of the necessary steps to acquire the land and the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board recently granted a possession certificate for approximately 1,827 acres of the site.  The Company seeks to have possession of the remaining 972 acres of the site by May 2012. The Karnataka Government has also approved the project’s use of water from the Tungabhadra River. The Company has begun to apply for mining leases, although following a recent court decision and proposed new mining legislation, allocation of mining leases has been put on hold. Issues relating to the ban are expected to be resolved during the course of 2012. A draft feasibility report for the contemplated steel plant is currently being prepared, and hydrological and environmental impact assessment studies have been initiated. Concerning the proposed steel plant in Jharkhand, ArcelorMittal is currently working to set up a three million tonne per annum module in the first stage for which adequate land is sought under the State Government Consent Award Scheme. Under this scheme, the State Government will facilitate the legal transfer of land for a project after an investor has secured the landowner’s consent to the sale of the land. Concerning the Orissa project, the Company is seeking to extend the memorandum of understanding with the Orissa Government, which became eligible for renewal on December 31, 2011. Obtaining such extension is expected to take approximately six to nine months, due to procedural reasons.

Kazakhstan. On June 10, 2008, ArcelorMittal announced plans to invest approximately $1.2 billion in improvements in health and safety and technological upgrades at its integrated steel plant and coal mines in Kazakhstan. This investment program is proceeding as announced. ArcelorMittal also announced possible investments to expand steelmaking capacity in Kazakhstan from five to ten million tonnes over a five to nine year period. The implementation of this expansion project has been postponed due, among other things, to the subsequent change in market conditions. As in other markets, any decision to increase investment in steelmaking capacity will depend on local market conditions and overall competitiveness considerations.

Brazil. On November 30, 2007, ArcelorMittal announced plans to expand capacity at its Monlevade integrated long products plant in the state of Minas Gerais with the construction of a second line of sinter plant, blast furnace, melting shop and rolling mill that would add approximately 1.2 million tonnes per annum of additional wire rod capacity. After having been delayed in late 2008-early 2009 due to market conditions, implementation of the project, estimated to entail an investment of $1.4 billion, was restarted in April 2010 with targeted completion in October 2012. In light of recent market uncertainty, however, the Monlevade project has been temporarily halted.  In August 2008, ArcelorMittal announced additional plans to expand steel production capacity in the long carbon




sector in Brazil, but the timing and scope of this other investment, initially estimated at $1.6 billion, remain under review. As in other markets, any decision to increase investment in steelmaking and wire drawing capacity will depend on market conditions and overall competitiveness considerations driven by market growth.

China. In 2008, ArcelorMittal announced the establishment of two joint venture projects in China with Hunan Valin Iron & Steel Group Co., Ltd., one related to electrical steel in which each party holds 50%, and the other related to automotive steel, in which each party holds a 33% stake and Hunan Valin Steel Co., Ltd. holds 34% stake. The automotive steel joint venture, Valin ArcelorMittal Automotive Steel (“VAMA”), would build facilities with an annual production capacity of 1.5 million tonnes of products including cold rolled steel, galvanized steel and galvanealed steel, with an estimated investment amount of CNY 4.5 billion ($714 million). The electrical steel joint venture, Valin ArcelorMittal Electrical Steel Co., Ltd. (“VAME”), would build cold rolling and processing facilities with annual production capacity of 200,000 tonnes for non-grain oriented steel and 100,000 tonnes for grain oriented electrical steels, with an estimated investment amount of CNY 3.9 billion ($624 million). Implementation of both projects is advancing including with respect to the regulatory approval process, but the precise timing of implementation of these projects remains to be decided. Approval from China’s National Development and Reform Commission and the Ministry of Commerce was received in 2010.

Saudi Arabia. In 2007, Mittal Steel signed a joint venture agreement with the Bin Jarallah Group of companies for the design and construction of a seamless tube mill in Saudi Arabia. This facility will be located in Jubail Industrial City, north of Al Jubail on the Persian Gulf. ArcelorMittal currently holds 51% and Bin Jarallah Group holds 49% of the joint venture company, which is managed under the joint control of both investors. The project’s completion date has been delayed until 2013, mainly due to construction delays.

Liberia. In December 2006, the Government of Liberia and ArcelorMittal announced the finalization of agreements relating to an iron ore mining and infrastructure development project. The project consists of reopening mines in Nimba County, rehabilitating 260 kilometers of abandoned railway and developing the Buchanan port for shipping traffic, and includes a number of important social initiatives, including relating to providing training and health facilities for employees. Production of direct ship ore (“DSO”) commenced in the second half of 2011 with actual production of 1.3 million tonnes, expected to increase to four million tonnes in 2012. An expansion of production to 15 million tonnes by 2015 is currently in the final stages of approval.  This expansion would require substantial investments in a concentrator, sag mills, attacker-reclaimers and power plants.

Kalagadi Manganese (South Africa). In 2007, ArcelorMittal entered into a joint venture agreement with Kalahari Resources and the Industrial Development Corporation Limited to develop the Kalagadi manganese ore deposits in South Africa. Kalagadi Manganese’s project is situated in the Kuruman / Hotazel district of the Northern Cape Province. The project envisages the establishment of a manganese ore mine and sinter plant at Hotazel that would ultimately produce 2.4 million tonnes of sinter product per annum. It would also see the establishment of a 320,000 tonne per annum ferromanganese alloy production facility in the Coega Industrial Development Zone in Port Elizabeth. Commencement of mine and sinter operations is expected to begin by early 2013.

Mauritania. In late 2007, ArcelorMittal entered into an agreement with Société Nationale Industrielle et Minière (“SNIM”) of Mauritania, pursuant to which SNIM and ArcelorMittal would jointly develop a large iron ore mining project in the large El Agareb deposit. ArcelorMittal expects to complete exploratory works and a feasibility study by mid-2013.

Baffinland (Canada).  In March 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of Baffinland, with ArcelorMittal holding 70% of the controlling interests and Nunavut Iron Mines owning the remaining 30%. Baffinland owns the Mary River Project, which has direct shipped, high grade iron ore assets on Baffin Island in Nunavut. The Mary River Project is located within the Arctic Circle and consists of nine high grade deposits. The project envisages the establishment of mining facilities and infrastructure so as to ship 18 million tonnes of high grade, direct shipped lump and sinter ore on an annual basis.  The feasibility study for the project is expected to be completed in the first half of 2012. The application for environmental permits is in process.

Key Transactions and Events in 2011

ArcelorMittal’s principal investments, acquisitions and disposals, and other key events for the year ended December 31, 2011 are summarized below.

·         On October 25, 2011, ArcelorMittal notified Peabody Energy Corporation (“Peabody”) that, following its acceptance of the offer of PEAMCoal Ltd. (“PEAMCoal”), a bid company 40% owned by ArcelorMittal and 60% owned by Peabody, to acquire up to 100% of the issued securities of Macarthur Coal Limited (“Macarthur”) in July 2011, it would be terminating the Co-Operation and Contribution Agreement between ArcelorMittal and Peabody.  Under the initial proposed offer on August 1, 2011, Macarthur shareholders were to be offered a cash price of AUD$15.50 per share, implying a value for the equity in Macarthur of approximately AUD$4.7 billion. On August 30, 2011, the Macarthur board had agreed to a cash takeover of all outstanding shares for AUD$16.00 per share, which was raised on October 21, 2011 to AUD$16.25 per share if the 90% threshold of acceptance was reached. ArcelorMittal had already had an ownership interest of approximately 16% of Macarthur’s shares.  ArcelorMittal remained a shareholder in PEAMCoal until the termination arrangements were completed on December 21, 2011. In taking its decision to terminate the Agreements, ArcelorMittal had determined that it




would no longer be appropriate to allocate substantial capital to the acquisition of a non-controlling, minority business interest. This was in accordance with the rights that ArcelorMittal had negotiated with Peabody at the time the Co-Operation and Contribution Agreement was signed. As a consequence, ArcelorMittal is no longer, directly or indirectly, a shareholder of Macarthur.

·         On September 30, 2011, ArcelorMittal extended the maturity of its $4 billion revolving credit facility from May 6, 2013 to May 6, 2015.

·         On September 27, 2011, ArcelorMittal commenced commercial iron ore production from its mining operations in Liberia. See also “Item 4A—History and Development of the Company—Updates on Previously Announced Investment Projects”.

·         On July 26, 2011, the Company announced that Bruno Lafont had joined the Audit Committee and that Suzanne P. Nimocks had joined the Appointments, Remuneration and Corporate Governance Committee as well as the Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors.

·         On May 24, 2011, ArcelorMittal announced changes to both its Group Management Board (“GMB”) and Management Committee. The changes to the GMB were as follows:

         Aditya Mittal, CFO, who was previously in charge of Flat Carbon Americas, Strategy, Investor Relations and Communications, remains the CFO, but is now responsible for Flat Carbon Europe as well as Investor Relations and Communications.

         Michel Wurth, who was previously responsible for Flat Carbon Europe, is now responsible for Long Carbon worldwide.

         Gonzalo Urquijo, who was previously responsible for Long Carbon, is now responsible for AACIS (excluding China and India), AMDS, Tubular Products, Corporate responsibility and will also remain Chairman of the Investments Allocations Committee (“IAC”).

         Lou Schorsch, previously a member of the Management Committee and CEO of Flat Carbon Americas, joined the GMB with responsibility for Flat Carbon Americas, Strategy, Technology (CTO), Research & Development and will be a member of the IAC.

         The other GMB responsibilities remained unchanged, i.e., Peter Kukielski will continue as Head of Mining; Sudhir Maheshwari responsible for Corporate Finance, M&A, Risk Management, China and India; and Davinder Chugh responsible for Shared Services.

         Christophe Cornier has chosen to retire from the GMB and will assume the role of Advisor to the CEO and GMB; he retired on December 14, 2011 as Chairman of ArcelorMittal France.

         Mr. Lakshmi N. Mittal, CEO, takes direct charge of Health and Safety.

In addition, the Management Committee was extended from 12 to 24 members, consisting of divisional CEOs and other leaders of the Company.

·         On May 20, 2011, ArcelorMittal announced expansion plans for its Mont-Wright mining complex and additional construction at Port-Cartier in Canada.  The investment is expected to allow ArcelorMittal Mines Canada (“AMMC”) to increase its annual production of iron ore concentrate from 14 million tonnes to 24 million tonnes by 2013. AMMC is also evaluating increasing its production of iron ore pellets from 9.2 million tonnes to 18.5 million tonnes. The project would represent a total investment of CAD$2.1 billion (including a CAD$0.9 billion investment in a pellet plant, if approved) and is subject to environmental and other regulatory approvals.

·         On April 20, 2011, ArcelorMittal extended the conversion date of the $750 million mandatory convertible bond (“MCB”) issued in December 2009 by one of its wholly-owned Luxembourg subsidiaries. The mandatory conversion date of the bond, originally set for May 25, 2011, was extended to January 31, 2013. On September 27, 2011, ArcelorMittal increased the MCB by $250 million to $1 billion. The MCB was placed privately with a Luxembourg affiliate of Crédit Agricole (formerly Calyon) and is not listed.

·         On April 8, 2011, ArcelorMittal and Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. (“Cliffs”) announced that they had reached a negotiated settlement regarding all pending contract disputes related to the procurement by ArcelorMittal of iron ore pellets for certain of its facilities in the United States. As part of the settlement, Cliffs and ArcelorMittal agreed to specific pricing levels for 2009 and 2010 pellet sales and related volumes. Cliffs and ArcelorMittal have agreed to replace the previous pricing mechanism in one of the parties’ iron ore supply agreements with a world market-based pricing mechanism in which the pellet price is indexed to the Platts published price for Vale fines on a quarterly basis. The new pricing mechanism began in




2011 and will continue through the remainder of the contract. The previous pricing mechanism was formula based including multiple market-related factors; however, under certain conditions, it allowed for price re-openers which would ultimately approximate market pricing in the affected years. The renegotiated contract represents approximately 15% of the Company’s U.S. pellet requirements under normal operating conditions and 30% of its total Cliffs pellet contracts. Finally, as a result of the settlement, ArcelorMittal obtained greater certainty with respect to 2011 volumes under the parties’ other pellet supply agreement.

·         On March 26, 2011 ArcelorMittal and Nunavut Iron Acquisition Inc. announced the completion of the acquisition of Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation (“Baffinland”) under their joint offer (70% ArcelorMittal and 30% Nunavut) to purchase all the outstanding common shares and common share warrants of Baffinland and a subsequent court-approved plan of arrangement under the laws of Ontario. The total consideration paid by ArcelorMittal was $362 million (not including any additional compensation that may become payable to dissenting shareholders).

·         On March 18, 2011, ArcelorMittal signed a US$6 billion 5-year revolving credit facility. The facility replaces the €5 billion revolving credit facility under ArcelorMittal’s €17 billion credit facility agreement dated November 30, 2006, and will be used for the general corporate purposes of the ArcelorMittal group.

·         On March, 7, 2011, ArcelorMittal completed the offering of three series of U.S. dollar-denominated notes, consisting of $500 million aggregate principal amount of 3.75% Notes due 2016, $1.5 billion aggregate principal amount of 5.50% Notes due 2021 and $1 billion aggregate principal amount of 6.75% Notes due 2041. The proceeds to ArcelorMittal (before expenses), amounting to approximately $3 billion, were used to prepay the last two term loan installments under the Company’s €17 billion credit facility.

·         On March 2, 2011, ArcelorMittal announced that it had signed agreements to invest in new equity capital resulting in a shareholding of 40% in G Steel Public Company Limited (“G Steel”), a company listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET). G Steel and its subsidiary GJ Steel Public Company Limited (“GJ Steel”), which is also listed on the SET, are leading producers of hot-rolled coils. G Steel has an electric arc furnace (“EAF”) based medium slab rolling facility in Rayong and GJ Steel has an EAF-based thin slab rolling facility in Chonburi, with a combined capacity of over 2.5 million tonnes per annum. On December 21, 2011, ArcelorMittal announced that it would not be completing this transaction, as the conditions precedent had not been satisfied.

·         On January 25, 2011, an extraordinary general meeting of shareholders of ArcelorMittal approved the spin-off of ArcelorMittal’s stainless and specialty steels business into Aperam, a newly created company. The new company, whose shares were spun-off to ArcelorMittal’s shareholders, is headquartered in Luxembourg and listed on the stock exchanges of Amsterdam and Paris (Euronext) and on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. Effective January 25, 2011, the assets, rights and liabilities pertaining to the Company’s stainless and specialty steels business transferred by operation of law to Aperam as part of the spin-off.

·         On January 25, 2011, ArcelorMittal announced that the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders had approved the step down of François Pinault from his position as a member of the Board of Directors effective January 26. The shareholders also approved the appointment of Suzanne P. Nimocks to the Board of Directors.

·         On January 6, 2011, the City of Luxembourg contributed its gas and electricity networks as well as its energy sales activities to two subsidiaries of Enovos International S.A., Creos Luxembourg S.A and Enovos Luxembourg S.A., respectively. As a result, the stake held by the Company in Enovos International S.A. decreased from 25.29% to 23.48%.

Other Information

ArcelorMittal is a public limited liability company (société anonyme) that was incorporated under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg on June 8, 2001. ArcelorMittal is registered at the R.C.S. Luxembourg under number B 82.454.

The mailing address and telephone number of ArcelorMittal’s registered office are:

19, Avenue de la Liberté
L-2930 Luxembourg
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Telephone: +352 4792-2484

ArcelorMittal’s agent for U.S. federal securities law purposes is:




ArcelorMittal USA LLC
1 South Dearborn Street, 19th floor
Chicago, Illinois 60603
United States of America
Telephone: + 1 312 899-3400

ArcelorMittal shares are listed and traded on the NYSE (symbol “MT”), ArcelorMittal’s principal United States trading market, are admitted to trading outside the United States on the Luxembourg Stock Exchange’s regulated market and listed on the Official List of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange (“MT”), and are listed and traded (on a single order book as from January 14, 2009) on the NYSE Euronext European markets (Paris and Amsterdam) (“MT”) and the stock exchanges of Madrid, Barcelona, Bilbao and Valencia (the “Spanish Stock Exchanges”) (“MTS”).

Internet Site

ArcelorMittal maintains an Internet site at www.arcelormittal.com. Information contained in or otherwise accessible through this Internet site is not a part of this annual report. All references in this annual report to this Internet site are inactive textual references to this URL and are for your information only.

B.    Business Overview

Competitive Strengths

We believe that the following factors contribute to ArcelorMittal’s success in the global steel and mining industry:

Market leader in steel. ArcelorMittal is the world’s largest steel producer, with an annual production capacity of approximately 125 million tonnes of crude steel for the year ended December 31, 2011. Steel shipments for the year ended December 31, 2011 totaled approximately 85.8 million tonnes.

ArcelorMittal is the largest producer of steel in North and South America and Africa, the fourth largest steel producer in the CIS region, and has a growing presence in Asia, including investments in China and India. It is also the largest steel producer in the European Union, with significant operations in France, Germany, Belgium, Spain, Luxembourg, Poland, the Czech Republic and Romania. In addition, many of ArcelorMittal’s operating units have access to developing markets that are expected to experience, over time, above-average growth in steel consumption (such as Central and Eastern Europe, South America, India, Africa and CIS).

ArcelorMittal has a diversified portfolio of steel products to meet a wide range of customer needs across all steel-consuming industries, including the automotive, appliance, engineering, construction, energy and machinery industries. The Company sells its products in local markets and through a centralized marketing organization to customers in approximately 174 countries. ArcelorMittal’s diversified product offering, together with its distribution network and research and development (“R&D”) programs, enable it to build strong relationships with customers, which include many of the world’s major automobile and appliance manufacturers. With approximately 18% of the worldwide market share of flat steel sheets for the automotive industry, ArcelorMittal is a strategic partner for the major original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”), and has the capability to build long-term contractual relationships with them based on early vendor involvement, contributions to global OEM platforms and common value-creation programs.

With a portfolio of assets that is diversified across product segments and geographic regions, ArcelorMittal benefits from a number of natural hedges designed to foster relatively stable cash flows in normal economic circumstances and protect it over time from weaknesses in any one particular country or region, as well as volatility in commodity and currency markets.

A world-class mining business. ArcelorMittal has a global portfolio of 16 operating units with mines in operation and development and is the world’s fourth largest iron ore producer. In the year ended December 31, 2011, ArcelorMittal mines and strategic contracts produced 65.2 million tonnes of iron ore and met 57% of the Company’s requirements, and produced 8.9 million tonnes of coking coal and PCI.  The Company currently has iron ore mining activities in Algeria, Brazil, Bosnia, Canada, Kazakhstan, Liberia, Mexico, Ukraine and the United States and has projects under development or prospective development in Canada, Mauritania and India. The Company currently has coal mining activities in Kazakhstan, Russia and the United States. ArcelorMittal’s main mining products include iron ore lump, fines, concentrate, pellets, sinter feed, coking, PCI and thermal coal. ArcelorMittal’s iron ore reserves are estimated at 3.8 billion tonnes and its total coking coal reserves are estimated at 323 million tonnes.

The Company’s long-life iron ore and coal resources provide a measure of security of supply and an important natural hedge against raw material volatility and global supply constraints.  As from January 1, 2011, the mining business is reported as a separate reportable segment.  This enhances the ability to optimize capital allocation and pursue growth plans, which include a material increase in production and sales to third parties at market prices.

Research and Development. R&D supports ArcelorMittal’s business units in process and product improvement to produce the best quality steel at a low cost and with a limited impact on the environment. With 11 major research centers, ArcelorMittal possesses




a leading R&D capability in the steel industry. The Company’s locations worldwide enable quick transfers of know-how to ArcelorMittal plants around the world. In addition, ArcelorMittal’s close relationship with its customers enables it to foster innovation and work with them to meet their evolving needs and develop new steel products and solutions. To improve its research efficiency and achieve a high level of scientific knowledge, ArcelorMittal maintains strong academic partnerships with world-class scientific and technical universities.

The main focuses of ArcelorMittal’s R&D are:

·         In process research, ArcelorMittal places significant emphasis on cost-effective processes (related to energy savings and raw materials selection), quality, environmental improvements and efficiently deploying process improvements throughout its plants worldwide.

·         In the automotive sector, ArcelorMittal’s engineering teams resident at customers’ plants work with OEMs from the design stage of new product launches, helping to create vehicles that are lighter, stronger, safer and more attractive to end-users. ArcelorMittal continues to lead the way with advanced high-strength steels and high deformability steels in conjunction with a quick deployment at all worldwide customers’ locations.

·         In construction and civil engineering, ArcelorMittal works to develop new products and solutions addressing safety, health, cost-efficiency, affordability, durability, energy-efficiency, environmental impact, comfort and transportability.

·         In other industry markets such as appliances, packaging and metal processing, ArcelorMittal develops cost-effective products, solutions and new coatings, while anticipating new legal and regulatory environmental requirements.

·         In the energy market, ArcelorMittal is increasing its efforts to develop new steel grades for energy pipes, and a larger and cost-effective product range for tubular products.

·         ArcelorMittal takes part in the development of new energy-saving technologies with the production of new, fully processed grades of electrical steel and has a growing presence in the wind energy sector.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, ArcelorMittal’s R&D expense was approximately $306 million.

Diversified and efficient producer. As a vertically-integrated global steel manufacturer with a leading position in many markets, ArcelorMittal benefits from scale and production cost efficiencies in various markets and a measure of protection against the cyclicality of the steel industry and raw materials prices

·         Diversified production process. In 2011, approximately 65.9 million tonnes of crude steel were produced through the basic oxygen furnace route, approximately 22.6 million tonnes through the electric arc furnace route and approximately 3.4 million tonnes of crude steel through the open hearth furnace route. This provides ArcelorMittal with greater flexibility in raw material and energy use, and increased ability to meet varying customer requirements in the markets it serves.

·         Product and geographic diversification. By operating a portfolio of assets that is diversified across product segments and geographic areas, ArcelorMittal benefits from a number of natural hedges.

·         Upstream integration. ArcelorMittal believes that its own raw material production provides a competitive advantage over time. Additionally, ArcelorMittal benefits from the ability to optimize the efficient use of raw materials in its steel-making facilities, a global procurement strategy and the implementation of overall company-wide knowledge management practices with respect to raw materials. Certain of the Company’s operating units also have access to infrastructure, such as deep-water port facilities, railway sidings and engineering workshops that lower transportation and logistics costs.

·         Downstream integration. ArcelorMittal’s downstream integration through its Distribution Solutions segment enables it to provide customized steel solutions to its customers more directly. The Company’s downstream assets have cut-to-length, slitting and other processing facilities, which provide value additions and help it to maximize operational efficiencies.

Business improvement through company-wide Knowledge Management Program. Knowledge sharing and implementation of best practices are an integral part of ArcelorMittal’s management philosophy. Through its global Knowledge Management Program (“KMP”), ArcelorMittal shares, develops and utilizes its knowledge and experience across its facilities to accelerate improvement in business performance. The KMP covers all key functional areas, such as procurement, finance, marketing, logistics and health and safety, as well as the main steps in steel production and processing. The KMP includes ongoing detailed benchmarking, regular technical meetings and information-sharing at the corporate, regional and operating levels and inter-plant expert and operational support to drive performance improvement. The KMP enables each business unit to benefit from the scale and reach of ArcelorMittal’s global presence and access the best practices and experience within the Company. ArcelorMittal believes that the KMP provides a differentiating advantage to ArcelorMittal’s business performance by continuously contributing to reduced procurement and conversion costs and enhancing safety, quality, productivity and profitability.




Dynamic responses to market challenges and opportunities. ArcelorMittal’s management team has a strong track record and extensive experience in the steel and mining industries. Management had the vision to recognize and take full advantage of the strong steel market trend from 2004 to mid-2008 and by responding quickly and decisively to opportunities, succeeded in building the world’s largest steel company. Even as ArcelorMittal grew in recent years (in large part due to its expertise in acquisitions and turnarounds as described below), it put itself on stronger footing to weather the market downturn in late 2008 and early 2009. Management’s flexibility and agility allowed ArcelorMittal to shift quickly from the growth-oriented approach that prevailed in early 2008 to a crisis response that focused on prudent deployment of cash and reduction of costs, while continuing to provide customers with superior value-added steel products and solutions. In 2010, management continued to carefully adjust its production to changing market conditions and the slow and uncertain economic recovery, while also broadening the Company’s strategic focus on developing its mining activities and securing long-term stable supplies of raw materials.  In response to the worsening Euro-zone sovereign debt crisis in the summer of 2011 and resultant increased risk of recession in the regions where ArcelorMittal operates, ArcelorMittal accelerated its operating results improvement plans: the Company reconfirmed its management gain targets and, in September 2011, launched an Asset Optimization Plan aimed at maximizing steel production at lowest cost facilities. The Company also decided to temporarily suspend steel growth capital expenditure while maintaining a focus on core growth capital expenditure in mining. The Company is also considering some non-core asset divestments.

Proven expertise in acquisitions and turnarounds. ArcelorMittal’s management team has proven expertise in successfully acquiring and subsequently integrating operations, as well as turning around underperforming assets within tight timeframes. The Company takes a disciplined approach to investing and uses teams with diverse expertise from different business units across the Company for evaluating any new asset, conducting due diligence and monitoring integration and post-acquisition performance. Since the inception of ArcelorMittal’s predecessor company Mittal Steel in 1989, the Company has grown through a series of acquisitions and by improving the operating performance and financial management at the facilities that it has acquired. In particular, ArcelorMittal seeks to improve acquired businesses by eliminating operational bottlenecks, addressing any historical under-investments and increasing acquired facilities’ capability to produce higher quality steel. The Company introduces focused capital expenditure programs, implements company-wide best practices, balances working capital, ensures adequate management resources and introduces safety and environmental improvements at acquired facilities. ArcelorMittal believes that these operating and financial measures have improved the operating performance and quality of steel produced at these facilities.

Employees. Recognizing them as the Company’s most valuable assets, ArcelorMittal’s management devotes considerable effort towards securing the right people and enhancing their productivity in four key ways: (1) organizational effectiveness, which aligns the organizational structure and size with the Company’s goals and operations; (2) resourcing, workforce planning, skill gaps identification and training which ensure that the right people are in the right roles; (3) succession planning and development; and (4) performance management through measures such as management review and incentive programs.

Corporate responsibility. ArcelorMittal’s commitment to corporate responsibility (CR) is an important value driver of long-term shareholder value. By acting in a responsible and transparent manner, and by maintaining good relationships with stakeholders, the Group can better manage social and environmental risk, mitigate the impact of its operations on society, meet local expectations, and foster local economic development. ArcelorMittal’s CR approach is structured around four areas, which reflect the key priorities of our business and our stakeholders: investing in our people, making steel more sustainable, enriching our communities and transparent governance.  In 2011, ArcelorMittal achieved its best safety performance to date, was listed on Aon Hewitt’s European list of ‘Top Companies for Leaders’, maintained membership of the two major sustainability and corporate responsibility indices: the Dow Jones Sustainability Index World and the FTSE4Good Index series, and was acknowledged for steel making innovation with the ‘S-in motion’ product range.

Business Strategy

ArcelorMittal’s success has been built upon a consistent strategy that emphasizes size and scale, vertical integration and increased production of and access to raw materials, product diversity, continuous growth in higher value products and a strong customer focus. We intend to continue to be the global leader in the steel industry and a leader in iron ore and coal mining, in particular through the following:

Three-dimensional strategy for sustainability and growth. ArcelorMittal has pursued for a number of years a consistent, three-dimensional business strategy focused on its unique geographical and product diversification, coupled with upstream and downstream integration that reduces exposure to risk and cyclicality. This strategy can be broken down into its three major elements:

Geography: ArcelorMittal is the largest producer of steel in Europe, North and South America, Africa, the fourth largest steel producer in the CIS region, and has a growing presence in Asia. ArcelorMittal has steel-making operations in 20 countries on four continents, including 60 integrated, mini-mill and integrated mini-mill steel-making facilities which provide a high degree of geographic diversification. In 2011, approximately 38% of its steel was produced in the Americas, approximately 46% was produced in Europe and approximately 16% was produced in other countries, such as Kazakhstan, South Africa and Ukraine.




Worldwide steel demand in recent years has been driven by growth in developing economies, in particular in the BRICET countries. The Company’s pre-global financial crisis expansion strategy gave it a leading position in Africa, Central and Eastern Europe, South America and Central Asia. The Company is also gradually building its presence in China and India.

Products: As a global steel producer of a broad range of high-quality finished and semi-finished steel products, ArcelorMittal is able to meet the needs of diverse markets. Steel consumption and product requirements are different in mature economy markets and developing economy markets. Steel consumption in mature economies is weighted towards flat products and a higher value-added mix, while developing markets utilize a higher proportion of long products and commodity grades. As these economies develop, local customers will require increasingly advanced steel products as market needs evolve. To meet these diverse needs, ArcelorMittal maintains a high degree of product diversification and seeks opportunities to increase the proportion of its product mix consisting of higher value-added products.

Mining and value chain: ArcelorMittal has access to high-quality and low-cost raw materials through its own mines and strategic contracts with key suppliers, and plans to continue to develop its upstream integration in the medium-term. Iron ore and coal mining projects have been a key focus of ArcelorMittal in recent years, and this focus is only expected to intensify in the medium-term, as the Company has a goal to secure 100 million tonnes of iron ore supply from its own mines and under strategic long term supply contracts on a cost-plus basis by 2015. As part of this strategy, in March 2011, the Company completed the acquisition of Baffinland, which holds a substantial undeveloped iron ore deposit in the Canadian territory of Nunavut (the potential output from Baffinland is not part of the 100 million tonne production target). For additional information, see “Item 4A—History and Development of the Company—Updates on Previously Announced Investment Projects”.

Downstream integration is also a key element of ArcelorMittal’s strategy to build a global customer franchise. In high-value products, downstream integration allows steel companies to be closer to the customer and capture a greater share of value-added activities. As its key customers globalize, ArcelorMittal intends to invest in value-added downstream operations, such as steel service centers and building and construction support services for the construction industry. In addition, the Company intends to continue to develop its distribution network in selected geographic regions. ArcelorMittal believes that these downstream and distribution activities will allow it to be closer to end-user customers, which in turn will allow it to benefit from better market intelligence and better manage inventories in the supply chain to reduce volatility and improve working capital management. Furthermore ArcelorMittal will continue to expand its production of value-added products in developing markets, leveraging off its experience in developed markets.

Growth Prospects. Notwithstanding the difficult market conditions of 2008-2009, and the current uncertainties arising from the Euro-zone sovereign debt crisis, ArcelorMittal’s management believes that there will be strong global demand growth for steel and mining products in the medium- to long-term. The Company will continue to invest opportunistically in expanding its steel and mining production capacity with a view to maintaining and expanding its market share and existing customer base, depending on local market conditions and projected global and regional demand trends.

Mergers and acquisitions have historically been a key pillar of ArcelorMittal’s strategy to which it brings unique experience, particularly in terms of integration. Instead of creating new capacity, mergers and acquisitions increase industry consolidation and create synergies. ArcelorMittal has also placed strong emphasis on growth in emerging economies through greenfield developments. In light of the difficult economic and market conditions prevailing in late 2008 and early 2009, ArcelorMittal sharply curtailed M&A and greenfield investment activity, and this activity remained subdued for most of 2010 and 2011 (with the exception of Baffinland). As market conditions gradually improve, however, the Company intends to take advantage of selected growth opportunities, mainly in the mining sector and in emerging markets.

Business Overview

ArcelorMittal reports its operations in six reportable segments representing continuing operations: Flat Carbon Americas, Flat Carbon Europe, Long Carbon Americas and Europe, Asia, Africa and CIS (“AACIS”), Distribution Solutions and Mining.




The following table sets forth selected financial data by segment.

Millions of U.S. dollars

Flat Carbon Americas

Flat Carbon Europe

Long Carbon Americas & Europe

Asia &
Africa & CIS

Distribution Solutions


Others / Elimination*


Year ended December 31, 2009









Sales to external customers









Intersegment sales**








Operating income



























Capital expenditures









Year ended December 31, 2010









Sales to external customers









Intersegment sales**








Operating income

























Capital expenditures









Year ended December 31, 2011









Sales to external customers









Intersegment sales**








Operating income
























Capital expenditures













*        Others / Eliminations includes all other operational and/or non-operational items which are not segmented, together with inter-segment elimination.

**      Transactions between segments are conducted on the same basis of accounting as transactions with third parties except for certain mining products shipped internally on a cost plus basis.






ArcelorMittal has a high degree of product diversification relative to other steel companies. Its plants manufacture a broad range of finished and semi-finished steel products of different specifications, including many difficult and technically sophisticated products that it sells to demanding customers for use in high-end applications.

ArcelorMittal’s principal steel products include:

·         semi-finished flat products such as slabs;

·         finished flat products such as plates, hot- and cold-rolled coils and sheets, hot-dipped and electro-galvanized coils and sheets, tinplate and color coated coils and sheets;

·         semi-finished long products such as blooms and billets;

·         finished long products such as bars, wire-rods, structural sections, rails, sheet piles and wire-products; and

·         seamless and welded pipes and tubes.

ArcelorMittal’s main mining products include:

·         iron ore lump, fines, concentrate, pellets and sinter feed; and

·         coking, PCI and thermal coal.

Steel-Making Process

Historically, primary steel producers have been divided into “integrated” and “mini-mill” producers. Over the past few decades, a third type of steel producer has emerged that combines the strengths of both the integrated and the mini-mill processes. These producers are referred to as “integrated mini-mill producers”.

Integrated Steel-Making

In integrated steel production, coal is converted to coke in a coke oven, and then combined in a blast furnace with iron ore and limestone to produce pig iron, which is subsequently combined with scrap in a converter, which is generally a basic oxygen or tandem furnace, to produce raw or liquid steel. Once produced, the liquid steel is metallurgically refined and then transported to a continuous caster for casting into a slab, bloom or billet, which is then further shaped or rolled into its final form. Various finishing or coating processes may follow this casting and rolling. Recent modernization efforts by integrated steel producers have focused on cutting costs through eliminating unnecessary production steps, reducing manning levels through automation, and decreasing waste generated by the process.


A mini-mill employs an electric arc furnace to directly melt scrap and/or scrap substitutes such as direct reduced iron, thus entirely replacing all of the steps up to and including the energy-intensive blast furnace. A mini-mill incorporates the melt shop, ladle metallurgical station, casting, and rolling into a unified continuous flow. Mini-mills are generally characterized by lower costs of production and higher productivity than integrated steel-makers. These attributes are due in part to the lower capital costs and lower operating costs resulting from the streamlined melting process and more efficient plant layouts of mini-mills. The quality of steel produced by mini-mills is primarily limited by the quality of the metallic raw materials used in liquid steel-making, which in turn is affected by the limited availability of high-quality scrap or virgin ore-based metallics for use in the electric arc furnaces. Mini-mills are substantially dependent on scrap, which has been characterized by price volatility, generally rising prices and limited availability in recent years.

Integrated Mini-Mills

Integrated mini-mills are mini-mills that produce their own metallic raw materials consisting of high-quality scrap substitutes, such as direct reduced iron. Unlike most mini-mills, integrated mini-mills are able to produce steel with the quality of an integrated producer, since scrap substitutes, such as direct reduced iron, are derived from virgin iron ore, which has fewer impurities. The internal production of scrap substitutes as the primary metallic feedstock provides integrated mini-mills with a competitive advantage over traditional scrap-based mini-mills by insulating the integrated mini-mills from their dependence on scrap, which is generally more expensive and has been subject to price volatility, generally rising prices and limited availability. The internal production of metallic feedstock also enables integrated mini-mills to reduce handling and transportation costs. The high percentage use of scrap substitutes such as direct reduced iron also allows the integrated mini-mills to take advantage of periods of low scrap prices by procuring a wide variety of lower-cost scrap grades, which can be blended with the higher-purity direct reduced iron charge. Because




the production of direct reduced iron involves the use of significant amounts of natural gas, integrated mini-mills are more sensitive to the price of natural gas than are mini-mills using scrap.

Key Steel Products

Steel-makers primarily produce three types of steel products; flat products, long products and stainless steel. Flat products, such as sheet or plate, are produced from slabs. Long products, such as bars, rods and structural shapes, are rolled from blooms and/or billets. Stainless steel products include austenitic stainless, ferritic stainless and martensitic stainless.

Flat Products

Slab. A slab is a semi-finished steel product obtained by the continuous casting of steel or rolling ingots on a rolling mill and cutting them into various lengths. A slab has a rectangular cross-section and is used as a starting material in the production process of other flat products (e.g., hot-rolled sheet, plates).

Hot-Rolled Sheet. Hot-rolled sheet is minimally processed steel that is used in the manufacture of various non-surface critical applications, such as automobile suspension arms, frames, wheels, and other unexposed parts in auto and truck bodies, agricultural equipment, construction products, machinery, tubing, pipe and guard rails. All flat-rolled steel sheet is initially hot-rolled, a process that consists of passing a cast slab through a multi-stand rolling mill to reduce its thickness to less than 12 millimeters. Flat-rolled steel sheet that has been wound is referred to as “coiled”.

Cold-Rolled Sheet. Cold-rolled sheet is hot-rolled sheet that has been further processed through a pickle line, which is an acid bath that removes scaling from steel’s surface, and then successively passed through a rolling mill without reheating until the desired gauge, or thickness, and other physical properties have been achieved. Cold-rolling reduces gauge and hardens the steel and, when further processed through an annealing furnace and a temper mill, improves uniformity, ductility and formability. Cold-rolling can also impart various surface finishes and textures. Cold-rolled steel is used in applications that demand higher surface quality or finish, such as exposed automobile and appliance panels. As a result, the prices of cold-rolled sheet are higher than the prices of hot-rolled sheet. Typically, cold-rolled sheet is coated or painted prior to sale to an end-user.

Coated Sheet. Coated sheet is generally cold-rolled steel that has been coated with zinc, aluminum or a combination thereof to render it corrosion-resistant and to improve its paintability. Hot-dipped galvanized, electro-galvanized and aluminized products are types of coated sheet. These are also the highest value-added sheet products because they require the greatest degree of processing and tend to have the strictest quality requirements. Coated sheet is used for many applications, often where exposed to the elements, such as automobile exteriors, major household appliances, roofing and siding, heating and air conditioning equipment, air ducts and switch boxes, as well as in certain packaging applications, such as food containers.

Plates. Plates are produced by hot-rolling either reheated slabs or ingots. The principal end uses for plates include various structural products such as for bridge construction, storage vessels, tanks, shipbuilding, line pipe, industrial machinery and equipment.

Tinplate. Tinplate is a light-gauge, cold-rolled, low-carbon steel usually coated with a micro-thin layer of tin. Tinplate is usually between 0.14 millimeters and 0.84 millimeters thick and offers particular advantages for packaging, such as strength, workability, corrosion resistance, weldability and ease in decoration. Food and general line steel containers are made from tinplate.

Long Products

Billets/Blooms. Billets and blooms are semi-finished steel products. Billets generally have square cross-sections up to 180 millimeters by 180 millimeters, and blooms generally have square cross-sections greater than 180 millimeters by 180 millimeters. These products are either continuously cast or rolled from ingots and are used for further processing by rolling to produce finished products like bars and wire rod sections.

Bars. Bars are long steel products that are rolled from billets. Merchant bar and reinforcing bar (rebar) are two common categories of bars. Merchant bars include rounds, flats, angles, squares, and channels that are used by fabricators to manufacture a wide variety of products such as furniture, stair railings, and farm equipment. Rebar is used to strengthen concrete in highways, bridges and buildings.

Special Bar Quality (SBQ) Steel. SBQ steel is the highest quality steel long product and is typically used in safety-critical applications by manufacturers of engineered products. SBQ steel must meet specific applications’ needs for strength, toughness, fatigue life and other engineering parameters. SBQ steel is the only bar product that typically requires customer qualification and is generally sold under contract to long-term customers. End-markets are principally the automotive, heavy truck and agricultural sectors, and products made with SBQ steel include axles, crankshafts, transmission gears, bearings and seamless tubes.

Wire Rods. Wire rod is ring-shaped coiled steel with diameters ranging from 5.5 to 42 millimeters. Wire rod is used in the automotive, construction, welding and engineering sectors.




Wire Products. Wire products include a broad range of products produced by cold reducing wire rod through a series of dies to improve surface finish, dimensional accuracy and physical properties. Wire products are used in a variety of applications such as fasteners, springs, concrete wire, electrical conductors and structural cables.

Structural Sections. Structural sections or shapes is the general term for rolled flanged shapes with at least one dimension of their cross-section of 80 millimeters or greater. They are produced in a rolling mill from reheated blooms or billets. Structural sections include wide-flange beams, bearing piles, channels, angles and tees. They are used mainly in the construction industry and in many other structural applications.

Rails. Rails are hot-rolled from a reheated bloom. They are used mainly for railway rails but they also have many industrial applications, including rails for construction cranes.

Seamless Tube: Seamless tubes have outer dimensions of approximately 25 millimeters to 508 millimeters. They are produced by piercing solid steel cylinders in a forging operation in which the metal is worked from both the inside and outside. The final product is a tube with uniform properties from the surface through the wall and from one end to the other.

Steel sheet piles. Steel sheet piles are hot rolled products used in civil engineering for permanent and temporary retaining structures. Main applications are the construction of quay walls, jetties, breakwaters, locks and dams, river reinforcement and channel embankments, as well as bridge abutments and underpasses. Temporary structures like cofferdams in the river are made with steel sheet piles. A special combination of H beams and steel sheet piles are sometimes used for the construction of large container terminals and similar port structures.  

Welded Pipes and Tubes: Welded pipes and tubes are manufactured from steel sheet that is bent into a cylinder and welded either longitudinally or helically.

Stainless Steel

In January 2011, ArcelorMittal completed the spin-off of its stainless steel operations to a separately-focused company, Aperam. See “Item 4A—History and Development of the Company—Recent Developments”.

Electrical Steels

There are three principal types of electrical steel: grain-oriented steels, non-grain oriented fully processed steels and non-grain oriented semi-processed steels:

·         Grain-oriented steels are 3% silicon-iron alloys developed with a grain orientation to provide very low power loss and high permeability in the rolling direction, for high efficiency transformers. These materials are sold under the Unisil trademark. Unisil H is a high permeability grade that offers extremely low power loss.

·         Non-grain oriented fully processed steels are iron-silicon alloys with varying silicon contents and have similar magnetic properties in all directions in the plane of the sheet. They are principally used for motors, generators, alternators, ballasts, small transformers and a variety of other electromagnetic applications. A wide range of products, including a newly developed thin gauge material for high frequency applications, are available.

·         Non-grain oriented semi-processed steels are largely non-silicon alloys sold in the not finally annealed condition to enhance punchability. Low power loss and good permeability properties are developed after final annealing of the laminations. These materials are sold under the Newcor and Polycor trademarks.

Direct Reduced Iron

Direct reduced iron, also known as DRI, is produced by removing the oxygen from iron ore without melting it. DRI is used as feedstock for electric arc furnaces and is a high-quality substitute for scrap. In 2011, ArcelorMittal produced 8.0 million tonnes of DRI. Direct reduced iron enables ArcelorMittal to control the quality and consistency of its metallic input, which is essential to ensure uniform high quality of the finished products. Direct reduced iron has historically given ArcelorMittal a cost advantage compared to scrap.

Mining Products

ArcelorMittal’s principal mining products and raw material input items for steel operations include iron ore, solid fuels (coking coal, PCI coal and coke), metallics, alloys, base metals, energy and industrial gases.

ArcelorMittal’s mining and raw materials supply strategy consists of:




·         Acquiring and expanding production of certain raw materials, in particular iron ore, coal and manufacturing refractory products and developing diverse third-party customer relationships;

·         With respect to purchasing, pursuing the lowest unit price available based on the principles of total cost of ownership and value-in-use through aggregated purchasing, supply chain and consumption optimization;

·         Exploiting its global purchasing reach; and

·         Leveraging local and low cost advantages on a global scale.

Faced with rising and more volatile raw materials prices in recent years and in light of the concentrated nature of the mining industry (in particular iron ore), ArcelorMittal has pursued a strategy of selectively acquiring mining assets that are complementary to its steel producing activities and making substantial investments in the development of its own production base. These acquisitions and investments have focused mainly on iron ore and coking coal, which are the two most important inputs in the steel-making process, but have also included investments to secure access to other raw materials such as manganese. ArcelorMittal has exploration and evaluation mining projects in India, Africa and South America that have not yet reached the development and production stages, and whose advancement was delayed in late 2008 and 2009 due to the global economic crisis. ArcelorMittal also holds stakes in a few joint ventures and other entities with substantial mining assets. As the global economic crisis continued in 2010, ArcelorMittal focused on optimizing output and production from its existing sources rather than on further expanding its portfolio of mining assets. In early 2011, the Company’s expansion of its own raw materials base resumed with its acquisition of Baffinland, owner of an undeveloped iron ore deposit in the Canadian territory of Nunavut. See “Item 4A—History and Development of the Company—Updates on Previously Announced Investment Projects”.

ArcelorMittal is a party to contracts with other mining companies that provide long-term, stable sources of raw materials. The Company’s largest iron ore supply contracts are agreements with Vale that were entered into in 2008 and amended in 2009 in response to changed market conditions in order to reduce and introduce a greater level of flexibility with respect to ArcelorMittal’s purchasing requirements and Vale’s supply requirements (although quarterly minimum amounts remain in effect). ArcelorMittal’s other principal international iron ore suppliers include Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. in the United States, Metalloinvest in Russia, Metinvest in Ukraine, SNIM in Mauritania, Luossavaara-Kiirunavaara AB in Sweden, Samarco in Brazil, IOC (Rio Tinto Ltd.) in Canada and Sishen (South Africa). ArcelorMittal’s principal coal suppliers include the BHP Billiton Mitsubishi Alliance in Australia, Alpha Natural Resources in the United States, Anglo Coal in Australia, Xstrata Coal in Australia, Walter Energy Inc. in the United States, Teck Coal in Canada and MacArthur Coal in Australia. ArcelorMittal classifies certain of these long-term contracts as “strategic”, such as one of the contracts with Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. and the contract with Sishen, due to their pricing arrangements and includes them in its assessment of its raw material self-sufficiency.

ArcelorMittal believes that its portfolio of long-term supply contracts can play an important role in preventing disruptions in the production process.    In 2011, ArcelorMittal sourced nearly all of its iron ore requirements and the majority of its coking coal requirements, beyond that provided by its own mines and strategic long-term contracts, under long-term contracts, the majority of which are now on a quarterly pricing arrangement (see “Item 5—Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Raw Materials”). 

The table below sets forth information regarding ArcelorMittal’s raw material production and consumption in 2011.

Millions of metric tonnes


Sourced from own mines and strategic long-term contracts

Other sources

sufficiency %

Iron Ore(1)





PCI & Coal(2)










Scrap & DRI






(1)    Assuming full production of iron ore at ArcelorMittal Mines Canada, Serra Azul and full share of production at Peña Colorada for own use.

(2)    Includes coal only for the steelmaking process and excludes steam coal for power generation. Assumes all production of coal at Kuzbass and Princeton mines for own use.

Iron Ore

ArcelorMittal sources significant portions of its iron ore needs from its own mines in Kazakhstan, Ukraine, Bosnia, Algeria, Canada, the United States, Mexico and Brazil. During 2011, the Company’s iron ore mining complex in Liberia became operational and contributed to the supplies of ArcelorMittal. ArcelorMittal is also expanding capacity of existing mines in Canada, Liberia and Brazil. In addition, the Company has announced prospective mining developments in India, Africa, South America and North America. See “Item 4A—Updates on Previously Announced Investment Projects”. Several of ArcelorMittal’s steel plants also have in place off-take arrangements with mineral suppliers located near its production facilities, some of which supply the relevant plant’s iron ore requirements on a cost-plus basis and are considered strategic long-term contracts.




In 2012, the Company is targeting an increase of approximately 10% in its iron ore production as compared to 2011.




The following table sets forth information on ArcelorMittal’s principal iron ore mining operations and production (own mines and strategic long-term contracts) in 2011:




2011 Production
(in millions of metric

Own mines




North America(2)

Open pit

Concentrate and pellets


South America

Open pit

Lump and sinter feed



Open pit

Lump and fines



Open pit /underground

Lump and fines


Asia, CIS & Other

Open pit /underground

Concentrate, lump and fines


Total own iron ore production of own mines




Strategic long-term contracts
– iron ore




North America(3)

Open pit




Open pit

Lump and fines


Total strategic long-term contracts – iron ore

















(1)    Total of all finished production of fines, concentrate, pellets and lumps (includes ArcelorMittal’s shares of production of less than wholly-owned mines and strategic long-term contracts).

(2)    Includes ArcelorMittal’s share of production from Hibbing (United States, 62.30%) and Peña (Mexico, 50%).

(3)    Consists of long-term supply contracts with Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. (“Cliffs”). On April 8, 2011, ArcelorMittal announced that it  had reached a negotiated settlement with Cliffs regarding all pending contract disputes related to the procurement of iron ore pellets for certain facilities in the U.S.  As part of the settlement, Cliffs and ArcelorMittal agreed to specific pricing levels for 2009 and 2010 pellet sales and related volumes and, beginning in 2011, to replace the previous pricing mechanism in one of the parties’ two iron ore supply agreements with a world market-based pricing mechanism. Accordingly, beginning first quarter of 2011, this excludes the long-term supply contract for which the market-based pricing mechanism was reached.

(4)    Includes purchases under a strategic agreement with Sishen/Thabazambi (South Africa). Prices for purchases under the July 2010 interim agreement with Kumba have been on a fixed-cost basis since March 1, 2010. See “Item 8A—Consolidated Financial Statement and Other Financial Information – Legal Proceedings – Other Legal Claims – South Africa”.


For further information on each of ArcelorMittal’s principal iron ore mining operations, see “Item 4D—Property, Plant and Equipment”.

Solid Fuels

Coking Coal

As with iron ore, ArcelorMittal sources a percentage of its coking coal from its own coal mines in Kazakhstan, Russia and the United States. The Company’s mines in Kazakhstan supply substantially all the requirements for its steel making operations at ArcelorMittal Temirtau, while the mines in Russia and the United States supply other steel plants within the ArcelorMittal group.




The following table sets forth information on ArcelorMittal’s principal coking coal mining operations and production (own mines and strategic long-term contracts) in 2011:

Coal Mine Operations by Region

2011 Production
(millions of metric

Own mines


North America


Asia, CIS & Other


Total own coal production


Coal - strategic contracts


North America(1)




Total strategic contracts – coal





(1)    Strategic agreement - prices on a cost-plus basis.

(2)    Long term lease - prices on a cost-plus basis.


For additional information on each of these mines, see “Item 4D—Property, Plant and Equipment”.

Where ArcelorMittal’s coke-making facilities do not have access to internal sources of coking coal, they buy it from mostly regional or seaborne sources under supply contracts.

Other Raw Materials and Energy


ArcelorMittal has its own coke-making facilities at most of its integrated mill sites, including in Bosnia, the United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Spain, France, Germany, Belgium, Poland, Czech Republic, Kazakhstan, South Africa and Ukraine. While ArcelorMittal meets most of its own coke requirements, certain of ArcelorMittal’s operating subsidiaries buy coke from mostly domestic or regional sources to optimize cost savings from transport efficiencies, and certain of its subsidiaries also sell excess coke at market prices to third parties. The remainder of the spot purchases of coke is made from China, Japan and the United States.

In the United States, ArcelorMittal USA produces part of its coke requirement in its own batteries, with the bulk procured under long-term contracts from dedicated coke batteries owned by third parties. These contracts have formula-based pricing arrangements.

Metallics (Scrap)

ArcelorMittal procures the majority of its scrap requirements locally and regionally to optimize transport costs, or under short-term contracts. Typically scrap purchases tend to be made in the spot market on a monthly basis. In Europe, ArcelorMittal has entered into certain contracts for scrap recycling.


ArcelorMittal purchases its requirements of bulk and noble alloys from a number of global, regional and local suppliers on contracts that are linked to generally-accepted indices or negotiated on a quarterly basis. The Company’s joint venture with Kalagadi Manganese in South Africa is expected to provide an additional source of manganese alloys in the future.

Base Metals

The majority of the Company’s base metal needs, including zinc, tin and aluminum for coating, are purchased under annual volume contracts. Pricing is based on the market-accepted indices. Material is sourced from both local and global producers.


ArcelorMittal generally procures its electricity through tariff-based systems in regulated areas such as parts of the United States and South Africa, or through bilateral contracts. The duration of these contracts varies significantly depending on the various areas and types of arrangements.

For integrated steel mills, plant off-gases from various process steps are utilized to generate a significant portion of the plant’s electricity requirements and lower the purchase volumes from the grid. This is either produced by the plant itself or with a partner in the form of a co-generation contract.




Natural Gas

ArcelorMittal procures much of its natural gas requirements for its U.S., Canadian and Mexican operations from the natural gas spot market or through short-term contracts entered into with local suppliers, with prices fixed either by contract or tariff-based spot market prices. For its European operations, ArcelorMittal sources its natural gas requirements under prevailing oil-based pricing systems, with an increasing share of European spot-indexed supply contracts. The remainder of ArcelorMittal’s natural gas consumption represents less than 20% of ArcelorMittal’s total consumption and is generally based in regulated markets.

Industrial Gases

Most of ArcelorMittal’s industrial gas requirements are produced under long-term contracts with various suppliers in different geographical regions.


ArcelorMittal Shipping Limited (“AMS”) provides ocean transportation solutions to ArcelorMittal’s manufacturing subsidiaries and affiliates. AMS determines cost-efficient and timely approaches for the transport of raw materials, such as iron ore, coal, coke and scrap, and semi-finished and finished products. AMS is also responsible for providing shipping services to the Company’s sales organizations. This includes forwarding services and complete logistics services through ArcelorMittal Logistics. It provides complete logistics solutions from plants to customer locations using various modes of transport.

In 2011, AMS arranged transportation for approximately 60.7 million tonnes of raw materials and about 12.5 million tonnes of finished products. The key objectives of AMS are to ensure cost-effective and timely shipping services to all units. AMS acts as an agent for a Mauritius-based shipping company, Global Chartering Ltd. (“GC”) and ArcelorMittal Sourcing. GC handles shipping of approximately 38% of the Company’s raw materials, which are transported by sea by chartering vessels on a short- to long-term basis. In its fleet are several Capesize, Panamax, Supramax and Handymax vessels, either owned or on a medium-to-long-term charter. AMS’s strategy is to cover 50-75% of the cargo requirements of the Group on a medium to long-term basis, and to arrange remaining transportation requirements on a spot basis.


ArcelorMittal has implemented a global purchasing process for its major procurement requirements, including raw materials, industrial services, industrial equipment, spares and maintenance, as well as capital expenditure items, energy and shipping. ArcelorMittal’s centralized purchasing teams also provide services such as optimization of contracts and the supply base, logistics and optimizing different qualities of materials suitable for different plants and low cost sourcing.

In doing so, ArcelorMittal seeks to benefit from economies of scale in a number of ways, including by establishing long-term relationships with suppliers that sometimes allow for advantageous input pricing, pooling its knowledge of the market fundamentals and drivers for inputs and deploying specialized technical knowledge especially for the acquisition of industrial services and plant equipment and facilities. This enables ArcelorMittal to achieve a balanced supply portfolio in terms of diversification of sourcing risk in conjunction with the ability to benefit from a number of its own raw materials sources.

A global and integrated “Total Cost of Ownership” project that built on previous expertise employed in a number of sites was implemented during 2007. This project was successful in changing the business approach from unit price-based decision-making to total cost of ownership-based decision making, with the goal of lowering the total cost of production through minimization of waste, improved input material recovery rates and higher rates of recycling. The Total Cost of Ownership methodology has now become an institutionalized way of conducting the purchasing activities across the group.

Sales and Marketing

In 2011, ArcelorMittal sold approximately 85.8 million tonnes of steel products.


The majority of steel sales from ArcelorMittal are destined for domestic markets. For these domestic markets, sales are usually approached as a decentralized activity that is managed either at the business unit or at the production unit level. For some specific markets, such as automotive, there is a global approach offering similar products manufactured in different production units around the world. In instances where production facilities are in relatively close proximity to one another, and where the market requirements are similar, the sales function is aggregated to serve a number of production units. Sales are conducted principally with the customer. In the E.U. region and in South America, ArcelorMittal owns a large number of service and distribution centers. Depending on the level of complexity of the product, or the level of service required by the customer, the service center operations form an integral part of the supply chain to our customers. Distribution centers provide access to our products to smaller customers that cannot or do not want to buy directly from the operating facility.




The Group prefers to sell exports through its international network of sales agencies to ensure that all ArcelorMittal products are presented to the market in a cost-efficient and coordinated manner.

Although executed at the local level, sales are strategically coordinated at the Group level to ensure uniform contract, price, rebate and payment conditions.

For some global industries with customers in more than one of the geographical areas that ArcelorMittal serves, the Company has established customized sales and service functions. This is particularly the case for the automotive and packaging industries. Sales through these channels are also coordinated at the Group level with respect to contract, price, rebate and payment conditions.


Marketing follows the sales activity very closely and is by preference executed at the local level. In practice, this leads to a focus on regional marketing competencies, particularly where there are similarities among regional markets in close geographical proximity. Local marketing provides guidance to sales on forecasting and pricing. At the global level, the objective is to share marketing intelligence with a view towards identifying new opportunities, either in new products or applications, new product requirements or new geographical demand. Where a new product application is involved, the in-house research and development unit of ArcelorMittal is involved in developing the appropriate products.

An important part of the marketing function at ArcelorMittal is to develop short-range outlooks that provide future perspectives on the state of market demand and supply. These outlooks are shared with the sales team in the process of finalizing the sales strategy for the immediate future and with senior management when market conditions call for production adjustments.

Globally, sales and marketing activities are coordinated to ensure a harmonized approach to the market. The objective is to provide similar service experiences to all customers of ArcelorMittal in every market.


ArcelorMittal maintains insurance on property and equipment in amounts believed to be consistent with industry practices. ArcelorMittal insurance policies cover physical loss or damage to its property and equipment on a reinstatement basis arising from a number of specified risks and certain consequential losses, including business interruption arising from the occurrence of an insured event under these policies.

ArcelorMittal also maintains various other types of insurance, such as comprehensive construction and contractor insurance for its greenfield and major capital expenditures projects, public and products liability, directors and officers liability, credit, commercial crime, transport, and charterers’ liability, as well as other customary policies such as car insurance, travel assistance and medical insurance.

Each of the operating subsidiaries of ArcelorMittal also maintains various local insurance policies that are mandatory at the local level, such as employer liability, workers compensation and auto liability, as well as specific insurance such as public liability to comply with local regulations.

Intellectual Property

ArcelorMittal owns and maintains a patent portfolio covering processes and steel products, including uses and applications that it creates, develops and implements in territories throughout the world. Such patents and inventions primarily relate to steel solutions with new or enhanced properties, as well as new technologies that generate greater cost-efficiencies.

ArcelorMittal also owns trademarks, both registered and unregistered, relating to the names and logos of its companies and the brands of its products. ArcelorMittal has policies and systems in place to monitor and protect the confidentiality of its know-how and proprietary information. The Company applies a general policy for patenting selected new inventions, and its committees organize an annual patent portfolio screening by individuals from the Company’s R&D and business sectors in order to optimize the global efficiency of the Company’s patent portfolio. Following the spin-off of ArcelorMittal’s stainless and specialty steels business into Aperam, a newly-created company, the Company’s patent portfolio still includes more than 5,500 patents and patent applications, mostly recent and middle-aged, for more than 500 patent families, with 29 inventions newly-protected in 2011. Because of this constant innovation, the Company does not expect the lapse of patents that protect older technology to materially affect current revenue. Aperam maintains ownership of its patents, although some patent cross-licenses were entered into to allow both ArcelorMittal and Aperam to maintain patent coverage over technologies used by both companies.

In addition to its patent portfolio, technical know-how and other unpatented proprietary information, ArcelorMittal has also been granted licenses for technologies developed by third parties in order to allow it to propose comprehensive steel solutions to customers. ArcelorMittal is not aware of any pending lawsuits alleging infringement of others’ intellectual property rights that could materially harm its business.




Government Regulations

See “Item 3D—Key Information—Risk Factors” and “Item 8A—Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings”.

ArcelorMittal’s operations are subject to various regulatory regimes in the regions in which it conducts its operations. The following is a discussion of the principal features of selected regulatory regimes, as of December 31, 2011, that affect or are likely to affect its operations.

Environmental Laws and Regulations

ArcelorMittal’s operations are subject to a broad range of laws and regulations relating to air emissions, wastewater storage, treatment and discharges, the use and handling of hazardous or toxic materials, waste disposal practices, the remediation of environmental contamination, the protection of soil, biodiversity and ecosystems in general and other aspects of the protection of the environment at its multiple locations and operating subsidiaries. As these laws and regulations in the United States, the European Union and other jurisdictions continue to become more stringent, ArcelorMittal expects to expend substantial amounts to achieve or maintain ongoing compliance. Furthermore, as an owner and operator of a significant number of mining assets, these operations will require rehabilitation expenditure upon closure. Provisions to cover environmental remedial activities and liabilities, decommissioning and asset retirement obligations are described in “Item 8A—Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Environmental Liabilities”.

Some of ArcelorMittal’s most important environmental compliance initiatives are described below, as well as the main environmental laws and regulations that apply to ArcelorMittal in its principal countries of operation. It is difficult to anticipate whether additional operating or capital expenditures will be required to comply with pending or recently-enacted amendments to environmental laws and regulations or what effect they will have on our business, financial results or cash flow from operations.

Industrial Emissions Regulation: Climate Change

ArcelorMittal’s activities in the 27 member states of the European Union (“EU”) are subject to the E.U. Emissions Trading Scheme (“ETS”), and it is likely that requirements relating to greenhouse gas emissions will become more stringent and will expand to other jurisdictions in the future. In the United States, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has taken the first steps towards implementing a comprehensive greenhouse gas policy. In South Africa, bill to tax carbon dioxide emissions is under approval to be implemented by 2013. In Mexico, Brazil and Kazakhstan new regulatory initiatives are being discussed by the different government authorities. In the United Kingdom, ArcelorMittal’s activities are subject to the Carbon Reduction Energy Efficiency Scheme (“CRC”).

On December 11, 2011, the 17th Conference of Parties (“COP 17”) under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (“UNFCCC”) adopted a new agreement relating to greenhouse gases, the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action. Developing countries secured a compromise to extend the Kyoto Protocol’s greenhouse gas emissions reductions through 2017, although the extension excludes important Kyoto participants such as Canada, Japan, and Russia. As a non-Kyoto participant, the United States will not be subject to mandatory cuts under the extension, and Australia, which recently passed a carbon tax, has not signed on to a new phase. As relevant to ArcelorMittal’s activities, the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action essentially extends the emissions reduction obligations for the E.U., aligning with the obligations of the existing EU ETS without requiring additional reductions.

The Durban Platform for Enhanced Action also included an agreement to embark upon negotiations to forge a new international framework by 2015 that would take effect by 2020 and would include emissions obligations for all emitting countries—both developed and developing.

The post-2012 carbon market remains uncertain, and ArcelorMittal is closely monitoring international negotiations, regulatory and legislative developments and is endeavoring to reduce its own emissions where appropriate.

United States

Our operating subsidiaries in the United States are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations including the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, also known as “Superfund”, the Safe Drinking Water Act and the Toxic Substances Control Act, as well as applicable state and local environmental requirements.

In October 2009, the EPA published its final Mandatory Greenhouse Gas (“GHG”) Reporting Rule. That rule required data collection to commence on January 1, 2010.  Reports covering calendar year 2010 were filed in September 2011. Reports covering calendar year 2011 are to be filed in March 2012. ArcelorMittal USA has implemented appropriate programs and compliance plans in response to these annual monitoring and reporting obligations and expects to continue to incur substantial expense and management time to comply with the rule.




During 2010, the EPA also issued a series of additional regulations and guidance documents, which both establish permitting obligations for significant stationary sources of GHG emissions (including iron and steel facilities) and will serve as the precursor for further GHG regulations. The permitting obligations created by these rules became effective on January 2, 2011 and apply to both significant new sources of GHGs and existing facilities that are modified in ways projected to significantly increase GHG emissions. While the development of guidance to implement this permitting program is still underway, sources triggering permit obligations are obligated to install Best Available Control Technology to reduce GHG emissions. As a result, ArcelorMittal USA may incur substantial expenses to assess, identify and install such control technologies.

Based on the findings made in 2010, the EPA may also decide to press forward with the establishment of substantive emissions limitations or other requirements that require large industrial sources (including power plants and iron and steel facilities) to minimize GHG emissions. There are several regulatory alternatives that the EPA may elect to pursue under its existing Clean Air Act authority. As these potential developments would have significant financial implications, ArcelorMittal USA will continue to carefully monitor all developments in this area and to proactively engage with regulators as appropriate to define its regulatory obligations.

On June 2, 2010, the EPA promulgated a new National Ambient Air Quality Standard for sulfur dioxide.  The EPA’s new sulfur dioxide standard is unprecedented because it also requires states to model facility emissions to demonstrate attainment rather than rely on state air monitoring networks. Under the new rule, if the EPA’s model designates an area to be in non-attainment and even though a local monitor near a facility shows that the ambient air meets the standard, the area is considered non-attainment and a facility within the area shown to contribute to the non-attainment will be required to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions.  The EPA’s model indicates that ArcelorMittal USA LLC (Indiana Harbor East and Indiana Harbor Long Carbon), ArcelorMittal Indiana Harbor LLC (Indiana Harbor West), ArcelorMittal Cleveland Inc., and ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC may have to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions significantly in order to demonstrate attainment through modeling.  Other ArcelorMittal USA facilities are yet to be modeled.  States are in the process of modeling counties with significant sulfur dioxide sources and will develop state implementation plans (“SIPs”) by June 2013 with enforceable emissions reductions for facilities shown to contribute to exceedances of the new ambient air quality standard for sulfur dioxide, and determined by the modeling.  Facilities will have until August 2017 to comply with the new emissions limits required by the SIPs.  ArcelorMittal USA is part of a broad industry coalition in discussions with the EPA to effect a rule change.

On April 20, 2011, the EPA issued a proposed rule to regulate cooling water intake structures that draw at least 25% of their water for cooling purposes and with intake design flows of more than 2 million gallons per day.  Affected facilities would be subject to case-by-case technology determinations to limit the number of fish killed due to impingement on intake systems or reduce intake.  Facilities withdrawing at least 125 million gallons per day would have to conduct studies to aid permitting authorities in determining site-specific controls, and new facilities could be required to install closed-cycle cooling systems or the equivalent.  ArcelorMittal USA is part of a broad industry coalition in discussions with the EPA to limit the scope of the rule.

On December 2, 2011, the EPA re-proposed a series of rules that regulate emissions of hazardous air pollutants (“HAPs”) from industrial boilers, process heaters and solid waste incinerators.  The EPA has publicly announced that it expects to adopt new final rules by April 30, 2012.  ArcelorMittal USA proactively participated in the development of these rules and will continue diligent involvement in the rulemaking process as the EPA reconsiders and reshapes important elements of these rules in early 2012.  ArcelorMittal USA is also engaged in extensive strategic planning to ensure maximum operational flexibility under the impending requirements.

The EPA is evaluating mercury emissions data from electric arc furnaces (“EAFs”) throughout the United States to develop new emissions standards for mercury.  The EPA has indicated that it expects to issue a proposed rule in early 2012 that will include numeric limits.  The EPA is also preparing an information request for issuance in 2012 as part of the process of developing a regulation for major source EAFs such as the EAF located at Indiana Harbor Long Carbon, which is currently not subject to the existing HAP control standards for EAFs.

The EPA has issued an information request under Section 114 of the Clean Air Act to ArcelorMittal USA LLC (Indiana Harbor East and Indiana Harbor Long Carbon), ArcelorMittal Indiana Harbor LLC (Indiana Harbor West), ArcelorMittal Cleveland Inc., ArcelorMittal Burns Harbor LLC and ArcelorMittal Riverdale to collect information that will be used to revise the Integrated Iron and Steel MACT Regulations.  The requests require each of the facilities to conduct extensive stack testing and to provide source information.  ArcelorMittal USA is currently engaged with the EPA to reduce the testing burdens in an effort to reduce costs.

During 2012, ArcelorMittal USA does not expect to incur significant capital expenditures relating to these regulatory developments or other environmental matters.  Post-2012 expenses to install additional controls technologies and otherwise address new regulations applicable to the U.S. facilities could be substantial.

European Union

Significant EU Directives and regulations are applicable to our production units in the European Union, including the following:




·         Directive 2010/75/EU of November 24, 2010 on Industrial Emissions (the “IED directive”), which applies common rules for permitting and controlling industrial installations. This directive updates and merges seven pieces of existing legislation, including the directives on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (the “IPPC directive”), large combustion plants (the “LCP directive”) and solvents. To receive a permit, installations covered by IPPC directive must apply best available techniques (“BATs”) and comply with BAT-Associated Emissions Levels, as adopted in the BAT conclusions by the European Commission, to optimize their all-around environmental performance. Emissions to air, soil or water, energy efficiency, waste generation as well as noise, hazards and site closure are all considered. The directive maintains limited flexibility for competent authorities by setting two conditions for deviating from the use of BATs: environmental conditions related to the location of the site and its technical characteristics. Such derogation must be justified. Member States must transpose the rules into national legislation by January 7, 2013. The implementation of the IED directive will materially impact ArcelorMittal activities in the European Union at a time and in an amount not yet determined since many issues that ultimately will determine this impact need to be further elaborated in implementing decisions and reconsideration of permits. The decision of the European Commission establishing the conclusions on new BATs and BAT-Associated Emissions Levels for iron and steel production is expected to be issued during the first half of 2012. This directive is complemented by European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR) Regulation (EC) no. 166/2006 of January 18, 2006, implementing the yearly report on release of pollutants and off-site transfer of waste.

·         Directive 2008/98/EC of November 19, 2008, which establishes the legislative framework for the handling and management of waste in the European Union and Regulation (EC) no. 1013/2006 of June 14, 2006, which regulates the shipment of waste from and to the European Union. Under directive 2008/98/EC, Council Regulation (EU) no. 333/2011 of March 31, 2011 established criteria determining when certain types of scrap metal cease to be waste.

·         Directive 2008/105/EC of December 16, 2008, which establishes new water quality standards for priority pollutants in support of Directive 2000/60/EC of October 23, 2000, which established a framework for action in the field of water policy.

·         Directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003, as amended by Directive 2004/101/EC (the “Emissions Trading Directive”), which establishes a scheme under which EU member states are allowed to trade greenhouse gas emission allowances within the E.U. subject to certain conditions.

The following EU Directives are also significant:

·         Directive 2008/50/EC of May 21, 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe.

·         Directive 2004/107/EC of December 15, 2004 relating to limit values and target values for pollutants in ambient air, including thresholds on very fine particulates.

·         Directive 2001/81/EC of October 23, 2001 on national emission ceilings for certain pollutants.

·         Directive 96/82/EC of December 9, 1996 and Directive 2003/105/EC of December 16, 2003, on the control of major accidents hazards involving dangerous substances (also known as the “SEVESO directives”). These two directives are under revision.

·         Directive 2008/68/EC of September 24, 2008 on the inland transport of dangerous goods, by rail, road, and inland waterway.

Environmental damages and violations of the E.U. legislation are subject to environmental and criminal liability under Directive 2004/35/EC of April 21, 2004, and Directive 2008/99/EC of November 19, 2008.

EU Directives applicable to our products include those relating to waste electrical and electronic equipment (Directive 2002/96/EC of January 27, 2003), end-of-life vehicles (Directive 2000/53/EC of September 18, 2000), packaging and packaging waste (Directive 2004/12/EC of February 11, 2004). The Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC is relevant for products used in construction because it aims at recovering 70% of construction waste by 2020.

ArcelorMittal is also subject to the “CLP” Regulation (EC) no. 1272/2008 of December 16, 2008 on the classification, labeling and packaging of substances and mixtures, which implements the United Nations Globally Harmonized System of classification and labeling and the “REACH” Regulation (EC) no. 1907/2006 for Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals, adopted on December 18, 2006, which controls the chemical substances manufactured in or imported into the E.U. in volumes of over one tonne per year. A legal entity of the ArcelorMittal group will not obtain the required license for continued production of a subject chemical if it fails (i) to submit a registration file for the subject chemical in due time, (ii) to submit a complete registration file or (iii) to make any required payment in connection with the registration file. In June 2007, ArcelorMittal established a dedicated task force at the corporate level, responsible for coordinating the strategic aspects of implementation, as well as a platform addressing technical issues in order to achieve implementation of these regulations. In compliance with the REACH regulation, the legal entities of the ArcelorMittal group have pre-registered their imported and manufactured substances in the European Community with the European Chemical Agency (“ECHA”). Groupwide, as of November 2008, ArcelorMittal had submitted 756 pre-registration files to




ECHA. In November 2010, ArcelorMittal submitted to the ECHA, in the name and on behalf of 40 legal entities, 149 registration files concerning 21 substances. In addition, the alignment of hazards criteria with the CLP regulation and the designation of additional chemicals of “high concern” under the REACH regulation could increase the costs of compliance with other EU Directives, including those relating to waste and water and the SEVESO directives. In 2011, documents supporting the implementation of strictly-controlled conditions in the manufacture of organic coke oven by-products were developed, supported by internal audits conducted by ArcelorMittal. The specific uses of certain substances which might be listed under Annex XIV of REACH by the Commission are under review, and the elaboration of dossiers for the authorization procedure is investigated in the supply chain.

In particular, since 2005 ArcelorMittal’s operations in the E.U. have been subject to the Emissions Trading Directive, the E.U.’s central instrument for achieving the E.U. Member States’ commitments under the Kyoto Protocol by providing a European emissions trading system (“ETS”) for carbon dioxide emissions. The ETS covers more than 10,000 installations across the E.U., including combustion plants, oil refineries, coke ovens, iron and steel plants, and factories making cement, glass, lime, brick, ceramics, and pulp and paper. At the heart of ETS is the common trading currency of emission allowances. One allowance gives the holder the right to emit one tonne of carbon dioxide. For each trading period under the ETS, EU member states draw up national allocation plans that determine how many emission allowances each installation will receive. Companies that keep their emissions below the level of their allowances can sell their excess allowances. Companies that do not keep their emissions below the level of their allowances must either reduce their emissions, such as by investing in more efficient technology or using less carbon-intensive energy sources, or purchase the extra allowances that they need on the open market.

The allowances assigned to ArcelorMittal’s EU operating subsidiaries in the framework of the current National Allocation Plans (“NAPs”) are not expected to fall short for the 2008 to 2012 period given the global slowdown in production.

For the period after 2012, the E.U. institutions adopted on December 17, 2008 the so-called “climate and energy package” which, inter alia, aims to reduce the E.U.’s greenhouse gas emissions by 20% by 2020 compared to 1990 levels, and 30% if other developed countries commit themselves to comparable emission reductions and economically more advanced developing countries contribute adequately according to their responsibilities and capabilities. The climate and energy package contains in particular the following legislative documents:

·         Directive 2009/29/EC of April 23, 2009 to improve and extend ETS.

·         Decision no. 406/2009/EC of April 23, 2009 on the effort of Member States to reduce their GHG emissions to meet the E.U.’s GHG emission reduction commitments up to 2020.

·         Directive 2009/31/EC of April 23, 2009 on the geological storage of carbon dioxide.

·         Directive 2009/28/EC of April 23, 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources.

In particular, the ETS for the period after 2012 includes centralized allocation rather than national allocation plans, a cap designed to achieve an overall reduction of greenhouse gases for the ETS sectors of 21% in 2020 compared to 2005 emissions and auctioning as the basic principle for allocating emissions allowances, with transitional free allocation in particular on the basis of benchmarks for manufacturing industries under risk of “carbon leakage”. Many issues that ultimately will determine the impact of the revised ETS scheme are further elaborated in implementing legislation. Through Commission Decision 2010/2/EU of December 24, 2009, manufacturing of coke oven products, of basic iron and steel, of ferro-alloys and of cast iron tubes have been recognized as exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage. In its decision of April 27, 2011, the Commission determined transitional EU-wide rules for the harmonized free allocation of emission allowances and the benchmark values for the steel industry. The values adopted are lower than those proposed by the European steel industry and will lead to additional cost for steel companies in Europe. In May 2011, the European steel federation Eurofer filed a lawsuit against the Commission decision on benchmarks for steel at the European Court of Justice.

The Commission Regulation (EC) no. 1031/2010 of November 12, 2010 on the timing, administration and other aspects of auctioning of greenhouse gas emission allowances pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC completes the E.U.’s legislative framework in this area.

ArcelorMittal anticipates that its capital expenditure with respect to environmental matters in the E.U. over the next several years will relate primarily to installations of additional air emission controls and to requirements imposed in the course of renewal of permits and authorizations, including those pursuant to the IED Directive. In 2011, ArcelorMittal approved a number of multi-year capital expenditures totaling more than $200 million in order to facilitate compliance with these EU environmental regulations, including the following: $125 million for power plants; $52 million for coke and by-products plants; $21 million for sinter plants.

Other Jurisdictions




Increasingly stringent environmental laws and regulations also have been adopted in other jurisdictions. Set out below is a summary of the principal environmental legislation applicable to ArcelorMittal in key jurisdictions where it has substantial manufacturing or mining operations.


The Decree 06-138 of April 2006 for air emissions and the Decree 06-141 of April 2006 for water discharges define the limit values with which companies have to comply within five years. Moreover, a financial law introduced in July 2008 imposes additional taxes for air emissions and water discharge. These taxes are calculated according to the method described in Decree 07-299 of September 2007 for atmospheric emissions and the Decree 07-300 of September 2007 for liquid effluents. The date of application of these taxes is not defined. However, the Wilaya State environmental authorities, to whose authority ArcelorMittal Annaba is subject, have received from the Ministry of Environment an instruction pursuant to the Decree 06-141 with respect to the calculation and implementation of the tax relating to the liquid effluents. Since 2006, ArcelorMittal Annaba has been working to comply with the relevant limit values for air emissions and water discharges. However, ArcelorMittal Annaba could face penalties as full compliance has not been achieved pursuant to the applicable decrees.

An Executive Decree dated June 21, 2009 requires authorization to discharge liquid effluents, other than sewage, from mining activities. In accordance with the provisions of the Decree 06-198 of May 31, 2006 on hazards, ArcelorMittal Annaba submitted in 2009 an environmental audit and a study relating to the authorization of its operations. This report is currently in the approval process. In 2010, the Decree 09-338 of October 20, 2009 on the multiplier of the tax (tax enacted in Finance Act 1999) on the polluting or dangerous activity on the environment was implemented. In September 2010, an application for authorization to operate waste and co-products disposal and storage with all the supporting documentation was submitted to the Ministry of Environment. The approval is pending.

In the context of a draft contract of performance between ArcelorMittal Annaba and the Ministry of Environment, in 2010, ArcelorMittal Annaba submitted a proposal which foresees a set of compliance actions until 2017 to the Ministry of Environment. ArcelorMittal Annaba is still waiting for a response from the Ministry of Environment on its proposal, which could be issued during the course of 2012.


Environmental legislation in Argentina is based on the provisions of the federal, provincial and basin laws and their associated decrees, dispositions and resolutions. For ArcelorMittal’s operations in Argentina, the regulations applicable in the provinces of Buenos Aires and Santa Fe and in the basin of Matanza-Riachuela are particularly relevant. The following provisions are also relevant for ArcelorMittal Acindar’s operations in Villa Constitucion, Tablada and San Nicolas: Law 11717 and Decree 101, which relate to environmental licenses and environmental requalification plan (such a plan was required for Steelshop diffuse emissions); Federal Laws 25670 and 25675, which relate to the export and treatment of polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”) and the requirement to maintain environmental insurance; Federal Law 26168, which relates to industrial restructuring plans (such a plan was required to be submitted in respect of the Tablada plant, which had previously been deemed a polluting agent); and Resolution 165/10, which relates to environmental insurance. The Acindar plants will require capital expenditures, in an undetermined amount, to improve and complete existing pollution control equipment.

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Environmental legislation in Bosnia and Herzegovina is essentially based on the provisions of a set of federal laws and regulations that have been effective since January 2008. The following practices are particularly relevant for ArcelorMittal Zenica: adopting best available techniques and complying with limit values that achieve environmental quality standards in air and water, preventing and controlling major accidents involving hazardous substances, procedures and measures for dealing with accidents on waters and coastal water land, fees on sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and dust emissions and discharge of pollutants in water, waste recovery, disposal and export and limitations on noise pollution.

In order to restart full production at ArcelorMittal Zenica’s plant in 2008 and to obtain all relevant permits, an environmental protection plan was submitted to federal and local authorities in 2007. In February 2009, the Federal Government approved all environmental protection plans, except for the industrial waste landfill Rača. ArcelorMittal Zenica subsequently obtained all required environmental permits except for the Rača landfill, the permit for which is expected to be issued in 2012 after the environmental protection plan is revised.  The Zenica plant will require capital expenditures, in an undetermined amount, to improve and complete existing pollution control equipments. In 2011, ArcelorMittal approved capital expenditures for approximately $24.7 million in order to facilitate compliance with environmental regulations at the coke plant and at the blast furnace.


National Decree no. 6514/2008, which implements Federal Law no. 9605/2008 on environmental liability, and National Decree no. 6686/2008, which implements the law on environmental crimes, were both published in 2008.




National Decree no. 6848/2009, which implements Federal Law no. 9985/2000 concerning environmental compensation, establishes the percentage of total planned investments that must be devoted to greenfield projects in areas of conservation. Moreover, federal law places certain restrictions on the location of mining projects. The Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente (“IBAMA”) controls licensing over certain types of land, including indigenous lands within 50 kilometers of the border of a neighboring country, environmentally protected areas (referred to locally as conservation units), or lands within or affecting more than one state, such as a railway. All other projects are licensed by the agencies of the state in which the project is located.

Federal Resolution no. 382/2006, which was published by the Brazilian National Environmental Council (“CONAMA”) imposes more stringent limitations on dust, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides for new sources in the steel industry. Administrative Order no. 259/2009 published by the Ministry of the Environment (“MMA”) and IBAMA requires that the environmental impact statement contain a specific chapter on alternative clean technologies that can reduce the impact on the health of workers and the environment.

Federal Resolution no. 396/2008 published by CONAMA defines the guidelines and the guiding quality standards for classification of groundwater. Taxation on water usage and discharge is implemented in São Paulo and Minas Gerais drainage basins. Some industrial facilities are already concerned. Such taxation is expected to be extended in the future to all major Brazilian basins. Minas Gerais state published in July 2011 Deliberação Normativa (Normative Deliberation) and Conselho Estadual de Recursos Hídricos (State Water Resources Council)) no. 37/2011, which establishes procedures for obtaining the right to water usage in mining activities and guidelines for preparing a water use plan.

Federal Law no. 12305/2010 established the National Policy on Solid Waste, which sets out principles, objectives, instruments and guidelines for the management of solid residues and defined responsibilities for generators and government. The state policy on solid waste management and recovery in the area of Espirito Santo, where ArcelorMittal Tubarão is located, is outlined in Law no. 9264/2009.

Regarding soil protection, a CONAMA federal resolution was approved on November 26, 2009. It established guidelines for environmental management of contaminated areas by chemicals due to human activities. It also defined criteria and guidelines for soil quality for the presence of such substances and installed the classification of soil quality. This Federal Resolution is considered to be one that will have a major impact in the Environment Management System in the steel industry in Brazil. States have already started to define soil criteria and procedures for the implementation of such regulation. Minas Gerais state has already published its own regulation (DN 02/2010) and is already questioning all industry activities towards past contamination on soil and groundwater.

National decree no. 7390/2010 regulates Articles 6, 11 and 12 of the National Policy on Climate Change (Law 12187 of December 29, 2009). Its impact on the steel sector is not yet clearly defined, but the decree establishes:

·         the creation of sectoral plans, among which the Plan for Reducing Emissions for the Steel Industry is scheduled. ArcelorMittal Brazil is participating in the Strategic Studies and Management working group created to encourage the use of charcoal in the Brazilian steel industry.

·         the reduction of 3.236 billion tons of carbon dioxide equivalent until 2020 (234 million of which will be responsibility of the industrial sector, including the steel sector).

São Paulo state, through Law no. 13798/2009 and its respective Decree no. 55947/ 2010, sets targets of reducing by 20% the State’s GHG emissions as compared to 2005. A target reduction level for the steel industry is expected to be established in 2012.

ArcelorMittal Brazil is closely monitoring the development of these national and regional policies on climate change and is proactively engaging with authorities as appropriate to define its commitments.


The Government of Canada has indicated its intent to design and implement cap-and-trade regulations to limit GHG emissions, although it intends to harmonize the rules with the forthcoming U.S. regulations in this respect prior to implementation. Four Canadian provinces, including Ontario and Quebec, are members of the Western Climate Initiative (“WCI”), a sub-national North American GHG program intended to implement cap-and-trade regimes at State and Provincial levels.  Company and industry representatives are actively working to encourage all levels of government to avoid duplicate GHG regulatory frameworks.

Within its Air Quality Management System (“AQMS”) program, Environment Canada is in discussions with industries and non-governmental organizations to establish Base Level Industrial Emissions Requirements (“BLIERs”) to be reflected in new federal air emission limits expected to be implemented in 2015.  For the iron and steel sector, pollutants expected to be subject to a BLIER are total particulate matter, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides.

ArcelorMittal Mines Canada and two other Canadian iron ore mining operations are also developing BLIERs for dust, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides.  To date, a consensus has been reached on sulfur content by weight, consistent with the new Quebec




regulation adopted at the province level. Discussions are continuing towards a BLIER limit for dust, with a proposed limit for existing and new plants.  To date, no limit has been agreed upon for nitrogen oxides.

Canadian steelmakers must file pollution prevention plans with Environment Canada addressing efforts to reduce mercury emissions on an annual basis. ArcelorMittal Dofasco, ArcelorMittal Contrecoeur, ArcelorMittal Contrecoeur West and other member companies of the Canadian Steel Producers Association meet this obligation by funding a national program to remove mercury-containing convenience switches from end-of-life vehicles before they enter the scrap stream and implementing mercury-free scrap purchasing policies.

In the Province of Ontario, ArcelorMittal Dofasco is in compliance with conditions set out by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment for site-specific air emissions standards under Ontario Regulation 419/05 approved in August 2010. ArcelorMittal Dofasco is on schedule in its implementation of a $16.3 million portfolio of environmental capital projects and operating programs between 2010 and 2014 to reduce emissions of certain parameters.

In the Province of Quebec, the metallurgical sector facilities are negotiating new environmental permits that will apply to the ArcelorMittal Mines Canada and ArcelorMittal Contrecoeur works. This program will require ArcelorMittal Mines Canada to invest in wastewater treatment at Port-Cartier and conduct studies on and monitor both the Port-Cartier and Mount Wright sites. The permit for Mount Wright was issued in March 2010, and the permit for Port-Cartier is expected in 2012. ArcelorMittal Mines Canada will be required to present a new restoration plan for its facilities in Port-Cartier and Mount Wright to the Quebec Ministry of Natural Resources. Under the current mining regulations, financial insurance in the amount of CDN $15 million is required by 2020 for restoration of both sites.

ArcelorMittal Montreal expects the new permits for ArcelorMittal’s Contrecoeur and Contrecoeur West facilities to be issued in 2012. Obtaining the new permits will require increasing monitoring frequencies as well as conducting certain studies.

A Quebec regulation required reporting monthly volume of water pumped from rivers beginning in the fourth quarter of 2009.  Beginning on January 1, 2011, a tax is charged on water withdrawal regardless of whether it is from a private pumping station or supplied by cities. Total additional costs to ArcelorMittal Montreal are expected to be approximately CDN $100,000 per year. The total additional costs to ArcelorMittal Mines Canada are also expected to be approximately CDN $100,000 per year.

In October 2007, a carbon tax was implemented in Quebec that applies to the purchase of fossil fuels. The tax is based on GHG emissions. Quebec is beginning to implement a cap-and-trade regime that will require third-party verified GHG emission reports for 2012.  Starting in 2013, companies will be required to purchase carbon dioxide credits. According to the Ministère du Développement Durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs, credit purchases will be equivalent to the carbon tax, which will be eliminated. Beginning in 2013, free allocation will be reduced annually until 2020. The minimum price for carbon dioxide credits is CDN $10/tonne, while the maximum price is CDN $50/tonne. The Company does not expect to incur significant additional costs under the new cap and trade regime through 2014 (assuming pellet plant emission levels remain generally consistent with their average levels over the 2007 to 2010 period); after 2014, there is considerable uncertainty and the additional costs to the Company cannot yet be determined.

At the province level, Quebec adopted the Clean Air Regulation on June 30, 2011, which will require annual particulate matter (“PM”) testing for steel mills, and installation of broken bag detectors in baghouses. The intensity limit for PM in the steel sector has been increased.  ArcelorMittal Contrecoeur has proposed a project to the Investment Allocation Committee to reduce dust emissions at its steel mill. The new regulation has also reduced the limit for PM concentration in dust controlling equipments. Tests will be done at some DRI plant scrubbers to validate compliance with the new limit.

This regulation will also reduce the limit for total PM from 120 to 75 grams per ton produced for existing pelletizing plants, including ArcelorMittal Mines Canada. The limit for a new plant will be 50 grams per ton produced.

An “Act to amend the Quebec Environmental Quality Act to reinforce compliance” was adopted on October 5, 2011. This act increases penalties and fines for environmental offences. Presumption of statutory liability of directors and administrators is included in the bill.

Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation was acquired by ArcelorMittal in 2011, and a mining project, proposed on Baffin Island in the territory of Nunavut, is currently in a regulatory review process.  The Nunavut Land Claims Agreement establishes the requirement and expectations for development activities occurring in Nunavut. A number of regulatory processes apply to the project, including compliance with the North Baffin Regional Land Use Plan by the Nunavut Planning Commission. The project is also subject to a Part 5 environmental review by the Nunavut Impact Review Board as well as an environmental review by the Canadian Transportation Agency.

Archaeological and paleontological permits are required from the Department of Culture, Language, Elders and Youth for survey and mitigation of archaeological and paleontological sites prior to development. Land tenure through long-term leases and shorter-term land use permits will be required from the Qikiqtani Inuit Association to access Inuit-owned land that surrounds the proposed Mine Site and from Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada for the port at Steensby Inlet and most of the proposed




railway corridor. Other key environmental regulatory approvals include a Type A Water Licence from the Nunavut Water Board for water used, treated and discharged, Fisheries Act authorization from the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, approvals or exemptions under the Navigable Waters Protection Act administered by Transport Canada Navigable Waters Protection Program and a license for explosives manufacture from Natural Resources Canada under the Explosives Act.

Costa Rica

ArcelorMittal’s operations in Costa Rica are subject to laws and regulations promulgated by the central government related to environmental areas such as air emissions, wastewater storage, treatment and discharges, the use and handling of hazardous or toxic materials, waste management, recovery and disposal practices and responsibilities and the remediation of environmental contamination.  These regulations are taken into account in ArcelorMittal’s day-to-day operations in Costa Rica, and are reinforced by an EMS ISO 14001 certification that is valid until 2014 with a verification process each year.


Kazakhstan’s Environmental Code no. 212-III dated January 9, 2007 and its amending law no. 164-IV dated June 23, 2009 specify the requirements for licensing, standardization, environmental audits, environmental permits, in-process controls and monitoring, and import of environmentally hazardous processes, techniques and equipment. They establish the liabilities of users of natural resources in respect of design, development and operation of economic entities and other facilities; it also establishes the responsibilities regarding emissions, discharge of wastewater and the operation and maintenance of landfills and long-term waste storage.

New amendments to the Environmental Code have been in effect since December 2011.  These amendments relate to the conditions for the delivery of permits, to environmental action plans for the reduction of atmospheric emissions, and to waste management programs to reduce accumulated waste and programs to phase out and dispose of PCB transformers.  The amendments also introduced a carbon dioxide emission trading scheme based on the scheme applied in the European Union, with a first national allocation plan of carbon dioxide allowances to be established in 2013.


The Act Adopting the Environment Protection and Management Law of the Republic of Liberia (2002) (“EPML”) is the principal piece of legislation covering environmental protection and management in Liberia. It provides the legal framework for the sustainable development, management and protection of the environment by the Liberian Environmental Protection Agency (“Liberian EPA”) in partnership with relevant ministries, autonomous agencies and organizations.

The Liberian system incorporates all social impact assessment within the Environmental Impact Assessment, otherwise referred to as “ESIA” by ArcelorMittal. The Liberian EPA’s Environmental Impact Assessment Procedural Guidelines provide an interpretation of the requirements of the EPML with respect to ESIA.

In the absence to date of any environmental management regulations, ArcelorMittal has devised a complete Environmental Standards Manual to cover its operations in Liberia. This was approved by the Liberian EPA for use as a guidance document for all site activities under the existing Liberia mining project and remains the only set of such guidelines in the country.

The Act Adopting the National Forestry Reform Law (2006), together with the National Forestry Law (2000) and the Act Creating the Forestry Development Authority (2000) which it amended, cover all aspects of commercial and community use of forests. This law also has a primary role with respect to the wider environment, covering environmental protection, protected forests and protected areas for wildlife. The Act to Establish the Community Rights Law of 2009 with respect to forest lands gave communities far-reaching rights to areas of forest under claims of customary use.

The categories of protected forest areas are contained in the Protected Forest Areas Network Law (2003). This, in aiming to protect Liberia’s forests from deforestation, fragmentation and degradation, specifically requires the establishment of a Protected Forest Areas Network to cover at least 30% of the existing forested area of Liberia. It defines eight protected area types, two of which have relevance to ArcelorMittal’s mining operations in Liberia because of the proximity of such areas (i.e., national forest and nature reserve).

The key government policy with regard to biodiversity is the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (2004), which implements the Convention on Biological Diversity at national level. It comprises two components: the vision statement, the guiding principles, the goals and objectives, on the one hand, and the actions for biodiversity conservation, sustainable use, and benefit sharing, on the other hand. The goals and objectives are developed in accordance with the guiding principles.


Complementary to the framework laws on environment no. 53/05, 81/05, 24/07 and 159/08 which regulate environmental permits, environmental audits, prevention and control of major accidents involving hazardous substances and environmental liability,




the following specific regulations are also applicable: no. 67/04, 92/07 on quality of ambient air, no. 68/04, 71/04, 107/07, 102/08, 143/08 on management of waste, no. 161/2009 on packaging management and management of waste materials from packaging, no. 87/08, 06/09 on water protection, no. 145/10 on chemicals and no. 79/07 on noise. Official Register no. 17/2011 and no. 47/2011, which amend law no. 161/2009, regulate the tax rate applicable to each ton of waste resulting from packaging.

To comply with these laws and regulations, ArcelorMittal anticipates investments in an amount of $4.2 million to revamp the furnace of the hot dip galvanazing line for ArcelorMittal Skopje in addition to the $1.8 million already invested in 2008.


In Mexico, steel and mining activities are under federal jurisdiction. Permits to operate are subject to different environmental authorizations. Complementary to the framework law on the environment of January 28, 1988 (Ley general para el equilibrio ecologico y protección ambiente or “LGEEPA”), the following specific regulations apply: prevention and control of air pollution of November 25, 1988; environmental impact study of May 30, 2000; environmental audit of April 29, 2010; transfer of contaminants of June 3, 2004; water management of April 29, 2004; waste management of May 22, 2006; sustainable forestry development act of February 25, 2003; radioactivity control of March 2, 1985; wildlife management of July 3, 2000; and environmental noise pollution control of March 2, 1985.

Prior to beginning any new construction project, ArcelorMittal México conducts an environmental impact study to obtain authorization for certain activities, including mining activities.

On May 27, 2011 modifications to water management legislation were approved. ArcelorMittal Mexico has launched a compliance action plan for its steel and mining activities and has invested $39 million for the control of dust emissions, waste water treatment and hazardous waste handling and final disposal over the 2006 to 2011 period. Certain ongoing projects are expected to be completed in 2012.


ArcelorMittal’s Long Carbon subsidiary Sonasid is subject to numerous environmental regulations, including the following laws and their decrees of application:  Law no. 10-95 relating to water (August 16, 1995); Law  no. 11-03 relating to the protection of the environment and its enhancement (May 12, 2003); Law no. 12-03 relating to environmental impact studies (May 12, 2003); Law  no. 13-03 relating to air pollution abatement (May 12, 2003); and Law no. 28-00 relating to waste management and disposal (November 22, 2006). Sonasid complies with the limit values for water discharge in surface water and groundwater. Approval for the emission limit values of air pollutants for the steelmaking sector is pending.  In 2009, Sonasid received approval of the Ministry of Environment for the disposal of EAF dust in a landfill owned by the Company.


ArcelorMittal’s mining subsidiaries operating in the Kuzbass region of Russia are subject to several Russian Federation laws and regulations in the field of environmental protection, including: Law no. 7 “On Environmental Protection” dated January 10, 2002; Law “On Air Protection” dated May 4, 1992; Law no. 89-FZ “On Production and Consumption Wastes” dated June 24, 1998; Water Code no. 74/FZ dated June 3, 2006; Land Code no. 136-FZ dated October 25, 2001; and Forest Code no. 101/FZ dated August 10, 2008, among others.

In 2007, once the new Water Code dated March 30, 2007 went into effect, requirements to limit wastewater from mining activities increased considerably. As of December 31, 2008, the legislation monitors 19 pollutants in mine wastewater, with new standards and provisions for penalties in the case of non-compliance. The main pollutants are coal and rock dust suspended solids, ferrous sulphate, dissolved phenolic compounds and oils. The existing wastewater treatment facilities at the mines were commissioned in 1976 and are now obsolete.

In October 2011, an investment project in the amount of $24.4 million was approved in order to upgrade mine water utilities and waste water treatment facilities at the Berezovskaya and Pervomayskaya mines and to clean the settling pond of Berezovskaya mine. These activities will allow ArcelorMittal’s subsidiaries to achieve the required level of effluent treatment and avoid any penalties for damage to water bodies. Standard quality objectives will be achieved only upon completion of the project in 2014. Until then, ArcelorMittal’s Russian mining operations could be exposed to potential penalties.


In Senegal, the environmental regulations applicable to mining companies are set forth in the Mining Code, Act no. 2003-36 of November 24, 2003, its application decree no. 2004-647 of May 17, 2004, and the Code of the Environment, Act no. 2001-01 of January 15, 2001.

These laws outline the requirements that apply to the activities of mining companies, including the exploration phase, exploitation phase and the rehabilitation of a mining site at the end of a mining lease.




Concerning the site of Falémé, a preliminary environmental impact study has inventoried the issues to be considered when implementing the mining project, the construction and operation of a railway, and the construction of a mineral port.

South Africa

The National Environmental Management Act (“NEMA”) of 1998 serves as the departure point for any project in South Africa and determines the Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”) procedure that needs to be followed in order to obtain the required authorization. NEMA is applicable to new infrastructure, capacity increases, changes to or upgrades of existing infrastructure and all water and air related activities. A General Authorization (“Record of Decision” or “ROD”) is issued in terms of this Act for any related projects. There is also a strong link between this Act and new legislation that was promulgated and this Act can be regarded as an “umbrella” for such legislation. The “duty of care” principle is also enshrined in NEMA and specifies that any harm caused to the environment is a criminal offence in terms of this Act.

To regulate water use, water abstraction, effluent discharges and potential pollution of water resources including ground water, Water Use Licenses (“WUL”) are issued under the National Water Act of 1998. Due to the scarcity of water in South Africa, the authorities are placing an emphasis on water recycling in permits; Zero Effluent Discharge (“ZED”) status is a condition many plants are required to achieve. Saldanha Works is currently a ZED plant. Vanderbijlpark has failed to remain a ZED facility, and the authorities have insisted that ZED status be achieved again before the end of 2012. Newcastle Works is expected to achieve ZED status by early 2013.

A Waste Act, which came into effect on July 1, 2009, applies to all waste and by-product related activities and contaminated land and replaces older legislation in this regard. Waste Management Licenses are issued in terms of this Act after the EIA process (including public participation) is concluded as per NEMA. Existing disposal facilities are also included in this Act, although existing permits will remain valid until new Waste Management Licenses are issued. The most significant new issue pertaining to the Waste Act is that by-product related activities now require a Waste Management License in certain cases. The interpretation of the requirements of the Waste Act regarding by-products remains a challenge. The level of duplication that is introduced by this requirement is of concern as by-product related activities are also regulated in terms of other environmental laws. The interpretation of the definition of waste remains a contentious issue and negotiations with the authorities have not been concluded on this matter.

A new Air Quality Act, which took full effect on April 1, 2010, introduced strict emission standards for new and existing plants. Existing plants or processes are granted a period of between five and ten years to achieve standards set for new plants. Atmospheric Emission Licenses will be issued in terms of this legislation after a General Authorization is issued under NEMA. ArcelorMittal’s coke making operations, in particular, have been severely affected by the implementation of the new emission standards, and major capital expenditures are expected to be implemented over the next five years.

In December 2010, the Department of National Treasury launched a discussion document on the option to install a carbon tax in order to reduce GHG emissions. ArcelorMittal South Africa constructively engaged with the authorities to promote alternative taxation proposals that were not in the discussion document. The proposals in the discussion document would have significantly affected the feasibility of ArcelorMittal’s operations as taxation from the very first ton of carbon dioxide being emitted was envisaged. A reviewed taxation paper will be published by early 2012.

Trinidad & Tobago

Various regulations have been enacted under the Environment Management Act of March 8, 2000, two of which include the Water Pollution Rules of October 24, 2001 and the Noise Pollution Rules of April 19, 2001. ArcelorMittal Point Lisas was registered under the Water Pollution Rules in 2008. In 2010, ArcelorMittal Point Lisas was re-registered under the Water Pollution Rules and in 2011 began the process for obtaining a permit to emit pollutants. The application in this regard has been filed and the relevant authorities are processing the application. In accordance with the requirements of the Pesticides and the Toxic Chemicals Act, ArcelorMittal Point Lisas has completed the registration process for the premises and chemicals used and/or stored on its site. Two other pieces of legislation are being proposed—the Air Pollution Rules of 2001 and the Waste Management Rules of 2008.


An air regulation (no. 309) was published in Ukraine on June 27, 2006 and significantly restricts the emission limits of 140 substances for all types of plants. Priority pollutants are particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and carbon monoxide. Since January 2011, the on-site disposal of waste has been subject to tax legislation, which aims to prevent the accumulation of waste on site and to promote the transfer of waste to companies that hold waste disposal permits.

Total expenses for reconstruction and construction of environmental facilities in 2011 amounted to approximately $24.9 million. The principal capital expenditure in 2011 related to the tailing facilities and the water circuits at the mining operations and the coke oven, the blast furnace and the BOF facilities at the steel production facilities.





Unicon’s operations are subject to various environmental laws and regulations including: Environmental Frame Law and Environmental Penal Law, Decree 638 on Air Quality, Decree 1400 on Water Use; Decree 2216 on Solid Wastes; Decree 2.635 on Hazardous Recoverable Materials and Wastes; and Decree 3.219 on Water Quality for the basin of Valencia Lake.

To comply with the environmental requirements, Unicon has launched and will continue to launch different improvement projects at its water collection, drainage and treatment systems for the storage, handling and recovery or disposal of wastes and of hazardous materials, and for the control of emissions to the atmosphere. With regard to the restrictions established by the Venezuelan State, Unicon is closely monitoring and controlling its water and energy consumption.

For further details regarding specific environmental proceedings involving ArcelorMittal, including a description of the more significant remediation sites, see “Item 8A—Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Environmental Liabilities” and Note 24 to ArcelorMittal’s consolidated financial statements.

Foreign Trade

ArcelorMittal has manufacturing operations in many countries and sells its products worldwide. In 2011, certain countries and communities, such as Brazil, Canada, the European Union, the Customs Union of Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus, and the United States have initiated proceedings to decide whether to impose/continue imposing trade remedies (usually antidumping or safeguard measures) against injury or the threat caused by steel imports originating from various steel producing countries.

Under international agreements and the domestic trade laws of many countries, trade remedies are available to domestic industries where imports are “dumped” or “subsidized” and such imports cause injury, or a threat thereof to a domestic industry. Although there are differences in how the trade remedies are assessed, such laws typically have common features established in accordance with World Trade Organization (“WTO”) standards. Dumping involves selling for export a product at a price lower than that at which the same or similar product is sold in the home market of the exporter, or where the export prices are lower than a value that typically must be at or above the full cost of production (including sales and marketing costs) and a reasonable amount for profit. Subsidies from governments (including, among other things, grants and loans at artificially low interest rates) under certain circumstances are similarly actionable. The trade remedy available is typically an antidumping duty order or suspension agreement where injurious dumping is found and a countervailing duty order or suspension agreement where injurious subsidization is found. A duty equal to the amount of dumping or subsidization is imposed on the importer of the product. Such orders and suspension agreements do not prevent the importation of product, but rather require either that the product be priced at a non-dumped level or without the benefit of subsidies, or that the importer pay the difference between such dumped or subsidized price and the actual price to the government as a duty.

Safeguard measures are addressed more generally to a particular product irrespective of its source to protect the domestic production against increased imports of the exported product. The remedies available under the safeguard investigations are commonly safeguard duties or allocation of quotas on the exported products between the exporting countries.

Each year there is typically a range of so-called “sunset” reviews affecting various countries of interest to ArcelorMittal. For example, the United States conducted sunset reviews of orders on hot-rolled steel from Brazil, Japan, and Russia and cut-to-length plate from India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan and Korea in 2011. All WTO members are required to review antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders and suspension agreements every five years to determine if they should be maintained, revised or revoked. This requires a review of whether the dumping or subsidization is likely to continue or recur if the order/suspension agreement is revoked and whether a domestic industry in the country is likely to suffer the continuation or recurrence of the injury within the reasonably foreseeable future if the orders are revoked. If the government finds both dumping or subsidization and the injury are likely to continue or recur, then the orders are continued. In case of safeguard measures for duration exceeding three years, all WTO members are required to review the imposed measures in the mid-term of the relevant measure. After a review, restrictions may be extended if they continue to be required, but the total period of relief provided may not exceed eight years.

In a number of markets in which ArcelorMittal has manufacturing operations, it may be a beneficiary of trade actions intended to address trade problems consistent with WTO regulations. In other situations, certain operations of ArcelorMittal may be a respondent in one or more trade cases and its products subject to duties or other trade restrictions.

In some developing countries in which ArcelorMittal is producing, state intervention impacts trade issues. For example, exports of steel mill products could require licenses from the local ministry of industry and trade or ArcelorMittal could be required to domicile, or submit for registration, export contracts with the local central bank.




Key Currency Regulations and Exchange Controls


The Algerian foreign currency market is regulated by the Central Bank of Algeria. Exchange control regulations do not permit capital account convertibility of the Algerian dinar (“DZD”) with a few exceptions involving Algerian companies investing in overseas projects. Currency outflows on current accounts, while are freely permitted for the import of goods, are subject to controls for payments for service contracts. Overseas dividend repatriation is permitted subject to a 20% withholding tax. Algerian companies are restricted from investing their cash surplus overseas. All overseas remittances have to be made through the Central Bank. Exporters are permitted to retain 50% of their proceeds in foreign currency accounts, 20% of which can be utilized freely and the rest of which can be used in accordance with certain restrictions. Hedging of currencies is tightly regulated and restricted. Overseas investment in and out of Algeria requires compliance with several fiscal regulations.

In September 2010, Algeria’s government unveiled a series of measures that confirm the shift towards greater economic regulation. The measures were included in a supplementary budget law, which states that any foreign firm bidding for a state contract must form a joint venture with an Algerian company.

Before any goods exceeding €1,500 (approximately $1,900) can be imported into the country, importers must obtain a letter of credit from a bank to cover the value of the goods. An exemption exists for industries that need to import materials and spare parts essential to their production, up to a value of DZD 2 million (€20,000). It also exempts imports of services.


The Argentine peso (“ARS”) has not been freely convertible since December 2001. It is mandatory to convert 100% of foreign exchange revenues from exports into local currency. Exporters have from 60 to 360 consecutive days to convert foreign exchange receipts from exports depending on the type of exported product, and 120 days to settle foreign exchange receipts through the foreign exchange market. This term is extended to 180 days if the purchaser fails to pay and if the foreign exchange receipts result from export credit insurance. Service export receipts have 15 days to be converted into ARS. An exporter must transfer any payment within ten days from collection to the bank that transfers the funds into Argentina, but the exporter may also maintain the funds abroad in foreign currency until the due date.

The Central Bank of Argentina allows foreign exchange transactions for the purposes of futures settlements, guarantees, forwards, options and other derivatives as long as they are traded on-shore and settle in ARS. The authorities intervene in the foreign exchange market in order to maintain a stable rate. The Central Bank buys and sells U.S. dollars at its discretion.

During 2010, the Central Bank of Argentina announced tighter regulations on the trade of foreign currencies. Under the new rules, individuals and businesses purchasing foreign currencies above $250,000 per calendar year are required to provide proof of income and corresponding tax data. Buyers will have to prove adequate declared assets to justify the currency purchase. Additionally, transactions carried out above the limit cannot be settled in cash and are restricted to wire transfers and checks. The same regulations will also apply to transactions above $20,000 in any given month. Legislation governing foreign exchange for the purpose of imports, dividends and overseas debt payments will remain unchanged.


In Brazil, all foreign exchange transactions are carried out on a single foreign exchange market. Foreign currencies may be purchased or sold only through Brazilian financial institutions authorized to operate in such market and are subject to registration with the Central Bank of Brazil’s electronic system. The Central Bank allows exchange rates between the Brazilian real (“BRL”) and foreign currencies (including the U.S. dollar) to float freely, although it has intervened occasionally to control volatility. Exchange controls on foreign capital and international reserves are administrated by the Central Bank. During periods of strong BRL appreciation, the Central Bank has implemented measures to discourage portfolio capital from entering the country. Foreign and local companies may borrow internationally subject to registration with an approval by the Central Bank. Local companies may maintain up to 100% of their export revenues abroad.


The Chinese yuan (“CNY”) is a managed float with reference to a basket of currencies and non-deliverable currency. The exchange rate of the Chinese yuan is determined by the interbank foreign exchange market, the China Foreign Exchange Trade System (“CFETS”). Five currency pairs are traded in CFETS: the CNY is paired with each of the following currencies: the U.S. dollar, the Hong Kong dollar, the Japanese Yen, the euro and the British Pound.

Since January 1, 2006, existing designated foreign exchange banks have been permitted to engage in a ‘bilateral trading platform’ which allows them to trade directly with other member banks in the CNY foreign exchange spot market, as opposed to just trading with CFETS, subject to a daily trading band limitation of no more than +/- 0.5% against the U.S. dollar. China maintains strict controls on its currency. Non-residents and Foreign Investment Enterprises must obtain a Foreign Exchange Registration Certificate to




open a foreign currency account onshore. There are three types of foreign currency accounts for non-residents: capital accounts (for investment and repatriation), current accounts (for trade) and loan accounts (for receiving and repaying loans). Residents may hold foreign currency in onshore accounts.


In India, the exchange rate of the Indian rupee (“INR”) is determined in the interbank foreign exchange market. The Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”) announces a daily reference rate for the rupee against the U.S. dollar, Japanese yen, British pound and euro. The RBI monitors the value of the rupee against a Real Effective Exchange Rate (“REER”). The REER consists of six currencies: U.S. dollar, euro, British pound, Japanese yen, Chinese yuan and Hong Kong dollar. The rupee rate has been known to deviate significantly from longer-term REER trends.

The RBI intervenes actively in the foreign exchange market in cases of excessive volatility. Exchange controls are established by both the government and the RBI. The Foreign Exchange Management Act of 2000 mandates that the government oversee current account transactions, while the RBI regulates capital accounts transactions. Restrictions on purchases and sales of INR have been significantly relaxed since the early 1990s. Since 1995, the Indian rupee has had full current account convertibility, though exchange controls on capital account transactions remain in effect.


There are no requirements for foreign investors to invest in Kazakhstan; however, investors are required to obtain a tax registration number in order to open a cash account. Payments in “routine currency operations” may be made by Kazakh residents to non-residents through authorized banks without any restriction so long as information about the purpose of the transaction is provided.

Routine currency operations include:

·         import/export settlements with payment within 180 days;

·         short-term loans with terms of less than 180 days;

·         dividends, interest and other income from deposits, investments, loans and other operations; and

·         non-commercial transactions such as wages and pensions in Kazakh tenge (“KZT”).

Direct investment abroad by residents and non-residents of Kazakhstan (provided they hold 10% or more of a Kazakh company’s voting shares) are subject to registration with the Central Bank of Kazakhstan. The registration regime only applies if the amount of a currency transaction exceeds $300,000 (in the case of currency being invested in Kazakhstan) and $50,000 (in the case of currency being transferred out of Kazakhstan). The exceptions to registration are currency operations with derivatives between residents and non-residents. The Central Bank of Kazakhstan is only required to be notified if the payment amount exceeds $100,000 or the equivalent in KZT.

Operations involving the transfer of capital from residents to non-residents require a license from the Central Bank of Kazakhstan, and transactions involving the transfer of capital from non-residents to residents must be registered with the National Bank of Kazakhstan. Licenses are issued on a case-by-case basis and are valid for a single transaction only. These transactions include:

·         payments for exclusive rights to intellectual property;

·         payments for rights to immovable property;

·         settlements for import/export transactions;

·         loans with terms of more than 180 days;

·         international transfers of pension assets; and

·         insurance and re-insurance contracts of an accumulative nature.

The Central Bank of Kazakhstan is also required to be notified of certain transactions, including, among others, acquisitions of share capital, securities and investment funds, financial derivatives, transfers of real estate and the opening of bank accounts by certain legal entities.




South Africa

The South African rand (“ZAR”) is subject to exchange controls enforced by the South African Reserve Bank (“SARB”). Prior approval is required for foreign funding, hedging policies and offshore investments. Imports and export payments are monitored by the Central Bank. Although the ZAR has not been fully convertible since 1941, the SARB has taken steps to gradually relax exchange controls. To ease the burden of compliance for small and medium-sized businesses, the application process for approval from the Financial Surveillance Department, before undertaking new foreign direct investment, has been removed for company transactions from below ZAR 50 million to below ZAR 500 million per Applicant Company per calendar year. Such applications need only be approved by Authorized Dealers. Furthermore, the 180-day rule requiring export companies to convert their foreign exchange proceeds into ZAR has been removed and South African companies are permitted to open foreign bank accounts without prior approval. Offshore bank accounts may, however, only be used for permissible transactions. Qualifying international companies are allowed to raise and transfer capital offshore without exchange control approval as from January 1, 2011.


Ukraine has significant restrictions on capital account flows, currencies and financial instruments that govern all aspects of transactions in the local currency, the hryvnia (“UAH”), and foreign currency, even if the authorities have taken some measures in recent years to improve the functioning of the foreign exchange market.

The main regulatory body of the government is the National Bank of Ukraine, which has wide regulatory powers in this field. Export of capital from Ukraine, offshore investments, and purchases of foreign currency by Ukrainian companies are heavily regulated and are subject to National Bank regulations. A transfer of foreign currency abroad requires an individual license from the National Bank, subject to certain exemptions. Such exemptions include:

·         payment in foreign currency abroad by a Ukrainian resident in the discharge of a contractual obligation in such foreign currency to a non-resident in settlement for goods, services, intellectual property rights, or other property rights acquired or received by the resident from the non-resident (however, an acquisition of securities or other “currency valuables” does not fall within this exemption);

·         payment of interest under a loan or income earned (such as, dividends) from a foreign investment in foreign currency abroad; and

·         repatriation abroad from Ukraine of the amount of a foreign investment in foreign currency previously made in Ukraine upon the termination of the relevant investment activity.

An individual National Bank license is also required for:

·         all payments in UAH abroad;

·         repatriation and transfer of funds in UAH into Ukraine, if in excess of the amounts in UAH which have been transferred abroad on legal grounds;

·         depositing funds in foreign currency and other “currency valuables” (such as securities) in an account outside Ukraine, except in the case of an account opening with a duly licensed Ukrainian commercial bank of a correspondent account with a foreign bank;

·         opening an account in Bank located abroad; and

·         investing abroad, including transferring foreign currency abroad in connection with acquisitions of assets and securities.

The National Bank of Ukraine issues both individual and general foreign exchange licenses to conduct foreign exchange transactions that are within the guidelines of the government’s exchange controls. General licenses are issued to financial institutions and commercial banks to conduct currency transactions. These licenses are for an indefinite period of time and allow banks and financial institutions to conduct a wide range of foreign exchange activities, including transfers and foreign exchange trading. Individual licenses are issued by the National Bank of Ukraine to residents and non-residents for the sole purpose of transacting and completing a stated and agreed-upon single transaction.

A foreign currency loan by a Ukrainian resident (including a Ukrainian bank) from a non-resident is subject to the registration of the loan with the National Bank. Ukrainian residents are required to settle import/export transactions within 180 days without restrictions. Ukrainian legal entities may acquire non-cash foreign currency in Ukraine only through a duly licensed Ukrainian commercial bank and only in a limited number of cases and subject to certain conditions.





The “Strong Bolivar” (Bs.F.) has been the official currency in Venezuela since January 2008. Although an exchange control system fixes its value vis-à-vis the U.S. dollar, an unofficial currency market has existed since February 2003 whereby the value of the U.S. dollar is quoted above the rate set by the official exchange control system. On June 4, 2010 the Exchange Agreement no. 18 was enacted, which established the parameters of the new regime for foreign currency transactions of securities, making the Central Bank of Venezuela the only authorized entity to buy and sell foreign currency.

On June 7, 2010, the Central Bank created the System of Transaction with Foreign Currency Instruments (SITME), which, among other things, publishes daily rates for trading securities, establishes the parameters for such transaction, fixes the price band in Bs.F., the amount traded and the exchange rate. Companies domiciled in Venezuela can acquire through SITME securities up to a daily maximum value of $50,000 and must not exceed $350,000 in a month.

In August 2010, the Central Bank decided to ease restrictions to allow companies to access the foreign exchange market. Since then, companies that are not authorized to buy U.S. dollars at official exchange rates are allowed to use SITME. The goal is to make foreign exchange transactions more “fluid”. The Bank also plans to periodically allocate U.S. dollars to companies facing purchase quotas.

On December 31, 2011, according to the SITME rate, one U.S. dollar was equal to 5.30 Bs.F., which has remained the same since the beginning of this system in June 2010, while the official exchange rate was one U.S. dollar to 4.3 Bs.F. The Bs.F. was devalued effective January 11, 2010, resulting in a rate of 4.3 Bs.F. per U.S. dollar for all imports and transactions.

The exchange control system permits transfers abroad from Venezuela by purchasing U.S. dollars at the official rate of Bs.F. 4.30 per U.S. dollar for dividends:

·         derived from a foreign investment (business activities);

·         that are registered with the Superintendence of Foreign Investments (SIEX); and

·         in respect of which the transferor has paid the relevant taxes and purchased the foreign currency from the Foreign Exchange Administration Commission (CADIVI), which is subject to availability.

Foreign investors who have registered their investment with the SIEX are entitled to repatriate the funds obtained from the sale of shares, reduction of capital or liquidation related to such investment at any time. For this purpose, the exchange control system admits the possibility of granting foreign currency at the official rate from CADIVI, so that dividends can be converted into foreign currency for repatriation.

In practice, however, obtaining the required amount of foreign currency (particularly U.S. dollars or euros) from CADIVI may take several months or even years. There are no legal restrictions regarding the percentage of benefits or dividends that can be reinvested in companies in Venezuela.

C.    Organizational Structure

Corporate Structure

ArcelorMittal is a holding company with no business operations of its own. All of ArcelorMittal’s significant operating subsidiaries are indirectly owned by ArcelorMittal through intermediate holding companies. The following chart represents the operational structure of the Company, including ArcelorMittal’s significant operating subsidiaries and not its legal or ownership structure.




The following table identifies each significant operating subsidiary of ArcelorMittal, including its registered office and ArcelorMittal’s percentage ownership thereof.




Flat Carbon Americas



ArcelorMittal Dofasco Inc.

1330 Burlington Street East, P.O. Box 2460, L8N 3J5Hamilton,
Ontario, Canada


ArcelorMittal Lázaro Cárdenas S.A. de C.V.

Fco. J. Mujica no. 1-B, 60950, Cd. Lázaro Cárdenas,Michoacán, Mexico


ArcelorMittal USA LLC

1, South Dearborn,Chicago, IL 60603, USA


ArcelorMittal Brasil S.A.

1115, avenida Carandai, 24° Andar, 30130-915 Belo Horizonte- MG, Brazil





Flat Carbon Europe



ArcelorMittal Atlantique et Lorraine S.A.S.

1 à 5, rue Luigi Cherubini, 93200 St Denis, France


ArcelorMittal Belgium N.V.

Boulevard de l’Impératrice 66, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium


ArcelorMittal España S.A.

Residencia La Granda, 33418 Gozon, Asturias, Spain


ArcelorMittal Flat Carbon Europe S.A.

Avenue de la Liberté, 19, L-2930 Luxembourg, Luxembourg


ArcelorMittal Galati S.A.

Strada Smardan nr. 1, Galati, Romania


ArcelorMittal Poland S.A.

Al. J. Pilsudskiego 92, 41-308 Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland


Industeel Belgium S.A.

Rue de Châtelet, 266, 6030 Charleroi, Belgium


Industeel France S.A.

1 à 5, rue Luigi Cherubini, 93200 St Denis, France


ArcelorMittal Eisenhüttenstadt GmbH

Werkstr. 1, D-15890 Eisenhüttenstadt, Brandenburg, Germany


ArcelorMittal Bremen GmbH

Carl-Benz Str. 30, D-28237Bremen, Germany


ArcelorMittal Méditerranée S.A.S.

1 à 5, rue Luigi Cherubini, 93200 St Denis, France





Long Carbon Americas and Europe



Acindar Industria Argentina de Aceros S.A.

Leandro N. Alem 790 8° floor, Buenos Aires, Argentina


ArcelorMittal Belval & Differdange S.A.

66, rue de Luxembourg, L-4221 Esch sur Alzette, Luxembourg


ArcelorMittal Brasil S.A.

1115, Avenida Carandai, 24° Andar, 30130-915 Belo Horizonte- MG, Brazil


ArcelorMittal Hamburg GmbH

Dradenaustrasse 33, D-21129Hamburg, Germany


ArcelorMittal Las Truchas, S.A. de C.V.

Francisco J Mujica 1, 60950, Lázaro Cárdenas Michoacán, Mexico


ArcelorMittal Montreal Inc

4000, route des Aciéries, Contrecoeur, Québec J0L 1C0, Canada


ArcelorMittal Gipúzkoa S.L.

Carretera Nacional Madrid—Irun S/N, 20212 Olaberría, Spain


ArcelorMittal Ostrava a.s.

Vratimovska 689, 707 02 Ostrava-Kunčice, Czech Republic


ArcelorMittal Point Lisas Ltd.

ISCOTT Complex, Mediterranean Drive, Point Lisas,Couva, Trinidad and Tobago


Société Nationale de Sidérurgie S.A.

Route Nationale no. 2, Km 18, BP 551, Al Aarroui, Morocco


ArcelorMittal Duisburg GmbH

Vohwinkelstraße 107, D-47137 Duisburg, Germany


ArcelorMittal Warszawa S.p.z.o.o.

Ul. Kasprowicza 132, 01-949Warszawa, Poland








ArcelorMittal South Africa Ltd.

Main Building, Room N3/5, Delfos Boulevard, Vanderbijlpark, 1911,
South Africa


JSC ArcelorMittal Temirtau

Republic Ave., 1, 101407 Temirtau, Karaganda Region,Republic of Kazakhstan


OJSC ArcelorMittal Kryviy Rih

1 Ordzhonikidze Street, Kryviy Rih, 50095 Dnepropetrovsk Oblast, Ukraine








ArcelorMittal Mines Canada Inc.

1801 McGill College, Suite 1400, Montreal, Québec, Canada H3A2N4





Distribution Solutions



ArcelorMittal International Luxembourg S.A.

19, avenue de la Liberté, L-2930 Luxembourg, Luxembourg






(1)…Société Nationale de Sidérurgie, S.A. is controlled by Nouvelles Sidérurgies Industrielles, a joint venture controlled by ArcelorMittal.

Reportable Segments

ArcelorMittal reports its business in the following six reportable segments corresponding to continuing activities:

·         Flat Carbon Americas;

·         Flat Carbon Europe;

·         Long Carbon Americas and Europe;

·         Asia, Africa and CIS;

·         Distribution Solutions; and

·         Mining. 

Within its corporate headquarters and, where appropriate, at the segment or regional management level there are specialized and experienced executives in fields such as finance, mergers and acquisitions, marketing, procurement, operations, shipping, human resources, communications, internal assurance, health and safety, information technology, strategic planning, performance enhancement, technology and law.

Flat Carbon Americas produces slabs, hot-rolled coil, cold-rolled coil, coated steel products and plate. These products are sold primarily to customers in the following industries: distribution and processing; automotive; pipes and tubes; construction; packaging; and appliances. In Flat Carbon Americas, production facilities are located at eight integrated and mini-mill sites located in four countries. In 2011, shipments from Flat Carbon Americas totaled 22 million tonnes.

Flat Carbon Europe produces hot-rolled coil, cold-rolled coil, coated products, tinplate, plate and slab. These products are sold primarily to customers in the automotive, general industry and packaging industries. In Flat Carbon Europe, production facilities are located at 15 integrated and mini-mill sites located in six countries. In 2011, shipments from Flat Carbon Europe totaled 27 million tonnes.

Long Carbon Americas and Europe produces sections, wire rod, rebars, billets, blooms, wire drawing, pipes and tubes, sheet piles, rails, ingots, speciality bars and slopes. In Long Carbon Americas, production facilities are located at 14 integrated and mini-mill sites located in six countries, while in Long Carbon Europe production facilities are located at 17 integrated and mini-mill sites in nine countries. In 2011, shipments from Long Carbon Americas and Europe totaled approximately 24 million tonnes.

AACIS produces a combination of flat and long products. It has six flat and long production facilities in three countries. In 2011, shipments from Asia, Africa and CIS totaled approximately 13 million tonnes, with shipments having been made worldwide.

Distribution Solutions is primarily an in-house trading and distribution arm of ArcelorMittal. It also provides value-added and customized steel solutions through further steel processing to meet specific customer requirements.

Mining provides the Company’s steel operations with high quality and low-cost iron ore and coal resources and also sells limited amounts of mineral products to third parties. The Company’s mines are located in North and South America, Europe, the CIS and Africa. In 2011, iron ore and coal production totaled approximately 65.2 million tonnes and 8.9 million tonnes, respectively.

In January 2011, ArcelorMittal completed the spin-off of its stainless steel operations to a separately-focused company, Aperam. Accordingly, the former Stainless Steel segment has been reclassified as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

D.    Property, Plant and Equipment

ArcelorMittal has steel production facilities, as well as iron ore and coal mining operations, in North and South America, Europe, Asia and Africa.




All of its operating subsidiaries are substantially owned by ArcelorMittal through intermediate holding companies, and are grouped into the six reportable segments (excluding Stainless Steel, which is now reported as discontinued operations) described above in “Item 4C—Organizational Structure”. Unless otherwise stated, ArcelorMittal owns all of the assets described in this section.

For further information on environmental issues that may affect ArcelorMittal’s utilization of its assets, see “Item 4B—Business Overview—Government Regulations—Environmental Laws and Regulations” and “Item 8A—Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings”.

Steel Production Facilities of ArcelorMittal

The following table provides an overview by type of steel facility of the principal production units of ArcelorMittal’s continuing operations:


Number of

(in million tonnes
per year)(1)

Production in 2011
(in million tonnes)(2)

Coke Plant




Sinter Plant




Blast Furnace




Basic Oxygen Furnace (including Tandem  Furnace)




DRI Plant




Electric Arc Furnace




Continuous Caster—Slabs




Hot Rolling Mill




Pickling Line




Tandem Mill




Annealing Line (continuous / batch)




Skin Pass Mill




Plate Mill




Continuous Caster—Bloom / Billet




Breakdown Mill (Blooming / Slabbing Mill)




Billet Rolling Mill




Section Mill




Bar Mill




Wire Rod Mill




Hot Dip Galvanizing Line




Electro Galvanizing Line




Tinplate Mill




Tin Free Steel (TFS)




Color Coating Line




Seamless Pipes




Welded Pipes





(1)    Reflects design capacity and does not take into account other constraints in the production process (such as upstream and downstream bottlenecks and product mix changes). As a result, in some cases, design capacity may be different from the current achievable capacity.

(2)    Production facility details include the production numbers for each step in the steel-making process. Output from one step in the process is used as input in the next step in the process. Therefore, the sum of the production numbers does not equal the quantity of sellable finished steel products.

Flat Carbon Americas

ArcelorMittal’s Flat Carbon Americas segment has production facilities in both North and South America, including the United States, Canada, Brazil and Mexico. The following two tables set forth key items of information regarding ArcelorMittal’s principal production locations and production units in the Flat Carbon Americas segment:

Production Locations—Flat Carbon Americas




Type of Plant




Warren, OH





Monessen, PA



Indiana Harbor (East and West)


East Chicago, IN



Burns Harbor


Burns Harbor, IN





Cleveland, OH





Riverdale, IL





Coatesville, PA





Gallatin, KY



Columbus Coatings


Columbus, OH



I/N Tek and I/N Kote


New Carlisle, IN





Conshohocken, PA





Weirton, WV



Gary Plate


Gary, IN



Double G


Jackson, MS








ArcelorMittal Tubarão





ArcelorMittal Vega


São Francisco do Sul



ArcelorMittal Dofasco



Integrated, Mini-mill


ArcelorMittal Lázaro Cárdenas


Lázaro Cárdenas







Production Facilities—Flat Carbon Americas


Number of

(in million tonnes
per year)(1)

Production in 2011
(in million tonnes)(2)

Coke Plant




Sinter Plant




Blast Furnace




Basic Oxygen Furnace




DRI Plant




Electric Arc Furnace




Continuous Caster—Slabs




Hot Rolling Mill




Pickling Line




Tandem Mill




Annealing Line (continuous / batch)




Skin Pass Mill




Hot Dip Galvanizing Line




Electro Galvanizing Line




Tinplate Mill




Tin Free Steel (TFS)




Plate Mill





(1)    Reflects design capacity and does not take into account other constraints in the production process (such as, upstream and downstream bottlenecks and product mix changes). As a result, in some cases, design capacity may be different from the current achievable capacity.

(2)    Production facility details include the production numbers for each step in the steel-making process. Output from one step in the process is used as input in the next step in the process. Therefore, the sum of the production numbers does not equal the quantity of sellable finished steel products.

ArcelorMittal USA

Steel Production Facilities

ArcelorMittal USA has 17 major production facilities, consisting of four integrated steel-making plants, one basic oxygen furnace/compact strip mill, six electric arc furnace plants (one of which produces flat products and five of which produce long products), four finishing plants, and two coke-making operations, one of which has been temporarily idled. ArcelorMittal USA owns all or substantially all of each plant. ArcelorMittal USA also owns interests in various joint ventures that support these facilities, as well as railroad and transportation assets.

ArcelorMittal USA’s operations include both flat carbon and long carbon production facilities. The long carbon facilities are discussed separately under “—Long Carbon Americas and Europe—ArcelorMittal USA”.

ArcelorMittal USA’s main flat carbon operations include integrated steel-making plants at Indiana Harbor (East and West), Burns Harbor and Cleveland. The basic oxygen furnace/compact strip mill is located at Riverdale. The electric arc furnace plant is located in Coatesville. The four finishing plants are located in Gary, Weirton, Conshohocken, and Columbus. The two stand alone coke plants are located in Warren and Monessen. The Monessen coke plant has been temporarily idled.

Indiana Harbor (East and West) is a fully integrated steelmaker, strategically located on the southern shore of Lake Michigan in East Chicago, Ind., 20 miles southeast of Chicago, Illinois. The plant sits on both sides of the Indiana Harbor Canal, which provides shipping by large ships over the Great Lakes as well as highway and railroad transportation access. The two Indiana Harbor facilities produce hot-rolled sheet, cold-rolled sheet, hot dip galvanized sheet and bar products for use in automotive, appliance, service center, tubular, strip converters and contractor applications. Indiana Harbor West’s operations include a sintering plant, two blast furnaces, two basic oxygen furnaces and two continuous slab casters. Finishing facilities include a hot strip mill, pickle line, tandem mill, batch




annealing facilities, a temper mill, a hot dip galvanizing line and an aluminizing line. Indiana Harbor East facilities include three blast furnaces, four basic oxygen furnaces and three slab casters. Finishing facilities include a hot strip mill, a pickle line, a tandem mill, continuous and batch annealing facilities, two temper mills and a hot dip galvanizing line. The Indiana Harbor West plant covers an area of approximately 4.9 square kilometers and the Indiana Harbor East plant covers an area of approximately 7.7 square kilometers. Indiana Harbor (East and West) produced 5.2 million tonnes of crude steel in 2011.

Burns Harbor is a fully integrated steel-making facility strategically located on Lake Michigan in northwestern Indiana approximately 50 miles southeast of Chicago, Illinois. The area allows for good shipping access to the Port of Indiana-Burns Harbor, as well as highway and railroad access. Burns Harbor produces hot-rolled sheet, cold-rolled sheet, hot dip galvanized sheet and steel plate for use in automotive, appliance, service center, construction and shipbuilding applications. Burns Harbor facilities include a coke plant, a sinter plant, two blast furnaces, three basic oxygen furnaces and two continuous slab casters. Finishing facilities include a hot strip mill, two picklers, a tandem mill, continuous and batch annealing facilities, a temper mill and a hot dip galvanizing line and a plate mill facility. The Burns Harbor plant covers an area of approximately 15.3 square kilometers. Burns Harbor produced 4.4 million tonnes of crude steel in 2011.

Cleveland is located on the Cuyahoga River in Cleveland, Ohio with good access to Port of Cleveland and Great Lakes shipping, as well as good highway and railroad transportation routes. The facilities in Cleveland include two blast furnaces, four basic oxygen furnaces, two slab casters, ladle metallurgy and vacuum degassing facilities, a hot-strip mill, cold rolling mill, temper mill, a batch annealing shop and a hot dip galvanizing line. Cleveland plant serves the automotive, service centers, converters, plate slabs and tubular applications markets. Cleveland produced 2.2 million tonnes of crude steel in 2011.

Riverdale is located near the Indiana border in Riverdale, Illinois, south of Chicago. Its location has shipping access to Lake Michigan and is surrounded by good highway systems and railroad networks. The Riverdale facility produces hot-rolled strip for strip converter and service center applications, and obtains supplies of hot metal for its basic oxygen furnaces from the Burns Harbor or Indiana Harbor locations. Riverdale’s principal facilities consist of basic oxygen furnaces, ladle metallurgy facilities and a continuous slab caster that uses a compact strip process. Riverdale produced 0.6 million tonnes of crude steel in 2011.

The Weirton facility is a significant producer of tin mill products. Columbus produces hot dip galvanized sheet for the automotive market.

Coatesville’s facilities consist of an electric arc furnace, a vacuum degasser, slab caster, and one plate mill capable of producing a wide range of carbon and discreet plate products for use in infrastructure, chemical process, and shipbuilding applications. Conshohocken and Gary’s principal facilities are plate mills and associated heat treat facilities. These locations use slabs principally from Coatesville and Burns Harbor, respectively. Coatesville produced 0.6 million tonnes of crude steel in 2011.

ArcelorMittal USA, through various subsidiaries, owns interests in joint ventures, including (1) ArcelorMittal Tek, (60% interest), a cold-rolling mill on 200 acres of land (which it wholly owns) near New Carlisle, Indiana with a 1.7 million tonne annual production capacity; (2) ArcelorMittal Kote (50% interest), a steel galvanizing facility on 25 acres of land located adjacent to the ArcelorMittal Tek site, which it wholly owns and which has a one million tonne annual production capacity; (3) Double G Coatings (50% interest), a coating line producing galvanized and Galvalume near Jackson, Mississippi with a 270,000 tonne annual production capability, (4) PCI Associates, (50% interest) a pulverized coal injection facility located within Indiana Harbor West; and (5) Hibbing Taconite Company, which is described under “Mining” below. ArcelorMittal USA also owns several short-line railroads that transport materials among its facilities, as well as raw material assets (including iron ore). It also has research and development facilities in East Chicago, Indiana. Moreover, on December 30, 2010, ArcelorMittal Dofasco transferred ownership of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Dofasco Holdings International (DHI), which held investments in Dofasco USA, ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Corp., ArcelorMittal Tailored Blanks Americas Corporation and a 50% investment in Gallatin Steel, to ArcelorMittal USA Holdings.  This transfer was completed to consolidate ArcelorMittal USA’s holdings under direct U.S. ownership.

ArcelorMittal USA has two stand alone coke plants, in addition to Burns Harbor’s coke plant, that supply coke to its production facilities. The coke battery in Warren is able to supply about 40% of the Cleveland facilities’ capacity coke needs. Warren is located in Warren, in northeastern Ohio, and has good rail, river and highway transportation access plus access to coal fields in the Appalachian region as well as to steel mills from Pennsylvania to Indiana. ArcelorMittal Monessen Coke Plant in Monessen, Pennsylvania has an annual production capacity of 320,000 metric tonnes of metallurgical coke, which has been temporarily idled.

ArcelorMittal Tubarão

ArcelorMittal Tubarão (“AMT”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ArcelorMittal Brasil, has two major production facilities: the Tubarão integrated steel making facility, located in Espírito Santo state, Brazil and the Vega finishing complex, located at São Francisco do Sul, in Santa Catarina state, Brazil. The Tubarão integrated steel mill produces merchant slabs, and hot-rolled coils while ArcelorMittal Vega produces cold-rolled coil and galvanized steel, to be used primarily by the automotive industry and, to a lesser degree, for household appliances, construction, pipe and coil formed shapes industries.




The Tubarão complex is strategically located and has infrastructure that includes a well-equipped road and railway system, as well as a port complex and the Praia Mole Marine Terminal. The Vega facility uses the port of São Francisco do Sul to receive hot-rolled coil, its main raw material, from Tubarão. AMT’s plant covers an area of approximately 13.7 square kilometers.

AMT’s steel-making complex is composed of a coke plant consisting of three batteries, the Sol coke plant, consisting of four batteries (heat recovery process), a sinter plant, three blast furnaces, a steel-making shop consisting of three basic oxygen furnace converters, three continuous slab casters and a hot strip mill. The Vega finishing complex consists of a modern, state-of-the-art cold mill and two hot dip galvanizing lines. AMT produced 5.4 million tonnes of crude steel in 2011.

ArcelorMittal Lázaro Cárdenas

ArcelorMittal Lázaro Cárdenas (“AMLC”) is the largest steel producer in Mexico. AMLC operates a pelletizer plant, two direct reduced iron plants, electric arc furnace-based steel-making plants and continuous casting facilities. AMLC has advanced secondary metallurgical capabilities, including ladle furnaces refining, vacuum degassing and Ruhrstahl-Heraeus (RH) processes with calcium and aluminum injections, permitting the production of higher quality slabs that are used in specialized steel applications in the automotive, line pipe manufacturing, shipbuilding and appliance industries. AMLC utilizes direct reduced iron as its primary metallic input for virtually all of its production.

AMLC’s production facilities are located on approximately 4.4 square kilometers adjacent to a major deep-water port in Lázaro Cárdenas in Michoacán State, México, through which most of its slabs are shipped for export and its raw materials are received.

AMLC’s principal product is slab for the merchant market. AMLC’s product line mainly caters to the high-end applications of its customers, including heat-treatment grades for plate manufacturing, oil country tubular goods and high chromium grade for oil exploration applications and for the gas transportation industry. AMLC has the capability to produce a wide range of steel grades from ultra low carbon-IF to microalloyed, medium and high carbon. In 2011, AMLC produced 2.4 million tonnes of crude steel.

ArcelorMittal Dofasco

ArcelorMittal Dofasco Inc. (Dofasco) is a leading North American steel solution provider and Canada’s largest manufacturer of flat rolled steels. Its products include hot-rolled, cold rolled, galvanized and tinplate as well as tubular products and laser-welded blanks. Dofasco supplies these products to the automotive, construction, packaging, manufacturing, pipe and tube and steel distribution markets. Dofasco’s Hamilton plant covers an area of approximately 3.1 square kilometers.

Steel-making facilities are located at Dofasco’s Hamilton, Ontario plant. Products produced by Dofasco and its joint ventures and subsidiaries include: hot- and cold- rolled steels; galvanized, ExtragalTM and GalvalumeTM steel; prepainted steel; tinplate and chromium-coated steels in coils, cut lengths and strips; welded pipe and tubular steels; laser welded steel blanks.

Dofasco’s steel-making plant in Hamilton, Ontario is adjacent to water, rail and highway transportation. The plant has two raw material handling bridges, ore and coal docks, storage yards and handling equipment, three coke plants comprising six batteries, three blast furnaces, one basic oxygen steel-making plant, one twin shell electric arc furnace, two ladle metallurgy stations associated with steel-making, one two–strand slab caster and a single-strand slab caster, a hot strip rolling mill, slitting facilities for hot-rolled steel, two cold rolling mill complexes each consisting of a coupled pickling line and tandem cold rolling mill, one continuous stand-alone pickle line, coiling, slitting, rewind and inspection equipment related to the cold mills, three temper mills, one continuous annealing line, 84 conventional and 40 high hydrogen bases for batch annealing, 16 bases for open coil annealing, five continuous galvanizing lines, one of which is capable of producing Galvalume™ steel and another of which is capable of producing Extragal™ steel, one continuous electrolytic tinning and chromium coating line and a tinplate packaging line and two tube mills. Dofasco produced 3.5 million tonnes of crude steel in 2011.

Flat Carbon Europe

ArcelorMittal’s Flat Carbon Europe segment has production facilities in Western and Eastern Europe, including Germany, Belgium, France, Spain, Italy, Luxembourg, Romania, Poland, Macedonia, Estonia and the Czech Republic. The following two tables provide an overview by type of facility of ArcelorMittal’s principal production locations and production units in the Flat Carbon Europe segment:

Production Locations—Flat Carbon Europe




Type of Plant


ArcelorMittal Bremen





ArcelorMittal Eisenhüttenstadt





ArcelorMittal Belgium


Ghent, Geel, Genk, Huy,


Integrated and Downstream


ArcelorMittal Liège Upstream





ArcelorMittal Atlantique et



Dunkirk, Mardyck,

Montataire, Desvres,

Florange, Mouzon, Basse-


Integrated and Downstream


ArcelorMittal Méditerranée


Fos-sur-Mer, Saint-Chély



ArcelorMittal Galati




Flat, Long,
Pipes and

ArcelorMittal España


Avilés, Gijón, Etxebarri



ArcelorMittal Poland


Krakow, Swietochlowice,

Dabrowa Gornicza,

Chorzów, Sosnowiec,




ArcelorMittal Sestao





ArcelorMittal Sagunto





ArcelorMittal Piombino


Avellino, Piombino



ArcelorMittal Dudelange


Dudelange, Giebel



ArcelorMittal Frydek – Mistek

Czech Rep




ArcelorMittal Skopje





ArcelorMittal Tallinn







Charleroi, Le Creusot,

Chateauneuf, Saint-

Chamond, Seraing

Mini-mill and Downstream






Production Facilities—Flat Carbon Europe


Number of

(in million tonnes
per year)(1)

Production in 2011
(in million tonnes)(2)

Coke Plant




Sinter Plant




Blast Furnace




Basic Oxygen Furnace




Electric Arc Furnace




Continuous Caster – Slabs




Hot Rolling Mill




Pickling Line




Tandem Mill




Annealing Line (continous/batch)




Skin Pass Mill




Plate Mill




Continuous Bloom / Billet Caster




Hot Dip Galvanizing Line




Electro Galvanizing Line




Tinplate Mill




Color Coating Line





(1)    Reflects design capacity and does not take into account other constraints in the production process (such as upstream and downstream bottlenecks and product mix changes). As a result, in some cases, design capacity may be different from the current achievable capacity.

(2)    Production facility details include the production numbers for each step in the steel-making process. Output from one step in the process is used as input in the next step in the process. Therefore, the sum of the production numbers does not equal the quantity of sellable finished steel products.

ArcelorMittal Bremen

ArcelorMittal Bremen is situated on the bank of the River Weser north of Bremen, Germany, and covers an area of approximately seven square kilometers. ArcelorMittal Bremen is a fully integrated and highly automated plant, with 3.6 million tonnes of crude steel annual production capacity. ArcelorMittal Bremen produced 3.0 million tonnes of crude steel in 2011.

ArcelorMittal Bremen has primary and finishing facilities and contains one sinter plant, two blast furnaces, one steel shop with two basic oxygen converters, one vacuum degassing line, one continuous slab caster and one hot strip mill for the primary facility. As a result of the acquisition of the Prosper coke plant from RAG AG, a German coal producer, on June 1, 2011, ArcelorMittal Bremen now also has a coke making facility of 2.0 million tonnes located in Bottrop. The finishing plant has one pickling line, a four-stand tandem mill, a batch annealing and temper mill, and three hot dip galvanizing lines. ArcelorMittal Bremen produces and sells a wide




range of products, including slab, hot-rolled, pickled, cold-rolled and hot dip galvanized rolls to the automotive and primary transformation sectors.

ArcelorMittal Atlantique et Lorraine

ArcelorMittal Atlantique

ArcelorMittal Atlantique is part of ArcelorMittal Atlantique et Lorraine, which is wholly-owned by ArcelorMittal France. It has four plants in the north of France, located in Dunkirk, Mardyck, Montataire and Desvres. The Dunkirk, Mardyck, Desvres and Montataire plants cover an area of approximately 4.6 square kilometers, 2.6 square kilometers, 0.1 square kilometers and 0.7 square kilometers, respectively. ArcelorMittal Atlantique has an annual production capacity of 6.5 million tonnes of crude steel. In 2011, ArcelorMittal Atlantique produced 5.8 million tonnes of crude steel. The Dunkirk plant has a coke plant, two sinter plants, three blast furnaces, a steel plant with three basic oxygen furnace  converters, one ladle treatment, two RH vacuum degassers, four continuous casters for slabs and one hot strip mill. The remaining three plants serve as finishing facilities. Mardyck has a high-capacity coupled pickling-rolling line, a push-pull pickling line, and two hot dip galvanizing lines, while Montataire has three hot dip galvanizing lines, one organic coating line and one laminated composite line. Desvres has one hot dip galvanizing line.

ArcelorMittal Atlantique produces and markets a large range of products, including slabs, hot-rolled, pickled, galvanized, color-coated coils and composite products. ArcelorMittal Atlantique’s products are sold principally in the regional market in France and Western Europe, particularly in the automotive market.

ArcelorMittal Lorraine

The sites of Florange and Mouzon comprise the Lorraine facilities of ArcelorMittal Atlantique et Lorraine. Florange is the only fully integrated steel plant in France. Mouzon specializes in finishing hot dip coating operations and is fully integrated in the “Lorraine Cluster” of flat carbon steel plants.

The Florange site has a total annual production capacity of 2.6 million tonnes of hot-rolled coils, which supply the finishing cold facilities and the coating lines of Mouzon and Dudelange, as well as the tinplate cold facilities for packaging facilities in Florange and Basse-Indre.

The Florange site has primary and finishing facilities that are located mainly along the Fensch River in Lorraine. It covers an area of approximately 6.2 square kilometers and contains a coke plant, two sinter plants, two blast furnaces (temporarily idled due to weak market demand), a steel-making division with two bottom blowing oxygen converters, a ladle furnace and tank degasser facilities, one continuous slab caster and a hot strip mill for the primary portion. Florange produced 1 million tonnes of crude steel in 2011. The finishing plant of Florange has a high-capacity coupled pickling-rolling line, a continuous annealing line, a batch annealing and temper mill, as well as three coating lines dedicated to the automotive market—a hot dip galvanizing line, an electro galvanizing line and an organic coating line. The Mouzon site covers an area of approximately 0.9 square kilometers and has two hot dip galvanizing lines for the production of zinc-aluminum silicium coated products.

The sites of Florange and Mouzon produce and deliver a range of flat steel high-value finished products to customers, including cold-rolled, hot dip galvanized, electro-galvanized, aluminized and organic-coated material, tin plate, draw wall ironed tin plate (DWI). Certain of its products are designed for the automotive market, such as Extragal, Galfan, Usibor (hot dip), Bonazinc (organic-coated), while others are designed for the appliances market, such as Solfer (cold-rolled) for enameling applications or High Gloss (organic-coated). Over 93% of the sites’ total production supplies the French and European Union markets.

ArcelorMittal Eisenhüttenstadt GmbH

ArcelorMittal Eisenhüttenstadt is situated on the Oder River near the German-Polish border, 110 kilometers southeast of Berlin, and covers an area of approximately 8.8 square kilometers. ArcelorMittal Eisenhüttenstadt is a fully integrated and highly-automated plant with two blast furnaces, one sinter plant, two oxygen converters, two continuous casters (slab and bloom), a hot strip mill with a coil box and a cold rolling mill with capacities for the production of cold-rolled coils, hot dip galvanizing and organic coating products and facilities for cutting and slitting. A small blast furnace with approximately 0.54 million tonnes of capacity was temporarily idled in November 2011 due to weak market demand.

In 2011, ArcelorMittal Eisenhüttenstadt produced 1.8 million tonnes of crude steel. Its maximum production capacity is 2.4 million tonnes. ArcelorMittal Eisenhüttenstadt produces and sells a wide range of products, including hot-rolled, cold-rolled, electrical and hot dip galvanized and organic-coated rolls to automotive, distribution, metal processing, construction and appliances industry customers in Germany, Central and Eastern Europe.

ArcelorMittal España

ArcelorMittal España consists of two facilities, Avilés and Gijón, which are interconnected by ArcelorMittal España’s own railway system and cover an area of approximately 15.1 square kilometers. The two facilities operate as a single integrated steel plant




comprising coking facilities, sinter plants, blast furnaces, steel plants, hot-rolling mills and cold roll plants. The product range of ArcelorMittal España includes rail, wire rod, heavy plates and hot-rolled coil, as well as more highly processed products such as galvanized sheet, tinplate and organic-coated sheet. In 2011, ArcelorMittal España produced 3.9 million tonnes of crude steel.

The facilities are also connected by rail to the two main ports in the region, Avilés and Gijón. Raw materials are received at the port of Gijón, where they are unloaded at ArcelorMittal España’s own dry-bulk terminal, which is linked to the steel-making facilities by conveyor belt. A variety of products are shipped through the Avilés port facilities, both to other units of the ArcelorMittal group and to ArcelorMittal España’s customers.

ArcelorMittal España is connected to the other ArcelorMittal facilities in Spain by the wide-gauge and narrow-gauge rail networks. Shuttle trains link the ArcelorMittal España facilities direct to the ArcelorMittal Sagunto and ArcelorMittal Etxebarri plants, which it supplies with hot-rolled coils for subsequent processing into cold-rolled, galvanized and electrogalvanized sheet and tinplate.

ArcelorMittal España operates two coking plants, two sinter plants, two blast furnaces and two steel plants—one in Avilés for flats products, with two continuous casters slab, and another one in Gijón for long products, with two casters for blooms and billets, a hot strip mill, a heavy plate mill, a wire rod mill and a rail mill. The cold-rolled plants include two pickling lines, two five-stands cold tandem mills, annealing facilities for tinplate, tinning lines, two galvanizing lines and one organic coating line. ArcelorMittal España includes coating facilities in Lesaka and Legasa and also packaging facilities in Avilés and Etxebarri.

ArcelorMittal Méditerranée

ArcelorMittal Méditerranée operates a flat carbon steel plant in Fos-sur-Mer. It also operates a finishing facility for electrical steel located in Saint-Chély, 300 kilometers northwest of Fos-sur-Mer. The Fos-sur-Mer plant is located 50 kilometers west of Marseille on the Mediterranean Sea and covers an area of approximately 15 square kilometers. ArcelorMittal Méditerranée’s principal equipment consists of one coke oven plant, one sinter plant, two blast furnaces, two basic oxygen furnaces, two continuous slab casters, one hot strip mill, one pickling line, one cold rolling mill and two continuous annealing lines located at Saint-Chély. A deep water private wharf, situated at one end of the plant, is equipped with two unloader cranes to unload raw materials (iron ore, pellets and coal) and send them to the stock yard. ArcelorMittal Méditerranée produced 2.7 million tonnes of crude steel in 2011.

ArcelorMittal Méditerranée’s products include coils to be made into wheels, pipes for energy transport and coils for finishing facilities for exposed and non-exposed parts of car bodies, as well as the construction, home appliance, packaging, pipe and tube, engine and office material industries. The Saint-Chély plant produces electrical steel (with up to 3.2 % silicon content), mainly for electrical motors. About 60% of its products are shipped from a private wharf, in part through a shuttle system. 30% of its products are shipped by rail, with the remaining amount transported by truck.

ArcelorMittal Belgium

ArcelorMittal Gent, Geel, Genk and Liège are part of ArcelorMittal Belgium. ArcelorMittal Gent is a fully integrated coastal steelworks which is located along the Ghent-Terneuzen canal, approximately 17 kilometers from the Terneuzen sea lock, which links the works directly with the North Sea. The canal is of the Panamax type and can accommodate ships of up to 65,000 tonnes. The ArcelorMittal Gent plant covers an area of approximately 8.2 square kilometers. ArcelorMittal Gent has an annual production capacity of 4.9 million tonnes of crude steel. In 2011, ArcelorMittal Gent produced 4.4 million tonnes of crude steel. ArcelorMittal Geel and ArcelorMittal Genk plants contain an organic coating line and an electrolytic galvanizing line, respectively. The Genk facility covers an area of 0.2 square kilometers.

ArcelorMittal Gent, Geel and Genk’s principal equipment consists of one coke oven plant, two sinter plants, two blast furnaces, two basic oxygen converters, two RH vacuum degassers, two continuous slab casters, one hot strip mill, one high capacity couples pickling and rolling mill line, two coupled pickling and rolling mills, one pickling line for pickled and oiled products, batch annealing furnaces, one continuous annealing line, two temper rolling mills, three inspection lines, three hot dip galvanizing lines, one electrozinc coating line and two organic coating lines.

ArcelorMittal Gent produces flat steel products with high-added value. A significant part of the production is coated, either by hot dip galvanizing, electrolytic galvanizing or organic coating. ArcelorMittal Gent’s products are mainly used in the automotive industry and in household appliances, tubes, containers, radiators and construction. The products are sold through the Flat Carbon Western Europe units.

ArcelorMittal Liège Upstream

The primary facilities of ArcelorMittal Liège Upstream are located in two main plants along the Meuse River: the Seraing-Ougrée plant, which includes a coke plant, a sinter plant and two blast furnaces and the Chertal plant, which includes a steel shop with three converters, a ladle metallurgy with RH vacuum treatment, two continuous caster machines (a double strand and a single strand) and a hot strip mill.




Most raw materials used by ArcelorMittal Liège Upstream are shipped from Rotterdam and Antwerp through dedicated port facilities situated along the Meuse River next to the Liège installations. Pig iron is transported from Ougrée to Chertal by torpedo ladles. The coke and blast furnace gases are sent to a power plant that produces steam and electricity.

ArcelorMittal Liège Upstream produced 0.9 million tonnes of crude steel in 2011. On October 14, 2011, the Company announced its intention to close the primary ArcelorMittal Liège Upstream facilities, which had been idled since August 2011.

ArcelorMittal Liège Downstream

The finishing facilities of ArcelorMittal Liège located south of Liège consist of a coupled pickling rolling mill line and a pickling line and a five-stand tandem mill (located in Tilleur), batch annealing furnaces and one continuous annealing line (located in Jemeppe), four hot dip galvanizing lines and two organic coating lines (located in the Flemalle/Ramet area) as well as three electrogalvanizing lines (located in Marchin).

ArcelorMittal Liège produces a large range of high-quality steel grades—ultra-low carbon steels to deep-drawing aluminum-killed steels and tinplate low carbon specifications, including a range of construction steels and micro-alloyed grades. A portion of its production is sent to the Liège finishing facilities. The Liège finishing facilities mainly produce higher added-value products, such as products for automotive use (exposed and non-exposed parts), including high-strength steel for household electrical devices, general industry and construction applications, as well as packaging.

ArcelorMittal Liège Downstream relies on the finishing facilities of ArcelorMittal Belgium (Liège facility) and has an annual production capacity of 2.7 million tonnes of slabs.

ArcelorMittal Piombino

ArcelorMittal Piombino’s production facilities and headquarters are located in Piombino, Italy. It also has a production division in San Mango sul Calore in Avellino, Italy. ArcelorMittal Piombino manufactures galvanized and organic-coated steel products. It operates one pickling line, a full continuous four-stand tandem mill, three hot dip galvanizing lines (of which two are operational) and three organic coating lines, one of which is located in Avellino. ArcelorMittal Piombino’s products are sold to European customers, primarily in the distribution, appliance and construction industries.

ArcelorMittal Dudelange

The Dudelange site is located in Luxembourg, 25 kilometers north of Florange, and contains a cold-rolled products plant. Dudelange operates two hot dip-coating lines, producing Alussi and Aluzinc, and two electro galvanizing lines for appliances and industries.

ArcelorMittal Sagunto

ArcelorMittal Sagunto is a flat steel finishing products plant located in eastern Spain. ArcelorMittal Sagunto has a maximum annual production capacity of 2.1 million tonnes of cold and coated steel. The facilities comprise a pickling line, a regeneration plant for HCl, a full continuous five stands tandem mill, H2 and HNX batch annealing, a temper mill, an electro galvanizing line, a hot dip galvanizing line, a power station and a waste treatment plant. ArcelorMittal Sagunto covers an area of 0.3 square kilometers.

ArcelorMittal Sestao

ArcelorMittal Sestao is located inside the port of Bilbao on a 0.5 square kilometer property. Most of its raw materials arrive through a port owned by ArcelorMittal that is situated adjacent to the melt shop. ArcelorMittal Sestao’s principal equipment consists of two electric arc furnaces (one of which was temporarily idled in October 2011 due to weak market demand), two continuous slab casters, one hot rolling mill and one pickling line. ArcelorMittal Sestao produced 0.9 million tonnes of crude steel in 2011.

ArcelorMittal Sestao is a major supplier of hot-rolled, pickled and oiled coils to the Spanish market. Its range of production includes cold forming and drawing steels, structural steels, cold for re-rolling, direct galvanization, dual phase, weather resistance and floor plates. The compact steel production equipment, including a seven-stand hot rolling mill, enables ArcelorMittal Sestao to supply low thickness hot-rolled coil down to 1.0 millimeter. Sales outside Spain represent 20% of total shipments, most of them in Western Europe.

Industeel Belgium and Industeel France

Industeel’s facilities consist of six plants: Industeel Belgium (“IB”), located in Charleroi, Belgium; Industeel Creusot (“IC”) in Le Creusot, France; Industeel Loire (“IL”) in Chateauneuf, France; Euroform in Saint-Chamond, France; ArcelorMittal Ringmill in Seraing, Belgium; and UF Aciers in Dunkirk, France. Industeel also owns an R&D center in Le Creusot, France.




IB, IC and IL are heavy plate mills. Each plant is fully-integrated, including melt shop and finishing facilities. IB and IC are designed to produce special steel plates, ranging from five to 150 millimeters in thickness, including stainless steel products, while IL is dedicated to extra heavy gauge products, ranging from 120 to 900 millimeters in thickness, in alloyed carbon steel. Euroform operates hot forming facilities, mainly to transform extra heavy gauge products received from IL. The R&D center is fully dedicated to special plate products development. ArcelorMittal Ringmill produces rings on a circular rolling mill.

Industeel’s principal facilities consist of three electric arc furnaces, two ingot casting, one continuous caster, three hot rolling mills, one circular rolling mill and heat treating and finishing lines. Industeel’s plants in Belgium cover an area of approximately 0.4 square kilometers, and its plants in France cover an area of approximately 0.7 square kilometers.

Industeel provides products for special steel niche markets, both in the form of alloyed carbon grades and in stainless steel. It mainly focuses on applications where tailor-made or added-value plates are needed. Industeel’s steel shipments reached 0.34 million tonnes in 2011, including 0.05 million tonnes of semi-finished products.

Industeel’s main product segments are stainless steel, pressure vessels steel, wear-resistant steel, cryogenics steel, mold steel, high-strength steel, jack-up rig elements, protection steel, clad plates, tool steel for oil and gas, chemistry and petrochemistry, assembly industries, process industries and construction inside and outside of Europe. The ringmill products are predominantly used in the wind turbine market.

ArcelorMittal Poland

ArcelorMittal Poland is the largest steel producer in Poland, with an annual production capacity of approximately 8.0 million tonnes of crude steel. The major operations of ArcelorMittal Poland are based in Dabrowa Gornicza, Krakow, Sosnowiec, Świętochłowice, Chorzów and Zdzieszowice in Poland. AMP’s Zdzieszowice Coke Plant produces and supplies coke to ArcelorMittal subsidiaries and third parties. ArcelorMittal Poland’s Dabrowa Gornicza, Krakow, Sosnowiec, Swietochlowice, Chorzów and Zdzieszowice production plants cover areas of 13.3, 15.4, 0.5, 0.8, 0.2 and 2.1 square kilometers, respectively. ArcelorMittal Poland also has interests in a number of companies.

ArcelorMittal Poland produces coke and a wide range of steel products, including both long products and flat products. Its product range includes slabs, billets, blooms, sections, rails, hot-rolled sheets and strips, cold rolled sheets and strips, galvanized sheets, heavy plates, wire-rods, wires and other wire products and coated sheets and coils. Products are mainly sold in the domestic Polish market, while the remainder is exported, primarily to customers located in other EU member states. ArcelorMittal Poland’s principal customers are in the construction, engineering, transport, mining and automotive industries.

ArcelorMittal Poland’s principal equipment consists of nine coke oven batteries, two sinter plants, four blast furnaces, six basic oxygen furnaces, two continuous casters for blooms and billets, two continuous casters for slabs, one billets rolling mill, one hot rolling mill, one cold rolling mill, five section mills, three of which are operational, two galvanizing lines, two color coating lines, one wire rod mill, one wire drawing mill, one cold rolling mill for narrow strips, and a heavy plates mill. ArcelorMittal Poland produced 4.4 million tonnes of crude steel in 2011.

ArcelorMittal Galati

ArcelorMittal Galati’s principal facilities include two sintering plants, four blast furnaces (two of which are operational), six basic oxygen furnaces, four continuous slab casters, one continuous bloom caster, two heavy plate mills, one hot strip mill, one cold rolling mill and one hot dip galvanizing line. ArcelorMittal Galati’s plant covers an area of approximately 15.9 square kilometers.

In 2011, ArcelorMittal Galati produced 1.8 million tonnes of crude steel which were sold as plates, hot-rolled coil, cold rolled coil and galvanized products for the Romanian, Turkish and Balkan markets. ArcelorMittal Galati has stopped its coke battery for competitive and environmental issues and has a long-term supply contract with another ArcelorMittal company (Zdzieszowice Coke Plant in Poland) for the supply of high quality coke. One of the blast furnaces with equivalent crude steel capacity of 1.0 million tonnes was idled in December 2011.

Following the completion in 2011 of $351 million capital expenditure program as provided under the terms of the purchase agreement for the facility, the shareholders of ArcelorMittal Galati have no additional commitment to invest in capital expenditures. The investment commitment had been secured by a pledge of a portion of ArcelorMittal Galati shares. These shares remain pledged as the relevant terms of the purchase agreement have not been terminated.

ArcelorMittal Ostrava

ArcelorMittal Ostrava produces both flat and long carbon products. The facility is described under “—Long Carbon Americas and Europe—Long Carbon Europe—ArcelorMittal Ostrava”.




ArcelorMittal Annaba

ArcelorMittal Annaba produces both flat and long carbon products. Its flat products business is included in ArcelorMittal’s Flat Carbon Europe segment, while its long products business is included in ArcelorMittal’s Long Carbon Americas and Europe segment. It is described under “—Long Carbon Americas and Europe—Long Carbon Europe—ArcelorMittal Annaba”.

Long Carbon Americas and Europe

ArcelorMittal’s Long Carbon Americas and Europe segment has production facilities in North and South America and Europe, including the United States, Canada, Brazil, Argentina, Costa Rica, Mexico, Trinidad, Spain, Germany, France, Luxembourg, Poland, Romania, Morocco, Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina and the Czech Republic. The following two tables provide an overview by type of facility of ArcelorMittal’s principal production locations and production units in the Long Carbon segment:

Production Locations—Long Carbon Americas and Europe




Type of Plant


ArcelorMittal Ostrava

Czech Republic



Flat, Long / Sections, Pipes and Tubes, Wire Rod

ArcelorMittal Poland


Dabrowa Gornicza, Sosnowiec,Chorzow


Flat, Long / Sections, Wire Rod, Sheet Piles, Rails

ArcelorMittal Annaba




Flat, Long / Wire Rod, Rebars, Flat/Hot-Rolled Coils, Galvanized Coils, Cold Rolled C