Subsequent Events	3 Months Ended
Dec. 28, 2012
Subsequent Events	11. Subsequent Events In January 2013, Clark Leips, a purported shareholder of the Company, filed a lawsuit against the Company and its board of directors in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging, among other things, that the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors breached its fiduciary duties in each of calendar years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 by approving equity incentive grants for the Company’s chief executive officer that exceeded the respective sub-limitations under Section 5 of the Company’s 2003 long-term incentives plan for grants to a single participant in any calendar year. Plaintiff also alleged that the disclosures in the proxy statement for the Company’s 2013 annual meeting of stockholders are inadequate. The plaintiff seeks, among other things, injunctive relief, damages, rescission of the excess grants, disgorgement and attorney’s fees. Plaintiff filed a motion to enjoin the Company’s 2013 annual meeting of stockholders until the Company issued additional disclosures to supplement the proxy statement. On January 22, 2013, the Company filed a supplement to the proxy statement. The motion for an injunction was then withdrawn by the plaintiff. Management does not believe the resolution of this matter will result in a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Subsequent Events

3 Months Ended

Dec. 28, 2012

11. Subsequent Events

In January 2013, Clark Leips, a purported shareholder of the Company, filed a lawsuit against the Company and its board of directors in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging, among other things, that the compensation and management development committee of the board of directors breached its fiduciary duties in each of calendar years 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 by approving equity incentive grants for the Company’s chief executive officer that exceeded the respective sub-limitations under Section 5 of the Company’s 2003 long-term incentives plan for grants to a single participant in any calendar year. Plaintiff also alleged that the disclosures in the proxy statement for the Company’s 2013 annual meeting of stockholders are inadequate. The plaintiff seeks, among other things, injunctive relief, damages, rescission of the excess grants, disgorgement and attorney’s fees. Plaintiff filed a motion to enjoin the Company’s 2013 annual meeting of stockholders until the Company issued additional disclosures to supplement the proxy statement. On January 22, 2013, the Company filed a supplement to the proxy statement. The motion for an injunction was then withdrawn by the plaintiff. Management does not believe the resolution of this matter will result in a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.