Subsequent Events	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Notes to Financial Statements
9. Subsequent Events	On April 30, 2015, the parties to Guidance IP LLC v. T-Mobile Inc. filed a dismissal without prejudice of all claims, defenses and counterclaims, with all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses to be borne by each party incurring the same. On May 1, 2015, we initiated litigation against Verizon Services Corp.; Verizon South Inc.; Verizon Virginia LLC; Verizon Communications Inc.; Verizon Federal Inc.; Verizon Business Network Services Inc.; MCI Communications Services, Inc.; Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless; and Cisco Systems, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) in Spherix Incorporated v. Verizon Services Corp. et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-0576-GBL-IDD, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,959,990; 6,111,876; RE40,999; RE44,775; RE45,065; RE45,081; RE45,095; and RE45,121 (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”). The complaint alleges that Defendants has used, manufactured, sold, offered for sale and/or imported technology that infringes the Asserted Patents. We seek relief in the form of a finding of infringement of the Asserted Patents, damages sufficient to compensate us for Defendants’ infringement, together with pre- and post-judgment interest and costs, and our attorney’s fees. Defendants have not yet filed an answer in the case.

Subsequent Events

3 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2015

On April 30, 2015, the parties to Guidance IP LLC v. T-Mobile Inc. filed a dismissal without prejudice of all claims, defenses and counterclaims, with all attorneys’ fees, costs of court and expenses to be borne by each party incurring the same.

On May 1, 2015, we initiated litigation against Verizon Services Corp.; Verizon South Inc.; Verizon Virginia LLC; Verizon Communications Inc.; Verizon Federal Inc.; Verizon Business Network Services Inc.; MCI Communications Services, Inc.; Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless; and Cisco Systems, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) in Spherix Incorporated v. Verizon Services Corp. et al., Case No. 1:15-cv-0576-GBL-IDD, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,959,990; 6,111,876; RE40,999; RE44,775; RE45,065; RE45,081; RE45,095; and RE45,121 (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”). The complaint alleges that Defendants has used, manufactured, sold, offered for sale and/or imported technology that infringes the Asserted Patents. We seek relief in the form of a finding of infringement of the Asserted Patents, damages sufficient to compensate us for Defendants’ infringement, together with pre- and post-judgment interest and costs, and our attorney’s fees. Defendants have not yet filed an answer in the case.