Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2020

Accounting Policies [Abstract]

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Refer to the Company’s 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020 for a summary of its significant accounting policies. Except as disclosed below, there have been no changes to the Company’s significant accounting policies in the three months ended September 30, 2020.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses. This new guidance was effective January 1, 2020 and replaced the incurred loss impairment methodology with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses. Financial assets that are measured at amortized cost are required to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected with an allowance for credit losses deducted from the amortized cost basis. In addition, an entity must consider broader information in developing its expected credit loss estimate, including the use of forecasted information. In November 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, which clarifies that receivables arising from operating leases are not within the scope of this new guidance. Generally, the pronouncement requires a modified retrospective method of adoption. The adoption of this pronouncement on January 1, 2020 did not have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as it did not have any financial assets within the scope of this guidance.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement. This new guidance was effective January 1, 2020 and provides new and, in some cases, eliminates or modifies the previously existing disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. Public entities are now required to disclose the following: (i) the changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period and (ii) the range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. In addition, public entities are no longer required to disclose the following: (i) the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, (ii) the policy for timing of transfers between levels and (iii) the valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. The new pronouncement also clarifies and modifies certain existing provisions to promote the appropriate exercise of discretion by entities when considering fair value measurement

disclosures and clarifies that materiality is an appropriate consideration when evaluating disclosure requirements. As permitted by the new pronouncement, the Company removed the discussion of its valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements. The Company did not remove any other disclosures as it did not have any transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy during the current and comparative periods. The adoption of this pronouncement on January 1, 2020 did not have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The amended disclosure guidance will be applied prospectively.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform. This temporary guidance is effective as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022 to ease potential burdens related to the accounting for, or recognizing the effects of, reference rate reform on financial reporting. The guidance provides optional expedients for applying existing GAAP to contract modifications and hedging relationships affected by the move of global capital markets away from interbank offered rates, most notably the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). Specifically, the guidance allows for certain changes in critical terms of a designated hedging instrument or hedged item as a result of reference rate reform to not result in the dedesignation of the hedging relationship. In addition, the optional expedients related to probability and effectiveness assessments allow companies to disregard certain economic mismatches in a hedging relationship arising due to reference rate reform until both the derivative and hedged transactions have completed the transition, where current GAAP requires those mismatches to be modeled into the assessment of effectiveness. The Company adopted this guidance as of the effective date and elected to apply the optional expedients related to probability and effectiveness prospectively. The Company has not modified any hedging relationships and has disregarded the potential economic mismatches in hedging relationships due to reference rate reform during the nine months ended September 30, 2020.

In April 2020, the FASB staff issued a question-and-answer (Q&A) document focusing on the application of the lease guidance in ASC 842, Leases, for lease concessions provided as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior to the Q&A, changes to lease payments that are not stipulated in the original lease contract are generally accounted for as lease modifications under ASC 842. Within the Q&A, the FASB staff provides relief for lease concessions offered as a result of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and does not require these concessions to be accounted for in accordance with the lease modification guidance in ASC 842.

Under existing lease guidance, a company determines, on a lease-by-lease basis, if a lease concession is the result of a new arrangement with the tenant or if it is under the enforceable rights and obligations within the lease agreement. Under the relief guidance, a company can account for certain concessions (i) as if no changes to the existing lease contract were made or (ii) as a negative variable lease adjustment to lease income. This optionality is offered in circumstances when the total future payments required by the modified contract are substantially the same as the total payments required by the existing contract. Also, under the relief guidance, a company can account for certain other concessions only as a variable lease adjustment. This singular relief option is offered in circumstances including when the total future payments required by the modified contract are less than the total payments required by the existing contract (i.e., abatement) or when the total payments required are the same, but extend over a longer period of time as compared to the existing contract.

Application of the relief guidance is optional; however, it is required to be applied consistently to leases with similar characteristics and similar circumstances. The Company has elected to apply the relief guidance where lease concessions (i) have been granted as relief due to the COVID-19 pandemic and (ii) result in the cash flows remaining to be substantially the same or less than the existing contract.

Based on the policy elections made under the relief guidance as well as modifications that do not qualify for the relief guidance, the Company has accounted for lease concessions as follows:

Lease Concession	Accounting Treatment of Concession
(i) Deferral of payment to a future period, with no change in lease term	Treated as if there are no changes to the existing lease contract; no change to lease income recognized, including straight-line rental income.
(ii) Deferral of payment to a future period, with a modest extension of the lease term (iii) Abatement (iv) Combination of abatement and deferral	Treated as a variable lease adjustment; reduction in lease income for the abated and deferred amounts; however, no change in straight-line rental income. Any deferred amounts will be recognized as lease income when payment is received.
(v) Significant lease extension resulting in an increase in cash flows	Existing lease modification guidance under ASC 842 is followed.

See a discussion regarding lease concessions agreed to with tenants as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and related impact in Note 6 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.