XML 98 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.19.3.a.u2
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2019
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments:
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Value
 
Fair Value
Financial assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative asset
$

 
$

 
$
2,324

 
$
2,324

Financial liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgages payable, net
$
94,155

 
$
98,082

 
$
205,320

 
$
208,173

Unsecured notes payable, net
$
796,247

 
$
822,883

 
$
696,362

 
$
671,492

Unsecured term loans, net
$
716,523

 
$
720,000

 
$
447,367

 
$
449,266

Unsecured revolving line of credit
$
18,000

 
$
18,000

 
$
273,000

 
$
272,553

Derivative liability
$
12,288

 
$
12,288

 
$
3,846

 
$
3,846


The carrying value of the derivative asset is included within “Other assets, net” and the carrying value of the derivative liability is included within “Other liabilities” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Fair Value Hierarchy
A fair value measurement is based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability in an orderly transaction. The hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value are as follows:
Level 1 Inputs – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 Inputs – Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 3 Inputs – Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.
When inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents the Company’s financial instruments, which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall. Methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of these instruments are described after the table.
 
Fair Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
December 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative liability
$

 
$
12,288

 
$

 
$
12,288

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative asset
$

 
$
2,324

 
$

 
$
2,324

Derivative liability
$

 
$
3,846

 
$

 
$
3,846


Derivatives:  The fair value of the derivative asset and derivative liability is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis on the expected future cash flows of each derivative. This analysis uses observable market data including forward yield curves and implied volatilities to determine the market’s expectation of the future cash flows of the variable component. The fixed and variable components of the derivative are then discounted using calculated discount factors developed based on the LIBOR swap rate and are aggregated to arrive at a single valuation for the period. The Company also incorporates credit valuation adjustments to
appropriately reflect both its own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives use Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by itself and its counterparties. However, as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company has assessed the significance of the impact of the credit valuation adjustments on the overall valuation of its derivative positions and has determined that the credit valuation adjustments are not significant to the overall valuation. As a result, the Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. In adjusting the fair value of its derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered any applicable credit enhancements. The Company’s derivative instruments are further described in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
The following table presents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2019, aggregated by the level within the fair value hierarchy in which those measurements fall. The table includes information related to properties remeasured to fair value as a result of impairment charges recorded during the year ended December 31, 2019. Methods and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of this asset are described after the table. The Company did not remeasure any assets to fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2018.
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
 
Provision for
Impairment
December 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investment properties
$

 
$
11,644

(a)
$
5,300

(b)
$
16,944

 
$
12,298


(a)
Represents the fair value of the Company’s King Philip’s Crossing investment property as of December 31, 2019, the date the asset was measured at fair value. The estimated fair value of King Philip’s Crossing was based upon the expected sales price from an executed sales contract and determined to be a Level 2 input.
(b)
Represents the fair value of the Company’s Streets of Yorktown investment property as of September 30, 2019, the date the asset was measured at fair value. The estimated fair value of Streets of Yorktown was determined using the income approach. The income approach involves discounting the estimated income stream and reversion (presumed sale) value of a property over an estimated holding period to a present value at a risk-adjusted rate. The discount rates and third-party comparable sales prices used in this approach are derived from property-specific information, market transactions and other industry data and are considered significant inputs to this valuation. The reversion value of the property was based upon third-party comparable sales prices, which contain unobservable inputs used by these third parties. A weighted average discount rate of 6.89% was used to (i) present value the estimated income stream over the estimated holding period and (ii) present value the reversion value.
Fair Value Disclosures
The following table presents the Company’s financial liabilities, which are measured at fair value for disclosure purposes, by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
 
Fair Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
December 31, 2019
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgages payable, net
$

 
$

 
$
98,082

 
$
98,082

Unsecured notes payable, net
$
255,965

 
$

 
$
566,918

 
$
822,883

Unsecured term loans, net
$

 
$

 
$
720,000

 
$
720,000

Unsecured revolving line of credit
$

 
$

 
$
18,000

 
$
18,000

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2018
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgages payable, net
$

 
$

 
$
208,173

 
$
208,173

Unsecured notes payable, net
$
235,788

 
$

 
$
435,704

 
$
671,492

Unsecured term loans, net
$

 
$

 
$
449,266

 
$
449,266

Unsecured revolving line of credit
$

 
$

 
$
272,553

 
$
272,553


The Company estimates the fair value of its Level 3 financial liabilities using a discounted cash flow model that incorporates future contractual principal and interest payments. The Company estimates the fair value of its mortgages payable, net and Level 3 unsecured notes payable, net by discounting the anticipated future cash flows of each instrument at rates currently offered to the Company by its lenders for similar debt instruments of comparable maturities. The Company estimates the fair value of its unsecured term loans, net and unsecured revolving line of credit by discounting the anticipated future cash flows at a reference rate, currently one-month LIBOR, plus an applicable credit spread currently offered to the Company by its lenders for similar instruments of comparable maturities. The following rates were used in the discounted cash flow model to calculate the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities:
 
December 31, 2019
 
December 31, 2018
Mortgages payable, net – range of discount rates used
3.2% to 3.6%
 
4.2% to 4.4%
Unsecured notes payable, net – weighted average discount rate used
3.79%
 
4.91%
Unsecured term loans, net – weighted average credit spread portion of discount rate used
1.26%
 
1.25%
Unsecured revolving line of credit – credit spread portion of discount rate used
1.05%
 
1.10%

There were no transfers between the levels of the fair value hierarchy during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.