XML 29 R16.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
DISCLOSURE ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
12 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
DISCLOSURE ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
DISCLOSURE ABOUT FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 
Fair value measurement requires that valuation techniques maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs and also establishes a fair value hierarchy that categorizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels as follows:

•
Level 1 — Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

•
Level 2 — Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

•
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists. The Company develops these inputs based on the best information available, including the Company’s own data.

During fiscal years ended September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 there were no significant transfers into or out of Levels 1, 2 or 3.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments:
 
Cash and cash equivalents — The carrying value approximates fair value due to the liquid nature of these instruments.

Finance Receivables — The fair value of finance receivables is estimated by discounting the receivables using current interest rates at which similar finance receivables would be made to customers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities as of the balance sheet date. In addition, the best estimate of losses inherent in the portfolio is deducted when computing the estimated fair value of finance receivables. If the Company’s finance receivables were measured at fair value in the financial statements these finance receivables would be classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.
 
Revolving Credit Line - Banks — The fair value of revolving credit line borrowings is estimated to approximate carrying value. Management believes the variable nature of the interest rate under the credit agreement approximates market terms. If the Company’s revolving credit line borrowings were measured at fair value in the financial statements, these revolving credit line borrowings would be categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
 
Subordinated Debt — The fair value of subordinated debt is estimated by discounting future cash flows using current interest rates at which similar subordinated debt would be offered for the same remaining maturities. If the Company’s subordinated debt were measured at fair value in the financial statements, the subordinated debt would be categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
 
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our financial instruments as of September 30, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
 
`
As of September 30, 2017
 
As of September 30, 2016
 
Carrying
 
 
 
Carrying
 
 
 
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
(dollars in thousands)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial assets:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
$
7,235

 
$
7,235

 
$
11,318

 
$
11,318

Finance receivables, net
199,441

 
196,456

 
237,918

 
237,974

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities:
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Revolving credit line - banks, net
114,447

 
114,447

 
157,005

 
157,005

Subordinated debt, net
29,518

 
31,527

 
32,903

 
35,921