XML 60 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.3.0.15
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES (POLICIES)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2011
Adoption Of New Accounting Standards [Abstract] 
Insurance Contract Acquisition Costs

Effective January 1, 2011, we prospectively adopted amended Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) guidance that modified the definition of the types of costs that can be capitalized in relation to the acquisition of new and renewal insurance contracts. The amended guidance requires costs to be incremental or directly related to the successful acquisition of new or renewal contracts in order to be capitalized as a deferred acquisition cost. Capitalized costs would include incremental direct costs, such as commissions paid to brokers. Additionally, the portion of employee salaries and benefits directly related to time spent for acquired contracts would be capitalized. Costs that fall outside the revised definition must be expensed when incurred. In accordance with the transitional provisions of this amended guidance, we elected not to capitalize acquisition costs that we did not previously capitalize, namely those costs related to employee salaries and benefits. The adoption of this guidance did not impact our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

 

Comprehensive Income

Effective July 1, 2011, we retrospectively adopted FASB guidance revising the manner in which entities present comprehensive income in their financial statements. The amended guidance eliminated the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in shareholders' equity. Components of comprehensive income may be reported in either 1) a continuous statement of comprehensive income or 2) two separate but consecutive statements. As the new guidance did not change the items that constitute net income and/or other comprehensive income, the timing of reclassifications from other comprehensive income to net income or the earnings per share computation, its adoption did not impact our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

 

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

Repurchase Agreements

 

In April 2011, the FASB issued additional guidance for determining whether a repurchase agreement should be accounted for as a sale or as a secured borrowing. The guidance changes the assessment of effective control by focusing on the transferor's contractual rights and obligations with respect to the transferred financial assets and removing the criterion to assess its ability to exercise those rights or honor those obligations. These changes will become effective on a prospective basis at January 1, 2012 and early adoption is prohibited. We are presently evaluating the impact of this guidance but do not expect that adoption will significantly impact our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

 

Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures

 

In May 2011, the FASB amended its existing fair value measurement guidance by:

  • clarifying principal market determination,
  • addressing the fair value measurement of instruments with offsetting market or counterparty credit risks,
  • clarifying that the valuation premise and highest and best use” concepts are not relevant to financial instruments,
  • limiting the application of premiums and discounts,
  • prohibiting the use of blockage factors to all three levels of the fair value hierarchy, and
  • expanding disclosure requirements.

 

If different fair value measurements result from the application of the amended guidance, the difference will be recognized in income in the period of adoption as a change in estimate. The new requirements will be effective January 1, 2012, with early adoption prohibited. The new disclosure requirements are to be applied prospectively. We are presently evaluating the impact that this amended guidance may have on our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.

 

Goodwill

 

In September 2011, the FASB issued new guidance providing entities with the option to perform a qualitative assessment prior to calculating the estimated fair value of a reporting unit, the first step of the required annual goodwill impairment test. Entities able to qualitatively conclude that the fair value of a reporting unit more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) exceeds its carrying amount can bypass the existing requirement to perform the quantitative annual impairment test. This guidance will become effective at January 1, 2012, with early adoption permitted. This new guidance does not change how an entity measures a goodwill impairment loss; thus, the adoption of this guidance will not impact our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.