XML 27 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Derivatives
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
General Discussion of Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities [Abstract]  
Derivatives

(7) Derivatives

 

Commodity Swaps

 

The Partnership manages its exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices by hedging the impact of market fluctuations. Swaps are used to manage and hedge price and location risks related to these market exposures. Swaps are also used to manage margins on offsetting fixed-price purchase or sale commitments for physical quantities of natural gas and NGLs.

 

The Partnership commonly enters into various derivative financial transactions which it does not designate as accounting hedges. These transactions include “swing swaps,” “third party on-system financial swaps,” “storage swaps,” “basis swaps,” “processing margin swaps, “liquids swaps” and “put options.” Swing swaps are generally short-term in nature (one month) and are usually entered into to protect against changes in the volume of daily versus first-of-month index priced gas supplies or markets. Third party on-system financial swaps are hedges that the Partnership enters into on behalf of its customers who are connected to its systems, wherein the Partnership fixes a supply or market price for a period of time for its customers, and simultaneously enters into the derivative transaction. Storage swap transactions protect against changes in the value of products that the Partnership has stored to serve various operational requirements (gas) or has in inventory due to short term constraints in moving the product to market (liquids). Basis swaps are used to hedge basis location price risk due to buying gas into one of the Partnership's systems on one index and selling gas off that same system on a different index. Processing margin financial swaps are used to hedge fractionation spread risk at the Partnership's processing plants relating to the option to process versus bypassing the Partnership's equity gas. Liquids financial swaps are used to hedge price risk on percent of liquids (POL) contracts. Put options are purchased to hedge against declines in pricing and as such represent options, not obligations, to sell the related underlying volumes at a fixed price.

 

The components of loss on derivatives in the condensed consolidated statements of operations relating to commodity swaps are provided below (in thousands):

   Three Months Ended 
   March 31, 
   2012 2011 
        
Change in fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge       
 accounting $ 1,181 $ 1,555 
Realized losses on derivatives    1,026   1,761 
        
Ineffective portion of derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting    (38)   19 
Net losses related to commodity swaps  $ 2,169 $ 3,335 
        
Put option premium mark to market   -    86 
Losses on derivatives  $ 2,169 $ 3,421 

The fair value of derivative assets and liabilities relating to commodity swaps are as follows (in thousands):   
        
   March 31, December 31,
   2012 2011
        
Fair value of derivative assets — current, designated  $ 48 $ 151
Fair value of derivative assets — current, non-designated    1,226   2,716
Fair value of derivative assets — long term, non-designated    131   -
Fair value of derivative liabilities — current, designated    (246)   (702)
Fair value of derivative liabilities — current, non-designated    (4,597)   (4,885)
Fair value of derivative liabilities — long term, non-designated    (110)   -
Net fair value of derivatives  $ (3,548) $ (2,720)

Set forth below is the summarized notional volumes and fair value of all instruments held for price risk management purposes and related physical offsets as of March 31, 2012 (all gas volumes are expressed in MMBtu's and liquids volumes are expressed in gallons). The remaining term of the contracts extend no later than December 2013 for derivatives. Changes in the fair value of the Partnership's mark to market derivatives are recorded in earnings in the period the transaction is entered into. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income until the related anticipated future cash flow is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion is recorded in earnings immediately.

   March 31, 2012
Transaction Type Volume Fair Value
       
   (In thousands)
       
Cash Flow Hedges:*     
 Liquids swaps (short contracts)   (4,584) $ (198)
 Total swaps designated as cash flow hedges    $ (198)
       
Mark to Market Derivatives:*     
 Swing swaps (long contracts)   195 $ -
 Physical offsets to swing swap transactions (short contracts)   (195)   -
 Swing swaps (short contracts)   (450)   (10)
 Physical offsets to swing swap transactions (long contracts)   450   -
       
 Basis swaps (long contracts)   2,830   (10)
 Physical offsets to basis swap transactions (short contracts)   (2,830)   4,509
 Basis swaps (short contracts)   (2,830)   17
 Physical offsets to basis swap transactions (long contracts)   2,830   (6,267)
       
       
 Processing margin hedges — liquids (short contracts)   (13,569)   357
 Processing margin hedges — gas (long contracts)   1,600   (2,331)
 Processing margin hedges — gas (short contracts)   (187)   287
       
 Liquids swaps — (short contracts)   (4,393)   (57)
       
 Storage swap transactions — gas (short contracts)   (290)   155
       
 Total mark to market derivatives    $ (3,350)

       

*       All are gas contracts, volume in MMBtu's, except for liquids swaps (designated or non-designated) and processing margin hedges - liquids (volume in gallons).

 

On all transactions where the Partnership is exposed to counterparty risk, the Partnership analyzes the counterparty's financial condition prior to entering into an agreement, establishes limits and monitors the appropriateness of these limits on an ongoing basis. The Partnership primarily deals with two types of counterparties, financial institutions and other energy companies, when entering into financial derivatives on commodities. The Partnership has entered into Master International Swaps and Derivatives Association Agreements that allow for netting of swap contract receivables and payables in the event of default by either party. If the Partnership's counterparties failed to perform under existing swap contracts, the Partnership's maximum loss as of March 31, 2012 of $5.9 million would be reduced to $4.7 million due to the netting feature.

 

Impact of Cash Flow Hedges

 

The impact of realized gains or losses from derivatives designated as cash flow hedge contracts in the condensed consolidated statements of operations is summarized below (in thousands):

   Three Months Ended 
   March 31, 
Decrease in Midstream Revenue 2012 2011 
Liquids realized loss included in Midstream revenue $ (12) $ (660) 

Natural Gas

 

As of March 31, 2012, the Partnership has no balances in accumulated other comprehensive income related to natural gas.

 

Liquids

 

As of March 31, 2012, an unrealized derivative fair value net loss of $0.2 million related to cash flow hedges of liquids price risk was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, all of which is expected to be reclassified into earnings through March 2013. The actual reclassification to earnings will be based on mark to market prices at the contract settlement date, along with the realization of the gain or loss on the related physical volume, which is not reflected in the above table.

 

Derivatives Other Than Cash Flow Hedges

 

Assets and liabilities related to third party derivative contracts, swing swaps, basis swaps, storage swaps, processing margin swaps and liquids swaps are included in the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities and the profit and loss on the mark to market value of these contracts are recorded net as (gain) loss on derivatives in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. The Partnership estimates the fair value of all of its energy trading contracts using actively quoted prices. The estimated fair value of energy trading contracts by maturity date was as follows (in thousands):

  Maturity Periods
  Less than one year One to two years More than two years Total fair value
March 31, 2012. $ (3,371) $ 21 $ -  $ (3,350)