Commitments and Contingencies and Guarantees	12 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2020
Commitments and Contingencies and Guarantees
Commitments and Contingencies and Guarantees	(23) Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees. The Company indemnifies its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences under its charter or by-laws and under indemnification agreements while the officer or director is, or was, serving at its request in a defined capacity. The term of the indemnification period is with respect to the period that such person was an officer or director of the Company. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification obligations is unlimited. The costs incurred to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification obligations have not been material. As a result, the Company believes that its estimated exposure on these obligations is minimal. Accordingly, the Company had no liabilities recorded for these obligations as of March 31, 2020. The Company is insured against any actual or alleged act, error, omission, neglect, misstatement or misleading statement or breach of duty by any current or former officer, director or employee while rendering information technology services. The Company believes that its financial exposure from such actual or alleged actions, should they arise, is minimal and no liability was recorded at March 31, 2020. From time to time the Company is involved in legal proceedings, claims and litigation related to employee claims, contractual disputes and taxes in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When a material loss contingency is reasonably possible but not probable, the Company does not record a liability, but instead discloses the nature and the amount of the claim, and an estimate of the loss or range of loss, if such an estimate can be made. Legal fees are expensed as incurred. Although the Company cannot predict the outcome of such matters, the Company has no reason to believe the disposition of any current matter, other than the specific matters described below, could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s balance sheets, income of operations and cash flows or the ability to carry on any of its business activities. This assessment is based on our current understanding of relevant facts and circumstances. As such, our view of these matters is subject to inherent uncertainties and may change in the future. One of the Company’s larger clients made a demand for damages related to a project in which the Company was performing services. The client alleges breaches of certain representations and warranties regarding the Company’s performance and is seeking indemnification for damages from those alleged breaches. No litigation has been filed. The Company believes that it has defenses against the claims described in the demand, and intends to zealously defend against those claims. However, the Company cannot provide any assurance that the Company will prevail in the dispute or even partially prevail. Further, if the Company is unsuccessful in any settlement discussions, the Company also cannot provide any assurance that the client will not use set off rights in the contract, even if the Company disputes the claims or amount of damages alleged. In the event the Company does not fully prevail in this dispute, the Company may have to pay damages in amounts for which it may not have reserved or which may or may not be covered by the Company’s insurance policies; further, even if the damages are covered, depending on the outcome, the Company’s insurance may not cover or be adequate to pay the entire claim. In addition, the Company cannot guarantee that the Company will not lose future business with such client as a result of such dispute. On February 28, 2019, the Supreme Court of India issued a ruling interpreting certain statutory defined contribution obligations of employees and employers, which altered historical understandings of such obligations, extending them to cover additional portions of employee income. As a result, contributions by our employees and the Company will increase in future periods. There is uncertainty as to whether the Indian government will apply the Supreme Court's ruling on a retroactive basis and if so, how this liability should be calculated as it is impacted by multiple variables, including the period of assessment, the application with respect to certain current and former employees and whether interest and penalties may be assessed. As such, the ultimate amount of our obligation is difficult to quantify. If the Indian government were to apply the Supreme Court ruling retroactively, without assessing interest and penalties, the impact would be a charge of approximately $7,500 to the Company’s income from operations and cash flows.

Commitments and Contingencies and Guarantees

12 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2020

Commitments and Contingencies and Guarantees

Commitments and Contingencies and Guarantees

(23) Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees.

The Company indemnifies its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences under its charter or by-laws and under indemnification agreements while the officer or director is, or was, serving at its request in a defined capacity. The term of the indemnification period is with respect to the period that such person was an officer or director of the Company. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification obligations is unlimited. The costs incurred to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification obligations have not been material. As a result, the Company believes that its estimated exposure on these obligations is minimal. Accordingly, the Company had no liabilities recorded for these obligations as of March 31, 2020.

The Company is insured against any actual or alleged act, error, omission, neglect, misstatement or misleading statement or breach of duty by any current or former officer, director or employee while rendering information technology services. The Company believes that its financial exposure from such actual or alleged actions, should they arise, is minimal and no liability was recorded at March 31, 2020.

From time to time the Company is involved in legal proceedings, claims and litigation related to employee claims, contractual disputes and taxes in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues a liability when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. When a material loss contingency is reasonably possible but not probable, the Company does not record a liability, but instead discloses the nature and the amount of the claim, and an estimate of the loss or range of loss, if such an estimate can be made. Legal fees are expensed as incurred. Although the Company cannot predict the outcome of such matters, the Company has no reason to believe the disposition of any current matter, other than the specific matters described below, could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s balance sheets, income of operations and cash flows or the ability to carry on any of its business activities. This assessment is based on our current understanding of relevant facts and circumstances. As such, our view of these matters is subject to inherent uncertainties and may change in the future.

One of the Company’s larger clients made a demand for damages related to a project in which the Company was performing services. The client alleges breaches of certain representations and warranties regarding the Company’s performance and is seeking indemnification for damages from those alleged breaches. No litigation has been filed. The Company believes that it has defenses against the claims described in the demand, and intends to zealously defend against those claims. However, the Company cannot provide any assurance that the Company will prevail in the dispute or even partially prevail. Further, if the Company is unsuccessful in any settlement discussions, the Company also cannot provide any assurance that the client will not use set off rights in the contract, even if the Company disputes the claims or amount of damages alleged. In the event the Company does not fully prevail in this dispute, the Company may have to pay damages in amounts for which it may not have reserved or which may or may not be covered by the Company’s insurance policies; further, even if the damages are covered, depending on the outcome, the Company’s insurance may not cover or be adequate to pay the entire claim. In addition, the Company cannot guarantee that the Company will not lose future business with such client as a result of such dispute.

On February 28, 2019, the Supreme Court of India issued a ruling interpreting certain statutory defined contribution obligations of employees and employers, which altered historical understandings of such obligations,

extending them to cover additional portions of employee income. As a result, contributions by our employees and the Company will increase in future periods. There is uncertainty as to whether the Indian government will apply the Supreme Court's ruling on a retroactive basis and if so, how this liability should be calculated as it is impacted by multiple variables, including the period of assessment, the application with respect to certain current and former employees and whether interest and penalties may be assessed. As such, the ultimate amount of our obligation is difficult to quantify. If the Indian government were to apply the Supreme Court ruling retroactively, without assessing interest and penalties, the impact would be a charge of approximately $7,500 to the Company’s income from operations and cash flows.