Commitments and Contingencies	12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2022
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	NOTE 18 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES From time to time, the Company may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. Management does not believe that after the final disposition any of these matters is likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, except as follows. On January 27, 2022, a former employee filed suit against the Company in the Tulsa County Oklahoma District Court, Case No. CJ-2022-00221. The plaintiff has alleged that she was entitled to six months of severance pay after her employment contract was not renewed, and that her option agreements did not expire thirty days after cessation of her employment, and claims she is owed approximately $75,000 in severance and $250,000 in damages for her options. The Company filed an Answer on or about March 18, 2022. The Company disputes the plaintiff’s allegations, has not accrued for any contingent losses, and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit. On June 16, 2022, the Company received notice from certain former shareholders of SAGUNA claiming breaches of the SAGUNA stock purchase agreement and claiming that all of the former shareholders of SAGUNA have suffered damages totaling approximately $13.9 million, which they calculated as the value related to the consideration issued to those former shareholders for the acquisition of SAGUNA. The Company denies those claims and has not accrued any contingent loss. However, the Company may face legal claims or proceedings regarding those claims. By notice dated July 14, 2022, the Company received notice from a distributor that has a distribution agreement with InduraPower claiming that InduraPower, and the Company as guarantor, has breached the distribution agreement, and are claiming approximately $2.0 million in damages, which includes a claim for $0.5 million of foregone profit. The Company had received $1.3 million in cash as a deposit against future product deliveries which is included in contract liabilities – current. In addition, the Company fully accrued the remaining claim of $0.7 million in accrued liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022. On or about July 17, 2022, the former employees of SKS filed an insolvency request against SKS in the Nazareth District Court, Israel, No. 35035-06-22. The action represents $400,000 of claims of the former employees, which were fully accrued as of September 30, 2022. The claims of the former employees were resolved pursuant to the SKS Sale Agreement (see Note 21 - Other Business Developments – Business Developments for additional information) and the action was dismissed on or about January 9, 2023. See Note 22 – Subsequent Events – Business Developments for additional information. On or about July 28, 2022, a former employee filed suit against the Company, Dustin McIntire, and Daniel Hodges in the San Diego County California Superior Court, Case No. 37-2022-00028083-CU-BC-CTL (“RVI Claim #1”). The plaintiff alleged that his wages were not paid, that he was constructively discharged, that the Company failed to issue him stock options, and that he is owed future amounts. He claimed damages of no less than $238,000. On December 29, 2022, the Company resolved this lawsuit. See Note 21 – Other Business Developments – Business Developments for additional information. On or about August 22, 2022, two former FastBack employees filed suit against the Company, DragonWave and FastBack in the Alameda County Superior Court, California, Case No. 22CV016666. The plaintiffs allege that their payroll was late and that the Company failed to make one payroll, failed to timely pay wages three times, failed to pay accrued vacation time, and owes penalties under California law. Each plaintiff claimed damages of no less than $66,500. The Company has accrued for the wage claims for services provided but has not accrued for penalties. On April 4, 2023, the Company resolved this lawsuit. See Note 22 – Subsequent Events – Business Developments for additional information. On or about August 23, 2022, a former employee filed suit against the Company in the Clark County District Court, Nevada, Case No. 3 A-22-857361-C (“RVI Claim #2”). The plaintiff alleged that his wages were not paid, that he was constructively discharged, that the Company failed to issue him stock options, and that he is owed future amounts. He claimed damages of no less than $184,000. As of September 30, 2022, the Company had accrued for the wage claims for services provided of $8,000 but had not accrued for the claims associated with future services. On December 29, 2022, the Company resolved this lawsuit. See Note 21 – Other Business Developments – Business Developments for additional information. On or about September 20, 2022, the Company was served with a suit that was filed on or about May 27, 2022 by the holder of a Transform-X Inc. (“Transform-X”) promissory note, suing the Company, Daniel Hodges, and Transform-X in the Richland County Court of Common Pleas, South Carolina, Case No. 2022CP4002806. The plaintiff alleges that for $125,000 he purchased an 8% promissory note in 2018 from Transform-X which has not been paid. Plaintiff alleges that the Company is also liable under the Transform-X promissory note. This lawsuit was removed to the United States District of South Carolina, Civil Action No.:3:22-cv-03645-MGL. The Company filed an Answer on October 27, 2022 and the proceedings are currently in the discovery phase. The Company strongly disputes the plaintiff’s allegations, has not accrued for any contingent losses, and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit. On or about November 14, 2022, an intellectual property law firm filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, San Diego. The plaintiff alleges that they performed work for the Company and its subsidiaries subsequent to September 30, 2022 and are owed approximately $75,000, which was fully accrued as of December 31, 2022. See Note 22 – Subsequent Events – Litigation, Claims and Contingencies Developments for post-December 31, 2022 developments.

Commitments and Contingencies

12 Months Ended

Dec. 31, 2022

Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]

NOTE 18 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

From time to time, the Company may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. Management does not believe that after the final disposition any of these matters is likely to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, except as follows.

On January 27, 2022, a former employee filed suit against the Company in the Tulsa County Oklahoma District Court, Case No. CJ-2022-00221. The plaintiff has alleged that she was entitled to six months of severance pay after her employment contract was not renewed, and that her option agreements did not expire thirty days after cessation of her employment, and claims she is owed approximately $75,000 in severance and $250,000 in damages for her options. The Company filed an Answer on or about March 18, 2022. The Company disputes the plaintiff’s allegations, has not accrued for any contingent losses, and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

On June 16, 2022, the Company received notice from certain former shareholders of SAGUNA claiming breaches of the SAGUNA stock purchase agreement and claiming that all of the former shareholders of SAGUNA have suffered damages totaling approximately $13.9 million, which they calculated as the value related to the consideration issued to those former shareholders for the acquisition of SAGUNA. The Company denies those claims and has not accrued any contingent loss. However, the Company may face legal claims or proceedings regarding those claims.

By notice dated July 14, 2022, the Company received notice from a distributor that has a distribution agreement with InduraPower claiming that InduraPower, and the Company as guarantor, has breached the distribution agreement, and are claiming approximately $2.0 million in damages, which includes a claim for $0.5 million of foregone profit. The Company had received $1.3 million in cash as a deposit against future product deliveries which is included in contract liabilities – current. In addition, the Company fully accrued the remaining claim of $0.7 million in accrued liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022.

On or about July 17, 2022, the former employees of SKS filed an insolvency request against SKS in the Nazareth District Court, Israel, No. 35035-06-22. The action represents $400,000 of claims of the former employees, which were fully accrued as of September 30, 2022. The claims of the former employees were resolved pursuant to the SKS Sale Agreement (see Note 21 - Other Business Developments – Business Developments for additional information) and the action was dismissed on or about January 9, 2023. See Note 22 – Subsequent Events – Business Developments for additional information.

On or about July 28, 2022, a former employee filed suit against the Company, Dustin McIntire, and Daniel Hodges in the San Diego County California Superior Court, Case No. 37-2022-00028083-CU-BC-CTL (“RVI Claim #1”). The plaintiff alleged that his wages were not paid, that he was constructively discharged, that the Company failed to issue him stock options, and that he is owed future amounts. He claimed damages of no less than $238,000. On December 29, 2022, the Company resolved this lawsuit. See Note 21 – Other Business Developments – Business Developments for additional information.

On or about August 22, 2022, two former FastBack employees filed suit against the Company, DragonWave and FastBack in the Alameda County Superior Court, California, Case No. 22CV016666. The plaintiffs allege that their payroll was late and that the Company failed to make one payroll, failed to timely pay wages three times, failed to pay accrued vacation time, and owes penalties under California law. Each plaintiff claimed damages of no less than $66,500. The Company has accrued for the wage claims for services provided but has not accrued for penalties. On April 4, 2023, the Company resolved this lawsuit. See Note 22 – Subsequent Events – Business Developments for additional information.

On or about August 23, 2022, a former employee filed suit against the Company in the Clark County District Court, Nevada, Case No. 3 A-22-857361-C (“RVI Claim #2”). The plaintiff alleged that his wages were not paid, that he was constructively discharged, that the Company failed to issue him stock options, and that he is owed future amounts. He claimed damages of no less than $184,000. As of September 30, 2022, the Company had accrued for the wage claims for services provided of $8,000 but had not accrued for the claims associated with future services. On December 29, 2022, the Company resolved this lawsuit. See Note 21 – Other Business Developments – Business Developments for additional information.

On or about September 20, 2022, the Company was served with a suit that was filed on or about May 27, 2022 by the holder of a Transform-X Inc. (“Transform-X”) promissory note, suing the Company, Daniel Hodges, and Transform-X in the Richland County Court of Common Pleas, South Carolina, Case No. 2022CP4002806. The plaintiff alleges that for $125,000 he purchased an 8% promissory note in 2018 from Transform-X which has not been paid. Plaintiff alleges that the Company is also liable under the Transform-X promissory note. This lawsuit was removed to the United States District of South Carolina, Civil Action No.:3:22-cv-03645-MGL. The Company filed an Answer on October 27, 2022 and the proceedings are currently in the discovery phase. The Company strongly disputes the plaintiff’s allegations, has not accrued for any contingent losses, and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

On or about November 14, 2022, an intellectual property law firm filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, San Diego. The plaintiff alleges that they performed work for the Company and its subsidiaries subsequent to September 30, 2022 and are owed approximately $75,000, which was fully accrued as of December 31, 2022.

See Note 22 – Subsequent Events – Litigation, Claims and Contingencies Developments for post-December 31, 2022 developments.