SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2018

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with the generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and instructions to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The condensed consolidated financial statements, including these notes, are unaudited and exclude some of the disclosures required in annual financial statements. Management believes it has made all necessary adjustments so that the condensed consolidated financial statements are presented fairly and that estimates made in preparing its condensed consolidated financial statements are reasonable and prudent. The operating results presented for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the entire year. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 filed with the SEC.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts and activities of the AOG entities, their consolidated subsidiaries and certain Consolidated Funds. These Consolidated Funds include certain Ares-affiliated funds, related co-investment entities and collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) (collectively, the “Consolidated Funds”) managed by Ares Management LLC (“AM LLC”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Including the results of the Consolidated Funds significantly increases the reported amounts of the assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and cash flows in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements; however, the Consolidated Funds results included herein have no direct effect on the net income attributable to controlling interests or on total controlling equity. Instead, economic ownership interests of the investors in the Consolidated Funds are reflected as non-controlling interests in Consolidated Funds in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. Further, cash flows allocable to non-controlling interest in Consolidated Funds are specifically identifiable in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.

Reclassifications

The Company has reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform to the current year presentation.

Adoption of ASC 606 and Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Adoption of ASC 606

Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Topic 606 (“ASC 606”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The Company adopted ASC 606 to all applicable contracts under the modified retrospective approach using the practical expedient provided for within paragraph 606-10-65-1(f)(3); therefore, the presentation of prior year periods has not been adjusted. The Company recognized the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASC 606 as an adjustment to the opening balance of components of equity as of January 1, 2018.

Pursuant to ASC 606, the Company recognizes revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Under this standard, revenue is based on a contract with a determinable transaction price and distinct performance obligations with probable collectability. Revenues cannot be recognized until the performance obligation(s) are satisfied and control is transferred to the customer. The Company's adoption of ASC 606 impacted the timing and recognition of incentive fees in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The adoption of ASC 606 did not have an impact on the Company’s management fees, administrative fees, transaction fees or other fees. The details of the significant changes and quantitative impact of the adoption of ASC 606 are further discussed below.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company considers the applicability and impact of all FASB ASUs issued. ASUs not listed below were assessed and either determined to be not applicable or expected to have minimal impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The objective of the guidance in ASU 2016-02 is to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and liabilities in the balance sheet and disclosing key information. ASU 2016-02 amends previous lease guidance, which required a lessee to categorize and account for leases as either operating leases or capital leases, and instead requires a lessee to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset on the entity’s balance sheet for all leases with terms that exceed one year. The lease liability and right-of-use asset are to be carried at the present value of remaining expected future lease payments. The guidance should be applied using a modified retrospective approach. ASU 2016-02 is effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently compiling all leases and right–of–use terms to evaluate the impact of this guidance on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. ASU 2018-02 allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from Public Law No. 115-97 (the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”). Consequently, the amendments eliminate the stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and will improve the usefulness of information reported to financial statement users. However, because the amendments only relate to the reclassification of the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the underlying guidance that requires that the effect of a change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing operations is not affected. This ASU also requires certain disclosures about stranded tax effects. ASU 2018-02 is effective for all entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, (1) for public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued and (2) for all other entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. The guidance should be applied either in the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is recognized. The Company adopted ASU 2018-02 in the three months ended March 31, 2018. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2018-02, $1.2 million of stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to shareholders' equity during the three months ended March 31, 2018.

Performance Income

Performance income consists of carried interest and incentive fees.

Carried Interest

In certain fund structures, typically in private equity and real estate equity funds, carried interest is allocated to the Company based on cumulative fund performance to date, subject to the achievement of minimum return levels in accordance with the respective terms set out in each fund’s governing documents. At the end of each reporting period, a fund will allocate carried interest applicable to the Company based upon an assumed liquidation of that fund's net assets on the reporting date, irrespective of whether such amounts have been realized. Carried interest is recorded to the extent such amounts have been allocated, and may be subject to reversal to the extent that the amount allocated ultimately exceeds the amount due to the Company based on a fund’s cumulative investment returns.

Carried interest is realized when an underlying investment is profitably disposed of and the fund’s cumulative returns are in excess of the specific hurdle rates as defined in the applicable governing documents. Since carried interest is subject to reversal, the Company may need to accrue for potential repayment of previously received carried interest. This accrual represents all amounts previously distributed to the Company that would need to be repaid to the funds if the funds were to be liquidated based on the current fair value of the underlying funds’ investments as of the reporting date. The actual repayment obligations, however, generally do not become realized until the end of a fund’s life. As of June 30, 2018, if the funds were liquidated at their fair values, there would be a $0.2 million repayment obligation, and accordingly, the Company recorded a contingent repayment liability as June 30, 2018. As of December 31, 2017, if the funds were liquidated at their fair values, there would be no repayment obligation, and accordingly, the Company did not record a contingent repayment liability as of December 31, 2017.

Prior to January 1, 2018, the Company accounted for carried interest under Method 2 described in ASC 605-20-S99-1, which provides guidance on accounting for incentive-based performance income, including carried interest. Since Method 2 is no longer available following the adoption of ASC 606, the Company has reassessed its accounting policy for carried interest, and has determined that carried interest is within scope of ASC 323, Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures, and out of scope under the scoping provision of ASC 606. Therefore, following the election of ASC 323, the Company accounted for carried interest, which represents a performance-based capital allocation from an investment fund to the Company, as earnings from financial assets within the scope of ASC 323. Accordingly, the Company recognizes carried interest allocation as a separate revenue line item in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Uncollected carried interest as of the reporting date is recorded within investments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

The Company has applied the change in accounting principle on a full retrospective basis, and prior periods presented have been recast to conform with the current period's presentation. The change in accounting principle did not change the timing or the amount of carried interest recognized. Instead, the change in accounting principle resulted in reclassification from performance income to carried interest allocation, and therefore did not have any impact on net income. See the tables below for the impact of the change in accounting principle of carried interest.

Incentive Fees

Incentive fees earned on the performance of certain fund structures, typically in credit funds, are recognized based on the fund’s performance during the period, subject to the achievement of minimum return levels in accordance with the respective terms set out in each fund’s investment management agreement. Incentive fees are realized at the end of a measurement period, typically annually. Once realized, such fees are no longer subject to reversal.

Prior to January 1, 2018, the Company accounted for incentive fees under Method 2 as described above. However, the accounting for incentive fees is separate and distinct from the accounting for carried interest because the incentive fees are contractual fee arrangements and do not represent allocations of returns from partners' capital accounts. The Company now accounts for incentive fees in accordance with ASC 606. Accordingly, the Company recognizes incentive fee revenue only when the amount is realized and no longer subject to reversal. Therefore, the Company no longer recognizes unrealized incentive fees in revenues in the condensed consolidated financial statements. The adoption of ASC 606 results in the delayed recognition of unrealized incentive fees in the condensed consolidated financial statements until they become realized at the end of the measurement period, which is typically annually.

The Company adopted ASC 606 for incentive fees using the modified retrospective approach with an effective date of January 1, 2018. The cumulative effect of the adoption resulted in the reversal of $22.6 million of unrealized incentive fees and is presented as a reduction to the opening balances of components of equity as of January 1, 2018.

Fair Value Measurements

GAAP establishes a hierarchal disclosure framework that prioritizes the inputs used in measuring financial instruments at fair value into three levels based on their market observability. Market price observability is affected by a number of factors, including the type of instrument and the characteristics specific to the instrument. Financial instruments with readily available quoted prices from an active market or for which fair value can be measured based on actively quoted prices generally have a higher degree of market price observability and a lesser degree of judgment inherent in measuring fair value.

Financial assets and liabilities measured and reported at fair value are classified as follows:


•	Level I—Quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments.

•

Level II—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in inactive markets; and model‑derived valuations with directly or indirectly observable significant inputs. Level II inputs include prices in markets with few transactions, non-current prices, prices for which little public information exists or prices that vary substantially over time or among brokered market makers. Other inputs include interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment risks, loss severities, credit risks and default rates.


•	Level III—Valuations that rely on one or more significant unobservable inputs. These inputs reflect the Company’s assessment of the assumptions that market participants would use to value the instrument based on the best information available.

In some instances, an instrument may fall into more than one level of the fair value hierarchy. In such instances, the instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest of the three levels (with Level III being the lowest) that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of an input requires judgment and considers factors specific to the instrument. The Company accounts for the transfer of assets into or out of each fair value hierarchy level as of the beginning of the reporting period.

Derivative Financial Instruments

In the normal course of business, the Company and the Consolidated Funds are exposed to certain risks relating to their ongoing operations and use various types of derivative instruments primarily to mitigate against credit and foreign exchange risk. The derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments under the accounting standards for derivatives and hedging. The Company recognizes all of its derivative instruments at fair value as either assets or liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition within other assets or accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, respectively. These amounts may be offset to the extent that there is a legal right to offset and if elected by management.