XML 60 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements
 
Fair value, as defined by GAAP, is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement.  Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.  As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified within Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy) has been established.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
 
Derivative financial instruments
 
We use derivative financial instruments, such as interest rate swaps, to manage our interest rate risk. The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow analysis of the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair values of interest rate swaps are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts).  The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves. 
We incorporate credit valuation adjustments (“CVAs”) to appropriately reflect both our own nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of our derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we have considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts, and guarantees.
Although we have determined that the majority of the inputs used to value our derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the CVAs associated with our derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by us and our counterparties.  However, we have assessed the significance of the impact of the CVAs on the overall valuation of our derivative positions and have determined that they are not significant.  As a result, we have determined that our derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.  Unrealized gains or losses on derivatives are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) within equity at each measurement date. Our derivative financial instruments are included in “other liabilities” on our consolidated balance sheets.

The following table sets forth our financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, which equals book value, by level within the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014 (in thousands).
 
 
 
 
Basis of Fair Value Measurements
 
 
 
 
Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Items (Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
 
Total Fair Value
 
 
 
Description
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative financial instruments
 
$
(5,345
)
 
$
—

 
$
(5,345
)
 
$
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivative financial instruments
 
$
(789
)
 
$
—

 
$
(789
)
 
$
—



Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
 
Impairment of Real Estate Related Assets
 
We have recorded non-cash impairment charges related to a reduction in the fair value of certain of our assets.  The inputs used to calculate the fair value of these assets included projected cash flows and a risk-adjusted rate of return that we estimated would be used by a market participant in valuing these assets or by obtaining third party broker valuation estimates, bona fide purchase offers, or the expected sales price of an executed sales agreement. 

During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we recorded additional impairment losses of approximately $0.1 million for a property that was impaired at December 31, 2014, and was sold in 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we also recorded impairment losses for a property classified as held for sale. The following table summarizes those assets which were measured at fair value and impaired during 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):

 
 
 
 
Basis of Fair Value Measurements
 
 
Description
 
Fair Value
of Assets at Impairment
 
Quoted Prices
In Active
Markets for
Identical Items
(Level 1)
 
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Total
Losses
for the three months ended March 31, 2015
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Real estate
 
$
11,489

 
$
—

 
$
11,489

 
$
—

 
$
(132
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
for the year ended December 31, 2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Real estate (1)
 
$
11,489

 
$
—

 
$
11,489

 
$
—

 
$
(4,940
)
Real estate held for sale (2)
 
$
42,000

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
42,000

 
$
(8,225
)

_______________
(1) Recorded in the quarter ended December 31, 2014
(2) Recorded in the quarter ended March 31, 2014




Financial Instruments not Reported at Fair Value
 
Financial instruments held at March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, but not measured at fair value on a recurring basis include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, notes payable, accounts payable, payables to related parties, accrued liabilities and other liabilities.  With the exception of notes payable, the financial statement carrying amounts of these items approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. Estimated fair values for notes payable have been determined using recent trading activity and/or bid-ask spreads and are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. Carrying amounts and the related estimated fair value of our notes payable as of March 31, 2015, and December 31, 2014, are as follows (in thousands):
 
March 31, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair
Value
Notes payable
$
1,124,475

 
$
1,147,309

 
$
1,194,085

 
$
1,216,991

Notes payable associated with real estate held for sale
$
96,824

 
$
95,175

 
$
97,257

 
$
95,011