XML 28 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2017
Receivables [Abstract]  
Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses
The composition of net loans is summarized as follows:

 
 
Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars In Thousands)
 
2017
 
Percentage of Total
 
2016
 
Percentage of Total
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 
$
467,082

 
23.60
%
 
$
250,440

 
23.87
%
Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
 
436,083

 
22.04

 
184,688

 
17.59

Residential real estate
 
489,669

 
24.74

 
204,413

 
19.47

Commercial
 
463,652

 
23.43

 
311,486

 
29.67

Real estate construction
 
97,481

 
4.93

 
91,822

 
8.75

Consumer
 
24,942

 
1.26

 
6,849

 
0.65

Total loans
 
$
1,978,909

 
100.00
%
 
$
1,049,698

 
100.00
%
Less allowance for loan losses
 
15,805

 
 

 
16,008

 
 

Net loans
 
$
1,963,104

 
 

 
$
1,033,690

 
 

 

Unearned income and net deferred loan fees and costs totaled $3.1 million and $2.4 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Loans pledged to secure borrowings at the FHLB totaled $492.2 million and $266.6 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses totaled $15.8 million and $16.0 million at year end December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The allowance for loan losses was equivalent to 0.80% and 1.53% of total loans held for investment at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Adequacy of the allowance is assessed and the allowance is increased by provisions for loan losses charged to expense no less than quarterly. Charge-offs are taken when a loan is identified as uncollectible.

The methodology by which the Corporation systematically determines the amount of its allowance is set forth by the Board of Directors in its Loan Policy and implemented by management. The results of the analysis are documented, reviewed, and approved by the Board of Directors no less than quarterly.

The level of the allowance for loan losses is determined by management through an ongoing, detailed analysis of historical loss rates and risk characteristics. During each quarter, management evaluates the collectability of all loans in the portfolio and ensures an accurate risk rating is assigned to each loan. The risk rating scale and definitions commonly adopted by the Federal Banking Agencies is contained within the framework prescribed by the Bank’s Loan Policy. Any loan that is deemed to have potential or well defined weaknesses that may jeopardize collection in full is then analyzed to ascertain its level of weakness. If appropriate, the loan may be charged-off or a specific reserve may be assigned if the loan is deemed to be impaired.

During the risk rating verification process, each loan identified as inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged is considered impaired and is placed on non-accrual status. On these loans, management analyzes the potential impairment of the individual loan and may set aside a specific reserve. Any amounts deemed uncollectible during that analysis are charged-off.

For the remaining loans in each segment, the Bank calculates the probability of loss as a group using the risk rating for each of the following loan types: Commercial Real Estate - Owner Occupied, Commercial Real Estate - Non-Owner Occupied, Residential Real Estate, Commercial, Real Estate Construction, and Consumer. Management calculates the historical loss rate in each group by risk rating using a period of at least six years. This historical loss rate may then be adjusted based on management’s assessment of internal and external environmental factors. While management may consider other factors, the analysis generally includes factors such as unemployment, office vacancy rates, and any concentrations that exist within the portfolio. This adjustment is meant to account for changes between the historical economic environment and current conditions and for changes in the ongoing management of the portfolio which affects the loans’ potential losses.

Once complete, management compares the condition of the portfolio using several different characteristics, as well as its experience, to the experience of other banks in its peer group in order to determine if it is directionally consistent with others’ experience in our area and line of business. Based on that analysis, management aggregates the probabilities of loss of the remaining portfolio based on the specific and general allowances and may provide additional amounts to the allowance for loan losses as needed. Since this process involves estimates, the allowance for loan losses may also contain an amount that is non-material which is not allocated to a specific loan or to a group of loans but is deemed necessary to absorb additional losses in the portfolio.

Management and the Board of Directors subject the reserve adequacy and methodology to a review on a regular basis by internal auditors and bank regulators, and such reviews have not resulted in any material adjustment to the allowance.

The following provides detailed information about the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 as well as the recorded investment in loans at December 31, 2017 and 2016. 

 
 
Allowance for Loan Losses
Twelve months ended December 31, 2017
 
Commercial real
estate - owner
occupied
 
Commercial real
estate - non-owner
occupied
 
Residential
real estate
 
Commercial
 
Real estate
construction
 
Consumer
 
Total
 
 
(In Thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Beginning Balance
 
$
2,943

 
$
2,145

 
$
2,510

 
$
7,053

 
$
1,277

 
$
80

 
$
16,008

Charge-offs
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(7,457
)
 
—

 
(27
)
 
(7,484
)
Recoveries
 
17

 
—

 
131

 
209

 
—

 
5

 
362

Provisions
 
1,320

 
959

 
(460
)
 
5,645

 
(571
)
 
26

 
6,919

Ending Balance
 
$
4,280

 
$
3,104

 
$
2,181

 
$
5,450

 
$
706

 
$
84

 
$
15,805


Twelve months ended December 31, 2016
 
Commercial real
estate - owner
occupied
 
Commercial real
estate - non-owner
occupied
 
Residential
real estate
 
Commercial
 
Real estate
construction
 
Consumer
 
Total
 
 
(In Thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Beginning Balance
 
$
3,042

 
$
1,862

 
$
2,862

 
$
4,612

 
$
1,056

 
$
129

 
$
13,563

Charge-offs
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Recoveries
 
—

 
—

 
40

 
285

 
—

 
—

 
325

Provisions
 
(99
)
 
283

 
(392
)
 
2,156

 
221

 
(49
)
 
2,120

Ending Balance
 
$
2,943

 
$
2,145

 
$
2,510

 
$
7,053

 
$
1,277

 
$
80

 
$
16,008


Twelve months ended December 31, 2015
 
Commercial real
estate - owner
occupied
 
Commercial real
estate - non-owner
occupied
 
Residential
real estate
 
Commercial
 
Real estate
construction
 
Consumer
 
Total
 
 
(In Thousands)
Allowance for loan losses:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Beginning Balance
 
$
3,229

 
$
1,894

 
$
3,308

 
$
4,284

 
$
596

 
$
88

 
$
13,399

Charge-offs
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(186
)
 
—

 
—

 
(186
)
Recoveries
 
—

 
—

 
61

 
102

 
37

 
—

 
200

Provisions
 
(187
)
 
(32
)
 
(507
)
 
412

 
423

 
41

 
150

Ending Balance
 
$
3,042

 
$
1,862

 
$
2,862

 
$
4,612

 
$
1,056

 
$
129

 
$
13,563


Loans acquired in a transfer, including in business combinations, where there is evidence of credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at the date of acquisition that the Corporation will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments, are accounted for as purchased credit impaired loans. Purchased credit impaired loans are initially recorded at fair value, which includes estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loan. Accordingly, the historical allowance for loan losses related to these loans is not carried over.

Accounting for purchased credit impaired loans involves estimating fair value, at acquisition, using the principal and interest cash flows expected to be collected discounted at the prevailing market rate of interest. The excess of cash flows expected to be collected over the estimated fair value at the acquisition date is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized in interest income using an effective yield method over the remaining life of the loans. The difference between contractually required payments and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition, considering the impact of prepayments, is referred to as the nonaccretable difference and is not recorded. Any decreases in cash flows expected to be collected (other than due to decreases in interest rate indices and changes in prepayment and assumptions) will be charged to the provision for loan losses, resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan losses.

The following table present the changes in the accretable yield for purchased credit impaired loans for the year ended December 31, 2017:

(In Thousands)
 
2017
Accretable yield, beginning of period
 
$
—

   Additions
 
557

   Accretion
 
(313
)
   Reclassification from (to) nonaccretable difference
 
—

   Other changes, net
 
—

Accretable yield, end of period
 
$
244



 
 
Recorded Investment in Loans
December 31, 2017
 
Commercial real
estate - owner
occupied
 
Commercial real
estate - non-owner
occupied
 
Residential
real estate
 
Commercial
 
Real estate
construction
 
Consumer
 
Total
 
 
(In Thousands)
Allowance
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Ending balance:
 
$
4,280

 
$
3,104

 
$
2,181

 
$
5,450

 
$
706

 
$
84

 
$
15,805

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
234

 
$
186

 
$
—

 
$
420

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
 
$
4,280

 
$
3,104

 
$
2,181

 
$
5,216

 
$
520

 
$
84

 
$
15,385

Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Ending balance:
 
$
467,082

 
$
436,083

 
$
489,669

 
$
463,652

 
$
97,481

 
$
24,942

 
$
1,978,909

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
1,393

 
$
—

 
$
166

 
$
3,107

 
$
865

 
$
182

 
$
5,713

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
 
$
464,030

 
$
435,109

 
$
487,390

 
$
460,369

 
$
96,616

 
$
24,713

 
$
1,968,227

Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
 
$
1,659

 
$
974

 
$
2,113

 
$
176

 
$
—

 
$
47

 
$
4,969


December 31, 2016
 
Commercial real
estate - owner
occupied
 
Commercial real
estate - non-owner
occupied
 
Residential
real estate
 
Commercial
 
Real estate
construction
 
Consumer
 
Total
 
 
(In Thousands)
Allowance
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Ending balance:
 
$
2,943

 
$
2,145

 
$
2,510

 
$
7,053

 
$
1,277

 
$
80

 
$
16,008

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
2,805

 
$
221

 
$
—

 
$
3,026

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
 
$
2,943

 
$
2,145

 
$
2,510

 
$
4,248

 
$
1,056

 
$
80

 
$
12,982

Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Ending balance:
 
$
250,440

 
$
184,688

 
$
204,413

 
$
311,486

 
$
91,822

 
$
6,849

 
$
1,049,698

Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
335

 
$
—

 
$
606

 
$
6,182

 
$
940

 
$
—

 
$
8,063

Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
 
$
250,105

 
$
184,688

 
$
203,807

 
$
305,304

 
$
90,882

 
$
6,849

 
$
1,041,635

Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—



Identifying and Classifying Portfolio Risks by Risk Rating

At origination, loans are categorized into risk categories based upon original underwriting. Subsequent to origination, management evaluates the collectability of all loans in the portfolio and assigns a proprietary risk rating on a quarterly basis as of the 15th of the last month in the quarter. Ratings range from the highest to lowest quality based on factors including measurements of ability to pay, collateral type and value, borrower stability, management experience, and credit enhancements. These ratings are consistent with the bank regulatory rating system.

A loan may have portions of its balance in one rating and other portions in a different rating. The Bank may use these “split ratings” when factors cause loan loss risk to exist for part but not all of the principal balance. Split ratings may also be used where cash collateral or a government agency has provided a guaranty that partially covers a loan.

For clarity of presentation, the Corporation’s loan portfolio is profiled below in accordance with the risk rating framework that has been commonly adopted by the federal banking agencies. The definitions of the various risk rating categories are as follows:

Pass - The condition of the borrower and the performance of the loan are satisfactory or better.

Special mention - A special mention asset has one or more potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in the deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institution’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard - A substandard asset is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified must have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses, that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful - An asset classified doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loss - Assets classified loss are considered uncollectible and their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, and a partial recovery may be effected in the future.

The Bank did not have any loans classified as loss or doubtful at December 31, 2017 and 2016. It is the Bank’s policy to charge-off any loan once the risk rating is classified as loss.

The profile of the loan portfolio, as indicated by risk rating, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 is shown below.

 
 
December 31, 2017
Credit Risk Profile by Risk Rating
 
Pass
 
Special Mention
 
Substandard
 
Doubtful
 
Loss
 
Unearned
Income
 
Total Loans
 
 
(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 
$
465,464

 
$
1,639

 
$
758

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
(779
)
 
$
467,082

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
 
437,087

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(1,004
)
 
436,083

Residential real estate
 
487,800

 
189

 
1,835

 
—

 
—

 
(155
)
 
489,669

Commercial
 
461,091

 
1,615

 
1,750

 
—

 
—

 
(804
)
 
463,652

Real estate construction
 
92,522

 
5,349

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(390
)
 
97,481

Consumer
 
24,928

 
—

 
10

 
—

 
—

 
4

 
24,942

Total
 
$
1,968,892

 
$
8,792

 
$
4,353

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
(3,128
)
 
$
1,978,909


 
 
December 31, 2016
Credit Risk Profile by Risk Rating
 
Pass
 
Special Mention
 
Substandard
 
Doubtful
 
Loss
 
Unearned
Income
 
Total Loans
 
 
(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 
$
247,001

 
$
1,213

 
$
2,807

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
(581
)
 
$
250,440

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
 
185,020

 
300

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(632
)
 
184,688

Residential real estate
 
202,762

 
932

 
878

 
—

 
—

 
(159
)
 
204,413

Commercial
 
287,978

 
4,544

 
19,561

 
—

 
—

 
(597
)
 
311,486

Real estate construction
 
91,296

 
—

 
940

 
—

 
—

 
(414
)
 
91,822

Consumer
 
6,848

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1

 
6,849

Total
 
$
1,020,905

 
$
6,989

 
$
24,186

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
(2,382
)
 
$
1,049,698



Loans listed as non-performing are also placed on non-accrual status. The accrual of interest is discontinued at the time a loan is 90 days delinquent or when the credit deteriorates and there is doubt that the credit will be paid as agreed, unless the credit is well-secured and in process of collection. Once the loan is on non-accrual status, all accrued but unpaid interest is also charged-off, and all payments are used to reduce the principal balance. Once the principal balance is repaid in full, additional payments are taken into income. A loan may be returned to accrual status if the borrower shows renewed willingness and ability to repay under the term of the loan agreement. The risk profile based upon payment activity is shown below.

 
 
December 31, 2017
Credit Risk Profile Based on Payment Activity
 
Performing
 
Non-Performing
 
Total Loans
 
 
(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 
$
466,016

 
$
1,066

 
$
467,082

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
 
436,083

 
—

 
436,083

Residential real estate
 
489,669

 
—

 
489,669

Commercial
 
461,139

 
2,513

 
463,652

Real estate construction
 
96,616

 
865

 
97,481

Consumer
 
24,760

 
182

 
24,942

Total
 
$
1,974,283

 
$
4,626

 
$
1,978,909


 
 
December 31, 2016
Credit Risk Profile Based on Payment Activity
 
Performing
 
Non-Performing
 
Total Loans
 
 
(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 
$
250,440

 
$
—

 
$
250,440

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
 
184,688

 
—

 
184,688

Residential real estate
 
203,982

 
431

 
204,413

Commercial
 
305,935

 
5,551

 
311,486

Real estate construction
 
90,882

 
940

 
91,822

Consumer
 
6,849

 
—

 
6,849

Total
 
$
1,042,776

 
$
6,922

 
$
1,049,698



Loans are considered past due if a contractual payment is not made by the calendar day after the payment is due. For reporting purposes, however, loans past due 1 to 29 days are excluded. The delinquency status of the loans in the portfolio is shown below as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. Loans that were on non-accrual status are not included in any past due amounts.

 
 
Age Analysis of Past Due Loans
December 31, 2017
 
 
30-59 Days
Past Due
 
60-89 Days
Past Due
 
Greater than
 90 Days
 
Total Past
Due
 
Non-accrual
Loans
 
Current
Loans
 
Total
Loans
 
 
(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
1,066

 
$
466,016

 
$
467,082

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
436,083

 
436,083

Residential real estate
 
655

 
140

 
213

 
1,008

 
—

 
488,661

 
489,669

Commercial
 
138

 
19

 
—

 
157

 
2,513

 
460,982

 
463,652

Real estate construction
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
865

 
96,616

 
97,481

Consumer
 
81

 
2

 
—

 
83

 
182

 
24,677

 
24,942

Total
 
$
874

 
$
161

 
$
213

 
$
1,248

 
$
4,626

 
$
1,973,035

 
$
1,978,909


 
 
12/31/2016
 
 
30-59 Days
Past Due
 
60-89 Days
Past Due
 
Greater than
90 Days
 
Total Past
Due
 
Non-accrual
Loans
 
Current
Loans
 
Total
Loans
 
 
(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
250,440

 
$
250,440

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
184,688

 
184,688

Residential real estate
 
—

 
97

 
—

 
97

 
431

 
203,885

 
204,413

Commercial
 
438

 
—

 
—

 
438

 
5,551

 
305,497

 
311,486

Real estate construction
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
940

 
90,882

 
91,822

Consumer
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
6,849

 
6,849

Total
 
$
438

 
$
97

 
$
—

 
$
535

 
$
6,922

 
$
1,042,241

 
$
1,049,698



Impaired Loans

A loan is classified as impaired when it is deemed probable by management’s analysis that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, or the recorded investment in the impaired loan is greater than the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan's effective interest rate. In the case of an impaired loan, management conducts an analysis which identifies if a quantifiable potential loss exists, and takes the necessary steps to record that loss when it has been identified as uncollectible.

As the ultimate collectability of the total principal of an impaired loan is in doubt, the loan is placed on nonaccrual status with all payments applied to principal under the cost-recovery method. As such, the Bank did not recognize any interest income on its impaired loans for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

The table below shows the results of management’s analysis of impaired loans as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

 
 
Impaired Loans
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Recorded
investment
 
Unpaid principal
balance
 
Related
allowance
 
Recorded
investment
 
Unpaid principal
balance
 
Related
allowance
 
 
(In Thousands)
With no specific related allowance recorded:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 
$
1,066

 
$
1,092

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Residential real estate
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
431

 
431

 
—

Commercial
 
747

 
1,080

 
—

 
2,748

 
3,771

 
—

Real estate construction
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Consumer
 
145

 
155

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

With a specific related allowance recorded:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Residential real estate
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Commercial
 
1,766

 
1,817

 
234

 
2,803

 
1,400

 
2,805

Real estate construction
 
865

 
952

 
186

 
940

 
994

 
221

Consumer
 
37

 
38

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Total:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 
$
1,066

 
$
1,092

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Residential real estate
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
431

 
431

 
—

Commercial
 
2,513

 
2,897

 
234

 
5,551

 
5,171

 
2,805

Real estate construction
 
865

 
952

 
186

 
940

 
994

 
221

Consumer
 
182

 
193

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
 
$
4,626

 
$
5,134

 
$
420

 
$
6,922

 
$
6,596

 
$
3,026



The table below shows the average recorded investment in impaired loans for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

 
 
Twelve Months Ended
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Average Recorded
Investment
 
Average Recorded
Investment
 
Average Recorded
Investment
 
 
(In Thousands)
Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 
$
1,075

 
$
59

 
$
—

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
 
—

 
2,099

 
5,572

Residential real estate
 
—

 
120

 
163

Commercial
 
3,395

 
4,885

 
917

Real estate construction
 
923

 
1,009

 
1,086

Consumer
 
179

 
—

 
—

 
 
$
5,572

 
$
8,172

 
$
7,738



Troubled Debt Restructurings

A troubled debt restructuring ("TDR") is a formal restructure of a loan when the Bank, for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties, grants a concession to a borrower. The Bank classifies these transactions as a TDR if the transaction meets the following conditions: an existing credit agreement must be formally renewed, extended and/or modified; the borrower must be experiencing financial difficulty; and the Bank has granted a concession that it would not otherwise consider.

Once identified as a TDR, a loan is considered to be impaired, and an impairment analysis is performed for the loan individually, rather than under a general loss allowance based on the loan type and risk rating. Any resulting shortfall is charged off. This method is used consistently for all segments of the portfolio.

Normally, loans identified as TDRs would be placed on non-accrual status and considered non-performing until sufficient history of timely collection or payment has occurred that allows them to return to performing status, generally 6 months.

During 2017, one commercial loan totaling $91 thousand at December 31, 2017 was modified in connection with a troubled debt restructuring. The modification granted the borrower an extension of the maturity date and was deemed to have no material financial effects as a direct result of this modification. Two construction loan totaling $2.0 million at the time of restructure were modified in connection with a troubled debt restructuring during the year ended December 31, 2016. The modification granted the borrower reduced payments for a period of two years as well as a reduction in the interest rate. There were no material financial effects as a direct result of this modification.

No payment defaults occurred during the year ended December 31, 2017 or December 31, 2016 for loans restructured during the preceding 12 month period.

The table below shows the results of management’s analysis of troubled debt restructurings as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. 

 
 
Troubled Debt Restructurings
 
 
December 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Number of
loans
 
Outstanding
balance
 
Recorded
investment
 
Number of
loans
 
Outstanding
balance
 
Recorded
investment
 
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
Performing
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Residential real estate
 
1

 
208

 
166

 
1

 
217

 
175

Commercial
 
2

 
921

 
921

 
2

 
967

 
967

Real estate construction
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Consumer
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-Performing
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial real estate - owner occupied
 
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
—

 
$
—

 
$
—

Commercial real estate - non-owner occupied
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Residential real estate
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Commercial
 
2

 
956

 
956

 
2

 
2,000

 
2,000

Real estate construction
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
1

 
994

 
940

Consumer
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total
 
5

 
$
2,085

 
$
2,043

 
6

 
$
4,178

 
$
4,082