XML 46 R12.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair value measurement
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Fair value measurement  
Fair value measurement

6. Fair value measurement

 

ASC 820 establishes a three-tiered hierarchy that draws a distinction between market participant assumptions based on (i) quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1); (ii) inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2); and (iii) unobservable inputs that require us to use present value and other valuation techniques in the determination of fair value (Level 3). The following table sets forth our financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

 

At June 30, 2014

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents

 

$

4,295

 

$

 

$

 

$

4,295

 

Marketable securities

 

 

29,909

 

 

29,909

 

Restricted cash

 

545

 

 

 

545

 

Total assets

 

$

4,840

 

$

29,909

 

$

 

$

34,749

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration

 

$

 

$

 

$

1,584

 

$

1,584

 

Total liabilities

 

$

 

$

 

$

1,584

 

$

1,584

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2013

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents

 

$

23,683

 

$

 

$

 

$

23,683

 

Marketable securities

 

 

32,962

 

 

32,962

 

Restricted cash

 

545

 

 

 

545

 

Total assets

 

$

24,228

 

$

32,962

 

$

 

$

57,190

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contingent consideration

 

$

 

$

 

$

1,942

 

$

1,942

 

Total liabilities

 

$

 

$

 

$

1,942

 

$

1,942

 

 

Our marketable securities utilize Level 2 inputs and consist primarily of corporate securities which include commercial paper and corporate debt instruments including notes issued by foreign or domestic corporations which pay in U.S. dollars and carry a rating of A or better. We have evaluated the various types of securities in our investment portfolio to determine an appropriate fair value hierarchy level based upon trading activity and the observability of market inputs.  Due to variations in trading volumes and the lack of quoted market prices in active markets, our fixed maturities are classified as Level 2 securities. The fair value of our fixed maturity marketable securities is derived through the use of a third party pricing source using recent reported trades for identical or similar securities, making adjustments through the reporting date based upon available market observable data.

 

The Company used the income approach to value the contingent consideration as of June 30, 2014. The contingent consideration used a discounted cash flow method with probability weighted cash flows for Endeka. The contingent consideration for AWG was paid out subsequent to June 30, 2014. The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts related to the fair value of contingent consideration for the Endeka and AWG acquisitions, categorized as Level 3:

 

Beginning balance, January 1, 2014

 

$

1,942

 

Change in fair value

 

(358

)

Balance, June 30, 2014

 

$

1,584