XML 30 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.4.0.3
Fair Value Measurements
12 Months Ended
Jan. 30, 2016
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements

We follow the guidance in ASC Topic 820, “Fair Value Measurement” (“ASC 820”) as it relates to financial and nonfinancial assets and liabilities. ASC 820 prioritizes inputs used in measuring fair value into a hierarchy of three levels:

Level 1 – Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
 
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions about the inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available.

In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described above, the following table shows the fair value of our financial assets and liabilities that are required to be remeasured at fair value on a recurring basis:
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
January 30,
2016
 
January 31,
2015
 
January 30,
2016
 
January 31,
2015
 
January 30,
2016
 
January 31,
2015
 
(In thousands)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents 1
$
41,509

 
$
110,022

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Total
$
41,509

 
$
110,022

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
GoJane performance plan liability 2
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
723

 
$
1,446

Total
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
723

 
$
1,446


1 Cash equivalents include money market investments valued as Level 1 inputs in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of cash equivalents approximates their carrying value due to their short-term maturities.

2 Under the terms of the fiscal 2012 GoJane acquisition agreement, the purchase price also includes contingent cash payments of up to an aggregate of $8.0 million if certain financial metrics are achieved by the GoJane business during the five year period beginning on the acquisition date (the "GJ Performance Plan"). These performance payments are not contingent upon continuous employment by the two individual former stockholders of GoJane. The GJ Performance Plan liability is measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs as defined in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the contingent payments as of the acquisition date was estimated to be $7.0 million. This was based on a weighted average expected achievement probability and a discount rate over the expected payment stream. Each quarter, we remeasure the GJ Performance Plan liability at fair value. During the fourth quarter of 2015, we remeasured the liability and reversed $0.8 million based on the probability of achieving the payment targets. During the fourth quarter of 2014, we remeasured the liability and reversed $4.5 million based on the probability of achieving the payment targets.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the GJ Performance Plan measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
 
Fiscal Year Ended
 
January 30, 2016

 
January 31, 2015
 
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period
$
1,446

 
$
7,416

Accretion of interest expense
77

 
121

GoJane consideration payment

 
(1,600
)
Subsequent remeasurement
(800
)
 
(4,491
)
Balance at end of period
$
723

 
$
1,446



The $0.7 million liability as of January 30, 2016 and the $1.4 million liability as of January 31, 2015 were included in non-current liabilities.

Non-Financial Assets

Our non-financial assets, which include fixtures, equipment and improvements and intangible assets, are not required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis.  However, if certain triggering events occur, or if an impairment test is required and we are required to evaluate the non-financial asset for impairment, we would record an impairment charge if the carrying value of the non-financial asset exceeds its fair value.  

We recorded asset impairment charges of $11.1 million included in cost of sales during fiscal 2015. The impairment charges relate to 87 stores that were not previously impaired in addition to previously impaired stores. We recorded asset impairment charges of $77.2 million in fiscal 2014 for primarily 341 stores. Of these charges, $46.7 million was included in cost of sales. The remaining $30.5 million was included in restructuring charges, as it related to the P.S. from Aéropostale stores to be exited. We recorded store asset impairment charges, all of which was included in the cost of sales, of $46.1 million in fiscal 2013 for primarily 230 stores. The above mentioned asset impairment charges are included in our retail stores and e-commerce segment. These amounts included the write-down of long-lived assets at stores that were assessed for impairment because of (a) changes in circumstances that indicated the carrying value of assets may not be recoverable, or (b) management’s intention to relocate or close stores.  Impairment charges were primarily related to revenues and/or gross margins not meeting targeted levels at the respective stores as a result of macroeconomic conditions, location related conditions and other factors that were negatively impacting the sales and cash flows of these locations. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2014, we recorded $5.1 million of impairment loss for GoJane trademarks included in our retail stores and e-commerce segment. The decline in fair value of the trademarks below its book value was primarily the result of lower than expected revenue and gross margin growth relative to the assumptions made in the prior fiscal year.

Long-lived assets and intangible assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for purposes of calculating impairment using Level 3 inputs as defined in the fair value hierarchy.  The fair value of these assets is determined by estimating the amount and timing of net future discounted net cash flows.  We estimate future net cash flows based on our experience, current trends and local market conditions. Based upon future results of operations at the store level, additional impairment charges may be recorded in future periods if loss trends continue and/or the current net cash flow projections are not achieved.

The table below sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the fair value of long-lived assets and intangible assets for which impairment was recognized during the year:

 
 
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)
 
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
 
 
Total Fair Value
 
Total Losses
 
 
(In thousands)
January 30, 2016:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-lived assets held and used
 
$

 
$

 
$
1,177

 
$
1,177

 
$
11,120

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
January 31, 2015:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-lived assets held and used
 
$

 
$

 
$
7,904

 
$
7,904

 
$
77,224

Intangible assets
 

 

 
6,300

 
6,300

 
5,100

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
February 1, 2014:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-lived assets held and used
 
$

 
$

 
$
11,687

 
$
11,687

 
$
46,070