XML 19 R8.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
BASIS OF PRESENTATION  
BASIS OF PRESENTATION

1.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared by Cimarex Energy Co. (“Cimarex,” “we,” or “us”) pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  Accordingly, certain disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and normally included in Annual Reports on Form 10-K have been omitted.  Although management believes that our disclosures in these interim financial statements are adequate, they should be read in conjunction with the financial statements, summary of significant accounting policies, and footnotes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2016.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary to fairly present our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods and as of the dates shown.  

Use of Estimates

Areas of significance requiring the use of management’s judgments include the estimation of proved oil and gas reserves used in calculating depletion, the estimation of future net revenues used in computing ceiling test limitations, the estimation of future abandonment obligations used in recording asset retirement obligations, and the assessment of goodwill.  Estimates and judgments are also required in determining allowances for doubtful accounts, impairments of unproved properties and other assets, valuation of deferred tax assets, fair value measurements, and contingencies.

Oil and Gas Well Equipment and Supplies

Our oil and gas well equipment and supplies are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value, where net realizable value is estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation.  An analysis of our oil and gas well equipment and supplies was performed as of March 31, 2017, and no impairment was required.  Declines in the price of oil and gas well equipment and supplies in future periods could cause us to recognize impairments on these assets.  An impairment would not affect cash flow from operating activities, but would adversely affect our net income and stockholders’ equity.

Oil and Gas Properties

We use the full cost method of accounting for our oil and gas operations.  Accounting rules require us to perform a quarterly ceiling test calculation to test our oil and gas properties for possible impairment.  If the net capitalized cost of our oil and gas properties subject to amortization exceeds the ceiling limitation, the excess is charged to expense.  The ceiling limitation is equal to the sum of: (i) the present value discounted at 10% of estimated future net revenues from proved reserves, (ii) the cost of properties not being amortized, and (iii) the lower of cost or estimated fair value of unproven properties included in the costs being amortized, less the related income tax effects.  Estimated future net revenues are determined by proved reserve quantities and commodity prices net of operating costs and capital expenditures.

At March 31, 2017, the carrying value of our oil and gas properties subject to the test did not exceed the calculated value of the ceiling limitation and, therefore, no ceiling test impairment was recognized.  At March 31, 2016, we recognized a ceiling test impairment of $318.8 million ($202.6 million, net of tax).  This impairment resulted primarily from decreases in the 12-month average trailing prices for oil, natural gas, and NGLs utilized in determining the future net revenues from proved reserves.  The quarterly ceiling test is primarily impacted by commodity prices, changes in estimated reserve quantities, reserves produced, overall exploration and development costs, depletion expense, and deferred taxes.  If pricing conditions decline, or if there is a negative impact on one or more of the other components of the calculation, we may incur full cost ceiling test impairments in future quarters.  The ceiling calculation is not intended to be indicative of the fair market value of our proved reserves or future results.  Impairment charges do not affect cash flow from operating activities, but do adversely affect our net income and various components of our balance sheet.  Any impairment of oil and gas properties is not reversible at a later date.  

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).  In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date by one year to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period.  Early adoption is permitted, but not before the original effective date of reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016.  The new revenue standard provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized.  The core principle of the guidance is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.  The guidance in this update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification.  Entities can choose to apply the standard using either the full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach.  We intend to adopt this standard on January 1, 2018, utilizing a modified retrospective approach.  Management does not believe the effect of adoption will be material to our financial statements because we follow the sales method of accounting for our oil, gas, and NGL production, which is generally consistent with the revenue recognition provisions of the new standard.  However, we anticipate the new standard will result in more robust footnote disclosures. 

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842).  The key provision of this ASU is that a lessee must recognize (i) liabilities to make lease payments and (ii) right-of-use assets on its balance sheet.  The ASU permits lessees to make a policy election to not recognize lease assets and liabilities for leases with terms of less than twelve months.  Under current generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), a determination of whether a lease is a capital or operating lease is made at lease inception and no assets or liabilities are recognized for operating leases.  Under this ASU, the determination to be made at the inception of a contract is whether the contract is, or contains, a lease.  Leases convey the right to control the use of an identified asset in exchange for consideration.  Only the lease components of a contract must be accounted for in accordance with this ASU.  Non-lease components, such as activities that transfer a good or service to the customer, shall be accounted for under other applicable Topics.  An entity may make a policy election to not separate lease and non-lease components and account for the non-lease components together with the lease components as a single lease component.  This ASU retains a distinction between finance and operating leases concerning the recognition and presentation of the expense and payments related to leases in the statements of operations and comprehensive income and cash flows, however, both types of leases require the recognition of assets and liabilities on the balance sheet.  This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted.  Upon transition, lessees will be required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach.  We are in the process of evaluating the potential impact of adopting this guidance, but believe the primary effect will be to record assets and liabilities for contracts currently accounted for as operating leases.  We do not intend to adopt the standard early.