XML 33 R22.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Fair Value (Tables)
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis and their corresponding placement in the fair value hierarchy are presented below at:
 
March 31, 2017
 
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
Total
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
 
(In thousands)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed maturity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. corporate
$
—

 
$
681,990

 
$
50,104

 
$
732,094

U.S. government and agency
286,435

 
118,453

 
—

 
404,888

RMBS
—

 
197,176

 
20,077

 
217,253

Foreign corporate
—

 
201,866

 
32,500

 
234,366

CMBS
—

 
176,061

 
5,324

 
181,385

State and political subdivision
—

 
50,709

 
—

 
50,709

ABS
—

 
21,730

 
4,926

 
26,656

Foreign government
—

 
16,417

 
—

 
16,417

Total fixed maturity securities
286,435

 
1,464,402

 
112,931

 
1,863,768

Short-term investments
—

 
1,998

 
—

 
1,998

Derivative assets: (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency exchange rate
—

 
7,896

 
—

 
7,896

Embedded derivatives within asset host contracts (2)
—

 
—

 
354,497

 
354,497

Separate account assets (3)
—

 
4,876,874

 
—

 
4,876,874

Total assets
$
286,435

 
$
6,351,170

 
$
467,428

 
$
7,105,033

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Embedded derivatives within liability host contracts (2)
—

 
—

 
(36,327
)
 
(36,327
)
Total liabilities
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
(36,327
)
 
$
(36,327
)
 
December 31, 2016
 
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
Total
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
 
(In thousands)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Fixed maturity securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. corporate
$
—

 
$
681,406

 
$
40,405

 
$
721,811

U.S. government and agency
289,186

 
117,359

 
—

 
406,545

RMBS
—

 
217,091

 
21,296

 
238,387

Foreign corporate
—

 
200,454

 
31,886

 
232,340

CMBS
—

 
173,763

 
5,193

 
178,956

State and political subdivision
—

 
56,320

 
—

 
56,320

ABS
—

 
21,736

 
4,934

 
26,670

Foreign government
—

 
17,485

 
—

 
17,485

Total fixed maturity securities
289,186

 
1,485,614

 
103,714

 
1,878,514

Derivative assets: (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency exchange rate
—

 
8,656

 
—

 
8,656

Embedded derivatives within asset host contracts (2)
—

 
—

 
379,297

 
379,297

Separate account assets (3)
—

 
4,758,449

 
—

 
4,758,449

Total assets
$
289,186

 
$
6,252,719

 
$
483,011

 
$
7,024,916

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Embedded derivatives within liability host contracts (2)
—

 
—

 
(23,740
)
 
(23,740
)
Total liabilities
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
(23,740
)
 
$
(23,740
)
______________
(1)
Derivative assets are presented within other invested assets on the balance sheets.
(2)
Embedded derivatives within asset host contracts are presented within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables on the balance sheets. Embedded derivatives within liability host contracts are presented within policyholder account balances on the balance sheets.
(3)
Investment performance related to separate account assets is fully offset by corresponding amounts credited to contractholders whose liability is reflected within separate account liabilities. Separate account liabilities are set equal to the estimated fair value of separate account assets.
Fair Value Inputs, Quantitative Information
The following table presents certain quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, and the sensitivity of the estimated fair value to changes in those inputs, for the more significant asset and liability classes measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) at:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
Impact of
Increase in Input
on Estimated
Fair Value (2)
 
Valuation Techniques
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
 

Range
 
Weighted
Average (1)
 
Range
 
Weighted
Average (1)
 
Fixed maturity securities (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. corporate and foreign corporate
•
Matrix pricing
 
•
Offered quotes (4)
 
96
-
144
 
107
 
94
-
136
 
107
 
Increase
 
•
Market pricing
 
•
Quoted prices (4)
 
75
-
110
 
97
 
75
-
110
 
97
 
Increase
RMBS
•
Market pricing
 
•
Quoted prices (4)
 
58
-
110
 
79
 
56
-
111
 
86
 
Increase (5)
CMBS
•
Market pricing
 
•
Quoted prices (4)
 



 

 
104
-
104
 
104
 
Increase (5)
Embedded derivatives
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Direct and ceded guaranteed minimum benefits
•
Option pricing techniques
 
•
Mortality rates:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ages 0 - 40
 
0%
-
0.09%
 
 
 
0%
-
0.09%
 
 
 
Decrease (6)
 
 
 
 
 
Ages 41 - 60
 
0.04%
-
0.65%
 
 
 
0.04%
-
0.65%
 
 
 
Decrease (6)
 
 
 
 
 
Ages 61 - 115
 
0.26%
-
100%
 
 
 
0.26%
-
100%
 
 
 
Decrease (6)
 
 
 
 
•
Lapse rates:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Durations 1 - 10
 
0.25%
-
100%
 
 
 
0.25%
-
100%
 
 
 
Decrease (7)
 
 
 
 
 
Durations 11 - 20
 
2%
-
100%
 
 
 
2%
-
100%
 
 
 
Decrease (7)
 
 
 
 
 
Durations 21 - 116
 
2%
-
100%
 
 
 
2%
-
100%
 
 
 
Decrease (7)
 
 
 
 
•
Utilization rates
 
0%
-
25%
 
 
 
0%
-
25%
 
 
 
Increase (8)
 
 
 
 
•
Withdrawal rates
 
0.25%
-
10%
 
 
 
0.25%
-
10%
 
 
 
(9)
 
 
 
 
•
Long-term equity volatilities
 
17.40%
-
25%
 
 
 
17.40%
-
25%
 
 
 
Increase (10)
 
 
 
 
•
Nonperformance risk spread
 
0.04%
-
0.55%
 
 
 
0.04%
-
0.57%
 
 
 
Decrease (11)
______________
(1)
The weighted average for fixed maturity securities is determined based on the estimated fair value of the securities.
(2)
The impact of a decrease in input would have the opposite impact on estimated fair value. For embedded derivatives, changes to direct guaranteed minimum benefits are based on liability positions; changes to ceded guaranteed minimum benefits are based on asset positions.
(3)
Significant increases (decreases) in expected default rates in isolation would result in substantially lower (higher) valuations.
(4)
Range and weighted average are presented in accordance with the market convention for fixed maturity securities of dollars per hundred dollars of par.
(5)
Changes in the assumptions used for the probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the loss severity and a directionally opposite change in the assumptions used for prepayment rates.
(6)
Mortality rates vary by age and by demographic characteristics such as gender. Mortality rate assumptions are based on company experience. A mortality improvement assumption is also applied. For any given contract, mortality rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative.
(7)
Base lapse rates are adjusted at the contract level based on a comparison of the actuarially calculated guaranteed values and the current policyholder account value, as well as other factors, such as the applicability of any surrender charges. A dynamic lapse function reduces the base lapse rate when the guaranteed amount is greater than the account value as in the money contracts are less likely to lapse. Lapse rates are also generally assumed to be lower in periods when a surrender charge applies. For any given contract, lapse rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative.
(8)
The utilization rate assumption estimates the percentage of contractholders with a GMIB or lifetime withdrawal benefit who will elect to utilize the benefit upon becoming eligible. The rates may vary by the type of guarantee, the amount by which the guaranteed amount is greater than the account value, the contract’s withdrawal history and by the age of the policyholder. For any given contract, utilization rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative.
(9)
The withdrawal rate represents the percentage of account balance that any given policyholder will elect to withdraw from the contract each year. The withdrawal rate assumption varies by age and duration of the contract, and also by other factors such as benefit type. For any given contract, withdrawal rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. For GMWBs, any increase (decrease) in withdrawal rates results in an increase (decrease) in the estimated fair value of the guarantees. For GMABs and GMIBs, any increase (decrease) in withdrawal rates results in a decrease (increase) in the estimated fair value.
(10)
Long-term equity volatilities represent equity volatility beyond the period for which observable equity volatilities are available. For any given contract, long-term equity volatility rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative.
(11)
Nonperformance risk spread varies by duration and by currency. For any given contract, multiple nonperformance risk spreads will apply, depending on the duration of the cash flow being discounted for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative.
Fair Value Inputs, Quantitative Information
The following table presents certain quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, and the sensitivity of the estimated fair value to changes in those inputs, for the more significant asset and liability classes measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) at:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
March 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
Impact of
Increase in Input
on Estimated
Fair Value (2)
 
Valuation Techniques
 
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
 

Range
 
Weighted
Average (1)
 
Range
 
Weighted
Average (1)
 
Fixed maturity securities (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. corporate and foreign corporate
•
Matrix pricing
 
•
Offered quotes (4)
 
96
-
144
 
107
 
94
-
136
 
107
 
Increase
 
•
Market pricing
 
•
Quoted prices (4)
 
75
-
110
 
97
 
75
-
110
 
97
 
Increase
RMBS
•
Market pricing
 
•
Quoted prices (4)
 
58
-
110
 
79
 
56
-
111
 
86
 
Increase (5)
CMBS
•
Market pricing
 
•
Quoted prices (4)
 



 

 
104
-
104
 
104
 
Increase (5)
Embedded derivatives
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Direct and ceded guaranteed minimum benefits
•
Option pricing techniques
 
•
Mortality rates:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ages 0 - 40
 
0%
-
0.09%
 
 
 
0%
-
0.09%
 
 
 
Decrease (6)
 
 
 
 
 
Ages 41 - 60
 
0.04%
-
0.65%
 
 
 
0.04%
-
0.65%
 
 
 
Decrease (6)
 
 
 
 
 
Ages 61 - 115
 
0.26%
-
100%
 
 
 
0.26%
-
100%
 
 
 
Decrease (6)
 
 
 
 
•
Lapse rates:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Durations 1 - 10
 
0.25%
-
100%
 
 
 
0.25%
-
100%
 
 
 
Decrease (7)
 
 
 
 
 
Durations 11 - 20
 
2%
-
100%
 
 
 
2%
-
100%
 
 
 
Decrease (7)
 
 
 
 
 
Durations 21 - 116
 
2%
-
100%
 
 
 
2%
-
100%
 
 
 
Decrease (7)
 
 
 
 
•
Utilization rates
 
0%
-
25%
 
 
 
0%
-
25%
 
 
 
Increase (8)
 
 
 
 
•
Withdrawal rates
 
0.25%
-
10%
 
 
 
0.25%
-
10%
 
 
 
(9)
 
 
 
 
•
Long-term equity volatilities
 
17.40%
-
25%
 
 
 
17.40%
-
25%
 
 
 
Increase (10)
 
 
 
 
•
Nonperformance risk spread
 
0.04%
-
0.55%
 
 
 
0.04%
-
0.57%
 
 
 
Decrease (11)
______________
(1)
The weighted average for fixed maturity securities is determined based on the estimated fair value of the securities.
(2)
The impact of a decrease in input would have the opposite impact on estimated fair value. For embedded derivatives, changes to direct guaranteed minimum benefits are based on liability positions; changes to ceded guaranteed minimum benefits are based on asset positions.
(3)
Significant increases (decreases) in expected default rates in isolation would result in substantially lower (higher) valuations.
(4)
Range and weighted average are presented in accordance with the market convention for fixed maturity securities of dollars per hundred dollars of par.
(5)
Changes in the assumptions used for the probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the loss severity and a directionally opposite change in the assumptions used for prepayment rates.
(6)
Mortality rates vary by age and by demographic characteristics such as gender. Mortality rate assumptions are based on company experience. A mortality improvement assumption is also applied. For any given contract, mortality rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative.
(7)
Base lapse rates are adjusted at the contract level based on a comparison of the actuarially calculated guaranteed values and the current policyholder account value, as well as other factors, such as the applicability of any surrender charges. A dynamic lapse function reduces the base lapse rate when the guaranteed amount is greater than the account value as in the money contracts are less likely to lapse. Lapse rates are also generally assumed to be lower in periods when a surrender charge applies. For any given contract, lapse rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative.
(8)
The utilization rate assumption estimates the percentage of contractholders with a GMIB or lifetime withdrawal benefit who will elect to utilize the benefit upon becoming eligible. The rates may vary by the type of guarantee, the amount by which the guaranteed amount is greater than the account value, the contract’s withdrawal history and by the age of the policyholder. For any given contract, utilization rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative.
(9)
The withdrawal rate represents the percentage of account balance that any given policyholder will elect to withdraw from the contract each year. The withdrawal rate assumption varies by age and duration of the contract, and also by other factors such as benefit type. For any given contract, withdrawal rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. For GMWBs, any increase (decrease) in withdrawal rates results in an increase (decrease) in the estimated fair value of the guarantees. For GMABs and GMIBs, any increase (decrease) in withdrawal rates results in a decrease (increase) in the estimated fair value.
(10)
Long-term equity volatilities represent equity volatility beyond the period for which observable equity volatilities are available. For any given contract, long-term equity volatility rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative.
(11)
Nonperformance risk spread varies by duration and by currency. For any given contract, multiple nonperformance risk spreads will apply, depending on the duration of the cash flow being discounted for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative.
Fair Value, Measured on Recurring Basis, Unobservable Input Reconciliation
The following tables summarize the change of all assets and (liabilities) measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):
 
 
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
 
 
Fixed Maturity Securities
 
 
 
 
Corporate (1)
 
Structured Securities
 
Net Embedded
Derivatives (2)
 
 
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
 
$
72,291

 
$
31,423

 
$
403,037

Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss) (3) (4)
 
(42
)
 
95

 
(131,329
)
Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in AOCI
 
998

 
216

 
—

Purchases (5)
 
20,631

 
—

 
—

Sales (5)
 
(11,274
)
 
(1,449
)
 
—

Issuances (5)
 
—

 
—

 
—

Settlements (5)
 
—

 
—

 
119,116

Transfers into Level 3 (6)
 
—

 
42

 
—

Transfers out of Level 3 (6)
 
—

 
—

 
—

Balance, end of period
 
$
82,604

 
$
30,327

 
$
390,824

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, beginning of period
 
$
55,189

 
$
13,862

 
$
360,381

Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss) (3) (4)
 
(896
)
 
56

 
49,158

Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in AOCI
 
1,189

 
(91
)
 
—

Purchases (5)
 
2,369

 
21

 
—

Sales (5)
 
(121
)
 
(418
)
 
—

Issuances (5)
 
—

 
—

 
—

Settlements (5)
 
—

 
—

 
(5,711
)
Transfers into Level 3 (6)
 
2,921

 
—

 
—

Transfers out of Level 3 (6)
 
(1,864
)
 
—

 
—

Balance, end of period
 
$
58,787

 
$
13,430

 
$
403,828

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss) for the instruments still held at March 31, 2017 (7)
 
$
(42
)
 
$
95

 
$
(130,943
)
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss) for the instruments still held at March 31, 2016 (7)
 
$
(896
)
 
$
56

 
$
51,199

______________
(1)
Comprised of U.S. and foreign corporate securities.
(2)
Embedded derivative assets and liabilities are presented net for purposes of the rollforward.
(3)
Amortization of premium/accretion of discount is included within net investment income. Impairments charged to net income (loss) on securities are included in net investment gains (losses). Lapses associated with net embedded derivatives are included in net derivative gains (losses). Substantially all realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in net income for net embedded derivatives are reported in net derivatives gains (losses).
(4)
Interest accruals, as well as cash interest coupons received, are excluded from the rollforward.
(5)
Items purchased/issued and then sold/settled in the same period are excluded from the rollforward. Fees attributed to embedded derivatives are included in settlements.
(6)
Gains and losses, in net income (loss) and OCI, are calculated assuming transfers into and/or out of Level 3 occurred at the beginning of the period. Items transferred into and then out of Level 3 in the same period are excluded from the rollforward.
(7)
Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss) relate to assets and liabilities still held at the end of the respective periods. Substantially all changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss) for net embedded derivatives are reported in net derivative gains (losses).
Fair Value of Financial Instruments Carried at Other Than Fair Value
The carrying values and estimated fair values for such financial instruments, and their corresponding placement in the fair value hierarchy, are summarized as follows at:
 
March 31, 2017
 
 
 
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
 
 
Carrying
Value
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Total
Estimated
Fair Value
 
(In thousands)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage loans
$
407,390

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
407,235

 
$
407,235

Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables
$
27,425

 
$
—

 
$
223

 
$
28,041

 
$
28,264

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Policyholder account balances
$
1,195,566

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
1,263,486

 
$
1,263,486

 
December 31, 2016
 
 
 
Fair Value Hierarchy
 
 
 
Carrying
Value
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Total
Estimated
Fair Value
 
(In thousands)
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage loans
$
406,085

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
404,079

 
$
404,079

Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables
$
30,122

 
$
—

 
$
2,095

 
$
30,272

 
$
32,367

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Policyholder account balances
$
1,214,186

 
$
—

 
$
—

 
$
1,283,338

 
$
1,283,338