XML 22 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.7.0.1
Derivatives
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2017
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivative Financial Instruments
5. Derivatives
Accounting for Derivatives
Freestanding Derivatives
Freestanding derivatives are carried on the Company’s balance sheet either as assets within other invested assets or as liabilities within other liabilities at estimated fair value. The Company does not offset the estimated fair value amounts recognized for derivatives executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting agreement.
Accruals on derivatives are generally recorded in accrued investment income or within other liabilities. However, accruals that are not scheduled to settle within one year are included with the derivatives carrying value in other invested assets or other liabilities.
If a derivative is not designated as an accounting hedge or its use in managing risk does not qualify for hedge accounting, changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative are reported in net derivative gains (losses).
Hedge Accounting
To qualify for hedge accounting, at the inception of the hedging relationship, the Company formally documents its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedging transaction, as well as its designation of the hedge. Hedge designation and financial statement presentation of changes in estimated fair value of the hedging derivatives are as follows:
•
Cash flow hedge (a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability) - effectiveness in OCI (deferred gains or losses on the derivative are reclassified into the statement of operations when the Company’s earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the hedged item); ineffectiveness in net derivative gains (losses).
The changes in estimated fair values of the hedging derivatives are exclusive of any accruals that are separately reported on the statement of operations within interest income or interest expense to match the location of the hedged item. 
In its hedge documentation, the Company sets forth how the hedging instrument is expected to hedge the designated risks related to the hedged item and sets forth the method that will be used to retrospectively and prospectively assess the hedging instrument’s effectiveness and the method that will be used to measure ineffectiveness. A derivative designated as a hedging instrument must be assessed as being highly effective in offsetting the designated risk of the hedged item. Hedge effectiveness is formally assessed at inception and at least quarterly throughout the life of the designated hedging relationship. Assessments of hedge effectiveness and measurements of ineffectiveness are also subject to interpretation and estimation and different interpretations or estimates may have a material effect on the amount reported in net income.
The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (i) it is determined that the derivative is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of a hedged item; (ii) the derivative expires, is sold, terminated, or exercised; (iii) it is no longer probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will occur; or (iv) the derivative is de-designated as a hedging instrument.
When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined that the derivative is not highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of a hedged item, the derivative continues to be carried on the balance sheet at its estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in net derivative gains (losses). Provided the hedged forecasted transaction is still probable of occurrence, the changes in estimated fair value of derivatives recorded in OCI related to discontinued cash flow hedges are released into the statement of operations when the Company’s earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the hedged item.
When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is no longer probable that the forecasted transactions will occur on the anticipated date or within two months of that date, the derivative continues to be carried on the balance sheet at its estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized currently in net derivative gains (losses). Deferred gains and losses of a derivative recorded in OCI pursuant to the discontinued cash flow hedge of a forecasted transaction that is no longer probable are recognized immediately in net derivative gains (losses).
In all other situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued, the derivative is carried at its estimated fair value on the balance sheet, with changes in its estimated fair value recognized in the current period as net derivative gains (losses).
Embedded Derivatives
The Company sells variable annuities and is a party to certain reinsurance agreements that have embedded derivatives. The Company assesses each identified embedded derivative to determine whether it is required to be bifurcated. The embedded derivative is bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for as a freestanding derivative if:
•
the combined instrument is not accounted for in its entirety at estimated fair value with changes in estimated fair value recorded in earnings;
•
the terms of the embedded derivative are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract; and
•
a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would qualify as a derivative instrument.
Such embedded derivatives are carried on the balance sheet at estimated fair value with the host contract and changes in their estimated fair value are generally reported in net derivative gains (losses). If the Company is unable to properly identify and measure an embedded derivative for separation from its host contract, the entire contract is carried on the balance sheet at estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in the current period in net investment gains (losses) or net investment income. Additionally, the Company may elect to carry an entire contract on the balance sheet at estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in the current period in net investment gains (losses) or net investment income if that contract contains an embedded derivative that requires bifurcation. At inception, the Company attributes to the embedded derivative a portion of the projected future guarantee fees to be collected from the policyholder equal to the present value of projected future guaranteed benefits. Any additional fees represent “excess” fees and are reported in universal life and investment-type product policy fees.
See Note 6 for information about the fair value hierarchy for derivatives.
Derivative Strategies
The Company is exposed to various risks relating to its ongoing business operations, including interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate, credit and equity market. The Company uses a variety of strategies to manage these risks, including the use of derivatives.
Derivatives are financial instruments with values derived from interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, credit spreads and/or other financial indices. Derivatives may be exchange-traded or contracted in the over-the-counter (“OTC”) market. Certain of the Company’s OTC derivatives are bilateral contracts between two counterparties (“OTC-bilateral”). The Company primarily uses foreign currency swaps.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Derivatives
The Company uses foreign currency swaps to reduce the risk from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates associated with its assets denominated in foreign currencies.
In a foreign currency swap transaction, the Company agrees with another party to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between one currency and another at a fixed exchange rate, generally set at inception, calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional amount. The notional amount of each currency is exchanged at the inception and termination of the currency swap by each party. The Company utilizes foreign currency swaps in cash flow and nonqualifying hedging relationships.
Primary Risks Managed by Derivatives
The following table presents the gross notional amount, estimated fair value and primary underlying risk exposure of the Company’s derivatives, excluding embedded derivatives, held at:
 
 
 
March 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
Primary Underlying Risk Exposure
 
Gross
Notional
Amount
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Gross
Notional
Amount
 
Estimated Fair Value
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
 
 
(In thousands)
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments:
Cash flow hedges:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency swaps
Foreign currency exchange rate
 
$
33,923

 
$
4,526

 
$
—

 
$
33,930

 
$
4,947

 
$
—

Derivatives Not Designated or Not Qualifying as Hedging Instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency swaps
Foreign currency exchange rate
 
14,063

 
3,370

 
—

 
14,063

 
3,709

 
—

Total
 
$
47,986

 
$
7,896

 
$
—

 
$
47,993

 
$
8,656

 
$
—

Net Derivative Gains (Losses)
The components of net derivative gains (losses) were as follows:
 
 
Three Months 
 Ended 
 March 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
(In thousands)
Freestanding derivatives and hedging gains (losses) (1)
 
$
(207
)
 
$
882

Embedded derivatives gains (losses)
 
(131,329
)
 
49,158

Total net derivative gains (losses)
 
$
(131,536
)
 
$
50,040

______________
(1)
Includes foreign currency transaction gains (losses) on hedged items in cash flow and nonqualifying hedging relationships, which are not presented elsewhere in this note.
The Company recognized net investment income from settlement payments related to qualifying hedges of $148 thousand and $124 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The Company recognized net derivative gains (losses) from settlement payments related to nonqualifying hedges of $84 thousand and $63 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Nonqualifying Derivatives and Derivatives for Purposes Other Than Hedging
The amounts of net derivative gains (losses) from foreign currency exchange rate derivatives that were not designated or qualifying as hedging instruments were ($339) thousand and $94 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Cash Flow Hedges
The Company designates and accounts for foreign currency swaps to hedge the foreign currency cash flow exposure of foreign currency denominated assets, as cash flow hedges, when they have met the requirements of cash flow hedging.
In certain instances, the Company discontinued cash flow hedge accounting because the forecasted transactions were no longer probable of occurring. Because certain of the forecasted transactions also were not probable of occurring within two months of the anticipated date, the Company reclassified amounts from AOCI into net derivative gains (losses). For both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no amounts reclassified into net derivative gains (losses) related to such discontinued cash flow hedges.
There were no hedged forecasted transactions, other than the receipt or payment of variable interest payments, for both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the balance in AOCI associated with foreign currency swaps designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges was $4.3 million and $4.7 million, respectively. 
Gains (losses) deferred in AOCI related to foreign currency swaps were ($421) thousand and ($146) thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, the amounts the Company reclassified into net derivative gains (losses) related to foreign currency swaps were not significant. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, no amounts were reclassified into net derivative gains (losses) related to foreign currency swaps. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 the Company recognized $1 thousand in net derivative gains (losses) representing the ineffective portion of all cash flow hedges. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the amounts the Company recognized in net derivative gains (losses) representing the ineffective portion of all cash flow hedges were not significant.
All components of each derivative’s gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
At March 31, 2017, the Company expected to reclassify $486 thousand of deferred net gains (losses) on derivatives in AOCI to earnings within the next 12 months.
Credit Risk on Freestanding Derivatives
The Company may be exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by its counterparties to derivatives. Generally, the current credit exposure of the Company’s derivatives is limited to the net positive estimated fair value of derivatives at the reporting date after taking into consideration the existence of master netting or similar agreements and any collateral received pursuant to such agreements.
The Company manages its credit risk related to derivatives by entering into transactions with creditworthy counterparties and establishing and monitoring exposure limits. The Company’s OTC-bilateral derivative transactions are generally governed by International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) Master Agreements which provide for legally enforceable set-off and close-out netting of exposures to specific counterparties in the event of early termination of a transaction, which includes, but is not limited to, events of default and bankruptcy. In the event of an early termination, the Company is permitted to set off receivables from the counterparty against payables to the same counterparty arising out of all included transactions. Substantially all of the Company’s ISDA Master Agreements also include Credit Support Annex provisions which require both the pledging and accepting of collateral in connection with its OTC-bilateral derivatives.
See Note 6 for a description of the impact of credit risk on the valuation of derivatives.
The estimated fair values of the Company’s net derivative assets and net derivative liabilities after the application of master netting agreements and collateral were as follows at: 
 
 
March 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Derivatives Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement or a Similar Arrangement
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
Assets
 
Liabilities
 
 
(In thousands)
Gross estimated fair value of derivatives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTC-bilateral (1)
 
$
8,162

 
$
—

 
$
8,850

 
$
—

Total gross estimated fair value of derivatives (1)
 
8,162

 
—

 
8,850

 
—

Amounts offset on the balance sheets
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Estimated fair value of derivatives presented on the balance sheets (1)
 
8,162

 
—

 
8,850

 
—

Gross amounts not offset on the balance sheets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross estimated fair value of derivatives: (2)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTC-bilateral
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Cash collateral: (3)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTC-bilateral
 
(8,087
)
 
—

 
(8,672
)
 
—

Securities collateral: (4)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
OTC-bilateral
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
—

Net amount after application of master netting agreements and collateral
 
$
75

 
$
—

 
$
178

 
$
—

______________
(1)
At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, derivative assets included income or (expense) accruals reported in accrued investment income or in other liabilities of $266 thousand and $194 thousand, respectively.
(2)
Estimated fair value of derivatives is limited to the amount that is subject to set-off and includes income or expense accruals.
(3)
Cash collateral received is included in cash and cash equivalents or in short-term investments, and the obligation to return it is included in payables for collateral transactions on the balance sheet. The amount of cash collateral offset in the table above is limited to the net estimated fair value of derivatives after application of netting agreements. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company received excess cash collateral of $655 thousand and $270 thousand, respectively, and did not provide any excess cash collateral, which is not included in the table above due to the foregoing limitation.
(4)
Securities collateral received by the Company is held in separate custodial accounts and is not recorded on the balance sheet. Subject to certain constraints, the Company is permitted by contract to sell or re-pledge this collateral, but at March 31, 2017, none of the collateral had been sold or re-pledged. Securities collateral pledged by the Company is reported in fixed maturity securities on the balance sheet. Subject to certain constraints, the counterparties are permitted by contract to sell or re-pledge this collateral. The amount of securities collateral offset in the table above is limited to the net estimated fair value of derivatives after application of netting agreements and cash collateral. At both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company did not receive or provide excess securities collateral.
The Company’s collateral arrangements for its OTC-bilateral derivatives generally require the counterparty in a net liability position, after considering the effect of netting agreements, to pledge collateral when the collateral amount owed by that counterparty reaches a minimum transfer amount. In addition, the Company’s netting agreements for derivatives contain provisions that require both the Company and the counterparty to maintain a specific investment grade credit rating from each of Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’s Global Ratings 500 Index. If a party’s credit or financial strength ratings, as applicable, were to fall below that specific investment grade credit rating, that party would be in violation of these provisions, and the other party to the derivatives could terminate the transactions and demand immediate settlement and payment based on such party’s reasonable valuation of the derivatives.
At both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company held no OTC-bilateral derivatives that were in a net liability position after considering the effect of netting agreements. The Company’s collateral arrangements require both parties to be fully collateralized, as such, the Company would not be required to post additional collateral as a result of a downgrade in its financial strength rating.
Embedded Derivatives
The Company issues certain products that contain embedded derivatives that are required to be separated from their host contracts and accounted for as freestanding derivatives. These host contracts principally include: variable annuities with guaranteed minimum benefits, including GMWBs, GMABs and certain GMIBs; affiliated ceded reinsurance of guaranteed minimum benefits related to GMWBs, GMABs and certain GMIBs; and fixed annuities with equity-indexed returns.
The following table presents the estimated fair value and balance sheet location of the Company’s embedded derivatives that have been separated from their host contracts at:
 
Balance Sheet Location
 
March 31, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
 
(In thousands)
Embedded derivatives within asset host contracts:
 
 
 
 
Ceded guaranteed minimum benefits
Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables
 
$
354,497

 
$
379,297

 
 
 
 
 
 
Embedded derivatives within liability host contracts:
 
 
 
 
Direct guaranteed minimum benefits
Policyholder account balances
 
$
(36,258
)
 
$
(23,740
)
Fixed annuities with equity indexed returns
Policyholder account balances
 
(69
)

—

Embedded derivatives within liability host contracts
 
$
(36,327
)
 
$
(23,740
)

The following table presents changes in estimated fair value related to embedded derivatives:
 
 
Three Months 
 Ended 
 March 31,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
(In thousands)
Net derivative gains (losses) (1), (2)
 
$
(131,329
)
 
$
49,158

______________
(1)
The valuation of direct guaranteed minimum benefits includes a nonperformance risk adjustment. The amounts included in net derivative gains (losses) in connection with this adjustment were ($300) thousand and $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. In addition, the valuation of ceded guaranteed minimum benefits includes a nonperformance risk adjustment. The amounts included in net derivative gains (losses) in connection with this adjustment were $7.0 million and ($17.8) million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(2)
See Note 10 for discussion of affiliated net derivative gains (losses).