XML 100 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Derivative Financial Instruments
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Derivative Financial Instruments  
Derivative Financial Instruments

7. Derivative Financial Instruments

  • Commodity Derivatives

        NGL and natural gas prices are volatile and are impacted by changes in fundamental supply and demand, as well as market uncertainty, availability of NGL transportation and fractionation capacity and a variety of additional factors that are beyond the Partnership's control. The Partnership's profitability is directly affected by prevailing commodity prices primarily as a result of processing or conditioning at its own or third-party processing plants, purchasing and selling or gathering and transporting volumes of natural gas at index-related prices and the cost of third-party transportation and fractionation services. To the extent that commodity prices influence the level of natural gas drilling by the Partnership's producer customers, such prices also affect profitability. To protect itself financially against adverse price movements and to maintain more stable and predictable cash flows so that the Partnership can meet its cash distribution objectives, debt service and capital plans, the Partnership executes a strategy governed by the risk management policy approved by the General Partner's board of directors. The Partnership has a committee comprised of senior management that oversees risk management activities, continually monitors the risk management program and adjusts its strategy as conditions warrant. The Partnership enters into certain derivative contracts to reduce the risks associated with unfavorable changes in the prices of natural gas, NGLs and crude oil. Derivative contracts utilized are swaps and options traded on the OTC market and fixed price forward contracts. The risk management policy does not allow the Partnership to take speculative positions with its derivative contracts.

        To mitigate its cash flow exposure to fluctuations in the price of NGLs, the Partnership has entered into derivative financial instruments relating to the future price of NGLs and crude oil. The Partnership currently manages the majority of its NGL price risk using direct product NGL derivative contracts. The Partnership enters into NGL derivative contracts when adequate market liquidity exists and future prices are satisfactory. A portion of the Partnership's NGL price exposure is managed by using crude oil contracts. In periods where NGL prices and crude oil prices are not consistent with the historical relationship, the crude oil contracts create increased risk and additional gains or losses. The Partnership may settle its crude oil contracts prior to the contractual settlement date in order to take advantage of favorable terms and reduce the future exposure resulting from the less effective crude oil contracts. Based on our current volume forecasts, the majority of our derivative positions used to manage our future commodity price exposure are direct product NGL derivative contracts.

        To mitigate its cash flow exposure to fluctuations in the price of natural gas, the Partnership primarily utilizes derivative financial instruments relating to the future price of natural gas and takes into account the partial offset of its long and short gas positions resulting from normal operating activities.

        As a result of its current derivative positions, the Partnership has mitigated a portion of its expected commodity price risk through the fourth quarter of 2015. The Partnership would be exposed to additional commodity risk in certain situations such as if producers under deliver or over deliver product or when processing facilities are operated in different recovery modes. In the event the Partnership has derivative positions in excess of the product delivered or expected to be delivered, the excess derivative positions may be terminated.

        Currently, all of the Partnership's financial derivative positions are with financial institutions that are participating members of the Credit Facility ("participating bank group members"). Management conducts a standard credit review on counterparties to derivative contracts. There are no collateral requirements for derivative contracts among the Partnership and any participating bank group members. Specifically, the Partnership is not required to post collateral when it enters into derivative contracts with participating bank group members as the participating bank group members have a collateral position in substantially all the wholly-owned assets of the Partnership other than MarkWest Liberty Midstream and its subsidiaries. A separate agreement with certain participating bank group members allows MarkWest Liberty Midstream to enter into derivative positions without posting cash collateral. The Partnership uses standardized agreements that allow for offset of certain positive and negative exposures ("master netting arrangements") in the event of default or other terminating events, including bankruptcy.

        The Partnership records derivative contracts at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and has not elected hedge accounting or the normal purchases and normal sales designation. The Partnership's accounting may cause volatility in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as the Partnership recognizes in current earnings all unrealized gains and losses from the changes in fair value on derivatives.

  • Volume of Commodity Derivative Activity

        As of December 31, 2013, the Partnership had the following outstanding commodity contracts that were executed to manage the cash flow risk associated with future sales of NGLs or future purchases of natural gas.

Derivative contracts not designated as hedging instruments
  Financial
Position
  Notional
Quantity (net)
 

Crude Oil (bbl)

  Short     1,323,905  

Natural Gas (MMBtu)

  Long     3,187,606  

NGLs (gal)

  Short     125,470,405  
  • Embedded Derivatives in Commodity Contracts

        The Partnership has a commodity contract with a producer in the Appalachia region that creates a floor on the frac spread for gas purchases of 9,000 Dth/d. The commodity contract is a component of a broader regional arrangement that also includes a keep-whole processing agreement. This contract is accounted for as an embedded derivative and is recorded at fair value. The changes in fair value of this commodity contract are based on the difference between the contractual and index pricing and are recorded in earnings through Derivative (gain) loss related to purchased product costs. In February 2011, the Partnership executed agreements with the producer to extend the commodity contract and the related processing agreement from March 31, 2015 to December 31, 2022, with the producer's option to extend the agreement for successive five year terms through December 31, 2032. As of December 31, 2013, the estimated fair value of this contract was a liability of $91.8 million and the recorded value was a liability of $38.3 million. The recorded liability does not include the inception fair value of the commodity contract related to the extended period from April 1, 2015 to December 31, 2022. In accordance with GAAP for non-option embedded derivatives, the fair value of this extended portion of the commodity contract at its inception of February 1, 2011 is deemed to be allocable to the host processing contract and, therefore, not recorded as a derivative liability. See the following table for a reconciliation of the liability recorded for the embedded derivative as of December 31, 2013 (in thousands):

Fair value of commodity contract

  $ 91,815  

Inception value for period from April 1, 2015 to December 31, 2022. 

    (53,507 )
       

Derivative liability as of December 31, 2013

  $ 38,308  
       
       

        The Partnership has a commodity contract that gives it an option to fix a component of the utilities cost to an index price on electricity at its plant location in the Southwest segment through the fourth quarter of 2014. Changes in the fair value of the derivative component of this contract are recognized as Derivative loss (gain) related to facility expenses. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the estimated fair value of this contract was an asset of $3.3 million and $6.1 million, respectively.

  • Financial Statement Impact of Derivative Contracts

        The impact of the Partnership's derivative instruments on its Consolidated Balance Sheets is summarized below (in thousands):

 
  Assets   Liabilities  
Derivative contracts not designated as
hedging instruments and
their balance sheet location
  Fair Value at
December 31,
2013
  Fair Value at
December 31,
2012
  Fair Value at
December 31,
2013
  Fair Value at
December 31,
2012
 

Commodity contracts(1)

                         

Fair value of derivative instruments—current

  $ 11,457   $ 19,504   $ (28,838 ) $ (27,229 )

Fair value of derivative instruments—long-term

    505     10,878     (27,763 )   (32,190 )
                   

Total

  $ 11,962   $ 30,382   $ (56,601 ) $ (59,419 )
                   
                   

(1)
Includes Embedded Derivatives in Commodity Contracts as discussed above.

        Although certain derivative positions are subject to master netting agreements, the Partnership has elected not to offset any derivative assets and liabilities. The gross amounts in the table below equal the balances presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The table below summarizes the impact if the Partnership had elected to net its derivative positions that are subject to master netting arrangements (in thousands):

 
  Assets   Liabilities  
As of December 31, 2013
  Gross
Amounts of
Assets in the
Consolidated
Balance
Sheet
  Gross
Amounts
Not Offset
in the
Consolidated
Balance
Sheet
  Net Amount   Gross
Amounts of
Liabilities
in the
Consolidated
Balance
Sheet
  Gross
Amounts
Not Offset
in the
Consolidated
Balance
Sheet
  Net Amount  

Current

                                     

Commodity contracts

  $ 8,181   $ (7,017 ) $ 1,164   $ (18,293 ) $ 7,017   $ (11,276 )

Embedded derivatives in commodity contracts

    3,276         3,276     (10,545 )       (10,545 )
                           

Total current derivative instruments

    11,457     (7,017 )   4,440     (28,838 )   7,017     (21,821 )
                           

Non-current

                                     

Commodity contracts

    505         505              

Embedded derivatives in commodity contracts

                (27,763 )       (27,763 )
                           

Total non-current derivative instruments

    505         505     (27,763 )       (27,763 )
                           

Total derivative instruments

  $ 11,962   $ (7,017 ) $ 4,945   $ (56,601 ) $ 7,017   $ (49,584 )
                           
                           


 

 
  Assets   Liabilities  
As of December 31, 2012
  Gross
Amounts of
Assets in the
Consolidated
Balance
Sheet
  Gross
Amounts
Not Offset
in the
Consolidated
Balance
Sheet
  Net Amount   Gross
Amounts of
Liabilities
in the
Consolidated
Balance
Sheet
  Gross
Amounts
Not Offset
in the
Consolidated
Balance
Sheet
  Net Amount  

Current

                                     

Commodity contracts

  $ 16,438   $ (9,541 ) $ 6,897   $ (16,679 ) $ 9,541   $ (7,138 )

Embedded derivatives in commodity contracts

    3,066         3,066     (10,550 )       (10,550 )
                           

Total current derivative instruments

    19,504     (9,541 )   9,963     (27,229 )   9,541     (17,688 )
                           

Non-current

                                     

Commodity contracts

    7,798     (2,637 )   5,161     (2,637 )   2,637      

Embedded derivatives in commodity contracts

    3,080         3,080     (29,553 )       (29,553 )
                           

Total non-current derivative instruments

    10,878     (2,637 )   8,241     (32,190 )   2,637     (29,553 )
                           

Total derivative instruments

  $ 30,382   $ (12,178 ) $ 18,204   $ (59,419 ) $ 12,178   $ (47,241 )
                           
                           

        In the tables above, the Partnership does not offset a counterparty's current derivative contracts with the counterparty's non-current derivative contracts, although the Partnership's master netting arrangements would allow current and non-current positions to be offset in the event of default. Additionally, in the event of a default, the Partnership's master netting arrangements would allow for the offsetting of all transactions executed under the master netting arrangement. These types of transactions may include non-derivative instruments, derivatives qualifying for scope exceptions, receivables and payables arising from settled positions and other forms of non-cash collateral (such as letters of credit). These types of transactions are excluded from the offsetting tables presented above.

        The impact of the Partnership's derivative instruments on its Consolidated Statements of Operations is summarized below (in thousands):

 
  Year ended December 31,  
Derivative contracts not designated as hedging instruments and the location of
gain or (loss) recognized in income
  2013   2012   2011  

Revenue: Derivative (loss) gain

                   

Realized loss

  $ (3,534 ) $ (6,508 ) $ (48,093 )

Unrealized (loss) gain

    (21,104 )   63,043     19,058  
               

Total revenue: derivative (loss) gain

    (24,638 )   56,535     (29,035 )
               

Derivative gain (loss) related to purchased product costs

                   

Realized loss

    (6,634 )   (26,493 )   (27,711 )

Unrealized gain (loss)

    8,371     40,455     (25,249 )
               

Total derivative gain (loss) related to purchase product costs

    1,737     13,962     (52,960 )
               

Derivative (loss) gain related to facility expenses

                   

Unrealized (loss) gain

    (2,869 )   (1,371 )   6,480  
               

Total (loss) gain

  $ (25,770 ) $ 69,126   $ (75,515 )
               
               

        At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the fair value of the Partnership's commodity derivative contracts does not include any value for premium payments. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Realized loss—revenue includes amortization of premium payments of zero, zero and $4.4 million, respectively.