XML 54 R24.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  
Interim Financial Information

Interim Financial Information

 

The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Nabors are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”).  Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods to conform to the current-period presentation, with no effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.  Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted.  Therefore, these financial statements should be read along with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (“2011 Annual Report”).  In management’s opinion, the consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly our financial position as of September 30, 2012, the results of our operations and other comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and cash flows and changes in equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, in accordance with GAAP.  Interim results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 may not be indicative of results that will be realized for the full year ending December 31, 2012.

 

Our independent registered public accounting firm has reviewed and issued a report on these consolidated interim financial statements in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.  Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), this report should not be considered a part of any registration statement prepared or certified within the meanings of Sections 7 and 11 of such Act.

Principles of Consolidation

Principles of Consolidation

 

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Nabors, as well as all majority-owned and nonmajority-owned subsidiaries required to be consolidated under GAAP.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

 

Investments in operating entities where we have the ability to exert significant influence, but where we do not control operating and financial policies, are accounted for using the equity method.  Our share of the net income (loss) of these entities is recorded as earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates in our consolidated statements of income (loss), and our investment in these entities is included in both investment in unconsolidated affiliates and assets held for sale in our consolidated balance sheets. The portion of such investments included in investments in unconsolidated affiliates totaled $70.2 million and $371.0 million as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.  At each of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the portion of such investments included in assets held for sale totaled $13.7 million.  See Note 4 — Discontinued Operations for additional information.

 

We have investments in offshore funds, which are classified as long-term investments and are accounted for using the equity method of accounting based on our ownership interest in each fund.

Inventory

Inventory

 

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method and includes the cost of materials, labor and manufacturing overhead.  Inventory included the following:

 

 

 

September 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Raw materials

 

$

148,323

 

$

133,480

 

Work-in-progress

 

45,959

 

50,951

 

Finished goods

 

62,876

 

88,421

 

 

 

$

257,158

 

$

272,852

 

Goodwill

Goodwill

 

We determined it was necessary to perform our annual goodwill impairment test, a Level 3 fair value measurement, during the second quarter of 2012.  The impairment test compares the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount.  If the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, a second step is required to measure the goodwill impairment loss.  This second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill to its carrying amount.  If the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the excess.  Our goodwill impairment test results required the second step measurement for two reporting units.

 

The fair values calculated in these impairment tests were determined using discounted cash flow models involving assumptions based on our utilization of rigs or other oil and gas service equipment, revenues and earnings from affiliates, as well as direct costs, general and administrative costs, depreciation, applicable income taxes, capital expenditures and working capital requirements.  Our discounted cash flow projections for each reporting unit were based on financial forecasts.  The future cash flows were discounted to present value using discount rates determined to be appropriate for each reporting unit.  Terminal values for each reporting unit were calculated using a Gordon Growth methodology with a long-term growth rate of 3%.

 

Our estimated fair values of our reporting units incorporate judgment and the use of estimates by management.  Potential factors requiring assessment include a further or sustained decline in our stock price, declines in natural gas and oil prices, a variance in results of operations from forecasts, and additional transactions in the oil and gas industry.  Another factor in determining whether impairment has occurred is the relationship between our market capitalization and our book value. As part of our annual review, we compared the sum of our reporting units’ estimated fair value, which included the estimated fair value of non-operating assets and liabilities, less debt, to our market capitalization and assessed the reasonableness of our estimated fair value. Any of the above-mentioned factors may cause us to re-evaluate goodwill during any quarter throughout the year.

 

The carrying amounts and change of goodwill for our operating segments as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were as follows:

 

 

 

Balance as of
December 31,
2011

 

Acquisitions
and
Purchase
Price
Adjustments

 

Disposals
and
Impairments

 

Cumulative
Translation
Adjustment

 

Balance as of
September 30,
2012

 

 

 

(In thousands)

 

Drilling and Rig Services:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Lower 48 Land Drilling

 

$

30,154

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

30,154

 

U.S. Offshore

 

7,296

 

 

7,296

(1)

 

 

Alaska

 

19,995

 

 

 

 

19,995

 

International

 

18,983

 

 

18,983

(1)

 

 

Other Rig Services

 

34,766

 

 

3,035

(2)

518

 

32,249

 

Subtotal Drilling and Rig Services

 

111,194

 

 

29,314

 

518

 

82,398

 

Completion and Production Services:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Land Well-servicing

 

55,072

 

 

 

 

55,072

 

Pressure Pumping

 

334,992

 

 

 

 

334,992

 

Subtotal Completion and Production Services

 

390,064

 

 

 

 

390,064

 

Total

 

$

501,258

 

$

 

$

29,314

 

$

518

 

$

472,462

 

 

 

(1)         Represents the impairment of goodwill associated with our U.S. Offshore and International reporting units. As of June 30, 2012, these reporting units had no recorded goodwill. The impairments were deemed necessary due to the prolonged uncertainty of utilization of some of our rigs as a result of changes in our customers’ plans for future drilling operations in the Gulf of Mexico as well as our international markets. A significantly prolonged period of lower natural gas prices or changes in laws and regulations could continue to adversely affect the demand for and prices of our services, which could result in future goodwill impairment charges for other reporting units due to the potential impact on our estimate of our future operating results.

 

(2)         Represents the removal of goodwill in connection with our sale of Peak USA to an unrelated third party for $13.5 million cash during the second quarter of 2012.  Peak USA, a subsidiary included in our Other Rig Services reporting unit, provided trucking and logistics services to the oilfield service market in the U.S. Lower 48 states.